The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSP201600011 Review Comments Special Use Permit 2016-08-17Short Review Comments Report for: SP201600011 SubApplication Type: Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display New Special Use Permit Date Completed:05/25/2016 Reviewer:Joel DeNunzio VDOT Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:04/21/2016 Reviewer:Francis MacCall CDD Admin Zoning Review Review Status:QC OK Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/27/2016 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski CDD ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:This application is scheduled for ARB review on June 6, 2016. Comments will be available after that meeting. Division: Date Completed:05/24/2016 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer CDD Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/18/2016 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:I have reviewed the above referenced special use permit. It appears that the applicant is proposing landscaping along the Route 29 frontage. The ACSA and RWSA have water infrastructure in this area. My comments are as follows: • Show the existing ACSA and RWSA water infrastructure along the Route 29 frontage (see attached GIS Map). • Show existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • Ensure no landscaping is proposed within existing ACSA and RWSA easements. Division: Date Completed:05/27/2016 Reviewer:Ron Higgins CDD Zoning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:-the Conceptual Special Use Application Plan shows a "body shop" use in the building closest to Berkmar Drive. Body Shops require a special use permit in the HC Zoning District. -All parking spaces should be marked, whether they are for off-street parking or display parking for vehicles. -New lighting will need to be shown and meet current ordinance standards. Division: Date Completed:05/19/2016 Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA Review Status:Requested Changes • Show the existing ACSA and RWSA water infrastructure along the Route 29 frontage (see attached GIS Map). • Show existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • Ensure no landscaping is proposed within existing ACSA and RWSA easements. Division: Page:1 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:October 18, 2018 Reviews Comments:• Show the existing ACSA and RWSA water infrastructure along the Route 29 frontage (see attached GIS Map). • Show existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • Ensure no landscaping is proposed within existing ACSA and RWSA easements. Date Completed:05/15/2016 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Admin Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Based on SP dated 4/18/16. No comments or objections. Division: Date Completed:05/11/2016 Reviewer:Matthew Wentland CDD Engineering Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/12/2016 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski CDD ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. The plan shows an existing wooded area on-site for screening the vehicles awaiting repair. Trees do not exist in this location. On site screening is required to eliminate visibility from any public street or residential property. Revise the plan to show new screening trees to be planted or some other means of screening. Note that the screening will need to compensate for the view down the slope from Berkmar Drive. 2. Revise the plan to eliminate the word “display” from the “vehicles shall not be elevated…” note. The note is meant to apply to all parked vehicles. For clarity, please move the note to Sheet 1. Division: Date Completed:07/23/2016 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/16/2016 Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:RWSA has no additional concerns. Division: Date Completed:08/11/2016 Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/17/2016 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:I have no additional comments and hereby recommend approval. We will review the water meter size at the building permit stage for the body shop. Division: Date Completed:08/03/2016 Reviewer:Ron Higgins CDD Zoning Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Previous comments have been addressed. No new comments. Division: Date Completed:08/05/2016 Jay SchlothauerPage:2 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:October 18, 2018 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer CDD Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:08/03/2016 Reviewer:Matthew Wentland CDD Engineering Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Page:3 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:October 18, 2018 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 August 19, 2016 Valerie Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main Street, Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SP201600011: Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display SP201600018: Malloy Ford Body Shop Dear Valerie: Fax (434) 972-4176 Staff has reviewed your submittal with revision date of July 18, 2016 for the above referenced applications for the Malloy Ford automobile dealership. We have the following comments. The following reviewers had a comment of "No Objection": • Zoning: Ron Higgins • Engineering: Matthew Wentland • Fire/Rescue: Robbie Gilmer • Building Official/Inspections: Jay Schlothauer • Albemarle County Service Authority: Alexander Morrison • Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority: Victoria Fort Current Development Please note that this proposal will require an amendment to the site plan and may be processed as a minor amendment. This minor amendment will be the last one allowed before a major amendment is required to incorporate all approved changes with previous minors and letters of revision. Entrance Corridor/Planning The Architectural Review Board reviewed this proposal on June 6, 2016. A copy of the action letter is attached to this correspondence. 1. The ARB recommended the following condition: "Vehicles shall not be elevated anywhere on site." The note added to the revised plans does not include this exact language. For clarity, the plan should be revised to include the exact recommended language. The note applies to all vehicles on site. 2. Regarding the body shop proposal: The plan shows an existing wooded area on site for screening the vehicles awaiting repair. Trees do not exist in this location. On-site screening is required to eliminate visibility from any public street or residential property. This includes the view down the slope from Berkmar Drive. Revise the plan to show new screening trees to be planted or some other means of screening. Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Cuipeper Virginia 22701 August 11, 2016 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Margaret Maliszewski Re: SP -2016-00011 Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display SP -2016-00018 Malloy Ford Body Shop Review #2 Dear Ms. Maliszewski: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plans as submitted by Shimp Engineering, last revised 18 July 2016, and offers the following comment: In our 25 May 2016 review letter we noted that the entrances to TMPs 45-68C 1 & 45- 68A would need to be consolidated in order to meet current Access Management Regulations. It is preferable that this be done during the special permit process, so that review of the consolidation may begin, but may be addressed during site plan review. Likewise concerning the requested traffic generations and turn lane warrant analysis. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, yo� . tL Gwv-"- Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency Virginial)OT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING MIT911 Comments from Adam Moore with VDOT are copied below. Note that VDOT prefers entrance consolidation to be addressed now, but Adam indicates that it can be addressed with the site plan. Charies A, Kilpatrick, RE Cr,nmirinnw COXIMONW-T.'A 11TH of Vjk(j11N1A August IL 2016 County of Albemarle Dcparintent of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlotiesvift. VA 22902 Aunt: NLrg=t Nialiszewski R,--: SP -2016 -(Ml I Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display SP-2016-OWIS Mulloy Ford Body Shop Revie-w #2 Dc'Ir "vls. The L)cpkrtrrtente.['I"fatispoiiation- Charlottesville Residency Transporimior Lrw. ],.Ind 1",c Scc non, has rivimcd the above referenced plans as submitted by Sidnip Engineering, Last 18 July 016, and offers the folln wing comnwnt: I. In our 125,Nelay 2016 review Icitcr we noted °hat the entrances tOTIMPS 45-68CI & 45- 6qA would ncml to Inc cowiolidaicd in order to meet current Access Munaecment Regulations. It vi p-cfembIc that th—'s be dcinc during the special Permit procesi, so thu: review of 111V Lx1:1s;):ijA1im1 111ay begin, but nix, he tuldrrssed during sac plan review, Likewise,concemin,,,, the rc:uested trafflc rnrrutirrns and turn lane warTani analysis, It further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-91194. A VDOT Lind Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the nglil-r)f-way. The owncrtdcvc1oper must contact the Charlottesville Residency Trunsportafion and Land Use Section a((434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this precess. Sincerely. % V'61x__11 N-Jarn J Nloore, P.E. AteL Lind Use Engineer Clix1cme,sville Rc6lency Virginia(DOT.cig SP Conditions At this point in the review process, we anticipate that recommended conditions of approval for the Special Use Permits will include those conditions recommended by the Architectural Review Board and a condition related to the screening of the vehicles awaiting repair in the body shop. I recommend revising the plan to correct the elevated vehicles note and to clarify the screening of vehicles awaiting repair prior to moving forward to the Planning Commission. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. A resubmittal including only the two revisions requested above will not incur a fee and I can accept that resubmittal at any time. A resubmittal including revisions other than those requested will incur a fee and must be submitted according to the resubmittal schedule, which is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $ 338.00 Cost for newspaper advertisement ($169 x 2 applications) 430.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners; $215 x 2 applications) $ 768.00 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing ($384 x 2 applications) Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. $ 338.00 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing ($169 x 2 applications) $ 1106.00 Total amount for all notifications ($553 x 2 applications) Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the some time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is mmaliszewski@albemarle.org. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner, Planning Division cc: B Properties LC, PO Box 7627, Charlottesville, VA 22906 enc: Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form ft COGNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Dn-clotinicial 4111 VIclutiry Road, Nitrih Wilk� Ch,Arloiteyvifle, Virginia -.12902-45% bone 1: ;1 %, 1.1;141 9,7Z-4126 June 10, 2016 Valerie Lr--,r..g Williams kl,Alen 321 Past Mafn Sbeet Charlotlesville, VA 22902 kE: ARB 2016 $3, Malloy Ford Outdoor SalesiStoragej' D-ar Nis Lnnc, -1-e A,Dernarle Counpi Arcnitectwa. Review Board, at ft Meeting On June 6, 2016, corrip eted an advisory ,ev;ew of re above -noted request to establish an auto dealershto with Wooer sale.,Ustoraos,'display W autorricbOes TI -e Board by a vote of 3:0, forwatrded the fall w, rKm-=-endabon to he Fian-,ing Cc-rmissic:-. The ARB exprosses, rio objection;o the special use permi-.-'.,ezonirg, sub ' �act I% the follovwkq conditions: I Veniclos shall be displaed dor stored only in areas indicated for display 00 s on the plan unlined lCtoceptual Special Use "ication Plan for Malloy Fcrd* do10 Apo 18, 2016 (the C price ,t Plan) 2. ldr,- "ce, ava"y she" z:,e parked in sl-ipod pa king spaces 3 Ve-��',esshall rot he e'eva-ar a-%yvehzrc on site. 4 F,'ill site par, app -oval is subjcc-.o ARB approval of the ljqP%,plan submitted with Itic site plan:. Maximum height of pole 6g,1-ts (Pre-iudinq oases and fixtures), shall not exceea 20'. Maxim urn light levels shall not exceed .30 too"n4les in the dispay IW. and 20 leotcandles in all other lctcafictns,Nor-corif arming pole lights shall be removed or fixtures shaii be -cpkx*d with f,A cutoff fixtures to match other proposedlrixtures. Fina! situ plan approval is subject to ARB approval of the tardscapwith plan (submitted th.P sie plan), Landscapv)q shown an !he plan may be raqi !red to be in excess of the onimVirrt requirements of I - PAR 8 qu del-, net, andlcr *he Zor, ng Ordjnar� to mittigate, visual itirpactsi of -.he pirc,posed, use and shazi rude, but not be limilod to, the fullowtfig Pant- g area along ii -e Entrance Cwidce It Q,itape sha', be increased, if necessary, to ac co rn rn oz. ate plar, t ng vehicle of taftwe 0 tS t, Large s-ade tremas shall be eventy disribwed ;3-. tte,nteriU of the d sptayr lot at a :atC 041 'ree nor uvury 'D spam cast and sukAhsides of the front display area extend the islana side of `he dtSPlayares to add an add nf%.r�l *reia and st—Libs, (i SM.nr. proyced at the penrne-or of t.0 display arta *hat)t,- u 1-nuIrInwro Of 23* -28' high at pla-t-Q. 0. Largc shade ;reel spaced r47 on center Shall be pt:)vtded on new planting beds, cr islands &ong the sc4ul.h pertiersat the !rwddle vehicle storage area. You-nay suornit your application for pry :mirarj ARS review at your ca= vstconveotemce Applicalicr,, fomis. che:K :s1s arch sc:"edvlos are awailable v -lire at www If you have any cijes!lans cunce,ning any of thf� ease feel free -a call me Margaret Ma szew.•sx PInrcipal R'Anner 1C: B Pfooemes I.0 PO Box 7627 C,r,aroHesville VA .72O66 F* DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments If you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at www.albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your submittal. The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Request Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit/request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) (3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. After outstanding issues have been resolved and/or when you are ready to request a public hearing, staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County. The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no later than twenty-one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty-two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting. (4) Withdraw Your Application If at any time you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c) request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. ' The reviewing planner will contact applicant to discuss comments of reviewers and advise that changes that are me--ded are significant enough to warrant an additional submittal or advise that the the project is ready fora public hearing. If changes weeded are minor, the planner will advise that the project go to public hearing. — The legal ad deadline is the last date at which an applicant can decide whether to resubmit or go to public hearing- If an applicant decides to go to public hearing against the advice of the reviewing planner, a recommendation for denial VAH likely result. Generally, the applicant will YAP have only one opportunity to defer the PC public hearing fbr the project once it has been advertised for public hearing- Additional deferrals will not be allowed except in extraordinary circumstances such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention- 2016 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Written Coninients and Earliest Planning Commission Public Hearing" Resubmittal Dates Comments to applicant for decision on whether to proceed to Public Hearing ' Request for PC Public Hearing, Legal Ad Payment Due Planning Commission Public Hearing No sooner than* COB Auditorium Monday Friday Monday Tuesday Nov 2 201 t'7, Dec4 2015 Dec 21 2015 Jan 12 Nov 16 2015 Dec 18 2015 Jan 04 Jan 26 Dec 7 2015 Jan 08 Jan I I Feb 02 Dec 21 2015 Jan 22 Feb 01 Feb 23 Jall 04 Feb 05 Feb 08 Pvla r 01 Tue Jan 19 Feb '19 Feb 22 Mai -15 Fe 01 Mar 04 h1ar 14 Apr 05 Tue Feb 16 r,,l a r 18 Apr 04 Apr 26 h1ar 07 Api-08 Apr 11 rvlay 03 Niar 21 Apl-22 klay 09 rlay 31 Apr 04 tylay 06 Nlay 09 Nlav 31 Apr 18 May 73 Ma y 30 Jun 21 10ay 02 Jun 03 Jun 20 JI -11,12 f,vlay 16 Jun 17 Jun 20 Jul 12 Jun 06 Jul 08 Jul 18 Aug 09 Jun 20 Jul 22 Aug 01 Aug 23 Tue Jul 05 Aug 05- Auq 22 Sep 13 Jul 18 Au, 10 Aug 22 Sep 13 Aug 01 Sep 02 Sep 05 Sep 27 Aug 15 Sep 165 Sep 19 Oct 11 Tue Sep 06 Oct 07 Oct 10 Nov 01 Sep '19 Oct 21 Oct 31 Nov 22 Oct 03 Nov 04 Nov '14 Dec 06 Oct 17 Nov '18 Nov 28 Dec 20 Nov 07 Dec 09 Dec 19 Jan '10 2017 Nov 21 Dec 2.3 Jan 09 20,17 Jan 31 2017 Dec 05 Jan 06 2017 Jan 16 20,17 Feb 07 2017 Dec 19 Jan 20 2017 Feb 06 2017 Feb 28 2017 Jan 03 2017 Feb 03 20,17 Feb 13 2017 Mar 07 2017 Bold italics = submittal/meetino day is different due to a holiday. Dates vAth shaded background are not 20,16, 12017 dates are tentative. ' The reviewing planner will contact applicant to discuss comments of reviewers and advise that changes that are me--ded are significant enough to warrant an additional submittal or advise that the the project is ready fora public hearing. If changes weeded are minor, the planner will advise that the project go to public hearing. — The legal ad deadline is the last date at which an applicant can decide whether to resubmit or go to public hearing- If an applicant decides to go to public hearing against the advice of the reviewing planner, a recommendation for denial VAH likely result. Generally, the applicant will YAP have only one opportunity to defer the PC public hearing fbr the project once it has been advertised for public hearing- Additional deferrals will not be allowed except in extraordinary circumstances such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention- FOR OFFICE 1 -SE ONLY SP Fei.A.-w= I — Date Paid By wino' P-eipt the By - Resubmittal of information for 11 Ir T 'F% Special use Permit PROJECT NUMBER THAT H.35 BEEN ASSIGNED: 0-tvaerApplicant Must Read and Sign I herebv certify that the information provided with this re -submittal is whit haz, been requested from staff Simahire of Owner. Contract Purchaser Date Print I+tarue Daytime phcue number of Siqnitcn� FFFS to be imid after aimfication For original Special Use Permit fee of S1.075 First resubmission (To BE PAiD mms THE msLmnssioN IS NLADE TO LN-TALT STAM Free Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID 11TIEN TMr RESUBMISSION IS RUDE TO L-,-T-ART STAFF) Fuc ia_y<al Spnia L ;e �entut fee :f S`1 Kiri int resubmssion(TOBE PADINBY-N THE RESUMMSIONISUADE TOWrART STAFF} Fee 7ach additional re.-mbmission (IO BE P.ADAXTIEN THE RFSUBNESSION IS \LADE To rr7Aja STAFF) County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesi-Me, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-583-1 Fax: (434) 972-4126 P -Ki Ed 11 2 '-V15 Pada 1 d 1 10 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone 434 296-5832 Fax 434 972-4176 June 3, 2016 Valerie Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main Street, Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SP201600012: Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display Dear Valerie: Staff has reviewed your initial proposal to establish outdoor sales/storage/display of vehicles in association with a new Ford automobile dealership. Comments that are available at this time are listed below. As you know, the ARB will review this proposal on June 6, 2016. Once we have the ARB's recommendation on the proposal, we will be able to recommend whether the proposal is able to move forward to the Planning Commission, or if issues should be resolved prior to public hearing. Plannine Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Comprehensive Plan are provided below. Comments on conformity with the Comprehensive Plan are provided to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as commercial mixed use in Neighborhood 1. This designation includes as primary uses: community and regional retail, commercial service, and auto commercial service and office. Secondary uses include: office, research & development, flex, residential, open space, and institutional uses. The proposed use is similar in type and scale to the designated uses. The Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 2, Natural Resources and Cultural Assets) establishes the goals for preserving the scenic resources that are essential to the County's character, economic vitality and quality of life. The Entrance Corridor Overlay District is intended to support that goal by maintaining the visual integrity of the County's roadways. The Architectural Review Board addresses potential adverse aesthetic impacts in the Entrance Corridors by applying the County's Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines during their review of development proposals. The ARB will review the subject request for conformance with the Design Guidelines on June 6, 2016. The ARB's recommendation to the Planning Commission will be available after that meeting. 1 The Places 29 Master Plan calls for the widening of Berkmar Drive to four lanes. As you may be aware, the County has just begun work on a Small Area Plan that will likely include this part of Berkmar Drive. It is not known yet whether Berkmar Drive will need to be widened to four lanes. New development would be expected to either provide land for these improvements or accommodate future improvements. Previously, we asked that you consider a reservation for dedication of right-of-way in this area; however, we note that you have declined to do this as no development is proposed adjacent to the Berkmar right-of-way. We also note that you are not proposing any development which would impede widening of Berkmar at this location. Zoning The following comments related to zoning matters have been provided by Ron Higgins: 1. The Conceptual Special Use Application Pian shows a "body shop" use in the building closest to Berkmar Drive. Body Shops require a special use permit in the HC Zoning District. 2. All parking spaces should be marked, whether they are for off-street parking or display parking for vehicles. 3. New lighting will need to be shown and meet current ordinance standards. Current Development The proposal will require an amendment to the site plan and may be processed as a minor amendment. This minor amendment will be the last one allowed before a major amendment is required to incorporate all approved changes with previous minors and letters of revision. Engineering and Water Resources The following comments related to engineering and water resources have been provided by Matthew Wentland: No objection. Fire/Rescue The following comments related to fire/rescue issues have been provided by Robbie Gilmer: No objection. Building Official/Inspections The following comments have been provided by Jay Schlothauer: No objection. Entrance Corridor The Architectural Review Board will review this proposal on June 6, 2016 and you have already received a copy of the staff report for that meeting. Formal comments from the ARB regarding Entrance Corridor impacts of the proposal will be available after the meeting. VDOT Comments from Joel Denunzio with VDOT are copied below. It is my understanding that the first comment is a recommendation, not a requirement, and that the second comment can be addressed with the site plan. I have asked Joel for confirmation on these two points but have not yet received a response. I will forward the response when I receive it. N COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINTA QEPARTMENr OF TRANSPORTATION +GA S owso Paad Gv vwvyw 22171 Chsrks A. Kilpatrick, P.t?. Camwksbner May 25, 2016 Ms. Margaret Ma iszewski County of Albemarle DeWmnt of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SP2016-OOtl11 Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display Dear Ms. Maliszewski, We have reviewed the special use permit application for Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display and offer the following ��]rntrd�rir5, The Virginia Atvess Management Regulations (24VAC30.73.130) states that commercial entrances may tm-- reviewed and reconstruction, relocations, consolidation, upgrading, or a combitiatior+ c. f these nmy be required if any of the fallowing occur; 1) the property is being considered for rezoning or other local legislative action that involves a change in use, 21 if the prrVerty is subject to u site plan or subdivision plat revive. 3) there is a change (increase) In corner =ial use, or 4) circulation between adjoining properties lxconres uvuiluhlc. In order io comply with the Virginia Access Managernanr Regulations, the entrances ro T IN 45-68C I & 45-68A should be consolidated allowing fur a shared entrance to the two parcels. Please provide both existing, and proposed traffic generations as well as right -turn lane warrants. If you need ;additional information conce,ming this project, please do not hesitate tar contact me at (434)422-9894. � - _ fr�r , 1 DeNunzio, P.E. Resident Engler, Charlottesville Culpeper District WF 9EEP ViA(IINIA MOVING Albemarle County Service Authority The following comments have been provided by Alexander J. Morrison: I have reviewed the above referenced special use permit. It appears that the applicant is proposing landscaping along the Route 29 frontage. The ACSA and RWSA have water infrastructure in this area. My comments are as follows: • Show the existing ACSA and RWSA water infrastructure along the Route 29 frontage (see attached GIS Map). • Show existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • Ensure no landscaping is proposed within existing ACSA and RWSA easements. Riv_anna Water and Sewer Authority Victoria Fort had the same comment as ACSA. Note that I forwarded Justin's waterline/fire hydrant exhibit (dated and emailed to me on May 31, 2016, image copied below) to Alex and Victoria. Victoria's response was as follows: The exhibit shows the RWSA water line a little further from the edge of pavement than our records indicate, otherwise it is fairly consistent with as -built data. I could not find records of an easement along the road, which would be consistent with the line having been installed within VDOT right-of-way as Justin had assumed. As long as there are no plantings within 10' of the existing water line (which the attached plan does not appear to show), I have no issues with the proposed landscaping plan. ACSA will have to weigh in on whether the proposed plan will impact the existing hydrant. I have not heard back from Alex on the waterline exhibit, but will forward any information I receive. Existing Waterline / rlre Hydrant Exhibit for Malloy Ford 1aiWng a.} RWrt; -n AP 045C0 00 00-06BC I :xn�oedinp.,jtS' ewsacti !w+`ding m._ rrrtvnlh 5.19 Acme �¢•]I �J'Gr j p� JA A J fY -'4 - LJ 0 _i t — _;'a.r�� 4�� ' • is W� dlsrlap aea �*nkny �F,. araae;rt �rY ✓dhty I llrx j,�yy l Existing Waterline / rlre Hydrant Exhibit for Malloy Ford 1aiWng a.} RWrt; -n AP 045C0 00 00-06BC I :xn�oedinp.,jtS' ewsacti !w+`ding m._ rrrtvnlh 5.19 Acme SP Conditions At this point in the review process, we anticipate that recommended conditions of approval for the Special Use Permit will include those conditions recommended by the Architectural Review Board. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter and we have the opportunity to consider the ARB's action, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $ 169.00 Cost for newspaper advertisement 215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200+ actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $ 384.00 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing 5 '4 p� J fY -'4 - LJ 0 — _;'a.r�� 4�� ' • is W� dlsrlap aea �*nkny �F,. araae;rt �rY ✓dhty I llrx j,�yy l -. - - s — IM. PC LGJ! not SP Conditions At this point in the review process, we anticipate that recommended conditions of approval for the Special Use Permit will include those conditions recommended by the Architectural Review Board. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter and we have the opportunity to consider the ARB's action, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $ 169.00 Cost for newspaper advertisement 215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200+ actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $ 384.00 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing 5 Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. $ 169.00 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing $ 553.00 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is mmaliszewski@albemarle.ore_ Sincerely, It -� Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner, Planning Division cc: B Properties LC, PO Box 7627, Charlottesville, VA 22906 enc: Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments If you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at www.albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your submittal. The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Reauest Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit/request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) (3) Reguest Plannina Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. After outstanding issues have been resolved and/or when you are ready to request a public hearing, staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County. The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no later than twenty-one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty-two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting. (4) Withdraw Your Application If at any time you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c) request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. 2016 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Written Comments and Eari es+t Planning Corrrniss�*n Public Hea-ring* Resubrmllfital Cornmer to ua l�� Planning Dc MM!ssion-1 Dates applicant for Public Hearing, public Hearing decision sin wMetiher L egad Ad No sooner than* o proceed tai Public[Reqstfor Payment [due COS Auddortum Hearing x 2015 Dec 4 2015 21 2V4V Jan 12 162015 Dec 18 ,?[71.5 f Jars 04 I Jan 2#i 7 2015 Jan 08 j„ l! i 9 Feb 02 mar zi Apr 04 r.�. +'. 22 Mav 00 Kl r 09 M ,, 09 My �o iVf� 31 Apr 18 .20 M � .30 Jun 21 ay 02 Jun 03 Jago 20 Jul 12 May 10 Jury 17 !s:1:7 -: � i Jul 12 Jun 0 Jul 08 dull 18 09 Jun til Jul 22_ Aug 01 23 Tree geed 05 Au 05 Aug 22 13 Jul 18 iI Aug19 241 W 22 Aug01 02 Se 0`5 27 Aug15 15 19 Oct 11 Tue Sep 06 _ _ Oct 07 Oct 10 Nov 01 Sep -19 Cct .21 _ Oct 31 Nov 22 Oct 03 Nov 04 Nov 14 Dec 08 Oct 17 Nov 18 Nov 23 1 Dec 20 Nov 07 Dec 09 Dec 19 Jori 10 201 t Nov 21 Dec 23 Jan 09 2017 Jan 3120-1-7 Dec 05 1 Jan 08 2017 Jan 16 2017 Feb 07 2017 10010 Ml►ics = submittallmeeU a day is e7eiei`ereni due to a hohdav II dui t nates are tentavve- Thn mgiewing piattrser will exmtaet aPpliwrd to discuss r orn"wrhs of revieven and adore that d%anges tial are needed are 5ignMeant enough to warrant an additional subrnilltai or, advise that the the protect is ready for a public hearing- if changes needed are minor, the planner wil advise that the project go to .public hear ft, — The legal ad deadtine is the last date at which an applicant ear decide w hetlw to resubmit or go to public hearing- If ars applicant decides to go to public hearing Wirsst the advice of the reviewing plainer, a recommendations for denial wid kkely result. Generally, the applicant will will! have only one oppowtur4y to defer the PG pjbhe hearing for the project cxsce it has been adverbsod for public hearing. Additional deferrals +milt not be alkywed except in eAracndiriary circuirnstances such as a tssrapor change in ttte project proposal by the applicant or more issues idenuffod by serif that have not previously been brought to Me applicants attenrton- FOR QMCT USE ONLY SIE w �e A b IAS Fzid �yr�'. as_ 5 • i �.•,�r _,�. resubmittal of information for Special ITse Permit Owinj' 1pphcant Must Read and Sign I hereby eert6 that ih:- aakiwa#cm IxowLedwith = resub rond r, . hil has beeureqwsted from std si of OWM. cosstsxct F=haw Der Point Nme Da) phone number of Sipgory FEES to be paid after aouffeation County of Mbeti'aie Depawtueent of C'Pmmuttatr D fvelopment 401 Iicln0v Road VA 22942 "Voke: (434) 2W5'932 Fax: (434) 972-4126 F--ti3.'-`ai5PatwicfI 10 For MpW sem[ Use Pemt fee of S1.075 ZI TIM zesnbnaiSW a (TOIE FADUMN nW MSMOMMIS MAW TIMMEX S7AM I Free RF mpal SpsdAUwFernit%of5?150 FrA xc-,ub=%maoEz:7AwR=trnK XERMMMXMIS MAW aOMAXESTAM wee ZI Each adiki sal TOIlIrt_A= S'r 1,475 County of Mbeti'aie Depawtueent of C'Pmmuttatr D fvelopment 401 Iicln0v Road VA 22942 "Voke: (434) 2W5'932 Fax: (434) 972-4126 F--ti3.'-`ai5PatwicfI 10 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4176 August 19, 2016 Valerie Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main Street, Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SP201600011: Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display SP201600018: Malloy Ford Body Shop Dear Valerie: Staff has reviewed your submittal with revision date of July 18, 2016 for the above referenced applications for the Malloy Ford automobile dealership. We have the following comments. The following reviewers had a comment of"No Objection": • Zoning: Ron Higgins • Engineering: Matthew Wentland • Fire/Rescue: Robbie Gilmer • Building Official/Inspections:Jay Schlothauer • Albemarle County Service Authority: Alexander Morrison • Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority: Victoria Fort Current Development Please note that this proposal will require an amendment to the site plan and may be processed as a minor amendment. This minor amendment will be the last one allowed before a major amendment is required to incorporate all approved changes with previous minors and letters of revision. Entrance Corridor/Planning The Architectural Review Board reviewed this proposal on June 6, 2016. A copy of the action letter is attached to this correspondence. 1. The ARB recommended the following condition: "Vehicles shall not be elevated anywhere on site." The note added to the revised plans does not include this exact language. For clarity, the plan should be revised to include the exact recommended language. The note applies to all vehicles on site. 2. Regarding the body shop proposal:The plan shows an existing wooded area on site for screening the vehicles awaiting repair.Trees do not exist in this location. On-site screening is required to eliminate visibility from any public street or residential property. This includes the view down the slope from Berkmar Drive. Revise the plan to show new screening trees to be planted or some other means of screening. 1. Ire VDOT Comments from Adam Moore with VDOT are copied below. Note that VDOT prefers entrance consolidation to be addressed now, but Adam indicates that it can be addressed with the site plan. `rt; i IN.ri.E A lr. uti: ll '_t716 i:.'+rint7 Lace Arrficro..cf t cA.ntllun ter I_ r a l.�} 13}, t1i`I !!rr R.„,1.t Ann. \i,..u,r t2t Ric If. ? (tetil ',r 1;2 Ltci \iti. ,rl F.A. rt[,11 I RA s1.1.et,g 1 irrl traLrI,rt,cu Ise.] I g I In ow _' t a. '. ,l;F rrt A".1 Ietrrr itt 11'1"!. act.t'. .-;Ira t can n, A r;.s, L.tas.r .rrnr Rci'2I.,tt2.ri',.it h.;a.:2cr2t11 tet=tt( .;hr.~Jeri at ring r3tw sP4N;,11 pt`_mIt taut: .i Flrr:� .3. esJattco-❑nr h� irl, hni PI-:rt1 f l�ixit ii :A/10.7/1rnr martini a ,r1 HIt It unix+ ,e EnnI at 414-}22-4t t ,'1 \BU= T'E.tr;1 I R !'erntlt a,u tcd aat T=<e , :t'ccr:rleVcInr„ ttrjI,r nial flitthe taliarlr,t.zsu I,Iz FZettdi ax.4,Ttarrpi :r,rrJua.Ina I ar3FI t! c Inkl:r,ntionper1Git`1it1,4 P thn,�,r�_ •4,,. �+IrICt:'(CIG'. 1144*te i1` darn y 4'I A [C,1'.h. Are1_aft ii t E r;t nnt:r n.m 2 SP Conditions At this point in the review process, we anticipate that recommended conditions of approval for the Special Use Permits will include those conditions recommended by the Architectural Review Board and a condition related to the screening of the vehicles awaiting repair in the body shop. I recommend revising the plan to correct the elevated vehicles note and to clarify the screening of vehicles awaiting repair prior to moving forward to the Planning Commission. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. A resubmittal including only the two revisions requested above will not incur a fee and I can accept that resubmittal at any time. A resubmittal including revisions other than those requested will incur a fee and must be submitted according to the resubmittal schedule, which is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently, the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $ 338.00 Cost for newspaper advertisement ($169 x 2 applications) 430.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200+ actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners; $215 x 2 applications) $ 768.00 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing ($384 x 2 applications) Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. $ 338.00 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing ($169 x 2 applications) $ 1106.00 Total amount for all notifications ($553 x 2 applications) Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is mmaliszewski@albemarle.org. 3 �ww� vie ' ~ | 5�n�erey, M.-4-4,21.64,49"/CA- Margaret /C — Margaret Ma|iszewski Principal Planner, Planning Division cc: B Properties LC, PO Box 7627, Charlottesville, VA 22906 enc: Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form 4 44111, • ('4)t 11" ` 1 IM \1 ‘.1-411 ILZ1flfl •tt t I ' ii ) 1 Iii ‘1,1i.i.m. I 1. \ t'11 \\ I 11:krd‘or,, j1i-, it-g-Aii,1 221)02-4506 Va'e.•e Lord k4t.tiCn :221 Md•- St-dc: e VA 2291:2 ARB 2016 53.Malloy Ford Outdoor Sales;Storage; 1.dro,•:, A:)A-..rnarle C:7)un4 F"..c.)co tical.„.: .1,-;:1 pred Br *athisz,ry above--)uted tooLict:o 14.17:::::Y'r Axe F:Storageinplay z_Jtorncar.es BCG":.3 ny tiOn." 5tPt rFfErt/1.--E),Iklat- r'to The Plar—T4 Cc--rnissio,-- Tt-Q).`t,RBt.t.*:•••:`vt.), C-t.)rtQ,,bjvct tt . sot:goer:t c ttie 1:.)11;:vortiii ;;oncnrionL -it;tt"n Ltd •- • , .3-oas ,-dcated ford:s1•.-lity s-,!..-tr•zrrikt un!tie pia, coti-ted i • Al', 16 2C1Iiftne C Pq1'11 Vet 51•43,4r Dt . 4 f-,rcit iIo arap;t-oysi s ),PL• " ' • k• '- " w. riaximurd 'd- h:of o•,:dc -.4: • ' - Max--urn ightei5haIIrcLYU•''r,' •* . l ,•,‘• ....)catons Nc":;(1114 : _ ! ma' Oa- • . andscape Aeitr-the 1,14.1- ,..:rrtisi,•0 • • - Ii I1 ;1•• • I i • /.tt; tnn rttitt••• I ; rcit • •• *.• * ; I •• *,• *ItaCtS. se ici5,ha .: v( 3 ant ru. area a'or: yt: •1 I 4:necessary to accornmodate Ia tg u,tritte • -I _age Ode CtetsS , 11:,1 1 tIc Ca iJ 4•:44',"1 ,-c Sirevery') ; M.P.tn. 5.'41, Le.{..,11-.,%,..; L1 ug 4 • y arrla f-xtia,.nd t-e!soar,: ;:le SC of tic d;10.4t're-.)!e3 Si I s'^,req4!Ind sh'..ts 1..rnY,:F.C.1 tne pE-rr C:ef t . -31 Li t -0 -I ‘,, '.: 5 111110 You may suOMIt your aDoi,caT-Jri r ii - t che: 8rart:Ilvullaule If Y'ou have anY q,cic ourvx:uttr; : Sreesely, 7'1'7 ro 6 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT =t kAL/1qtr }4 f ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments If you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at www.albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your submittal. The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Request Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit/request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) i (3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. i 1 After outstanding issues have been resolved and/or when you are ready to request a public I hearing, staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with 7 i a 1 I `SII ',uo, the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County. The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no later than twenty-one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty-two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting. (4) Withdraw Your Application If at any time you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c) request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. 8 2016 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Written Comments and Earliest Planning Commission Public Hearing Resubmittal Comments to Request for PC Planning Commission Dates applicant for Public Hearing, Public Hearing decision on whether Legal Ad No sooner than' to proceed to Public Payment Due '' COB Auditorium Hearing ' Monday Friday Monday Tuesday Nov 2 2015 Dec 4 20 15 Dec 2-1 2015 Jan /2 Nov 16 2015 Dec 18 2015 Jan 04 Jan ?6 Dec 7 2015 Jan 08 Jan 11 Feb 02 ? , Dec 21 2015 Jan 22 Feb 01 Feb 23 Jan 04 Feb 05 Feb 08 Mar 01 Tue Jan 19 Feb "9 Feb 22 Mar 15 Feb 0; Mar 04 Mar 14 Apr 05 Tue Feb 16 f1ar '8 Apr 04 Apr 26 Mar07 Apr04 Apr 1 May 03 , Mr 2; Apr 22 May00 May 31 Apr 04 Ma\* 06 May 00 May 31 Apr 18 Ma,, 20 May30 Jun 21 , May 02 Jun 03 Jun 20 Jul 12 May 10 Jun 17 Jun 20 Jul 12 Jun 06 ..Jul 08 Jul 18 Aug 00 Jun 20 Jul 22 Aug 01 Aug 23 Tue Jul 05 Aug 05 Aug 22 Sep 13 Jul 18 Aug 10 Aug 22 Sep 13 Aug 0 I Sep 02 Sep 05 Sep 27 Aug 15 Sep 16 Sep 19 Oct I 1 Tue Sep 06 Oc107 Oct 10 Nov 0'1 Sep '1';:o Oct 21 Oct 3/ Nov 22 Oct 03 Nov 04 Nov 14 Dec 06 Oct 17 Nov 18 Nov 28 Dec 20 Nov 07 Dec 09 Dec 19 Jan 10 2017 I Nov 21 Dec 23 Jan 09 2017 Jan 31 2017 Dec 05 Jan 06 2017 Jan -16 2017 Feb 07 2017 , d 1 Dec 19 Jan 20 2017 Feb 06 2017 Feb 28 2017 Jan 03 2C-17 Feb 03 2017 Feb 13 2017 Mar 07 2017 Bold italics = submittal/meeting day is different due to a holiday. Dates with shaded baadround are not 2015_ , -,J— , ,__ 1 ,- cia,e, are tentative. Tr...,.i.rev,i,14-ig planner iiiiii I contact applicant to L'irl:4155 cornit-erts of reviewers and advise that changes mat are r eeted are 1 significant enough to warrant an additional subm-ittai or advise that the the project is ready for 3 public hearing. If changes needed are minor,the planner will advise that the project go to pubic hear rig. ii x The legal ad deadline is the last date at which an applicant can decide whether to resubnvt or go to pudic hearing_If an applicant decides to go to public hearing against the advice of the reviewing planner,a reoornmenclation for denial will likely result.Generally,:he applicant wilt wit have orty one opportunity to defer the. PC public hearing for the project once it has been advertised for pubic nearing,.Addidenal deferrals will riot be allowed except in extraordinary circumstance-A such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicants attention NOII NOP. 10F.OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Av.,,Dtut S Px.e. 2,10.547, f_L= Resrall)rararaittal of information for Special Use Permit PROJECT NUMBER THAT }{A',BEEN AS$,IGNED: Applic AU( Must Read and Siri I he & c ::fy that the mfonnatIou pfovided with 1 e,..13batirtal ha,.,beer.tecitted f:;:r.staff Signature of Owner.Contract Pulchae1 Date PI Int Name U2;11:11.2c: 37 FEES to be paid after application Fr On F11131 UtPe:-thit fee, Fh5t aiD BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBSLISSION LS SLADE TO DIA}E STAFF) F:ee 011.1r:ow1 re:.:17,a13;;;c::(TO PE PAID ViHE N THE RESUPNIISSION H MADE TO EVIA1.1 STAFF) S. Pe:Ir.:P.fee hr :e73b211.S510:1(TO BE P kID SVIIEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO EVI.k.si z:TAIT). Each adaloonal kTO BE PAID ASHEN THE RESUMES S ON kDF.TI)rcr Ara s TAFF, Of Ilbetliai le Depa I['new of Cominkiiiiiy De)elopmem 401 McIntire Foal Ch,ii lotresville,VA 22902 Voice: i434) 29(i-5832 Fax: (434) 9'2-4126 RRAI,Ed 201S 1>3ft 1 of 1 1 0 " Comments ~~ SP201600011 Project Name |aUoy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display Date Completed . =hday. August 12. 2016�-- — New Special Use Permit Reviewer:' !Warg@retKX0|i3ZewSKi D*purtnent"D|No|oniAgency, ARB Reviews Comments: 1 The plan shows an existing wooded area on-site for screening the vehicles awaiting repair. Trees do not ^ exist in this location. On site screening is required to eliminate visibility from any public street or residential property, Revise the plan to show new screening trees to be planted or some other means of screening. Note that the screening will need to compensate for the view down the slope from Berkrnar Drive_ /2 Revise the plan to eliminate the word display from the 'vehicles shall not be elevated . note The note is meant to apply to all parked vehicles For clarity, please move the note to Sheet 1 Review Status- Requested Changes Page- 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: O8/1212O16 9/z sT//, 1,4,, The ARB expresses no objection to the special use permit/rezoning, subject to the following conditions: 1. Vehicles shall be displayed or stored only in areas indicated for display or storage on the plan entitled "Conceptual Special Use Application Plan for Malloy Ford" dated April 18, 2016 (the Concept Plan). pLrtryt... it t't g -Avi v / ', Zp/ L V Vehicles for display shall be parked in striped parking spaces. 3. Vehicles shall not be elevated anywhere on site. Gy / reiL / 1Ch1_ —G Y {GCS ✓4.1-ti-ea ".amv_.-/,? e,(- .., , . , 4. Final site plan approval is subject to ARB approval of the lighting plan (submitted with the site plan). Maximum height of pole lights (including bases and fixtures), shall not exceed 20'. Maximum light levels shall not exceed 30 footcandles in the display lot and 20 footcandles in all other locations. Nonconforming pole lights shall be removed or fixtures shall be replaced with full cutoff fixtures to match other proposed fixtures. — al47,a4C-4-1 .)/ C{ C A, � -0).ii(,¢_. ', 1 G-fes-V - i u ,. 5. Final site plan appro al is subject to A� approval of the landscape plan (submitted with the site plan). Landscaping shown on the plan may be required to be in excess of the minimum requirements of the ARB guidelines and/or the Zoning Ordinance to mitigate visual impacts of the proposed use, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Planting area along the Entrance Corridor frontage shall be increased, if necessary, to J accommodate planting outside of easements. ‘t--4.--e 1-2-1)-4/4")31 - b. Large shade trees shall be evenly distributed at the interior of the display lot at a rate of 1 tree for every 10 spaces. 5-S-4) — , •r 1, c. Ground cover shall be provided continuous throughout the north, east and south sides of the front display area. Extend the island on the south side of the display area to add an additional tree and shrubs. 1_4•14_,_,,r; Lk vc i, t. ..Lv..' m } Li. , 14:. ,r'-4-Q , d. Shrubs provided at the perimeter of the display area shall be a minimum of 30"-36" high at planting. �/� � - , • ,S `'` ti /� . tr e'is LE:.. ,-14..Gk.. - ,.1 t l /fr — e /2.6.1,4 ,,,,,t24.1,/ 1 'ij ,„ , � ,'r' e. Large shade trees spaced 40' on center shall be provided in new planting beds or islands along the south perimeters of the middle vehicle storage area. • • 4(4-4-(p c# 04,6/2-7104-1--? L.4 1/1-1-ZYV, / ti‘(?/1/Cle& a-yL 1/-6,14 (i+ektit 1,,r4,1.)94f". ALL, et-1.4-ek P/G//vt. fittat.; 7/-2) , )/t-e4Ai /Ade-to e-t_ e/Jr-Y-d (-4qt-ff-- „.,4,zi, (-34)//a eiLevvyt 74,4\„),,c, .04'L -7211-e s&tity,-71-4--vij NW° Noe v ti aW r�;� ,a j !t b COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road CutpeRer Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner August 11, 2016 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Margaret Maliszewski Re: SP-2016-00011 Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display SP-2016-00018 Malloy Ford Body Shop Review#2 Dear Ms. Maliszewski: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plans as submitted by Shimp Engineering, last revised 18 July 2016, and offers the following comment: 1. In our 25 May 2016 review letter we noted that the entrances to TMPs 45-68C1 & 45- 68A would need to be consolidated in order to meet current Access Management Regulations. It is preferable that this be done during the special permit process, so that review of the consolidation may begin, but may be addressed during site plan review. Likewise concerning the requested traffic generations and turn lane warrant analysis. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434)422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, • IA/\C6V--'' Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(4341 296-5832 Fax(434)972-4176 June 3, 2016 Valerie Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main Street, Suite 400 Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE: SP201600011: Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage& Display Dear Valerie: Staff has reviewed your initial proposal to establish outdoor sales/storage/display of vehicles in association with a new Ford automobile dealership. Comments that are available at this time are listed below. As you know,the ARB will review this proposal on June 6, 2016. Once we have the ARB's recommendation on the proposal, we will be able to recommend whether the proposal is able to move forward to the Planning Commission, or if issues should be resolved prior to public hearing. Planning Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Comprehensive Plan are provided below. Comments on conformity with the Comprehensive Plan are provided to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as commercial mixed use in Neighborhood 1.. This designation includes as primary uses: community and regional retail, commercial service, and auto commercial service and office. Secondary uses include: office, research & development,flex, residential, open space, and institutional uses. The proposed use is similar in type and scale to the designated uses.The Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 2, Natural Resources and Cultural Assets) establishes the goals for preserving the scenic resources that are essential to the County's character, economic vitality and quality of life. The Entrance Corridor Overlay District is intended to support that goal by maintaining the visual integrity of the County's roadways. The Architectural Review Board addresses potential adverse aesthetic impacts in the Entrance Corridors by applying the County's Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines during their review of development proposals. The ARB will review the subject request for conformance with the Design Guidelines on June 6, 2016. The ARB's recommendation to the Planning Commission will be available after that meeting. 1 The Places 29 Master Plan calls for the widening of Berkmar Drive to four lanes. As you may be aware,the County has just begun work on a Small Area Plan that will likely include this part of Berkmar Drive. It is not known yet whether Berkmar Drive will need to be widened to four lanes. New development would be expected to either provide land for these improvements or accommodate future improvements. Previously, we asked that you consider a reservation for dedication of right-of-way in this area; however,we note that you have declined to do this as no development is proposed adjacent to the Berkmar right-of-way. We also note that you are not proposing any development which would impede widening of Berkmar at this location. Zoning The following comments related to zoning matters have been provided by Ron Higgins: 1. The Conceptual Special Use Application Plan shows a "body shop" use in the building closest to Berkmar Drive. Body Shops require a special use permit in the HC Zoning District. 2. All parking spaces should be marked, whether they are for off-street parking or display parking for vehicles. 3. New lighting will need to be shown and meet current ordinance standards. Current Development The proposal will require an amendment to the site plan and may be processed as a minor amendment. This minor amendment will be the last one allowed before a major amendment is required to incorporate all approved changes with previous minors and letters of revision. Engineering and Water Resources The following comments related to engineering and water resources have been provided by Matthew Wentland: No objection. Fire/Rescue The following comments related to fire/rescue issues have been provided by Robbie Gilmer: No objection. Building Official/Inspections The following comments have been provided by Jay Schlothauer: No objection. Entrance Corridor The Architectural Review Board will review this proposal on June 6, 2016 and you have already received a copy of the staff report for that meeting. Formal comments from the ARB regarding Entrance Corridor impacts of the proposal will be available after the meeting. VDOT Comments from Joel Denunzio with VDOT are copied below. It is my understanding that the first comment is a recommendation, not a requirement, and that the second comment can be addressed with the site plan. i have asked Joel for confirmation on these two points but have not yet received a response. I will forward the response when I receive it. 2 :Olik ; COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 160:s-sorkd ,:.uyryy.K J„a 22+311 Charles A.Kilpatrick,P.Z. Corraiss4oner May 25,2016 Ms.Margaret Maliszewski County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: SP-2016-00011 Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage&Display Dear Ms.Maliszewski, We have reviewed the special est permit application for Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage& Display and offer the following womrner,r,; I. The Virginia Access Management Regulations(24VAC30.73-110)states that commercial entrances may he reviewed and reconstruction,relocations,consolidation, upgrading,or a combination of these may be required if any of the following occur; 1) the property is being considered tar rezoning or other local legislative action that involves a change in use,2)if the property is subject lou site plan or subdivision plat reviw,3)there is a change(increase)in commercial use,or 4)circulation between adjoining properties becomes availeble. In order to comply with the Virginia Access Management Regulation::,the entrances to TMPs 45-68C1 &45-68A should be consolidated allowing for a shared entrance to the two parcels. 2. Please provide both existing and proposed traffic generations as well as right-turn lane warrants. If you need additional information concerning this project,please do not hesitate to contact me at (434)4224894. SinceN a z.../.1,......__ __r I DeNunzio,P.E. Resident Engineer,Charlottesville Culpeper District WE KEEP ViRdINIA It1OVINA 3 Albemarle County Service Authority The following comments have been provided by Alexander J. Morrison: I have reviewed the above referenced special use permit. It appears that the applicant is proposing landscaping along the Route 29 frontage. The ACSA and RWSA have water infrastructure in this area. My comments are as follows: • Show the existing ACSA and RWSA water infrastructure along the Route 29 frontage (see attached GIS Map). • Show existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • Ensure no landscaping is proposed within existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • I2w�.K. +i . 4fJ %r ir:CA M,ON.5015/ / 7) - fix` • - a / - 7', /,,•t,�,,• fir,..,.•„>..,,, k. "'..:7 r , 1474 II 04+414+.. .. % 1 M.Ntr.6cv 1 .., 121N i rS :// r , „r„:_.,- , i fe,„iittio)J . •i / ,. /41.554.4•14/4r5c5.^i5.40 F MS.w•YM.V r fix,. m r.... . F•i .., C9A JJ Sc.1.1rJs pK4Y• Alan/ w••NM M..•n.M•IMw•w ..14.}the w+%., •nr�IwwNlrnrw�rerlrn�, .�YMw'A/.1ra M".•s ""`•wow"�'"""""�,....,` Service Authority 44.•••••445••••••••••444.46P41.5.5545444.5.5441144.41, co5•455035~Ow op44444•4544.Yaw* Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Victoria Fort had the same comment as ACSA. Note that I forwarded Justin's waterline/fire hydrant exhibit (dated and emailed to me on May 31, 2016, image copied below)to Alex and Victoria. Victoria's response was as follows: The exhibit shows the RWSA water line a little further from the edge of pavement than our records indicate, otherwise it is fairly consistent with as-built data. I could not find records of an easement along the road, which would be consistent with the line having been installed within VDOT right-of-way as Justin had assumed. As long as there are no plantings within 10' of the existing water line (which the attached plan does not appear to show), I have no issues with the proposed landscaping plan. ACSA will have to weigh in on whether the proposed plan will impact the existing hydrant. 4 I have not heard back from Alex on the waterline exhibit, but will forward any information I receive. "` _ Extsting Waterline/Fire hydrant rxhiblt for . 1 . .f.-r-1-:-.....„4: Malloy Ford t; -4A.:1. r wwo ,f ma.04500 oo-oaocec I t/ .rnac Jt.--10 ouat,h.e.4nJ to::WK.ct nlF f rnrnrtFJr J�cr. n 14 , 5.19 Acres (rC.14 11Ism,! anted te � r ', # t -fic, r. q ., .. y • .r . ., , ,. + *- MU"LAItc """��- _ t 7,ptit 1, 11; "•1 tall! .,,try -,,,-411.771:' t y ' / -,4 deroR light lok ."' erene:rt ✓�w L' Ito: —. " • -. MiMik '^ SH/ f'�1L1N(,R/h43 P.C. t, Amon le:nmo G.- ,ni -Av., .....enw T:.ar.. YTr.:'v-v 1 -1 t I.o'_ M'ate.lute Vi 1.41 r;xS t:. I �� \ GrMgWlelme •. SP Conditions At this point in the review process, we anticipate that recommended conditions of approval for the Special Use Permit will include those conditions recommended by the Architectural Review Board. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter and we have the opportunity to consider the ARB's action, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter' which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Recently,the Board of Supervisors amended the zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: $ 169.00 Cost for newspaper advertisement 215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners(minimum $200+ actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $ 384.00 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing 5 Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. $ 169.00 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing $ 553.00 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is mmaliszewski@albemarle.org. Sincerely,j /2 Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner, Planning Division cc: B Properties LC, PO Box 7627, Charlottesville,VA 22906 enc: Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form 6 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT pF A ^111{ 011owLii tel IIII W.: ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments If you plan to resubmit within 30 days, make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. The full resubmittal schedule may be found at www.albemarle.org in the "forms" section at the Community Development page. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your submittal. The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Request Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter, you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit/request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) (3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time, you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However, we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. After outstanding issues have been resolved and/or when you are ready to request a public hearing, staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County. The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no later than twenty-one (21) days before the Planning Commission's public hearing, a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid. (See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty-two (22) days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. Please be advised that, once a public hearing has been advertised, only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances, such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always, an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting. (4) Withdraw Your Application If at any time you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days, we will contact you again. At that time, you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a) request withdrawal of your application, b) request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff, or c)request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days, staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. 8 2016 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Written Comments and Earliest Planning Commission Public Hearin r,_ 65 eget Comments to .0 -R f • - I .Planning Commisstarn Dates •I applicant for Public Hearing !' decision or •rhet'ner Legai Ad , No soonerThan* ' :o proceed :o PJWfc1 Payment • ,l COB Auditorium I Hearing ' Ia f; Morula FridayTuesda F • f Dec=12015 21 2015 Jan 12 • 2015 Dec 18 2015 Jan 04 Jan 26 Dec 7 y Jan 08 Jail 1 Feb 02 Dec 21 2015 Jan 22 Feb 01 Feb 23 04 Feb Fe—ma" -ammouslim, A,� r 01 L . - Feb Februe 01 Mar 04 fear1 4 . r rue Feb 16 • _ . . .far '8 Apr 04 ... _ ,+ re - Mar r r . Apr r_. '1.11111111K_...,o.,__..... Mar 21 A�:.,21 yR_0+� 11�1a 31 1 Ei r d Mav 06 P.,av 0 Ma 31 Apr 1$ 7 ,� . .� -Wick-_._ _ Jun 21 1.y r t Jun 03 Jun 20 Jul 12 Jul 12 jun r r 00 -�---- Jun 20 Jul 22• �. Aug 01 u _ I d . j rue Jul 05 , i ' Alt 22 Jul18 1 Au199 ;_ l Au, 01 ! + 02 = '? 0� + Ails 15 , -, Se7,r 19 • 111 _i Tue . i. r Oct 10 r Sep 19 I OctOct 311 + .► Oct 03 Nov 04 Nov 14 _ Dec 06 • « � + Nov 28 -IL . Dec 20 _ Novr � -- Dec19 Dec 19 Jan 1020i" - , Nov 21 F Dec 23 Jan 09 2017 —Jan 31' 2017 Dec 05 Jan 06 2017 Jan 16 2.017 Feb 07 2017 Dec i c�f Jan 20 2017 Feb 06 2017 Feb 28 2017 Jan .11 - Feb 03 2 r 1 Feb 13 017 Mar 07 2017 Bold italics =submittal/meet, . dany�is different due to a holiday. t 211 dates are en alive_ 'The reviewing partner tins contact applicant to discuss comments of reviewers anti advise that changes that are needed are significant enough to warrant an additional submittal or advise that the the project is ready for a public hearing. If changes needed are minor,the planner will advise that the cycled go to pubic hearing, "The legal ad deadline is the test date at which an applicant can decide whether to resubmit or go to public hearing.if sn applicant decides to go to public hearing sgaittsl the advice of the reviewing planer.a recommendation for denial will likeh/ result.Generally,the opplicsnt will iii have only one opportunity to defer the PC public hearing for the prcjact cm*it has bean advertised for public hearing.Additional deferrals WM not be adiewed except in extraordinary circumstances such as a ne:rjor change in tyre prci.et'proposal by the applicant or more issues identii►ed by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant s attention. Noe "ger FOR emu 1..*-$E OINIX ST Tar Amara$ Pala Arkae Fe: : In? Resubmittal of information for Special Use Permit PROJECT NUMBER THAT HtS BEEN ASSIGNED: Owner:Appbcant Mot Read and Sign I finery testify That th::. .ifamostiou yisrmiled remna at.74420 ba been ave.sted flora 1.a.f Simone..'fOne.Conrad Purchaws Thrte Punt Nrine Daytime phone number of Sm - FEES to be paid after application Tor abgirtai Speakla 1.37C?malt ire of S1.071 Fir*resubtarztaa(TORE TAIDIATIEEN ISE NEST3115SPONIS mann TO MANE STATT) Free - Each ackliticia4 TembnaisTice(TOM YAZD Wiles{TIIIE nrsanessatri IS MDT iro 2cr.tanz -33:4 For oaring Spy:mit:it Mad fie of 52150 Fit Tembuossion 101SEEFAID TMTIEN T2E NESIIMISHON =OE TO maim stn) Five Each atialitimal resthiminton.g0FE LCD MOOT THE HIESMIISSION WIZ TO WALT STATF) 31,075 C°ann. of.Albemaiit Department of C ornmaunity Development 401 McIntire Road Ckai ionesville.VA 22902 Voice:(434)296-f S32 Fax:(4M)972-412d Rinse 112 11013 Ptp.1 10 Margaret Maliszewski From: Victoria Fort <vfort@rivanna.org> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 4:44 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski Cc: Alex Morrison Subject: RE: Malloy Ford Waterline/ Fire Hydrant Location Margaret, The exhibit shows the RWSA water line a little further from the edge of pavement than our records indicate, otherwise it is fairly consistent with as-built data. I could not find records of an easement along the road, which would be consistent with the line having been installed within VDOT right-of-way as Justin had assumed. As long as there are no plantings within 10' of the existing water line (which the attached plan does not appear to show), I have no issues with the proposed landscaping plan. ACSA will have to weigh in on whether the proposed plan will impact the existing hydrant. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks a lot, Victoria Victoria Fort, P.E. Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority 695 Moores Creek Lane Charlottesville,VA 22902 (P):(434)977-2970 ext. 205 (F):(434) 295-1146 From: Margaret Maliszewski [mailto:MMaliszewski@albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:50 PM To: Alex Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>;Victoria Fort<vfort@rivanna.org> Subject: FW: Malloy Ford Waterline/ Fire Hydrant Location Alex and Victoria, I'm forwarding this message, which is a response from the applicant to my concern about water infrastructure, easements, and required planting. Does the information in this response sound accurate to you?The water line shown in the applicant's "waterline exhibit" appears to be in a different location than the line on the "GIS Map". Thanks for your help. Margaret From:Justin Shimp, P.E. [mailto:iustin@shimp-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:27 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc: Valerie Long<vlong@williamsmullen.com>; Ashley Davies<adavies@williamsmullen.com> Subject: Fwd: Malloy Ford Waterline/ Fire Hydrant Location Hi Margaret, I understand there was some concern about a potential waterline conflict on the Malloy Ford SUP. Valerie forwarded your email to me and the pictures and upon further review I can confirm that the waterline is actually in the ROW, not on our property. For reference, the hydrant is about 2' or so on to our property, there is no recorded easement so I suspect it was just placed in the wrong location years ago and nobody noticed that it was actually on the parcel not the ROW. As far as our landscape goes, we are showing all of our EC required landscaping on our own property, so this waterline should not interfere with anything we have proposed. We may need to keep a little distance from the hydrant, but I think we have plenty of room in that corner to work. Hope this helps clarify, let me know if you need anything else. Thanks! -Justin 2 o O 73 g < ' a1 s 0 O c� 1 ai O C( M \ o /1 O O { C ii M S._ U IL— U L rn t'.`, 0 - S<' L —1 l .iii/,... . . d i E; .vr -.. ....kigt'...ti .0111 g :.:17. --,--s (71 �%��• 1 3'1151 I {..1 N' v z I ; a Qj sig v� - V �i Ilii; X i 0 O R R r ' I I', \ W c % �� l c % 4, 1 .. it 1v,r itli 1c v, 1 Io-, oE. I �, �g 1 1<-----H.,..1 tr O �. 1 5 v I , I7 lii 'Cf 1 I I' .' �1. ';_. t.,_-=-, • ..„. . ,u,... cu ,,,,, , ,,,J LE V > OW11 '--- ; ,1 0 \i/ O o Ya ' - I 1�► 3 , 0 • ler 1 K ^ v 0 1 O .1-,.. "E' I' .Y 1 N U P2rryn m� 2 I v v Iti't.. Q w w v cn 1 s v y; N U 7 Q"�a I Ql ^J ad, 1 im..," t. i ii 441111 • 1 ° QOffalall, ter'v W4811 littiS •, jMI 1 v O)— v ` ' 0 . N -0----ir " WF- 0 F— _ d ` yg T v v i JW D -- �_ S 1 L,_ ,. V 4. O J O gra \ �\,,, >� cy O m J I � ' I m — _y s I c � 8 { 111111—I � I ) 8 o1 I L 1t t.11 l� °r✓ Nt,rr' `i • • . 4 _ • r.' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper V:rira 22101 Charles A.Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner May 25, 2016 Ms. Margaret Maliszewski County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SP-2016-00011 Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage& Display Dear Ms. Maliszewski, We have reviewed the special use permit application for Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage& Display and offer the following comments; 1. The Virginia Access Management Regulations (24VAC30-73-110) states that commercial entrances may be reviewed and reconstruction, relocations,consolidation, upgrading, or a combination of these may be required if any of the following occur; 1) the property is being considered for rezoning or other local legislative action that involves a change in use, 2) if the property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat reviw, 3) there is a change(increase) in commercial use,or 4)circulation between adjoining properties becomes available. In order to comply with the Virginia Access Management Regulations, the entrances to TMPs 45-68C1 &45-68A should be consolidated allowing for a shared entrance to the two parcels. 2. Please provide both existing and proposed traffic generations as well as right-turn lane warrants. If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434)422-9894. Since % /, `Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Resident Engineer, Charlottesville Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Margaret Maliszewski From: Alexander Morrison <amorrison©serviceauthority.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:41 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Cc: vfort@rivanna.org Subject: SP201600011: Malloy Ford Outdoor Storage & Display Attachments: SP201600011_GISMap.pdf Margaret, I have reviewed the above referenced special use permit. It appears that the applicant is proposing landscaping along the Route 29 frontage. The ACSA and RWSA have water infrastructure in this area. My comments are as follows: • Show the existing ACSA and RWSA water infrastructure along the Route 29 frontage (see attached GIS Map). • Show existing ACSA and RWSA easements. • Ensure no landscaping is proposed within existing ACSA and RWSA easements. Alexander J. Morrison, P.E. Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116 (C) 434-981-5577 (F) 434-979-0698 1 A 3 3 J J � 0. I., C « 4,,i1 ¢'N N t ° U a vC d c ` � c v v atifA _m c, OO c 's m co a d° w w mL �-° a co ° p a c o •_c0 a = L O ? n n • AI ¢ y c3a ¢ ac ¢ aa � ¢` i E Y Jc VL d N; a aaotCm L ` Z` �'d d m cc (n t « c c "2 12, > > . °'= S « a; v d c cC 8 8 ) c 3 3 � 3 w ES0u 3 d2 ` 3 % % c y 0 aO VC. O ° d a 0a+ J ¢ ¢ 2 U � Z U « t « mN U 3 ¢ m t_ E « ¢ LE ° cm Uoo gy ° (4 (0 ¢ ,, Vc cm ° ¢ 3 Em ¢ a iUN m we „ > Uin g „ ` NIC Vy : az8 8 2= X c0 ¢ a a sQ Z Z c c Uaa 2 ¢Uay aUQE g W < ¢ U Nr,,v) I0ra ma u.......„, a . a 41, 11 if oy/44'6N ,.r _. .r >v4 �•ef ' in ,, 1-15. • r. '' o co + '.:, `rye t y . rCD - -. +ccv u CO _ �• i v O d %I./' `°. Ductile Iron O ga, r 6.c 1.'15CV -,_ . -."4-......., 7......„ ..,................./ o i' m - :! r e '! P;Hll _ N Y N NOc0. _ O �O� ,,.... .., 0 //4/7 . - C l6 E - OU0E w O CC r' E N91 co C L UWjNO.ON0OaN ` CcQ0 jN0O0_NET(0 n. o C U_v O"FA.E 16 0 0 n ° y E >U a\ _ + t. O = 0 Z m o ' O N T •475 i« 0 mU a 5 Ct vi� 0 �'i � 7�fOE • ✓ 3 0nami oa m y , , d ib" aN C c :ci): >'� Ui•0 0 t �_ c Y m tl / ~ °5c° mE