Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201600194 Review Comments Final Plat 2017-11-17 (4)County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434-296-5832 Memorandum To: Rev. 2: Steve Krohn (skrohn(a-resortscompanies.com) From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: December 12, 2016 Rev. 1: June 5, 2017 Rev. 2: November 17, 2017 Subject: SUB 201600194 Belvedere — Special Lot Fax 434-972-4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will approve the plat referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] [Proffer 3.2, 14-302 (A)(14) & 14-426] Greenway proffer. Proffer 3.2 states that "The greenway will be conveyed in the form of a general warranty deed...". The submitted plat, although submitted as a "special lot" is titled as an easement and the labels on the proposed greenway state "New Greenway trail easement", which is very confusing. The reference to a "general warranty deed" in the proffer is referring to a "fee simple" dedication and not an "easement". Change the plat, in title and in labels, to be for a fee simple dedication, and not an easement, to the County for public use. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The plat has been updated to be for a "fee simple" special lot. However the deed still has wording and sections that are meant for an easement and not a fee simple transfer of land. See the County Attorney's Office comment. Use the deed provided by the County Attorney's Office, modified from a standard template the County provides, that has been attached and will also be provided in a Word document file for your use. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 2. [Proffer 3.2, 14-302 (A)(14) & 14-426] Greenway proffer. Add a note on the coversheet that specifies that the land is to be dedicated to the County for public use. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The note has been provided but should be revised either to not specify specific sheets of the plat or to include all sheets of the plat that show the proposed "New Greenway Trail Parcel". Sheet V8 shows the "New Greenway Trail Parcel" but is not specified in the note and Sheet V2 does not show the proposed parcel. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 3. [Proffer 3.2, 14-302 (A)(14) & 14-426] Greenway proffer. Proffer 3.2 specifies the dedication of "... a strip of land no less than one hundred (100) feet in width...". There are at least three areas in which there is less than 100' between the edge of the river and the proposed greenway boundary. These can be seen where the existing 100' Stream Buffer is further away from the river than the proposed greenway boundary. Areas like this can been seen on Sheet. No. V4 & V5. Ensure that the proposed greenway area has a width of at least 100' of land for its whole length along the river. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. On sheet V4 there is still a small portion of the New Greenway Trail Farcel that appears to be less than 100' wide, based on the "stream buffer" lirle. Revise the plat to ensure that the New Greenway Trail Parcel has at least 100' width from the edge of the river. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. [Proffer 3.2, 14-302 (A)(14) & 14-426] Land to be dedicated in fee or reserved/green space and amenities (Table 4). Provide a table that includes all of the information from Table 4 Green Space Tabulation in the most recent Code of Development (As Revised: July 22, 2014), as the 'Approved with Rezoning', and that also specifies what has already been provided & platted, what is proposed with this special lot plat, the difference from the rezoning, and totals for all of Belvedere. Provide the deed book and page number for the open spaces provide and platted. Refer to SUB201400178 Belvedere Phase IIA-2 Final Subdivision Plat, Sheet No. V1, for an example. Ensure that, if it is approved prior to this special lot plat, the open space modifications for the recently requested variations are included in the open space chart for this plat. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: This table must include all open spaces for Belvedere and no information on provided open spaces is provided for Block 1 and most of Block 2. Provide all required information on the open space for Blocks 1 & 2. If they are platted show them as such. If they have not been platted as a separate parcel but have been shown as open space on an approved final site plan provide that information as well but specify the difference. Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn. • Depending on the timing of approvals the "Proposed with Phase IIB" should either be removed or integrated into the "Platted" portion of the table. Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. As specified in an email from Scott Collins on 8/25/17 the open space chart was to show open space through Phase IIA. The chart provided shows the open space through Phase IIB, which is not correct. Also, the amount of open space being platted with this submission changed, as is shown in the Area Table on Sheet V1, and therefore has to be updated in the open space chart provided. The planning reviewer has generated a markup of the chart which will be attached to these comments. Either modify the chart as shown in the markup or contact the planning reviewer to discuss any other needed modifications. Depending on the timing of approvals the "Platted" "Other Green Space" for block 9A or 0.43 acres may or may not be included in this table. It was not included in SUB2014-178 and it shown as "Open Space/Conservation Area" and not "Other Green Space" in the C.O.D. It is proposed to be integrated with variation request #54, but that variation request has not yet been approved. Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn as long as this plat is approved prior to other approvals for subdivisions, site plans, and/or variations that could impact the open space areas. Depending on the timing of approvals the 0.05 AC of "Open Space" in Block 9, next to "Lot 201" may or may not be included in this table. It is also designated on the ZMA graphics as "Open Space/Conservation Area" and not "Other Green Space". Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn as long as this plat is approved prior to other approvals for subdivisions, site plans, and/or variations that could impact the open space areas. o Discuss the timing of different submittals with the plan reviewer in order to coordinate the submittals and the timing of when specific items should or should not be included in the open space chart. Rev. 2: Comment addressed as long as this plat is approved prior to other approvals for subdivisions, site plans, and/or variations that could impact the open space areas. • The Green Space tabulation provide is the one that was approved with the rezoning and through variation #52. There is currently a variation request submitted and under review. If that variation is approved prior to the approval of this special plat the table provided on the coversheet will need to be updated to take any newly approved variation into account. Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn as long as this plat is approved prior to approval of variations that could impact the open space areas. 5. H4-302(A)(1)1- !Name of subdivision. Revise the name of the plat to specify that it is a special lot and a boundary line adjustment (BLA) plat. See comments below for reference to the I31.A. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 6. [14-302(A)(3)&(6)] Existing or platted streets; Alleys and shred driveways. There is line work for existing roads and trails that is shown on Sheet No. V5 and no other sheet. Also, at least one of the roads or trail lines on V5 appears to continue on to the next sheet, V4. However, no roads or trails are shown on any other sheet except V5. Ensure that all existing and proposed trails and roads are clearly represented and to their full extent within the subject parcels. The COD states that "Several trail connections will be made through adjacent stream corridors that will provide access to this Riverfront amenity area." and the ZMA graphics, exhibit 2C shows a connection to the riverfront trails. Provide information on how these trail requirement either have already or will be met. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The line work has been added to the sheet of the plat and the legends for the roads and trails. However, only sheet V3 has a label specifying "Hiking Trails". Add labels to the other sheets where the linework is shown and specify with the labels if they are trails or roads since the legend uses the single linetype for both. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 7. [14-302(A)(4)&(5)] Private Easements; Public Easements. If the existing roads or trails within the subject parcels have easements provide all required information on those easements. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 8. [14,302(A)(4)&(5)] Private Easements, Public Easements. Provide information on, and an explanation of, the "grading and access easement" shown on Sheet No. V6. This proposed easement is shown within the existing preservation easement. Provide information which specifies that a grading and access easement can be added within the preservation easement. Rev. 1: The creation of a non-contiguous residue, as part of a parcel that it is not attached to, is no longer allowed. Parcels created with a new plat must meet all lot requirement including among things road frontage and water and sewer, with the exception special lots and open spaces. See comments from Zoning (6/2/2017) on this "non-contiguous residue" and the options that are available for this area since it is part of the Belvedere NMD. Address the comment from zoning and specify it as open space or dedicate it to the County. Please note that if the area is specified as open space the area within the "Proffered 100' Reserved RAN", although designated as open space, should not be counted towards the required "Rivanna River Bottom Land" portion of the open space calculations. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. The non-contiquous residue parcel is no longer proposed. 9. [14-302(A)(7), 14-303(C)&(E)] Existing and departing lot lines; Boundary lines, Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys, easements, and shared driveways. Address the following comments: Show existing lot lines and proposed lot lines for the new greenway special lot in a way that differentiates them. Rev. 1: Comment Addressed. Add existing and proposed lot lines to the legend. Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Add an entry for the boundary lines to the legends on the sheets. Rev. 2: Comment not addressed, but withdrawn. • It appears that some of the boundary bearing and distance labels are missing for TMP 62-2c and the proposed greenway lot on Sheets No. V3, V4, & V5. Ensure that all bearing and distance labels for the lots are provided. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: o The boundary lines of the Norfolk Southern Railroad RM does not appear to be correct. It does not match the boundary shown in Deed Book 4571 Page 300. Either revise the property line, shown on sheets V2, V6, V7 & V8 to be correct or provide information on changes to the boundary since the previous plat was recorded. Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn. o Add bearing and distance lines on the Norfolk Southern Railroad R/W boundary lines. Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressee, but sufficient. No additional changes will be required, o Revise the "Approximate I ocation Proffered 100' Reserved R/W" so that it is accurately shown 100' off of the railroad right of -way. o Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn, This comment was not fully addressed because railroad comment not fully addressed. However, it does not imgact the greenway plat and therefore this comment is withdraywn. o Provide the bearing for the 709.72' boundary line, on the south side of the proposed Greenway Trail Parcel, and provide a bearing and distance for the remaining portion of that boundary line that will not be part of the proposed Greenway Trail Parcel. Rev. 2. Comment addressed. o Provide the distance for the third portion of the 827.04' long boundary of the proposed Greenway Trail Parcel in the southwest corner of the proposed parcel. There are labels for the 406.46' and 24.75' portions of that boundary but not the remaining portion. Rev. 2: Comrnent addresses. o On Sheet V4, for that same proposed boundary line, there is a note that says "See Sheet V2 for Boundary Line Call". This must be updated since a sheet was added and that boundary call is now on Sheet V3. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o Just north of the "See Sheet V2 for Boundary Line Call" note there is a boundary that does not have any bearing specified and is missing a distance on one of its sections. Add the required boundary information to this boundary line. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o Near the top of Sheet V4 there is a label that says "See Sheet V4 for Boundary Line Call". Since a sheet was added to the plat this should state "See Sheet V5 for Boundary Line Call". Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o On Sheet V5 there is a label that says "See Sheet V3 for Boundary Line Call". Since a sheet was added to the plat this should state "See Sheet V4 for Boundary Line Call". Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o On Sheet V6 there is a label that says "See Sheet V4 for Boundary Line Call". Since a sheet was added to the plat this should state "See Sheet V5 for Boundary Line Call". Rev. 2: Cornment addressed. o On Sheet V7 there is a label that says "See Sheet V5 for Boundary Line Call". Since a sheet was added to the plat this should state "See Sheet V6 for Boundary Line Call". Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o On Sheet V8 there is a label that says "See Sheet V6 for Boundary Line Call". Since a sheet was added to the plat this should state "See Sheet V7 for Boundary Line Call". Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o Provide a bearing for the proposed Greenway Trail Parcel line along the railroad r/w at the northern edge of the proposed parcel. o Rev. 2. Cornment addressed. • Point "A" specified in note #5 does not appear to be shown on the plat. Show and label Point "A„ Rev. 1: Comment addressed. If the boundary lines within the river, including those between Point "A" and Point "B, are meant to represent the center of the river then add leader lines from the labels for the center line of the river to the lines representing the center of the river. The labels are not located close enough to the lines for this to be obvious. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. • REV. 2: MEW COMMENTI On Sheet V3 there is a label that says "See Sheet V3 for Boundary Line Call". This should state "See Sheet V4 for Boundary Line Call". 10. [14-302(A)(7)) The line work on the coversheet, for both the vicinity map and the existing features of the larger site, are not legible. Increase is darkness and/or width of lines so that they can be distinguished on the plat even when copied or scanned. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The existing parcel line that divides TMP62A3-1 and :C-MP 2-2C is not fully shown in the existing features graphics on the cover sheet. Ensure the fell length of that existing parcel line is shown. Rev. 2: Comme—nt was redundant yrith ft19 k elovv, and therefore being, withdrawn. 11. [14-303(C)&(E), 14-303(B)&(F)] Boundary lines; Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys, easements, and shared driveways; Section name or number; Identification of sections, blocks and lots. Provide all required information on residue lots created by the special lot. The creation of the special lot will result in the creation of two residue lots form TMP 62-2C. However, these residue lots are not labeled, dimensioned, or calculated. They must also be shown to be code compliant or they need to be combined with another existing lot. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. There is still one residue lot shown on the plat that is not contiguous and would not meet all of the requirements of the subdivision and zoning ordinances. It is also part of the Belvedere NMD and must meet its requirements. See the Zoning comments and comment # 8 above. Update the coversheet "Area Table" once this is resolved. .Rev. Comment addressed. The non-contiouous residue parcel is no longer pro oossed. 12. [ 14-302(A)(9) & 14-4061 Building sites on proposed lots; Remnants. Provide a "Building Sites:" note to specify that the residue of parcel TMP 62A3-1 contains a building site which complies with the CODE. The two areas of residue of TiAP 62-2C would not contain a building site. Provide all required information on residue parcels and ensure all resulting parcels can meet code requirements. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The non-contiguous residue of TMP 62A3-1 & 62-2C, at the furthest north portion of the site and shown on sheets V7 and V8, does not appear to meet the minimum requirements for a lot. The residue is also zoned NMD and must meet the requirements of the ZMA and Code of Development. See the zoning comment and comments #8 and 11 above. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. The non-contiguous residue parcel is no longer proposed. 13. [14-302(A)(15) & 14-314] Identification of all owners and certain interest holders; Identification of all interest of the County in property. Provide the address of the owner of the two parcels effected by this special lot plat. Specify the owner of the preservation easement. Specify who will be the owner of the proposed grading and access easement. Add a note that specifies that the Greenway special lot is to be dedicated to the County for public use. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The address shown on sheet V2 for Bondstone Ventures, LLC is not the same address as shown on the County's Online GIS property data. Confirm that the address provided is the current address of Bondstone Ventures, LLC. Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. Ownership has changed for most if not all parcel associated with this plat. County GIS no longer shows Bondstone Ventures, LLC as the owner of TMP62-213 and therefore with the amendment to the "Declaration of Aquatic and Wetland Restrictions", which must be recorded prior to this plat (see County Attorney's office comments), the information on Sheet V2 will no longer be correct. Either clarify why Bondstone Ventures, LLC is still correct and address the comment above about the address of that company or revise the plat to show the correct owners that will be party to the amendment to the "Declaration of Aquatic and Wetland Restrictions". 14. [14-302(B)(5)] Zoning classification. Revise note 8 to specify that TMP 62-2C is zoned NMD and that TMP 62A3-1 is split zoned as both R4 and NMD. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 15. [14-302(B)(6)] Tax Map and Parcel Number. On the coversheet, when specifying the name and addresses of the owners of the lots, include information on both TMP 62-2C and TMP 62A3-1 since both of these lots are impacted by this special lot plat. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 16. [14-302(B)(8) and COD] Yards. Add a note on the coversheet that specifies the yards for both the R4 and NMD zoned portion of the two subject lots. For the NMD portion of the note it can refer to Table 9 in Belvedere's COD. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following: • T hero is a variation request submitted that wiil modify the yards/setback for some, of the Belvedere NMD lots. If this is approved prior to the approval of this plat the yard iniormation wiii need to oc updated on this piat prior to approval. Rev. 2: Comment withdrawn as Iona as variations are not approved prior to approval of this plat. Add a note with the "Building setbacks for NMD Zoned Areas:" that specifies that the setbacks shown are those for the C.O.D. through Variation#52. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o There is a type in the "Building Setbacks for R4 Zoned Areas:". The rear setback minimum should be 20', not 2'. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. o Include the maximum setbacks for the front, garage, side, and rear in the "Building Setbacks for R4 Zoned Areas:". Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 17. [14•-303'D)] Acreage of lots. Include a calculation for the existing and proposed TMP 62-2C, 62A3-1, Greenway special lot parcel and any residue parcels. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Update the "Area Table:" to address the comments above about the non-contiguous parcel being designated as open space or dedicated to the County. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 18. [COD 4.21 The line work for the Future North Free State Connector Extension Road, which is parallel to the railroad tracks, is not legible. Increase its darkness and/or width of line so that it can be distinguished on the plat even when copied or scanned. Rev. 1: Comment Addressed. 19. [14-302(A)(7)] The line work on the coversheet, for both the vicinity map and the existing features of the larger site, are not legible. Increase is darkness and/or width of lines so that they can be distinguished on the plat even when copied or scanned. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The existing parcel line that divides TMP62A3-1 and TMP62-2C is not fully shown in the existing features graphics on the cover sheet. Ensure the full length of that existing parcel line is shown. Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. The linework for the vicinity map now appears to show the areas of DEQ's Proposed Enhancement Areas. This linework should not be include in the vicinity map. 20. [Comment] See zonings comments on the revisions to the declaration of restriction. As stated in an email on 3/30/16, zoning requested to review the "Amendment to Declaration of Aquatic and Wetlands Restrictions" before it is recorded. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Declaration has been submitted, however the following still needs to be addressed: o DEQ has requested changes to the proposed declaration that must be addressed. o The date specified for the Proffers appears to be incorrect. The date of the proffer signatures was October 10, 2005, not October 19, 2005. Revise this date in the declaration or provide information on what the date shown is correct. o When the declaration is ready for signatures the date specified as the date of the amendment will need to be updated. April 2017 is no longer correct. Rev. 2: Comment not addressed. No revision to the "Amendment to Declaration of Aquatic and Wetlands Restrictions" appears to have been submitted with the other documents in this submission. Address the following: o DEQ has requested changes to the proposed declaration that must be addressed. o The date specified for the Proffers appears to be incorrect. The date of the proffer signatures was October 10, 2005, not October 19, 2005. Revise this date in the declaration or provide information on what the date shown is correct. o When the declaration is ready for signatures the date specified as the date of the amendment will need to be updated. April 2017 is no longer correct. o See and address RWSA's comment about the existing conflict with the DEQ preservation easement. o See and address the Parks and Recreation comment. The amendment to the declaration should be modified as needed to address this comment. o See and address the County Attorney's office's comment. 21. [Comment] A deed of dedication for the greenway area must be submitted to the County for review and approval. The special lot plat will not be approved until the deed of dedication is approved by the County Attorney's office and Zoning. The deed of dedication is to be recorded with the plat. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Deed of dedication has been submitted. However it is still includes wording as if an easement was being dedicated and not a fee simple lot being transferred. See the County Attorney's office's comments. Attached find a new deed that has been edited by the County Attorney's office. A Word document form of the new deed will be provided for use. Rev. 2: Comment not fully addressed. See the County Attorney's office's comments. 22, [Comment] As noted in RWSA comments, show and label the RWSA sewer line showing ownership and sizes. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. As discussed with the applicant, RWSA has agreed to provide the as -built plans so that the information can be added to the plat. Once the as -built is available it will be forwarded to you. Revise the plat to include the information specified comment. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. See revised RWSA comments. 23. [Comment] Comments from other reviewers are attached. Engineering had no objection. Comments from Parks and Recreation, the County Attorney's office, Zoning, RWSA, and ACSA must be addressed before this Special Plat will be approved. Rev. 1: Comments from other reviewers are attached. Comments from County Attorney's office, Zoning, RWSA, and DEQ must be addressed before this Special Plat will be approved. The DEQ comments on the deed were sent to you directly and have not been attached to this document. Rev. 2: Comment not fullv addressed. See attached comments. Comments from all reviewers, including but not limited to the County Attorney's office, Parks & Recreation, Zoning, ACSA and RWSA must be addressed before this Special Lot Plat will be approved. We are awaiting DEQ comments but those comments will not be complete since it appears that the "Amendment to Declaration of Aauatic and Wetlands Restrictions" was not submitted for review with the other documents in this submission. 24. [NEW COMMENT] Specify on the plat in a note below Table 4 on the cover sheet when, and with what instrument, the remaining 8.34 acres of "Rivanna River Bottomland" listed in Table 4 of the Code of Development will be designated and platted as Conservation Area open space. Rev. 2: Comment was not addressed, bvt staff is withdrawing the comrne.nt. 25. [NW COMMENT] The proposed plat will not be approved until it has been confirmed by DEQ and the Army Corps that all fines and violations have been resolved/paid. See the County Attorney's office, Zonings, and Parks and Recreation's comments. 26. [NEW COMMENT] The proposed plat will not be approved until it has been confirmed by DEQ and the Army Corps that either there are no required plantings within the greenway area or documentation specifying that Albemarle County will not be liable or responsible for planting, and the maintenance of the required plantings, has been created and put in place. See the County Please contact Pat rfi in the Planning Division by using psaternye(a)albemarle.orq or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for further i r tion. j Review Comments for SUB201600194 lNo Sub-ApplicationType Selected - Project Name: BELVEDERE Date Completed: Thursday, November 16, 2017 Department1DivisianfAgency: Review Sys: Reviewer: County Attorneys Oifice Requested Changes 1 _ Reversion clause in Deed — Please replace the sentence 'If Grantee [County] has not commenced construction of a greenway within 10 gears of the date of this Deed of Dedication then Grantee shall reconvey the Property to Grantors or their successors and assigns for use as open space' with the following sentence: Pursuant to Proffer No_ 3_2 of ZMA No_ 2004- 0000i, if the greenway is not used for the purpose for which it is dedicated within ten (10) rears from the date of dedication, the County is obligated to transfer the land back to and for the use of the Owner to be used as open space-' 2_ The final 'Amendment to Declaration of Aquatic and Wetlands Restrictions' should be recorded immediately before the final Deed of Dedication- 3- New Belvedere shall provide a title opinion verifying that the greenway property is free from any liens, including any Department of Environmental Quality andiorArmy Corps penalties before recordation- 4- The Albemarle County Department of Parks & Recreation shall certify that the proposed greenway parcel is an acceptable size and location_ Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 11 V1712017 Review Comments for SUB201600194 NoSub-Application Type Selected - Project Name: BELVEDERE Date Completed: Fnday, June 02, 2017 DepartmentlDivisionlAgency: Review sus: Reviewer: Rebecca Ragsdale CDD Zoning I Requested Changes Based on the Application Plan for Belvedere, the non-contiguous residue parcel may only be used for open space, not as area developed for lots_ The non-contiguous residue must be desinated as open space for Belvedere_ Or, if the applicant is willing, this area can also be dedicated to the County with the special lot_ The grading and access easement shown on Sheet 6 must be defined_ The DEQ and Army Corps declaration of restrictions must be amended prior to recordation of this plat. DOCLImentation MLIst be provided that any outstanding fines from DEO have been paid before the greenway is dedicated_ Email correspondence }r5,ith the applicant on this was forwarded to you_ Parks and the CountyAttorney's office should be reviewers with each submittal of this plat_ Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 11 V1712017 Review Comments for SUB201600194 NoSub-ApplicationType Selected - Project Name: BELVEDERE Date Completed: Thursday, November 16, 2017 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review Sys: Reviewer: Victoria Fort LJ RA Re"uested Changes Resolve the conflict between the existing RWSA sewer easement and the DEQ preservation easement as part of amending the } deed of restrictions_ Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 11 V1712017 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Parks and Recreation 401 McIntire Road, Room 323 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296 - 5844 MEMORANDUM TO: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner Planning and Community Development Department FROM: Dan Mahon, Greenway Coordinator Department of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Belvedere Greenway (SDP2016-194 Belvedere) DATE: Nov. 17, 2017 I have reviewed the plat for the proposed greenway trail and can approve it with the following request. 1) Albemarle County will not be held responsible for the cost of establishing and maintaining any trees or shrubs required within the area defined by the compensatory mitigation plan where there might be an overlap or encroachment of the conservation area into the future greenway corridor.