Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600060 Correspondence Final Site Plan and Comps. 2017-06-16 • �5 �,c �- Dominion v? I h Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive ' Charlottesville, VA 22911 A o, �I� 434.979.8121 (p) 'ie*et 434.979.1681 (f) °ts DominionEng.com June 16, 2017 Megan Yaniglos Principal planner Community Development Albemarle County 401 McIntire Rd Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SDP-2016-055 Moscone Center-Final Site Plan Dear Megan, Please find enclosed for your review, five(5)sets of Final Site Plan. These plans have been revised to address the Final Site Plan comments dated March 27th, 2017. CDD ARB—Margaret Maliszewski 1. This site falls within the Rt. 250 Entrance Corridor(EC). Development on this parcel is eligible for staff level design review. The applicant should submit an ARB application, checking the box in Part B under"Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness"for"Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC,"and the corresponding checklist. It is recommended that site sections illustrating the degree of visibility of the buildings as viewed from RT. 250 be included with the submittal. Portions f the proposed buildings that are not visible from the EC are not subject to review. RESPONSE: Per email confirmation with Margaret Maliszweski 5/9/2017 "no ARB application is needed at this time". She has also said that her comment has been updated in County View. CDD Engineering—Matthew Wentland 1. An approved WPO plan will be required before site plan approval. RESPONSE: Comment noted. 2. A copy of the PPP will need to be included in the SWPPP before beginning construction. Areas of possible pollutants will need to be identified on the plan sheet(such as concrete washouts, dumpsters, and portable toilets). RESPONSE: PPP areas have been identified on all phases of this project. 3. Provide verification that the existing SWM pond is still operating as designed and is still adequate for the new development. RESPONSE: The amendment for SWM pond was submitted 5/26/17 to Matthew Wentland. is % 4• Dominion a;4 � i. Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive • ,I OFF Charlottesville, VA 22911 e d4 l 434.979.8121 (p) ���`e ens ' 434.979.1681 (f) `ts DominionEng.com Albemarle County Department of Community Development 1. [32.5.2(l)]A plat and associated deeds will be required for all easements outside of the right of way prior to final site plan approval.Revi:Plat has not been submitted to date.Comment not addressed. RESPONSE: A plat and associated deeds will be submitted under separate cover. 2. [32.7.9.5(e)]Where parking is located so that parked cars are visible from an off-site street, low shrubs between the street and parking lot are needed. Provide shrubs for any of the parking areas that are visible from Olympia Drive. Revl:Additional screening shrubs need to be provided.The parking in front of Building#2 needs to be screened,as well as the parking areas from Rolkin Road. RESPONSE: Additional shrubs have been provided in front of all parking areas and areas that are visible from Rolkin Road on SP6(Landscape plan). 3. [4.12.13; 32.5.2(n)]Two loading spaces are required. Provide the loading spaces and adjust your parking calculations accordingly.Also list the loading spaces on sheet 2. Revi:A note on the plan requesting that loading spaces not be required is not sufficient. Please provide written justification for the loading spaces for the Zoning Administrator and County Engineer to review.The justification should include information addressing 4.12.13(f)below: f The requirements of this subsection may be modified or waived in an individual case if the zoning administrator_ in consultation with the county engineer, finds that the public health_ safety or welfare would be equally or better served by the modification or waiver: that the modification or waiver would not be a departure from sound engineering and design practice; and that the modification or waiver would not otherwise be contrary to the purpose and intent of this chapter. In granting a modification or waiver. the zoning administrator may impose such conditions as deemed necessary to protect the public health.safety or welfare. RESPONSE: The modification request has been withdrawn. Adequate loading spaces and dumpsters have been provided and the calculations have been updated on sheet SP2. 4. Additional Comments:The site plan cannot be approved until the Architectural Review Board application and review/approval occurs.To do date, an ARB application has not been submitted for this site plan. RESPONSE: Per email confirmation with Margaret Maliszweski 5/9/2017 "no ARB application is needed at this time". She has also said that her comment has been updated in County View. 2 of 6 el5 7000 �,e �110k Dominion any I Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 �,. . 434.979.8121 (p) 'eee ets 434.979.1681 (f) its DominionEng.com VDOT—Charles A. Kilpatrick 1. Sight distance profiles are required RESPONSE: Sight distance profiles have been shown on SP12. 2. The minimum entrance radius, without separate truck access, is 42 feet. RESPONSE: The entrance radius has been increased to 42'for the main entrance without separate truck access. See SP4. 3. In a previous email correspondence with the applicant concerning the proposed parallel parking on Olympia Drive we noted that this area must have adequate drainage. It is unclear how this has been addressed. RESPONSE: Spot shots and grading lines have been provided to show that there will be positive drainage for the water in the parking lane so that there will be no ponding. Albemarle County Service Authority-Alexander Morrison • General Comments and Sheet SP1 o The PE signature on the cover page must be original. RESPONSE: The signature on the cover page is original with this submittal. o Resubmit with final water/sewer data sheets and ensure they only include the public ACSA infrastructure that is proposed. RESPONSE: New water/sewer data sheets have been provided with only public infrastructure that is proposed. o Confirm that there is no desire for irrigation on this site. RESPONSE: There is no desire for irrigation on this site. o Provide fixture counts if available so the ACSA can determine if a 1" connection will suffice for each building or if a large service tap is required. RESPONSE: Fixture counts will be provided when the owner applies for the building permit. 3 of 6 .c Ao<s e,� .3: Dominion ?` it . Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive l Charlottesville, VA 22911 t.41% 'wa. � 434.979.8121 (p) -e 434.979.1681 (f) e°ts DominionEng.com o Confirm that sprinkler systems are not required for these building (I have also reached out to Fire/Rescue separately to confirm). RESPONSE: No sprinkler system will be necessary for Building 2 per conversation with Keith Huckstep. • Sheet SP3 o Propose a new manhole for MH E-D. Due to the existing cored connections in the existing manhole the new connection cannot be completed. A new manhole will be required. RESPONSE: A new manhole has been proposed for MH E-D with this submittal. o Add notes that the pump around plan will be required for review and approval by the ACSA prior to the pre-construction meeting. RESPONSE: A note has been provided on sheet SP4 that the pump around plan will be required for review and approval by ACSA prior to the pre-construction meeting. •Sheet SP4 o Call out the 8"gate valve and plug to be restrained to the tee. RESPONSE: The 8"valve and plug has been called out to be restrained to the tee. o Move the proposed building 1 meter between the sidewalk and curb. RESPONSE: The building 1 meter has been moved between the sidewalk and curb. o Propose a 1" tap for building 1 water service. RESPONSE: A 1"tap has been proposed for the water service for building 1. o Provide a new easement for the relocated fire hydrant on Olympia Drive. RESPONSE: A new easement has been provided for the relocated fire hydrant'on Olympia Drive. o Confirm if a fire hydrant will be required on site to meet spacing requirements through Fire/Rescue. RESPONSE: Access has been provided within 150'of all outside building areas. A FH has been provided in front of Building 2. Robbie Gilmer has requested a FH to be adjacent to Building 2 if no sprinkler is proposed. 4 of 6 _ 5 cea%s �',e'tL. Dominion „ Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 A . I, 434.979.8121 (p) 'Pe-PS 434.979.1681 (f) cts DominionEng.com o Call out the water services as 1” Domestic line tap. RESPONSE: Domestic water services have been called out as 1" line taps. o Call out all vertical and horizontal bends by size and degree. RESPONSE: All vertical and horizontal bends have been called out by size and degree on sheer SP4. o Call out the sewer lateral connection to the main as a wye connection. RESPONSE: The sewer lateral connection to the main has been called out as a wye connection. o Call out manhole EX-D as a new manhole. Note that is a drop manhole and call out size and drop configuration (60" internal drop of 48" external drop). RESPONSE: Manhole EX-D has been called out as a new manhole. A note has been added to SP4 that it is a drop manhole with size and drop configuration of 48"external drop. See profile sheet SP9. o Call out manhole C to D as private. RESPONSE: Manhole C to D has been called out as private. o Provide a curb cut or roll top curb in the parking space near the rear of the lot where the water main leaves the parking lot. RESPONSE: A curb cut has been provided at the parking space near the rear of the lot where the water main leaves the parking lot. o Call out a horizontal bend for the proposed water connection at the existing gate valve. RESPONSE: This comment has become null and void due to the change in waterline alignment. The horizontal bend has been abandoned for extending the existing waterline to a proposed 8"x8"tee. o Revise manhole E location so it is not within a parking space. You can also propose an island in lieu of the parking space so you do not need to revise the alignment. It appears you will still meet the parking requirements if you eliminate I parking space. RESPONSE: The location of manhole E has been revised so it is not within a parking space. 5 of 6 • ' Is e 440 Dominion ,,y` I I" Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive ( ' i Charlottesville,VA 22911 d,a OK �,d,�, , 434.979.8121 (p) 4i *ite' 434.979.1681 (f) ects DominionEng.com •Sheet SP6 o Revise the trees in conflict with the proposed ACSA infrastructure as shown on the plans. RESPONSE: The trees in conflict with ACSA infrastructure have been moved. • Sheet SP9 o Decrease the slope from MH-A to EX-D so the drop connection inverts difference is at least 24". RESPONSE: The slope from MH-A to EX-D has been decreased so the difference in the drop connection is at least 24". o Propose a new manhole for MH EX-D as either a 60"with an internal drop or 48"with an external drop. RESPONSE: A new manhole,48"with external drop has been proposed for MH EX-D with designation proposed MH"Al". o Call out PVC as SDR-26. RESPONSE: SDR-26 has been called out or the PVC. o Call out manhole EX-2A to EX-2B as private. RESPONSE: EX-2A and EX-2B has been called out as private • Sheet SP14 and SP15 o New technical details have been adopted by the ACSA. I will send a PDF binder of all new technical details. The following technical details should be included: RESPONSE: The new details have been updated for all details. We trust the above adequately addresses your comments. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ‘)all ' Dustin . Greene, EIT 6 of 6 ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting 23 May 2017 Ms. Mean Yani.los Principal Planner County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 Mr. Derek Bedarf E93.1 County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 RE:SDP-2016-06o-Rivanna Village Block A Villas Final Site Plans Dear Megan and Derek, This letter is to accompany the Final Site Plan revisions to serve as written response to your comments provided in your November 21, 2017 letter 1. [32.5.2(1)]A plat and associated deeds will be required for all easements prior to final site plan approval. If not contained in open space,all trails should be within easements.Revi:Comment not adequately addressed.All trails outside of open space need to be within easements.The final site plan cannot be approved until this plat is reviewed and approved. Response:Proposed trail layout associated with Block A Villas has been revised slightly to minimize easements required from fire house property.A majority of the trail is in open space areas.Where the trail is proposed on lots or on the fire house property,a proposed easement has been added to the plan. This easement is being coordinated with the surveyor working on the plat. 5. [32.5.2(n);COD] Label the material for the 6'trail. Per the code of development this should be asphalt. Also in the label, include the sheet number where the detail can be found. Revi:Comment not adequately addressed.While a couple of details are provided, it is not clear which detail applies to which trail.Also,the"nature trail"does not state the material,which as stated previously,the code of development calls for all asphalt trails. Response:The shared use path detail has been removed from the plan since the shared use path is being constructed as part of the road plans SUB2o15-119.The nature trail detail has been removed from the plan.The 6'trail plan labels and detail have been revised to clearly indicate that the trail shall be a 6'wide asphalt trail. 7. [Code of Development Section 4.2]Covenants to Provide Architectural Review Committee.Prior to final site plan and/or final subdivision plat approval a Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions for Rivanna Village shall be reviewed/approved by the County Attorney's office in consultation with County Planning staff.The above document shall be approved by the County and recorded by the developer prior to final site plan and/or final subdivision plat approval.The DB page reference information of this recorded document shall be noted on the final site plan and/or final 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting subdivision plat.This has not been provided to date. Revi:Comment not addressed. Response:The required neighborhood documents have been prepared by the project attorney and are being reviewed by the owner.The will be submitted for approval to you and the County Attorney for review and approval. E93.3.—Derek Bedarf Please provide road name alternatives to Sycamore Street and Village Avenue. Response: See below for road name alternative to Village Avenue East Rivanna Ave East Village St Village Park Ave See below for road name alternatives for Sycamore Street Tank Road Ladder Lane I hope that you find this information useful in your consideration for approval. Per your letter,please find the attached 2 copies of plans. Please feel free to call with any questions or request for additional information. Sincerely,� in Alan G. Franklin, PE 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com o. ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting 12 October 2016 Mr.Christopher Perez Senior Planner County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 RE:SUB2015-00119-Rivanna Village,Phase 1, Public Road,Water,&Sanitary Sewer Plans Dear Christopher, This letter is to accompany the Road Plan revisions to serve as written response to your comments provided in your October 19, 2015 SDP2015-036 Initial Site Plan Approval letter. 1. [Comment]This application was reviewed against Site Development Plan requirements only. Road plans being reviewed simultaneously and comments will be provided under separate cover.Also, it appears that lot lines are shown on the plan but no subdivision application was submitted at this time.Any subdivision or road plan related comments are provided for reference only unless necessary for site plan approval. Response: No action required at this time. 2. [ZMA20130001 Proffer 101 Prior to Initial Site PI'an approval submit Construction Traffic Management not be a Planas esr ibed in the proffer. Please coordinate'CTM'with road plans under review. This item n of initial site plan approval. Please be awar : 'The owner shall obtain approval of the CTM Plan by the Director before the County approv s any grading permit for the property..." Comment Addr ssed:The Construction Traffic Management(CTM)Plan has been submitted and is now Under review 1 -19-15. 3. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 10A]Assure the CMT establishes the location,design and width of the shared use path (the 'trail' as labeled on the initial site plan). Response:CTM included the location of the shared use path and has been approved. 4. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 3] Route 250 and Eastern Entrance Improvements. "The owner shall either construct left and right turn lanes on Route 250 at the eastern entrance to the property or bond these improvements prior to approval of the first site plan or subdivision plat for the development..." The above shall take place prior to final site plan approval. Response:The owner intends to bond these improvements.A construction estimate from the owner's site contractor was provided to the County Engineer. It is not clear that this estimate is an acceptable determination of the required bond amount. Please advise on how to best proceed. 5. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 8,Code of Development Section 5.4.1]Landscape Buffer along Glenmore Way. On the plan provide the full width of the retaining walls to include the underground geo grid,as the geo grid is part of the retaining wall. Notably retaining walls are not permitted to be within the 70' buffer per Section 5.4.1 of the Code of Development.As depicted on sheet C2.2 the existing trees within the required 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting 70' buffer are being disturbed to provide for the retaining walls; however,as discussed above this is not permitted. Revise appropriately so no portion of the retaining wall is disturbing the 70' buffer. Response:The layout of the retaining walls in question has been revised and a construction detail provided to demonstrate that the retaining wall and its associated structural elements will reside outside of the 70' buffer. 6. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 8,Code of Development Section 5.4.1]Landscape Buffer along Glenmore Way. On the final site plan depict the amount of disturbance and the grading required for the installation of the trail. Response: Proposed grades have been added to the shared-use path in the landscape buffer. 7. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 8,Code of Development Section 5.4.1]Landscape Buffer along Glenmore Way. On the site plan assure that the entire 70' landscape buffer within Block A is depicted, as the final site plan dictates the landscaping requirements for this feature. Notably, sheet C1.1 will not be adequate on the final site plan to meet the above mentioned requirement as it is merely an overview. Revise appropriately. Response:Additional sheets were added to the plan set to satisfy this request. 8. [32.7.9] Landscape Plan.On sheet C2.0 it is noted that Screen Plantings are Part of Road Plans; however, these types of plantings(screening)are required to be captured and accounted for on the final site plan's landscape plan. Revise appropriately. On 9-15-15 Road plan review SUB2015-119 specifically comment 6 has corrected this issue,all 70' buffer landscaping shall be on the road plan rather than the final site plan; however,on the final site plan provide a note that the landscaping in this buffer is depicted on the road plan SUB2015-119. Response: Note added. 9. [32.5.2(e),32.7.9.4(c)]Existing landscape features."The landscape plan shall show the existing landscape features on the site, which shall include:(1) Wooded areas.All wooded areas, identifying whether they are composed of evergreen, deciduous, or a mix of type, and showing the location of the tree line;(2) Small groups of trees and individual trees. Small groups of trees and individual trees of six(6)inch caliper or greater, or ornamental trees of any size, identified by common name and approximate caliper and showing their location;" Assure that the final site plan provides the above detail for the site,with special attention to the 70' buffer area on Glenmore Way. Revise appropriately. Response: Notes and hatching were added to the areas of existing woodlands to be preserved. 10. [32.5.2(m)]Ingress and Egress. The proposed first entrance of'Winding Road'from Glenmore Way(near Villa Al on the site plan) is not depicted on the site plan but rather only depicted on the road plan. Prior to final site plan approval the entrance and the entire duration of the proposed road shall be depicted on the site plan and approved by VDOT. (See VDOT comments dated 8-18-15, with special attention to#3). Notably, sheet C1.1 will not be adequate on the final site plan to meet the above mentioned requirement as it is merely an overview. Revise appropriately. Response:Additional sheets were added to the plan set to satisfy this request. 11. [32.5.2(n)]Proposed Improvements.Assure that all improvements(except the single family detached units)within Block A are depicted on the final site plan to include all trails/shared use paths.Notably, sheet C1.1 will not be adequate on the final site plan to meet the above mentioned requirement as it is merely an overview. Revise appropriately. 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting Response:Additional sheets were added to the plan set to satisfy this request. 12. [Code of Development Section 4.2]Covenants to Provide Architectural Review Committee. Prior to final site plan and/or final subdivision plat approval a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Rivanna Village shall be reviewed/approved by the County Attorney's office in consultation with County Planning staff.The above document shall be approved by the County and recorded by the developer prior to final site plan and/or final subdivision plat approval.The DB page reference information of this recorded document shall be noted on the final site plan and/or final subdivision plat. Response:To be submitted separately by the owner. 13. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 9]Affordable housing. The owner shall provide affordable housing equal to 15%of the total residential units constructed on the property.On all final site plan and final subdivision plats assure that the affordable units for the entire development are clearly tracked in a chart provided on the cover sheet, regardless if any affordable units are proposed for said block. Response:Chart added to Sheet CO.1. 14. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 5,32.5.2(d)]An easement plat by David A.Jordan of Roudabush,Gale& Associates [SUB2015-138 Rivanna Village Easement plat] has been submitted to the County,which proposes various easements required for the grading, drainage,SWMP/BMP,and Trails...etc for improvements in Block A and H. Prior to final site plan approval the required easements shall be reviewed and approved by the County and recorded in the Clerk's Office by the developer.The DB page reference information of this recorded document shall be noted on the final site plan. "If the required easements are not provided, alternative storm water management(to be consistent with the storm water requirements for the overall project)will be provided which does not compromise the design of Block A and H." Response:The easement in question has been approved and recorded and it noted on the approved road plans(SUB2015-119). It is not noted on this site plan because it does not seem to relate to Block A improvements. 15. [Code of Development-Attachment B-sheet 7] Open Space and Recreational Plan. -To avoid confusion, throughout the plan revise the labels for the "Open Amenity Space"to be consistent with the rezoning. For this Block please label these areas as "Open Space/Green Space Area: Linear Park w/Trails". The reasoning behind the above request is that these areas in Block A are labeled in Attachment B dated 7-15-13 as"Linear Park with Trails" (which is a portion of the sites' 13.26 acres of this designation), which is a part of the sites' "Amenity Area" (which makes up 31.68 acres of the site),which is a part of the developments total "Open Space/Greenspace Area" (which makes up 37.52 acres of the site). Excluding areas in Block K. -Also,to avoid confusion it is advisable to track the Open Space Statistics for the development as page 7 of Attachment B did (see below). Response: The Amenity and Greenspace areas for Block A have been listed in the table that is similar in form to that which was included in the rezoning package. 16. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 6, Code of Development Section 8, 32.5.2(o)] Construction and Dedication of Parks and Recreation Improvements. 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering, Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting Block A contains 'Linear Park Areas' subject to Proffer 6 and Section 8 of the Code of Development, as such, on the site plan provide a note that states: "Linear Park Area hereby dedicated to public use"Prior to approval of the final subdivision plat County Planning staff shall coordinate with the Director of Planning, Parks & Recreation, and the County Engineering to determine if the land shall be dedicated with the final subdivision plat for this Block or at a later date. The dedication of this land shall be in a form acceptable to the County Attorney and the Director of Planning. Response: No action required at this time. 17. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On Sheet CO.1, under project data the site plan lists all tax map parcels involved in the rezoning. Please revise this note to specify which tax map parcels this site plan covers (93A1-4 and 79-25A). Response:Tax map and parcel numbers have been revised to include only the parcels within Block A. 18. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data, under Proffers assure that an additional note is added which stated that a Code of Development dated June 9, 2014 and titled: "Rivanna Village Amended and Restated Code of Development" applied to this development. Response: Reference to the Code of Development has been added under the Proffers heading in the Project Data. 19. [Comment] If the applicant chooses or is required to resubmit the initial site plan on sheet 1 assure that the site plan number is included:SDP2015-36). Response: N/A. Plan is being submitted as a final site plan. 20. [32.5.2(a),(b)] General Information. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data, Parking Requirements are listed; however,the parking calculations account for Single Family Detached Units; however, such a unit type is not being proposed on this site plan. Revise the parking calculations to omit that unit type to avoid any confusion. Response: Parking calculations have been revised to address this comment. 21. [32.5.2(b),4.12.6,Code of Development Section 7.1]Parking. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data, Parking Requirements of 61 spaces are correctly listed for the 27 Single Family Attached units; however,the calculations should be broken down to their simplest form.Assure that the number of bedrooms for each unit is provided/listed on the plan(2 of more bedrooms *27=54 required parking spaces).Also, assure that the required Guest Spaces are separately calculated and listed(27 units/4= 7 guest spaces). If the guest spaces are not located on each individual lot and are proposed within the R/W assure that the physical location of the guest spaces are labeled and marked (stripped or signed)on the final site plan, currently they are not depicted on the site plan. Response: Parking calculations have been revised to address this comment. 22. [32.5.2(b),4.12.6]Parking. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data, Parking Requirements, under Provided Parking 124 spaces are accounted for; however,this far exceeds the maximum 20%over the required spaces which are permitted by the ordinance. Prior to final site plan approval revise appropriately. Response: Parking calculations have been revised to address this comment. 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting 23. [32.5.2(b),4.12.6] Parking. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data, Parking Requirements are listed as each unit providing a 2 car garage and a driveway which can handle 2 parked cars.Also on sheet C2.0 Villa A3 provides a typical dimension for the garage and driveway; however,the dimensions provided are not universal for all of the driveways, nor all of the garages.On the site plan dimension each driveway and each garage to assure the required parking can be accommodated. Revise appropriately. Each parking space shall be a minimum of 9' wide by 18' long. -The proposed 16'wide garage does not provide enough width to accommodate two parked cars. Either reduce the number of'provided' spaces in the garage or widen the garage to accommodate two vehicles.If the latter is chosen, when dimensioning the garage please take into account the garage entrance door walls and interior drywall. Revise appropriately. -The proposed 16'wide driveway does not provide enough width to accommodate two parked cars. Either reduce the number of'provided'spaces in the driveway or widen the driveway to accommodate two vehicles. Revise appropriately. Revise appropriately. Response:The driveway aprons have been revised to 18'wide for each unit to accommodate two parked cars outside of each unit.The garages are intended to be two-car garages but we are unsure of the exact dimensions,therefore the garage spaces are not included in the parking calculations.Guest parking will occur on the street. 24. [32.5.2(b),4.12.6] Parking. `Winding Road' is listed as 29' FC/FC and 60' R/W.The Code of Development provides that typical road section type with either parking on one side or no street parking.What is being proposed for this Block, please include a typical road section in the site plan. If street parking is proposed on the site plan please label and sign appropriately(ie. parking on one side and depict it or no parking). Revise appropriately. Response:The typical section for Winding Road has been included on the plan showing that the street section is 29' FC/FC with parking allowed on one side.The street parking spaces are depicted on the plans. 25. [Code of Development Section 3.3]Lot Regulations/Minimum lot size.Assure that the minimum lot size for each proposed duplex or multiplex lot can be met. Currently no lot minimums are provided on the site plan. While not required for site plan approval, it is advisable to keep track of this for subdivision purposes, as it will be required prior to final subdivision plat approval. The minimum lot size for these units is 3,000 SF. There is no maximum. Response:The square footage of each lot has been added to the plan to verify minimum lot size requirements are met. 26. [Code of Development Section 3.3]Lot Regulation/Setbacks. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data,Setbacks, add a Side Setback for: any unit which has a road or alley at its side,the minimum side yard setback is increased to 15 feet. Response:Side setback for units with side alley has been added to the Project Data on Sheet C0.1. 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan©alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting 27. [32.5.2(b),Code of Development Section 3.4] Building Height Regulations. On sheet CO.1, under Project Data,assure a note is added which lists the maximum building height for proposed structures.The Code of Development has a limit of 50'for building height. Response:The maximum allowable building height has been added to the Project Data on Sheet CO.1. 28. [32.5.2(d)] Managed Slopes. There are managed slopes in various portions of Block A,assure they are correctly depicted and labeled on the final site plan.Any disturbance of these slopes shall be per the County's Design Guidelines. Response: Location of existing managed steep slopes has been added to the plans. 29. [32.5.2(k)]Proposed sewer and drainage facilities. On the site plan for the storm drainage system provide direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows. Response: Flow direction arrows have been added to the storm and sanitary drains. 30. [32.5.2(a)] Waivers/Special Exceptions. Numerous waivers were granted with ZMA2001-08 and were carried over with ZMA2013-12.On the site plan list all waivers which apply to this development. These waivers can be found in the August 6th 2014 BOS action letter. Revise appropriately. Response:A complete list of waivers approved with the rezoning has been added to Sheet CO.1. 31. [32.5.2(n),Code of Development Section 8] Proposed Improvements. On the final site plan provide typical sections for trails(6' wide asphalt per Section 8 of the Code of Dev),sidewalks, and road improvements. Also, in addition to the typical assure the improvements are dimensioned on the plan. Revise appropriately. Response:The trail width was increased from 5'to 6'and trail details have been added to the plans. 32. [32.5.1(c),32.5.2(n)] Dimensions. On the plan provide the dimensions of all the proposed structures (specifically units A5 - A16, as the others have been dimensioned). Response:Additional dimensions added to all of the proposed building units. 33. [32.5.2(k)]Verify that all necessary easements for proposed water,sewer and drainage facilities have been shown on the plan. Response:We feel that all required easements are shown and labeled on the plans. 34. Comment]Water!:nes are currently depicted in the middle of the roadway,this will not be acceptable to VDOT,when relccating them assure they are relocated as not to interfere with the required street trees. VDOT says they have no authority over this. Comment shall be omitted. Response: No action required. 35. [32.5.2(p)&32.7.9.7] Proposed SWM Facility should be screened from the adjacent residential lots. Response: Proposed buffer screening of the BMP Facility has been added to the Landscape Plan. 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com ALAN FRANKLIN PE, LLC Civil Engineering,Site Planning,and Land Development Consulting 36. [32.5.2(n)&(p),Code of Development Section 5.1]The following will be required for final site plan approval:-If lighting is proposed:Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire [Sec.32.7.8&Sec.4.17] -A landscape plan in accordance with Sec. 32.7.9, except where the provisions of the Code of Development are more stringent. Response:At this time, no site lighting is proposed. 37. Attached is the Soil Report furnished by Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District datedt} August015. Please take the soils into consideration. Response: No action required. VDOT - Troy Austin Response:VDOT's site plan comments were addressed with revisions to the road plans SUB2015-119. Engineering- John Anderson Response:John Anderson's site plan comments were addressed with revisions to the road plans SUB2015-119. Fire and Rescue - Robbie Gilmer 1. Response: The approved road plans specify the location of"No Parking Fire Lane"signage as well as anticipated on-street parking areas.The site plans are overlay the approved road plan drawings. 2. Response:Jeremy Lynn at the ACSA has coordinated with Robbie Gilmer to remove this requirement as the proposed water system serving this neighborhood will be completely new. E911 - Andrew Slack Response:Andy's comment was address with the road plan revisions. ACSA - Alex Morrison Response:Water and sewer plans were approved by ACSA.This site plans overly the approved plans. Police Department Response: No action taken. Building Inspections - Jay Schlothauer Response: No comments received. We hope that you find this information useful in your consideration for approval. Per your letter, please find the attached 9 copies of plans, application,and $1613.00 fee. Please feel free to call with any questions or request for additional information. Sincerely,/ in Alan G. Franklin, PE 427 Cranberry Lane PHONE (434)531-5544 Crozet,Virginia 22932 E-MAIL alan@alanfranklinpe.com