Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600060 Approval - County Final Site Plan and Comps. 2015-10-19 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 October 19,2015 Alan Franklin 427 Cranberry Lane Crozet VA 22932 RE: SDP201500036 Rivanna Village Phase 1,Block A Villas—Initial Site Plan Dear Mr.Franklin: The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative approval to the above referenced site plan. This approval shall be valid for a period of five(5)years from the date of this letter,provided that the developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one(1)year after the date of this letter as provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle,and thereafter diligently pursues approval of the final site plan. The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received: 1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. 2. Afee of$1,613. Please submit 9 copies of the final plans to the Community Development Department.The assigned Lead Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies(for ACSA,please also submit 3 copies of construction plans directly to them).Once you receive the first set of comments on the final site plan,please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements. The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained: SRC Member: Albemarle County Planning Services(Planner)-3 copies[Christopher Perez(434)-296-5832 Ext.3443] Albemarle County Engineering Services(Engineer)- 1 copy[John Anderson(434)-296-5832 Ext. 3069] Albemarle County Information Services(E911)- 1 copy[Andy Slack(434)-296-5832 Ext. 3384] Albemarle County Building Inspections- 1 copy[Jay Schlothauer(434)-296-5832 Ext.3228] Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue- 1 copy[Robbie Gilmer 434-531-6606] Albemarle County Service Authority- 1 copy[Alex Morrison(434)977-4511 Ext. 116] Virginia Department of Transportation- 1 copy[Troy Austin(434)422-9373] *Recommendations: Albemarle County Police Department—Steve Watson(OPTED recommendations] Albemarle County Planning Services(ARB)-Margaret Maliszewski[recommendations] If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at Extension 3443,cperez®albemarle.org. Sincerely, Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner 1 • cf nth Ai COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 August 19,2015 Revised 10-19-15 for Conditional Approval Letter Alan Franklin 427 Cranberry Lane Crozet VA 22932 RE: SDP201500036 Rivanna Village Phase 1,Block A Villas—Initial Site Plan Dear Sir: Department of Community Development has reviewed the above referenced site plan (dated 7-6-15)against applicable Code of Development, Proffers, Application Plan, and other codes and ordinances. Comments are provided below; however, additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference,which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] 1. [Comment] This application was reviewed against Site Development Plan requirements only.Road plans being reviewed simultaneously and comments will be provided under separate cover.Also,it appears that lot lines are shown on the plan but no subdivision application was submitted at this time. Any subdivision or road plan related comments are provided for reference only unless necessary for site plan approval. 2. {Z-MIA t - ., . . . . • . " .,. . • . - • Comment Addressed: The Construction Traffic Management(CTM)Plan has been submitted and is now under review 10-19-15. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 10A] Assure the CMT establishes the location,design and width of the shared use path(the`trail' as labeled on the initial site plan). 0 [ZMA201300012 Proffer 3]Route 250 and Eastern Entrance Improvements. "The owner shall either construct left and right turn lanes on Route 250 at the eastern entrance to the property or bond these improvements prior to approval of the first site plan or subdivision plat for the development... " The above shall take place prior to final site plan approval. I. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 8,Code of Development Section 5.4.1)Landscape Buffer along Glenmore Way. On the plan provide the full width of the retaining walls to include the underground geo grid,as the geo grid is part of the retaining wall.Notably retaining walls are not permitted to be within the 70' buffer per Section 5.4.1 of the Code of Development. As depicted on sheet C2.2 the existing trees within the required 70'buffer are being disturbed to provide for the retaining walls; however,as discussed above this is not permitted.Revise appropriately so no portion of the retaining wall is disturbing the 70' buffer. 0 [ZMA201300012 Proffer 8,Code of Development Section 5.4.1]Landscape Buffer along Glenmore Way. On the final site plan depict the amount of disturbance and the grading required for the installation of the trail. sy. , n i [ZMA201300012 Proffer 8,Code of Development Section 5.4.1]Landscape Buffer along Glenmore Way. On the site plan assure that the entire 70' landscape buffer within Block A is depicted,as the final site plan dictates the landscaping requirements for this feature.Notably,sheet C1.1 will not be adequate on the final site plan to meet the above mentioned requirement as it is merely an overview. Revise appropriately. ` [32.7.9]Land,cape Plan. e .t • . . . ' . • •. . '• '.. . • . \ byy ' On 9-15-15 Road plan review SUB2015-119 specifically comment 6 has corrected this issue,all 70' .6•14-1.16)-1 5 buffer landscaping shall be on the road plan rather than the final site plan;however,on the final site (r )'t„,plan provide a note that the landscaping in this buffer is depicted on the road plan SUB2015-119. �' if if '� ` 32.5.2 a 32.7.9.4 c Existinglandscape ��t -i4J [ O, O] features."The landscape plan shall show the existing landscape featrres on the site, which shall include: (1) Wooded areas.All wooded areas, identifying SC‘‘..- whether they ate composed of evergreen, deciduous, or a mix of type, and showing the location of the w tree line; (2)Srhall groups of trees and individual trees. Small groups of trees and individual trees of Lk six(6) inch caliper or greater, or ornamental trees of any size, identified by common name and V\o, ci ximate caliper and showing their location;” \ Assure that the final site plan provides the above detail for the site,with special attention to the 70' buffer area on Glenmore Way.Revise appropriately. 71 . 132.5.2(m)]Ingress and Egress. The proposed first entrance of`Winding Road' from Glenmore Way / (near Villa A 1 on the site plan)is not depicted on the site plan but rather only depicted on the road plan. Prior to final site plan approval the entrance and the entire duration of the proposed road shall be depicted on t6 site plan and approved by VDOT. (See VDOT comments dated 8-18-15, with special attention to#3). Notably,sheet C1.1 will not be adequate on the final site plan to meet the above mentioned requirement as it is merely an overview. Revise appropriately. ((li 404\ 11. 132.5.2(n)] Proposed Improvements.Assure that all improvements(except the single family detached t,9\G' , - units)within Block A are depicted on the final site plan to include all trails/shared use paths.Notably, . sheet C1.1 will not be adequate on the final site plan to meet the above mentioned requirement as it Ik`� is merely an overview Revise appropriately. 1[Code of Development Section 4.2] Covenants to Provide Architectural Review Committee.Prior to final site plan and/or final subdivision plat approval a Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions for Rivanna Village shall be reviewed/approved by the County Attorney's office in consultation with County Planning staff.The above document shall be approved by the County and recorded by the developer prior to final site plan and/or final subdivision plat approval.The DB page reference information of this recorded document shall be noted on the final site plan and/or final subdivision plat. l _� a). [ZMA201300012 Proffer 9]Affordable housing. The owner shall provide affordable housing equal to 5 15%of the total residential units constructed on the property. On all final site plan and final subdivision ..(\,t4` Ly___. plats assure that the affordable units for the entire development are clearly tracked in a chart provided on ' the cover sheet,regardless if any affordable units are proposed for said block. 1 . [ZMA201300012 Proffer 5,32.5.2(d)] An easement plat by David A.Jordan of Roudabush,Gale& Associates [SUB2015-138 Rivanna Village Easement plat] has been submitted to the County,which proposes various easements required for the grading,drainage, SWMP/BMP,and Trails...etc for improvements in Block A and H.Prior to final site plan approval the required easements shall be reviewed and approved by the County and recorded in the Clerk's Office by the developer.The DB page reference information of this recorded document shall be noted on the final site plan. "If the required easements are not provided, alternative stormwater management(to be consistent with the stormwater requirements for the overall project)will be provided which does not compromise the design of Block A and H." 1 . [Code of Development-Attachment B-sheet 7] Open Space and Recreational Plan. 7 -To avoid confusion,throughout the plan revise the labels for the"Open Amenity Space"to be consistent with the rezoning.For this Block please label these areas as"Open Space/Green Space Area: Linear Park w/Trails". The reasoning behind the above request is that these areas in Block A are labeled in Attachment B dated 7-15-13 as"Linear Park with Trails"(which is a portion of the sites' 13.26 acres of this designation), which is a part of the sites' "Amenity Area"(which makes up 31.68 acres of the site),which is a part of the developments total"Open Space/Greenspace Area"(which makes up 37.52 acres of the site). Excluding areas in Block K. -Also,to avoid confusion it is advisable to track the Open Space Statistics for the development as page 7 of Attachment B did(see below). OPEN SPACE STATISTICS: TOTAL SITE AREA 94.75 ACRES LNCLUDINC:BLOCK K(FIRE STATION) COMMUNITY JNITY PARK 18.42 ACRES' plus LINEAR PARK W/1 RAILS 13.26 ACRES' AMENITY AREA 31.65 ACRES(35.7%)' AM EN'l'Y AREA 31.68 ACRES. Om OTHER OPEN SPACE 7.87 ACRE:,. minus IMPERVIOUS AREAS 1.83 ACRES' TOTAL OPEN SPACE/GREENS PACE AREA 37.52 ACRES(42.3%)• 'EXCLUDES AREA IN BLOCK K(FIRE STATION) RECREATION STATISTICS: BASKETBALL COURT 2 TENNIS COURTS 2 PICNIC SHELTERS LARGE PLAYFIELD PLAYGROUND 1 WF RESTROOM FACILTY T DOG PARK WITH PIER AT QUARRY " POND WITH PIER \�"�—WOODED GROVE WITH QUARRY-BIDE PAVILION :., O, 8,650 LF OF PAVED TRAILS 'S.:.N..'',/./ZA -- /. [ZMA201300012 Proffer 6,Code of Development Section 8,32.5.2(0)1 Construction and Dedication of Parks and Recreation Improvements. Block A contains `Linear Park Areas' subject to Proffer 6 and Section 8 of the Code of Development,as such,on the site plan provide a note that states: "Linear Park Area hereby dedicated to public use" Prior to approval of the final subdivision plat County Planning staff shall coordinate with the Director of Planning,Parks&Recreation,and the County Engineering to determine if the land shall be dedicated with the final subdivision plat for this Block or at a later date. The dedication of this land shall be in a form acceptable to the County Attorney and the Director of Planning. /7. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On Sheet CO.1,under project data the site plan lists all tax map parcels involved in the rezoning.Please revise this note to specify which tax map parcels this site plan covers(93A1-4 and 79-25A). . 132.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data,under Proffers assure that an additional note is added which stated that a Code of Development dated June 9,2014 and titled: "Rivanna Village Amended and Restated Code of Development"applied to this development. ([Comment] If the applicant chooses or is required to resubmit the initial site plan on sheet 1 assure that the site plan number is included: SDP2015-36). . 132.5.2(a),(b)] General Information. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data,Parking Requirements are listed;however,the parking calculations account for Single Family Detached Units;however,such a unit type is nobeing proposed on this site plan.Revise the parking calculations to omit that unit type to avoid any coniiusion. 11. 132.5.2(b),4.12.6,Code of Development Section 7.1]Parking. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data, Parking Requirements of 61 spaces are correctly listed for the 27 Single Family Attached units; however,the calculations should be broken down to their simplest form.Assure that the number of bedrooms for each unit is provided/listed on the plan(2 of more bedrooms * 27= 54 required parking spaces).Also,assure that the required Guest Spaces are separately calculated and listed(27 units/4= 7 guest spaces). If the guest spaces are not located on each individual lot and are proposed within the R/W assure that the physical location of the guest spaces are labeled and marked(stripped or signed)on the final site plan,currently they are not depicted on the site plan. 2. 132.5.2(b),4.12.6]Parking. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data,Parking Requirements,under Provided Parking 124 spaces are accounted for;however,this far exceeds the maximum 20%over the required spaces which are permitted by the ordinance. Prior to final site plan approval revise appropriately. . 132.5.2(b),4.12.6] Parking. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data,Parking Requirements are listed as each unit providing a 2 car garage and a driveway which can handle 2 parked cars.Also on sheet C2.0 Villa A3 provides a typical dimension for the garage and driveway; however,the dimensions provided are not universal for all of the driveways,nor all of the garages.On the site plan dimension each driveway and each garage to assure the required parking can be accommodated. Revise appropriately. Each parking space shall be a minimum of 9' wide by 18' long. -The proposed 16'wide garage does not provide enough width to accommodate two parked cars.Either reduce the number of`provided' spaces in the garage or widen the garage to accommodate two vehicles. If the latter is chosen,when dimensioning the garage please take into account the garage entrance door walls and interior drywall.Revise appropriately. -The proposed 16'wide driveway does not provide enough width to accommodate two parked cars. Either reduce the number of`provided' spaces in the driveway or widen the driveway to accommodate two vehicles. Revise appropriately. Revise appropriately. . 132.5.2(b),4.12.6]Parking. 'Winding Road' is listed as 29' FC/FC and 60' R/W.The Code of Development provides that typical road section type with either parking on one side or no street parking. What is being proposed for this Block,please include a typical road section in the site plan.If street parking is proposed on the site plan please label and sign appropriately(ie.parking on one side and depict it or no parking).Revise appropriately. [Code of Development Section 3.3]Lot Regulations/Minimum lot size. Assure that the minimum lot i size for each proposed duplex or multiplex lot can be met.Currently no lot minimums are provided on the site plan.While not required for site plan approval,it is advisable to keep track of this for subdivision purposes,as it will be required prior to final subdivision plat approval. The minimum lot size for these units is 3,000 SF. There is no maximum. ▪ [Code of Development Section 3.3]Lot Regulation/Setbacks. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data, Setbacks,add a Side Setback for:any unit which has a road or alley at its side,the minimum side yard setback is increased to 15 feet. . [32.5.2(b),Code of Development Section 3.4]Building Height Regulations. On sheet CO.1,under Project Data,assure a note is added which lists the maximum building height for proposed structures. The Code of Development has a limit of 50' for building height. . [32.5.2(d)]Managed Slopes. There are managed slopes in various portions of Block A,assure they are 8 e correctly depicted and labeled on the final site plan.Any disturbance of these slopes shall be per the County's Design Guidelines. / • [32.5.2(k)]Proposed sewer and drainage facilities. On the site plan for the storm drainage system provide direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows. 0. 132.5.2(a)] Waivers/Special Exceptions. Numerous waivers were granted with ZMA2001-08 and were f carried over with ZMA2013-12.On the site plan list all waivers which apply to this development. These waivers can be found in the August 6'h 2014 BOS action letter. Revise appropriately. 1. [32.5.2(n),Code of Development Section 8]Proposed Improvements. On the final site plan provide typical sections for trails(6' wide asphalt per Section 8 of the Code of Dev),sidewalks,and road improvements.Also,in addition to the typical assure the improvements are dimensioned on the plan. Revise appropriately. 3 . [32.5.1(c),32.5.2(n)]Dimensions. On the plan provide the dimensions of all the proposed structures (specifically units A5—A16,as the others have been dimensioned). 13• [32.5.2(k)] Verify that all necessary easements for proposed water,sewer and drainage facilities have been shown on the plan. trees.VDOT says they have no authority over this.Comment shall be omitted. i. [32.5.2(p) & 32.7.9.71 Proposed SWM Facility should be screened from the adjacent residential lots. 3 . [32.5.2(n)&(p),Code of Development Section 5.1] The following will be required for final site plan approval: - If lighting is proposed: Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description,and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire[Sec.32.7.8&Sec.4.17] - A landscape plan in accordance with Sec. 32.7.9,except where the provisions of the Code of Development are more stringent. 37. • • _. • • .. • . . • • • .. . . - Distfift-dated-A. . Please contact Christopher P.Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez@albemarle.org or 434-296- 5832 ext. 3443 for further information or if you have questions. 624 =.5, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434) 296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 Project: Rivanna Village,Phase 1,Block A,Villas—Initial Plan preparer: Alan Franklin,427 Cranberry Lane,Crozet,VA 2293 [alan@alanfranklinpe.com] Owner or rep.: Rivanna Village,314 E Water St,Charlottesville,VA 22902 Plan received date: 17 Jul 2015 Date of comments: 19 Aug 2015 Reviewer: John Anderson Plan Coordinator: Christopher Perez SRC: 20-Aug-2015 A.Initial Site Plan(SDP201500036) 1. Note:WPO201400077 SWMP(Approved 16-Jun 2015)provides design to control storm runoff from 11.904 Ac.of impervious area. The SWMP shows rough grading,and depicts hardscape features in light- gray line type. Approved VSMP/WPO SWM Plan should be amended to show hardscape layout consistent with Final Site and Road Plan. Depicting roadway/structures as a layer without complementary fine grade contours is unusual. The Final Site Plan cannot be approved until SWMP contours match FSP fine grade contours,and until SWMP includes proposed layout consistent with Final Site Plan. Lots may only be graded consistent with the Approved SWMP. SWM facilities must be bonded prior to Final Site Plan Approval. SWM Facility,Access,and Drainage Easements must be recorded prior to Final Site Plan Approval. A SWM Maintenance Agreement for Rivanna Village Phase 1 (blocks A,B,C,D,E&H)is required to be recorded prior to Final Site Plan Approval. (Additional Note: In the future,SWM-related/ Drainage Easements and Maintenance Agreements will be required to be recorded prior to WPO Approval.) Scott Blossom,PE,Stantec,sent note(8/19/2015 4:02 PM)stating:"The stormwater plans were designed to treat the impervious area associated with Phase 1 development,including proposed roads,sidewalks, hardscape and structures.The,impervious areas are depicted within the stormwater plan set, and the supporting calculations for runoff reduction,channel adequacy and TR-55 based hydrology were all provided and approved along with the plan set." 2. ZMA Proffer#10 includes text immediately following 10.G.that reads in part:"The Owner shall obtain approval of the CTM Plan by the Director(of Community Development)before the County approves any grading permit for the property,and shall satisfy and thereafter ... Any approval of the Director required by this proffer shall be made only after consultation with the Owner,the County Engineer and VDOT." VDOT Road Plan comment#50 requests a maintenance of traffic plan. This is a separate plan,not identical with Proffer Condition#10 CTM Plan. Please note:Albemarle County is prohibited from issuing a grading permit prior to approval of the CTM Plan. Provide CTM Plan as soon as possible. 3. Note: SUB201500119(P1 Rivanna Village Public Road,Water&Sanitary Sewer-Road Plans)is under review. ACF&R(d. 7/12/15)and VDOT comments(d.8/5/15)are available via CV database system. Engineering and Planning Division comments on road plans received 6/23/15 will be sent as soon as possible. Road Plans must be approved and bonded prior to Final Site Plan Approval. Also,VDOT comments indicate response to road plan comments may affect Initial or Final Site Plan. Please coordinate road plan comments with individual reviewing agencies/reviewers,and carry design revisions(required by road plan comments)through to Initial or Final Site Plan as necessary. 4. Note:Coordinate design revisions with ACSA. ACSA road/utility plan approval is required prior to Final Site Plan Approval. Easements relating to Glenmore GST and associated new water line are relevant to Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 Final Site Plan(visible on C2.1 as 20'ACSA Easement). 5. Submit Construction Traffic Management Plan(`CTM'). Reference ZMA Proffer Condition#10. Coordinate `CTM'with road plans. 6. Woods credited in SWM compliance computations(WPO201400077; 19-Dec 2014 plan review comment; B.2,image below)require permanent easement. Ensure that(confirm if/whether)0.705 Ac.Preserved Woods visible on C2.2 are preserved via conservation easement if credited in SWM computations. 2. Where preserved/forested areas are credited in the computations,there must be temporary physical barriers and permanent easement measures provided to ensure they remain undisturbed. 7. C1.1 —Provide phase lines and the proposed(approximate)timing of development for Rivanna Village.— Ref. 18-32.5.2.c. [Recommend revise C1.1,or include separate sheet similar to Sheet 6 of Attachment B. (ZMA201300012/12-16-13,Mark E.Keller/Alan G.Franklin,Terra Concepts,P.C.)] 8. C0.1 —Trip Generation Estimates table: identify number of condominium/townhouse/duplex units associated with Ave.weekday/peak/weekend estimates(as with single-family detached=4). Note: these values relate to CTM Plan,but may not serve as accurate parameter for public/private street pavement design. Pavement design for streets within the development should reflect ultimate(full build-out)ADT estimates. 9. C0.1 —Project Data: Although ISP may not make additional waiver/variance requests,this descriptor may be inconsistent with Planning Div.expectation for ISP/FSP. Defer to Planning on whether this descriptor requires revision consistent with waiver/variance requests granted by initial or revised ZMA. B.for Final Site Plan 10. C1.0—Label wetlands located west of East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company. C2.0 11. Align concr to entrance aprons with edges of 16'W driveways. Winding Road horizontal/reverse curves, with apron 4urbs shown perpendicular to EP,creates mismatch with driveway edges(image below). Mismatch is similar(and severe)in recently developed areas Alb.County. Left unaligned,design would impose effects hard to remedy. Provide,with road and Final Site Plan,aprons and drive edges that align. Aprons may flare. Provide special(typ.)apron detail. Also,eliminate 2'R curb returns at entrances at following locations. Instead,provide continuous concrete aprons that serve two villas,from road(EP)to sidewalk. Provide special(typ.)continuous apron detail with caption/typ.label to identify where continuous aprons required:Villas Al/A2;A5/A6;A11/Al2;A15/A16;A17/A18;A23/A24;and A26/27. Proposed entrance/driveway design does not work at listed Villa locations. Revised design is required at listed locati M ns 1 rior to FSP/RP a 4'royal. c / �. 010, e \ OFR 106»0 _— \� rpt '�� - • �"• NJA 1114 \ - 7.-- , , ,,- . , . \ ..„, it,„, , . „, .., ,.., -., 4,,,,,t.. , ..,,, ,,....-- 1‘ ,\ . ,_ . +t MLA A16 \\ - f \\ on.4417 \ . ) /.. 'tke. \ Pit alb \ V6U A$6 \ < h- *, � � \ ... 7/ i0.4W.sr + _, Nl [p1 as - • I' VILLA/428 GG 6r at 40pfi I��. i " \ 0...: 4, 41 1�k i 1 \ 4 k.,, 1 ,- _,_.,-, , ,... I , VitIA A17 • \ .\) 1\ , . I 12. PT/PRC are provided. Provide complete horizontal curve data(or roadway CL radii at a minimum). 1 L Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 13. Label Glenmore Way. 14. Retaining wall(RW):If CMU proposed,examine geogrid length in direction of preserved woods. Consult geotechnical engineer. Examine RW/geogrid relative to preserved woods,sheet C2.2. Confirm that 0.705 Ac.area is unaffected. 15. L(length RW segment)=183.72'understates actual length. This figure may exclude wall length north of 79.60'boundary. Please confirm whether value is correct. 16. Eliminate trees/plantings near retaining wall. Do not show trees closer than the greater(distance)of:Max. length of geogrid required to construct RW(if design requires geogrid);or canopy(Radius/ft.)of proposed plantings/trees at maturity(dripline). Geotechnical PE-sealed retaining wall design must accompany Final Site Plan,and is prerequisite to FSP approval. Please reference attached Retaining Wall Plan checklist. 17. Show north intersection of Glenmore Way and Winding Road.[18-32.5.2.m./ingress and egress]. C2.1 18. Provide yard inlets at additional locations:behind Villas A19,A22,A25,and A14,and in front of A10. [Ref.Drainage Plan checklist,Attached,Drainage,last item {Policy}] 19. Relocate/revise proposed MH locations in 4'strips between drives at Villas Al 7/A18,A23/A24,A26/A27. 20. Show grading for bioretention basin Access,consistent with facility to be proposed under WPO201400077. 21. Provide additional existing contour labels. 22. Change line weight/type to indicate proposed contours—at bioretention basin,and inlet above/bchind upper retaining wall,for example. 23. Label(12"DIP Water Main)ACSA Easement crossing Villa A15/A16 Lots`to be constructed by others.' While important to show this water line,line weight suggests construction with this plan. 12"water line was approved independent of ISP review,earlier this year,and is not proposed with this project. 24. SS lateral,Villa A20,appears to have a bend. Eliminate bend,if nonessential. Feel free to call to discuss./Tel:434.296-5832—x3096 Thank you rile: Sl)I'2015001>>r,-1a`.. Review Comments SDP201500036 roject Name ivanna Village. Phase 1 , Block A Villas - Initial tate Completed =nday, July 17, 2015 Initial Site Plan .eviewer 6,ndrew Slack 'epartmentfDivision:Agency E911 .eviews Comments he applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) replacement names for "Main Street". hat road name is not an acceptable road name. Review Status: Requested Changes 'age 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 110/19/2015 Review Comments SDP201500036 • roject Name- .ivanna Village. Phase 1 ; Block A Villas - Initial sate Completed: Monday, August 24, 2015 Initial Site Plan •i .eviewer Jay Schlothauer •l 'epartment'Division/Agency Inspections • .eviews Comments: lased on plans dated July 6. 2015 lo comments or conditions. Review Status: No Objection • 'age: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On; 110/19/2015 Review Comments SDP201500036 roject Name ivanna Village, Phase 1 . Block A Villas - Initial late Completed. Saturday, August 15, 2015 Initial Site Plan .eviewer Robbie Gilmer lepartment Division!Agency Fire Rescue eviews Comments used on plans dated 7/6/15. . Streets 29' or less shall be marked on one side "No Parking Fire Lane" per County code Bquirments. . Fire flow test required before final approval_ Review Status_ Requested Changes • 'age: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On 110/19/2015 .eviewer: 4lexander Morrison "-1 tepartmentlDivisioniAgency AC SA • .eviews Comments 'rom: Alex Morrison [mailto:amorrison©serviceauthority.org] ;ent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 3:16 PM 0: Christopher Perez <cperez a albemarle.org> ;object: SDP201500036: Rivanna Village - Phase 1 - Block A - Initial Site Plan :hris. have reviewed the above referenced plan. Currently the overall utility plan for Rivanna Village is under aview by the ACSA. I hereby recommend approval of SDP201500036 with a condition that approval for ie final site plan will not be granted until utility approval is given by the ACSA for Rivanna Village. dexander J. rvtorrison. P.E. ;ivil Engineer dbemarle County Service Authority 68 Spotnap Road ;harlottesville, Virginia 22911 0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116 C) 434-981-5577 F) 434-979-0698 Review Status: See Recommendations )age: _ j County of Albemarle Printed On: 110/19/2015 :z^:;mss--a. .�W...z cr. .: :rs:^r'. ... ":.:A=" ': ^C^!C':t. — s.n. -a.. .rte tnrit."Valif`-7,14 =i: sem: • x` i• vl COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper,Vry:nit,22701 Charles A.Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner August 18, 2015 Mr. Christopher Perez Senior Planner County of Albemarle • Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: SDP-2015-00036 Rivanna Village, Phase 1, Block A Villas Initial Site Plan Dear Mr. Perez: We have reviewed the initial site plan for Rivanna Village, Phase 1, Block A dated July 2,2015 as submitted by Alan Franklin and offer the following comments: 1. Utilities, including storm sewer should cross the roadway perpendicularly. In particular, the storm sewer between SD-I4 and SD-I5 should be realigned to provide as close as possible a perpendicular crossing. 2. The waterline under the roadway should be installed by deflection where possible rather than including the numerous bend fittings as shown. If a leak will developed in the waterline, it is Iikely to occur at a fitting so it is important to minimize the number of fittings. 3. Review comments of the road plans that were identified in a letter dated August 5,2015 may impact this site plan. Due to the numerous comments, they have not been restated in this letter; however the comments in the August 5th letter need to be considered during site plan review. If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434)422-9782. Sincerely, l Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING tt COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange ROM Culpeper Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner August 5, 2015 Mr. John Anderson County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SUB-2015-00119 Rivanna Village, Phase 1 Road Plans Dear Mr. Anderson: We have reviewed the road plans for Rivanna Village, Phase 1 dated 6/18/15 as submitted by Alan Franklin and offer the following comments: 1. There appear to be numerous drafting errors with the road plans. Potentially there have been redesign iterations of the layout and some of the labels may have not been corrected. Examples of some of the errors are as follows: • On Sheet 5 of 25, there is a note calling out a CG-12, Type C at Lot E6; however, there does not appear to be a CG-12 at this location. • On Sheets 12, 16, and 18 of 25 there is a label or reference to SD G3-1 on Winding Road, however there does not appear to be a drop inlet for SD G3-1. • On Sheet 18 of 25, there are several labels that have duplicate arrows to the features that they are identifying. • On Sheet 18 of 25, there are labels for SS F1, SD NI, SD N2, and SD MI near Sycamore Lane; however there do not appear to be features associated with these labels. • The Sheet Numbers for Sheets 4, 6 and 23 of 25 are missing. • Sheets 16 and 18 are mislabeled as Sheets 16 and 18 of 24. 2. On Sheet 2, there needs to be a note indicating that VDOT will be contacted 48 hours in advance of starting construction. VDOT should also be included in the pre-construction meeting. 3. Sheet 2 has a Trip Generation table, however, there should be a detail identifying the proposed ADT for each individual street as this information is necessary to determine the appropriate roadway typical section. 4. The plan should clearly identify which lots are single family residential and which are condominium/townhouse duplex. 5. On Sheet 4 there is a note stating"Potential Cul-De-Sac Area, See Note#7". Where is i note 7 and is this notation necessary as the cul-de-sac has been shown? i 6. On Sheet 5, the radii for the intersection of Sycamore Lane and Main Street have been shown as 15'. The minimum radii allowed by the Road Design Manual, Appendix B(1) is 25'. 7. Sight lines and profiles for each intersection needs to be provided for review. 8. The CG-12 at the intersection of Sweet Gum Lane and Main Street does not have a receiving CG-12 and should be removed. 9. Typically, the preference is to not locate CG-12's in the midpoint of the intersection returns. This directs a visually impaired person towards the center of the intersection. The preference is to locate CG-12's perpendicular to the road centerline near the intersection. The CG-12's at the intersections of Steamer Drive and Main Street, and at Sycamore Lane and both Main Street and Steamer Drive, and at Sweet Gum Lane and Steamer Drive should be revised accordingly. 10. Midblock crossings are discouraged. Approval from NWRO for the midblock crossings on Main Street, Winding Road, and Steamer Drive will be required. 11. The proposed radius of the cul-de-sac on Steamer Drive needs to be added to the plan. 12. Extending centerline profile of Steamer Drive through the cul-de-sac does not serve any real purpose. The centerline should begin at the center of the cul-de-sac and then run perpendicularly to the mainline centerline of Steamer Drive. 13. Spot elevations along the curbing of the cul-de-sac should be provided to ensure positive drainage from the cul-de-sac. 14. The centerline of Sweet Gum Lane should intersect Main Street and Steamer Drive perpendicularly. 15. The stations and finished grade elevations of each cross street needs to be added to the road centerline profiles. Specifically, the stations and elevations for the intersections with Sweet Gum Lane, Private Alley"A", Private Alley "C", and Sycamore Lane needs to be added to the profiles for Steamer Drive and Main Street. In addition, the station and elevation of the intersection of Steamer Drive and Main Street needs to be added to the Main Street profile. 16. The design speeds for each road section is based on the ADT for each road section. To this end, the ADT for each specific roadway needs to be provided. In addition, it appears that the 30 mph/25 mph design speeds shown on the Steamer Drive profile should be reversed. 17. The method of control fill for the fill sections of the roadways should be added to the profiles. 18. On the profile for Sweet Gum Lane, the beginning and ending labels for the profile appear to be reversed. The higher elevation side of the profile should be Steamer Drive and the lower elevation side should be Main Street. 19. The profile for Sweet Gum Lane shows the intersection with Steamer Drive to be at station 10+01.74. The station for this intersection shown on Sheet 5 of 25 indicates the station is 10+00. This stationing should be the same. 20. The profile for Sycamore Lane shows the intersection with Steamer Drive to be at 10+00. The station for this intersection shown on Sheet 5 of 25 indicates the station is 10+12.57. This stationing should be the same. 21. The profile for Sycamore Lane shows the intersection with Main Street to be at 12+80. The station for this intersection shown on Sheet 5 of 25 indicates the station is 12+92.57. This stationing should be the same. 22. The station and elevation of the low point in the sag of Winding Road should be added to the profile. 23. It appears that the profile for Alley B on Sheet 7 of 25 is actually the profile for Alley C and vice versa based on the labels of these alleys on Sheet 5 of 25. 24. The distance from the back of curb to the street trees needs to be shown in the typical sections. Note, the minimum distance is 3'. 25. In all typical sections, the minimum distance of the right-of-way beyond the sidewalk is 1'. The typical for Main Street (Station 12+50 to 18+00) needs to be revised accordingly. 26. The labels for the CG-6 in the typical sections for Main Street are not pointing to the curb. 27. The typical section for Main Street (Station 12+50 to 18+00) indicates parking on both sides of the road. The numerous entrances shown on the north side of Main Street appears to make this not practical. 28. The typical section for Steamer Drive from Station 10+00 to 14+50 indicates that the ADT is between 2,000 and 4,000 vehicles per day. However, based on the stationing shown on Sheet 5 of 25, this is the cul-de-sac section of Steamer Drive and this ADT is not accurate. It appears the ADTs shown for the two typical sections of Steamer Drive have been reversed. 29. The grades of the roadway, landscape strip, and sidewalk need to be shown on each typical section. 30. The pavement design should be added to each typical section. 31. Both typical sections for Steamer Drive indicate that there will either be no on-street parking or parking on one side. This needs to be defined as to which condition will occur on each section. Furthermore, which side of the roadway parking will be allowed needs to be identified and No Parking signs need to be added to the plan indicating which side of the street parking will be allowed. 32. The most current details from the 2008 Road and Bridge Standards for the CG-12, the CG-9 and the pavement widening need to be provided in the plans. 33. The left turn lane and taper on Glenmore Way into Main Street needs to be regraded in plan view. In addition, the roadside ditch needs to be relocated and regraded as the left turn lane will be removing the ditch. 34. On Sheet 10 of 25, it appears that the left turn lane is shown on the wrong side of the typical section. 35. The typical sections shown on Sheet 10 of 25 are not in accordance with the pavement widening(WP-2) standard as shown in the 2008 Road and Bridge Standards. 36. The pavement designs shown on Sheet 11 of 25 are incorrect. The BM-25 course is actually the Base course and the 2l A aggregate is actually the sub-base course. As such, the equivalency value for the 21A should be 0.6 instead of 1. The designs with ADT of 200 and 600 appear to be adequate, but the designs with ADT of 2,200 and 4,400 do not. The designs need to be revised. 37. It appears to be a need for a drainage easement between SD A10-1 and SD A10. 38. The following structures were included in the storm sewer structure schedule but could not be found on the plan: • SD NI • SD N2 • SD B3-1 • SD K1 • SD K2 • SD G3-1 39. A column for height of structure should be added to the storm sewer structure schedule. 40. There are several discrepancies in the data for the storm sewer system between the profiles, the storm structure schedule and the storm sewer calculations. A full review of the storm sewer calculations will be made once these discrepancies have been corrected. 11 41. There is greater potential for leakage in the public waterline at fittings than there is if the waterline is deflected. The following locations of bends in the waterline should be reevaluated; • It appears that the waterline along Winding Road could be deflected instead of using the bends currently shown. • It would be preferable to replace the two 45° bends at the intersection of Glenmore Way and Main Street with a single 90 bend. • The waterline shifts from one side of the road to the other on Steamer Road near Lot 88. The waterline should remain on the same side of the road. 42. Utilities should cross the roadway perpendicularly or as close as possible. Locations of concern that need to be reevaluated are: • The storm sewer crossing of Winding Road between SD 15 and SD 14. • The storm sewer crossing of Sycamore Lane between SD A5-3 and SD A5-2. • The sanitary sewer crossing of Steamer Drive between SS Alb and SS A17. 43. The inverts of the storm sewer structures should be labeled as either Invert In or Invert Out instead of having a bearing. In addition, the invert ins should indicate which structure they are coming from and all invert ins to a structure should be included in the label of the structure on the profiles. 44. It appears that SD B2 as shown on the profile for Storm Sewer "B"on Sheet 14 of 25 could be lowered to existing grade to avoid potential settling of the inlet. 45. It appears that the final and existing grades in the Storm Sewer "A7" have been reversed. 46. It appears that SD B2, SD B2-1, and SD B2-2 as shown on the profile for Storm Sewer "B2" on Sheet 14 of 25 could be lowered to existing grade to avoid potential settling of the inlets. 47. The separation between utility crossings and the storm sewer should be labeled for each crossing in the storm sewer profiles. Many of these separations have been labeled, but several have not. 48. There appears to be a couple of conflicts between the storm sewer and utility crossings. Two of the locations are as follows: • Sanitary Sewer A crossing between SD A3 and SD A4. • Sanitary Sewer A crossing between SD C2 and SD C3. 49. An erosion and sediment control plan needs to be provided for this project for review. This can be a separate submittal. 50. A maintenance of traffic plan needs to be provided for this project for review. This can be a separate submittal. We are currently using the attached checklists during our review of road and site plans. It may be helpful for the engineer to use these checklists during construction plan development to reduce the number of review comments by VDOT. Due to the numerous comments associated with this review, it may be beneficial to meet with the design engineer to review the comments. If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434) 422-9782. Sincer y, "14/4/ Troy A stin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING ACCREDITED L A W ENFORCEMENT A GENCY. � - �lily "� pR,t.E e0 we ,.-.. : 1 • -� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Y POLICE DEPARTMENT 211111k ir Z ACCREDITED AGENCC ***************** Initial Site Plan Lead Reviewer: Chris Perez Item Number: SDP201500036 Project Name: Rivanna Village, Phase 1, Block A Villas Due Date: August 17, 2015 All Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design(CPTED)recommendations are considered to be advisory. The recommendations are meant to be utilized as a design strategy to create a safer environment for the future residents of Rivanna Village. Advisory I andscapint Recommendations • All shrubbery and ornamental grasses used in foundation planting areas should follow the CPTED two foot six foot rule. Shrubs should be no taller than two feet in front of building windows. Tree crowns in common areas, near buildings, and along pedestrian walkways should be pruned no less than six feet from ground level to maximize surveillance opportunities. Shrubbery should always remain below the window line so natural surveillance is not hindered from the interior of the residence out onto property grounds. • Shrubs,ornamental grasses,and ornamental flowering trees should be planted no less than six feet from pedestrian walkways to eliminate concealment and ambush opportunities. • Shrubbery and ornamental grasses should be maintained at no more than two feet tall around pedestrian entranceways to eliminate concealment and ambush opportunities. Advisory I.iahtin<g Recommendations • All lighting should be within the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America(IESNA)guidelines for minimum security lighting standards. • It is advised that all pedestrian walkways,be illuminated to a minimum 1.0 fc horizontal on pavement and a minimum of.5 fc to.8 fc vertical 5' above ground. • All lighting on site should be at a 4:1 average to minimum ratio(background to face), and designed to limit light trespass and glare. • Use pedestrian scale lighting(see below) in high pedestrian traffic areas. All lighting on site should be sufficient to allow facial recognition at thirty feet. Thirty feet is the minimum for reaction time to determine if a person is a potential threat. • It is advised that the open space area and all alley ways should be illuminated to a minimum 1.0 fc horizontal on pavement and a minimum of.5 to.8 fc vertical 5' above ground. Advisory Territorial Recommendations • Concrete sidewalks leading to the individual buildings from the public sidewalks should be constructed with pavers or different textures and colors to indicate a transition from public space to private space. • All living space should be designed with front porches or stoops to promote ownership of the property and encourage surveillance. Pedestrian Scale Li<„liting • Typical pedestrian scale luminaires are mounted at a height of 10 to 20 feet. Typical pedestrian zone lighting is usually mounted in the 12 to 18 ft. range. All luminaires should be dark sky compliant and designed to minimize glare and light trespass. • (J-r-t 4164 WsL MPO Steve Watson, ICPS,CPD Albemarle County Police Department Crime prevention Unit I Review Comments SDP201500036 roject Name- .ivanna Village. Phase 1 . Block A Villas - Initial late Completed riday, August 07, 2015 Initial Site Plan .eviewer Margaret Maliszewski v j lepartmentDivision!Agency ARB L .eviews Comments_ ;lock A does not fall within the Entrance Corridor overlay. However, regarding the landscape buffer long Glenmore Way: . The areas on Sheet C5.0 that show a mix of individual trees adequately meet Entrance Corridor squirements due to the quantity of trees proposed. . It is not clear from the plan how the first 130' of buffer at the intersection of Rt. 250 and Glenmore Vay (approx.. measured along Glenmore Way) will be treated. If existing trees are to remain in this rea, this should be noted on the plan and individual existing trees to remain should be identified by pecies and size. The quantity of trees to remain in this area should be sufficient to provide a onsistent appearance with the buffer areas to be planted. Consider any impacts of path construction Then showing existing trees to remain. If existing trees to remain are riot sufficient, show new trees to e planted in this area. . Two other areas in the Glenmore Way buffer do not show individual trees to remain or to be planted. is recommended that these areas be treated as in comment#2. Review Status- No Objection 'age: I 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 110/19!2015 roti Al Well COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax (434)972-4126 August 6, 2014 Valerie W. Long, Esq., Williams Mullen 321 E. Main Street, Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA. 2902 RE: ZMA2013010012—Rivanna Village TAX MAP PARCEL: 079000000025A0, 08000000004600, 080000000046A0, 080000000046CO3 080000000046D0, 080000000046E0, 00800000000500, 08000000005100, 080000000052A0, 080000000055A0, 093A1000000300, 093A1000000400 Dear Ms. Long: The Board of Supervisors adopted the following resolutions on July 9, 2014: RESOLUTION#1 By a vote of 6:0, ADOPTED resolution approving ZMA 2013-00012 and the special exceptions related thereto with the addition that Steamer Drive end as a cul-de-sac. Please note that this approval did not include Tax Map Parcel 093A1000000200 East Rivanna Fire Station.This parcel will be subject to ZMA200100008. RESOULTION#2 By a vote of 6:0, ADOPTED resolution finding that the land and improvements proffered in Proffer 6 of ZMA 2013-00012 provide the public facilities envisioned by Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 and that Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 i5 satisfied to at least an equivalent degree. RESOULTION#3 By a vote of 6:0, ADOPTED resolution requesting that VDOT continue to evaluate whether an entrance permit at Route 250 and Butterfield Lane should be issued during the development of Rivanna Village to allow construction traffic to use that entrance. Please be advised that although the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors took action on the project noted above, no uses on the property as approved above may lawfully begin until all applicable approvals have been received and conditions have been met. This includes: • • compliance with applicable PROFFERS; • compliance with requirements of the CODE OF DEVELOPMENT; • approval of and compliance with a SITE PLAN; and • approval of a ZONING COMPLIANCE CLEARANCE. If you have questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not hesitate to contact Rebecca Ragsdale at 296-5832. Sincerely, David Benish Chief of Planning Cc Rivanna Village LLC-Andrew Boninti 314 East Water Street Charlottesville VA. 22902 Glenmore Associates Limited Partnership P O Box 7623 Charlottesville VA. 22906 Rebecca Ragsdale, Zoning File RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 (Glenmore), originally accepted as a proffer for the rezoning of Glenmore ZMA 1990-019, stated that the owner, Glenmore Associates, would donate approximately 27 acres of land to the County or its designee for a public school or other public use facilities as the County may select, together with an appropriate right of way; and WHEREAS, Proffer 6 of ZMA 2001-00008 (Rivanna Village at Glenmore) stated that the owner, Glenmore Associates, would, at its expense and at the request of the County, engineer, construct, and dedicate in fee simple to the County a park comprising approximately 18 acres, which would be platted with the first plat for Rivanna Village at Glenmore, and all of the park improvements described in the code of development would be built or bonded prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 174`h residential unit within Rivanna Village; and WHEREAS, the County desired the park proffered in Proffer 6 of ZMA 2001-00008 to serve the residents of Albemarle County; and WHEREAS, the land referred to in Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 was part of the land rezoned under ZMA 2001-00008 and, as a result of such rezoning, the land offered by Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 was no longer available for public facilities uses; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with its approval of ZMA 2001-00008, the Board adopted a resolution finding that the land and improvements proffered in Proffer 6 of ZMA 2001-00008 would provide the public facilities envisioned by Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 and that such land and improvements were deemed to satisfy Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 to at least an equivalent degree and that neither Glenmore Associates nor its successors nor assigns would have any further obligation with respect to Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016; and WHEREAS, Proffer 6 of ZMA 2013-00012 (Rivanna Village) restates Proffer 6 of ZMA 2001- 00008 but amends certain terms including that the park will comprise 18.4 acres and will be located in Block J, and that all of the park improvements described in the code of development will be built or bonded prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 137th residential unit within Rivanna Village. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors finds that the land and improvements proffered in Proffer 6 of ZMA 2013-00012 provide the public facilities envisioned by Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 and that such land and improvements are deemed to satisfy Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016 to at least an equivalent degree; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that neither Glenmore Associates, Rivanna Village LLC, nor their successors nor assigns. shall have any further obligation with respect to Proffer 2 of ZMA 1999-016. I, Ella W. Jordan, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to zero, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on July 9, 2014 Clea , Board of C4 Supervisors Aye Nav Mr. Boyd Y Ms. Dittmar Y Ms. Mallek Y Ms. McKeel Y Ms. Palmer Y Mr. Sheffield Y RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the application plan approved in conjunction with ZMA 2013-00012 for Rivanna Village shows an eastern entrance designated as Butterfield Lane from Route 250 into Rivanna Village; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") previously determined that it would not issue an entrance permit at Butterfield Lane to serve construction traffic during the development of Rivanna Village (the "decision") and, as a result, construction traffic will use Glenmore Way, subject to a construction traffic management plan proffered by the owner of Rivanna Village, subject to approval by the County's Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, the residents of Glenmore are concerned about the construction traffic using Glenmore Way during the construction of Rivanna Village and these concerns are primarily focused on safety and congestion on Glenmore Way; and WHEREAS, the Glenmore Community Association and Glenmore residents have stated that they will continue to request that VDOT reconsider its decision, and the Board supports these efforts. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby requests that VDOT continue to evaluate whether an entrance permit at Butterfield Lane should be issued { during the development of Rivanna Village to allow construction traffic to use such an entrance and that it reconsider its decision based on changing conditions, traffic data, or other justifications that may arise during the development of Rivanna Village. I, Ella W. Jordan, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to zero, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on July 9,2014. L L ./'i!: I k, Board of •. my Supervisors Aye Nay Mr. Boyd Ms. Dittmar Y Ms. Mallek Y Ms. McKee) Y Ms. Palmer Y Mr. Sheffield Y I RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the application of Rivanna Village, LLC, to amend the zoning map for Tax Map and Parcel Numbers 07900-00-00-025A0, 08000-00-00-04600, 08000-00-00-046A0, 08000-00-00-046CO3 08000-00-00-046D0, 08000-00-00-046E0, 08000-00-00-05000, 08000-00-00-05100, 08000-00-00- 052A0, 08000-00-00-055A0, 093A1-00-00-00300 and 093A1-00-00-00400 (the"Property") is identified as ZMA 2013-00012, Rivanna Village ("ZMA 2013-00012")for a community known as "Rivanna Village"; and WHEREAS, 93.0 acres of the Property are zoned Neighborhood Model District, subject to the code of development, application plan and proffers approved and accepted in conjunction with ZMA 2001-00008 on June 13, 2007, and ZMA 2013-00012 proposes to amend the code of development, application plan and the proffers applicable to the Property; and WHEREAS, 1.76 acres of the Property, comprised of Tax Map and Parcel Numbers 08000-00- 00-05100, 08000-00-00-052A0, are designated TownNillage Center in the Village of Rivanna Master Plan and are zoned Rural Areas, and ZMA 2013-00012 proposes to amend the zoning map and change the zoning of those parcels from Rural Areas to Neighborhood Model District, to be added as part of Rivanna Village, and to be subject to the amended code of development, application plan and proffers applicable to Rivanna Village; and WHEREAS, ZMA 2013-00012 would reduce the maximum number of residential units allowed on the Property from 521 to 400 and the maximum square footage of non-residential structures from 120,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet, and would make other amendments to the code of development, the application plan, and the proffers that were approved in conjunction with ZMA 2001-00008; and WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing for ZMA 2013-00012 on July 9, 2014 after notice was provided as required by Virginia Code§§ 15.2-2204 and 15.2-2285, and Albemarle County Code § 18-33; and WHEREAS, the Board also considered at the public hearing for ZMA 2013-00012 the owner's request for special exceptions that would modify zoning regulations pertaining to yards, parking and loading, signs, recreation, outdoor lighting, and swim. golf and tennis clubs as set forth in Attachment D to the Executive Summary, which had previously been approved in conjunction with ZMA 2001-00008. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that upon consideration of the material and relevant factors in Virginia Code § 15.2-2284, including the consideration of the Village of Rivanna Master Plan, the executive summary and reports prepared by the County's planning staff, and the comments and information received from the public, and for the purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practices, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby amends the zoning map and approves ZMA 2013-00012 with the code of development dated June 9, 2014, the application plan dated June 9, 2014, and the proffers dated June 13, 2014; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in rezoning Tax Map and Parcel Numbers 08000-00-00-05100 and 08000-00-00-052A0 from Rural Areas to Neighborhood Model District, the Board is mindful that the Village of Rivanna Master Plan states that "approval of future development should be monitored in conjunction with improvements to US 250 and available sewer capacity so that approval of new units or uses does not exceed capacity of the sewage treatment plant or the road system" (page 4) and "in addition to sewer limitations, approval of any development by rezoning will be predicated on the completion of a number of transportation improvements" (page 32); however, although these improvements have not been made, rezoning these parcels as part of ZMA 2013-00012 would not establish a precedent because these parcels were anticipated for future inclusion within Rivanna Village when ZMA 2001-00008 was approved, as reflected in their inclusion on the application plan for that rezoning and being designated for"Potential Future Development," the parcels are adjacent to the other portions of Rivanna Village, and ZMA 2013-00012 reduces the maximum number of dwelling units and commercial intensity allowed and, therefore, the impacts from Rivanna Village are less than the potential full buildout under ZMA 2001-00008; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the special exceptions for the modifications set forth in Attachment D to the Executive Summary for ZMA 2013-00012 are approved, based upon the Board's consideration of the relevant factors set forth in Albemarle County Code § 18-33.9 and the specific sections being modified, and the executive summary and reports prepared by the County's planning staff, including those prepared for these modifications, in conjunction with ZMA 2001-00008. I, Ella W. Jordan, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to zero, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on July 9, 2014. �---- 0701,, , :oa'• of I ounty Supervisors Aye Nav Mr. Boyd Y Ms. Dittmar Y Ms. Mallek Y Ms. McKeel Y Ms. Palmer Y Mr. Sheffield Y { I i - . L:-..,.f. ,1,;; i• t7 1111.fi.li, .. ; ., NVId NOLT.V.II Mal' !7•••• !,[1 •I N i 1 r.%-, too it• 1, „IpviriaA\TNNTNAIH • 0 l'••1:.,: •. Iwo i; ,., 101 1 k'llti(1,11.,dl IA'11/411/4, i,i7 75 :1 ‘s g . i .!. , , ,;•t., ,c. ''., , t ; F : ; P a '11 0 I- , C r. r*a• 1:: E O . C r-• :.1•7 g: i, C) -, 1 ' • F" • 1:-. • %, t '''''; .. ti,IT r-, t-,'" '' 4, i 1...q :c ,, '' E a „, , :- ,. ; „0,,, .., . 5• I'‘I --- I - , N.) •-.1_ i *;•, _FP 4- ' 9 , •4! -;= 1 :•.,f, F,., ; i !!, ; =;•.,..k ,,, ,... • ,,,; 4 ; ; 'Fi`• ; ft;,;.- 2 ,<,. n tft - 6.4 Z, -e, • ,',; 'i :, '', it,ei „. .:t ,„ , . . _ , t .,t, E N .,,' •=••••.... ;! k ,q,7F ,/.,-t , ,,i: ' - ,•Ir -- n' t't ', , 1":B•il , , , - , -- -. • \ , .-- -, t.:5••• I t I 7 I;< ...<7".' •-•, 7 '- 7„.• .. I ' ..f. `I7 :r. - ..• ... . •, -.'*.k.; ,ZA)to• . ',.'>- t ' -."1•404b. -\ j• i• • '‘‘,. • ,/, .• , 4” , 't . . , ,ao,7 rii•ir,i'ieMgE •iig ' / "' , • , ...•••••"" .-: 4 1 -"" ..--•-''' • El /.. • .„„....-- -$ • r'' ......... • .. , . "".-..... ,' ...-,7. , ......... . .........' ..,, v , g . `0•4* ;-,-, ' , 47 _ r: , -.... , • OA I P-: 04' - / C:.i. .".'' '''''''*,.. •'•''', . - . ,,.. •- 1 OE ...- „, I ,--)- ..,•,, , - - , •-, f.-.).- . .. \ 1 ......„ . • , i ' • . \ r, .• 41-.5.1 Ix'//, . \ / . ... \ rk ., , a.. 1 • • ' a 1 • a— —, 1 1,.. 1.••,•. . .5 '-' • F, ... • :-',..`, tf - ,',,> ; ,,.... -,- c \_. Y,-F.).: .i.,>-.c.,- \ ,'t'l-....;,:i, Litt ';',;•-• p Rivanna Village Waivers (ZMA 2013-00012) A number of waivers were approved with ZMA 2001-08, the original Rivanna Village rezoning. The Owner requests that most of the same waiver be approved again, or remain in place, specifically as follows: I. Section 4.6.3.a. -- Lots, Yards, adjacent to Streets, Alleys and Shared Driveways 2. Section 4.11.1 —Covered Porches 3. Section 4.1 1.1 and 4.1 1.2— Structures in required yards and accessory structures 4. Section 4.12,9 Street and Alley Parking 5. Section 4.12.13 — Loading Areas. This was approved for Block E in the 2007 rezoning, which is now identified in the 2013 rezoning as Block I). 6. Section 4.12.4-- Parking Areas. Change the reference from Block E to Block D 7. Section 4.12.6— Minimum number of parking spaces for scheduled uses. Change the reference from Block E to Block D. 8. Section 4.15.5.3 — Allows for signs in the public right of way. 9. Section 4.15.11 Setback requirements for signs in NMD zoning districts. 10. Section 4.16—Recreational area regulations 11. Section 4.17.4(h) Lighting Standards. 12. Section 14-233 - Private Streets 13. Section 14-409D— Coordination and Extension of Streets 14. Section 14-422 -- Sidewalks and Planting Strips 15. Section 4.16.2 Minimum Recreational Facilities PROFFER STATEMENT RIVANNA VILLAGE Date: June 13,2014 ZMA#: 2013-00012 Tax Map Parcel#: 07900-00-00-025A0, 08000-00-00-04600, 08000-00-00-046A0, 08000- 00-00-046CO3 08000-00-00-046D0,08000-00-00-046E0, 08000-00-00- 05000. 08000-00-00-05100, 08000-00-00-052A0, 08000-00-00-055A0, 093A1-00-00-00300,093A1-00-00-00400, &093 A 1-00-00-00200(the "Property") Rezone two parcels totaling 1.76 acres from Rural Areas (RA) to Neighborhood Model Development(NMD),and rezone eleven parcels totaling 93.0 acres (by current plat,or 94.05 acres by County Assessor's records) from NMD to NMD. Total Land Area: 94.76 acres by current plat(95.81 acres by County Assessor's Records) Pursuant to Sections 33.4 and 33.7 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance,the Owner hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed herein below which shall be applied to Rivanna Village (hereinafter the `Property") if the Zoning Map Amendment (hereinafter the"ZMA") is approved by the County of Albemarle (the "County"). These conditions are proffered as a part of the requested ZMA and it is agreed that: (1)the ZMA itself gives rise to the need for the conditions, and (2)such conditions have a reasonable relation to the rezoning requested. The term "Owner"as referenced herein shall mean the owner of record and successors in interest of parcels 07900-00-00-025A0, 08000-00-00-04600, 08000-00-00-046A0, 08000-00-00-046C0. 08000-00-00-046D0, 08000-00-00-046E0, 08000-00-00-05000, 08000-00-00-05100, 08000-00- 00-052A0,08000-00-00-055A0, 093A1-00-00-00300, and 093A1-00-00-00400. Although tax map parcel 093A1-00-00-00200 is part of the Property that is subject to the ZMA, neither such parcel,nor the owner thereof shall he subject to the terms. conditions, and obligations imposed by this proffer statement. The Application Plan shall refer to that certain Application Plan prepared by Terra Concepts dated July 15, 2013, last revised June 9, 2014 (the "Application Plan"). The Code of Development shall refer to the Code of Development fix Rivanna Village dated June 9, 2013 (the "Code of Development"). The headings of the proffers and conditions set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or he taken as an interpretation of any provisions of the proffers. This proffer statement shall supersede and replace in all respects the proffer statement approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 13, 2007 in connection with /MA 2001-00008. 1. Community Development Authority Participation: To mitigate impacts from this development,the Owner shall,upon request by the County (such request to he made by the • County within 90 days of ZMA approval), petition for and consent to any lot or unit(as the case may be)designated on the Application Plan for non-residential uses to participate in a Community Uevelopment Authority ("CDA") established pursuant to Section 15.2-5152,et seq. of the Code of Virginia("Code"). The CDA, if created,will he created for the purpose of implementing transportation improvements located along Route 250 East between the Property and the interstate 64 interchange to the west. In the event that a lot or building,as designated in the final and approved Application Plan, contains both residential and non-residential units, only the non- residential units shall participate in the CDA. 2. Cash Proffer for Capital Improvements: In order to mitigate impacts from this development, the Owner shall contribute cash for each market rate residential unit constructed within the Property to Albemarle County for the stated purpose of either funding traffic improvement projects within or immediately adjacent to the Village of Rivanna as identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program or school projects at Stone-Robinson Elementary School,Burley Middle School, and Monticello IIigh School as identified in the County School's Capital improvements Program. The cash contributions shall be at the following rates: Three Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($3,500.00) for each single family detached unit,Three Thousand Dollars($3,000.00) for each townhouse unit c r other single family attached unit,and Two Thousand, Five i lundred Dollars (S2,500.00) for each multifamily unit. Residential units paying cash in lieu of an affordable dwelling unit as provided in paragraph 9, and other affordable dwelling units shall be exempt from this paragraph 2. The cash contribution shall be paid after completion of the final inspection and prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for such applicable residential dwelling unit. If the cash contribution has not been exhausted by the County for the stated purposes within ten (10) years from the date of the issuance of the last residential building permit within Rivanna Village,all unexpended funds shall be applied to any public project or program serving the Village of Rivanna. Animal Adjustment of Cash Proffers. Beginning January 1, 2014, the amount of each cash contribution required herein shall be adjusted annually until paid, to reflect any increase or decrease tnr the preceding calendar year in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index ("IASI"). In no event shall any cash contribution amount be adjusted to a sum less than the amount initially established by these proffers. The annual adjustment shall be made by multiplying the proffered cash contribution amount for the preceding year by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the MSI as of December 1 in the preceding calendar year and the denominator of which shall be the MSI as of December 1 in the year preceding the calendar year most recently ended. For each cash contribution that is being paid in increments,the unpaid incremental payments shall he correspondingly adjusted each year. 3. Route 250 and Eastern Entrance Improvements: To mitigate traffic impacts,the Owner shall either construct left and right turn lanes on Route 250 at the eastern entrance to the Property or bond these improvements prior to approval of the first site plan or subdivision plat for the development. The Owner shall install the traffic signalization required by the Virginia Department of Transportation (5'VDOT") at the intersection of Route 250 for the eastern entrance to the Property at such point in time that VDOT traffic signalization warrants are met and VDOT requests the installation of such signal, provided that such request from VDOT is made prior to the completion of Rivanna Village,which for the purposes of this paragraph shall be deemed to be the later of(i)the date of approval and recordation of the subdivision plat creating individual residential lots in the final block permitting residential lots or(ii)the date of final site plan approval for the 'incl undeveloped block within the Property. 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. 5. Construction of Steamer Drive Improvements: The Owner's obligation to construct the improvements on TMP 093A1-00-00-00200, including the sidewalk and pedestrian pathway shown within suich parcel on the Application Plan,shall be deemed satisfied when construction is complete or if the owners of TMP 093A1-00-00-00200 do not grant the required easements or other interests in the land so as to permit the construction and maintenance of such improvements prior to County approval of the final site plan or subdivision plat for the lands immediately adjacent to these improvements. Failure of the owners of TMP 093A1-00-00- 00200 to grant tte required easements shall not relieve the Owner of the obligation to provide stormwater management for Blocks A and H and, if the required easements are not provided, alternative stormwater management(to be consistent with the stormwater requirements for the overall project) will be provided which does not compromise the design of Blocks A and H. 6. Construction and Dedication of Parks and Recreation Improvements: To mitigate impacts on existing public facilities, the Owner,at its expense, shall,at the request of the County, engineer,construct, and dedicate in fee simple to the County a park comprised of approximately 18.4 acres located in Block J and park improvements to be located in Block J (the "Community Park"). The improvements to be constructed in Block J arc set forth in the Code of Development (the "Park Improvements"). The Park Improvements shall he built or bonded prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the l37`t' residential unit within the Property. The Owner shall dedicate the Community Park to the County upon completion of the Park Improvements or earlier upon request of the County. If dedicated prior to completion of the required Park Improvements, the responsibility for implementation of this proffer shall run with the residue of the Property. The Owner and the County acknowledge that the County may assume responsibility for maintenance for completed portions of the Community Park prior to 3 dedication. The Owner and the County further acknowledge that the Owner proffers the Community Park subject to the County passing a resolution concurrent with ZMA approval, whereby proffer number 2 ofZ.MA-79-016 is deemed satisfied. To further mitigate impacts on existing public facilities,the Owner, at its expense, shall, at the request of the County,engineer, construct and dedicate in fee simple to the County additional open space areas containing approximately 13.26 acres in the aggregate as shown on the Application Plan(the"Linear Park Areas"). The Owner shall dedicate individual portions of the Linear Park areas upon the completion of such areas as they are constructed as part of the improvements within the block within which the areas are located, or later as may be required by the County. If the land to he dedicated to the County for either the Community Park or the Linear Park Areas is not dedicated as part of a site plan or subdivision plat,the Owner shall pay the costs of surveying the land and preparing the deeds of dedication. The Owner shall construct the trails through the Linear Park Areas within twelve (12) months after the approval by the County of the first subdivision plat or site plan applicable to any portion of a block within with the trails are located. 7. Route 250 Landscape Buffer and Right of Way Dedication: To establish a landscaped buffer along the Route 250 entrance corridor and accommodate potential future improvements to Route 250,the Owner shall establish a minimum seventy (70) foot reservation zone (the "Reservation Zone"and thirty (30) foot landscape buffer along Route 250(the "Landscape Buffer") as shown on the Application Plan,the use and maintenance of which is described in the Code of Development. The Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer shall be reserved for public use and dedicated upon the request of the County, subject to the terms of the Code of Development. Prior to dedication of the Reservation Zone and the Landscape Buffer,the Owner shall maintain the existing vegetation within the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer subject to the following conditions: (a) the Owner retains the right to remove trees and undergrowth where necessary to maintain a groomed edge in the Reservation Zone; (b) the terms of the Code of Development of this Proffer Statement; (c) any requirements of the County Architectural Review Board; and(d)any disturbance required as part of any improvements being made to Route 250 or construction of the entrance to the Project from Route 250. Utilities allowed in the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer are limited to those approved by the Director of Community Development (or designee) that do not preclude or conflict with entrance corridor landscaping requirements. Standards for landscaping within the Reservation Zone may be established by the ARB during the Certificate of Appropriateness process where development is subject to ARB review. Landscaping within the Landscape Buffer shall be subject to ARB review, and shall be installed in conjunction with the widening of Route 250 (or sooner, if desired by the Owner). Nothing herein shall preclude the Owner or designee from adding landscaping to the Landscape Buffer prior to the widening of Route 250 to screen and/or buffer new homes within the Project from Route 250 as needed in the Owner's discretion. Once planted, the Landscape Buffer and all landscaping therein shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association of Rivanna Village. 4 7 After dedication and until the subject regional transportation improvements are funded for construction, the Owner shall,at the request of the County, maintain the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer until requested by the County to no longer do so; provided,however, during the period of Owner maintenance, the Owner shall enjoy the right of exclusive use of the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer for purposes of landscaped open space, signage, utilities and/or other purposes described in the Code of Development. Upon being requested by the County to forego maintenance of the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer, the Owner shall cease all use of the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer and remove, to the extent requested by the County, all improvements constructed or installed by the Owner within the Reservation Zone and Landscape Buffer. 8. Landscape Buffer Along Glenmore Way: To mitigate impacts to Glenmore Way, the Owner shall proh'ide a minimum seventy (70) foot landscape buffer along Glenmore Way as shown on the Application Plan and regulated by the Code of Development. 9. Affordable Ilousing: The Owner shall provide affordable housing equal to fifteen percent (15%)of the total residential units constructed on the Property,in the form of for-sale and/or for-rent units, subject always to the terms and conditions contained herein (the "Affordable I lousing Requirement"). A site plan or subdivision plat shall designate the units, as applicable, that will, subject to the terms and conditions of this paragraph 9,incorporate affordable units as described herein. The Owner shall convey the responsibility of constructing the affordable units to the subsequent owner of the lots or Blocks where the affordable units will he located. The subsequent owner/builder shall create units affordable to households with incomes less than eighty percent (80%)of the area median income such that housing costs consisting of principal,interest, real estate taxes, and homeowners insurance ("PITI") do not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the gross household income. A. For-Sale Affordable Units. All purchasers of the for-sale affordable units shall be approved by the Albemarle County Housing Office or its designee. The subsequent owner/builder shall provide the County or its designee a period of ninety (90)days to identify and prequalify an eligible purchaser for the affordable units. The ninety(90)-day period shall commence upon written notice from the then-current owner/builder that the unit(s) will he available for sale. This notice shall not be given more than sixty(60) days prior to receipt of the Certificate of Occupancy for the applicable unit. If the County or its designee does not provide a qualified purchaser during the ninety(90)-day period, the then-current owner/builder shall have the right to sell the unit(s) without any restriction on sales price or income of the purchaser(s). This paragraph shall apply only to the first sale of each of the for-sale affordable units. B. For-Rent Affordable Units. (1) Rental Rates. The initial net rent for each for-rent affordable unit shall not exceed the then-current and applicable maximum net rent rate approved by the County Housing Office. In each subsequent calendar year,the monthly net rent for each for-rent affordable unit may be increased up to three percent(3%). For purpose of this proffer statement, the term"net rent" means that the rent does not include tenant-paid utilities. The requirement 5 that the rents for such for-rent affordable units may not exceed the maximum rents established in this paragraph 9B shall apply for a period of five(5) years following the date the certificate of occupancy is issued by the County for each for-rent affordable unit, or until the units are sold as low or moderate cost units qualifying as such under either the Virginia Housing Development Authority, Fanners Home Administration, or Housing and Urban Development, Section 8, whichever conies first(the "Affordable Term"). (2) Conveyance of Interest. All deeds conveying any interest in the for-rent affordable units during the Affordable Term shall contain language reciting that such unit is subject to the terms of this paragraph 9B. In addition, all contracts pertaining to a conveyance of • any for-rent affordable unit, or any part thereof,during the Affordable Term shall contain a • complete and full disclosure of the restrictions and controls established by this paragraph 9B. At least thirty(30) days prior to the conveyance of any interest in any for-rent affordable unit during the Affordable Term, the then-current owner shall notify the County in writing of the conveyance and provide the name,address and telephone number of the potential grantee, and state that the requirements of this paragraph 9B have been satisfied. (3) Reporting Rental Rates. During the Affordable Term, within thirty (30) days of each rental or lease term for each for-rent affordable unit, then then-current owner shall provide to the Albemarle County Housing Office a copy of the rental or lease agreement for each such unit rented that shows the rental rate for such unit and the term of the rental or lease agreement. In addition, during the Affordable Term,the then-current owner shall provide the County, if requested, any reports, copies of rental or lease agreements,or other data pertaining to rental rates as the County may reasonably require. C. Cash In-Lieu of Affordable Units. Nothing herein shall he construed to prohibit the Owner from providing cash to the County for affordable housing initiatives in lieu of constructing all or some of the affordable housing units within the Project that would be required to achieve the Affordable Housing Requirement. In the event that the Owner elects in its discretion to provide cash to the County as an alternative to constructing one or more of the affordable dwelling units that would be required to achieve the Affordable Housing Requirement, the Owner shall contribute cash to the County in the amount of Twenty-One Thousand, One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($21,150) instead of constructing each such required affordable dwelling unit. Such payment shall he made after completion of the final inspection and prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any such unit for which payment in lieu of constructing affordable housing is made. Any unit for which such contribution is made to the County shall count as an affordable dwelling unit for purposes of this paragraph 9 and also for purposes of paragraph 2. 10. Construction Traffic Management Plan. Prior to,or in conjunction with, submitting s b the first initial site plan, erosion and sediment control plan, grading plan,preliminary subdivision division plat or, if a preliminary subdivision plat is not submitted, the first final subdivision plat,the Owner shall submit a Construction Traffic Management Plan(the"CTM Plan"). The purpose of the CTM Plan shall be to minimize conflicts between construction vehicles related to developing the Property and pedestrians, cyclists,equestrian riders, and motor vehicles on Glenmore Way and at the intersection of Glenmore Way and the construction entrance to be established at Main 6 Street, as depicted on the Application Plan,while the Property is being developed. The CTM Plan shall include the following elements: A. Establish a shared use path along Glenmore Way from Route 250 to Main Street. The location, width and design of the shared use path shall be subject to the approval of the County's Director of Community Development (the "Director"). If the Director determines, based on the volume and nature of the existing use of Glenmore Way between Route 250 and Main Street by pedestrians,cyclists,and equestrian riders,that the path depicted on the Application Plan within the 70-foot wide buffer may serve as the shared use path,but that path is later determined(prior to the end of the term of the GYM Plan,as established therein) to be inadequate to serve all users, the Owner shall establish a second shared use path subject to approval of the Director as provided herein. B. In addition to any temporary traffic control signage required by the Virginia Department of Transportation("VDOT"),install such signage as determined to be necessary by the Director. C. Establish an asphalt-paved construction entrance to the Property at the Glenmore Way and Main Street intersection.The length and width of the paved portion of the Main Street construction entrance shall he sufficient to allow construction vehicles to safely enter and exit the Property, to reduce dust, soil, sand,mud, gravel, and other substances being deposited on Glenunore Way, and to accommodate a construction vehicle wash-down area. The length and width of the paved portion of the Main Street construction entrance shall be subject to approval by the Director. D. . Establish a construction vehicle wash-down area within the paved Main Street construction entrance. The wash-down area shall have equipment that shall he used to remove any soil, sand, mud, gravel or other substances from any construction vehicle,passenger car, or motorcycle before it enters onto Glenmore Way from the Property. The wash-down area and its equipment shall be subject to approval by the Director. E. Have a flagman present at the intersection of Glenmore Way and the Main Street construction entrance at all times when construction vehicles are entering and exiting the Property to assist them in safely entering and exiting the Property and to ensure smooth traffic Clow for commuter and any other vehicles using Glenmore Way. F. Clean the intersection of Glenmore Way and the Main Street construction entrance every evening of each day during which construction activity occurs on the Property, if necessary, to remove any soil, sand, mud, gravel or other substances from the road. G. Provide the Glenmore Community Association with written weekly updates of anticipated construction activity for the upcoming week. The Owner shall obtain approval of the CTM Plan by the Director before the County approves any grading permit for the Property, and shall satisfy and thereafter continue to satisfy any applicable requirement of the CTM Plan before the first construction vehicle enters the Property, 7 except as necessary to satisfy a requirement of the CTM Plan itself, such as establishing the Main Street construction entrance, until an ending date or event as provided in the CTM Plan. Any approval of the Director required by this proffer shall be made only after consultation with the Owner, the County Engineer and VDOT. The term"construction vehicle"includes, but is not limited to, any tractor truck, tractor truck/semitrailer combination,tractor truck/trailer combination,dump truck,concrete mixer truck, land mover,bulldozer, front-end loader,grader, packer,power shovel, or crane, but does not include any passenger car,passenger truck (such as a pick-up truck), or motorcycle. If VDOT issues an entrance permit for an entrance on Route 250 at Butterfield Lane as shown on the Application Plan, or any other location, for construction vehicle use, then all construction traffic for the Project shall thereafter use that entrance for entering and exiting the Property instead of Glenmore Way, and the CTM Plan shall automatically terminate. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence to the contrary, if Block A as shown on the Application Plan has not yet been completed at the time that VDOT issues such an entrance permit for construction vehicle use, then construction traffic related to the development of Block A may nevertheless continue to use Glenmorc Way, and the applicable provisions of the CTM Plan shall remain in effect with regard to such construction vehicle use until the,completion of Block A. The undersigned Owner hereby proffers that the use and development of the Property shall be in conformance with the proffers and conditions herein above,and these proffers shall supersede all other proffers and conditions made prior hereto. WITNESS the following signature: RIVANNA VILLAGE, LLC "z/f/- Bl Andrew Boninti, Manager 21434'87 tl 8 RIVANNA VILLAGE Amended and Restated Code of Development ZMA # 2013-12 Amendment to ZMA # 2001-08 APPLICANT: Rivanna Village, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company PROPERTY: County TMP nos. 07900-00-00-025A0, 08000-00-00-04600, 08000-00-00-046A0, 08000-00-00-046CO3 08000-00-00- 046D0, 08000-00-00-046E0, 08000-00-00-05000, 08000-00- 00-05100, 08000-00-00-052A0, 08000-00-00-055A0, 093A1- 00-00-00300, 093A1-00-00-00400, & 093A1-00-00-00200 June 9, 2014 23404383_6 ZMA#12013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Purpose and Intent 3 1.2 Existing Conditions. 3 2. LAND USE 4 2.1 Application Plan 4 2.2 Illustrative Plan 4 2.3 Establishment of Blocks 5 Description of Land Use Mix by Block. 5 2.4 Permitted/Prohibited Uses By Block. 6 2.5 Historic Structures and Sites. 9 3. BUILDING FORM STANDARDS 9 3.1 Purpose 9 3.2 Density Regulations 9 3.3 Lot Regulations. 11 3.4 Building Height Regulations. 12 4.ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS&ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 13 4.1 Architectural Standards 13 4.1.1 Architectural Styles, Form, Massing,and Proportions of Structures 13 4.1.2 Materials, Colors,and Texture; Facade Treatments. 14 4.2 Covenants to Provide for Architectural Review Committee. 14 4.3 Variance 14 5. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS 15 5.1 General Standards 15 5.2 Planting Strip and Street Tree Standards 15 5.3 Exterior Screening Standards 16 5.4 Landscaping/Screening Areas and the Route 250 Reservation Zone 16 5.4.1 Glenmore Way Buffer 16 5.4.2 Route 250 Reservation Zone 17 5.4.3 Route 250 Landscaping Buffer 17 6. STREETSCAPE STANDARDS 19 6.1 Streetscape Standards 19 6.2 Street Signage 19 6.3 Street Materials. 19 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 7. PARKING REGULATIONS 19 7.1 Regulations. 19 7.2 Shared Parking 20 7.3 Alternative Parking Surfaces. 20 8.OPEN SPACE/GREENSPACE&AMENITIES 20 Open Space/Greenspace Preservation 20 9. PUBLIC FACILITIES 23 9.1 Water&Sewer. 23 9.2 Stormwater 23 9.3 Dedications. 23 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A Boundary Plat of The Rivanna Village Towncenter dated June 19, 2013, prepared by Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT B Plans dated July 15, 2013, last revised June 9, 2014, prepared by Terra Concepts, P.C. EXHIBIT C Concept Plan prepared by Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Intent. Pursuant to the requirements of the Neighborhood Model District ("NMD") under Sections 20.A.4 and 20.A.5 of the Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County (the "Zoning Ordinance"), this "Code of Development", together with the "Application Plan" referenced herein, amends and restates Rivanna Village's General Development Plan and Code of Development and shall supersede the General Development Plan and Code of Development adopted as ZMA 2001-08. As envisioned by the NMD ordinance, this Code of Development for Rivanna Village is intended to accomplish the following: (a) to promote flexibility and creativity in establishing the building locations, mixture of uses, bulk requirements, and densities within the subject property, and (b) to establish the regulatory framework and guidelines for each block within Rivanna Village, as well as the uses, location, building types, and street systems contained therein. Rivanna Village is comprised of 13 contiguous parcels, containing 94.76 acres in the aggregate (based on a current survey attached as Exhibit A, or 95.81 acres based on the current County Assessor records), which are owned by Rivanna Village, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (the "Development").1 For the purposes of this Code of Development, the "Applicant" shall be Rivanna Village, LLC. The "Owner" shall be Rivanna Village, LLC, its heirs, successors and assigns. 1.2 Existing Conditions. Rivanna Village is located just off U.S. Route 250 approximately five miles east of the City of Charlottesville in Albemarle County, Virginia (the "County"). It is bounded on the west by Glenmore Way, on the north by the Magruder subdivision and Route 250, and on the east and south by single family residential lots. A number of the parcels comprising the project front on Route 250 and have long been used for residential purposes. Some are abandoned, while others remain in use. The vast majority of the property is comprised or rolling,wooded open space with small creeks and ponds. All of the parcels comprising Rivanna Village are located within the area designated in the County Comprehensive plan as the "Village of Rivanna" Development Area, and are designated as Neighborhood Density. As shown in Table 1.2 below, the majority of the parcels are currently zoned NMD (Neighborhood Model District) pursuant to ZMA 2001- 08, and the remaining parcels are zoned RA(Rural Areas). For boundaries of the parcels comprising the Development, see the "Boundary Plat of The Rivanna Village Towncenter" at Exhibit A. 3 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 : TABLE 1.2—Sunman/of Parcels Comprising ZMA Tax Map Parcel Existing Zoning Comprehensive Plan Designation 07900-00-00-025A0 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-04600 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-046A0 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-046C0 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-046D0 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-046E0 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-05000 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-05100 RA Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-052A0 RA Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 08000-00-00-055A0 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 093A1-00-00-00300 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 093A1-00-00-00400 j NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 093A1-00-00-00200 NMD Village of Rivanna,Town/Village Center 2. LAND USE 2.1 Application Plan. The Application Plan (Exhibit B) is the governing plan that serves as the roadmap for the development and depicts the general location of key features of the development, which are referenced in this Code of Development. 2.2 Illustrative Plan. The Illustrative Plan, which is not a part of the Application Plan, is a conceptual rendering of how the property might develop at full build-out pursuant to the standards set forth in this Code of Development. The Illustrative Plan is conceptual and may be expected to change in response to market conditions. No aspect of the development depicted on the Illustrative Plan shall, by itself, be construed to impose any obligation, regulation or limitation on the Owner related to the Development. 4 11. ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 2.3 Establishment of Blocks. To regulate land uses within Rivanna Village, the project is divided into eleven (11) distinct blocks (Blocks "A" through "K"). The blocks are defined geographically by the Application Plan on Sheet 2 of Exhibit B. The approximate acreages of the individual blocks are established in Table 3.2 herein. To promote flexibility as recited in the NMD ordinance, it is recognized that, as the development proceeds through the submission and review of site plans and subdivision plats, individual architectural and engineering decisions may modify the precise dimensions, area and location of the individual blocks. Nothing in this Code of Development or the Application Plan shall be construed to prohibit the alteration of any one or several blocks, as depicted in the Code of Development or the Application Plan, at the time of site plan or subdivision review by the County; provided, however, that no such modification shall exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the gross land area of the larger block impacted by each such change. Site plans and subdivision plats may be submitted and approved for any portion of an individual block, provided that all requirements of this Code of Development and the County Zoning Ordinance are otherwise met. Description of Land Use Mix by Block. The following section is intended to describe the development and relative location of important land uses by providing a summary of the most important features, land uses and other improvements to be included within each block: Block A: Block A will serve as a transition zone between the more rural character of Route 250 and Glenmore Way and Rivanna Village. As such, uses are relatively limited and a buffer area and open space will be provided. The "Glenmore Way Buffer" area is described in more detail in the Landscape Section. The principal use in this Block will be residential uses, which will most likely include single family detached units. However, certain non-residential uses are also permitted, but they are extremely limited. Block B: Block B continues the transition zone by extending the Glenmore Way Buffer and generally providing for residential uses. The principal use in this Block will be residential uses, which will most likely include single family attached Villa-style units. However, certain non- residential uses are also permitted, but they are extremely limited. Block C: Block C is bounded by Sweetgum Lane, Main Street, and Steamer Drive and will serve as a transition area between the lower-density areas in Block A and B and the commercial and higher-density areas in Block D. Block C is envisioned primarily for residential uses in the form of single family attached townhouse units, although non-residential units are also permitted there. Townhouse units that are constructed in Block C will likely be rear-loaded and accessed by alleys. 5 ti ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 Block D: Block D is the most intensive block in the Development, and will contain commercial, residential and civic uses. The buildings in Block D will likely contain a mixture of retail, service, office and/or residential uses. Although a variety of residential uses is permitted in this Block, such uses would likely include apartments above non-residential uses. This Block will likely provide a sense of connection to the park in Block J. Block E: Block E is envisioned to be developed with townhouse units that front on Main Street and that are served by a rear alley, although a variety of residential and non-residential uses are permitted in this Block. Block F: Block r is also envisioned to be developed with townhouse units that front on Main Street, although a variety of residential and non-residential uses are permitted in this Block. Block G: Block G is also envisioned to be developed with townhouse units, but other types of residential units are also permitted. An effort was made to preserve as much open space and existing vegetation between this Block and the Magruder Subdivision as possible, and to permit only very limited non-residential uses. Block H: Block H is a small Block located adjacent to the East Rivanna Fire Station parcel and the proposed County Service Authority water tank. The lots would front on Park Street. This Block is envisioned to be developed with residential units in the form of single family detached units, but all or a portion of the Block may also include indoor recreational facilities, such as tennis court. Block I: Block I permits primarily residential uses and will likely include primarily single family detached units, and will permit only limited non-residential uses. This Block will include a vehicular connection to Route 250, and will be subject to the requirements for the Route 250 "Reservation Area" and Route 250 "Landscape Buffer" as described in more detail in the Landscape section. Block J: Block J will include a community park that will serve as the recreational and outdoor space for not only the future residents of Rivanna Village, but for the other County residents. The park shall be built by the Owner to the standards detailed in the "Open Space &Amenities" in Section 8 herein, and then dedicated to the County. Block J will also include a number of residential units that will most likely involve single family detached units. Block K: Block F is the East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Company(ERVFC). 2.4 Permitted/Prohibited Uses By Block. TABLE 2.4—Permitted/Prohibited Uses By Block P=Permitted Use By Block;SP=Uses that may be applied for via Special Use Permit;Blank=Uses prohibited within Block. Uses Block A BCDIE F G ; H I JK 6 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 TABLE 2.4—Permitted/Prohibited Uses By Block P=Permitted Use By Block;SP=Uses that may be applied for via Special Use Permit;Blank=Uses prohibited within Block. Block Uses A BCDE F GH I JK Detached single-family dwellings IIIII 00000 P — Semi-detached and xes,attached ow hsingle-family dwellings es(e.and. alio u, �� ����11- triplexes,quadraplexes,townhouses,atrium houses and•otic houses) Multiple-family dwellings 1111111111/111 Rental of permitted residential uses and guest cottages 1111 Homes for developmentally-disabled persons Tourist lod:in: -- • P 110111121111211111111101111211111111 Home Occu••tion(Class A) 000000 p P P NM. Home Occu•ation(Class B 1 SP 111ENm101m01331 SP 111111131111111 Accessory uses and buildings,including storage buildings P 111111111111 Assisted living residential facilities Administrative professional offices Antique,gift,jewelry,notion and craft shops Barber,beauty shops -- —11111--- Cefular communication,miaowave,and radio wave transmission and reby towers,i P ���������m substabonsand. - • •- Clothing,apparel and shoe shops Clubs,lodges,civic,fratemal,patriotic(reference 5.1.02) 111111111111111111111111 Community center Concessions for the serving of food refreshments or entertainment of dub members ■■iiiiiriiim■■■ and guests in conjunction with swim,golf,or tennis club. Convenience stores P PP P Day care,child care,or nursery facility(ref.5.1.06) P PP P Drive-through windows serving or associated with permitted usesIIII SP SP SP SP 1111111 Drugstore, may ore • • y P P I P i P Educational,technical and trade schools -- P I P I P P 11111111111111111111111 Electric,gas,oil and communication bdlties,excluding tower structures and including P ' P i P j P P poles,lines,transformers,pipes,meters and related farlities for distribution of local1 111 service and owned and operated by a pubic utility.Water distribution and sewerage collection hnes,pumping stations and appurtenances owned and operated by the t Abemarte County Service Authority.Except as otherwise expressly provided,central water supplies and central sewerage systems in conformance with Chapter 16 of the Code of Albemarle and al other applicable law. . T Factory outlet sales-clothin:and fabric 11111111111111=1,21112111P —�—�— Farmers'market(reference 5.1.47) P P P P a P 0---- P - ,Farm Stand P P P I P P —__QQ = Financial institutions I P P 1 P 0--_-- s - Fre and rescue squad stations(reference 5.1.09) 1111111111111111111101111111111111=111111111111111=111111ffill Florist 1111111 Food and grocery stores including such specialty shops as bakery,candy, milk dispensary and wine and cheese shops Furniture and home ap•liances sales and service) _1111I� ®—� IIIIIIIIII Hardware store 40) • Health dub or spa — Home and business services such as grounds care,cleaning,exterminators,miter 1111111111/1111111 repair and maintenance services Hotels,motels and inns(2) --0000 Indoor athletic facilities •UHHHHUU Indoor theaters(9) Laboratories,medical or pharmaceutical • Laundries,dry cleaners • Libraries,museums Medical center(3) 1 Musical instrument sales Newsstands,magazines,pipe and tobacco shops t Office and business machines sales and service Optical goods sales i --- ��� -- Outdoor Amphitheatre 101111111 1 7 1 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 TABLE 2.4—Permitted/Prohibited Uses By Block Vu P=Permitted Use By Block;SP=Uses that may be applied for via Special Use Permit;Blank=Uses prohibited within Block. Uses Block A BCDE F GH I J K Outdoor eating establishment or café PPP P Outdoor storage,display and/or sales serving or associated with a by-right SP SP SP SP permitted use,if any portion of the use would be visible from a County-designated Entrance Corridor Outdoor storage,display and/or sales serving or associated with a by-right PPP P p PPP permitted use not visible from a County-designated Entrance Corridor Parks,playgrounds and civic spaces P PP PPP PP PPP Photographic goods sales P PPP Professional offices,including medical,dental and optical P PP p Public and private utilities and infrastructure P PP PP P P P PPP Public uses and buildings,induding temporary or mobile facilities such as PIP P P P P P P PPP schools,offices,parks,playgrounds and roads funded,owned or operated by local,state,or federal agencies,public water and sewer transmission, main or trunk lines,treatment facilities,pumping stations and the like, owned and/or operated by the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Research and development activities including experimental testing P PP P Rest home,nursing home,convalescent home,orphanage or simiar institution P PP P Restaurant P P P P j Retail sales and service establishments alowed under G I,permitted astemporary P PP P events(4)(5) School of special instruction P PP P Sporting goods sales(10) PPP P Stand-alone parking and parking structures(reference 4.12,5.1.4.1)(6) P PP P Stormwater management facilities shown on an approvedfinal site plan or P P P r P P P p P PPP subdivision plat Swim,golf,tennis or athletic facility P PP P p p Tailor,seamstress P PP P Temporary construction uses(reference 5.118) P PP PP P PP PPP Temporary nonresidential mobile homes(reference 5.8) P P P P Tier I&Tier ll personal wireless service facilities(reference 5.140) P PP PP P PP P P P . Tier III personal wireless senlicefacilities(7) SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP SP Veterinary Office and Hospital(8) P PP P Visual and audio appliances sales(10) P p P P 1. Where permitted, home occupation and Class B uses shall be regulated per Section 5.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Where permitted, any"Inn" shall not exceed 15 guest rooms. 3. Where permitted, any medical center shall allow only an emergency care (i.e., First Med)facility. 4. Where permitted, outdoor retail sales within this category shall be limited to temporary, seasonal and periodic events supporting the community (no more than ten a year), including, without limitation, holiday festivals, community fairs, artisan and public open markets, weddings, and other pedestrian-related events to be conducted in Main Street or in the adjacent streets during specially permitted events during which Main Street and/or the adjacent streets would be blocked to vehicular traffic. 5. Where permitted, temporary retail sales events are allowed no more than 15 times per year. In the case of weekend sales, a "sales event" may include Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. 8 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 6. Stand-alone parking is permitted in the Blocks labeled with a "P." Parking structures shall be limited to Blocks C, D, E and F only. Where utilized, the facade treatment, height, setback, lighting, and scale of any parking structure shall be subject to administrative review and approval by the Director of Community Development (or designee) to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential uses. 7. As of the date of approval of this Code of Development,Section 5.1.40 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, which regulates Personal Wireless Service Facilities ("PWSF"), requires a special use permit for a Tier III PWSF. In the event the PWSF ordinance is ever amended in the future to permit Tier III PWSF by-right in a NMD zoning district, this Code of Development shall be deemed to have been similarly amended, such that Tier Ill PWSFs will be permitted in those blocks where they are currently only permitted by Special Use Permit. 8. Where permitted, this use is restricted solely to small animal care with no outdoor kennels and for offices for off-site veterinary services, such as for vets tending to horses off the premises. 9. Where permitted, this is use is restricted to a maximum of two screens. 10. Where permitted, these uses are limited to 10,000 square feet. 2.5 Historic Structures and Sites. There are no historic structures or sites located within Rivanna Village. 3. BUILDING FORM STANDARDS 3.1 Purpose { The regulations contained in this section are promulgated (i) with the intent that the form of buildings in Rivanna Village will foster a vibrant pedestrian-scale neighborhood community, with architectural and landscape elements that complement and enhance building design and (ii) to create a flexible range of density over the designated blocks described herein. 3.2 Density Regulations Table 3.2 establishes the general mix of commercial, residential, office and civic space uses and the minimum and maximum density for residential uses (in dwelling units) and development intensity for non-residential units (in gross leasable area ("GLA"). At full build-out, the development shall not exceed the maximum levels established at the bottom of the table. For the purposes of interpreting Table 3.2, no site plan or subdivision plat shall be approved unless it conforms to the following standards: II 9 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 For residential uses, there shall be a minimum and maximum of residential dwelling units for Rivanna Village at full buildout. Within this range, the Owner may adjust the residential unit type and density by block to meet market and design considerations. For non-residential uses, there shall be a maximum and a minimum amount of gross leasable area required/permitted. Within this range, the Owner may adjust the non- residential use and density by block to meet market and design considerations. • I TABLE 3.2 Density Regulation Minimum/Maximum Use Regulations Non-Residential Uses Residential Uses Minimum Maximum Non- Dwelling unit Dwelling Non-Residential Residential minimum unit Block Acreage (s.f.) (s.f.) (1) maximum A 9.80 0 20,000 10 41 B 6.76 0 20,000 8 35 C 4.66 0 60,000 8 50 D 2.39 0(4) 60,000 0 80 E 2.76 0 30,000 0 36 F 1.62 0 20,000 0 24 G 5.62 0 10,000 13 45 H 2.03 0 40,000 0 12 21.90 0 10,000 40 90 J 31.22 012) 20,000(2) 30 80 K 6.00 23,000 N/A 0 0 Total 94.76 Min. Non- 20,000 Residential GLA Max. Non- Residential GLA 60,000(1) Min. Residential 275 Dwelling Units Max. Residential Dwelling Units 400 10 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 1. The regulations shall not include any non-residential uses in Block K (fire station) or Block J (park amenities). 2. For park facilities in Block J, there are no minimum or maximum non-residential requirements. 3. The non-residential minimum/maximum limitations are based on the building's gross leasable area in square feet. 4. No individual block has a minimum amount of non-residential use, since it has not yet been established with certainty which block or blocks will contain non-residential uses. Nevertheless, there shall be a minimum of 20,000 s.f. of non-residential uses within the Development. 3.3 Lot Regulations. TABLE 33 -Lot Regulations Area and Area and Bulk Setback Regulations Bulk Regulations Regulations Minimum Maximum Lot Min. Front Min. Side Min. Rear Lot Size (s.f.) Size (s.f.) Setback Setback Setback (ft.) (ft ) (1) Single Family 3,000 None 10 5 (3) 10(4) Detached Single Family 3,000 None 10 5(2)(3) 10(4) Attached Villas (e.g. duplex or multiplex) Single Family 1,300 None 10(4) 5(2)(3) 10(4) Attached Townhouses Non-Residential, N/A N/A 0(s) 0(5) 0 Multifamily and Mixed-Use Buildings 1.Whenever a unit has a road or alley at its side,the minimum side yard setback is increased to 15 feet. 2.There shall be no minimum setback(i.e. zero ft.) along the side property line at the point of attachment of two or more single family dwelling units of any type. 3. Intentionally Omitted. 4.Setbacks for individual lots may vary when a utility or landscape easement encroaches on a side yard. 5. Build-To Lines: Structures in block D to be built to the property line along the frontage of all public 11 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 roads except where property lines are radii. I 3.4 Building Height Regulations. The maximum building heights for Rivanna Village by block shall be as shown in Table 3.4 below: TABLE 3.4 Building Height Regulations Residential Non-Residential & Block Mixed-Use Buildings Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Stories Height (ft.) Stories Height (ft.) Block A 1 50 1 50 Block B 1 50 1 50 Block C 1 50 1 50 Block D 1 50 1 65 Block E 1 50 1 50 Block F 1 50 1 50 Block G 1 40 1 40 Block H 1 50 1 55 Block I 1 50 1 50 1 Block J 1 50 1 50 j Block K N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 4. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS &ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 4.1 Architectural Standards. The following standards shall be applied to the buildings and structures in Rivanna Village. For the purposes of this Code of Development, this Section 4.1 shall be defined as the "Architectural Design Standards." Nothing herein is intended to conflict with the architectural standards established by the County Architectural Review Board for use in protecting County entrance corridors. Where conflicts arise between architectural standards established in this Code of Development and recommendations made by the ARB within its defined purview, the ARB recommendations shall prevail. Buildings within Rivanna Village that are subject to ARB review per the existing regulations shall be reviewed by the ARB under the typical Certificate of Appropriateness process. 4.1.1 Architectural Styles, Form, Massing, and Proportions of Structures. • The form and massing of the Rivanna Village's buildings will relate to their proximity to the central commercial core. This relationship means that the tallest, most dense and intensely utilized areas shall be in and around the commercial core. As the development radiates away from this core, the form shall change and the density and intensity of the massing shall decrease. • With larger buildings, the building's architecture shall employ architectural techniques that break up the larger facade into smaller, multiple facades. To achieve this, the following architectural techniques shall be used: plane changes, stepbacks, the use of windows or building entries on each story, varied building materials, or other like architectural elements." • For single family detached dwelling units, the porch or the front of the house shall be the prominent feature along the road, rather than the garage. To implement this standard, all garages on single family detached units shall be either side-loaded or set back from the face or porch by a minimum of three feet. • In blocks A, B, C, D, E and F when non-residential uses are proposed,the Owner shall use reasonable efforts to relegate parking to the rear and side of buildings whenever reasonable possible, and whenever reasonably possible, such parking shall be screened by buildings, landscaping, permanent structures, or other acceptable measures. • Each non-residential building abutting a street shall have a primary entrance from either the front or side of the building. A building may also have secondary entrances on the side or rear of the building. 13 3 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 4.1.2 Materials, Colors, and Texture; Façade Treatments. • The Thomas Jefferson Foundation, which owns and operates Monticello, has expressed that roof colors/materials have the greatest potential to impact Monticello's viewshed and, accordingly, represent their principal concerns for developments proposed within the viewshed. To mitigate these concerns, the Owner shall use medium to darker shaded earth tone colors for major facade treatment of the building (i.e., trim colors are not restricted) for all mixed-use or commercial buildings within Block D. The emphasis shall be to reduce the reflective nature of certain colors and materials. Secondly, the Owner shall use dark, non- reflective roof materials throughout the development. 4.2 Covenants to Provide for Architectural Review Committee. Prior to the approval of any site plan or subdivision concerning any portion of Rivanna Village,the Owner shall cause to be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Rivanna Village (the "Declaration")that includes provisions for the following: • Procedure for creation of an "Architectural Review Committee", which shall include the minimum and maximum number of members and manner of appointment. • Procedure for review of proposed buildings by the Architectural Review Committee for consistency with requirements of this Code of Development. • Procedure for amending or supplementing the Architectural Design Standards, which shall include the number of property owners required to approve any such change; provided, however, that any such amendment may not eliminate or lessen the minimum standards of Section 4.1 of this Code of Development absent the written consent of the Director of Community Development. • Rights of Declarant to enforce the Architectural Design Standards. The Architectural Review Committee shall have exclusive design jurisdiction over all original construction, modifications, additions or alterations made on or to all existing improvements and the open space, if any, appurtenant thereto, on all property within Rivanna Village. 4.3 Variance. The Architectural Review Committee may authorize variances from compliance with any of the provisions of the Architectural Design Guidelines when circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic, or environmental considerations require, but only in accordance with duly adopted rules and regulations. 14 orb. ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 5. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS The following standards shall be applied to the buildings and structures in Rivanna Village. For the purposes of this Code of Development, this Section shall be defined as the "Landscape Standards." 5.1 General Standards The landscape standards contained in Section 32.7.9 of the County Zoning Ordinance shall apply to the Development, except as where the provisions of this Code of Development are more stringent. Required landscape materials planted within public areas, such as the community park, common areas, buffer areas, amenity areas, and right of ways, shall be chosen from the Albemarle County Recommended Plants List. If it is desired to use plants not included above, then information demonstrating the suitability of the plant materials shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development or designee, who may authorize alternative plant materials. 5.2 Planting Strip and Street Tree Standards See the street sections on sheet 5 of Exhibit B for the basic standards, which shall be supplemented with the following: • Notwithstanding anything shown on the Application Plan or the Illustrative Plan to the contrary, Owner may elect to plant the street trees in wells/ grates on Main Street and Park Street between Steamer Drive and Main Street. If tree wells/ grates { are used in place of a planting strip, they shall be in a minimum sixty (60) square feet. • Planting strips are not required on private travel ways and residential alleys. • Street trees shall be provided along all public streets. They shall be a minimum of two (2) inch caliper (measured six (6) inches above ground level) at the time of installation and planted within the 6-foot wide continuous planting strip located between the curb and sidewalk. Trees shall be installed at an average of fifty (50) foot on center or less. Street tree spacing may vary due to site distance requirements or utility easements or because there is a need to highlight a special feature, such as a plaza, important architectural feature, or to permit an important vista. (Note: In Entrance Corridors, the ARB may require greater caliper street trees, designate specific tree locations, and specify tree spacings which are different from the standards established within this Code of Development.) In residential areas, if conflicts arise between street trees and utilities, utility easements or site distance requirements and if it can be demonstrated that no other economically or physically viable alternative exists, the Director of Community Development or designee may 15 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 allow street trees to be placed on the residential lots as close to the street as possible as a replacement for the street tree within the planting strip. Along private travel ways, street trees shall either be provided behind the sidewalk in the parking setback where a parking lot fronts the street in parking islands of parking lots, or shall not be required where a building is immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. 5.3 Exterior Screening Standards Within Rivanna Village, commercial and other non-residential uses shall not be required to be screened from adjacent residential areas. 5.4 Landscaping/Screening Areas and the Route 250 Reservation Zone Within Rivanna Village, there are certain areas around the exterior of the project which require special landscape treatments to ensure a reasonable transition between Rivanna Village and the surrounding existing land uses and roadways. These areas and standards are defined as follows: 5.4.1 Glenmore Way Buffer A landscaped buffer area that is a minimum of seventy (70) feet deep shall be established along those portions of Rivanna Village fronting along Glenmore Way (in Blocks A and B) and shall be installed in connection with the development of Blocks A and B. The minimum depth of this area shall be measured from the eastern edge of the Glenmore Way right of way as it exists on the date of approval of this Code of Development. This landscaped buffer area is intended to serve two purposes. First, it is intended to complement the rural character of Glenmore Way and the area adjacent to the Glenmore Way/ Route 250 intersection through the creation of a maintained area consisting of turf, shrubs and/ or trees. Second, it is intended to preserve or enhance the existing mature vegetation within the landscaped buffer area so as to soften, but not necessarily "screen," Rivanna Village from the Glenmore Manor house. No buildings or roads except as shown on the Application Plan shall be allowed within the landscaped buffer area. The only uses and construction activity allowed in the buffer shall be: • The installation and maintenance of required drainage channels and public utilities. • The installation and maintenance of freestanding signage (as permitted in the Zoning Ordinance Section 4.5.11), sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities, and sight distance or other improvement related to the construction of roads shown on the Application Plan or the pedestrian paths shown on the Illustrative Plan. • The installation and maintenance of pedestrian paths and trails. 16 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 • Clearing and grading into the landscaped buffer area shall be allowed as part of construction; however, any disturbed areas resulting from this activity shall be revegetated with turf, shrubs, or trees as part of the construction and site plan/subdivision plat process. 5.4.2 Route 250 Reservation Zone Within Block I, the Owner shall reserve an area for the possible future expansion of Route 250 as shown in the "Route 250 East Corridor Study," prepared by VDOT and dated March 2004. The depth of this reservation area shall be the first seventy(70)feet as measured from the Route 250 right of way as it exists on the date of approval of this Code of Development and shall run along the length of the Route 250 frontage of Rivanna Village. If VDOT requires less than the total seventy (70) feet, the depth of the Reservation Zone shall be reduced accordingly. Within the Route 250 Reservation Zone, no buildings, roads, or parking lots shall be constructed, except for the following improvements: the entry road shown on the Application Plan, sidewalks, utilities, landscaping and other improvements approved by } the Director of Community Development or designee. Utilities shall not be located within the Route 250 Reservation Zone so as to preclude the landscaping required by the ARB along the Entrance Corridor. Additionally, freestanding directory signage (as permitted in the Zoning Ordinance Section 4.5.11 and as reviewed by the ARB for a Certificate of Appropriateness) shall also be allowed. Standards for landscaping within the Route 250 Reservation Zone may be established by the ARB during the Certificate of Appropriateness process where development is subject to ARB review. The applicant will maintain the existing vegetation in its natural state, but retains the right to remove trees and undergrowth where necessary to maintain a groomed edge in the Route 250 Reservation Zone. 5.4.3 Route 250 Landscaping Buffer For those portions of Rivanna Village fronting along Route 250, a landscaped buffer that is a minimum of thirty (30) feet deep shall be established behind the Route 250 Reservation Zone at the time Route 250 is widened. The minimum depth of this area shall be measured from the southern edge of the Route 250 Reservation Zone as defined above. The intent of this buffer area is to reserve an area exclusively for landscaping and to ensure that an appropriate relationship with the Entrance Corridor can be established if Route 250 is ever widened. As a result, no buildings, roads, parking lots, utilities, or other similar feature shall be constructed within this zone. The only exceptions shall be the entry road shown on the Application Plan, sidewalks, utilities, and other improvements approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. Utilities shall not be located so as to preclude the landscaping required by the ARB along 17 is` ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 the Entrance Corridor. Landscaping within the buffer area shall be subject to ARB review, and shall be installed in conjunction with the widening of Route 250. Nothing here shall preclude the Owner or designee from adding landscaping to the buffer area prior to the widening of Route 250 to screen and/or buffer new homes within Rivanna Village from Route 250 as needed in developer's discretion. Once planted, the buffer and all landscaping therein shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association of Rivanna Village. 18 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 6. STREETSCAPE STANDARDS 6.1 Streetscape Standards. All named streets within the Development shown on the Application Plan are proposed to be public, except for Cattail Court, alleyways serving residential uses, and parking lot travel ways, which are proposed to be private. All streets shall be constructed to VDOT standards as well as any additional, complementary standards included in Section 20A.10 of the NMD section of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. Beyond construction of roadways, sidewalks and utilities, the Owner reserves the right to install within or adjacent to the right of way such items that may be deemed acceptable to VDOT such as MUTCD signing, lighting, landscape treatments, mailboxes, low walls or other features.Streetscapes will be more formal in nature near the central core of the community and less so in other areas. Grading of areas between the curb and sidewalk have been proposed as flat to permit unrestricted pedestrian access between on-street parking accommodations and the sidewalk system. 6.2 Street Signage. Non-standard signage may be installed throughout Rivanna Village at no cost to the County upon approval of a signage plan by the Director of Community Development, or designee. 6.3 Street Materials. Street improvements may be constructed using alternative type roadway paving materials upon approval by the Director of Community Development, or designee, or the Virginia Department of Transportation, as applicable. 7 PARKING REGULATIONS 7.1 Regulations. Notwithstanding the minimum parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance,the following regulations expressly supersede those restrictions: 1. The parking schedule in the Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.6 is modified such that minimum number of parking spaces for all non-residential uses within Blocks C, D, E and F shall be based on the requirements for Shopping Centers contained in Section 4.12.6. Secondly, the calculations for non-residential parking shall be based on the total square footage within the block and not upon a per lot basis. However, if the Owner elects to subdivide any portion of the block and/or off-site parking is required to support the subdivided portions of the block, then the Owner shall also satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.8. Finally, nothing in the Code of Development shall restrict the Owner from seeking a modification or waiver as allowed under the Zoning Ordinance 19 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 Section 4.12.2.c or a further reduction in required parking as allowed under Section 4.12.8 through 4.12.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Section 4.12.4.a of the Zoning Ordinance is modified to allow the maximum number of parking spaces to exceed the required number of spaces by twenty (20%) percent in Block D only. 3. Residential parking in garages shall count towards the residential minimum parking requirements. 4. Section 4.12.9.a of the Zoning Ordinance is modified to permit on-street parking spaces, which are located on a public or private right of way and are within five hundred (500)feet of a use,to count towards the parking requirements generated by that use. Off-Street Parking. Off-street parking shall be provided according to the following Parking Schedule: TABLE 117 Parking-Schedule USE RATIO Residential 2 per dwelling unit Residential guest parking 1 per every 4 dwelling units Non-Residential See note 1 in Section 7.1 Notwithstanding the foregoing, parking requirements may be further reduced based upon the recommendations of a Shared Parking Plan approved by the Director of Community Development or designee pursuant to Section 4.12 of the Zoning , Ordinance. On-Street Parking. On-Street Parking is permitted throughout Rivanna Village. On- street parking may be 90-degree, angle,or parallel. 7.2 Shared Parking. A shared parking plan may be submitted by the Owner at the time of submission of a Site Plan and reviewed by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with Section 4.12 of the Zoning Ordinance (a "Shared Parking Plan"). 7.3 Alternative Parking Surfaces. Alternative parking surfaces may be approved, subject to prior review and approval by the Director of Community Development, or designee. 8. OPEN SPACE/GREENSPACE & AMENITIES Open Space/Greenspace Preservation Rivanna Village shall incorporate an extensive open space and amenity system that creates recreational opportunities and enhances the sense of place, as depicted on the • Open Space I Amenity Plan on Sheet 7 of Exhibit B. The Owner will dedicate and convey 20 it ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 to the County (a) a portion of the Development for use as open space park area, the approximate area of which is shown on Sheet 7 of Exhibit B containing approximately 18.42 acres, and (b) a portion of the Development for use as linear park area (which area includes the trails shown therein), the approximate area of which is shown on Sheet 7 of Exhibit B containing approximately 13.26 acres (collectively, the "Park Dedication Area"), as such Park Dedication Area may be modified pursuant to written acknowledgement of the Director of Parks and Recreation of the County. The Park Dedication Area will provide opportunities for both active and passive recreational activities of the Rivanna Community and members of the public at large. Trail Standards: The trails shown on the Application Plan shall be six (6) feet wide asphalt, and shall be field located in the general location shown on the Application Plan. TABLE 8—Open Space jGreenspace and Amenity Areas Total Acreage: 94.76 acres Approximate Open Space/Greenspace Area (excluding Block K) 37.52 Acres Open Space/Green Space Area/Total Site Area Ratio(excluding Block K) 42.3% Approximate Amenity Area (excluding Block K) 31.68 Acres Amenity Area/Total Site Area Ratio(excluding Block K) 35.7% The following section provides a general description of the open space and amenities within each Block: Block A: Block A will include the Glenmore Way Buffer along the portion of the Block adjacent to Glenmore Way. Block A will also include open space in the form of stormwater management facilities and pedestrian trail connections to Blocks B, K and H. Block B: Block B will also include the Glenmore Way Buffer along the portion of the Block adjacent to Glenmore Way, and a portion of open space along Route 250. Block B will also include open space areas in the form of stormwater management facilities and a trail network that will provide pedestrian connections to Blocks A, G and E. Block C: With its location in the more dense area of the Development, Block C will provide less open space. It will be closely located in proximity to amenity areas that are likely to be located in Blocks D and J. Block D: Given Block D's designation as the most densely developed block that will include some portion of non-residential uses,there is limited open space therein. However,this Block is likely to include recreational amenities in the form of a fitness facility, and it will be located directly adjacent to the large expanse of open space and amenities within the Park in Block J. Block E: Block E includes a small area of open space and a pedestrian trail connection to Blocks B and G. 21 'Y ._ ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9, 2014 Block F: Block F includes open space areas and pedestrian trail connections to Blocks E, G and I. Block G: Block G includes larger areas of open space and pedestrian trail connections to Blocks B, E, F and I. Block H: Block H is adjacent to the wooded open space area behind the fire station, and includes pedestrian trail connections to Blocks A, K, and J. In addition, it is possible that amenities in the form of indoor tennis courts will be constructed within Block H. Block H is also adjacent to the large park and associated amenities located within Block J. Block I: Block I includes the Route 250 Reservation Zone which will serve as open space until the widening of Route 250. This block also includes the Route 250 Landscape Buffer that will ensure an appropriate buffer between the residential uses in this Block and Route 250. Block I also includes several other open space areas and pedestrian trail connections to Blocks G,J,and F. Block J: The large community park is located within Block J along with a variety of park amenities and improvements described in more detail herein. This Block also includes an extensive network of trails, preserved wetlands areas, and trail connections to several adjacent Blocks, including Blocks I, H and F. There is also a strong pedestrian sidewalk connection to Block D. The community park will consist of approximately 18.4 acres and provide for active and passive recreational opportunities. The park will include the following amenities as agreed to with the Director of Parks and Recreation, but nothing herein shall prohibit the Director of Community Development, after consultation with the Director of Parks and Recreation,from approving modifications to such amenities as requested by the Owner. In addition, variations to the acreage,the uses and the location of uses can be made by the Director of Planning in consultation with the Director of Parks and Recreation. Approval of the final park plan by the Director of Parks and Recreation is required prior to approval of the final site plan for the park. Proposed Park Amenities: • One basketball court • Two outdoor tennis courts • Dog park with a pier at the Quarry • Two picnic shelters • Large playfield • Quarry pond area with pier (which may be fenced) • Wooded grove with Pavilion next to the Quarry • Restroom facilities • Approximately 8,650 linear feet of trails • Playground The park may also include stormwater management facilities, public utilities, and landscaping improvements. The parking requirements for the park may be satisfied through the use of on- 22 ZMA#2013-00012 Rivanna Village June 9,2014 street spaces along the perimeter of Block J,or provided using on-street or surface lots available to the public in adjacent blocks or in Block K's surface parking lot. Block K: Block K will retain the wooded area behind the fire station. This wooded area may be disturbed for the installation of stormwater management facilities and pedestrian paths. 9. PUBLIC FACILITIES 9.1 Water&Sewer. A water and sewer plan is shown on Sheet 4 of Exhibit B. The East Rivanna Volunteer Fire Station located within Block K will be connected to public water and sewer during Phase 1 of the Development,for Phase 1 will impact the existing drainfield servicing the Station, and water service will be provided to the other areas of Phase 1 at that time as well. 9.2 Stormwater. A preliminary stormwater concept is shown on Sheet 6 of Exhibit B. 9.3 Dedications. Areas dedicated to the County for public use, other than streets dedicated by recorded subdivision plat, shall be conveyed to the County only in such manner and form approved by the County Attorney. 23404383_6 23