HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201800153 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2018-11-29Heather McMahon
From: Heather McMahon
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 3:22 PM
To: Michele
Cc: Jack Degagne
Subject: ARB2018-153: Longhonr Steakhouse Initial, resubmission -- application incomplete
Attachments: ARB2018-153 Preliminary SDP Checklist for Completeness.pdf
Hello Michele and Jack,
I have just checked your application package for completeness and it is incomplete. Review cannot commence until the
missing information is provided and the application is deemed complete. 8 hardcopies of a complete site plan set are
required for a full review of an Initial Site Plan. Your scheduled ARB meeting date may be postponed if copies are not
received in a timely manner.
Please see the attached checklist for the areas in which your application is deficit. Furthermore, your previous submittal
of an Initial Site Plan included the following:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing
Date
C1.1
Cover Sheet
8/27/18
C2.1
General Notes/Tree Conservation Plan
8/27/18
C2.2
Demolition Plan
8/27/18
C2.3
Site Plan
8/27/18
C2.4
Grading Plan
8/27/18
C2.5
Drainage & Utility Plan A
8/27/18
C2.6
Drainage & Utility Plan B
8/27/18
C3.1
Utility Profiles (Storm)
8/27/18
C3.2
Utility Profiles (Sanitary)
8/27/18
C3.3
Utility Profiles (Sanitary)
8/27/18
C4.1
Lighting Plan
8/27/18
C4.2
Lighting Plan Details
8/27/18
C5.1
Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan
8/27/18
C5.2
Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Notes & Details
8/27/18
C6.1
Construction Details
8/27/18
C6.2
Construction Details
8/27/18
C6.3
Construction Details
8/27/18
C6.4
Construction Details
8/27/18
C6.5
Construction Details
8/27/18
C6.6
Construction Details
8/27/18
C7.1
Soil Boring Logs
8/27/18
C8.1
Vehicle Circulation Plan (WB-67)
8/27/18
C8.2
Vehicle Circulation Plan (Refuse)
8/27/18
1-1.1
Landscape Plan
8/27/18
1-1.2
Landscape Plan Notes & Details
8/27/18
Sheet 1 of 2
Survey
7/25/18
Sheet 2 of 2
Survey
7/25/18
A1.1
Dimensioned Floor Plan
8/27/18
A1.2
Noted Floor Plan
8/27/18
A3.1
Roof Plan
8/27/18
A4.2
Schedule, Notes and Details
8/27/18
A5.1
Exterior Elevations
8/27/18
A5.2
Exterior Elevations
8/27/18
n.p.
Color renderings (2 pages)
6/25/18
p. 1-15
Sign permit drawings
6/12/18
n.p.
Manufacturer's specifications on lighting
n.d.
Material samples boards (2)
n.d.
In contrast, this submittal includes the following:
n.p.
Color renderings (2 pages)
11/19/18
T1.1
Title Sheet
8/27/18
C2.3
Site Plan
11/20/18
C4.1
Lighting Plan
11/20/18
1-1.1
Landscape Plan
11/20/18
A3.1
Roof Plan
8/27/18
A5.1
I Exterior Elevations
8/27/18
A5.2
I Exterior Elevations
8/27/18
At the least, your site plan must include the following missing sheets for ARB review (and they must be the latest
revisions, facsimiles of those submitted to Chris Perez, the lead planner on your Site Review Committee):
C1.1
Cover Sheet
C2.1
General Notes/Tree Conservation Plan
C2.2
Demolition Plan
C2.3
Site Plan
C2.4
Grading Plan
C2.5
Drainage & Utility Plan A
C2.6
Drainage & Utility Plan B
C4.1
Lighting Plan
C4.2
Lighting Plan Details
1-1.1
Landscape Plan
1-1.2
Landscape Plan Notes & Details
A1.1
Dimensioned Floor Plan
A1.2
Noted Floor Plan
Please let me know if you would like to defer this project or when I can expect to receive 8 hardcopies of a complete site
plan set and architectural drawings.
Thanks,
Heather McMahon, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3278
hmcmahon@albemarle.org
ARB2018-153: Longhorn Steakhouse, Preliminary
HNM 11/29/18
Architectural Review Board
Preliminary Site Development Plan Checklist for Completeness
® 8 collated copies
A. Written description of the proposal
® Provide a general description of all proposed work.
❑ Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor.
B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale off "=20', clearly legible and folded):
® Location(s) of proposed building(s) on the site.
® Schematic layout of parking, travelways, and other improvements
❑I Location of existing and proposed tree lines. Individually identify trees of a 6-inch caliper or greater. [ Commented [HM1]: N/A
❑ Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 2-feet, and with sufficient off -site Commented [HM2]: Not provided
topography to describe prominent and pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics, but in
no case less than 50-feet outside of the site.
❑� Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent Commented [HM3]: Not provided
of easement.
❑ Conceptual stormwater management plan. Commented [HMa]: Not provided
® Conceptual landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines.
® Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and
contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings.
C. Appearance of the proposed building(s)
® Show a representation of the appearance of the proposed building(s). This must include architectural
elevations drawn to the scale of at least 1/16"=1'-0". This may also include perspective sketches, or
photos of the proposed building(s). These documents should provide a basic understanding of:
® The size, form, and scale of the building.
® The architectural style of the building.
® The proposed building materials and color(s).
D. Additional material
❑ Provide labeled, color, 8-'/2" x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the
Entrance Corridor.
❑ The applicant is welcome to submit any additional material that will make the preliminary review more
productive. Drawings or other submittal items that clarify topography, visibility, utilities, landscaping,
or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome.
❑ Site sections may be useful.
® Signatures