Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201600085 Correspondence Minor Amendment 2018-11-21 Natural 1009 Shepherd St. NE Washington, DC 20017 Resources www.NaturalResourcesDesign.com Design Transmittal Letter To: Albemarle County Date: 11/21/1018 Project Number: 182002 Attention: Frank Pohl If enclosures are not as noted, please notify our office. If checked below. please: Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. Return enclosures to use. We Transmit: ® herewith n under separate cover via in accordance with our request For Your : approval I ' distribution to parties information review & comment ❑ record use The Following: drawings specifications change order shop drawings product literature samples correspondence ©Copies Date Number I Description Revised drawing sheet for insertion _ Full ESC/SWPPP drawing sets 1 Revised Registration Statement Remarks: The first sheet of the plans and the Registration statement have been corrected in accordance with your most recent comments. Copies to: (with enclosures) By: Chris Sonne Thank you, Jennifer From: Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Sent: Monday, March 12,2018 4:59 PM To:Jennifer Pritchett<iritchett@albemarle.org>;Ana<Kilmer@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com> Cc:csonne@lhg.net; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; ddllplaw.com@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com Subject: Fwd:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Ana/Jennifer You mentioned in a previous email that after posting the bond,we would need to apply for a DEQ permit, but I was not exactly sure why. I posed the question to Chris Sonne who is our engineer and he did not think that we need a DEQ permit per the reasons outlined below. Would you please review and let me know if we are misunderstanding something. Thank you, Doug Lowe Owner's Rep for SOCA 434-882-0755 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From:Chris Sonne<csonne@lhg.net> Date: March 12, 2018 at 3:55:36 PM EDT To: Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Subject:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Doug - As previously discussed and approved by Albemarle County, the proposed SOCA facility meets the requirements of the DEQ permit Grandfathering provisions. As such, no VSMP application or approval by DEQ is required for this project. I have attached a copy of the DEQ requirements, with the pertinent section highlighted. Please note that the grandfathering provisions expire on June 30, 2019. At this time, all site construction must be initiated (or permits obtained under the current regulations). I hope this answers the questions. The County reviewers we met with previously had all the information on previous submission and approval dates pertaining to the site, so they could answer any specific project applicability issues. Chris Sonne, PE, LEED AP Civil Senior Project Engineer 3 "p-id oziees{k r l, / i koy Frank Pohl From: Frank Pohl pw -uvig Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:03 PM To: 'Chris Sonne'; Doug Lowe b311',111 Cc: matt.wilson@socaspot.org; Don Long; Geoff Elsie;Jonney Otto;Jennifer Pritchett; Mark Graham;Jack Kelsey Subject: RE: SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Chris/Doug, That is correct.We made a mistake in the review of this by calling this an Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Program (VESCP) plan. It should have been a VSMP plan since it is 1) within a common plan of development and 2)the LDA exceeds 1 acre.The plan should have referenced the stormwater management facilities to be used for this site as part of the application so that this information was in the file. Each application must stand alone, even if part of a master planned facility, and even though the site is addressed by a future facility, is not exempt from VSMP regulations [17- 303].Since the plan has already been approved,the only thing that we will require at this time is that a SWPPP be submitted. Which brings me to the next bigger issue. It has come to my attention that the stormwater facility that serves this site has not been converted and is no longer bonded.The bond was pulled by the County but the funds were not sufficient enough to allow the County to complete the conversion of this facility(5A).Considering this project relies on that facility for its stormwater treatment,the new land owner will need to post a bond for the conversion before we can issue a land disturbance permit for the SOCA Field House [17-414].The only other option that I can think of would be for SOCA to provide stormwater management facilities on the SOCA site. Don't hesitate to give me a call or email me if you would like to discuss this further. Sincerely, Frank Frank V. Pohl, PE, CFM County Engineer 434-296-5832 (ext. 7914) From:Chris Sonne<csonne@1hg.net> Sent:Wednesday, March 14, 2018 9:24 AM To: Frank Pohl<fpohl@albemarle.org>;Jennifer Pritchett<jpritchett@albemarle.org>; Doug Lowe <doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Cc:matt.wilson@socaspot.org; Don Long<ddl@lplaw.com> Subject: RE:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Frank - To clarify - we need to provide the Stormwater General Permit registration form (and generate a SWPPP for the project) to meet these requirements. Is this correct? Feel free to call, if we need to discuss. •1 Il Thank you, Chris Sonne, PE, LEED AP Mobile 434.996.1752 www.lho.net From: Frank Pohl<fpohl@albemarle.org> Sent:Tuesday, March 13, 2018 3:01 PM To:Jennifer Pritchett<ipritchett@albemarle.org>; Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Cc:Chris Sonne<csonne@lhg.net>; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; Don Long<ddl@lplaw.com> Subject: RE:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Doug, I just wanted to follow up because I mentioned below that we will submit for the DEQ permit. However,Jen informed me that we still need a registration statement. Please provide a DEQ permit number(if you already have a DEQ permit) or a completed registration statement at your earliest convenience so we can file for the DEQ permit. If you think I am missing something, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks, Frank From: Frank Pohl Sent:Tuesday, March 13,2018 9:45 AM To:Jennifer Pritchett<ipritchett@albemarle.org>; Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Cc:csonne@lhg.net; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; ddllplaw.com@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com Subject: RE:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Doug/Chris, Yes you are grandfathered. However,we don't have a record that a DEQ permit was ever issued. Please provide the DEQ permit number. If you don't have a DEQ permit, one is required since this is in a common plan of development and the land disturbance area exceeds 1 acre.Grandfathering does not exempt projects from needing a permit,grandfathering } simply allows a project to follow the 2C regulations and not the current 2B regulations. It appears that the bond has been posted. So we will submit the project to DEQ for permitting (assuming you don't have a DEQ permit).You should receive a notification from DEQ with instructions for payment. Please forward us the proof of payment and we will process your request for a pre-construction meeting(if the request has been made). Thanks, Frank From:Jennifer Pritchett Sent:Tuesday, March 13, 2018 7:23 AM To: Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com>;Ana <Kilmer@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com>; Frank Pohl <fpohl@albemarle.org> Cc:csonne@1hg.net; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; ddlIplaw.com@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com Subject: RE:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Good morning Frank, Please see the email thread below. 2 Frank Pohl From: Jim Taggart <JTaggart@roudabush.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:19 AM To: Frank Pohl Cc: Jack Kelsey;Jonney Otto;Jack Kelsey Subject: Belvedere SWM handoffs Frank,Johnny and Jack, Thank you all for meeting with me this morning. Just a quick email to summarize my take-away. Please review this and let me know if you see any misunderstandings or errors. I intend to send this to my client once we all revise or agree. All of these notes concern the existing stormwater management facilities within Belvedere. A. SWM number one (1). This is the facility across from the Senior center and is shown on the W.W. &Assoc. Phase 1 drawings as SWM#1. That Stormwater management facility is complete and ready to be turned over to Homeowners Association. The County is ready to return, or already has returned,the appropriate,available bond money to Wells Fargo. The owner may begin the procedure to hand that facility over to the HOA and pursue return of bond monies through Wells Fargo. B. There is no Stormwater facility number 2. There is an un-named facility near Belvedere SWM#1 which is a part of"The Reserve" property and not included in these discussions. C. SWM number three (3). This is the facility behind the Freestate development and is shown on the W.W. & Assoc. Phase 1 drawings as SWM#3. That Stormwater management facility is complete and ready to be turned over to Homeowners Association. The County is ready to return, or already has returned,the appropriate, available bond money to Wells Fargo. The owner may begin the procedure to hand that facility over to the HOA and pursue return of bond monies through Wells Fargo. D. SWM number four(4). This is the facility west of Loring Run behind Block 9A and is shown on the W.W. &Assoc. Phase 1 drawings as SWM#4. That Stormwater management facility is complete and ready to be turned over to Homeowners Association. The County is ready to return, or already has returned,the appropriate, available bond money to Wells Fargo. The owner may begin the procedure to hand that facility over to the HOA and pursue return of bond monies through Wells Fargo. E. SWM number four-A(4A). This is the facility immediately west of Loring Run behind Block 9A, is a forebay of SWM#4 and is not specified on the W.W. &Assoc. Phase 1 drawings. That Stormwater management facility is currently undergoing warranty work by County forces. It is NOT ready to be turned over to Homeowners Association. The County will complete its efforts and we can then pursue turn-over. F. SWM number four(5). This is the facility Northwest of Addison St. and is shown on the W.W. &Assoc. Phase 1 drawings as SWM#5. That Stormwater management facility is complete and ready to be turned over to Homeowners Association. The County is ready to return, or already has returned,the appropriate,available bond money to Wells Fargo. The owner may begin the procedure to hand that facility over to the HOA and pursue return of bond monies through Wells Fargo. G. SWM number five-A(5A). This is the facility immediately northwest of Development Phase 4B at the ends of Colvin Alley and Colbert Street. This is a tributary of SWM#5 and is not specified on the W.W. &Assoc. Phase 1 drawings. This is currently an erosion control basin and It is NOT ready to be turned over to Homeowners Association. The owner must decide if it should stay active as an ESC Basin or if should be converted NOW to a 1 stormwater management facility. Once a conversion has been completed and accepted,then movement can begin to hand this facility over to HOA. H. The new owner should make a clear determination of who is responsible for the SOCA property, including who is responsible for the bond of the ESC structure (5A) mentioned above. A couple of other notes to consider and be aware of: I. The County has used some portions of the bond monies for these facilities. J. Any return of bond monies would be made to Wells Fargo Bank as the original bond holder. K. Wells Fargo has made contact with the County to request at least some of that bond return to take place. L. Jack Kelsey will draft a note to Frank Pohl acknowledging the completions as noted above. M. The County is anxious for the consent order to move forward as finalization will seemingly allow certain road acceptance within Belvedere to take place. Thanks and let me know if you see something wrong. JT Thankyou, Jim Taggart Jim Taggart,P.E. For Roudabush Gale&Assoc.,Inc. 914 Monticello Rd.,Charlottesville,VA 22901, 434.977.0205 2 Frank Pohl From: Mark Graham Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 11:42 AM To: Trevor Henry;Jack Kelsey; Greg Kamptner Subject: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/WP0201100026 I discussed this with Bill Mueller two years ago and again last year. Both times I told him that we could delay this conversion until we were also completing the remaining work in this section, but we would need to do the conversion at that time. I was also clear that if they had not commenced construction by this time, it would be necessary for them to either 1) have separate E&SC measures for their construction and be responsible for cleaning out sediment that reaches this basin, or 2) Bond the stormwater facility themselves and be responsible for completing the conversion following their construction. If the latter, they are responsible for making their own deal with Wells Fargo about any use of those funds. I did see the possibility of a win-win for Wells Fargo and SOCA with such an arrangement, but I don't believe the county can broker that deal. From: Trevor Henry Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:24 PM To: Jack Kelsey; Mark Graham; Greg Kamptner Subject: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024 / WP0201100026 That seems like a reasonable position to take given our willingness to work with them.. From: Jack Kelsey [mailto:JKELSEY@albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 1:31 PM To: Mark Graham; Trevor Henry; Greg Kamptner Subject: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/ WP0201100026 To All, Based on the bids we received there was inadequate funding in the water protection bond to cover the conversion of SWM Basins#5 and #5A to the permanent biofilters. We will be doing muck-out, slope repairs and stabilization of#5A, but we opted to omit the#5A permanent biofilter conversion (below the SOCA site) from the contract. So if you'd like I can respond to Bill Mueller that it will be available to provide E&S control. Question: would SOCA be responsible to clean-out additional sediment and repair/stabilize any eroded areas as a result of their use of the facility through their approved E&S plan? Jack M. Kelsey,PE Transportation Engineer Office of Facilities Development-Ext 3376 From: Bill Mueller [mailto:bill.mueller@socaspot.org] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:26 PM To: Jack Kelsey Cc: Stephen von Storch; rmckee@mckeecarson.com; Christopher Mantle; Rick Natale; Natale, Rick J CIV USA INSCOM Subject: Re: FW: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024 / WP0201100026 Jack, I am writing is regards to the SOCA Field House project at Belvedere. On July 1, 2013 members of our design team were able to meet with Ellie Ray, Mark Benish and another gentleman from the County staff regarding our 1 site plan. Due to some updates and small revisions, we will be resubmitting our site plan with minor amendments, along with a resubmitted current WPO. The issue of access to the existing sediment basin for our use when we are under construction was discussed in the meeting. It is unclear what the County plans are for converting the basin to it's final stormwater facility configuration. I know that County staff have been patient with the development of our project, as we worked with the landowner to secure the property for SOCA. It is SOCA's intention to move as swiftly as possible to raise the funds and construct the building, once we have approval to do so. We took ownership of the property this past February. Since then we have refined the design of the building and re-examined how it sits on the site. As a result, we will be making the minor amendment submission mentioned above. We've been told that process may take 4-6 months. Once we have an approved site plan, it is our intention to begin construction within 9-12 months. We'd like to proceed as quickly as possible, and as quickly as our fundraising will allow. Right now we are proceeding on the assumption that the sediment basin will remain in place. Can you advise me and my design team if that is accurate? What steps must be taken to get confirmation on the status of the basin? I am grateful for your assistance and guidance, and your willingness to work with us on this project. Let me know what additional information you may require from me. Best regards, Bill On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Jack Kelsey<JKELSEY@albemarle.org>wrote: Bill, I left a detailed(and probably long winded)voice message for you. That message and email below should help explain the situation. Based on my June 21'conversation with Mark Graham,he was supportive of holding off our conversion of the sediment basin,to the permanent stormwater facility, so that SOCA could use it for erosion\sediment control. However,he would need to know SOCA intended to start\finish construction of the soccer facility in a reasonable time frame and he'd need some assurance that the commitment\resources were in place to make it happen. If you need more specifics about what to provide in the letter I'd suggest contacting Mark directly. Hope this helps. Sincerely, Jack M. Kelsey,PE Transportation Engineer Office of Facilities Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road 2 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (434)872-4501 office;ext 3376 (434)760-1272 mobile (434)972-4091 fax jkelsey/(1),albemarle.org From: Jack Kelsey Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:00 PM To: 'Brajesh Tiwari' Cc: 'Bill Mueller'; 'Bob McKee' Subject: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/WP0201100026 Gentlemen, I spoke with Mark Graham (Director of Community Development) today and he agreed that due to the close proximity of the SOCA Field House construction to Sediment Basin 5A (Biofilter A), it would make sense for this sediment basin to remain until your work is completed and the site stabilized. However, the County has called all of the bonds for the Belvedere project and we are now responsible to complete the infrastructure within a reasonable time frame -this includes the conversion of sediment basins into the permanent stormwater management facilities according to the approved plans. Before Mark can make a decision, we will need a response from SOCA stating their expected start and completion dates, and providing any information to support their commitment to completing the work within that time frame. Please email or fax the response and let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jack M. Kelsey,PE Transportation Engineer Office of Facilities Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (434)872-4501 office;ext 3376 3 (434)760-1272 mobile (434)972-4091 fax jkelseynalbemarle.org From: Brajesh Tiwari [mailto:btiwari@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:29 AM To: Jack Kelsey Cc: 'Bill Mueller; 'Bob McKee' Subject: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/WPO201100026 Good morning Jack: We received the Final Site Plan comments from the county last week(in additional to engineering comments)and would like to address them with the outstanding issue of SOCA SWM/E&S facility. Did you get chance to talk to Glenn and Ray on this issue?We would like to get this issue resolved before resubmitting the Final Site Plan to the County. Could you please give us any update on this issue? Thanks. Brajesh Tiwari, PE, LEED AP McKee Carson and Field Sport Concepts, Ltd. 301 East High Street Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.979.7522 tel 434.977.1194 fax www.mckeecarson.com www.fieldsport.com From: Jack Kelsey [mailto:JKELSEY@albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:11 PM To: Brajesh Tiwari Cc: Glenn Brooks; Ray Lilly Subject: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/ WPO201100026 Brajesh, I have been out to the site and"Biofilter A" and"SWM Facility#5"have not yet been converted from erosion & sediment control to their permanent stormwater management function. As mentioned in Phil's email below, the County has taken possession of the bonds for the Phase I improvements (including Water Protection). The County is now responsible for, and presently making preparations to complete, the infrastructure 4 improvements. This includes the conversion of the erosion control facilities to the permanent stormwater management facilities. To determine "which facilities" and"when"they're to be converted, we will consider the condition/status of the areas draining into these facilities. I'll be scheduling a meeting with Glenn Brooks (County Engineer) and Ray Lilly(Inspector), in the very near future, to discuss and decide on this matter. I hope this is helpful. Jack M. Kelsey,PE Transportation Engineer Office of Facilities Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (434)872-4501 office;ext 3376 (434)760-1272 mobile (434)972-4091 fax jkelsey@albemarle.org From: Brajesh Tiwari [mailto:btiwari@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:05 AM To: Jack Kelsey Subject: FW: SOCA Fieldhouse- SDP201100024/ WPO201100026 Good morning Jack: Please see below email from Phil in regards to Belvedere sediment trap/stormwatrer facility close to SOCA Fieldhouse. For your reference, I have also attached the comments letter from John Diez. I would appreciate your any input in this matter. Thanks. 5 Brajesh Tiwari, PE, LEED AP McKee Carson and Field Sport Concepts, Ltd. 301 East High Street Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.979.7522 tel 434.977.1194 fax www.mckeecarson.com www.fieldsport.com From: Philip Custer [mailto:pcuster@albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 3:36 PM To: Brajesh Tiwari Subject: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/ WPO201100026 I don't know much about this. As I might have mentioned to you before, the county called the bond for Belvedere close to a year ago and has been in charge of the project since then. Judging from John's comments, the facility behind the fieldhouse may have been converted to the permanent SWM facility already. This seems unusual to me, but it's not out of the question. Jack Kelsey is responsible for managing the portion of the Belvedere project which the county has called the bonds for. You or Bob might want to contact him for the status of that facility, but I suspect John has already talked to him. Jack can be reached at (434)872-4501 x3376. From: Brajesh Tiwari [mailto:btiwari@mckeecarson.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 12:25 PM To: Philip Custer Subject: FW: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/ WPO201100026 Phil: Do you have any knowledge about the existing sediment trap on Belvedere? Contrary to our impression, John mentioned that it's no longer active. He is out of the office this afternoon so I will talk to him early next week but I thought I should get your input on this. Thanks. Brajesh Tiwari, PE, LEED AP McKee Carson and Field Sport Concepts, Ltd. 6 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.979.7522 tel 434.977.1194 fax www.mckeecarson.com www.fieldsport.com From: John Paul Diez [mailto:jdiez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:23 AM To: BTIWARI@MCKEECARSON.COM Subject: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/WP0201100026 Brajesh, Engineering has reviewed the plans for SOCA Fieldhouse.Attached, you will find the comments that need to be addressed. Feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Thank you, John Diez Engineering Technician Dept. of Community Development (434)296-5832 Ext. 3025 William Mueller SOCA Executive Director 434-975-5025, ext. 12 www.SOCAspot.org 7 Frank Pohl From: Jack Kelsey Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 3:49 PM To: Frank Pohl Subject: FW: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/WP0201100026 Attachments: RE: SOCA Fieldhouse - SDP201100024/WP0201100026; Belvedere SWM handoffs Forwarding the"corrected typo"email to clarify that my email was referring to SWM Facility#5A. Jack M. Kelsey,PE Transportation Engineer Facilities&Environmental Services Project Management Division-Ext 3376 From:Jack Kelsey Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:48 PM To: Mark Graham<mgraham@albemarle.org> Cc: Blake Abplanalp<babplanalp@albemarle.org>;Trevor Henry<thenry@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: SOCA Fieldhouse-SDP201100024/WP0201100026 Corrected Typo Below Mark, The topic of Belvedere SWM Basin#5A conversion from E&S Control to the approved final SWM function is being raised by the new developer New Belvedere Inc. Please refer to the enclosed email for our last conversation on the matter. The SOCA plan (WP0201300056)was approved 8-13-2013. The bond funds remaining from Water Protection Bond - Belvedere Phase I Blocks 3,4A, 5A,6B&9A are inadequate for the conversion and I'm not aware of any arrangement between SOCA and Wells Fargo to complete the conversion (suggestion in attached email). Jim Taggart met with myself, Frank and Jonney this past September to discuss the status of all the Belvedere SWM facilities for their transfer to the HOA. Refer to the second attached email for Taggart's meeting notes. The responsibility for the SWM Basin#5A conversion has kind of been the "elephant in the room". Jim Taggart and the New Belvedere Inc. Chief(Steve Krohn) have requested a meeting to get direction on how to get this resolved. Due to the complexity of this matter, I told Jim that I'd touch base with you and discuss who from the County would be best to attend. Think about it and then call me. Thanks Mark. Jack M. Kelsey,PE Transportation Engineer Facilities&Environmental Services Project Management Division-Ext 3376 1 Jennifer Pritchett From: Frank Pohl Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:45 AM To: Jennifer Pritchett; Doug Lowe Cc: csonne@lhg.net; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; ddllplaw.com@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.corn Subject: . Doug/Chris, Yes you are grandfathered. However, we don't have a record that a DEQ permit was ever issued. Please provide the DEQ permit number. If you don't have a DEQ permit, one is required since this is in a common plan of development and the land disturbance area exceeds 1 acre. Grandfathering does not exempt projects from needing a permit,grandfathering simply allows a project to follow the 2C regulations and not the current 2B regulations. It appears that the bond has been posted. So we will submit the project to DEQ for permitting (assuming you don't have a DEQ permit).You should receive a notification from DEQ with instructions for payment. Please forward us the proof of payment and we will process your request for a pre-construction meeting (if the request has been made). Thanks, Frank From:Jennifer Pritchett Sent:Tuesday, March 13, 2018 7:23 AM To: Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com>; Ana <Kilmer@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com>; Frank Pohl <fpohl@albemarle.org> Cc: csonne@lhg.net; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; ddllplaw.com@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com Subject: RE: SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Good morning Frank, Please see the email thread below. Thank you, Jennifer From: Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 4:59 PM To:Jennifer Pritchett<ipritchett@albemarle.org>; Ana <Kilmer(WNETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com> Cc:csonneCa lhg.net; matt.wilson@socaspot.org; ddllplaw.com@NETORGFT1118991.onmicrosoft.com Subject: Fwd: SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Ana/Jennifer You mentioned in a previous email that after posting the bond, we would need to apply for a DEQ permit, but I was not exactly sure why. I posed the question to Chris Sonne who is our engineer and he did not think that we need a DEQ permit per the reasons outlined below. Would you please review and let me know if we are misunderstanding something. i Thank you, Doug Lowe Owner's Rep for SOCA 434-882-0755 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From:Chris Sonne<csonneP1hg.net> Date: March 12, 2018 at 3:55:36 PM EDT To: Doug Lowe<doug@sagebuildconsulting.com> Subject:SOCA-VSMP Grandfathering Provisions Doug - As previously discussed and approved by Albemarle County, the proposed SOCA facility meets the requirements of the DEQ permit Grandfathering provisions. As such, no VSMP application or approval by DEQ is required for this project. I have attached a copy of the DEQ requirements, with the pertinent section highlighted. Please note that the grandfathering provisions expire on June 30, 2019. At this time, all site construction must be initiated (or permits obtained under the current regulations). I hope this answers the questions. The County reviewers we met with previously had all the information on previous submission and approval dates pertaining to the site, so they could answer any specific project applicability issues. Chris Sonne, PE, LEED AP Civil Senior Project Engineer 2 Jennifer Pritchett From: Jennifer Pritchett Sent: Monda March 12, 201812:28M To: Don Long;Matt Wilson (matt.wilson@socaspot,org) Cc: nny Thacker;Jonney Otto Subject: .WPO-2016-00085 SOCA Field. Hoyv Attachments: tegistrationStatement2014.pdf In order to completerrVIlintiraftlf I need the attached form completed and returned to me. Thank you, Jennifer From:Ana Kilmer Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 11:05 AM To: Don Long<ddl@lplaw.com>; Matt Wilson (matt.wilson@socaspot.org) <matt.wilson@socaspot.org> Cc: Kenny Thacker<KTHACKER@albemarle.org>;Jennifer Pritchett<jpritchett@albemarle.org>;Jonney Otto <jotto@albemarle.org> Subject: WPO-2016-00085 SOCA Field House The $30,180 water protection performance bond has been posted and approved (erosion only). Jennifer: Frank had mentioned that this project requires a DEQ permit. Check with him. Total disturbed area 1.5 acres. Thanks Ana D. Kilmer Management Analyst Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832 1 akilmerPalbemarle.org 1 Jennifer Pritchett From: Ana Kilmer Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 11:05 AM To: Don Long; Matt Wilson (matt.wilson@socaspot.org) Cc: Kenny Thacker;Jennifer Pritchett;Jonney Otto Subject: WPO-2016-00085 SOCA Field House The$30,180 water protection performance bond has been posted and approved (erosion only). Jennifer: Frank had mentioned that this project requires a DEQ permit. Check with him. Total disturbed area 1.5 acres. Thanks Ana D. Kilmer Management Analyst Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832 akilmer@albemarle.org 1