HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400075 Review Comments Letter of Revision 1 2018-12-11ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. $
J A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
S !p
IaNnsulrv�rlvG Serving VITiniaVni-e 1956
F\CIhF�Rf�7f,:
IRNA PLANNING 1iRAiINEER1N(i 11UMMILNI tit RVE) D1:1I%RI MFNI
172 S! R: I I1 MN 1'' 1"; PRM:. 51 L. A 414 NI 1 ,1 K EI.LI l ItI IAl l
11.11 L, CAUGAPLIT (iillil(IIIICS`I1.1.1:1]1"V11 l'i1:11;1D11FSVILLF.VA22462 151L1.1X%IJ LlflliiLIILR. L5,
(M'111 AN( 0. IM, PI IU\l: (43411179-812 I'I 10NL (4-41477-I12I15
13RI:1\' I)„I:1111ti1!\,1 S
DAVI1)%1.RORMSON.Irl: FAX (434147'1-1M11 FAX 14341'_`11+-+736 11AVID.A IORDAN,I,%.
\I111Y %I 61:10RUL L.A 1\1 I la 1411 11 WIN N I f 1111 KR IS 10111 IIiR V. N I\ I FRS, L”;
December 11th, 2018
Tori Kanellopoulos
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Chariottesville, VA 22902
RE: Letter of Revision to SDP201400075, Cascadia Blocks 1-3
Dear Tori,
The purpose of this letter of revision Is to show the change from the originally approved Site
Development Plan. The changes are as follows:
The applicant requested a special exception to the Code of Development for Cascadia to allow
"single-family detached units" in Block 1(lots 259-266). The Board of Supervisors approved the
special exceptions at their meeting on May 9th of this year. The 4 attached single-family units
(duplexes) have been changed into 8 single-family detached units.
• The applicant is also proposing a boundary line adjustment for Lots 215-222 (Block 3) going from
(4) duplex units to (2) 4 -unit townhouses. These changes will be reflected in an updated plat.
• Proposed Use calculations have been updated.
• Proposed ADT information has been updated.
• The stormsewer from structure 62 to 63 has been shifted to accommodate the change in lots
215-222.
• Proposed landscape easements have also been updated.
■ Open Space B increased in size and a new Open Space Z has been shown with this submittal.
• Lots 236-241 are now shown as (2) 3 -unit townhouses with no utility changes.
• Block K Build To Line has changed to 17.5`
• Block 1 Build To Line has changed to 21.5'
Block M Build To line has changed to 19.0'
■ Propose tree in front of lots 221-222 has been moved ± 15' North East along Delphi Drive so that
there is no conflict with the water meter.
• Proposed tree in front of lots 236-237 has been moved ± 15' South along Delphi Drive to avoid
utility conflict.
• Abandon eastern water meter on dual water meter in front of lot 218 along Delphi Drive.
Sanitary lateral serving lot 220 to be cut back to within the ROW and redirected so as to enter
lot 220 and not pass through any other private lot.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 217 to be cut back to be on lot 217 and not cross onto lot 21.8.
• A private sanitary lateral easement has been created on lot 215 for lot 216's lateral.
* inaccuracies were noticed in the Land Schedule Area Calculations prepared by Dominion
Engineering. These inaccuracies have been corrected with this revision.
Lots 206-207 have been converted from a duplex to (2) single family detached units. No impact
to utilities, easements, or landscape is proposed.
Retaining wall fronting Terrace Lane on the north edge of Lot 206 has been removed. Slopes
steeper than 3:1 shall be planted with hardier than grass vegetation
We thank you for taking the time to review this request. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Dustin reene, EIT
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Dustin Greene
From: Tori Kanellopoulos- Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: December 5, 2018
Subject: LOR#1-SDP201400075
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the Letter of
Revision referenced above once the following comments have been addressed:
- Addressed. Plat was approved 12105/2018. Both match.
2. There is a proposed landscape easement shown on Lot #259 (Single -Family Detached). 1
do not believe this easement has been previously platted//approved. Therefore, either a
new easement plat for that proposed landscape easement is needed, or that tree can be
inoved into the ROW (if it's a sight distance issue, maybe it can be moved in front ora
different Iot_ which would not change the tree count).
Addressed. Easement was added as separate page to plat (SUB2018-131).
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org or
434-296-5832 ext. 3270 for further information.
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. g
6p�i A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
8 P
IANDSURVIMNC Serving Vioginhi Siwe 19 56
ENGINFERIM
IANV PLANNING 1:%0%1.:l:RINC IN -PAR I W -NU St RVE-'Y DI.PAR"IVEN1
17'-501111 PAN101", 1)RIVF. SIT.A Ola %10N 11(111,0
AMLI:UIGARLRL. 0 MR[ (fillSVILl.li.4:AS'-')tI CIIARLO1'11-SV9LI.F_V.11-'4(L NILLI:\411.i.liUEi111��1I>R_1.5,
IN)N FRA CO. PT. Pf Ill\li (434) 479.81-11 PHONE (4341 977400;
149 [AN I)..1:1VIISlP�, I._S.
llAFI1) %L ROBINSON. P.1.. FAX (4341079-1681 I.AX (434)=9R-522(1 DAVID). H1RRIN\. L.S.
AMMY &I. GLOR(iE. L.A. 1\H )x RIR'1)AI31'SIL( .OM KRIS II)PI II•K ( M INTLRS. L,S,
November 2nd, 2018
Tori Kaneilopoulos
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Letter of Revision to 5DP201400075, Cascadia Blocks 1-3
Dear Tori,
The purpose of this letter of revision is to show the change from the originally approved Site
Development Plan. The changes are as follows:
• The applicant requested a special exception to the Code of Development for Cascadia to allow
"single-family detached units" in Block 1 (lots 259-266). The Board of Supervisors approved the
special exceptions at their meeting on May 9th of this year. The 4 attached single-family units
(duplexes) have been changed into 8 single-family detached units.
• The applicant is also proposing a boundary line adjustment for Lots 215-222 (Block 3) going from
(4) duplex units to (2) 4 -unit townhouses. These changes will be reflected in an updated plat.
• Proposed Use calculations have been updated.
• Proposed ADT information has been updated.
• The stormsewer from structure 62 to 63 has been shifted to accommodate the change in lots
215-222.
• Proposed landscape easements have also been updated.
• Open Space B increased in size and a new Open Space Z has been shown with this submittal.
• Lots 236-241 are now shown as (2) 3 -unit townhouses with no utility changes.
• Block K Build To Line has changed to 17.5'
• Block J Build To Line has changed to 21.5'
* Block M Build To line has changed to 19.0'
• Propose tree in front of lots 221-222 has been moved ± 15' North East along Delphi Drive so that
there is no conflict with the water meter.
• Proposed tree in front of lots 236-237 has been moved ± 15' South along Delphi Drive to avoid
utility conflict.
• Abandon eastern water meter on dual water meter in front of lot 218 along Delphi Drive.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 220 to be cut back to within the ROW and redirected so as to enter
lot 220 and not pass through any other private lot.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 217 to be cut back to be on lot 217 and not cross onto lot 218.
A private sanitary lateral easement has been created on lot 215 for lot 216's lateral.
Inaccuracies were noticed in the Land Schedule Area Calculations prepared by Dominion
Engineering. These inaccuracies have been corrected with this revision.
Lots 206-207 have been converted from a duplex to (2) single family detached units. No impact
to utilities, easements, or landscape is proposed.
We thank you for taking the time to review this request. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Dustin Greene, EIT
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. B
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p
UNDSURVEY 144. SerUiNg 111inia Sime 1956
ENGINEH NG -
LANDPIANNEgG 6NUM' FRIXG DEN\%'I}lP`.1.. SCRV EN 1)EJ'AR'IA4LN 1
: i_ SIN - r I I P-k,�,'I UPS DRIVE; STL..1 914 MONTICF'LLu ROAD
JIM LEAGGARL,P.L. C'IIARL.M' I'.1,VII.LF,VA229i1 VIIARi.fY1TFtiVIL1.E.VA32912 WILLIAM J.'IJJ I3,I
Do%MANC'0.R!;. PII01Hi434)479•)1!21 P'IONL(4;4)977d12bi FJRI1ki).J:\\l15i)1,,l..i.
IMIDM.ROI)IAS0'N.P);, F',1X�414)9;4-ifiRi PAX(4,14l290-5]21! iMV III A.AIRDAN. L';.
AXMIY AI. GEURGG. L.A. 1VI'0w Rill DAM 'SILC OM KRIS 10PIII-R C. %J1%I'I:R.S. L.S.
October 25th, 2018
Tori Kanellopoulos
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE. Letter of Revision to SDP201400075, Cascadia Blocks 1-3
Dear Tori,
The purpose of this letter of revision is to show the change from the originally approved Site
Development Plan. The changes are as follows:
• The applicant requested a special exception to the Code of Development for Cascadia to allow
"single-family detached units" in Block 1(lots 259-266). The Board of Supervisors approved the
special exceptions at their meeting on May 9th of this year. The 4 attached single-family units
(duplexes) have been changed into 8 single-family detached units.
• The applicant is also proposing a boundary line adjustment for Lots 215-222 (Block 3) going from
(4) duplex units to (2) 4 -unit townhouses. These changes will be reflected in an updated plat.
■ Proposed Use calculations have been updated.
• Proposed ADT information has been updated.
• The stormsewer from structure 62 to 63 has been shifted to accommodate the change in lots
215-222.
• Proposed landscape easements have also been updated.
■ Open Space B increased in size and a new Open Space Z has been shown with this submittal.
• Lots 236-241 are now shown as (2) 3 -unit townhouses with no utility changes.
• Block K Build To Line has changed to 17.5'
• Block J Build To Line has changed to 21.5'
• Block M Build To line has changed to 19.0'
• Propose tree in front of lots 221-222 has been moved ± 15' North East along Delphi Drive so that
there is no conflict with the water meter.
• Proposed tree in front of lots 236-237 has been moved ± 15' South along Delphi Drive to avoid
utility conflict.
• Abandon eastern water meter on dual water meter in front of lot 218 along Delphi Drive.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 220 to be cut back to within the ROW and redirected so as to enter
lot 220 and not pass through any other private lot.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 217 to be cut back to be on lot 217 and not cross onto lot 218.
A private sanitary lateral easement has been created on lot 215 for lot 216's lateral.
Inaccuracies were noticed in the Land Schedule Area Calculations prepared by Dominion
Engineering. These inaccuracies have been corrected with this revision.
We thank you for taking the time to review this request. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Dustin Greene, EIT
e
0�j
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
g p
[AA'PSURVWIN G
Serving Wi'giniu Since 1956
ENGINEERING
tAMMANNING
RIrv(lUt:YAR'M1liX,C SIAVEYDEPAKINI NT
172 SOL' 111 RAN POPS DRIVE_ S 11:, A 914 MON FICELLO ROAD
JIM L.TAGGART,PA.
0IARL(MTSVILLE,VA22911 CHARM I"1'FSVII.I.F,V":1_'.911? WILLIAM
J.LIsUB1iIl"ER-L.S.
DON FRANCO. P.E.
PHON11% (434) 979-8121 PI10'.E (+.341 977-0205
BRIAN D. JA1,II%0N. L.S.
U:wR1 NI. ROBINSON, RE,
FAX (4 34) q79-1681 FAX 034) 296-52-11)
UAVI1) A..IORIJAN_ L.S.
XMININ' S7. GHOR(.F.. I -A,
INFO &RUL'UA3US1 LCUM KRISfGPIIER
C. NT\-rLRs. L N.
October 25, 2018
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
ATTN: Tori Kanellopoulos
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: LOR #1 SDP2014-75 Cascadia Blocks 1 - 3 Letter of Revision
Dear Tori,
We have reviewed your comments provided on October 23rd, 2018, and have provided the
following responses:
I. The LOR can only be approved after SUB201800131 (Easement/Special LotBLA). Also,
as shown in the SUB comments, the LOR and SUB will need to match (e.g. there was a
difference in Build To Lines).
RESPONSE: The plat and the LOR have been updated to match.
2. There is a proposed landscape easement shown on Lot #259 (Single -Family Detached). I
do not believe this easement has been previously platted/approved. Therefore, either a
new easement plat for that proposed landscape easement is needed, or that tree can be
moved into the ROW (if it's a sight distance issue, maybe it can be moved in front of a
different lot, which would not change the tree count).
RESPONSE: The landscape easement has been shown on the subdivision plat.
We thank you for taking the time to review these plans and trust the above adequately addresses your
comments. However, please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.
Best ]Regards,
Dustin Greene, EIT
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Dustin Greene
From: Tori Kanellopoulos- Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: October 23, 2018
Subject: LOR#1-SDP201400075
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the Letter of
Revision referenced above once the following comments have been addressed:
1. The LOR can only be approved after SUB201800131 (Easement/Special Lot/BLA). Also,
as shown in the SUB comments, the LOR and SUB will need to match (e.g. there was a
difference in Build To Lines).
2. There is a proposed landscape easement shown on Lot #259 (Single -Family Detached). I
do not believe this easement has been previously platted/approved. Therefore, either a
new easement plat for that proposed landscape easement is needed, or that tree can be
moved into the ROW (if it's a sight distance issue, maybe it can be moved in front of a
different lot, which would not change the tree count).
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at vkanellopoulos _,albemarle.org or
434-296-5832 ext. 3270 for further information.
September 7th, 2018
Paty Saternye
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Letter of Revision to SDP201400075, Cascadia Blocks 1-3
Dear Paty,
The norpose i this is':u s.,4vw the change from the origi,.ia'fv ai,.psoved S ,v
Qlpvei prner?"t'llan, Fhe cl�a.igas •ire ac k0ows'
• Tibe 7,u }ltca if"[-:ques'ted Ko 1i_, i.vd, _, , 3 ✓en ole?rA )P ;T': �C: rCawadiv ti3 aiiaw
Tile the
� CjUliri?$C?5" f'akrL' -cha gL ed illi [ sif)gle4emi1v :letaol' d 1;1i0t5.
* Tne V'-nl'1osmtt �1 ; :lund;31V ime .?ti.l " rie ,f for Uuts -_715. r i (Block 3) going from
(4) duplex units to (2) 4 -unit townhouses. These changes will be reflected in an updated plat.
• Proposed Use cActil,i't clic have- been do dotc-o_
• Proposed ADT information has been upd-wted_
The storrnspwE!R *rorty s; ructure 52 to 61 has heon shifted to accommodate the change in lots
215-222.
■ Proposed landscape easements have also been iipdated.
• Open Space B increased in size and a new Open Space Z has been shown with this submittal.
• Lots 236-241 are now shown as (2) 3 -unit townhouses with no utility changes.
• Block K Build To Line has changed to 17.5'
■ Block 1 Build To Line has changed to 21.5'
• Block M Build To line has changer! to 19.0'
• Propose tree in front of lots 221.222 ;tai been moved t 15' Forth East along Delphi Drive so that
there is no conflict with the water meter.
• Proposed tree in front of lois 236-237 has been moved f 15' South along Delphi Drive to avoid
utility conflict.
• Abandon eastern water meter on dual water meter in front of lot 218 along Delphi Drive.
• 5anitaw lateral serving lot 220 to be cut back to within the ROW and redirected so as to enter
'ot 220 and not pass through any other private lot.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 217 to be cut back to be cert lot 217 and not cross onto lot 218.
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
W_fV_j
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORKfION
lie �P
LANDSURVEY[NG
.ir; :°9: _r Orginht Since 1156
ENGINBERIN(:
LAND PUNNING
ENOINE MING UO-IRMC U-NiT SURVEY DEEM lIAEN7
17.54l.''Tkl ;!gv'IYJ?'S UR1Vtt, 5fL. a 914 MONTIC:ELLO ROA11
JIML.FAG GART.BE.
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA229U CHARLMrESVILLE,VA'-'NIP: WILLIAM
J.LHUBF.IMR. L ,
DONFRANCO.P.E.
P[IUNF'r33+19:v-81_1 PIR]NE14341977-u-05
BRIAND. JAMISON. L.S.
DAV ID M. ROBINSON. P.L.
FAX id3i19;9-1691 FAX (4341396-5224
DAVIDA.JORDAN. LS.
A-MMY M, GBORGI-_ I-A.
I vNYwR01'UABI SH.cOM KI :ST MER C'. W1NI ERS. l..i
September 7th, 2018
Paty Saternye
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Letter of Revision to SDP201400075, Cascadia Blocks 1-3
Dear Paty,
The norpose i this is':u s.,4vw the change from the origi,.ia'fv ai,.psoved S ,v
Qlpvei prner?"t'llan, Fhe cl�a.igas •ire ac k0ows'
• Tibe 7,u }ltca if"[-:ques'ted Ko 1i_, i.vd, _, , 3 ✓en ole?rA )P ;T': �C: rCawadiv ti3 aiiaw
Tile the
� CjUliri?$C?5" f'akrL' -cha gL ed illi [ sif)gle4emi1v :letaol' d 1;1i0t5.
* Tne V'-nl'1osmtt �1 ; :lund;31V ime .?ti.l " rie ,f for Uuts -_715. r i (Block 3) going from
(4) duplex units to (2) 4 -unit townhouses. These changes will be reflected in an updated plat.
• Proposed Use cActil,i't clic have- been do dotc-o_
• Proposed ADT information has been upd-wted_
The storrnspwE!R *rorty s; ructure 52 to 61 has heon shifted to accommodate the change in lots
215-222.
■ Proposed landscape easements have also been iipdated.
• Open Space B increased in size and a new Open Space Z has been shown with this submittal.
• Lots 236-241 are now shown as (2) 3 -unit townhouses with no utility changes.
• Block K Build To Line has changed to 17.5'
■ Block 1 Build To Line has changed to 21.5'
• Block M Build To line has changer! to 19.0'
• Propose tree in front of lots 221.222 ;tai been moved t 15' Forth East along Delphi Drive so that
there is no conflict with the water meter.
• Proposed tree in front of lois 236-237 has been moved f 15' South along Delphi Drive to avoid
utility conflict.
• Abandon eastern water meter on dual water meter in front of lot 218 along Delphi Drive.
• 5anitaw lateral serving lot 220 to be cut back to within the ROW and redirected so as to enter
'ot 220 and not pass through any other private lot.
• Sanitary lateral serving lot 217 to be cut back to be cert lot 217 and not cross onto lot 218.
A private sanitary lateral easement has been created on lot 215 for lot 216's lateral.
Inaccuracies were noticed in the Land Schedule Area Calculations prepared by Dominion
Engineering. These inaccuracies have been corrected with this revision.
We thaink you for taking; the time to review this request. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
wlnceredy,
Dust' Greene, ElT
On
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A f1RC'k°VSS10NAI- Ct:ft.i-;_)RATIOIN gni` p
uNDsv NG Serving Virginia Since 1956
fd1VGIN8HtiNG
LAND PLANNING ENGrNFFRING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT
172 SOUTH PANTOPS DRIVE, STE. A 914 MONTICFLLO ROAD
JIM I.- TAGGART. P.E. CHARLOTTESVILLF.VA2"— 11 CHARLOTTESVILLE.VA2M WILLIAM J.LEDBETTP.R.L.S.
DON PRANGO. A.E. PRONE 4434) 979-8 121 PHONE (434) 977-0205 BRIAN D. JAMISON. L.S.
DAVID M. ROBINSON. P.E. FAX(434)q79-1691 FAX f434) 296-S3O DAVID A. JORDAN. L.S.
AMIMY M. GEORGE L.A. INF0*ROUDABLSH.COM KRISTOPHER C. WINTERS. L.S.
September 7, 2018
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
ATTN: Paty Saternye
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: LOR #I SDP2014-75 Cascadia Blocks ' - 3 - Letter of Revision
Dear Ms. Saterrye.
We have reviewed your w>..)I'rr.l)c1:ia pro ided ou August 31, 2018, and have provided the following
responses:
2. [Comment] Revise the Proposed t scl- information on sheet 2 (SP2) to be current. It does not appear to
have been updated for all unit chang4s wqu•z- GWd.
Rev. 2_ Comment not fully addresscct_ ClArify if the ch igr;es in the "Propq!� d Use:"
calculation are the inaccuracies ��wcs#ird 9JJ Leiter of Revision Chant;a! list. If so
specify it in the requested chanv%� lint as lu in- for the ")"roprJ.wd t.:sr ralvidatic►v.s", If
the are for other vortions of thecalx �aii►ti��x�� ��t��e�c����e_�Th of thral. bbl;
;torras lahefrki ria Sheet SP2, or other sheet if u jK T�,A!:3�,
alculatit:ns arx� IIKo� oils trt'tlsis 1,t)1+C ax�t[ Ir:�ve k) ear
provided zn On, lirst o requested 0x41aege,&
4, X n merltl Not all changes sho�wi o)? tiro LOR revised site plan sheets are listed in the request
letter or 1)c `i .y~tj. r of Revision to SDP2 01400075 " description on the coversheet. Examples are the
changes to ilie water, sewer, storm & easements that will be required either for the change in units or for
otjher zea,ons not obvious (see Engineering and ACSA comments on stormwater and a storm pipe
cklut- in Block 3). Revise the submission in order to address this issue. Also, if a description is
ificluded on 41 provided LOR coversheet it is suggested that it be provide in a buffeted or numbered
ibrmat: fur clarity. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a] Add labels to the LOR site plan sheets in order to specify exactly where the changes
will occur for items like. sewer lines, sewer easements (see ACSA comments), water
meters, tree relocations and the stormsewer structure.
RESPONSE: Labels have been added to the LOR site plan sheets in order to specify exactly where
the changes occur for items life, sewer lines, sewer easements, water meters, tree locations and
stormsewer structure.
0�j
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC,
s
A PK()FESSIUNAL CURPUKKI'10N
f:
L
Serving WrginwSince 195K
r:xrcrNeemNc
LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEYDEPARTMENT
172 SO[II'H PANTOPS DRIVE, STE. A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD
JIM L. TAGGART, P.E.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA2_- 911 CHARLO'rrFSVILLE, VA22-MWILLIAM
J. LEDBEITER. L.S.
DON CRANE.
PHONE (434) 979-8121 PHONE 1434) 9'17-0285
D.
DAVID M. RU6iNSON. P.E.
N.
FAX (434) 979.1681 FAX 1434) 296-T=8
JORDAN, L.S.
DAVID A. JORDAN, L.S.
DAVID
AMMY M_ GEORGE, LA.
INFO�rLROUDABUSH.COM KRISTOPHER C. WINTERS. L.S.
b) Revise the list to include chances to one sewer line (Lot 220 & 221). two water meters
LLots 2.16-218), one tree (Lots 236 & 237) and the addition of one sewer easements (see
ACSA comments).
RESPONSE: The list of changes has been revised to include changes to sewer line (Lot 220 & 221),
two water meters (Lots 216-218), one tree (Lots 236 & 237) and the addition of one sewer easement.
C) Ensure all of the changes specified above are also included in the Bulleted revisions list
on the coversheet.
RESPONSE: All changes have bee pr(Y%riA on the coversheet revision list.
d) In the Bulleted revisions list on the coversheet split the second bullet into two separate
items, one for lots 259-266 and another for Lots 215-222.
RESPONSE: The second bulleted item has been separated into two bulleted items.
13. [Comment] [Comment] Provide the landscape sheets for the areas of change in both Block 1 &
Block 3. Either show that previously proposed tree locations are still feasible or provide new
location,-,. Also, ensure that the landscape easement, along the road in the front of the Block 3
units, does not need to be revised_ It if needs to be revised a revision to the easement plat will be
required- If a revision to the easement is required that revision, and any deeds associated, will have
to be subirtitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
Rev. .1:'Comment not fullv addressed. Address the finita,- ng:
a. One of the trees in front of Lots 236 & 237 annears to have been moved. See above
:about revisions to the LOR submission to address this change.
RESPONSE: The tree in front of Lots 236 & 237 has been moved.
b. An easement plat has been submitted for review that will create the landscaping
easement in front of Lot 217. That easement plat must be approved and recorded prior
to this LOR being approved.
RESPONSE: An easement plat has been submitted for review concurrently,
14. [Comment] A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA
comment). The easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded priorto this
LOR approval. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. ACSA has a comment about Private sewer
lateral easement being required. Ensure that the easement plat already submitted includes this
easement or submit another easement plat for review.
RESPONSE: Comment noted. ACSA comments will be addressed with neat easement plat
submittal.
16. [Comment] The Build to Line for "Block T' is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit
to show the correct Build -to -line (BTL) for "Block Y' or include a change in the BTL for "Block P in
the LOR as a requested item with it being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet
SPSA must be part ofthc LOR submission.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the revision clouds around `Block M" to include
all of Block M, and not lust units 236-241, since the change in Build -To -Line impacts all of the
units within that Block.
RESPONSE: The revision clouds have been revised un;uiid to include all o. Rk)i:k 9.
19. [Comment] Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The outstanding comments from
ACSA and planning must be successfully addressed priorto the LOB's approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering.
The outstanding comments from ACSA and planning must be successfully addressed
rior to the LOR's approval.
RESPONSE: Comment Noted.
20. FLNEW COMMENT Rev. 1: Because a new open sace is proposed, in order to address
comment 18 above, submission legal documents specifying the ownership and maintenance of
thatopenspace will required.
RESPONSE: Easement information has been provided with this submittal. HOA documents
address all concerns with AN +eommeut. The Easement documents cover Cascadia 1-3 and Cascadia
4-7.
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCUTES, INC.
A i'ROFFSS10NtAL CORPORATION
F`
r�+�n mexewr.
Serving W?gwwSiuee 1956
ANr,:t�i<ea3rru
s con r[ SNYphr
ENGINEERING DEPARTMINr SURVEY DEPAIUMFt4l'
172 SOUTH PANTOP5 DRIVE, STE. A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD
JIM L.TAUGART.RF
C'HARLOTTESVILLE.VAr-911 CHARWrtliSVILI.k VA r-902 WILLIAM].LE9DBFITER.L.S_
DON FRANCO. P.E.
PHONE ( 434) 97941121 PHONE f434) Wn-MO5
BRIAN D. JAMISON. L.S.
DAVID M. ROBINSON, AF.
FAX 1434) 979-i 691 FAX 1434) 29b5'-29
DAVID A. JORDAN. L.S.
AMMYM.GEORGE, L.A.
INFOrreROE:DABIISILC'OM KRISTOPIIERC. WINTERS, I.S.
14. [Comment] A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA
comment). The easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded priorto this
LOR approval. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. ACSA has a comment about Private sewer
lateral easement being required. Ensure that the easement plat already submitted includes this
easement or submit another easement plat for review.
RESPONSE: Comment noted. ACSA comments will be addressed with neat easement plat
submittal.
16. [Comment] The Build to Line for "Block T' is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit
to show the correct Build -to -line (BTL) for "Block Y' or include a change in the BTL for "Block P in
the LOR as a requested item with it being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet
SPSA must be part ofthc LOR submission.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the revision clouds around `Block M" to include
all of Block M, and not lust units 236-241, since the change in Build -To -Line impacts all of the
units within that Block.
RESPONSE: The revision clouds have been revised un;uiid to include all o. Rk)i:k 9.
19. [Comment] Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The outstanding comments from
ACSA and planning must be successfully addressed priorto the LOB's approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering.
The outstanding comments from ACSA and planning must be successfully addressed
rior to the LOR's approval.
RESPONSE: Comment Noted.
20. FLNEW COMMENT Rev. 1: Because a new open sace is proposed, in order to address
comment 18 above, submission legal documents specifying the ownership and maintenance of
thatopenspace will required.
RESPONSE: Easement information has been provided with this submittal. HOA documents
address all concerns with AN +eommeut. The Easement documents cover Cascadia 1-3 and Cascadia
4-7.
E
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. $
A 11ROF SSIONAL CORPORATION
LAND SURVEWNc
Serving W>giniu Sinee 1950
SNCINBBBING
LAND PIANNINC;
ENGINFFJCI,YG DEPARTMENT SURVEY DLPAR7'SB:NT
ITL SOUTH PANTOPS DRIVE, STE. A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD
JIM L. TACAIA RT. PE.
DON FRANCE), P.E.
DAVID M. ROBIN'SOM, P.E.
AMMY M. (i£0RQF,)_.A_
CHARLOTTF.SVILLF., VA23911 CIIARLOW05VILLF, VA 229M WILLIAM 1. LEDBETTER. L.S.
PHONE 0434) 979-$121 PHONF (434)977-M(15 BRIAN D. JAM1SDN, L S.
FAX 4434) 979-1611 FAX 14347 29&51-30 DAVID A. JORDAN. L.S.
INKYoROUDABUSH.COM KRISTOPHER C. WINTERS. L.S.
ACSA Comments
I. Add a general note. Buildings with 4 or marc levels require back flow prevention.
RESPONSE: A general note has been provided on sheet SP6, 8, 9 that buildings with 4 or more
levels require back flow prevention.
2. SP9 —There is an additional sewer lateral upstream of waako(e EK A2 it will ncod to be capped
at the sewer main connection.
RESPONSE: The as -built locations for the laterali for Lots 211 and 216 b vv becn i,4pdated.
Sanitary sewer latera in this area will be used and act capped.
3. Ca all out sewer lateral n�ik�walion for lot 220.
R
LUSY+C I SE: Se►ve.r laterA rclawMiop.. has been called out for lot 220.
4. Lot 216 will need a private sewer lateral cascmevt.
RESPONSE: A private sewer lateral easement has been provided on lot 216 and the easement plat
will be updated.
We thank you for taking the time to review these plans and trust the above adequately addresses your
comments. However, please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.
Best Regards,
Dustin Greene, EIT
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone 434 2905832 Fax 434 972-4126
July 10, 2018
Rev. 1: Aunust 31 2018
Don Franco
Roudabush, Gale and Associates
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22912
dfrancofdominionem,.com
RE: LOR #1 SDP2024-75 Cascadia Blocks 1-3 — Letter of Revision
Dear Mr. Franco:
Your tetter of Revision application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the
following revisions are required:
1. [Comment] Revise the sheet number sheet to match those i4} uie Sheet
Index on the coversheet.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. [Comment] Revise the Proposed Use: information on sheet 2 (SP2) to be current. It does not appear to
have been updated for all unit changes requested.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Clarify if the changes In the "ProUse:"
cakulation are the Inaccuracies specified In the Letter of Recision Chancre list. If so, specify it
In the requested changes list as being for the "Proposed Use calculations". If the inaccuracies
are for other portions of the calculations also specify each of them, but category as labeled on
Sheet SP2 or other sheet if necessary,
3. [Comment] Cor:firm that all units revised in Block 3 will remain ADU units.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. [Comment] Not all changes shown on the LOR revised site plan sheets are listed in the request letter or
the "Letter of Revision to SDP20140007V description on the coversheet. Examples are the changes to
the water, sewer, storm & easements that will be required either for the change in units or for other
reasons not obvious (see Engineering and ACSA comments on stormwater and a storm pipe clouded in
Block 3). Revise the submission in order to address this issue. Also, if a description is included on a
provided LOR coversheet it is suggested that it be provide in a bulleted or numbered format for clarity.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the fallowi :
a] Add labels to the LOR site pian sheets in order to specify exactly where the changes will
occur for items like, sewer lines, sewer easements (see ACSA comments), water meters,
tree relocations and the stormsewer structure.
b] Revise the list to Include chancres to one sewer line (Lot 220 & 221), two water meters
(Lots 216-218), one tree (Lots 236 & 2371 and the addition of one sewer easements (see
ACSA comments).
c) Ensure all of the chap es soecified above are also Included In the Bulleted revisions list on
the coversheet.
d) In the Buileted revisions list on the coversheet split the second bullet into twe se rate
Items, one for lots 259-266 and another for Lots 215-222.
S. [Comment] When r(_v-Ung ti*e LOR change description on the coversheet ensure teat two typographical
errors are corrected. They are:
i "Letter or Revision to SDP201400075" should be "Letter of Revision to 5DP201400075".
* "Board os Supervisors" should be "Board of Supervisors"
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
6. ;Comment) For changes specified, and shown, in this LOR ensure the carrect sheets ,a, r_ included in the
set that address those changes.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
7. [Comment] Ensure that there are revision clouds shown around all changes specific to this LOR #1.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
8. (Cernment] Revise the impervious calculation to address the changes with this LOO. The footprint of the
buidings in Block 3 have increased.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
9. [Comment] Revise the parking calculations to address the changes in tire i;nit tv�ws, parking required, and
p(ir:jn, provided.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
10. [Cornmert; Revise flie site pian to clearly label and show garages for the units being revised in Block 3, if
they are to be provided, and ensure the parking spaces are sufficient dimensions for the number of spaces
"provided" in the calculation.
Rev. 1: Comment addresses).
11. [Comment] if insufficient parking spaces, with garages and surface spaces, are not provided on lot, for the
townhomes for the Block 3 revisions, then specify how and where the rernaininp requires spaces will' be
met.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
12. [Comment] Revise the buildings for the changes to the units in Block 3 so that the rectargles attached to
the back of the units are clearly shown and labeled. It is unknown wha; these r ectangk s represent and
therefore review for setback and depths of parking spaces are not possibl*�,
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
13. [Comment] Provide the landscape sheets for the areas of change in both Block 1 & Block 3. Either show
that previously proposed tree locations are still feasible or provide new locations. Also, ensure that the
landscape easement, along the road in the front of the Block 3 units, does not need to be revised. It if
needs to be revised a revision to the easement plat will be required. If a revision to the easement is
required that revision, and any deeds associated, will have to be submitted separately, review, approved
and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) One of the trees in front of Lots 236 & 237 appears to have been moved. See above about
revisions to the LOR submission to address this change.
b) An easement plat has been submitted for review that will create the landscaping
easement in front of Lot 217. That easement plat must be aonroved and recorded prior to
this LOR being approved.
14. [Comment] A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA comment). The
easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. ACSA has a comment about R rivate sewer lateral
easement being required. Ensure that the easement plat already submitted includes this
easement or submit another easement plat for review.
15. [Comment] There appears to be linework, in the front yards of all units, that was not sl;a:rj.� m, chi
approved site plan. Either remove the linework, if it is not meant to be there, or clearly label tba '
proposed revision to the plan and include it in the list of requested changes for the LOR.
Rev. 1. Comment addressed.
16. [Comment] The Build to Line for "Block J" is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit to show the
correct Build -to -line (BTL) for "Block J" or include a change in the BTL for "Block J" in the LOR as a
requested item with it being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet SPSA must be part
of the LOR submission.
Rev. 1: Comment not folly addressed. Revise the revision clouds around "Block NO to ind_ude
all of Block M, and not lust units 236-241, since the change in Build -To -Line impacts all of the
units within that Block.
17. [Comment] Revise the placement of the buildings for Lots 222-225 so that they meet the tat. d-Za-Line
requirement, either as approved or as requested (see comment above). Please note that because of
(Votes #1 & 2, under Table 10, the porches do not count towards meeting the BTL requirement.
Rev. ;.: Comment addressed.
18. [Comment] The maximum lot w:dth for a Townhonne is 35'. The corner Lots 222 & 115 exceed this
maximum. Revi5e the LOO exhibit such that tl e towhilic-mes no longer exceed the maximum. If necessary
provide, or increase the size of the, open space in order to stay within the required range.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
19. [Comment] Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. Tne outstanding comments from ACSA
and planning must be successfully addressed prior to the LOWS approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fulfil addressed. Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The
outstanding comments from AM and planning must be successfully addressed prior to the LoWs
approval.
20. ANEW COMMENT! Rev. 1: Because a new open space is proposed. In order to address comment 18
abovesubmission legal documents specifying the ownership and maintenance of that open space will
required.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised
final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application
shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer,
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at psaternve0albemarle.urx or at
434-296-5832 ext. 3250.
4Satye
Senior Planner
Planning Division
CC: Keith Lancaster, Southern Development
Review Comments for SDP201400075Final Site Development Pl&,
Noc�s - FrrW
30.
111;char4 M*kon LJ ACSA Requested Chartgas
Paga. ; 1 f ArnCourity obearle Printed On F5-8—
: /3112018
Review Comments for SDP201400075 F' Jnal Site Develop
Project Dame: Cis-cadia Blocks 1-3 - Final
r_)ate Completed: Monday, July 30, 2018 Department/Division/Agency: Review S#t
Rear+ewer- Matthew Wentland • CGG l=ncineerina No Qbjecti
_.
6P
:�J
LAND SLRLTVING
EN"GINRIMING
L. AM PLAUNI NG
JhNJ L. IAGGARI, P.L.
DULY F R AM.U. P.E.
DAVID M. ROU MI SON. P.E.
AMMY Ill. (GORGE. Li.
July 18th, 2018
Paty Saternye
ROUDABUSH, GALE 1& ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PROFESSION U C;ORPORAT10N
SYfY17 g 171gi dj Simy 1956
F-WANETRING DMICIMUNT SURVEY DEPARTNI041
172 }t 11,,111 PAN 1U11% URI M P_ IffK A 914 A1t►11ICFLLEI ROAD
('IIAZJ1fTESVII_Lr..VAr-01I CIIARIOTTES[VIUX.Y%229b2 WILLIAM J. L. DU1_f1L.R.LS.
PFK)NE1434)979-812[ 1NIONI:t4;:,9'77-UMS BRIAN 1). JAMISON, LS.
FAX 034197%16111 FAN (434'j DAVID A.JORUA&L.S
I\HIQ 101-17AN8 NItt [W K1464 TILER C'.:V1lSfF.'R5. L,S.
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Letter of Revision to SDP201400075
Dear Paty,
The purpose of this letter of revision is to show the change from the originally approved Site
Development Plan. The changes are as follows:
• The applicant requested a special exception to the Code of Development for Cascadia to allow
"single-family detached units" in Block 1(lots 259-266). The Board of Supervisors approved the
special exceptions at their meeting on May 9th of this year. The 4 attached single-family units
(duplexes) have been changed into 8 single-family detached units.
• We're also proposing a boundary line adjustment for Lots 215-222 (Wocl; 3! gong f rool 4 duplex
units to Z .sets of 4 tc.�wnhou_w�, 'These chaiwp; will be. rv&cwd in an 1.ipdato;f plat
• The stormsewer from structure 62 to 63 has been shifted to accommodate the change in lots
215-222. Landscape easements have also been updated.
• Open Space B increased in size and a new Open Space Z has been shown with this SubmUta1.
• Lots 236-241 are now shown as 2, three unit townhouses with no utility changes.
• Block K Build To Line has changed to 17.5'
• Block J Build To Une has changed to 21,5'
• Block M Build To line has changed to 19.0'
• Inaccuracies were noticed in the area calculations prepared by Dominion Engineering. These
inaccuracies have been corrected with this revision.
We thank you for taking the time to review this request. Please let me Know if you have any questions
or regWre additional information.
Sincerely,
Dustin Greene, EIT
0:�i
ROUDASUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORA.f'I0
S P
LUM SURVEYING .Serving 1rh nk Sine 1956
ENGINEMUNG
LAND PLANNING F2VGuNEERING DEPA3ammr SURVEY DEPARIVIEAI'
172 SO Ml PANIOPS DRIVE STE. A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD
JIM L. TAGGART.P.E. CILARLOTI'ESVILLE. VA22911 CLIARL(YI'rFSVILLE. VA22902 WILLIAM J. LEDBETTF.R. L.S.
DON FRANCO. P.E. PIIO?1E (439) 979-8121 PHONE (434) 977.0205 BRIAN D. JAMISON, LS.
DAVID M. R0904SON. Rt; FAX (434) 979-1691 FAX (434) 29Fr3« 0 DAVID A. JORDAN. L.S.
AM9IYM.GEORCE.L-1, INFGtr'.ROL:DAB(1SILCOM KRISTOPHER.C. WIN"110,L S.
Paty Saternye
Community Development 401 McIntire Road
Charlottesviiie, VA 22911
RE: LOR #1 SDP2014-75 Cascadia Blocks 1-3 — Letter of Revision
Dear Ms. Saternye
We received your comments dated July 10, 2018 on the above -referenced project file number.
Please find attached eight copies of the revised Pians. The i.)I;ns Dave been revised to iddresa the
comments in accordance with the following:
1. Revise:hv, sheet num',)-r ill k`ho tit'( block of orj Ir sheet to match those shown in the Sheet
Index on thecoversheet.
RESPONSE: The sheet number in the title block has been updated to match the original sheet index.
2. Revise the Proposed Use: information on sheet 2 (SP2) to be current. It does not appear to have
been updated for all unitchanges requested.
RESPONSE: The proposed use on sheet SP2 has been updated. Overall unit count does not change.
3. Confirm that all units revised in Block 3 will remain ADU units.
RESPONSE: Lots 215-222 have been labeled as ADU units.
`= ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. $
J A PROFESSiMAI, CORPORATION R p
E.XNa`1 S"4: 4'L'YE.hY:
Serving j 7Td1Fkv Shia 1956
1tE.11rL>�Ilutpu VNOINEERINGDEMRTMENT SURVEYDFPAKINIENT
172 MUTH PANITOPS MOW— SM A 914 MONTICFi.LO WAD
JL41 L. TAW3ARr. P.F. C1JARLOTEESVILL@, VAM91; 01ARL01'M'SVILLE_ LA 2—'W.! WILLIAM 1 t.L•DR TFR. L.S.
PVON6 0134] 979-111 _1 PHONE Nadi 9:7-ITYI3
DONIE) M. ROBINSON.O. FAX (434) q79-1681 FAX 434) 2Wr5320 .��';N D"JOR AN,.+..5.
DAVI[] M. R13lNSP.L•'. ( E7��,y1D.1.lURUAN. L.S.
AMMY M. GEORCE, LA. INFOd e;ROUDABUS(1. X M KRISTOPI IER l;,11'Ih7'ERS, I..S.
4. Not all changes shown on the LOR revised site plan sheets are listed in the request letter or the
"Letter of Revision to SDP201400075" description on the coversheet. Examples are the changes
to the water, sewer, storm & easements that will be required either for the change in units or
for other reasons not obvious (see Engineering and AtSA comments on stormwater and a storm
pipe clouded in Block 3). Revise the submission in order to address this issue. Also, if a
description is included on a provided LOR coversheet it is suggested that it be provide in a
bulleted or numbered format for clarity.
RESPONSE: All changes have been provided in the LOR narrative and cover letter in bulleted form.
5. When revising the LOR change descripticm on the coversheet ensure that two typographical
errors are corrected. Theyare:
"Iotter orRcvisiflntt�5[�?:�t31 ��i7�"yh�Iir��"i.[it�rvNievisinl+tc:aD!120i•3000/a'
"Board os 5 a Mivi clr;" shy uld
RESPONSE: The typographical errors have been updated with this submittal.
6. For charges speLftied, and shown, in this LOR e1 sure the correct sheets are included lathe So
that address those changes.
RESPONSE; The correct sheets are included with this submittal.
7. Ensure that there are revision clouds shown around all changes specific to this LOR #1.
RESPONSE: Revision clouds have been provided for all changed areas specific to this LOR.
S. Revise the impervious calculation to address the changes with this EOR. The footprint of the
buildings in Block 3 have increased.
RESPONSE: The impervious calculation has been updated with this submittal.
On
ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
8 P
IScming Wginki Since 1956.
J'MGINEB6II+TG
XANDFLANNING ENGINEERING DEF-ARTMWr SURVEYDEPARTMENT
173 SOUTH PANHOPS DRIVE STF. A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD
JIM L. TAGGART. P.E. CHARLOT F-JVILL$, V,%12911 CHARL I-1712SVILLE, VA229D2 WULMAXI J. LEDBETTER, LS.
DON FRANCO-F-E. PHONE (4341979.1121 PHONE (434) 977-4205 BRIAN D. WMISON, L.S.
DAVUO 161. ROBINSON, RE. FAX(434)979-1S91 FAX (434) ZWLM0 DAVID A. JORDAN. I.S.
AMMY M. GEORGE LA. I UF05gROUDABUSILCOM KRI.WOPHER C. WINTERS, L.S.
B. Revise the parking calculations to address the changes in the unit types, parking required, and
parking provided.
RESPONSE: The parking calculations have been updated with this submittal.
1(. Revise the site plan to clearly label and show garages for the units being revised in Block 3, if
they are to be provided, and ensure the parking spaces are sufficient dimensions forthe number
of spaces "provided" in thecalculation.
RESPONSE: Garages have been clearly labeled for the units in Block 3. The parking spaces are
sufficient for the provided calculation.
11. if insufficrar; i. parking _,paces, with garagvs spaces, are not provided on lot, for the
townhomes ;by the Block 3 revisions, the -t spF-cify how and where the remaining requires spaces
will be met. See parking note SP2.
RESPONSE: See Response 9/10.
12. baildi(igs clwrifes t�) the: t»t In Mock 3 so that the rectangles a*sachedi a b1p back of
the units are clearly shown and labeled. It is unknown what these rectangles represent and therefore
review for setback and depths of parking spaces are not possible.
RESPONSE: The rectangles at the building rears are decks and are located above the driveways.
13. Provide the ,'andscape sheets for the areas of change in both Block 1 & Block 3. Either show that
previously proposed tree locations are still feasible or provide new locations. Also, ensure that the
landscape easement, along the road in the front of the Block 3 units, does not need to be revised. It if
needs to be revised a revision to the easement plat will be required. if a revision to the easement is
required that revision, and any deeds associated, will have to besubmitted separately, review,
approved and recorded prior to this Mapproval.
RESPONSE: Street trees have been added to the site plan sheets in the areas impacted by this LOR.
Street tree numbers and species remain unchanged.
14. A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA comment). The
easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR
approval.
RESPONSE: Per phone conversation with Richard Nelson of ACSA the S' easements shown for the
water meters are sufficient for ACSA.
15. There appears to be linework, in the front yards of all units, that was not shown onthe approved site plan.
Either remove the linework, if it is not meant to be there, or clearly label the .proposed revision to the plan
and include it in the list of requested changes for the LOR.
RESPONSE: The linework is the electrical easement. It has been labeled with this submittal.
16. 1 he Build to Line for "Block J" is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit to show the correct Build -
to -'ire (BTL) for'elockJ" or include a change in th:F WP for "Block J" in the I OR as a re:,u�!st A i,em with it
being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet SPSA must be part of the LORsubmission.
RESPONSE: The Build To Line for Block J has been updated to 21.5' and provided in bulleted form on
the cover sheet and letter. Spee sheet SP6 for de*.ails.
17. Revise the placement of the buildings for Lacs 121-2z5 so that they meet the �3uild-to-Line requirement,
either as approved or as requested (see comment above). Please note that because of Notes til & 2,
under Taale 10, the porches do not count towards meeting the BTL requirement.
RESPONSE, The Build to Line for lots 217-222 has been updated to 1.7.5' thus eliminating the need to
relocate building.
18. The maximum lot width for a Townhome is 35'. The corner Lots 222 & 215 exceed this maximum. RevisQ
the LOR exhibit such that the townhomes no longer exceed the maximum. If necessary provide, or
Increase tie size of the, open space in order to stay within the required range.
RESPONSE: The townhome lot widths have been updated so that no lot has a greater width than 35'.
Open space has been increased with this s+ btaittal. A BLA plat will be submitted to effect these
changes.
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
*8P
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORAMN
lumsemv��rG
Servuag W ginira Since 1956
anrpNFlatttNc
LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENr SURVEY DEPAKNEN1'
172 SOt.rFH PAN" TOPS DRIVE. STE. A 913 MONrICELLO ROAD
JI-MLTAGGART.RE
DON FRANCA. P.E.
DAVID M. ROBINSON_ P.E.
CIIARLOTTESVILLE? VA 32911 CJ[ARLOTFESVILLE.VA2Y902 WILLIANIJ.LEDGETTER.LS.
PI[ONE (434)979-612] PHONE (434) Wn-MOS BRIAN D. JAMISON. L.S.
FAX (434) 9741661 FAX {434) 2965320 DAVID A. JORDAN, L.S.
AMMY M. GEORGE LA.
INFOp;EtOUDABUSILCO.W KRISIOPHER
C, WINTER& L.S.
14. A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA comment). The
easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR
approval.
RESPONSE: Per phone conversation with Richard Nelson of ACSA the S' easements shown for the
water meters are sufficient for ACSA.
15. There appears to be linework, in the front yards of all units, that was not shown onthe approved site plan.
Either remove the linework, if it is not meant to be there, or clearly label the .proposed revision to the plan
and include it in the list of requested changes for the LOR.
RESPONSE: The linework is the electrical easement. It has been labeled with this submittal.
16. 1 he Build to Line for "Block J" is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit to show the correct Build -
to -'ire (BTL) for'elockJ" or include a change in th:F WP for "Block J" in the I OR as a re:,u�!st A i,em with it
being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet SPSA must be part of the LORsubmission.
RESPONSE: The Build To Line for Block J has been updated to 21.5' and provided in bulleted form on
the cover sheet and letter. Spee sheet SP6 for de*.ails.
17. Revise the placement of the buildings for Lacs 121-2z5 so that they meet the �3uild-to-Line requirement,
either as approved or as requested (see comment above). Please note that because of Notes til & 2,
under Taale 10, the porches do not count towards meeting the BTL requirement.
RESPONSE, The Build to Line for lots 217-222 has been updated to 1.7.5' thus eliminating the need to
relocate building.
18. The maximum lot width for a Townhome is 35'. The corner Lots 222 & 215 exceed this maximum. RevisQ
the LOR exhibit such that the townhomes no longer exceed the maximum. If necessary provide, or
Increase tie size of the, open space in order to stay within the required range.
RESPONSE: The townhome lot widths have been updated so that no lot has a greater width than 35'.
Open space has been increased with this s+ btaittal. A BLA plat will be submitted to effect these
changes.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
Atone (434) 296-5832 Fax 434) 972-4326
July 10, 2018
Don Franco
lioudabush, Gale and Associates
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
dfranco@dominionen.e.com
RE: LOR #1 SDP2014-75 Cascadia Blocks 1-3 — Miter of Revision
Dear Mr. Franco:
Your Letter of Revision application has been reviewed. in order for the amended site plan to be approved the
following revisions are required:
1. fCornment] devise the sl e, number in the title block of each sheet to match those shown in the Sheet
index on the coversheeL
2. [Comment] Revise the Proposed Use: information on sheet 2 (Sli to be current. Qa does r)ot appear to
have been updated for all unit changes requested.
3. [Comment] Confirm that all units revised in Block 3 will remain ADU units.
4. [Comment] Not all changes shown on the LOR revised site plan sheets are listed in the request letter or
the "Letter of Revision to SDP201400075" description on the coversheet. Examples are the changes to
the water, sewer, storm & easements that will be required either for the change in units or for other
reasons not obvious (see Engineering and ACSA comments on stormwater and a storm pipe clouded in
Block 3). Revise the submission in order to address this issue. Also, if a description is included on a
provided LOR coversheet it is suggested that it be provide in a bulleted or numbered format for clarity.
S. [Comment] When revising the LOR change description on the coversheet ensrire that two typographical
errors are corrected. They are:
+ "Letter or Revision to SDP201400075" should be "Letter of Revision to .SDP201400075".
o "Board os Supervisors" should be "Board of Supervisors"
6. [Comment] For changes specified, and shown, in this LOR ensure the correct sheets are included in the
set that address those changes.
7. [Comment] Ensure that there are reviSiMl clouds shown around all changes specific to this LOR #1,
8. [Comment] Revise the Impervious calculation to address the changes with this LOR. The footprint of the
buildings in Block 3 have increased.
9. [Comment] Revise the parking calculations to address the changes in the unit types, parking required, and
parking provided_
10. .[Comment] Revise the site plan to clearly label and shove garages for the units being revised in Block 3, if
they are to be provided, and ensure the parking spaces are sufficient dimensions for the number of spaces
"provided" in the calculation.
11. [Comment] if insufficient parking spaces, with garages and surface spaces, are not provided on lot, for the
towAhomes for the Block 3 revisions, then specify how and where the remaining requires spaces will be
pl et.
12. (Commant] Revise the buildings for the changes to the units in Block 3 so that the rectangles attached to
the bark of the units are clearly shown and labeled. It is unknown what these rectangles represent and
therefore review for setback and depths of parking spaces are not possible.
13. [Commant] Provide the landscape sheets for the areas of change in bath Black 1 & Block 3. Eether show
That previously proposed tree locations are still feasible or provide new locations. Also, ensure that the
landscape easement, along the road in the front of the Block 3 units, does not need to be revised. It if
needs to be revised a revision to the easement plat will be required. if a revision to the easement is
required that revision, and any deeds assnclated, will have to be submitted separately, review, approved
and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
14. [Comment] A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA comment). The
easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
.,. [Comment] There appears to be linework, in the front yards of all units, that was not shown on the
approved site plan. Either remove the linework, if it is not meant to be there, or clearly label the
proposed revision to the plan and include it ir, the list of requested changes s`or the LOR.
16. [Comment] The Build to Line for "Block J" is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit to show the
correct Build-to-line (BTL) for "Block J" or include a change in the BTL for "Block J" in the LOR as a
requested item with it being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet SP5A must be part
of the LOR submission.
17, [Comment] Revise the placement of the buildings for Lots 222-225 so that they meet the Build -to -Line
requirement, either as approved or as requested (see comment above). Please note that because of
Notes #1 & 2, under Table 10, the porches do not count towards meeting the BTL requirement.
18. [Comment] The maximum lot width for a Townhome is 35'. The corner Lots 222 & 215 exceed this
maximum. Revise the LOR exhibit such that the townhomes no longer exceed the maximum. If necessary
provide, or increase the size of the, open space in order to stay within the required range.
19. [Comment] Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The outstanding comments from ACSA
and planning must be successfully addressed prior to the LOR's approval.
In accord wish the provisions of section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised
Hirai sits plan to address alJ of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application
shall be deemed to have )seer voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at psaternvel2albemaf_le.c_;r or a+.
434-246-5832 ext. 3250.
SincereI
Pa Saternye
Senior Plan
Planning Division
CC: Keith Lancaster, Southern Development
Review Comments for SDP201400075 Final Sfte Develop:Irrent Plan
al"elkv, 1-3
Project Name: F-Ij qC—v I. I
—
Date Completed: F- Ay, hirio W5, 1-MU1V Rt-,�k-x
DOI Phi kfie I WWvkdfifdApcW(.,v:
uffno qo 1. E, R, i f, El F1 *14 7 SL (X�, 1, 1 t. C 4 4. i, Fk, i; I T] I Ftwc
in front of Lots 259 and 260 �tjjifx--,af io be dram incorredly (i.e. Outfall in sidewalk).
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 107106/2018
Review Comments for SOP201400075 Final Site Development Plan
Frt)06 Nzgmp,��
04i -a C. Vv-, ".-I ri%s-LIjay. mty !A? 113
Reviewer Matthew Wantland
Df: p"am-E, colic) i I I n c, -v R00*14,
CDD Enaineerino Requested Clmrws
p iws on til -r I , i ', m, n1i M':VA-, M,,l aW 2W are'shown rpc arriacly, Fk-o-sT7,ix i-*
pa;e , 07,1212-018
County of Adbemarle Printed OnF
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:
Dustin Greene
From:
Tori Kanellopoulos- Planner
Division:
Planning Services
Date:
October 23, 2018
Subject:
LOR#1-SDP201400075
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the Letter of
Revision referenced above once the following comments have been addressed:
1. The LOR can only be approved after SUB201800131 (Easement/Special Lot/BLA). Also,
as shown in the SUB comments, the LOR and SUB will need to match (e.g. there was a
difference in Build To Lines).
2. There is a proposed landscape easement shown on Lot #259 (Single -Family Detached). I
do not believe this easement has been previously platted/approved. Therefore, either a
new easement plat for that proposed landscape easement is needed, or that tree can be
moved into the ROW (if it's a sight distance issue, maybe it can be moved in front of a
different lot, which would not change the tree count).
Please contact Tori Kanellopoulos in the Planning Division at vkanellopoulos(aalbemarle.org or
434-296-5832 ext. 3270 for further information.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
July 10, 2018
Rev. 1: August 31, 2018
Don Franco
Roudabush, Gale and Associates
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
dfranco@dominioneng.com
RE: LOR #1 SDP2014-75 Cascadia Blocks 1-3 — Letter of Revision
Dear Mr. Franco:
Your Letter of Revision application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the
following revisions are required:
1. [Comment] Revise the sheet number in the title block of each sheet to match those shown in the Sheet
Index on the coversheet.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. [Comment] Revise the Proposed Use: information on sheet 2 (SP2) to be current. It does not appear to
have been updated for all unit changes requested.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Clarify if the changes in the "Proposed Use:"
calculation are the inaccuracies specified in the Letter of Revision Change list. If so, specify it
in the requested changes list as being for the "Proposed Use calculations". If the inaccuracies
are for other portions of the calculations also specify each of them, but category as labeled on
Sheet SP2, or other sheet if necessary.
3. [Comment] Confirm that all units revised in Block 3 will remain ADU units.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
[Comment] Not all changes shown on the LOR revised site plan sheets are listed in the request letter or
the "Letter of Revision to SDP201400075" description on the coversheet. Examples are the changes to
the water, sewer, storm & easements that will be required either for the change in units or for other
reasons not obvious (see Engineering and ACSA comments on stormwater and a storm pipe clouded in
Block 3). Revise the submission in order to address this issue. Also, if a description is included on a
provided LOR coversheet it is suggested that it be provide in a bulleted or numbered format for clarity.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) Add labels to the LOR site plan sheets in order to specify exactly where the changes will
occur for items like , sewer lines, sewer easements (see ACSA comments), water meters,
tree relocations and the stormsewer structure.
b) Revise the list to include changes to one sewer line (Lot 220 & 221), two water meters
(Lots 216-218), one tree (Lots 236 & 237) and the addition of one sewer easements (see
ACSA comments).
c) Ensure all of the changes specified above are also included in the Bulleted revisions list on
the coversheet.
d) In the Bulleted revisions list on the coversheet split the second bullet into two separate
items, one for lots 259-266 and another for Lots 215-222.
5. [Comment] When revising the LOR change description on the coversheet ensure that two typographical
errors are corrected. They are:
"Letter or Revision to SDP201400075" should be "Letter of Revision to SDP201400075".
1P 'Board os Supervisors" should be "Board of Supervisors"
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
6. ;Comment] For changes specified, and shown, in this LOR ensure the correct sheets are included in the
set that address those changes.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
7. [Comment] Ensure that there are revision clouds shown around all changes specific to this LOR #1.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
8. [Comment] Revise the impervious calculation to address the changes with this LOR. The footprint of the
buildings in Block 3 have increased.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
9. [Comment] Revise the parking calculations to address the changes in the unit types, parking required, and
parking provided.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
10. [Comment] Revise the site plan to clearly label and show garages for the units being revised in Block 3, if
they are to be provided, and ensure the parking spaces are sufficient dimensions for the number of spaces
"provided" in the calculation.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
11. [Comment] If insufficient parking spaces, with garages and surface spaces, are not provided on lot, for the
townhomes for the Block 3 revisions, then specify how and where the remaining requires spaces will be
met.
1: Comment addressed.
12. [Comment] Revise the buildings for the changes to the units in Block 3 so that the rectangles attached to
the back of the units are clearly shown and labeled. It is unknown what these rectangles represent and
therefore review for setback and depths of parking spaces are not possible.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
13. [Comment] Provide the landscape sheets for the areas of change in both Block 1 & Block 3. Either show
that previously proposed tree locations are still feasible or provide new locations. Also, ensure that the
landscape easement, along the road in the front of the Block 3 units, does not need to be revised. It if
needs to be revised a revision to the easement plat will be required. If a revision to the easement is
required that revision, and any deeds associated, will have to be submitted separately, review, approved
and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) One of the trees in front of Lots 236 & 237 appears to have been moved. See above about
revisions to the LOR submission to address this change.
b) An easement plat has been submitted for review that will create the landscaping
easement in front of Lot 217. That easement plat must be approved and recorded prior to
this LOR being approved.
14. [Comment] A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA comment). The
easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. ACSA has a comment about private sewer lateral
easement being required. Ensure that the easement plat already submitted includes this
easement or submit another easement plat for review.
15. [Comment] There appears to be linework, in the front yards of all units, that was not shown on the
approved site plan. Either remove the linework, if it is not meant to be there, or clearly label the
proposed revision to the plan and include it in the list of requested changes for the LOR.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
16. [Comment] The Build to Line for "Block J" is 17.75' (see sheet SP5A). Revise the LOR exhibit to show the
correct Build -to -line (BTL) for "Block J" or include a change in the BTL for "Block J" in the LOR as a
requested item with it being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet SP5A must be part
of the LOR submission.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the revision clouds around "Block M" to include
all of Block M, and not just units 236-241, since the change in Build -To -Line impacts all of the
units within that Block.
17. [Comment] Revise the placement of the buildings for Lots 222-225 so that they meet the Build -to -Line
requirement, either as approved or as requested (see comment above). Please note that because of
Notes #1 & 2, under Table 10, the porches do not count towards meeting the BTL requirement.
Rev. 1:Comment addressed.
18. [Comment] The maximum lot width for a Townhome is 35'. The corner Lots 222 & 215 exceed this
maximum. Revise the LOR exhibit such that the townhomes no longer exceed the maximum. If necessary
provide, or increase the size of the, open space in order to stay within the required range.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
19. [Comment] Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The outstanding comments from ACSA
and planning must be successfully addressed prior to the LOR's approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The
outstanding comments from ACSA and planning must be successfully addressed prior to the LOR's
approval.
20. [NEW COMMENTI Rev. 1: Because a new open space is proposed, in order to address comment 18
above, submission legal documents specifying the ownership and maintenance of that open space will
required.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised
final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application
shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at psaternye@albemarle.org or at
434-296-5832 ext. 3250.
Sincerel
Pa Sate ye
Senior Planner
Planning Division
CC: Keith Lancaster, Southern Development
Review Comments for SDP201400075 Final Site Development Plan LJ
Project Name: Cascadia Blacks 1-3 - Final
Date Completed: Monday, July 3D, 2018 DepartmentQvisiordAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer:
Richard Nelson ACSA Requested Changes El
9wer main
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed ❑n: 08!31 ±2018
.A
Review Comments for SDP201400075 Final Site Develo
Project flame: ascadia Blocks 1-3 - Final
Date Completed: Monday, July 80, 2018 Department/DivisicrVAgency: Review Sty
Reviewer: Matthew 1entland CDD Enaineerina FNo Objecti
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
July 10, 2018
Don Franco
Roudabush, Gale and Associates
172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
dfranco@dominionene.com
RE: LOR #1 SDP2014-75 Cascadia Blocks 1-3 — Letter of Revision
Dear Mr. Franco:
Your Letter of Revision application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the
following revisions are required:
1. [Comment] Revise the sheet number in the title block of each sheet to match those shown in the Sheet
Index on the coversheet.
2. [Comment] Revise the Proposed Use: information on sheet 2 (SP2) to be current. It does not appear to
have been updated for all unit changes requested.
3. [Comment] Confirm that all units revised in Block 3 will remain ADU units.
4. [Comment] Not all changes shown on the LOR revised site plan sheets are listed in the request letter or
the "Letter of Revision to SDP201400075" description on the coversheet. Examples are the changes to
the water, sewer, storm & easements that will be required either for the change in units or for other
reasons not obvious (see Engineering and ACSA comments on stormwater and a storm pipe clouded in
Block 3). Revise the submission in order to address this issue. Also, if a description is included on a
provided LOR coversheet it is suggested that it be provide in a bulleted or numbered format for clarity.
5. [Comment] When revising the LOR change description on the coversheet ensure that two typographical
errors are corrected. They are:
• "Letter or Revision to SDP201400075" should be "Letter of Revision to SDP201400075".
• "Board os Supervisors" should be "Board of Supervisors"
6. [Comment] For changes specified, and shown, in this LOR ensure the correct sheets are included in the
set that address those changes.
7. [Comment] Ensure that there are revision clouds shown around all changes specific to this LOR #1.
8. [Comment] Revise the impervious calculation to address the changes with this LOR. The footprint of the
buildings in Block 3 have increased.
9. [Comment] Revise the parking calculations to address the changes in the unit types, parking required, and
parking provided.
10. [Comment] Revise the site plan to clearly label and show garages for the units being revised in Block 3, if
they are to be provided, and ensure the parking spaces are sufficient dimensions for the number of spaces
"provided" in the calculation.
11. [Comment] If insufficient parking spaces, with garages and surface spaces, are not provided on lot, for the
townhomes for the Block 3 revisions, then specify how and where the remaining requires spaces will be
met.
12. [Comment] Revise the buildings for the changes to the units in Block 3 so that the rectangles attached to
the back of the units are clearly shown and labeled. It is unknown what these rectangles represent and
therefore review for setback and depths of parking spaces are not possible.
13. [Comment] Provide the landscape sheets for the areas of change in both Block 1 & Block 3. Either show
that previously proposed tree locations are still feasible or provide new locations. Also, ensure that the
landscape easement, along the road in the front of the Block 3 units, does not need to be revised. It if
needs to be revised a revision to the easement plat will be required. If a revision to the easement is
required that revision, and any deeds associated, will have to be submitted separately, review, approved
and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
14. [Comment] A revision to the ACSA easements appears to be required (see the ACSA comment). The
easement plat must be submitted separately, review, approved and recorded prior to this LOR approval.
15. [Comment] There appears to be linework, in the front yards of all units, that was not shown on the
approved site plan. Either remove the linework, if it is not meant to be there, or clearly label the
proposed revision to the plan and include it in the list of requested changes for the LOR.
16. [Comment] The Build to Line for "Block J" is 17.75' (see sheet SPSA). Revise the LOR exhibit to show the
correct Build -to -line (BTL) for "Block J" or include a change in the BTL for "Block J" in the LOR as a
requested item with it being clouded and in the list. If this change is requested sheet SPSA must be part
of the LOR submission.
17. [Comment] Revise the placement of the buildings for Lots 222-225 so that they meet the Build -to -Line
requirement, either as approved or as requested (see comment above). Please note that because of
Notes #1 & 2, under Table 10, the porches do not count towards meeting the BTL requirement.
18. [Comment] The maximum lot width for a Townhome is 35'. The corner Lots 222 & 215 exceed this
maximum. Revise the LOR exhibit such that the townhomes no longer exceed the maximum. If necessary
provide, or increase the size of the, open space in order to stay within the required range.
19. [Comment] Attached see comments from ACSA & engineering. The outstanding comments from ACSA
and planning must be successfully addressed prior to the LOR's approval.
in accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised
final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application
shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at psaternve@albemarle.ora or at
434-296-5832 ext. 3250.
Sincerel
L
Pa Saternye
Senior Plan
Planning Division
CC: Keith Lancaster, Southern Development
Review Comments for SDP201400075 IFinal Site Development Plan
Project Name: Cascadia Blocks 1-3 - Final
Date Completed: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 DepartmentIDivisionfAgency: Review sus:
Reviewer: Richard Nelson AOA Requested Changes
2018-06-05: Below are comments for SDP -2014-75 LOR #1 for Cascadia Blks 1-3 - Final Site Plan:
1) ACA requires 10 -feet on all sides of water meter typ_
) Storm structures in front of Lots 259 and 260 appear to be drawn incorrectly (i -e- Outfall in sidewalk)_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 107106120'18
Review Comments for SDP201 400075 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: Caseadia Blocks 1-3 - Final
Date Completed: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 aepartmentfDivision!Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Matthew Wentland
CDD Enaineerin❑ Requested Changes
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: i}711212018