HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800065 Review Comments Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2019-01-03�/Rcir�1Q
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Tim Miller (tmillerkmeridianwbe.com)
From: Cameron Langille — Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: October 19, 2018
First Revision: January 3, 2019
Subject: SDP201800065 — Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park — Major Amendment
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development
will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed.
(The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may
be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the
Albemarle County Code.]
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) — Cameron Langille, blan ig llegalbemarle.org — Required changes:
1. [32.4.2.1 (f)] The mailing notification fee of $215.00 has not been paid. The fee must be paid prior to approval
of the major site plan amendment. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. [General Comment] The $100.00 review fee for the Department of Fire & Rescue has not been paid. The fee
must be paid prior to approval of the major site plan amendment. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
3. [32.5.2 (a)] Amend the Zoning note on Sheet C-100 to state that the primary zoning district is LI Light Industry.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. [32.5.2 (a)] Provide a list of all recorded plats and deeds that apply to the property on Sheet C-100. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
[32.5.2 (a)] Add a note to Sheet C-100 stating the minimum and maximum building and parking setback lines,
yard, and building separation requirements as specified in Section 4.20 (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. Rev. 1:
Comment not fully addressed.
a. Front Minimum (building): 10 feet from the right-of-way or the exterior edge of the sidewalk if the
sidewalk is outside of the right-of-way; Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. Front Minimum (off-street parking and loading spaces): 10 feet from any public street right-of-way
c. Front Maximum (building): None Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
d. Side and rear minimum (building): primary structure shall be constructed and separated in accordance
with the current edition of the Building Code. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. A comment was
missed in error on first review. In the LI district, "if the abutting lot is zoned residential, rural
areas, or the Monticello Historic district: (i) no portion of any structure, excluding signs, shall be
located closer than 50 feet from the district boundary; and 00 no portion of any off-street parking
space shall be located closer than 30 feet from the district boundary." Please add this language to
the setback note on Sheet C-100. See Section 26.5 of the Zoning Ordinance for additional
information.
e. Side and rear maximum (building): None Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
6. 132.5.2 (a)] Add a note to Sheet C-100 stating the maximum permitted structure heights in the LI District, in
accordance with Section 26.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. Maximum structure height: 65' Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. The minimum stepback requirements for any story that begin above forty (40) feet in height or for each
story above the third story, whichever is less, in height shall be as provided in section 4.20. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
7. [32.5.2 (a)] Add a note to Sheet C-100 stating the required building stepbacks in accordance with Section 4.20
(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. Front: For each story that begins above 40 feet in height or for each story above the third story, whichever
is less, the minimum stepback shall be 15 feet. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. Side and rear: None. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
8. [32.5.2 (r)] Provide a Legend on each drawing showing all symbols and abbreviations visible. Rev. 1: Comment
not fullv addressed. The svmbologv used for Managed and Preserved Steeu Slopes is very similar in
appearance and it is difficult to differentiate between the two slope types on several drawings. Please use
a different symbology or line type for these two features and update the drawings as necessary. This is
Particularly important on Sheets C-200, C-201, C-202, and C-203.
9. [32.5.1 (c)] Please show all existing utility easements on the drawings. Include a label or call out for each
easement stating whether the easement is public or private, the owner of record and the recorded instrument
number, and easement width where existing easements are visible on the plans. Rev. 1: Comment not fully
addressed. An easement plat, SUB201800221, is currently under review for the new easements proposed
as part of this site plan amendment. The easement plat must be approved and recorded prior to approval
of the major amendment. Once the easement plat is recorded, please revise Sheet C-400 to state the deed
book and instrument number of all the new easements created by SUB201800221.
10. [32.5.2 (a)] Please show and label all minimum and maximum building and parking setback lines on Sheet C-
200. The setbacks should be shown in accordance with Section 4.20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Rev. 1: Comment
not fully addressed. Per Comment #5d above, the required setback along Franklin Street is 50' minimum
building setback measured from the centerline of the Franklin Street right-of-way into the property, with
a 30' undisturbed. Please amend Sheet C-200 so that the 50' minimum building side setback is shown
within the property boundary.
11. [32.5.2 (b)] Please state what the proposed use is within each building. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed.
Sheet C-100 states that "each building shall become part of a condominium and uses shall be by -right U."
Does this mean residential uses are proposed? The original submittal stated that the buildings were to be
offices. Industrial offices are a by -right use in U. The parking schedule on Sheet C-100 states that each
building will be a warehouse use, which is also by -right in U. Please clarify. If the uses will be industrial
offices and/or warehousing, remove reference to condominiums since the County does not regulate
ownership types, just use types.
12. 132.5.2 (b) ] Please state the maximum floor area ratio and lot coverage for industrial uses proposed. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
13. [4.12.4 (a)] Please revise the parking calculation table on Sheet 1. It should state the exact standard from the
Zoning Ordinance being applied. One (1) space per employee on the largest shift plus one (1) space per five
hundred (500) square feet open to the public for customer parking but in all cases a minimum of two (2) customer
parking spaces." Rev. 1: The standard listed on the site plan applies to storage/warehousing. Per response
to comment #11 above, if the proposes uses have changed for any of the buildings from warehousing to
something else, please revise the parking requirements on Sheet C-100 accordingly.
14. [32.5.2 (d)] Please show the locations of all Managed and Preserved steep slopes across all applicable drawings.
a. Add a legend to each drawing where these features are visible and label each features. Rev. 1: Comment
not fully addressed. Per comment #8 above, please revise the symbology for the Managed and
Preserved Steep Slopes.
15. [32.5.2 (h)] Please show the boundaries of the FH Flood Hazard Overlay District on the parcel on all applicable
drawings. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Please add the FH Flood Hazard overlay line type to the
Legend across all applicable drawings. The FH boundary should also be shown on Sheet C-200 and it is
not currently included on that drawing.
16. [32.5.2 (b)] Loading spaces must meet the design standards specified in Section 18-4.12.18 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Please show the dimensions of each loading space on Sheet C-200. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
17. [32.5.2 (b)] In accordance with Section 18-4.12.13 (e), please show the dimensions for the dumpster pad and
associated improvements on Sheet C-200. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
18. [4.12.19 and 32.7.9.7 (a)(3)] Please provide a profile view detail with dimensions and materials of the dumpster
pad enclosure to verify compliance with the screening requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Please
note that fences or other constructed screening measures must be a minimum of six feet (6') in height, as specified
in 32.7.9.7 (e). Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. The three dumpsters provided in Phase 1 should be
screened because they may have negative visual impacts on Monticello, which is a property listed on the
Virginia Historic Landmarks Register. As was done with the original final site plan, all dumpsters should
be screened with materials complying with Section 32.7.9.7. Staff suggests providing a constructed screen
such as an opaque fence in compliance with Section 32.7.9.7 (e). Please label the screening materials on
Sheet C-200, C-201, C-202, and C-203 and provide a profile view detail with dimensions and materials of
the dumpster pad enclosure on the construction details drawings.
19. [32.7.3 (b)] Please show the locations of all proposed mechanical equipment and utility hardware. Please provide
information so that the agent can verify they will be screened from public view. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
20. [32.5.2 (k)] Please label all existing and proposed sewer and drainage easements by type and include a
size/width measurement.
a. An easement plat application must be submitted, reviewed, approved and recorded prior to major
amendment approval for all proposed easements. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. An
easement plat, SUB201800221, has been submitted for review. Once this plat is approved
and recorded, please amend Sheet C-400 so that the new easement labels contain the
recorded deed book and page number.
b. Once the easement plat is recorded, the major amendment must be revised to show the recorded
instrument number for the easement plat (deed book and page number). The newly created
easements will need to be labeled with a dimensional width, easement type, and state whether it is
public or private. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat, SUB201800221,
has been submitted for review. Once this plat is approved and recorded, please amend
Sheet C-400 so that the new easement labels contain the recorded deed book and page
number.
21. [32.5.2 (i)] Note 1 on Sheet C-200 states that "a deeded access easement will be placed across all travel
ways and parking spaces." This easement will need to be shown on the previously requested easement
plat. Rev. 1: Comment addressed, the easement is shown on the plat currently under review,
SUB201800221.
22. [32.5.2 (n)] Please state the height of all proposed fences and retaining walls in the labels used on the drawings.
Profile view details of all proposed fences, retaining walls, and constructed screening measures will be required
with the final site plan. Each will need to show the types of materials used and dimensions. Rev. 1: See comment
#30 below and Engineering comments. It anuears that this maior amendment is utilizing the anuroved
construction drawings from the original approved final site plan, SDP201600076. Please include a
narrative on the Cover Sheet stating which drawings from SDP201600076 still apply to this maior
amendment. The retaining wall, fence, and other constructed screening measures from SDP201600076
are on drawings that are not included as part of SDP201800065.
23. [32.5.2 (e)] Please provide more details about the existing landscape features as described in Section 18-
32.7.9.4(c). Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Please identify the locations, sizes, and types of existing
landscaping materials that are proposed to be preserved within the areas designated "Existing Canopy
Area A" and "Existing Canopy Area B." See Sheet SP6 of the approved final site plan for an example of
how these items should be identified on the major amendment, i.e. "8"42" caliper deciduous trees at 5%
15" spacing and 30'-40' height along Franklin St." Ensure that this labeling and information is included
on Sheet C-203 for Existing Tree Canopy Area A and on Sheet C-300 for Existing Tree Canopy Area B.
a. The Albemarle County Conservation Plan Checklist and Chapter 3.38 of the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control handbook. The Conservation Plan Checklist will need to be signed by the owners and
provided as an exhibit on major amendment prior to approval. Rev. 1: Per applicant response, the
conservation checklist will be signed by the owner once the signature set is submitted for approval.
b. Per Note 4 on Sheet C-203, the grading drawings and landscape plan should show the tree and vegetation
protection measures that will be installed in order to protect existing vegetation from disturbance. The
limits of disturbance should be labeled on both drawings and symbology should be added for the fences
or other protection measures that will be installed. Rev. 1: Across all drawings, please add the tree
protection fence symbology to the legend.
24. [32.7.9.51 The 5% landscaping required within the parking area figures on Sheet C-203 do not match. The
calculation note states that 1,531 sq. ft. of canopy is provided, but the landscape schedule states that the total
canopy sq. ft. of the seven (7) proposed trees is 2,291 sq. ft. Please verify and revise the notes as necessary.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. [32.7.9.81 Staff cannot verify if the provided trees meet the minimum 10% canopy required for
the development without the canopy figures shown on the drawings. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
25. [32.7.9.91 Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating "All landscaping shall be installed by the first planting
season following the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within the development." Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
26. [32.7.9.91 Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating "All landscaping and screening shall be maintained
in a healthy condition by the current owner or a property owners' association, and replaced when necessary.
Replacement material shall comply with the final site plan approved landscape plan." Rev. 1: Comment not
fully addressed. Please remove Note 3 from Sheet C-203.
27. [32.7.8 and 4.171 The major amendment does not include a lighting plan in accordance with the requirements
of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. Please include a lighting plan on the next submittal and address the
following:
a. [4.17.4] Please provide a luminaire schedule stating the quantity of each outdoor luminaire proposed,
the model number, the fixture type, wattage emission, etc. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. [4.17.4 (a)] Please provide documentation from the manufacturer that all proposed outdoor luminaries
exceeding 3,000 lumens are full -cutoff fixtures. Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. The manufacturing
insets provided on Sheet C-403 do not demonstrate that the 9 proposed wall lights are full cutoff
luminaires. Please provide information from the manufacturer that these lights are full cutoff
fixtures and no light spills out past 90 degrees.
c. Please state the pole height of all outdoor luminaires. Rev. 1: Comment not applicable all proposed
lights are wall mounted.
d. 14.17.4 (b)] Please show foot-candle measurements within the development and along all existing and
proposed street right of ways and property boundaries. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto
public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half (1/2) foot
candle. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
e. Please add a note to the lighting plan which states "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that
emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to
reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from
luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed
one-half footcandle." Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
28. 132.6.2 (d) and Chapter 141 Please submit an easement plat and application to the County that shows all new
easements proposed by the site plan. This includes all new drainage, stormwater, public access easements, etc.
The easement plat must be reviewed, approved, and recorded prior to approval of the final site plan. Rev. 1:
Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat, SUB201800221, has been submitted for review. Once
this plat is approved and recorded, please amend Sheet C-400 so that the new easement labels contain the
recorded deed book and page number.
29. [General Comment] Prior to final site plan approval, a WPO plan must be submitted, reviewed, and approved
by the Engineering Division. Please see Engineering comments below for additional information. Rev. 1:
Comment not fully addressed, please see Engineering comments for further details.
30. [General Comment] It appears that the major amendment will utilize some of the approved sheets from
SDP201600076. Please provide a list of the approved final site plan sheets on the Cover Sheet, and cross out
which sheets will not be amended with this major amendment. This is critical for items such as the construction
details, as well as certain sheets necessary for Engineering review (sight distance profiles and traffic management
plan).
a. [30.7.4 (b)] Provide a narrative of the disturbances to areas of Preserved Steep Slopes on the Cover
Sheet. There are some areas of Preserved Slopes adjacent to Moores Creek Lane that will be disturbed
to allow installation of utility lines. See the project narrative on Sheet SP 1 of the approved final site plan
for an example of how this information should be conveyed (where Preserved Steep Slopes will be
disturbed, and Zoning Ordinance section that allows the disturbance by -right).
b. Please reference the approved final site plan in Note 1 on Sheet C-100 (SDP201600076).
31. [30.7] The revised major site plan amendment layout proposes to disturb areas of Preserved Steep Slopes behind
buildings 2, 3, and 4. There is a zoning map amendment application under review (ZMA201800017) to rezone
those Preserved Steep Slopes to Managed Steep Slopes in order to allow disturbance of these areas as currently
shown. The major site plan amendment cannot be approved until the ZMA is approved and these slopes have
been re -designated as Managed Steep Slopes. Should the ZMA be disapproved by the Board of Supervisors, the
project will need to be re -designed so that those northern Preserved Steep Slopes remain undisturbed.
32. [General Comment] Please move the crosswalk in the travel way between buildings 4 and 5 so that it connects
to where the sidewalks terminate.
Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blan ig lle(c-r�,albemarle.org or 296-
5832 ext. 3432 for further information.
Comments From Other Reviewers:
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) — David James, dlames(kalbemarle.org — Requested Changes,
see attached.
Albemarle County Building Inspections — Michael Dellinger, mdellin er(c-r�,albemarle.org — No Objection.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — Shawn Maddox, smaddox(c-r�,albemarle.org — Requested changes, see
attached.
Albemarle County Service Authority Richard Nelson, melsongserviceauthority.org — ACSA review not yet
complete. Comments or approvals from ACSA will be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority — Victoria Fort, vfortkrivanna.org, 434-977-2970, ext. 205 — Requested changes,
see attached.
PROJECT: SDP201800065 Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park — Major Site Plan Amendment
Engineering comments (David James):
1. Submit a VSMP plan & application.
Not addressed — VSMP plan approval required prior to FSP approval.
2. WPO plan approval required prior to site plan approval.
Not addressed.
3. Cover: The SDP# is SDP201800065.
Addressed.
4. Existing Conditions sheet: Show all existing easements with deed references (i.e. forest/open
space, public drainage, etc.).
Review plat...
5. Provide engineered plans and computations for the retaining wall design for all the walls that
are next to parking or travelways. Specify all structural components and dimensions of wall.
The following items will be required [DSM]:
a. A typical detail. (VDOT standard walls are acceptable)
b. Specific details as required for unusual or possibly conflicting areas. An example is
where utilities are expected to go through walls or footings (Show accurate wall
features/dimensions where they cross on the profiles).
c. Certified computations to support the design (for wall over 4' high). All soil and bearing
assumptions, as well as reinforcement materials and assumed loadings must be
included.
Addressed, building permit required. If the drainage easement is intended to be public and
meets the criteria, than provide a cut-off sleeve for the pipe through retaining wall D.
6. Wall design should include at a minimum:
a. Typical sections for all configurations.
b. Details for any pipes, utilities, structures through geogrid.
c. Structural computations with original seal.
d. Accurate surcharges and loading assumed.
e. Materials & dimensions match plans.
f. Appropriate safety factors used.
g. Safety provision(s) for vehicles and pedestrians for walls over 30" high (Typ. guardrail,
wall, or fencing).
h. Show accurate depiction of horizontal depth (batter) on site plans.
i. Structural reinforcement layout shown and dimensioned (steel, geogrids, etc.).
Addressed, building permit required. If the drainage easement is intended to be public and
meets the criteria, than provide a cut-off sleeve for the pipe through retaining wall D.
7. Provide & show guardrail over any slope steeper than 3:1, wall, or drop-off greater than 4', with
start and end sections labeled, and with VDOT designations (GR-2, GR-2a, etc.).
Show exactly where the guardrail is being placed.
8. Sheet 4 — Show grading elevations on proposed contours adjacent to proposed walls.
9. Add notes:
a. All walls over 30" height to have safety provisions in place.
b. All wall construction will not impact the preserved slopes.
Show safety railing for 3.5' wall.
10. Include ALL notes on previously approved FSP making corrections to them where not accurate.
Addressed.
11. Water runoff going over 24' max height wall may erode soils behind wall and cause scour issues.
Addressed.
12. Water runoff coming down 2:1 slope may likely concentrate and channelize eroding slope.
Concentrated water at bottom may cause localized flooding issues if Str. 5A becomes clogged.
Drainage should not run across, thru, or backwater in dumpster areas. 118-4.12.191
Addressed.
13. For grass stabilization on constructed slopes, the maximum steepness is 3:1. Slopes steeper than
3:1 must be permanently stabilized with landscaping vegetation hardier than grass, which will
not require mowing.
Monkey grass alone is not an approvable; See VADEQ ESC HB, Spec. 3.32 & 3.37 for what's
recommended. A mix of shrubs, non -turf grasses, and other vegetation would be best. Low
maintenance is the key. Whatever is planted should have a mix of quick germination and
slower growing ground cover to get the best results.
14. Show bumper block detail. Show bumper blocks for parking spaces that are adjacent to 5' wide
sidewalks. Alternatively, increase sidewalk width to 6'. 118-4.12.16. e}
Addressed.
15. Show future drainage connection upstream of Str. 5A & 7 showing proposed public easement.
What's shown is not acceptable. Drainage must be coming through site to those structures in
order to cut through preserved slope areas. Alternatively, provide detention onsite and drainage
easement will not cross through preserved slope and will be private.
Acknowledged.
16. Provide anchor at joints where pipes are over 16% slope.
Addressed.
17. Provide drainage area map, drainage summary table, drainage calculations and ditch cross -
sections.
Acknowledged — to be addressed on VSMP plan.
18. Show sight distance profiles.
Acknowledged.
19. Provide Maintenance of Traffic plan.
Acknowledged.
20. Sidewalk location and widths, minimum 5' width, 4" concrete surface with wire/rebar
reinforcement, 4" 21-A stone base, with underdrains (UD-4, etc) per VDOT standards where
applicable.
Addressed.
21. The pavements section has changed from approved FSP, and I don't think this should be
allowed, provide justification.
Addressed.
22. Private road standards must be met [DSM] and where standards not specified in ordinance road
shall meet VDOT standards.
Addressed.
23. Provide concrete inlet shaping (IS-1) specified on any structure with a 4' or greater drop.
24. Provide safety slabs (SL-1) in any structure taller than 12'.
25. Remove public label for proposed drainage easements. Drainage pipes don't appear to cross
site from offsite or come from a public road.
Review Comments for SDP201800065 IMajorAmendment
Project Name: 'Noolen Mills Light Industrial Park — Major Amendment
Date Completed: Wednesday, December 05, Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox F Fire Rescue Requested Changes
1_ The emergency apparatus turn around shall be marked as afire lane to ensure nothing is placed in those
areas-
_ FDC's must be shown on the plan and located within 100' of a hydrant for those buildings that will be sprinklered_
3_ Building heights that exceed 30' require the travel way to be increased to a minimum of 6' unobstructed width-
4- Afire flow test shall be required before final acceptance-
5- Knox boxes will be required for the structure, location to be coordinated with the fire marshal's office_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 120612018
Cameron Langille
From: Victoria Fort <vfort@rivanna.org>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 8:51 PM
To: Cameron Langille
Cc: Richard Nelson
Subject: SDP201800065 Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park - Major Site Plan Amendment
Cameron,
RWSA has reviewed the final site plan for the Woolen Mills Light Industrial Park as prepared by Meridian Planning
Group, LLC and dated 8/3/2018 with last revision dated 11/9/2018 and has the following comments for the applicant:
Sheet C-101:
Include a note this sheet that temporary fencing will be required for security while the fence is removed for the
sanitary sewer installation
Label and call out the deed book and page number for the RWSA sanitary sewer easement this sheet
Sheet C-201:
1. Show the RWSA sewer line this sheet (manholes are shown and labeled, but not the sewer alignment)
Sheet C-202:
1. Label and call out the deed book and page number for the RWSA sanitary sewer easement this sheet
2. Call out the proposed water connection location and refer to utility plan notes, this sheet
3. Call out the proposed 20' ACSA sanitary sewer easement across RWSA property (TMP 77-3813)
4. Call out the proposed sanitary sewer drop connection location and refer to utility plan notes, this sheet
5. Utility Plan Notes — revise note #5 as follows: "A flow acceptance request will be required if the end vendors will
produce greater than 40,000 gpd of sewage flows".
6. Add the following note to the Utility Plan Notes:
a. Actual sanitary sewer invert elevations to be determined in the field and at RWSA's sole discretion
Sheet C-300:
On Sanitary Sewer Profile 1, include the following note:
a. See utility plan notes on sheet C-202
2. On Sanitary Sewer Profile 1, label manhole Ex-3 at Sta. 0+00 as "RWSA Manhole MCI-MH-03"
3. On Water Main Profile 1, include the following note:
a. See utility plan notes on sheet C-202
4. On Storm Sewer Profile 1, call out a minimum vertical separation of 18" between the existing 30" clay sanitary
sewer and the proposed 24" HDPE Storm sewer with
5. On Storm Sewer Profile 1, label the RWSA sanitary sewer as "RWSA 30" Clay Sanitary Sewer"
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks a lot,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(0): (434) 977-2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295-1146