HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800057 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2019-01-16County of Albemarle
Department
of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832
Memorandum
To: Rusty Coan
From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: Final: September 18, 2018
Rev. 1: November 30, 2018
Rev. 2: January 16, 2019
Subject: SDP201800057 Caliber Collision— Final Site Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following
comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by
the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Initial Site Plan Comments (from conditional approval letter dated 6/8/18):
2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. See comments below
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. See comments below.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. See comments below.
[32.5.1, 32.5.2(a) & 4.201 Setbacks. Revise the setback descriptions to fully specify the setback requirements. There
are maximums and minimums, there are special circumstances (such as from ROW versus from back of sidewalk
outside of the ROW), there are special criteria based upon the adjoining properties and there are setbacks for parking
and loading. The descriptions provided to not state the setback requirements fully, and therefore not correctly. Also
note that the setback information is not consistent between sheet 1 or 1 and sheet 8.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) The setback descriptions on Sheet 8 do not fully match those shown in the code. Ensure the descriptions include
the details and the possible options.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following on sheet 8:
V. Rev. 2: [NEW COMMENT] If the RA setbacks are being shown graphically then thev must all be
shown graphically. The front setback for the portion of the parcel that is RA was added to the layout,
but the side and rear setbacks were not. Add the side and rear lot setbacks for the RA portion of the
lot.
11. [32.7.4.2, 32.5.2(j) & (k)] Easements for stormwater management facilities; Drainage Easements; Proposed sewer
and drainage facilities. Address the following:
c) As specified in the engineering comments a stormwater easement plat and deed is required and must be submitted,
reviewed, approved, signed and recorded prior to final site plan approval.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted. Its approval and recordation of the plat
and deeds of easement for all proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of
Dedication, must be provided prior to final site plan approval. See the engineering comments.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. An easement plat has been submitted. Its approval and recordation of the plat and
deeds of easement for all proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of
Dedication, must be provided prior to final site plan approval. See the engineering comments.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the comment specified in Rev. 1.
12. [32.5.2(k)] Private & public easements. Provide the location and dimension of all proposed private offsite easements.
Note that in addition to other possible easement there appears to be the need for offsite easements, construction and
grading easements, landscaping easements and sidewalk easements.
UPDATE: Comment still valid. Also note that required easement plats and deeds must be submitted, reviewed,
approved, signed and recorded prior to final site plan approval.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted and is under review. However, the
easement plat does not appear to include all of the easements that will be required. Construction and grading
easements on the adjoining parcels also appear to be necessary. Their approval and recordation of the plat and deeds of
easement for the proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication,
must be sent to planning prior to final site plan approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted and I It round comments have been
provided. Construction and grading easement was added prior to the Pt round easement plat comments. The approval
and recordation of the plat and deeds of easement for the proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court
receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication, must be sent to planning prior to final site plan approval.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the comment specified in Rev. 1.
13. [32.5.2(1)] Existing and proposed utilities. Show all required proposed easement utilities. The submission, review,
approval and recordation of a plat and deeds of easement for all proposed easements will be prior to final site plan
approval.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted. Its approval and recordation of the plat
and deeds of easement for all proposed easements, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of
Dedication, must be sent to planning prior to final site plan approval
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. An easement plat has been submitted and I't round comments have been
provided. The approval and recordation of the plat and deeds of easement for all proposed easements, and a PDF scan
of the circuit court receipt of recordation of Deed of Dedication, must be sent to planning prior to final site plan
approval.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the comment specified in Rev. 1.
16. [32.5.2(o)] Areas to be dedicated or reserved. Address the following:
c) Submission, review, approval, and recordation of the special lot subdivision plat for ROW dedication is required
prior to final site plan approval. The special lot plat is done by separate, with an application and fee.
FINAL: Comment addressed. Address comment.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. A special lot plat for right of way dedication has been submitted and is
under review. Its approval and recordation of the plat, and a PDF scan of the circuit court receipt of recordation of
plat, must be sent to planning prior to final site plan approval.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the comment specified in Rev. 1.
20. [32.6.2(k)] Outdoor lighting. A photometric plan is required on the final site plan that meets all requirements of
section 4.17.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
e) Spill over lighting from luminaries onto public roads and rural areas shall not exceed one-half (1/2) foot candle. It
appears that this ordinance may not be met along the proposed street right of way line.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. It appears that there is a location, near the top right corner of the
building and at the "proposed right of way" line where the footcandles will be above t/z footcandles. Revises the
Photometric Plan to address the following:
i. Show the correct "proposed right of way line".
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. The line that has the label for "property line" is the
existing property line and not the "proposed property line". The proposed property line appears to
be included but is not vet label. Label the "Proposed Property Line".
ii. Show the foot candles at that "proposed right of way" line and along the whole frontage of the lot
including the entrance to the shared driveway.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Show the foot candles along the full length of the front of
the property. Because the wrong line was labeled as "property line", as if it was the "proposed
property line", the footcandles have not actually been provided along the maiority of the front of the
parcel at the "proposed property line".
iii. Ensure that at no point adjacent to the public road or Rural Area district that the footcandle exceeds th.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. It appears that this requirement may be met, but until the
two items above are fully addressed it is not possible to know. Address the two items above and
ensure that this requirement is met.
2
f) Ensure that all of the property lines, the proposed street right of way line, and the zoning line (between HC and RA
on the property) are clearly shown and labeled in the photometric plan.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following:
i. The street right of way line is the existing and not the "proposed" right of way. Show the correct right of
way line.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. The proposed street right of way appears to have been
added but not labeled as either the "proposed street right of way" or as "proposed property line"
(see above). Ensure the correct line was added and label it so that it can be differentiated from the
other linework.
h) All outdoor lighting, regardless of the amount of lumens, shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from
adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. It appears that one of the building light fixtures, in the top right corner
and near the entrance to the shared driveway, is not shielded to reflect light away from the road. Revise the
Photometric Plan to meet this requirement.
Rev. 2: Comment sufficiently addressed.
j) Rev. 2: [NEW COMMENTI Revise the Fixture Schedule to either add "Lumens" or replace "Lum. Watts"
with "Lumens". Ensure that this matches the lumens specified in the specification sheets for each fixture
type.
24. [Comment] See the majority of the other SRC reviewer comments attached. Other comments will be forwarded to
you when they become available. At this time VDOT, and RWSA have not submitted comments. The final VDH
comments are also still pending. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan
approval.
UPDATE: See the other SRC reviewer comments attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address
prior to final site plan approval.
FINAL: Comment not fully addressed. See the other SRC reviewer comments attached. All SRC reviewer comments
must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Fire Rescue and Engineering comments have been attached. VDOT and
ACSA comments will be forwarded to you when they are received.
Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. See the attached comments from most of the other reviewers. VDOT
comments have not been provided and will be forwarded to you once they are available.
Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to
date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under
"Departments" at Albemarle.org.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final
site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed
to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer.
Please contact Paty Satemye in the Planning Division by using psatern. e a,albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for
further information.
3
Review Comments for SDP201800057 Final Site Development Plan LJ
Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL
Date Completed: Monday, January 14, 2019 Department/DivisiordAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: John Anderson CDD Enaineerina Requested Changes
1. (Rev. 2) Addressed_
2. (Rev. 2) Addressed. Note: Engineering has no objection to Easement Plat, including SWM Facility Easement (see
email, SUB201800160, 1012212013 3-41 PM).
3. As noted elsewhere, VSMP approval is required prior to FSP approval. VSMP 1WPO is in process, and reviewer is
in contact with Applicant re. VSMP 1WPO plan status. No further WPO plan revisions are required; but nutrient credit
purchase, tree conservation plan, SWM Maintenance Agreement, and Easements are required, and are for the moment
outstanding. (Rev. 2) Not addressed. As of 11128118, all items remain incomplete: nutrient credit purchase; tree conservation
plan, SWM Facility Maintenance Agreement, and easement recordation_ It is Engineering's understanding that the SWM
Facility Maintenance Agreement is at impasse since property has not transferred to future owner, which is entity applying for
Site Plan Approval- If this understanding is incorrect, please notify_ Most recent correspondence on SWM Facility
Maintenance Agreement: email sent 1112812018 8:29 AM.. (Rev_ 3) Comment persists_ Applicant response: `Noted.'
4. As follow-up to ISP Engineering review comment 10.g., keynote V appears in legend, sheet 8, but unless
overlooked, this symbol does not appear on the site layout; please include symbol at each location to receive a CG-12 ramp,
on site layout, sheet 8. (Rev. 2) Not addressed. Three sidewalk ramp details appear on sheet 9. Add symbol (°UA, ramp type
2) to plan view to show VDOT CG-12 location at radius curb north of entrance on Avon Street Ext. This ramp should be
constructed with entrance curb. (Rev. 3) Addressed. Applicant response: `Ramp not located at north radius curb, reference
grading plan. Area is flush with drive no ramp needed. A call out has been added to the Site Plan sheet to help clarify this.'
5. As follow-up to ISP Engineering review comment 19_: Engineering defers to VDOT to request or require specific
additional MUTCD traffic control measure detail, or Maintenance of Traffic Plan (if any), beyond level of detail presented with
the FSP. (Rev. 3) Comment persists. Applicant response: 'Noted.'
Supplement to item #3, above, 7117118 VSMP-WPO Plan review comment: 'This project is denied, but eligible for approval
pending receipt of Agreement of Sale for 1.38 lb. nutrient credits, in document format acceptable to county, and upon receipt
of scan of recordation of Deed of Dedication of SWM Facility, Access, and Permanent Drainage Easement (acquisition of
easements, and purchase of Nutrient Credits are in process).'
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 01115/2019
Review Comments for SDP2018OOO57 Final Site Development Plan LJ
Project Name: CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL
Date Completed: Wednesday, January 02, 2fl19 DepartmenVDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Richard Nelson ACSA I No Objection El
2010-01-02: 1 recommend SDP-201 &-57 Caliber Collision — Final for approval_
.A
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 01115/2019