HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800008 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2018-12-18Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201800008
SubApplication Type:
Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Initial Site Plan
Date Completed:04/26/2018
Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Mr. Justin Deel, P.E., notified the County and the applicants on 4/26 that VDOT's Traffic Section
conducted a traffic count on South Pantops Drive within the past week. The total count was 6,849.
Mr. Deel instructed the applicants to use this updated traffic count data in the warrant analyses.
Division:
Date Completed:04/26/2018
Reviewer:Tim Padalino CDD Planning
Review Status:Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments:Approved with conditions; action letter (and attached conditions of approval) are available in
Laserfiche.
Updated action letter and updated review comment letter (dated 5/24) are also available in
Laserfiche.
Division:
Date Completed:09/05/2018
Reviewer:Tim Padalino CDD Planning
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:BOS voted to approve Special Exception request (to modify/waive stepbacks) by Consent Agenda
during the Board's regular meeting on 9/5/2018.
Division:
Date Completed:04/17/2018
Reviewer:Tim Padalino CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Site Tabulations chart is partially illegible (not visible).
Please ensure the chart is properly displayed and fits entirely on the sheet, without any content being
omitted.
2. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(r)]: On Sheet ISP2, the right half of the Legend does not contain any labels for
the various symbols. Please revise to ensure all symbols in the Legend are properly labeled.
3. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP2, please revise the Zoning Information on the Site
Tabulations chart as follows: add the word “Steep” so that it states “Managed and Preserved Steep
Slopes Overlay District” and add “Flood Hazard Overlay District.”
4. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP3, the north arrow appears to be shown incorrectly. Please
check and revise as necessary. The north arrow appears to be shown correctly on the other sheets.
5. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Site Tabulations chart identifies the Tax Map/Parcel
as being 13.31 acres, but the Land Cover Schedule states that the total area is 13.76 acres. Please
address and resolve this discrepancy, and please recalculate affected calculations (as may be
necessary).
6. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(d)]: The Grading Plan on Sheet ISP5 shows a “proposed construction
easement +/- 3,200 sf” on the adjoining property to the south (Overlook Condominiums). Please
provide additional explanation, documentation, or other information about these proposed off-site
construction activities, such as an easement or a letter of intent to grant the proposed easement.
7. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor trash containers.
8. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor lighting.
9. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please provide the proposed paving materials or other surface materials
for all walks, parking lots, and driveways.
10. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Parking Requirements information on the Site
Tabulations chart states that there are 12 ADA spaces (9 van accessible), but Sheets ISP4 and ISP5
appear to show only 10 ADA spaces (with only 8 van accessible). Please revise the Site Tabulations
chart as necessary.
11. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please add graphic depictions and/or notes to Sheet ISP4 that clearly
identify the location and size of the proposed clubhouse and proposed pool deck/swimming pool.
12. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Recreation Regulation information on the Site
Tabulations chart identifies the Provided Area as including “473,497 SQFT of onsite nature trails and
wooded areas.” Please identify the location/extent of the area that was used to calculate this
approximately 11-acre proposed recreation amenity.
13. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(i)]: Please revise Sheets ISP2, ISP4, and ISP6 (as may be necessary) to
provide information about any access easements which may potentially be granted in conjunction
with the proposed “5’ nature trails” that are proposed as publicly-accessible recreational connections
from South Pantops Drive through the subject property to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County
Greenway Corridor along the Rivanna River.
14. [Z.O. Sections 32.5.2(n) and 4.16]: The proposed substitution of “provided recreation
facilities” (“trails in wooded area and connection to county trails system-greenway”) for minimum
required facilities is partially acceptable, and partially unacceptable. Please revise as follows:
A. It is acceptable to utilize the proposed “trails in wooded area and connection to county trails
system-greenway” as a substitution for some of the minimum facilities required by 4.16.2; however, it
is not acceptable to completely substitute those minimum facilities. Specifically, one (1) tot lot that
complies with 4.16.2.1 and 4.16.1 must be provided.
B. Please modify the trail locations and alignments in collaboration with Mr. Dan Mahon in the
Albemarle County Parks and Recreation Department (ACPR).
C. Please consider opportunities to partially relocate/realign the southern trail into areas which will
already be subject to land disturbance, so as to minimize disturbance within steep slopes where
possible.
D. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: “Per County Code 18-4.16.3.2,
recreational equipment and facilities shall be maintained in a safe condition and replaced as
necessary. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner if rental units or a
homeowners' association if sale units.”
E. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: “Per County Code 18-4.16.3.3,
recreational facilities shall be completed when fifty (50) percent of the units have received certificates
of occupancy.”
15. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(o)]: The “proposed right-of-way dedication area” along South Pantops Drive
must include the statement “dedicated to public use.” Please revise accordingly and please clarify the
purpose or intent of the proposed dedication. Please note that this proposed dedication of land
requires the preparation and submission of a separate subdivision plat satisfying the requirements of
chapter 14, and will likely need to be accompanied by a deed of dedication in a form and having the
substance approved by the county attorney.
16. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(q)]: The traffic generation figures provided in the ADT section of the Site
Tabulations chart on ISP2 specify a Total ADT based on 144 units. This proposal contains 148 units.
Please revise these calculations accordingly.
17. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(s)]: As noted above, this proposed development (as shown on the Initial Site
Plan) will require the preparation and submission of an off-site construction easement plat, as well as
a subdivision plat with corresponding deed of dedication. The proposed “5’ nature trails” which are
intended to provide a public recreational connection to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County
Greenway Corridor along the Rivanna River, may also require an easement plat (TBD, based on
additional coordination with ACPR).
Division:
Page:1 of 5 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 24, 2019
8. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor lighting.
9. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please provide the proposed paving materials or other surface materials
for all walks, parking lots, and driveways.
10. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Parking Requirements information on the Site
Tabulations chart states that there are 12 ADA spaces (9 van accessible), but Sheets ISP4 and ISP5
appear to show only 10 ADA spaces (with only 8 van accessible). Please revise the Site Tabulations
chart as necessary.
11. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please add graphic depictions and/or notes to Sheet ISP4 that clearly
identify the location and size of the proposed clubhouse and proposed pool deck/swimming pool.
12. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Recreation Regulation information on the Site
Tabulations chart identifies the Provided Area as including “473,497 SQFT of onsite nature trails and
wooded areas.” Please identify the location/extent of the area that was used to calculate this
approximately 11-acre proposed recreation amenity.
13. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(i)]: Please revise Sheets ISP2, ISP4, and ISP6 (as may be necessary) to
provide information about any access easements which may potentially be granted in conjunction
with the proposed “5’ nature trails” that are proposed as publicly-accessible recreational connections
from South Pantops Drive through the subject property to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County
Greenway Corridor along the Rivanna River.
14. [Z.O. Sections 32.5.2(n) and 4.16]: The proposed substitution of “provided recreation
facilities” (“trails in wooded area and connection to county trails system-greenway”) for minimum
required facilities is partially acceptable, and partially unacceptable. Please revise as follows:
A. It is acceptable to utilize the proposed “trails in wooded area and connection to county trails
system-greenway” as a substitution for some of the minimum facilities required by 4.16.2; however, it
is not acceptable to completely substitute those minimum facilities. Specifically, one (1) tot lot that
complies with 4.16.2.1 and 4.16.1 must be provided.
B. Please modify the trail locations and alignments in collaboration with Mr. Dan Mahon in the
Albemarle County Parks and Recreation Department (ACPR).
C. Please consider opportunities to partially relocate/realign the southern trail into areas which will
already be subject to land disturbance, so as to minimize disturbance within steep slopes where
possible.
D. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: “Per County Code 18-4.16.3.2,
recreational equipment and facilities shall be maintained in a safe condition and replaced as
necessary. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner if rental units or a
homeowners' association if sale units.”
E. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: “Per County Code 18-4.16.3.3,
recreational facilities shall be completed when fifty (50) percent of the units have received certificates
of occupancy.”
15. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(o)]: The “proposed right-of-way dedication area” along South Pantops Drive
must include the statement “dedicated to public use.” Please revise accordingly and please clarify the
purpose or intent of the proposed dedication. Please note that this proposed dedication of land
requires the preparation and submission of a separate subdivision plat satisfying the requirements of
chapter 14, and will likely need to be accompanied by a deed of dedication in a form and having the
substance approved by the county attorney.
16. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(q)]: The traffic generation figures provided in the ADT section of the Site
Tabulations chart on ISP2 specify a Total ADT based on 144 units. This proposal contains 148 units.
Please revise these calculations accordingly.
17. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(s)]: As noted above, this proposed development (as shown on the Initial Site
Plan) will require the preparation and submission of an off-site construction easement plat, as well as
a subdivision plat with corresponding deed of dedication. The proposed “5’ nature trails” which are
intended to provide a public recreational connection to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County
Greenway Corridor along the Rivanna River, may also require an easement plat (TBD, based on
additional coordination with ACPR). Page:2 of 5 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 24, 2019
additional coordination with ACPR).
Date Completed:04/18/2018
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. Coordination may be required with state agency concerning Federal Dam Break Inundation
Zone.
2. Preserved Slopes remain ineligible for development unless more accurate or more technical
data demonstrate to the satisfaction of the County Engineer that the slopes are less than twenty-five
(25) percent. Avoid favorable averaging across contours that indicates slopes less than 25%, when,
for example, using horizontal distance between adjacent 2-ft interval contours in Area C, ISP10,
slopes as steep as 33% appear to exist in area ISP proposes for development. Recommend
Engineering plan review meeting to discuss.
3. Consider practicality of constructing 26-ft high wall within 1 ft. of preserved steep slopes
(ISP4).
ISP4:
4. Confirm all parking lot parking space and island curb radii = 3’.
5. Provide fire-truck design vehicle to show graphically that internal site design allows adequate
turnaround. Fire response vehicle/s that enter the site must be able to exit without backing into
South Pantops Drive.
ISP5:
6. Revise 16’ retaining wall design per Albemarle County Code, 18-30.7.5 (since built upon
steep slopes).
7. Provide complete drainage computations; plan and profile of proposed storm system
elements (inlets /pipes). Use VDOT storm conveyance tabular reporting format.
8. Ensure exit velocity at storm system structure 1 (outfall for entire development) is a
non-erosive velocity.
9. Ensure adequate riprap apron outfall protection at storm system structure 1.
10. Provide riprap apron design for outfall protection at storm system structure 1.
11. Include off-site pass-through storm runoff volumes that transit the site in all routings. (ISP7)
12. Provide velocity and volume storm runoff computations. Provide routings to support
stormwater narrative, especially to support statements concerning pass-through peak flows, and
site-generated peak flows (ISP7).
13. Provide storm routings that pass through Ex. 54” pipe beneath South Pantops Drive.
14. 2:1 slopes are generally an exception. Provide 3:1 or flatter slopes wherever possible.
15. ISP6: Proposed sanitary MH Str. 2A height appears to require safety slab. Show safety slab.
16. ACSA must approve sanitary sewer design (slope, length, pipe material, MHs, etc).
17. ISP7: Preliminary review of preliminary SWM computations and narrative indicates concept
depends upon 9.44 Ac. land cover in forest/open space, once site is developed. Reliance upon
forest/open space in VaRRM .xls requires open space permanent easement recordation prior to
VSMP plan approval.
18. Final Site Plan requires VSMP Application review and approval.
19. ISP9: VDOT approval of turn lane warrant analysis is required.
20. Please be advised that Final Site Plan approval of design that includes retaining walls of
varying height, including walls integral to parking and a 4-story residential apartment building, will
require (retaining wall) structural plans sealed by a licensed professional engineer with structural or
geotechnical expertise.
Division:
Date Completed:03/29/2018
Reviewer:Shawn Maddox Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. A hydrant is not shown near the two FDC's at the entrance. Placement of a hydrant should
consider how it impacts traffic flow once hose is deployed. One hydrant to serve both buildings would
restrict emergency vehicle traffic during an incident. Contact our office with any questions.
2. Due to no access to the rear of these structures and interior garage spaces Fire Rescue requests
stand pipes located in the garage and on each floor to assist with fire suppression and to reduce the
hose pull which could exceed 150' in the garages.
3. A knox box will be required, please add a note indicating the placement must be approved by the
fire code official.
4. A fire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance.
Thank you for address the travel way width before submission.
Division:
Page:3 of 5 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 24, 2019
3. A knox box will be required, please add a note indicating the placement must be approved by the
fire code official.
4. A fire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance.
Thank you for address the travel way width before submission.
Date Completed:04/18/2018
Reviewer:Adam Moore VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. The intention of the sites along South Pantops Drive is to have frontage improvements
(widening to match existing sections) constructed when the sites are developed. It is the County’s
authority to require this.
2. Show route number, street name, ADT, ROW width, and design/posted speeds.
3. Please adjust line weight so that the plan is more legible.
4. The existing culvert being tied in to must be in good condition, otherwise it will need to be
replaced before connecting. Contact Andrew Scott at the Charlottesville Residency to schedule an
inspection.
5. Where are the proposed retaining walls’ failure zones in relation to the road and right-of-way? If
within the right-of-way, the structures must be approved by the Culpeper District Structure & Bridge
Section.
6. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual
Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other requirements.
7. The most recent traffic count on South Pantops is from 2012. The Traffic Engineering Section
has advised us to increase the counts by 1% each year since the most recent count in areas of
ongoing growth, such as Pantops, when conducting warrant analysis.
Division:
Date Completed:03/23/2018
Reviewer:Elise Kiewra CDD E911
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:see uploaded letter, per site plan dated 3/5/18
Division:
Date Completed:04/18/2018
Reviewer:Richard Nelson ACSA
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:I recommend SDP201800008 - Vistas at South Pantops – Initial for approval with the following
conditions:
Submit 3 copies of plan to ACSA for water/sewer review.
Relocation of existing sewer will be required.
Division:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:Josh Kirtley Health Department
Review Status:Pending
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:03/20/2018
Reviewer:Michael Dellinger CDD Inspections
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:No building plans submitted so we hav no idea how many proposed units meet the Type A and B. In
addition to the chart used to determine accessible parking please verify compliance with the
following:
1106.2 Groups R-2 and R-3.
At least 2 percent, but not less than one, of each type of parking space provided for occupancies in
Groups R-2 and R-3, which are required to have Accessible, Type A or Type B dwelling or sleeping
units, shall be accessible. Where parking is provided within or beneath a building, accessible parking
spaces shall also be provided within or beneath the building.
Retaining walls exceeding 3 feet in height require separate building permits, walls exceeding 4' in
height require engineering also.
Division:
Page:4 of 5 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 24, 2019
units, shall be accessible. Where parking is provided within or beneath a building, accessible parking
spaces shall also be provided within or beneath the building.
Retaining walls exceeding 3 feet in height require separate building permits, walls exceeding 4' in
height require engineering also.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA
Review Status:Pending
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:04/25/2018
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Review comment #21: As follow-up to Engineering Plan Review meeting with Applicant on 4/19/18
(4:15 PM), please provide refined field survey data on maximum 20’ spacing between survey
elevation data points for areas on Initial Site Plan that are located within Albemarle County GIS steep
slopes overlay district that the Applicant proposes to develop. Applicant proposes more accurate
topographic survey data will position Engineering to accept specific areas as eligible for
development, if slopes are shown to be less than 25%. Coordination with Engineering Division prior
to Final Site Plan submittal is encouraged / strongly recommended. Should Applicant submit a Final
Site Plan prior to submitting refined field survey data, and prior to receiving clarification from
Engineering of the development potential of areas proposed to be graded or developed with the Initial
Site Plan, the Applicant runs risk of Final Site Plan disapproval. It is Engineering Division
understanding that Planning Division will condition Initial Site Plan approval upon Applicant
submitting information discussed during the 4/19/18 SRC follow-up meeting with Applicant as vital to
evaluation of development potential of areas within GIS steep slopes overlay district. Please see
related comments at Items 2, 3, 6, Engineering Division review comments dated 18 Apr 2018.
Division:
Date Completed:08/17/2018
Reviewer:Tim Padalino CDD Planning
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:Special Exception request to modify and waive stepback requirements has been scheduled for BOS
action on 9/5/2018. Staff have recommended approval, with conditions. A summary memo,
application materials, and staff analysis have been uploaded to Laserfiche.
Update 9/5/2018: BOS voted to approve Special Exception request (to modify/waive stepbacks) by
Consent Agenda during the Board's regular meeting on 9/5/2018.
Division:
Date Completed:12/18/2018
Reviewer:Kevin Mccollum CDD Zoning
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:Parking Determination approved 12/18/2018; available as "Other" document in Laserfiche.
Division:
Date Completed:09/21/2018
Reviewer:Tim Padalino CDD Planning
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:Recreation Substitution Request - approved 9/21/2018. Approval Letter available in Laserfiche
Weblink.
Division:
Page:5 of 5 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 24, 2019
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (4341972-4126
April 17, 2018 — (update: April 19, 2018)
Dominion Engineering
172 S. Pantops Drive, Suite A, Charlottesville, VA 22911
(434)-979-8121 x. 2 / operations@dominioneng.com
Mr. Trey Steigman, Management Services Corporation
102 S. First Street, Suite 30, Charlottesville, VA 22902
(434)-977-4181 x. 105 / tstei an �,msc-rents.comrents.com
RE: Site Review Committee Comment Letter for SDP-2018-00008 (Vistas at South Pantops — Initial Site Plan)
Dear Mr. Steigman:
The Planner for the Planning Division of the Albemarle County Community Development Department (CDD) and
other members of the Site Review Committee (SRC) have reviewed the development proposal referenced above.
Initial review comments from the following SRC members are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) — PENDING (update 4/19 — attached)
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) — (attached)
Albemarle County Building Inspections — (attached)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — (attached)
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) — PENDING (update 4/18 — attached)
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) — PENDING (update 4/18 — attached)
Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code (Zoning
Ordinance), unless otherwise specified. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time;
additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review.)
The Planner will either approve with conditions or deny the Initial Site Plan within 15 days of the SRC meeting.
Please contact me at your convenience if you have questions or require additional information or assistance.
Sincerely,
Tim Pad no, AICP
Senior Planner / ttadalino@albemarle.org / (434)-296-5832 x 3088
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) —Tim Padalino, tadalino e,albemarle.org —Requested Changes:
1. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Site Tabulations chart is partially illegible (not visible). Please
ensure the chart is properly displayed and fits entirely on the sheet, without any content being omitted.
2. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(r)]: On Sheet ISP2, the right half of the Legend does not contain any labels for the various
symbols. Please revise to ensure all symbols in the Legend are properly labeled.
3. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP2, please revise the Zoning Information on the Site Tabulations chart as
follows: add the word "Steep" so that it states "Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes Overlay District" and add
"Flood Hazard Overlay District."
4. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP3, the north arrow appears to be shown incorrectly. Please check and
revise as necessary. The north arrow appears to be shown correctly on the other sheets.
5. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Site Tabulations chart identifies the Tax Map/Parcel as being
13.31 acres, but the Land Cover Schedule states that the total area is 13.76 acres. Please address and resolve this
discrepancy, and please recalculate affected calculations (as may be necessary).
6. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(d)]: The Grading Plan on Sheet ISP5 shows a "proposed construction easement +/- 3,200
sf'on the adjoining property to the south (Overlook Condominiums). Please provide additional explanation,
documentation, or other information about these proposed off -site construction activities, such as an easement
or a letter of intent to grant the proposed easement.
7. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor trash containers.
8. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor lighting.
9. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please provide the proposed paving materials or other surface materials for all walks,
parking lots, and driveways.
10. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Parking Requirements information on the Site Tabulations chart
states that there are 12 ADA spaces (9 van accessible), but Sheets ISP4 and ISP5 appear to show only 10 ADA
spaces (with only 8 van accessible). Please revise the Site Tabulations chart as necessary.
11. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please add graphic depictions and/or notes to Sheet ISP4 that clearly identify the
location and size of the proposed clubhouse and proposed pool deck/swimming pool.
12. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Recreation Regulation information on the Site Tabulations chart
identifies the Provided Area as including "473,497 SQFT of onsite nature trails and wooded areas." Please
identify the location/extent of the area that was used to calculate this approximately 11-acre proposed recreation
amenity.
13. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(i)]: Please revise Sheets ISP2, ISP4, and ISP6 (as may be necessary) to provide
information about any access easements which may potentially be granted in conjunction with the proposed "5'
nature trails" that are proposed as publicly -accessible recreational connections from South Pantops Drive
through the subject property to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County Greenway Corridor along the
Rivanna River.
14. [Z.O. Sections 32.5.2(n) and 4.161: The proposed substitution of "provided recreation facilities" ("trails in
wooded area and connection to county trails system-greenway") for minimum required facilities is partially
acceptable, and partially unacceptable. Please revise as follows:
A. It is acceptable to utilize the proposed "trails in wooded area and connection to county trails system-
greenway" as a substitution for some of the minimum facilities required by 4.16.2; however, it is not
acceptable to completely substitute those minimum facilities. Specifically, one (1) tot lot that
complies with 4.16.2.1 and 4.16.1 must be provided.
B. Please modify the trail locations and alignments in collaboration with Mr. Dan Mahon in the
Albemarle County Parks and Recreation Department (ACPR).
C. Please consider opportunities to partially relocate/realign the southern trail into areas which will
already be subject to land disturbance, so as to minimize disturbance within steep slopes where
possible.
D. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: "Per County Code 18-4.16.3.2,
recreational equipment and facilities shall be maintained in a safe condition and replaced as
necessary. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner if rental units or a
homeowners' association if sale units."
E. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: "Per County Code 18-4.16.3.3,
recreational facilities shall be completed when fifty (50) percent of the units have received
certificates of occupancy."
15. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(o)]: The "proposed right-of-way dedication area" along South Pantops Drive must include
the statement "dedicated to public use." Please revise accordingly and please clarify the purpose or intent of the
proposed dedication. Please note that this proposed dedication of land requires the preparation and submission
of a separate subdivision plat satisfying the requirements of chapter 14, and will likely need to be accompanied
by a deed of dedication in a form and having the substance approved by the county attorney.
16. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(q)]: The traffic generation figures provided in the ADT section of the Site Tabulations
chart on ISP2 specify a Total ADT based on 144 units. This proposal contains 148 units. Please revise these
calculations accordingly.
17. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(s)]: As noted above, this proposed development (as shown on the Initial Site Plan) will
require the preparation and submission of an off -site construction easement plat, as well as a subdivision plat
with corresponding deed of dedication. The proposed "5' nature trails" which are intended to provide a public
recreational connection to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County Greenway Corridor along the Rivanna
River, may also require an easement plat (TBD, based on additional coordination with ACPR).
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
John Anderson, janderson2@albemarle.org — PENDING; review comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Update 4/19: Requested Changes (4/18, 4/19); see attached comments
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Elise Kiewra, ekiewra@albemarle.org — Requested Changes (3/23/18); see attached comments.
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Michael Dellinger, mdellinger@albemarle.org — See Recommendations (3/20/18); see attached comments.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Shawn Maddox, smaddox@albemarle.org — Requested Changes (3/29/18); see attached comments.
Albemarle County Service Authority
Richard Nelson, rnelson@serviceauthorjiy.org — PENDING; review comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Update 4/18: See Recommendations (4/18/18); see attached comments.
Virginia Department of Transportation
Adam Moore, Adam.Moore@vdot.virgima.gov — PENDING; review comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Update 4/18: Requested Changes (4/18/18); see attached comments.
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
rJohn Anderson CDD� En ineerin Requested Changes El
Reviewer: _ g 9
1- Coordination may be required with state agency concerning Federal Dam Break Inundation Zone -
Preserved Slopes remain ineligible for development unless more accurate or more technical data demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the County Engineer that the slopes are less than twenty -free (25) percent- Avoid favorable averaging across
contours that indicates slopes less than 26%, when, for example, using horizontal distance between adjacent 2-ft interval
contours in Area C, I P 10, slopes as steep as 33% appear to exist in area I P proposes for development- Recommend
Engineering plan review meeting to discuss-
3- Consider practicality of constructing 26-ft high wall within 1 ft- of preserved steep slopes (I P4)-
IP4:
4- Confirm all parking lot parking space and island curb radii = 3'-
5- Provide fire -truck design vehicle to show graphically that internal site design allows adequate turnaround- Fire
response vehiclels that enter the site must be able to exit without backing into South Pantops Drive-
IP5:
6- Revise 16' retaining wall design per Albemarle County Code, 18-30-7-5 (since built upon steep slopes)-
7- Provide complete drainage computations-, plan and profile of proposed storm system elements (inlets /pipes)- Use
VDOT storm conveyance tabular reporting format-
8- Ensure exit velocity at storm system structure 1 (outfall for entire development) is a non -erosive velocity-
9- Ensure adequate riprap apron outfall protection at storm system structure 1-
10- Provide riprap apron design for outfall protection at storm system structure 1-
11- Include off -site pass -through storm runoff volumes that transit the site in all routings- (IP7)
12- Provide velocity and volume storm runoff computations- Provide routings to support stormwater narrative especially to
support statements concerning pass -through peak flows, and site -generated peak flows (IP7)-
13- Provide storm routings that pass through Ex- 54" pipe beneath South Pantops Drive-
14- 2:1 slopes are generally an exception- Provide 3:1 or flatter slopes wherever possible-
15- IP6: Proposed sanitary MH Str_ 2A height appears to require safety slab- Show safety slab-
16- ACSA must approve sanitary sewer design (slope, length, pipe material, MHs, etc)-
17- I PT Preliminary review of preliminary SWIVI computations and narrative indicates concept depends upon 9-44 Ac-
land cover in forest/open space, once site is developed- Reliance upon forest/open space in VaRRM -xls requires open space
permanent easement recordation prior to VMP plan approval-
18- Final Site Plan requires VMP Application review and approval-
19- IP9: VDOT approval of turn lane warrant analysis is required-
20- Please be advised that Final Site Plan approval of design that includes retaining walls of varying height inclriding 'Malls
integral to parking and a 4-story residential apartment building, will require (retaining wall) structural plans sealed by a licensed
professional engineer with structural or geotechnical expertise -
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10411912018
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project:
Plan preparer:
Owner or rep.
Plan received date:
Date of comments:
Reviewer:
Project Coordinator:
SDP2018-0008
Vistas at South Pantops —Initial Site Plan
Trey Steigman, Dominion Engineering, 172 S. Pantops Drive, Suite A
Charlottesville, VA 22911 [tsteigmangmsc-rents.com ;
operationsndominioneng com ]
Jim Taggart —Roudabush, Gale & Assoc, Inc [itaaizart@roudabush.com ]
914 Monticello Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902
South Pantops II Land Trust, Charles W Hurt and Shirley L. Fisher, Trustees
P. O. Box 8147, Charlottesville, VA 22906
7 Mar 2018
18 Apr 2018
John Anderson
Tim Padalino
Coordination may be required with state agency concerning Federal Dam Break Inundation Zone.
2. Preserved Slopes remain ineligible for development unless more accurate or more technical data
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the County Engineer that the slopes are less than twenty-five (25) percent.
Avoid favorable averaging across contours that indicates slopes less than 25%, when, for example, using
horizontal distance between adjacent 2-ft interval contours in Area C, ISP10, slopes as steep as 33% appear
to exist in area ISP proposes for development. Recommend Engineering plan review meeting to discuss.
3. Consider practicality of constructing 26-ft high wall within 1 ft. of preserved steep slopes (ISP4).
ISP4:
4. Confirm all parking lot parking space and island curb radii > 3'.
5. Provide fire -truck design vehicle to show graphically that internal site design allows adequate turnaround.
Fire response vehicle/s that enter the site must be able to exit without backing into South Pantops Drive.
ISP5:
6. Revise 16' retaining wall design per Albemarle County Code, 18-30.7.5 (since built upon steep slopes).
7. Provide complete drainage computations; plan and profile of proposed storm system elements (inlets
/pipes). Use VDOT storm conveyance tabular reporting format.
8. Ensure exit velocity at storm system structure 1 (outfall for entire development) is a non -erosive velocity.
9. Ensure adequate riprap apron outfall protection at storm system structure 1.
10. Provide riprap apron design for outfall protection at storm system structure 1.
11. Include off -site pass -through storm runoff volumes that transit the site in all routings. (ISP7)
12. Provide velocity and volume storm runoff computations. Provide routings to support stormwater narrative,
especially to support statements concerning pass -through peak flows, and site -generated peak flows (ISP7).
13. Provide storm routings that pass through Ex. 54" pipe beneath South Pantops Drive.
14. 2:1 slopes are generally an exception. Provide 3:1 or flatter slopes wherever possible.
15. ISP6: Proposed sanitary MH Str. 2A height appears to require safety slab. Show safety slab.
16. ACSA must approve sanitary sewer design (slope, length, pipe material, MHs, etc).
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
17. ISP7: Preliminary review of preliminary SWM computations and narrative indicates concept depends upon
9.44 Ac. land cover in forest/open space, once site is developed. Reliance upon forest/open space in
VaRRM .xls requires open space permanent easement recordation prior to VSMP plan approval.
18. Final Site Plan requires VSMP Application review and approval.
19. ISP9: VDOT approval of turn lane warrant analysis is required.
20. Please be advised that Final Site Plan approval of design that includes retaining walls of varying height,
including walls integral to parking and a 4-story residential apartment building, will require (retaining wall)
structural plans sealed by a licensed professional engineer with structural or geotechnical expertise.
Please call if any questions: 434.296-5832 —x3069
Thank you
SDP201800008_V istas_S_Pantops_ISP_041818. doc
APPLICATION#
TMP:
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
SDP201800008
07800-00-00-02000
DATE: 3/23/2018
FROM: Elise Kiewra
ekiewra@albemarle.org
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
www.albemarle.org/ads
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3030
The following roads will need a name:
Please propose one road name for the main access.
This site will require a one (1) new private road name. Per Sec. 7-200-B of the County's Road
Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance (Page 2 of PDF).
"It is intended by this article that all roads within the county which serve or are designed
to serve three (3) or more dwelling units or business structures shall be named."
Please review the procedures in the Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual to decide upon
a road name.
We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for
review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
httns://www.albemarle.ora/unload/imaaes/Forms Center/Departments/Geographic Data Service
s/Forms/Road Namina and Property Numberina Ordinance and Manual.pdf
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The
Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/
Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Tuesday, March 20, 2019 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Dellinger
rMichael Dellin Inspections See Recommendations
❑ DDD
No building plans submitted so we hav no idea how many proposed units meet the Type A and B_ In addition to the chart used }
to determine accessible parking please verify compliance with the following:
110 6 -2 Groups R-2 and R-3-
At least 2 percent, but not less than one, of each type of parking space provided for occupancies in GroLips R-2 and R-3 }r5,hich
are required to have Accessible, Type A or Type B dwelling or sleeping units, shall be accessible_ Where parking is provided
within or beneath a building, accessible parking spaces shall also be provided }within or beneath the building
Retaining walls exceeding 3 feet in height require separate building permits_ walls exceeding 4' in height require engineering
also_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10410512018
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Thursday, March 29, 2018 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review sus:
Reviewer: FShawn Maddox F-7 Fire Rescue Requested Changes
1 _ A hydrant is net shown near the two FDC's at the entrance_ Placement of a hydrant should consider hew it impacts traffic
flow once hose is deployed_ One hydrant to serve both (buildings would restrict emergency vehicle traffic during an incident_
Contact our office with any
questions-
_ Due to no access to the rear of these structures and interior garage spaces Fire Rescue requests stand pipes located in the
garage and on each floor to assist with fire suppression and to reduce the hose pull which could exceed 150' in the garages-
3- A knox box will be required. please add a note indicating the placement must be approved by the fire code official-
4- Afire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance.
Thank YOU for address the travel way width before sribmission_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10410512018
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review sus:
Reviewer:
rRichard Nelson LJ ACA See Recommendations
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10411812018
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review sus:
Reviewer: Fdam Moore F-1 VDOT Requested Changes
1 _ The intention of the sites along South Pantops Drive is to have frontage improvements (widening to match existing
sections) constructed when the sites are developed_ It is the County's authority to require
this-
_ Show route number, street name, ADT, ROW width, and design/posted speeds-
3- Please adjust line weight so that the plan is more legible-
4- The existing culvert being tied in to must be in good condition, otherwise it will need to be replaced before connecting_
Contact Andrew Scott at the Charlottesville Residency to schedule an inspection-
5- Where are the proposed retaining walls' failure zones in relation to the road and right-of-way? If within the right-of-way, the
structures must be approved by the Culpeper District Structure & Bridge Section-
6- Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well
as any other applicable standards regulations or other requirements_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10411812018
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper. Virginia 22701
Stephen C. Brfch, P.E.
Commissioner
April 18, 2018
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Tim Padalino
Re: Vistas at South Pantops — Initial Site Plan
SDP-2018-00008
Review #1
Dear Mr. Padalino:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Dominion Engineering, dated 5
March 2018, and offers the following comments:
1. The intention of the sites along South Pantops Drive is to have frontage improvements
(widening to match existing sections) constructed when the sites are developed. It is the
County's authority to require this.
2. Show route number, street name, ADT, ROW width, and design/posted speeds.
3. Please adjust line weight so that the plan is more legible.
4. The existing culvert being tied in to must be in good condition, otherwise it will need to
be replaced before connecting. Contact Andrew Scott at the Charlottesville Residency to
schedule an inspection.
5. Where are the proposed retaining walls' failure zones in relation to the road and right-of-
way? If within the right-of-way, the structures must be approved by the Culpeper District
Structure & Bridge Section.
6. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or
other requirements.
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894.
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
April 18, 2018
Tim Padalino
Page 2
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
In Cooperation with the Thomas Jefferson Health District ALBEMARLE CHARLOTTESVILLE
State Department of Health FLUVANNA COUNTY(PALMYRA)GREENE
1138 Rose Hill Drive COUNTY (STANARDSVILLE)LOUISA COUNTY(LOUISA)
Phone (434) 972-6219 P O. Box 7546 NELSON COUNTY (LOVINGSTON)
Fax (434) 972-4310
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
April 12, 2018
Tim Padalino, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: The Vistas at South Pantops
Initial Site Development Plan
SDP2018-08
Mr. Padalino:
As requested by your department, I have reviewed the subject plan, dated 3/5/18, for The
Vistas at South Pantops, for compliance with VDH regulations. It appears that all
proposed construction is to connect to public water and sewer systems and therefore I
have no comments or concerns.
Recommendation: Approval
Conditions: None
If there are any questions or you wish to discuss, please give me a call, 434-972-4306.
Sincerely,
Alan Mazurowski
Environmental Health Supervisor
Thomas Jefferson Health District
alan.mazurowski(c�r�,vdh.vir ig�nia.gov
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (4341972-4126
April 17, 2018
Dominion Engineering
172 S. Pantops Drive, Suite A, Charlottesville, VA 22911
(434)-979-8121 x. 2 / operations@dominioneng.com
Mr. Trey Steigman, Management Services Corporation
102 S. First Street, Suite 30, Charlottesville, VA 22902
(434)-977-4181 x. 105 / tstei an �,msc-rents.comrents.com
RE: Site Review Committee Comment Letter for SDP-2018-00008 (Vistas at South Pantops — Initial Site Plan)
Dear Mr. Steigman:
The Planner for the Planning Division of the Albemarle County Community Development Department (CDD) and
other members of the Site Review Committee (SRC) have reviewed the development proposal referenced above.
Initial review comments from the following SRC members are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) — PENDING
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) — (attached)
Albemarle County Building Inspections — (attached)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue — (attached)
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) — PENDING
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) — PENDING
Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code (Zoning
Ordinance), unless otherwise specified. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time;
additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review.)
The Planner will either approve with conditions or deny the Initial Site Plan within 15 days of the SRC meeting.
Please contact me at your convenience if you have questions or require additional information or assistance.
Sincerely,
Tim Pad no, AICP
Senior Planner / ttadalino@albemarle.org / (434)-296-5832 x 3088
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) —Tim Padalino, tadalino e,albemarle.org —Requested Changes:
1. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Site Tabulations chart is partially illegible (not visible). Please
ensure the chart is properly displayed and fits entirely on the sheet, without any content being omitted.
2. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(r)]: On Sheet ISP2, the right half of the Legend does not contain any labels for the various
symbols. Please revise to ensure all symbols in the Legend are properly labeled.
3. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP2, please revise the Zoning Information on the Site Tabulations chart as
follows: add the word "Steep" so that it states "Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes Overlay District" and add
"Flood Hazard Overlay District."
4. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(a)]: On Sheet ISP3, the north arrow appears to be shown incorrectly. Please check and
revise as necessary. The north arrow appears to be shown correctly on the other sheets.
5. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Site Tabulations chart identifies the Tax Map/Parcel as being
13.31 acres, but the Land Cover Schedule states that the total area is 13.76 acres. Please address and resolve this
discrepancy, and please recalculate affected calculations (as may be necessary).
6. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(d)]: The Grading Plan on Sheet ISP5 shows a "proposed construction easement +/- 3,200
sf'on the adjoining property to the south (Overlook Condominiums). Please provide additional explanation,
documentation, or other information about these proposed off -site construction activities, such as an easement
or a letter of intent to grant the proposed easement.
7. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor trash containers.
8. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please show the proposed location(s) of outdoor lighting.
9. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please provide the proposed paving materials or other surface materials for all walks,
parking lots, and driveways.
10. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Parking Requirements information on the Site Tabulations chart
states that there are 12 ADA spaces (9 van accessible), but Sheets ISP4 and ISP5 appear to show only 10 ADA
spaces (with only 8 van accessible). Please revise the Site Tabulations chart as necessary.
11. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(n)]: Please add graphic depictions and/or notes to Sheet ISP4 that clearly identify the
location and size of the proposed clubhouse and proposed pool deck/swimming pool.
12. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(b)]: On Sheet ISP2, the Recreation Regulation information on the Site Tabulations chart
identifies the Provided Area as including "473,497 SQFT of onsite nature trails and wooded areas." Please
identify the location/extent of the area that was used to calculate this approximately 11-acre proposed recreation
amenity.
13. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(i)]: Please revise Sheets ISP2, ISP4, and ISP6 (as may be necessary) to provide
information about any access easements which may potentially be granted in conjunction with the proposed "5'
nature trails" that are proposed as publicly -accessible recreational connections from South Pantops Drive
through the subject property to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County Greenway Corridor along the
Rivanna River.
14. [Z.O. Sections 32.5.2(n) and 4.161: The proposed substitution of "provided recreation facilities" ("trails in
wooded area and connection to county trails system-greenway") for minimum required facilities is partially
acceptable, and partially unacceptable. Please revise as follows:
A. It is acceptable to utilize the proposed "trails in wooded area and connection to county trails system-
greenway" as a substitution for some of the minimum facilities required by 4.16.2; however, it is not
acceptable to completely substitute those minimum facilities. Specifically, one (1) tot lot that
complies with 4.16.2.1 and 4.16.1 must be provided.
B. Please modify the trail locations and alignments in collaboration with Mr. Dan Mahon in the
Albemarle County Parks and Recreation Department (ACPR).
C. Please consider opportunities to partially relocate/realign the southern trail into areas which will
already be subject to land disturbance, so as to minimize disturbance within steep slopes where
possible.
D. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: "Per County Code 18-4.16.3.2,
recreational equipment and facilities shall be maintained in a safe condition and replaced as
necessary. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner if rental units or a
homeowners' association if sale units."
E. Add a note to the Initial Site Plan that states the following: "Per County Code 18-4.16.3.3,
recreational facilities shall be completed when fifty (50) percent of the units have received
certificates of occupancy."
15. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(o)]: The "proposed right-of-way dedication area" along South Pantops Drive must include
the statement "dedicated to public use." Please revise accordingly and please clarify the purpose or intent of the
proposed dedication. Please note that this proposed dedication of land requires the preparation and submission
of a separate subdivision plat satisfying the requirements of chapter 14, and will likely need to be accompanied
by a deed of dedication in a form and having the substance approved by the county attorney.
16. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(q)]: The traffic generation figures provided in the ADT section of the Site Tabulations
chart on ISP2 specify a Total ADT based on 144 units. This proposal contains 148 units. Please revise these
calculations accordingly.
17. [Z.O. Section 32.5.2(s)]: As noted above, this proposed development (as shown on the Initial Site Plan) will
require the preparation and submission of an off -site construction easement plat, as well as a subdivision plat
with corresponding deed of dedication. The proposed "5' nature trails" which are intended to provide a public
recreational connection to the Old Mills Trail in the Albemarle County Greenway Corridor along the Rivanna
River, may also require an easement plat (TBD, based on additional coordination with ACPR).
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
John Anderson, janderson2@albemarle.org — PENDING; review comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Elise Kiewra, ekiewra@albemarle.org — Requested Changes (3/23/18); see attached comments.
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Michael Dellinger, mdellinger@albemarle.org — See Recommendations (3/20/18); see attached comments.
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Shawn Maddox, smaddoxkalbemarle.org — Requested Changes (3/29/18); see attached comments.
Albemarle County Service Authority
Richard Nelson, rnelson@serviceauthoriiy.org — PENDING; review comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
Virginia Department of Transportation
Adam Moore, Adam.Moore@vdot.vir ig nia gov — PENDING; review comments will be forwarded upon receipt.
APPLICATION#
TMP:
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
SDP201800008
07800-00-00-02000
DATE: 3/23/2018
FROM: Elise Kiewra
ekiewra@albemarle.org
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
www.albemarle.org/ads
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3030
The following roads will need a name:
Please propose one road name for the main access.
This site will require a one (1) new private road name. Per Sec. 7-200-B of the County's Road
Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance (Page 2 of PDF).
"It is intended by this article that all roads within the county which serve or are designed
to serve three (3) or more dwelling units or business structures shall be named."
Please review the procedures in the Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual to decide upon
a road name.
We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for
review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
httns://www.albemarle.ora/unload/imaaes/Forms Center/Departments/Geographic Data Service
s/Forms/Road Namina and Property Numberina Ordinance and Manual.pdf
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The
Index can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webapps/roads/
Parcel and mapping information can be found here: http://gisweb.albemarle.org/
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Tuesday, March 20, 2019 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Dellinger
rMichael Dellin Inspections See Recommendations
❑ DDD
No building plans submitted so we hav no idea how many proposed units meet the Type A and B_ In addition to the chart used }
to determine accessible parking please verify compliance with the following:
110 6 -2 Groups R-2 and R-3-
At least 2 percent, but not less than one, of each type of parking space provided for occupancies in GroLips R-2 and R-3 }r5,hich
are required to have Accessible, Type A or Type B dwelling or sleeping units, shall be accessible_ Where parking is provided
within or beneath a building, accessible parking spaces shall also be provided }within or beneath the building
Retaining walls exceeding 3 feet in height require separate building permits_ walls exceeding 4' in height require engineering
also_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10410512018
Review Comments for SDP201800008 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Vistas at South Pantops - Initial
Date Completed: Thursday, March 29, 2018 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review sus:
Reviewer: FShawn Maddox F-7 Fire Rescue Requested Changes
1 _ A hydrant is net shown near the two FDC's at the entrance_ Placement of a hydrant should consider hew it impacts traffic
flow once hose is deployed_ One hydrant to serve both (buildings would restrict emergency vehicle traffic during an incident_
Contact our office with any
questions-
_ Due to no access to the rear of these structures and interior garage spaces Fire Rescue requests stand pipes located in the
garage and on each floor to assist with fire suppression and to reduce the hose pull which could exceed 150' in the garages-
3- A knox box will be required. please add a note indicating the placement must be approved by the fire code official-
4- Afire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance.
Thank YOU for address the travel way width before sribmission_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10410512018
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
May 18, 2018
Mr. Jeremy Fox
Roudabush, Gale & Associates Inc.
172 South Pantops Drive, Suite A
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Re: The Vistas at South Pantops – Critical Slopes Exhibit (TMP 78 Parcel 20)
Dear Mr. Fox:
We have completed our review of the above referenced document with latest revised date of 05/09/18 as
prepared by your office. We concur with the information presented on the exhibit sheets 1 through 6 that the
crosshatched areas in subareas A, B, C, D, E, and F represent slopes that are less than 25%.
Please note that any land disturbing activities performed in these crosshatched areas must comply with the
design standards outlined in Albemarle County Code Chapter 18, Section 30.7.5. This determination is in
accord with Albemarle County Code Chapter 1, Section 30.7.4(b)(1)(h).
A field inspection with Albemarle County Engineering is required to review the proposed routing of any
outfall pipe to the stream. This will require staking out of the pipe centerline and proposed outfall, including
limits of disturbance through the preserved slopes and within the floodplain/floodway.
If there are any questions, please contact me at (434) 296-5832 ext. 7914.
Sincerely,
Frank V. Pohl, P.E., CFM
County Engineer
REVISIONS914 MONTICELLO ROAD - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE 434-977-0205 - FAX 434-296-5220 - EMAIL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COMSHEETFILE NUMBERDATESCALERIVANNA DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VA
THE VISTAS AT SOUTH PANTOPS
CRITICAL SLOPE EXHIBIT FOR17.0110APR. 26, 2018OF 6SITE
REVISIONS914 MONTICELLO ROAD - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE 434-977-0205 - FAX 434-296-5220 - EMAIL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COMSHEETFILE NUMBERDATESCALERIVANNA DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VA
THE VISTAS AT SOUTH PANTOPS
CRITICAL SLOPE EXHIBIT FOR17.0110APR. 26, 2018OF 6
REVISIONS914 MONTICELLO ROAD - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE 434-977-0205 - FAX 434-296-5220 - EMAIL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COMSHEETFILE NUMBERDATESCALERIVANNA DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VA
THE VISTAS AT SOUTH PANTOPS
CRITICAL SLOPE EXHIBIT FOR17.0110APR. 26, 2018OF 6
REVISIONS914 MONTICELLO ROAD - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE 434-977-0205 - FAX 434-296-5220 - EMAIL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COMSHEETFILE NUMBERDATESCALERIVANNA DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VA
THE VISTAS AT SOUTH PANTOPS
CRITICAL SLOPE EXHIBIT FOR17.0110APR. 26, 20184 OF 6
REVISIONS914 MONTICELLO ROAD - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE 434-977-0205 - FAX 434-296-5220 - EMAIL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COMSHEETFILE NUMBERDATESCALERIVANNA DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VA
THE VISTAS AT SOUTH PANTOPS
CRITICAL SLOPE EXHIBIT FOR17.0110APR. 26, 2018OF 6
REVISIONS914 MONTICELLO ROAD - CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE 434-977-0205 - FAX 434-296-5220 - EMAIL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COMSHEETFILE NUMBERDATESCALERIVANNA DISTRICT, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VA
THE VISTAS AT SOUTH PANTOPS
CRITICAL SLOPE EXHIBIT FOR17.0110APR. 26, 2018OF 6\\192.168.2.15\residata\Projects\Civil Projects\2017\17.0110\ENGINEERING\DWG\17.0110-PANTOPS-CritSlopeExhibit-JFox.dwg