Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201800032 Plan - VSMP WPO VSMP 2019-01-16Site Information Site: Baker Butler Elementary School 2740 Proffit Rd Owner: County of Albemarle School Board Superintendent of Schools 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville VA , 22902 Zone: RA Tax Map Parcel: 04600-00-00-03000 Legal Reference: Mageristerial District: D.B.1951 Pg.228 Rivanna Watershed: South Fork Rivanna River - Watershed Powell Creek - Sub Watershed Proposed Parking: 13 Spaces i. i • 1 • � 1' • 1 Sheets Prepared for: Cover Sheet L1 Erosion and Sediment Control Notes ......... EST. QTY. Storm Water Management Notes L2 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan L5 Layout &, grading plan L4 Layout &, grading plan L5 Details L6 Stormwalter L7 Stormwalter L8 Stormwater Albemarle Countv Final Plan General Notes Albemarle County Project Management Division 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Prepared by: Land Planning and Design Associates 1006 E. Jefferson Street, Suite B Charlottesville, VA 22902 (434) 296-2108 1. Prior to any construction within any existing public right-of-way, including connection to existing road, a permit shall be obtained from the Virginia Departmentartment of Transportation (VDOT). This plan as drawn may not accurately reflect the requirements of the permit. Where anydiscre discrepanciesies occur the of t he permit shall govern. 2. All materials and construction methods shall conform to current specifications and standards of VDOT unless otherwise noted. 3. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be provided in accordance with the approved erosion control plan and shall be installed prior to any clearing, grading or other construction. 4. All slopes and disturbed areas are to be fertilized, seeded and mulched. 5. The maximum allowable slope is 2:1 (horizontal:veaical). Where reasonably obtainable, lesser slopes of 3:1 or better are to be achieved. 6. Paved, rip rap or stabilization mat lined ditch maybe requited when in the opinion of the County Engineer, or designee, it is deemed necessary in orderto stabilize a drainage channel.1. 7. All traffic control signs shall conform with the Virginia Manual forUniform Traffic Control Devices. 8 Unless otherwise noted all concretepipe shall be reinforced concrete pipe- Class 111. 9. All excavation for underground pipe installation must comply with OSHA Standards for the Construction Industry (29 CFR Part 1926). GENERAL NOTES 1. The contractor is responsible for reviewing all drawings and specifications. Any discrepancies shall be brought to the attention of the landscape architect immediately. 2. Existing conditions base information is a combination of gis data provided by albemarle county and gis field points collected by Ipda. Land Planning and Design (LPDA) does not warrant or guarantee the completeness nor the accuracy of the property information shown herein. The contractor shlall verify all dimensions, grades, boundaries, utilities, and related information prior to construction. Should any discrepancies be found, the owner and the landscape architect shall be notified innmediately. 3. The Contractor is responsible for obtaining all permits. Permits may include, but are not limited to, VDOT' land use permits, Albelmarle County building & electrical permits, and power company permit for connection. Contractor is responsible for compliance with permit requirements and any applicable environmental requirements, whether listed in E&S plan, grading permit, approved VSMP plan or not. Owner (Albemarle County) will delegate SWPPP responsibilities to contractor. 4. The owner shall secure the services of a geotechnical engineer during construction and shall be responsible for the sole expense. The geotechnical engineer shall approve all subgrades prior to placement of base material. 5. A copy of the approved construction documents and written specifications, permits, and erosion and sedimentation control plan(s), including the swppp, shall be kept on site at all times. 6. All vehicular traffic on all roads throughout project area shall be maintained. 7. Existing underground utilities are not shown on the site survey data provided by Albemarle County via GIS data. Utilities may exist within the construction area of these plans that are not shown. The contractor shall be responsible for determining the exact location and depth of all utilities before commencing work, and for any damages which occur by his failure to locate such utilities. If during construction operations the contractor should encounter utilities other than those shown on these plans, they shall immediately notify the owner and take necessary and proper steps to protect the utility and assure continuance of service. the contractor is responsible for contacting miiss utility (toll free at 1.800.552.7001) prior to undertaking any work so that all utilities within the limits of work, or affected by the work, shall be clearly identified and marked. 8 Any field survey required for laying out and establishing grades for the site as indicated on the plans shall be included in the contract lump sum bid price for construction. LPDA is not responsible for the stakeout. 9 Materials used and methods of construction shall adhere to the current observed VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, Road and Bridge Standards, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devises, and land use permit special provisions. f LAND PLA.N.NING &► DESIGN A MISS UTILITY OF VIRGINIA APPROVED BY: 2 VDOT ..... ... Spec ........ ............ ...................... ............................ ................_ ............... ...... .......... Site Improvements ......... EST. QTY. QTY. UNIT TOTAL 10642 3`�5 6" x 6' Wide 21A Agg. Base for Asphalt Trail (2,101 LF) . .... 350 Ten $ - ........ .... ......._ 1042 ... 315 ... .......... . ..... 6 x $ 11�lide 21A A Base for Asphalt Trail jf1,14C LF 26C} Ton $ - 10642 ..315 y�y, 10" - 21 A A . Base for Parkin 196 } F ��. tiJ,....._ 90 Ten $ .. ... .. 27500 . ...i 30 .... ...... ......._....,.. ......,... ............... .... ...... ............ .. ... ..... .: Geotextile under trail 2414 .... ....... .... SY $ - ...... 1065 ATM ..... ..... 2"x 6' Wide Asphalt Trail TY. SM -9 5-2" X2,101 LFA ........ '154 Ten $ - ......... 10635 ....... ATM ....... ......:,,, ... .......... iF 8' 2 x 8 Wide Asphalt Trail TY. SM -9.5-2 (1,140 LFj p }:: t.......... r 110 Ton .... $__ - 10635 ATM .......... ,. ,:.. ..,,- Asphalt for Parkin 37 Ten ........ .. ...... $ NS .......... ...... NS _ _......... ...... ..�J............................................. .......... ............ ....... ......... ........ Boulder _ 1.5-2 Ton/Each 1.1 .._ EA $ - .......... . 54020 704 :Type A Pavement Markin 4" - White Yl g 495 ; LF $ - 50430 700 ......... _ ........ . ........ ............._ .............. .. Compact Car Parking Sign _.. 3 EA $ 2702 ATrQ Regular seed (permanent Seed) 1 LS $ ... . ................ SUBTOTAL, ..... ... ... . $ Materials Quantities NOTE: All material quantities shall be for estimate purposes only. The contractor shall be responsible for the full scope of the construction documents. See Bid Form. APPROVED by the Nbemarle County Community De\jelc �;rn rpt Department Date_ i 14`' '----- — �., R- Vicinitv Ma m=ILPDA LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I A T E S 310 East Maid Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia i www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Albemarle County, Virginia A -;;-i WILLIAM R. MECHNICK 0 No. 000844 August 31, 2018 G '4�DSCAPE X61%h� No. Revision Dale Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL Scale V=20' Date August 31, 2013 Issued For Drawing Title � i f Drawing Number Project Number EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A TRAIL AROUND THE BAKER -BUTLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAMPUS AND PAVING AN INFORMAL PARKING AREA. THE LAND CONSISTS OF OPEN LAWN SPACE, PLAYING FIELDS, AND FOREST AND THE TOTAL LAND DISTURBANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 19,000 SQUARE FEET (0.4362 ACRES) - THESE VALUES ARE ACCEPTABLE TO ENGINEERING. LPDA UNDERSTANDS THESE VALUES ARE ACCEPTABLE TO ALBEMARLE COUNTY. 2. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: THE SITE CONSISTS OF OPEN FIELDS AND TURF AREAS AROUND THE SCHOOL BUILDING AND PARKING AREA IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE WITH FOREST AROUND THE PERIMETER. THERE IS A CREEK ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH THE CONSTRUCTION WILL CROSS VIA AN EXISTING CULVERT. 3. ADJACENT AREAS: ADJACENT AREAS CONSIST MAINLY OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN A WOODED SETTING. 4. OFF-SITE AREAS: IF OFF SITE BORROW OR WASTE AREAS ARE NEEDED, SOIL SHALL BE TAKEN FROM A SITE WITH AN APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND STOCKPILES OF TOPSOIL. IF TOPSOIL STOCKPILES ARE NOT USED IN 7 DAYS, THEY SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A TEMPORARY SEED MIX. 5. SOILS: THE SITE SOILS CONSIST PRIMARILY OF GLENELG LOAM (-75%) WITH SOME AREAS OF HAZEL LOAM (-15%) AND MEADOWVILLE LOAM (^'10%). THIS COMPLEX EXHIBITS A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF B, EXCEPT FOR MEADOWVILLE LOAM WHICH IS CLASSIFIED AS A. THE TYPICAL SOIL PROFILE IS AS FOLLOWS: GLENEG LOAM 2-15 PERCENT SLOPE: 0 TO 8 INCHES - LOAM, 8 TO 28 INCHES - SILTY CLAY LOAM, 28 TO 80 INCHES - LOAM. THE WATER TABLE IN THIS AREA IS GREATER THAN 80 INCHES DEPTH. GLENEG LOAM 15-25 PERCENT SLOPE: 0 TO 65 INCHES - LOAM. THE WATER TABLE IN THIS AREA IS GREATER THAN 80 INCHES DEPTH. HAZEL LOAM: 0 TO 20 INCHES - LOAM, 20 TO 30 INCHES - CHANNERY LOAM, 30-79 INCHES - BEDROCK. THE WATER TABLE IN THIS AREA IS GREATER THAN 80 INCHES DEPTH. MEADOWVILLE LOAM: 0 TO 79 INCHES - LOAM. THE WATER TABLE IN THIS AREA IS GREATER THAN 80 INCHES DEPTH. 6. CRITICAL AREAS: THERE ARE CRITICAL SLOPES AND AREAS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT SITE. THESE AREAS ARE STEEP SLOPES WITH IN OR ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND A SMALL CREEK THAT RUNS THROUGH THE SITE. THE CRITICAL AREAS ARE MARKED ON THE PLAN. 7. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES: REFER TO SHEET L2 FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS, INCLUDING STATE STANDARD DETAILS. REFER TO THIS SHEET FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND NOTES, INSTALLATION SEQUENCE, GRADING NOTES, AND MINIMUM STANDARD COMPLIANCE. 8. PERMANENT STABILIZATION: THE SITE WILL BE STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE OF PERMANENT SEEDING AND PAVEMENT. SEEDING INFORMATION, DATES AND AMENDMENTS ARE INCLUDED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS (SHEET 1-2). SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF EXISTING SOILS AND THE NEED FOR ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE THAT PERMANENT SEEDING WILL GROW EFFECTIVELY. PERMANENT STABILIZATION TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN NINE (9) MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY COMMENCED. (WATER PROTECTION ORDINANCE SECTION 17-207B.) 9. STORMWATER RUNOFF CONSIDERATIONS: REFER TO SHEETS L6 - L9. 10. CALCULATIONS: SEE NOTES THIS SHEET. 11. MAINTENANCE: ALL E&S MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO THE ADJACENT PARK FACILITIES AND ROADWAY THROUGH PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AND/OR WASHING AND REWORKING OF EXISTING STONE. 12. IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED THAT OFF SITE BORROW OR WASTE AREAS WILL BE NEEDED. 13. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: PLEASE REFER TO E AND S INSTALLATION SEQUENCE. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT CONSTRUCTION WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS IN DURATION. t -:1-... °ti: i%,.�2 ra if.i?" Sg .�€%I, j -. ~4~ �•£ir i4£k�i� 'r S. -IDE EL PATI I C'TIM4 B -B i`nnctri Intinn P:ntrnnr n nafnii GENERAL NOTES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS 1 .THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY MUST BE NOTIFIED ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE, ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY, AND ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION. 2.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK AND VIRGINIA REGULATIONS VR 625-02-00 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS. 3.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE PLACED PRIOR TO OR AS THE FIRST STEP IN CLEARING. 4.A COPY OF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5. PRIOR TO COMMENCING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES IN AREAS OTHER THAN INDICATED ON THESE PLANS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OFF-SITE BORROW OR WASTE AREAS), THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AS DETERMINED BY THE PLAN APPROVING AUTHORITY. 7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO DRAIN TO APPROVED SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AT ALL TIMES DURING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND DURING SITE DEVELOPMENT UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED. 8. DURING DEWATERING OPERATIONS, WATER WILL BE PUMPED INTO AN APPROVED FILTERING DEVICE. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PERIODICALLY AND AFTER EACH RUNOFF PRODUCING RAINFALL EVENT. ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS OR CLEANUP TO MAINTAIN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 10. ALL FILL MATERIAL TO BE TAKEN FROM AN APPROVED, DESIGNATED BORROW AREA. 11. ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE TAKEN TO AN APPROVED WASTE AREA. EARTH FILL SHALL BE INERT MATERIALS ONLY, FREE, OF ROOTS, STUMPS, WOOD, RUBBISH, AND OTHER DEBRIS. 12. BORROW OR WASTE AREAS ARE TO BE RECLAIMED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION PER ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 5.1.28. 13. ALL INERT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRANSPORTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 13-301 OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE. 14. BORROW, FILL OR WASTE ACTIVITY INVOLVING INDUSTRIAL -TYPE POWER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:OOAM TO 9:OOPM. 15. BORROW, FILL OR WASTE ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A SAFE MANNER THAN MAINTAINS LATERAL SUPPORT, OR ORDER TO MINIMIZE ANY HAZARD TO PERSONS, PHYSICAL DAMAGE TO ADJACENT LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND DAMAGE TO ANY PUBLIC STREET BECAUSE OF SLIDES, SINKING, OR COLLAPSE. 16. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RESERVE THE RIGHT TO INSTALL, MAINTAIN, REMOVE OR CONVERT TO PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES WHERE APPLICABLE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED BY THIS PLAN REGARDLESS OF THE SALE OF ANY LOT, UNIT, BUILDING OR OTHER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. 17, TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. SEEDING IS TO BE AT 75 LBS/ACRE, AND IN THE MONTHS OF SEPTEMBER TO FEBRUARY TO CONSIST A 50/50 MIX OF ANNUAL RYEGRASS AND CEREAL WINTER RYE, OR IN MARCH AND APRIL TO CONSIST OF ANNUAL RYE, OR MAY THROUGH AUGUST TO CONSIST OF GERMAN MILLET. STRAW MULCH IS TO BE APPLIED AT 80LBS/100SF. ALTERNATIVES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVED BY THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. 18. PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE LIME AND FERTILIZER, PERMANENT SEEDING, AND MULCH. AGRICULTURAL GRADE LIMESTONE SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90LBS/1000SF, INCORPORATED INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIIED AT 1000LBS/ACRE AND CONSIST OF A 10-20-10 NUTRIENT MIX. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AT 180LBS/ACRE AND CONSIST OF 95% KENTUCKY 31 OR TALL FESCUE AND 0-5% PERENNIAL RYEGRASS OR KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS. STRAW MULCH IS TO BE APPLIED AT 80LBS/100SF. ALTERNATIVES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVED BY THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. 19. MAINTENANCE: ALL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. ANY DAMAGE OR CLOGGING TO STRUCTURAL MEASURES IS TO BE REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. SILT TRAPS ARE TO BE CLEANED WHEN 50% OF THE WET STORAGE VOLUME IS FILLED WITH SEDIMENT. ALL SEEDED AREAS ARE TO BE RESEEDED WHEN NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE A GOOD STAND OF GRASS. SILT FENCE AND DIVERSION DYKES WHICH ARE COLLECTING SEDIMENT TO HALF THEIR HEIGHT MUST BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. 20. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FINAL SITE STABILIZATION, WHEN MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. �+ A :..'3 iF t I C ( ,'.�sr,�`:a� T �`'p � U (,# ��i��'} ."N (. a''k La 7 I. r.t i):l:t ,:t Alt>7. EXCAVATE A 17X. 4 1'R;:.ryC:H UPS1WRE &i trNG '!'BE LME OF �Y. � .f'.-•�'..-. ��� �....-` y'.,1� � .. �'r �, rr�a�yi fE. €.�'.I y ££ (, l{tt E ,. 3 S7`.`;lE"LE. FILTER MATERIAL TO A';n EXTEND i P INTO TIH T 4111 1-1. FL G, 4BAC. K1 €I.t. AND COMPACITI THE EXCAVATED SMI.- �iIL.L, ' � OW lis 3TAL ATJON (ter : a-;t,l I ; I; ,<e PrAbff.S jA .S7�p:'�'r�...ULD TUBE j1lljrx�?i' R j'1 THAN $�■..INT I:'i. D1?A3pp� {A�`7,1J ijP"A�I. [ SSS. •E,A}'jE'.yt A•IM1If.JN (1 .ROINI tY E i f !}Aili'ei_Fk�'') Cilt 1=onro notnii T 1.5' MAX. SILT FENCE DROP INLET PROTECTION 2 X 4' WOOD FRAME 3DRr1P INLET aME E&S INSTALLATION SEQUENCE 1. THE E&S PLAN ON SHEET L2 AND THIS E&S CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE OUTLINES THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT. 2. COUNTY/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL FLAG ALL VEGETATION TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS INCLUDING SILT FENCE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 5. CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY E&S INSPECTOR AFTER INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER CONTROLS AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, BEFORE PROCEEDING TO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEGIN LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING WHEN FINAL GRADES ARE ACHIEVED. 7. SLOPES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED AS SOON AS FINAL GRADES ARE ACHIEVED. SEEDING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH PERMANENT SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE ALL CONTROLS IN PLACE UNTIL REMOVAL IS APPROVED BY THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY E&S INSPECTOR. 9. ONCE COUNTY APPROVAL IS SATISFIED, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY CONTROLS AND ADDRESS REMAINING DISTURBED AREAS THROUGH ADDITIONAL PERMANENT SEEDING. TABLE 3.32-D (Revised June 200.3) PERMANENT SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIEDMONT AREA Seto' LAND USE SPECIES APPLICATION PER. ACRE S#Yi3:s5.......................... Tall Fescue' 95-10V% Minimum Care Lawn Perennial Ryegrass 0-5%n (Commercial or Residential) Kentucky Bluegrass' 0-5°!0 TOT AL. 175-200 lbs. Hicih-Maintenance Lawn Tall Fescue' TOTAL: 200-250 lbs. Tall Fescue' 128 lbs. General ;lope (3:1 Or less) Red Top Grass or Creeping Red Fescue Seasonal Nurse Crop2 2 lbs: 20 lbs. TOTAL: 150 lbs. Tall Fescue' 1081bs.. i€iiEg£l..t.,f ££Y43£lI}{f€ f. "s Red Top Grass or Creeping. Red Fescue 2 lbs: Low -Maintenance Slone Seasonal Nurse CroP2. 20 lbs. 3:1) (Steeper than Crownvetch3 20 lbs. TOTAL 150 lbs I - When selecting varieties of turtgrass, use the Virginia Crap Improvement Association (VCIA) recommended turfgrass variety list. Quality seed will bear a label indicating that they are approved by VCIA. A current turfgrass' Variety, list is available>at the local County Extension office or through VCIA at 8504-746-4884 or at httr-://Sudan. cses.vt, edu/htmIfFurffturf/publications/pub[ications2. html 2 - Use seasonal nurse crop in accordance with seeding dates as stated belovt: February 161" - April .., ...... ;., . Annual Rye May 'I" - August 15'� ........ .... ... Foxtail Millet August 16" - October .:_..: Annual Rye November - February 15EE' ......... .... ....... Winter Rye 3 Substitute Ser,bQa tespedeza for Crownvetch east of Farmville, VA (May through September use hulled seed, all other periods, use unhulled Sericea): If Flatpea is used, increase rate to 30 Ibs.Iacre. If Weeping Lovegrass is used, include in arty slope or IE?vd maintenance mixture doting warmer seeding petiods. increase to.30 -4Q FERTILIZER & LIME s Apply 10-201-10 fertilizer at a rata -of 504 lbs f acre. (or 12 lbs 11,000 sa fit;). Apply Pulverized Agricultural. Limestone. at a rate of 2 tonslacre (or 90 lbs. 11 000 sq. ft.) NOTE: A soil test is necessary to determine the actual amount of lime required to adjust the soil pH of site. Incorporate the Ilene and fertilizer into the top 4 - 6 inches of the soil by disking or by other means.. When applying Slowly Available Nitrogen, use rates available in Erosion & Sediment Control Technical Bulletin # 4. 2003 Nutrient Management for Development Sites at http:llwww.dcr'state:ua.us/state&s htnn#pubs Permanent Seeding Schedule STAKE ELEVATION OF STAKE AND FABRIC ORIENTATION SPECIFIC APPLICATION Ili 1' MItJ. DETAIL A THIS METHOD OF INLET PROTECTION IS APPLICABLE: WHERE THE INLET DRAINS A RELATIVELY FLAT AREA (SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 5%) WHERE THE INLET SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOWS (NOT EXCEEDING 1 C.F.S.) ARE TYPICAL. THE METHOD SHALL NOT APPLY TO INLETS RECEIVING CONCENTRATED FLOWS;, SUCH AS IN STREET OR HIGHWAY MEDIANS. •• IwIpt Pi-*tP_r.til&* CURB INLET PROTECTION PRODUCTS: Basis of Design for curb inlet protection shall be ACF Environmental Gutter Buddy or equal selected from VDOT"s Approved List and approved by Owner and Landscape Architect. Follow manufacturer's recommended installation methods for selected product. ri irh Inlot hrntontinn natnii Narrative to Accompany VaRRM .xls (VA Runoff Reduction Method Spreadsheet) Albemarle County Engineering Division staff (Anderson) visited site 4/27`18 with Project Manager (PMD staff) to walk length of the proposed asphalt trail. This trail crosses stream buffer and passes through woods along Powell Creek; there are also upland portions. There are no wetland, stream or stream buffer impacts associated with this project, based upon design, grade, limited scope, and trail location. Stream buffer mitigation is rani required. Engineering Division accepts routing limited impervious area runoff to already existing i3M.Ps; two are intrinsic to a soccer (athletic) field. This field includes (incidental to design): i.) a vegetated filter strip (the far side of field - image below), and, ii) grass swales at each end (behind soccer goals). The long far side of field is estimated to receive, at a aatinitnum, runoff from one-third the total length of trail proposed to encircle the field. The total estimated length of tirail around. the field is 0.2 Mi, so 352 LF( ±,) will reach filter strip of the athletic field itself_ (Since path width =6", 0.04848 Ac. is shown treated by Grass Channel A!8 Soils (Spec. #3). Engineering accepts this concept, and practice as effective treatment for 0.04848 Ac. impervious area runoff. Next, runoff from the 6' impervious width of the trail (identical area; one-third the length of proposed loop trail is sheetflow to vegetated filter strip. No design revisions, calculation, or special maintenance are required to achieve runoff reduction as the as -built condition of the athletic field, flat grades, and site visit confirm estimate of 0.04848 A.c, treated b s� heet flow to vegretated filter strip (Spec. #2). Last, 185' x 6' wide portion of asphalt trail in front of the school adjacent to parking areas draiins to a D1 and routes through. Ex. bioretention basin (Spec. #9). This basin was inspected by Albemarle County Water Resources Program staff in 2017, and was in compliance. De mini.rms increase of peak., 1 - year event, 1,110 sq. ft. (0.0255 Ac.) runoff thru biofilter adds approximately 0.34 cfs, and is rated insignificant, Chapter 4 Graphical Peak Discharge Method .... .... .. ..... 3 €sii ik tsEc lilts >f 3$t s,a<tE£ li .;u # <;ak Ef,w.F s3 4t ... ...... ..<, ................ € gurE: F 1 t.sn,tE§i c E E i i r E l .ii t'). 3£x-R$tiif:i fftE3i31trSE:}[k2SIn tt f.(£, #3.tj's,YE} ry? $#. i"'1E:/1. 3?Ef,{ - S#Yi3:s5.......................... ........................................., {�xS{ #0 esft f1 9frK. i .Ela¢ # €� �i#, t., tfk tt€ 4£F S, $" � •t, {' z 'i <f:T{�3£ € t 3#'h3 €• fat! 3):kE3 N4 1€V lkr std': ::, : �f f'ti{ jt,'E»Ej r£ t € 'di'. d# �E i sty -}s 2'i£ 1 zs 3s zi5 3£ s # 3`s.; 1��1 1 ♦ss Meadowville I(oam, 2-7 percent slopes €. f}35i3'(;ti:`S3•. sEf`<t tt`x f� i5i:1£iy ��"w-� "'w_,� �'""^w_ """`" P isfi jEiirt33 S ^-Ef1712'fi'C+z£'•isriff 3sbr#Isk s J.E€s ki+ 3€£ 3 £4?o:} .>,ilo by i€iiEg£l..t.,f ££Y43£lI}{f€ f. "s Checkecd by MEL inv£,, 3.£ i t 11 1:1, r€: of €£1 t, i4) F'= 20' ....... -- ..... . . ....... ......- ,A,, .3,3 %sE . ` a, ,,ad -liti3 EanlbE8sYE iIw wa F;.l'wd dS..# .Afs:'£E iD f ! :x: <i r. VIRGINIA RUNOFF REDUCTION METHOD MAP W J' 11N M„ r irr N 725PW 72594 T2KAO 72BIW Moo Scale: 1:2,SSUJ f punted on A lands pe (11" X 8.5') shez[. N 0 40 80 1EO _ -__ 240 w reet 0 100 200 400 FM a"n cwrdnates:WGS84. EdmUmUTMZrn 17NWGS84 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map WITHIN PROJECT S17E: 34B Glenelg loam, 2-7 percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam, 7-15 percent slopes 34D Glenelg loam, 15-25 percent slopes 39C Hazel loam, 7-15 percent slopes 39D Hazel loam, 1;5-25 percent slopes 56B Meadowville I(oam, 2-7 percent slopes Cnilc infnrmatinn 7�1W ,=; 7,93�O R6W ADJACENT TO PROJECT SITE: 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7-15 percent slopes, severely eroded 93D Watt channery silt loam, 15-25 percent slopes 93E Watt channery silt loam, 25-45 percent slopes LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I A `I' E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 ■ Fax 434 296 2109 I Project Title Baker Butler Tia' Albemarle County, Virginia -�F WILLIAM R. MECHNICK No. 000844 August 31, 2018 G �9NDSCAPE A6���� No. Revision Date Drawing Title Drawing Number L I Project Number Drawn by 7AC Checkecd by MEL Scale F'= 20' Date August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing Title Drawing Number L I Project Number X I -X X Z X X (S5F z 'XI 'LEGEND (STDS. PER VESC H HANDBOOK) NO. TITLE KEY SYMBOL 1�3.02 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE x.05 SILT FENCE .... . ....... 3W7 X I -X X Z X X (S5F z 'XI 'LEGEND (STDS. PER VESC H HANDBOOK) NO. TITLE KEY SYMBOL 1�3.02 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE x.05 SILT FENCE 3W7 INLET PROTECTION IP 1 2 PERMANENT SEEDING PS PS SF ell Z P 11> Z X Z 0 -1 --- — ------------ ------------ -- --- - ------- ------- ........ X .. . ....... ... --- ---- ----- -- ----- --------- AIFIQ Z Y✓A -4- X I Z1 P X, ED P X X/V ---------- - ----- -------- --- ---- - ---- - - AV, ..... . ---- ------ . ..... .......... i"LPDA LAND PLANNING &DESIGN A S S 0 C I A T E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia a www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 E Fax 434 296 2109 J, %Project Title 2, ... .. . . A � � / // � if r ' i i � i I d vU c,f � /' � �,� f #I l / l t i Z >\ V C ........... -xxx- P Z-7 (D C-31 ! / / 1 / CID 7Q— C) I J K-1 X "N -N- L itmnit D, ------- Isturb CNq ........... . 7 f ------- ----------- 7, 20' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7 of 4 01 8011, . . ...... OX Sc�,Ie: V7-40' EX STING CONDITIONS INFORMATION IS BASED UPON ALBEMLLtNtY GIS DATA AND GPS FIELRDATA k POINT. ELEVATIO4.\SLOPE, AND 'H,,,(FT US). D POSffiQN OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE'MELD. G15 PROJECtIgN SYSTEM`S�S NAD83 VIRGINIA S06 Baker Butler Trail Albemarle County, Virginia KLT O WILLIAM R. MECHNICK NO. 000844 August 31, 2018 � G 4 "20184 -0SCAPE No. Revision Date Drawing Title Drawing Number Project Number Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL scale V=40' Date AttgList 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing Title Drawing Number Project Number Z' Z _4 ell N:3933043.2 E: 11505693.0 TRAIL GRADE AT APIP60 .469.6 LP N:3933044.3 LAND PLANNING &DESIGN V (�VVID`EASPHALT TRAIL, "�:11505627.7 2 - ­R�ICAL CURVE TRANSITION, PVI APPROX.,49f.�' � � \� A E BALL FIELD 0,,13 MILES LONG, TO FOLLOW N:3933002�. �4 111'5 A S S 0 C I A T E S \EXISTING INFORMAL PATH _1�1 0�t4 E:11� 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia E www.lpda.net EX. OBELISK ' # f /' / / 1 f r~ \ \ \ \ yy3 \ ".•.~ / �'' 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 X CON7N;' TO EXISTING AL_ ASP ALT TRAIL AT Wo 000- �PPROX. 495.7 _ >»rrx�� 0- 0 Z Z✓11/11_/�_� ------------ --- -- ---- - . . .... .... --- - ----- - — ---------- X, MEET GRADE AT EXISTING SIDEWAtK' I APPROX. 457.5 ------ ---- ---- ------ . . ...... ------------------- Y! PARKING -- ---- 8% GRADE TO 460 ME& APPROX. 454.2 Z J /7 7 N-.3932934.0 0 LOT 1 11 krW� — ' I" \ N�: 3 '�?32& X X IW5 07.2 E: 1 15Z547P--__ z '�'-WIDE ASPHALT MEDIAN P __;ET. 70 7. �2 -AVING- If f , 4 �VIDEASRHALTTRAd!_,-c TME-K Z Ir _456 FROM BACK OF CURB Z_� . ...... - ------- - N:39328_K5-,, J Li E:11505310 X N:3932829.7 E:11566Q77.0 r, N:302804.2 _�:115060914--, 1;91 lip Z BUS PARKING ----- ------ N:393MO.7 f/ �t-.IZQ609't5 ✓ ;3R2760.1 Z "E:AW6180�8 -y zll PARKING LOT V Project Title y Baker Butler Trail END PATH AT CURB RADIUS BEGINNING Albemarle County, 'x; —7'm 6-AIDE ASPHALT PATH, ALIGN WITH PATH 5 7S ACROSS DRIVEWAY Virginia 1;A CONNECT ASPHALT PATH TO EXISTING . . ........... SIDEWALK IN LEVEL AREA • N:3932693,5 N r` ... 1 / / l `' — - ` `' o i' E:11506136.0 WILLIAM R. No. 000844 -Z MECHINj !CK P/ "'-•".""'^"""".-•w,,.,, ""..'••..,._ ` ' '_ _ _ `i _ •,`,..4 _ \ ''`" "'u; oar. f j'' / •»`- ------- ---- August 31 2018 4�, , 1= \ — _ ; f 1APE 0�6 \ if BAKER—BUTLER SC ) If ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C-13 No. Revision Date if SOCCER FIELD f/ / Z' --- 4\d ; I if J PLAY FIELD SOCCER FIELD ,' ,; # ,� \ M �'d / // FINISH 0.75 CIRCUIT if If If ND SOC �DE ASPHALT PATH AROUND SOC f Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL L FIELD, 1--t4O LF, x4.75 CIRCUITS= 1 MILE Scale V -4 01 Data August 31, 2018 `� ,s h' ' '\ � ; `•.., ".^`""'-.~..~ �f � � + 1 � E . ",^4^ \ fir, rr l Issued for CIRCUIT' FOR SOCCER FIELD AND PARKING,For Bid SEE SHEET L2 CONNECT NEW 0, �A'RA��T �T I �I f�_MAR�K�R SA ANIS BOX EX,��JTR ASRHAI_;,,TRAtL Drawing Title AWN G RbAD _J - --- ---- -43932-3a9.4 ----- . .......... 0___ : 932336.5.1�- 115G59951 E:1,1506069.0 E 8 N3932302.9 6'WIDE ASPHALT TRAIL, 0.2 MILES LONG ---N:3932319.2 _-__N:3932B2.9 ell L5 I Over --- - - ------ t5n899.5 E:11506�N.2// E4150547 N-.3-932299.6-- Improvements Plan rr rr -"932296.� of -11505645.5----- Dis - ----- turba- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ` ---..,..,.ww ', \ \ \ ''',/'- ,,,-,.,.. .......- __ --"` '' , .-' %• Drawing Number — — — ------ — 20,\ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - if . ...... ...... ill 011 Scal 4:4 A,01- \ INSET, SHEET L Project Number DA `7 EXISTING CONDITIONS INFbRMATION 1,S BASED UPON ALBEM NfY GIS DATA AND GPS FIELR'DATA POINTS, ELEVATIOKSLOPE, AND POSIT OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL 4 VERIFIED BY THE A El' \ � `'~ CONTRACTOR E 1�G' \ TRACTOR IN THE !_D. \ F I� PROJE&IQN SYSTEM8�\S NAD83 VIRGINIA SOUTH (FT US). - .,. ,}y ` ,f% NOTE: s•_ - BOULDER, TYP. PLACE-BETWEENPAVCM61T AND ,- ' 1. PROPOSED PARKING SPACES TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE AND NOT h . _ TOP OF BANK-,DACE APPROX. 0 --'' -BARKING S ACLS 9' MIN. TO EXCEED 2% CROSS SLOPE AWAY FROM THE ROAD. '"EDGE OF PAVEMEI '` f,: .- WIDTH/AT TRAVELWY '- 4 WHITE PAINT, STRIPE SHOULDE \\. W Elk CONCRETE SWALE 2. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM PROPOSED PERPENDICULAR AND k - r' f STRIPE . KWG �o i OF DRIVEWAY TO 20 WIDTH ` TOP OF EX. BAUK- - ,��'q.'. #\ PARALLEL PARKING SPACES MUST SHEET FLOW SOUTH/SOUTHWEST � - �' � � RELATIVE REFERENCE ELEV.100�,- \_-_,__..�---.�-..-- �# � f ACROSS THE ASPHALT TOWARDS EXISTING CONCRETE SWALE AND _ -REL. ELEV. 91.1 N:3.�-2637 7 � REL-EL . 93 6 <. `' - LAND PLANNING E I� �� � �" � :. N:3932669.1 x:3932655.4 " f �- - W<u ^<< _1505292.9 { \-.\.. SHALL NOT BE CONCENTRATED OR COLLECTED BY ANY DEVICE A s s o I r� s - - N�393262:0.= E 11505441.3 E:1 15051 3 `--.:��.,w���. "'� �- �- �' �� � �•��--"� -•--�------ �` f - # ` � OTHER THAN THE EXISTING CONCRETE SWALE. DO NOT PERFORM - .__.. yE TAPER ASPHALT PARKIN E:115k}53�0.4 / �� 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 DA ,. f .. AREA TO ROAD AT / EX.NERATOR PAD ANY ADDITIONAL GRADING OR CREATE A NEW SWALE TO ROUTE a Charlottesville, Virginia ■ wwwApda.net _ 6 RUNOFF FROM THESE SPACES INTO THE EXISTING CONCRETE SWALE. - (3) COMPACT / , L5 B RD 29 Fax 434 296 2109 N:3932644. / 434 6 2103 j W_. - - --- - - jLA :115051,6.9 _ - :`~w ~^ W r"-. ` PARKING SIGN \ - µ 1 / �+ PROTECT EX. HYDRANT, EDGE OF PARKIN L5 ASPHALT PAVING - ,� / �� ��,� �� �- PARKING] TO BE 3 FROM FADE OF HYDRANT 22' 9" 5' REL. ELEV. 9 6.. Tf D O� - - ' j FILL WITH TOPSOIL TO MATCH GRAQE AS NEEDED a PROTECT EX. TREE CONCRETE BUMPER STOPS, TYP.. M_ -_ k_ J.A ri - �, -: _ _ .+++++++++%++++++++++' '1 ASPHALT PAVING - PARKING / _N ' % L5 \ - LET EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK w_ ._w 8' L5 VEL DIAPHRAGM" \ w_ _._. ASPHALT PATH CONNECTS TO f'`� /f o �� _ L L5 EX. CONCRETE SIDEWALK ,/ EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK If REL. EL€V. 94.9 f rf f L5 ASPH LT TO CONNECT TRAIL TO,IE�STING SIDEWALK % llf __w{ N:3932572.2 / -� 11, 1505452.6 1 f # r s r l l l I t r 1' 8' 8' WIDEIASPHAILT TRAIL N:3932555.6 L AROUND SOCCER FIELD, 1140 LF I ' r E:11505463.7 f s SCHOOL BUILDING t i / f if l l f SOCCER. FIELD � Project Title rB 1 i SOCCER FIELD f' ; Barer Butler Trail f ' L ! j Albemarle Count 1s s f Q ' ` ; r� r � � -- � Virginia giilAa N:3932464,8 l f f - E:115066.3 ---J ;if LTH 0 ( rr 1 { WILLIAM R. MECHNICK '`' ., \ Ir "`"w.,'�i (f �'r j ' � # � y`•t, ® ^rte �' •• ," — — ''"~ -_ `-`.-.......,� t f � i ONWoO0084441�� u` _w August 31, 2018 � �9�D5CAPE ARCk�l��G N:3932-446.2 No. Revision Do to N:3932394.0 E:11505440.4 i 1.. N,3932410.5 E:11505208.6 L i r w _ t f F 4 DRAIN PIPES UNDIER TRAIL \ \ � ` �� _ 1�:3932361.fi w 5 \ \ "..•,e \ E:1150't398,4 h I r \ Drawn b Checked b 6' WIDE ASPHALT TRAIL L5 � `` ��_�._..- `�y,�-`. `� -�-- --- � �..� �� `` , �. v TAC y MEL scale 1" = 20' Date `August 31 2018 moon— t \ \ \ _ `' ` — /r '•. Issued for For Bid ` \ \ yy \"\ ✓ _ _ ".., _ Drawing Title : Of \111 0 EXISTING U.TUfY MARKER AND BOX DSS orb t --" ROUTE TRAIL SO TRAIL EDGE IS MIN 6' _ - a �1 a , -`FROM UTILITY BOX Soccer & Parking Improvements Ilan Drawing Number w.w.w-w L4 Scale: 1 �Otit t f '^, Project Number EXISTING CONQITIONS INFORMATION IS`BASED UPON ALMARLE COUNTY bIS DATA AND GPS FIELD DATA POINTS. ELEVAflQN SLOPE, AND POSITI64,OF SITE IMPROVWENTS SHALL BE VkRIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE FIELD. GIS PROJECTIONSYSTEMS IS NAN,3 VIRGINIA SOUTR(FT US). ASPHALT .APARKING TYPICAL TRAIL PROFILE 1 2" SM 9.5 A ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE 3" BM -25.0 ASPHALT BASE COURSE 6" 21-A STONE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR UNDISTURBED SOIL NOTE: APPLICATION OF TACK AT JOINTS ADGACENT TO CURBS SHALL BE APPLIED BY HAND AT A RATE OF .2 GAL/SQ. YD. REFER TO THE 'VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS' FOR ASPHALT DENSITY AND INSTALLATION PROCEEDURE:S. REMOVE ROCKS AND STUMPS ++++ �- �++-- NOT USED KNOCK DOWN HIGH POINTS _ EXISTING GRADE � � _ =�—------_— nDAnr- ZONE FLUSH TO SHOULDER GRADE ASPHALT PARKING co 2'- SEE PLANS 2' b 2"- 4" DROP 1; 1 5:1,.S:I GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM '++ + + + +/ + + + + .... -++++++ + + + + -FILL IN LOW POINTS TYPICAL TRAIL DEMOLITION / 8 \ ASPHALT TRAIL - TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION Not to Scale 1►rlarel M c i WOR R' TRAIT WIF)TN (y) — N 4" DRAIN PIPES UNDER TRAIL COMPACTED 21-A EOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR SUBGRADE STABILIZATION OMPACTED SUBGRADE L SOIL DIAMETER METAL BOLLARD NISH GRADE =T CONCRETE FOOTER 3" =LOW FINISH GRADE AND COVER 'ITH SOIL TO ALLOW GRASS TO ROW OVER FOOTER )00 PSI CONCRETE FOOTER OMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" SM 9.5 A ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE (3) 4" DIA. HDPE DRAIN PIPES 6" 21-A STONE BASE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR UNDISTURBED SOIL 2" SM 9.5 A ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE 6" 21-A STONE BASE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR UNDISTURBED SOIL LAND PLANNING & DESI+GN A S S 0 C i .A `r E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Albemarle County, Virginia N WILLIAM R. MECHNICK. U � No: 000844 August 31, 201 s G SCAPE No. Revision Date Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL (—CLEAN WASHED #57'G L = 20' FILTER FABRIC Issued LINING AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER TO PREVENT SUBGRADE SATURATION GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM '++ + + + +/ + + + + .... -++++++ + + + + -FILL IN LOW POINTS TYPICAL TRAIL DEMOLITION / 8 \ ASPHALT TRAIL - TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION Not to Scale 1►rlarel M c i WOR R' TRAIT WIF)TN (y) — N 4" DRAIN PIPES UNDER TRAIL COMPACTED 21-A EOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR SUBGRADE STABILIZATION OMPACTED SUBGRADE L SOIL DIAMETER METAL BOLLARD NISH GRADE =T CONCRETE FOOTER 3" =LOW FINISH GRADE AND COVER 'ITH SOIL TO ALLOW GRASS TO ROW OVER FOOTER )00 PSI CONCRETE FOOTER OMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" SM 9.5 A ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE (3) 4" DIA. HDPE DRAIN PIPES 6" 21-A STONE BASE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR UNDISTURBED SOIL 2" SM 9.5 A ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE 6" 21-A STONE BASE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR UNDISTURBED SOIL LAND PLANNING & DESI+GN A S S 0 C i .A `r E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Albemarle County, Virginia N WILLIAM R. MECHNICK. U � No: 000844 August 31, 201 s G SCAPE No. Revision Date Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL Scale V = 20' Date August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing Title i Drawing Number Project Number Narrative to Accomoanv VaRRM .xls (VA Runoff Reduction Method Spreadsheet Albemarle County Engineering Division staff (Anderson) visited site 4/27/18 with Project Manager (PMD staff) to walk length of the proposed asphalt trail. This trail crosses stream buffer and passes through woods along Powell Creek; there are also upland portions. There are no wetland, stream or stream buffer impacts associated with this project, based upon design, grade, limited scope, and trail location. Stream buffer mitigation is not required. Engineering Division accepts routing limited impervious area runoff to already existing BMPs-, two are intrinsic to a soccer (athletic) field. This field includes (incidental to design): i.) a vegetated filter strip (the far side of field - image below), and, ii) grass swales at each end (behind soccer goals). The long far side of field is estimated to receive, at a inininaum, runoff from one-third the total length of trail proposed to encircle the field. The total estimated length of trail around the field is 0.2 Mi, so 352 LF(±) will reach filter strip of the athletic field itself. Since path width =6', 0.04848 Ac is shown treated by Grass Channel A/B Soils (Spec. #3). Engineiering accepts this concept, and practice as effective treatment for 0.04848 Ac. impervious area runoff. Next, runoff from. the 6' impervious width of the trail (identical area; one-third the length of proposed loop trail is sheetflow ito vegetated filter strip. No design revisions, calculation, or special maintenance are required to achieve runoff reduction as the as -built condition of the athletic field, flat grades, and site visit confirm estimate of 0.04848 Ac. treaeted b sheet �heet flow to vegetated filter strip(Spec. #2). Last, 185' X 6' wide portion of asphalt trail in front of the school adjacent to parking areas drains to a Dl and routes through Ex. bioretention basin (Spec. #9). This basin was inspected by Albemarle County Water Resources Program staff in 2017, and was in compliance. De minimis increase of peals, 1 - year event, 1,110 sq.ft. (0.0255 Ac.) runoff thru bi.ofilter adds approximately 0.34 cfs, and is rated insignificant. ------------- - - ­­­ -------------------------- - ----------------------_ ......- - - ..- Chapter 4 Graphical Pei Discharge Method il:f; sl,,tyF,t sf4 t. #:L iMMMMMNNNNIIL 3 Ea33a1}; i'€ {fY£. {;t z3f 3i 3f E£3t».€st Yip fIs`tiC'.i3 F#est {4"F)f3f j31 3 Fal 3Y.i ' SD 1 3z>€)f£Yf tik 1!3 f r alai }s Y Y {}£1i I as Y Yfe>x 1,€ e, Y �#ff# 3 ;iY if�.7 h�riY £ai 3€YsvF '. iY•#Yf3~�l It r{3 Ft3$Y€3;s£{�{' { s Qt"' t , -- z €Y pva&-'d fes ?b3:{3 k3 Y34 d# fl£tegiy �{ .. .FEETm:A k' Y:7 ,,...,.Y„,....,..,«.t.. 1 pond tat:'t �#a`frki�a€l <PF< €nCrsisr: 'i`1f4 f{qs d Xt q air+a tlh for Ullc €:Yt YlthWaai T' {wtltssr,: ml <{aWk :; pproptr w' i:s.{iY -ilx sii t{#I .at<v.{:{ # 1 1i, tis r>E 1I1?. fA) *NWAW ANW "'pi'.adtlfSsrI1,£k.IfsJf3,i)l:.>-s'wvrxb'Ek.<YFxt 301. i'i 3Ms�,E{I§r3'FI. f3,'k {s3£ 4'xE3 Fjrs3( i£: {{3 al., tl)i3'sYtYs r,l 1£:'£l.. 3kit31 tski.... tfYi 3Ff ?£€k r Y \ y f _ 0.34 cls from TR -55)I SCS Method, where Am =10,000 ft2 (0.23 Ac.; 0.000359 Mi'); Q =1" (if CN =70, Tc 0.1hr; 3.5" 1 -yr 24 -hr storm)}; Fp =1.0; qu =950). Final Site Plan, Baker -Butler ES, d. 5111/01 (Timmons) approved 6/1/01 (SDP 01-009), sheet C2.3 indicates following biofilter storage capacities (2-, 10-, 100 -yr): 25,265cf, 38,335cf, 45,310cf. Again, 0.34cfs from 185' length of 6' paved trail routed through this facility is rated de minimis. Also, letter, C. Scott Browne, Timmons, to Alb. Co., 1/3 1/0 1 (that ref. SWM Basin calculations including water quality worksheet and routing ,computations). Data on File with CDD /Engineering, site visit 4/27/18, and photos are evaluated sufficient to support values entered in VaRRM .xls (d. 4/27/18; rev. 5/3/18), prepared by J. Anderson, PE, CDD /Engineering (County of Albemarle). VaRRM .xis (Version 3.0, together with TR -55) indicates after routing runoff from new impervious areas proposed with this project through vegetated filter strip, grass swale, and biofilter, as outlined above, Remaining TP Load Reduction Required is 0,1 "_� lb/yr. DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Re -Development Compliance Spreadsheet - Version 3.0 Site Compliance Summary -_----------_---_-______ I 1 __-________-_____ I - - - - 1 -year storm 2 -year storm 10 -year storm - BMP Design Specifications List: 12013 - -- Draft Stds & Specs Maximum % Reduction Required Below Pre-ReDevelopment Load 10% Note. % Reduction wilt reduce post-developnnent l -P (oad to less than or equal to baseline food of 0.091b/yr (0.41 lblaclyr) 3.00 3.60 5.40 [Required reduction for Post-ReDev. = Post-ReGev, TP load- baseline load of 0.093685 1b/yr], baseline load = site area x 0.41 lbjoc/y r Site Summary A Solis B Solis - - - - - -- Drainage Areas RV & CN Drainage Area A Drainage Area B Total Runoff Volume Reduction {ft3] 152 Drainage Area E Forest/Open (acres) - 0.00 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 0.12 0 0 Project Title: Baker -Butler, NIFI_Parking-Trails - - - ---- j-- --- Total TN Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 0.90I- 152 0 0 0 0 Date: 4/27/2018; rev. 5/3/18 Total Rainfall (in): 43 Practice 1 -year return perhod Remaining Post Development TP Load 0.35 0.00 0.00 TP Removed (Ib/yr) RV w RR (ws-in) 2.57 0.00 Total Disturbed Acreage: 0.44 (Ib/yr) CN adjusted 96 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - 2 -year return period 10 -year return period Remaining TP Load Reduction (lb/yr) 0417 0.00 0.00 - - -- - 0.03 0.02 RV w RR (ws-in) 3.16 0.00 Site Land Cover Summary 0.00 0.00 0.0484848 167.20 0.00 CN CN adjusted 96 0 RV wo RR (ws-in) 5.16 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pre-ReDevelopment Land Cover (acres) -- --------- 'Reduction below new development ioud finait. ,tion not required RV w RR (ws-in) 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 1 96 0 0 A soils a Soils C Soils D Soils Totals % of Total Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.23 0,00 0.00 0.23 52 Total TN Load Reduction Achheved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.90 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 07.21 48 impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 07.00 0 0).44 100 Post-ReDevelopment Land Cover (acres) Asoils B Soils C Soils D Soils Totals % of Total Forestlopen (acres) 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 03.23 52 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03.00 0 impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.21 1 0.00 0.00 03.21 48 * Forest/Open Space areas must be protected in accordance with the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method 0.44 100 Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads Final Post -Development post Post Adjusted Pre- Pre - ReDevelopment Final Post -Development Post-ReDevelopment TP EME (Post-ReDevelopment ReDevelopment Development ReDevfelopment TP Load per acre TP Load per acre Load per acre New impervious) {New Impervious) (Ib/acre/yr) (Ib/acre/yr) (lb/acre/yr) Site Rv 0.47 0.03 0.95 0.03 1 0.07 1,07 0.07 Treatment Volume (ft3) 741 25 716 25 TP Load (lb/yr) 0.47 0.02 0.45 07.02 - - --- - - - - - Baseline TP Load (Ib/yr): 0.093685* *Reductlon be?ow new I I deve!flpmc_nt load limitotion not required Total TP Load Reduction Required (Ib/yr) 0.29 -0.08 0.36 Final Post -Development Load ire (Post-ReDevelopment & New Impervious) ReDevfelopment - -- -- - Load (lb/yr) 3.33 (0.79 Drainage Area Summary Site Compliance Summary -_----------_---_-______ I 1 __-________-_____ I � 1 -year storm 2 -year storm 10 -year storm - -- - - Maximum % Reduction Required Below Pre-ReDevelopment Load 10% Note. % Reduction wilt reduce post-developnnent l -P (oad to less than or equal to baseline food of 0.091b/yr (0.41 lblaclyr) 3.00 3.60 5.40 [Required reduction for Post-ReDev. = Post-ReGev, TP load- baseline load of 0.093685 1b/yr], baseline load = site area x 0.41 lbjoc/y r A Solis B Solis - - - - - -- Drainage Areas RV & CN Drainage Area A Drainage Area B Total Runoff Volume Reduction {ft3] 152 Drainage Area E Forest/Open (acres) - 0.00 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 0.12 0 0 0 - - - ---- j-- --- Total TN Load Reduction Achieved (lb/yr) 0.90I- 152 0 0 0 0 Practice 1 -year return perhod Remaining Post Development TP Load 0.35 0.00 0.00 TP Removed (Ib/yr) RV w RR (ws-in) 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Ib/yr) CN adjusted 96 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - 2 -year return period 10 -year return period Remaining TP Load Reduction (lb/yr) 0417 0.00 0.00 - - -- - 0.03 0.02 RV w RR (ws-in) 3.16 0.00 Required 0.00 0.00 0.0484848 167.20 0.00 CN CN adjusted 96 0 RV wo RR (ws-in) 5.16 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 I -- --------- 'Reduction below new development ioud finait. ,tion not required RV w RR (ws-in) 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drainage Area Summary LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I T E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Baler Butler Frail Albemarle County, Virginia WILLIAM R. MECHNICK O No. 000844 August 31, 2018 G %ZDSCAPE A06� No. Revision Date Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL Soule Date August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing 1 itle Drawing Number L6 Project Number Runoff Volume and {CN Calculations -_----------_---_-______ I 1 __-________-_____ � 1 -year storm 2 -year storm 10 -year storm - -- - - Target Rainfall Event (in) 3.00 3.60 5.40 A Solis B Solis C Soils Drainage Areas RV & CN Drainage Area A Drainage Area B Drainage Area C Drainage Area D Drainage Area E Forest/Open (acres) - 0.00 0.00 CN 98 0 0 0 0 - - - ---- j-- --- -- RR (ft') 152 0 0 0 0 Practice 1 -year return perhod RV wo RR (ws-in) 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TP Removed (Ib/yr) RV w RR (ws-in) 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 96 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - 2 -year return period 10 -year return period RV wo RR (ws-in) 3.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - -- - 0.03 0.02 RV w RR (ws-in) 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0484848 167.20 0.00 CN CN adjusted 96 0 RV wo RR (ws-in) 5.16 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 -- --------- RV w RR (ws-in) 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 1 96 0 0 0 0 LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I T E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Baler Butler Frail Albemarle County, Virginia WILLIAM R. MECHNICK O No. 000844 August 31, 2018 G %ZDSCAPE A06� No. Revision Date Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL Soule Date August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing 1 itle Drawing Number L6 Project Number I Drainage Area A Summary I Land Cover Summary A Solis B Solis C Soils D Solis Total % of Total - - -- - -- Forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 - Managed Turf (acres) impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0 100 BMP Selections Practice Managed Turf Credit Area (acres) Impervious Cover Credit Area (acres) BMP Treatment Volumeft3 { ) TP Load from Upstream Practices (Ibs) Untreated TP Load to Practice (Ibs) TP Removed (Ib/yr) TP Remaining (lb/yr) Downstream Treatment to be Employed 4.a. Grass Channel A/B Soils (Spec #3) 0.0484848 167.20 0.00 0.10 0.03 0.07 _- 6.a. Bioretention #1 or Micro-Bioretentlon #1 or Urban Bioretention (Spec #9) 0.02548 87.87 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.02 - - 9.c. Sheetf low to Vegetated Filter Strip, A Soils or Compost Amended B/C/D Soils (Spec #2 & #4) 0.0484848 167.20 0.00 0.10 0.05 0.05 _ Total Impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.12 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 II - ._ --_ -------- - Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.12 Total TN Load Reduction Achheved in D.A. (lb/yr) 0.90 LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I T E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 0 Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Baler Butler Frail Albemarle County, Virginia WILLIAM R. MECHNICK O No. 000844 August 31, 2018 G %ZDSCAPE A06� No. Revision Date Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL Soule Date August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing 1 itle Drawing Number L6 Project Number Project Name: FSiker-Burr )1€[Ff rkin -Tr t pa alis 1y Date:C2/2f12$,rev 5f1$ Linear Development Project? 1l 3 Information Post -Development Project (Treatment Volume and Loads) Enter Total Disturbed Area (acres) 4 U,44 Check, BMP Design Specifications dist; 20113 Draft St& & Specs ---+' Unearproject? No a a Lane( cover (areas entered correct=ly? � Total disturbed area entered? f Pre-ReDevellopment Land Cover (acres) A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Totals :Forest/C)pen Space (acres) -- undisturbed forest/open space 1123 tManaged Turf (acres} -- distu,bed, graded for ;yards or outer tt!rf Fo 4e mowed/managed ..... _ .. Impervious Cover (acres) I i j l f. Land Cover lacrii rryrrrr<aeaual} e v Ltuo.Ytel„utt 'Constants Runoff Cranffirierits lRul :Annual Rainfall (inches) A Sails B Sails C Soils D Soils Totals 'ForestJOpert Space (aeras) -- undisturbed, :Total Nitrogen (TN) EMC (ri k.fi3 Target TP Load {Ib/acre/Yr) O,Af : protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 90 OZO Ci,22 .'.'..0.25 :M raged Turf (acres) --disturbed, graded for p 95 0 9S i,9a O,�S or other turf to be mo Ned/managed T323 _ __. ftentaining Runoff 'TotatBMP 'Treatment tCi'yards .Impervious Laver (acres) (1#33 -'.l = i- ,'>etect!core drapduvmIi- Dovmstmzi Practice to be 2. Arca (saes) Pract{ce fli "Lij J!r,l S Y Forest Ar Ch?ck ULT <. Cfia( tfK: fiitt. .... rryrrrr<aeaual} e v Ltuo.Ytel„utt 'Constants Runoff Cranffirierits lRul :Annual Rainfall (inches) q3 :Target Rainfall Event (inches) 1.OD :Total Phosphorus (TP) EiL9C (mg/L) Forest/Open Space :Total Nitrogen (TN) EMC (ri k.fi3 Target TP Load {Ib/acre/Yr) O,Af : Pj (unitless correction factor) 0 90 <:',r, r ye.. �. .r„•.,..•::cal. •, 2f ,. r�f�... <rr , iifri0.41 A Soils B Soils C Sails D Soils Forest/Open Space Q;02 k.fi3 4�,E2 O.GS Managed Turf O;iS OZO Ci,22 .'.'..0.25 Impervious Cover p 95 0 9S i,9a O,�S <:',r, r ye.. �. .r„•.,..•::cal. •, 2f ,. r�f�... <rr , iifri0.41 TP Load Reduction Required for , Redeveloped Area flb/y r) Nedvt;ion beloN new development fold iiautation not mq.ired TP Load Reduction Required (lb/yr) Nitrogen Loads (informational Purposes Only) Deveopment TN Lad IF 17-1 post Pre-fief7eveinpme{tt TN Load (Ib/yr) p,79 (Pest ReDevelopment & New Impervious) 3,33 (Ib/yr) TP Load Reduction Required for New X, Impervious; Area (Ib/yr) Drainage Area A Drainage Area A tarW Co., raaesl coo= ASala 3 .Ih C5uils DSob T.L.N Land Cover Rv O W 8013 z- UAL, A4r< - io:ai PY,psph,x: A ' 1 41 h1r A1,11111+:r D.A. A lib/y,)� :3 Port D evelppmeot Treacment Vpiume In D.A. Stormwater Hest Management Practices (RR = Runoff Reduction) '--- Runoif Ntanaged ImpPenpua VGortw frons R mg INAI BHt Phosphorus Phosphorus laid U t :ed Phosphosu Remain n6 Ru,wH CUpsRemoval from Upstream �hoephorus lo.d Removed By Phosphorus Load Downstream Pract{ce to be Practice Red -i— Turf r^dit fiJver Credit oxvm R noR Vcium i m creml `n' riieJv<linp Aj (, j Aea {i ores) Area (aaej Practice Volumel�:') Effid"gI5, le--- ib tp Pracdce Ib' POW. ID Ib Empi°yeJ .a. Panic k, 1--, al 11—til 3b Ee:ea•.ant g, j5pe. P)j TOTAIIK•{'ERVIoUS LOVER TRkA[kU furl Gf3 AREA fNFf:K; O:t. TOTALMANAGED TuRFAR£ATREATO){a<I {;,qi :: AREA CHEEK: OK. TUTALR N0H REDUCTION TOTALPHOStoORi15AVALLATTE?-OR REMOVALINUA AFb,'yfl- J4• ;( TOTAL PNOSPHORi7S REMOVED WITfi RUNT FF RFDUCIiGP: PRACTICES 1N U TOTAL PUDSPUORUS REH'AMING AT a APPi. IN r RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D , y _ .tff V`14 Wef(M07rFTE. < t'fcn . <f:,xtf-.At 1J,'f ..r7r .t7 f PTP 1.°+Cf fF±.. ULA t,f1.S TOTAL IMPERVIOUS CGYERTRFATED AREACUECK: OR. TOTALh',AftAGEL IURFAi?EAtREAFED (acj f3Off AREA CHECK: 4 . TOrA1 PLIU`I ORDS RFMOVAi lto{ILR2{J ON ?Ilk Sit•jy:) U')A _J SRTisf PtfGSPHGRUSA+/AiiARi£F�k RPMO'JAI i{dD4 AfihJY.l '1. TaiALY:t:)iVHf}Y.l)>RFP/IaYEf)X{IYNfilil%iUP:gFM1 RFfJUf fIpP PM(nrF>IN f)A.{ib/Y:) :: il,t,Xj .:l TGFAL PHGSPfiGRUS R£PdOVEDN/tTtf 1UNOFF REDUCTION PRACnC£SING ,A(7b",) TU?AL PNO51>HORUS LUAJ REUUr'[{rJN ACRIEYEO ;NL A Afib'Y`) C-2 TGTAt. PNCAPUtiRUS R£P,?A7NiNG AFTER APP3:IINi: 30.9P i0AORmLCfIONi:NBP AfltjYrf _ J - EE it ;Ari:d q£iAL?rY CLik'Ffv.)A,"VU TAS rOR St TE CoitlPt?ANCE CII4LGFL4T'IONS NI�R,],.r£N➢.TMflVrD Vl{TN RUPiuFFRCDUCT7CRi PRACT(Ct51{d DP At3h Yr) qp : N[H2OGEN{sEh4OJEU. vYTIRUUT RUNarf HEUUCnUk PRAtI:CE51Ni AAt1f p'I - C.W TOTAL NIFRin,FN RFPAOVFU iN D 9. A (ihfyrl : im! Uoi N ogcn Remaining Removal 4 om Upstream N t ogee F-' ip'. Removed e, Nitrogen Load CHI 1 cY (%) P t {ib) P b ltbs) P i IIbsJ (Ip j 7�7nary ebt e 9�IIrPJIIN t5 i5R U,rb? � 3MD2 nRp is nv ss > uez cRs TDTAI. kUNOFF REDUCTION IN D.A. ft..T 9S} NIFRLR:FN RFMOSFG WFTiF RUFfOFF RKDUC:MN PRACTICES fru D.A.AHvdrj�_; fzga .a:tY,'fii>•k GU,sl!': +CLtr.?ufrGr;{k .khi Y'SE:Rtf'J,ATfC:;.::;frrfi, r.nc:.u;•iTrfyf Drainage Area B Drainage Area A Land Cower (acres} ...... ..... ' A Soi> R$ 15 j C�oAs G5°I{s Tcrtafs La ul CoY rRV r sr, Qpepx ,se,1 - 1 fi 57tt OiYi enT�rt' a B c _sl f} � Q Land Cover Summary -Post (Final) lar7d Cover Summary -post i land Cover Summary -post Total Phosphorus Avadab)e for Removaim D.A.aOb/y)-{4f Post Reflev. &New Impervious ` Post-ReDevelopment Tptat Punt -Development New Impervious ForestJOpe0 Space i forest/Opel; Space 'atOrmwater }jest Management Practices (FIR = Runoff Reduction) Cover LES t ) Cover (acres) T323 _ __. ftentaining Runoff 'TotatBMP 'Treatment Fhoz oral Ph°sph°rus PH Removal Load (mot Weighted Rv(forest) (1#33 -'.l Weighted Rv(forest) i- ,'>etect!core drapduvmIi- Dovmstmzi Practice to be Credit l a) plea (acres) Arca (saes) Pract{ce fli "Lij % Forest. S Y Forest Removed By Phosphorus Employed Managed Turf Cover g - Managed rUrf Cover : PraC[ices (Ib) Eura Tice (IbTT Pr cr i w I b) (acres) .....r:: --r: E (acres) Weighted Rv (turf) i10b Weighted RV (turf} _p, i0 %Mann ed Turf : .. .....: ✓eneged Turf ' imp.—mous CGJEf (ars) :: :. ReDev. Impervious O74 New Ira ervio, Lqv r ' t�,z2 Cover [acres) (acres) Rv(imaervlqus)L)05 { ...... .............. Ru{impervious) ...... .:: :: iJ$ _ Rv{fmpervtous) trig;: %Impervious $ l Impervious l3.te Final Site Area (acres) it.4<I I Total ReDev. Site Area (acres)' Final Post Dev Site Rv it,lx ReDev Site Rv ti13 Treakir €'ft VoluritB £inn Ni Atient L..•£i%3fTa Fina'; Prt•DeueEopment i! Post-ReDeueEogment Post-DeveEapment Treamilent Volume 0,027fi? :' Treatment Volume 0{fz:Il)5 Treatment Volume 0 C31�q. (acre-(;) (acre -fie) {acfe-ft) Finae, posy-DevelGpDter•,Y : Post -RE DevelopmeNt Post -Development Treatment Volume Treatment Volume s !- Treatment Volume (cubic ?i.$ (cubic feed (Cubic feet) feet) Post - Final lost -mint 's: Post--ReDeaGEapmertk r Dewelo Development iP Goad Cft:.t aI Load(TP) itA :Post -Development TP Load (Ib/•yr) (IbJYr) Fria, lost [)- I.P trent Tr Y load pef WE .`).Tri f•rr r.: l:: {?'�3Ni - PJlax. Reduction Required (Below Pfz- i6°(o Ftsueve ripmen: Lti TP Load Reduction Required for , Redeveloped Area flb/y r) Nedvt;ion beloN new development fold iiautation not mq.ired TP Load Reduction Required (lb/yr) Nitrogen Loads (informational Purposes Only) Deveopment TN Lad IF 17-1 post Pre-fief7eveinpme{tt TN Load (Ib/yr) p,79 (Pest ReDevelopment & New Impervious) 3,33 (Ib/yr) TP Load Reduction Required for New X, Impervious; Area (Ib/yr) Drainage Area A Drainage Area A tarW Co., raaesl coo= ASala 3 .Ih C5uils DSob T.L.N Land Cover Rv O W 8013 z- UAL, A4r< - io:ai PY,psph,x: A ' 1 41 h1r A1,11111+:r D.A. A lib/y,)� :3 Port D evelppmeot Treacment Vpiume In D.A. Stormwater Hest Management Practices (RR = Runoff Reduction) '--- Runoif Ntanaged ImpPenpua VGortw frons R mg INAI BHt Phosphorus Phosphorus laid U t :ed Phosphosu Remain n6 Ru,wH CUpsRemoval from Upstream �hoephorus lo.d Removed By Phosphorus Load Downstream Pract{ce to be Practice Red -i— Turf r^dit fiJver Credit oxvm R noR Vcium i m creml `n' riieJv<linp Aj (, j Aea {i ores) Area (aaej Practice Volumel�:') Effid"gI5, le--- ib tp Pracdce Ib' POW. ID Ib Empi°yeJ .a. Panic k, 1--, al 11—til 3b Ee:ea•.ant g, j5pe. P)j TOTAIIK•{'ERVIoUS LOVER TRkA[kU furl Gf3 AREA fNFf:K; O:t. TOTALMANAGED TuRFAR£ATREATO){a<I {;,qi :: AREA CHEEK: OK. TUTALR N0H REDUCTION TOTALPHOStoORi15AVALLATTE?-OR REMOVALINUA AFb,'yfl- J4• ;( TOTAL PNOSPHORi7S REMOVED WITfi RUNT FF RFDUCIiGP: PRACTICES 1N U TOTAL PUDSPUORUS REH'AMING AT a APPi. IN r RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D , y _ .tff V`14 Wef(M07rFTE. < t'fcn . <f:,xtf-.At 1J,'f ..r7r .t7 f PTP 1.°+Cf fF±.. ULA t,f1.S TOTAL IMPERVIOUS CGYERTRFATED AREACUECK: OR. TOTALh',AftAGEL IURFAi?EAtREAFED (acj f3Off AREA CHECK: 4 . TOrA1 PLIU`I ORDS RFMOVAi lto{ILR2{J ON ?Ilk Sit•jy:) U')A _J SRTisf PtfGSPHGRUSA+/AiiARi£F�k RPMO'JAI i{dD4 AfihJY.l '1. TaiALY:t:)iVHf}Y.l)>RFP/IaYEf)X{IYNfilil%iUP:gFM1 RFfJUf fIpP PM(nrF>IN f)A.{ib/Y:) :: il,t,Xj .:l TGFAL PHGSPfiGRUS R£PdOVEDN/tTtf 1UNOFF REDUCTION PRACnC£SING ,A(7b",) TU?AL PNO51>HORUS LUAJ REUUr'[{rJN ACRIEYEO ;NL A Afib'Y`) C-2 TGTAt. PNCAPUtiRUS R£P,?A7NiNG AFTER APP3:IINi: 30.9P i0AORmLCfIONi:NBP AfltjYrf _ J - EE it ;Ari:d q£iAL?rY CLik'Ffv.)A,"VU TAS rOR St TE CoitlPt?ANCE CII4LGFL4T'IONS NI�R,],.r£N➢.TMflVrD Vl{TN RUPiuFFRCDUCT7CRi PRACT(Ct51{d DP At3h Yr) qp : N[H2OGEN{sEh4OJEU. vYTIRUUT RUNarf HEUUCnUk PRAtI:CE51Ni AAt1f p'I - C.W TOTAL NIFRin,FN RFPAOVFU iN D 9. A (ihfyrl : im! Uoi N ogcn Remaining Removal 4 om Upstream N t ogee F-' ip'. Removed e, Nitrogen Load CHI 1 cY (%) P t {ib) P b ltbs) P i IIbsJ (Ip j 7�7nary ebt e 9�IIrPJIIN t5 i5R U,rb? � 3MD2 nRp is nv ss > uez cRs TDTAI. kUNOFF REDUCTION IN D.A. ft..T 9S} NIFRLR:FN RFMOSFG WFTiF RUFfOFF RKDUC:MN PRACTICES fru D.A.AHvdrj�_; fzga .a:tY,'fii>•k GU,sl!': +CLtr.?ufrGr;{k .khi Y'SE:Rtf'J,ATfC:;.::;frrfi, r.nc:.u;•iTrfyf Drainage Area B Drainage Area A Land Cower (acres} ...... ..... ' A Soi> R$ 15 j C�oAs G5°I{s Tcrtafs La ul CoY rRV r sr, Qpepx ,se,1 - 1 fi 57tt OiYi enT�rt' a B c _sl f} � Q 1 a. Trp=t t.rl R�vF pl I;rec Y'± S.. SI:c�M;.v'pr;,,ervxt un Axz All 1.I v.i: 5,•eNil, w,p Looser ✓af x A,en, CJD s: is (Spec SEI 5r^e:r'rux• Ur V,•r,•:a4d 1A11 $..a A;Isp TOTA i L MPF.RVIOUS CD'YF.R FRF RFTDI ) ::- stn+ :: AREA iHEl.K: OK. TOTAL TU RF AREA TRFATEO I ) : Ufjfy ARF-ACHECH: OK. 2'O%'AL RUNQPF REDUCTION lh U,A. 8 t.l') TOTAL PHOSP PMUS AVARARUE FOR REMOVAL IFIDAI. 8tib/yy1 cj a0 TOTAT PHOSPHORUS REMOVEDWITH RUNOFF REUUCT:OPI PRACTIC=.5 IN lute IF Ii TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMAINING AFTER APPLYING RUN('aFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.Ai Eiji jy{ a2D3 ">£E WATER CFUANs%COfitprU?kCE TAI; FOR SIM C£tiv7Pci4 <r££ LCL;LA 1G?V 1.11 IETITRVIOUS COVER SREAYED( $ E3 £f0 AREALNECK:L7K, 'TOTAL MANAGED TURF AREATRE TEG E3, ft 53[, A'4EF. CHEEK. OK. TOTAL PFKISPUORUS REPrfOVAL REQU7Rkrl ON STIFF.(Wyrj ::4 �9 TOTAL PifOSPHORUS AVAL.AR,E FOR, REMOVAL IN D.A. alibry) _O EA7 �I TOTAL PROSPHORUS RtMOVED VJI thou?' RUNOFF REDUCTION PRALi ICES IN D,A., I B((bry,)I W TOTAL FHOSPNORUS REM -11 WITH RUNCrF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A.18(ibjy )I :<B RfE TOTAL PR6SPµORUS LOAD REOL1C',ION ACRIEVEI) IN b.A 18 ilhjY 1 LIAO [UTAS PHUxf'NOFiVS REMAfNINss AF[Eft APPYYkhG HYP LEWDR'cDULTIONafN U.A, 8(ibry? fI.tY3 S£L- iSE%,A nw f,,Im1Fri' cfa?wpaAiYt:£ fn'E3 Fi S1 TE L-GJ`Z1PEi„ ,'UE (At CULAt ONS: P 1TR ti OVEN R£KhUkEv14 FIN RUr4O[F REDUCFiQN PRACTICES IN ETA. Ea {Ib /rry I EI Od NfTR06fN R£MOVED''NI-EHJUIfLUN06F RiUUCT1Uti PRACT{CE; WN A,1 LIT UW TOTAL NETROGEN RI:P.I6VER IN D.A. R{I§ Pr$ ...EEG it Nn,ogen ryftYogentoad Untreated Nitrogen flemaining Removal from Upst—I Nitrogen toad to Removed By Nitrogen EiftciencY l"t7 P0—(Ii 0—(Ii Practicorbs) Fractice(1b5) Load Sibs) .�aoE # t7,es :im TOTAF Rt)N'OFF REDUCTION IN D,A. EF NITROGEN Rr.MOYEO 4Yi7t(R27NDFF RLDUC7iON PRACTICES iN n,A. D I b Y r C.#ED Sfc VFA?YR ERM rl'Y r±;fv1F';.tAb;C`f: rAu f Ort WE LA£G±;LA: FUNS iln”, rmnt,r:rr by;y) Nitrogen NNro6 Load i;LPDA x. LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I A T E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ® www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 ■ Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Albemarle County, Virginia 1 WILLIAM R. MECHIVICK No. 000844 August 31, 2018 {,_ * G,�l �a'SCdPE No. Revision Date Drawn by 7AC Checked by MEL Scale Dale August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing 1 itle Drawing Number Project Number Total Phosphorus Avadab)e for Removaim D.A.aOb/y)-{4f Off Tptat efp Post Geveloprrsent feeatment Volume to D.A. B (rt ) a 'atOrmwater }jest Management Practices (FIR = Runoff Reduction) __- Runoff Managed I Imprrai6Hs Volume Flan 1 Practice Reduction Turf Credit Cover Credit Upstream — Fl RunUE( Reduction _ __. ftentaining Runoff 'TotatBMP 'Treatment Fhoz oral Ph°sph°rus PH Removal Load (mot Untreated Pflosphazus I Phmphorus R¢maining i- ,'>etect!core drapduvmIi- Dovmstmzi Practice to be Credit l a) plea (acres) Arca (saes) Pract{ce fli "Lij Volume I. WOUM, ift Efficien %F Upstream ( I toad to Removed By Phosphorus Employed PraC[ices (Ib) Eura Tice (IbTT Pr cr i w I b) toed llbl 1 a. Trp=t t.rl R�vF pl I;rec Y'± S.. SI:c�M;.v'pr;,,ervxt un Axz All 1.I v.i: 5,•eNil, w,p Looser ✓af x A,en, CJD s: is (Spec SEI 5r^e:r'rux• Ur V,•r,•:a4d 1A11 $..a A;Isp TOTA i L MPF.RVIOUS CD'YF.R FRF RFTDI ) ::- stn+ :: AREA iHEl.K: OK. TOTAL TU RF AREA TRFATEO I ) : Ufjfy ARF-ACHECH: OK. 2'O%'AL RUNQPF REDUCTION lh U,A. 8 t.l') TOTAL PHOSP PMUS AVARARUE FOR REMOVAL IFIDAI. 8tib/yy1 cj a0 TOTAT PHOSPHORUS REMOVEDWITH RUNOFF REUUCT:OPI PRACTIC=.5 IN lute IF Ii TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMAINING AFTER APPLYING RUN('aFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.Ai Eiji jy{ a2D3 ">£E WATER CFUANs%COfitprU?kCE TAI; FOR SIM C£tiv7Pci4 <r££ LCL;LA 1G?V 1.11 IETITRVIOUS COVER SREAYED( $ E3 £f0 AREALNECK:L7K, 'TOTAL MANAGED TURF AREATRE TEG E3, ft 53[, A'4EF. CHEEK. OK. TOTAL PFKISPUORUS REPrfOVAL REQU7Rkrl ON STIFF.(Wyrj ::4 �9 TOTAL PifOSPHORUS AVAL.AR,E FOR, REMOVAL IN D.A. alibry) _O EA7 �I TOTAL PROSPHORUS RtMOVED VJI thou?' RUNOFF REDUCTION PRALi ICES IN D,A., I B((bry,)I W TOTAL FHOSPNORUS REM -11 WITH RUNCrF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN D.A.18(ibjy )I :<B RfE TOTAL PR6SPµORUS LOAD REOL1C',ION ACRIEVEI) IN b.A 18 ilhjY 1 LIAO [UTAS PHUxf'NOFiVS REMAfNINss AF[Eft APPYYkhG HYP LEWDR'cDULTIONafN U.A, 8(ibry? fI.tY3 S£L- iSE%,A nw f,,Im1Fri' cfa?wpaAiYt:£ fn'E3 Fi S1 TE L-GJ`Z1PEi„ ,'UE (At CULAt ONS: P 1TR ti OVEN R£KhUkEv14 FIN RUr4O[F REDUCFiQN PRACTICES IN ETA. Ea {Ib /rry I EI Od NfTR06fN R£MOVED''NI-EHJUIfLUN06F RiUUCT1Uti PRACT{CE; WN A,1 LIT UW TOTAL NETROGEN RI:P.I6VER IN D.A. R{I§ Pr$ ...EEG it Nn,ogen ryftYogentoad Untreated Nitrogen flemaining Removal from Upst—I Nitrogen toad to Removed By Nitrogen EiftciencY l"t7 P0—(Ii 0—(Ii Practicorbs) Fractice(1b5) Load Sibs) .�aoE # t7,es :im TOTAF Rt)N'OFF REDUCTION IN D,A. EF NITROGEN Rr.MOYEO 4Yi7t(R27NDFF RLDUC7iON PRACTICES iN n,A. D I b Y r C.#ED Sfc VFA?YR ERM rl'Y r±;fv1F';.tAb;C`f: rAu f Ort WE LA£G±;LA: FUNS iln”, rmnt,r:rr by;y) Nitrogen NNro6 Load i;LPDA x. LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I A T E S 310 East Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ® www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 ■ Fax 434 296 2109 Project Title Albemarle County, Virginia 1 WILLIAM R. MECHIVICK No. 000844 August 31, 2018 {,_ * G,�l �a'SCdPE No. Revision Date Drawn by 7AC Checked by MEL Scale Dale August 31, 2018 Issued for Drawing 1 itle Drawing Number Project Number Site Results (Water Quality Compliance) B Soils C Soils Area Checks D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D71 D.A. E AREA CHECK FOREST/OPEN SPACE (ac) D 77s' {1E74 C.QO t.flti OK. IMPERVIOUS COVER i 80' C 3f3 OK. IMPERVIOUS COMER TREATED (ac) Q 1 l QQ f1_j3Cl u.ti) Q[J ! OK. MANAGED TURF AREAf}Q 777777 1l.QtI #,fJO Q.17Q 1j.Qfl OK. MANAGED TURF AREA TREATED (ac) Q.Q#Q Q Q(l {L Q pQ Q_(3Q OK. AREA CHECK OK. OK. OK. LOK. OK. 0.06 0.03 0.42 0 91 or Urban Bioretention (Spec #9) Site Treatment Volume {ftp) Runoff Reduction Volume and TP By Drainage Area 9,c, Sheetflow to Vegetated Filter Strip, A RUNOFF REDUCTION VOLUME ACHIEVED (ft')15� D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D D.A. E TOTAL 0.10 0.05 Q Ci Q fi �s2 TP LOAD AVAILABLE FOR REMOVAL (lb/yr) Q (IQ (i,£lR Q Q(1:: {�,ti�l L7 � TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (lb/yr) (. ; 0 Qfl {t.€ 0 (( 0 p � TP LOAD REMAINING (lb/yr) CL.33 fI QO fl.00, D.DQ ; {�.Ctl 0 3 NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yrj Q,Q ii QQ77 .€)1i 13 Qq f3_tHl Q> Total Phosphorus FINAL POST -DEVELOPMENT TP LOAD (lb/yrj {),c17 TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (lb/yr) tt.Z TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr) D2 TP LOAD REMAINING (lb/yr):Q 3 REMAINING TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (lb/yr): 0.17 Total Nitrogen (For Information Purposes) POST -DEVELOPMENT LOAD (lb/yr) 3.33 .................::: NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (lb/yr)11 {} 9{j REMAINING POST -DEVELOPMENT NITROGEN LOAD (lb/yr) . 2l NOTES: ALBEMARLE COUNTY INTENDS TO PURCHASE 0.17 LBSNR. CREDITS FROM AN ELIGIBLE NUTRIENT CREDIT BANK TO MEET WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. THIS PROJECT MEETS CRITERIA AT 9VAC25-870-66.D.: "IF ALL RUNOFF FROM THE SITE IS SHEET FLOW AND THE CONDITIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION ARE MET, NO FURTHER WATER QUANTITY CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED." nuliuii Vi1lull1C CIIIGC,I %.Ui VC IMt.AA1 MC1 L0ILMIGILOW11a Enter design storm rainfall depths (in); 1 -year storm 2 -year storm 10 -year storm Drainage Area Curve Numbers and Runoff Depths � Curve numbers (CN, C"Nadl/ and runoff depths (RV orrPed/ acre computed with and without reduction practices. Drainage Area A Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected Area (a forest/open space or reforested land CN Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf Area (a to be mowed/managed CN impervious Cover Area (aCN RVDeveloped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* RVoeveloped (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction' Adjusted CNS` see Notes above A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils 77L} 0 Cb.......; O.Ofl €1.b(l.l 90 55 70 77s' tlilfS 0_00b_00 30 €i.b0,.' 39 51 74 80' Ob b_il 17.bb.... f.CCt!: 98 98 98 9A storm 2-vear storm CN(D.A, A) �s storm Drainage Area B B Soils A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected Area (acres) ....... ......... db_ ........... .............. ............................................. .......... ................11....1.....1.......... fl fi0 a 00 :: tl<00 forest/open space or reforested land CN 30 55 70 77 Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf Area (acres) CiOLI 0 CC C1.00 f.CCt!: to be mowed/managed CN 39 6Y 74 817 Method Area (acres) fl t7C fk bi7 0 CYC .' €3 00: Impervious Cover CN 98 98 4R 98 s *See Notes above Drainage Area C Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected Area (a forest/open space or reforested land CN Managed Turf-- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf Area (a to be mowed/managed CN Impervious Cover Area (a, CN RVDeveloped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* "Developed (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* Adjusted CN* `See Notes above Drainage Area D Forest/Open Space -- undisturbed, protected Area (a forest/open space or reforested land CN Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf Area (a, to be mowed/managed CN Impervious Cover Area (a CN A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils %'Pt bb b.t3L1 L1.00 i} 5S 74 77 .00, 52 c3.oti r3 L.. 39 61 74 80 4$ impervious Cover (acres) 0.01 0.00 9$ 98 9$ 98 * forest/Open Space areas must be protected in accordance with the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method CN(D.A. C) 0.44 0.44 200 Q. fear Storm 2-vear storm 10-vear storm 167.20 A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils n00 C+:COb CC {3 C 1 year storm "Developed (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction' L}bb "Developed (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* 4.L1L1 Adjusted CN* i1 *See Notes above Drainage Area E A Soils Forest/Open Space undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land Area (acres) F3011 (. 30 CN Managed Turf -- disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed Area (acres) fl>L3L1 39 CN Impervious Cover Area (acres) CN t# i3tj 1 -year storm RVDeveloped (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction* i7;Ot7 RVDeveloped (watershed -inch) with Runoff Reduction* atY(1 Adjusted CN* ::.,..' *:See Notes above CN(D.A. D) 2-vear storm 10-vear storm B Soils C Soils D Soils L1 bf1 R,LdLi C 0C3; CN(D,A. E) 0 storm 10 -year storm BMP C3esiga Specifications List: 2013 Draft Stds & Specs._..__ �------.----- _.-- -. - site summary Project Title: Baker-ButBer, NiFi_Parkjng-1-rails Date: 2/27/2018; rev. 5/3/18 Total Ralnfaill (in): 43 Total Disturbed Acreage; 0,44 Site Land Cover Summary Pre-ReDevelopment Land Cover (acres) Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads A soils B Soils C 5oiis b Spits Totals % of Total Forest/open (acres) 0.00 0,23 O,CO 0.00 0,23 52 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0,21 4$ impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 * forest/Open Space areas must be protected in accordance with the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method 0,47 0.44 0.44 200 o.00 4.a. Grass Channel A/B Soils (Spec #3) Post-ReDevelonment Land Cover (acres) 0,0493848 167.20 0.00 0,10 0.03 0.07 Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads A soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Totals % of Total Forestlopen (acres) 0.00 0.23 O.CO 0.00 0,23 52 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 0.00 O r0 040 0.00 0 impervious Coverjacres) 0.00 0.29, 0.£0 0.00 0.21 48 * forest/Open Space areas must be protected in accordance with the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method 0,47 0.44 100 Site Tv and Land Cover Nutrient Loads prnent toad lirnitut-iun not required Total TP Load Reduction Required jib/yr) 0.29 -0.08 0.36 Final Post -Development Load Post-ReDevelopment & New impervious) Pre- ReDevelopment TN Load (lb/yr) 3.33 0.79 Final Post-DevelopmentPost (lb/acre/yr) Post- Ad'usted Pre ) 1.07 (Post-ReDevelopment ReDevelopment Development ReDevelopment (3,00 & New impervious) 0.00 jluev, Impervious) 0,00 Site Rv 0.47 0.C3 0.95 0.03 Treatment Volume (ft) 7`I1 25 716 25 TP Load (lb/yr) 0,47 0.02 10.45 0.02 1 prnent toad lirnitut-iun not required Total TP Load Reduction Required jib/yr) 0.29 -0.08 0.36 LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I A T E S 310 Cast Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 ■ Fax 434 296 2109 Pre- ReDevelopment Final Post -Development Load Post-ReDevelopment & New impervious) Pre- ReDevelopment TN Load (lb/yr) 3.33 0.79 LAND PLANNING & DESIGN A S S 0 C I A T E S 310 Cast Main Street, Suite 200 Charlottesville, Virginia ■ www.lpda.net 434 296 2108 ■ Fax 434 296 2109 Pre- ReDevelopment Final Post -Development Post-ReDevelopment TP TP Lead per acre TP Load per acre Load per acre (lb/acre/yr) (lb/acre/yr) (lb/acre/yr) 0.07 1.07 0,07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Site Compliance Summary Maximum %Reduction Required Below 10% " Note: 96 Reduction will reduce post -development TP food w less than, or equal to boselinre load of O,09- Ibfyr fo.41 iblaclyr) pre-ReDevelopment Load [Required reductiars far Post-ReDev. = Post-ReDev TPload - basefine land of 0,093635lblyr) baseline load = site aieu x03.41 lblacJyr Total Runoff Volume Reduction (ft;) 1.52 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved (Ib/yr) 0-12 Total TN Load Reduction Achieved (Iblyr) 0.90 Remaining Post development TP Load 0.35 (lb/yr) 0.00 Remaining TP Load Reduction (lb/yr) 0.1.7 Required 0.00 '"F$F'dLiCiid?7 beh"w new fief e op"n m R?f d im. oti tWri not rYfS ;; r?i7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area Summary Drainage Area Compliance Summary .. . Q,A. A D.A. B D.A. C D.A. D D.A. £ Total forest/Open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Managed Turf (acres) (3,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 impervious Cover jacres) 0.21 0,00 0,013 0.00 0.00 0,27. Total Area (acres) 0.21 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 011 Drainage Area Compliance Summary .. . D.A. A D.A. B D.A. C D,A, D D.A. E Total TP Load Reduced (Ib/yr) 0,12 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1 TN load Reduced (lb/yr) 0.90 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.50 Drainage Area A Summary Land Cover Summary BMP Selections A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total °o of Total Forest/open (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Managed Turf (acres) 0.00 4.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0 Impervious Cover (acres) 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.2.1 100 BMP Selections Total impervious Cover Treated (acres) Managed Turf Impervious Cover 0.00 TP Laud from 0.9.2 (Ib/yr) CN Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D,A. 0.90 lib/yr) 0 BMP Treatment 0 Untreated TP load TP Removed TP Remaining ;downstream Treatment Practice Credit Area Credit Area Volume (ft) upstream to Practice (lbs) (Ib/yr) (ib/yr) to be Employed 0,00 (acres) (acres) Cit adjusted 96 0 0 0 Practices (lbs) 2 -year return period RV wo RR (ws-in) 3.37 o.00 4.a. Grass Channel A/B Soils (Spec #3) 0.00 0,0493848 167.20 0.00 0,10 0.03 0.07 Rv wo RR (ws-in) 6.a. Bioretention #1 or Micro-Bioretention (Ho 0,02548 87.87 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.42 0 91 or Urban Bioretention (Spec #9) 9,c, Sheetflow to Vegetated Filter Strip, A Soils or Compost Amended B/C/D Soils 0.0484848 167.20 0.00 0.10 0.05 0.05 (spec #2 & #4) Total impervious Cover Treated (acres) 0.12 Total Turf Area Treated (acres) 0.00 Total TP Load Reduction Achieved in D.A. 0.9.2 (Ib/yr) CN Total TN Load Reduction Achieved in D,A. 0.90 lib/yr) 0 Project Title Baker Butler Frail Albemarle County, Virginia ® WILLIAM R. MECHIJICK � "ea No. 000844 August 31, 2018 CAPE No. Revision Date Drawn by TAC Checked by MEL Scale Date August 31, 2018 Issued for ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Bid Runoff Volume and CN Calculations 1 -year storm 2 -year storm 10 -Year storm Target Rainfall Event (in) 13.00 1 160 1 5.40 Drawing Title Drainage Areas RV & CN Drainage Area A drainage Area 8 Drainage Area C Drainage Area D Drainage Area E CN ...................................... ..................................... 98 077,777777777 0 0 0 RR (ft) 152 0 0 0 0 1 -year return period RV wo RR (ws-in) 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 RV w RR (Ws -in) 2,57 o,Co t7.t30 €7.00 0.00 Cit adjusted 96 0 0 0 0 2 -year return period RV wo RR (ws-in) 3.37 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rv w RR (ws-in) 3.1.6 0.10 0.00 0.017 0.00 CN adjusted 96 O 0 0 0 10 -year return period Rv wo RR (ws-in) 5.16 (Ho 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rv w RR (w5 -in) 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CN adjusted 96 0 0 0 0 Drawing Number L8 Project Number