The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201900005 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2019-01-29COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4176 January 29, 2019 Mark Kestner Henningsen Kestner Architects 1108 E. High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2019-5: 2300 Hunter's Way, Major Amendment (TMP 07800-00-00-049A0) Dear Mr. Kestner, We have received the above -referenced application. We cannot accept your application for review because your submittal is not complete. The following items were missing from your submittal: 1. 8 collated copies of a site plan set that provide all of the information requested in Sections B., C., and D. of the Final Review of a Site Development Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist. 2. The correct and a completed submittal requirements checklist for a Final Review of a Site Development Plan (this application is not a County -wide Certificate of Appropriateness for Structures 750' or more from the EC and no taller than 5 stories). 3.One set of material and color samples. 4. A complete architectural drawings submission that is produced at a verifiable scale of 1/8" = 1'. Within 15 days of the date of this letter, you may resubmit the application with all of the information required by the ARB Checklist for Final Review ofa Site Development Plan. The date of the next submittal deadline following the date that the revised submittal is received by the County will be considered the new submittal date. Please consult the attached Submittal and Meeting Schedule for the corresponding ARB meeting date. If you fail to resubmit within the 15 day period, the application shall be denied and a new fee shall be required to submit the new application. If you have any questions about this process, feel free to contact me. Sincerely,*��" AA I�� polk� Heather McMahon, Senior Planner 434-296-5832 x3278 hmcmahon&albemarle. org cc: File ARB-2019-5 Heartrock Farm LLC 2521 Summit Ridge Trail Charlottesville, VA 22911 2019 Submission and Review Schedule Architectural Review Board Deadline for Filing (3 P.M.) Architectural Review Board Meeting Date Monday Monday Nov 26 2018 Jan 7 Dec 10 and 17 2018 Tue Jan 22 Wed Dec 26 2018 Feb 4 Jan 7 Tue Feb 19 Tue Jan 22 Mar 4 Feb 4 Mar 18 Tue Feb 19 Apr 1 Mar 4 Apr 15 Mar 25 May 6 Apr 8 May 20 Apr 22 Jun 3 May 6 Jun 17 May 20 Jul Jun 3 Jul 15 Jun 24 Aug5 Jul 8 Aug19 Jul 22 Tue Sep 3 Aug5 Sep 16 Aug 26 Oct 7 Sep 9 Oct 21 Sep 23 Nov 4 Oct 7 Nov 18 Oct 21 Dec 2 Nov 4 Dec 16 Nov 25 Jan 6 2020 Dec 9 Tue Jan 212020 Dec 30 Feb 3 2020 Jan 6 2020 Tue Feb 18 2020 ARB meets 1 st and 3rd day unless the day is a holiday or if otherwise noted. Bold italics = submittal/meeting day is different due to a holiday. Dates with shaded background are not 2019. 2020 dates are tentative. Architectural Review Board Final Review of a Site Development Plan Checklist for Completeness ❑I 8 collated copies set of color/material A. Written description of the proposal Commented [HM 1]: 8 collated copies of an 8-page architectural drawing set were submitted; no accompanying site plan set was submitted and 8 copies are required Commented [HM2]: Not submitted; furthermore, materials "board" on ARB.02 Sheet is incomplete and missing color, brand, and technical information ® Written description of the proposal. ❑ Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. — Commented [HM3]: Not provided B. $lte plan Showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20', clearly legible and folded): ❑ Location(s) of proposed building(s) on the site. ❑ Location of proposed parking, travelways, walkways and other improvements. ❑ Mechanical equipment, trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and improvements, and associated screening. ❑ Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient off -site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent of easement. ❑ Stormwater management plan. ❑ Location of retaining walls indicating top and bottom elevations, maximum wall height, and proposed materials, with material and color samples. ❑ Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised drawings, clearly identify revisions made. — Commented [HM4]: Not provided C. ILandscape plan Showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20' orlarger, clearly legible and folded): — Commented [HMS]: Not provided ❑ Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines. ❑ Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species. ❑ Landscape key including all landscape symbols and a description of what they represent. ❑ Location of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas. ❑ Location of existing natural features. ❑ Location of individual trees of 6-inch caliper or greater and all significant groups of trees indicated by botanical name and caliper. ❑ Location and height of above -ground utilities and associated easements, and location of below - ground utilities and associated easements. ❑ Stormwater facilities. ❑ Provide a signed, tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the landscape plans. ❑ Include tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans. I OVER D. Lighting plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1'=20' or larger, clearly legible and folded): _ - Commented [HM6]: Not provided ❑ Location of all proposed building and site lighting. ❑ Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets. ❑ Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures and information on illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height. ❑ Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting does meet the requirements of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. ❑ Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements. E. Appearance of the building(s) (architectural elevations, color perspective sketches, site sections): ❑ Dimensioned architectural elevations of the proposed buildin s . Elevations must be drawn to the — Commented [HM7]: The submitted drawings are dimensioned scale of 11/8"=V-0". Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings. at1/8"=r,however, reproduced onllxl7size paper, the scale is Submittal of elevations that are not visible from the Entrance Corridor may be required to clarify the reduced and is not" to scale" or verifiable when using an architect's overall building design. scale to measure given dimensions ❑ Color perspective sketches that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor. Commented [HMS]: Details s and 4 on ARs.03 sheet are mis- labeled as Y" = 1' when the scale is 1/8" = 1' on all other details ❑ Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed Commented [HM9]: Notprovided development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor elevation(s) and roof height(s) relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor. Commented [HM10]: Not provided ❑ One set of all building materials / colors. Commented [HM11]: Not provided ❑ A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls windows and doors. — Commented [HM12]: Not provided F. Additional material ® Provide labeled, color, 8-'/2" x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the Entrance Corridor. ® Signatures 2 OVER