HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800080 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2019-02-15Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201800080 — Rio East Medical Offices - Minor
SubApplication Type:
Date Completed: 11/30/2018
Reviewer: Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I See uploaded comment letter dated 11-30-2018. 1
Date Completed: 11/02/2018
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger Division: CDD Inspections
Review Status: See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status
Reviews Comments:
Due to the proximity of the building from the property line, fire rated construction and other fire safety
features may be required. Full disclosure will be evaluated with builidng permit application.
01/04/2019
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Requested Changes
Below are comments for SDP201800080 - Rio East Medical Offices:
The other buildings/units on this parcel are also served through the same water meter on this parcel.
Provide fixture counts of these as well in order to determine a 2 -inch meter is adequate.
Show proposed sewer lateral tie in to existing sewer.
11/19/2018
David James Division: CDD Engineering
Requested Changes
1. Cover - The SDP# should be SDP200100088.
2. Cover - Update/correct the disturbed area.
3. The limits of disturbance should include the existing UGE line and propane tank, and the
proposed relocation area.
4. Sheet 2 — Sheet No. should be C-101.
01/28/2019..
David James Division: CDD Engineering
No Objection
2/7/19: No Objection
1/28/19: It's recommended to show bumper blocks for parking spaces that are adjacent to the
sxisting 5' wide sidewalk. Alternatively, increase sidewalk width to 6'. {18-4.12.16. e}
Date Completed:
01/24/2019
Reviewer:
Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
I See letter uploaded to Laserfiche dated 1-24-2019 for Planning and ACSA comments.
Date Completed:
01/04/2019
Reviewer:
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Page: 1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On: February 15, 2019
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Below are comments for SDP201800080 - Rio East Medical Offices:
The other buildings/units on this parcel are also served through the same water meter on this parcel.
Provide fixture counts of these as well in order to determine a 2 -inch meter is adequate.
Show proposed sewer lateral tie in to existing sewer.
02/06/2019
Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
See Recommendations
Applicant emailed revised copies of the plans to Cameron Langille on 2/4/2019 and 2/6/2019. No
hard copies were submitted. All outstanding Planning comments have been addressed. Planning
staff has asked the applicant to provide documentation that Engineering and ACSA comments have
been addressed. Pending confirmation from ACSA staff, Engineering staff, and/or the applicant that
all other comments have been addressed, the applicant may submit four hard copies of the most
recently revised plans to the County for final signature and approval.
02/14/2019..
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
No Objection
See email correspondence dated 2-14-2019 for ACSA confirmation that all remaining ACSA
-omments have been addressed.
02/15/2019
Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Approved
Page: 2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On: February 15, 2019
Cameron Langille
From: Cameron Langille
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 5:52 PM
To: tmiller@meridianwbe.com
Cc: 'Gerardo Hernandez'
Subject: RE: Planning Application Review for SDP201800080 Rio East Medical Offices - Minor.
Tim,
All remaining Planning comments have been addressed. Pending review and confirmation from Engineering and ACSA
staff, the application will be ready for final signatures and approval. Have you contacted David James (Engineering) and
Richard Nelson (ACSA) directly to verify that their comments have been addressed? If so, please forward me any
correspondence you've had with them verifying this.
Once ACSA and Engineering have recommended approval, you will need to submit four (4) hard copies of the most
recently revised version of the plan (currently dated 2/4/2019) for final signature.
-Cameron
From: tmiller@meridianwbe.com <tmiller@meridianwbe.com>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 4:25 PM
To: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>
Cc: 'Gerardo Hernandez' <ghernandez@brw-architects.com>
Subject: RE: Planning Application Review for SDP201800080 Rio East Medical Offices - Minor.
Cameron,
Here is C-001.
There are no easement in the area on C-102 and C-201. All of the easements are shown on C-001.
Thanks,
Timothy Miller, P.E., L.S.
Principal
434-882-0121
www.meridianwbe.com
Mer
Plnrri
idian
From: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019 2:39 PM
To: tmiller(@meridianwbe.com
Cc: 'Gerardo Hernandez' <ghernandez@brw-architects.com>
Subject: RE: Planning Application Review for SDP201800080 Rio East Medical Offices - Minor.
Hi Tim,
Those revised drawings address all of my outstanding comments except #1-2. Can you send the revised Cover Sheet so I
can verify that the requested changes were made?
From: tmiller@meridianwbe.com <tmiller@meridianwbe.com>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 1:01 PM
To: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>
Cc: 'Gerardo Hernandez' <ghernandez@brw-architects.com>
Subject: RE: Planning Application Review for SDP201800080 Rio East Medical Offices - Minor.
Cameron,
Here are revised copies of C-300 & C-301.
Can take a look and let me know if this will address your comments?
Thanks,
Timothy Miller, P.E., L.S.
Principal
434-882-0121
+
Meridian
Planning Group
From: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 2:39 PM
To: tmiller@meridianwbe.com
Subject: FW: Planning Application Review for SDP201800080 Rio East Medical Offices - Minor.
Hi Tim,
Engineering has completed their review of the minor amendment for the Rio East Minor Amendment. Please see the
attachment.
Thanks,
Cameron
From: David James
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 4:57 PM
To: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>
Subject: Planning Application Review for SDP201800080 Rio East Medical Offices - Minor.
N
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number = SDP201800080
Reviewer = David James
Review Status = See Recommendations
Completed Date = 01/28/2019
I have a recommendation, but other with no objection to the minor amendment. See CV.
Thanks,
David
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memarandnm
To: Tim Miller (tmiller(c�meridianwbe.com)
From: Cameron Langille — Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: November 30, 2018
First Revision: January 24, 2019
Subject: SDP201800080 — Rio East Medical Offices — Minor Site Plan Amendment
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will
recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The
following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or
eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County
Code.]
First Review Comments:
1. [General Comment] Please renumber the sheets accurately. See Engineering comments and Planning comment below.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The Index on Sheet C-001 still lists two C-300 sheets. There is a C-3001
and a C-301. Please revise the index.
2. [32.5.2 (s)] Please revise the project narrative on the Cover Sheet so that it explains all changes to the site proposed by
this minor site plan amendment. State the specific square footage of the building addition, and clarify whether new
parking is proposed. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Please state that this is minor amendment #2 to
SDP200100088 and is expanding the building by the square footage figure currently listed. State that no changes
to parking are proposed. Please also state that this minor amendment revises the previously approved
landscaping plan from SDP200200065. See comment #14 below for additional information.
3. [32.5.2 (a)] Please provide the parcel boundary dimensions. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. 132.5.2 (a)] Please state all applicable overlay zoning districts on the Cover Sheet Site Data table. This includes the
AIA Airport Impact Area overlay Zoning District, and the EC Entrance Corridor Overlay Zoning District. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
5. 132.5.2 (a)] Please state that this is Minor Amendment #2 to SDP200100088 on the Cover Sheet.
a. Amend the final site plan number under Site Data on Sheet C-001. State the previous minor site plan number
SDP200200065. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. State which sheets from SDP200100088 are proposed to be revised per this minor amendment and which
sheets will be unaffected. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
6. [32.5.2 (a)] Please list all zoning map amendment and special use permit conditions and proffers that apply to the
property. The property is subject to the proffers of ZMA199600004. Show the proffers as an exhibit on the plans. Rev.
1: Comment not fully addressed. Sheet C-301 is missing the first two pages of the approved ZMA1996-04 with
staff signatures. Please add this page to Sheet C-301.
7. [32.5.2 (a)] Please revise the setback data on Sheet C-001. It should state:
a. Front Minimum Setback: 10 feet from the right-of-way or the exterior edge of the sidewalk if the sidewalk
is outside of the right-of-way; for off-street parking or loading spaces, 10 feet from any public street right-
of-way. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. Side and Rear Minimum setback: If the abutting lot is zoned residential, rural areas, or the Monticello
Historic district: (i) no portion of any structure, excluding signs, shall be located closer than 50 feet from
the district boundary; and (ii) no off-street parking or loading space shall be located closer than 20 feet to
the district boundary. If the abutting lot is zoned commercial or industrial, any primary structure shall be
constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code. Rev. 1: Comment
addrecced_
c. Buffer zone adjacent to residential and rural areas districts. For the purpose of this subsection, a buffer shall
not be required when a commercial zone is across a street from a residential or rural area district. No
construction activity including grading or clearing of vegetation shall occur closer than twenty (20) feet to
any residential or rural areas district. Screening shall be provided as required in section 32.7.9. The board
of supervisors may waive by special exception the prohibition of construction activity, grading or the
clearing of vegetation in the buffer in a particular case upon consideration of whether: (i) the developer or
subdivider demonstrates that grading or clearing is necessary or would result in an improved site design;
(ii) minimum screening requirements will be satisfied; and (iii) existing landscaping in excess of minimum
requirements is substantially restored. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
8. 132.5.2 (a)] Per the previous comment, please show and label the 20' undisturbed buffer on the site plans. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
9. 132.5.2 (a)] Please state the stepback requirements per Section 4.20 (a) of the Zoning Ordinance in the Site Data table
on Sheet C-001. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
10. 132.5.2 (b)] Please add a note to the Site Data table on Sheet C-001 stating the maximum building height permitted, and
the proposed building height in accordance with Section 21.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. Maximum building height permitted: sixty-five (65) feet. The minimum stepback requirements for any
story that begins above forty (40) feet in height or for each story above the third story, whichever is less, in
height shall be as provided in section 4.20. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
11. [32.5.2 (b)] Please clarify the parking requirements on Sheet C-001. Per SDP200100088, the existing building sq. ft.
measures 16,000 sq. ft. which required 80 parking spaces. 112 parking spaces (including 4 handicap spaces) were
installed. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
a. Revise the required parking calculation based on the building addition. State the minimum required parking
spaces per the addition, and the amount of existing parking spaces on site. If no additional spaces are
required, then state that no additional parking will be in stalled as part of the minor site plan amendment.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. The parking standard which applies to this development is as follows: Offices, business, administrative and
professional (including medical offices but not dental clinics): One (1) space per two hundred (200) square
feet of net office floor area. The term "net office floor area" shall be deemed to be: (1) eighty (80) percent
of the gross floor area; or (2) at the request of the applicant, the actual net office floor area as shown on
floor plans submitted by the applicant, delineating the actual net office floor area, which plans shall be
binding as to the maximum net floor area used. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
12. [32.5.2 (j)] Please show all existing easements and water, sewer, and drainage systems on the plans. No easements are
shown. Please clearly delineate, dimension, and label all public and private easements around existing sewer, water,
and drainage facilities. Show easement lines on the landscape drawings to demonstrate that proposed vegetation
locations do not conflict with easements. Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Sheets C-101 and C-201 do not show
easement dimensions or labels.
13. [32.6.2 (c)] Please delineate the limits of disturbance and proposed grading (up to twenty [20] percent slope, maximum
two [2] foot contours; over twenty [20] percent slope, maximum five [5] foot contours). Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
14. [32.7.9.] The demolition plan shows removal of trees on the side property line. Staff cannot verify whether the minor
amendment will comply with the minimum landscaping requirements of 32.7.9. Please provide the following:
a. Show all existing landscaping on site as approved with SDP200100088 and SDP200200065. State the type
of landscaping (tree or shrub species) and label each type. Provide the calculations of minimum required
parking trees, minimum parking lot canopy, buffer screening calculation, and overall tree canopy for the
site. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Sheet C-300 appears to be a revised landscaping plan
based on the approved landscaping plan from SDP200200065. The words "For Reference only"
should be removed since the Landscape Schedule and the canopy calculations are different from the
previously approved minor amendment.
The 5% interior landscaping requirement and overall 10% canopy requirement were both
requirements at the time of SDP200200065's approval. These landscaping calculations can be seen
on the right side of the drawing under the Landscape Schedule.
Please revise Note 1 at the bottom of Sheet C-300 that is under the drawing so that it indiciates that
this drawing is an updated landscaping plan based off of SDP200200065. Note 1 should state
"Revised landscaping calculations are based on the approved landscaping plan for SDP200200065."
b. [32.7.9.6] An area of at least five (5) percent of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be
landscaped with trees or shrubs with one (1) large or medium shade tree per ten (10) parking spaces or
portion thereof. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The revised Landscape Schedule on Sheet C-
300 states different quantities of vegetation and overall total canopies that are different from the
approved Landscape Plan SDP200200065. Please confirm what exactly is happening with the
landscaping changes proposed by this minor amendment. For example, is Sheet C-300 supposed to
replace the landscape plan from SDP200200065? If so, the Landscape Schedule needs to be revised
so that it states the quantity of each plant currently installed that won't be affected by the site
changes. Any landscaping material in the Landscape Schedule that will be changed needs to be
bubbled and the quantities, canopy totals revised as appropriate.
Staff suggests placing an "X" over the canopy calculations that are listed under the Landscape
Schedule since those are from SDP200200065 and will be changed. The new notes at the bottom of
the page should state the updated canopy calculations based on the landscaping proposed with this
minor amendment.
c. [32.7.9.8 (a)(1)] Please include a calculation for the overall tree canopy required and provided on Sheet C8.
The minimum canopy for this site is 10%. The tree canopy required by subsection (a) shall be composed of
all areas of the site that would be covered by trees and other plant materials exceeding five (5) feet in height
at a maturity of ten (10) years after planting. The trees and plant materials composing the tree canopy are
those required to be planted under sections 32.7.9.5, 32.7.9.6 and 32.7.9.7. Rev. 1: Comment not fully
addressed. This amendment proposes to remove one (1) T4 tree, three (3) T6 shrubs, and seven (7)
T11 trees in order to expand the building. The Landscape Schedule on Sheet C-300 should be revised
so that the quantities of each landscaping item are accurate, and the total canopy provided needs to
be updated to reflect the overall reduction. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Per previous
comment, Sheet C-300 states the overall 10% canopy calculation based on what was approved with
SDP200200065. An "X" should be placed over those calculations, and a reference made to Notes 1-3
at the bottom of the page indicating that the revised figures are the proposed canopy calculations that
will result from the minor amendment.
15. [32.7.9.7 (a)(1)] Per Section 21.7 (c), additional screening landscaping must be installed at the rear of the property
behind the building addition adjacent to the property zoned R-15. Please provide a landscaping plan that extends the
screening tree buffer further west in compliance with Section 32.7.9.7. The new screening must be located outside of
the minimum 20' undisturbed buffer at the rear of the property. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
16. [32.7.9] On the landscaping plan, please provide a landscape schedule stating the types of landscaping proposed, the
minimum height and caliper at time of installation, the quantity of each species proposed. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
17. 132.7.7.9 (c)] Please add a note to the landscape plan that states "All landscaping and screening shall be maintained in
a healthy condition by the current owner or property owners' association and replaced when necessary. Replacement
material shall comply with the approved landscape plan." Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blan ig llegalbemarle.org or 296-5832
ext. 3432 for further information.
Albemarle County Engineering Services — David James, ddiamesgalbemarle.org — Engineering review not yet complete.
Any comments or approvals from Engineering will be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt.
Albemarle County Service Authority — Richard Nelson, rnelson(&serviceauthority.org — Requested changes, see attached.
4
Cameron Langille
From: Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 1:27 PM
To: Cameron Langille
Subject: SDP201800080 - Rio East Medical Offices
Cameron,
Below are comments for SDP201800080 - Rio East Medical Offices:
The other buildings/units on this parcel are also served through the same water meter on this parcel. Provide fixture
counts of these as well in order to determine a 2 -inch meter is adequate.
Show proposed sewer lateral tie in to existing sewer.
Thanks,
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(434) 977-4511
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memarandnm
To: Tim Miller (tmiller(c�meridianwbe.com)
From: Cameron Langille — Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: November 30, 2018
Subject: SDP201800080 — Rio East Medical Offices — Minor Site Plan Amendment
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will
recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The
following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or
eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County
Code.]
First Review Comments:
1. [General Comment] Please renumber the sheets accurately. See Engineering comments and Planning comment below.
2. [32.5.2 (s)] Please revise the project narrative on the Cover Sheet so that it explains all changes to the site proposed by
this minor site plan amendment. State the specific square footage of the building addition, and clarify whether new
parking is proposed.
3. [32.5.2 (a)] Please provide the parcel boundary dimensions.
4. [32.5.2 (a)] Please state all applicable overlay zoning districts on the Cover Sheet Site Data table. This includes the
AIA Airport Impact Area overlay Zoning District, and the EC Entrance Corridor Overlay Zoning District.
132.5.2 (a)] Please state that this is Minor Amendment #2 to SDP200100088 on the Cover Sheet.
a. Amend the final site plan number under Site Data on Sheet C-001. State the previous minor site plan number
SDP200200065.
b. State which sheets from SDP200100088 are proposed to be revised per this minor amendment and which
sheets will be unaffected.
[32.5.2 (a)] Please list all zoning map amendment and special use permit conditions and proffers that apply to the
property. The property is subject to the proffers of ZMA199600004. Show the proffers as an exhibit on the plans.
7. [32.5.2 (a)] Please revise the setback data on Sheet C-001. It should state:
a. Front Minimum Setback: 10 feet from the right-of-way or the exterior edge of the sidewalk if the sidewalk
is outside of the right-of-way; for off-street parking or loading spaces, 10 feet from any public street right-
of-way
b. Side and Rear Minimum setback: If the abutting lot is zoned residential, rural areas, or the Monticello
Historic district: (i) no portion of any structure, excluding signs, shall be located closer than 50 feet from
the district boundary; and (ii) no off-street parking or loading space shall be located closer than 20 feet to
the district boundary. If the abutting lot is zoned commercial or industrial, any primary structure shall be
constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code.
c. Buffer zone adjacent to residential and rural areas districts. For the purpose of this subsection, a buffer shall
not be required when a commercial zone is across a street from a residential or rural area district. No
construction activity including grading or clearing of vegetation shall occur closer than twenty (20) feet to
any residential or rural areas district. Screening shall be provided as required in section 32.7.9. The board
of supervisors may waive by special exception the prohibition of construction activity, grading or the
clearing of vegetation in the buffer in a particular case upon consideration of whether: (i) the developer or
subdivider demonstrates that grading or clearing is necessary or would result in an improved site design;
(ii) minimum screening requirements will be satisfied; and (iii) existing landscaping in excess of minimum
requirements is substantially restored.
8. [32.5.2 (a)] Per the previous comment, please show and label the 20' undisturbed buffer on the site plans.
9. [32.5.2 (a)] Please state the stepback requirements per Section 4.20 (a) of the Zoning Ordinance in the Site Data table
on Sheet C-001.
10. [32.5.2 (b)] Please add a note to the Site Data table on Sheet C-001 stating the maximum building height permitted, and
the proposed building height in accordance with Section 21.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.
a. Maximum building height permitted: sixty-five (65) feet. The minimum stepback requirements for any
story that begins above forty (40) feet in height or for each story above the third story, whichever is less, in
height shall be as provided in section 4.20.
11. [32.5.2 (b)] Please clarify the parking requirements on Sheet C-001. Per SDP200100088, the existing building sq. ft.
measures 16,000 sq. ft. which required 80 parking spaces. 112 parking spaces (including 4 handicap spaces) were
installed.
a. Revise the required parking calculation based on the building addition. State the minimum required parking
spaces per the addition, and the amount of existing parking spaces on site. If no additional spaces are
required, then state that no additional parking will be in stalled as part of the minor site plan amendment.
b. The parking standard which applies to this development is as follows: Offices, business, administrative and
professional (including medical offices but not dental clinics): One (1) space per two hundred (200) square
feet of net office floor area. The term "net office floor area" shall be deemed to be: (1) eighty (80) percent
of the gross floor area; or (2) at the request of the applicant, the actual net office floor area as shown on
floor plans submitted by the applicant, delineating the actual net office floor area, which plans shall be
binding as to the maximum net floor area used.
12. [32.5.2 (j)] Please show all existing easements and water, sewer, and drainage systems on the plans. No easements are
shown. Please clearly delineate, dimension, and label all public and private easements around existing sewer, water,
and drainage facilities. Show easement lines on the landscape drawings to demonstrate that proposed vegetation
locations do not conflict with easements.
13. [32.6.2 (c)] Please delineate the limits of disturbance and proposed grading (up to twenty [20] percent slope, maximum
two [2] foot contours; over twenty [20] percent slope, maximum five [5] foot contours).
14. [32.7.9.] The demolition plan shows removal of trees on the side property line. Staff cannot verify whether the minor
amendment will comply with the minimum landscaping requirements of 32.7.9. Please provide the following:
a. Show all existing landscaping on site as approved with SDP200100088 and SDP200200065. State the type
of landscaping (tree or shrub species) and label each type. Provide the calculations of minimum required
parking trees, minimum parking lot canopy, buffer screening calculation, and overall tree canopy for the
site.
b. [32.7.9.6] An area of at least five (5) percent of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be
landscaped with trees or shrubs with one (1) large or medium shade tree per ten (10) parking spaces or
portion thereof.
c. [32.7.9.8 (a)(1)] Please include a calculation for the overall tree canopy required and provided on Sheet C8.
The minimum canopy for this site is 10%. The tree canopy required by subsection (a) shall be composed of
all areas of the site that would be covered by trees and other plant materials exceeding five (5) feet in height
at a maturity of ten (10) years after planting. The trees and plant materials composing the tree canopy are
those required to be planted under sections 32.7.9.5, 32.7.9.6 and 32.7.9.7.
15. [32.7.9.7 (a)(1)] Per Section 21.7 (c), additional screening landscaping must be installed at the rear of the property
behind the building addition adjacent to the property zoned R-15. Please provide a landscaping plan that extends the
screening tree buffer further west in compliance with Section 32.7.9.7. The new screening must be located outside of
the minimum 20' undisturbed buffer at the rear of the property.
16. [32.7.9] On the landscaping plan, please provide a landscape schedule stating the types of landscaping proposed, the
minimum height and caliper at time of installation, the quantity of each species proposed.
17. [32.7.7.9 (c)] Please add a note to the landscape plan that states "All landscaping and screening shall be maintained in
a healthy condition by the current owner or property owners' association and replaced when necessary. Replacement
material shall comply with the approved landscape plan."
Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blan ig lle(a-)albemarle.org or 296-5832
ext. 3432 for further information.
Albemarle County Building Inspections — Michael Dellinger, mdellingerkalbemarle.org - See attached recommendation.
Albemarle County Engineering Services — David James, diames&albemarle.org — Requested Changes, see attached.
Albemarle County Service Authority — Richard Nelson, rnelsonnserviceauthori .org — ACSA review is underway.
Comments will be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt.
Review Comments for SDP201800080
Project Name: Rio East Medical Offices - Minor
Date Completed: Friday, November 02, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger
CDD Inspections See Recommendations
Due to the proximity of the building from the property line, fire rated construction and other fire safety features may be required_ }
Full disclosure will be evaluated with builidng permit application_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 1-V 9120'18
Review Comments for SDP201800080 1 1-1
Project Name: Rio East Medical Offices - Minor
Date Completed: Monday, November 19, 2018 DepartmentlDivisionfAgency: Review sus:
Reviewer: LDavid dames _E CDD Engineering Requested Changes
1. Cover -The DP# should be DP200100088_
_ Cover - Updatelcorrect the disturbed area_
3_ The limits of disturbance should include the existing UOE line and propane tank, and the proposed relocation area_
4_ Sheet 2 — Sheet No_ should be C-101
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 1-V 9120'18