HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201900012 Application 2019-03-0530 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
March 4, 2019
Mr. Bart Svoboda
Chief of Zoning
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE; Stonefield — Block D2 — Phase Two — Parking Reduction Request
Albemarle County TMP 61W-03-D2A, 22-61 AND 90-104
Dear Bart,
This is a request for a parking variation to allow a 35% reduction in the minimum number of required
parking spaces for the above -referenced project. The request is being made in accordance with
Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.8, and as permitted by the Code of Development for Albemarle Place
(Code Section 5. Parking and Loading, p. 31, paragraph 2).
The 35% reduction request is supported by four major factors, including:
1. Shared parking of the residential and office uses.
2. Availability of mass transit to the site.
3. Walkability and "bikeability" of the Stonefield shopping center and surrounding area.
4. Reduced car ownership of renters.
Although the above factors may alone justify a 35% reduction, the parking ratio used to establish the
baseline in the COD, or Base Parking Ratio, is 20% higher than the rates published in Shared
Parking by the Urban Land Institute. Shared Parking is regarded as an authority on all matters
related to shared parking and is referenced in the Code of Development.
Shared Parking describes the Base Parking Ratio with the term "cornfield" rate, defining a project as a
free-standing land use in an area with little or no transit and only weak pedestrian connections with
other uses. In contrast, Stonefield has a strong transit program with bus service throughout the
shopping center, including along the site frontage with Inglewood Drive and Hydraulic Road.
Pedestrian connections are made throughout Stonefield and adjacent the subject parcel with concrete
sidewalks, crosswalks and curb ramps.
Notwithstanding the Base Parking Ratio used in the Code of Development, the following describes the
four major factors in justifying the reduction:
1. Shared Parking
The proposed residential and office use have offsetting peak -hour parking demands. This provides an
approximate 17% reduction in the required number of parking spaces based on an analysis of the
Shared Parking Time -of -Day Reduction Factor as found in Shared Parking, fable 2-5 (pp. 16-17). See
1�Page
30 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
s�o
Appendix A for site parking tabulations and Appendix B for an analysis of Table 2-5, deriving the 17%
reduction factor.
2. Availability of mass transit
The Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) provides bus service within 450 feet of the site on District
Avenue and on Commonwealth Drive following construction of the pedestrian link as shown on the Site
Plan. Availability of mass transit reduces parking demand by up to 10%.
BUs T i
Ex
E3 E3 E3
... ...... ... .. . E3 I
PHASE 1
126 * TO HYDRA T ` T PHASE 2
C
. BLOCK D2 ;ROAD BUS STOP AT �r
REGALCtNElow mom
I1A - MIMED -USE
....
t BUS STOP
Map Showing Nearby Bus Stops
3. Walkability and Bikeability of the site
The Shops at Stonefield consists of existing retail stores, a grocery store, movie theater, office space,
restaurants, apartments and is located adjacent Northrop Grumman, a major employer in the County.
This mix of uses in the Development Area presents employment opportunities for residents who can
walk or bike to work and may reduce the parking demand by up to 10%.
To improve the connectivity of the site, the owner is constructing a pedestrian stairwell and bike ramp
connection to the adjacent shopping center at the intersection of Hydraulic Road and Commonwealth
Drive. This will allow more convenient access for residents on Commonwealth and Turtle Creek
Condominiums, and will also serve as a means for apartment residents at Stonefield to more
conveniently access employment areas along Commonwealth Drive, Greenbrier Drive, and Berkmar
Drive.
21
30 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
s�o
Finally, a bicycle trail connection is planned by County Transportation that will connect Stonefield with
the east side of Seminole Trail via a flyover connection with Zan Road, which will create additional
non -automobile commuting opportunities.
4. Reduced Car Ownership of Renters
A significant trend in developments is to create live/work/play environments, typified by the Shops at
Stonefield. Another trend is to place mass transit nearby. The result of combining these trends is
fewer car trips. To recognize this, the Institute of Transportation Engineers has separated residential
uses into a number of different categories including adding Use Group 221, Low -Rise Apartments. The
average parking ratio for a suburban low-rise apartment is 1.2 spaces per unit (see Table 4-19 from
Shared Parking below) which represents a 31% reduction in the COD base parking ratio of 1.75 spaces
per unit. For comparison, this represents a 20% reduction in the ULI "cornfield" base parking ratio of
1.5 spaces per unit.
Peak -Hour Parking Accumulations at Residential Land Uses
(Spaces/Dwelling Unit)
Locatcr
85th Pvwti*
Awap Ratio
Saw= T r 110,* V CWV ►a10+ 3«C et
(210)
lteldd tin-k LOW-0sc
Torir Q�q i221)
&AubM &Aur�n Subsbm Urban
167-' 104-1.96 0 68 -1,94 0 -1.43
1.78 1.68 W6 1.17
too IM
Table 4-19 — Shared Parking, by ULI
urtm
152
The alternatives presented above to justify the parking reduction also meet the requirements listed
under Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.8, to wit:
4.12.8. Shared parking allows parking spaces to be shared among two (2) or more uses that
typically experience peak parking demands at different times and is located on the same
lot or on nearby lots. Because parking spaces are shared, the total number of parking
spaces that would otherwise be required may be reduced. In addition to all other
applicable requirements of this section, the following requirements shall apply to shared
parking:
a. Types of alternatives. The parking alternatives consist of street parking, as provided
in section 4.12.9. shared parking, as provided in section 4.12.10, off -site stand alone
31
30 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
S�O
parking, as provided in section 4.12.11, and other reductions resulting from the
provision of mass transit or other transportation demand management tools.
Street Parking : Per Z.O. 4.12.9. street parking may count toward the parking requirement for a lot if
the space abuts the lot. The 18 parallel spaces along the private street, Inglewood Drive, are directly
adjacent to Block D2. These spaces were counted to meet the parking requirement for Block D2 on
the approved Site Plan SDP 2014-00070 and have not been counted to meet the minimum parking
requirement of Hyatt or any other use.
Shared Parking : Shared parking is being provided per Z.O. 4.12.10. As shown in the parking
tabulations in Appendix A, ten (10) tandem parking spaces located in the parking garage have not
been counted toward the number of shared parking spaces. These spaces will be reserved for rental -
occupied units.
Other reductions: The other reductions including mass transit, walkability/bikeability of the site, and
demographics of the population (renters vs. owners) are transportation demand management tools
which are allowed alternatives as described in Shared Parking.
b. Combination of alternatives. One or more parking alternatives may be used in
combination with one another or with on -site parking to attain the minimum number
of required parking spaces.
Combining the four alternatives will attain the minimum number of required parking spaces.
C. Provision of means for safe movement. Sidewalks and other means for permitting
safe movement of pedestrians between the parking area or spaces and the use or
structure they serve shall be provided.
As part of site plan approval, the owner will provide adequate infrastructure to allow the safe,
unencumbered movement of pedestrians and bicyclists, including the connection toward
Commonwealth Drive.
d. Parking not to be separated from use by major roads. No parking area or spaces
shall be separated from the use or structure they serve by a street whose
classification is greater than a major collector, unless safe and convenient access is
provided from the parking area or spaces to the use or structure and is approved by
the director of planning and community development.
All parking can be accessed from the property without the need to cross major roads.
The reduction in the number of minimum required spaces by shared parking and other techniques was
envisioned as an element of the Code of Development that would be best addressed at the time of site
plan approval when the uses and parking program could be more clearly evaluated. The residential
and office uses have offsetting peak parking demands and are compatible for shared parking
arrangements. Other factors including the availability of mass transit, walkability and bikeability of
the site, and the reduced car ownership of renters are also considered. Finally, the actual parking
4 1 P a g e
30 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
rates published in the COD are approximately 20% higher than industry standard as established by
the Urban Land Institute's publication, Shared Parking.
The benefits of a parking reduction include greater flexibility and creativity in design, higher density in
the development area, and reduction of excess impervious paving surface.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or would like additional information regarding this
request.
Sincerely,
Cc: John Regan, The Christopher Companies
Randy Steck, The Christopher Companies
attachments
51Page
APPENDIX A
Site Parking Calculations
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES - BASED ON COD RATES
APARTMENTS, RENTAL, LOW-RISE 160 UNITS
COD APARTMENT PARKING RATE 1.75 SPACES/UNIT
APARTMENT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 280 SPACES
35% REDUCTION 182 SPACES
OFFICE/RETAIL RATE PER COD 4.5 SPACES/1,000 SF
OFFICE GSF 20,000 GLA
OFFICE GLA (0.8 X GSF) 16,000 GLA
OFFICE/RETAIL SPACES REQUIRED 72 SPACES
35% REDUCTION 47 SPACES
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED WITH 35% REDUCTION 229 SPACES
PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 241 SPACES
PROPOSED NUMBER OF NON -SHARED PARKING SPACES 10 SPACES
NET PROVIDED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 231 SPACES
And, for the purposes of comparison to base rates published by ULI:
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES - BASED ON ULI BASE RATES {"CORNFIELD" RATES}
APARTMENTS, RENTAL, LOW-RISE 160 UNITS
BASE PARKING RATE 1.50 SPACES/UNIT
APARTMENT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 240 SPACES
35% REDUCTION 156 SPACES
OFFICE/RETAIL RATE PER COD 3.5 SPACES/1,000 SF
OFFICE GSF 20,000 GLA
OFFICE GLA (0.8 X GSF) 16,000 GLA
OFFICE/RETAIL SPACES REQUIRED 56 SPACES
35% REDUCTION 36 SPACES
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED WITH 35% REDUCTION 192 SPACES
PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 241 SPACES
PROPOSED NUMBER OF NON -SHARED PARKING SPACES 10 SPACES
NET PROVIDED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 231 SPACES
NET SURPLUS NUMBER OF SPACES 39 SPACES
APPENDIX B
Shared Parking Analysis for Residential and Office Uses
0
N
N
N
N
!�
a
000
00
ao
Co
0000
0
0000
IR
�
r•
N
cs�
�
M
N
N
oo
00
�
r`
N
N
c
N
Cn
C
N
N
�•
^
N
CO
*-+
0
I,%%
0
N
N
N
.•..
Q.
CLL
•.Nw
LA
��t'1
OQ
C�
LA
N
fn
N
Z
0
tA
LA
Ln
LA
GC
N
Ln
0
N
c�
O
W
Ln
t�w
w
*
9
to
N
00
O
'�
r•
Nz
IW6
(
0
wl
t�
rl
00
fV
C`i
C )
s-i
�•
N
Li.
cc
C)
a0
ko
k
Q
W
C1
h
p
N
in
r`
N
�
~
0.
M
a
Y
0
C44
uj
4
�
Z
e
u1
Q
un
00
�
v
gn
ew
<L
00
00
r%
p
N
�t
,n
v
0
N
�
�
-
ON
rn
N
Q
M
O000
N
00
N
Lai
t1f
�
a
Li
V'f
Q
W
V
Lai
CL
0.
Li
$
N
M
in
L6!--