Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA197300003 Application 1973-04-12 Applical inn for Va ri ar e or Special Exception TO: THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1RIANCE NO. Vi 7 3-C The undersigned applicant is(are) the owner of the following described property: A PLAT OF THIS PROPERTY MUST BE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS APPLICATION. GIVE LOCATION BY REFERENCE'TO NEAREST ROAD INTERSECTION. DIMENSIONS OF SITE MUST BE GIVEN. I/We respectfully request the Zoning Administrator of Albemarle County, Virginia to grant the Variance or Special Exception stated below in the Magisterial District and described as County Tax Map 5 H Parcel I L, F containing acres and zoned Applicant Signature Date The petitioner request that the Zoning Administrator grant: the use as a construction storage yard facility The applicant make this request because: the property was so used before the County rezoning Action Taken by the Zoning Administrator: Approved Denied Signed - ------ - TO: THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS-- - - - ----— - Date Jan. 9 1973 I/WeR7 ack Intl st ;Ps/ ruby appeal the ruling of the Zoning Administrator of Albemarle County on the foregoing application, and respectfully request a reversal of his decision by granting the request for a variance or special exception as stated above. Applicant Signature Address c/o Fred N. 'Co�1m r, `10 West igh St: City Phone Number 293-9177 ACTION BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DATE APPROVED DENIED itit. odozol C - tor, X X x x x x x x K. K x x,tt. c. %DJ 1b Ve..40 1 emis-ot-k * (6 '1 Rv tl Fy KT1 c.Lowar Lbs - ( - vrotAr. Zaatu p . hlot' Pee P0.S gl mitt1 0 if l s j 3.(wicp. St UJ ¢ 6�•a y _.; Fit p% .%-up -mu-um,. -.1 61 4 Novr %. ttTUJ C.. Si 0 AfaLtAir etet Szwttxt. k WW Ij) SVv-* u.. o Veik0 1S:40A i h. 0 o -4 S -to F4..tC L. V....- piAVat ,,,...✓ „.,„r .rr° err` ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Permit No.-7/— 0:67 Date of Application /A.$ - 9/ When structure has been completed and this certificate has been filled out, return to: PLANNING & ZONING OFFICE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901 Note: Before Returning, Fill in Actual Cost and Sign Name or Corporation The undersigned owner or lessee hereby applies for a certificate of occupancy in accordance with the pro- visions of the Zoning Ordinance, for the following use, for the hereinafter described building, and hereby agrees to fully conform to all the terms of any permit which may be issued on account of the application. It is understood that this Certificate of Occupancy does not take the place of any license that may be re- q u i red by law, and also that it does not confer the right to install or erect any kind of signs, boilers, motors, or machinery. Name of Owner ,_.c. � �2 taY61471,6P7' Address of Building S 5-(6,12 .;?_j�j)L- a%xlli,(L �ji ,/)'X, C di- -ems Tax Map 91/ Parcel ` /— Zone `/ (1 0-LO Proposed Use 9 Ae Zfrati. 2 -'7' Material of Building Number of Stories — Address to which Certificate is to be mailed !( 1. 64)/ S4' ,6 (-77124z' lC' K? (0211Z 22k9 Actual Cost 2/40 fr Remarks 1-- ` TIi'i,5 certificate will be issued to the applicant after construction has been completed and the structure � pp it r ; rnade`r�eady for occupancy in the manner stated above. �`' 'c ` k -RA an.- X V�}-�1 Nt-r �R 1'• ra. <. date ignature o caner or essee T \✓:, . �> Approved/Disapproved by �.`1 1c:' `: V. Zoning Administrator EXPENDITURES OF SUPERIOR EXCAVATING CORPORATION AND BLACK INDUSTRIES, INC. ON ROUTE 250 EAST PROPERTY 1. Purchase Price $20,000 2. Legal fees and costs 377 3. Install Protective Fence 3,400 4. Replace Roof on Shop 1, 100 5. Exterminate Shop Building 200 6. Crushed Stone to cover lot 675 Total Cash Expenditures $25,752 500 man hourse spent to clean lot of trash 3 F7�•-,,'Ly' _�7,,�(� nyt�,iyA / ATTORNEYS AT LAW H/`-N B o ER 4 cioa 211 FIFTH STREET,N.E. t CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA.22901 STEPHEN H.HELVIN C RPO A ION COURT ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY CHARLES R.HAUGH COUNTY OF ALeEMARLE 1972 RICHARD E February COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY 1,COUNTY OF ALEEMARLE .CARTER Mr. Joseph M. Goldsmith \4A County Zoning Administrator County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia Re: Superior Excavating Company Route 250 East Dear Joe: I have this day met with Mr. Gordon Wheeler, Mr. David Goldberg and Mr. Richard Florence concerning the above captioned matter, specifically the use of this property prior to the adoption of zoning. From what they say, Talbott-Marks Company, Inc. had two sites in this general area, one leased from Mrs. Grissinger in add- ition to the subject which was then owned by Dr. Joseph W. Baker, and that the Grissinger site was the site used for the construction, storage and repair of heavy construction equipment. Since there is a conflict as to the actual use of this property prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, it is my opinion that you, as Zoning Administrator, should stand by your letter of December 21, 1971, concerning the use of this property only as a service station or other such service as was used by The Bug House, Inc. , if that firm was in existance and using this property during the time' that zoning became effective. However, because of the equities, I believe that any notice to Superior Excavating Company should provide that no enforcement of your opinion would be undertaken if Superior Excavating Company should file an appeal to the Circuit Court within sixty (60) days after receiving your opinion. If no appeal is taken, then please contact me and we will take the appropriate steps to enforce your opinion. Very truly yours, r/,- t.{ Charles R. Haugh ✓ .T ®' Commonwealth' s Attorney Albemarle County iCi.I�j! (? CRH:m L Now LAW OFFICES FRED N. COLMER 105 WEST HIGH STREET CHARLOTTESVILLE,VIRGINIA 22901 January 5, 1972 703 293 9177 Mr. Joseph Goldsmith Planning Office \' 'A‘ `+ County Office Building 1 Charlottesville, Va. � 1rt Dear Joe: Enclosed is a letter Duane Bickers has received from the Talbott Marks Company, Inc. which indicates that the parcel of land on Route 250 East purchased by Superior Excavating Corpora- tion of Virginia was used to store, repair and service heavy construction equipment at the time the Aleiarle County zoning ordinance cane into effect. I am sending a copy of this letter to Charlie Haugh. As we discussed I would hope that with this letter Charlie can issue an opinion that Superior can make any use of this property up to and including that of Talbott Marks. We would, of course, be interested in knowing what you found out from Louisa County. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Fred N. Colmer FNC: cck Enclosure cc: Mr. Charles R. Haugh Mr. Duane H. Bickers fur , " GORDON 8c IIATJOH ATTORNEYS AT LAW HENRY B.GORDON 211 FIFTH STREET,N.E. COMMISSIONER OF ACCOUNTS CORPORATION COURT CHARLOTTESVILLE7 VA.22901 CHARLES R.HAUGH STEPHEN H.HELVIN December 30 , 1971 Mr. Joseph M. Goldsmith °:+;(1 *01 i th "`' 'Ll czc '1 2 _ �tiy County Zoning Administrator , ' ` J. try. , County Office Building � � X Charlottesville, Virginia Re: Superior Excavating Company Route 250 East Dear Joe : This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of December 27, 1971 , concerning the building and zoning permit (71 -851 ) for the above captioned firm. Ater reading your letter and discussing the contents with others , it is my opinion that you should again contact the various firms and individuals involved in an effort to conclusively prove whether or not the present use of the property by the was or was not in existance as of the date of the CountyeZoni ngwOrdi - nance. In particular, I would again contact the Highway Department and get a written statement as to whether or not the present use was or was not in existance as of the date of the Zoning Ordinance. As soon as you have assembled this information, please contact me and we will then determine the legality of the original permi t. Very truly yours , GORDON & HAUGH Y,,_.i, ,//57 9(1.7< (7 CRH:m oM NWEALTFl-- OF VIR j '7 )OUGLAS B. FUGATE,COMMISSIONER �� ��'�� 3. L.BAUGHAN, LURAY VA �, V. FRED DUCKWORTH,NORFOLK,VA. l7 ( JOHN E. HARWOOD, ,� 4 '�� ©�� 1��h1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER&CHIEF ENGINEER .E ROY EAKIN,JR.,McLEAN,VA. + s �7 a �' " .E ARL A. AKIN,JRICK,ROANOKE,VA. f�f R Fi �� A.B. EURE,DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION HOMAS R.GLASS, LYNCHBURG VA. IUFUS T.HAIRSTON,BRISTOL,VA. A.K.HUNSBERGER,DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING IOUGLAS G.JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG,VA. IOBERT S.WEAVER,JR.,VICTORIA,VA. J.V.CLARKE:DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS W.S.G.BRITTON, M $xR DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING >f@t4tDCMOMMxxAxa3VtR Louisa, Virginia Please Reply To December 30, 1971 Department of Highways Louisa, Virginia Contractor usage of property on Route 250 at Route 794 just west of Route 616 Mr. Joseph M. Goldsmith, Zoning Administrator County of Albemarle Aga County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 �°� Gate Dear Mr. Goldsmith: Reference is made to your December 29, 1971, letter concerning the above subject. Our project records are primarily concerned with the project itself, and not with the use of the property in question. This property was primarily used by both the grading and paving contractors to erect field offices for State inspectors and for their Personnel. Some equipment was parked on this property at various times. However, we do not have any specific information documenting the use of this property. Our records indicate that the grading contractor, Robert A. Smith Company, Inc. , 0. 0. Box 305, Farmville, Virginia 23901, started work on the project on April 29, 1968, and completed work on December 19, 1969. The paving contractor, Ballinger ?awing Company, Inc. , P. O. Box 127, Greenville, S. C. 29602, started work on the project on April 29, 1968, and completed work on December 19, 1969. The use of the property on Route 250 for field offices should approximately coincide with these dates. We are sorry that we can not provide you with more specific information on this matter. Yours very truly, Z- F. E. Camopoonico Resident Engineer A HIGHWAY Ic Ac CAC, __ __ Y OF ALB vN� EMq 00 Planning Department JOHN L. HUMPHREY COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING COUNTY PLANNER CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 JOSEPH M. GOLDSMITH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 27, 1971 Mr. Charles R. Haugh, Commonwealth Attorney 211 5th Street, N.E. Charlottesville, Virginia, 22901 Re: Superior Excavating Company Route 250 East • Dear Mr. Haugh: • This letter will confirm our conversation of this afternoon concerning the building and zoning permit (71-851) for Superior Excavating Company on Route 250 East. Mr. Duane Bickers of that firm applied on the 5th of November for this permit. He requested at that time this office's varification of proper zoning so that his firm could use the parcel of land • in question for equipment storage, and to use the buildings to service and repair pick-up trucks and small off-road equipment. On a site plan submitted to this office Mr. Bickers varified his request and explained precisely what was to be done. Our office issued the zoning permit under the assumption that a highway construction office and temporary repair shop were located on this parcel of property prior to the effective date of the zoning ordinance. However, after issuance of this permit it was learned through Gordon Wheeler, Dick Florence, and the Highway Department that this construction office and repair facility was not located there until sometime during late summer or early fall of 1969. Due to this, a letter was sent to Mr. Bickers informing him of the new developments which had come to our attention (see copy of letter) . We explained to him that this office must accept partial responsibility for this mistake made, and we probably should accept full responsibility because we accepted assumed information rather than factual information. Superior Excavating Company purchased this tract of land for an amount somewhere in the neighborhood of $25,000. I understand from their attorney, Mr. Fred Colmer, that it has been purchased. w Mr. Charles R. Haugh December 27, 1971 r Page 2Nifty As Zoning Administrator my decision would have to rest on what actual uses were vested in this property prior to the effective date of the ordinance. The last known use before the ordinance took effect was the Bugg House, Inc. , a firm which manufactured dune buggies and made minor automobile repairs. It also operated as a service station. In my opinion this is the only use that can be performed as a non- conforming type of operation. Of course, you know that service station operations cover a multitude of different uses, from gas pumping to major vehicle repair. If Superior Excavating Company wishes to operate beyond this requirement, I feel that it would be necessary for their firm to appeal my decision to the Board of Zoning Appeals or to apply for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow construction storage yards in an A-1 zone, the first of these probably being the logical course of action. Since this firm has located there due to an error on this office's part, and it now appears that most of their use will be voided, in your opinion, what course of action do you recommend be taken? Respectfully, Jose M. Goldsmith Zon' g Administrator JMG:em cc: T.M. Batchelor, Jr. , County Executive Gordon Wheeler, Supervisor, Rivanna Magisterial District Fred Colmer, Attorney Duane H. Bickers Enclosure New �Rciiyti Planning Department JOHN L. HUMPHREY COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING JOSEPH M. GOLDSMITH COUNTY PLANNER CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 23, 1971 e'/ /7 (� I tli el 7 11 j� Mr. Duane H. Bickers /93- fig / Superior Excavating Company P.O. Box 3636 University Station Charlottesville, Virginia, 22902 Re: Your Construction Yard Route 250 East Map 94, Parcel 12 F Dear Mr. Bickers: We regret to infoimi you that since this office issued a permit for your firm to operate a construction storage yard and repair building on property at Route 250 and Route 794 some new developments have come to our attention. We had originally believed that the State Highway Construction Office for Route I-64, had been located there as a construction storage yard prior to August of 1968. However, this was not the case. They located there in the Fall of 1969. Since they were affiliated with a State agency no permit was needed, but they were still at this time in violation of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. Due to this, your facility could not possibly be used as a construction storage yard (tractors, bulldozers, front end loaders, trenchers, wire spools, etc.) . The last legal non-conforming use that existed on this property that can be varified was the Bugg House, Inc. , a firm which manufactured dune buggies and made minor automobile repairs as well as a service station. They have been removed for some eighteen (18) months. This narrows down the uses that can be performed as non-conforming to this type of operation - Minor repairs to small vehicles and the operation of a service station. Since this is in an A-1 Agricultural zone, your firm still has a recourse. Superior Excavating may file for an amenebnent to the Zoning Ordinance to allow a construction storage yard in an A-1 Agricultural zone. Duane H. Bickers December 23, 1971 Page 2 ,Nee This would be done by application through this office. This request would be handled as a rezoning or other permit and would require two public hearings; one before the Planning Commission and one before the Board of Supervisors. This office must accept partial responsibility for this mistake by issuing you a zoning permit before making a final and absolute investiga- tion of this property. We therefore, have given you a period until Tuesday, February 29, 1972, to have this problem resolved by the Planning Commission and Board or to remove the facility. Again, please accept our apologies for this mistake. Respectfully, -,/(igyx Jo e h Ail. Goldsmith Zo g Administra o JMG:em cc: T.M. Batchelor, Jr. , County Executive Gordon Wheeler, Supervisor, Rivanna Magisterial District ALBEMARLE COUNT" 80 I ` 3 \l"( 9A /, /4a 4T « 44 42 /N S / /^ / /1 3) N .( • ,/ , 4('''te 64 4 r� *30 N:9 �` 41 �39 / r.` \ I SfCTIL J fcA • i - II /; IN — 77>/S 1k _ ` ---'36A tJc / / s J, \ / / V r I" '� / ')' 348 .. C, 133 jr'T / f 14 128 / — ,/ 3- ` c_13 29b<§Ai .mil / / " " —N -.\' /., .. 126 \ _ / BOYD TAVERN \o ' / 2� G� ✓" D 1 / 1 �` _�� VZ - \ \ , RI 25• 258 26 - \ 1 / \ , 7,.......\ , \ 25 -' 27 '7 ) \ t0 ` 1 9 16 \ `-'—'.-1.—‘ ---'*'.....- 11>N., it- ' 26 , \ / /4. 15 21 j a �" 1w/ \ ' r \ / /2 5 A • , /\ ' / l'\ • .‘ • \ \ \ / \ 23 /7 \ 63 o '9 / \ I/ 22 \ `. .p SC • O j , Yq `// ~�18 // m r / /Iv \ sue\• a� C- J7/. 20 / \ '/ ,... . O .4 \\? vli / - i cr \ /. / �P \ / Z 7 17 � re. / /4�,P / r9 .....\.............„ li . 7'" \ .03 v,- _ ,,,_- . .7, \ _......_. _. \ -- , . . <. ,„ ,. _ ,..7. . ____.- . 7iii , SCALE IN FEET RIVANNA AND 550550 SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICTS SECTION 94 OF ALB .J,, Gp I:. .. �<F if AG%f.• Planning Department JOHN L. HUMPHREY COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING COUNTY PLANNER CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 JOSEPH M. GOLDSMITH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR February 15, 1972 Mr. Fred N. Colmer Attorney at Law 105 West High Street Charlottesville, Virginia, 22901 Re: Superior Excavating Corporation Route 250 East Dear Mr. Cotner: I have received a decision by Mr. Charles Haugh, Commonwealth Attorney, in regards to the above mentioned business. Mr. Haugh met with property owners of that area to determine along with the letters from Talbott-Marks Company, Inc. , and the Virginia Depart- ment of Highways, the specific use of the parcel in question. (Tax Map 94, parcel 12 F) Since there is a definite conflict between the property owners in the area and the uses stated in the letters from the Highway Department and from Talbott-Marks, Mr. Haugh has advised me to stand by my letter of December 23,1971, in regards to the use of this property. I have also been advised that due to the equities involved with your clients firm, that a time limit of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter be allowed for Superior Excavating to act on this decision. If Superior Excavating desires to appeal my decision as Zoning Administrator, they may appeal first to the Board of Zoning Appeals. If, however, they wish to apply for a rezoning of this property as stated in my letter of December 23, 1971, this may be done also. If a rezoning application is filed it would be up to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to decide the problem. Please disregard the February 29, 1972 deadline date in the December 23, 1971 letter. Please note that if no appeal is taken within the sixty (60) day time limit that Superior Excavating will be required to bring themselves within rrea N. Colmer February 15, 1972 Page 2 err New the bounds of the Zoning Ordinance or remove their facilities from the premises. I have attached copies of letters from Mr. Haugh, the Highway Department and the Talbott-Mrks Company for your file. If you have questions, which I am sure you will on this matter, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Joseph M. Goldsmith Zoning Administrator JMG:em cc: Charles Haugh Gordon Wheeler Enclosures ri OF ALBEMl 0�") V 1. • - i'i Ur Planning Department JOHN L. HUMPHREY COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING JOSEPH M. GOLDSMITH COUNTY PLANNER CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 6, 1972 Mr. Duane Bickers Black Industries, Inc. P.O. Box 3636 University Station Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 Re: Construction Storage Yard Route 250 East, V-72-03 Dear Mr. Bickers: This letter is in reference to the meeting held at 2: 00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 5, 1972 concerning the above mentioned construction storage yard violation. On November 5, 1971 , your firm, BLACK INDUSTRIES (at that time Superior Excavating Company) applied for andreceived a zoning and building permit on 2 . 07 acres described as County Tax Map 94, Parcel 12F and zoned A-1 Agricultural to allow renovation work for a construction storage yard facility. At this time my opinion was that this type of facility could be allowed. It was thought that this type of facility had existed prior to your locating there and was still within the bounds of the Zoning Ordinance and so should be allowed. I discussed this matter with John Humphrey, County Planner, and conclusions drawn were the same. On the 23rd of December 1971 , after a meeting with adjoining • property owners, I wrote you stating that additional information collected indicated that I was incorrect in issuing the original permit for a construction storage yard. It was stated by these property owners that this site was not used for this purpose and that the last known use was a service station operation which also traded as the Bugg House. As of December 23, 1971 , this use had been non-existant for some 18 months. I informed you then that the uses that would be allowed were: (1) Minor repairs to small vehicles, (2)and the operation of a service station. I in- formed you of your recourse with the particular bodies involved, Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, at that time. (2) Nitro, ' r TO: Mr. Duane Bickers SUBJECT: Construction Storage Yard Route 250 East, V-72-03 DATE: December 6, 1972 On December 27, 1972, I corresponded with Mr . Charles Haugh, Commonwealth Attorney for Albemarle County and requested that with the information available, that he make a decision as to what course of action be taken to clear this matter up. Mr. Haugh replied to me on December 30, 1972, and explained that there was not enough conclusive evidence to warrant a fair judgment of the situation. He requested me to again contact the property owner involved and to correspond with the Highway Department to ascertain the use that existed on this property at that time. On December 29th, 1971 , the day before I received Mr. Haugh 's letter, I wrote to Mr. Robert Connoch, Assistant Resident High- way Engineer for the Virginia Department of Highways in Louisa County, asking information on the location of this equipment . Mr. Connoch replied to me giving me the names of certain con- tractors which were located there and the dates of those. I then, on January 5, 1972, received a letter from Mr. Fred Colmer, (then your firm's attorney) informing me that you had received a letter from Talbott-Marks Company, Inc. giving dates of location of equipment on the questioned parcel . He attached a copy of that letter at that time. I then met with Mr. Haugh and presented him with this additional information. Mr . Haugh then met with Mr. Gordon Wheeler. Mr. David Goldberg, and Mr. Richard Florence on February 1 , 1972. From these two (2) meetings Mr. Haugh wrote me on the afternoon of February 1 , 1972 informing me to stand by my letter of December 23, 1971 as to the use of the property . This use being a service station and repair to small vehicles. On February 15, 1972, I corresponded with Mr. Fred Colmer (then your attorney) informing him of Mr. Haugh 's decision and also attached copies of all pertinent letters up to that time. I in- formed Mr . Colmer at that time that Superior Excavating (now BLACK INDUSTRIES, INC) had sixty (60) days to note an appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals or apply to the Board of Supervisors for rezoning. I stated at this time that if no appeal was taken that your firm Superior Excavating (now BLACK INDUSTRIES, INC. ) would be required to bring themselves within the bounds of the Zoning Ordinance. Nothing was heard from you or Mr. Colmer, and from the appearance of the site, progress was being made to comply with my request . I followed a hands-off policy in hopes that your firm would con- tinue this progress. However, I did not proceed with the follow-up that should have been accomplished with this matter. (3) r ' 41109 Noe TO: Mr. Duane Bickers SUBJECT: Construction Storage Yard Route 250 East, V-72-03 DATE: December 6, 1972 Soon after learning that a change in management of Superior Excavating had occurred, I made a check of your site. I saw then that heavy equipment was still present, and that the area, even though in a better condition than previously, was still in a disorderly state. It was at this meeting that I informed you of a meeting to include all parties concerned to bring this problem to an understanding, and to clear it up. Pursuant to this meeting, the County Attorney has directed me to inform your firm, BLACK INDUSTRIES, INC. as follows: "The uses allowed on land occupied by BLACK INDUSTRIES, INC. , containing 2. 07 acres, zoned A-1 Agricultural and described as County Tax Map 94, Parcel 12F are as follows: SERVICE STATION (Gas Station) 1) Dispensing gasoline & motor oil 2) Washing of vehicles (small trucks & cars) 3) Tire changing & repairing & wheel balancing 4) Minor repair of vehicles (small trucks & cars) , including tune-ups, brake work, muffler & tailpipe repair or replacement, shock absorber replacement, transmission adjustments. 5) Battery re-charging or replacement 6) Wrecker or road service (with 24 hr.storage of wrecked or inoperative vehicle) 7) Greasing & oil changes 8) U-haul rental and similar uses This site can include any or all of these stated uses but cannot exceed these uses. " I find it necessary to give your firm until 12: 00 noon, January 10, 1973 to bring BLACK INDUSTRIES, INC. within the bounds of the Zoning Ordinance in conjunction with my ruling as previously stated, (service station operation) or to apply to the Board of Zoning Appeals to review my decision as Zoning Administrator in this matter. If you or your firm has any questions, please feel free to contact me at my office. Very truly y rzlico cy4, Jo ph M. G dsmith Zoning Administrator JMG:bfj cc: listed on Page 4 (4) % 1 TO: Mr. Duane Bickers SUBJECT: Construction Storage Yard Route 250 East, V-72-03 DATE: December 6, 1972 CARBON COPIES TO: Mr. Gordon Wheeler, Chairman-Bd. of Supervisors, Rivanna District Mr. Lloyd Wood, Supervisor, Charlottesville Distr. Mr. Dick Florence, Property Owner Mr. David Goldberg, Property Owner Mr. Herbert Pickford, County Attorney Mr. Donald Woodson, Zoning Inspector Mr. Thomas Batchelor, County Executive APPLICANT'S LIST OF ADJACENT OR ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS • The Planning Department will list all Map and Parcel Numbers of Adjacent or Abutting Property Owners. Applicant is to then take this form to the Real Estate Office where personnel in that office will aid applicant in listing property owners and addresses of all Map and Parcel Numbers given below. Real Estate Office is to return blue copy to Planning Department. Map Parcel Name Address q 4 2/ Ia,ch c n 1 E / 130444) kgsWS Jc-i py,41,114 • Vi 2 /I /3 • C.2 nde.4.4 h C L- ha- ).-.) p.o .174 r vid 9okI &Ai ler (t-) 1 `�`� 3z .# 7n4t�s � �lw f cm..) ��N 1% , � * Note - This form is for REZONING, SPECIAL PERMITS, VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS • Application Number I/4 - 13•- 43. f-lap 94 - po..4 cAi 12,t' vA 1 _( May 10, 1973 /r f ft\ Mr. Fred N. Colme r i.,) 105 West High St. tnirlottesville , Virginia 22901 Re : VA-73-03 �\ / Gentlemen : ) To d k � ate this office has not rece �,,__/ construction storage yard. If you i a site plan for your Appeals granted a variance forrecall , the Board of Zoning proposed conditioned upon approval of a sitepla nby the County propertylan EYCommission before the granting of a certificatef occupancy. $ o Please be advised that unless a site plan is submitted to this office within 10 days of the date of this letter it will be necessary to file an injunction against you. Sincerely yours , Ruth Miller (Mrs. ) Zoning Administrator RM/bc cc: Mr. S. E. Amato Dr. Avery Catlin Mr. Gordon Wheeler Mr. George St. John Mr. Duane H. Bickers 128 MINUTES-BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS March 13 , 1973 This was a regular meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals , held on Tuesday , March 13 , 1973, at 5 : 30 P.M. in the Board Room of the County Office Building . Meeting was called to order. All members were present : Savory Amato , Chairman , William Roudabush, Harry Brown, W. P . Heath, E . H. Bain. The chairman established that a quorum was present . Mr. Amato inquired about minutes from previous meetings this year. 1 . VA- 73-03 Black Industries Inc. , applicant requests the Board of Zoning Appeals to reverse a decision made by the Zoning Administrator in order to allow a construction storage yard facility on property in an A-1 Agricultural zone described as County Tax Map 94 , Parcel 12F, Rivanna Magisterial District . The Secretary distributed copies of correspondance which occurred illbetween former Zoning Administrator Joseph Goldsmith and persons in- volved in the case . This case was originally scheduled for February 13 , 1973 , but was re- scheduled due to the applicants request . The chairman asked to hear from a representative of Black Industries , Inc. Mr. Fred Colmer, attorney for Superior Excavating Co . , now Black Industries , came forward. Mr. Colmer stated that he was appealing Mr. Goldsmith ' s decision for two reasons ; (1) because Mr. Goldsmith originally approved the use , which he said Mr. Duane Bickers of Superior Excavating could testify to ; and (2) because the land was used for a similar use , prior to Superior Excavating coming in. He said there were two employees from Talbott-Marks Company p y ( the previous user) to testify. •Mr. Amato asked whether the prior use of the land was the only question in the matter. Mr. Colmer stated that they were asking relief because they did all 129 -2 - they could prior to purchasing the property to make sure that they would be allowed to use the property as they wished. Mr. Amato restated that they were appealing the decision due to a hardship and conflict a,1d:` prior usage of the property prior to the zoning ordinance . Mr. Colmer said the two employees present were now employed by Black Industries , formerly employed by Talbott-Marks when I -64 was being constructed. Duane Bickers , Area Superintendent for Black Industries was called to speak. He explained that they had wanted a place for the storage of equipment while it was being serviced, then it would be put back in the field. He explained that their work involved buried telephone cable construction and their equipment included both tired and track equipment , 2 ton-trucks and tendem flatbed trucks . He said when they found the subject property they took a site plan to Mr. Goldsmith and wanted to make sure they could use it . This was in November of 1971 . They had not yet purchased the land. Mr. Goldsmith said it would' be alright to use the property. (and issued a building permit) Superior Excavating then purchased the property for $20 , 000 . (Mr. Bickers was asked to explain the relationship between Superior Excavating and Black Industries .) He said Superior Excavating had since been bought by Black Industries . He stated that they exrecteda chain link fence on the property which cost $3 ,500 .. Also they have put in 100 tons of gravel to improve the appearance . He was asked if all this took place before they were notified by Mr. Goldsmith they would not be able to use it. He said yes . Also they 130 -3- put a roof on the place . He said they were using the property for exactly the use they said they would. He said that the term "storage yard" was a misnomer. The Black Industries was a construction business and stored vehicles only when moving from one job to another. Mr. Amato asked if there were any buildings on the property and repairs. Mr. Bickers said yes , but major repairs were sent to Durham; only minor repairs were done on site , as they were not qualified to work on heavy equipment . Mr. Colmer asked Mr. Bickers if any equipment was stored there full time . Mr. Bickers replied a rubber-tired spare backhoe . He agreed with Mr. Colmer that when equipment was sitting in the shop they were losing money. Mr. Colmer questioned whether there was any question raised about the proper use of the site . Mr. Bickers said no , he had taken over the company less than a month before the property was purchased and he did not want to make a mistake in purchasing. Mr. Amato asked what use was made of the property by Talbott-Marks . Mr. Bickers said that when he sued to be in cement business they supplied cement to Ballinger Paving Co . , who did paving on I -64. Mr. Ballinger said that Talbott-Marks did work on heavy equipment but Mr. Bickers said he did not know. Raymond Jones , Plow foreman for Black Industries came forward. He formerly worked for Talbott-Marks from 1968 to February or March of 1970 . Mr. Amato asked the effective date of the ordinance . Mr. Roudabush answered August 1968. Mr. Amato asked if Mr. Jones was with Talbott- Marks in August 1968. He was not . Mr. Colmer asked what Talbott-Marks did in Charlottesville . - 131 4- Mr. Jones replied they had the lot which Black Industries owns now they had an office there, operations to continue gradin ' g project They stored a diesel fuel tanker on the lot and at least (2) water trucks (Big Mack 10 wheel tandems . ) They moved to this lot in June of 1969. Their first lot was located at intersection of I-64 and Route 20, then they moved to this Mr. Colmer asked who used this lot previousl location. y• Mr. Jones replied Harvestore (construct silos , they had a storage g yard there , kept materials and supplies, also trucks and equipment) He didn ' t remember when this was . Mr. Colmer asked if Central Bridge also used this location. Mr. Jones said yes , this was June 1969 . g Mr. Amato asked if other people were using it in August 1968 . Mr. Jones said he knew of use by Bugg House , -for building dune buggies from Volkswagens . Mr. Amato asked if they used it as a repair shop . Mr. Jones said not too much, they were building the ,buggies , but was not used for construction storage yard. Mr. Jones said he did not know who was using it in 1968 until Talbott- Marks took it over in 1969 . Mr. Amato said our problem is we would like to know what use was being made of this property close to August 1968 . Mr. Jones replied he did not know, he had no dealings there at that time . Mr. Roger Gilbert came forward, he previously worked for Talbott-Marks , and is now employed by Black Industries . He worked for Talbot-Marks from 1967-1971 , operated from what is now Blacks property. (A lease was presented by Mr. Colmer from Talbott-Marks . ) Mr. Colmer asked Mr. Gilbert what this property was used for. In 1967 they had a small trailer for an office , they laid pipe lines , per- formed small repairs at this time until the full grading crew came in. Later on they went large scale , had several trailers , and covered vans . 132 -S- Mr. Amato asked if he could pinpoint 196 the activity Mr. Gilbert replied in August or September mostly full scale , at least three Y, also he covered trailers parked stationer thought Central Brid They performed small and large ge was there . g repairs and stored equipment. Mr. Amato asked when Bugg House was the Mr. Gilbert said here . thought g prior to Talbott-Marks but he wasn ' t s Mr. Colmer finished his presentation, ure. Mr. Amato asked for views in opposition Richard Florence came forward. He is a • years . resident of the When he first heard of the purchasearea for 25 went to by Superior Excavating he see Mr. Goldsmith to see why the permit was issued. operation would involve Mr. Gold- smith said the Gold- truck nothing larger than a dump no bulldozers or earth movers . He indicat seen the permit which Mr. ed that he had Goldsmith never Gold Mr. Florence issued. rence referred to a letter from the highway department Goldsmith which stated the heavyto Mr. completed on equipment was removed when 1-64 was December 19, 1969 this was 2 years before the permit was granted. At the time the permit was granted a service station off and on si It had been used as since the highway department vacated in 1969. Mr. Florence pointed out that when non-conforming uses were chap e a more limited use they could not g d to go back. He understood that the : highway department would allow contractors as a temporary use . He stated the property was used as a service station until Black Industries purchased the property. The present use made by Black Industries They have stored heavy , is M-1 Industrial . equipment , bulldozers on the site at various time . Also a truck used to haul machinery which can carry a large bulldozer. 133 -6- The property has been in various states of disrepair. attempted to straighten it out , Mr. Goldsmith ,-- to disrepair. It 's ugly• they did a little but it went back He noted that section 13-1 of the Zoning ng Ordinance states that a permit issued in conflict ni is null and void. Mr. Amath,lasked if his position was that after Talbott-Marks a different the lot was used for Mr. purpose, a service station. Florence agtsvered yes . Mr. Talbott stopped using the department finished Property after the highwayI-64 almmst 2 ; activity had ceased for years . There were numerous temporary sites along I-64 when it was which are not used being now for M-1 uses , built David Goldberg came forward, he is an adjacent owner since Jul was some July 1969. When he moved in there after they moved a equipment on the property. Shortly out and service station moved in. Last existing use before Superior Excavating Mr. Goldber Property was a service g goes on record as being in station. opposition . He said the use is ugly, , and dan gerous . A bad bus accident facility. A trailwaysoccured as a result bus hit the back of of this No acceleration a slow moving flatbed lane from the sitetruck. on to 250. Mr. Amato asked for others in opposition. H. C. Lanahan an adjacent owner living in White Hall at the presenttime , came forward. He purchased Si ned Property across the g sales agreement August- - road in November. in Au - - time . g a Union 76 station was there at tha Mr. Lanahan checked with the zonln t The same as g office and found it zoned his own Preperty. Mr. Lanahan A:1 . of the meeting. then questioned the Mr. Amato explained the appealpurpose beinon the basis of (1) g a non-conforming use, (2) a h hardsip occurred on the basis of the 134 -7 Zoning Administrator 's decision. The Board of Zoning Appeals has the to review byright to grant a variance the courts , subject Mr. Lanahan stated this is bad zoning. Mr. Amato replied t zone , they just rule if it is a non- hey don 't conformin Mr. Lanahan wondered why the Zoningg use or a hardship . Administrator wasn 't Elizabeth B . Anderson came forward, she 1 • Present. lived across the road for 50 years . Mr. Amato told her she didn' t a fillip look 50. Mr. Anderson said g station occupied the property before Black I Talbott-Marks occupied before ndustries had. the filling station . She considered this temporary while they were buildin out completel g 1-64. She said they moved Y before the gas station came in. She said House did not store large e qui the Bugg pment. Also Mr. Jefferson would not approve. Also she thought the Planning Board wanted to make this area historical , Joseph Polumbo cmae forward. He stated that the accident which Mr. Goldberg referred to, took place because of extreme sunlight- no no one was charged. ght-= g This was not the fault of Black Industrie Mr. Goldberg stated that other neighbors also co s complained of the truck traffic on Route 250, and consider it a safety Mr. Gilbert stated that Mr. hazard. Florence' 's statement moved was in error since he worked on when Talbott-Marks with them until the fall of 1970 in that area. Mr. Amato wondered what would be the situation if this use were con- sidered abandoned. Mr. Colmer said Mr. Goldsmith property had this use when zoning came in said since the if Talbott 's it was alright . It was asked use was discontinued for 2 years . Mr. Colmer s Mr. Gilbert said they were there aid no , if in the fall of 1970, and Superior .Pi.i, . -g _ 135 purchased the place in September 1971 . Mr. Roudabush asked what the : use was in November 5, 1969. Mr. Colmer asked if Talbott-Marks was o perating there then. Mr. Gilbert said yes , definitely. Mr. Florence noted the Zoning. Ordinance, articles 10-1-3 and 10-1-4. Said abandonment would not apply here, because the use was changed. He said Article 10-1-4 could apply, which refers to a Mr. Amato said he would like to defer this more limited use. matter until the next regular meeting on April 10 at 5 : 30 P.M. He asked if Black Industries were using the Property at the moment . Mr. Colmer said yes . Mr. Amato said a decision would be asked if we made on April 10 . Mr. Florence had minutes from the last meeting since he that time of the hearing being defe complained at deferred. Mr. Amato said he would like to impress the fact that in the futur no continuances bould be e granted unless the applicant makes the re- quest before the Board of Zoning Appeals . Mr. Florence said let the records show that h Mr. Amato assured him that we have the minute objected to the defferal . minutes . The meeting was adjourned at 6 :25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Secretary 136 MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A regular meetin APRIL 10, 1973 g of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Albemarle County was held on April 10 , 1973 , at 5 : 30 P .M. in the Board Room . Present were Messrs . Amato , Chairman, W. P. Heath , Harry Brown , and William Roudabush . E. H. Bain, . ,---, Minutes of the January 30, February 6 , 12 , 13 and March 13 , 1973, were read, corrected and approved . The first matter to be heard was the application of B deferred from March 13 1973 lack Industries , . VA-73-03, Black Industries Inc . , applicant requests the Board of Zoning Appeals to reverse a decision made by the Zoning trator in order to allow a construction storage property in an A_ Adminis- trator Parcelty 12 F, 1 Agricultural zone described yard CountyfaciTaty on Rivanna Magisterial District . as Tax Map The chairman , noting that the public hearing had been that the decision of the Board had been deferred , closed, stated Mr. St . John was present and was asked if Hehe had reviewed the matter. replied that he had not . Mr. Fred Colmer , attorney for the Black Industries , offered memorandum indicating a that his client had invested $25 , 752 . 00 in the Property. David Goldberg , one of the adjacent property owners , questioned the propriety of the memorandum. Chairman Amato explained that it was accepted as evidence pertaining to the hardship section of the and further or specifically ordinance , P y that the Board could consider such evidence in deciding whether or not the granting of the requested variance would alleviate a clearly demonstrable hardship approachin The g confiscation. public hearing was closed at this point , and the Board considered 12-2-2 , pages 50 , 51, 52 , and 53 . Chairman Amato indicated two questions , one of which is no n-conforming use - 137 2- and whether such use had been discontinued for a period in ex of two years cess and the second question of hardship . Mr. Roudabush : We were funished with correspondance from f Zoning Administrator where it was indicated that he advised t °rmer that he would be permitted the use of the he applicant property. No disagreement on that . I feel that based on the action of the Zoning Administrator and the good faith that the purchaser acted in purchasing the property in spending certain amount of funds on the property that he has cause for the hardship but I 'm not too clear on the in probably Zoning Ordinance on abandonment of useage . tent of the g The ordinance says if any "non-conforming use structure activities is discontinued for exceeding2 a period years after the enactment of this ordinance it shall be deemed abandoned and subsequent uses shall conform to the requirements of this ordinance". And I q irements would think that the word "subsequent" means subsequent after a period of 2 years . And I think the argument that some of the opponents presented at the last meeting inter- vening use nulified the 2 that the year period that the owner was given to reactivate a non-conforming use . I think we could approach this from either point . That the use was not abandoned or that it is a hardship . Maybe other members have views on this . Mr. Roudabush : I 'd like to also mention the last paragraph on page 54 of the ordinance which says " in authorizing a variance the board may impose such conditions regarding the location, character other features of the and proposed structure or use" and I think that it may be necessary in public interest . I would like to suggest that we did . . . if well in this case I think the action would be to overrule the last action of the Zoning Administrator . And if we did that I would • like to, if we are authorized to do it , require some type of screening `J and maybe get some other recommendations from the planning department _ 138 3_ as to what might be necessary on this property to protect the adjacent 'land owners and other things that might be in the public Yn Mr. Amato : Well, tereat , may I suggest that if you feel that way about it that you make the motion . . . make it subject to such requirements of screenin that may be required by uired the Planningg Department . Can we do that , John? Mr. Humphrey : I believe you certainly can, and as a matter of fact, you could refer this to the commission before taking action for recommendation . Mr . Amato : For the Planning Commission? Mr. Humphrey : I think you may want to expand further than screening . I 'm not that familiar with access and safety and this type of thing it could be rather broad . so Mr . Amato : Could we pass it then subject to such restrictions as the Planning Commission may make on access and screening . Mr. Amato: That ' s a good suggestion on the access because there may be some requirements they want to put on it . Mr. Humphrey : They may have to come back to you for the final action with a condition I think it refers to the Planning Commission for recommendation they may have to come back to you again to confirm and adopt those recommendations . Mr. Roudabush : If we impose conditions , could those conditions be that the Planning Commission approve one of those . . . Mr. Amato : I don ' t think we should specify that it should come back to us . It should be subject to such restrictions as to access and screening as the Planning Commission may deem necessary and proper , and then that would be the end of it . Mr. Roudabush : I 'm going to make that motion . . . that . . . ,bush that- -4- 139 Mr. Roudabush : Our ordinance says in authorizing a variance for a proposed use that the Board may impose such conditions it may deem necessary in public interest . I guess we could be specific as to. . . Mr . Amato : That ' s why I thought it should be as to access and screening this is the things we are concerned with . Mr . Roudabush : I think we have got to be as specific to the Planning ! Commission. . .we qan,'� g ' 4. just say that whatever the Planning Commission thinks is good we ' ll say ii o. k . Mr. Amato : That ' s why I think the motion should be to overrule the decision of the Zoning Administrator subject to such conditions as to access and screening of the Planning Commission deems proper. Mr. Heath : Judge , Could you add the word noise in it? Mr. Amato : If you are going to say no engines run , you just may as well not have the use . Mr. Roudabush : I make a motion that the last action of the Zoning Administrator be overruled and that the applicant be granted a variance for the use of this property and a certificate of occupancy be issued upon approval of a site plan by the County Planning Commission which site plan would incorporate all the features normally incident to approval of any other site plan required by the county ordinance . Mr. Brown : I second that motion. Chairman : Any discussion on the motion? All in favor indicate by saying aye . (All aye 's) I vote aye . Opposed by contrary sign . (No "no ' s") . The motion is carried . 2 . VA-73-05 , Virginia Land Company. Applicant is requesting the • Board of Zoning Appeals to grant a variance of 34 square feet from the required maximum of 16 square feet for a "sale or rental" sign in an A-1 Agricultural zone . Applicant is also requesting the Board of Zoning Appeals to grant a variance to allow them to place said sign on premises other than that which is for sale ( on road right-of-way) . Property as Co M4A /.. C`Jalho11=\lG'(-a�lCs eornJ any L%nc. 9'Q9f$111‘N45.0 GENERAL CONTRACTORS P. O. BOX 308 PHONE 3748184 CLARKSVILLE, VIRGINIA 23927 December 28, 1971 VI \ Mr. Duane Bickers Superior Excavating Corp, P. v. Box 3036 Charlottesville, Va. 22903 Dear Sir: This certain parcel of land described in the attached agreement, was used by us from, May 1 , 1q68 through November of 1969 to store, repair and service heavy construction equipment . This parcel was also used by Ballenger Paving Corporation, Greenville, South. Carolina, for similar , purposes . Yours truly, TALBOTT-MARKS CO. , INC . M. W. Bullock Secretary M1aB:p n MCGUIRE, WOODS & BATTLE COURT SQUARE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CLOSING STATEMENT Sale of by and , Sellers to and , Buyers , 19 Purchase price $ Escrow fund purchased by the Buyers Oil in tank purchased by the Buyers Rent due the Sellers Buyers' pro-rata share of insurance premium on pol- icy assumed, based on a total annual premium of $ By downpayment $ By rent refund due the Buyers By assumption of existing loan Sellers' portion of interest for the month of to be paid by Buyers when the payment is made Sellers' real estate transfer tax— to be paid by Buyers at time of recordation of deed Sellers' pro-rata share of the 19 real estate taxes (based on a total tax of $ ). Said tax to be paid in its entirety by the Buyers when due December 5 By check due the Sellers $ $ NOTES Sellers represented by: Buyers represented by: .aww ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Permit No. Date of Application When structure has been completed and this certificate has been filled out, return to: PLANNING & ZONING OFFICE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING COURT SQUARE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901 Note: Before Returning, Fill in Actual Cost and Sign Name or Corporation The undersigned owner or lessee hereby applies for a certificate of occupancy in accordance with the pro- visions of the Zoning Ordinance, for the following use, for the hereinafter described building, and hereby agrees to fully conform to all the terms of any permit which may be issued on account of the application. It is understood that this Certificate of Occupancy does not take the place of any license that may be re- q u i red by law, and also that it does not confer the right to install or erect any kind of signs, boilers, motors, or machinery. Name of Owner Address of Building Tax Map Parcel Zone Proposed Use Material of Building Number of Stories Address to which Certificate is to be mailed Actual Cost Remarks This certificate will be issued to the applicant after construction has been completed and the structure made ready for occupancy in the manner stated above. date Signature of Owner or Lessee Approved/Disapproved by Zoning Administrator T I ZONING I "oft", CO t' T ALBEMARLE '"'• ZONING AND BUILDING PERMIT Permit No. Application for Permit to Build, Alter, Add To or Repair REAL ESTATE DIVISION DISTRICT MAP REFERENCE STATE ESTIMATED SUB-DIVISION ACRES REGISTRATION COST f CONTRACT PRICE MAP LOT BLOCK—SECTION Name of Owner Address Location: N E S W Side of Road No. ""atlout miles from Or: side of Street, between and Yard Requirements: Front Setback_ Side Rear USE CONSTRUCTION EXTERIOR WALLS INTERIOR WALLS ROOFING GENERAL FEATURES Dwelling Wood Frame Wood Siding _ Plaster Metal No. Stories Apartment Steel Frame Wood Shingles I Dry Wall Slate No. Rooms Store Brick Asbestos Shingles, Celetex Comp. Shingle Floors Garage _ Cinder Block Asphalt Siding I Pine Ceil Asbestos Shingle No Basement Service Station Mill Brick Paneled Tar-Gravel Pt. Bsmt. %Y. Solid Masonry Cinder Block I Comp. Roll Full Basements PLUMBING HEATING SEWAGE WATER No. Baths Basin Hot Water Air Cond. Public Public _ Tile Shower Electric Fireplace Private Private Water Closet Hot Air Stove Septic Tank Well . Bath Tub Floor Furnace If for Alterations or Repairs, State Nature: TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTORS STATE REG.NO General Heating Plumbing Electrical Excavation Plaster Masonry Steel Frame Tile Architect Application is hereby made for Permit in accordance with the description and for the purpose herein set forth. This application is made subject to all County and State laws and ordinances and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned and which shall be deemed a condition entering into the exercise of this permit. I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, that the information given is correct and that the construction will conform with the regulations of private building restrictions, if any, which may be imposed upon the above property by deed and the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent_ Address " . . . Telephone No. Based on the above information, Building Permit is hereby granted this day of , 19 . Director of Finance By ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Type of Facilities: Approved: Sanitarian �I�.� c �kVA-4'4)4 Date.11" ate• Zoning Office Copy 11 L