The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA201600023 Review Comments Zoning Map Amendment 2017-12-13 • • Si7 e, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 VSMP Permit plan review Project title: Brown Toyota Project file number: WP0201700065 Plan preparer: Clark Gathright [cgathright@dgarchs.com] Owner or rep.: Virginia First Family of Fine Cars [N/A] Plan received date: Rev 1 — 17'h August, 2017 Rev 2—86 September,2017 Date of comments: Rev 1 —29t"August,2017 Rev 2—3rd October,2017 Reviewers: Rev 1 —Bobby Jocz Rev 2—Bobby Jocz County Code section 17-410 and Virginia Code §62.1-44.15:34 requires the VSMP authority to act on any VSMP permit by issuing a project approval or denial. This project is Approved conditional on small corrections detailed below included in final submittal. The application may be resubmitted for approval.if all of the items below are satisfactorily addressed. The VSMP application content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-401. A.Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) The SWPPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-405. A SWPPP must contain(1)a PPP, (2)an ESCP,(3)a SWMP,and(4)any TMDL measures necessary. 1. Cover sheet should be provided which includes WPO application number[WPO201700065]. Information on date of topography,parcel details, and a legend for symbols used should be included on this sheet. Rev 2—Partially addressed.Please provide date of topography.Include a legend outlining symbols and line types used in plans. Topography must be filed verified by designer within the last year(provide date of last site inspection). 2. No SWPPP provided. Please see template located on County website for guidance on SWPPP development. Rev 2—Land disturbance smaller than 10,000 sq-ft.not needed 3. Completed DEQ Construction General Permit Registration from must be provided. Rev 2—Land disturbance smaller than 10,000 sq-ft.not needed 4. Remove the existing 18"pipe from the SWM plan if not to be included in final design. Rev 2—Addressed 5. Label contour elevations within parking arca for clarity. Rev 2—Addressed 6. Show limits of gravel and paved parking areas. Rev 2—Addressed 7. Provide square footage or acreage for each drainage area identified. Rev 2—Addressed Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 B.Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP) The PPP content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-404. I. No PPP provided. Please see SWPPP template on County website for guidance. Rev 2—See Comments A.3 and A.2 C.Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) VSMP Regulation 9VAC25-870-108 requires the VSMP authority to approve or disapprove a SWMP. This plan is Approved,and the reasons are provided in the comments below. The stormwater management plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-403. I. Show limits of land to be placed in SWM Forest and Open Space Easement. Rev 2—Addressed. 2. Underground detention system must be placed in SWM maintenance easement,please show on plans. A SWM Maintenance agreement will be needed. Rev 2—Addressed. Maint.Agreement currently under review. 3. VRRM spreadsheet is filled out incorrectly. Pre-developed forested area should not be included as a pre development condition as it is not currently in conservation. Re-development worksheet needs to be used to determine the amount of phosphorus reduction needed for the change from managed turf/forested area(gravel lot area)to impervious surface.New development worksheet should then be used to determine how much phosphorous"credit"is gained by conserving forest and open space. The difference in these two values is the amount of phosphorous reduction needed (or exceeded). Rev 2—Addressed. 4. Provide plan view of riser. Rev 2—Addressed. D.Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) Virginia Code§62.1-44.15:55 requires the VESCP authority to approve or disapprove an ESCP. This plan is Approved conditional on small corrections detailed below included in final submittal.The erosion control plan content requirements can be found in County Code section 17-402. 1. Inlet protection should be placed around existing grate inlet. Rev 2—Sediment log not approvable E&S measure.Recommend Std.3.07 "Block and Gravel Drop Inlet sediment Filter",include detail on sheet 2. 2. Provide engineering details sheet containing the inlet protection,and silt fence engineering details. Rev 2—Addressed The VSMP permit application and all plans may be resubmitted for approval when all comments have been satisfactorily addressed. For re-submittals please provide 2 copies of the complete permit package with a completed application form. Engineering plan review staff are available from 2-4 PM on Thursdays, should you require a meeting to discuss this review. Process; After approval,plans will need to be bonded. The bonding process is begun by submitting a bond estimate • Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 request form and fee to the Department of Community Development. One of the plan reviewers will prepare estimates and check parcel and easement information based on the approved plans. The County's Management Analyst will prepare bond agreement forms,which will need to be completed by the owner and submitted along with cash,certificates or sureties for the amounts specified. The agreements will need to be approved and signed by the County Attorney and County Engineer. This may take 2-4 weeks to obtain all the correct signatures and forms. Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance agreements will also need to be completed and recorded. The County's Management Analyst or other staff will prepare the forms and check for ownership and signature information. The completed forms will need to be submitted along with court recording fees. After bonding and agreements are complete,county staff will need to enter project information in a DEQ database for state application processing. DEQ will review the application information based on local VSMP authority approval. At this time,the DEQ portion of the application fees will need to be paid directly to the state. For fastest processing,this is done electronically with the emails provided on the application. DEQ should notify applicants with instructions on how to pay fees. When DEQ approves the application,they will issue a permit coverage letter. This should be copied to the county. After DEQ coverage is issued,via the coverage letter,the County can hold a pre-construction conference. Applicants will need to complete the request for a pre-construction conference form,and pay the remainder of the application fee. The form identifies the contractor and responsible land disturber,and the fee remaining to be paid. This will be checked by county staff, and upon approval,a pre-construction conference will be scheduled with the County inspector. At the pre-construction conference,should everything proceed satisfactorily, a joint VSMP and grading permit will be issued by the County so that work may begin. County forms can be found on the county website forms center under engineering; http://www.albemarle.org/deptforms.asp?department=cdengwpo Bobby Jocz,EIT Albemarle County Community Development—Engineering rjocz@albemarle.org (434) 296-5832 ext. 3283 r� 'AL � IRGS?at� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Clark Gathright (cgathright@dgarchs.com) From: J.T. Newberry — Senior Planner, Cameron Langille — Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: July 21, 2017 Revision 1: September 24, 2017 Subject: ZMA201600023 Brown Toyota The Planner for the Planning Services Division will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.) Comments for the ZMA Application Plan drawi [General Comment] In the side title bar of both drawings, please change the title to "Rezoning Application Plan." a. Please change the Sheet C-1.0 title bar at the bottom of the page to "Existing Conditions with Current Steep Slopes Overlay District from County GIS." b. Please change the Sheet C-1.1 title bar at the bottom of the page to "Area of Rezoning — New Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes." 2. [General Comment] On Sheet C-1.0, please remove the hatching and label for the proposed 2.52 acre Forest and Open Space Preservation Area. Please add the hatching to Sheet C-1.1, but amend the label so that it only states "Preservation Area — No Future Development." 3. [32.5.1(c)] On Sheet C-1.0, please change the label for the hatched area representing the "New steep slopes (area of re -zoning 0.18 ac.)." To avoid confusion between the existing adopted overlay zoning district and the post - development slopes, this label should simply read as "New slopes above 25%." 4. [32.5.2(a)] Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78- 14C. Please amend the ownership name and addresses on Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia's First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 5. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the outer boundaries of all proposed Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas (i.e. the 'metes and bounds') that will be changed through the rezoning. The proposed dimensions should be shown on Sheet C-1.1 of the ZMA Application Plan with a note stating that the measurements are from the post -development site survey conducted by Commonwealth Surveying, LLC Dated 08- 16-2016. This information will allow the County to accurately update the dimensions of the overlay district following action by the Board. [32.5.2(a)] On Sheet C-1.0, under Site Data, please specify the classification of slopes based on the County GIS (Managed, Preserved, or both Managed & Preserved) next to the steep slopes overlay district label under each parcel. For example, T.M. 78 Parcel 14E should show "Steep Slopes Overlay District (Preserved Slopes)." Sheet C-1.1 should list the proposed steep slopes overlay for each parcel based on the rezoning. 7. [32.5.2(a)] On Sheet C-1.1, please add a note that lists the proposed steep slopes overlay districts for each parcel based on the rezoning. 8. [32.5.2(a)] Sheet C-1.0 is the "Existing Conditions" of the site based on the post -development topographic survey and current County GIS areas of Managed and Preserved slopes. Please amend the Steep Slopes table so that it lists the acreages of Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes that currently exist based on County GIS, and the post development survey. It should be broken into three overall sections, as shown in the example table below. The first column should list the TMP numbers. The second and third columns should list the existing acreages of Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes as measured currently in County GIS. The fourth and fifth columns should list the acreages of managed and Preserved Steep Slopes as measured by the survey conducted on 08-16-2016. The sixth and seventh columns should list the net change. a. Remove the Net Reduction Statement Below the Table. Steep Slopes Table Existing Steep Slopes per County GIS Existing Steep Slopes per Post -Development Survey dated 08-16-2016 Net Change Parcel Preserved I Managed Preserved Managed Preserved Managed TMP 78-14 (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14A (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14E (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14C (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) 9. [32.5.2(a)] On Sheet C-1.1, please add anew Steep Slopes table that lists the revised acreages for Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes for each parcel that will exist after the rezoning. Steep Slopes Table Proposed Steep Slopes After Rezoning Parcel Preserved Managed TMP 78-14 (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14A (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14E (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14C (acreage) (acreage) 10. [General Comment] It is our understanding that the ownership of the property may have changed since this application was originally submitted. The current owner (or their agent) will need to consent to the rezoning application for it to continue being processed. Attached is a blank signature page for the new owner to sign. A link to Attachment A is included for more information about how to demonstrate that the signatory has legal authority to sign on behalf of the new owner. Action after receipt of the comment letter After you have read this letter: 1) Resubmit revisions to address comments on a Resubmittal Monday (see attached schedule). Please use the provided coversheet to resubmit. The $1,344 resubmittal fee is required because this will be considered the second resubmission. 2) Request Planning Commission public hearing Notification and Advertisement Fees Please note that the applicant is required to pay fees for future public hearing notices for the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. The fees will need to be paid a minimum of 21 days before the Planning Commission's scheduled public hearing. The total outstanding fee due for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors is $559 and is broken down as follows: 2 172 Cost for newspaper advertisement 215 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) 387 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. 172 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing 559 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the some time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact J.T. Newberry (jnewberry@albemarle.org) or Cameron Langille (blangille@albemarle.org) if you wish to meet or need additional information. Sincerely, 4. 1%W1&111X J.T. Newberry Senior Planner Attachments: 1. Resubmittal Schedule 2. Resubmittal Coversheet 3. New Ownership Signature Information (to replace Pages 3 and 4 of original ZMA Application) 2017 Submittal and Review Schedule Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Dates Comments to applicant for decision on whether to proceed to Public Hearing Payment Due for Public Hearing Legal Ad Planning Commission Public Hearing No sooner than* COB Auditorium Monday Friday Monday Tuesday Nov 07 2016 Dec 09 2016 Dec 19 2016 Jan 10 Nov 21 2016 Dec 23 2016 Jan 09 Jan 31 Dec 05 2016 Jan 06 Jan 16 Feb 07 Dec 19 2016 Jan 20 Jan 30 Feb 21 Tue Jan 03 Feb 03 Feb 13 Mar 07 Tue Jan 17 Feb 17 Feb 27 Mar 21 Feb 06 Mar 10 Mar 13 Apr 04 Tue Feb 21 Mar 24 Mar 27 Apr 18 Mar 06 Apr 07 Apr 10 May 02 Mar 20 Apr 21 May 01 May 23 Apr 03 May 05 May 22 Jun 13 Apr 17 May 19 May 22 Jun 13 May 01 Jun 02 Jun 05 Jun 27 May 15 Jun 16 Jun 19 Jul 11 Jun 05 Jul 07 Jul 17 Aug 08 Jun 19 Jul 21 Jul 31 Aug 22 Jul 03 Aug 04 Aug 14 Sep 05 Jul 17 Aug 18 Tue Sep 05 Sep 26 Aug 07 Sep 08 Sep 18 Oct 10 Aug 21 Sep 22 Oct 02 Oct 24 Tue Sep 05 Oct 06 Oct 16 Nov 07 Sep 18 Oct 20 Oct 23 Nov 14 Oct 02 Nov 03 Nov 13 Dec 05 Oct 16 Nov 17 Nov 27 Dec 19 Oct 30 Dec 01 Jan 02 2018 Jan 23 2018 Nov 13 Dec 15 Jan 08 2018 Jan 30 2018 Dec 18 Jan 19 2018 Jan 29 2018 Feb 20 2018 Tue Dec 26 Jan 26 2018 Jan 29 2018 Feb 20 2018 Tue Jan 02 2018 Feb 02 2018 Feb 12 2018 Mar 06 2018 Tue Jan 16 2018 Feb 16 2018 Feb 26 2018 Mar 20 2018 Bold italics = submittal/meeting day is different due to a holiday. Dates with shaded background are not 2017. 2018 dates are tentative. *Public hearing dates have been set by the Planning Commission; however, if due to unforeseen circumstances the Planning Commission is unable to meet on this date, your project will be moved to the closest available agenda date. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP # Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# Bv: a Resubmittal of information for 2,oning Alap Amendment �— PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: ZMA201600023 Brown Toyota Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff Signature of Owner, Contract Purchaser Date Clark Gathright Print Name FEES that may apply: Daytime phone number of Signatory ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request $194 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,688 ❑ First resubmission FREE m Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,344 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $3,763 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,881 To be Daid after staff review for Dublic notice: Most applications for a Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $215 + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) $1.08 for each additional notice + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost (averages between $150 and $250) County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 Revised 11/02/2015 Page 1 of 1 ❑ One (1) copy of a local traffic impact statement as required by Virginia Code § 15.2-2222.1 and 24 VAC 30-155-40. ❑ One (1) copy of the most recent recorded plat, that shows the Deed Book/Page Number, of the parcel(s) composing the proposed project, or a boundary survey if a portion of one or more parcels compose the proposed project, both of which shall include a metes and bounds description of the boundaries. 0 One (1) copy of ownership information (if applicant is not also the owner). If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority to do so. If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. Please attach the owner's written consent. See Attachment A in the Land Use Law Handbook for more information. ❑ As the owner/agent I certify that any delinquent real estate taxes, nuisance charges, stormwater management utility fees, and any other charges that constitute a lien on the subject property, which are owed to the County of Albemarle and have been properly assessed against the subject property, have been paid. For a Neighborhood Model District (NMD) - new or amendment of an existing NMD ❑ Seventeen (17) copies of the Code of Development satisfying the requirements of section 20A.5. ❑ One (1) copy of a parking and loading needs study that demonstrates parking needs and requirements and includes strategies for dealing with these needs and requirements, including phasing plans, parking alternatives as provided in section 4.12.8, and transportation demand management strategies as provided in section 4.12.12; provided that the applicant may elect to submit the parking and loading needs study in conjunction with the preliminary site plan for the development if it determines that the uses that may occupy the buildings are not sufficiently known at the time of the zoning map amendment. ❑ One (1) copy of strategies for establishing shared stormwater management facilities, off -site stormwater management facilities, and the proposed phasing of the establishment of stormwater management facilities. OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Proffer Form signed by owner(s) (1 copy). ❑ Additional Information, if any. (17 copies) THE FOLLOWING ZONING DISTRICT CHECKLISTS WILL BE USED BY BOTH THE APPLICANT AND STAFF DURING THE MANDATORY PRE -APPLICATION MEETING. ALSO CONSULT THE OTHER DOCUMENTS BELOW BEFORE SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION: CONVENTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT CHECKLIST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT CHECKLIST NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL DISTRICT CHECKLIST PROFFER FORM (MS Word doc) STAFF ANALYSIS OF ZMA & SP REQUESTS WATER AND SEWER EVALUATION CHECKLIST PLANNING COMMISSION REQUEST FOR INFO Zoning Map Amendment Application Revised 11/02/2015 Page 3 of 4 Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true, and correct to the best of my knowledge. By signing this application I am consenting to written comments, letters and or notifications regarding this application being provided to me or my designated contact via fax and or email. This consent does not preclude such written communication ftom also being sent via first class mail. Signature of Owner/Agent or Contract Purchaser Date Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory Required FEES to be paid once the application is deemed complete: What type of Zoning Map Amendment are you applying for? m Zoning Map Amendment of less than 50 acres $2,688 ❑ Zoning Map Amendment of greater than 50 acres $3,763 To be paid after staff review for public notice: Most applications for a Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $215 + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) $1.08 for each additional notice + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost (averages between $150 and $250) ➢ Special Exception —provide written justification with application - $457 Other FEES that may apply: ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request $194 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,866 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,344 Resubmittal fees for original Special Use Permit fee of $3,763 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,881 The full list of fees can be found in Section 35 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Map Amendment Application Revised 11/02/2015 Page 4 of 4 AL$ L�RGiNL�' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 January 27, 2017 Clark Gathright 100 101h street NE Suite 200 Charlottesville, VA 22901-8393 RE: ZMA201600023, Brown Toyota amendment to Steep Slopes Designations Dear Clark, Fax (434) 972-4176 The request to amend the Preserved Slopes at the south end of the site has been analyzed and the following comments have been developed. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues. Our comments are provided below: Planning 1. Staff will be able to support eliminating the designation of Preserved Slopes which have already been graded to create the existing parking area. 2. Staff cannot support designating the new steep slopes that have been created by the fill activity and construction of the parking as Managed slopes. Designating these steep slopes as Managed would allow future clearing and grading activity which could have a detrimental impact to the adjacent wooded area which consists of an intermittent stream valley area a large system of Preserved Slopes. This area has been designated as Greenspace in the County's Comprehensive Plan/Pantops Master Land Use Plan in order to protect these critical resources. The steep slope area created by the fill and parking construction now connects to the larger existing system of designated Preserved slopes in the Greenspace area. These slopes are more consistent with the Preserved Slope characteristics identified in the Steep Slopes Ordinance than the characteristics identified for Managed Slopes. 3. Staff believes (and will recommend) that the slope area discussed in the comment (2.) above should be treated as Preserved slopes in order to protect the resources within the designated Greenspace area. The Preserved designation does have the potential to cause complications in the long-term if any maintenance or repairs are needed to the slope area, since the Preserved designation precludes most any disturbance activity on those slopes. Staff would like to further discuss potential ways to address this issue, including the potential use of a forest/open space Page I of 3 Revised 4-25-11 eke agreement in the Greenspace area (as suggested by the County Engineer below as a possible method to meet Water Protection Ordinance requirements). 4. Since a site plan violation exists for the construction of the parking lot in this area, staff recommends that a site plan amendment be submitted now to address the violation. Review of the site plan during the review of the rezoning request would allow for more detailed assessment of how to address stormwater management issues and protection of the adjacent greenspace area. Improvements identified through the site plan review process may address the issues identified in 2 and 3, above. 5. Staff would like to meet with you to further discuss the process and schedule for further review of this proposal. Zoning No additional comments regarding the rezoning request. The ZMA request is intended to address previously identified violation of steep slope provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Engineering and Water Resources The following comments related to engineering and water resources have been provided by Frank Pohl, the County Engineer: - A VSMP application is required, to address both ESC and SWM requirements. - Considering the violation occurred when offsite nutrient credits were not an option, it is recommended that the applicant meet at least 75% of required pollutant removal onsite. This can be done a number of ways, including forest/open space preservation and pervious pavers. If forest/open space preservation is utilized, it is recommended that the bamboo stand (an invasive) is eradicated from the preserved area. - During a staff site visit on Jan 11, 2017, drums and debris (concrete, stumps, etc.) were noted at the edge of the fill area. Recommend applicant identify contents and dispose drums and debris at an approved facility. - The surface of the lot shall be stabilized (e.g. pervious pavers, asphalt, etc.). Entrance Corridor No objection to the rezoning proposal. This portion of the property is not visible from the Entrance Corridor. VDOT N/A, as it relates to the rezoning request to change the steep slope designation. ASCA/RWSA N/A, as it relates to the rezoning request to change the steep slope designation. Revised 4-25-11 eke Page 2 of 3 Proffers No proffers have been submitted at this time. in general, proffers can provide a potential method of addressing a proposal's inconsistency with the comprehensive plan or other county policies, infrastructure deficiencies and/or other health,safety,welfare and issues. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resuhmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees The zoning ordinance to require that applicants pay for the notification costs for public hearings. Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees is needed: 172 Cost for newspaper advertisement 215 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $200 + actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) 387 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing, payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing needed. 172 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing 559 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the some time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is dbenish @albemarle.org. Sincerely, David Benish Chief of Planning enc: Action After Receipt of Comments Resubmittal Schedule Resubmittal Form Revised 4-25-11 eke Page 3 of 3 AL 4 IRGIN% County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Clark Gathright(cgathright@dgarchs.com) From: Cameron Langille—Senior Planner,J.T. Newberry—Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: July 21, 2017 Revision 1:September 13,2017 Subject: SDP201700031 Brown Auto Group—Minor Amendment The Planner for the Planning Services Division will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.) Comments for the ZMA Application Plan drawings: 1. [General Comment] In the side title bar of both drawings, please change the title to "Rezoning Application Plan." a. Please change the Sheet C-1.0 title bar at the bottom of the page to "Existing Conditions with Current Steep Slopes Overlay District from County GIS." b. Please change the Sheet C-1.1 title bar at the bottom of the page to "Area of Rezoning—New Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes." 2. [General Comment] On Sheet C-1.0, please remove the hatching and label for the proposed 2.52 acre Forest and Open Space Preservation Area. Please add the hatching to Sheet C-1.1, but amend the label so that it only states "Preservation Area—No Future Development." 3. [32.5.1 (c)] On Sheet C-1.0, please change the label for the hatched area representing the new steep slopes that have been identified by the survey as post-development features.The label should state "New slopes above 25%." �h..i C l.a.�,,,(�-,tc.•(-,o„�. ...-:. 0uo�� Ca+,I ce . 4. [32.5.2 (a)] Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78- 14C. Please amend the ownership name and addresses on Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia's First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 5. [32.5.2 (d)] Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the outer boundaries of all proposed Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas that will be changed through the rezoning.The proposed dimensions should be shown on Sheet C-1.1 of the ZMA Application Plan with a note stating that the measurements are from the post- development site survey conducted by Commonwealth Surveying, LLC Dated 08-16-2016. k c u;: Lt. tiil��t: u s F or y L4-p j 4- f'Gc rK R.io 4'f-ur co n.s y ¢-(.e no ,"( 6. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C-1.0, please list the existing steep slopes overlay districts (Managed, Preserved, or both Managed & Preserved) based on both the County GIS site survey condUttcd -by � �a. Sheet C-1.1 should list the proposed steep slopes overlay for each parcel based on the rezoning. 6.,4 166 ,. • S'.Ic c114.1, 7. [32.5.2(a)] On Sheet C-1.1, please add a note that lists the proposed steep slopes overlay districts for each parcel based on the rezoning. 1 • A. [32.5.2 (a)] Sheet C-1.0 is the "Existing Conditions" of the site based on the post-development topographic survey and current County GIS areas of Managed and Preserved slopes. Please amend the Steep Slopes table so that it lists the acreages of Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes that currently exist based on County GIS, and the post development survey. It should be broken into three overall sections, as shown in the example table below. The first column should list the TMP numbers.The second and third columns should list the existing acreages of Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes as measured currently in County GIS. The fourth and fifth columns should list the acreages of managed and Preserved Steep Slopes as measured by the survey conducted on 08-16-2016. The sixth and seventh columns should list the net change. a. Remove the Net Reduction Statement Below the Table. Steep Slopes Existing Steep Slopes Existing Steep Slopes per Post-Development Net Change Table per County GIS Survey dated 08-16-2016 Parcel Preserved Managed Preserved Managed Preserved Managed TMP 78-14 (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14A (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14E (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14C (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) (acreage) 1. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C-1.1, please add a new Steep Slopes table that lists the revised acreages for Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes for each parcel that will exist after the rezoning. Steep Slopes Table Proposed Steep Slopes After Rezoning Parcel Preserved Managed TMP 78-14 (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14A (acreage) • (acreage) TMP 78-14E (acreage) (acreage) TMP 78-14C (acreage) (acreage) Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blangille@albemarle.org or 296-5832 ext. 3432 for further information. 2 of ALg 11 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Clark Gathright(cgathright@dgarchs.com) From: Cameron Langille—Senior Planner,J.T. Newberry—Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: July 21, 2017 Revision 1:September 13,2017 Subject: 5DP201700031 Brown Auto Group—Minor Amendment The Planner for the Planning Services Division will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.) Comments for the Minor Site Plan Amendment drawings: 1. [General Comment] Per David Benish, Chief of Planning, this minor amendment will serve as the application plan for ZMA201600023, which is currently deferred. The purpose of that zoning map amendment (ZMA) is to reclassify the Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes located adjacent to the existing gravel areas at the back of the site to Managed Steep Slopes.The minor amendment will be reviewed until it is in a form suitable for use in the rezoning review. Doing so will ensure the minor amendment is consistent with the application plan considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.Rev.1:Comment addressed.Since the first review comments,staff and the applicant have agreed to separate this application into two separate documents: a minor amendment site plan, and a two page ZMA application plan. 2. [General Comment] Staff has conducted an audit of the site plan amendments for this property and determined that there have been at least six(6) minor amendments approved since 1998 for this site without any approved major site plan amendments. County policy requires a major site plan amendment for changes to final site plans once three (3) minor amendments have been approved. Staff will accept this application as a minor amendment to facilitate the review of the zoning map amendment. However,the next application submitted for this site should be filed as a major amendment that incorporates all of the site changes that have been approved on the previous minor amendments and letters of revision. A link to the Albemarle County Site Plan Amendment policy can be accessed HERE. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 3. [32.5.2 (a)] On Sheet C1.0, please amend the site data table so that the owner names and addresses are clearly identified with specific tax map parcel numbers. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78-14C. Please amend Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia's First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 4. [32.5.2(d)] Please provide the source and date of topographic information used to determine areas of existing Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes. Rev. 1:Comment not fully addressed. Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the proposed outer boundaries of all Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas that will be changed through the rezoning on Sheet C-1.1 of the Minor Site Plan Amendment. 5. [32.5.2(a)] Please amend the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0 so that each TMP number and its applicable zoning/overlay districts are individually listed. Please be aware that the primary zoning district for all four parcels is HC Highway 1 Commercial. Rev. 1:Comment addressed. 6. [32.5.2 (a)] Per Comment #5, please state each zoning overlay district in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. For example, TMP 78-14 is zoned Steep Slopes Overlay District (Managed and Preserved). Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Sheet C1.0 should be amended to list the steep slopes overlay designations that will exist after the rezoning is approved, i.e. "Managed Steep Slopes" or "Preserved Steep Slopes" or both "Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes." 7. [32.5.1 (c)] The current plans only label existing or proposed Preserved Steep Slopes. The plans need to include at least one exhibit that shows and labels the existing conditions, which include both Managed Steep Slopes and Preserved Steep Slopes within the area of rezoning. We recommend that Sheet C1.0 show all areas of existing Managed and Preserved Steep Slopes. Then, the exhibit on Sheet C1.1 could show the proposed Managed Steep Slopes per the rezoning. a. Areas of existing Preserved Steep Slopes proposed to be reclassified to Managed Steep Slopes with ZMA201600023 should be called out and labeled as "Existing Preserved Steep Slopes, Proposed Change to Managed Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023" on Sheet C1.1. Rev. 1: Please see comment#16 below. 8. [General Comment] In the "Revision to SDP200000049" table on Sheet C1.0, please amend the second bullet point to state "Rezoning to designate new Steep Slopes per ZMA201600023." Rev. 1:Comment addressed. 9. [32.5.2(b)] Please state the acreage of each property in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. Please provide the acreage of the rezoning area,the total acreage of the disturbance proposed by the new grading, and the acreage of proposed open space. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. [32.5.2 (r)] Please include a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 11. [32.7.3 and 4.12] For future zoning compliance inspections, please provide a calculation of the existing and required parking spaces on TMP 78-14, 78-14C and 78-14E. Rev.1: Comment addressed. 12. [4.20(a)] Please amend the setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.0. In the HC Zoning District,the minimum front setback is 10' from the right-of-way, and there is no maximum front setback since all structures existed as of June 3,2015.The minimum side and rear setbacks should state"Primary structures shall be constructed and separated in accordance with the current edition of the Building Code." The maximum side/rear setbacks should state "None." Rev. 1:Comment addressed. 13. [32.7.4] Please refer to Engineering Comment#1 regarding submittal and approval of a WPO plan prior to site plan approval. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See Engineering comments below. WPO is not yet approved and the minor amendment will not be approved until WPO approval. 14. [32.7.4.2] Please refer to Engineering comment#2 regarding approval and recordation of a stormwater easement plat and maintenance agreement prior to site plan approval. New Comments First Revision: 15. [32.5.2 (a)] Albemarle County GIS lists S&B Realty Venture LLC as the property owners of TMP 78-14A and TMP 78- 14C. Please amend the ownership name and addresses on Sheet C-1.0 or provide documentation that Virginia's First Family of Fine Cars owns TMP 78-14C. 16. [32.5.2(d)] Please provide the linear and curvilinear dimensions for the outer boundaries of all proposed Preserved and Managed Steep Slopes areas that will be changed through the rezoning.The proposed dimensions should be shown on Sheet C-1.1 of the Minor Site Plan amendment with a note stating that the measurements are from the 2 post-development site survey conducted by Commonwealth Surveying, LLC Dated 08-16-2016.An additional note may be required by the County based on what gets approved by the Board of Supervisors with ZMA201600023. Please contact Cameron Langille at the Department of Community Development at blangille@albemarle.org or 296-5832 ext.3432 for further information. Albemarle County Engineering Services—Bobby Jocz, riocz@albemarle.org—Requested Changes: 1. WPO plan will need approval prior to Site plan approval. 2. Remove Stormwater management sheet from plan set as it is included in WPO plan. Virginia Department of Transportation — Willis Bedsaul, willis.bedsaul@vdot.virginia.gov — See attached recommendation. 3