The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800090 Review Comments Letter of Revision 2 2019-04-09COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5832 April 9, 2019 Dustin Greene Roudabush, Gale & Associates 172 S Pantops Dr Charlottesville VA 22911 dgreene@rudabush. com M 7 of 7 ICI] WIN Dear Mr. Greene, The LOR application referenced above has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required: 1. [Comment] Application. There has been a LOR to this site plan previously (approved December 9, 2013). Please update the application materials to reflect that this is the second LOR. 2. [32.5.2(a)] Special Use Permit. On the Cover Sheet, please provide a note referencing the special use permit associated with this LOR as well as the conditions attached to the permit (see attached list of conditions for reference). 3. [32.5.2(a), SP2018000221 Conditions. Proposed Condition #3 of the special use permit requires proposed landscape elements located in the stormwater easement to be comprised of species on the County approved plant list. The proposed "Ilex meserveae" species does not appear to be on this list. Please review and revise the planting schedule accordingly. 4. [Comment] Landscaping Plan. It appears not all of the original landscaping elements, as approved in the original site plan, are reflected in the revised landscaping plan on Sheet S6. Specifically, shrubs surrounding Buildings A and B seem to be left off. Please include those elements on the submitted landscaping plan (see attached excerpt from 2010 site plan for reference). 5. 132.6.2(k), 4.171 Outdoor Lighting. The information panels for Proposed Light Fixture "D" were illegible. Please submit higher resolution images so this information can be read and evaluated against the County ordinances. 6. [Comment] Signature Block. Please remove the signature block on the Cover Sheet. It is not needed for a LOR (LORs are typically only signed by the lead planner). 7. [Comment] Check spelling in notes/labels on Sheets S4 and ST Revise as necessary. 8. [Comment] The special use permit associated with this LOR, SP201800022, will need to be approved before this LOR can be granted approval by the County. Frank Pohl — County Engineer 9. Sheet S5 - 1st note in lower left corner of sheet. Change "If construction exceeds 6,000 SF..." to "If the area of land disturbance exceeds 10,000 SF...". Heather McMahon — Architectural Review Board. See review comments attached. Kevin McCollum — Zoning. See attached parking determination. Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may be found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, k�ag* Mariah Gleason Senior Planner I Community Development mgleason@albemarle.org SP201800022 — Proposed Conditions 1. Development of the use shall be in general accord with the conceptual plan titled "Dogtopia" prepared by RJA Architect and Roudabush, Gale & Associates, with the latest revision date of 2/4/2019, as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator. To be in general accord with the Conceptual Plan, development shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the development: a. Location of outdoor play area and fence as shown on the plan. Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Outdoor play hours shall be restricted to no earlier than Sam and no later than 7pm. 3. The proposed landscaping within the stormwater drainage easement will be limited to shrubs and small trees (as listed in the County approved plant list). No medium or large tree(s) shall be planted within the easement. 4. Following the installation of all proposed noise mitigation improvements but prior to the final zoning inspection, the applicant must perform a noise test in accord with County Code § 18-4.18 and submit a report to confirm (to the County Engineer's satisfaction) that the proposed use will not exceed a 65-decibel maximum, as measured from the interior of the nearest tenant space. 5. A parking study shall be provided by the applicant, subject to approval by the Zoning Administrator, to confirm that there are a sufficient number of spaces on site and to ensure there are no parking conflicts with other shopping center tenants when more than the seven allotted parking spaces are needed, prior to the approval of the site plan amendment. 6. The fence shall not conceal any part of the triple window on the southeast corner of the building or either of the 2 easterly brick piers. 7. The fence material and detailing are subject to Architectural Review Board review. An 8- foot-tall fence shall have only bottom and top rails (no intermediate rails). The fence color shall be coordinated with the existing building colors and is subject to Architectural Review Board approval. 8. Landscaping shall be provided on the east and south sides of the fence to the satisfaction of the Architectural Review Board. 9. No tinted or reflective films or similar materials shall be applied to windows visible from the Entrance Corridor. Window glass visible from the Entrance Corridor shall remain transparent. w .... w ... .. _.. _' _-'•- . ..._ ! /r cP5EMDfcri ST M0ES B 4839-3 0 o .. I �o'T IDi�jAINA E -_mil= r - _ _. -.... .« .^ -: .., { 1-- t ; Qj I r E EM�NT 83�1-39; r _ _ _ _ • I �__Fa., ` ?' :> w _�. _ _ r: c 1. } 1 i ,} i — RTDI-ROCIt7'v``, r - r c r � , i WALL-uj 10 , • _ r PI 0 n �; r-- f 3••dC RE ti w _. I ALL -"A ....._.. . _..._ _ - _ MTH SAFETY ..° ° . t n;..q:z.. ��, ;<: • OR 1 +� J Se RAILING . 1 �• x�L'f,,�` 71 r+ 25• I . +aw:,.,. AG[ 1 fff ! # 1 1 1 _ •4 j+ `l. a_ j gam... t;� - - '. :s h: Rszr" f d { I 1 }� 1 £ ~` - 'T y 500- _. f_ : SED • .wa r� f m , r • r..� 1.� 1 a�" r .s rI .I I • ! • \ • 4 .^M1 '^:,`::fit...;: sneers:' :::::: r•� �_ : i - -max ,.� � 1 � , o•�� r� PR D ` ONE ST °RY ` _ - YCAR �ILf I -- - _ _ _ 4 � ..� �r � _6 NEAL N. WRIGHT } . % rf `; : 1 _ Lie. IVa. 22402 f1001 T Rw- .- 1 RE�_R� , . ... r: - •• .� ' 1'� - "` -.. �, ' --. W -. .� • s{ t - r dN A L F'e� d" f _ • '; i ; : `... r,- ` y k ..J `•., `rfj .• r f y,-y� ry ar ---. _' .. — "� • RETAI } 40 ;' .. -: _ r •: I .; 1 }� _ f WALL--q\AC kirj Tj } �RFE 1' 1 1 v' - . - ,. �. .� >t j s 4f. `^ d 1 CD C +�y r RAILINGcv \ • " - i a f.� - 1 _ 3G PLOL - x ti u y ^i s r ; i NI IN VARIABLE WIDTH a I STORM I j ` ,' .. \ rcPp 4 i i _ ' `�� w DRAINAGE I a �1� RE EASEMENT RED -ROCK r_. s !, `� \ l ' `` _ _ DB 3839-300 REt INGs~ I AG uA -0R I � '%2 - ..- .. :wez•• p'• :.r.`,';f, •,Ci - - - .- _— -- .r fI f , �� - aEC ..... T) C p w I � ,. f'; ,•. - - • ... F i Is � .''•• y' J -ya7a 'b'v %• � d1 � w . _ �F _ w -�7.F - AC I I I a P I j co CD r if 1 • r c Qrp Lu 498. 20' , s to r ' ^ i `^ �.. x ' u7 Gj � D6 3839 _ ��_i,,' I 1:11 1 1 co LeD 1 � S r� ,� . • pp p .I1 VARIABLE WIOT ! + Ir 14-Pt0L STORM ~ -� 5q DRAINAGE I 2 G}P EASEMENT DS 3839-300 ! r L 1MT w j _._ - _-- ----- - ! '- pB 3 1 S 27- I C5T 24- ICST . i \ • ' r i O �, w q I?. ICY + t� �, + r + I 11 _ _ , �I RETALNIN WALL SCHEDULE: �' POSE► i 1 _ _ - 71 I I DONE STOR� + ' � �jQ J ` "' � TYPE "A" REDI-ROCK ORANGE BASE / I I �� # N T o o r� B�1 LD . -� J I 4.10 r. , ' # . � �I --,WITH MEDITERRANEA TOPCOAT I j INGI A- 1 `464 _ _ - r PRO ONE4TORY - . ' - _ - . , - f y ' 4I84O S r _ � TILD + j �, _ , r= TYPE e LJJ � �N G-� FIELD BRICK; HARMAR J 1 GIB GT -- 627 FT. WASHINGTON ANTIQUE S.B. 4, 8On S - GT5 - . _ ,{ T # r r r r 1 r + • b e. FLASHED W f fQP . 49. IG5 f ( r' p ! i I I I j f I _ ', I STm DRAINAGE HE INSERT BELOW T Of FO .�` x ni .a� w :i I g�a I �.� ,�"s�eEaL — — - eNNTac�� - �;= _ -`` - _. BLACK METAL SAFETY RAILING TO BE J 26' PLOL 1 __- D 3839-300 PiArffIHGS �- r 731 _ ! ` ! '- 1 I `� - INSTALLED WALLS THAT EXCEED • A. _ •.--Fp�iR FEET IN HEIGHT 21 AGG r MPDD y �� 9 LC5 � \ d' VV L ESMT 4- IG59 s.,, 1- - -- •- . -- .'- � : ,................ �.......,., .�......�....,. .. r.>n ... C,7... z k 4� 1CI1 �a 2 CAKE G + G75 ► LG s' ! .... ._........ ri ✓ .... , f7t APPROX. LOC . - L,IG FIBS OPTIC LINE w inQ 0 0 i ATION d 0 I _ p O j �p 4 . ..-------..,.--.__ nAN EX157 72RNSA WAEERLI* ur IQ XA - ....;rn,a533x.... :::»•ss.:-.airExn...::;eansec¢:-:... ..-. .. :-::-�_ .r-maw �— Yid• r ............. a� ? -� . f/0 PED. �—+_-ram �. ' ..- � �APPROIf. LOCATION E?L iJIG FlBEIZ OPTI LINE ... ...... .-,....,.. . .......... I - AG 2- CAKf u4rr _ u � l .. f -. �:�- ti fir' _�.. _... .. -.. .�..... .-.LLJ � - y ..... ..... ,,. ... .. V. m. e. r,.>< :r: vs f .. ..........a r � SEMINOLE TRAIL _ r STATE ROUTE 29 r ;' VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT,OF WAY PLANT L15T K L Y]- 60"ANICAL NAME CDMAEDN NAME CALIPER hE1GHi REMAFZKS CANOPY [5P] I TOTALQUANTITY 12ANOFY [5F] 51ADIr TREES 1 1 ARA Acer rubr,Jm "Arrr-.:r A^mstro Re Iv?a e 3-5" 57 627 r CT5 G1edit5la trladcarltY:r�+ 5hddema5ter' '5•Eademaster' .ocu5t 3.5" 481 4.010 3 OPP Quercu5 pad unxr:5 r'-in ree Prinq-een P •� :)ak 2-`' 34 1 02 r3 QP Quercu5-phof111cp WdlomOak 2.5" 419 9,637 ORNAMENTAL TREES 9 AC k-lanchi 5fwe. ow 5er v, c e bL - -y 99 891 3 my M nok�a tnr iriarie Irr r':ckg 5weetba Magnd1a 4-5 77 231 1 2 LG qennroernija 1na1 a'Na ct;ei Natcnex' Cra emyrtle E'-7' 77 924 13ROADLEAF EVERGREENS 21 AG Abefia q ranaiF1e-a'C. ictt.' Ccnfgtt:' G : -,s Abe1,a 24' 1 4 294 I •i C57 Ilex r,rena[a , Se. me- t5 Com cta' Cor'racta' Y'chy 24' 1 6 S24 2 1 i:,'f Ilex crenara'h10e' hellen rfdly 24' 1 G 336 7 : lc I;er crera=a 'rx.': T ; h' Soft Toucn' h,:T _2 4' 1 6 1 1 3c 53 7 Gs iF Ilex cl Iabra'5lhari .x e' rlex'Patnot' '5h.ar,rock' he 'Patr'oL' hi0lIv 3G" E-7' 23 44 1219 306 9 LC5 Loh eta urn ce :e Suxanr.e' 'Suaanne Clyne se Fr.rae = ow or 2�" NIA N/A 72 Ml`�)❑ My ^cateriie?ra Co-15 Cwa!i d�^5 Dwari' ya berr ?4" 44 31 G5 S C7 PLO, Pr un u5 I a Lj,oc ykL-4 10 1070 CON1F>rR5 i J'e' ,funs perus+ rq inian� Eastern Red Cedar =' /' 19 95 ORNAMENTAL GRA55F5 AND GROUNDCOVER5 2 CAC` Calama moss a: Jt1' cra iarl Forrester' '.Car• Forreste^ `earner tieed Grass I Gal. NIA "A 208 1C Juripperus chrnneD5'r+ ar,ya' Parean'sJun, per 03 Gal. 3 c. C. N4A N/A Total Canopy (SF)-. 26,672 Note. - Al 1 0ar:i.rg5 cf tree and shruos 53h2 11 by all. -,Wed to reach 2'1d be ma1rta;red at mature he+aht. T`h,.E topp no of tree% 15 prchOi too; -hrub5 snag! Ve pruned mire ma Ily ano Crlly to �w^port the overall health of tthe 4,rub. 2. Afl !irut sa]orq the Entrance Cormc!�n r.•ialI be maintained i3 :. a hedge. /r rr E_ r , z LAND5CAPE REQUIREMENT5 J INTERIOR LAN D5CAPI NG: A AREA REQUIRED: 0.05'47,372 5P = 2,369 5F QUANTITY REQUIRED: I TREE PER 10 PARKING 5PACE5 Lu 153/ 10 = 15.3 ME5 REQ'D J QUANTITY PROVIDED: 14 Tree5Lu U TOTAL AREA: � Lu 2 REQUIRED: 0.10'59,572 5F = 5,987 51' cn AREA pRovl DED: 2E,672 5f DDR PROJECT NO: 70379 INDE TITLE: 5C H EWEL15 LAN D5CAPE REQU I REMENT5 S6 INTERIOR PARKING LAND5CAPING: 1" AREA REQU I RED: `• QUANTITY REQUIRED: I TREE PER 10 PARKING 5PACE5 2G110 = 2.G TRE5 REQ'D SHEET NO: 6 OF It 30 0 30 60 90 QUANTITY PROVIDED: 3 Tree5 {GT5} SCALE: 1" = 30' INSERT SCALE: V = 201 DATE: 5-2$-2008 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 April 9, 2019 Dustin Greene Roudabush, Gale & Associates 172 South Pantops Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: ARB-2019-32: Rivanna Plaza [Dogtopia], minor amendment [fencing, lighting, equipment] Dear Dustin, We have received the above -noted application for a county -wide Certificate of Appropriateness. The following revisions are requested to make the proposal consistent with the design criteria that apply to the County -wide Certificate. 1. Building elevations of the west, south, and east elevations of the existing building with proposed changes must be submitted for review. Revised building elevations must include the west, south, and east elevations of the proposed fence as well as the locations of the proposed wall -mounted light fixtures. 2. Provide the note about no tinted or reflective films will be applied to windows visible from the EC on revised architectural elevations. 3. The landscape plan provided on S6 does not meet the previous recommendation that the "landscape plan [be] denser [and] layered." A single row of evergreen shrubs interspersed by deciduous shrubs does not look naturalistic and is not an appropriate arrangement for screening. Screening landscaping should be staggered in a minimum depth of two rows: should be layered (i.e., tallest ornamental trees in back, smaller shrubs in front); and should have a naturalistic appearance. Revise the landscape plan to provide appropriate screening and to meet previously stated recommendations. 4. The landscape plan as well as the additional plant schedule on S6 suggests that 5 new MV (Sweetbay magnolia) are proposed. However, the MV cannot be located on the plan. The label and arrow appear to point to four existing shrubs on the property that are not labeled. Rectify this discrepancy and provide a larger landscape plan that is more legible. 5. Revise the plant schedule on S6 to correctly categorize the proposed plant species: glossy abelia is a deciduous shrub and the Castle Spire blue holly is an evergreen shrub. 6. Note that two out of three species proposed are deciduous and will not provide year -around screening. With the minimal amount of landscaping proposed, this is not acceptable. The landscape plan must provide a base of evergreen screening in which deciduous and ornamental trees and shrubs are added for visual variety. 7. Note that only one of three proposed species is native to the region, the other two are non -natives to North America. Also note that an ARB standard is that no proposed plant species exceed 25% of the total amount of proposed shrubs and trees. This is to ensure that a monoculture will not be planted for health and sustainability reasons as well as to provide the naturalistic planting pattern desired. The only way to achieve this is to add more species and variety to the planting plan. Please promote natives (and especially natives that are local to the Virginia Piedmont) in a more diverse planting plan. A list of plants native to the region can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/NativePlants/list.asp 8. The landscape plan (S6) shows trees on the southern property line with tree -protection fencing. At staff s last site visit in December, staff was unable to locate those trees on the ground. Conversely, the existing three Amelanchier canadensis and one crapemyrtle mentioned in a note on S6, which are north of the southern property line, on the slope and in the approximate location of the fence, are not labeled or marked "to be removed" on the plan. A site visit would clarify what exists on the property today. Please rectify the planting plan to clearly show what has been planted, what is proposed to be planted, and what is to be removed. 9. There are 20 ICST shrubs shown on the southern elevation of the building, which will fall inside the proposed enclosed area. If these are to be removed, this must be shown on the landscape plan (S6). 10. No stormwater easement has been depicted on the plan set; if an easement around the 42" storm pipe exists, it must be shown on the plans. 11. The luminaire schedule on S7 must be revised to include the three new proposed wall -mounted light fixtures. The Numeric Summary table on S7 should also be updated to reflect the additional light values added to the site plan. 12. One proposed wall -mounted light appears (in plan view on S7) to lie east and outside of the enclosed area. Clarify why this light is necessary if it lies outside of the fenced area. 13. The manufacturer's specifications for the lighting fixtures provided on S7 are too small and are illegible. Provide the manufacturer's specifications on 8.5 x 11" paper for review. Within 15 days of the date of this letter, please send me a letter (by email is acceptable) indicating whether you will or will not proceed with these revisions. If you choose not to proceed with these revisions, staff will be unable to approve your application. If you choose to proceed with the revisions, please forward me one set of revised drawings together with a memo summarizing the revisions you've made. Your decision to make the revisions will suspend the 60-day review period associated with your original submittal. However, I expect to complete the review of your revised proposal within 2 weeks of your re -submittal. If you have any questions about this action, please contact me as soon as possible. I look forward to receiving your revisions and completing this review with an approval letter. Sincerely, 9d1b0*_*0 Heather McMahon, Senior Planner hmcmahon@albemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3278 cc: ARB-2019-32 File Rivanna Plaza SPE LLC Attn: Mark Green 1208 Preston Ave. Charlottesville, VA 22903 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 February 19, 2019 Valerie Long c/o Williams Mullen 321 E. Main Street, Ste. 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB-2018-161: Dogtopia Dear Ms. Long, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on February 19, 2019, reconsidered issues related to ARB-2018-161: Dogtopia. By a vote of 4:0 the ARB took the following actions: The ARB has no objection to the proposed use with the following conditions: 1. The fence shall not conceal any part of the triple window on the southeast corner of the building or either of the 2 easterly brick piers. 2. The fence material and detailing are subject to ARB review. An 8-foot-tall fence shall have only bottom and top rails (no intermediate rails). The fence color shall be coordinated with the existing building colors and is subject to ARB approval. 3. Landscaping shall be provided on the east and south sides of the fence to the satisfaction of the ARB. 4. No tinted or reflective films or similar materials shall be applied to windows visible from the Entrance Corridor. Window glass visible from the Entrance Corridor shall remain transparent. The ARB offers the following comments to be addressed with the future site plan submittals: 1. Note that a Letter of Revision application will be required to update and amend the current site plan. 2. A County -wide Certificate of Appropriateness application for Equipment, Fencing or Lighting is required prior to approval of the LOR. 3. Provide a grading plan for review. 4. Provide a landscape plan that includes denser, layered landscaping on the east and south sides of the fence, and particularly at the southeast corner. Include evergreen shrubs that will mature to a height between 4 and 6 feet. 5. The fence shall not conceal any part of the triple window on the southeast corner of the building. 6. No tinted or reflective films or similar materials shall be applied to windows visible from the Entrance Corridor. Window glass visible from the Entrance Corridor shall remain transparent. 7. Consider breaking the 72-foot length with material variation, surface relief, detailing, breaks, or proj ections/recesses. 8. Revise the elevations to show the fence in its true configuration, with vertical posts and caps and horizontal members. 9. If the SimTek material is used, choose an alternate color that is better coordinated with the building materials. Provide a fence detail. 10. Provide information confirming that the SimTek material is durable and colorfast over time. 11. Provide a utility plan for review. 12. Provide standard mechanical equipment note to future site plans: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. 13. Provide a lighting plan that includes photometric values, manufacturer's specifications, and luminaire schedule for review. Include the standard lighting note on the lighting plan: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle. 14. Provide the standard plant health note on the landscape plan: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant. 15. Provide a grading plan that shows all grading outside the drip line of all trees to remain. 16. Provide adequate tree protection fencing on future site plans submitted for review. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Heather McMahon Senior Planner cc: Mark Green c/o Rivanna Plaza, LLC 1208 Preston Ave. Charlottesville, VA 22903 File Lp r COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 April 8, 2019 Dustin Greene Roudabush, Gale, & Associates, Inc. 172 South Pantops Drive, Suite A Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: Parking Determination — Rivanna Plaza SDP2008-90 Parking Study for Commercial Kennel (Dogtopia) Dear Mr. Greene: This letter is an official determination in response to your request for Zoning Administrator approval of the proposed commercial kennel (Dogtopia) parking. As recommended by the Planning Commission, the following is an analysis and confirmation that there will be sufficient parking on site with the addition of the commercial kennel use. The parking schedule of the approved site plan for Rivanna Plaza (SDP-2008-90 "Rivanna Plaza Final") shows 153 existing parking spaces on site. The proposed commercial kennel use would occupy an estimated 6,800 GSF of planned retail space within "Building A", as shown on the site plan. The parking calculation based on the approved site plan is provided below. Parking Schedule Retail: 5.5 parking spaces/1000 GSF Total GSF of Retail on site: 19,029 Required Parking: 105 spaces Daycare: 1 space/10 children + 1 space per employee Required Daycare Parking: 47 Total Parking Provided: 153 spaces Typically, for zoning clearances the parking requirement is determined by the approved parking schedule on the site plan. Rivanna Plaza, as you can see above, was approved as shopping center standard (10,000-24,999 GSF) and therefore the parking requirement for Dogtopia would be that same parking formula. The Planning Commission, however, has asked us to confirm that the site will have adequate parking using the commercial kennel parking calculation. Based on the approved site plan parking calculation for shopping center, there are 37 spaces allocated for the 6,800 GSF of retail space (5.5 spaces/1000GSF) in Building A that Dogtopia will be occupying. In accordance with Zoning Code Section 4.12.6, the proposed commercial kennel use, based on the data provided in the parking study, in this same space would require 22 parking spaces. April 8, 2019 Dogtopia Parking Determination Page 2 Commercial Kennel: 1 parking space/400 GSF including runs, plus one space/employee Required Spaces for 6,800 GSF of commercial kennel space: 22 parking spaces Therefore, whether the parking calculation is based on the shopping center standard shown on the site plan or the more specific commercial kennel standard, in accordance with Section 4.12.6 of the Zoning Ordinance, it is my official determination that the Rivanna Plaza shopping center, as shown on the approved site plan, will have adequate parking for the proposed commercial kennel use. If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty (30) days of this notice, in accordance with Virginia Code § 15.2-2311. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final and unappealable. An appeal may be taken only by filing an appeal application with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals, in accordance with § 34.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, along with a fee of $258 plus the actual cost of advertising the appeal for public hearing. Applications for Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's Determination are available at the Department of Community Development located at 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 or online at www.albemarle.org/cdapps. This form applies to the appeal of a decision of the zoning administrator or any other administrative officer pertaining to the Zoning Ordinance. Regulations pertaining to the filing of an appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals are located in Chapter 18, Section 34.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. They may be reviewed online at www.albemarle.ora/countvcodebza. (Please note that our online documents are in Adobe Acrobat PDF format and must be viewed with the Adobe Acrobat Reader or an equivalent. A link to download the free plug-in is available at the bottom of www.albemarle.org/cdapps.) Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Kevin McCollum Planner Designee to the Zoning Administrator ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. B A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVMNG Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PIANMNG E \GINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SO[ 1'TI I PAN FOPS DRIVE. S'I E. A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JI�1 L. IAGGARL P.L. CIIARLOFTESVILLE. VA22911 CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 2290'- p ILLIAM J. LEDBE I'l ER. L.S. DON FRANC'O. P.E. PHONE (4341979-8121 PHONE (434) 977-020-5 BRIAN D. JAMISON. L.S. DAVID M. ROBINSON. P.E. FAX (434) 979-1681 FAX (434) 296-5220 KRISTOPI IER C. WINTERS. L.S. AMMY M. GEORGE. PLA INFO,aROL DABI.Sl l.C'OUI March 18, 2019 Stephanie Banton, Planning Assistant Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE. Rivanna Plaza - SDP2008-00090 — Parking Study Dear Stephanie, The Planning Commission recommended a parking study be done as a condition for approval of the Letter of Revision. Please forward this information on to the Zoning administrator as a part of this submittal package. Parking Schedule of approved site plan for Rivanna Plaza PARKING SCHEDULE: RETAIL: (FORMULA: 5.511000 SF GLFA) GFA = 14,800 (BUILDING A) + 4,800 (BUILDING B) = 19,600/1.03 = 19,029 GFLA 19,029 GLFA/1000 = 19,029 SF X 5.5 = 105 RETAIL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED DAYCARE: 200 CHILDREN AT 1 SPACE PER 10 CHILDREN = 20 SPACES + 27 EMPLOYEES AT 1 SPACE PER I EMPLOYEE = 27 SPACES 47 DAYCARE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 153 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (6 HC + 1 LOADING + 146 REGULAR SPACES) 153 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (6 HC + 1 LOADING + 8 DROP-OFF + 138 REGULAR SPACES) PROPOSED PARKING: COMMERCIAL KENNEL - ONE SPACE PER 400 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA INCLUDING RUNS, PLUS ONE SPACE PER EMPLOYEE. 2.5 SPACES / 1000 SF GLFA < 5.5 SPACES / 1000 SF GLFA PARKING ALREADY PROVIDED FOR EXISTING RETAIL SPACE = (6,800 / 1,000) * 5.5 = 37.4 SPACES PARKING REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL KENNEL = [(6,800 / 1,000) * 2.5] + 5 MAX SHIFT = 22 SPACES Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Dustin Greene, EIT