Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA197400044 Application 1974-11-11 • .App licat ' ) n for \fari ar : e or • • Special Exception . TO: THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, ALBEMARI.F. COUNTY,. VIRGINIA .\RIANCE NO.\/A -14-44 The undersigned applicant is(are) the owner of the following described property: • A PLAT OF THIS PROPERTY MUST BE ATTAQIED HERETO AND MADE • A PART OF TI1IS APPLICATION. • GIVE LOCATION BY REFERENCE TO NEAREST ROAD INTERSECTION. DIMENSIONS OF SITE MUST BE GIVEN. Georgetown Limited 1/We Partnership respectfully request the Zoning Administrator of Albemarle County, Virginia to grant the Variance or Special .xception stated below in the Charlottesville Magisterial District and described as County Tax Map 61 Parcel _42 containing 1. 0582+-acres and zoned R-3 . Georgetown Limited Partnership Applicant Signatureby Date 1 1/11/7 4 • The petitioner requests that the Zoning Administrator grant: � •� . A variance in the amount of. off street parking required for construction of an additional - apartment unitsto the Westgate Apartments 2- t C • t The applicant makes this request because: .`See attached covering letter • • Action Taken by the Zoning Administrator: Approved Denied Signed -- ------------ — TO: THE ALBEMARI.F COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS--— — — -- ---- ------ -- • Georgetown Limited Date xr L'We Partnership hereby appeal the rul ng of the Zoning Administrator of Albemarle County on the foregoing application, and respectfully request a eversal of his decision by granting • the request for a varian s e ' 1 ,ce 'on as stated above. G rg L m' rship Applicant Signature by Pa Address P. 0. Box 5526 , Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 Phone Number 804-296-4141 • • ACTION BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DATE APPROVED DENIED 1111/ GREAT EASTERN COMPANIES P. O. Box 5526 CHARLOTTESVILLE VIRGINIA 22903 (804) 296-4141 November 12 , 1974 Mrs . Ruth Miller Zoning Administrator County Office Building East High Street Charlottesville, Va. RE: Georgetown Limited Partnership Request for Parking Variance Dear Mrs. Miller: Enclosed herewith please find our check for $20. 00 and an application requesting the Board of Zoning Appeals to grant us a variance on the number of parking spaces required for the final 16 apartment units of Westgate. Upon filing our site plan for approval with the Planning Commission, we were unaware that a new off-street parking ordinance had been adopted. As a result, our plan was design- ed using 1-1/2 spaces per unit. We are requesting that the Board of Zoning Appeals approve our site plan with 24 spaces for the 16 units. You may recall that we were happy to cooperate with the Plan- ning Staff and Highway Department in not previously building on this corner property in an effort to hold down the right of way acquisition cost on the proposed improvements to the Georgetown-Hydraulic Road intersection. For the last 2-1/2 years we have worked closely with Bob Warner of the Highway Department and have waited patiently for the proposed realign- ment to come from the Highway Department' s Culpeper office. In spite of the fact that the preliminary plans were due some eighteen months ago, we did not get a copy of these until October of this year. Our proposed set back from Hydraulic Road on the new build- ings respects the preliminary proposal for the realignment of Hydraulic Road even though it does create some hardships for us. Because of the way we had to place our buildings on the site, it will be necessary for us to install a very expensive sewage pumping system. DEVELOPMENT • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT Mrs. Ruth Miller Page 2 November 12, 1974 Although there is enough room on the site to build two park- ing spaces per unit, it would require cutting all the trees which would detract not only from the apartments but also from the attractiveness of the wooded area on the corner of Hydraulic and Georgetown Roads. In addition, to build the extra spaces would necessitate our constructing yet another entrance to the site from Hydraulic Road which we feel could creates an even greater traffic bottleneck in the area. Our two new buildings will contain 16 units (eight two bed- room apartments and eight efficiency units) which will give us a total of 112 units . Of this total, 24 units are effi- ciency type and an additional 52 are one bedrooms . These two smaller type of apartments total 76 out of the 112 or approximately 68% of the units. Although I will agree that two parking spaces are needed for two bedroom type units , it has been our experience that 1-1/2 spaces per unit are more than adequate for one bedroom type units. I would also like to point out that we have 148 spaces on our site which is four more than the required number of 144 for our existing 96 units. In addition, a recent count showed approximately 85% of all the cars in our parking lot to be the mid-sized or compact variety. I would appreciate your reviewing our request and advising us if you need any further information. Naturally, we would like to be put on the Board of Zoning Appeals adgenda just as soon as possible as we are anxious to begin construction on these units. The recent conditions in the money market and economy in general have made it difficult to keep our crews busy and we would like very much to use this small project to keep our key people on the payroll through the winter. Sincerely, GEORG WN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By arles M. Ro in, Jr. General Partner CMRjr:rhp Enclosures