HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201700036 Review Comments As-Built Reviews 2019-04-25COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project title:
Project file number:
Plan preparer:
Owner or rep.
Plan received date:
Rev. 1 received date:
Date of comments:
Rev. 1 comments:
Reviewers:
Michelle & Barry,
VSMP Permit plan review
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority New Ivy Solid Waste Transfer Station
WP0201700036 — Amendment 1 (AS -BUILT REVIEW)
design: SCS Engineers — Anthony Tomlin [ttomlin@scsengineers.com]
As -built: Lincoln Surveying
RSWA — Phillip McKalips [PMcKalips@rivanna.org]
Michelle Simpson[msimpson@rivanna.org]
Barry Hertzler — Project Manager [BHertzler@lantzcc.com]
28 Nov 2018
19 Apr 2019
11 Dec 2018
25 April 2019
Emily Cox
See updated comments below.
We received as -built drawings for the above referenced plan. In order to process these as-builts
and close out the DEQ general construction permit, the items below need to be addressed. It is our
understanding that some items have been shared with the County inspector, John Yerby, however,
please provide all items in one, concise package for review. If you have any questions, feel free to
contact me.
1. Provide a bond inspection request form. Since this is a County project, there is no fee
associated, but the application is still necessary. Form can be found here:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms_center/departments/Community Develop
ment/forms/bonds/Bond_ Inspection_ Request_Form.pdf Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. Termination form:
https://www.deq.vir ig nia.gov/Portals/O/DEQ/Water/Publications/CGPNoticeofrerminatio
n20l4.pdf Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
Ensure all applicable items in the following checklist are provided:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/ima,ges/forms_center/departments/Community Develop
ment/forms/applications/WPO_VSMP_Construction _ Record_ Drawings Policy 23MU20
14.pdf
It appears the following items are still necessary:
a. Inspection records.
b. Geo-coordinates of all facilities.
c. Verified drainage area maps.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
d. As -built profiles (as -built plan -view was provided).
e. Computations or verification/certification that as -built is equivalent or better than
design. (Per County code 17-422-D....."...certifying that the stormwater
management facility has been constructed in accordance with the approved plan.."
f. Ditch lines on as -built.
g. Material layers.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. See attached pictures. Structure Al2 has a pipe outfalling directly into it. This is not
shown on the approved plans or the as -built. Where is this pipe coming from? Is it the
outfall of the trench drain? Please have your engineer review as this is not allowed. If the
water is supposed to be going into the sand filter, it obviously is not. If the water is
allowed to be bypassed, it should be tied into the structure, not outfalling on top.
I
....... 1 ,. =�r �� _ 1 ,�yf�'�.. ,�F.a��'�.a.=�'�.t�d'-fix 5—'_•. -_ .,. .. \T-. .