HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201900013 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2019-05-03County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memarandnm
To: Ryan Perkins, P.E. (ryan.perkins(&kimley-horn.com)
From: Andy Reitelbach, Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: May 2, 2019
Subject: SDP2019-00013 — Wawa at Pantops — Final Site Plan
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development will
recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The
following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added
or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County
Code.]
New Comments — First Review of Wawa at Pantops Final Site Plan (SDP2019-00013):
[General Comment] This parcel is potentially within the Monticello Viewshed. It is recommended you contact Liz
Russell at Monticello to discuss this project if you have not already done so.
2. [General Comment; Chapter 14, Subdivision Ordinance] An easement plat is currently under review for Pantops
Corner (SUB2019-00059). Any easements on this plat that affect TMP78-5A will have to be shown on the site plan,
with deed book and page numbers referenced. The dedication of land for the widening of Route 250 is also included on
this plat, so the reference for this plat will be required for that dedication shown on the site plan once the plat is approved
and recorded.
3. [General Comment] Please be aware that existing conditions and boundary lines will change, as the site plan and road
plan for Pantops Corner have not been approved yet. These elements will have to be revised on this Wawa site plan to
reflect what is included in the final approved versions of the Pantops Corner plans.
4. [General Comment; 4.15] Signs are not approved with the site plan. Signs, such as the monument signs depicted, are
reviewed and approved through a separate sign application process, which includes ARB review as this site is within the
Entrance Corridor.
5. [32.5.2(k)] Please show the location of all proposed sewer and drainage easements. Label as "proposed" with a size/width
measurement.
6. [32.5.2(1)] Please show the location of all proposed utility easements. Label as "proposed" with a size/width
measurement.
7. [32.5.5(a)] Revise the title of the site plan to reference the application number for the final site plan — SDP2019-00013.
8. [32.7.91 Provide the equivalent acreage in the landscaping schedules, as well as equivalent square footage of impervious
areas and paved areas on the site date cover sheet for ease of comparison — the paved parking area may be 36,154 square
feet in the landscape schedule on sheet CP-101.
9. [32.7.91 Label the proposed VEPCO easement on the landscaping plan. It appears that trees along Pantops Corner Way
may interfere with this easement. There is a gray dashed line extending from Route 250 along Pantops Corner Way to
Travelway B, approximately 5 feet off the property line. There is also no clear label of this line on the site plan.
In addition, as previously mentioned, there is an easement plat under review for Pantops Corner. Please be aware of
these proposed easements, as landscaping may not be able to share space with these easements.
10. [4.17] The light poles directly to the south of the Pantops Corner Way entrance, along the frontage of Route 250, and in
the northeastern -most parking island appear to be covered with trees. It is suggested that these lights be moved so there
is no interference with the landscaping.
11. [4.17] The wall mount lights do not appear to be full cut-off fixtures. Please revise.
Comments from SDP2018-00078 — Wawa at Pantops Initial Site Plan Action Letter:
The original comments from the review and action letter for SDP2018-00078 are in gray font. Follow-up comments from the
review of the final site plan, SDP2019-00013, are in bolded black font. Please address these follow-up comments as well.
1. [General Comment] The final site plan for the Wawa at Pantops project will not be granted approval unless either one of the
two conditions below is met:
a. The final site plan for Pantops Corner (project number SDP2018-00089, prepared by Shimp Engineering) is granted
approval, and the proposed private street, known as Pantops Corner Way (along with all sidewalks, landscaping, the
private access way that stubs out to the east adjacent to the Malloy Ford property, and all other associated
improvements), is either constructed or bonded.
b. The proposed private street, known as Pantops Corner Way (along with all sidewalks, landscaping, the private access
way that stubs out to the east adjacent to the Malloy Ford property, and all other associated improvements), is shown
as an integral part of the proposed plan on the Wawa at Pantops final site plan. This option will require these
improvements to be constructed and installed as part of the development of the Wawa property. Staff acknowledges
applicant's desired course of review for this site plan. SDP2018-00089, Pantops Corner, must be approved
prior to approval of this site plan. As SDP2018-00089, is still under review, elements may continue to change.
Those revisions will also have to be reflected in the site plan for Wawa.
In addition, the following comments must be addressed before the Planning Division will recommend approval of the final
site plan for the Wawa at Pantops project:
2. [General Comment] Because this project involves improvements that are located on other parcels, these other parcel numbers
and the site information data for these parcels should also be included. (Parcels 78-58G1 and 78-513) A boundary line
adjustment plat has recently been approved by the County with additional parcels, TMP78-5E and 78-5C. These parcel
2
numbers will also have to be included in the site data on the cover sheet, as the proposed Pantops Corner Way and
street improvements cross these parcels.
In addition, a boundary line adjustment plat will have to be submitted and reviewed by County staff regarding the
Wawa parcel, as the property lines shown on this plan differ from existing conditions. Staff acknowledges that the
BLA may not be submitted until the location of the proposed road and improvements has been approved.
3. [General Comment] The Existing Conditions sheet should show what the actual conditions are at the site today, not what is
proposed on other site plans, and should include all three parcels involved in the overall development of this area, as the
proposed travelways are partially on those parcels.
What is currently shown on the Existing Conditions sheet should be shown on a separate page indicating that these
improvements are shown on an approved initial site plan, along with that plan's application number, SDP201800039. Revise
the name of sheet #CV-102 to "Pantops Corner SDP2018-00089 Improvements."
4. [32.5.2(a)] Identify the setback lines on all sheets showing the property, including on the other two parcels for the Existing
Conditions and requested new sheets. Also provide a front setback line along the Pantops Corner Way frontage of the
Wawa parcel.
5. [32.5.2(a)] Please provide the tax map and parcel numbers for all three parcels involved in the overall development of this
project, including the two parcels adjacent to Wawa's that include the proposed new roads and travelways.
Also, include the full 14-digit TMP number for each of these three parcels (e.g., 07800-00-00-005AO). Revise the Pantops
Corner site data table with parcels TMP78-5C and TMP 78-5E, as SUB2019-00002, a boundary line adjustment plat,
has caused these two parcels to also be included.
6. [32.5.2(a)] The Overlay District note on the cover sheet should include "Steep Slopes — Managed," as well as the overlay
districts found on the other two parcels, which include "Steep Slopes — Preserved" and Floodplain Hazard Overlay District."
These various overlay districts should be identified by which parcels they are located on. These overlay districts should also
be shown on each sheet where the property is shown, including the Existing Conditions, Site and Utility Plan, and Landscape
Plan, as well as the requested new sheet from comment #2.
In addition, all other aspects of the Project Data should include information for all three parcels, as a portion of this project
does extend on the two adjacent parcels as well. The site data for Pantops Corner (78-G1, 78-511, etc.) also needs to
include Steep Slopes — Managed.
7. [32.5.2(a)] In the project data information on the cover sheet, include that state and federal dam break inundation zones
overlay parcels 78-58G1 and 78-513. Also, on the existing conditions sheet and the requested new sheet, shown the limits of
these two zones. Comment addressed.
8. [32.5.2(a)] In the project data information on the cover sheet, identify the building setbacks for front, rear, and side yards,
and label accordingly. Include the building separation note for side and rear setbacks of commercial properties in the
site data on the cover sheet — see 4.20 of the Zoning Ordinance.
9. [32.5.2(a)] Please include a note describing the zoning map amendment that relates to this property, ZMA2013-00002, as
well as a list of the proffers and conditions included in that ZMA. Comment addressed.
10. [32.5.2(a)] In the title, please specify that it is the Rivanna Magisterial District. Comment addressed.
11. [32.5.2(a)] Please include a numeric scale, in addition to the graphic that is already included Comment addressed.
12. [32.5.2(a)] On all sheets showing the property, please include the names of the owners, the zoning district, the tax map and
parcel numbers, and the present uses of all abutting parcels. Revise the adjacent properties information with the new
configuration of boundary lines and uses, as approved with SUB2019-00002.
13. [32.5.2(a)] Provide the dimensions and deed book and page number of the re -located VEPCO easement along Route 250 that
is shown on sheet CS-101. Comment still applies.
14. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the proposed height of the canopy structure on the cover sheet, in addition to the height of the convenience
store building that is already provided. Comment addressed.
15. [32.5.2(b)] Please revise the parking schedule on the cover sheet. Please see the following comment from the Zoning Division:
After reviewing your request for a waiver to the maximum allowed parking, Zoning has reconsidered the parking calculation
used for the use proposed with this plan. Instead of the 1 space per 200 sq. ft. of floor area, Zoning recommends that the site
plan use the following calculation. Revise the plan as noted below:
SHEET CA-100
BUILDING AREA
6049 SF GFA
PARKING
1 SPACE PER 100 SF OF RETAIL SALES AREA FOR THE FIRST 5000 SF OF
REQUIRED
RETAIL SALES AREA. RETAIL SALES AREA = 80% OF THE GROSS FLOOR
AREA (GFA)
6049 * 0.8 = 4839
4839 / 100 = 48
PARKING
48 SPACES
PROVIDED
Comment addressed.
16. [32.5.2(b)] Please include the maximum amount of impervious area allowed on the site. Comment addressed.
17. [32.5.2(b)] Include the maximum amount of paved parking and other vehicular circulation areas. This note should include
those travelways extending onto the adjacent parcels. Comment addressed.
18. [32.5.2(b)] Please clarify that the "Maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation" is for the landscaping
purpose Comment addressed.
19. [32.5.2(d)] Identify on the plans on all sheets those areas of the three parcels that are either managed steep slopes or preserved
4
steep slopes. Comment addressed.
20. [32.5.2(h)] Identify the boundaries of the flood hazard overlay district on all sheets showing the property. Comment
addressed.
21. [32.5.2(i)] Provide the right-of-way width for U.S Route 250 on sheet CS-101. Comment addressed.
22. [32.5.2(i)] As Pantops Corner Way and the access road to the north of the property are required for development of the Wawa
parcel, these proposed streets need to be shown on the proposed site plan. They need to be included as integral parts of this
site plan, not shaded grey with the expectation that they are already in place. There is no final site plan approved yet for the
other two parcels, and the construction of the entire road network in this area, so the timing of development is not yet known.
In addition, the widening of U.S. Route 250 to accommodate a turn lane must also be included on this plan.
All other required improvements must also be shown, including sidewalks and landscaping along both sides of the two new
streets (Pantops Corner Way and the access street to the north of the Wawa property), and along the turn lane of Route 250.
These improvements must be shown on this site plan, as this site plan must be able to stand on its own, in case a final site
plan for the adjacent properties does not get approved, or if this project moves toward construction prior to the project on the
adjacent parcels. Acknowledged. Please be aware that elements may change until SDP2018-00089 is approved by the
County, and any such changes will have to be reflected in this site plan for the Wawa, if applicable.
23. [32.5.2(i)] Identification of public access easements along the proposed Pantops Corner Way and the street north of the Wawa
parcel must be shown on the site plan. Comment addressed.
24. [32.5.2(i)] Provide the right-of-way lines and widths, and the pavement widths, for all of the new streets proposed for this
project, including Pantops Corner Way, the new street to the north of the Wawa property, and the 250 turn lane widening.
Comment addressed.
25. [32.5.2(m)] The existing ingress/egress to the property should be shown on the existing conditions sheet. Comment
addressed.
26. [32.5.2(m)] Provide sight lines at intersections, to ensure vegetation and signage does not interrupt the required sight
distances. Comment addressed.
27. [32.5.2(n)] Clarify the width of the sidewalk on the south side of the building, as well as identifying the structure that appears
to be in the middle of that sidewalk. Provide a label on the site plan for the front porch/awning structure.
28. 132.5.2(n), 4.171 Please provide a full lighting plan with the final site plan in compliance with Section 4.17 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Comment addressed.
29. [32.5.2(n)] Please provide the location of all existing and proposed improvements, including the new roads and sidewalks
that extend onto the adjacent properties.
The full set of improvements for the adjacent properties (SDP201800039) should be shown on a new sheet, not the existing
conditions sheet. Comment still applies until SDP2018-00089, Pantops Corner, is approved, and all improvement shown
on the approved plan are reflected on the Wawa plan.
30. [32.5.2(n)] Please provide the footprint of the canopy on sheet CS-101. Comment addressed.
31. [32.5.2(n)] Reduce the height of the canopy, as requested by the County's Architectural Review Board. Current development
review staff defers to ARB on this comment. Canopy height must meet requirements of the ARB.
32. [32.5.2(n)] Sidewalks must be provided along both sides of the two new streets, as well as along 250. Please show them.
Final location will be determined with the approval of SDP2018-00089. This site plan must reflect the improvements
as shown on that approved site plan.
33. [32.5.2(n)] In the dumpster enclosure area:
a. What is the proposed material for the enclosure screening? Comment addressed.
b. What is the structure in the top left corner of the enclosure? Label this structure on the site plan.
c. Provide the dimensions of the enclosure and concrete pad in front of it. Comment addressed.
34. [32.5.2(n)] What are the dimensions of the loading zone? Comments addressed.
35. [32.5.2(n)] Provide bumper blocks in all parking spaces that are adjacent to a sidewalk. Comment addressed.
36. [32.5.2(n)] Provide ADA-accessible ramps at all crosswalks, as well as adjacent to the ADA-accessible parking spaces. A
sidewalk also must be installed at the northeast corner of the site, at the stub of Travelway B into TMP78-6; a crosswalk
and ADA ramps must also be installed across this entrance to connect those sidewalk sections.
37. [32.5.2(n)] Provide the distance from the gas tanks to the edge of the canopy. Comment addressed.
38. [32.5.2(p)] The landscape plan must show all landscaping that is currently shown on the approved initial site plan,
SDP201800039. Please be aware that landscaping shown on the plan may change depending on what is included in the
final approved version of SDP2018-00089.
39. [32.7.9] On the landscape plan, provide the length of the parcel's frontage along each of the roadways so that staff may
accurately calculate the number of street trees required. In the landscape schedule, provide the various frontage lengths
and the number of trees required.
40. [32.7.9] On the landscape plan, provide the number of proposed parking spaces so that staff may accurately calculate the
number of interior trees required. Comment addressed.
41. [32.5.2 (e)] Please provide more details about the existing landscape features as described in Section 18-32.7.9.4(c).
a. The Albemarle County Conservation Plan Checklist and Chapter 3.38 of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
handbook. The Conservation Plan Checklist will need to be signed by the owners and provided as an exhibit on the
6
final site plan. Comment addressed.
42. [32.7.9] On the plant schedule, provide the canopy area for each tree. Comment addressed.
43. 132.7.9.91 Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating, "All landscaping shall be installed by the first planting season
following the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within the development." Comment addressed.
44. 132.7.9.91 Please add a note to the Landscape plans stating "All landscaping and screening shall be maintained in a healthy
condition by the current owner or a property owners' association, and replaced when necessary. Replacement material shall
comply with the approved landscape plan." Comment addressed.
45. 132.6.2 (h)] Please provide a signature panel with a line for each member of the Site Review Committee. Comment
addressed.
46. [32.7.91 Please provide individual landscaping schedules for required landscaping in accordance with Sections 32.7.9.5,
32.7.9.6, 32.7.9.7, 32.7.9.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Each schedule should state the Botanical Name and Common Name of
each species proposed, the proposed caliper and height at time of installation, and the canopy coverage area per plant species.
The canopy area for each species can be found on the Albemarle County Recommended Plants List and Albemarle County
Plants Canopy Calculations tables. PDFs of these documents can be accessed through the Department of Community
Development webpage: LINK. Additional comments may be provided regarding landscaping once a more complete landscape
plan has been submitted.
a. [32.7.9] Indicate what landscaping is being used to fulfill the requirement for the required parking lot landscaping.
Provide calculations showing how the "maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation" of 5%
requirement for landscaping is being met. Provide the square footage of the individual parking lot planting areas
so staff can calculate the required amount.
b. [32.7.91 Please provide calculations for tree canopy coverage, including if any existing trees are proposed to count
toward this requirement. Also, any plant under five feet in height (32.7.9.8(b)), including shrubs, does not count
toward the required canopy coverage amount. Additional tree canopy coverage must be provided. Canopy coverage
must be 10% of the overall site. Comment addressed.
Please contact Andy Reitelbach in the Department of Community Development at areitelbach(cr�,albemarle.org or 434-
296-5832 ext. 3261 for further information.
Comments from Other Reviewers:
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) — John Anderson, janderson2&albemarle.org_— Requested
Changes; please see the attached memo.
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) — Andy Slack, aslackkalbemarle.org — Approved; please see the
attached memo.
Albemarle County Building Inspections — Michael Dellinger, mdellinger(c�r�,albemarle.org — Requested Changes; please see
the attached memo.
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) — Heather McMahon, hmcmahonL&albemarle.org — Requested
Changes; please see the attached memo.
Albemarle County Fire Rescue — Shawn Maddox, smaddox(c�r�,albemarle.org —No Objection; please see the attached memo.
Albemarle County Service Authority — Richard Nelson, rnelsonkserviceauthority.org — Pending; comments will be
forwarded to applicant upon receipt.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority — Victoria Fort, vfort@rivanna.org — Pending; comments will be forwarded to
applicant upon receipt.
Virginia Department of Transportation — Adam Moore, Adam.Moore@vdot.vir ingia.gov — Requested Changes;
please see the attached memo.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project: Wawa Pantops Corner — Final Site Plan
Plan preparer: Ryan Perkins, Kimley-Horn Associates, 1700 Willow Lawn Drive, Suite 200
Richmond,VA 23230 [ryan.perkins(a-)kimley-hom.com ]
Owner or Rep: Pantops Corner LC, 12704 Crimson Court, Suite 101; Henrico,VA 23233-7657
Applicant: Paul Sprouse, The Rebkee Company, 2800 Patterson Ave, Suite 200
Richmond, VA 23221 [psprouse(a)rebkee.com]
Plan received date: 6 Mar 2019
Date of comments: 23 Apr 2019
Reviewer: John Anderson
Project Coordinator: Andy Reitelbach
SDP2019-00013 (Comments below from ISP, SDP2018-00078)
CA-100
1. Provide 1" =2,000 (or less) scale vicinity map. (FSP) Addressed.
2. Include SDP201800078 in revised initial site plan title. (FSP) Addressed. As follow-up: With
assignment of FSP file identifier, please revise next submittal to ref. SDP2019-00013.
3. Engineering recommends include ZMA201300002 proffer on title sheet. (FSP) Addressed.
4. Ref. WP0201800088 (Pantops Corner VSMP Plan) as well as WP0201400028, Mass Grading
and Erosion & Sediment Control Plan for Pantops Corner, approved 6/11/14, with estimated area to
be disturbed =7.01 Ac. (FSP) Addressed.
5. Note: Site under development does not have an existing stormwater management plan. A Mass
Grading and ESC Plan was approved, 6/11/14. No development layout is shown with the Mass
Grading and ESC Plan. Grandfathering (9VAC25-870-48) would not apply in this instance, for this
reason. VARIOE170 (VSMP Program VPDES) permit was issued for mass grading on 9/9/14.
Grading has been performed, and site should be stabilized. If mass grade operations are complete, and
site stabilized, it is time to terminate VAR10E170, and apply for a new VSMP permit for never -
reviewed proposed development on this parcel. Further, VDEQ SWCGP database lists Construction
Activity Operator (VAR10E170) that does not match Initial Site Plan Owner information. Albemarle
does not accept the position that this development is eligible for grandfathering, but views development
subject to stormwater quality and quantity requirements at 9VAC25-870-65 and 9VAC25-870-66.
(FSP) Review error. Comment withdrawn.
CV- 101 (Existing Conditions)
6. Do not show: (FSP) Item 6 Addressed.
a. Proposed development on TMP 78-58G1, which does not exist.
b. Any proposed development features on TMP 78-5A, unless they exist.
C. Show existing features only. If Applicant arranged with Planning Division to represent
proposed features on CV-101 (Existing conditions), provide whatever elements were
requested as an Exhibit or separate ISP sheet with appropriate title.
7. Do show: (FSP) Item 7 Addressed.
a. Full width of U.S. Rt. 250 where it fronts TMP #78-5A. Show existing travel lanes, turn
lanes, traffic signs, median, etc.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 5
b. Steep slopes (Ref. County GIS Critical Resource layer). Managed steep slopes exist on
this parcel.
C. Proposed RW for private road Pantops Corner Way. (FSP) Addressed. AAPplicant
response: `The proposed public access easement for the Pantops Corner Way is shown on
Sheet CV-102 and CS-101. There is no proposed right-of-way for this road.'
8. Add Note stating that all known existing easements are shown, or that none exist on TMP# 78-5A.
(FSP) Addressed.
9. Provide Ownership information for parcel under development, and adjacent parcels: provide
TMP#, owner name, DB/PG. (FSP) Addressed.
CS- 101 (Site and Utilitv Plan
10. Transfer proposed development features from CV- 101 to CS- 101, including:
a. For FSP approval (submit /respond to comments until approved):
i. Retaining wall design, since proposed retaining walls support necessary
infrastructure (engineered plans, not generic manufacturer's details). Consider
county retaining wall plan review checklist. (FSP) Not addressed. See proposed
plan view information, Final Site Plan checklist (Attached). Engineering restates
requests for design to consider retaining wall plan review checklist. Specifically:
1. Provide complete retaining wall design specific to site design and site
geotechnical parameters sealed by a geotechnical PE, for all walls that
support infrastructure, roads, parking lots, drive aisles, or in close proximity
to a property line. Final Site Plan checklist for reviewers states: `Retaining
Wall Plans checklist. Any walls supporting roads or necessary infrastructure
require engineered plans (not generic manufacturer's details) and computations.
{Design Manual, section 81 This will also be required where walls are close to
property lines and there is the danger of affecting neighboring property, either
during construction, with later failures, or with pedestrian or vehicle safety.
These concerns can be alleviate with layout spacing also. In any case, retaining
walls will require building permits at construction.'
2. Delete reference labels that appear to transfer design responsibility to
Pantops Corner Development. Engineering requires retaining wall design
checklist items for retaining walls integral to Wawa site development.
3. Provide private easements for retaining walls (Access /maintenance).
4. Label all six sets of retaining walls shown on plan sheet CV-102
(including a 2-tier wall, and a 3-tier wall). Label 1 - 6, or A - F.
5. Only the 5' segmental block retaining wall is exempt from requirement
to provide detailed, PE -sealed plan /profile design
ii. Drainage plans. Consider county drainage plan review checklist, including:
1. Drainage structure typ. details. (FSP) Partially addressed. As ollow-
yp: Please include 2016 VDOT R&B Std. details (Site Details); including:
a. Drop inlets, DI-1, DI-3B/C
b. MH Safety steps, SS-1
C. Pipe bedding, PB-1
d. Inlet shaping, IS-1
e. Manhole, MH-1
Please also include commercial entrance detail:
f. CG-11 (2016 R&B Standards)
2. Pipe and inlet type, length, diameter, material, slope, etc. (FSP)
Addressed.
3. Calculations (LD-204, LD-229)
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 5
a. Velocity /Capacity /Inlet spread and depth. (FSP) Partially
Addressed. As follow-up: Provide LD-204 Inlet computations.
4. Profiles, all elements labeled. (FSP) Addressed. Asfollow-up: In
profile (CG-103), label Str. B7 and A13 as BY OTHERS, since not existing.
Also, Engineering recommends increase pipe slope from minimal acceptable
0.5% to 0.55%, for example. Often, designing to a minimum introduces
issues during construction. This is a recommendation, not a requirement.
5. Label inlets, pipes, and structures (FSP) Partially Addressed. As
follow-up: Please revise plan sheet CG-101 to Grading and Drainage Plan.
iii. Water and sewer line profiles. (FSP) Addressed. (Note: Water Line N/A)
iv. WP0201800088, Pantops Corner, must be approved (prior to Wawa at
Richmond Road and Stony Point Road FSP Approval). (FSP) Comment persists as
noted, elsewhere.
V. Include Exhibit for off -site (TMP #78-58G1) SWM facilities required to meet
stormwater quality and quantity requirements. (FSP) Not addressed; nor to be
immediately addressed. Applicant (KHA) should coordinate with Pantops Corner
LLC (hotel) design engineer (Skimp Engineering) to obtain at least conceptual
stormwater management design information to address water quality and quantity
requirements. At present, Wawa and Pantops Corner, LC (hotel) sites are owned by
a single entity. That site plan application processes are pursued by distinct entities
with Wawa site plan that includes direct /indirect reference to work to be performed
by others (Pantops Corner LC), but there is a single owner (Pantops Corner, LC) at
this time. The VSMP plan, WP02018000881 which amends WP0201400028, must
Le approved and bonded, with Wawa site properly registered with DEQ before
SDP201900013 can be approved. Given current single ownership with sale pending
to separate entity, this site plan should include an Exhibit consistent with
WP0201800088 design at point of VSMP approval that ties SWM compliance
requirements and compliance responsibility to the current owner of TMP #78-5A
(Wawa site). Engineering recommends plan sheet images that capture salient specific
SWM facility design information, titled SWM Exhibit for reference only. Subtitled:
Ref. WP0201800088 for approved VSMP plan.
vi. WP0201800088 must be bonded. (FSP) Comment persists.
vii. Pantops Corner Way must be (built or) bonded to limits required by Planning
Division, as defined by ZNIA201300002 proffer. (FSP) Comment persists.
Applicant response: `Comment noted.'
it. Note: Provide Road Plan under separate Application to County at earliest convenience. Ensure
road plan design for Pantops Corner Way considers Road Plan checklist for plan reviewers, and
includes a temporary turnaround meeting VDOT, Fire Rescue, and ACDSM needs, unless fully
constructed between U.S. Rt. 250 and R. 20 with Wawa. Attached. (FSP) Addressed.
SUB201900024 is under review.
12. Light grayscale indicates Pantops Corner Way is existing. Revise to show Pantops Corner Way is
proposed and is to be constructed with Wawa site plan to limits defined by Planning. Provide
turnaround sufficient to meet multiple agencies temporary turnaround requirements. (FSP) Partially
addressed. Applicant response: `The Pantops Corner Way is shown as proposed on Sheet CV- 101 and
shaded as existing on Sheet CS-101 as it will be existing during the construction of the Wawa parcel.'
As follow-up: Label Pantops Corner Way `to be constructed BY OTHERS' on plan sheet CS-101.
13. Loading width is less than 12', if exclude area occupied by bollards. Revise to provide min.
loading space width of 12'. (FSP) Addressed.
14. Delete note stating `Terraced Retaining Wall ...is to be designed and constructed as part of
Pantops Corner Development plans.' The terraced retaining walls are intrinsic to site development.
Include engineered PE -sealed retaining wall design plans with FSP. (FSP) Not addressed. Also, item
CS-502
CG-101
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4of5
10.a.i., above. Comment persists. Applicant response: `Once available the retaining wall plans will be
inserted into this plan set. It should be noted that the wall will be constructed by the current landowner
as part of the Pantops Corner Way plans and not by Wawa. It is a condition in the purchase contract
for this wall to be installed by the seller (current landowner).' Engineering welcomes this explanation.
Please submit detailed PE -sealed design for 5 of 6 retaining wall locations shown on CV-102, if CV-
102 remains part of Wawa FSP. If CV-102 is removed from this FSP (as Engineering recommends),
then provide detailed PE -sealed design for all retaining walls on TMP #78-5A prior to FSP approval.
15. Provide VDOT GR4 2 (guardrail) for parking spaces fronting retaining wall; ensure sufficient
parking space depth, once guardrail is installed. (FSP) Addressed.
16. Proposed SS line appears discontinuous. Revise to show connection with Ex. SS, or extend
proposed SS to a logical endpoint. (FSP) Addressed.
17. If proposed retaining wall fronting Pantops Corner Way coincides with managed steep slopes,
ensure design meets (retaining wall) design standards at 18-30.7.5. (FSP) Comment persists.
Applicant response: `The wall plans will be submitted once available.'
18. Likewise, storm drain pipe from DI at third southernmost parking space facing Pantops Corner
Way is discontinuous. Clarify connection with downgradient elements of storm system. (FSP)
Addressed.
19. xeview proposed bike rack to ensure adequate clearance between typ. bike and proposed sidewalk
(1'-2' clearance, recommended). (FSP) Addressed.
20. Show proposed easements, including:
a. Drainage (FSP) Partially addressed. As follow-up: Show drainage easements on CG-
101, since CG-101 is a Drainage and Grading plan. CS-100, titled boundary plan, shows
drainage easements, and resembles a plat. Easements need to be shown with pipe /inlet
structures (and SWM facility) if they are to be evaluated.
i. Ref. ACDSM, pg. 15
b. Sidewalk (FSP) Withdrawn. Sidewalks appear to be within public access easement.
C. ACSA (FSP) Partially Addressed. CS-100 resembles a plat. Show ACSA easements
on CS-101. Same rationale as above: Engineering cannot evaluate easements against invisible
structures.
d. Sight (FSP) Addressed.
e. RW (FSP) Addressed. Public Access Easement shown on CS-101.
21. Provide entrance sight lines, north -south, for vehicles exiting Wawa. (FSP) Addressed.
22. Label commercial entrance using VDOT nomenclature (CG-9a, etc.). (FSP) Addressed.
23. Label corner clearance distance from site entrance to U.S. Rt. 250. Engineering defers to VDOT.
(FSP) Addressed. Note: Engineering defers to VDOT on corner clearance distance.
24. Label any spilling curb and gutter. (FSP) Addressed.
25. Label entrance curb radius. (FSP) Addressed.
26. Show trench drains. (FSP) Partially addressed. As follow-up: South and East ends of trench are
labeled with elevations, which is helpful. Please provide additional trench, oil -water separator
elevations. Provide profile from the point where the two trenches join and a single pipe departs fuel
canopy, to Str. 7.
27. Provide concrete specification; provide 3000 psi strength at 28 days. (FSP) Addressed.
28. Provide dumpster pad detail. (FSP) Addressed.
29. Provide CG-6 detail. (FSP) Partially addressed. As follow-up: 6" depth of `spilling' gutter must
match VDOT (CG-6) 7" gutter depth. Revise CS-501 Spilling Curb and Gutter detail depth to 7".
30. Recommend spot elevations at entrance. (FSP) Partially addressed. Engineering recommends
spot elevations at entrance EP.
31. Ensure spills from filling UG fuel tanks reach trench drain. Check west -most UG tank, in
particular. (FSP) Withdrawn.
CP-101
Engineering Review Comments
Page 5 of 5
32. Show steep slopes, this sheet. (FSP) Addressed. Shwon on CG-101.
33. Stormwater Management Narrative (Also, items 5, 10.a.iv, above): (FSP) Not addressed.
a.
ti4en4 baPA. will satisfy st .. .,..ate f ma-a,,,.om ent r-e uir-e en4s. Delete specific reference to
2.45 lb. credit from site plan; instead, reference WP0201800088. Transfer specific, detailed
SWM Narrative and design information to WP0201800088.
b. Please note that WP0201800088 references 8.3 lb. purchase. WPQ plan in fefmatior has
not been reviewed i detail; presentation and integration of TMP #78-5A and 78-58G1 SWM
requirements into a single WPO requires care. (FSP) Comment persists. VSMP plan under
review.
34. Provide note for vegetative ground cover hardier than grass for areas between discrete individual
plantings north of retaining wall on north side of site (2:1 slope). Mulch may suffice. (FSP)
Addressed.
35. Remove proposed street trees within drainage easement/s. Recommend show drainage easement/s
on Landscape plan. (FSP) Addressed.
36. Street trees appear to obstruct sight distance. Provide sight lines. Also, item #21 above. (FSP)
Addressed.
New
37. CV-102: It is unorthodox to include site information for separate parcel with separate site plan
application under review with Albemarle County (SDP201800089). This separate site plan may be
referenced, but detailed information shown with separate final site plan should not be included with
SDP201900013 Final Site Plan (Wawa), as Wawa FSP approval would then in effect approve
SDP201800089 site plan elements. Engineering defers to Planning.
38. Note /Reminder: All roadway (Pantops Corner Way /U.S. Rt. 250 /SR 20) elements shown with
FSP201900013 must be consistent with Road Plan design at point Road Plan is approved
(SUB201900024). In other words, Road Plan approval is required prior to FSP approval.
39. CS-101 /Site Legend: There is no concrete sidewalk detail on CS-501. Please provide concrete
sidewalk detail or revise title of Mountable curb/island and stamped concrete detail (CS-502), if this
detail may serve two purposes (stamped /plain).
CS-101
40. Label sidewalk along U.S. Rt. 250 `by others.'
41. Label sidewalk along Pantops Corner Way `by others.'
42. Provide bumper blocks for all 18' L parking spaces adjacent to GR-2.
43. Provide /show detectable surface at ramp on west side of stamped asphalt crosswalk.
Please call if any questions: 434.296-5832 —x3069
Thank you
SDP201900013 Wawa Pantops _FSP 042319
Review Comments for SDP201900013 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: Wawa @ Pantops Corner - Final
Date Completed: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 DepartmentJDivision/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer Andrew Slack rnn Fg99 Approved
Approved_
Review Comments for SDP201900013 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name:
Wawa @ Pantops Corner - Final
Date Completed:
Friday, March 15, 2019
Department}Division/Agency:
Review Status:
Reviewer
Michael Dellinger
rnn 1nfz ,-r-finnc
See Recommendations
Add "building permit needed for retaining walls" Other than that, no objection_
Architectural Review Board Comments — Heather McMahon. Senior Planner
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to approval of the Final Site Plan. The applicant must
submit a final site plan to the ARB for full board review.
The comments provided on the Initial Site Plan, which was reviewed at the December 3, 2018 ARB
meeting, are provided here:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and
recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB:
1. Reduce the height dimension of the fuel -pump canopy to comply with the Standards for Fuel
Pump Canopies as outlined in Appendix B of the EC Design Guidelines.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
1. Consider substituting tree and shrub species native to the Piedmont region for those exotic species
found in the plant schedule.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
1. Clarify and correct the discrepancy between the stated square footage of the fuel -pump canopy
and the dimensions of the fuel -pump canopy provided on the site plans.
2. Consider continuing windows across the full length of the fagade. Relieve blankness on the east
and west elevations by using landscaping.
3. Provide the standard glass note on the elevations: Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should
meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light
reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%.
4. Reduce the height of the fuel -pump canopy to comply with the Standards for Fuel Pump Canopies
as outlined in Appendix B of the EC Design Guidelines.
5. Provide landscape screening for the vent stacks and other similar equipment. Consider locating the
underground tanks to the east side of the site.
6. Show how the visibility of all mechanical equipment will be eliminated from the EC.
7. Provide a roof plan with equipment locations for review if any proposed mechanical equipment
will be roof -mounted. Show equipment locations and heights on the elevation drawings.
8. Provide a dumpster enclosure detail in the plan. Show how the enclosure is compatible with the
building design.
9. Provide the standard mechanical equipment note on the site plan set and on the architectural
drawings: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated.
10. Provide a lighting plan for review.
11. Provide standard lighting note on the lighting plan: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp
that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to
reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall
not exceed one half footcandle.
12. Provide a glass sample and/or manufacturer's specifications that provide the VLR and VLT
values.
13. Specify the exact species for each tree and shrub proposed in the plant schedule. If multiple
species are proposed, provide distinct symbols for each and call them out on the landscape plan.
14. Provide a finalized landscape plan at the front of the property which is consistent with previous
reviews and approvals.
15. Clarify the material of the area surrounding the proposed entrance sign.
16. Ensure that all proposed trees are clear of utilities and their easements.
17. Provide plantings in the southwest corner of the site.
18. Consider substituting tree and shrub species native to the Piedmont region for those exotic species
found in the plant schedule.
19. Ensure that the centers of proposed trees are a minimum of 7 feet from the centers of underground
utility lines.
20. Provide landscaping along interior pedestrian ways.
21. Provide three additional interior parking trees.
22. Revise the landscape plan to show the appropriate spacing of proposed shrubs based on the final
species chosen.
23. Ensure that any proposed tree or shrub species does not exceed 25% of the total trees or shrubs
proposed on the site.
24. Provide the standard plant health note on the landscape plan (CP-101): All site plantings of trees
and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is
prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.
25. Clarify the height of the retaining wall on the northwest corner of the site. If the wall is over 6'
tall, it must be terraced and landscaped, and this must be shown on the site plans.
26. Provide top -of -wall and bottom -of -wall elevations for the retaining walls.
27. Show how glare from canopy fixtures will be eliminated.
As a courtesy, ARB staff has the following responses to the comment response letter dated March 1, 2019
and to the site plan dated 2/28/19 to benefit the applicant for a future ARB application submittal:
Comments #1 and 6. Architectural elevations of the fuel pump canopy must be submitted with an ARB
application for a Final Site Plan in order to verify that the maximum height of the canopy is 14'-6" from
grade to bottom of the eave.
#2 and 20. Shrubs AGE, CDB, and CSA are deciduous and should be placed in the correct category in the
plant schedule provided on CP-101. While I of 7 proposed tree species are native to America, only 3 of 8
proposed shrubs species are native to America and only one of those is native to the Virginia Piedmont
region. Plants native to this region can be found here: http://www.albemarle.org/NativePlants/list.asp
#3. The dimensions of the fuel pump canopy as shown on CS-101 are 96.0' x 81.0' = 7,776. The stated SF
of the canopy on CA-100 is 7,777. Account for the one -foot discrepancy.
#4-5. Submit architectural elevations and renderings with an ARB application for a Final Site Plan.
#7-8. The visibility of all mechanical equipment from the EC must be eliminated from the moment a
Certificate of Occupancy is issued (i.e., from day 1). Clarify how three IGS planted at 24" and 1
deciduous ornamental tree (CC) will provide year -around screening of the proposed vent stack pad in the
southeast corner of the site. Provide renderings.
#9. Submit architectural plans (including a roof plan) with an ARB application for a Final Site Plan.
# 10-17. Received or noted.
#18 and #21. This will be reviewed with the Final Site Plan submission for the ARB.
#19, #22-26. Noted.
#27. This will be reviewed with the Final Site Plan submission for the ARB.
#28. Noted.
#29. Manufacturer's specifications and an elevation of the fuel pump canopy showing how the canopy
light fixtures are housed in the ceiling are requried for ARB review of the Final Site Plan.
Review Comments for SDP201900013 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: Wawa @ Pantops Corner - Final
Date Completed: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 ] Department}Division/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer Shawn Maddox Firi- RNo Objection
Fire Rescue has no objections to the final site plan as submitked. NI'd
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper Virginia 22701
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
April 02, 2019
Andy Reitelbach
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP-2019-00013- WaWa at Pantops Carver — Final Site Plan
Dear Mr. Reitelbach:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Kimley and Horn, dated
February 28, 2019 and offer the following comments.
Land Use
This final site plan cannot be approved until SDP-2018-00089 Pantops corner, final site plan is
approved.
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399
for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
& � i 0ax
Adam J. M re, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING