Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201700026 Correspondence Special Use Permit 2018-06-26 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent Tuesday,June 26, 2018 1:06 PM To: 'Allie Marshall Pesch' Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish Subject: RE:Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Allie, I really wish I was provided and/or knew about this resolution of the CCAC's position while I was writing my staff report. I'd have included this in my report and findings. Regardless,I'll mention it at the PC meeting tonight and at the BOS meeting in Sept. Thanks for sending this along,better late than never. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Allie Marshall Pesch<alicemarshall@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,June 26,2018 12:57 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re:Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Hi Chris, Sorry I didn't get this to you for the PC packets. If you'd like to get this to them at the meeting tonight that'd be great. Thanks, Allie Allie Marshall Pesch CCAC Chair 434-249-4211 aI ice marshal laq mai I.co m On Jun 26, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Allie Marshall Pesch<alicemarshalR2i.gmail.com>wrote: Dear Planning Commissioners, The Crozet CAC and community members heard presentations from Milestone Communications and ACPS in February and March regarding the proposed Tier III wireless tower at WAHS. The committee passed the attached resolution, which explains the reasons the CCAC does NOT support the issuance of the special use permit. Thank you, 1 Allie Pesch <CCAC Milestone WAHS Tower Resolution 3-28-18.pdf> Allie Marshall Pesch CCAC Chair 434-249-4211 alicemarshall@qmail.com 2 Crozet Community Advisory Committee ("CCAC") Resolution on Proposed Milestone Communications SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier III March 28, 2018 WHEREAS, Milestone Communications has submitted an application referenced above for a special use permit ("SP") to construct a communications tower at the Western Albemarle High School; WHEREAS,the Crozet Community Advisory Council ("CCAC") has reviewed this application and related documents,heard presentations from Milestone Communications representatives, reviewed the county staff report, and received input from Crozet and County residents,and wishes to provide input to the Albemarle County Planning Commission ("PC") and the Board of Supervisors ("BOS"); BE IT RESOLVED,that the Crozet Community Advisory Committee does not support the issuance of this special use permit,as currently proposed. Reasons discussed by CCAC members and/or the public for concern include: • Concern that approval of a Tier III tower which does not comply the height and other limitations for a Tier I tower in the zoning ordinance could provide precedence for other such towers and approvals in the County which has properly fought to limit such visual impact on the valued visual landscape of Albemarle County; • Visual impact of the tower; • Desire for further exploration of alternatives, including alternate location and lower height/fewer&arrays; • Concern over potential lack of benefit-to the schools and school students by not being able to point to a reliable number of students who would in fact have internet access who do not currently have such access; are there real benefits to emergency responders; • Potential health effects (cited by citizens); I, David Stoner, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true correct copy of the resolution adopted by the Crozet Community Advisory Committee at a regular meeting held March 28, 201 by a motion made by Shawn Bird and seconded by Phil Best. CCAC Members present and voting yes:Allie Pesch, Mike Kunkel, Kim Guenther, Phil Best,Jon McKeon, David Stoner, Shawn Bird. Members Voting NO: Sandra Mears, Doug Bates. Members absent or abstaining: Kostas Alibertis, Leslie Burns,James King, Tom Loach. David A.Stoner CCAC Chairman o i Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday,June 12,2018 1:39 PM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, The proposal can move forward without the SE being advertised.Thus we'll move this forward as is.Thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Tuesday,June 12,2018 10:15 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Brown, Christina N.<Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Me too! Thank you, Chris. It would be hard for Milestone and Shentel to swallow if an SE they don't believe they need holds up the application. I spoke to Bill this morning about the RRH issue, and he recommended a request to Amelia for a determination to settle the issue. That's a great idea, of course, but we need to move this forward now. If the county determined that the SE must be advertised,then that particular SE could be placed on the consent agenda at the following BOS meeting as an add-on if there were not time to advertise it. Thanks for whatever you can do, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(cill eclai rrvan.com httos://www.leclainvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 • • From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperezCalalbemarle.orq] Sent:Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:08 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility This is a question I was thinking about last night at 4am and am planning on discussing with David Benish this morning. From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Tuesday,June 12,2018 10:06 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Brown,Christina N.<Christiha.Brown@leclairryan.com>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, What is your thought regarding advertising? Is there time to advertise this new SE to keep us on schedule,or does it not need to be advertised? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel lera leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com LinkedIn I BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Schweller, Lori H. Sent: Monday,June 11, 2018 3:48 PM To: 'Christopher Perez' Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Thanks for your response, Chris. The applicant has decided it would prefer to request the SE for the antenna size and have the third provider on the pole. Attached is our response letter and the revised plans. We'll drop the 18 hard copies off tomorrow or Thursday. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law 2 • s LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel ler(&leclai rrva n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(Thalbemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 1:41 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. • Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, Please send me the emailed PDF with the response by COB today and deliver 18 hardcopies of the plans by Thursday. Thank you Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent: Monday,June 11,2018 12:39 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Knuppel<aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Brown,Christina N. <Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Importance: High Chris, • I would like to follow up with you and Bill on this question, but we still plan to file the plans today. Is an emailed set of plans and response to your SRC letter okay, or do you need 18 hard copies? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax 3 s • (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(a leclairrvan.com https://www.leclainyan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cuerez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:38 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Andrew Knuppel; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, I briefly touched base with Bill this morning and he agrees the radioheads count and that I am applying the ordinance correctly. This item is scheduled for the PC's June 26ei meeting. Please submit the revised plans by COB today so I can write the staff report tomorrow and Wednesday. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 5:09 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Knuppel<aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris • I disagree. A RRH is not an antenna and is not intended to transmit a signal, so the answer to both questions is "no." • Thank you, Lori Sent with BlackBerry Work(www.blackberry.com) From: Christopher Perez<cperez@,albemarle.org> Sent: Jun 8, 2018 4:14 PM To: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@,leclairryan.com> Cc: Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz <BFRITZ(a�albemarle.org> Subject: FW: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility • Lori, RE: Antenna size and the number of arrays You makes an interesting argument. 4 • • i Section 5.1.40(B)(2)(A), limits the number of arrays by stating All types of antennas and dishes regardless of their use shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. The definition of Antenna Array is:Antenna array:An orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services. Thus the question seems to be does a radiohead fall under"all types of antennas and dishes" and is it required to "transmit a signal"? I believe the answer to those two questions is, yes. It is part of the antenna because it is required for the antenna to function and transmit the signal. I'll get with Bill on Monday and discuss this with him a little more. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 3:18 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Cc: Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Good Afternoon, Chris, We are working on the Milestone Communications WAHS Tier Ill PWSF revisions and intend to send those to you on Monday to stay on track for the June 26th Planning Commission hearing. We must object, however,to comment No. 2 in your Site Review Committee summary letter dated June 4, 2018. Many of us copied on this email were involved in the PWSF zoning text amendments that took place in 2013 and 2015 and recall conversations during those meetings about the treatment of remote radio heads for the relevant calculations. We have also ushered through the approval process many PWSF applications since remote radio heads have come into widespread use. The interpretation of Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) that serves as the premise for this comment is erroneous and is not consistent with previous practice. Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) only limits the size of each "antenna": "(e)ach antenna proposed under the pending application shall not exceed the size shown on the application, which size shall not exceed one thousand four hundred (1400) square inches." A remote radio head is not an antenna and is not limited in size by the zoning ordinance. As you know,the definition of"antenna array" is"(a)n orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services." Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a) limits the number of arrays: "(t)he total number of arrays of antennas shall not exceed three (3). All types of antennas and dishes, regardless of their use,shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays." Again, arrays only encompass antennas (and dishes),which propagate a signal. A remote radio head is not an antenna, and a grouping of RRHs is not an array. Because of the flush-mounting restriction on antennas, RRHs are typically mounted below the antennas in Albemarle County. That means that, for a Tier II,the RRHs are often in the trees and so, I assume, their visibility has been 5 • unimportant to the county; but, even for Tier Ill's as well,their size has not been included in the calculation of antennas. I have never requested a special exception based on the aggregate size of antenna plus RRH. Please provide an explanation as to why the county's approach to evaluating antenna size has changed and how the ZO is being interpreted to include the size of the remote radio heads in the antenna size calculation. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law , LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellerleclairrvan.com httos://www.leclairrvan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 2:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold(@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier HI Personal Wireless Service Facility If you can get me these revised plan sets no later than the 11 s'of June that would be ideal. If you're ok with moving forward,I'll begin writing the staff report which is due on the 13th with the assumption that you plan to do everything being requested in the comments (and omitting the future array at the bottom). Is it safe to say the first version of the plans which provided all the critical slope info will be used for the revision,or at the very least the same slopes and amounts being impacted. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 • From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 2:28 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan'<ckhan@entrex.com> • Cc: Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: 5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, In our resubmission, we will remove the future collocation so that no additional SE will be required. To stay on track for the June 26th PC hearing, how soon do you need the revised plans in hand? Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 . (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.S chwel ler@ leclai rrya n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 12:42 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Cc: Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, • RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility I double checked with Bill Fritz and he agrees that is how to calculate it. If you would rather request a special exception to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) for the size to be larger than 1,400 square inches, instead of increasing the number of arrays, that would work too being those remote radioheads'are supporting the main antenna. Either request gets you to the same point of needing an additional SE. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 11:54 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan' <ckhan@entrex.com> Subject: FW: 5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Hi Chris, 7 • Thank you for sending these comments regarding the WAHS Milestone Communications resubmission. I have a quick question based on my initial review of your letter: until now, remote radio heads have never been included in the calculation of the face size of panel antennas. Please double-check on your request regarding antenna size. I'm bringing the check for notices,etc. in a few minutes. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor • Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 • (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellertd leclairrvan.corn https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I NO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 11:43 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Attached are the review comments for the above ref plan. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development Bounty of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratorAleclairrvan.com and delete this a-mail,and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 8 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday,June 12, 2018 10:08 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: 5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility This is a question I was thinking about last night at 4am and am planning on discussing with David Benish this morning. From:Schweller, Lori H. Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Tuesday,June 12, 2018 10:06 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Brown,Christina N.<Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP2O1700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, What is your thought regarding advertising? Is there time to advertise this new SE to keep us on schedule,or does it not need to be advertised? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(@leclainvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Schweller, Lori H. Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:48 PM To: 'Christopher Perez' Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Thanks for your response, Chris. The applicant has decided it would prefer to request the SE for the antenna size and have the third provider on the pole. Attached is our response letter and the revised plans. We'll drop the 18 hard copies off tomorrow or Thursday. t Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN • 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel I erft leclai rrya n.com httos://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. • From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(Thalbemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 1:41 PM • To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, Please send me the emailed PDF with the response by COB today and deliver 18 hardcopies of the plans by Thursday. Thank you • Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 11, 2018 12:39 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Knuppel<aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ(c@albemarle.org>; Brown,Christina N. , <Christina.Brown @ leclairryan.com> Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Importance: High Chris, I would like to follow up with you and Bill on this question, but we still plan to file the plans today. Is an emailed set of plans and response to your SRC letter okay, or do you need 18 hard copies? Thanks, Lori 2 • Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwe ll erO leclai rrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(a@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:38 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Andrew Knuppel; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, I briefly touched base with Bill this morning and he agrees the radioheads count and that I am applying the ordinance correctly. This item is scheduled for the PC's June 26th meeting. Please submit the revised plans by COB today so I can write the staff report tomorrow and Wednesday. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 5:09 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Knuppel<aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris I disagree. A RRH is not an antenna and is not intended to transmit a signal, so the answer to both questions is "no." Thank you, Lori Sent with BlackBerry Work(www.blackberry.com) From: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Sent: Jun 8, 2018 4:14 PM To: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori:Schweller@leclairryan.com> • Cc: Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel(a albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility 3 4 Lori, RE: Antenna size and the number of arrays You makes an interesting argument. Section 5.1.40(B)(2)(A), limits the number of arrays by stating All types of antennas and dishes, regardless of their use shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. The definition of Antenna Array is:Antenna array:An orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage oiler a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services. Thus the question seems to be does a radiohead fall under"all types of antennas and dishes" and is it required to "transmit a signal"? I believe the answer to those two questions is, yes. It is part of the antenna because it is required for the antenna to function and transmit the signal. I'll get with Bill on Monday and discuss this with him a little more. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 3:18 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Cc: Subject: RE:5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Good Afternoon, Chris, We are working on the Milestone Communications WAHS Tier Ill PWSF revisions and intend to send those to you on Monday to stay on track for the June 26th Planning Commission hearing. We must object, however, to comment No. 2 in your Site Review Committee summary letter dated June 4, 2018. Many of us copied on this email were involved in the PWSF zoning text amendments that took place in 2013 and 2015 and recall conversations during those meetings about the treatment of remote radio heads for the relevant calculations. We have also ushered through the approval process many PWSF applications since remote radio heads have come into widespread use. The interpretation of Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) that serves as the premise for this comment is erroneous and is not consistent with previous practice. Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) only limits the size of each "antenna": "(e)ach antenna proposed under the pending application shall not exceed the size shown on the application,which size shall not exceed one thousand four hundred (1400)square inches." A remote radio head is not an antenna and is not limited in size by the zoning ordinance. As you know,the definition of"antenna array" is"(a)n orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services." Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a) limits the number of arrays: "(t)he total number of arrays of antennas shall not exceed three (3). All types of antennas and dishes; regardless of their use, shall be counted toward 4 • S the limit of three arrays." Again, arrays only encompass antennas (and dishes),which propagate a signal. A remote radio head is not an antenna, and a grouping of RRHs is not an array. Because of the flush-mounting restriction on antennas, RRHs are typically mounted below the antennas in Albemarle County. That means that,for a Tier II,the RRHs are often in the trees and so, I assume,their visibility has been unimportant to the county; but, even for Tier III's as well,their size has not been included in the calculation of antennas. I have never requested a special exception based on the aggregate size of antenna plus RRH. Please provide an explanation as to why the county's approach to evaluating antenna size has changed and how the ZO is being interpreted to include the size of the remote radio heads in the antenna size calculation. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel ler@lecla irrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold(amilestonecorD.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan(ThemD.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility If you can get me these revised plan sets no later than the 11th of June that would be ideal. If you're ok with moving forward,I'll begin writing the staff report which is due on the I3th with the assumption that you plan to do everything being requested in the comments(and omitting the future array at the bottom). Is it safe to say the first version of the plans which provided all the critical slope info will be used for the revision, or at the very least the same slopes and amounts being impacted. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development!County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 5 -40 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leciairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04,2018 2:28 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan' <ckhan@entrex.com> Cc: Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, In our resubmission,we will remove the future collocation so that no additional SE will be required. To stay on track for the June 26th PC hearing, how soon do you need the revised plans in hand? Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN -N123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez©albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 12:42 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Cc: Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility I double checked with Bill Fritz and he agrees that is how to calculate it. If you would rather request a special exception to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) for the size to be larger than 1,400 square inches, instead of increasing the number of arrays, that would work too being those remote radioheads are supporting the main antenna. Either request gets you to the same point of needing an additional SE. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 . From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 11:54 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) 6 S <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan'<ckhan@entrex.com> Subject: FW:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Hi Chris, Thank you for sending these comments regarding the WAHS Milestone Communications resubmission. I have a quick question based on my initial review of your letter: until now, remote radio heads have never been included in the calculation of the face size of panel antennas. Please double-check on your request regarding antenna size. I'm bringing the check for notices, etc. in a few minutes. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor • Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwe ll er@ leclai rrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 11:43 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Attached are the review comments for the above ref plan. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 - * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@,leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 7 • * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratorAleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratoraleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(uleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 8 • 4 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday,June 11, 2018 9:37 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Andrew Knuppel; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, I briefly touched base with Bill this morning and he agrees the radioheads count and that I am applying the ordinance correctly. This item is scheduled for the PC's June 26'h meeting. Please submit the revised plans by COB today so I can write the staff report tomorrow and Wednesday. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 5:09 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris I disagree. A RRH is not an antenna and is not intended to transmit a signal, so the answer to both questions is "no." Thank you, Lori Sent with BlackBerry Work(www.blackberry.com) From: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Sent: Jun 8, 2018 4:14 PM To: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: Antenna size and the number of arrays You makes an interesting argument. Section 5.1.40(B)(2)(A), limits the number of arrays by stating All types of antennas and dishes, regardless of their use, shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. 1 The definition of Antenna Array is: Antenna array: An orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services. Thus the question seems to be does a radiohead fall under"all types of antennas and dishes" and is it required to "transmit a signal"? I believe the answer to those two questions is, yes. It is part of the antenna because it is required for the antenna to function and transmit the signal. I'll get with Bill on Monday and discuss this with him a little more. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 3:18 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Cc: Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Good Afternoon,Chris, We are working on the Milestone Communications WAHS Tier III PWSF revisions and intend to send those to you on Monday to stay on track for the June 26th Planning Commission hearing. We must object, however,to comment No. 2 in your Site Review Committee summary letter dated June 4, 2018. Many of us copied on this email were involved in the PWSF zoning text amendments that took place in 2013 and 2015 and recall conversations during those meetings about the treatment of remote radio heads for the relevant calculations. We have also ushered through the approval process many PWSF applications since remote radio heads have come into widespread use. The interpretation of Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b)that serves as the premise for this comment is erroneous and is not consistent with previous practice. Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b)only limits the size of each "antenna": "(e)ach antenna proposed under the pending application shall not exceed the size shown on the application,which size shall not exceed one thousand four hundred (1400)square inches." A remote radio head is not an antenna and is not limited in size by the zoning ordinance. As you know, the definition of"antenna array" is"(a)n orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services." Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a) limits the number of arrays: "(t)he total number of arrays of antennas shall not exceed three (3). All types of antennas and dishes, regardless of their use,shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays." Again, arrays only encompass antennas(and dishes),which propagate a signal. A remote radio head is not an antenna, and a grouping of RRHs is not an array. Because of the flush-mounting restriction on antennas, RRHs are typically mounted below the antennas in Albemarle County. That means that, for a Tier II,the RRHs are often in the trees and so, I assume,their visibility has been unimportant to the county; but, even for Tier III's as well,their size has not been included in the calculation of antennas. I have never requested a special exception based on the aggregate size of antenna plus RRH. 2 41, Please provide an explanation as to why the county's approach to evaluating antenna size has changed and how the ZO is being interpreted to include the size of the remote radio heads in the antenna size calculation. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellerleclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez©albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility If you can get me these revised plan sets no later than the 11`h of June that would be ideal. If you're ok with moving forward, I'll begin writing the staff report which is due on the 13`h with the assumption that you plan to do everything being requested in the comments(and omitting the future array at the bottom). Is it safe to say the first version of the plans which provided all the critical slope info will be used for the revision,or at the very least the same slopes and amounts being impacted. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 2:28 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan'<ckhan@entrex.com> Cc: Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, 3 111 In our resubmission, we will remove the future collocation so that no additional SE will be required. To stay on track for the June 26th PC hearing, how soon do you need the revised plans in hand? Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 12:42 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Cc: Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility I double checked with Bill Fritz and he agrees that is how to calculate it. If you would rather request a special exception to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) for the size to be larger than 1,400 square inches, instead of increasing the number of arrays, that would work too being those remote radioheads are supporting the main antenna. Either request gets you to the same point of needing an additional SE. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 11:54 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan'<ckhan@entrex.com> Subject: FW:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Hi Chris, Thank you for sending these comments regarding the WAHS Milestone Communications resubmission. 4 I have a quick question based on my initial review of your letter: until now, remote radio heads have never been included in the calculation of the face size of panel antennas. Please double-check on your request regarding antenna size. I'm bringing the check for notices, etc. in a few minutes. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 11:43 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Attached are the review comments for the above ref plan. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 5 LECLAIR-RYAN June 11, 2018 Mr. Christopher P. Perez, Senior Planner Planning Division Albemarle County Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: SP201700026 —Milestone Communications Application for Western Albemarle High School Tier III PWSF Dear Chris: In response to the comments from the Site Review Committee you provided by letter of June 4, 2018, enclosed is a set of revised plans, dated June 6, 2018. Our responses are set out below. 1. [5.1.40(C)(2), 4.2, 5.1.40(a)12] Critical Slope Waiver Request. The plan does not depict the critical slopes being disturbed nor does the plan provide the required critical slope calculations for the amount of disturbance as the previous plans did. Staff previously had no objection to the critical slopes request;however,the revised plan set omits all required information for the waiver to be reviewed. Provide the information on the plans so staff can review and recommend an action on the critical slopes waiver. Response: The critical slope disturbance calculation has been added to Sheet Z-2. Steep Slopes are shown on Sheets Z-IA and Z-2. 2. [5.1.40(b)(2)(a)] Number of Arrays. It has been County practice to permit multiple antennas at different heights to count as one array, but in order for this interpretation to hold the total of the square inches making up the group shall not exceed 1,400 square inches. The Shentel position contains 1 large antenna at 1,375 square inches and 3 supporting RRH units which total at 988.46 square inches I for a combined group size of 2,388.46 square inches. Because the size of the group is larger than the ordinance permits an antenna to be then the group shall be counted as two arrays.Thus the number of arrays appears to be four(4). Request the special exception to permit 4 arrays. Response: We respectfully assert that this interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance to include the face size of every remote radio head in the maximum surface size of each antenna is not E-mail: Lori.Schweller@leclairryan,com 123 East Main Street, Suite 800 Direct Phone: (434) 245.3448 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Direct Fax: (434) 296-0905 Phone: (434) 245.3444 1 Fax: (434) 296-0905 CALIFORNIA1 CONNECTICUT 1 DELAWARE IFLOR DA I GEORG'A 1ILLL NO 1 MARYLAND\MASSAChUSETTS 1 MICHIGAN\ NEW JERSEY NEW YORKI PENNSYLVANIA 1 RHODE'SIAM\TEXASIVIRGINIAI WASHINGTON,D.C. ATTORNEYS Al LAW 1 WWW.LECLAIRRYAN.COM Mr. Christopher P. Perez June 11, 2018 Page 3 of 4 Response: Complied. 5. [5.1.40(c)(3)] Setbacks. Sheet Z-1, monopole setbacks chart incorrectly lists 135' as the setback required; however, it is truly based on a 1 to 1 setback, as the heights is 145' so is the required setback. The proposal meets this setback but the chart is incorrect. Response: Chart has been corrected. 6. [ 5.1.40(C)(6), 321 Site Plan. The site is well over the 10,000 SF threshold of disturbance (specifically 16,988.4 SF), as such a VSMP is required. Because of this, the following shall be a condition of the SP: "Prior to the issuance of a building permit a VSMP permit will be required. " Response: Understood, we will apply for VSMP permit. 7. [5.1.40(b)(11), 5.1.40(a)121 Color of Monopole, Antennas, and Equipment. The color Java brown is 1 (preferred for the monopole and all equipment. This will be a condition of the SP. Response: Note has been added to Sheet Z.--4. 8. [5.1.40(b)2(c), 5.1.40(a)12] Projection. You have requested a special exception (SE) to the flush mount provisions of the ordinance to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to project more than the permitted twelve (12) inches from the monopole. However, all arrays will still comply with the 18" maximum standoff distance for the farthest point of the back of the antenna. Staff does not have any objection to this SE request. Response: Dimension is shown on 1/Z-5. Albemarle County Division Architectural Review Board (ARB)—Margaret Maliszewski 1. An overhead utility line is present above the chain link fence. The row of eastern red cedar trees will need to be planted a sufficient distance away to avoid interfering with the overhead lines. Response: Understood. Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue- Robbie Gilmer 1. No objections. Albemarle County Engineering Division (Engineer)—Frank Pohl 1. Steep slopes and stream buffer limits should be shown on the plans. 11101 Mr. Christopher P. Perez June 11, 2018 Page 4 of 4 Response: 100'Stream buffers are shown on Sheet Z-1, Steep Slopes are shown on Sheets Z- IA and Z-2. 2. Disturbed area is shown as 12,298 sf, therefore, a separate VSMP application is required. Offsite nutrient credits may be required if onsite treatment is not provided. Bonding will be required prior to issuance of grading permit. Response: Understood, we will apply for VSMP permit. 3. A paved construction entrance is required. Replace the stone construction entrance detail with the paved detail. Response: Complied, see Sheet Z-2. Thank you for your careful consideration of our request. Please let me know if you need anything further or have questions regarding this response letter. We will submit eighteen (18) hard copies of the plans to your office. Sincerely, Lori H. Sch eller Enclosure cc: Milestone Communications Shentel 1111) Brown, Christina N. From: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 1:41 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Brown, Christina N.; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Lori, Please send me the emailed PDF with the response by COB today and deliver 18 hardcopies of the plans by Thursday. Thank you Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 12:39 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Brown, Christina N. <Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com> Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Importance: High Chris, I would like to follow up with you and Bill on this question, but we still plan to file the plans today. Is an emailed set of plans and response to your SRC letter okay, or do you need 18 hard copies? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434) 296-0905 Fax (804) 248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.Ieclairryan.com LinkedIn I BIO 1 1110 Please consider the environment before printing this email, From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:38 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Andrew Knuppel; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, I briefly touched base with Bill this morning and he agrees the radioheads count and that I am applying the ordinance correctly. This item is scheduled for the PC's June 26th meeting. Please submit the revised plans by COB today so I can write the staff report tomorrow and Wednesday. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 5:09 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris I disagree. A RRH is not an antenna and is not intended to transmit a signal, so the answer to both questions is "no." Thank you, Lori Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com) From: Christopher Perez<cperezna,albemarle.org> Sent: Jun 8, 2018 4:14 PM To: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Cc: Andrew Knuppel <aknuppel@,albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: Antenna size and the number of arrays You makes an interesting argument. Section 5.1.40(B)(2)(A), limits the number of arrays by stating All types of antennas and dishes, regardless rj their use, shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. 2 The definition of Antenna Array is: Antenna array:An orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providin cg overage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services. Thus the question seems to be does a radiohead fall under"all types of antennas and dishes" and is it required to "transmit a signal"? I believe the answer to those two questions is, yes. It is part of the antenna because it is required for the antenna to function and transmit the signal. I'll get with Bill on Monday and discuss this with him a little more. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 08, 2018 3:18 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Cc: Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Good Afternoon, Chris, We are working on the Milestone Communications WAHS Tier III PWSF revisions and intend to send those to you on Monday to stay on track for the June 26th Planning Commission hearing. We must object, however,to comment No. 2 in your Site Review Committee summary letter dated June 4, 2018. Many of us copied on this email were involved in the PWSF zoning text amendments that took place in 2013 and 2015 and recall conversations during those meetings about the treatment of remote radio heads for the relevant calculations. We have also ushered through the approval process many PWSF applications since remote radio heads have come into widespread use. The interpretation of Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b)that serves as the premise for this comment is erroneous and is not consistent with previous practice. Sec. 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) only limits the size of each "antenna": "(e)ach antenna proposed under the pending application shall not exceed the size shown on the application, which size shall not exceed one thousand four hundred (1400) square inches." A remote radio head is not an antenna and is not limited in size by the zoning ordinance. As you know,the definition of"antenna array" is"(a)n orderly arrangement of antennas mounted at the same height on a tower or other structure and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage over a specific area for a single provider of personal wireless services." Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a) limits the number of arrays: "(t)he total number of arrays of antennas shall not exceed three (3). All types of antennas and dishes, regardless of their use, shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays." Again, arrays only encompass antennas (and dishes),which propagate a signal. A remote radio head is not an antenna, and a grouping of RRHs is not an array. Because of the flush-mounting restriction on antennas, RRHs are typically mounted below the antennas in Albemarle County. That means that, for a Tier II,the RRHs are often in the trees and so, I assume,their visibility has been unimportant to the county; but, even for Tier III's as well,their size has not been included in the calculation of antennas. I have never requested a special exception based on the aggregate size of antenna plus RRH. 3 Please provide an explanation as to why the county's approach to evaluating antenna size has changed and how the ZO is being interpreted to include the size of the remote radio heads in the antenna size calculation. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804) 248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.oro] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility If you can get me these revised plan sets no later than the 11'h of June that would be ideal. If you're ok with moving forward,I'll begin writing the staff report which is due on the 13'h with the assumption that you plan to do everything being requested in the comments(and omitting the future array at the bottom). Is it safe to say the first version of the plans which provided all the critical slope info will be used for the revision, or at the very least the same slopes and amounts being impacted. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 2:28 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan'<ckhan@entrex.com> Cc: Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, 4 Ilk 110 In our resubmission, we will remove the future collocation so that no additional SE will be required. To stay on track for the June 26th PC hearing, how soon do you need the revised plans in hand? Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434) 296-0905 Fax (804) 248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellerna leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(alalbemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 12:42 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold©milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@iemp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Cc: Bill Fritz • Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP2017O0026 Western Albemarle High School- Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility I double checked with Bill Fritz and he agrees that is how to calculate it. If you would rather request a special exception to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) for the size to be larger than 1,400 square inches, instead of increasing the number of arrays, that would work too being those remote radioheads are supporting the main antenna. Either request gets you to the same point of needing an additional SE. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 11:54 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com) <Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan' <ckhan@entrex.com> Subject: FW:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Hi Chris, Thank you for sending these comments regarding the WAHS Milestone Communications resubmission. 5 I have a quick question based on my initial review of your letter: until now, remote radio heads have never been included in the calculation of the face size of panel antennas. Please double-check on your request regarding antenna size. I'm bringing the check for notices, etc. in a few minutes. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.SchweIler leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@ albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 11:43 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP2O1700O26 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Attached are the review comments for the above ref plan. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(aleclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 6 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 2:37 PM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.'; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility If you can get me these revised plan sets no later than the 1 lth ofIne that would be ideal. If you're ok with moving forward, I'll begin writing the staff report which is due on the 13t1i with the assumption that you plan to do everything being requested in the comments (and omitting the future array at the bottom). Is it safe to say the first version of the plans which provided all the critical slope info will be used for the revision,or at the very least the same slopes and amounts being impacted. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 2:28 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan' <ckhan@entrex.com> Cc: Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility Chris, In our resubmission, we will remove the future collocation so that no additional SE will be required. To stay on track for the June 26' PC hearing, how soon do you need the revised plans in hand? Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(Meclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO 1 Please consider the environment before printing this email. s.G From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 12:42 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Chris Harold (CHarold(Thmilestonecorp.com); Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan(&emp.shentel.com); 'Colleen Khan' Cc: Bill Fritz Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility • Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility I double checked with Bill Fritz and he agrees that ihow to calculate it. If you would rather request a special exception to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(b) for the size to be larger than 1,400 square inches, instead of increasing the number of arrays, that would work too being those remote radioheads are supporting the main antenna. Either request gets you to the same point of needing an additional SE. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 11:54 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; 'Colleen Khan' <Ckhan@entrex.com> Subject: FW:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Hi Chris, Thank you for sending these comments regarding the WARS Milestone Communications resubmission. I have a quick question based on my initial review of your letter: until now, remote radio heads have never been included in the calculation of the face size of panel antennas. Please double-check on your request regarding antenna size. I'm bringing the check for notices, etc. in a few minutes. Thanks, Lori • Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct 2 (434)296-0905 Fax (804)241-8700 Mobile La;i.Schweller(a)leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 11:43 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Lori, RE: SP201700O26 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Attached are the review comments for the above ref plan. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 Christopher Perez From: Stephanie Banton Sent: Tuesday,June 05, 2018 9:23 AM To: Lisa Green; Carla Harris- CDD Cc: Christopher Perez; Elaine Echols Subject: FW:WHS Tower Lisa/Carla, Sorry, I am a little behind. We had to finalize some final details for this project. Can you please post sign#55 for the project below by Friday? Thank you, Stephanie From: Christopher Perez Sent:Tuesday,June 05, 2018 9:03 AM To:Stephanie Banton<sbanton@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org>;Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schwel ler@ lecla i rrya n.com> Subject: RE:WHS Tower Stephanie, The revised legal ad is provided below.The applicant would like to move forward with the June 26th PC meeting. PROJECT: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall TAX MAP/PARCEL: 056000000017C0 LOCATION: Western Albemarle High School located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike, Crozet,VA 22932 PROPOSAL: Construction of a one hundred and forty five(145) foot tall steel monopole with three(3) antenna arrays.A special exception has been requested to allow the disturbance of critical slopes onsite and a special exception to the flush mount provisions of the ordinance to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to project more than the permitted 12 inches from the monopole.However,all arrays will still comply with the 18 inch maximum standoff distance for the farthest point of the back of the antenna.The tower is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. PETITION: Section 10.2.2(48) of the zoning ordinance which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the RA,Rural Areas district. ZONING: RA Rural Areas-agricultural,forestal, and fishery uses; residential density(0.5 unit/acre in development lots) OVERLAY DISTRICT: EC-Entrance Corridor PROFFERS:No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Rural Areas-preserve and protect agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural,historic and scenic resources/residential density 0.5 unit/acre in development lots. Rural Areas 3 Comp Plan Area. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 From:Stephanie Banton Sent: Monday,June 04, 2018 1:35 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org> Subject:WHS Tower Chris, If you could please let me know ASAP about the WHS tower and if it is going to PC on 6.26 that will be great. I have to let zoning know about the signs.They like to know on Mondays but I can give them a heads up that it may be later based on the applicant. Thank you, Stephanie Banton Community Development Assistant II 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville VA 22902 Phone: (434)296-5832 X:3255 Fax:(434)972-4126 sbantonc'albemarle.orq 2 Christopher Perez From: Stephanie Banton Sent: Tuesday,June 05, 2018 11:15 AM To: CHAR Legal Ads Cc: clerk;John Blair; Bill Fritz; Christopher Perez; Carla Harris- CDD Subject: June 26,2018.doc Attachments: June 26, 2018.doc Good morning, Attached is the legal ad for the June 26, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. Please run this ad on June 11, 2018&June 18, 2018(two consecutive Mondays). Please send proof by the end of the business day. Thank you, Stephanie 1 FAX TRANS—. 'TTAL TO: Dana Hubbard FROM:Stephanie Banton CO Daily Progress CO Albemarle County DEPT Classified PHONE# 296-5832 FAX# 978-7204 Fax# 972-4012 $CLASS,MonAd,Planning Commission, The Albemarle County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, June 26, 2018, 6:00 p.m., Lane Auditorium to consider the following: ZTA 201800004 Beekeeping The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on June 26, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. in the County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville,Virginia 22902, to receive comments on its intent to recommend adoption of the following ordinance changes to the Albemarle County Code:Amend Section 18-3.1 to add a definition of urban beekeeping; Amend Sections 18-12.2.1, 18-13.2.1, 18-14.2.1, 18-15.2.1, and 18-16.2.1 to list urban beekeeping as a by right use, and add Section 18-5.1.63 to establish supplementary regulations for urban beekeeping to establish setback regulations for beehives, a warning sign requirement, prohibition of wax combs and other material left on the grounds that might encourage robbing by other bees, beekeeping equipment regulations, and establishing a maximum number of bee colonies pursuant to a lot's size. A copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance amendments is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and in the Department of Community Development, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville,Virginia. ZTA 201700004 Farmer's Markets The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on June 26, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. in the County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902, to receive comments on its intent to recommend adoption of the following ordinance changes to the Albemarle County Code:Amend Section 18-5.1.47 to establish regulations for by right farmers' markets including prohibitions on amplified sound and lighting, limiting by right farmers' markets to twice a week, prohibiting by right farmers' markets from operating when the primary use of the property is occurring, and limiting by- right farmers' markets to properties subject to approved site plans pursuant to Section 18-32 and limiting parking to the parking areas shown on the property's approved site plan; Amend Sections 18-10.2.-1, 18- 11.3.1, and 18-12.2.1 to permit farmers' markets as a by right use. A copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance amendments is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and in the Department of Community Development, County Office Building,401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility(Sign#551 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:White Hall TAX MAP/PARCEL: 056000000017C0 LOCATION: Western Albemarle High School located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike, Crozet,VA 22932 PROPOSAL: Construction of a one hundred and forty five (145)foot tall steel monopole with three (3)antenna arrays.A special exception has been requested to allow the disturbance of critical slopes onsite and a special exception to the flush mount provisions of the ordinance to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to project more than the permitted 12 inches from the monopole. However, all arrays will still comply with the 18 inch maximum standoff distance for the farthest point of the back of the antenna.The tower is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. PETITION: Section 10.2.2(48)of the zoning ordinance which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the RA, Rural Areas district. ZONING: RA Rural Areas -agricultural, forestal, and fishery uses; residential.density(0.5 unit/acre in development lots)OVERLAY DISTRICT: EC-Entrance Corridor PROFFERS: No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Rural Areas-preserve and protect agricultural,forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/residential density 0.5 unit/acre in development lots. • Rural Areas 3 Comp Plan Area. Anyone desiring further information about the above may contact the Department of Community Development, County Office Building, North Wing, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., or telephone 296-5832 ext. 3255. Copies of the proposed plans, ordinances, amendments, and/or applications may be examined at such location. Reasonable accommodations will be provided to persons with disabilities, if requested. PURCHASE ORDER#06262018 Phone 296-5823 Please note that tear sheets are required. Date: June 5, 2018 Date Run: June 11, 2018&June 18, 2018 (two consecutive Mondays) ' . ., - iii'vips;/i�'ii 'i'ii, )..7. Christopher Perez -t't '`,:-- •F% ' ��`e S From: Christopher Perez Lt Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 9:03 AM To: Stephanie Banton Cc: Elaine Echols; Carla Harris - CDD; 'Schweller, Lori H.' Subject: RE: WHS Tower Stephanie, The revised legal ad is provided below.The applicant would like to move forward with the June 26th PC meeting. PROJECT: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School -Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall TAX MAP/PARCEL: 056000000017C0 LOCATION: Western Albemarle High School located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike,Crozet,VA 22932 PROPOSAL: Construction of a one hundred and forty five(145) foot tall steel monopole with three(3)antenna arrays. A special exception has been requested to allow the disturbance of critical slopes onsite and a special exception to the flush mount provisions of the ordinance to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to project more than the permitted 12 inches from the monopole.However,all arrays will still comply with the 18 inch maximum standoff distance for the farthest point of the back of the antenna.The tower is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. PETITION: Section 10.2.2(48)of the zoning ordinance which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the RA,Rural Areas district. ZONING: RA Rural Areas-agricultural,forestal,and fishery uses; residential density(0.5 unit/acre in development lots) OVERLAY DISTRICT: EC-Entrance Corridor PROFFERS: No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Rural Areas-preserve and protect agricultural,forestal,open space,and natural,historic and scenic resources/residential density 0.5 unit/acre in development lots. Rural Areas 3 Comp Plan Area. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Stephanie Banton Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 1:35 PM To: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org> Subject: WHS Tower Chris, If you could please let me know ASAP about the WHS tower and if it is going to PC on 6.26 that will be great. I have to let zoning know about the signs. They like to know on Mondays but I can give them a heads up that it may be later based on the applicant. Thank you, 1 Stephanie Banton Community Development Assistant II 401 Mcintire Road ' Charlottesville VA 22902 Phone:(434)296-5832 X:3255 Fax:(434)972-4126 sbanton(axalbemarie.orq 2 her Perez Christopher Perez Monday,June 04, 2018 11:43 AM 'Schweller, Lori H.' RE: 5P201700026 Western Albemarle High School -TierHII Personal Wireless Service Facility Attachments: 6-4-2018_SP201700026—WAHS—Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility.pdf Lori, RE: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility 1 Attached are the review comments for the above ref plan. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,June 04,2018 9:10 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> • Cc: Brown, Christina N.<Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com> Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Thank you, Chris. We will work on getting these together. 7 Lori C' (4 (4 Lori H. Schweller <ay. Attorney at Law htt., LECLAIRRYAN (;ale 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 pjo (434)245-3448 Direct ass (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwelleraleclairrvan.com FI1-p\ https://www.leclairrvan.com Sea y Linkedln I BIO soh,Schw fit. , Please consider the environment before printing this email. L O� I hOAe to From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperezCalalbemarle.orq] Coo._ J�a Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 9:09 AM oepangyer To: Schweller, Lori H. goo l''ebr a Pete. Subject: RE: Milestone WARS o34z 6`0 a ton, Lori, I'm wrapping up my comments on the project,while discussing it with Stephanie,-an, 1 project are needed by noon of June 5,2018, if your still seeking the June 20 PC meeting. Thus I'm sending you this in advance comments,which will be coming shortly. Notification and Advertisement Fees $347 Cost for newspaper advertisement $215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners(minimum $215 +actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owne $562 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing • Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner :ol Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 3UaS 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 .0013 434.296.5832 ext.3443 c 51a�1J From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.corn> Sent: Friday,June 01, 2018 9:05 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Thanks, Chris. Lori Lori H. Schweller •ttorney at Law ECLAIRRYAN '3 East Main Street, Eighth Floor arlottesville, Virginia 22902 4)245-3448 Direct )296-0905 Fax 248-8700 Mobile .chweller(c�leclairryan.com //www.leclairryan.com In I BIO onsider the environment before printing this email. ristopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] 'ay, June 01, 2018 9:03 AM Iler, Lori H. E: Milestone WAHS e all comments to you by the 51I'. I Senior Planner unity Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia arlottesville,VA 22902 2 • 1 _ FronirSchweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com>, Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2018 5:23 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone WAHS Hi Chris, I had it on my calendar that we would have comments from you on the resubmission for this application, being heard on June 26th. Do I have my timeline wrong? / Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellerfi leclairrvan.com https://www.leclai rryan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(c�leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent Monday,June 04, 2018 9:09 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Lori, I'm wrapping up my comments on the project,while discussing it with Stephanie,she informed me that the notification fees for this project are needed by noon of June 5,2018,if your still seeking the June 26th PC meeting.Thus I'm sending you this in advance of the comments,which will be coming shortly. Notification and Advertisement Fees $347 Cost for newspaper advertisement $215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners(minimum $215+actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $562 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,June 01, 2018 9:05 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Thanks, Chris. Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel lera lecla irrvan.com httos://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 9:03 AM 1 To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Lori, I hope to have all comments to you by the 5th Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2018 5:23 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone WAHS Hi Chris, I had it on my calendar that we would have comments from you on the resubmission for this application, being heard on June 26th. Do I have my timeline wrong? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct • (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.S chwel ler(cD leclai rrva n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratorna,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2018 10:05 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Lori, I spoke to the Clerk's Office and the Sept 12th BOS meeting is the soonest date we can get you on. Would you like me to tentatively schedule it for you on that date? I can't guarantee it but I'll work with the Clerk to tentatively schedule it because it's a tower. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 08,2018 9:19 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone WAHS Hi Chris, Could you estimate when Milestone's Board hearing would be, assuming the Planning Commission hearing will be June 26th? Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-6700 Mobile Lod.Schweller(a leclairrvan.com https://wwwieclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 10:40 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Resubmission Lori, I looked through the revised proposal and it appears the only two reviewers who need to review it before I rewrite my staff report are Margaret and myself. But because the plans changed designers I'd like you to verify that all other items on the plan remain the same: with special focus on the location and design of the access road. If those items changed at all, I'd also need Engineering and Fire and Rescue to look at it. Please verify thanks.At which I'll make sure to send it to them asap. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development 'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 10:11 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Resubmission Chris, I think we just missed that. It was an oversight, and we can restore it. As you may have noticed,this is a new set by Entrex, so not everything carried over or is the same as the Timmons plans. I will let them know that we need to add that Planting Schedule back in. Perhaps we can send you a new Sheet Z-12 to slipsheet. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lo ri.Schwel ler(&leclai rryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 9:54 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Resubmission Lori, I just distributed the revision. One thing I noticed was that the landscaping plan's planting list has been omitted from this new set of plans. Thus we do not know how tall the trees are at planting. Am I missing it and it is truly provided? Let me know. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent: Monday,April 30,2018 2:30 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone WARS Resubmission Hi Chris, In case it's helpful, here are the electronic copies of the documents in the resubmission package we just submitted out front. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lo ri.Schwell er@ leclai rrvan.cam httos://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratoraleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(a,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, May 04,2018 9:54 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS Resubmission Lori, I just distributed the revision. One thing I noticed was that the landscaping plan's planting list has been omitted from this new set of plans. Thus we do not know how tall the trees are at planting. Am I missing it and it is truly provided? Let me know. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,April 30, 2018 2:30 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone WARS Resubmission Hi Chris, In case it's helpful, here are the electronic copies of the documents in the resubmission package we just submitted out front. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwe ll er{ai leclai rrva n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratort@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. t Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 7:52 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton; Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com); Margaret Maliszewski Subject RE:SP2017-26 -WARS -Tier III Lori, The new proposal should provide a single comprehensive narrative with all updated information to cover all that is being proposed. The staff report is not going to be focused how much better this proposal is from the initial proposal,but rather solely based on this new proposal. So I'd like to keep it clean and easy to understand what is being proposed w a single comprehensive narrative of the proposal. Thank you Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,April 27, 2018 3:47 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;.David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton<sbanton®albemarle.org>; Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com) <cwinkler@ m ilestoneco rp.com> Subject: RE:5P2017-26-WARS-Tier Ill Thank you, Chris, The applicant has been working with the schools and Shentel over the past few weeks to make two major design changes: (1)to reduce the standoff of all arrays to 18",and (2)to reduce the number of arrays to 3. We are also adding an additional area of tree preservation. We have produced new photosims of the views that you note in the staff report as most concerning,and we will include those sims in both brown and stainless steel so the county can decide which it prefers. Please note that,though the 18"stand-off is flush-mounted,it doesn't meet the current ordinance 12" minimum,so we still need to ask for that SE. Please let me know if my supplemental narrative with the new information can be added to the information already provided,or the county prefers a single comprehensive narrative. 1 We will submit the application, check, narrative, new zoning drawings, and two sets of photosims on Monday. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellerna leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 11:56 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton Subject: RE: SP2017-26 -WARS -Tier III Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WARS-Tier HI Based on the schedule for a SP resubmittal all dates to get to a May PC meeting are past.The next resubmittal date is April 16 or April 30th,which dates will both get you to the PC by June 261°(as the no sooner date). You are aware that a second resubmittal will cost$1,075 application fee.What do you plan to modify during this resubmittal? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,April 09,2018 11:39 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject: WAHS Milestone Resubmission Hi Chris, Could you please let us know by what date we would need to resubmit to be heard during a May Planning Commission meeting? 2 • S. - Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel lera leclai rrva n.co m https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Friday,April 27,2018 3:47 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton; Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com) Subject RE: SP2017-26-WAHS -Tier III Thank you, Chris, The applicant has been working with the schools and Shentel over the past few weeks to make two major design changes: (1)to reduce the standoff of all arrays to 18", and (2)to reduce the number of arrays to 3. We are also adding an additional area of tree preservation. We have produced new photosims of the views that you note in the staff report as most concerning,and we will include those sims in both brown and stainless steel so the county can decide which it prefers. Please note that,though the 18"stand-off is flush-mounted, it doesn't meet the currentordinance 12" minimum, so we still need to ask for that SE. Please let me know if my supplemental narrative with the new information can be added to the information already provided,or the county prefers a single comprehensive narrative.• We will submit the application;check, narrative, new zoning drawings, and two sets of photosims on Monday. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel le r(a)leclai rrvan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez©albemarle.org] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 11:56 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez;Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton Subject: RE: SP2017-26 - WAHS -Tier III 1 Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WAFTS-Tier III Based on the schedule for a SP resubmittal all dates to get to a May PC meeting are past.The next resubmittal date is April 16 or April 30th,which dates will both get you to the PC by June 26s'(as the no sooner date). You are aware that a second resubmittal will cost$1,075 application fee.What do you plan to modify during this resubmittal? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,April 09,2018 11:39 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject:WAHS Milestone Resubmission Hi Chris, Could you please let us know by what date we would need to resubmit to be heard during a May Planning Commission meeting? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com httos://www.leclairnian.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 �_ Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <LoriSchweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Friday,April 27, 2018 3:38 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: WAHS - Milestone Hi Chris, Just left you a VM. I drafted my resubmittal letter to you to address only those things that are changing,then I realized that that approach only works if you are planning to include the original submission in the PC packet as well. If not, I can redo it as a comprehensive narrative addressing all points. Please let me know. To summarize the resubmission--the applicant has been working with the schools and Shentel to make two major changes: (1) reduce the standoff of all arrays to 18", and (2) reduce the number of arrays to 3. We have produced new photosims of the views that you note in the rport as most concerning, and we will include those Sims in both brown and stainless steel so the county can decide which it prefers. We have also added a new tree preservation area at the southeast corner of the school property. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellea@leclairrvan.com httes://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. t r `, Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Wednesday,April 25, 2018 3:00 PM To: Stephanie Banton; Christopher Perez Cc: Cristian Hernandez;Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Brown, Christina N. Subject RE: SP2017-26 -WAHS -Tier III Thank you, Stephanie. Yes,that's very helpful. We will submit$1,269.00 when we resubmit the application,then will submit the advertising fee once we know what that will be. Thanks again, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile • Lori.Schwel le r(th leclai rrva n.com https://www.leclainvan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Stephanie Banton [mailto:sbanton@albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 2:57 PM To: Christopher Perez; Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols Subject: RE: SP2017-26 -WAHS -Tier III Good afternoon Lori, Chiming in on the fees as Chris mentions below: Deferral Fee: $194.00 Resubmittal Fee $1075.00 A total of$1269.00 will need to be paid when you resubmit.Once you resubmit and Chris has made any changes to the legal ad if any, I will price it with the Daily Progress and Chris wilt let you know what they are once I get a total. Legal fees will need to be paid before the Planning Commission meeting (approx. 3 weeks prior). I hope this help. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Stephanie 1 IF ' e From:Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday,April 25,2018 2:50 PM To:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.or8>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton <sbanton@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier III Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WARS-Tier III • Ok. Sounds good. Of course you will need to pay additional fees prior to scheduling the PC public hearing: 1) the fee for deferral after the SP public hearing was advertised and 2) the fee for readvertisment of the public hearing I believe we can handle that prior to PC scheduling. Stephanie, Chime in if I am misspeaking. Also, please provide her the fee amount for the 1st fee mentioned above. Thanks. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner • Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent:Wednesday,April 25, 2018 2:13 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton<sbanton@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP2017-26-WARS-Tier Ill Hi Chris, Just to confirm, we plan to resubmit this application on Monday,April 30th. We will include a $1,075 resubmittal fee with the submission. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct 2 (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. • From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 11:56 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold©milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton Subject: RE: SP2017-26 - WAHS -Tier III Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WARS-Tier III Based on the schedule for a SP resubmittal all dates to get to a May PC meeting are past.The next resubmittal date is April 16 or April 30th,which dates will both get you to the PC by June 26th(as the no sooner date). You are aware that a second resubmittal will cost$1,075 application fee.What do you plan to modify during this resubmittal? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,April 09, 2018 11:39 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject:WAHS Milestone Resubmission Hi Chris, Could you please let us know by what date we would need to resubmit to be heard during a May Planning Commission meeting? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel ler@I ecla i rrya n.com httos://www.leclairryan.com 3 r j LinkedIn i BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratoraleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.corn and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to°emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 4 Christopher Perez From: Stephanie Banton Sent: Wednesday,April 25, 2018 2:57 PM To: Christopher Perez;Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols Subject: RE: SP2017-26 -WAHS -Tier III Good afternoon Lori, Chiming in on the fees as Chris mentions below: Deferral Fee:$194.00 Resubmittal Fee$1075.00 A total of$1269.00 will need to be paid when you resubmit.Once you resubmit and Chris has made any changes to the legal ad if any, I will price it with the Daily Progress and Chris will let you know what they are once I get a total. Legal fees will need to be paid before the Planning Commission meeting (approx. 3 weeks prior). I hope this help. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Stephanie From:Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday,April 25,2018 2:50 PM To:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS®albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton<sbanton@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier Ill Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WARS-Tier HI Ok. Sounds good. Of course you will need to pay additional fees prior to scheduling the PC public hearing: 1)the fee for deferral after the SP public hearing was advertised and 2)the fee for readvertisment of the public hearing I believe we can handle that prior to PC scheduling. Stephanie, • Chime in if I am misspeaking. Also, please provide her the fee amount for the 1"fee mentioned above. Thanks. t Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner • Department of Community Development 'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Wednesday,April 25,2018 2:13 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton <sbanton@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier Ill Hi Chris, Just to confirm,we plan to resubmit this application on Monday,April 30th. We will include a $1,075,resubmittal fee with the submission. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 11:56 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton Subject: RE: SP2017-26 -WAHS -Tier III Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WARS-Tier III Based on the schedule for a SP resubmittal all dates to get to a May PC meeting are past.The next resubmittal date is April 16 or April 30th,which dates will both get you to the PC by June 26th(as the no sooner date). You are aware that a second resubmittal will cost$1,075 application fee.What do you plan to modify during this resubmittal? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner • Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 2 From:Schweller,Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,April.09, 2018 11:39 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:-Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject:WAHS Milestone Resubmission Hi Chris, Could you please let us know by what date we would need to resubmit to be heard during a May Planning Commission meeting? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law • LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO • Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please ' notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments: * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 s FINAL ACTIONS Planning Commission Meeting of April 10, 2018 AGENDA ITEM/ACTION FOLLOW-UP ACTION 1. Call to Order. • Meeting called to order at 6:00 p.m. by the Chair Keller. • PC members present were Mr. Dotson, Chair Keller, Mr. Bivins, Ms. Spain, Ms. More, Ms. Firehock and Mr. Palmer (UVA Rep). Vice-Chair Riley was absent. • Staff members present were Chris Perez, Elaine Echols, Andrew Gast- Bray, Sharon Taylor and John Blair. 2. Other Matters Not on the Agenda from Clerk: the Public No action required None 3. Consent Agenda Clerk: a. Approval of Minutes: December 19, a. Finalize minutes a 2017 b. Resolution of Intent — proceed with CPA b. Resolution of Intent: process. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Birdwood Master Plan —Area B Study) APPROVED, by a vote of 6:1 (Riley absent). _ 4. Item Requesting Deferral Staff: Action Letter — Indefinitely deferred as SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle noted in the actions. High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall TAX MAP/PARCEL: 056000000017C0 LOCATION: Western Albemarle High School located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike, Crozet, VA 22932 PROPOSAL: Construct of a one hundred and forty five (145) foot tall steel monopole with five (5) antenna arrays. Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three (3) arrays, to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance, and to allow disturbance of critical slopes -1 - Albemarle County Planning Commission FINAL Action Memo-04-10-2018 Page 1 I onsite. The tower is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. PETITION: Section 10.2.2(48) of the zoning ordinance which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the RA, Rural Areas district. ZONING: RA Rural Areas - agricultural, forestal, and fishery uses; residential density (0.5 unit/acre in development lots) OVERLAY DISTRICT: EC- Entrance Corridor PROFFERS: No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Rural Areas - preserve and protect agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/residential density 0.5 unit/acre in development lots. Rural Areas 3 Comp Plan Area. APPLICANT REQUESTS INDEFINITE DEFERRAL APPROVE INDEFINITE DEFERRAL, by a vote of 6:1 (Riley absent), of SP-2017- 00026 Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility as per the applicant's request. 4. Committee Reports Mr. Dotson reported: • Places29/Rio CAC met and working on dividing area into 4 sub areas to create watch list of concerns to be prepared for future funding starting with East Rio. • School Long Range Planning Advisory Committee to meet tomorrow. Mr. Bivins reported: • Recommended going onto the Route 29 Solutions website to look at Hydraulic Road intersection work since final report comes out on Thursday. Mr. Gast-Bray noted next week Mark Graham will be presenting the Hydraulic results for the Planning Commission. Ms. Spain reported: • Pantops CAC met in third meeting —2— Albemarle County Planning Commission FINAL Action Memo—04-10-2018 Page 2 - . to discuss revisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Firehock reported: • Met with Ms. Riley who attended CAC meeting to discuss Southwood site and phasing of the development. • Stormwater Utility meeting with Supervisor Palmer last Thursday at Ruritan Club to discuss rural residents concerns. Ms. More reported: • Crozet CAC met and discussed deferred item from tonight. • PRFA met and discussed name change. • ACE met twice with discussion of five properties and how rank properties. 5. Review of Board of Supervisors Staff Meeting Schedule for next PC meeting on April 17. Postponed. 6. Old Business - None 7. New Business Staff: Rebecca Ragsdale briefed on an . None. upcoming item and community meeting: PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS (ZTA201800002 At the direction of the Board of Supervisors, the County is considering revisions to the Zoning Ordinance regulating Commercial and Industrial zoned properties not served by public water. Proposed changes will replace the current special use permit requirement for water consumption exceeding 400 gallons per site acre per day with a list of permitted uses and uses by special use permit. The purpose of these changes is to better align the Zoning Ordinance with the Comprehensive Plan goals of resource protection and Rural Area policy. April 16, 2018 Informational Meeting at 6:30p.m. —3— Albemarle County Planning Commission FINAL Action Memo—04-10-2018 Page 3 a Rm 241 at 401 McIntire Road May 8, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing at 6 p.m. Auditorium at 401 McIntire Road June 13, 2018 Board of Supervisors Public Hearing Auditorium at 401 McIntire Road Mr. Keller announced: • Meet and greet to be held on Tuesday, April 16 at 5:00 p.m. in 2nd floor lobby. • The next meeting will be on Tuesday, April 16 in Auditorium at 6:00 p.m. 7. Items for Follow-up None 8. Adjourn to April 16, 2018 Albemarle County Planning Commission meeting, 6:00 p.m., Auditorium, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville,Virginia. • The meeting adjourned at 6:31 p.m. Attachment 1: Adopted Resolution of Intent—CPA Birdwood Master Plan /Area B Study Southern and Western Urban Neighborhoods Master Plan Albemarle County Planning Commission FINAL Action Memo—04-10-2018 Page 4 Attachment 1- Resolution of Intent RESOLUTION OF INTENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT BIRDWOOD MASTER PLAN/AREA B STUDY SOUTHERN AND WESTERN URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, the Birdwood Property (hereinafter "the Property") is located on Tax Map Parcel Number 07500-00-00-06300, within Area B, which is an area covered by a 3-Party Agreement among the City of Charlottesville,the University of Virginia, and Albemarle County; and WHEREAS,the three entities have agreed to engage one another in cooperative planning activities regarding the future use of properties that are intended to serve the University of Virginia but which are owned by the University of Virginia (real estate) Foundation; and WHEREAS,the University of Virginia Foundation, which exists to serve University purposes, is the owner of property within Area B and, as a separate property owner is committed to abide by all City and County land use laws and regulations; and WHEREAS,the University of Virginia Foundation and Albemarle County, Virginia, desire to undertake an Area B study of the Property and develop a Birdwood Master Plan (hereinafter "Birdwood Master Plan") that will address various aspects of the current and potential future uses of the Property, including new and/or more intensive land uses, green infrastructure, and potential opportunities for multi-modal connectivity; and WHEREAS, elements of the Birdwood Master Plan will be evaluated for inclusion as an amendment into the Comprehensive Plan's Southern and Western Urban Neighborhoods Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan may be amended by the Board of Supervisors, acting upon a recommendation by the Planning Commission, in response to criteria first adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 17, 1985, and amended December 11, 1991, effective April 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, one of the criteria is whether there is updated information since the future land use designation was established for the Property. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT for purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good land use planning practices,the Albemarle County Planning Commission hereby adopts a resolution of intent to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the Birdwood Property which is part of Area B. -5— Albemarle County Planning Commission FINAL Action Memo—04-10-2018 Page 5 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:01 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com) Subject: RE: SP2017-26 - WAHS -Tier III Thank you for that information, Chris. We are carefully reviewing every element of your report and re-evaluating our analyses of several factors. At this point,we don't know if any modifications can be made or what modifications will be made, but we want to make 100%sure that we have fully challenged ourselves to make our application the best it can be. Yes,we will submit the resubmission fee along with the resubmission. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.SchwellerCcr�leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 11:56 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); David Benish; Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton Subject: RE: SP2017-26 - WAHS -Tier III Lori, RE: SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier III Based on the schedule for a SP resubmittal all dates to get to a May PC meeting are past. The next resubmittal date is April 16 or April 30th, which dates will both get you to the PC by June 26th(as the no sooner date). You are aware that a second resubmittal will cost$1,075 application fee. What do you plan to modify during this resubmittal? Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday,April 09, 2018 11:39 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject:WAHS Milestone Resubmission Hi Chris, Could you please let us know by what date we would need to resubmit to be heard during a May Planning Commission meeting? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434) 245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804) 248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(cr�.leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairryan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 Christopher Perez From: Ann Mallek Sent: Wednesday,April 04, 2018 11:13 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: FW: Milestone WAHS PWSF Attachments: Milestone Communications-WAHS Resubmission Letter 2.19.18.PDF Making sure you received this too From:Jennie More Sent:Wednesday,April 4,2018 10:39 AM To:Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org> Subject: Fwd: Milestone WAHS PWSF Sharing this. -J From: Schweller, Lori H. Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 10:34 AM Subject: Milestone WAHS PWSF To: Julian Bivins, Karen Firehock, Pam Rileyl, 'bdotson@albemarle.org', Daphne Spain, Jennie More, Timothy Keller Cc: Cristian Hernandez, Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) Dear Commissioners, We look forward to presenting the Milestone application to you on Tuesday, April 10t'. We are requesting a special use permit for a use that is allowed with Board approval. The factors for consideration of a special use permit outline a benefit vs. detriment analysis. ("No substantial detriment to adjacent lots; the character of the district will not be changed by the proposed special use; the proposed special use will be harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district, with the public health, safety, and general welfare; the use will be consistent with the comprehensive plan.") The proposed site will have substantial benefits to the community, as we and the schools' representatives will describe. The facility would contribute to the education, safety, convenience and general welfare of the surrounding community. The only effect discussed in the staff report is visibility of the facility. Wireless service is a necessary utility, and we are accustomed to some visibility of utilities structures. Staffs suggested alternative is for Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Shentel to build four brown treetop monopoles in this area, which is permitted without Board approval. However, setting aside the inferior service and service area of short poles with flush-mounted antennas, that route would defeat the purpose of supplying internet to 400+ students in the area at no expense to the schools. We have received an outpouring of support from parents of children who need the school internet service at home to do schoolwork and from other citizens in the area without good wireless service. During the balloon test and community meetings, only one neighboring family opposed the site, and several either supported it or were indifferent. t The staff report for the Milestone Communications item refers to the ARB decisions regarding ground equipment and visibility of the monopole. The applicant's representative and I were at the meeting and heard the entire discussion of the ARB, which was nuanced and thoughtful. The statement in the staff report that the ARB "did not support or recommend approval" is misleading without the context of the full discussion. The consensus of the ARB was that the monopole would be sufficiently screened from the Entrance Corridor with the planting of the trees in front of the school. The ARB was unconcerned about the fleeting view from 250 in front of Brownsville, though pointed out that if the neighbors were to cut down all their trees, the view would be affected. Finally, I have attached the narrative letter accompanying the resubmission package because it contains updated information, some of which is different from the initial letter attached to your staff report as "Attachment D—Applicant's information packet." This letter answers many of the questions in staffs initial review letter. If you have questions or comments, please feel free to call me on my cell phone at 804-248-8700. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434) 245-3448 Direct (434) 296-0905 Fax (804) 248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(c�leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratorta�Ieclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent Monday, April 09, 2018 8:16 AM To: Liz Palmer Subject: RE:SP2017-26 -WAHS -Tier III Liz, • No,the Keswick tower is not related to the WARS tower in any way. Completely different applicants and different sites. The major things they both have in common are neither meet the County ordinance or the Wireless Policy/County Comp Plan to minimize visibility. Additionally, each relies on a bunch of special exceptions to design criteria aimed at minimizing visibility.Also,the applications were not withdrawn;rather,they were deferred. Both projects have applicants who are merely gathering information aimed at refuting and arguing against findings in the staff reports. It is conceivable that the applicants may modify the proposal slightly to address some items raised in the staff report;however, this is not a guarantee.We'll see what happens soon enough. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 .• 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Liz Palmer Sent:Saturday,April 07, 2018 9:43 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re:SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier III Chris, we have had 2 cell tower withdrawals in one month. Are the two related in anyway? Thanks, Liz Palmer (434) 964-7876 Samuel Miller District Representative Albemarle County Board of Supervisors From:Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,April 6, 2018 2:45:03 PM To: David Stoner; Planning Commission;Stephanie Banton; Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) Cc:Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE:SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier Ill All, RE: SP2017-26-WAILS-Tier III The applicant of the above ref project has requested an indefinite deferral(attached).As such this item is not anticipated to be heard at the April 10th PC public hearing nor the May 9 BOS public hearing.The applicant plans to resubmit soon and we will reschedule the public hearings as appropriate. i Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent:Thursday,April 05, 2018 5:31 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Planning Commission<PlanningCommission@albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>; Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; Deborah Balser(Deborah.Balser@emp.shentel.com)<Deborah.Balser@emp.shentel.com>;Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com)<cwinkler@milestonecorp.com>; Brown,Christina N. <Christina.Brown@leclairrvan.com>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone Communications application for 4/10/2018 PC hearing Good Afternoon, Chris, On behalf of Milestone Communications, I respectfully request a deferral of the WAHS Tier Ill application's hearing by the Planning Commission. The Milestone and Shentel teams have discussed your staff report at length and have developed a plan to revisit certain items with the schools (and internally) and to address new ideas. We recognize that a new set of advertisements will be required. Please let me know what would be the soonest date for rescheduling. Many thanks for your help, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller onleclairrvan.com httes://www.leclairrvan.com 2 • Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday,April 09, 2018 8:00 AM To: Claudette Borgersen Subject: RE: May 9 Agenda (please pull SP2017-26 - WAHS -Tier III) Claudette, The shot clock was extended when the applicant agreed to resubmit the required changes to the site plan. This was the applicants choice, thus they consented to the extension of the shot clock. The applicant then scheduled the PC and BOS meetings post resubmittal, and once they received the staff report they requested deferral. Thus the applicant consented to extending the time for action yet again. Each time the shot clock has been extended by choices the applicant made. Thus I see no fault in the County for not having met a shot clock deadline, which the applicant has continually requested extension through their choices during the process. [Section 5.1.40 (e)] Extending time for action. The time by which action must be taken may be extended upon request by, or with the consent of, the applicant. Hope your morning is going well. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Depa ent of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 Mc 're Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 0001 434.296. xt.3443 From:Claudette Borgersen Sent: Friday,April 06, 2018 4:53 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: May 9 Agenda (please pull SP2017-26-WAHS-Tier III) Wasn't there a shot clock on this item? How does that work now. Asking because I don't quite understand the process yet and hoping you can educate me a bit. Thanks!! Best Regards, Claudette K. Borgersen Clerk, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)296-5843 ext. 3405 cborgersenc. ialbemarle.orq From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,April 6, 2018 2:20 PM To:clerk<clerk@albemarle.org> Cc: Mark Graham<mgraham@albemarle.org>; David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Subject: RE: May 9 Agenda (please pull SP2017-26 -WAHS-Tier III) 1 Claudette, RE: May 9 Agenda (please pull SP2017-26-WARS-Tier III) The public hearing for WAHS needs to be pulled from the May 9th BOS meeting(item#22 on the agenda), as just this morning the applicant requested deferral from the April 10th PC public hearing. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Claudette Borgersen On Behalf Of clerk Sent: Friday,April 06, 2018 12:49 PM To:Alyssa Mezzoni<amezzoni@albemarle.org>; Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbrav@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Blake Abplanalp<babplanalp@albemarle.org>; Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org>; Ches Goodall<cgoodall@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Claudette Borgersen <cborgersen@albemarle.org>; County Attorney<CountvAttornev@albemarle.org>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Diane Mullins<DMULLINS@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Elise Kiewra<ekiewra@albemarle.org>; Greg Harper<gharper@albemarle.org>;Jack Kelsey<JKELSEY@albemarle.org>; Jennifer Johnston<jjohnston@k12albemarle.org>;Johnathan Newberry<inewberrv@albemarle.org>; Kevin McDermott <kmcdermott@albemarle.org>; Leadership Council <LeadershipCouncil@albemarle.org>; Leah Brumfield <Ibrumfield@albemarle.org>; Lisa Breeden<lbreeden2@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Megan Nedostup<mnedostup@albemarle.org>; OMB<OMB@albemarle.org>; Pam Shifflett<PSHIFFL@albemarle.org>; Peter Lynch<plvnch@albemarle.org>; Phil Giaramita <pgiaramita@k12albemarle.org>; Rachel Falkenstein<rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; Rebecca Ragsdale <rragsdale@albemarle.org>; Rocio Lamb<rlamb@albemarle.org>; Ruth Emerick<remerick@albemarle.org>; Scott Clark <Sclark@albemarle.org>; Sharon Taylor<STAYLOR@albemarle.org>; Sherry Short<SSHORT@albemarle.org>; Siri Russell <srussell@albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton<sbanton@albemarle.org>; Steven Allshouse <SAllshouse@albemarle.org>;Tex Weaver<TWeaver@albemarle.org>;Tia Mitchell<tmitchell@albemarle.org>;Tim Shea <tshea@k12albemarle.org>;Travis Morris<tmorris2@albemarle.org> Cc:Travis Morris<tmorris2@albemarle.org>; Cheryl Skeen<cskeen@albemarle.org> Subject: May 9 Agenda Good Afternoon, Attached are the tentative agenda for the May 9 Board of Supervisor's meetings. If you have any changes or deletions, please e-mail clerk@albemarle.org by next Tuesday, April 10. Please be sure to make changes to any items that have been entered into the Agenda Item Request Form via the link located on your confirmation e-mail. As a reminder, here is the link: https://albemariecountyva.sharepoint.com/clerks/SitePages/Home.aspx Please note the due dates for Executive Summaries and Agenda Material: May 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES DUE TO COUNTY ATTORNEY NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, APRIL 20. ALL AGENDA MATERIAL DUE TO CLERK NO LATER THAN MONDAY, APRIL 30. Reminder: the May 2 BoS meeting will be cancelled. All regularly scheduled consent agenda items are scheduled on the May 9 agenda. 2 • The deadlines for requesting agenda items for the remaining 2018 meetings can be found on the Albemarle County Executive Summary Reference Materials page. Here is the link: https://ia2010.albemarle.orq/Pages/Executive-Summary-Deadlines.aspx. Please be advised that requests made after these dates will be placed on the next available agenda. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Claudette K. Borgersen Clerk, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)296-5843 ext. 3405 cborgersen(o�albem arle.orq 3 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclainyan.com> Sent Thursday,April 05,2018 5:31 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Planning Commission;Ira Socol; Dean Tistadt; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com); Deborah Balser(Deborah.Balser@emp.shentel.com); Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Christian Winkler (cwinkler@milestonecorp.com); Brown, Christina N.; Margaret Maliszewski Subject: Milestone Communications application for 4/10/2018 PC hearing Good Afternoon, Chris, On behalf of Milestone Communications, I respectfully request a deferral of the WAHS Tier Ill application's hearing by the Planning Commission. The Milestone and Shentel teams have discussed your staff report at length and have developed a plan to revisit certain items with the schools(and internally) and to address new ideas. We recognize that a new set of advertisements will be required. Please let me know what would be the soonest date for rescheduling. Many thanks for your help, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYA.N 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel le r(d leclai rrya n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,April 06, 2018 2:45 PM To: David Stoner; Planning Commission; Stephanie Banton; Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) Cc: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: SP2017-26 -WAHS -Tier III All, RE: SP2017-26-WARS-Tier III The applicant of the above ref project has requested an indefinite deferral(attached). As such this item is not anticipated to be heard at the April 10th PC public hearing nor the May 9 BOS public hearing.The applicant plans to resubmit soon and we will reschedule the public hearings as appropriate. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia • ' 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Thursday,April 05,2018 5:31 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> 'Cc: Planning Commission<PlanningCommission@albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>; Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com) <Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>; Deborah Balser(Deborah.Balser@emp.shentel.com)<Deborah.Balser@emp.shentel.com>; Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com)<cwinkler@milestonecorp.com>; Brown,Christina N. <Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: Milestone Communications application for 4/10/2018 PC hearing Good Afternoon,Chris, On behalf of Milestone Communications, I respectfully request a deferral of the WAHS Tier III application's hearing by the Planning Commission. The Milestone and Shentel teams have discussed your staff report at length and have developed a plan to revisit certain items with the schools (and internally)and to address new ideas. We recognize that a new set of advertisements will be required. Please let me know what would be the soonest date for rescheduling. Many thanks for your help, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIR RYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent Friday,April 06, 2018 2:20 PM To: clerk Cc: Mark Graham; David Benish; Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: May 9 Agenda (please pull SP2017-26 -WARS -Tier III) Attachments: Milestone Communications application for 4/10/2018 PC hearing Claudette, RE:May 9 Agenda (please pull SP2017-26-WARS-Tier Ill) The public hearing for WAHS needs to be pulled from the May 9s'BOS meeting(item#22 on the agenda),as just this morning the applicant requested deferral from the April lOs'PC public hearing. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Claudette Borgersen On Behalf Of clerk Sent: Friday,April 06,2018 12:49 PM To:Alyssa Mezzoni<amezzoni@albemarle.org>;Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz <BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Blake Abplanalp<babplanalp@albemarle.org>; Carla Harris-CDD<CHARRIS@albemarle.org>; Ches Goodall<cgoodall@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Claudette Borgersen <cborgersen@albemarle.org>; County Attorney<CountyAttorney@albemarle.org>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Diane Mullins<DMULLINS@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Elise Kiewra<ekiewra@albemarle.org>; Greg Harper<gharper@albemarle.org>;Jack Kelsey<JKELSEY@albemarle.org>; Jennifer Johnston <jjohnston@k12albemarle.org>;Johnathan Newberry<jnewberry@albemarle.org>; Kevin McDermott <kmcdermott@albemarle.org>; Leadership Council <LeadershipCouncil@albemarle.org>; Leah Brumfield <lbrumfield@albemarle.org>; Lisa Breeden<lbreeden2@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Megan Nedostup<mnedostup@albemarle.org>; OMB<OMB@albemarle.org>; Pam Shifflett<PSHIFFL@albemarle.org>; Peter Lynch<plynch@albemarle.org>; Phil Giaramita <pgiaramita@k12albemarle.org>; Rachel Falkenstein<rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; Rebecca Ragsdale <rragsdale@albemarle.org>; Rocio Lamb<rlamb@albemarle.org>; Ruth Emerick<remerick@albemarle.org>;Scott Clark <Sclark@albemarle.org>;Sharon Taylor<STAYLOR@albemarle.org>;Sherry Short<SSHORT@albemarle.org>;Sid Russell <srussell@albemarle.org>;Stephanie Banton<sbanton@albemarle.org>;Steven Allshouse <SAllshouse@albemarle.org>;Tex Weaver<TWeaver@albemarle.org>;Tia Mitchell<tmitchell@albemarle.org>;Tim Shea<tshea@k12albemarle.org>;Travis Morris<tmorris2@albemarle.org> Cc:Travis Morris<tmorris2@albemarle.org>; Cheryl Skeen<cskeen@albemarle.org> Subject: May 9 Agenda Good Afternoon, Attached are the tentative agenda for the May 9 Board of Supervisor's meetings. If you have any changes or deletions, please e-mail clerk(ct�.albemarle.org by next Tuesday, April 10. Please be sure to make changes to any items that have been entered into the Agenda Item Request Form via the link located on your confirmation e-mail. As a reminder, here is the link: https://al bema rleco untvva.sharepo int.com/clerks/S itePages/Hom e.aspx 1 Please note the due dates for Executive Summaries and Agenda Material: May 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES DUE TO COUNTY ATTORNEY NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, APRIL 20. ALL AGENDA MATERIAL DUE TO CLERK NO LATER THAN MONDAY, APRIL 30. Reminder: the May 2 BoS meeting will be cancelled. All regularly scheduled consent agenda items are scheduled on the May 9 agenda. The deadlines for requesting agenda items for the remaining 2018 meetings can be found on the Albemarle County Executive Summary Reference Materials page. Here is the link: https://ia2010.albemarle.orq/Pages/Executive-Summary-Deadlines.aspx. Please be advised that requests made after these dates will be placed on the next available agenda. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Claudette K. Borgersen Clerk, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)296-5843 ext. 3405 cboroersenaal bemarle.orq 2 • Christopher Perez From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent Wednesday,April 04, 2018 9:13 AM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Christopher Perez Cc: Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Cristian Hernandez; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com) Subject: RE:WAHS ARB Support Good morning, everyone. I've copied the ARB's actions below. The ARB addressed the two areas where the balloon was visible from the EC. They indicated that visibility from the vantage point adjacent to the WAHS property on 250 could be mitigated with the addition of screening trees. With the addition of those trees,the visibility of the pole from that vantage point would be eliminated. Regarding the other area of visibility, in the vicinity of Brownsville Elementary,the ARB pointed out that off-site trees are being relied upon for screening and, if those trees were lost, visibility would increase dramatically. Consequently, the ARB stated that the facility is not being sited to minimize visibility. This is particularly true if the BOS expects all impacts to be mitigated on site. Consequently, in this case,the ARB's action isn't a simple thumbs-up or thumbs-down. The ARB made recommendations and added a qualification regarding the resolution of impacts on site. The entirety of the ARB's recommendation should be considered. Regarding the ground equipment and base station The Board,by a vote of 4:0, approved the application as proposed. Regarding the visibility of the monopole The Board,by a vote of 4:0, forwarded the following recommendation to the agent: As viewed from the Entrance Corridor(EC), screening of the monopole is provided primarily by off-site trees outside of the control of the School Board. Should that off-site wooded area adjacent to the Rt. 250 EC be lost,the view of the monopole from the EC is expected to increase dramatically. Consequently, the facility is not being sited to minimize its visibility,particularly if visual impacts are to be resolved on site. Visibility of the pole from the EC adjacent to the school property can be reduced with the addition of evergreen trees in the lawn area adjacent to the chain link fence and the retention of existing trees(and replacement of trees that die) in this area. Consider a color other than Java Brown to further minimize the visibility of the pole. Margaret From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Wednesday,April 04,2018 8:18 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>;Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com> Subject: RE: WAHS ARB Support Chris, 1 Chris Hernandez and I were there and heard all of their comments. It's strong language to say they"did not support or recommend approval" the project when their job is to evaluate visual impact from the EC,which they did and found acceptable for the reasons I've mentioned. My point is that the PC will interpret your language as meaning they disapproved of the site,when they actually did not disapprove of it. I can make that clear at the hearing. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile LorLSchweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I RIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 8:11 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Margaret Maliszewski; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Cristian Hernandez; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com) Subject: RE: WAHS ARB Support Lori, I disagree with your statements that the ARB supported"the site". The ARB supported and approved the ground equipment. They did not support the visibility of the monopole. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Sent:Wednesday,April 04,2018 8:01 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>;Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)<Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com> Subject:WARS ARB Support Good Morning,Chris, I have not reviewed your staff report, but I notice in the summary on page one that you state the ARB does not support the project. The ARB did support the site and voted to recommend its approval. With the tree plantings in front,the 2 ARB agreed that it was sufficiently screened from the Entrance Corridor. The visibility directly in front of Brownsville Elementary School was deemed de minimus because it would only be a view seen briefly while traveling if one turned to the side. Please let me know if you'd like to discuss. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(ahleclairrvan,com https://www.leclairryan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratorAleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 8:16 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Subject: RE: ARB Lori, The section below is almost verbatim from the action letter of the ARB. From:Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent:Wednesday, April 04, 2018 8:10 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:ARB Chris, Please check with Margaret. I was there and have notes and can tell you that this characterization of the ARB's decision is misleading. RELAVENT PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY: ARB2017-119 WARS Tier III PWSF- On January 12, 2018 the ARB considered the current proposal_ The ARB did not support or recommend approval of the application because of visibility from the Entrance Corridor. They stated that the facility is not sited to minimize its visibility,particularly if visual impacts are to be resolved on site. If of.site wooded areas adjacent to the Rte. 250 were lost then the view of the monopole from the EC would increase dramatically. While the ARB did not support or recommend approval of the application for the monopole they were able to issue a certificate of appropriateness for the ground equipment and base station because these items are not be visible from the EC. [Attachment B] Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIR RYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(afeclai rryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(&,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. Christopher Perez From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 11:30 AM To: Ann Mallek Cc: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: ARB opinion on wahs cell tower Good morning, Ann. The ARB's purview in this type of application is limited to 1)review/approval of the ground equipment based on visibility from the EC and 2)making a recommendation on whether or not the facility is being sited to minimize visibility from the EC.Regarding#1,the ARB did approve the ground equipment because it isn't expected to be seen from the EC street. (See portion of ARB action letter,below.)If there is no visibility,the ARB has nothing to comment on.Regarding #2, the ARB addressed the two areas where the balloon was visible from the EC. They indicated that visibility from the vantage point adjacent to the WAHS property on 250 could be mitigated with the addition of screening trees. With the addition of those trees,the visibility of the pole from that vantage point would be eliminated. Regarding the other area of visibility, in the vicinity of Brownsville Elementary,the ARB pointed out that off-site trees are being relied upon for screening and, if those trees were lost,visibility would increase dramatically. Consequently,the ARB stated that the facility is not being sited to minimize visibility.This is particularly true if the BOS expects all impacts to be mitigated on site. The ARB does not have the authority to comment on impacts generally to scenic highways or historic districts beyond Entrance Corridor considerations,but the lead planner,the Planning Commission,and the Board of Supervisors can consider these impacts. The WAHS site is located just outside the Greenwood-Afton historic district.(See portion of map below.)We did not travel the entire district during the balloon test,but we did drive through the eastern end of the district and we were not able to see the balloon from the areas we traveled. Please let me know if I can provide further clarification. 1 O Lori 1i Schweller,Esq. LeClair Ryan 123 E Main St, 8th Floor Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE: AltB•2017-119:Western Albemarle High School Tier Ill PWSF Dear Ms.Schweller, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board,at its meeting on January 8,2018,reviewed the above noted petition to construct a 145'-tall steel monopole with associated equipment.Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three(3)arrays,to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance,and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite.The ARB took the following actions: ReetZardina the Qround equipment tlpd base station the Board,by a vote of 4:0,approved the application as proposed jtestardintt the visibility of the mon000lc The hoard,by a vote of 4:0,forwarded the following recommendation to the agent: As viewed from the E.rurance Corridor(EC),screening of the monopole is provided primarily by off-site trees outside of the control of the School Board.Should that off-she wooded area adjacent to the Rt.250 EC be lost,the view ofthe monopok from the EC is expected to increase dramatically.Consequently,the facility is not being sited to minimize its visibility,particularly if visual impacts are to be resolved on site.Visibility of the pole from the EC adjacent to the school property can be reduced with the addition of evergreen trees in the lawn arca adjacent to the chain link fence and the retention of existing trees(and replacement of trees that die)in this area.Consider a color ocher than Java Brown to further minimize the visibility of the pole. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness for the ground equipment and bast station.This approval is specifically conditioned on the following. I. Execution of the design indicated on the final approved plans,attachments,materials,samples,and other submittal items presented. 2. Mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. it r� .st :go },,, ♦. • 411:tior:41io. 141. bF,l I • 4 / 1A1 • B B .141 • 1 1N .r i1L1f y*r 1 µ.,K'. • 1 tr 1 { c 1011. J•• }I\. •t• 1•IM I t• 7,1. b -I rt 7 I V?=, :? 7 4110.21 711114 /� !I tI1., •rt N'• '� •I.0 rt I. Thanks. Margaret Original Message From: Ann Mallek Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:44 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: ARB opinion on wahs cell tower Margaret 2 • Please help me understand why the ARB neglected to support 250 as a scenic highway and the two historic districts nearby when they seemed to bless the 145 foot tower at wahs. It seemed to me that these are important elements in the guidelines for area character. Yes I am searching for ways to beat back the application since not complying with the ordinance may not do it with my colleagues. Thank you Ann Phone is fine.996-6159 Sent from my iPhone 3 of A2:4\ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 Mclntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434) 972-4126 January 12,2018 Lori H Schweller, Esq. LeClair Ryan 123 E Main St, 8th Floor Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE; ARB-2017-119: Western Albemarle High School Tier IIl PWSF Dear Ms. Schweller, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board,at its meeting on January 8,2018,reviewed the above noted petition to construct a 145'-tall steel monopole with associated equipment.Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three(3)arrays,to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance,and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite.The ARB took the following actions: Regarding the ground equipment and base station The Board,by a vote of 4:0,approved the application as proposed. Regarding the visibility of the monopole The Board,by a vote of 4:0,forwarded the following recommendation to the agent: As viewed from the Entrance Corridor (EC), screening of the monopole is provided primarily by off-site trees outside of the control of the School Board.Should that off-site wooded area adjacent to the Rt.250 EC be lost,the view of the monopole from the EC is expected to increase dramatically.Consequently,the facility is not being sited to minimize its visibility,particularly if visual impacts are to be resolved on site.Visibility of the pole from the EC adjacent to the school property can be reduced with the addition of evergreen trees in the lawn area adjacent to the chain link fence and the retention of existing trees(and replacement of trees that die)in this area.Consider a color other than Java Brown to further minimize the visibility of the pole. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness for the ground equipment and base station.This approval is specifically conditioned on the following: 1. Execution of the design indicated on the final approved plans,attachments,materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. 2. Mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. If you have any questions concerning any of the above,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, -mu/4,am, Margaret Maliszewski Chief of Planning/Resource Management - Attachment H Citizen Communication about the Proposed Facility Staff received the following communication: A) 12 emails from citizens Al) 11 in favor of the facility for reasons of increased service and finances to the school. A2) 1 opposed to the facility because of visual impacts to the community and that the facility does not comply with the County ordinances for concealment.Additionally,she also mentions health effects caused by the facility. [Emails Attached] B) Additionally,staff received the following discussion points at the community meeting on Dec 20,2017. B1)There were three nearby households represented at the December 20 community meeting. The Hilles family,whose 21 acre parcel abuts the site(TMP 56-17, 100 Miller School Road), seemed to be in favor of it for the service,which could benefit them.Milestone has a letter of intent from Verizon,who says this site would work in its network to improve service in the area; apparently,lease negotiations are underway. Mr. Cushing(TMP 56-17F, 5861 Rockfish Gap Turnpike)mentioned concern that the trees screening the pole in many of the pictures were not on the school property and may disappear,leaving the pole much more visible that suggested by the photos. The Jackson(TMP 56-16E,479 Savannah Court) expressed great concern over visibility. B2)There was a lot of interest in seeing photo simulations with a pole that has 5 sets of antenna arrays on it. Some were concern that the photos did not,fully equate to the anticipated visual impact. The height of the facility and associated visual impact were a significant concern to the CAC members. B3)Many questions about whether the pole really needs to be this tall and whether it could still be viable at a lower height with fewer arrays. I didn't hear anyone suggest a specific reduction, though a couple of people were focused on the height of the Albemarle HS facility. Tom Loach said he would like to see it shorter and asked about economic viability if shorter. B4)There was interest in visual comparisons with the Albemarle HS pole. B5) One concern was raised about possible erosion and sediment control impacts, feeling this was a sensitive area. B6) Concern that the trees screening the pole in many of the pictures were not on the property and may disappear,leaving the pole much more visible that suggested by the photos. B7) Some questions with how important this was to Schools. CAC expressed interest in having someone from School Board or Superintendent's Office speak to the value seen with this project. Though not specifically said,I took this to mean there was interest in knowing if this was "nice to have"versus an"important to have"facility. B8) Some concerns that there was no way to assure Schools plowed any monies received for the facility back into the local schools versus the school district as large. I took this to mean there was a feeling the impact was local and the benefit should all be local. C)Additionally, staff received the following discussion points at the community meeting on February 21,2018. CI) 1 in person discussion of opposition from TMP 56-17G1, property owner William Buckon. The citizen caught up with staff in the parking lot to discuss the visual impacts on his property. He states that the facility was highly visible and skylite from his property during the balloon test.He is adamantly opposed to this facility being constructed in his viewshed,because the height of the facility is too great and will destroy their scenic views and vistas from their backyard as well as that of the community as a whole. His son also mention the devastating effects that these facilities have on beehives and bee population collapse in the area. He believes this should be considered and discussed because this area has a lot of farms and orchards, which rely on bees to pollinate their products, as well as ecological health of the area as a whole. C2) Many of the same discussion points from the Dec 20'h meeting were reiterated and discussed further. - Questions about whether the pole really needs to be this tall and whether it could still be viable at a lower height with fewer arrays. -There was interest in visual comparisons with the Albemarle HS pole. - One concern was raised about possible erosion and sediment control impacts, feeling this was a sensitive area. - Some concerns that there was no way to assure Schools plowed any monies received for the facility back into the local schools versus the school district as large. I took this to mean there was a feeling the impact was local and the benefit should all be local. Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 8:14 AM To: 'David Stoner' Cc: David Benish Subject: RE:WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up David, I called you this morning around 8am but it went to voicemail.I plan on attending tonight's meeting to hear what citizens have to say.I believe it starts at 7pm and is located in Crozet Library. The applicant just resubmitted revised plans,which I.have not reviewed yet,nor has anyone else on the review committee(I am distributing them today). There is no staff report ready for this proposal just yet; such a report will not be ready until it is due to the Planning Commission for their public hearing. This tower is a Special Use Permit because of its height.It is a Tier III, which does not rely on a reference tree.Thus BOS action is required for approval. Two public hearings (Pt at PC,2nd at BOS)...this application also relies on a myriad of special exceptions,which all require BOS action. Call me if you have more questions. • Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: David Stoner[mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re:WARS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Chris— [suspect you're out today but I think it would be good if the group for context was clear on how this tower is regulated pursuant to the ordinance...my understanding is due to height it is not permitted by right, rather permitted only pursuant to special use permit,yes? Any other key parts of the ordinance worth reviewing? Or maybe that is in the staff report if available? Will you be attending Wed eve? Thanks, Dave David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com t From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 9:01 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com>, Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro<jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis <RReionis@k12albemarle.org>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>,Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, "Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com)" <Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com>, "Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)" <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Good Morning, Dave, Thank you for checking in with us. We would like to make a follow-up presentation at your meeting Wednesday, if your agenda will permit. The most important new information that we have to share is analysis from County Schools regarding the service this facility will provide for the schools and teh number of students who will benefit from the new facility. I will provide a copy of a packet prepared by Ira Socol via email later today and will bring hard copies to the meeting. Also new—Milestone is proposing to plant a row of evergreens along the fence in front of the school, which will completely block the view of the facility from the intersection with Old Trail Drive. Another set of trees will be planted south of the football field to better screen the facility from residences on that side of the school. Finally, a no-cut zone of trees will be established around the facility. Please let me know if you have questions. I look forward to seeing you and the CCAC on Wednesday. Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl©gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 9:15 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Dean Tistadt; Christopher Perez Cc: David Oberg; Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis; Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez; Andrew Gast-Bray Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Lori/Dean— 2 w i Just confirming if you plan to have a follow-up discussion/presentation to the CCAC this Wed 21n as previously discussed? And has there been a change to the application? If so, could someone share that information or anything else you might wish to share as a pre-read ahead of Wed's meeting? Christopher— Is there a staff report on the [revised] application? Any idea of timing of Planning Commission meeting yet on this? Thanks all, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastoner1@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date: Thursday,January 11, 2018 at 12:05 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com>, Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro<lalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis <RReionis@k12albemarle.org>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, Christopher Perez • <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Thank you for the opportunity, Dave. I will put Feb.21"on my schedule. At this point, we are still planning for the 215` but we will let you know if that changes. Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 3 From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:46 AM To: Dean Tistadt; Schweller, Lori H. Cc: David Oberg; Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis; Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez; Andrew Gast-Bray; Christopher Perez Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Dean, Thank you. I'll plan on that and touch base closer to the Feb CCAC meeting to confirm. That's after the Planning Commission meeting if the applicant sticks to the schedule laid out below(can anyone advise if a Feb 20 PC meeting is likely?), but I know these things slip sometimes and CCAC will deal with whatever the schedule is. Thanks, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org> Date: Thursday,January 11, 2018 at 11:35 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis <RReionis@k12albemarle.org>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up I think you might want to plan on the February meeting. We are working to respond to your questions but we are also heavily immersed in preparing the Superintendent's FY 2019 funding request that goes before the School Board on January 18. Dean A.Tistadt Chief Operating Officer Albemarle County Public Schools From: David Stoner Imailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 11:28 AM To:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.schweller@leclairrvan.com> Cc: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; David Oberg<doberg@kl2albemarle.org>;Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>; Robert Rejonis<RRelonis@k12albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>;Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbrav@albemarle.org>;Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Lori/ACPS Rep: 4 I'm trying to finalize the Crozet CAC agenda for next Wed the 17th,so please let me know if anyone from Milestone or ACPS will have any info they would like to share by then in response to the questions posed below, or if that will come later(CCAC next meeting is Feb 21). We have other agenda items that will take up most of next week's meeting, so we'd only have 30 min max on this—10-15 min for info present/Q&A and 15 min for follow-up CCAC discussion. Thanks, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Wednesday,January 10, 2018 at 8:37 AM To: David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com> Cc: Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>,Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>, David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com>, Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>, David Oberg<doberg@kl2albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis<RRelonis@k12albemarle.org>, Timothy Kunkel <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbrav@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up David Stoner, RE: SP201700026-Western Albemarle High School-Tier III PWSF The item is tentatively scheduled for the PC public hearing on Feb 20th and tentatively scheduled for the BOS public hearing on March 14. If these dates stick, the staff report shall be finalized on Feb 12t. Review comments on the proposal shall be provided to the applicant by COB this Friday. Depending on these comments and how the applicant decides to respond to them, we will know if these dates still work/are moving forward or if the review will need to be timed out and await a resubmittal of the concept plan. We are also up against a 150 day shot clock for this project based on FCC regulations. The 150 days expires on March 29th and an action should be taken by then; however, the applicant has the ability to extend the shot clock based on various circumstances. The 150 day shot clock is not the end of the world if it is missed; however, we never miss these deadlines and I do not intend to be the first. But a lot of it depends on how the applicant chooses to move forward once they receive the comments. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 5 From: David Stoner[mailto:davidastoner1@gmail.coml Sent:Tuesday,January 09,2018 2:40 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: FW:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Chris— Forgot to copy you on this....you're the lead planner on this,yes? Do you know when this is likely to be before the PC and/or when you would expect to have staff report completed? Trying to decide timing of any future CCAC discussion on this. thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: David Stoner<davidastoner1@gmail.com> Date:Tuesday,January 9, 2018 at 2:16 PM To: " Subject: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up All, I am writing this to follow-up on Milestone Communication's presentation to the Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) last month regarding the proposed cell tower at Western Albemarle High School. I first want to thank Lori and Milestone for an informative presentation. Secondly, I wanted to pass along some of the questions that were raised by CCAC members,for possible follow-up throughout this process. Third,the CCAC would like to invite someone from Albemarle County Schools or School Board to attend a future CCAC meeting(Jan 17 if possible or Feb, prior to planning commission meeting)to perhaps address some of these follow-up questions. Questions include: 1. Can you more specifically describe the benefits to the schools? Specifically, a. Some indication of what numbers of students can be reached with this tower that do not have current decent access to internet? Or are there other service benefits beyond that? b. What is estimated $ benefits to the school district? Can these funds be directed toward Western/Henley/Brownsville/Crozet Elementary since that is the population being impacted visually with this tower? c. Are there any lessons learned or feedback from the AHS installation in terms of benefits to AHS,things that might be considered differently at WAHS. Or feedback from other NOVA schools that maybe did this? 6 2. £ Can similar benefits to the schools exist with a shorter tower(e.g., 100'vs. 125'vs the 145' requested, etc)? What is the pro/con assessment of this—e.g., similar/lower benefits vs. shorter tower or fewer arrays and less visual impact? Can the project proceed with a shorter tower? 3. Is an alternate location "back further" onto the school property,that may have less visual impact from rte 250 especially,feasible? 4. Can Milestone produce pictures of similar 4-array towers like the one being proposed? Can Milestone produce more realistic visual simulations with the 4-equipment arrays vs.one array? Possibly also show what a 125'or 100'tower might look like, if that is at all feasible or to be considered. I recognize some of the above questions may be best answered by school reps,others by Milestone. I also ask who is the best contact at Albemarle County Schools to coordinate with on these issues? Finally,all of this is intended to supplement the public review process and inform the CCAC and citizens so they can better provide input to the Planning Commission and Board. Thanks for your assistance, Cheers, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner Chair,Crozet Community Advisory Council 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com> Cc: "T. Michael Kunkel" <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Hi Dave, It was our pleasure, and thanks again for giving us the opportunity. Yes,two people with the schools were mentioned during the presentation. I mentioned Dean Tisdadt,who came to Albemarle from Fairfax County schools and is the COO for Strategic Planning and Operations. Dean established a relationship with Milestone Communications while in Fairfax County, and has led the school board to enter into a relationship with the company here to improve the schools' wireless communications and increase revenue. Cria Wood mentioned Ira Socol, who is Interim Executive Director of Technologies and Innovation. He is serving in the place of Vince Schreivert,who worked with us on the AHS site and has since left the county. Here's the webpage with their info: https://www2.k12albemarle.org/acps/departments/Pages/default.aspx We met with Dean,Vince, and engineer Robert Rejonis to learn the schools' plans for the AHS site. I'm sure we will do the same for WAHS and will request the schools' representatives to be at the hearings to discuss and answer questions as they did for the earlier site. Thanks very much, Lori 7 Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@Jeclairryan.com httos://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl(aemail.com1 Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 12:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: T. Michael Kunkel Subject: Re: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library - Milestone Presentation Lori— Thanks for your presentation. One request, as I reach out to school board for follow-up. Do you have the name/contact information for the person within the school district who was named as managing this project with Milestone (as I recall worked with them in a prior life in Fairfax)? The districts IT guy in the audience was helpful, but I got the sense he maybe wasn't the best to direct some questions to (and/or do you have his name/contact info possibly? I had hoped to reach out to them as well as school board members,thinking they may have more info/details than the board members. Mike—maybe same request to you from your notes/minutes/attendee list? thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com • From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 10:47 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com>, Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC <crozetcac(a@googlegroups.com> Cc: Emily Kilroy<ekilrov@albemarle.org>, "Tim F.J. Tolson" <tfitolson@gmail.com>,Jennie More <jmore@albemarle.org>, Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>, "cperez@albemarle.org" <cperez@albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Dear Dave and CCAC, Thank you again for allowing us to present the Milestone Communications wireless project for WAHS at your meeting last night. Attached, as requested, is the presentation without photographs and photosimulations. Please let me know if you have trouble opening it, and I will send it in a different format. 8 a We will work on gathering the information and exhibits requested by the Committee and citizen attendees. I would greatly appreciate an email if members if the School Board agree to attend an upcoming CCAC meeting. Best regards, and Happy Holidays, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel ler(T I ecl a i rrva n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:03 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC; Notification about CCAC Cc: Emily Kilroy; Tim F.J. Tolson; Jennie More; Ann Mallek; cperez@albemarle.org; Schweller, Lori H. Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library All— Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held Wed, Dec 20 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Probably a shorter meeting than usual,so if anyone has any comments or suggestions on the agenda, please let me know. Regards, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 9 *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 10 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Monday, February 19,2018 9:01 AM To: David Stoner; Dean Tistadt; Christopher Perez Cc: David Oberg;Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis;Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez;Andrew Gast- Bray; Dan Meenan (Dan.Meenan@emp.shentel.com);Chris Harold (CHarold @ milestonecorp.com) Subject RE:WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Good Morning, Dave, Thank you for checking in with us. We would like to make a follow-up presentation at your meeting Wednesday, if your agenda will permit. The most important new information that we have to share is analysis from County Schools regarding the service this facility will provide for the schools and teh number of students who will benefit from the new facility. I will provide a copy of a packet prepared by Ira Socol via email later today and will bring hard copies to the meeting. Also new—Milestone is proposing to plant a row of evergreens along the fence in front of the school, which will completely block the view of the facility from the intersection with Old Trail Drive. Another set of trees will be planted south of the football field to better screen the facility from residences on that side of the school. Finally, a no-cut zone of trees will be established around the facility. Please let me know if you have questions. I look forward to seeing you and the CCAC on Wednesday. Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller o?Jeclairrvan.com https://www.leclainyan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 9:15 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Dean Tistadt; Christopher Perez Cc: David Oberg; Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis; Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez; Andrew Gast-Bray Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Lori/Dean— 1 4 ' Just confirming if you plan to have a follow-up discussion/presentation to the CCAC this Wed 21"as previously discussed? And has there been a change to the application? If so, could someone share that information or anything else you might wish to share as a pre-read ahead of Wed's meeting? Christopher— Is there a staff report on the [revised] application? Any idea of timing of Planning Commission meeting yet on this? Thanks all, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Thursday,January 11, 2018 at 12:05 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com>, Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis <RReionis@k12albemarle.org>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Thank you for the opportunity, Dave. I will put Feb. 21"on my schedule. At this point, we are still planning for the 21" but we will let you know if that changes. Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 - . From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@omail.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 11:46 AM To: Dean Tistadt; Schweller, Lori H. Cc: David Oberg; Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis; Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez; Andrew Gast-Bray; Christopher Perez Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Dean, Thank you. I'll plan on that and touch base closer to the Feb CCAC meeting to confirm. That's after the Planning Commission meeting if the applicant sticks to the schedule laid out below (can anyone advise if a Feb 20 PC meeting is likely?), but I know these things slip sometimes and CCAC will deal with whatever the schedule is. Thanks, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org> Date:Thursday,January 11, 2018 at 11:35 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@kl2albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis <RRejonis@k12albemarle.org>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>,Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up I think you might want to plan on the February meeting. We are working to respond to your questions but we are also heavily immersed in preparing the Superintendent's FY 2019 funding request that goes before the School Board on January 18. Dean A.Tistadt Chief Operating Officer Albemarle County Public Schools From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 11:28 AM To:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori:Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>;Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>; Robert Rejonis<RReionis@k12albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>;Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbrav@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Lori/ACPS Rep: 3 I'm trying to finalize the Crozet CAC agenda for next Wed the 17th,so please let me know if anyone from Milestone or ACPS will have any info they would like to share by then in response to the questions posed below,or if that will come later(CCAC next meeting is Feb 21). We have other agenda items that will take up most of next week's meeting,so we'd only have 30 min max on this—10-15 min for info present/Q&A and 15 min for follow-up CCAC discussion. Thanks, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Wednesday,January 10, 2018 at 8:37 AM To: David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com> Cc:Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>,Jennie More<Imore@albemarle.org>, David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com>, Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>, David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis<RRelonis@k12albemarle.org>,Timothy Kunkel <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up David Stoner, RE: SP201700026-Western Albemarle High School-Tier III PWSF The item is tentatively scheduled for the PC public hearing on Feb 20th and tentatively scheduled for the BOS public hearing on March 14. If these dates stick, the staff report shall be finalized on Feb 12`h. Review comments on the proposal shall be provided to the applicant by COB this Friday. Depending on these comments and how the applicant decides to respond to them, we will know if these dates still work/are moving forward or if the review will need to be timed out and await a resubmittal of the concept plan. We are also up against a 150 day shot clock for this project based on FCC regulations. The 150 days expires on March 29d' and an action should be taken by then; however, the applicant has the ability to extend the shot clock based on various circumstances. The 150 day shot clock is not the end of the world if it is missed;however, we never miss these deadlines and I do not intend to be the first. But a lot of it depends on how the applicant chooses to move forward once they receive the comments. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development 'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 4 From: David Stoner(mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com) Sent:Tuesday,January 09, 2018 2:40 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: FW:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Chris— Forgot to copy you on this....you're the lead planner on this,yes? Do you know when this is likely to be before the PC and/or when you would expect to have staff report completed? Trying to decide timing of any future CCAC discussion on this. thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: David Stoner<davidastoner1@gmail.com> Date:Tuesday,January 9, 2018 at 2:16 PM To: " Subject: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up All, I am writing this to follow-up on Milestone Communication's presentation to the Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) last month regarding the proposed cell tower at Western Albemarle High School. I first want to thank Lori and Milestone for an informative presentation. Secondly, I wanted to pass along some of the questions that were raised by CCAC members,for possible follow-up throughout this process. Third,the CCAC would like to invite someone from Albemarle County Schools or School Board to attend a future CCAC meeting(Jan 17 if possible or Feb, prior to planning commission meeting)to perhaps address some of these follow-up questions. Questions include: 1. Can you more specifically describe the benefits to the schools? Specifically, a. Some indication of what numbers of students can be reached with this tower that do not have current decent access to internet? Or are there other service benefits beyond that? b. What is estimated$ benefits to the school district? Can these funds be directed toward Western/Henley/Brownsville/Crozet Elementary since that is the population being impacted visually with this tower? 5 c. Are there any lessons learned or feedback from the AHS installation in terms of benefits to AHS,things that might be considered differently at WAHS. Or feedback from other NOVA schools that maybe did this? 2. Can similar benefits to the schools exist with a shorter tower(e.g., 100'vs. 125'vs the 145' requested, etc)? What is the pro/con assessment of this—e.g.,similar/lower benefits vs. shorter tower or fewer arrays and less visual impact? Can the project proceed with a shorter tower? 3. Is an alternate location "back further" onto the school property,that may have less visual impact from rte 250 especially,feasible? 4. Can Milestone produce pictures of similar 4-array towers like the one being proposed? Can Milestone produce more realistic visual simulations with the 4-equipment arrays vs.one array? Possibly also show what a 125'or 100'tower might look like,if that is at all feasible or to be considered. I recognize some of the above questions may be best answered by school reps,others by Milestone. I also ask who is the best contact at Albemarle County Schools to coordinate with on these issues? Finally,all of this is intended to supplement the public review process and inform the CCAC and citizens so they can better provide input to the Planning Commission and Board. Thanks for your assistance, Cheers, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner Chair,Crozet Community Advisory Council 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Tuesday,January 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com> Cc: "T. Michael Kunkel" <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Hi Dave, It was our pleasure, and thanks again for giving us the opportunity. Yes,two people with the schools were mentioned during the presentation. I mentioned Dean Tisdadt, who came to Albemarle from Fairfax County schools and is the COO for Strategic Planning and Operations. Dean established a relationship with Milestone Communications while in Fairfax County, and has led the school board to enter into a relationship with the company here to improve the schools' wireless communications and increase revenue. Cria Wood mentioned Ira Socol, who is Interim Executive Director of Technologies and Innovation. He is serving in the place of Vince Schreivert, who worked with us on the AHS site and has since left the county. Here's the webpage with their info: https://www2.k12albemarle.org/acps/departments/Pages/default.aspx We met with Dean,Vince, and engineer Robert Rejonis to learn the schools' plans for the AHS site. I'm sure we will do the same for WAHS and will request the schools' representatives to be at the hearings to discuss and answer questions as they did for the earlier site. 6 • Thanks very much, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@ I ecla irrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, January 02, 2018 12:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: T. Michael Kunkel Subject: Re: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library - Milestone Presentation Lori— Thanks for your presentation. One request, as I reach out to school board for follow-up. Do you have the name/contact information for the person within the school district who was named as managing this project with Milestone (as I recall worked with them in a prior life in Fairfax)? The districts IT guy in the audience was helpful, but I got the sense he maybe wasn't the best to direct some questions to (and/or do you have his name/contact info possibly? I had hoped to reach out to them as well as school board members,thinking they may have more info/details than the board members. Mike—maybe same request to you from your notes/minutes/attendee list? thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastoner1@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 10:47 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com>, Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC <crozetcac@googlegroups.com> Cc: Emily Kilroy<ekilroy@albemarle.org>, "Tim F.J. Tolson" <tfltolson@gmail.com>,Jennie More <jmore@albemarle.org>,Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>, "cperez@albemarle.org" <cperez@albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Dear Dave and CCAC, 7 Thank you again for allowing us to present the Milestone Communications wireless project for WAHS at your meeting last night. Attached, as requested, is the presentation without photographs and photosimulations. Please let me know if you have trouble opening it, and I will send it in a different format. We will work on gathering the information and exhibits requested by the Committee and citizen attendees. I would greatly appreciate an email if members if the School Board agree to attend an upcoming CCAC meeting. Best regards, and Happy Holidays, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwell er@ lecla irryan.corn https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:03 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC; Notification about CCAC Cc: Emily Kilroy;Tim F.J.Tolson; Jennie More; Ann Mallek; cperez@albemarle.orq; Schweller, Lori H. Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library All— Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held Wed, Dec 20 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Probably a shorter meeting than usual, so if anyone has any comments or suggestions on the agenda, please let me know. Regards, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastoner1@gmail.com *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 8 *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 9 (,%4 ',5%,"--(,,, ___ s -pc — Ap4 ,0 f�j �C &S M -r c� -� I CROZET COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE CrozetCrozet Library Wednesday, Feb 21 , 2018 from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. re5)/44941 . --02° -e Agenda Co y.- �� � 1;az ��j/"�/ 1y. {Agenda) Review (D ve Stoner - /CCAC chair) �/y /�/J'/� LA" `-)04- 1-te tt doe._ l�' 4,1 e -�OLd / _ /e- � , '�- ' 02,11 .. '1 J G/ f't�i� 2. Approval of-AA• 3. WAHS Wireless Tower SUP supplemental information (ACPS, Milestone) 4. Follow-up discussion on Crozet Su y and Master Plan Update --) 5. Items Not Listed on the Agend lif?-PnkeA" -.)ziASe.P 0li V; -.5')&1-'3-- / . iS.Q_Le 5 um/ic7--(C,c9,,,,eti-,i) 6. Announcements /0 * /� '(Dcp -Oi a lit•�� CCAC positions are open beginning April 2018!! Apply by Feb 27. Link to application: http://www.albemarle.org/boards/ CCAC 2018 Officer Nominations in March 7. Potential Future Agenda Items a. Mar- Continued discussion on Crozet Survey and Master Plan Update b. Mar- Officer Elections c. Apr - Western Park Master Plan Update (Bob Crickenberger, Albemarle County) d. Jun - Crozet Drinking Water Infrastructure Plan Update (Mr. Mawyer ACSA/RWSA) e. Summer - Albemarle County Stormwater Utility Plans (Greg Harper, Env. Services Chief) �hcI/ * CO1D-r' — 13row\/t 1Nr1 k X *-or-_0, vs 3 C I a,i ,5`/lQi J Christopher Perez From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: ' Wednesday, February 21,2018 11:30 AM To: Ann Mallek _ Cc: Christopher Perez Subject: RE:ARB opinion on wahs cell tower Good morning,Ann. The ARB's purview in this type of application is limited to 1)review/approval of the ground equipment based on visibility from the EC and 2)making a recommendation on whether or not the facility is being sited to minimize visibility from the EC.Regarding#1,the ARB did approve the ground equipment because it isn't expected to be seen from the EC street. (See portion of ARB action letter, below.)If there is no visibility,the ARB has nothing to comment on.Regarding #2,the ARB addressed the two areas where the balloon was visible from the EC.They indicated that visibility from the vantage point adjacent to the WARS property on 250 could be mitigated with the addition of screening trees. With the addition of those trees,the visibility of the pole from that vantage point would be eliminated. Regarding the other area of visibility, in the vicinity of Brownsville Elementary,the ARB pointed out that off-site trees are being relied upon for screening and, if those trees were lost, visibility would increase dramatically. Consequently,the ARB stated that the facility is not being sited to minimize visibility. This is particularly true if the BOS expects all impacts to be mitigated on site: The ARB does not have the authority to comment on impacts generally to scenic highways or historic districts beyond Entrance Corridor considerations,but the lead planner,the Planning Commission,and the Board of Supervisors can consider these impacts.The WAITS site is located just outside the Greenwood-Afton historic district.(See portion of map below.)We did not travel the entire district during the balloon test,but we did drive through the eastern end of the district and we were not able to see the balloon from the areas we traveled. Please let me know if I can provide further clarification. 1 • Lori H Schwelkr,Esq. LeClair Ryan 123 E Main St,8th Floor Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE: ARB-2017.119:Western Albemarle High School Tier 111 PWSF Dear Ms.Schweller, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board,at its meeting on January 8,2018,reviewed the above noted petition to construct a 145'-tall steel monopole with associated equipment.Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three(3)arrays,to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance,and:o allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite.The ARO took the following actions: ,Rcstardlne the ground cauloment and base station I he Board,b} a vote of 4:0,approved the application as proposed. Retarding the visibility of the monopole The Board,by a vote of 4:0,forwarded the following recommendation to the agent: As viewed from the Entruice Corridor(EC),screening of the monopole is provided primarily by off-sire trees outside of the control of the School Board.Should that oft'--site wooded area adjacent to the Rt.250 EC be lost,the view ofthe monopole from the EC is expected to increase dramatically.Consequently,the facility is not being sited to minimize its visibility,particularly if visual impacts are to be resolved on site.Visibility of the pole from the EC adjacent to the school property can be reduced with the addition of evergreen trees in the lawn area adjacent to the chain link fence and the retention of existing trees(and replacement of trees that die)in this area.Consider a color other than lava Brown to ftsrther minimize the visibility of the pole. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness for the ground equipment and base station.This approval is specifically conditioned on the following: I. Execution of the design indicated on the final approved plans,attachments,materials,samples,and other submittal items presented. 2. Mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. err4.• ��lit4'.. . �9U.,�j- y1:1 , • if, �7��� »err. �iy i'. ,.. � j�/. •i`� • /'--s w a ts f. nor. w j '.. ..i. / •' µ.r. n.Cfi• M 1914, ,I*.,N M.pI I✓' t7N n.. 1 - '�• M.t. # yrL111 M! ..� % n eti K.telle "w' 1►MAl ;al IS l��ays • na r,. '4..s 1Y w CliV 1 . lip l' a r L� ***- v.. 4. --7,-,..-4„,- fygni?..gy , ,.•iii... le •—r:-.1,,-, x.w i1 .t * 4,11. . . P''' f $ ,.)). \ litilik-m..01111 ,d,144404 M .-C/ 4.,AAA 10 :111X Ithi ... ''"..N Thanks. Margaret Original Message From: Ann Mallek Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:44 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: ARB opinion on wahs cell tower Margaret 2 • Please help me understand why the ARB neglected to support 250 as a scenic highway and the two historic districts nearby when they seemed to bless the 145 foot tower at wahs. It seemed to me that these are important elements in the guidelines for area character. Yes I am searching for ways to beat back the application since not complying with the ordinance may not do it with my colleagues. Thank you Ann Phone is fine.996-6159 Sent from my iPhone 3 I.. Lr,. LECLAIR-RYAN February 19, 2018 RE: SP201700026 — Western Albemarle High School - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) Dear Mr. Perez: On behalf of Milestone Communications (the "Applicant"), I submit the following additional information for the proposed Tier III PWSF on the property of the School Board of the County of Albemarle near the football field of Western Albemarle High School. Our responses (in bold) follow each of the comments from the County reviewers and refer to the latest set of revised plans by Timmons Group, dated October 30, 2017, last revised February 19, 2018, 18 copies of which are enclosed (the "Plans"). (Where no objection was noted or no response was required, I have not reproduced the comment.) Please note that, as we have discussed, some of the issues were resolved with an interim set of plans submitted during the review period, but our responses will refer only to the enclosed set of plans, which are the latest revision, resubmitted for County review. The second part of our resubmission is a package (18 copies) from Albemarle County Schools Department of Learning Engineering, Access, and Design (LEAD) and its LINK project. Many of the questions from the community meeting held during the regular Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) meeting on December 20, 2017 were centered around benefits of the proposed facility to Albemarle County Public Schools (the "Schools") and students in the surrounding community. Answers to those questions follow the responses to the County reviewers' questions. Albemarle County Division of Planning Services (Planner)-Christopher Perez 1. [5.1.40(4)(a)] Proposed Improvements. The plans and the formal request shall be revised to accurately depict and request the maximum height of the facility. Sheet Z-6 depicts 831' AMSL (145' tall monopole); however, the maximum height is depicted and labeled incorrectly on the plans. The height provided was taken from the top of the monopole; rather, than the maximum height of the facility, which in this case is the top of the uppermost antenna array. Either revise the plan to accurately depict the true maximum height above ground of the facility (which appears to be 146') or reduce the maximum height above ground of the facility to truly be 145' tall. HEIGHT OF FACILITY. The revised elevation on Sheet A-6.0 of the Plans shows the top of the monopole at an elevation of 831.0 AMSL/145'-0" AGL, which lowers the highest proposed antenna array by five feet (5') from 145' to 140'. At the community meeting held during the regular Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) meeting on December 20, 2017, and in other conversations with various interested parties since the application was E-mail: Lori.Schweller©leclairryan.com 123 East Main Street, Suite 800 Direct Phone: (434) 245-3448 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Direct Fax: (434) 296-0905 Phone: (434) 245-3444 I Fax: (434) 296-0905 CALIFORNIA\CONNECTICUT I DELAWARE 4 FLORIDA I GEORGIA 1 ILLINOIS 1 MARYLAND 1 MASSACHUSETTS 4 MICHIGAN\ NEW JERSEY NEW YORK 1 PENNSYLVANIA I RHODE ISLAND\TEXAS 1 VIRGINIA 1 WASHINGTON,D.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW \ WWW.LECLAIRRYAN.COM submitted, the Applicant has been asked whether the proposed height for this wireless facility is actually needed. Mr. Ira Socol, Executive Director of Technologies and Innovation/Department of Learning Engineering,Access, and Design for Albemarle County Public Schools ("County Schools") has explained to us that the 140' height is a "necessity" based on his department's "mapping of existing student addresses and the need for its signal to be at an angle that will allow penetration to homes located below the street address." He states further that the "County does not fund us in a way that would allow us to erect those [wireless communications monopoles] throughout the southern and western regions of the County" and that he has been "strongly challenged by School Board members from those areas on our ability to provide students with a signal sufficient to carry multimedia into the homes of our students." 2. [5.1.40(6)(c)] Balloon Height. What was the height that the balloon was flown at on Dec 7th? Also, what was the height of the balloon in the photographs provided to staff in the initial application packet? Was it 145' or 146'? Please state this in your response. This may cause staff to recommend the balloon test to be renown at the correct height. BALLOON HEIGHT. The balloon was flown at 145', the proposed height of the facility. Though a two-foot (2') lightning rod is permitted above the approved PSWF height by the zoning ordinance, the diameter of the lightning rod will only be one inch (1") so would not be visible from a distance. Therefore,the height of the lightning rod was not included in the balloon fly height. 3. [5.1.40(4)(a) & (h)] Proposed Improvements. Fire and Rescue will not permit the access road under the bleachers (see Fire/Rescue comment below). Thus the location of the access road shall to be revised. It is suggested that the temporary construction easement and temporary 10' wide gravel access road become the permanent easement and access for the facility. The plans shall be revised to correctly depict this modification. ACCESS TO SITE. The location of the temporary/permanent access road has been changed, as shown on the Plans. The area under the bleachers will not be used at all. 4. [5.1.40(a)4(a)] Existing and proposed improvements. To aid in assessing the visual impacts of the monopole provide dimensions for the proposed monopole; to include diameter of the base, mid- level, and top of the monopole. MONOPOLE DIMENSIONS. The diameter of the proposed monopole is set out in a Note on Sheet Z-6.0 of the Plans: the approximate diameter at the top of the pole would be two feet (2'), and the approximate diameter at the bottom of the pole would be five feet (5'). The diameter at the middle of the pole is approximately forty inches (40"). 5. [5.1.40(a)4(a)] Proposed Improvements. Provide the unit type for the measurements of the platforms and the measurements of the platform from the monopole(are they feet, inches, mm?). ANTENNA ARRAY MOUNTS. The three horizontal antenna mounts would be eight feet (8')long,connected by three shorter horizontal platform connectors. 6. [5.1.40(a)4(a)] Proposed Improvements. How far is the closest point of the back of the antenna from the monopole and how far is the further point of the back of the antenna from the monopole? Provide these dimensions on the plan. They are also required to be part of your special exception request as well as part of the plan itself. Provide this information. Page 2 of 8 ANTENNA ARRAY DIMENSIONS. The proposed widest standoff of any antenna array is based on the needs of the committed commercial carrier, Shentel. Those dimensions are shown on Sheet Z-7.0 of the Plans. The greatest distance from the face of the monopole to the back of an antenna would be sixty-six inches (66"), and the shortest distance from the face of the monopole to the back of an antenna would be approximately forty-three and three quarters inches (43.75"). 7. [5.1.40(a)4(a), 5.1.40(a)4(f), 5.1.40(b)3] Existing and proposed improvements (significant natural features), (trees), and(tree conservation plan). To aid in screening and to help minimize visibility of the facility. On the plan depict existing wooded areas to remain on the school property within a 200' radius of the lease area. Additionally, depict and label the ARB requested plantings along the frontage of the property. Additionally, provide evergreen screening trees on the southern area of the field to aid in screening from residential properties to the South. Please depict, label, and providing planting information: species, caliper, heights at time of planting (minimum of 6 foot required, recommends between 8' - 10' at time of planting. tia • CY° �k r r r , eat ease .v ": <, ., The Applicant has revised the Plans as requested. Please see Sheets Z-0.1 and Z-0.2 for (a) 22 juniperus virginiana (Eastern red cedar) along the front of the school parcel at the entrance to block view of the facility from the intersection with Old Trail Drive, and (b) six (6)juniperus virginiana along the southeast corner of the football field to screen the fenced compound from residential parcels to the south. Sheet Z-0.1 shows a new 200' radius for tree preservation. 8. [5.1.40(a)6(e)] Photographs. The applicant shall identify the camera type, film size, and focal length of the lens for each photograph. Please specify this information. If digital, please state such. The photos were taken by digital camera. Based on photos taken at the balloon test,Entrex has prepared a second set of photosimulations, copies of which are enclosed. Some of the photos in the initial set of photosimulations were not representative of the expected visual impact because the facility appeared gold in color and was too prominent in situations where there would be some tree cover and in a couple of situations where the facility would Page 3 of 8 be a mile or greater in distance. We're submitting this second set to supplement your records. Note that the new landscaping in front of the school will eliminate the view of the facility seen in photosimulation P6. 9. [ 5.1.40(C)(6), 32] Site Plan. The site is well over the 10,000 SF threshold of disturbance (specifically 16,988.4 SF), as such a VSMP is required. Because of this, the following shall be a condition of the SP: "Prior to the issuance of a building permit a VSMP permit will be required. " The Applicant will submit a VSMP permit application. Special Exception Requests 1. [5.1.40(b)2(c), 5.1.40(a)12] Projection. You have requested a special exception (SE) to the flush mount provisions of the ordinance to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to project more than the permitted twelve(12) inches from the monopole. And to allow the furthest point of the back of the monopole to be greater than (18) inches. The request is incomplete as it does not request any maximums for the projections. What is the closest point of the back of the antenna from the monopole and what is the further point of the back of the antenna from the monopole? Provide these dimensions on the plan. Depict and label the maximum standoff distance for all antenna on the facility. This information is required to be part of your special exception request. ANTENNA ARRAY DIMENSIONS. The proposed widest standoff of any antenna array is based on the needs of the committed carrier, Shentel. Those dimensions are shown on Sheet Z-7.0 of the Plans. The greatest distance from the face of the monopole to the back of an antenna would be sixty-six inches (66"), and the shortest distance from the face of the monopole to the back of an antenna would be approximately forty-three and three quarters inches (43.75"). 2. [5.1.40(b)(a), 5.1.40(a)12] Number of Arrays. Staff is not in support of the special exception to allow 5 antenna arrays. Three is the maximum permitted by the ordinance. By seeking 5 arrays the facility is unnecessarily that much taller than it would need to be if it were only serving 3 arrays. The County's wireless policy relies heavily on visual impacts and supports more facilities of lesser visual impacts than fewer facilities with larger visual impacts. It is suggested the request/application be revised to omit unnecessary arrays at the top of the facility (limiting it to 3), reduce the height of the facility. NUMBER OF ARRAYS. The Applicant is requesting a special exception to permit five, as opposed to three, antenna arrays. Currently, the proposed PWSF is designed to support County Schools at 140' and Shentel at 130'. Both T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless have submitted Letters of Interest indicating that they have evaluated the location of the proposed PWSF and have determined that it would meet future goals of such company's wireless network. Lease negotiations for collocation are already underway. If the application were approved, the Applicant would expect all five arrays to be used eventually. Since the County Schools and Shentel have claimed the 140' and 130' array levels, the additional arrays would be lower than the three permitted by right. Having five versus three arrays would have no effect on the height of the facility and would not significantly affect the visual impact. Five are requested because once the County Schools, Shentel, Verizon Wireless, and T-Mobile have taken four, there is only one more location, and it is highly likely that AT&T would have an interest in this location, particularly as Dean Tisdadt has let us know that County Schools use AT&T and they have a lot of dropped calls at WARS. Page 4 of 8 As discussed in other responses below, the site is not feasible at a lower height because the Schools require their antenna array to be at 140' to serve students in the western portion of the county. Similarly, Shentel requires the 130' height for its antenna arrays. With two arrays at 130' and 140',the difference between the visual impact of three arrays versus five would be minimal. 3. [5.1.40(C)(2), 4.2, 5.1.40(a)12] Critical Slope Waiver Request. Staff currently has no objection to the critical slopes request. The required modifications to the access road does not increase the amount of critical slopes being disturbed; however,the County Engineer has requested additional information be provided on the plans to take an action on the request. Provide the information he has requested. Please see Sheet Z-2.0 of the Plans attached. 4. [5.1.40(b)(11), 5.1.40(a)12] Color of Monopole, Antennas, and Equipment. Staff has no objection to the request to modify the color of the monopole from brown to galvanized steel finish. Our request is revised as to color. During the balloon test, the Applicant concluded that painting the facility Sherwin Williams Java Brown would provide more effective blending into the surroundings because of the thick forest of surrounding trees and because the existing ball field light poles are brown wood. Albemarle County Division Architectural Review Board (ARB) — Margaret Maliszewski See attached action letter from the ARB The ARB recognized that the facility would be 1,450 feet— over a quarter of a mile-- from the Entrance Corridor,U.S.250 West/Rockfish Gap Turnpike. The visibility in front of the high school entrance and at the intersection with Old Trail Drive will be eliminated by the trees to be planted along and inside the fence along the front of the school. Members of the ARB said they were "unconcerned" with the other view along the EC (in front of Brownsville Elementary School) because it would be a "fleeting glimpse" of the facility in passing. The ARB noted that this site presents a difference situation than the previously approved site at Albemarle High School in that it is surrounded by trees and much less visible from the Entrance Corridor. To minimize the potential of increased visibility in the future, the Applicant has worked with the Schools to establish a 200' radius of tree preservation around the site as recommended. Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue-Robbie Gilmer I. The proposed 10' access road under the bleachers will not allow emergency apparatus access. The clearance under the bleachers will need to be 13'6" and greater than 10' of unobstructed clear width. The access to the site has been relocated as shown on the enclosed Plans. Albemarle County Engineering Division (Engineer)—Frank Pohl To complete the critical slopes waiver analysis,the applicant shall provide: 1. Proposed grading where critical slopes are impacted; 2. Area(xx sf)of critical slopes as shown on the submitted plan; and 3. Area(xx se of critical slopes proposed to be impacted. Page 5 of 8 4. The request also shall state the reason for the modification or waiver, explaining how the modification or waiver, if granted, would address the rapid and/or large-scale movement of soil and rock, excessive stormwater run-off, siltation of natural and man-made bodies of water, loss of aesthetic resources, and, in the event of septic system failure, a greater travel distance of septic effluent (collectively referred to as the "public health, safety, and welfare factors") that might otherwise result from the disturbance of critical slopes [18-4.2.5.a.1]. VSMP permitting is required since area of land disturbance exceeds 10,000 sf[Chapter 17 County Code]. The area of critical slopes proposed to be impacted is 2,870 square feet, as shown on Sheets Z-2.0, Z-2.1, Z-3.0, and Z-4.0. The Applicant will submit a critical slope waiver and a VSMP application. Albemarle County Natural Resources Manager"-David Hannah It appears the site for the monopole requires clearing approximately 4,500 square feet of existing woods/forest. The area to be cleared is at the edge of a large wooded buffer area that is beside an intermittent stream. The intermittent stream flows into nearby Stockton Creek. Maintaining the wooded stream buffers in this area is important. Locating the monopole in an already existing cleared or disturbed area would be preferable to clearing trees. However, given the relatively small area to be cleared, and its location on the outer edge of the existing woods, I do not have serious concerns. If the location of the monopole should change, or the size of the area to be cleared is increased, I will need to reassess. The area in which trees need to be removed on the edge of the forest is shown on Sheet Z- 2.1 of the Plans and has not changed since Mr.Hannah's review. As shown on Sheet Z-0.1, the site is approximately 142' to 100' from the stream. Crozet Community Advisory Council(CCAC)Meeting We presented the proposed project to the CCAC at its December 20, 2017 meeting. Mark Graham, Director of Community Development, attended the meeting on behalf of the Department and sent us a list of questions and comments he gathered from the meeting. David Stoner, Chair of the CCAC, also provided a list of questions for the Applicant to answer. Below are the Applicant's responses to these questions from the community that are not otherwise covered in the information above. 1. Can you more specifically describe the benefits to the schools? Specifically, a. Some indication of what numbers of students can be reached with this tower that do not have current decent access to internet? Or are there other service benefits beyond that? Quoting from the enclosed package from LINK/ACPS: "The Milestone Tower at Western Albemarle High School is an essential part of the commitment our Board of Education has made to provide connectivity to all students. If built at the requested height, this tower will do two critical things: First, it will allow our dedicated LTE signal to reach the homes of approximately 400 students, many of whom currently have no access to broadband. Second, the tower, if high enough to meet commercial needs, will provide a dedicated revenue stream that will help make our network self-sustaining after build out. That revenue will pay for system maintenance, system upgrades, and individual student connectivity devices .... In this century internet connectivity is as essential as electricity to a successful community. Connectivity was one of the key criteria Amazon listed in its search for a second headquarters. Connectivity options are high on the inquiry lists for those buying homes. Connectivity is essential to emergency services and general public safety. Connectivity is a basic part of business relocation choice — if workers cannot work from Page 6 of 8 home as they do 'at the office,' many businesses will locate elsewhere: LINKIACPS is designed to fill another gap — a gap that leaves too many rural children behind, because their ability to explore their world is limited when they leave school. That gap exacerbates the impacts of poverty and rural isolation, and creates a wall that blocks opportunity. The Milestone Tower is thus part of those essential goals of our County Schools, that we create an equitable environment for our children, and that we open every possible opportunity for every child." b. What are the estimated monetary benefits to the school district? Can these funds be directed toward Western/Henley/Brownsville/Crozet Elementary since that is the population being impacted visually with this tower? The lease between the Albemarle County School Board and Milestone provides for a $20,000 one-time fee for initial facility installation, $5,000 one-time fee upon installation of each carrier, and 40% of all rent from collocations to be paid to the School Board. Milestone estimates, on average, each wireless facility generates over $400,000 for the schools over a ten-year period (assumes each wireless facility carries three wireless providers for a six-year period). The top spot on the monopole is dedicated (at no charge to the ACPS) for the school system's wireless antennas. ACPS is devoting significant time and resources to support the communities of the western edge of the County, and is helping to ensure that economic growth,and child opportunity,is sustained across all of our communities. As to directing the funds, Dean Tisdadt, Chief Operating Officer of ACPS, responds as follows: "The School Board has yet to make a decision on the allocation of funds from cell towers. Historically the School Board has been reluctant to dedicate specific revenue streams for specific purposes as doing so is limiting the flexibility of the board on how it allocates funds. The schools and communities that are receiving cell towers are benefitting greatly by the enhanced cellular services associated with these towers. Because cell towers are inherently beneficial, school system staff are not of the opinion that financial compensation also needs to be provided to these schools and communities." 2. Can similar benefits to the schools exist with a shorter tower (e.g., 100' vs. 125' vs the 145' requested, etc)? What is the pro/con assessment of this —e.g., similar/lower benefits vs. shorter tower or fewer arrays and less visual impact? Can the project proceed with a shorter tower? No, ACPS has determined that 140' is the minimum height at which it can provide the needed service to students in the western part of Albemarle County. Milestone Communications' business model is to construct a wireless facility on public property at no charge to the public and to permit the locality or school system to use the facility for its own communications system while sharing in the rent from commercial carriers that use the facility to enhance their commercial networks. Shod treetop towers can only provide service for a single carrier and are built by the carrier for use by the carrier and benefit only the customers of the carrier. This project would not be proposed by Milestone other than as a multi-carrier facility as it would not be economically viable. Each wireless facility requires months — sometimes years — of planning and due diligence, and the project expenses are the same for a short pole as for a taller one, yet the short one supports only a single carrier. Multiple short poles would be required to provide the same benefit as this single proposed facility. Page 7 of 8 • 3. Is an alternate location "back further" onto the school property, that may have less visual impact from rte 250 especially, feasible? No, ACPS determined that the proposed site is the best location for the site as it will not interfere with current school activities or future planned expansion of WAHS. 4. Can 'Milestone produce pictures of similar 4-array towers like the one being proposed? Can Milestone produce more realistic visual simulations with the 4-equipment arrays vs. one array? Possibly also show what a 125' or 100' tower might look like, if that is at all feasible or to be 'OW considered. The photosims have been revised to show all arrays as large as the proposed Shentel array, which is the maximum requested. A shorter monopole is not being considered for this site as it would not provide the benefits needed by ACPS. Please let me know if you have any questions about the information in this letter or the enclosed exhibits. Thank you for your assistance throughout the development review process. Very truly yours, Lori H. Schweller Attorney for Milestone Communications cc: Cristian Hernandez, Milestone Communications Chris Harold, Milestone Communications Page 8 of 8 % Iii/ �N � m '2 g 0 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 10:13 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish;Andrew Gast-Bray; Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Brown, Christina N. Subject: RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Lori, I would suggest since your choosing to resubmit on Feb 20th and keeping the April 10th PC date,go ahead just pay the notification fees when you resubmit. Playing it to the 16th of March seems unwise. It is up to you. From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 9:51 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>;Andrew Gast-Bray <agastbray@albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Brown,Christina N.<Christina.Brown@leclairryan.com> Subject: RE:Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Thanks so much, Chris. We will calendar February 20th for our resubmittal and March 16th for our check. Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(&eclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 9:25 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish; Andrew Gast-Bray Subject: RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Lori, 1 Ok, sounds good.Your wish is my command@ PS. Make sure you hit the resubmittal date w/hard copies in our office for all reviewers. Thanks From:Schweller, Lori H. (mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.coml Sent:Wednesday, February 07, 2018 9:23 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS©albemarle.org>; David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>;Andrew Gast-Bray <agastbray@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Chris, Milestone would like to stick with the April 10th PC hearing date and pay the fees in advance of receiving comments. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwell erfa leclai rrva n.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:coerez@albemarle.orq) Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 2:00 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish; Andrew Gast-Bray Subject: RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Lori, I spoke to Elaine she said if you resubmit by 2-20-18 you can still make the April 10th PC meeting; however, if you choose to go to the April 10th meeting the legal ad payment is due on 3-16-18 Noon at the latest. Thus you will not receive comments before having already paid and advertised. Thus if you need to pull it for any reason (which may come up in the review comments you will have to pay the additional fee to pull the advertisement). Alternatively, if you resubmit by 2-20-18 and stay on the 4-24-18 PC meeting schedule, you will have the benefit of receiving comments prior to paying the public hearing advertising fee. Comments would be received to you by 3-21-18 and the legal ad payment would be 3-30-18. If you chose to'go to the PC on 4-24-18 your next BOS date would be: June 13th(night meeting). How would you like to proceed? Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner 2 Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Thursday, February 01, 2018 4:05 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; David Benish<DBENISHPalbemarle.org> Subject: RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Thank you, Chris and Elaine, ... and please let me know, if the answer is that delaying a week or two (submitting by the February 20th date) shifts our PC date to April 24th (right?), what would our(tentative) BOS date be? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwellert leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 3:45 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish Subject: RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Lori, This offset schedule you are trying to swing only allows 14 days for the resubmittal to be reviewed by the SRC reviewers. I'm fine with that; however, my concern lies with the dates which comments will be provided to you 3-21-18);and when the legal ad payment is due for the April 10th meeting(which is 3-16-18). I need to get Elaine to sign off on this. If she does, I bet she will preface it so that you need to pay your fees for the legal ad by 3-16-18 in good faith; however, if the comments come back and it's still not have all the approvals you now have to either live with it and move to the PC with lacking application or pull the ad and pay the extra fee for pulling an advertised/scheduled project. Either way I need Elaine to sign off on this and guide it. She will return Monday. 3 Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. fmailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com] Sent:Thursday, February 01, 2018 2:59 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Hi Chris, Milestone's construction team and Timmons engineers have been in touch with the schools about access and are meeting on-site next week to work out a plan. I've shared your email,and they are aware of the need to avoid disturbing critical slopes any further than as previously proposed. I want to double-check timing with you. I know we discussed 30 days after your letter is 2/11/2018, and the next resubmission date is Monday, 2/5/18 for the April 10th PC. If we were to resubmit on the next date,2/20/18, would that push us to April 24th PC or is it possible to stay on April 10'h? Just checking on options so we can decide how hard to push the revisions of the site plans. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(a leclairrvan.com httus://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(a,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(uleclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministratorna,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 4 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by retum e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@a,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. s Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Thursday, February 01, 2018 4:05 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish Subject RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WARS) Thank you, Chris and Elaine, ... and please let me know, if the answer is that delaying a week or two (submitting by the February 20th date) shifts our PC date to April 24th (right?),what would our(tentative) BOS date be? Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(a leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 3:45 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Elaine Echols; David Benish Subject: RE: Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WAHS) Lori, This offset schedule you are trying to swing only allows 14 days for the resubmittal to be reviewed by the SRC reviewers. I'm fine with that; however, my concern lies with the dates which comments will be provided to you (3-21-18) and when the legal ad payment is due for the April 10th meeting(which is 3-16-18). I need to get Elaine to sign off on this. If she does, I bet she will preface it so that you need to pay your fees for the legal ad by 3-16-18 in good faith; however, if the comments come back and it's still not have all the approvals you now have to either live with it and move to the PC with lacking application or pull the ad and pay the extra fee for pulling an advertised/scheduled project. Either way I need Elaine to sign off on this and guide it. She will return Monday. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner 1 Department of Community Development 'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. Imailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvamaim] Sent:Thursday, February 01, 2018 2:59 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:Site Access and Plan Resubmission (Milestone WARS) Hi Chris, Milestone's construction team and Timmons engineers have been in touch with the schools about access and are meeting on-site next week to work out a plan. I've shared your email,and they are aware of the need to avoid disturbing critical slopes any further than as previously proposed. I want to double-check timing with you. I know we discussed 30 days after your letter is 2/11/2018, and the nex resubmission date is Monday, 2/5/18 for the April 10th PC. If we were to resubmit on the next date, 2/20/18, e ould tha push us to April 24`h PC or is it possible to stay on April 10th? Just checking on options so we can decide ho hard to push the revisions of the site plans. Thank you, "lb. _ _ Lori ' .), Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 9 e g ve 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor .� f f Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 �!> i d}g�:��N (434)245-3448 Direct /AV • Y�'it �" 'v= • (434)296-09057 Fax �� fr (804)248-8700 Mobile S Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com • , https://www.leclairrvan.com ►�i.7d1 , e anLinkedln I BIO /�V/ •2'i Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. WOW Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday,January 19, 2018 3:28 PM To: Ann Mallek Cc: Mark Graham;Jennie More; Bill Fritz; David Benish Subject: RE:Wahs tower Attachments: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF; CD1 CPP_SP201700026— WAHS—Tier III plus followup emails prior to resubmital providing additional guidance.pdf Ann, I have provided responses to your questions below in red/yellow. I would be more than willing to talk to you about it and expand on anything if this response is not sufficient. If such an expanded conversation is needed/requested, I feel it would best be facilitated in person. Maybe we can get you, Jennie, and Mark and I in a room and knock it out in one swoop. If you want Bill there instead of Mark be of his tower skills, I'll go for that. If after that meeting you all feel strongly that I am doing something wrong/inappropriate, which I do not believe I am, let me know and I'll discontinue it and avoid it on future projects. If after the meeting it appears that I have become an "advocate" of some kind and yall want to pull me off the project, I will gladly step back and hand over the reins to someone else, if for nothing more than to avoid the appearance of being tainted. However, I assure you that I am not tainted in this review; rather, merely helping get the BOS all you need in making an informed decision/action. If it is reassigned, I would still be willing to help the planner who takes it over. Let me know what works best for you all. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 Original Message From:Ann Mallek Sent: Friday,January 19, 2018 1:55 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Mark Graham<mgraham@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org> Subject: Wahs tower 1 Please help me understand the seeming coaching from you to attorney to somehow make the wahs tower comply in some way with our ordinance. Helping applicants understand what is necessary to comply w/ the ordinance is the entire point of my review on any project. I review proposals for compliance with the ordinance, tell the applicants what is wrong with it (why it does not meet the ordinance or comp plan), and then tell them how to fix it to comply with the ordinance. It is what we do here in Community Development. We facilitate development and if it can't meet the ordinance we deny it, if it's a BOS action we provide you all our recommendations of denial and then yall make the final call. My goal in guiding the applicants in how to comply with the ordinance is to assure the BOS has the best product possible to take an action on. When I say "the best", I mean the version of the project that meets our ordinance (or as closely as it can from the applicants perspective/needs. See my attached email to my management team in community development explaining my recommendation as it stands today and why I am requesting a resubmital...etc. Also, please view my review comments and see what ya think. You may have become an advocate and this concerns me. I also think that all discussion about school benefit is a red herring and not part of the wireless ordinance. Such information was requested be of the BOS requesting it, focusing on it, and using it to make the decision on AHS tier III, so I requested it on this facility too; however, it is not something I will be taking into my consideration for land use reviews, nor recommendations to the BOS; however, I want to make sure you, the BOS, had all the information you need to make a decision. Again, as a land use Planner I do not utilize any of that in my review or recommendation to the BOS, it was requested strictly so the BOS's could have the benefit of that information when deliberating. I am happy to meet with you and discuss this further. We need to focus on the concealment elements of the ordinance. My review comments sufficiently focus on this (see attached emails). School fire rescue police should not be a party to it. I look forward to understanding your point of view. Thank you. Ann Sent from my iPhone 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 1:42 PM To: Elaine Echols; David Benish; Andrew Gast-Bray Cc: Stephanie Banton; Claudette Borgersen Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier III PWSF All, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier III PWSF I feel like I should explain how and why this rescheduling is/has happened, as typically we don't schedule BOS meetings in advance of a PC meeting or for that matter PC meeting in front of resubmittal. The reason why the applicant has been given dates for the PC and the BOS is because these meetings are currently available/open meeting. The reason why I felt this was/is appropriate for this application is because it is a Tier III wireless facility/tower, which has the added pleasure of being subject to the FCC shot clock, which for this application is 150 days for action. However, the timeframe for action may be extended beyond the 150 days by permission from the applicant. By providing the April PC and May BOS meetings, the applicant felt comfortable extending the FCC shot clock by defacto of acceptance of such a date. Otherwise the application would have needed to stay on its previously scheduled Feb PC meeting and March BOS meeting. If this would have happened, a resubmital of required changes would not have been able to have been facilitated. Without a resubmital to address the outstanding issues, staffs recommendation would have been denial on all accounts (including all SE request, with the exception to the color of the monopole waiver). So essentially an airtight denial recommendation, with no positives, like a can of coke. By pushing the schedule and extending the 150 shot clock the applicant was provided time submit a resubmittal for consideration...additionally this allows them to meet with the CCAC again (Feb 21 st) and facilitate community dialog and question answering and address concerns raised at the 1st CCAC meeting they attended. This is always looked upon favorably by the BOS. This resubmittal, if they do the majority or what we asked/requested (within the confined 1111 of what works for their provider— ie. height reduction to 100'as requested will not be possible), will result in a recommendation of denial w a slew of positives designed at mitigating visual impacts. Such as including additional screening, a possible reduction in height by up to 10 feet (if the school board provides information that a lower height criteria for their antenna array than 145' for function of their facility will suffice), anticipated approval of the access road by Fire and Rescue (fully required for health safety and welfare), staff recommendation of 2 of 1 the 4 SE requests (critical slopes and color of monopole). So essentially a lidded recommendation for denial but not airtight, more like a box of pasta. Hope this explains my logic and why I guided the applicant to this place. Trying to give the BOS a better product they can take an action on (whatever they choose to do w/ this application). Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 17, 2018 12:47 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Stephanie Banton<sbanton@albemarle.org>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Claudette Borgersen <cborgersen@albemarle.org>; Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE:SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier Ill PWSF Good Afternoon, Chris, Milestone Communications would like to be scheduled for the April 10th PC meeting with the hope of being on the Board's May 9th agenda. We will prepare a formal submittal. By copy of this email, I am confirming the PC meeting date with Dave Stoner, Chair of the CCAC. I plan to attend the CCAC's February 215t meeting to provide additional information in answer to the Committee's questions. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax J" (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(a�leclairryan.com httos://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orgj Sent: Tuesday,January 16, 2018 3:33 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton; David Benish; Andrew Gast-Bray; Margaret Maliszewski; Claudette Borgersen Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF As discussed, I got into the scheduling, I offer the following: If you choose to do a resubmittal, the date would be Jan 296. If you can have the resubmittal by then we can make two PC dates available; either, the soonest- March 20th PC meeting(which I know you said you cannot make), OR the April 10th PC meeting. If you make either of these two PC dates the soonest BOS meeting we can go to is May 9t". What that means is, if you push it and go to the March 20th PC meeting, the soonest you can get a BOS date is May 9th. If you allow the April 10th PC meeting,the soonest you can get a BOS date is May 9t". I have confirmed this with Stephanie, and CCed Claudette (Clerk of Courts to this email). The March 661 PC date is not an option. I spoke to Stephanie and the meeting is full. Additionally,I spoke to Elaine it is not possible based on allotting review times (14 days), which is super condensed than the usual schedule and then the legal ad notification deadlines. If the March 6th meeting was in play, the time line would go: 1) Resubmittal of plans by Tuesday, Jan 23rd (that's 1 week from today—outside of a resubmittal week) 2) 14 days for reviewers to review (comments due Tuesday Feb 6°i) 3) Legal ad payment due by Friday, Feb 9t" 11 am latest 4)March 6t" PC meeting Who I must have review the resubmittal: 1) Planning(me) 2) Engineering(Frank)—Critical Slopes waiver info requested (While we discussed pushing this to the VSMP portion of the review, it still would need to go to the BOS as a SE for action) — Frank said if you get him the requested information this week or next he can knock his waiver review out in 2 days and not mess with your timeline. 3) Fire and Rescue(Shawn Maddox is the new reviewer. The original reviewer Robbie Gilmer is no longer w the County. Robbie never reviewed the temp access point as the permanent access point, so we still need Fire and Rescue approval of the access. You would need to work with Fire and Rescue to determine if he can do an expedited review (14 days). However, Frank of Engineering believes Shawn won't be able to recommend approval of the access till you provide the grades for the new access, which the current plan does not contain. Thus a tesubmittal will be needed for Fire and Rescue's review regardless. 4) ARB—Margaret needs to do a quick review of the additional landscape items. But she said it would be fast. How do you wish to proceed? Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 3 4 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 4 s ov A 4trpe Cc: 111 'Ms COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 January 12,2018 Milestone Communication c/o Lori Schweller LeClairRyan, 123 East Main Street 8`h floor Charlottesville VA 22902 RE: SP201700026—Western Albemarle High School-Tier III PWSF Dear Lori: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies,as applicable,are provided below: Albemarle County Division of Planning Services(Planner)-Christopher Perez 1. [5.1.40(4)(a)]Proposed Improvements. The plans and the formal request shall be revised to accurately depict and request the maximum height of the facility. Sheet Z-6 depicts 831'AMSL(145'tall monopole); however,the maximum height is depicted and labeled incorrectly on the plans.The height provided was taken from the top of the monopole;rather,than the maximum height of the facility,which in this case is the top of the uppermost antenna array.Either revise the plan to accurately depict the true maximum height above ground of the facility(which appears to be 146')or reduce the maximum height above ground of the facility to truly be 145'tall. 2. [5.1.40(6)(c)]Balloon Height. What was the height that the balloon was flown at on Dec 7th?Also,what was the height of the balloon in the photographs provided to staff in the initial application packet? Was it 145'or 146'?Please state this in your response.This may cause staff to recommend the balloon test to be reflown at the correct height. 3. [5.1.40(4)(a)&(h)]Proposed Improvements. Fire and Rescue will not permit the access road under the bleachers(see Fire/Rescue comment below). Thus the location of the access road shall to be revised. It is suggested that the temporary construction easement and temporary 10'wide gravel access road become the permanent easement and access for the facility. The plans shall be revised to correctly depict this modification. 4. [5.1.40(a)4(a)J Existing and proposed improvements.To aid in assessing the visual impacts of the monopole provide dimensions for the proposed monopole;to include diameter of the base,mid-level,and top of the monopole. 5. [5.1.40(a)4(a)]Proposed Improvements. Provide the unit type for the measurements of the platforms and the measurements of the platform from the monopole(are they feet,inches,mm?). 6. [5.1.40(a)4(a)] Proposed Improvements. How far is the closest point of the back of the antenna from the monopole and how far is the further point of the back of the antenna from the monopole?Provide these dimensions on the plan.They are also required to be part of your special exception request as well as part of the plan itself. Provide this information. 7. [5.1.40(a)4(a),5.1.40(a)4(f),5.1.40(b)3 J Existing and proposed improvements(significant natural features), (trees), and(tree conservation plan). To aid in screening and to help minimize visibility of the facility.On the plan depict existing wooded areas to remain on the school property within a 200'radius of the lease area.Additionally,depict and label the ARB requested plantings along the frontage of the property.Additionally,provide evergreen screening trees on the southern area of the field to aid in screening from residential properties to the South.Please depict,label,and providing planting information: species,caliper,heights at time of planting(minimum of 6 foot required,recommends between 8' - 10'at time of planting). I r ...t ‘..---s _/f awro Si SI ..- .63 ! t.1 T-4 �ty . f\ ,.pro Is)i 1 _ i (\ ‘\ ,, 1‘,5') \ ur**Awe.sr.wroa+s i -� I 1 A��\IV i waft. 1 1 k' t_.. . w..n.a.w i ww.w'w°w,so•i°S 1, ..� l<C.,... ........"--•,,,_ oiwrow f((/rd Lor•,nolaww'n i -'l ' wuriror. wr V` - � ° h IIIIIIIII . i �cm _� v 8. [5.1.40(a)6(e)]Photographs. The applicant shall identify the camera type,film size,and focal length of the lens for each photograph. Please specify this information.If digital,please state such. 9. [5.1.40(C)(6),321 Site Plan. The site is well over the 10,000 SF threshold of disturbance(specifically 16,988.4 SF),as such a VSMP is required. Because of this,the following shall be a condition of the SP: "Prior to the issuance of a building permit a VSMP permit will be required." Special Exception Requests 1. [5.1.40(b)2(c),5.1.40(a)12]Projection. You have requested a special exception(SE)to the flush mount provisions of the ordinance to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to project more than the permitted twelve(12)inches from the monopole.And to allow the furthest point of the back of the monopole to be greater than(18)inches.The request is incomplete as it does not request any maximums for the projections.What is the closest point of the back of the antenna from the monopole and what is the further point of the back of the antenna from the monopole?Provide these dimensions on the plan.Depict and label the maximum standoff distance for all antenna on the facility.This information is required to be part of your special exception request. 2. [5.1.40(b)(a),5.1.40(a)121 Number of Arrays. Staff is not in support of the special exception to allow 5 antenna arrays.Three is the maximum permitted by the ordinance.By seeking 5 arrays the facility is unnecessarily that much taller than it would need to be if it were only serving 3 arrays. The County's wireless policy relies heavily on visual impacts and supports more facilities of lesser visual impacts than fewer facilities with larger visual impacts. It is suggested the request/application be revised to omit unnecessary arrays at the top of the facility(limiting it to 3),reduce the height of the facility. 3. [5.1.40(C)(2),4.2,5.1.40(a)12] Critical Slope Waiver Request. Staff currently has no objection to the critical slopes request.The required modifications to the access road does not increase the amount of critical slopes being disturbed;however,the County Engineer has requested additional information be provided on the plans to take an action on the request. Provide the information he has requested. 4. [5.1.40(b)(11),5.1.40(a)12] Color of Monopole,Antennas, and Equipment. Staff has no objection to the request to modify the color of the monopole from brown to galvanized steel finish. Albemarle County Division Architectural Review Board(ARB)—Margaret Maliszewski See attached action letter from the ARB Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue-Robbie Gilmer 1. The proposed 10' access road under the bleachers will not allow emergency apparatus access. The clearance under the bleachers will need to be 13'6"and greater than 10'of unobstructed clear width. Albemarle County Engineering,.,vision(Engineer)—Frank Pohl To complete the critical slopes waiver analysis,the applicant shall provide: 1. Proposed grading where critical slopes are impacted; 2.Area(xx sf)of critical slopes as shown on the submitted plan;and 3.Area(xx sf)of critical slopes proposed to be impacted. 4.The request also shall state the reason for the modification or waiver,explaining how the modification or waiver,if granted,would address the rapid and/or large-scale movement of soil and rock,excessive stormwater run-off,siltation of natural and man-made bodies of water,loss of aesthetic resources,and,in the event of septic system failure,a greater travel distance of septic effluent(collectively referred to as the "public health,safety,and welfare factors")that might otherwise result from the disturbance of critical slopes[1 8-4.2.5.a.1]. VSMP permitting is required since area of land disturbance exceeds 10,000 sf[Chapter 17 County Code]. Albemarle County Natural Resources Manager-David Hannah It appears the site for the monopole requires clearing approximately 4,500 square feet of existing woods/forest. The area to be cleared is at the edge of a large wooded buffer area that is beside an intermittent stream. The intermittent stream flows into nearby Stockton Creek. Maintaining the wooded stream buffers in this area is important. Locating the monopole in an already existing cleared or disturbed area would be preferable to clearing trees. However,given the relatively small area to be cleared,and its location on the outer edge of the existing woods, I do not have serious concerns. If the location of the monopole should change,or the size of the area to be cleared is increased,I will need to reassess. Albemarle County Building Inspections—Michael Dellinger 1. Electrical permit for service required from County. All other inspections are to be performed by third party engineer. Albemarle County Service Authority(ACSA)-Alex Morrison No objection. Virginia Department of Transportation(VDOT)—Adam Moore The Department of Transportation,Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section,has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Timmons Group,dated October 30,2017 and find it to be generally acceptable. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way.The owner/developer must contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency Land Use Section at (434)422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. If further information is desired, please contact Willis C.Bedsaul at 434-422-9866. Albemarle County Division of Planning(E911)—Elise Kiewra 1. No objection. Action after Receipt of Cor.......�ts Please address all comments prior to requesting a PC public hearing.The proposal is not ready to move forward. If the applicant chooses to move forward with the application as it is(without a resubmittal),the tentative PC public hearing date is February 20,2018;however,notification fees for this meeting are needed by noon of Jan 29th.If the applicant wishes to stay on this schedule the tentative BOS date to March 14t.After you have read this letter,please take one of the actions identified on"Action after Receipt of Comment Letter"which is attached. Resubmittal When you resubmit,please use the attached form.There is no fee for the first resubmittal.The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees $347 Cost for newspaper advertisement $215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners (minimum $215+actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $562 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing,payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing is needed: $347 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing $909 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. I can be reached at cperez(a.albemarle.org or 434-296-5832,ext. 3443. Sincerely, Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Planning Division OFAG -111k1*,, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER Within 30 days of the date of this letter,please do one of the following: (1) Resubmit in response to review comments (2) Request indefinite deferral (3) Request that your Planning Commission public hearing date be set (4) Withdraw your application (1) Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments If you plan to resubmit within 30 days,make sure that the resubmittal is on or before a resubmittal date as published in the project review schedule. $e sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your comment letter with your submittal. The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal. Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.) (2) Request Indefinite Deferral If you plan to resubmit after 30 days from the date of the comment letter,you need to request an indefinite deferral. Please provide a written request and state your justification for requesting the deferral. (Indefinite deferral means that you intend to resubmit/request a public hearing be set with the Planning Commission after the 30 day period.) (3) Request Planning Commission Public Hearing Date be Set At this time,you may schedule a public hearing with the Planning Commission. However,we do not advise that you go directly to public hearing if staff has identified issues in need of resolution that can be addressed with a resubmittal. After outstanding issues have been resolved and/or when you are ready to request a public hearing,staff will set your public hearing date for the Planning Commission in accordance with the Planning Commission's published schedule and as mutually agreed by you and the County. The staff report and recommendation will be based on the latest information provided by you with your initial submittal or resubmittal. Please remember that all resubmittals must be made on or before a resubmittal date. By no later than twenty-one(21)days before the Planning Commission's public hearing,a newspaper advertisement fee and an adjoining owner notification fee must be paid.(See attached Fee Schedule) Your comment letter will contain the actual fees you need to pay. Payment for an additional newspaper advertisement is also required twenty- two(22)days prior to the Board of Supervisors public hearing. These dates are provided on the attached Legal Ad Payments for Public Hearings form. Please be advised that,once a public hearing has been advertised,only one deferral prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing will be allowed during the life of the application. The only exception to this rule will be extraordinary circumstances,such as a major change in the project proposal by the applicant or more issues identified by staff that have not previously been brought to the applicant's attention. As always,an applicant may request deferral at the Planning Commission meeting. (4) Withdral% Your application If at any time you wish to withdraw your application,please provide your request in writing. Failure to Respond If we have not received a response from you within 30 days,we will contact you again. At that time,you will be given 10 days to do one of the following: a)request withdrawal of your application,b)request deferral of your application to a specific Planning Commission date as mutually agreed to with staff,or c)request indefinite deferral and state your justification for requesting the deferral. If none of these choices is made within 10 days,staff will schedule your application for a public hearing based on the information provided with your original submittal or the latest submittal staff received on a resubmittal date. Fee Payment Fees may be paid in cash or by check and must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator. FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONING APPLICATIONS A. For a special use permit: I. Additional lots under section 10.5.2.1;application and first resubmission Fee $1,075.00 Each additional resubmittal $538.00 2. Public utilities;application and first resubmission Fee $1,075.00 Each additional resubmittal $538.00 3. Day care center;application and first resubmission Fee $1,075.00 Each additional resubmittal $538.00 4. Home occupation Class B;application and first resubmission Fee $1,075.00 Each additional resubmittal $538.00 5. Amend existing special use permit;application and first resubmission Fee $1,075.00 Each additional resubmittal $538.00 6. Extend existing special use permit;application and first resubmission Fee $1,075.00 Each additional resubmittal $538.00 7. All other special use permits;application and first resubmission Fee $2,150.00 Each additional resubmittal $1,075.00 8. Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request Fee $194.00 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez <christopherperez123@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:12 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: Fwd: SP2017-26 WAHS - TIER III From: Christopher Perez<christopherperez123@gmail.com> Date:January 12, 2018 at 9:00:16 PM EST To: "Lori H. Schweller" <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>, David Benish <DBENISHt albemarle.org>,Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, cperez@albemarle.org Subject: Re:SP2017-26 WAHS-TIER III Lori, I want to make sure I am clear in my comments and logic for my recommendation as it currently stands. I believe the facility is highly visible from two residential lots and various locations on the EC. much of the screening provided on adjacent lots and once developed will increase the already visible to even more unacceptable visibility. As such if the facility heigth is not reduced and/or the facility is not more appropriately sited to minimize visibility and/or the number of arrays is not reduced and/or the projection is more in line with county ordinance requirements, my recommendation in the staff report will be denial due to visual impacts. When revising the proposal please consider working on reducing the visual impacts of the facility in the items dicussed above. I hope this clarification can help guide you during your revisions. christopher p. perez senio planner, albemarle county Sent from my iPhone On Jan 12, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>wrote: Lori, Attached are the comments for SP2017-26 WAHS - TIER III. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 ies and attachments. <CDI CPP_SP201700026 —WAHS —Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility.pdf5 <ARB ACTION LETTER .pdf5 1 • , -0,0 •. ' . , -• . y... ' . '„.)," ' ':'''"'" ' ' '''''' r ""•, t ' ''. . ',,,,,,-,,,...14, •, 04;• '' ,'v,•4- I/ '• . ••'. , i•)?•• ' • ..s ••• ,.' • 041 'I r, — r ' •4.4- ii. ,,frei ' .. ' ' I ili ',I . .i, • \\ i - - '' ' ,'t• 4 VP,. V "1 , 11'1 f .. ,,I ,Po2r9n• , ••• ,111!",F,..• ,t,,z., '5,,*,1"4160? ,,r• "..r1C4 ...‘ . yt,„ •, ., • • _. ,. ..• . • ,,,,,,.... .. Ii: . .0. .' -or ' ...1.%.:41i •..'.'.- 1' ' 4.' . . .,' ^s. ..:. 1.,:'' ,.. • ...,. i , _ , -,"'•—OA iy.e- i - 1.---- , • b 10110' ., - oe--- 1 '•''‘ --:,-- - •r_ -,44 --, __. r---- - _----- , ./1 4 — ir. ., , i ._ ,. s — .._ .:. ._ ins-4,41 . 14,• 1 I . •• , ‘i 1 -,._-= -:- .• ------ \ ......:..„- _.......1 --- - .."•••••••„...____-r-... ......„, -----...... • ... Nmilmmri ..... -.. • . , • , • . , - .... aP . 4- ..4. • _ ) ',,,t` <1'1,,• s st kt .,. ,., ___ _ , . .. _ . . ye, 4 ,* el r---,, .._,._ 1 . �is • w y'' „,,,,„,„:41,11 .,,,,. ._..,, i ,,,„:. .. , „ . _.:,. _. ,c.. .... . . e,_ ..,,,,...s. , ; . .._. , ,,.. • • , ... , .... I i ,. \.,... /4 . . . • . „ ,,,, . fli s ., ,. . .:•4 . /„. _, . ,... .. i , .. . . . '•7 1' t • . .> �• w'1T •� i .� .!'., f Q r• fir• , 5 • r-- • -ice '4�is. < ' if N.. .; 1 \ .\\,. n r Wester / . SITE , o Cot Propos( 2 1 4,- 44. s 1. Y� .r — ±, + P2• r:f. I fr, k.., / '. ik• 0-:::. i ;, / • /� �f -1 4.y'.• a-- I 1) f•� #f • M S j -�' ALL. „,' • ` • :. r4 - . .:r- i. . . M �' A► to ` w. , • Vr Ni.,,. it. 'r R • • /..\ V .'"*. I. Li \ 0 f ~ II t i I I fi I II / �� • Wester' SITE o Cot Propos( Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent:Tuesday,January 16, 2018 9:04 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> 3 Cc:Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; 'Cristian Hernandez' <cris@milestonecorp.com>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; 'Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)' <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;Ann Mallek <amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF Oh yeah this picture too. Sorry. 4 •fg lifil1/4041:, A , 44 - --,-A i . .. ,,.r, ks . . , .444,.....-,tiril:;1-„..,: :, 1 '‘. 1.1‘ Nittoi 1 4, •. _ ....:16. -4400c,A' • • #VI I 4 '.;is44 It. M % 'Iii, ".1. ,,1 ‘,.i is ' . ;:. . '. : 4it r � '�4 M " ± I v s • ti to / : • y� ,4 ( Y i. . '; I5 eif , -; '.'1 ^ �f' + Al -, �� a i 0004 014114 1. I , r R i T r11. r 14i'. ' r" ►i le‘.$111111: ; . % .* i... 4 ... ,..., 4, . ,. .. , , t 114, ,,,.... .,... . f - - - _ isqhf , , i• i•• - Ifitft. IOC.°1 'gWoli . . '''40141. - -a..'.-. • : ts t 1410.*•""lir Nik ..., ... _ ...__ ..... ., . ..._ ._ ,. , . ___,,... A ,, , , - __,,...:„.44,.__.,... ..._ _ ilak,, ahs. , 11',", ... s.iiiHnee i - - . s s • • WI SiT' 0 Western Albemarle Nigh School Pro From: Christopher Perez Sent:Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:03 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' <Lori.Schweller( leclairryan.com> 5 Cc:Andrew Gast-Bray<aeastbrav@albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; David Ben ish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Ann Mallek <amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<imore@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier III PWSF The plan that everyone from SRC reviewed was the original plan submitted with the application (dated 10-30- 17). The Jan 3rd unofficial email submittal was not reviewed by me nor anyone on SRC (with the possible exception of ARB). Please review all SRC review comments and assure that you revise the Jan 3rd version of the plans to address all comments and then formally resubmit. A response letter to each comment is also needed. About the number of arrays (5)not being tied to the height of the proposed facility. While this may be true for the Shentel array(the 2nd array from the top)positioned at 821 AMSL or 135 feet tall, I do not believe the top array for the schools needs to be at 145'. If this is a false assumption by me, please clearly state in the comment response letter the reasons why the school must be given a position at 145 feet. How will it benefit the school wireless/internet/911 services vs having a different position on the monopole dedicated to the school array? Essentially, how will it affect service? If you can separate out money/income generation in the justification please do, you can include it for BOS consideration, but it won't be considered by me in the land use recommendation. I recommend that the#of arrays be reduced down to 3 and that the school array be relocated to one of the lower arrays below Shentel's (respectably at either the 125 feet position or the 115 feet position). Thus the max height of the facility would be 135' (or 137' w antenna height consideration). The# of arrays would be reduced down to 3. Additionally, I'd like the standoff distance of the arrays to meet County requirements (flush mount). I suspect that if these items took place with the plantings requested by myself and ARB that the visibility would be reduced substantially. If you do these suggestions I believe all views will be dramatically better, as the visibility of the facility will be reduced. To what extent and if approvable, I'd like to see photo sims before making that decision. Below is what I'm talking about. Also, below this picture are the three primary views that are my main basis for recommendation of denial at this point. 6 t I WI SEw CAc1$D SyE.—`_._J {,;...,,i.s1-4.1.Y6T i it,0 1'. • • ,• + PNO►Di(D 7 LO-1I.WO t��.! it S (Avy for SCI1X%LSf n . -1 fir Qf YtD<Gf i1 U . _- ... fl 5.11;'ANIl u x .,• AA'J'OSt)(S;S1$iAIE1 PA11L--- /MffNWS. i RR ANEAAIA AC M\ Z 1 A _/artily Ph:A:6LD M*d1[l mama NIL mop R4 MMS ON A 1r-6.PiAlrpgy It / R7'ff rlFl - N�N hIAD.9A ��...-� I rti Vie.AROMAS.11 A— - V t .>y PAML?ammo \�Jr Jn 11)JnL JnL _ 7\y, u u , u u C.D110 Ay9 IU .l/clI .Ai CMA ---. 111 t;M hRPHOIV RATpYy r n 1I n rl u u 1 u u (L sold A.IS. 1 '::lL'F AK**ON I -- _ II -M MAF PLAfDIW n r{ r �f_AI I' t tl A.;S1 O GT • k°, `mai,i1y +1�-15 II • e ( 1 1 l -) t, 4 J 0.5h ►ho.�T CA,At 5 4* A%4ANnrk . - Pdr tfoiSKNE CIa i 0 1 MYY.M�NIYQ( I - P7tOSED.11ircIF 110 7 rr_[cSLMG ib-0' MIS,Wr611'. 1 T _�L I q I I I ijj i .- 1 ,. PROPOSED SrENRtIA OPS ANFIb1A PIK OVO 1.001Et -- PROPOSED%VII et ORM ` WY EOEN:W A COOP It III MC C•1.1S 10.Rf.CPOIf Lib _ ; 1 { r l � _ f _- [*--- --_—. ik I L _ 1 These are the primary views I'm concerned with reducing visibility from, additionally ARB views. But if you do the things I'm suggesting above, I think all views will be dramatically better, as the visibility of the facility will be reduced. To what extent and if approvable, I'd like to see photo sims before making that decision. 7 r • y P' -+ ► * ' '4 'r; ' r .f' + i', S. • • 1 fJ ��f kt 'V411 /,'7 , t'..\:,1:''.fr i:-;,-.,-..° f, ,,. i.if`ii,41'..:.. ; s . . .. ,� .�� . , //� j. : ; 1.• .�,.: I Y.. 1' ' ,��, '� t9'i ,q, /. •* .ilk ... • • ., ,, . •+, ' R�r } . • r F, .- • — M ] ' is • r k" t" J i[ tA). O • IVY SHE / , 1W.... IM I$ II 4, Pi 8 I ,r .y t? Ia ' - ''' tilt ' , '_. . f It 1 kk . lookl o ``-rs .4:. • rat ,,,,,,„„..„.„5, . t .er , . ,,,, .., -. . , .,„. Q ` Ste T. Henley Middle ithool 'tip 0 Pro Re Nate 9 I Memory r © Si IL. Wee-tern Albeerarl, High Schaal 9 i r �. w i { , f ]) fr` i. / ...... .'•i it , 9 �. . i , \\\ff r , 4 . ' rol, - —' f y , ,' t° c,�• , .'.� ram. .tl. ."\ - *... 4+ �11�:� f7 � ♦ i 4 { Z 4 1 t i t ! 1 I f Yf ,• . . a •I P Ir :•• . 7E -c. r . Q SITE Western Albemarle .41111%.1%••,................,.............4 High School 1 • F Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner 10 Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent: Friday,January 12, 2018 4:00 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com> Subject: FW: WAHS tower at January 8 2018 ARB meeting Hi Chris, Thanks for your staff report. It appears not to consider the revisions that were made to the drawings after the initial submission. We sent the attached revisions to you on January 3`d, and I think they answer several of the questions (1, 4, 6, SE request 1). Perhaps your review must based on the original formal application, and we need to submit these drawings formally with our responses. (They were again updated last week to add landscaping in front of the school,so these are not the latest either.) The applicant and I will work on revised drawings and a formal resubmission. Please note that, as we discussed at the community meeting and at the ARB, the request for five arrays does not affect the height. These two variables are unrelated as the height is determined by Shentel's RF needs. Having five arrays allows full use of the pole, as the schools and all major carriers can collocate and not need to build a new facility in this area. Though it's not obvious from the wording of its action letter,the ARB was fine with the facility and with the five arrays since they won't be visible from the entrance corridor except in passing(in front of Brownsville) once the trees are planted in front of WAHS. Thanks and have a good weekend, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller a..leclairryan.com httos:J/www.leclairrvan.com LinkedIn I BIC1 Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Schweller, Lori H. Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 4:23 PM To: 'Christopher Perez'; 'Margaret Maliszewski' Cc: 'Cristian Hernandez" Subject: RE: WAHS tower at January 8 2018 ARB meeting Margaret and Chris, 11 The attached zoning drawings were revised as follows: Z-1.0 and Z-7.0—the Shentel application form pasted into these two sheets has been replaced with a new one; the revised form has the RAD center at 130' in order to decrease total height shown to 145'. Z-6.0 (Elevation): 1. Previously,the antennas were shown as extending higher than the monopole, which made the overall height appear to be more than 145' (the problem we had with the Stony point drawings); each antenna array has been shifted down about 5' to ensure that the max height(exclusive of lightning rod) will be 145' as tested in the balloon test. The heights AGL are on the arrows along the side of the pole. 2. We changed the schematic look of the arrays so that the one requested for Shentel represents the maximum standoff and number of antennas (9); previously, we the other arrays were depicted as wider with 12 antennas; 3. A note has been added to give the approximate diameter of the monopole at top and bottom; Z-7.0 The antenna array now shows the distances between the face of the monopole and the back of the closest antennas (approximately 43.75") and from the face of the monopole to the back of the farthest antennas (approx. 65"). In the next series of emails, I will send you the revised photosims showing five arrays. Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(a�leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedin I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez©albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:57 PM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Margaret Maliszewski Cc: Cristian Hernandez Subject: RE: WAHS tower at January 8 2018 ARB meeting Lori, I plan to have all my zoning review comments on the tower to you by COB this Friday. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 12 From: Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 03, 2018 1:12 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: WAHS tower at January 8 2018 ARB meeting Hi, Margaret, and thank you. Milestone has been working on revised zoning drawings to correct the elevation sheet and on revised photosims to show all five requested arrays. I will send you those today. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller ..leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Margaret Maliszewski [mailto:MMaliszewski©albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 11:45 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Christopher Perez Subject: WAHS tower at January 8 2018 ARB meeting Lori, Please find attached the tentative agenda and staff report for your item at the January 8, 2018 ARB meeting. Feel free to contact me with questions. Thanks. Margaret Margaret Maliszewski, Chief of Planning/Resource Management Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 mmaliszewski@albemarle.org * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(ideclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 13 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:33 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Elaine Echols; Stephanie Banton; David Benish;Andrew Gast-Bray; Margaret Maliszewski; Claudette Borgersen Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier III PWSF Lori, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF As discussed, I got into the scheduling, I offer the following: If you choose to do a resubmittal, the date would be Jan 29th. If you can have the resubmittal by then we can make two PC dates available; either,the soonest- March 20th PC meeting(which I know you said you cannot make), OR the April 10th PC meeting. If you make either of these two PC dates the soonest BOS meeting we can go to is May 9th What that means is, if you push it and go to the March 20th PC meeting,the soonest you can get a BOS date is May 9th. If you allow the April 10th PC meeting,the soonest you can get a BOS date is May 9th I have confirmed this with Stephanie, and CCed Claudette(Clerk of Courts to this email). The March 6th PC date is not an option. I spoke to Stephanie and the meeting is full. Additionally,I spoke to Elaine it is not possible based on allotting review times (14 days), which is super condensed than the usual schedule and then the legal ad notification deadlines. If the March 6th meeting was in play,the time line would go: 1)Resubmittal of plans by Tuesday, Jan 23rd(that's 1 week from today—outside of a resubmittal week) 2) 14 days for reviewers to review(comments due Tuesday Feb 6th) 3) Legal ad payment due by Friday, Feb 9th 11am latest 4)March 6th PC meeting Who I must have review the resubmittal: 1)Planning(me) 2)Engineering(Frank)—Critical Slopes waiver info requested (While we discussed pushing this to the VSMP portion of the review, it still would need to go to the BOS as a SE for action)— Frank said if you get him the requested information this week or next he can knock his waiver review out in 2 days and not mess with your timeline. 3)Fire and Rescue(Shawn Maddox is the new reviewer. The original reviewer Robbie Gilmer is no longer w the County. Robbie never reviewed the temp access point as the permanent access point, so we still need Fire and Rescue approval of the access. You would need to work with Fire and Rescue to determine if he can do an expedited review(14 days). However, Frank of Engineering believes Shawn won't be able to recommend approval of the access till you provide the grades for the new access, which the current plan does not contain. Thus a resubmittal will be needed for Fire and Rescue's review regardless. 4)ARB—Margaret needs to do a quick review of the additional landscape items. But she said it would be fast. i How do you wish to proceed? Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent Tuesday,January 16, 2018 1:37 PM To: 'David Stoner' Cc: Emily Kilroy; Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE:Crozet CAC Wed Jan 17, 2018 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm,Crozet Library Attachments: CCAC Jan 2018 Agenda.pdf David, I looked over the agenda for 1-17-2018 CCAC. The WAHS SUP application is on the agenda, item #4; however, the applicant and I believe the item is not to be discussed at the CCAC till Feb 21S`. What is taking place tomorrow for this item? From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 12:15 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC<crozetcac@googlegroups.com>; Notification about CCAC<ccac- notify@googlegro u ps.com> Cc: Emily Kilroy<ekilroy@albemarle.org>;Tim Tolson<tfitolson@gmail.com>;Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>; Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>;Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com>; Shawn Bird<shawn_bird@Hotmail.com>; Elaine Echols<EECHOLS@albemarle.org> Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Jan 17, 2018 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm,Crozet Library All— Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held next Wed, Jan 17 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Should be an interesting meeting as we'll hear from the Survey Committee about results of the recent Crozet community survey. Regards, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com 1 . r,c24--e--- CROZET CO UNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Crozet Library dnesday, Jan 1712018 from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. , Dt.A0 5-#4.P., Agenda • 1. Agenda Review (Dave Stoner— CCAC chair , 2. Approval of Minutes ell Slit 3. Crozet Survey Results Presentation & Discussion (Cro y Committee — ShawnBir4,-Tom Guterbock, and Tim Tolsen — 90 min) 6/ 4. CCAC Discussion follow-up: WARS Wireless Tower SUP (ten ative - possibly pus to Feb) 5. Items Not Listed on the Agenda r 6. Announcements 7. Potential Future Agenda Items a. Feb — Albemarle County Stormwater Utility Plans (Greg Harper, Env. Services Chief) b. Feb — Western Park Master Plan Update (-Bob-Crickenberger, Albemarle (--------eaunt c. Feb — WAHS Wireless Tower SUP supplemental information (ACPS, Milestone) d. Mar- Follow-up discussion on Crozet Survey and Master Plan Update e. Mar - Crozet Drinking Water Infrastructure Plan Update (Mr. Mawyer ACSA/RWSA) f. Mar— Officer Elections g. TBD - Old Trail Historical Recap h. TBD - Albemarle County Economic Development Authority Invite t • t 1 % I c t Christopher Perez From: David Stoner <davidastonerl@gmail.com> Sent Thursday,January 11, 201812:15 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC; Notification about CCAC Cc: Emily Kilroy;Tim Tolson;Jennie More;Ann Mallek; Christopher Perez; Schweller, Lori H.; Shawn Bird; Elaine Echols Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Jan 17, 2018 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library Attachments: CCAC Jan 2018 Agenda.pdf All— Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held next Wed, Jan 17 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Should be an interesting meeting as we'll hear from the Survey Committee about results of the recent Crozet community survey. Regards, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com • ;-- Christopher Perez From: Andrew Gast-Bray Sent Thursday,January 11,201812:14 PM To: Christopher Perez; Bill Fritz Subject FW:WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up FYI? Andrew Gast-Bray (434) 296-5832 x 3254 From: David Stoner[mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 11:28 AM To:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>;Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>; Robert Rejonis<RRejonis@k12albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>;Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Lori/ACPS Rep: I'm trying to finalize the Crozet CAC agenda for next Wed the 17th,so please let me know if anyone from Milestone or ACPS will have any info they would like to share by then in response to the questions posed below, or if that will come later(CCAC next meeting is Feb 21). We have other agenda items that will take up most of next week's meeting,so we'd only have 30 min max on this—10-15 min for info present/Q&A and 15 min for follow-up CCAC discussion. Thanks, Dave • ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Wednesday,January 10, 2018 at 8:37 AM To: David Stoner<davidastoner1@gmail.com> Cc: Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>,Jennie More <jmore@albemarle.org>, David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com>, Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>, David Oberg<doberg@kl2albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <ialcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis<RReionis@k12albemarle.org>,Timothy Kunkel <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up 1 4- David Stoner, RE: SP201700026-Western Albemarle High School-Tier III PWSF The item is tentatively scheduled for the PC public hearing on Feb 20th and tentatively scheduled for the BOS public hearing on March 14. If these dates stick,the staff report shall be finalized on Feb 12th. Review comments on the proposal shall be provided to the applicant by COB this Friday. Depending on these comments and how the applicant decides to respond to them, we will know if these dates still Work/are moving forward or if the review will need to be timed out and await a resubmittal of the concept plan. We are also up against a 150 day shot clock for this project based on FCC regulations. The 150 days expires on March 29th and an action should be taken by then; however, the applicant has the ability to extend the shot clock based on various circumstances. The 150 day shot clock is not the end of the world if it is missed;however,we never miss these deadlines and I do not intend to be the first. But a lot of it depends on how the applicant chooses to move forward once they receive the comments. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: David Stoner[mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday,January 09,2018 2:40 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> - Subject: FW:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Chris— Forgot to copy you on this....you're the lead planner on this,yes? Do you know when this is likely to be before the PC and/or when you would expect to have staff report completed? Trying to decide timing of any future CCAC discussion on this. thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: David Stoner<davidastoner1@gmail.com> Date:Tuesday,January 9, 2018 at 2:16 PM 2 • To: Subject: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up All, I am writing this to follow-up on Milestone Communication's presentation to the Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) last month regarding the proposed cell tower at Western Albemarle High School. I first want to thank Lori and Milestone for an informative presentation. Secondly, I wanted to pass along some of the questions that were raised by CCAC members,for possible follow-up throughout this process. Third,the CCAC would like to invite someone from Albemarle County Schools or School Board to attend a future CCAC meeting(Jan 17 if possible or Feb, prior to planning commission meeting)to perhaps address some of these follow-up questions. Questions include: 1. Can you more specifically describe the benefits to the schools? Specifically, a. Some indication of what numbers of students can be reached with this tower that do not have current decent access to internet? Or are there other service benefits beyond that? b. What is estimated $ benefits to the school district? Can these funds be directed toward Western/Henley/Brownsville/Crozet Elementary since that is the population being impacted visually with this tower? c. Are there any lessons learned or feedback from the AHS installation in terms of benefits to AHS,things that might be considered differently at WAHS. Or feedback from other NOVA schools that maybe did this? 2. Can similar benefits to the schools exist with a shorter tower(e.g., 100'vs. 125'vs the 145' requested, etc)? What is the pro/con assessment of this—e.g., similar/lower benefits vs.shorter tower or fewer arrays and less visual impact? Can the project proceed with a shorter tower? 3. Is an alternate location "back further"onto the school property,that may have less visual impact from rte 250 especially,feasible? 4. Can Milestone produce pictures of similar 4-array towers like the one being proposed? Can Milestone produce more realistic visual simulations with the 4-equipment arrays vs.one array? Possibly also show what a 125'or 100'tower might look like, if that is at all feasible or to be considered. I recognize some of the above questions may be best answered by school reps,others by Milestone. I also ask who is the best contact at Albemarle County Schools to coordinate with on these issues? Finally,all of this is intended to supplement the public review process and inform the CCAC and citizens so they can better provide input to the Planning Commission and Board. Thanks for your assistance, Cheers, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner Chair,Crozet Community Advisory Council 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com 3 y From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Tuesday,January 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com> Cc: "T. Michael Kunkel" <tmkunkel©gmail.com>, Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Hi Dave, It was our pleasure, and thanks again for giving us the opportunity. Yes,two people with the schools were mentioned during the presentation. I mentioned Dean Tisdadt, who came to Albemarle from Fairfax County schools and is the COO for Strategic Planning and Operations. Dean established a relationship with Milestone Communications while in Fairfax County, and has led the school board to enter into a relationship with the company here to improve the schools' wireless communications and increase revenue. Cria Wood mentioned Ira Socol,who is Interim Executive Director of Technologies and Innovation. He is serving in the place of Vince Schreivert,who worked with us on the AHS site and has since left the county. Here's the webpage with their info: https://www2.k12albemarle.org/acps/departments/Pages/default.aspx We met with Dean,Vince, and engineer Robert Rejonis to learn the schools' plans for the AHS site. I'm sure we will do the same for WAHS and will,request the schools' representatives to be at the hearings to discuss and answer questions as they did for the earlier site. Thanks very much, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel le r(cill ecla i rrvan.com https://www.leclainvan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please'consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl(©gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 12:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: T. Michael Kunkel Subject: Re: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation - Lori— Thanks for your presentation. One request, as I reach out to school board for follow-up. Do you have the name/contact information for the person within the school district who was named as managing this project with Milestone (as I recall worked with them in a prior life in Fairfax)? The districts IT guy in the audience was helpful, but I got the sense he maybe wasn't the best to direct some questions to (and/or do you have his name/contact info possibly? I had hoped to reach out to them as well as school board members,thinking they may have more info/details than the board members. Mike—maybe same request to you from your notes/minutes/attendee list? thanks 4 • b— Dave • ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 10:47 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com>, Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC <crozetcac@googlegroups.com> Cc: Emily Kilroy<ekilrov@albemarle.org>, "Tim F.J. Tolson" <tfitolson@gmail.com>,Jennie More <Imore@albemarle.org>, Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>, "cperez@albemarle.org" <cperez@albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Dear Dave and CCAC, Thank you again for allowing us to present the Milestone Communications wireless project for WARS at your meeting last night. Attached, as requested, is the presentation without photographs and photosimulations. Please let me know if you have trouble opening it, and I will send it in a different format. We will work on gathering the information and exhibits requested by the Committee and citizen attendees. I would greatly appreciate an email if members if the School Board agree to attend an upcoming CCAC meeting. Best regards, and Happy Holidays, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:03 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC; Notification about CCAC Cc: Emily Kilroy; Tim F.J. Tolson; Jennie More; Ann Mallek; cperez@albemarle.orq; Schweller, Lori H. Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library All- 5 Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held Wed, Dec `' 20 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Probably a shorter meeting than usual,so if anyone has any comments or suggestions on the agenda, please let me know. Regards, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ • David A.Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 6 Christopher Perez From: Andrew Gast-Bray Sent: Thursday,January 11, 2018 12:14 PM To: Christopher Perez; Bill Fritz Subject: FW:WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up • FYI Andrew Gast-Bray (434) 296-5832 x 3254 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 12:06 PM To: David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com>; Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>;Jonno Alcaro<jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>; Robert Rejonis <RRejonis@k12albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>;Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Thank you for the opportunity, Dave. I will put Feb.21st on my schedule. At this point, we are still planning for the 21" but we will let you know if that changes. Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.Ieclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:46 AM To: Dean Tistadt; Schweller, Lori H. Cc: David Oberg; Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis; Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez;Andrew Gast-Bray; Christopher Perez Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Dean, Thank you. I'll plan on that and touch base closer to the Feb CCAC meeting to confirm. 1 That's after the Planning Commission meeting if the applicant sticks to the schedule laid out below(can anyone advise if '' a Feb 20 PC meeting is likely?), but I know these things slip sometimes and CCAC will deal with whatever the schedule is. Thanks, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org> Date:Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 11:35 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro<jalcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis <RReionis@k12albemarle.org>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up • I think you might want to plan on the February meeting. We are working to respond to your questions but we are also heavily immersed in preparing the Superintendent's FY 2019 funding request that goes before the School Board on January 18. Dean A.Tistadt Chief Operating Officer Albemarle County Public Schools From: David Stoner[mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,January 11, 2018 11:28 AM To:Schweller, Lori H.<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: Dean Tistadt<dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>; David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>;Jonno Alcaro <jalcaro@kl2albemarle.org>; Robert Rejonis<RReionis@k12albemarle.org>; Ira Socol<isocol@k12albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>;Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Lori/ACPS Rep: I'm trying to finalize the Crozet CAC agenda for next Wed the 17th, so please let me know if anyone from Milestone or ACPS will have any info they would like to share by then in response to the questions posed below, or if that will come later(CCAC next meeting is Feb 21). We have other agenda items that will take up most of next week's meeting, so we'd only have 30 min max on this—10-15 min for info present/Q&A and 15 min for follow-up CCAC discussion. Thanks, Dave 2 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com • From: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Date: Wednesday,January 10, 2018 at 8:37 AM To: David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com> Cc:Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>,Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>, David Benish <DBENISH@albemarle.org>, "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com>, Dean Tistadt <dtistadt@k12albemarle.org>, David Oberg<doberg@k12albemarle.org>,Jonno Alcaro <ialcaro@k12albemarle.org>, Robert Rejonis<RReionis@k12albemarle.org>,Timothy Kunkel <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Ira Socol <isocol@k12albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>, Andrew Gast-Bray<agastbray@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up David Stoner, RE: SP201700026-Western Albemarle High School-Tier III PWSF The item is tentatively scheduled for the PC public hearing on Feb 20th and tentatively scheduled for the BOS public hearing on March 14. If these dates stick, the staff report shall be finalized on Feb 12th. Review comments on the proposal shall be provided to the applicant by COB this Friday. Depending on these comments and how the applicant decides to respond to them, we will know if these dates still work/are moving forward or if the review will need to be timed out and await a resubmittal of the concept plan. We are also up against a 150 day shot clock for this project based on FCC regulations. The 150 days expires on March 29°i and an action should be taken by then;however,the applicant has the ability to extend the shot clock based on various circumstances. The 150 day shot clock is not the end of the world if it is missed;however, we never miss these deadlines and I do not intend to be,the first. But a lot of it depends on how the applicant chooses to move forward once they receive the comments. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: David Stoner[mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.coml Sent:Tuesday,January 09, 2018 2:40 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: FW:WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Chris— 3 Forgot to copy you on this....you're the lead planner on this,yes? Do you know when this is likely to be before the PC and/or when you would expect to have staff report completed? Trying to decide timing of any future CCAC discussion on this. thanks Dave David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com> Date:Tuesday,January 9, 2018 at 2:16 PM To: " Subject: WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up All, I am writing this to follow-up on Milestone Communication's presentation to the Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) last month regarding the proposed cell tower at Western Albemarle High School. I first want to thank Lori and Milestone for an informative presentation. Secondly, I wanted to pass along some of the questions that were raised by CCAC members,for possible follow-up throughout this process. Third,the CCAC would like to invite someone from Albemarle County Schools or School Board to attend a future CCAC meeting(Jan 17 if possible or Feb, prior to planning commission meeting)to perhaps address some of these follow-up questions. Questions include: 1. Can you more specifically describe the benefits to the schools? Specifically, a. Some indication of what numbers of students can be reached with this tower that do not have current decent access to internet? Or are there other service benefits beyond that? b. What is estimated $ benefits to the school district? Can these funds be directed toward Western/Henley/Brownsville/Crozet Elementary since that is the population being impacted visually with this tower? c. Are there any lessons learned or feedback from the AHS installation in terms of benefits to AHS,things that might be considered differently at WAHS. Or feedback from other NOVA schools that maybe did this? 2. Can similar benefits to the schools exist with a shorter tower(e.g., 100'vs. 125'vs the 145' requested, etc)? What is the pro/con assessment of this—e.g.,similar/lower benefits vs.shorter tower or fewer arrays and less visual impact? Can the project proceed with a shorter tower? 3. Is an alternate location "back further"onto the school property,that may have less visual impact from rte 250 especially,feasible? 4. Can Milestone produce pictures of similar 4-array towers like the one being proposed? Can Milestone produce more realistic visual simulations with the 4-equipment arrays vs.one array? Possibly also show what a 125'or 100'tower might look like, if that is at all feasible or to be considered. I recognize some of the above questions may be best answered by school reps,others by Milestone. I also ask who is the best contact at Albemarle County Schools to coordinate with on these issues? Finally,all of this is intended to 4 ✓ supplement the public review process and inform the CCAC and citizens so they can better provide input to the Planning Commission and Board. Thanks for your assistance, Cheers, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner Chair,Crozet Community Advisory Council 434-227-2105 davidastoner1(a@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Tuesday,January 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1@gmail.com> Cc: "T. Michael Kunkel" <tmkunkel(a@gmail.com>, Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Hi Dave, It was our pleasure, and thanks again for giving us the opportunity. Yes,two people with the schools were mentioned during the presentation. I mentioned Dean Tisdadt,who came to Albemarle from Fairfax County schools and is the COO for Strategic Planning and Operations. Dean established a relationship with Milestone Communications while in Fairfax County, and has led the school board to enter into a relationship with the company here to improve the schools' wireless communications and increase revenue. Cria Wood mentioned Ira Socol,who is Interim Executive Director of Technologies and Innovation. He is serving in the place of Vince Schreivert, who worked with us on the AHS site and has since left the county. Here's the webpage with their info: https://www2.k12albemarle.org/acps/departments/Pages/default.asnx We met with Dean,Vince,and engineer Robert Rejonis to learn the schools' plans for the AHS site. I'm sure we will do the same for WAHS and will request the schools' representatives to be at the hearings to discuss and answer questions as they did for the earlier site. Thanks very much, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth.Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com httos://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 5 From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@omaii.com] Sent: Tuesday,January 02, 2018 12:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: T. Michael Kunkel Subject: Re: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Lori— Thanks for your presentation. One request,as I reach out to school board for follow-up. Do you have the name/contact information for the person within the school district who was named as managing this project with Milestone (as I recall worked with them in a prior life in Fairfax)? The districts IT guy in the audience was helpful, but I got the sense he maybe wasn't the best to direct some questions to (and/or do you have his name/contact info possibly? I had hoped to reach out to them as well as school board members,thinking they may have more info/details than the board members. Mike—maybe same request to you from your notes/minutes/attendee list? thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Date: Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 10:47 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastoner1(a@gmail.com>, Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC <crozetcac@googlegroups.com> Cc: Emily Kilroy<ekilrov@albemarle.org>, "Tim F.J. Tolson" <tfitolson@gmail.com>,Jennie More <jmore@albemarle.org>,Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>, "cperez@albemarle.org" <cperez@albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Dear Dave and CCAC, Thank you again for allowing us to present the Milestone Communications wireless project for WAHS at your meeting last night. Attached, as requested, is the presentation without photographs and photosimulations. Please let me know if you have trouble opening it, and I will send it in a different format. We will work on gathering the information and exhibits requested by the Committee and citizen attendees. I would greatly appreciate an email if members if the School Board agree to attend an upcoming CCAC meeting. Best regards, and Happy Holidays, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor 6 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.S chwel ler(a)leclai rrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@cimail.com] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:03 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC; Notification about CCAC Cc: Emily Kilroy; Tim F.J.Tolson; Jennie More; Ann Mallek; cperez@albemarle.orq; Schweller, Lori Ii. Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library All— . Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held Wed, Dec 20 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Probably a shorter meeting than usual,so if anyone has any comments or suggestions on the agenda, please let me know. Regards, Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A. Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@Rmail.com *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(a,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 7 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday,January 10, 2018 8:37 AM To: 'David Stoner' Cc: Ann Mallek;Jennie More; David Benish; 'Schweller, Lori H.'; Dean Tistadt; David Oberg; Jonno Alcaro; Robert Rejonis; Timothy Kunkel;Ira Socol; Cristian Hernandez;Andrew Gast-Bray Subject: RE:WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up David Stoner, RE: SP201700026- Western Albemarle High School - Tier III PWSF The item is tentatively scheduled for the PC public hearing on Feb 20th and tentatively scheduled for the BOS public hearing on March 14_ _ _-- - -—- —_- -- If these dates stick, the staff report shall be finalized on Feb 12th• Review comments on the proposal shall be provided to the applicant by COB this Friday. Depending on these comments and how the applicant decides to respond to them, we will know if these dates still work/are moving forward or if the review will need to be timed out and await a resubmittal of the concept plan. We are also up against a 150 day shot clock for this project based on FCC regulations. The 150 days expires on March 29th and an action should be taken by then; however, the applicant has the ability to extend the shot clock based on various circumstances. The 150 day shot clock is not the end of the world if it is missed; however, we never miss these deadlines and I do not intend to be the first. But a lot of it depends on how the applicant chooses to move forward once they receive the comments. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent:Tuesday,January 09, 2018 2:40 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: WAHS Cell Tower-Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up Chris— Forgot to copy you on this.... you're the lead planner on this,yes? Do you know when this is likely to be before the PC and/or when you would expect to have staff report completed? Trying to decide timing of any future CCAC discussion on this. thanks Dave 1 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: David Stoner<davidastonerl@gmail.com> Date:Tuesday,January 9, 2018 at 2:16 PM To: " Subject:WAHS Cell Tower- Crozet CAC Public Meeting Follow-up All, I am writing this to follow-up on Milestone Communication's presentation to the Crozet Community Advisory Council (CCAC) last month regarding the proposed cell tower at Western Albemarle High School. I first want to thank Lori and Milestone for an informative presentation.,Secondly, I wanted to pass along some of the questions that were raised by CCAC members,for possible follow-up throughout this process. Third,the CCAC would like to invite someone from Albemarle County Schools or School Board to attend a future CCAC meeting(Jan 17 if possible or Feb, prior to planning commission meeting)to perhaps address some of these follow-up questions. Questions include: 1. Can you more specifically describe the benefits to the schools? Specifically, a. Some indication of what numbers of students can be reached with this tower that do not have current decent access to internet? Or are there other service benefits beyond that? b. What is estimated $ benefits to the school district? Can these funds be directed toward Western/Henley/Brownsville/Crozet Elementary since that is the population being impacted visually with this tower? c. Are there any lessons learned or feedback from the Al-IS installation in terms of benefits to AHS,things that might be considered differently at WAHS. Or feedback from other NOVA schools that maybe did this? 2. Can similar benefits to the schools exist with a shorter tower(e.g., 100'vs. 125'vs the 145' requested, etc)? What is the pro/con assessment of this—e.g.,similar/lower benefits vs.shorter tower or fewer arrays and less visual impact? Can the project proceed with a shorter tower? 3. Is an alternate location"back further"onto the school property,that may have less visual impact from rte 250 especially,feasible? 4. Can Milestone produce pictures of similar 4-array towers like the one being proposed? Can Milestone produce more realistic visual simulations with the 4-equipment arrays vs.one array? Possibly also show what a 125'or 100'tower might look like,if that is at all feasible or to be considered. I recognize some of the above questions may be best answered by school reps,others by Milestone. I also ask who is the best contact at Albemarle County Schools to coordinate with on these issues? Finally, all of this is intended to supplement the public review process and inform the CCAC and citizens so they can better provide input to the Planning Commission and Board. • Thanks for your assistance, Cheers, Dave 2 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner Chair, Crozet Community Advisory Council 434-227-2105 davidastoner1@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date: Tuesday,January 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com> Cc: "T. Michael Kunkel" <tmkunkel@gmail.com>, Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Hi Dave, It was our pleasure, and thanks again for giving us the opportunity. Yes,two people with the schools were mentioned during the presentation. I mentioned Dean Tisdadt,who came to Albemarle from Fairfax County schools and is the COO for Strategic Planning and Operations. Dean established a relationship with Milestone Communications while in Fairfax County, and has led the school board to enter into a relationship with the company here to improve the schools' wireless communications and increase revenue. Cria Wood mentioned Ira Socol, who is Interim Executive Director of Technologies and Innovation. He is serving in the place of Vince Schreivert,who worked with us on the AHS site and has since left the county. Here's the webpage with their info: https://www2.k12albemarle.org/acps/departments/Pages/default.aspx We met with Dean,Vince, and engineer Robert Rejonis to learn the schools' plans for the AHS site. I'm sure we will do the same for WAHS and will request the schools' representatives to be at the hearings to discuss and answer questions as they did for the earlier site. Thanks very much, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@omail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 12:37 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: T. Michael Kunkel Subject: Re: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library - Milestone Presentation Lori- 3 Thanks for your presentation. One request, as I reach out to school board for follow-up. Do you have the name/contact information for the person within the school district who was named as managing this project with Milestone (as I recall worked with them in a prior life in Fairfax)? The districts IT guy in the audience.was helpful, but I got the sense he maybe wasn't the best to direct some questions to (and/or do you have his name/contact info possibly? I had hoped to reach out to them as well as school board members,thinking they may have more info/details than the board members. Mike—maybe same request to you from your notes/minutes/attendee list? thanks Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David A.Stoner 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com From: "Schweller, Lori H." <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Date:Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 10:47 AM To: 'David Stoner' <davidastonerl@gmail.com>, Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC <crozetcac@googlegroups.com> Cc: Emily Kilroy<ekilroy@albemarle.org>, "Tim F.J.Tolson" <tfitolson@gmail.com>,Jennie More <jmore@albemarle.org>, Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>, "cperez@albemarle.org"" <cperez@albemarle.org>, Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda -7-9pm, Crozet Library- Milestone Presentation Dear Dave and CCAC, Thank you again for allowing us to present the Milestone Communications wireless project for WAHS at your meeting last night. Attached, as requested, is the presentation without photographs and photosimulations. Please let me know if you have trouble opening it, and I will send it in a different format. We will work on gathering the information and exhibits requested by the Committee and citizen attendees. I would greatly appreciate an email if members if the School Board agree to attend an upcoming CCAC meeting. Best regards, and Happy Holidays, Lori Lori H. Schweller • Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Ditect (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel le r(a)leclai rrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 4 - • From:David Stoner [mailto:davidastonerl@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:03 PM To: Crozet Community Advisory Council CCAC; Notification about CCAC Cc: Emily Kilroy; Tim F.J. Tolson; Jennie More; Ann Mallek; cuerez@albemarle.orq; Schweller, Lori H. • Subject: Crozet CAC Wed Dec. 20 2017 Meeting Agenda - 7-9pm, Crozet Library All— Please find attached the agenda for this month's Crozet Community Advisory Committee meeting to be held Wed,Dec 20 at the Crozet Library from 7-9pm. Probably a shorter meeting than usual, so if anyone has any comments or suggestions on the agenda, please let me know. Regards, Dave David A. Stoner CCAC Chair 434-227-2105 davidastonerl@gmail.com * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. *This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 5 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 2:42 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Cristian Hernandez (0/4ev't Subject: Milestone WAHS Attachments: 11x17 Exhibit for Trees by 250.PDF L. levad.-41 ___,_ /�� Hi Chris, f / I just wanted you to be aware that the ARB recommended that this monopole should be gray, not brown, to blend better with the sky. Based on that recommendation,we would like to ask the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to consider a special exception to permit the applicant to retain the galvanized steel finish. Our application does request that SE, so I don't believe any change needs to be made. The ARB was good with the view from the EC if Milestone plants the trees along the front fence as proposed in the attached exhibit. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN j)\,Y,123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902(434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com #--- LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. kk ,4( )\)2) to ��Io� � 1 \ 1 1'1 1 `'1 — ____ 1 / - \ , 1 \ -- --"- -/� i- c �l 1 ;� ---- --:-.:-.---------a-- ,�--- ; _, , __. r \ ----(22).JUNIPERUS ,-- i -----__— ) � \� Y i '� VIRGINI/jNAT� = _ ,--SSE ADDED z5o i--� { . \ J ROUSE _i_-/ -' -' _i- /,-' --—— -% APPROX. �__� :11 LOCATIONPF j- . i EX. FENCE --- �-- i /! f ,r _..----- Va, \ 0 -- n -8 11 m 1 O % L2 \ \ LOCATION OF ` \ 1 1 I \ EX.TREES AND TREE 1`1 \ `1 I I I 1 LINE (TYP.) 11 I I 1 \ I '1 GRAPHIC SFALE —/ d 1 1 1 0 0' 400' I \ \\\ n' Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 3:34 PM To: Christopher Perez; Margaret Maliszewski Cc: Cristian Hernandez Subject: Western Albemarle Milestone Application -- color change Hi Chris and Margaret, In our application for the WAHS site, Milestone Communications requested a modification of Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(d)to permit the monopole to retain the gray galvanized steel finish to minimize visibility against the sky rather than paint it brown. We want to withdraw that request and would like to paint the pole and all related equipment on the pole Sherwin Williams Umbra SW4008 (Protective & Marine Coatings),which is the color Shentel tells us they use in Albemarle County. We think brown will better camouflage the pole when the leaves are off the trees. The facility will be skylit in only a couple of locations(from 250 near the school sign and immediately behind the school across the field off Emerald Court) whereas it will be visible through the trees when the leaves are off the trees from Miller School Road and from Ms. Jackson's residence on Savannah Court. Also,the ball field lights at the football field are actually brown wooden poles, and we'd like the monopole to be similar in color. Please let me know if you have any concerns about this change or would like additional information. We will send our photosims when available. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel ler(c�leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. • . - r �%'r" i!'''� W ?fig%j...ill!,r'gr <;� ...^:r"' t. � • ! Y• • Or!. 4% . ,,, , -.`iteolv ..........."----- , , _, ,, ;:.'--; 7- $ ' .r y 3' ! •a '.a !,� ij I i ! 4 ` . •-,...' ,„,,• -•,. . 11:i " ,.R, G Aliiiii.k._ , C � t .;2� . ,. IIIIII ' S �/ n Hi i161 11•11 If Ili `"- rota. '6'; i�F �., Rl� •w mow. .. �. r) M" r by yo> ��a ina nic j —•••••Nonr.--7,.....-5b1.. ..471,i,;"44Vitte.:,„441111k.. .40/cP9' .4941:14... "41/16/04 lerigiN,,:fy. • v. �.i" 4.-:::". 411:::.::::' . . ...... ...''' y * t yg J �$l _ q j� s)� �S_tPl •Q ,4711�e-'; ':1 H\lam., :_•''' ,.::.',,,, ., , :( . 0 „•-, lk l •*fr.,", ' • _AI:41111OWNbx•. V. • : • ,i1110011.111%111*„.... •-AW.. , .'•* .1 ^ ••••• P...* al 1° • ' .41116466.441 i ,,4 l''''''" -,.•:.-••-• ; _'5• ,'s,..--4.62..11. , . ..11,. •-••,._-•,- - .--•• -10,111'...-t,.4' _: ,Ilprw. '`.. " '. .A.. ,'s ,.?.t,- * $2"'••• MIIIMP' 7....\ ..,"'4.1';'''40:‘-•,, ''.-4..t." • '' '''7,*, 27-ffir•'...; ...'• . *• i ,,,,,,, .***•:„.k_74.1.4'N.:..*a: '.,;:., ,*441 . 14.....!;.•...**4•.**r* *** _ ... '' , . Tj •"-*'•-\., :.,..'... ' '• ,4, **Yr ft e Ili 4 Li;- .4.4,%111*' 7,..t.' i• ,. . •,„ ' . i — 1 ' •;/..' .. " -i-''' , • '10: / 4:,' 4,)•..• - , ., L , . 40,....,,....., ..,..., ... •• ,, 4..-, ' ", *‘ -•-70 1' • ,'.1.•,R.- '•'' -- , ..;cAl . f: ' ft 3 • .1. ' • . .• LI * ,.• -- ' At * I .,- -- - t k f • , , it '0;-',..00-,-ie-0019:r.' 4174e•-•-•'..-...", ,'. - ' ,-,- -' 4! .,.... .,- •,. f, 1 ... .f, V,IA 1"%.,A 041116. . - --•-- - — - - , r - A, .-: '''•.------ - ,....,.... ..' . Qs : p-• „,iiiselo..,--_;,. ,:-- „,...-,..._ - V. •‘-•-- •-' •''.11.• ' • - _ . • - ' , 1 �-: • GRANT •rL ,mans GaA "?. . j �1 yf '.„ •P 4 c a T _\ ;jJ `1.'. W. �;; , ,1.(D'/e / . ,. ai __`_Y r k '.Y w„n� CrozetlLibrary �„ i' r ....__ • RE'A 7 y? 1 • •�; `^- ,,,. • ` %r.'... :�. t' �. _ ' � 3 PARKSIDE ` ''.a_• ...a...-efe ''' :.,- . M r0.Jvr_? '^ - '_-,... a A. 1,.- .- . VILLAGE • r 4 •y f• .� F,',, * • •• _ l am • i ,v • tiq k ~ ,*rrw ` .'ARK_VIEW '" `tf <• 4110A. ~'\ ., � BROO WOOD ` 4 el. •4. �, �;'�kp4114k,, � LD TR�A',� rf. WHITE OA.<•SIt.‘1,0, ^' r Slabto4' ,,cf y. . •► ., i�v% �� �_ ! • --—i MOUNT'AIN�, k_. r '�:'HA'R•VEST-FARMS �, ti ��y� �3r,-</,i � \ • I , - . f .s\an ,. CORM' FARMS / (_ .\, o f:v "�, G% t� � :�1 B r r,• i,s I I`e't�� _ '' ( , I0. !` + ' L t -4`t;'. i� - ! 4 ! Twb. ... ' - Rockfish Gap•Turnpike - ?? / - �!, , 'op MOUNTAIN ' t V,• jl —r 1 j : "XI E W 1 ,'. • a !3� �,k t el .4.• ,. `I, i •did' • • , • w ,* `"°i • �'1, • e •i� �` • _ 4 Ohm ` , CB par - ..‘� �•!,. s�. •'` * ' ^,•�' _ c' Western Albem p��� '� � '� Y,;, ,.e • .�•i I S C .4.ty. • High Scl ool`�., t! l f 1 r 4 14. a , .,, 1®: . .r b j- EMEP.-�LI, FOREST •�� • ,�\` M y FOREST GLEN �• ,11\4• N..,11 it. .4-• . - -"' .., . • ' y ` fir a ,R x 1 •')c!Ui- .. r• • Fumpik M• l Mountain r� :Y w : sro,, ': . i'.1rair' Camp esort CASTL-EBERRY� ' �� F'e, �� COURT '` • . • 0,9 lit 'yak w v��s.p ` "'yin .r {{ • !� a - Al 55E-01--D is '6 -55E-01-H e / ��S6J146 35 Legend 55E Q1-A1-A• , 0 �G1 `'� 56 9 55 E-01-22-0 55 E-01-A1-0S 1 'g61" •�-56.14C1 ur�I (Note:Sorne items on map may not appear in legend) s' o A7 56-35E o a, 55E-01-A2 rn °ors„M 0 »ern. U56-35A1\ ailb MICE SIATIAN 1 ®c o �N.13RANGN 56-17A 056-15 24 M °a" TO 55E01 5 56-32C1�6 ,p SLAB W Q '� C. _ ' Henley MS _ Brownsville ES 56-3 BC2t� M 55-103F C{ q 0 - 56-32C� - 55E-01--A3 a 55E-01-R ,. 6-16, 56-32A1 55-104A1 rn.N s���I 11�� ` C� c\--jcS'' r r !�j - 66-17E ,f ,,56-16A 635j N5-104AJ !:►rtN coSSS7 55- 03C i-�_£55B`A9ril •• �' 'W.,` .6•7j •_ 46 •, e56. ( e7p3,0 F1S�;.6-0TP in 55B-16 mr------ 'I ' , ), :T m Q�, _ 797 ROCK cn : ( `-i 44 �n v�; �'♦ �, cif) `J v 5�11 G� ���1 v, N m 556-16A -+ !�► , J' / in S J %^ sal\ /� �055=109A+r W ;�' J -- 55-1 ` 56-16D a / C' o r '` 55409 �5, SB_2i 55B-i5A �,�j ^p ( r ..ra oT IA 55B-3 56-12 �° l c^` • �1 `r w 55-107A s t, est Albemarle HS56-1 • �� h• 55-108-1 55e.-:�lot •155B-13 0 u`"+ 5 5B,10 T. 2 y; _ 56-1 50288 55m-55B-9 r 5551111B 1 y /4 ti; -4 556-8 �P Ao�P f 76-1 E . : by CAE% 56-19F - ..�. I p,LDLN 56-19D *--11111111111111-: �56-19G� ��56-19H +55-106A3 55-106A2 �� ..41,4 Q� 56-19C2rimieh, 55-112A 56-19B1 GQ� rr� e 56-19B ATN K 71-42 rpGKTON GR�E 56-19132 716 ft 72-20A \ 56-19A i\_•m GIs-web �,e� ' Geographic Data Services wew.albemarle.org 71 37z1 72-19E (434)296-5832 Map is for Display Purposes On y•Aenal Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources December 7,2017 5 ` Co) • • 56A2-01--1'-44 L l /A� 56A2-01--72 / \56 55/ [' `������"?` �56K-fi S6C-OA-3156;45'A1� i' 6A2-01--72A 56 57B2 r �� 56K-02-7056FC=02--75561<-02=-76 .�_ Legend 56-41 r o h S6_ 56 56K-04 40 } i /. y- r r 1 g '. ` 5645A35645A4 �`2 KA? 56K-05-59s6K-02-72' 56K-D2 82 56K-A (Noe:Some dams on map may not appear inlegend) .6-13r5 s.• -0A-22 �v h• 56K-04 A ,ix` 'r �j 115645A 56 49A 56 50A + �r' -�► 56K-02-81 5fiC•J..` 20 'S6C--0A-1 v ffi 6� 5fiC;C '� 56K=0s'-48 56K-02 J8 ... d� - S6D-4 56 96 6 S6H-C /»y 56K-02--80 0 '� S6C-OB-21 ,o ,� y 56K--05 49CORAARA r'• ``' h S6D 556D-6 5649 �6H-01-11056156E-2 'n, •..� O4). OE56C-075fiPi moult. ' 560.-0B-156D.OB-4� ���\ �56H-0�1��1.16,. 56K--05-A • 0056C--06=12 c o ♦� Q .: I!5 �56L 8 S 56D-OB-6 ��� S6H-01-10356E-13 61-17' /\ 6, 4 5. 40B 56C-166-26 56D--OD;456D-0C�1 L ,�� ' 1'" 1!14' �,56L-956E=D56L-02-A 4 G , ,� 56D;OB=8l 56H-A56L-1456E-15�56L-Y9i56L�02-74 O/ . 56D-OD-6yj-iya v56H-01. A2 �� -6-40A.56C--0C-4 -� 1 56D=OC-4 � M—� Y 56-53R - 1 1 56C�00556C.-0C-656D--0D-11• S � �• s6H 01�-118 ':S6�.q �IK'S6L�2856LyU2=71 S6 56r--� -2A56C--OC-3 ^- % -irt 56D-=oC-556D-06-10 • •++� 56L*25� y --) 56D--0D-756Qk=0D=129 �� <-/ �• _ - 56U-OB'�1'�• 56H-01--7 S6L-21 ���56L-26^`/�6L-02-69 -OC-16C,,OC_2 r»i w !•k .5fiC--OC-11 56D-OC-6 c. 561141-93 56L-19-4 5fiC=24,� „i56L--02-68 1 .• �• i a� 560 SOB-�7A- \56C-47 r- i56C-0C-956C-•-OC-10 6D--OD.956D 0 14 " _ ' 56L-18 5 56D OB:1556H-01-A + ` 56L-31 6L�-456L--02-66 5fiC-0C-756C--O•C-856D70D-8 /• ^ ✓. r =GS6L-F� > �. 56D-OD-1556D,0C-13�y t'\N 56 97C S6L�44�56L--02,6356E-02 61 ..111 56H-0:1-45 56-37A 56D--0D-14,%n56DYOC,12 56D==0E6 r,��1`56 976 S6L-3256L�43�G6L�-02=62 138 . i/ 56D-OD�16'� (56D OE1056D= E6 ` 56L�34y� ", r" • '� 56H-01-44 56L-4256E-02-54 E56 37 s 56D 0 -17 s r '�vp � S6L-02 60 �' 56D--OE-1156D-0E'9 D 55L-3556E 41 /�'7`o S6L 02=59� i �i 560.-OE 1-5— 71 - SfiD\�E-756H-01 42 k r 5fiC-02-57� // O 56M-A56M=10 56D-OE-1256D=0E-8 56H-01-4056H-B \ ^ 56�Lr40 •6-rittS 56 1\T'.t�1 '! •;.1 56M-556 56M-9 \ 56-351 ' `56H 01_�39 56L-3756L-3856E-39 56L-02-B 56H=01 37 4,1ill 6M-12 56H:01--3356H-01•38 ` 56L-E 55E:01- • �` "►� i� cn ` �/"" a`. ' 2 S6 56-97 56-14C 56-108A 56F-010-32 56-986i as:00 t, . � Q 56-35 56F�01`-`3356F-01-31 ql°,.� 56F-0�1t 34 56F-01-A •r 4•Meadows Com nity Center_ Sg 56F-01 3556E-01,27 * • 56-99A • 3SC? 56F-01A-37456F-01--25 56F-01-12 56- "„1�' S6F-01• :-24 56F-01--11 Pillia '\.•\\,' 5• 1.3 �56F-01-26 v �� S6F.... 15 "S` •. ® p SC7 \ �56F 01'�22 /56+�01 1 56F2''05:14 • 5• `- • �_ s 56F-01-42- 56F-0.1--1 �` s I �� 240 56-35H J `�s�, 5fiF-01 Y�F-01--21 .._ _ 6-96B-56�9s6iA;1 Us fir56F,2-A 56- +C�1► $6,, , o 56Fv \4656F-0 -61 5�ggg56F2-049 '� 5. 32C2� Se �,56 0 i 7t! _ r S6F1'OD;g1,r.' • S6 1-10 S6F2 01-42J56F1tQC-3 • 5. 32C ,� 56F�0 5 `L1��' 1--'—'1 --� `0 56 106 'Tr 1111r4 • ' 7, R"" _ 5610761 56.---; -+ 56- FilpF. ' 561 /1 56 •A a�56.-0] •256F;01�- 56 =01_5 56F1-2 n /16 �� 1;r' �' ! S: --01 •156F 0 --5_ S6F�0:1_3 TPKE lit yre_ it _ r��- ' ri ROCKFISH'G'APLTPKE 55.110E 1 , f„-,,,f 09A5 mg S6 76 835 g� , �'� �c+ 56 110in, e �. dr s� Aill 'IS�. ?g� s6 09 c N .Q .r -�`w-... ...-Aii •6�17G1 Sg • - _ am 9 56-110A ,., • ii, ...-',- A lir Nbli ' -- r- '101104'i --- -.- ''-3 IESIll 56-111 O El �6 b do `' G ^ '. `° 41/21, � a c •co tiCO c, o n h �fo 5'.4 1 • r.^ � �� l�Z Q G h fo I: 56-25A 4, rti y6- yV a` _4 GIS-Web • ; 851 ft 56 17 h 56 2661 25 P2 • y Geographic Data Se v ces _ www.albemarle. 56-'19E56'1856-28B 56-28 16-28A 56-27� 56-26A1 I 56-25 e p r 5 56 25A3 56.25A1 56 113 p7 (434 2s�saaz� t.' Map is for• •ay Purposes On •Aerial Imagery V b from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources December 7,2017 • Al 55E-01--A5 _ Henley MS Brownsville ES 56-32W 56,35G56-35H 56F=01-47 56-108A / Legend ', 0 „erV 56-15 R 56-35A - r,, g �` 56.35 �ti S6F-01=66 g 56-32C Q o, . rn B S6F,01��0 (Note:Some items on map may not appear In legend 0 56-17A `'? w' 'w 'v 56-35B1 6P2 ,'S6F-U1-,5256F-01-56 56-32 to a a 56 2 � ;tea. 56-16 n c, O 56F 0,U1--5156F101_Aa-... rr0=.�..aa,. 55E-01--A3 v 56-32A� — s, n t — 56-109A5/� �KeH X' 5 m 56.2 pi w j-226E5c 5 26 s656'109A1± q•, oa ,«,mod RG 6•c ' ry —56-26E9 �.,' S6-26E6 'o 41) U p� 55B-19 56-17E1 -n 56-17G1 56 16 M h/ - 56-26E8 m- s� 4 �4 B • h „ �C9 j 683 a 56-109P co' f " ti ► 56-109D O S6 T6 in ��� h� �� S6 70 9 p7 I :\:6A _;teHs 5626• � '� — .i y 56-28 N 56-27 Q 56-25A'3 ''' I '�' _� — y 56-19E t N 1.:} �► Q (r N -,L �� • is, _ :1� to 41 55-106A3 ^0).C. \� 56-25 ^Q�Pti — 40. 56-19H c 56-19C. r 56-24, cD• 56-20C CT h `r)Y,1SW p ,. } ;1_ n tr 56. C- 1. f \._56-20A• `v D 56-19B -- ,\GCKTON CRE OC V-30 �G�56-20 71-42 56-19B2 5 9<0RD tr 56-19A Cr s �, • r, 72-1A -79`_ 11.11/1141P0 a I : -: C j C\ p� 56-25C "' �` 72-196 635 �a 72-20A la gyp, ` ' 72-19 71-43 851 ft 1 of 72-19A GISWeb J 7Z-,$ / Geographic Data Services L16C 7217 72-38 8371-45 _� , i, .,. asa>zesssaz Map is for Display Purposes Only•Aerial Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources December 7,2017 Legend 55-112A 1.\\........................._ ��71-42A 56-19B2 (Note:Some items on map may not a M far in legend) 71-425 E 56-19A oH.,TM 72-20A �oG�S ON CRF�� 56-19 B 7? ,• 9 MST 0.10E p . F. FSCMCOL 71-37J = 72-1A �2'9c ,2'9O 101 ``` 72-206 I-7`---1 72-196�? 71-41 ODv�O `�o 1-371 )i, cd o 72-19 v 71-37 �. _�63 - 71-43 �� 5 72-19A - 71-43A 77-43A1 72-1, -72-2 71-34:). s--.- VIAR-RD 71-34A4 `�."- -34P1 — ® 6�, 72-17 i,1 j' � c / !� ., :. 71-34F 2-�66 < A — 72-1•. • 71-34F2 � 72-3A1 r b • • 72-16 -7''2'N...•N...•'4•• T 71-34A2 7•? 2 3A 7 5 71-34C5 Irk \- ,,I4-' \~ / , - 1- —a 71-34A3 �' fi 72-15A 72-23 ( } 71-34C6 y 71-45A �2_� 4 7._1' -s z: 3 ' f ( 7 34D 71-45 744 ~ 77 72-14A5 J 71 34G 46g 72-14A4, D 72-25�A �pM 71-46C 1 72-14A3 e w 71-46D 7/qq 72-14A2 72-14 N 72-26A 72-22 cn a 71-46E 71-46 72-14A1 ^ N co /72.21 -II . n a v > 72-13B --72-13D , ^ry• 71-34C- •a• 1-4 H - -a'" - 716 ft $a.V .. iDNJAY RD 'd ., ANr � GiS-web Q Q -. J 7 w n, k C N .'uv''% Geographic Data Services o. 71-33D1 ' ? ? r __ 'QG 71-46A1 Q6, 72 3A 4 ..'2-2'PE \ 72-27F '791 www.albemadeorg .— ^ —, '9, -9 .6 - 47xr+, (434)296-5832 I ,� ,� s ' 72-27G� Map is for Display Purposes Only•Aerial Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources 1 v December 7.2017 . A 55-80 55-87% 55-84E E1-01:�29r1 55E1127 5-8? 55E-01_23-1 `.��y Legend 55-8AF N 55E'01-234 SSF SSE01-1u1-22 (Note. ome ems on map may not appear inlegend) 555--8�8A6 j�_ /� Ar+0% o . SSEr0 23 9 �, `� _ kil 55-84F 55E 01`3-A 55E-01-22-0 4� t f q� _ off, 55E-01-Al-OS1 •9 S r: •-ir.,„ To as co ,,, W stP 55-88D ,�' ' , , KIST OFFICE CO h SCICOL -�LcP -v. �, 55-84 • 555`12-Ai •. �q) ,m `� 55-88B - • •55A 3A 55E-01-A2 by • �' 9' n 5A-3V Pas ^' ilk P op' Bs 90 55• y`o • Ss• 55-906'SSA-9 SSE-01`A •��•9 5590A. r55A-10 55-103F SSE-01-i45 • • S SS,9 • 55A=11A t1C'� 55E-01-A3 N 55-93A2 s9� 55A-11 G N BRP 55E-01--R 55A-12 ,o' SOW "' s3; 55A-1_ _ 3r— g S� Sy�'a 55 11 `�"' S5A-14 Sc,P~' 55-70 5-0 A ��' 55-103 * AID - cr. 6 • - 1---,r, 4� + q _ - A C 556119 • �� I �, 36A1 �'' • 55-1 13E iii0 °6. 55B-16 c"n ,? 31 s a s55A-3455 1 f � ► - 55 f109A4ut c`'"„ m �, glil . 55-93\111:111‘ 36 55-1 d ''fir 40 °' �� SP 5 55B'16A o � a 5 � 5 � A-38A 0, LI 55A'31 i :. h 5 • 5549D+ 55-93131 55A-45A55A-2§A'.y j- \1P o, 558 'o v\ '� 55A-3155A d3 5- 0 55B-3. b ' 55A Yancey++•5A-2 �1 5951085 A G •556-13 �� •�t 55A-45 45B G 55A-2755 -44/ Ix s MilisC q' /9/ rr• '`I. �' pJJ-J!D N V � "i. 55 55B-9 %`i .�� -5A-2 ••' A-244Z, 5-97B s.. 55-112 .�'55-111B� l �►�� !_ 410 5_97 c 556 7/�` tr !1�7,.r -Al;t- --_55-97A r 55A$?8 - 556 8 ° . �. Apr Q% co cz, 55-98A "55-100 S�� 55-95 Gp ir • • •- -• lih‘,.:-i,-.•.•-'•.-,':t••-.'7:-''.;'''':--.'o-.-ir:..:,'-.1?.i1i,'t. pek5� 55_ 55-106A3 55-106A2 •` iAsi' Off' „_ rr 55-19B 9+ 55-112A r s .t w �I4 'c i 55-96 PATTERSO Ss994 M/ < • IliWir ----• 0-Neg.- 71-42 71}4 B �39 851 ft I 71-38 y A. Ifith fic • GIs-web 71-4H ' M• „� Geographic Data services ,1 STOCKTON CREEK 71-37J „� �7142A 1A M a)z• a32� 711-4D 7 0 L__7J1 ?2 ' c Map is for Display Purposes Only•Aerial Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources *$ December 7,2017 .55-796--' 55=7\LI55-79Er 9D1 ,+a �'•• ���; " • <' 55E-0:1-3855E-01 -43'� ,, \T 1. . -ee +� SSE�2,, 555E-027� Legend 55E`-01/--20 �55E-01+3g 55E-02--4355E P 4655E-02-80' ( Someibms on mep may not appear in legend; 5�79 ` 11 55E- 33 ���� • ° 55E-01-224\yam \55E-02=A` ` g ry 55E-O.4155E`-01`-6 55E-02-B.55E 92'5- . n• * RIVENDELt 55E 5,15t2455E1-5 SSE-01-1 55E 02a5 t_" 55-. t �-• 55E-01126Vr E 001-355E�1`32 55E-01-H , ° ` 55-82A `5S E'0F2855E=401-31, i-.-. 55-80 V55E-o1%1055E-01'A `'�vr 55+82. SSE=0l129y' /`\ a* S SE-01-7B-055E-01 55 E-01-3A-2 ��9\ `` �/ 55E-01-3A-3 h yl :'' 55E=01^3B-A55E=01t4,411, - �55E'�0'1�E Sy. �•,.. gySSE-01-7.. I. Fp .. ‘55E-01 3C-Avt' 7y� 55-81 55E-01 35-10 Y \55E�01=-C2��` �' vii ► 55E-0135�8� �� -,,, 55E-01_-F t 55E- 35p755E-U1-2' 8'1�55E-01-6A(-0'�i j m>"" ``0' in 55E-01ti35=655E`01 29-6 Wilk' 41'. ��� 7 • 55-86 u, 55E-01-6B--0 co v1 55E;01y3 74(5E-01-26-0 55E-04-0G=� , 55E-01-35w455E-01-29-A � 55E-01-35=3,'� I�+R?u 55E-04=0G,3 D • / - �� - 55E=01-2 -20 550 -88A6 S. 'IV 55E=0.1=35-1� 55 -01-11-27 �':'i abibs01- DR .�.:- SSE*-01{9-21551017111221F2i �. 5 E=0123-, ',....Vie, �� '' SSE=01-23 4 `ssF 501•-`11pI s 55-103F p SSEs01-23 9 oy � jts. s 5S 88q - ��� 55-8�4F � 55EA1`3 A 55E-01-22-0 9� 10 s l yy ,i i•. f 55E-01-A1-0S1 9 iv an c �j 55-88D yN ,n h �Q, cr u, 6;' ^55-84 ' 55E-01-12-A1 O0P . Ta`" 55-88-�-1•�455A3A 55E-01—A2 a tg 0 ^' <� h 43-1) ss9p 55A_7 hyP 55E-01--A SS• 55-90= ' A 9 55E-01 SAS ��Q 55�'��' SA-10 � - SS. ss-9 SA=11A Pr1G� 55E-01—A3 55-93A2 , s9� SSA-1 55.-12• 1,4r Pv;IOWN 8R 55E-01--R in a, er �p} y S1 55-10044AA1 ! 40 • SP >� .fir ,may`+' s55 *� y 55-103 - 55-103A55-10A _ . + .il��tilbriv.44 55-93A s 55-102 w ` ,� ' '0A �'^1 55-103C 556-19 Ao Air - 7�� • r 55A-36A1 w- * 5.103E55E103D u,5SB-16 v1 ? ' �` 111 55A-3455-1036109A\o1 cNi+ CO 17 I CP 5.'''''''... 55-93 `o�' u. 6 55-111;G�10 "t u"'>55B-16A (o /` 411X.._,.."111driablialligkiLir 4fr 851 ft L ` 55A 38A ras 55.A-3,1A' �P 0 —556.2 15A „"� t5-93B1 , -� 1 O 55B �vt �, ,y 55A-3155A-43 S5-� " 556-3' ' m clsweo `" ` d' SSA-29�� r yy t55=107A•o `r' 55A-45 45B y SSA-25A �� 3 4 SSB=1355-106A4 �` a% Geographic Data Services 55-111 B 55-108 50. alnemade.e g 55A ^ } 55A-2755A-'44 55 2 5 G 3di 256-5832 f 55A-24_y 55A-26 i rn 556-'S5B-11 ` Nap is for Dsolay Purposes Only•Aenal Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virgin and Other Sources \n‘rj!..)\ Oecember 7,2017 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:46 PM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Margaret Malisze' .i; 'Cristian Hernandez' Subject: RE: Milestone" S photosims Lori, [5.1.40(a)(6)e] Photographing balloon test. The photographs of the balloon test shall be taken from the nearest residence and from appropriate locations on abutting properties,along each publicly used road from which the balloon is visible, and other properties and locations as deemed appropriate by the agent. The applicant shall identify the camera type, film size, and focal length of the lens for each photograph. The ordinance requires it, I am requesting it in this instance,please provide it.Thank you. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@ie-lairryar;.com] Sent:Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:42 PM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>;Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS photosims Chris, Is the first photo in front of the house that is at the end of the private driveway? We don't usually include photos from private property unless specifically requested by the homeowner. Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:36 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: Milestone WAHS photosims 1 aP • Photo set 1 (group of 4 pics at a time)—sent from Cperez From:Christopher Perez Sent:Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:31 PM To:'Schweller, Lori H.'<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com>; 'Cristiari,Hernandez' <cris@milestonecorp.com>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Milestone WARS photosims , Ok, I will send you the pictures I need photo sims of. I will send them in picture sets of 4 (email size being the limiting factor). • From:Schweller, Lori H. fmailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com] Sent:Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:09 PM To: 'Cristian Hernandez'<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Milestone WARS photosims Margaret and Chris, I have the attached photo at the intersection of 250 and Old Trail, but I believe Ms. Mallek wants a shot farther west for the view of a car leaving Old Trail. Do you have that photo? We can make a photosim from it if you do. We also don't have shots from Miller School Road. I have photos from 250 in front of the school, but if you have any particular shot you'd like simulated, please send. Finally, Chris,you took shots from 250 looking down the private driveway opposite the elementary school. I have a shot from that location but cannot see the balloon. If you have one you want to use for a simulation, please send it. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel le r(hleclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller(alleclairrvan.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 13, 2017 12:03 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> 2 Cc: Crisstian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com> Subject: Milestone WAHS photosims Chris and Margaret, Will you please confirm the locations from which Milestone needs to create photosimulations? My notes indicate we need photosims from the following locations: • Old Trail—Cris has photos ■ Miller School Road—NEED photos • Emerald Forest in front of house for sale-Cris has photos ■ Emerald Forest in front of field immediately behind school (?)—have photo • From 250 in the right-of-way in front of Brownsville Elementary School where the balloon could be seen down the private driveway- Need photo ■ At the intersection of 250 and Old Trail from the Old Trail side as if a car were sitting at the stoplight to leave Old Trail- Need photo • In front of the high school where the entrance sign is located near the soccer field- Need photo • 479 Savannah Court(Jackson residence).Cris has photo If you have photos you'd like to send, Milestone will create the photosims from your photos. Otherwise,we can use the ones we took. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax . (804)248-8700 Mobile Lari.Schweller leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@,leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 411 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 10:24 AM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Christian Winkler (cwinkler@ mi lestonecorp.com) Subject: RE: Mileston Communications -WAHS LOIs from Additional carriers Thanks, Chris. Yes, I know the county doesn't involve itself in the applicant's business issues, but folks will ask about potential carriers, and I wanted you to have that information, especially as it supports our special exception request for more than three arrays. I appreciate the reminder about future collocators' standoff parameters. If we do not ask for wider arrays or other specifications requested by potential future carriers,we understand that our approval would set standoff parameters as shown on our plans,which are those requested by Shentel for its design. Thanks again, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(dileclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 7:14 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com) Subject: RE: Mileston Communications -WAHS LOIs from Additional carriers Lori, Ok, so I have this information and will put it in the file. I am not sure what this information is intended to do/add to the application,other than make the County aware that you may have potential clients to fill the various array slots you are requesting SEs to.My next question for you is—will the array locations depicted on the site plan&the standoff distance requested be sufficient for these companies to locate their antenna in these array slots?If not,you may need to revise your SE requests and the zoning drawings to account for this.Regardless,thanks for the information,I will put it in the file and it will be mentioned in the staff report. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 1 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 • From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com] Sent:Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:59 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com)<cwinkler@milestonecorp.com> Subject: Mileston Communications-WAHS LOIs from Additional carriers Good Afternoon,Chris, Milestone Communications has received letters of intent from T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless for the proposed WAHS facility. I'm sending these to your for the special use permit/special exception file. As you know,we have requested a special exception to permit more than three arrays. The top spot is reserved for the schools, and the second for Shentel. These expressions of interest in the site support our justification for the special exception request: additional arrays are needed for other wireless providers that want to improve coverage and/or capacity in the area. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.SchwelIer(d leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, December 13,2017 7:14 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.' Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com);Christian Winkler (cwinkler@ mi lestonecorp.com) Subject RE: Mileston Communications -WAHS LOIs from Additional carriers Lori, Ok, so I have this information and will put it in the file.I am not sure what this information is intended to do/add to the application,other than make the County aware that you may have potential clients to fill the various array slots you are requesting SEs to.My next question for you is—will the array locations depicted on the site plan&the standoff distance requested be sufficient for these companies to locate their antenna in these array slots?If not,you may need to revise your SE requests and the zoning drawings to account for this.Regardless,thanks for the information,I will put it in the file and it will be mentioned in the staff report. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:59 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com) <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>;Christian Winkler(cwinkler@milestonecorp.com)<cwinkler@milestonecorp.com> Subject: Mileston Communications-WAHS LOIs from Additional carriers Good Afternoon,Chris, Milestone Communications has received letters of intent from T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless for the proposed WAHS facility. I'm sending these to your for the special use permit/special exception file. As you know,we have requested a special exception to permit more than three arrays. The top spot is reserved for the schools, and the second for Shentel. These expressions of interest in the site support our justification for the special exception request: additional arrays are needed for other wireless providers that want to improve coverage and/or capacity in the area. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile 1 Lori.Schweller( Ieclairrvan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@u,leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. • 2 r 12 LECLAIRZYAN November 21, 2017 RE: Notice of a Balloon Test and a Cammunitjy Meeting for SP2017-26: Western Albemarle High School- Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility(PWSF) Dear Neighbor, Milestone Communications has recently submitted a Special Use Permit (SP) application for a proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) on the property of Western Albemarle Iligh School, located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike (U.S. Route 250 West), Tax Map Parcel Number 05600-00-00-017C0. The applicant seeks to construct a one hundred and forty-live (145) foot tall steel monopole with five (5) antenna arrays. Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three (3) arrays, to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance, to allow the monopole to be gray galvanized steel finish, and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite. The proposed site is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. As part of the application process, the County requires the applicant to conduct a Balloon Test and a Community Meeting prior to public hearings. Balloon Test We invite you to attend a Balloon Test on Thursday, December 7,2017,9:00 a.m.-Noon. The purpose of a balloon test is to evaluate the potential visual impact of the proposed PWSF from neighboring properties and roadways by raising a large red balloon to the height of the proposed monopole at the site location (WAHS) and photographing it from points where it is visible in the surrounding area. Representatives of the applicant and the County will be onsite at the start of the test to view the leased ground area. We will be parked near the football stadium; the site is at the edge of the wooded area northeast of the eastern field goal. (Any visitors to the site should first check in with school staff.) Following the ground area review, we will be off-site evaluating the visibility of the balloon from neighboring roadways and vantage points. Based on a preliminary balloon test that the applicant conducted in September,the facility is expected to have minimal visibility off-site. Both the applicant and the County representatives will take photographs to document visibility, and photographs and photosimulations of the proposed facility will be presented at the community meeting. In the case of rain or high winds, the test may be canceled and rescheduled for Friday, December 8, 2017, 8:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m. On the day of the original balloon test, if the weather is questionable, please call me at 804-248-8700 or County Staff at 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 for a status update of the test. '.f facility for the provision of personal wireless services,it inch may be composed of antennas,cables.wiring,supporting brackets and other structural equipment,grounding rods.transmission equipment,one or more ground equipment shelters,and a self-supporting monopole or tower �� ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 WWW.LECLAIRRYAN.COM Community Meeting In addition, we invite you to attend a Community Meeting on December 20, 2017 at Crozet Library, 2020 Library Ave, Crozet, VA 22932 during the regularly scheduled Crozet Community Advisory Council Meeting (CCAC) at 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. At the meeting, we will present slides to introduce the project and to show the photographs taken at the balloon test and photosimulations created from the photographs to show the expected visual impact, if any, of the PWSF. Please note that this presentation will be made at the regularly-sched:ded CCAC meeting. The purpose of the community meeting is to provide an opportunity for residents to receive information and ask questions about the proposed project, County review procedures, and relevant regulations and policies of the County applicable to the proposed project. The applicant and County staff will be available at the meeting to answer questions about the project and the review process for the application. If you have questions about the project, the balloon test, or the meeting, please call me at 434-245- 3448 or email at LSchweller(a`leclairnan.com or contact County staff, Christopher Perez at 434- 296-5832 ext.3443 cperez a alhemarle.org We look lonvard to seeing you. Sincerely, C:::::>Y:9-vt' . Lori F-I. Schwel r Attorney for Milestone Communications Location of Proposed Monopole Zya a ' „ I4• j 'S''' .$ .4 /. rs't' 1 • 'r rr IA � s 4 y .,. J = , . .,..,11 ; "•.gym ir yl ' -— _ !ii*... I. }} ♦ 1 , ' ' I - - -Ill4t.. 9 - . . .... a .. . . , ..,, , .• • - . ..„ .. . .. _ • ........ .4. , . • . . . , . _...,, I fti,7 'J tr4". 7.jlt MO :4,. ,.' . • 14, 1. CROZET COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Crozet Library Wednesday, Dec 20, 2017 from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Agenda 1. Agenda Review (Dave Stoner— CCAC chair) 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Milestone Communications Wireless Tower SUP Presentation (Lori Schweller, Re- LeClaireRyan, 45 min) 4. Items Not Listed on the Agenda 5. Announcements 6. Potential Future Agenda Items a. Feb —Albemarle County Stormwater Utility Plans Greg Harper, Env. Services Chief b. Feb (?) — Crozet Survey Results/Discussion c. TBD - Old Trail Historical Recap d. TBD - Albemarle County Economic Development Authority Invite )jaizA 7144164 dr. 4 +-e s /terry- S�J • SG St "l 'be/ 7 _ 1 <; Gr// 5d tz le&h.rizat 4-edfr negai. tire • G/!' U,iJ/�P 0 (d i5, 7 for 4111 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:59 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Cristian Hernandez;Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Christian Winkler (cwinkler@milestonecorp.com) Subject: Mileston Communications-WAHS LOIs from Additional carriers Attachments: Verizon LOI for Milestone Communications WAHS site.PDF;T-Mobile Western Albemarle HS LOI 12.06.2017_Signed.PDF Good Afternoon, Chris, Milestone Communications has received letters of intent from T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless for the proposed WAHS facility. I'm sending these to your for the special use permit/special exception file. As you know,we have requested a special exception to permit more than three arrays. The top spot is reserved for the schools,and the second for Shentel. These expressions of interest in the site support our justification for the special exception request: additional arrays are needed for other wireless providers that want to improve coverage and/or capacity in the area. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law • LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.corn and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. t , 0 S N Arerizont • . • Veriibri WIMIO6b- 4E13,1 FfedY Colt- . Richmond,VA 23 . Tteceiribef 1 l,2017, • ' . ichrislian Winld:cr, , 12110:Simset-Hills Road, Suite 100: ,i(estoMVA 290-0! Via,emaittMChriatian WiticrerScwinklef@milestonecorp.com) It.S. LettertiSfinteitst.Proposed tOrritthitlicatiOitaPadility:, Western Albemarle HialtSChool; . 5041 taCkfiati:60tiirifpilfC,reldet;VA•2202,, ' • • V cgl.YM Winkler, . - 'Pill letter serves 4?P0.46:3911 Olaf CelleP:Isa*etfiliii1C41?a VAi494Wirelesn. licensed bY,the Federal Communications Cbiiiiniagibfilotuande wireless telecommunications aciylces in Alberrigrle County,Vligitilk'Ye.fizonWirclesilias,eyaluated:ijip location youAm trepaitlgt for a new telOodfaiiiiiiileallon facility and has determined The location meets our future network opacity inaprovemot gols,-. YP.44011WirclOssi.SuPPolia-Mil 94tolie Communications in its effOris to gouge any required toning,permits or Othenlocal approvals necessary to develop the communicatiOns. Willy;'gp:prropc_i4c4., .11YerigTh5494l1 be-Of.411-Y,PsistaPOOlte You or prow:dol you Witlfany hitcinnatiMa regarding your pemit-milicationlo develop the,property;pleaseleeltree,to confacime. Very Truly our , „..,,: . ' thelq )-it 'C)(A Cathy Faulkner --,---- [Principal Engineer,fr'RE/Regulatory,NET,Enginecring • • • . 4 • • •Mobile • 200 Westgate Parkway,Suite 200 Richmond,VA 23233 December 6, 2017 Mr.Christian Winkler Vice President Milestone Communications 12110 Sunset Hills Road Suite 100 Reston VA 20190 RE: Proposed Tower Location at Western Albemarle High School Letter of Interest Dear Christian, Thank you for providing me information regarding the proposed tower site located at Western Albemarle High School. T-Mobile's Engineering Team has evaluated the proposed location and determined that this site would be of interest for future network enhancement planning. T-Mobile's collocation on the tower would be subject to receipt of all necessary governmental permits and both parties entering into a definitive agreement. This Letter of Interest is non-binding and does not create or impose any legal obligations upon either party. Please feel contact me if you have any questions. Best regards, Juhn L. Louissaint •T•••Mobile®• Virginia Engineering and Operations Manager, Engineering Development iuhn.louissaint@t-mobile.com Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 7:40 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE:WAHS tower ARB date Attachments: Milestone WAHS Balloon Test &Community Meeting Notice Letter- 11.21.17....pdf Margaret, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle IIS -Tier III PWSF Balloon Test: Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 9am—Noon Community Meeting: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 7pm - 9pm ARB dates: I do not have any record of a discussion taking place with the applicant about ARB dates. This project is on a 150 day review shot clock(BOS Action must be taken by March 29, 2018). Based on the dates for the balloon test, the community meeting, and the holidays it seems appropriate for this to go to ARB either Jan 8th or Jan 16tn Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 f From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 5:02 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject:WAHS tower ARB date Can you please confirm for me which date we told the applicant the WAHS tower would be going to the ARB? Thanks. Margaret Maliszewski,Chief of Planning/Resource Management Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 mmaliszewski@albemarle.org 1 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H: <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Monday, November 27, 2017 2:25 PM To: 'Mark Matzke' Cc: Christopher Perez; Cristian Hernandez Subject RE: Balloon Test at WAHS • Mark, I have reviewed the propagation maps from Shentel and see that the carrier currently has a large coverage gap in Old Trail. The computer modeling propagation map for this site shows that it should provide good in-building Shentel coverage throughout Old Trail and beyond. Thanks again, and please don't hesitate to let me know if you have additional questions. Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I 810 Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Mark Matzke [mailto:mark.matzke@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 2:13 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: Re: Balloon Test at WARS Perfect thank you. Mark On Mon,Nov 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@n,leclairryyan.com>wrote: Good Morning, Mark, I hope you had a good Thanksgiving holiday. Thank you for your questions. My answers,corresponding to your questions, are as follows: 1 1. In the 1990s,the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) evaluated various studies and adopted RF (radiofrequency) emissions limits for wireless transmission towers. Milestone Communications builds towers on which the wireless providers"collocate"; all wireless providers are required to comply with FCC safety standards., RF levels are measured annually on Milestone sites, and measurements have shown the RF levels to be a thousand times less than the FCC threshold. Various national and world bodies, including the World Health Organization, the FDA, and the American Cancer Society, have evaluated RF emissions' potential health effects and have found no evidence of negative health effects from wireless towers on the general population. The FCC provides information about the safety of RF emissions from cell sites on its website at https://www.fcc.gov/general/radio-frequency-safety-0. Also, keep in mind that RF waves are all around us, used not only for wireless voice and data but for many applications—TV and radio, police and fire emergency, pagers, baby monitors, walkie talkies,etc.—that we have been using for decades. Because the federal government is responsible for regulating and monitoring RF emissions from wireless sites, federal law prohibits local and state zoning authorities from considering health effects when making zoning decisions. 2. At this point,the only dedicated carrier is Shentel, which provides the wireless service for Sprint. We expect to have 3-4 additional carriers at the site. The site would improve service in the surrounding areas. Depending on topography, service from a site such as this can extend as far as 3 miles away, but, at this point, I don't know how the site will affect Old Trail, so we will work on gathering that information. At the community meeting, we will have propagation maps based on computer modeling to show the expected improvement for Sprint. 3. Yes, Milestone has a lease and rent-sharing agreement with the Albemarle County School Board. Upon construction of the facility and installation of the first carrier,the schools receive a flat$25,000;then an additional flat$5,000 for each additional carriers. Throughout the lease term,the schools will receive 40%of all rent from all users of the site. In addition, the schools have the right to use the top space on the monopole for their own antennas to serve the students, teachers, and administration of the schools in the area. i Thanks again for your questions, and please let me know if you need additional information. I hope to see you at the community meeting on December 20th. Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 • (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax j804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(d leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO 2 Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Mark Matzke [mailto:mark.matzke@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2017 4:06 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: cperez@albemarle.orq Subject: Balloon Test at WAHS Hi I just had a few questions, hopefully not a big deal: 1. Will this PWSF have any type of long term health implications (hopefully the county would have checked this but I figured I would ask). 2. Will the PWSF improve carrier signals in the surrounding area(i.e. AT&T/Sprint/etc. in Old Trail) 3. Is the lease term going to benefit the county or school in some measurable way? Thanks, Mark Mark Matzke 571.251.4911 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. • Mark Matzke 571.251.4911 3 * This e-mail may contain conriaential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please '- notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. • Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 10:19 AM To: 'Elizabeth Leverage Hilles' Cc: Scott Hilles;Christopher Perez;Cristian Hernandez Subject: RE:Tier III PWSF Dear Elizabeth, Thank you for your email. I have inserted answers to your questions below: 1. What are the "arrays" to which you refer in your letter, and why is a special exception needed to have 5 instead of 3? Why is 3 the typical number of arrays? An "array" is an arrangement of antennas mounted at a certain height on the monopole and intended to transmit a signal providing coverage for a single provider of wireless services. The Albemarle County zoning ordinance has a set of specific guidelines for wireless facilities that include antenna size, antenna standoff, number of arrays, diameter of the monopole, color, and height. If a proposed wireless facility meets all of these guidelines, it may be approved through an administrative process. The proposed site does not meet all of these guidelines and requires a special use permit. It will be reviewed not only by planning and Architectural Review Board staff but by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors so they can determine if the proposed design and location are suitable. The zoning ordinance sets a limit of three arrays unless the applicant requests an exception to that standard. Only one carrier can use an array. Since the top position on the pole is being reserved for the county schools, and the second position is reserved for Sprint/Shentel, Milestone wanted to be sure there would be room for other carriers, such as Verizon and AT&T,who may want to collocate on the pole. That is the reason for the request for more array positions. If more carriers can use an existing pole,then fewer poles need to be installed for citizens to benefit from wireless services. 2. What is the "maximum standoff distance" and to what does it relate? The county zoning ordinance sets a standard of 12"-18" from the face of the pole to the back of the antenna. Any greater standoff requires the approval of the Board of Supervisors. The industry refers to the type of close mounting the County prefers as"flush-mounted" antennas. An array of flush-mounted antennas cannot achieve the same separation of wavelengths (carriers use signals for 2-4 wavelengths to provide services at various points on the radiofrequency spectrum)as antennas that stand out farther from the support structure, so service is degraded. Some carriers cannot provide all of the services for which they are licensed in one set of flush-mounted antennas and need to use two arrays if flush-mounting is required. For these reasons, Milestone is requesting an exception to the flush-mounting standard so that the carriers on the pole can provide better service. 3. Our property fence is located very near the proposed site. Are you able to tell us whether there will be any impact on the fence and, if so, how that impact will be addressed and mitigated? Yes, at its closest proximity, your property's boundary line is about 300'feet from the location of the proposed site, so there should be no impact on your fence. The proposed site would be within a fenced compound 35' x 75'and would be on the edge of the woods near the WAHS ball field. 4. What is the typical color and material of a monopole and why was a special exception needed to have a gray galvanized steel monopole? 1 Most wireless support structures are galvanized steel, which is a matte gray color and finish. In Albemarle County,the zoning ordinance calls for wireless facilities to be painted dark gray-brown if they are of the type that blends in with the trees. If a pole is tall enough to be seen against the sky, light gray blends much better, so we usually ask for an exception to keep the pole its steel color. For reference, unless painted, ball field light poles and modern telephone and power poles are galvanized steel. Please let me know if you would like additional information or have questions. Feel free to call as well at the numbers below. We hope you can join us at the community meeting on December 20tn Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.SchwellerAleclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Elizabeth Leverage Hilles [mailto:hilles@law.virginia.edu] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 8:01 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Scott Hilles Subject: Tier III PWSF Dear Lori, God morning. We have received your November 21 letter notifying us of the proposed PWSF project at the corner of the WAHS property. My husband and I own and have our home on one of the adjacent proprieties that abuts the corner where the tower is to be located. We would like to know the meaning of the following: 1. What are the "arrays"to which you refer in your letter, and why is a special exception needed to have 5 instead of 3? Why is 3 the typical number of arrays? 2. What is the "maximum standoff distance" and to what does it relate? 3. Our property fence is located very near the proposed site. Are you able to tell us whether there will be any impact on the fence and, if so, how that impact will be addressed and mitigated? 2 " 4. What is the typical color and material of a monopole and why was a special exception needed to have a gray galvanized steel monopole? Many thanks for the information. Best, Elizabeth Leverage Hilles 100 Miller School Road, Charlottesville,VA. 22903 Elizabeth Leverage Hilles Sent from my iPhone * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 3 Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 9:56 AM To: 'Mark Matzke' Cc: Christopher Perez; Cristian Hernandez Subject: RE: Balloon Test at WAHS Good Morning, Mark, I hope you had a good Thanksgiving holiday. Thank you for your questions. My answers,corresponding to your questions,are as follows: 1. In the 1990s,the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) evaluated various studies and adopted RF (radiofrequency) emissions limits for wireless transmission towers. Milestone Communications builds towers on which the wireless providers"collocate"; all wireless providers are required to comply with FCC safety standards. RF levels are measured annually on Milestone sites, and measurements have shown the RF levels to be a thousand times less than the FCC threshold. Various national and world bodies, including the World Health Organization, the FDA, and the American Cancer Society, have evaluated RF emissions' potential health effects and have found no evidence of negative health effects from wireless towers on the general population. The FCC provides information about the safety of RF emissions from cell sites on its website at https://www.fcc.gov/general/radio-frequency-safety-0. Also, keep in mind that RF waves are all around us, used not only for wireless voice and data but for many applications—TV and radio, police and fire emergency, pagers, baby monitors,walkie talkies, etc.—that we have been using for decades. Because the federal government is responsible for regulating and monitoring RF emissions from wireless sites,federal law prohibits local and state zoning authorities from considering health effects when making zoning decisions. 2. At this point, the only dedicated carrier is Shentel,which provides the wireless service for Sprint. We expect to have 3-4 additional carriers at the site. The site would improve service in the surrounding areas. Depending on topography, service from a site such as this can extend as far as 3 miles away, but, at this point, I don't know how the site will affect Old Trail, so we will work on gathering that information. At the community meeting, we will have propagation maps based on computer modeling to show the expected improvement for Sprint. 3. Yes, Milestone has a lease and rent-sharing agreement with the Albemarle County School Board. Upon construction of the facility and installation of the first carrier,the schools receive a flat$25,000;then an additional flat$5,000 for each additional carriers. Throughout the lease term,the schools will receive 40%of all rent from all users of the site. In addition,the schools have the right to use the top space on the monopole for their own antennas to serve the students,teachers, and administration of the schools in the area. Thanks again for your questions, and please let me know if you need additional information. I hope to see you at the community meeting on December 20tn Best, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor 1 • Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com LinkedIn I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Mark Matzke [mailto:mark.matzke@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2017 4:06 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: cperez@albemarle.org Subject: Balloon Test at WAHS Hi I just had a few questions, hopefully not a big deal: 1. Will this PWSF have any type of long term health implications(hopefully the county would have checked this but I figured I would ask). 2. Will the PWSF improve carrier signals in the surrounding area(i.e. AT&T/Sprint/etc. in Old Trail) 3. Is the lease term going to benefit the county or school in some measurable way? Thanks, Mark Mark Matzke 571.251.4911 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 • LI LECLAIR-RYAN November 2I,2017 RE: Notice of a Balloon Test and a Cott tnmtity Meeting for SP2017-26: Western Albemarle High School- Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility(PWSF) Dear Neighbor, Milestone Communications has recently submitted a Special Use Permit (SP) application for a proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF)I on the property of Western Albemarle High School, located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike (U.S. Route 250 West), Tax Map Parcel Number 05600-00-00-017C0. The applicant seeks to construct a one hundred and forty-five(145) foot tall steel monopole with five(5) antenna arrays. Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three (3) arrays, to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance, to allow the monopole to be gray galvanized steel finish, and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite:The proposed site is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. As part of the application process, the County requires the applicant to conduct a Balloon Test and a Community Meeting prior to public hearings. • Balloon Test We invite you to attend a Balloon Test on Thursday,December 7,2017,9:00 a.m.-Noon. The purpose of a balloon test is to evaluate the potential visual impact of the proposed PWSF from neighboring properties and roadways by raising a large red balloon to the height of the proposed monopole at the site location (WAHS) and photographing it from points where it is visible in the surrounding area. Representatives of the applicant and the County will be onsite at the start of the test to view the leased ground area. We will be parked near the football stadium; the site is at the edge of the wooded area northeast of the eastern field goal. (Any visitors to the site should first check in with school staff.) Following the ground area review, we will be off-site evaluating the visibility of the balloon from neighboring roadways and vantage points. Based on a preliminary balloon test that the applicant conducted in September,the facility is expected to have minimal visibility off-site, Both the applicant and the County representatives will take photographs to document visibility, and photographs and photosimulations of the proposed facility will be presented at the community meeting. In the case of rain or high winds, the test may be canceled and rescheduled for Friday, December 8, 2017, 8:30 a.m:11:30 a.m. On the day of the original balloon test, if the weather is questionable, please call me at 804-248-8700 or County Staff at 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 for a status update of the test. 4 facility for the provision of personal wireless services,which may be composed of antennas,cables,wiring,supporting brackets and other structural equipment,grounding rods.transmission equipment,one or more ground equipment shelters,and a self-supporting monopole or tower. ATTORNEYS AT LAW \ WWW.LECLAIRRYAN.COM Community Meeting In addition, we invite you to attend a Community Meeting on December 20, 2017 at Crozet Library,2020 Library Ave, Crozet, VA 22932 during the regularly scheduled Crozet Community Advisory Council Meeting (CCAC) at 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. At the meeting, we will present slides to introduce the project and to show the photographs taken at the balloon test and photosimulations created from the photographs to show the expected visual impact, if any,of the PWSF. Please note that this presentation will be made at the regularly-scheduled CCAC meeting.The purpose of the community meeting is to provide an opportunity for residents to receive information and ask questions about the proposed project, County review procedures, and relevant regulations and policies of the County applicable to the proposed project, The applicant and County staff will be available at the - meeting to answer questions about the project and the review process for the application. If you have questions about the project, the balloon test, or the meeting, please call me at 434-245- 3448 or email at LSchwelleratleclairrl'an.com or contact County staff, Christopher Perez at 434- 296-5832 ext.3443 cperez�hilbemarle.org r We look forward to seeing you. Sincerely, Lori H. Schwel r Attorney for Milestone Communications c Location of Proposed Monopole fr ��ffr/)) I , } 'I.:" Y '! ^ `'. .: ri . r ' i..j t •is ` r- r :� 'p \=�r; . 4 , 1 a ' • • r ,+"t T J l r ' .*r • rJ ' \rt'.�I i�T °'T"�G.y'ti_, ^a} , rT)r ,,t` ;dy, ! t. I r' I t 1 t . cerest ,! i _ ► f pry' �_f� C ^p e .. � -' � � � + w.. liga-w..� � >t^ '} ' e W . v j tt sne .Lll1� - �Jr 5. { y'9�„y+ ' 'l i lam ' '— !�~ �" I ;r eC l� �,t f��y .,,,,„ .,_ .. , . . .. n. ;1 ` l f,1/4 , t f 1 c.r ti. . `•.,• . _ , , ,., .... . wiiii,„ • . .. „.. I,. r .rryr,Ar."-i-i. . .Try, 1+ li'k.' , .+ . .. r I . 1,5 J L, �4y�i .,e r " Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 4:23 PM To: Ann Mallek;Jennie More; Margaret Maliszewski;Christopher Perez; Heather McMahon; Bill Fritz; David Benish; kja4; Doug Bates; Phil Best; Shawn Bird; iamrtzy@gmail.com; Dean Eliason;guentherkim@gmail.com;Timothy Kunkel;Tom Loach; Sandra Mears;Jon McKeon;Allie Pesche; 'jasincville@embargmail.com'; David Stoner; Martin Violerre Cc: Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com);Christian Winkler (cwinkler@milestonecorp.com); Kristen Stelzer; Brown, Christina N. Subject: WAHS Balloon Test&Community Meeting Notice Letter Attachments: Milestone WAHS Balloon Test&Community Meeting Notice Letter- 11.21.17.PDF Good Afternoon, Attached for your files is a copy of a notice letter that will be mailed tomorrow to addressees within one half mile of the proposed site. A copy has been sent to Albemarle County Schools and to the WAHS principal in case they would like to notify parents. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have questions prior to the balloon test and meeting. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BID, Please consider the environment before printing this email. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 1 Christopher Perez From: David Hannah Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 11:31 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier III PWSF Chris, I looked at the maps in the plans you sent. It appears the site for the monopole requires clearing approximately 4,500 square feet of existing woods/forest. The area to be cleared is at the edge of a large wooded buffer area that is beside an intermittent stream. The intermittent stream flows into nearby Stockton Creek. Maintaining the wooded stream buffers in this area is important. Locating the monopole in an already existing cleared or disturbed area would be preferable to clearing trees. However, given the relatively small area to be cleared, and its location on the outer edge of the existing woods, I do not have serious concerns. If the location of the monopole should change, or the size of the area to be cleared is increased, I would want to reassess. On a side note, I see the applicant plans to plant eastern red cedar trees near the monopole. That is a native species, and an effective screen, and a good choice of plant. Let me know if you have any questions, or if you want more formal comments. David Hannah Natural Resources Manager Albemarle County Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 (434) 296-5832 ext. 3325 dhannah@albemarle.org From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:53 AM To: David Hannah <dhannah@albemarle.org> Subject: FW: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF David, RE: 5P2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF The proposal. From: Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2017 9:44 AM To:Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF 1 Ann/Jennie, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF As requested for the CCAC meeting tonight, attached see the plan and the project description for what was submitted. This project is on a 150 day shot clock, with an action being required by the BOS no later than Thursday, March 29,2018. Below is the legal ad: PROJECT:SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:White Hall TAX MAP/PARCEL:056000000017C0 LOCATION:Western Albemarle High School located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike,Crozet,VA 22932 PROPOSAL:Construct of a one hundred and forty five(145)foot tall steel monopole with five(5)antenna arrays.Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three(3)arrays,to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance,to allow the monopole to be gray galvanized steel finish,and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite.The tower is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. PETITION:Section 10.2.2(48)of the zoning ordinance,which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the RA,Rural Areas district. ZONING:RA Rural Areas-agricultural,forestal,and fishery uses;residential density(0.5 unit/acre in development lots) OVERLAY DISTRICT:EC-Entrance Corridor PROFFERS:No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:Rural Areas-preserve and protect agricultural,forestal,open space,and natural,historic and scenic resources/residential density 0.5 unit/acre in development lots.Rural Areas 3 Comp Plan Area. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 2 r. P Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent Monday, November 20, 2017 3:22 PM To: 'Schweller, Lori'H.' Cc: Jennie More;Ann Mallek; Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, I only received a single response about this date being less than idea. Jennie Moore said: "These dates work for me, with the exception of the weather delay date. I'm not suggesting this has to be changed, but I'd only be available from 9a - 9:30 on the delay date. " I am thinking we lock this date/time down and move forward. However, if we have to use this weather delay date may I suggest you have the balloon up and running at 9am, preferably by 8:30am knowing Jermie's limited availability this day. _ Thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent: Monday, November 20,2017 3:15 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>; Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: RE: 5P2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier Ill PWSF Chris, Are we settled on the 8`h for the rain date? We plan to send these letters out tomorrow so people have plenty of notice. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclainvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. t From: Christopher Perez fmailto:cperez©albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 11:58 AM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Jennie More; Ann Mallek Cc: Margaret Maliszewski; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, I went ahead and edited your letter in track changes.I believe this is how the letter should read so it is clear what is being proposed and avoid any confusion.Please utilize this letter or something very close to it. Thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. fmailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 10:51 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>;Ann Mallek <a mallek@albemarle.org> Cc: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez<cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Brown, Christina N. <Christina.Brown@leclairrvan.com> Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF Hi Chris, Attached is a draft notice letter for your review. I reversed the balloon test and community meeting information since we're having the balloon test first this time, but I've tried to make it clear in the first paragraph that there are two events. The Chair of the CCAC has agreed to schedule us for the regular meeting on December 20th at 7 p.m. Since these locations are relatively easy to find, I didn't think directions were necessary this time, but let me know if you disagree. We'll send these out early next week once we have confirmation of the rain date. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leciairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperezCalalbemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:15 AM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Jennie More; Ann Mallek Cc: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF All, SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF It seems like we have a game plan that works for everyone. Balloon Test Thursday,December 7th (9am—Noon) Weather delay date Friday, December 81h (9am—Noon)—Ann/Jennie please verify you can attend this date, if not, how about Tuesday, December 12th. Community Meeting A CCAC (held in the Crozet Library) Wednesday, December 20t (meeting starts at 7pm, specific item to be placed on agenda -Lori please organize this aspect of the project and get this item on the CCAC agenda). Also, as discussed assure your presentation includes photographs and photo simulations, also provide them to staff). thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com] Sent:Thursday, November 16,2017 11:50 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>;Jennie More <imore@albemarle.org>;Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; 'Cristian Hernandez' <cris@milestonecorp.com>; 'Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)' <CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; 'Kristen Stelzer'<kristen@milestonecorp.com>; Brown, Christina N. <Christina.Brown@leclairrvan.com> Subject: RE: RE:SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS•-Tier III PWSF Hi Chris, December 7th works for Milestone and its engineer. When you're back in the office, please let us know if we should set that date and let us know your preference for the rain date. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile 3 Lori.Schwel le r(cill ecla irryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIC Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Schweller, Lori H. Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:32 AM To: 'Christopher Perez'; Margaret Maliszewski; Jennie More Cc: David Benish; bfritz@albemarle.orq; Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Kristen Stelzer Subject: FW: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Good Morning,All-- just wanted to be sure everyone received Ms. Mallek's note regarding balloon test dates below. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwe Il er@ Iecla irryan.co m https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Ann Mallek [mailto:amallek@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 11:18 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF I made a mistake on the date. Wed Dec 6 is out for me, but Thurs Dec 7 is fine for me for the balloon test. Ann From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 15,2017 10:49 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>;Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More <imore@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>;Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Kristen Stelzer <kristen@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: RE:SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier Ill PWSF Great--thanks for the clarification, Chris. Given how close these dates are to the holidays, is there any reason why we couldn't do the balloon test in early December,then have the community meeting as an item on the CCAC's agenda for 4 December 20th, assuming the dates work for everyone? We would then be able to present photographs and photosimulations to the attendees at the meeting in case they weren't able to attend the balloon test itself. (Of course, dates need to be checked with Milestone,the schools, and the engineers, but I'm just checking on the concept.) Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwelier@Ieciairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:42 AM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Ann Mallek; Jennie More; Margaret Maliszewski Cc: David Benish; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, Such a request does not require a SE, see below. [5.1.40(a)(6)(a)] Scheduling. The applicant shall contact the agent within ten(10)days after the date the application was submitted to schedule a date and time when the balloon test will be conducted.The test shall be conducted within forty (40)days after the date the application was submitted, and the applicant shall provide the agent with at least seven(7) days prior notice;prov dei d that this deadline may be extended due to inclement weather or by the agreement of the pplicant and the agent; About the dates for when the SUP would go to the BOS, an action needs to be taken by March 29,2018.If we have the community meeting and the balloon test in Dec,the last Jan meeting for the ARB should work(pending Margaret weighing in on this),then Feb is when I will get it to the PC,then March is when it will go to the BOS.I am not seeing any issues with the timing. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:34 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More 5 ti <jmore@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: RE:SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF Yes,,thank you, Chris. I am checking on these dates with Milestone and will get back to you very soon. Am I correct in thinking that these dates would not delay the SUP hearing schedule? The balloon test would be held later than the Code requires (10/30+40 days= 12/8, Fri.), so I'm wondering if we will need to request a special exception for non- compliance with 5.1.40(a)(6)(a) or if that waiver can be granted administratively. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lo ri.Schwel le r(cil leclai rrva n.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:28 AM To: Ann Mallek; Jennie More; Margaret Maliszewski; Schweller, Lori H. Cc: David Benish; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Quick Note: the CCAC meeting starts at 7pm and is located in the Crozet Library. From:Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2017 9:41 AM To:Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<imore@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; 'Schweller, Lori H.'<Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:5P2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF All, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier III PWSF Per suggestions from the PC &BOS members for this district, they request we investigate having the community meeting at the next CCAC meeting, which is on Wednesday, December 20th . If that is amenable to the applicant, then we could have the balloon test set for Thursday, December 21'w/a rain delay of Friday, December 22 (Ps. The County Office building is closed at noon for the holidays). Please speak to your availability to these dates. 6 ♦ 41 Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@,leclairryan.corn and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(a leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairrvan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. Christopher Perez From: Schweller, Lori H. <Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com> Sent Friday, November 17, 2017 9:21 AM To: Christopher Perez;Jennie More;Ann Mallek Cc: Margaret Maliszewski; Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Kristen Stelzer; Brown, Christina N. Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Thank you, Chris. These dates work for Milestone. Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(d leclairrvan.com httus://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:15 AM m., --"" •— - To: Schweller, Lori H.; Jennie Mor ••' - allek Cc: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: RE:SP -00026.Western Albemarle HS Tier III PWSF All, /7 , SP20 -00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF It,;eems like we have a game plan that works for everyone. Balloon Test ,? Thursday, December 7th (9am—Noon) i Weather delay date Friday, December 8th (9am—Noon)—Ann/Jennie please f r•ify you can attend this date, if not, how about Tuesday, December 12"i. Communi MeetinL ' CCAC (held in the Crozet Library) ;✓ ednesday, December 20th (meeting starts at 7pm, specific item to by:laced on agenda -Lori please organize tin aspect of the project and get this item on the CCAC agenda). .: 'so, as discussed assure your presentation incluI .. photographs and photo simulations, also provide the ta•-o staff). thanks 1 V Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. fmailto:Lori.Schweller@Ieclairryan.com] Sent:Thursday, November 16,2017 11:50 AM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>;Jennie M.re <jmore@albemarle.org>;Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; 'Cristian Hernandez' <cris@milestonecorp.com>; 'Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)'<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; 'Kristen Stelzer'<kristen@milestonecorp.com>; Brown, Christina N.<Christina.Brown@leclairrvan.com> Subject: RE: RE:5P2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier Ill PWSF Hi Chris, December 7th works for Milestone and its engineer. When you're back in the office, please let us know if we shoul. set that date and let us know your preference for the rain date. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairryan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Schweller, Lori H. Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:32 AM To: 'Christopher Perez'; Margaret Maliszewski; Jennie More Cc: David Benish; bfritz@albemarle.orq; Cristian Hernandez; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com); Kristen Stelzer Subject: FW: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Good Morning,All-- just wanted to be sure everyone received Ms. Mallek's note regarding balloon test dates below. Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax 2 (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller(a leclairrvan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Ann Mallek [mailto:amallek@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 11:18 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF I made a mistake on the date.Wed Dec 6 is out for me, but Thurs Dec 7 is fine for me for the balloon test. Ann From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:49 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>;Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More cimore@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ@albemarle.org>; Cristian Hernandez <cris@milestonecorp.com>; Chris Harold (CHarold@milestonecorp.com)<CHarold@milestonecorp.com>; Kristen Stelzer <kristen@milestonecorp.com> Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF Great--thanks for the clarification,Chris. Given how close these dates are to the holidays, is there any reason why we couldn't do the balloon test in early December, then have the community meeting as an item on the CCAC's agenda for December 20`h, assuming the dates work for everyone? We would then be able to present photographs and photosimulations to the attendees at the meeting in case they weren't able to attend the balloon test itself. (Of course, dates need to be checked with Milestone,the schools, and the engineers, but I'm just checking on the concept.) Thanks, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com https://www.leclairrvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 3 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:42 AM To: Schweller, Lori H.; Ann Mallek; Jennie More; Margaret Maliszewski Cc: David Benish; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, Such a request does not require a SE, see below. [5.1.40(a)(6)(a)] Scheduling.The applicant shall contact the agent within ten(10)days after the date the application was submitted to schedule a date and time when the balloon test will be conducted.The test shall be conducted within forty (40)days after the date the application was submitted, and the applicant shall provide the agent with at least seven(7) days prior notice;provided that this deadline may be extended due to inclement weather or by the agreement of the applicant and the agent; About the dates for when the SUP would go to the BOS,an action needs to be taken by March 29,2018. If we have the community meeting and the balloon test in Dec,the last Jan meeting for the ARB should work(pending Margaret weighing in on this),then Feb is when I will get it to the PC,then March is when it will go to the BOS. I am not seeing any issues with the timing. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:34 AM To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More <jmore@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITz@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: RE:SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier Ill PWSF Yes, thank you, Chris. I am checking on these dates with Milestone and will get back to you very soon. Am I correct in thinking that these dates would not delay the SUP hearing schedule? The balloon test would be held later than the Code requires(10/30+40 days= 12/8, Fri.), so I'm wondering if we will need to request a special exception for non- compliance with 5.1.40(a)(6)(a) or if that waiver can be granted administratively. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.S chwe I le r(a�l eclai rrva n.com https://www.leclainvan.com Linkedln I BIO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 4 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperezttalbemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:28 AM To: Ann Mallek; Jennie More; Margaret Maliszewski; Schweller, Lori H. Cc: David Benish; Bill Fritz Subject: RE: RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Quick Note: the CCAC meeting starts at 7pm and is located in the Crozet Library. From: Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2017 9:41 AM To:Ann Mallek<amallek@albemarle.org>;Jennie More<jmore@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; 'Schweller, Lori H.' <Lori.Schweller@leclairrvan.com> Cc: David Benish<DBENISH@albemarle.org>; Bill Fritz<BFRITZ©albemarle.org> Subject: RE:SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier Ill PWSF All, RE: SP2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Per suggestions from the PC &BOS members for this district,they request we investigate having the community meeting at the next CCAC meeting, which is on Wednesday, December 20th . If that is amenable to the applicant, then we could have the balloon test set for Thursday, December 21 S`w/a rain delay of Friday, December 22 (Ps. The County Office building is closed at noon for the holidays). Please speak to your availability to these dates. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator(a�leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclainyan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 5 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:49 AM To: 'Schweller, Lori H.';Ann Mallek;Jennie More Cc: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Attachments: Public notifications Half Mile Radius.xls; Map half mile radius.pdf; Community Meeting Letter template for PWSF.doc Lori, RE: SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF Attached is the notification list(excel and map)of a %z mile radius, additionally there are a slew of other participants who need to be notified who are listed in the excel doc. Also,attached is a revised community letter for your use,which addresses Mr. Estes complaint about the order of items in the letter. Please modify this template for your letter. Ann/Jennie, RE: SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF County staff is working with the applicant to schedule the community meeting and the balloon test for the above ref Tier III tower application located on Western Albemarle High School property.Please comment on your availability of the following dates,and provide alternatives if these are not doable for you. Tuesday, Dec 5 Community Meeting at Western Albemarle High School from 6:30pm- 8pm Wednesday, Dec 6 Balloon Test primary date at 9am-11:30am Thursday, Dec 7 Balloon Test Weather Delay date at 9am— 11:30am Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:29 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject: RE: Special Use Permit SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS -Tier III PWSF Lori, RE: Special Use Permit SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS - Tier HI PWSF How does the following dates work for you? Tuesday, Dec 5 Community Meeting at Western Albemarle High School from 6:30pm - 8pm Wednesday, Dec 6 Balloon Test primary date at 9am-11:30am Thursday, Dec 7 Balloon Test Weather Delay date at 9am— 11:30am I will send over the list of notifications shortly, along with a revised community letter for use by you, which 1 addresses Mr. Estes complaint about the order of the letter. Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development I County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From:Schweller, Lori H. [mailto:Lori.Schweller@Ieclairryan.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:28 PM To: Francis MacCall<FMACCALL@albemarle.org> Cc: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Special Use Permit SP-2017-00026 Western Albemarle HS-Tier III PWSF Thanks! Chris, Milestone is asking about scheduling the balloon test and community meeting and suggested a couple of dates. I think they would prefer to have the balloon test the morning after the meeting, if that worked with the county's schedule (e.g. Dec. 5th/6th), but if you have other suggestions,that's fine,too. Thank you, Lori Lori H. Schweller Attorney at Law LECLAIRRYAN 123 East Main Street, Eighth Floor Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 (434)245-3448 Direct (434)296-0905 Fax (804)248-8700 Mobile Lori.Schwel I er(ry leclai rrva n.com httos://www.leclairrvan.com 2 ' 1707 \L le er: O,p/ �!'7WW RGE10E �� � Le end < 684 ♦� RgyR�C,�' C--" rozetT GEo. 1 jCH'DRD Notee�Somertemsonmapmay rot appear inlegendl (l 2 a Z�\ ` p'RD i6y9 / �� �l 1 RE�`� �GP�� + »���� r1 •' v��_BUCKlNGHA_M�$�jANCHTH � We, �FR HILL�A yP� � � � _ --r 8�.,':.�x�� 11` �C 7C7 f +i wsnrK JCO 691 JP� WI_NDMERE''LN> �A yq1 � . 2 1 �� r ' MO+ �RECRIC,,o Q "- •4MSIA El-BO.UR,y tUt /. 441'Fs N WAy '-�� Sin fiCVIH„L+LTO� '\OG �'� o"ire ,.. ,.. ..... 10 4V146441. ...4•?), LA /P/4, .ir > 3 , � +' ?i�� viiiiiro Rk RD �;� N003 . P 'kb r,,, ��42 (44, 3 sn KENO, c. LOCU.LJ7' S • ; � j CREEK PINE LN i i ��� �p �ii iti 9l a -•• �e P� 1¢.ti N. FPCa_fs+ o c,-- ,• `�-- oq,K1oR.1 `-4.? ,; oar R>►�v� PLO r.Q Z�+Q�. � �I� /�� � rrn ��� �K� � ���� ��� R° +Rv .s7c., `1J..1 r aye` 1�,7+ �t i� •, �Y Np. 684 ! itt. Cr; p ///• . 44111-eilkil --- "tw ,. • 1 , ?' kik TUCK 1 M 1 i5 so. , - ►� / + ,, ••>. ......44 ...1.... .:0)..k....11 Oil • I 1,, 011ill‘ iso,4 I �lise ...Air 000 yr ,1 MECHU :4- Y''- ' Af ,1\c,„V\I°.7/4111r4111MY417 -,_,. , ,,, ., ,,,ip. ,Ai- GEC ) �� �' v 411, &yew., MI • \ t' ��� •:3171r0), IIII.1111 NEIDIN'FgRM ::r , \ It 11 11 I 1 2 **lir 688 MIDWAY RDr �T W yA'ly T drat2400 ft `� LN- 1� L ,C , ���� �Nis r, b GISWeb ti M1T HE gER Y \Av.._ =�';j,, f Geograph c Data Servces \ ,�ry�\� -� ww34126-583org \` V\ ' f �� it-,��* (63<;29G-5832 Map is for Display Purposes Only•Aerial Imagery from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Other Sources November 14.2017 PROJECT: SP201700026 Western Albemarle High school - Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall TAX MAP/PARCEL: 056000000017C0 LOCATION: Western Albemarle High School located at 5941 Rockfish Gap Turnpike, Crozet, VA 22932 PROPOSAL: Construct of a one hundred and forty five (145) foot tall steel monopole with five (5) antenna arrays. Special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three (3) arrays, to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance, to allow the monopole to be gray galvanized steel finish, and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite. The tower is located behind the bleachers adjacent to the football field on the eastern side of the parcel. PETITION: Section 10.2.2(48) of the zoning ordinance which allows for Tier III personal wireless service facilities in the RA,Rural Areas district. ZONING: RA Rural Areas - agricultural, forestal, and fishery uses; residential density(0.5 unit/acre in development lots) OVERLAY DISTRICT: EC-Entrance Corridor PROFFERS: No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Rural Areas -preserve and protect agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural,historic and scenic resources/residential density 0.5 unit/acre in development lots. Rural Areas 3 Comp Plan Area. SP201700026 Western Albemarle High School-Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Proposal: Construct of a one hundred and forty five(145)foot tall steel monopole with five (5) antenna arrays. Four special exceptions have been requested to allow more than three (3)arrays, to allow mounting equipment to exceed the maximum standoff distance,to allow the monopole to be gray galvanized steel finish, and to allow disturbance of critical slopes onsite. Zoned: RA and Entrance Corridor(EC) Below is a tentative schedule for the 150 days action shot clock Submitted on 10-30-2017 + 150 days=Thursday, March 29, 2018 30 day review for completeness due by Wednesday, November 29, 2017 Balloon Test—needs to take place by day 40 of the review (which is Friday, December 8). ec 5 Comm pm Thursday, Dec 7 Balloon Test - - :- . - . ' : 11'4 Community Meeting ' • met L -/9ft`'7,I,1/ CCilc meetin i e dates in for A Jan 8`" argaret's staff report is due Dec ) Alt rnative date: Jan 16`" PC meeting(possible dates in January) BOS meeting(possible dates in February or March) Shot clock expires: Thursday, March 29, 2018