HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201800096 Checklist 2018-08-27 gizi e
The photometrics were calculated using an LLF of.75. To meet County requirements,the LLF
must be 1.0. Please revise the lighting plan using an LLF of 1.0.Note that this will tend to
increase the lighting levels. Levels must not exceed 20 fc to meet ARB guidelines.
d4 F,LithfracatitQ / o
2. Fixtures that emit 3,000 lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures.The LI,L10 and L11
fixtures are not full cutoff fixtures;they are either uplights or fixtures that can be angled.Revise
the Luminaire Schedule to indicate the total initial lumens emitted by these fixtures. Please revise
the plan to show that fixtures that emit 3,000 lumens or more are full cutoff and fixed in a
horizontal position.
/ 0 rssS
oVli / a 30
VThe ordinance prohibits lighting that illuminates outlines:Lighting that outlines any structure,
window, sign structure, sign, or part thereof using rare gas illumination or other light
(4.15.8.b.4). Consequently,the L14 FlexFire strip lights cannot be approved. Please eliminate
them from the plan.
1�G�'Yvrti �/ "�
1/3/,g
Fiber cement panels are noted as a new material.The overview memo notes th; :.material will match that used for
2335. Please revise the architectural drawings to identify the manufacturer and color of the fiber cement panels. Our
records show the approved material for 2335 as Cembonit high density fiber cement paneling in"Graphite".
VI-. The overview memo states that the equipment on the north side of the building will be removed. Please indicate the
new location for the equipment. If outside the building, note the location on the plan. If on the roof,provide sufficient
information ��to show that the equipment will not be visible from the EC street. e
/U&{.t/ COCAYI. v7'' Jig► Jt cr—(LyQds — �v?4-`��
/---01,--
Include the following note on the architectural drawings: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance
Corridor shall be eliminated." /,2 c Al . /
..€)(0„_
4. The overview memo states that new lighting at the two entrances and the west elevation will matc pproved for
2335 and that existing wall pacs will remain.The drawings don't reflect this.The drawings show ED_Arip lights in
some locations, and up-lights on the east elevation. Galvanized steel lighting channels are also shown.
a. Please revise the drawings to show the locations of all new light fixtures and to include the fixture cut sheets.
Our records shows the approved light fixtures for 2335 as FX Luminaire
D�E�Downlliight253358-4 CILY4teeti -
4MOD#
DE-9LEDBZ and B-K ighting u'plight HP2L BD`-TR-x33-NF 7`z%� 067Lttj
,k -� ,z
�� : . i ka ,cLr•�c-4 J �AKel 3d27D
b. Provid a photometric plan sufficient to show the illumination levels at the ground from the combined wall
tures. Illumination levels should not exceed 20 fc.Aftret2
.
c. Clarify the purpose of the lighting channels.
./66444/74,0 4,jkati ZocetAex et j/ e.u/x/651,3/ Lio e 74.),,
...,
/ 5. Signs are shown on the elevation drawings(for reference). Please note that the current Comprehensive Sign Plan for
V this development requires channel letter wall signs with white faces.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Updated April 7, 2011
REF# GUIDELINE NOTES
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Purpose
❑ 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated
Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the corridors
L� /
reflects the traditional architecture of the area.Therefore, it is the purpose of 6v.),a c/C41
ARB review and of these Guidelines,that proposed development within the Gy d
designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the i 4G n .
significant historical landmarks, buildings,and structures of the , ,' /�if
Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive development within these.corridors. Applicants should note that replication g-j-of historic structures is neither required nor desired. U�t;
❑ 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle
area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land,and vegetation. In
order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation
characteristic of these,sites,the Guidelines require attention to four primary
factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area;the character
of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping.
Compatibility with significant historic sites: '/
3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect 1 ��L� / //L)/���t-4
the traditions of-the architecture of historically significant buildings in the L c - aA—ti
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the
area, as well as drawings of architectural features,which provide importantAAA)/
examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 1r7-e'44 /-a
l:/❑ 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
area is neither intended nor desired.The Guideline's standard of
compatibility can be met through building scale,materials, and forms which
may embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as •
traditional.The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate
varying.tastes as well as special functional requirements.
1
i REF# GUIDELINE NOTES
Compatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor
5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of 4''-2-r-�'
... <-W. compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in
order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate ef->/
sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a
t. ‘ -3,3 V_
designated corridor is substantially developed,these Guidelines require 0 -
'' striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the
Zexisting character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the
,S significant historic sites in the area.
1 SPECIFIC GUIDELINES
Compatibility with significant historic sites `
sStructure design
❑ - 9 Building forms and features, including roofs,windows,doors, materials, Ai M( :,.vC/wo
I colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the 1����`t7
V significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by(but not limited to) 72):1 e,tri / 4,7
the buildings described in Appendix A. The standard of compatibility can be -1 J�7zi� � / ��
Chi 8 met through scale,materials,and forms which may be embodied in 1 ' ) `moo'/
L. ` architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional.The replication of % �a (� �
important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these �1./ ``C 471- "Aji)‘1,- 1
L guidelines.
`� (� 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. tv /5( 2 3.3cgfvt 64t,v?•�i
IN
ll 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be J �,-,,�
integral to the building and site design.
t ► ❑ 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, Dwy,�,a� o�
// shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. f e4/Z 3 .I-
❑� ,�
13 . Any appearance of"blankness"resulting from building design should be ,t/juto �+.,...7`ecif _,
V relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
14 Arcades, colonnades,or other architectural connecting devices should be gettzt,{"( "l' ____ c
used to unify groups of buildings within a development.
LV 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the 41/4'
requirements of the Guidelines.
o 16 Window glass in the Entrance Co ' ors ould not be highly tinted or dn,,,ARL t� 6 41.t
7 highly reflective. Reflectance off the ide pane of glass should be kept /I , pl,L cam;
• below 7%. Specifications on the propo a window glass and samples of �ri�r r
tinted window glass should be submitt d with the application for final eta ea. ,•�!cv�`yGG�tc 5NX 6zrz7 erX_
review. 7de.tet. L3 Tie-aLlTE Mill.D *
0 t,7'L(he . �ffcJ2
yt7ov
►A �_ o c r z II in
REF# GUIDELINE NOTES
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet thJollowing criteria: per 6 Z o7v
Visible light transmittance (VLT)shall not drop below 40%. Visible light a c..,reflectance (VLR)shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window v
U`�
glass should be submitted with the application for final review.
Accessory structures and equipment -
❑ 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan dD
7 of development and shall,to the extent possible,be compatible with the ,-,7`'
building designs used on the site.
o 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance J c
Corridor street: If,after appropriate siting,these features will still have a .,�'r""` Zr'�
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should b
provided to eliminate visibility:
a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas,
d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
f.Above-ground utilities,and
g. Chain link fence,barbed wire, razor wire,and similar security fencing
devices.
❑ 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of:
a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing.
❑ 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit mto0 / 44,' SA/
1 j the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from
VV the Entrance Corridor street,these features must be fully integrated into the
.- landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
C ) 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural
/ plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor
shall be eliminated."
o 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
v: buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. TheA
spacing, size,and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by _ k1
the length, height,and blankness of such walls. / /off'
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site,buildings, and other structures; "/ , Zvyl
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru"windows; service "t o -� /
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
3
• rrdy Uyr,0! 1- 57S div4
suS�s
ov-ty,
"42) i,z/vz2p ,rwxy,c764, rif
bZ / / E -bHJ f"'°I s 2-0 wC72-4 owe/
4iirno-)p
ouvt-friv p-z-m /44-elfro- Ez
rift v / r)1141242!gli e/CY eV4--tygy 0171, dlln kryintgip 11W1161.0
611itykI
COUNTY-WIDE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Building permits in which the proposed change occupies 50%or less of the altered elevation
DESIGN CRITERIA
Proportion Alteration must be in proportion with the existing elevation.
Roof form Roof form must be consistent with the existing patterns of scale and proportion
of the roof form of the existing building.
Materials Materials must be consistent with the existing patterns of scale and proportion
of the existing materials.No new vinyl.
Colors Colors must be coordinated with existing colors.
Planting Trees and shrubs may be required to integrate the alteration into the building
and site.
/4/1-01
"rke fit"()-1'71-'4141e. Gt1,07A-e l/te k_frai/ 1.4,01/
w % �Z 23351.
£ s
„Jaw
•
„.,(4/-66v,
/2.4,0/„„ii
/Avv-r_
pi
gir/
i , ,
Completeness Check .
COUNTY-WIDE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS co.w/CpylL/
Building Permits where the change isy5�0/%"/for lessof the alteredge elevation
Project name: �K444 . Cam. 1 . e it r /.ID
1 ❑ Submittal packages must contain 2 collated &folded copies of all info unless otherwise stated.
A. Written description of the proposal
Provide a general description of all proposed work.
2 Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and,the Entrance Corridor.
B. Site plan/Sketch plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20', clearly legible):
1!"- Location of all proposed changes in relation to the Entrance Corridor street.
2 G` If mechanical equipment or accessory structures are altered or added, then identify those
features, their locations, and screening that will eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor.
C. Landscape plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20', clearly legible):
. 1 Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species.
1 0Proposed landscaping. •
G--� `3 0 Landscape schedule indicating plant species with common and botanical names, plant quantity,
size at planting, and symbol used.
D. If new lighting is proposed or existing lighting will be modified, provide a lighting plan showing
the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20'and clearly legible): ?ALA),1 D Location of all proposed building and site lighting. e WHO, r7" """"'� —
Ca(
2 ❑ Manufacturer's cut sheets with a diagram of the proposed fixture(s) sufficient to determine if it is a
I full cutoff fixture. Include cut sheets as a separate sheet of the site plan set.
• 3 0 Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets. Identify illumination
type, intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height.
4 0 Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting meets the requirements of
section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. LLF must equal 1.0.
E. Appearance of the proposed building(s)
1 Architectural elevations of the proposed building(s). Elevations must be drawn to the scale of at
V least 1/8"=l'-0". Include existing condition and proposed changes. Include a building materials
schedule and key.
%jar One set of all building material samples and colors.
E� A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors.
F. Additional material
Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision,
and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings.
2 [��, Provide labeled, color 8-'/z" x 11" photos of the site as seen from both directions on the Entrance
(�/ Corridor.
3 Any additional material that will make the review more productive. Clarification of topography,
visibility, utilities, landscaping, or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome.
Revised 6/10/10 — 1