The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201800091 Review Comments Waiver, variation or substitution requirement 2019-05-21Phone 434-296-5832 ALg��9� �F ry �'IRGSNlP` County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: Steve Edwards(steve(c)edwardsdesignstudio. com) From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: May 21, 2019 Subject: ZMA201600015 Oakleigh Variation #1 Fax 434-972-4126 A variation request for Oakleigh (ZMA 16-15) were submitted April 15, 2019 (dated April 12, 2019) and then revised on May 7, 2019. We have identified changes that need to be made to the request for the variation that will be necessary for our recommendation of approval of these requests to the Board of Supervisors. Variation # 1 - Request to modify the Road Standards Table. 1. Planning staff is unable to support this variation request as it has been presented. Address the following comments and then resubmit the variation request for review. 2. Submit a revised application that has the signatures of both owners of parcels within Oakleigh, Oakleigh Albemarle LLC & The Blake at Charlottesville LLC. If the owner wishes to have an agent sign for them, provide a letter signed by the owner stating who has the right to sign the application. 3. Remove any mention of the second special exception request in reference to signage. That request will be processed separately. Please contact Rebecca Ragsdale for any questions in reference to that second special exception. 4. The changes that were made to the chart and notes in SDP2017-60 were not approved by the Board of Supervisors (BOS) as a variation. Therefore, in this variation request any changes to those table and notes must be requested, reviewed and approved by the BOS prior to the site plan approval. Therefore, ensure all proposed and requested changes use the approved Code of Development (C.O.D.) version of the chart and notes as their basis not the last site plan. Staff has provided in the attached spreadsheet the "Yard Requirements by Block" table from the C.O.D. for your reference. 5. Revise the request to address all change to the "Yard Requirements by Block" table in the C.O.D. and the notes below it. See the attached spreadsheet that shows both the approved C.O.D. table and notes and then the "Changes" version to both the chart and the notes. 6. The "Changes" version of the chart and notes that are attached address your requests and concerns raised with the previous site plan approval. Please note the following changes from what you submitted in your initial request: a) The chart is in the same order as in the C.O.D. to avoid confusion in comparison. b) The highlighting, color coding and "legend" are only for reference in this discussion and should not be included in any submitted request. c) The yellow highlighting shown where notes 3 and 4, through the use of superscript numbers, only applied to the "Side Building Setback" and "Side Parking Setback" in the C.O.D. In the "Changes version you will see how Note #3 no longer applies to just the Block 1 & Block 2 "Side Building Setback". This addressed the 75' front setback issue in Block III, since Note #3 becomes applicable to all Blocks. d) Note #3 is revised to make its intent clear, by the addition of the words in green. e) Note #4 still only applies to Blocks I & II "Side Parking Setback". f) Highlighted in orange are changes specified in the first submission of the special exception request that staff can support without modification. g) Highlighted in blue are changes specified in the first submission of the special exception request that staff was not able to support without modification. Those items have been left as they were specified in the C.O.D. However, superscript numbers have been added to them, and a note added, to address the specific circumstances in Blocks IV and V that was requested in the first submission without having those changes apply to all Blocks and property lines within Oakleigh. 7. A condition of approval will be required. It will state "The modification to the design and layout to protect the proffered preserved trees, as specified by the project arborist in their letter on 3/29/2019, are required unless alternative methods that meet or exceed those specified by the project arborist are approved by the Director of Planning." 8. Please note that all other requirements of the C.O.D. and zoning ordinance must be met. a) The minimum "Block Green Space and Amenities" specified in the chart on Sheet 4 of the Application Plan must be met. b) Any required screening of the parking and vehicular circulation areas will still be required. Considering the greatly decreased distance between the curb of the parking and circulation area, and the adjoining lot line, vegetative screening no longer appears to be feasible and an alternative screening method would need to be applied. An updated Code of Development and Application Plan reflecting the variation approved will be required prior to Final Plat approval if the variation is approved by the Board of Supervisors. Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye(cDalbemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for further information. 5/21/2019 Oakleigh COD chart and proposed changes ZMA C.O.D. CHANGES VIII - Yard Requirements by Block LOT/PARKING/BUILDING REGULATIONS FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR REAR MAX. LOT WIDTH BUILDING PARKING BUILDING PARKING BUILDING PARKING MIN/MAX BUILDING (min.) SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK STORIES HEIGHT min. min.) (min.) (min.) min. min.) BLOCK I 125' 30' 15' 0'3 04 30' 5' 1/3 65' BLOCK II 1 125' 1 30' 1 15' 1 0'3 0'4 30' 1 5' 1 1/3 1 65' BLOCK III 120' 75' 10' 5' 0' 0' 5' 1/3 65' BLOCK IV 16' 20' 0' 6' 5' 10' 5' 1 1/3 65' BLOCK V 50' 70' 10' 10, 10' 1 0' 5' 1/3 65' RESTRICTIONS/REQUIREMENTS/NOTES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STANDARDS ABOVE 1. Regulations established above are based upon an Assisted Living Facility development in general accord with ZMA-201600015 " 2. Refer to the Code of Development in ZMA-201600015 for detail on the Permitted Uses. 3. Interior lot lines will have a 0' setback along streets, roads, access easements or lot lines. 4. A 4' setback shall be enforced from any interior access easement. 5. Attached units with common walls will have a 0' Side Building Setback. Side Building Setbacks apply to exterior end units. 6. Curb and gutter may fall into all parking setbacks. 7. All roads are private with public access easements as shown over them. 8. Architectural features and overhangs may encroach into Building Setbacks up to (4') feet. 9. Parking setbacks shown are only for parking lots with (5) or more spaces. 10. Subterrain parking shall not be considered a building story. Vill - Yard Requirements by Block LOT/PARKING/BUILDING REGULATIONS FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR REAR MAX. LOT WIDTH BUILDING PARKING BUILDING PARKING BUILDING PARKING MIN/MAX BUILDING (min.) SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK STORIES HEIGHT (min.) (min.) (min.) (min.) (min.) (min.) BLOCK I 125' 30' 15' a 0'4 30' 0' 1/3 65' BLOCK II 1 125' 1 30' 1 15' 1 0' 0'4 30' 0' 1 1/3 65' BLOCK III 120' 75' 10, 5' 0'1 0' 5' 1/3 65' BLOCK IV 16' 20' 0' 6' 5' 10' 1 5'1 1/3 1 65' BLOCK V 50' 70' 10' 10'22 0' 5' 1/3 65' RESTRICTIONS/REQUIREMENTS/NOTES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STANDARDS ABOVE 1. Regulations established above are based upon an Assisted Living Facility development in general accord with ZMA-201600015 "Scenario A" Concept. 2. Refer to the Code of Development in ZMA-201600015 for detail on the Permitted Uses. 3. Buildings will have a 0' setback along interior streets, roads, access easements or lot lines. 4. A 4' setback shall be enforced from any interior access easement. 5. Attached units with common walls will have a 0' Side Building Setback. Side Building Setbacks apply to exterior end units. 6. Curb and gutter may fall into all parking setbacks. 7. All roads are private with public access easements as shown over them. 8. Architectural features and overhangs may encroach into Building Setbacks up to four feet (4'). 9. Parking setbacks shown are only for parking lots with five (5) or more spaces. 10. Subterranean parking shall not be considered a building story. 11. The turnaround areas, curb and gutter of parking lots in Block IV may encroach into Parking Setbacks but may not be closer than two feet from any exterior parcel boundary. 12. The Side Parking Setback to interior lot lines in Block V is zero feet (0'). LEGEND Cells linked to specific notes in Code of Development (C.O.D) Requested changes by applicant Cells linked to new notes Changes in text of chart and notes with request