Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
VA198200043 Application 1982-07-26
$20. Permit Fee _____Airj/ App licati No. VAC - O - ?j Sign Erected By: \N k . (n Staff: kajco APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Zoning Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596 County of Albemarle 296-5832 Date of Application Oa. an , 19 OWNER OF PROPERTY OCCUPANT (If other than owner) Name: K,\bdo m a 114(�o l-N pJ a jr. 1-1-tvs5' Name: c�`e— Address Q.o . eQ„ 334" I Address: C` r\arlo\Ve- e1\1 C 3 Telephone: c&O L - 7 3 - to 8 Telephone: Location of Property: LO O a-, RA--{off Tax Map Q I (p Parcel g Acreage � + � Existing Zoning R -a District 3(a-) U1'I e Existing Use: GnurC 1,-N Variance sought (describe briefly relief sought) : che, O Q L i(ANA' ictrrn Ss),(=iyy-N 4, 15, 3,3 4U. NbUllafrke. Co Zor\IN Drat nan(f aL\c .) &Th Q -at -t-o he— 0/ 5' • ) a vas- anc.� , J Q c1 q \( . = .b { s ref ro m Sean n 14 ,3 I-za a 1 o i 5v-1 n cat-ed 1 Coat- !If LaA6 ; \Icasri an oz. ag -red I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and coct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I am the owner named above. 7V_C 7-,e 7-,K2 plicant Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Zoning Administrator has/has not rendered a decision. If so, state substance of decision: Date of Hearing: `d ` Final Decision Made: The variance sought was-del� approved with the following conditions: < • .6 OA. 1/4/2/A .S Mtn/ .S grAl 74 b/ - Special Use Permit# BOARD OF GAP Sign Permit# 4 ' / q 0 / Date, Building Permit# 2a i• JlA —g-2—43 p� f, VI 1 \ Illk So 1 ‘ lti, IA N 5"-- Ocz i t 1 w , ‘t Ilk I ‘1 _A i r 1 IA r IA r 1 ' III T '11————;_ .../ 1 — , 3._,0,:;) ,j.1, ; j i i 1 i I i i i i Al I ' jir 44* ir tis) €.. 1 ,' j .. 1 � L4 1 , V • i 0 y m O CZ 'O P.H. '" © 0 0 CD (D 1-1 OV cn ',s, O cn P) (D O' O CI 0 O O 0, ct cn '-cri (n O oq Cu CZ O O �' CCD 1-1 U4 CPQ E-) 'Ci ,-1 fi f-1 0 !-+• F+;. t7 F''• O z H ct 1-1 as CPQ H• ,i ct O CD 0 0- Z 0. O O 1-6 0. )-i ct(7G 0, F-' 0 CD 1-'• F'• A) (D CD (D Cr) ti Cr) -i )-i c-t- ci- W ct QC o-" O H cD H 4 ct ct °' 1-4• 1-1 Sr 0 C Z 1-i cD I--i H CJJ Q O co F• Cll cn ct • 0 cn 'CS a) C3' O cF to i-, (n Sv C3' H C- CU O Cn CD 0 0 cf ch O CD O n • ALBEMARLE COUNTY -- , ..- J,...- 1 ,rip ., ..,,, iii-c-4...„ •LLY. C77.R! c J _ `---- EatIllibh. ' `� r h �I /. '�'��� tea '� O.ON / ,/ AlitTe ! L: IOC U.ORT .rLL / �, Nip ' ''''‘'" ••.,__, / . ...ighlv v I # ,-----. ��a.,l� / Ar '�; m f c. •'x� 7 a..zriaj 'ca.. '°'—4 (1 3ZC M //�� / • 1�- J )WJrO• \ ��' ,,,, -- _______ ,.., ,, _ • . i„. ....-- r:. ___. ,, , `x j 1 _ ___ , ,, 17C . ,,,' i \ 3 �� 1 al \ � CITY • CHAALOTTESVILI,E \Iiiiit.4111)0" , h ltCTgN �i V ` n \ I/+o..aL tr 1 .or • ems-, AA", * >. } \ , _Al__ I L ,-,- ./ ., (.--,--,.. , \ '4).,..!15. /.....)---7' ;7 i,, /11Moao.....a ''t .•. / .7 • ,/ -- / ~ ' ( r ///_ ram+ ,, „,„. 6 .4/ [" VILl !& 7' .•c �e/ii" i Q1Ure £ 15T. .7�'� � / "O. 1 j sx t — r ti?•:) ..' III' .P1 i �\\�ISN/ -\\44' ' / / / --, c_._ ,,,,,--,-7,77----,_,_,,..„= .-- )01Pt--p t) Cz 1 -iy,..,, r, .-_, . ,.,, .. „ # I / . .___-,,, --ParA 4 il 1 < ... ••.:;., ',,S,-L"...- '24 \ l r � /rm e' sti1,40„, /v �/ '� 4z* i r i� e n sw j y / .90 r W u N.IR w SAMUEL MILLER,SCOT7SVILLE ANO JACK JOUETT DISTRICTS SECTION i''6 STAFF REPORT VA-82-43. Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witnesses Tax Map: 076 Parcel: 51 Zoned: RA EXISTING ACTIVITY Church PROPOSED VARIANCE The applicant requests relief from Section 4.15.3.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to allow an identification sign to be 31.5 square feet; a variance of 29.5 feet. The applicant also requests relief from Section 14.3 to allow the sign to be located 1 foot from the right-of-way; a variance of 24 feet. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to Section 4.15.3.3, Identification Signs: Provided: (a) not more than two (2) square feet in area; and (b) not more than one (1) on any lot or premises. Pursuant to Section 14.3, all structures shall be located 25 feet from the front property line. STAFF RECOMMENDATION At the meeting of July 13, 1982, the Board denied the applicant's request, but granted the applicant the option of re-submitting a new design in the future. The applicant's proposed design of a single column design with attached lettering is more of an aesthetic design and would blend in with the existing vegetation. We feel that the applicant does warrant a need for additional footage than allowed by the ordinance requirements, and would not have any adverse effects on the adjacent properties. We care to make no recommendations. 4