HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900057 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2019-05-23Heather McMahon
From: Heather McMahon
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 2:07 PM
To: Bob Pineo; Katherine Salata
Subject: ARB2019-57: C&F Bank at Stone field, Final -- application completeness
Attachments: ARB2019-57 Final SDP Checklist for completeness.pdf
Hello Bob and Katherine,
I'm sorry this is so late — I returned to the office from a two -week vacation on 5/13, but it's still taken me a while to get
to your project. I just conducted an application completeness check today, and I noticed some issues with the lighting
plan and information: firstly, the lighting plan is produced at a scale that is too small to read and is thereby illegible.
Please send me a digital copy of this plan at your earliest convenience.
Secondly, I noticed on the lighting cut sheets that lighting fixtures AA and W do not have finish colors selected. Please
revise the manufacturer's cut sheets that you have included in your package to name these two fixtures' finish colors.
Lastly, your plans consistently show a LP (light pole, I'm assuming) on the east side of the one-way exit lane, the throat
of which lies northeast of the proposed building — but this light pole and fixture is not accounted for in the lighting plan
or in the cut sheets. Furthermore, the LLF in the lighting schedule must be 1.0 and the photometric plan must be
recalculated accordingly. If you are unable to resolve these two issues before next week, I will incorporate them into my
staff report comments, which are due in-house Monday, June 3rd. If you can revise or send me the missing information
next week, it will expedite the review process; otherwise, again, this missing information and inconsistencies will be
noted in my staff report and will become recommendations for future changes.
Thanks,
Heather McMahon, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3278
hmcmahon@albemarle.org
ARB2019-57: V&F Bank at Stonefield, Final SDP
® 8 collated copies
HNM 5/23/19
Architectural Review Board
Final Review of a Site Development Plan Checklist for Completeness
® 1 set of color/material
A. Written description of the proposal
® Written description of the proposal.
® Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor.
B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20, clearly legible and folded):
® Location(s) of proposed building(s) on the site.
® Location of proposed parking, travelways, walkways and other improvements.
® Mechanical equipment, trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and
improvements, and associated screening.
® Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient
off -site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics,
but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site.
® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent
of easement.
® Stormwater management plan.
L1[_Location of retaining_ walls indicating_top and bottom_elevations,_maximum_walI height, and_proposed__,-- Commented[HM3]: WA
materials, with material and color samples.
® Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and
contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised
drawings, clearly identify revisions made.
C. Landscape plan showing the following (drawn to thescale of 1"=20' orlarger, clearly legible and folded):
❑ Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines.
E❑[_Existing landscaping to be removed._ Include the location, size, and species________________------ Commented[HM2]: NSA
® Landscape key including all landscape symbols and a description of what they represent.
❑_Location of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas____________________ -- Commented [HM3]: N/A
❑` Location of existing n@tu-ra I features_ _________ _________ _________ _____________ _ _ _ _ ____ __ ____ ________ commented [HMa]: NIA
(:][ Location of individual trees of 6 mch caliper or greater and all sign'rficant_groups of trees mdicated_by ------- commented [HMS]: N/A
botanical name and caliper.
® Location and height of above -ground utilities and associated easements, and location of below -
ground utilities and associated easements.
® Stormwater facilities.
❑ Provide a signed, tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the landscape plans.
❑ Include tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans.
I
OVER
ARB2019-57: V&F Bank at Stonefield, Final SDP
HNM 5/23/19
D. Lighting plan showing the following (drawn to the scale ofl"=20'or larger, clearly legible and folded):
❑ Location of all proposed building and Site Bghtingl------------------------------------------------------------------- Commented[HM6]: One light pole shown but not accounted for
❑ ILightin scheduleidentif in allproposed light fixtures, oles and brackets. ;n small to read
® Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures and information on illumination type, Commented [HM7]:;ilegible
intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height.
® Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting Ooes_meet the_ requirements_ of ------- Commented [HM8]: LLF not equal to 10
Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
® Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements.
E. Appearance of the building(s) (architectural elevations, color perspective sketches, site sections):
® Dimensioned architectural elevations of the proposed building(s). Elevations must be drawn to the
scale of 1/8"=1'-0". Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings.
Submittal of elevations that are not visible from the Entrance Corridor may be required to clarify the
overall building design.
® Color perspective sketches that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor.
❑ Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed
development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor elevation(s) and
roof height(s) relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor.
® One set of all building materials / colors.
® A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors.
F. Additional material
® Provide labeled, color, 8-'/z" x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the
Entrance Corridor.
® Signatures
2
OVER