Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA198400004 Application 1983-10-26 • 1owe' INSPECTOR'S SITE PLAN OR SOIL EROSION INSPECTION REPORT TO: r\Qnt-vi '-) i1 SITE: N `�1� � Q� 1(00 abo d cep--t w t .0 -1I0 t PLAN NAME & NO. : 6 ���, 1)Cl Y112,l , n • • P OBSERVATIONS: (Note anyone you spoke with) 4 50 b y qe-aSe_. 0 by v �� a �r�� Ke_d, Date and Time ' ACTION REQUESTED OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR Date and Time FOLLOW-UP BY INSPECTOR: COMMENTS //Pt 2 44,.Ld.s1,c-res /9. ' 74' Sra � d '^ lr Pro pos.Q.J, a c+ a,- . V A-r ;6-2-.c .s 4 -la ..tc0 g11-1'in-- • ///36/fyi Date and Time cc: Soil Erosion File Site Plan File C LE COUNT 4lefLBEMARLE `wrr PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -._ u-S• ROU% E 29 _ NAI'a7£ G 26Q 39 w CHAIfM DESIGNATED AGENT 5-3-35 DATE OATS -t Q /em, , THIS DIVISION IS MADE WITH THE CONSENT OF THE °'N - UNDERSIGNED OWNERS,PROPRIETORS, &TRUSTEES,IF ANY. . --Pal ‘ 5111111110 THE ABOVE APPEARED BEFORE ME�� DEC" /4,/98/ 9 0,, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ULL S r'1 q. 3 QQ�� P (/ IA'S -')/ ' NOTARY PUBLIC @ 0 A' V b ® V `` PP \ t by (04 1 \ . �► ? 91 A .a��6 2y`bq LOCATION MAP � 4. ,� y9 w�,F' �ql 151" R'Pini o a q9 o�E TMTMa7?aR.33c p�a5 pyM"'OS N ROBERT V CLARK ' gtY y cA ^' A8.583P284 t °. OS GU5�Ppgti2 ;1g.7S ACRE R£3IDULr o-O• h. THREE.DEYELd'FNEEYT RIGHTS FEMME,NO j LOT 3 iron .? Iron 2.310 AC. .f V r Z S T.M.87P33£ 4'''10 94' K /r 9``• q +rYy7„ cUR7'15 L.ErYERS 74, 0; t cl , 4" OO D.R.849P3 / I ry 73. -! '- 1)„, !row _ I -.4/3 L T O\ Men /row I - °? 008 AC. O ..........7 i T.M.87 PAR.33F .►' p CALVIN LEAXE 4, 0a30sr 6P� n T V 0, s • C- Q ry JJH•9AA'VA( R, o.B58pA%49 ),s, Ir vn see M L . oo-a R q • ```-_' . Jp '�� 25'STRIP IS HEREBY ST,+7. 'BE DEDICATED TO PUBLIC ` rusE. PLAT SHOWING • LOT 3 5 LOT 4 ROUT\``` �'a<,s•�:iJ 7; �E --.` ROBERT V. CLARK DIVISION ^, , ` SAMUEL MILLER MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT' `!"A. IIi0G1i1S Fucac. ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA :ERTIFICAIE No. > SCALE. 1 100' DECEMJER II , 1981 " 1 54.17 30)913 54 1i 30;171 • i:**111111."'"?' "."..."....".-"--'_ PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA AL, „_,.,.ARLE COUNTY \/ (../ \ \„ .', \ ...... ._+........-1-----,I \ \\ ) \ \ / \ 4 . 'J.\. . - i iiii.)‘ , . 1 \ . / / -�. 1! i f.----, f --------------\- '‘ Ps***4%. : 1 l'''' i \ / - -- --„ \ II ,s !) \ \ 2 .\ \ 4).-1 Z3 Rt , ) \ (--- - "--J --. "Pr . is \ l / / Ohl "" I ."M. I. V I? / 1141/--/.- -'\ <:.. ' 86 I 23 1 \Y 4) / / i )J tg .L 3 1 5 ittOpi , \ I liii‘ 1 r- - y NN • / , ff � 2 ......7\ 0 /f) ,4N.\1 I " 4./1.e 7 .Ir,!L / \., /(Wr-i-Oi- ,3c' N \ „ 7/147A 1.2. • . .., t / I ) . li. 3. . 3 7\ • tair4 \ , ,,--..\-.__. . i i _ ' 2. v \ " 1 - � � lr�,-- t , \(•o �/,:: r N 31,\ / 7 \ J , A IRt. T60� s:sss7 =. — _ ...! , \ 3 ( \ ' 714 :.''... ..'1,00- —WA,:7- 7' !O )".14j A. . ...,,...? -/Aresizer,/ - , / ' 41/ 1:2A .fro !_ 534: >� 11//I frY ic,_._ ---2 /`'-', -• , iN( / „',. . 1. ' .. . %A W4!.ibkal 99 SCALE IN FUT '" •" "" ~' �� SAMUEL MILLER DISTRICT SECTION 87 NolY We STAFF REPORT VA-84-04. Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin Tax Map: 87 Parcel: 35C (2) - new parcel Zoned: Rural Areas, RA Existing Activity Single-Family Dwelling Proposed Variances The applicant requests relief from Section 10.4 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to allow an addition to single-family dwelling to be located 17 feet from side property line, a variance of 8 feet. Zoning Ordinance Requirements Pursuant to Section 10.4, all structures shall be located twenty-five (25) fe t from the side property line. Staff Comments The applicant has a residence under construction on the property at the presen ' time. The variance asked for is to add a bedroom addition that encroaches on required side q yard setback by 8 feet. The property of the applicant does not indicate any topographic problem. I ca t find any other physical evidence that the property would require the variance. A variance is required for the construction of an addition which physically because of the present floor plan of the house would be more suited to add on than the other side. By the granting of the variance I feel that it would not be any detriment to the adjoining property being a heavily wooded area. A favorable recommendation cannot be made on the basis of review for a hardship existing. VA-84-04. Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin February 14, 1984 The next variance before the Board was VA-84-04, Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin. Mr. Evans read the staff report at this time. VA-84-04. Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin, property described as tax map 087, parcel 35C2, located on N. side of Rt. 760, approximately 1800 feet west of intersection with Rt. 710, Zoned Rural Areas. The applicant requests relief from Section 10.4 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to allow an addition to single-family dwelling to be located 17 feet from side pro-' perty line, a variance of 3 feet. Pursuant to Section 10.4, all structures shall be located twenty-five (25) feet from the side property line. Staff Comments: The applicant has a residence under construction on the property at the present time. The variance asked for is to add a bedroom addition that encroaches on a required side yard setback by 8 feet. The property of the applicant does not indicate any topographic problem. I cannot find any other physical evidence that the property would require a variance. A variance is required for the construction of an addition which physically because of the present floor plan of the house would be more suited to add on than the other side. By the granting of the variance I feel that it would not be any detriment to the adjoining property being a heavily wooded area. A favorable recommen- dation cannot be made on the basis of review for a hardship existing. Mr. Kennedy asked if someone was present to speak for this application. Daniel McLaughlin was present to speak for the application. He stated that what he had done was designed a home in mind to build that would accommo- date his family, and hopefully sometime down the road he would be able to put a house addition onto this so that it would be larger and more suitable. He stated that what he had built had the appearance of a carriage shed. He stated that when he built his bigger home, it would look like a carriage shed adjacent to the home. He stated that the master bedroom was 8' 7" by 11 ' 9" which he thought was accommodable, but after getting it done it just appeared too small . He stated that he therefore wanted to put a 10 foot addition onto that. He stated that it was a honest mistake and was just trying to accommodate his family. He stated that he had seen how much time that he had spent building this already, and he knew that to build a larger home it would require a large amount of time, and they would have to live in this which was very small . He stated that this was, he believed, 30 foot off the property line, but it was hard to get an exact measurement, so rather than say 30 foot and ask for 6 feet, I went ahead and allowed 2 feet and asked for a 8 foot variance. He stated that it was accurately measured, but it was just that the fall of the land made it hard to get an exact measurement. He stated that there was a fence line up there. 1 I it VA-84-04. Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin February 14, 1984 Mr. Kennedy stated that what he was saying was he might just need a 5 foot variance. Mr. McLaughlin stated that it might be possibly 6. He stated that there was a fence line along the woods which he was told was the property line and then later was told that it came 2 foot off, which was what he went jl by. Mr. Smith asked if that portion of the building had been completed. Mr. McLaughlin stated that part of the house was under roof and he was presently working on it. He stated that was why he wanted to change it now before he got any further along. He stated that it had felt paper on the roof of that side. Mr. Smith asked if he could build the room on the other end of the house. , He stated that he had ample space. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he wanted to go out on the other side with the other addition hopefully. He asked them to look at his floor plan. He stated that if he built the addition there it would not enlarge that particular bedroom, but would make a separate bedroom on that side, which at a later date would not allow him to put a house addition on that side. He stated that the way he had the floor plan drawn, it would make it difficult to go out anyother way. He stated with the doors on the front, he could not actually build out on the front. Mr. Smith asked if he presently had a 1-bedroom house. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he had a loft area up above which was a small bedroom for his children. Mr. Kennedy asked if Mr. Mays had a dwelling on his lot. Mr. McLaughlin stated that it uid not and presently it was a wooded lot. He stated that it was his understanding that Mr. Mays was going to cut two lots for his sons. He stated that he was not sure, but that was what he had heard. Mr. Smith asked if the iron shown on the plat was visible. Mr. McLaughlin stated yes, sir. He stated that the length of the lot was 500 + feet from post to post. He stated that there was a lake down behind his house and the lot fell off. He stated that he stood back and eyed it one time, and it looked like the fence was over. i . Mr. Smith stated that he thought they would require a physical survey before you could get a building permit. He stated that he was asking for 8 feet, and unless you are definite, you might be wasting your time and find out that you need more variance. He stated that he did not think he could rely on a fence which is in the woods. Mr. McLaughlin stated that the man which he bought the property from was the one that told him that he thought that it came two foot off the fence. He stated that he did not accurately measure from post to post. 2 VA-84-04. Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin February 14, 1984 Mr. Smith stated that was what he was saying. He stated that he thought he needed a physical survey of that property to determine what kind of variance that you will need. He stated that he did not think they would issue a building permit without it. He stated that if they granted a variance, and then he found out what he needed, then it would present a problem. Mr. McLaughlin stated that was a possibility because he was not sure. Mr. Kennedy stated that he would have to make another application then and come back if it happened that you needed 10 feet. Mr. McLaughlin asked if it happened to be more or less. Mr. Kennedy stated that if it were less it would be alright. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he was almost sure and absolutely positive that it would be less, and that was why he pulled off the fence line with the measurement. He stated that he did not want to take the chance. He stated that he would rather be sure what it is that he wants and get it exact. Mr. Smith stated that he thought they should postpone this or defer it until he could get a certified surveyor there to determine the property line. Mr. Roberson stated that he would just need the one line. Mr. McLaughlin stated that it was recently surveyed before he bought the lot, so all he would need done was determine the line right around the house. Mr. Kennedy asked what the Board desired. Mr. Roberson asked what the time frame was on this. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he was building it on weekends, so it would not make that much difference. Mr. Smith made a motion to defer the application as long as he wanted because in this type of weather he was not sure he could get a surveyor out there.4 Mr. McLaughlin stated that he did not feel that there would be a problem if the next meeting was in a month, then that would be fine. Mr. Smith stated that the next meeting would be in a month. Mr. Roberson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Evans stated that he did not want to interrupt you, but you might want to ask if there is anybody present to speak for or against the application. Mr. Kennedy stated that he was probably right, but the only thing would be that the applicant would have additional information at the next meeting. He stated that the board would be glad to hear you. Mrs. Mays, adjacent property owner, stated that they have divided two lots for her two sons and had it surveyed, but had not gotten the report yet. 3 I VA-34-04. Daniel H. & Terese N. McLaughlin February 14, 1984 Mrs. Mays stated that after this came up, they had their lot surveyed. She stated that she was not 100 percent sure what she had heard. Mr. Kennedy stated that he had submitted a survey by Robert B. Clark with his application, which showed his subdivision of the two lots. He stated that the only problem was that he did not know exactly how far from his house it was to the line. He stated that he needed to have a stake put in. He asked Mrs. Mays if she was objecting to the variance. Mrs. Mays stated that she would not like to do anything to upset any- body too much, but wished very much that he would build his room on the other side of the house. She stated that he had three other sides that were open besides the one toward them. She stated that they were going to immmediately transfer the two lots to her sons. She stated that she would like for them to decide. Mr. Kennedy stated that maybe they could attend the next meeting. He stated that he thought a lot depended on where they wanted to locate their houses on the lots. Mr. Van Fossen asked Mr. McLaughlin what stage the house was in. Mr. McLaughlin stated that the house was under a temporary roof. Mr. Roberson stated that the next regular meeting would be the second Tuesday of the month. He stated that Mr. Evans stated that they would be notified again. Mr. Robert Clark, surveyor, stated that not only was their stab on the corner, but there was one in the middle, and therefore he did not under- stand what they meant by having a resurvey done. He stated that there was 250 feet in between the stabs. Mr. Kennedy stated that he had 500 feet on this plat. Mr. Clark stated that there also was an iron rod approximately half-way. Mr. Kennedy stated that it was not shown on the plat. He stated that he thought Mr. Smith's point was that he wanted to be certain about what they were talking about. He stated that he really could not tell when 1 he was eye-balling on whether he needed a 3 foot or 15 foot variance. Mr. Clark stated that there was no question that it was there and in the right place. Mr. Kennedy stated that it was deferred for thirty days, and anyone could come back if they wanted to. i 4 i $20. Permit Fee OLC.4 Application No. - - d Sign. Erected By: kojekca rvj Staff: ,Tpt-tj ‘;tirje APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE 4/4.64—sf44— Zoning Department 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596 County of Albemarle 296-5832 Date of Application ...'. a r a r 02 5 , I9 g q ( ER OF PROPERTY OCCUPANT (If other than owner) Name: Dan i e t 4. 4- ferese N . MrLauShlinName: Address: Q.col.zl-e 1, F)e.)x (.4 S 9 Address: Ivor44-, Garden , t3 t aacij i Telephone: (Rai (o I i '7 Telephone: Location of Property: o r, 11ov 5 d.e 0 el.. 7(0 Zg P P rah rn.a 4.c.I ci Q© Fie- csA- o c - to Tax Man g 1 Parcel 3 5 C.' a rf o Acreage 00 S Existing Zoning tom• District 3a m Lc ef t 1 I r E.sting Use: 4); Ie_ m‘+ 1+..1 reciden+ a4 x d4 7 (o el _ Variance sought (describe briefly relief sought) : baSc-me-n-1- S 'Xx;v:/- ' (/ er}owe to, /O s _ . Xi.,Y Div /PAv �; e%✓ �i 1,/ ���� - the c_pp\ic � Vesr� re.t e C-ror-< i3On i0 '4 \,\NT aL . i'GOI:r, Ono n 2.o CAA;n? c e -kL) ( ©L a+2 dk a n fb s�A7 --C a oft, ca w Q..�t.�c►�j "E'b la eQ �_ 1"'1 e C rri .604_ -yri)��. \'fl y ' 0 vcxr a n(e-`0 `1 e I herebycertifythat the for o' information is true and correct to the best eg ing of my knowledge and belief and that I am the owner named above. ., d ' C 5 $t • •• icant ate FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Zoning Administrator has/has not rendered a decision. If so, state substance of decision: Date of Hearing: ' 4;. Final Decision Made: .2P The variance sought was denied/approved with the following conditions: Special Use Permit, BOARD OF Z APPEALS " Sign Pezmitik 2-/y_ Date Building PPrni tik Cze-dli t4 —/key.