HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600065 Application Review History 2016-06-06 APPLICATION REVIEW HISTORY
ARB #/Name ARB201600065 'U,,(.or o., (Ak1/4-6
ACTION DATE NOTES
County received application 5/12/16 Received by Design Planner 5/24/16
(Submittal date
5/23/16)
Corresponding submittal 6/3/16 Staff review needed—Part of Stonefield
deadline/ARB meeting date Block G and CSP applies. Submittal is at
least close if not totally compliant with CSP.
Transfer from intake to ARB Staff 5/19/16 (Design Planner did not receive until 5/24/16
and there was a holiday on 5/30/16)
Submittal is complete enough:
"Metal" is specified, and sample provided,
5/27/2016 but what type of metal not specified. Didn't
Completeness Check specify sign area dimensions, but that is not
on completeness list. Sign dimensions and
height were given. Didn't give length of
building,but gave length of bay the business
is in.
Call to Contact 6/2/2016 I called Bob Anderson. He confirmed that
the text is meant to be left justified and that
is actually a company"logo"/standard.
6/2/2016 I called Bob Anderson. He confirmed that
the fax and the returns of the sign will be
Call to Contact aluminum. No material was specified on the
sign plan. A material sample was submitted,
but material type, and which surfaces it
applied to, was not specified on the sample.
6/1/16—6/6/16 Review findings:
• They are missing the"30 milliamp
(ma)neon"note. Margaret said if
that was the only thing we will
approve the sign but include that not
in the letter of approval.
First ARB staff review • The left justification of"European"
does not meet the ARB Guidelines.
However, it will be significantly
blocked by the other two buildings
that will be along Route 29, it is
about 340' away from Route 29, and
nothing in the CSP specifies that the
text needs to be centered.
Approval letter sent 6/6/2016 Approval letter emailed to contact and
Applicant Survey Included? mailed to contact and owner.