Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ARB201600115 Correspondence 2016-11-18
Ron Higgins From: Ron Higgins Sent Friday, November 18, 2016 4:29 PM To: 'Doug Stemler Cc: Stewart Wright Subject RE:ARB Admin review of replacement sign-Allstate @ Woodbrook Shopping Center(ARB201600115) Hello, Doug. Sorry for the delayed response, but this change from internally illuminated to non-illuminated results in an approved Certificate of Appropriateness for the new Allstate sign at Woodbrook Shopping Center. I have copied Stewart Wright so he can proceed in issuing the sign permit approval with others. Ron Higgins From: Doug Stemler[mailto:DougS@htsva.com] Sent: Friday, November 04,2016 3:39 PM To: Ron Higgins<rhiggins@albemarle.org>;vdlhomes@gmail.com Cc: Margaret Maliszewski<MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE:ARB Admin review of replacement sign-Allstate @ Woodbrook Shopping Center(ARB201600115) Hello Ron, Please find the updated rendering for the Allstate signage at the Woodbrook Shopping Center.The noted correction from internally illuminated to non-illuminated has been made. Thank you Ron. Let me know if you require anything else to move forward with this permitting process. Doug Stemler I Project Manager I Hightech Signs HUM TECH SIGNS [PH]:434-974-7900 x105 [FX]:434-974-6898 [E]:dougs@htsva.com From: Ron Higgins [mailto:rhigginsC@albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 3:47 PM To: Doug Stemler; vdlhomes©©gmail.com Cc: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: ARB Admin review of replacement sign- Allstate @ Woodbrook Shopping Center (ARB201600115) Dear, Doug and Peter: I have reviewed the new sign proposal for the Pace Insurance Company Allstate office at 1859 Seminole Trail (Woodbrook Shopping Center) and find that it does not meet the adopted comprehensive sign criteria for the Shopping Center(last revised,July 7, 2014). The particular criteria in question is the "Illumination Details", which allows for the sign to be externally illuminated or non-illuminated. The new sign is proposed to be internally illuminated. As a result, 1 I cannot administratively approve this sign. You will need to either revise the design to comply with the comprehensive sign criteria or request an amendment to the criteria from the Architectural Review Board. Please contact me if you have questions. Ron Higgins 296-5832 ext. 3225 2