Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600124 Application 2016-09-26 e1 Community Developm�entDcpartn � `}� 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4! '— Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4' Planning Application [PARCEL/ OWNER INFORMATION TMP 07800-000-00-013A0 Owner(s): HAPPY BOXES PANTOPS LLC Application # ARB201600124 PROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description ACREAGE B Magisterial Dist. Rivanna Land Use Primar Open Current AFD '. Not in A/F District E Current Zoning Primarf Highway Commercial APPLICATION INFORMATION Street Address Entered Judy`Martin Application Type Architectural Review Board 1 9/27,`2016 ProjectHappy Boxes Pantops- Preliminary Received Date 09/26/16 Received Date Final Submittal Date 09/26/16 Total Fees Closing File Date Submittal Date Final Total Paid Revision Number Comments Legal Ad SUB APPLICATION(s) Tye :Sty APPliPeeen P > Sit,,DeveloPmentP- n i0,P426116 APPLICANT/ CONTACT INFORMATION ContactTYPe Name Address CityState ; Zip Phone ( PhoneCt Owner/Applicant HAPPY BOXES PANTOPS LLC 289 INDEPENDENCE BLVD STE VIRGINIA BEACH 23462 Primary Contact MIKE STONEKING/STONEKING VON STOR P. O. BOX 1332 Ct ARLOTTESVILL .22902 4342954209 Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date Architectural Review Board Application Part A: Applicant,Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: 44L,29/ `j ax ( O P Tax map and parcel(s):6 7 OO'O0'W 'V Ar 0 Physical Street Address: 1Z+G4ICiC614t)Tl.O 1PaD Contact Person: / t V .- .6Tior4V-v..f t Business Name: GrON)ei4-G J A ticiJ 7/ re.A.CA4 Address _1. 'l54)1( Z CityC Q,lAj l4( e State f ZipZZ470 t Daytime Phone MI) G "haat Fax#( ) /�,� E-mail fAci 6 e S-.//, .ec.01 Owner of Record: �r �V y� �.D �,(/� A"i L.LC, 2 Address 207 I � D6 re? V- lf�'r State 'C Zip 'Z 't2 Daytime Phone( 1 ' �Teo Fax#� ) `�!� E-mail ,t✓Ci SV be a� .e6 lM x3 ($ Part B: Review Type and Fee Select review type Review by the Architectural Review Board Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review(for a Special Use Permit or a No Fee Rezoning) Preliminary/initial Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1075.00 Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $242.00 Building Permit Review $634.00 County-wide Certificate of Appropriateness Structures 750'or more from the EC,no taller than 5 stories No Fee Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee Personal wireless service facilities No Fee Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee Building permits where the change is 50%or less of the altered elevation No Fee NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ARB# Fee Amount$ Date Paid _ By who? Receipt# Check# By County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development,401 McIntire Rd,Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)9724126 10/2015 Page I of 2 OVER—. Part C:Description of Proposal Describe your proposal.Attach a separate skeet if necessary. Part D:Applicant Agreement Applicant mast read and sign • Ft ch application package must contain(8)folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only(I)set of building material samples is required. All submittal items,include.*building material samples,become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review_ The application package is not complete without the appropriate chi complete4 signal,and Included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate,true,and correct to the best of my knowledge,and that the attached plans contain all information required by the appropriate checklist. 414.1:1 47- 16 Sl l li".,: '. ' ,,� ,�ir s Date or coon' : Printed name,Title Daytime phone number of Signatory *Ownership Information: • If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to,the name of a corporation,partnership or association,or in the name of a trust,or in a fictitious name,a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has the authority to do so. • If the applicant is a contract purchaser,a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. • If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.Attach the owner's written consent. l 1/2010 Page 2 of2 OVER—. 01,,Ati\ Architectural Review Board i '. Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist Part A: Applicant Contact and Parcel Information Project name: �� � �a����j�_'>� `}� ( Tax map and parcel#: (Roo. oo-W •o- (77.1it0 Physical street address (if assigned): -AC.( ,jvb ' � Tlj Location of property(landmarks, intersections, or other): .0 j A op Contact person: V...� 1c 1 4. � (�-( Business name: !`�� 6, At/ sAve-40( z's n Address: r z>, 3}t_ Z City: !i(/(1...U6 State: VA' Zip: "2714C2 Daytime phon4e sr ' {. ( bbax: J/A Email: 'VV. S e_5.--v-5,. ,_,Am Part B: Preliminary Site Development Plan Requirements Checklist Important Note: Submittal packages must contain (8)collated copies of all information unless otherwise indicated. A. Written description of the proposal Provide a general description of all proposed work. ti .Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20; clearly legible and folded): `JO Location(s) of proposed building(s)on the site. Schematic layout of parking, travelways, and other improvements. Location of existing and proposed tree lines. Individually identify trees of a 6-inch caliper or greater. Y- . Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 2-feet, and with sufficient off-site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off-site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent of easement. Conceptual stormwater management plan. rlConceptual landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines. j[] Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and ` contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. 1 Revised 7/28/10 September 26, 2016 Happy Boxes Pantops TMP 07800-00-00-013A0 Richmond Road, Pantops Architectural Review Board Stoneking von Storch Architects Project Narrative: Site: The project is proposed for the currently vacant site situated on the south side of Richmond Road (route250) in the Pantops area of Charlottesville. The site is bordered to the east by Suntrust Bank and to the west by the Auto Superstore. Architecture: The building is an indoor storage facility owned and operated by Happy Boxes. It consists of just under eighty-three thousand square feet of space located on three floors over a partial basement. Its parking needs are light and, as vetted by the zoning department, a small parking lot is located to the side of the building. This approach is consistent with relegating parking concept employed by other recent projects in the area. The facade facing Route 250 is modulated via three step-backs in order to break up the massing. The primary form at the corner is constructed of modular face-brick while the flanking walls are of EIFS in colors commensurate with that of the adjacent brick. Windows are concentrated at the two-storey retail lobby and are made of clear anodized aluminum storefront with clear anodized trim. Additional matching windows articulate the corners of the step-backs. The building faces that turn away from Route 250 and are largely or completely non visible,from the Entrance Corridor are clad in box-corrugated metal siding. 'w. 'Wile Compatibility: Route 250 East has enjoyed a success that comes from development lagging that of Route 29 North. Many projects in this corridor are relatively new and as such have been influenced by new, creative ideas about planning and design. These include placing buildings closer to the road and relegating parking and other aspects to the side or rear. Brick is often used but other materials have been approved as well. Examples of no brick solutions include the metal panels on the Toyota dealership,the stucco on Flow& Mercedes and the gray brick on Freebridge Auto. With this project we seek to emphasize brick by using it at our primary corner and entrance. Cost considerations have us proposing EIFS is commensurate colors to the brick on adjacent facades. Both these materials are used regularly along this Entrance Corridor and others. The clear anodized storefront compliments the brick and is consistent with many other buildings in the area. This building is seen as a quiet addition to the Route 250 landscape of Pantops. It is neither heroic nor discomfiting. It seeks, rather, to fit in and provide a reassuring palette of color and material to the street. Submitted:Michael Stoneking 9.26.16 September 26, 2016 Happy Boxes Pantops TMP 07800-00-00-013A0 Richmond Road, Pantops Architectural Review Board Stoneking von Storch Architects Project Materials: Brick No.1: General Shale modular face-brick Red Centennial. Brick No.2: General Shale modular face-brick Northern Rose flashed. Storefront Framing: Clear anodized aluminum. Glass: Window glass will meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) will not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance(VLR) will not exceed 30%. EIFS Color No. 1: Benjamin Moore 2092-10 EIFS Color No.2: Benjamin Moore 2094-20 Submitted:Michael Stoneking 9.26.16