The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201900020 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2019-05-29COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434)296-5832 Memorandum To: Dustin Greene, Roudabush, Gale & Associates (dgreene@roudabush.com) From: Mariah Gleason Division: Community Development — Planning Date: May 29, 2019 Subject: SDP201900020 Old Trail Village (Block I & 3C) — Minor Amendment The site plan amendment referred to above has been reviewed by the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development (CDD) and by other members of the Site Review Committee (SRC). The Planner will approve the site plan when the following items (from the Planner and from other SRC plan reviewers) have been satisfactorily addressed and when all SRC plan reviewers have indicated in writing their tentative approvals. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(b)] Below are issues raised with the change in programmatic square feet for the Block I building. Please address the following in the next submission. a. In accordance with the Old Trail Village Code of Development approved by ZMA200400024, this block is required to provide a minimum of 20,000sf of gross non-residential floor area (see attached table excerpt from the Code of Development). b. The Code of Development permits an increase to 31 apartment units, however, the parking requirements to accommodate the increased unit density are not shown. In fact, this application provides less parking than was approved by a 2013 parking analysis and determination for Block 1 (see attached parking determination — pg 4). 2. [ZMA200400024] Since the number of residential units is increasing with this proposal, provide on the plan a table which demonstrates compliance with proffer #2 of ZMA200400024 regarding affordable housing. 2_ Affordable Ilousine. The Owner shall provide affordable housing equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the total residential units constructed on the Property, in the form of for -sale condominiums and townhouses, and for -rent condominiums, townhouses, apartments and accessory units. The affordable housing dwelling units shall be reasonably interspersed throughout the Property as provided in this paragraph 2, subject to the requirements of the General Development Plan and the Code of Development. If the Owner elects at its option to provide for -sale single family detached units at affordable rates (as defined herein), such units shall be applied toward the 15% requirement. Each subdivision plat and site plan for land within the Property shah designate the lots or units, as applicable, that will, subject to the terms and conditions of this proffer, incorporate affordable units as described herein, and the aggregalc number of such lots or units designated for affordable units within each subdivision plat and site plan shall constitute a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of the lots in such subdivision plat or site plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing however, the Owner may "carry-over" or "bank" credits for affordable units in the event an individual subdivision plat or site plan designates affordable units that in the aggregate exceed the fifteen percent (15%) minimum for such subdivision plat or site plan, and such additional affordable units may be allocated toward the Fifteen percent (15%) minimum on any future subdivision plat or site plan, provided however, that the maximum number of affordable units that may be carried over or banked shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total units on any subdivision plat or site plan. The Owner shall convey the responsibility of constructing the affordable units to the subsequent owners of lots within the Property. The subsequent owncr/builder shall create units affordable to households with incomes less than eighty percent (80%) of the area median income such that housing costs consisting of principal, interest, real estate taxes and homeowners insurance (PIT[) do not exceed thirty percent (300/6) of the gross household income. 3. [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(a)] Include the application number (SDP201900003) for this minor site plan amendment on the Cover Sheet. Also reference that this is an amendment to the final site plan for Blocks 113 & 3C - SDP201300044. 4. [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(b)] In the Purpose section of the Cover Sheet, the plan should make it clear that this minor site plan amendment is changing the building footprint and programming of the building on Lot 55-E1-C2 and that the parking schedule is also being updated. 5. [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(b)] Update the parking notes to reflect any changes to the parking schedule. 6. [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(b)] Include the seven (7) built townhouses in proposed use/density notes for this block (as was done in the approved site plan SDP201300044). 7. [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(a)] The scale bars provided appear to be slightly off. Adjust so longer lengths scale correctly on the plans. 8. [32.6.2(a), 32.5.2(a)] Depict all existing lot lines on the vicinity map on the Cover Sheet. Other SRC Reviewers: Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Emily Cox, ecox2galbemarle.org — Requests Changes; see attached comments Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Andrew Walker, awalkerkalbemarle.org — No Objection Albemarle County Building Inspections Michael Dellinger, mdellinger(c�r�,albemarle.org — Requests Changes; see attached comments Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Shawn Maddox, smaddoxnalbemarle.org — No Objection Albemarle County Service Authority Richard Nelson, rnelson(a)serviceauthority.org — PENDING; will forward comments upon receipt Virginia Department of Transportation Adam Moore, adam.moorekvdot.vir-it� nia.gov — PENDING; will forward comments upon receipt Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) Margaret Maliszewski, mmaliszewskigalbemarle.org — No Objection. This portion of the Old Trail development is not expected to be visible from the Entrance Corridor; consequently, ARB review/approval is not required. In accordance with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code, if the applicant fails to submit a revised site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter, the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant. Please contact Mariah Gleason in the Planning Division by using mgleason@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3097 for further information. I rl g g C) CS Cz� = CZC) RM R a § '<5v c6v R, JR� ICbti R R R R IV w m 00 m m CN r-, o tm C) c. � C> CD 0 0 C. 0 C5 C) m o mlo CIA tm Ct ze, Ail w '6 Cq m to In Zn in in C'j J'C>� = 5 o' m Zo w L5 C' c. S 4Dri Nz lC tv eq — (14 ip 6 c 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 c o w to pe ME f qi 4i w .1�6 vi .6 w -C� w 1'g IR I't I �g Ig I rl .1 �s t i §- 1� z . . . V6 C5 .d �6 �6 .6 �5 •'d ad i7 > ccCV ar m '� + k 6 1 *- cC R * rp C+ h- •t. tV C 11"Ir1 L> 0 0 Johnathan Newberry From: Ron Higgins Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 9:59 AM To: Scott Collins Cc: Johnathan Newberry; David Hilliard Subject: FW: Old Trail Block 1&2 final parking analysis Attachments: Old Trail Parking Analysis Block 1 &2.pdf Hello, Scott: I have reviewed your latest Parking Analysis (dated June 30, 2013) for the Old Trail Village Blocks 1 & 2 parking and approved this reduction in parking and the shared parking between Blocks 1 & 2 as outlined in that analysis. This represents just under an 18% reduction which is within the 35% acceptable range as specified in Section 4.12.10 of the zoning ordinance. This is justified by the variety of uses proposed as well as the different times of parking need for the uses. This replaces any prior parking determinations for Blocks 1 & 2, Old Trail Village. One minor edit to the Analysis is that Block 1 is Bast of Old Trail Drive instead of West (paragraph 1 under "Block 1" of Summary). Ron Higgins, AICP Chief of Zoning/Deputy Zoning Administrator PARKING ANALYSIS BLOCKS 1 AND 2 OLD TRAIL VILLAGE June 30, 2013 COLLINS Old Trail Village Blocks I & 2 Parking Analysis I. Summary of ro osed development BLOCK 1 Block 1, located along the west side of Old Trail Drive, between the two roundabouts, is considered the heart of the Village Center at Old Trail. This block will consist of two phases of nixed use buildings with commercial/retail spaces along with residential apartments and townhome units. While a range of uses are allowed by the code of development for Old Trail Village, some assumptions can be made based on anticipated market conditions and existing leased space. The following is a breakdown of the anticipated uses for each of the buildings within block 1: Block 1 Uses Building 1: • residential apartment units • restaurant/commercial/retail space • office space • athletic facility/ health club Building 2: • residential units and townhouse units • restaurant/commercial/retail space • office space BLOCK 2 Block 2 will be occupied by a retirement facility serving some residents in a congregate care environment, while other areas will be devoted to a rest home/ nursing home/ convalescent home. A 4-story hotel with a small restaurant is also proposed at the southwest corner of the block. The following summarizes the uses in Block 2: Block 2 Uses • 67 residential units devoted to a multi -family congregate care facility for the elderly • 56 beds devoted to rest home/ nursing home/ convalescent home • 21 employees maximum, during a given shift to serve residents of both components of the facility • 52 room Hotel with a 1,900 sf restaurant U. Parkine Required Block I consists of residential apartments and commercial space of varying uses. With at least 4 distinct uses under consideration, analyzing shared parking becomes more complex. To model the parking scenario anticipated for this block, we have based the parking ratio on a shopping center square footage basis for the commercial/retail uses (since the total square footage exceeds 50,000 sf and added in the residential parking for the overall units within the block. Both the commercial shopping center parking and the residential parking calculations are based on the parking requirements as set forth in the Albemarle County zoning regulations. The block 2 parking is based on the Albemarle County zoning regulations for the uses of the Hotel building, Restaurant, and the Retirement facility. Old Trail Village Blocks 1 & 2 Parking Analysis PARKING REQUIRED: BLOCK 1: Phase 1 Phase 2 Re 'd pgUng Residential Units 34 18 99 spaces Restaurant/ Retail (Shopping Center) 4.75 spaces / 1000 sf 25,154 sf 26,860 sf 247 spaces Townhouses 10 7 1 16 spaces TOTAL I 1 1362 BLOCK 2: Lot 1 Lodge Lot 2 — Hotel Req'd parking at Old Trail Hotel 1 space/room) 0 52 52 Hotel Restaurant (13 0 1,900 25 s aces/1000 sf) Congregate Care Units 67 units 0 23 1 space/3 beds Assisted Living Beds 56 beds 0 14 (1 space/4 beds) Senior Housing 21 0 21 Employees employees TOTAL 135 TOTAL PARKING DEMAND BETWEEN BLOCKS 1 & 2: 362 + 135 = 497 SPACES III. Parking Provided PARKING PROVIDED: Block 4 Surface Spaces Garage Spaces/ On -street Total Spaces driveways Spaces 1 185 21 19 225 2 86 78 19 183 Total spaces 271 99 38 408 provided for Blocks I and 2 Summary: Total required spaces per zoning ordinance for Block 1 &2: 497 spaces Total provided spaces on Block 1 &2: 408 spaces Deficit: 89 spaces Percentage of reduction: 497 — 408 = 18% shared 497 2 SV^°`rok l91w11:�+ CGS zip COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development - ---- - ----------- -- Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296.5832 Fax (434) 9724126 December 27, 2011 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Old Trail Block 3 — SDP2011-45 — Shared Parking Approval Dear Mr. Collins: You provided a parking analysis on September 6, 2011 for Block 3, Phases A, B, C & b which I approved in late September via email. This letter serves to reconfirm that approval. The latest analysis supports the provision of 209 total parking spaces with a shared parking ratio of 5.5%, which is well within the 35% maximum specified in Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.10-Shared Parking. This would accommodate the following: Phase A -pool and adjacent parking lot containing 72 spaces Phase B-25 townhouse units providing 52 spaces Phase C-20 townhouse units providing 40 spaces and 10,900 square feet of office providing 9 spaces Phase D-4 single family detached lots cortaining 8 spaces Claremont Lane-19 parallel spaces Brookley Drive-9 parallel spaces. Although the required parking for these uses total 220.85 spaces, your rationale provided in the parking analysis and breakdown of provided spaces by phase is acceptable. Additionally, Staff has required that you note on the Parking Analysis Chart for Phase C the requirement that employees of the commercial building be designated to park in the pool parking lot as stated in your correspondence. Please contact me should you have any questions on this information. Sincerely, Sarah . Baldwin Senior Planner, acting on behalf of the Zoning Administrator Copy: File: SDP2011-45, Megan Yaniglos, Senior Planner COLLINS September 6, 2011 Ron Higgins Zoning Administrator Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, VA 22902 800 E JEFFERSON CHARL0TTESVILLE VA 22902 4342933719 434 293 3719 ...... ,.......... ...........................I.....,..._._, ..... .... _.....,_._........... ...... ... www.coilins-ongineeiring.com RE: OLD TRAIL BLOCK 3 SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - REVISED Dear Ron: Please consider this request for a shared parking arrangement within block 3 of Old Trail Village. Block 3 has been developed in 4 phases as follows: Phase A — swimming pool and adjacent parking lot Phase B — 25 townhouse units Phase C — 20 townhouses, 10,900 s.f. office space (currently under review) Phase D — 4 single family detached lots The following is a summary of the parking required and provided within. block 3: Table I: Parking Analysis by Phase PHASE QUANTITY USE REQUIRED PARKING PARKING PROVIDED A pool 68 spaces 72 spaces B 25 townhouses 2.25 sp/unit= 56.25 spaces 52 spaces C 20 townhouses 2.25 sp/unit= 45 spaces 40 spaces 10,900 sf office 1 sp/200 sf GFA = 43.6 spaces 9 spaces D 4 Single family 2 sp/unit= 8 spaces 8 spaces CLAREMONT . LANE 19 spaces BROOKLEY DRIVE 9 spaces TOTAL 220.85 209 5.5% shared A shared parking ratio of 5.5% is proposed for Block 3, which is within the maximum allowed of 35% by the zoning ordinance. We believe block 3 is an ideal location for shared parking for the following reasons: • Employees of the commercial building in phase C will be designated to park in the pool lot, allowing spaces under the building to remain open for clients and patrons. • The pool operates seasonally during the summer months only, therefore the pool parking lot will be entirely available during 9 months of the year for other users. • The pool lot is less than a 500' walk (less than one tenth (1/10) of a mile) to the proposed mixed use building in phase 3C. New urbanist planners typically consider'/4 mile a reasonable walking distance within mixed -use communities. • This section of Old Trail is a densely designed, mixed -use village center, where seamless pedestrian mobility has been incorporated throughout all areas. It is anticipated that many residents will choose to walk to nearby services and businesses, rather than drive. • Townhouses will include ample space within their driveways for two additional parked vehicles, in addition to garage spaces. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please contact me if you have any questions or require any further information. Sincerely, Scott Collins Review Comments for SDP201900020 Minor Amendment Project Name: OLD TRAIL VILLAGE - MINOR Date Completed:Monday, May 13, 2019 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Emily Cox � C'fsfs Frrnirr rirrn � Requested Changes -Ensure correct TMP's are sholxn -Show DB & PO for any existing easements- -1 s the sidewalk that is outside of ROW in an easement's -Please label existing parking space dimensions- -PI ea se provide typical detail for proposed retaining wall_ Note that engineering plans and a building permit will be necessary for construction_ -Which approved WPO plan shows E&S and 'All`d for this plan' There are several references on this plan_ Where does this site drain to? upper Ballard pond's A'AIP0 amendment may be necessary before this plan can be approved_ Review mm nt for SDP201900020 I'dinorAmendment Project Name: OLD TRAIL VILLAGE - MINOR Date Completed: Monday, May 06, 2019 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer. Michael Bellinger rsrs ln¢ex rtinn¢ Reques#ed changes Add the follo}nring note to the general notes page: Retaining }rvalls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit ' galls etixceeding 4 feet in height require an stamped engineered design also ' galls require inspection from the building division per U BC Add the folloixing note to the general notes page: Accessible parking spaces and access isles shall net have a surface slope greater than 1:48_ Access isles shall be at the same level as the parking space they serve_