Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201700015 Staff Report Special Use Permit 2017-11-08 (2) J . BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TENTATIVE NOVEMBER8, 2017 COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING. 2:00 P.M.—AUDITORIUM 2:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order. 2. Joint Work Session with School Board: a. CIP and Two year Balanced Fiscal Plan in context of Five Year Financial Plan. (Lori Allshouse, Director, Office of Management and BudgeULaura Vinzant, Senior Budget Analyst) b. Presentation: School Board—Five Year Needs. (Matt Haas,Assistant Superintendent) c. Preliminary FY 19—FY 23 CIP Overview of the Requests. (Trevor Henry, Director, Facilities and Environmental Services) 3. Joint Resolution Recognizing Veteran's Day. 3:40 p.m.—Recess. 3:45 p.m. 4. Work Session: Government Operations/Courts Relocation Opportunities Analysis -Advisory Services Discussion. (Trevor Henry, Director, Facilities and Environmental Services) 5. 5:30 p.m,—Closed Meeting. 6. Certify Closed Meeting. • • 6:00 p.m. 7. Call back to Order. 8. Pledge of Allegiance. 9. Moment of Silence. 10. Adoption of Final Agenda. 11. Brief Announcements by Board Members. 12. Proclamations and Recognitions: 13. From the Public: Matters Not Listed for Public Hearing on the Agenda. 14. Consent Agenda (on next page). Action Item: 15. Neighborhood Improvement Funding Initiative Project Requests. (Emily Kilroy, Community Engagement Coordinator) Public Hearings: 16. SP201700015—Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co—Tier Ill PWSF. PROJECT: SP201700015—Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co—Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna TAX MAP/PARCEL: 048000000018D0 LOCATION: 3827 Stony Point Road PROPOSED: Installation of a one hundred and thirty five (135)foot tall steel monopole with 4 antenna arrays.Two special exceptions are requested:the 1st to allow more than three arrays on the monopole, and the 2nd to allow mounting equipment a standoff distance greater than 12"from the monopole.Associated with the proposal is ground equipment located within a 2,500 square feet fenced compound area located on 8.02 acres. PETITION: Section 12.2.2 (16), which allows for Tier III personal wireless facilities in the Village Residential zoning district(reference Section 5.1.40). ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE:VR-Village Residential: agriculture, compact residential (0.7 unit/acre); EC - Entrance Corridor: Overlay to protect properties of historic, architectural or cultural significance from visual impacts of development along routes of tourist access. Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District—Yes. PROFFERS: No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Rural Areas - preserve and protect agricultural,forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/density(0.5 unit/acre). (Chris Perez, Senior Planner) 17. SP201700016- Charlottesville Music Institute. PROJECT: SP201700014 Charlottesville Music Institute LLC MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Scottsville TAX MAP/PARCEL: 07700-00-00-040K0, 07700-00-00-040L0, 07700-00- 00-040J0 LOCATION: 1740 Broadway Street PROPOSAL: Use of approximately 8,000 square feet of the existi building for a music school to serve up to 500 students per year for a period of up to 5 years. PETITION: Private schools under section 27.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. ZONING: Li Light Industrial —industrial, office, and limited commercial uses (no residential use) OVERLAYS: Managed Steep Slopes COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial—professional office, commercial; research and development, design, development of prototypes, engineering; light manufacturing, fabrication, distribution if with a non-industrial use; Parks and Green Systems—parks, playgrounds, play fields, greenways, trails, paths, recreational facilities and equipment, plazas, outdoor sitting areas, natural areas, preservation of stream buffers,floodplains and steep slopes adjacent to rivers and streams. (Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner) Action Items: 18. Senior Center at Belvedere. (Bill Letteri, Deputy County Executive) 19. Commonwealth Attorney Positon Request. (Robert Tracci, Commonwealth's Attorney) 20. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. 21. From the County Executive: Report on Matters Not Listed on the Agenda. 22. Closed Meeting. (if needed) 23. Adjourn to November 16, 2017, 3:30 p.m., Lane Auditorium. CONSENT AGENDA FOR APPROVAL(action required): 14.1 Perrone Robotics Performance Agreement. (John Blair) 14.2 Shenandoah National Park Entrance Fee Resolution. (Jeff Richardson) 14.3 Preddy Creek Trail Park Special Use Permit Application. (Dan Mahone) 14.4 Pi' 19 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program Participation. (Kevin McDermott) 14.5 Special Exceptions: ZMA200700001 Hollymead Town Center Area A-2. (J.T. Newberry) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE TRANSMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA TITLE: AGENDA DATE: SP201700015—Stony Point Volunteer Fire November 8, 2017 Co-Tier Ill PWSF STAFF CONTACT(S): SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Walker, Blair, Graham, Gast-Bray, Benish, Special use permit request to install a 135-foot Perez tall steel monopole, four flush mounted arrays, associated ground-equipment in a 2,500 sf PRESENTER(S): fenced compound, and a gravel access road. Christopher P. Perez Associated with the request are two special exceptions (SEs). SCHOOL DISTRICT: Elementary: Stony Point; Middle: Sutherland; High: Albemarle BACKGROUND: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, voted 4:2 (Firehock, More no) (Lafferty- absent)to recommend approval of SP201700015 with the conditions recommended by staff, and to approve two special exception requests. DISCUSSION: At the public hearing the applicant explained the need to slightly shift a small segment of the proposed access road by 20 feet to the south. The slight shift is intended to allow firefighters to continue using the small hill behind the station for training purposes. The slight shift does not effect the recommendations provided in the staff report, nor does it require the removal of any additional trees, nor cause any disturbance of critical slopes. The proposed shift is depicted on sheets Z-1 and Z-2 of the revised concept plan dated October 10, 2017 (Attachment D). Condition #1 shall be slightly modified to reference the plan dated October 10, 2017 in place of the previous September 19, 2017 date. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board: 1)adopt the attached resolution to approve SP201700015 (Attachment E); and 2)adopt the attac hed resolution to approve two special exceptions (Attachment F). ATTACHMENTS: A— Planning Commission action letter B— Planning Commission staff report C— Planning Commission minutes e n D— Modified concept plan dated October 10, 2017 , +(,.,Q F, , E-Resolution approving special use permit F—Resolution approving two special exceptions 4 6-10 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 October 26,2017 Milestone Communications/Lori H Schweller,Esq. 123 West Main St,8th Floor Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE:SP201700015—Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co—Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility Dear Ms.Schweller, The Albemarle County Planning Commission,at its meeting on October 10,2017,by a vote of 4:2,recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this recommendation is subject to the following conditions: 1. The development of the site,and any modifications to the arrays,shall be in general accord with the plan titled "Milestone Communications—Shentel at Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co."prepared by John Caborgoudy,and dated 9/19/17 (hereafter "Conceptual Plan"), as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator. To be in general accord with the Conceptual Plan, development and use shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the development,including but not limited to all concealment elements and technique, as shown and described on the Conceptual Plan and mentioned below: a.Height(135 feet tall) b.Monopole location c.The farthest point of the back of the antennas shall be no more than 18 inches from the monopole Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit a VSMP permit will be required. In addition,the Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 4:2 of Zoning Ordinance Special Exceptions: 1. Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)Number ofArrays.-Modification to permit 4 arrays instead of the 3 arrays permitted by the ordinance. 2. Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c)Antenna Projection.-Modification to permit the closest point of the back of the antenna to be more than 12 inches from the monopole.The request does not seek to permit the furthest point of the back of the antenna to be more than 18 inches from the monopole. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action,please do not hesitate to contact me at(434)296-5832. Sincerely, Christopher Perez Senior Planner Planning Division e�of ^I'I II urass • 1I v ��RGn�P ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: SP201700015—Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co-Tier Staff: Christopher P.Perez,Senior Planner III PWSF(Rivanna) Planning Commission Public Hearing: October 10,2017 Board of Supervisors Hearing:Tentatively scheduled for November 8,2017 Owners:Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co,Incorporated Applicant:Milestone Communications,Lori Schweller Acreage: 8.02 acres Special Use Permit for: Section 12.2.2(16),which allows (Lease Area:2,500 square feet) for Tier III personal wireless facilities in the Village Residential zoning district. TMP:Tax Map 48 Parcel 18D By-right use:Village Residential(VR),Entrance Corridor, Location: 3827 Stony Point Road Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District,and Scenic Byway(Rte.20) Magisterial District:Rivanna Proffers/Conditions:No Requested#of Dwelling Units/Lots:N/A DA- RA—X Proposal:To install a 135-foot tall steel monopole,four flush Comp.Plan Designation: Rural Area 2 mounted arrays,associated ground-equipment in a 2,500 sf fenced compound,and a gravel access road.Associated with the request are two special exceptions(SEs). Character of Property:An 8.02 acre partially developed,mostly Use of Surrounding Properties: Stony Point Elementary wooded property,home to the Stony Point Volunteer Fire Station. School,single-family detached residential(small lot size to the west,and larger lot sizes to the east and south). [See Attachment A for aerial photograph of the surrounding area.] Factors Favorable: Factors Unfavorable: 1. The proposed facility has minimum visibility due to the 1. The proposal is located within the avoidance areas proposed height,location,and method of antenna attachment, described as the Southwest Mountains Rural which are"concealment elements". Historic District,and the Scenic Byway(Rte.20). 2. The Architectural Review Board(ARB)has no objections to the special exceptions and finds that the proposed location sufficiently minimizes the visibility of the monopole from the entrance corridor. Zoning Ordinance Waivers and Recommendations: I. Included are SEs for Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)(number of arrays)and Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c)(antenna projection).Based on the findings presented in the staff report,staff recommends approval of SP201700015 and both SEs. STAFF CONTACT: Christopher P.Perez,Senior Planner PLANNING COMMISSION: October 10,2017 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Tentatively scheduled for November 8,2017 DETAILS OF THE PROPOSAL: Request to install a 135-foot tall steel monopole,four arrays of flush-mounted antennas,associated ground- equipment in a 2,500 square foot fenced compound,and a 10 feet wide gravel access road through the Fire Station property.Associated with the request are two Special Exceptions(SEs),the first to allow more than three arrays on the monopole(a total of up to 4 arrays),and the second to allow the closest point of the back of the antenna to be more than 12 inches from the facility;however,the furthest point of the back of the antenna remains compliant with the County Ordinance,in that the furthest point of the back of the antenna shall not be more than 18 inches from the monopole. [Attachment B] CHARACTER OF THE AREA: The proposed facility is located on a partially developed 8.02 acre parcel,which is home to the Stony Point Fire Station.The property fronts Route 20,abuts the Stony Point Elementary School;and is surrounded by residential lots of varying size(smaller lots to the North and to the West;and larger lots to the East and the South) [Attachment A].The facility is to be situated in a wooded section of the parcel approximately 706 feet south of the school,657 feet east of Route 20,and 300 feet from the nearest residence..The property is located within the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District and the Entrance Corridor.Route 20 is a Scenic Byway. RELAVENT PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY: ARB-2017-73 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co PWSF Tier III—On September 18,2017 the ARB unanimously recommended approval of the proposed facility,the ground equipment,and the special exceptions.They found that the proposed location sufficiently minimized the visibility of the monopole from the Entrance Corridor. SDP2013-37 Stony Point Fire Station(Tier 11)—109.5 feet tower with reference tree.The location of the proposed facility was closer to Rte.20 and sited just behind the fire station.Approved on December 2,2013 but has not been constructed. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 5.1.40 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE: Each Tier III facility may be established upon approval of a special use permit issued pursuant to section 33.4 and 33.8 of this chapter, initiated upon an application satisfying the applicable requirements of section 5.1.40(a),and it shall be installed and operated in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter and the following: 1.The facility shall comply with section 5.1.40(b),5.1.40(c),5.1.40(d),5.1.40(e),and 5.1.40(0—(j) unless modified by the board of supervisors during special use permit review. [Attachment F] 2.The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit. The applicable requirements of section 5.1.40(a)application for approval and the requirements of section 33.4 uniform procedures for special use permits have been met.The requirements of section 5.1.40(c)applicability of other regulations in this chapter have been met.The County's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities set forth in section 5.1.40(b)have been met with the exception of section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)and section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c),which the applicant has requested SEs to modify or waive these design requirements.Analysis of the SE requests are provided below.Additionally,below staff has provided analysis of the visibility of the facility as viewed during the balloon test. [Ordinance sections are in bold italics] Section 5.1.40(b)(6)Screening and siting to minimize visibility. The site shall provide adequate opportunities for screening and the facility shall be sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets,regardless of their distance from the facility. The facility also shall be sited to minimize its visibility from any entrance corridor overlay district,state scenic river,national park or national forest,regardless of whether the site is adjacent to the district,river,park or forest If the facility would be located on lands subject to a conservation easement or an open space easement,or adjacent to a conservation easement or open space easement,the facility shall be sited so that it is not visible from,any resources specifically identified for protection in the deed of easement. A balloon test ' was conducted on Tuesday,August 22,2017.During the balloon test staff traveled Stony Point Road(Rte.20),Watts Passage(Route 600), Sacre Meadow Lane,Merrie Meadows Lane, Stony Point Pass,and November Hill Farm Rd to observe the visibility of the balloon from these streets as well as adjacent residential parcels.The balloon was only visible just above the treetops and for a very short duration along Rte.20,west of the 'A balloon test consists of raising one or more balloons from the site to a height equal to the proposed facility (County Code § 18-5.1.40(a)(6)(c)). site.These views are shown in the attached balloon test photos[Attachment C].On September 18,2017 the ARB unanimously recommended approval of the proposed facility,the ground equipment,and the special exceptions. They found that the proposed location sufficiently minimized the visibility of the monopole from the Entrance Corridor. The topography and existing vegetation of the site and surrounding properties,categorized as"the location",work together to minimize visibility of the proposed facility from adjacent parcels and streets.The facility is proposed on a partially developed 8.02-acre parcel,deep within a heavily wooded area of the site,surrounded on all sides by existing forest.The ground elevation of the facility is 480 feet above mean sea level(AMSL).The topography west of the facility gradually increases to 500 feet AMSL at Rte.20.Between the facility and Rte.20 are 5 single-family residential homes on small lots ranging in size from 0.83 acres to 1.88 acres. Of these,the 2 lots that abut the fire station property have very little existing vegetation.The remaining 3 lots fronting Rte.20 have large trees stands throughout the properties.The topography north of the facility gradually increases to.548 feet AMSL at the Stony Point Elementary School.Between the proposed facility and the school are large amounts of undeveloped heavily wooded portions of the Fire Station property and the School property.The topography south of the facility gradually increases to 488 feet AMSL at addressed structure 3775.This lot is roughly 13 acres in size and has sparse stands of existing vegetation throughout the property.The topography east of the facility gradually rises to 532 feet AMSL and is categorized by large heavily wooded parcels. Of the trees proposed to be removed with the installation of the facility,only 2 are of comparable size (approximately 89 feet tall&97 feet tall)and location to the remaining trees relied upon for screening of the monopole from Rte.20,west of the site.The loss of these 2 trees is not paramount to maintain the screening of the facility;however,remaining trees onsite to the west and to the south of the facility provide screening of the monopole and ground equipment from adjacent residential properties,as well as aid in the screening from Rte.20. To ensure this existing screening is maintained,the agent has required the applicant preserve existing wooded areas on the fire station property in excess of the required 100 feet required by the ordinance.The additional tree preservation areas have been identified with hatching,depicted,and labeled on sheet Z-1 of the plan.This tree preservation area shall be included on the required tree conservation plan as required under section 5.1.40(b)(3). The site provides adequate opportunities for screening and the facility is appropriately sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets,including but not limited to the Entrance Corridor. Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)Number of arrays. The total number of arrays of antennas shall not exceed three(3).All types of antennas and dishes,regardless of their use,shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. The SE request seeks to permit 4 arrays instead of the 3 arrays permitted by the ordinance.The request is being made because the applicant plans to lease space on the facility to a large carrier,which will likely require at least 2 array positions on the monopole to provide their services because of the flush mount design requirements.As discussed above the monopole will be visible just above the treetops,and for a very short duration along Rte.20, west of the site.Because the site provides adequate opportunities for screening and the facility is appropriately sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets,including but not limited to the Entrance Corridor the additional array is not anticipated to have a negative effect on the facility's visibility.For the above reasons staff supports the request and recommends approval of the SE request. Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c)Projection.No antenna shall project from the facility,structure or building beyond the minimum required by the mounting equipment,and in no case shall the closest point of the back of the antenna be more than twelve(12)inches from the facility,structure,or building,and in no case shall the farthest point of the back of the antenna be more than eighteen(18)inches from the facility,structure,or building. The SE request seeks to permit the closest point of the back of the antenna to be more than 12 inches from the monopole;however,the request does not seek to permit the furthest point of the back of the antenna to be further than 18 inches from the monopole.The intent of this dual requirement is to maintain flush mounting while permitting tilt of antennas.The proposed facility does not utilize tilt in the antenna attachment or arrangement; rather,the antenna are to remain vertical to the monopole.The maximum standoff distance of the furthest point of the back of the antennas shall remain no further than 18 inches from the monopole.Granting this request maintains the flush mount provisions in the ordinance and does not affect visibility.For the above reasons staff recommends approval of the SE request. Section 5.1.400)(3) Tree conservation plan;content Before the building official issues a building permit for the facility,the applicant shall submit a tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review and approval to ensure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall specify tree protection methods and procedures,identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the installation,operation and maintenance of the facility,and identify all dead and dying trees that are recommended to be removed In approving the plan,the agent may identify additional trees or lands up to two hundred(200)feet from the lease area to be included in the plan. As discussed above,to ensure the existing screening from Rte.20 and adjacent properties are maintained,the agent has required the applicant preserve existing wooded areas on the fire station property to the west and the south in excess of the 100 feet required by the ordinance.The additional tree preservation areas have been identified with hatching,depicted,and labeled on sheet Z-1 of the plan.This tree preservation area shall be included on the required tree conservation plan. ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST: Section 33.8 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the Planning.Commission(PC)and Board of Supervisors(BOS) shall reasonably consider the following factors when reviewing and acting upon an application for a Special Use ' Permit: No substantial detriment The proposed special use will not be a substantial detriment to adjacent lots. It is staffs opinion that the proposal will not be of substantial detriment to the adjacent properties because of the limited visibility of the facility.The ARB also finds that the proposed location sufficiently minimizes the visibility of the monopole from the Entrance Corridor.Additionally,the ARB has no objections to the special exceptions.The facility is located in a heavily wooded area of the property.The monopole will only be visible just above the treetops,and for a very short duration along Rte.20,west of the site. Character of district unchanged. The character of the district will not be changed by the proposed special use. It is staffs opinion that the character of the district will not be negatively affected by the use because of the limited visibility of the facility. Harmony. The proposed special use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this chapter. The request appropriately sites the facility to minimize visibility from the Entrance Corridor and abutting properties. Staff has reviewed the request as it relates to the"purpose and intent"of Sections 1.4(Authority, Establishment,Purpose of Official Zoning Map)and Section 12.1 (Village Residential Zoning District)of the Zoning Ordinance.The request is consistent with both sections,by not destroying or impacting identified historic resources,and by permitting related nonresidential development in order to increase the vitality and attractiveness of such areas as a living environment by providing improved and reliable wireless services in this area of the community. Harmony. The proposed special use will be in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district The proposed facility will not restrict any nearby by-right uses within the VR zoning district or the adjacent Rural Areas.(RA)zoning district because of the facility's remote location,level of visibility,and infrequency of traffic to serve the facility. Harmony. The proposed special use will be in harmony with the regulations provided in section 5 as applicable The proposed height, location,and method of antenna attachment are"concealment elements",which minimize visibility of the facility.These concealment elements are established and relied upon by the County in siting PWSFs as provided for in section 5.1.40(b)of the zoning ordinance and the PWSF Policy/Comprehensive Plan. Harmony. The proposed special use will be in harmony with the public health,safety and general welfare. The public health,safety,and general welfare of the community are protected through the special use permit process,which ensures that uses approved by special use permit are appropriate in the location requested.The proposed monopole will provide more reliable access to the wireless communication market,to include schools and residences,thus can be seen as contributing to the public health,safety,and welfare.No negative change to the public health,safety and general welfare is expected with the approval of the new facility. Consistency with.the Comprehensive Plan. The use will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural Area 2.This designation includes preservation and protection of agricultural,forestal,and open space,and natural,historic and scenic resources. Furthermore,the County adopted the PWSF Policy as a component of the Comprehensive Plan.The Policy was put in place to ensure that the construction of new facilities have limited visual impact on the community.The proposed facility meets the following principles of the policy: 1 1)Be.designed to minimize visibility—The proposed facility has minimum visibility due to the proposed height,location;and method of antenna attachment,which are"concealment elements". • 2) Utilize existing structures where possible—The applicant analyzed the viability of the Park Hill tower(AT&T)for a collocation;however,it is 1.3 miles from Stony Point and there will be several points of lost service between that location and Barboursville(the intended service area).The applicant also analyzed the viability to collocating on Stony Point Elementary School or the Fire Station itself; however,neither building could be considered a collocation opportunity since antennas on those structures would not clear the trees. 3)Mount antennas close to the supporting structure—This requirement is met through flush mounting of antenna arrays.The projection of these antennas are no greater than 18 inches from the monopole. 4)Not be located on ridgetops or along the ridgeline, and be provided with an adequate backdrop so that they are not skylined—This facility is ever so slightly sky lit but will only be visible just above the treetops,and for a very short duration along the Entrance Corridor.The level of visibility is supported by the PWSF policy. S)Not adversely impact scenic resources-The siting and design of the proposed facility does not adversely affect the scenic views and vistas of the area. It does not substantially impact the Entrance Corridor or the Scenic Byway designation.The ARB finds that the proposed location sufficiently minimizes the visibility of the monopole from the Entrance Corridor.The Scenic Byway(Rte 20) designation as an avoidance area is not triggered by this application because the facility is not within 200 feet of the Scenic Byway. In this circumstance,the Scenic Byway is 657 feet west,of the proposed facility,regardless;the majority of the monopole is sufficiently screened by existing vegetation.The facility is only visible just above the treetops and for a very short duration along the Entrance Corridor and Scenic Byway. Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(II)of The Telecommunications Act of 1996: This application is subject to the Telecommunications Act of 1996,which provides in part that the regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof a)shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers offunctionally equivalent services; (II)shall not prohibit or have the effect ofprohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. 47 U.S.C. In order to operate this facility,the applicant is required to comply with the FCC guidelines for radio frequency emissions that are intended to protect the public health and safety.Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal wireless services.However,both do implement specific policies and regulations for the sighting and design of wireless facilities. In its current state,the existing facilities and their mounting structure all offer adequate support for providing personal wireless communication services. Other Relevant Information A)FCC regulations would apply to a tower constructed as proposed in this application.The regulations would limit the County's ability to review additional uses and modifications to the facility once approved.The County may only deny changes to the facility if - The tower is increased in height by more than 20 feet;or - Antenna or other equipment would protrude more than 20 feet from the tower;or - More than 4 ground-based cabinets are added;or - Excavation occurs outside the lease area;or - The change would defeat concealment elements. As it relates to this application,the proposed height,location,and method of antenna attachment are"concealment elements",which minimize visibility of the facility.These"concealment elements"are established and relied upon by the County in siting PWSFs as specified in section 5.1.40(b)of the Zoning Ordinance and the PWSF Policy/Comprehensive Plan.If the facility were raised in height further above the tree line,the visibility of the facility may be increased beyond acceptable levels.If the location of the facility were modified the base elevation of the facility may be impacted by the topography of the new site,which may reduce the effectiveness of the existing trees on the property to provide sufficient screening,which may increase visibility of the facility beyond acceptable levels. If the method of antenna attachment deviates from flush mounting techniques,the standoff distance of the antenna from the monopole would be increased causing the area and bulk atop the facility to increase,which may effect the visibility of the facility beyond acceptable levels. B)The installation of the proposed facility and the 10 foot wide access road serving the facility requires 17,499 sf of land disturbance.A VSMP permit is required pursuant to Section 17-302 of the ordinance. C)Citizen Correspondence Received[Attachment E]. Staff received written feedback from 3 citizens in support of the facility because they are hopeful the facility will bring improved cellular service in this area of the County. Staff communicated with 1 citizen in opposition to the facility.The communication comprised of numerous emails, voicemails,phone calls,and in person conversations.The feedback received focused on concerns of the health effect caused by the facility(to children,pregnant women,and anyone else who lives nearby),requests to notify the parents of students at the elementary school of the proposal,concerns about the negative impacts to property values caused by the facility,concerns about the potential for the facility to catch fire and start a forest fire,concerns about the view of the monopole&ground equipment from the nature trail behind the elementary school,and concerns about the view from Rte.20 and surrounding properties.Additionally,staff received verbal feedback from a couple walking their property during the balloon test.They requested another balloon test be performed during the winter months to better gauge the visibility after the leaves have fallen off the trees. Staff also received feedback from 2 citizens interested in receiving more information about the proposal.No follow-up correspondence was received by staff from these citizens after they were provided with the requested information about the proposal. During the review of this PWSF staff has not and could not consider or factor in emission levels or possible health effects from these facilities because the FCC regulates these aspects of PWSF and localities are prohibit from doing so. Such information has been explained to each citizen who has contacted staff. SUMMARY: Staff has identified factors which are favorable and unfavorable to this proposal: Factors favorable to this request include: 1. The proposed facility has minimum visibility due to the proposed height,location,and method of antenna attachment,which are"concealment elements". 2. The Architectural Review Board(ARB).has no objections to the special exceptions and finds that the proposed location sufficiently minimizes the visibility of the monopole from the entrance corridor. Factors unfavorable to this request include: 1. The proposal is located within the avoidance areas described as the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District,and the Scenic Byway(Rte.20). RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings presented in the staff report,staff recommends approval of SP201700015 and both SEs. If the PC recommends approval of this application,staff recommends the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The development of the site,and any modifications to the arrays,shall be in general accord with the plan titled "Milestone Communications—Shentel at Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co."prepared by John Caborgoudy,and dated 9/19/17(hereafter"Conceptual'Plan"),as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator.To be in general accord with the Conceptual Plan,development and use shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the development, including but not limited to all concealment elements and technique as shown and described on the Conceptual Plan and mentioned below: a. Height(135 feet tall) b. Monopole location c. The farthest point of the back of the antennas shall be no more than 18 inches from the monopole Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit a VSMP permit will be required. Zoning Ordinance Special Exceptions: 1. Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)Number of Arrays. -Modification to permit 4 arrays instead of the 3 arrays permitted by the ordinance. 2. Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c)Antenna Projection. -Modification to permit the closest point of the back of the antenna to be more than 12 inches from the monopole.The request does not seek to permit the furthest point of the back of the antenna to be more than 18 inches from the monopole. Motions(Two Separate): Motion One for Special Exceptions:The Planning Commission's role is to recommend approval or denial of the Special Exceptions to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)and Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c)of the Zoning Ordinance. A. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of the SEs: I move to recommend approval the Special Exceptions to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)and Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c)for the reasons outlined in the staff report. B. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of the SEs: I move to recommend denial of the Special Exceptions to Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a)and Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(c).(Planning Commission needs to give a reason for denial) Motion two for Special Use Permit: The Planning Commission's role in this case(SP201700015)is to make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. A. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this Tier III personal wireless service facility: I move to recommend approval of SP201700015 with the conditions outlined in the staff report. B. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this Tier III personal wireless service facility: I move to recommend denial of SP201700015. (Planning Commission needs to give a reason for denial) ATTACHMENTS: A. Parcel and Location Maps B. Concept Plan/Site Plan C. Photos from the Balloon Test D. Memo on New FCC Rules Related to Eligible Support Structures E. Citizen Correspondence F. Chapter 18 Section 5.1.40 in Affect at the Time of Application Review/Action Attachment A Aerial Ma . • - • lifr If At ry: w 1 ti r 411 Stony Point Fire 71 ► 4 -�- -le Department r `~?? ixTiAl Qn :,, r, . II •� 1*,4 4=es . ....,.. . _ ,it . \..... . . 4.y. . . _ i Alit, _ ,,.- i . )460-1 , „.,,.. Parcel Maps .d► \. _____....--,-: .i.„... . * P'.. -.- -'.\ • _ Pp,.. ..i ,.•• 3 r: \s __" I _--�_- C 2. IV `\ 4. 4' 4 'L-� t• * •40 '+ s Cap s _,s s s ~' R F a S t M1 'O,e 7 h� a, # I d pp }j e _ 1 Attachment B •• entrex communication Nrvlea,Inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 BETHESDA,MD 20817 PHONE:(202)408-0960 FAX: (202)408-0961 MILESTONE COMMUNICATIONS - SHENTEL $U�� �,a- � is A ei AT STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. ®;:4/..,...,' '®' COUNTY omens ,- I tone I_______es 3827 STONY POINT , COMMUNICATIONS . CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 SEAL: ,� 5` HEN1EL �� 1} 16189 S HENANDOAH PERSONAL COMMUMCATONS,LLC • I \ s v w . b'%` 4.AL eHO�� \/\1 / `C3l.\ VICINITY MAP 1 ' T-1 TITLE SHEET FROM 12110 SUNSET HILLS ROAD.RESTON,We TUN RIGHT ONTO SUNSET OILS RD.MERGE ONTO VA-286 S/FARFAX COUNTY PION.MERGE ONTO 1-66 W. 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GM ALL NOTICES MO COMPLY NTH ALL LAWS,ORDNIRAS,RULE,,RELIAATIONS AND LAMUL ORDERS VERGE ONTO US-29 S.TARE RE US-15 EAT TOWARD QNPEPER/ORANGE.TURN LEFT ONTO US-15 5/JAES MAOIS°(HWY.CONTINUE°N US-15 S. Z-1 SITE PLAN OF ANY PUNK AUTIp TT.MUNICIPAL NO UILTY CONWAY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE d.RISOCIANAL COPES BEARING TURN RIGHT ONTO W MAIN ST/US-15 S.CONTINUE 10 FOLLOW W MAN ST.W MAN SE ENCORES C 1IDTUTHIN HWY/VA-20.TURN LEFT ON SPOTSw u,TRL/ ON THE PERFORMANCE CF THE WARM THE WORT PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AM)TEE MATERIALS INSTALLED US-33 E/VA-20.TAKE FIRST RIGHT ONTO WBTERRDN HWY/VA-20.TAN LEFT ONTO STONY PONT ED/VA-20.3827 STONY PONT RD IS ON THE in Z-1A TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PLAN /4 w� 41ALL BE N STRET ACCORDANCE NTH MI APPUCANE C ES.REGULATIONS AID ORDINANCES. z THE AROHIECT/1NOIEDI HAS MALE DERV EFFORT TD SET FORTH N TIE COISTNICIDI AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TIE COMPLETE Z-1 B ADJOINERS SCOPE OF THE CONTRACTOR WONTTONS THE JOBS XCUSEN SAID CAUTIONED THAT MINOR COMPLETING N5 OR ERRORS N Z-2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT �1 AID IMPRO(Z9ATR DR F]IDITS N ACCORDANCE TWIN,ICE NTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS Z-3 COMPOUND PLAN Milestone 1 THE CONTRACTOR OR BED SHALL BEAR TINE CNSB I f CF NOTFIWG(IN NG)WRI RE CONSTRUCTOR MANAGER OF ANY CONFLICTS,ERRORS,CR OMISSIONS PRICK TO THE SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTR'S PROPOSAL OR PERFORMANCE OF WORK Z4 MONOPOLE ELEVATION IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR EXTENSIVE WORK, ^ COMMUNICATIONS MESS DENIED"WRITING OTHERWISE o 5'at F07YT J Z-5 SHENTEL ANTENNA LAYOUT,SECTION,DETAILS AND SCHEDULE _ 4. TOE SCOPE OF MIK SHALL INCWDE R1INISHNG ALL MATERIALS.EQUIPMENT,LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR R0 Z-6 SHENTEL RADIO HEAD DETAILS CEDED NECESARY TO CURLER TIE WORC/PRO.ECT AS DFTERMIB D TERM 5 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAST TEE JOB STE PRIOR TO RE SUMMON OF SOS OR PERFORMING WORK TO FANUARZE HIYSEIF Z-7 SHENTEL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN PROJECT NO: 1050.213 I RN TIE FEED COOENNS NO TO NRFY THAT TIE PROECT CAN ICE CONSTRUCTED N ACWDNICE NTH TIE CONTRACT DOCAENTS 5 THE CCNTRACICIR TNN 0 SITE Z-8 SHENTEL FIBER DISTRIBUTION AND FTC CABINET DETAILS DESIGNER: C.S. NOT CLEARLY DINNED BY TIECONTUC AUTHORIZATION CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK°N MIT ITEM DRAPING DOCUMENTS ENGINEER: M.M. 7. THE CONTRACTOR STALL INSTALL ALL EOIWIEIIT MO MATERIALS ACCORDING TO THE YAIUFACURFR'S/vEND0R'S SPECIFICATION4ay F44 Z-9 SHENTEL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS UNLESS NOTED O7FERWIg OR MERE LOCAL O006 OR ORDINANCES TALE PRECEDENCE Z•10 SITE DETAILS scAtF B TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMS A FULL gT OF CONSTRUCTER DOANENTS AT THE STE UPDATED NTH TIE LATEST REASONS AND Q Z-11 TREE SURVEY PLAN D R z T AOEINDA OR CMFICAT10115 AVALANE FCR DE USE BY ALL PERSONNELN101W IN THE PROECT. 9. TEE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT TIE PROECT DESCRIBED 117ERN. 1 E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY - - Z-12 TREE SURVEY-TREES TO REMAIN GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES RESPWSWL.E FOR All CONSTRUCTOR LEANS METHODS,TEOEEQEES.SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL P OF TIEUNDER TIE CONTRACT. 1 STONY POINT 10.THESHALL CONTRACTOR ALL BE REIMSD INN LE FOR OBTAG ALL PERMITS AND NSPECT BE WHICH MAY REQRED FOR THE SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION BY TEE AROHTECT/BEPEOR,DE STATE.COUNTY CR LOCAL GOIS011ilIT AITH°Rm` VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EOSING IMPR0VEIQITS.EASEIENTS,PAVNG CURBING, AOJ ADJJSTABLE MECH MECHANICAL 4 SPOT ELEVATION SCOPE OF WORK: 1.NSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CLEAR TREES. ETC DURING COISIRUCIIOC UPON COWMEN°F I00N,TE CONTRACTOR 9iALL PERMANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED APPROX APPROXIMATE H R MANUFACTURER 2 INSTALL GRAVEL ACCESSROAD TO CCIIP(WND. 3827 STONY POINT RD WE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT DE PROPERTY. CAB CABINET YGB MAN GROUND 1 INSTALL BAR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS CLG CEILING MN MINION CENTERLINE 4.DEAR AND GRADE SITE TO FINAL 91B(RADE ELEVATION. 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING COISTIWCTT N AND DISPOSE CONC CONCRETE MIL METAL 5.N51ALL MONOPOLE FOFOATON AND 135'HIGH MCNOPOL CHARLOTTESVILLE VA OF ALL CRT,DE RE,RIDS(NO REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECFErD AS R URING O TIE PROPERTY.F E]WgS SHALL BE LEFT CONE CONTINUOUS NI NOT PI CCNIRACT t PLATE 6.INSTALL MOMENT FRAME AND EQUIPMENT 1 N CLEAN COMM AND FREE FROM PANT SPOTS DUST.CR SLOWS OF ANY MERE. 7.INSTALL GRCUIRNG,MESA CABINET BAST,UTUTY NREWAY. 22911 CI CONSTRUCTION JOINT NTS NOT TO SCALE &INSTALL ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT AND HAND HOOFS. LLJ I 1 11 THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL COMPLY NCH ALL OSHA RECORDER/5 AS THEY APPLY TO 1115 PROTECT. DIA DIAMETER CC CN CENTER Eek DETAIL NUMBER 9.INSTALL FENCE AND STE IMPROVOIEHTS. DWG DRAWING OPP OPPOSITE lap SHEET NUMBER 14.THE CONTRACTOR 91A11 NOTIFY TIE CONSTRUCTION MANOR MERE A COFUCT OCCURS ON ANY OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS EON EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 5' SQUARE FOOT PEE: THE CONTRACTOR FL6R Is NOT TO ORDEROF THE IN OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION E WORK THAT CONFLICT UNTIL SIT SHEET PROJECT INFORMATION 11E CONFLICT 6 IE50L1ED BY TIE CONSTRUCTION II,WAGBt. —G—CROWD WIRE ELEC ELECTRICAL SIMILAR SIM 15 TIE CC NIRALTOR 9MLL A Y All OMDN90NS.ELEVATIONS,PROPERTY IFES,ETC ON RE PROECT. D. ELEVATOR SS STAINLESS STEEL EO EQUAL SR STEEL ANTENNA EQUP EO(APMENT IOC TOP OF CONCRETE PROPERTY 0(NER: STONY FONT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO.,NC. LATITUDE II 38'06.15229•I-78'22'14.84 PONT RD. LONGITUDE 3827 ST TITLE SHEET Da EXTERIOR LOAN TOP OF YASORY ONY E: Y FF MISTED FLOOR 105 TOP OF STEEL r'AU- CWEDT1E51ELE,VA 22911 GROUND ELEVATIONt480.0 GA GAGE TIP TYPICAL MISS UTILITY APPLICANT: WESTON(DONFUNCATIONS &RISXCTCN: ALBEMARLE COUNTY EV-1-1 12110 SUNSET 4W 15 ROAD,STATE TOO PROPERTY Iwo: ACCT.NO.04800-00-00-DUm GAV GALVAM2ED VW VO3Y IN FIE1D RES1O1,VA 20190 CURRENT ZONING: NI,LAGE RESIDENTIAL(AIR) G8 GROUND BM OCR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING MR.LL7I FORMS ) GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR WAF WELDED WIRE FABRIC SAFETY PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY (703)620-2555 EFL 104 ENTRANCE CORRIDOR GND GROUND WI NTH CONTRACTOR(S)AT ALL TRENCHING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SW MQUNTANS RURAL HISTORIC DISTRICT USE: F18E/RSOE STATION/LG LONG a AND CURRENT OSHA STANDARD SHEET NUMBER: WI LONG LEG HORI2CNTAL 0 AT Tt�COMMIINNATIONS SITE MAX MAMUM T-1 r 4. I - Attachment B , / N ' entrex \ /\ -y y WATTS PASSAGE / \ communication services,Inc. OVY \ / y .` 11• . 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 sT 7 R0 A' '+: "•v BETHESDA,MD 20817 Sn•� PHONE:(202)408-09Fi0 \ / ' \ / '3! .: `'39 p FAX: (202)408.0961 ♦ 75.09. ` %SITE O 1 \ / ... I \ / / y O \ 5 y Q e \ . /-y y- l \. ( DATE SUBN Aa3 \ N. f `; W/ ` 06-30-17 ZONING AE\IEW �¢' ♦ /M/v,�' 07-17-17 ZONING RENEW \ • r -,' ,�,, 2 \ 08-16-17 ZONING RENEW i/ i / \• ' >.� -a, `�. •• t, \ D�1�n COUNTY VICINITY MAP © O /,\��/.NI i I 1 ems,;. N.\1 / \ SCALE:1'=1000' I? ' / / ./\ I 1 I y ... . \ SITE PLAN NOTES TRUE • \\ �/A 1 I r / /1 \\�\ / 1. ` ,y ' Toss' 1.) SITE NAME: STONY POINT ARE DEPARTMENT / ,�.' \\\\ \ 2.) THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND IS NOT TO BE \ =.1,....„.„, • • USED FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY. .•• `\` \ �" // ' lir j //�1�,//I PROPR4D 10'WOE \ 1 �y , ` _.\ \\. �� , o �. ,/ ) O.' D v CRAWL AGO ORRE 3.) THE SUBJECT PARCEL INFORMATION: I / `;y 1 �`, � `\. i \ / // / I t ESA 1g / \ OWNER: STONY PONT VOLUNTEER ARE CO.INCORPORATED PREMISES ADDRESS: 3827 STONY POINT RD F / .y " ,` \� �`1�`C )/ ^ / (/ / // / ) / / 616ALTR Op CHARLOTTESVILLE V0. 22901 ti \ •\. ��yy Y MUNG ADDRESS: 3827 STONY POINT RD O y � J\ / J / / 11iEO1 I r 12yCHARLOTTESVILLE VA.22901 .•,.,• �• W �`- / / // �, (1 I I I! l�D N G`•z COUNTY: ALBEMARLE COUNTY y .`• v _ / / �/ /// !, t I\ I I' I 1 I C m@ d ACCOUNT NUMBER: 04800-00-00-01 8D0 t. /� -•• L: � _ r t . \ ) J I I J ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL(VR),ENTRANCE CORRIDOR(EC), �' `-y `�`%� `�� .N), I\1( 1 1 1)1(( F t ;I 7LE69 SW MOUNTAINS RURAL HISTORIC DISTRICT +�.�� / �. i' qq"ttLJ7/i 1-` 1 1 11t1 1 \t^ 4.) THE OATUM'S ARE NAD 83 AND NAVD BB.AND // -•'1, // ��r' ri ...4‘,.....,.., \ Owl, C THE BEARING BAST:IS STATE GRID. >y . /' •-y �73C •7•4 �- 34Y/akALE fi 5.) NO UNDERGROUND UTILITES HAVE BEEN / • ` • 7O TIP 1 ��\ - \ - LOCATED, THE PRESENCE OF ANY SUCH f I..„ /� UTILITIES MUST BE CONFIRMED BY THE r -•�µ> 1\ t\` \\ \ CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. `.sj/ ` �;w�.� \ \ \\\ ... ._ _ _ \ 1\\ \\ \ k o 6.) NO WERANDS HAVE BEEN DEFINED AND ANY • AREAS SHOWN AS MARSH,PONDS OR y �� _7 \ DITCHES ARE DONE SO FROM VISIBLE SURFACE FEATURES AND IN NO WAY d" \ \� \�/ \�\ \\ \ CONSTITUTE A DEFINED WETLAND. �' 1 7.) THE FL000 ZONE OF THE PROPOSED MONOPOLE IS V \ / - ` \\ \\\ti \\ \I I I \1\'- / \` AS FOLLOWS: FLOOD ZONE X, AREA DETERMINED TO `rV `i: • ' \\ /\i \\ \ 11 I I I v /I I \ ' w BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. \ .\ SOURCE, FEMA FLOOD MAP FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VA. •y - 4! . COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 51003C0325D. \�•� '� _ _ • f 1 \ 275.6' ` \\ \ 1 I I I I L\/////-- EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 4, 2005. -`-y Cc ;1 • 1 1 I L \ /// �\ \ Z 8.) A TITLE REPORT FOR THIS PROPERTY WAS lL • _ •�o• I 1 1 l I \I \.-/ice ^\ • FURNISHED BY GAMDEN TITLE COMPANY DATED 1 Milestone DUNE 2,2017. \ 1 1 I I / ▪ /\ `\ \ 7 •� 1 I \ COMMUNICATIONS 9.)THE DATA COLLECTED AND SHOWN ON THIS `r+M �. II 1 1 \ I v i i///\�`�\ DRAWING ARE FOR THE PURPOSES OF • /Ah/�Y -� I I 1 \ //�/ ��� ` ' CONSTRUCTION OF A CELLULAR MONOPOLE, ANY 0 •4�Q 1 \I \1\ \\ \`�/// //-\�\\\ \ NECESSARY ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND ALL ` / 656.6' �' �/ \ 't. 1 \\ , \ / / / \ APPROPRIATE EASEMENTS. ♦ \ J \ \ \_._,..-."'...,/�/ �\ \ \ \ 1 1 10.)NO UNRECORDED EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON y �, 'i` R\It 5 ' \ �� \.,,.\\\ '\\\` ' '-i�1 `\I 1 \ PROJECT ND: 1050.213 \ I .\ // \ \ • DESIGNER: C.S. THIS SURVEY AND IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SUCH •- 299.6' I I \\ \ -- /// / -� \ It I\ ` EASEMENTS IMPACT THE SITE. I \,:_______-__:::,,,,,,,/, _ 1 \ t 1 t \ \� O` / ENGINEER: M.M. Ti.)THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL MATTERS /, ` TO MINN ` I } I I\ t\ \ ▪ t\\\�\\ /AREA OF PUBLIC RECORD. 11,, \ \ \ ii `,.,,,:\ ! / _ '/ --\\ SCALE 12.)THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED MONOPOLE IS .. l ' O \ \ 1// l� //'/ `/� ///i--��_ ,,\\\ / - 0 1/2 AS FOLLOWS; THE VALUES USTED BELOW ,A. / t'I t�'V��• / // / / / 1 i / ___ 151"H"}���= ARE WITHIN ±50'HORIZONTAL AND±20'VERTICAL '�/� J I / �1 // �� y " « `� �, / / /�� �� _,\ \ / GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES LATITUDE 3 N 38'OB'35.229• `��,'* � / / I // / / �- \` i STONY LONGITUDE: t W-78'22'14.842' ` ,.y . \ / 1 �w•/ , / // I// ! A///// \ 3 JTON 1 POINT ElEV AT BASE: 480.0'AMSL .11l�,//yjy�� / / 11 ///% -_�� O 13.) FIELD SURVEY BY ENTREX COMMUNICATION SERVICES,INC. \� ry'�� / 1 �'S1_�/`/ _ ( / ��___�� /^/� BY GPS ON JUNE 15, 2017. • `._ _\ L l I ` /` 111 !!! )30201///j.--__�� �'„� 14.) NO OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE 1 ) t\ I I I I I VJ ///- / VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 456,4 \11 II 1,0, �// / 3821 STONY POINT RD LINE TYPES • I / I I I Iylll��l j/ / / I '/ I ! \ I I III I Iit,/ice__\ BOUNDARY LINE-PARENT PARCEL LEGEND MONOPOLE SETBACKS _ I I I N-1 1 111II li I/%j _ , / CHARLOTTESVILLE VA I I ))'I I I I I 1 I // I --.- -. - -. - - Q FOUND PROPERTY CORNER PROPOSED i 1 /( I y-j �')//I))I I I I i ��I/// \ / ���� RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY TO PROPERTY REQUIRED ll II/ll Jr,\ Q BENCH MARKS LINE / . 1 -{ 'L.\.Ji171 I1IIIII) EDGE OF ASPHALT FRONT YARD(WEST) 174.2 135.V t/ ,/ ���LI II}11\ l TITLE: $ UTILITY POLE -522 I �l I . / REAR YARD(FAST) 302.0' 135.0' PROPOSED iN:392880.47� 5�2.80'�- • EDGE OF CONCRETE �- SIGN _ - - - SIDE YARD(SOUTH) 156.1' 135.0' GRID E:11520095.964 / FENCE UNE- CHAIN [Y LIGHT POLE SIDE YARD(NORTH) 7059' 1350' LATITUDE: 787'14.842'229' _ ........ gg LONGITUDE: -7822'14.842' •i SITE PLAN TEIJ=PHONE PEDESTAL - - GROUND ELEVATION: 480.0'ANSI. O / • • • • • ® CLOSEST OFF SITE RESIDENCE 2gg.g NIA - 1'CONTOUR UNE ® INDIVIDUAL TREE-DECIDUOUS IQ� u CLOSEST OFF SITE ROAD 656.8 WA u 5'CONTOUR UNE _ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 TREE OR VEGETATION UNE SITE PLAN - °° am �- SHEET NUMBER: SCALE 1'-w' L 'BO IL Z-1 Attachment B • • :.:'..: �ti:. . �. • ..<; y'<s.._, ;:.:'' ' •• •:o•" ,se• • p • mmmunlmt2on�oMw,Na y• aLfxrY.W` !'. "d'k. 7. Y• rfr. •S .•'t! •f; IG T.,:' :.•. ' ' •c:. .. ;: i�{( ',k,b:Y 2£ •�•5 ..:.. t i�::��• ..;j 6600 Rockledge M Delve, 550 y Y �,r • Nis PEONES A. D 17 k.•3}. .:[k,ti :kr�. yg.:.{:.Y:Y... . • • F°. , ..d ' .O:... • '.' .•` PNONE:l209J4118-0990 • N4riv•••i iK^" '.A' • • ? il• • pp •;(''}0i< 8': " • � ¢� FAX:(202)408-0961 f • Sss: :.:y P•. :ak..p...:'...�. n._.w .•�'•...a'.i:i'i : y ••>A1ll Y'i.:.. l �` ..Yc'�as. .?;€'..IQ£v..••• q>': S••. •.. �.2r.• ":, : 41. z '• :3.: , rs. . ., '. sf1'f,'..+ . r@y ;.: r,Yq� .� :.:ip.. ..r'F'[•t' :• .. ,4}l ¢i x'�., .'.- . " :v :c':.•::°:.•.1 : ..••• • :kKsfk Y:-.,•.y.••.• . -1+clfix.1 ':�''.�:•19° t2.a•: • SUB6IIITAL3 .::• ... ..?'yf • ...;ij5.•�.;Y: ...i :v:� ..%9i�::.. .•:z2..•.} : Y �,...' " �` C.�brrl{fmri: ^F��' � y x.>% . •'h oe¢ u3t>�nd �: .., . ,. .(':zzE : .'w.. . . ..:ir"z`';:• 3,.. .•:: . •.,t$`.• .... <.::: •:�: . �: ,onGVYAi$ .::. . . ,;ir.,rC+'£: e: of .3 • k." • •••3£,. . • a%2 m- .., {� .. ,aeE!. .. , y..w,2w� '. ..� .• �<� ^ "' ^.¢•a"�' '.Y$?"' t •�is}:'.�.:sf � .�€'i:•• ' ri:9 IDmlc EMI .. .JSy.. •.._�3 �: •" Gl"5J•�...... :... .: • :•��•.jl.� Z.x ,€.:� sJC.::�E"• • .fliyo*'s-Y" m-n-n BMW lev¢X '€. .„Y m., 'I0.. t At � Ol0-11 memo REVIEW ,i ', .::. , '.i::�•' ,r� rd 2.•:..-4, "& m-lan caxfrm9mlrs . . . • .d..•:..•.. �°'i : ..'2.' • :....y..,'" •' "'��typ" y ,{�( y�s:::• � 'f�:. •' ��'�h�' wM'"`yr.?'t ..''S '•:9 . .:in :: H :.. . ..Yf . '... .•, & 41 • gçLcy Y•• ;7 • • 'r;:;;:: _'A '.}, :•;:.•' h'r... .;{a. ' "`!sT.. S 11 • .)i4r. '• .iI • • • •I': �;ti'. 7,j.��i'il:<:.i .. : • il.2.g'<Y- 'Nd',1: a . ...:_y ':"t-?'•$: - .,::;• 3•P• ":'. ::.id.<. ::i(F {Y:. '} .:.,..:-"fj,;. 7.. ' . . ,�y�. ![A7}.... .i..-:;asl . "n.':.;..i...' • 3 rt •.�'f'• e' : 1 • vtr : t .MWiI^'biKJ� :H �::�' iY2'. i... • .•2.• • .A .. 1 II £ sxta. :: ..'r.."4£; rC' yiSR 2�1�e.:;t I. ' .iep:•. • sr:Y,:-' 2� l' . . tea. ;-':?. sEu: ,x. ` • • . . ..' %a'.°'.: •.l •':"k1��'. ::R`. . '.',L,.g, r'•''•y.� . .:z� • • :: :. $ :'�i"x .:'2ii tI2i4`F:a • +:..<'• ' ' I•. 1 C :sl..�;€•to.::,.. .:.. .. .-.},F d- .. -.: . . .:4" '.>. ..3 .i.; `✓ o?pcurrfos ee •• y+5}`p • :.;A••, irk.. .�. .. .asnwraY;:.1;,.z�vk�.;:• .:u� :�rri<;<I�.w: pp .. ��YI a. .Y.. y� •L y�ryi • . .. . . ... .n.xa.. ':: .dro-•. :.�, '>r.::.dz..2 ... :'. .-.[a.,...In, • :. A ,.t. 2� :�. . • . . .xi.>..•...I.. �..YD�: .. �f:it .. A� .�.•fiYr,�A.....:/.7+v')'fhf!S[ , :H ..:•. ..L'•.. ` .(�,.� <!� :'i \:•In:::i' luigitir �ii •'••'<:.,nT: . .fl•.f •4x.:gC?° ...n, ..IY.., .k?... ,.4., t':.:,•IT`:S'. • � �A z` .:ke:.::'. :`x 'F•�• iT(.�.: �i�' yy�xi...•• i;t�'!'q�Si[� • o Nl.. �^ 2a. •. ••. .x: t.)r.:•.f:::..':•. ".. v'•:; 6li.i . :::::.• ' frb.' WA ',. "4' . 'i� ' . . �.^.'xr2:' y € • �:i... ¢. 23••' '•�(• iyd .• • f!'lv ...Y:. ... ..v• .. �S,j7:io![i:::/•. �! ..:.. ':•� .�:};Yij:..•:f:'i:k ":2..:.)• 'wH:.:. i`9"W: ;'il,Y:'• yy . • . • ._. .r.s:,.:sy".i ° • .:'.:y',:.......:asrs0;rs ^ir, IpsN,nr2: yr � • .dx .. R •v • •ri".2::°'. .s:••• ..:,yy". . .fsf{ Ti:. :').'' t;i2:. ...e..• ..'f' •.`b.:• 3' '�: ' '•• .'I.. _ ,[{• :*r :_: .:J . F • rx h .r."LE!..• X' . ,>•„::as(x::.. `.':6•,:.. .•:s%'s 'd.. .i.s . • Yll tt • c' ':-' a•••...:::.. .pr,:. Milestone ' € ^" :': .:61xSY'r':2�^iny,:J:ii:': 1.. f.� ��. . 'r �,I.. '::.:}�'. N' :. COMMUNICATIONS •3j''.:8':•�.,. `�yfvv.� (kSs st :. " 'y. .tj` .- .®?. y :4 "h �f �'�{ �... � x.R 'S'. .. ..i^•", K.SI ' } _ :. '• . W;" � b:.•. :i� ,:x="..'�'.Aavw•+iR ,�.! .�� :s. yd�34 LL�. •� �. ... . EE"--�� 'i!Fi,''` iY'� '.Ff' ..• r. ,.\�'.,•.;::'�. .fig•. ..psr. .�s(,,a.2 •:.: °••<}�..'.. • w:?'..�(., J�. Y,: 1„r, ;': .:.�5.: .' 3i?. ": .2F:3i ". ..:\iY•; £i:'r :.'fic %Tr . ..,9 • .k ..F. . �j� , . .. PROJECT NO: 1050.213 ii. . tit �� , r xY.' :..y �:tic.: s .r!l� If< • DESCRIER: C S : •,. �l "au.. .cef .. ..�... .. . . .d'. : vit.• FF ••• ENGINEER: M.M. • • s.. . :3 S�•. . ;�, yr ' .1'}:� ..•xVf;::w...: 1':4T:-l .•.• '€a:;; ,.! ':L.' .::�;; .1�::�^': 1i1., ; .f!'yA ... M' J:.I .:z>.SM • ' '.3:®'`.:'.:'`. '::gy�. "::~ ��:. ..�. ":;y,.. ' .... . �'i�• ' '�'sY 6 '+:�I. :fr}'•.. ;;is^as' I: . .�w+.'• '.s?z••. .. • .j. �•;..:..•:'..:. ���. W.:it:• r l :7•... :. • :Y 4 • k: :v. . .' <F" rj.7. . : xi 1•1.:'..'.::...:h:•': ...£a• : it: " . .£'r:Jiir : ':..Si'.. . ' g •.Ir (; N. ' ,r iii. } '.i • 0,�!'�} 'R' . •�' • EF•. ' • GRAPHIC mN F M RICHES �;..'• ,._ .^�1::: • ..tk.. • • •go- :y:•' . .... :. . . :,..:. . :: .. l:: : • •u. ,.. ,,ki:::? '' '..4...„` ya. . ..... .• At •::::.: ..4 STONY POINT ..21 tl. r' F f�i': '4"• • . 'S�''v" .1' • :>: 'qww YT?. .�' .. :ix�• ;; .. 1.i.,• • " :: °:. .. . . :. :.e'•. • ;' ::is .. ::' j2• . .c . . - . .•ar>n" ;.;:: 1�°;:::� :<i .wp.A,,.,a, ;1 .`s::. ' . VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA '4. .p."• • ' } .Y•. € s i} [' 11 L :_Eu"l�`- .'• :.;R• e'�'":<.'a'nt.. t:;_;?P ,��.• .�,;,.., •.: �" Co;- . .'`•�,:. . . 3927STONYPOINTRD :�.. •: .S•.•: yH.: :. :.� i 2'.'� •i�::.!7.:� pie ...,nwlU � i� •'•.'it '.::.»�d'a." . . " �'*ev • • • • • ' .• .::"•'•i,.;.w'.. • • ., ... .a • '•`r. .: i .•` • R•yw.wa'3:m'.: • • ."s.....;ii+'.. :2rA' s ' ' 'a:� .. ,e::1:�: T1IE: .: ."AI • ' .:.s • ' :'t'"p.Iy(/: . 1• �^o- 4 :; : ...' ' � ' wf: x" "r w :':�ra� ;• ';II:I . ..K•�q' .•.rN• sS: • ;'`: ., • .';<' . 'x!(. ._. • N• •.'••.:."' '•.::^'.:.:„ ,;. (i .'Rd::.Kr 3•. ; •: • .l(d . :4: .. '1 ?/i• .<H. . W�:,UrA9¢)11?°:'..: . . •.:(r.. .,.:,k i; 0. ..,t .. 4.. YL4:(.•• W.'.'' .i;::. ••;:.: `:• ..;;;;,si:,...: ... .: :.,s= :.e�i'r:•":r: . .,.• .. . . .' ,. .:><Y:a•;; '�"1i0t'•wt9e)?;k..:'..:>^ `• .:a'r"' TOPOGRA 's•�2i• .'cs:,,:.1: "acx;.`•� •.:: �.,' ki,;;� fs. "d§:• ' ' .,m„�a: ,:,.r�:,;•.• :�I �,.- TOPOGRAPHIC ;fir y; • x ` MAP .:.:...:.:.:: .. . GRAPHIC SCALE•• TOPOGRAPHIC MAP /11�1 t , ; SHEET NUMBER 411E 1 .200 Z-1A \1, , Li (mint) Z-7 A 1i.e -60 R N Attachment B C�entrex communication smokes,Inc. MAIN PARCEL GPIN 04800-00-00—018D0 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 BETHESDA.MD 20817 N/F PFAX:E(20t)4080861 STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC. PARCEL ADDRESS: 3827 STONY POINT ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22901 MAIUNG ADDRESS: SAME DEED BOOK 575 PAGE 493 ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 8.0200 AC SUBMITTALS DAD: DESRFIRN REV. 06-6I-11 MING RMY 01-11-11 ZONING RENEW 68-I6-17 LWIG RENEW 1. osis-17 Eawn N1Amn5 GPIN 04800-00-00-019E0 6 N/F GPIN 04800-00-00-01881 DOVEDALE LLC N/F PARCEL ADDRESS: 3800 STONY POINT PASS MCDANIEL, KELVIN D OR DEBORAH J CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 PARCEL ADDRESS: 3821 STONY POINT ROAD MAILING ADDRESS: 3977 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 KESWICK VA, 22947 MAILJNG ADDRESS: 2966 WATTS PASSAGE ROAD DEED BOOK DATA NOT AVAILABLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 ZONING: RURAL AREA, VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL DEED BOOK 1640 PAGE 387SEIlz AREA: 247.73 AC ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL 2 AREA: 0.9980 AC d�ytALTil GPIN 04800-00-00-01700 7 ' 1210 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE SCHOOL BOARD GPIN 04800-00-00-01882 NF ATTN: SUPRTINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS TRIMBLE/MARY A PARCEL ADDRESS: 3893 STONY POINT RD. PARCEL ADDRESS: 3803 STONY POINT ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 H6 MAIUNG ADDRESS: 401 MCINITRE ROAD MAILJNG ADDRESS: SAME CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 DEED BOOK 3839 PAGE 346 DEED BOOK 1582 PAGE 454 ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 0.9980 AC AREA: 11.0350 AC 3. 8. GPIN 04800-00—OD-01800 GPIN 04800-00-00-01883 F N/F FLINT, THOMAS AYNE OR AIMEE S MATZER, HEINZ E OR MARY C PARCEL ADDRESS: 3801 STONY POINT ROAD ' PARCEL ADDRESS: 3869 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 KESWICK, VA 22947 MAIUNG ADDRESS: 2904 WATTS PASSAGE MAIUNG ADDRESS: SAME CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DEED BOOK 4406 PAGE 175 IDEED BOOK 1613 PAGE 383 Milestone ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 3.6400 AC AREA: 1.1710 AC COMMUNICATIONS 4. 9 GPIN 04800-00-00-016E0 GPIN 04800-00-00-02100 N/F N/F RICKARD, DAVID JOHN OR SUSAN BAKER ATHAYDE, JOHN M OR WHITNEY G PARCEL ADDRESS: 3830 STONY POINT RD PARCEL ADDRESS: 3775 STONY POINT ROAD PROJECT NO: 1050.213 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DESIGNER MAMAILING ADDRESS: 3796 STONY POINT RD ENS M.M. CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 MAIUNG ADDRESS: SAME DEED BOOK 4078 PAGE 457 IDEED BOOK 4372 PAGE 599 ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RURAL AREAS er41F- AREA: 1.956 AC AREA: 13.96 AC 0 1 2 1 5 10. GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES GPIN 04800-00-00-016D1 GPIN 04800-00-00-02000 RICKARD, DAVIO JOHNNF OR SUSAN BAKER NOVEMB HILL, STONY POINT PARCEL ADDRESS: N/A PARCEL ADDRESS:KESWICK,,2561 A 22 INC.NC. HILL FARM VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 47 MAILING ADDRESS: 3796 STONY POINT RD MAILING ADDRESS: SAME CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 DEED BOOK 1983 PAGE 363 3827 STONY POINT RD DEED BOOK 4078 PAGE 457 ZONING: RURAL AREAS ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 199.9020 AC CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA AREA: 2.2370 AC 2291 TTIE ADJOINERS SHEET NUMBER: Z-7 B AREA TABULATION 1_INF T1PF$ - Attachment B ma UN!-CHAIN TRAITS OF DISTURBANCECONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE SITE AREA: a02 AC __,_,__.__N___,_,_,_,_F,..�,_-- ---------------------- (WITHOUT WIRE SUPPORT) \r/ DISTURBED AREA: 17.499 SF I.CONTOUR UNE NUTS OF DISTURBANCE/SILT FENCE TREE OR yETETADRI LINE 1.innTEM gun 2.RCAYATE A e x♦'1T_TDH entI X 5'CONTOUR UNE �����1� �� $CE STEMMED DONSIRUC110N ENTRANCE x i IILWO ffi ILR al communIcauon eaMw,Inc_ - TREE PROTECTION FENCE `\ / / I - --��--�� / \ I �r /1T./ 1'II }� 6600 RoBEckledge DMve.SWI0650 / / / / // I r- �> \ �l III'/ 1 ry_IIGI Il'% 01117 PHONE:(202)DM20960 Emir\A�XIII / A 1 / / / r I / / / 1 1 1 I \ �nn -1�Ii - UIII I FAX: 20 MGM Car / " — / / . //// - 1' A // 1 1 I I V' �� ,. - ��, Ilu�' ,Im ( 2)400-0361 ` /�� a aTa�9 /.;pi i i/ ..."// ; ; I I I I r N-MEND Noah \ •3 M1°��� 1911 M1^/�/ .�r/ 1'L "14.4.„4112. • // / �� G/./mo i ^\\ % i \ \ 1 I I I I 1 I uu"(Tmrw11 O\ \ .. NIt=1iu'I( J �JI`I-1N o v p®o -`—__,__ oc.% i"7 7.• \,f \\\ \�I ' / ' I / ' ; I i,1 -III L 2Ni� % ':=� 7�7w/yyci /��..r\ .L� \ •"i I i , ( ; \I 1 11 • SUBMITTALS '�, /' /�'' ��--- / j' e --\ AI I I \ 1 1 1 \ I 1 \ a eO ST Tam AN E ;;, 06-30-17 MIS RUDE / — � \ 1 1 l 1 a I � u®ALm TDffiml6s BDu BE Wan NISrvAmY/ 1`� ' ' /,// .ILI EKH RECALL NL Ar DALY• MIPESL FE OE IMO NRY. RENEW RFD/HI iani BE YAIE EMO TO12 D09:Ai1fM019UN H PNO D THE RPAH 6 DIXA®SILT FELE ESAaC MCC ETDT�\ ,/ i h -" WIt6 A�IEAERORRNe/ \ r I I PT • i SCALDain INSI / A \ / ;JI.IN wr/ ME Fw6 METEDal EMS UDE WE TIU: DEAL 2 /��_ _ 1 \ \ 1 1' 1 \ 1\y 1 ` \L Iul'- _P..Ilit ROPERTY IDS. '\ 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 IA l 11 l 4 `\ IJI 4YII-III BONER RAIfm�f9DELPrtaSNIT,ME FARO SINS BE D1G TIP. I = I I l l e l r l 1 r—�` II l 4NaH OFFOSTS WOAD a Roam WIER — ;\ 11 1\ 1 ;1 1 I \\ ` ROAD TDRPDIDALI min FIAT INSGTId'RON EACH SmN Ea MET BAST PE RELMO ~ 1 �\1 /E� IflaJAD Ms 6 FP�FXTTva V6El NIB110FP®IS REACH APPPDNBARLT /i \ 11 1 1\ \`\ \ \ \ \ OS UREI E(TIP.) CIE-HALF DE IESE 611E BIKER a / \ \ \\ \ �\ \\ \ \ _ PROMO Imrs Inor I S S.ANY snmR uDmrs IEIMS n RACE / \ \\ \\ \\ \\\` \�\ \\`. vaPARDw pTDI �1 uu�Dai&S FENIX W mBwEw�i eDRw 111 -. \ \ \ \ FaSONS(RADG PRPAHO ND WFIXD. ?in:unto, \ \ \ \ \ \�\ I • i. o y ME(TDTD'W \\ e\ \\\ \I \\ \\ \S\ \`\1\ In6YSD ID PEE %/ \V • TI. .r'"�. s / �----�`\ \\ \ \\ 1\ •\\ \)9 ` I`a� \ aAWL Id 51 DRIVE / 11=11='Iz ..: / _--/ `\ \\ \ 1\ ; \ f. ` '-\ ` PDHr6'A'MOULD Er BIOME MIN PODR 8. 1111,0 • % � ; \\ ; • I I\ •\\ • \\ \i) 9 \`\ DRAINAGE WAY aBYATIATION /0.vm.s$ / t/- '. \\ j \ \\ \\ \` 9\1\ ). \\`\`�\\\ ` \\\ ` (FRONT ELEVATION) • % ' \ j �l \Y\l \\ • \\ \ \`\ SILT FENCE \ / / i ` ``1\ \ \\ \ \\ $ \ sy \ \• \ N• `\ SCALB NTS. 1121 • / • / / `\ \ \ \ \ • `1, s \ \ \1 II DEIy,H6.oma \ / // i/ \\ \ \ \ /\\ ,y/ \ I I NEN lm I I m$ fA I Al . \ •'\ / /' t1`//\ \I \ \\ \\\ \1 J \•\9 \\ \1 1 I •I I `\ �' iFn17n7iIIunn .......n r rrv...... .. ,.:.� \ ,! `\ ; ; \I \, 1 ��\ ; I ; \`.= , ccEsTmtGRIMM � .-A. ., ITOUNTARLE.: �., Milestone • / j 1 /\ sI I ,I I `\ CLuill SIDE ELEVATION COMMUNICATIONS • �\ 1 /1\ / \ 1\ I \\ \\ / POMACE �-a a nn u /r.. PROECT ND: 1050.213 / / / / \\ / /� A� DESIGNER: C.S. \ \ \ \ •\1r6 \ NOIS6 \ 490'— , 4r,L r r rSrA ./� PARKING T /\ / / CE(nP.) `\ / r r Yam. r.r.rK uanxc QJCI't•EFIt M.M. Ala SRN 02090 \ \ \/ s\ \ \ 1 I \ �__--__ i 4r1 .III r4»r MVOENT / •— 11' \/ `` / I I PEPLISED Ci OENac� `\ / / i =n l,r r.47.40J DAD r t isi 0. �, SNIP // PROPERTY _— 11 ; IB 1 1 N 1\ (M) • • ➢. _-- /' yarn a2sEr EA.- �e )/ r iAHI .r';T 0 1 2 I MIRAGE ., v"1. t I //I. S. I r \\\ \� A_, ' - /' rmfr TG,m. TO T GRAPHIC SCALE w wLT05 / PROPOSED IS r.® . • I P s , I PROPN I NDFIE % TRAPPING DELOCE ' i - - •OF INGRES Ma EGRESS PLAN VIEW / �EaPPISteOraDTtlF➢ I /`` / c / / ' ° STONY POINT / SEE DRAWND I/td 1 / , �C� ��� / /1 / -- / /' J i m.x /y ,VY,. / / : ; / : — .) . .) ,).. ,) ,) . .+...*WA,* , .., _ VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. DESONC MTh ,/, I// , jet': " / " / / N/•A�i{+ipA.tN,F ApA iS J(tj' ,* A NN 3827 STONY POINT RD / I I .y i ! I I / / , //� 8 / / n-TI r'V)N\T\l_V)\JINTN�'%Aiglk1%1N3 r1" /• - / i /� / �r. i/y , / /i "�0"� / FILTER CLOTH SECTION A-A CNARLOTTLEL$VILLE,VA •/ \\�T/ l ,9 1 ' / ," •• / % / / f ' , i / , , /i 2��p e�y_yr �gDL, 22i1�1 �\ I I 1 I I n �Q % / / ` / / / / / • / A. B.C. tl!I 6 / i i I itlit /: Pa" I i ;' :WaLI..,>IAt:.:.:.:.:.. .: EROSION AND // f' i! i' / / ' I ! / / / -i/�/ / J' AeB-i i i I i r/ i //% a9. ATE SECTION B-B DRAIN WRY SEDIMENT CONTROL I i ( 1 IDg6R�tuns it I / "`• ' / /% / 1 1 I I i ! ! / , , y, , PLANANDDETAILS 1 I I I SLT RIF"vq 4E I I //``A. �/ / ' 1 1 I / 1 I / ! / / / /' A WATER TRUE(SHALL BE PROWDED DURING I 1 I 1 I DD.Q 2 I 1 / / / / / - / I %' I ( I ! / 1 / I / " / / CONSTRUCTION R NO HYDRANT IS LOCATED NEARBY. STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ® ��NUMBER: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN e OCHE Nrs SCAM I'-20• TRUE INnx Z-Z 1 . Attachment B ,v `—PRP(9D 1d ACCESS ROAD entrex MiH 16idD'7URI AAOUt9 �, communication\Q mmunleatlon Cervices,inc. Y 6800 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 \\\\ PHONE:(202)408-0960 FAX: (20214084961 SUBMITTALS O: DEW✓PDm REV. a-n-D mac rvEr 07- 47 macRETRY MEM 0e-tsD-n mac�•A e9-10-11 COUNTY DXBRND Al PROPOSED TRANSENEON 1V-0- rx—x-X,-.w—x—x.x—z—x—x—X i i {o z—z—x—z-x—x—x—z—w—% x� . .FA A tA. �,'.. :.. SEAL �.. . . :: p ]Nppy WON PM DEER FRw�� II— 1 �!y : . .• . : m DETAIL IR-10 �E CABINET° 1�.,'. S / o in 40. T. : I it, I : x -0' WadLEASEAREA .x 1 I 1 I Ire•LEASE AREA L J TPROPOSED b rFENCE,MR 1 "c at;. OEDI PPowCY SUIT C 1 SEE DETAIL 5/1-10 b £���° I Milestone I —.L X ll NS X 'V -� I L. MAC LEASE AREA r-a• I PROPOSED 40 D RffOSED 105' PROST ND. 1050.213 •i I CABLE BRIDGE YaO POIE DESIGNER: as. x I I ENGINEER: N.M. • PRaPaEn SWtDR EGO C.` , X I D1 DE .1/Z-r PIAIFlFY \ L� J • P�A 1rr]0•LEASE KEA \ b I SCALE 1 SEE DEW.1/l-1 1 0 1 2 1 I r I -1 r , •I GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES I MMMI T�I� STONY POINT jel: I ' 11, Mar FAF AREA I'r_r I VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. I �' ■■ 3827 STONY POINT RD • L CNARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 - rs A-r 't I / ,i-,// >, x %-z—x=%—x�z—x= ¶� . COMPOUND PLAN COMPOUND PLAN ® SHEET NUMBER: sum 1/4•.I' Z-3 M Attachment B PROPOSED 2.MO{Dyl0 R1B IHIA0.0 RUN TAPERS AND DANDER `o entrex NOTE SCUM ND =ED T% communication mortices,Inc. mums. BE PRM OWES W AND MS A PRIM SOWN PROPOSED(J)Sega PANEL AVIDOUA 1DIIA16.U.VA BRORI M N mom Alm(6) IS m MEN MOMS 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 SETHESDA,MD 20817 IRS•ME CIA 1PHONE(202)4080%0 1!P PROPOSED SONEL AVN IA Tfl1EF AND TOP OF MONOPOLE FAX: (202)C080961 �I EL 135-D M,(MO AY3) W .i FUME ANIMAS I ON w51 MOUNTS \} .1 Sunni A --C �— BUBMRTALS H.1E IQP 60 DATE DSS:P621 R.V. GFNFD M9 MIAG R Ii m-n-n zomx�Tv FUME INmmAS O&16-IT mac REVEN m DISH trams \ ,�I EU11ME u1TumA xA0 DN1NF�E(( MDT 0➢-lo-IT MENGT MOODS fL 1154At (SSSO AID T T ARNE ANIMAS ��I CM WPM UD \ I DUN.ME MOD A.(SRAD CENTER NN) 7 iRSO4D SIEMDL 08aS SEAL: -1 OWE IIDNONtE �aeAVNOe DiSiP10lS 0 FRWOS D 10fSIDff ES y� TREES DEMO POPPoIE 1 !�p�$ 1 ----\....\ 'UAONALEMO ) Ii. 11' ,i. I) 1-71--, Milestone - COMMUNICATIONS / PROJECT NO: 1050.213 L DES JER C.S ENGMEER M.M. PROPOSED DE EL ICE BROM SCALE 0 i PROPOSED MEMO rrieLr 4RAPF6C SCALE IN INCHESd5 AXnIDA STONY POINT / (.} CHM Id01MFSNE B-R NCHPRMvsD ,= VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. O:II/I•d ON SEEL BATON (BARRED IRE I 3827 STONY POINT RD ., CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 'Ni; s n911 .NY DU.AT BASE OXORD EL N8d Ala IIRE: C--- PROPOSED IRASq+YR MONOPOLE 1.022ILSOAIL ELEVATION MONOPOLE ELEVATION SCALE:I/Y.1•-o• SHEET NOMBEFt Z-4 Attachment B • 2.5 GHz ANTENNA AND CABLE SCHEDULE 1 LOCATION mom FOLD STATUS =ETIOLOGY ANIEHNAMODEL/ M�N�GAL >IOFRRH COMBINER �A>vRF�EB� CABLE JUMPER 'entrex CENTER DOWNIRT DOWN•TILT MODELSLENGTH RW655-C3-3XR NEW 1 1 /'0 HYBRID 15-0' communlrallon roMwo,Inc..Rta CHSEC=130TOTAL) 01 ALPHA A-1 O 135'-0' PROPOSED - _ - 2 N/A / f15p' y (I)EACH sEcmR(3 TOTAL) (728'H x 11.s'W=7.1'O) HSR14-13N3U12 (LOIZ-`r NOTE HAUb IFAa - - - 6600 Rockledge T ,MDR.9Oi10560 NOT RA FO0.OIBLT/ 20817 �+ in E:(20 MD BETA B-I 120' 135'-0' PROPOSED RW65B-C3-3XR 2 N/A SHARER 15'-0' PHONE:(202)0084960 .0981 (n.e'H x tts'W=7.1'D) OXF12_ FAX: IZO2 COB-0961 — i KU \ Pmsr® !� - _ - _�. GAMMA C-I 240• 135'-0' PROPO4DRW65B-GT-310t 2 N A SHARER 15-0' SUBMITTALS xon:PAWL ATEA=a10 m NRW65 H x 11.9'W x 7.1"D) / (ICFT2-50.O / \ IDWOIAM:NI1Dd1A AREA-30 91 IN ! llLTWONAAREA-147151R OAR: om1RDa AFV. 17 WNW REVIEW ( ♦/(�� CABLE MINIMUM BEND RADIUS I1 WECODE07-06-Il Il mac ANEW ♦ I I 1 MICROWAVE ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE r EWE alo-n ZONE RENEW l 6-+ +/2Y.+NaDt xremicc NOMAa A'"p"" "�^' 1mrtF +a i1R c a9-,lFn CUM womns d Imo.ta ����dERWel ���� r 3Y xIl ( x•le D) 1® +A'-0 ,m R,P PBUIE IWIE BAONMA (R)w 5 HOlE ID Syr. . ANTENNA AND RF CABLE NOTES "ips� 0.\. [�l 1.ANIMAS 91ALL BE NWll9FD NIN uDIMAXc MOOSfl `�' A'A 1 PRW0E 10EN ER=H.ORR5R CARE OGd YUDIUA NN Off. ANTENNA 10 AIN a fH.1S 1 ANIDOA OHIEHNE HOW 6 N PEFFWNR Rl EIEVADa OD'. -Mel. 4.OL 010tom'91N1.DISTAL MDR OM RNOS a EACH OLD OF HERD CABLES.AT BM DO5 W ANY DORY PONT 01 EA1119EaA101 AND WIPER CARES MN Ulf =SW TAPE AIL CARES SHIDL BE=OEO AT THE TOP AND 90RW NM Y BREW R O>a TAPE a S1ER01 TAG ma TAPE MAT BE 0TMED FRa CRAIEM0 . ELEFORKED 90RL NENECTAPE 01 DONG MEIE SS OE AREA MI ROC 5 RE CAS P®E 1115 NIL TO 114 END OF LAAL➢I N E RD/O CABLE VI=VAL KFTAPEE R45T F�ORS�a CUE TO TEMHER ARCM)PE FRNIE 6 ME COW ITEM 0a4 I LTH pAy 10RWAl£ qo i PRONE F101ORAPHS 9NHMC W WEIE HSWIATtlI CF ME NUM MOUNTS,IrA11WRERORING MD CAME WONIG Q o W GA90 ENORM AMOR WER 0 If F R1PLANS REFERS Y 10 TRUE Na11L ➢E WI1HACfa 91V1 MaY ME NRIII H}➢ffNCE MGR TO CCNSWI0D0 A01 NO@Y 11E • �1 T%..I S I.WE=TRACIa 9OL 9NRY ALL CWP0C11a HARDWARE 10 SU=TE RE CABLES. AL WIECTON LARDIAIE 9LU1 BE STAMLSS STEEL p(��� 2 G 11E CANER OWL FSCI 1IE ANTENNAS RE RF RAW EOL PIM AND WER Y EEMS fa 11C PROWL 111E COMAtRa 9W1 SFMY RM ME OMOR THE "'pNLMDp 1m//TII�� WiERAL310 BE REa0D 1 PEW TO SUMI11P0 A W. NE MIS ARE NINE WI 9ELIE1. ANTENNA MOUNTING LAYOUT ® I EL REFER 10 GO0/I900 Wiz CARE COLOR( 16 DEEMS.WAIL I•-I'-0' IG CASE RHNGN R 11 C FROM THE 1 E MHDNA TO 1NE 9 CARE PONT POE PLUS+6 Ft ERE u.9• 4±' \ /'\ SO' PRONGED OWING ROD TOP WEW MDWNNA I W FACTumi?-MAW= — Milestone MOLE:1153459-01-33R MN (RN'N:IIr IA 1P D) b COMMUNICATIONS Pi PROPOSED SEHLL till DN 11.9' ),1• , WM%SE SCHEDULE NI E_1t P®�E6'ENTOP VIEW PROECT ND: 1050.21E 9 DESIGNER: C.S. HB• PROPOSED YaROE AW ANTOIA MOON ENGINEER: M.M. ANEMIA RAD CENTER I RECHT OWN •6.1O D) SCALE: a 0rir 1 2 1 GRAPHICININC1IIPI!!uI 11tI!e ^ • xiG moJIii'°iiIEI m I. I STONY POINT I 9 PR�9D RING MOUNT a VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. I I 3827 STONY POINT RD PHRD9D CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 s . LiriniuriFLIm-0• . ' ii�Eii=='�ai�iaE TIRE: J PROMS RING WAIT SHENTEL I Ill. ]aIa%MITE AN,DNA FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW ANTENNA LAYOUT, tHwxrvlEw BmEVIEw SECTION DETAILS AND SCHEDULE ANTENNA MOUNTING SECTION ® ANTENNA DETAILS ® MICROWAVE ANTENNA DETAILS ® SHEET NUMBER: Snir.3/A'=I'-O• SCALE:3/4=I'-V MAIE:3/4=1•-0' Z-5 Attachment B • l•-I D/4• IIIIIIII �1 ��� 0 entrex J' Z glo I 1'-01/t communisation services,Inc. . Z 111111111111111111111 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 660 —'— r - BETNE (A,M0.08/T \wl PHONE:X: ( 02)408BO610 I 6 0/4' I • n _ FAX: (202I408-0961 PLANNER! 7 2 [ t'-41/T i'-1 I/4' y 5® —' SUBMITTALS g�+�� ��_•-� _ .� PLAN VIEW 041E 0L�n01 RV. a6-50-n MR REV D? — .. �— 1—D m-n-n mmz 1¢xv'.. Le [ll JI r z/4. ae-15-n MHO lain t'-0 1N' I I r-t• I t•-o tN' I 00-19-n morn=WS • __ ____ y LJ E J = De e FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW =___ === ---- 00FtsONS 1291S1al1-[le2C == ==== Wait: 9185 tt I-. In I eeei. vpv AY ___ o0 00 ft "vial! ). d 12 J ,y� FRONT I 4..Q SIDE VIEW PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDEVIEW REARVIEW e� VIEWtOXALSad IIBOYIzNOTCHFam t. DRlsas era4.ahtr um:NO I 4N5 ram 11 I65 MIDIS=SM125e13.0 RRH II15 N IMOR WEN@ ±70 LDS gmsa@ IC1waseed&ro RN TFON1 YNON@ ±751BS 800 MHz RRH AND NOTCH FILTER DETAIL a 1900 MHz RRH DETAIL SCALE 1-IN=-l-0- SCALE 1-1/T=r-0' Milestone COMMUNICATIONS PROECT NO 1050.213 t DESIGNER M.A. ENGINEER: M.M. SCALE: O 1 2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 3827 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 NI LE: SHENTEL RADIO HEAD DETAILS SHEET NUMBER Z-6 • Attachment B d4 entrex VAX ARA communication aOMCOO.Inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive,SuIte S50 BETHESDA.MD 20917 PHONE(202)4080960 FAX: (2D2)400-0961 PROPOSED 9EM CAME BRINE ] i DAM SUBMITTALS PRg'(6F090NELF® 01611M1DDI CAMET \ L{`%i' oFdO-D mMc DESCRIPIICHRENEW Pat ]N Y 07-17-17 ZONING IEVIN 08-16-17 ZOO IEK11 Yri_ ,.; . , �1LF-J /] O9-IB-1] COMP'COMMIS I I II bg b PMPCGT PRO'09D 4I'9C&PIXY - 1BAC MP]AYACAMIET GBNET 9DDFL SEW_ SLED.RADU01 n iPA1rN Dpy S PROP=➢9O16L EDllRONT T-S a IT-S 91ER MAYON USX A MST 1ELT AREA r-r IYa' rd ONAL D EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN ®/�nar ),SCALE 1/74-0. Milestone COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT N0: 1050.213 1 DESIGNER: CS. ENGINEER: M.M. SCALE: D 7 2 7 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 3827 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 PRE: SHENTEL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER Z-7 i \/�A�ttachment B F-11 3/8' FIBER = V�J entrex MJf RDD =ET M651 CA communication Bamboos,Inc. 2-11 J/Y 2-11 3/6 f-1 I/C I r-e J/C T-11/C ) 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite MO nl _ _ BETHESDA.MD 20811 3/4' 3/4' PHONE: p60660 TO PJLV. FAX: (202)408-0961 WE 11P. T I I W.A-BO.T BUBMIITALS I u m_ 1, 1W.'L DATE ITE ECN REV. i 06-J0.p DING REVDI \ 7 _ I I * 0)-0-1) MINE RENEW \ re F n n H —A _00-I6-1) MC�VEM \\ I I 09-10-17 WJ01 COMETS \\ I I \ \ xEmaux CARES e IT \ �`_ ( -1/m nl • • II. . (3)I-1/4 IMSMO 1 1 1- cau 1u A'nuWs '- (I PER DECKS) —AORDINAS I I (1 PER SECTOR) (2)1-1/r1 Wears ` , RI)ICI 2 0 0)r nIER SEAL: 1 10 CARAT.(I)RFIBER _ _ I I AND(t)PORR } 1 • i AND O)PURER a r �.=. r Np PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW J.EFT SIDE VIEW 0 (\ s la Ms FEN.tre. SEE sr DUAL 4R-e ea, IOL 06ThHRMI CABINET SOIL BE IaLA R RATED •... ONALn'O CADET Min 150 IBS FIBER DISTRIBUTION CABINET DETAILS ® FIBER CABINET MOUNTING DETAILS op Rua:3/C=ILO' SCALE 3/4•4-0• MOUNT SPOT DORT w PPE /'\ LM U0 l spSP SE ELECTRICAL DIM PPE CAP,TIP. Milestone 1.7faiii COMMUNICATIONS r-6• 10' r-6' 10' - I z•-1 J/e• - -—- 'PROLCT ND: 1050.213 1 WIRY Pou R ENTRANCE QIERAiw PWc -=� _- DESIGNER: C.S. r-e J/D• - - - —_ • ENGINEER: M.M. L 0• I S%1RWEGNY. SERE TO PPE um 1/r1 U-0BOLTS SCALE: ppc 0 1 2 ;: :0E I I Y rk rxv.RPE I I t`al m ® I a p a1 Ate RMS.TIP.1Anw I I .,'0'DJ CENTER PUNCH LOCATIONS OCHE L I H uSd11 I wA� CHARLOT�2ITP21ESVILLE,VA (QPRA=MD➢tAC E — 1 - ' LL911 OBOEA RNOR IMAMS .i:i i.E I4 i i_{ 1 :V:Vaiet._ Zia: e SHENTEL PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW JR.FP SIDE VIEW FIBER DISTRIBUTION ,, CONCRETE FIER AND PTC r' �� CABINET DETAILS oar 4T-WI® PTC CABINET DETAILS ® PTC CABINET MOUNTING DETAILS ® SHEET NUMBER: SCALE 3/C=V-0' 9.NE P-1•-0' i Z-8 Attachment B 35.4 31.8 ..I 0 entrex communication cervices.Inc. 35.3 35.4 257 6800 Rockledge Drive,Suite 650 31.5 BETHESDA,MD20817 PHONE:(202)408-0960 FAX: (202(408.0961 TMiliMI 1 — 0 o m30- M SUBMIITAIS n IE.D Pi 0 DAZE owm8D1 REV. D6-17-17 291110IEMY 07-17-17 ZINID Wale W M1 [8-11-17 LE10 IRVEW 0 0 n u — 09-10-17 MINTY n TOMS EI E 0 0 WI m SEAL 1 . town-Hop FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW 11 ,' A5 PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW 1: ' tl47ES. NOTES: THE CABINET WEIGHT=945 LBS THE CABINET WEIGHT=2,640 LBS 9928 BTS CABINET DETAILS ® 45VCD BATTERY CABINET DETAILS elj ...„‘ SCRIP 1/2• -0' SCALE 1/T=1'-O* 4 ..\.=P Milestone COMMUNICATIONS PRO.ECT N0: 1050.213 1 DESIGNER C.S. ENGINEER: M.M. SCALE OrpsyLi . GRAPHIC SCAI F IN INCHES STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 3827 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 IBLE SHENTEL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: Z-9 Attachment B �� W entrex ( communication aeMAm,Inc. EN dWIRE �� 6600 Rodtletlge Drive,Sulfa 550 6'-0' I BETHESDA,MD 20817 .._. PHONE:(202)48896 0 FAX 08-0961 A i � 2111112 I _ II I3 _.....I/LUNCSIMOFSA SUBMITTALS OATS BANNERS CATE d501P101 REV. XII Y EED lISA 111SLOT TO 1 JP• 05-30-11 SUNG REM _ _ ,II 07-17-17 10110 MEW] m-la-n ZONING EMI 10 MY Nam SBIl UEBUE . 09-19-n WI GEMIMAIMS T-d lac R/1/tA cuv. ABC SNLRS(DP.) ma ' . de:11.7...,...,,,.251 FENCE: . USERS(TIP, o O Pd.1YFR,RSUE �/ &GRCOK 1O-0'ACES ROAD E M I WcE mt0A1a \� (T MOW SAmO .CP DACEnnAlr aIAWE BOX FLSIdG GRIE£ YAI01 FleSmm ROSH GRADE (PART Pfdfi.1l..m` VQ -6 \/ / I • % jjjj\ • 1 •A /\ , RoX OR APPROVED iEC h j ... I / I1 " // il ` — SOX _ALE ACDIG TO956iMO SOMBRII4Ra,ID ECM lAX '? • „ / .ei1 '. / \ .`i I'' ` /• \ O �► DRY ANWM=S �ROIfES 90W''°` • . ,±..r RL %flay.,: L�J..ro. \ j : .;/ aAME BOX(PART °q, A ' femora) � III ACDS90A0: "SCl°NALLN° / / / / NOTE: FAL IEDAOn AND Ca/PACT TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD OP �/� //\ //,//\ ///� /\/\// O ORANICR AREA L CR BE RUBBLECLEARED R 110 del®. FmIWE UNDERCUTFS GRADE FILL MI)OS ACT PACT L P 1 SIT ma.ORGANIC M 6'BELOW F9ml GRADE RACE WWI 500X MACE \ \/\\\, O�I • 011W Uf021 CRAM RUE A WW1 WE SIHDARN FAStC a SOGRADE HALE AND W 6'DIM E ae19ER WIN/ABC 10101EYdl GAME 1'-6Y fSalnwAna a ALL WM 8'd'M911057 S1001 l0 ROM CRAM 500.021.16111. f mynas tWINE MEETS I.9JREAE COURSECOURSEAND BASE COURSE 001E BE EIW*11FD 10 98X MAX DO'DEN0W STAMM PWICidt 2 cmRus 911.SOIL BE"SPACED TO 95X MAX DRY wart SWORD PP0Ltm. /' UTILITY FRAME DETAIL 1 MESA QUAZTTE BASE DETAIL 2 COMPOUND SURFACING DETAIL 3 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL A SCALE 5/4-1'-0' z-10 SCAM:1/2-5-(1' z-10 SCALE:1'-ILO' z-10 SCALE N.Ts z-ia Milestone ©© COMMUNICATIONS 6 O 0 0 Ird ® m 0 C-0'NMI \M� \_ ice =__ "i•:'::•:':•::':::•:;.'': - ' - PROJECT NO: 1050.213 -B°5•i 44•••:❖:❖C;):•V A I-- O l: :;:}I� 069GNE t M.A ENGINEER: M.M. a _ _ _ : SCALD o m _ m ' r• ::COWCAND GRACE S 1 - - •i i GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES j�j,3, t �::'. ..„„O„00.,y vi i ,Q>Q,S.,:(.; ; 'W ����4�4 1 f '' ;%SS;v��R v 1. O„O„O, E{{,(NdZio„o,.bg.N,p„g it r.:'„'$.::•( IA?": `Z`ssk g4.11 .;p; u.y;. .,,,gp;4.,5:. ..,04,,,o;,.,v i c:,. STONY POINT N O Q.1 h`A�,Q,p ,,>„:1;. 6•\� yJ 6��0„Oi .,,O,,O.. .00;,.a r u: GTE DTR R I I iP .' VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 6dHGNE Nms W XA' FENCE AND GATE BET•• L 2sa 3—xma W 3B2T STONY POINT RD fORILI O GTEEPPOST:4'80101AL Sd ota 40 PPE END CR FUL POST:3'MINX�O""E a`� O 111166311001 a dO WM GALVANIZED 4LE/dfE Rao. I. MSfWL MOM PER ASR1 F-581 CHARLOTTESVILLE,IL,B,B VA 2 OWE POST:Y SCHEDULE 40 PPE PER ASIIFHO81 IDS L B6TAt SANG CATES PER ASTI F-9m 2291 I PmR SHALLff WILY TA®AT WWI 6-0-at 10 FENCE COMER H41 BRACE:15/8'Mk 1 FENCE PPE MO WOVONTS OWL E GALVANIZED. LULL: Eta CORNER EI01 WAY. 3 RP PAL&BRAE RAIL 1 1/7 PEE,PER ASN-i1081 1. GTE PAVES OWL BE MWLO 11 GTE MAW:11/2'PPE PERASM-F10B1 GEIOO:C SHALL BE WAIm YNI(3)WA15 O FAB80 9 G CORE YOS ffi 2'KIK CCNEamNG TO Cr WD GU.(a BIWA ASHY-A392, 12 SINE WLIFIDOd10 EWE BY WESTOE S.PmlS SIWL HAVE DOFwl SITE DETAILS OlE WE:LOONY 11 G GALVANIZED STEM AT POSTS AM B.CATES 91A1L HAVE IDODIG N.UDNARE P1EWE 911d£511 A GARSCKAfO AT TEN9a WE 13 GTE OWUNII OAVAnim ma pm 2.FRa0E GTE SAPS TO SD=DIES M 09! BY NOG RIGS TA®BIAS.24'HMRVALS. ��' Q GTE FRAME BRAE•15/6.OAYEmt OMISCH WRE 9 GA.GAMED SOD. ® CENTER GTE STOP O,ETFi PRIVACY SLATS(LEAVE) 0 BALD WM "MOTE 5110240 12-I/2•OD.WISED Wff SHEET NUMBECt TO W1131 11111 FARM 14 GA APT.BARBS SPACED 01 Z-�0 0 SOBIOB.R" ART0YIAM.Y 5'GENERA - Attachment B 1 .'--Y_7 DINE TYPES TREES TO BE REMOVED (• entrex .�\ i O I tip FENCE LINE-CHAM PT! TREE SZE/TYPE HEGHT PT/ TREE SZE/TYPE HEIGHT communication services,Inc. \ / \ \ - _ 233 18'POPLAR 97 323 1T POPLAR • \ 1'CONTOUR TINE 2318 POPLAR 324 IT PWLAR \ t� \ ./ 237 11' OEEOI 325 10'POPLAR \ Y '. 6600 Rockledge OHve,Suit4650 \ 1 / • 0 5'CONTOUR UNE 239 12'PINEH 326 16" OPLAR BETHESOA,M02081] / : \ 240 15'PINE 328 14'POPLAR PHONE:(202)4084960 \\ \ / 329 12'PINE 1 \ 241 11'POPLAR 330 5'OAK FAX: (202)4080961 \ �EXSMIELOT i LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 288 13'POPLAR 331 5'OAK �O yt\ ' 'AKm010f � 'u—� T,13 —"--'•- - -"—"—"- - -�—�— 291 16'POPLAR 332 6'OAK 1. '8' —�—���N ` 292 23'POPLAR 89 333 22'POPLAR \ \ 1.r LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/SILT FENCE - \ �: �0:.... ;q 0 Dam YOLDI 29311'POPLAR 33816'POPLAR i. \ LAR \'\ ." 141' ty� "N, \ \ \ \ TREE PROTECTION FENCE 295 11'BEECH 343 le PINEPOPLAR 339 16'P 1 \ �� , —••— ~— — —��—~••—•—•— ir POPLAR 28B 14'OAK 344 6'GUM 345 5"GUAI SUBMITTALS // `\` \ �r 1© \ TREE OR VEGETATION LINE 319 le OAK 347 12'320 12'POPLAR 349 12'PINE 6fi-]IF17 ZR@IG REDS / \ c' \\^�4� 321 21'POPLAR 381 6'GUM 0]-17-17 MOM REDS \ . �:�„_. • PROPOSED MOTS CF - \ \\ ,F�{��f�'I'��-may\ _ \ 1616-1] 21NNG RENEW 0600Bh19£AA9 . \� �—��. \ • SLT FENCE SE \ • W-19-n CORM W00]RS DAL 2/2_2 wNFRR //JJ``MC TIP. \'Q �A�� - ROAD DIRT / ,�`,%�� OSTUMNI(111 CF.) L) \\ TREES TO REMA�fy BR1REA �• ' t.���� \ PT! TREE SZE/TYPE HECHT PT! TREE SIZE/TYPE HEGHT PT! TREE SZE/TPE HEIGHT \ \` \e 206 8'BEECH 265 16'POPLAR 135 10'PINE _ DIBRYG mLLF➢ 207 9'PINE 266 28'POPLAR 93 337 18'OAK• 1;� A8 208 9'PINE 267 16'POPLAR 68 340 T OAK / AREA BMW ��11�\ 209 B'BEECH 288 22'POPLAR 92 341 12'PINE —. Th ',.�L,�� \ 210 10'Wu 259 19'POPLAR 90 342 10'OAK SEAL 1 =\' al. 211 26'POPLAR212 23'POPLAR 270 19'POPLAR 90271 12'POPLAR 348 6'GUM 35��•�' sss,,, 213 0"PINE 29 B'MAPLE 87 350111'PINE /�4�I/\�:'I! ,+ 214 9'MAPLE 273 19'POPLAR 352 6'.GUM gI1AlT'np/,- \ / ���/•�01 215 10'PINE 274 11'MAPLE 354 24'HICKORY .a `�( ` ' 216 24'OAK 275 17'POPLAR 355 6'FINCH \• / � �� - /'` 217 19'OAK 276 19'POPLAR 356 14' POPLAR •2113 24'POPLAR 2>]19'POPLAR 35J 10'PME ' ,T A �5 \ / 44' / 2219 24'9 14'PINE 278 8'BEECH 8 12' EPLAR 38 359358 617'POPLAR '� 'l .x:r. , /. �/i 31>./ ) 221 25'OAK 281 24'POPLAR 360 12'POPLAR ./ 222 29'POPLAR 282 IS'POPLAR 361 8'HICKORY .A� s \ / � e/! 223 16'OAK 283 9'MAPLE 362 6'PINE "S2tlNALLTIO 284 15'POPLAR 363 6'BIRCH • AK / '.� .. 2262 10'BEECH 285 13"POPLAR 364 12'PINE /_T,.... 22' 286 24'POPLAR 92 365 10'PINE V. FMSTMG / ea tt 227 10 BEAK 287 24'POPLAR 91 366 5'GUM DR F490fH(>; \ 22B 10"OAK 2B9 1T POPLAR 367 6'GUM 0235 13'POPLAR 280 9'PINE ]3 368 B'PME / 242 10"POPLAR 296 22'POPLAR 92 369 6"GUYv 243 12'POPLAR 301 21'POPLAR 370 16'POPLAR 244 10'POPLAR 302 B'OAK 371 20'POPLAR h/ m 1� _ / 245 8'POPLAR 304 28 POPLAR PLA 372 6'GUM 245 9'MAPLE 304 28'POPLAR 88 373 6'HIIXORY /\ 87 374 10'PINE 252 247 19'MAPLE 63 306 14'PO 305 21" OPPLAR 9 375 15'OAK O '4 253 12'MAPLE 307 2>'POPLAR 91 376 8'BMCH25524'POP RR >5 309 21'POPLAR 90 3378 6'POPL RY 255 AR / pea .. TrileliClailittclei �_/�AA I �© 25G 20'PMAPE 3310 11 8 GUM R 9 39 5'POPLAR • / 25J 35'OAK BD 311 12'POPLAR >9 }60 e'GUY . 0 PROPOSED LMIS OF 25B 26'POPLAR/ �� ! f (RP.) 259 14'POPLAR 314 24'PPOPLAR 33833 26OAK Milestone o / •,_ 4� � /�Z_' 260 11'_POPLAR 316 16'PME 384 T CUM • 4� �F �` 26114 P PLR 31712'PINE 38518'OAK COMMUNICATIONS ((( .A•i1AI' \�� � , �,�9� 282 24'POPLAR 89327 9'BEEH386 16'OAK • ( "T itft /t1$ 4\ 9 262 4'POPLAR 32'/T BEECH 387 11'GUM - / \ \L / 1 ]' ^ 6 264 20'POPLAR 91 �F�}W,L 334 8'PINE /�<<�� -.YI�� P6uP99n 19 tnE RmmR �` .I*� 1-'(/% / LAAY8.ACCESS WM / "P'ki ,l �f� 4l /f \ PROJECT Nth 1050.213 r / 'r,Lj��. /!Y,`l� I D GNCR C.S. // /6 _o! FNgNEIIt MM. mil. ( , SCA 0 alk/ . frif GRAPHIC S'NF IN INCHES sa / �'�.�� j 'n*1/L�'/ ace i ER9=loam STONY POINT "�tikaq it gra r- �` "�""� VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. I. ►ioViI,t r is / I ���19J1�. *'"� 3827 STONY POINT RD / `� �`�a.;r„ CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA /• 01f 22911 TREE SURVEY PLAN 6,'Y2 ` `\ 2260'--- . tit I\\ TREE SURVEY PLAN I SHEET NUMBER: SGNE 1'-2rc Z-11 Li 4 ZAi Attachment B . l i - �� 4\\ /(TL LINE TYPES TREES TO BE REMOVED • entrex communication sorvle's.Inc. FENCE LWE- CHAINiiiiiiiii PT/ TREE SI /TYPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT23318'POPLAR 97 32317"POPLAR/ \ 1'CONTOUR LANE 236 18" POPLAR 324 17'POPLAR • • / 237 11•POPLAR 325 10"POPLAR 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 238 10'BEECH 326 16'POPLAR BETHESDA,MD 20817 •• 11 /Y /0 • 5'CONTOUR UNE 239 12"PINE 328 14"POPLAR PHONE:(202)408-0960 / !- 240 15'PINE 329 12'PINE FAX: (202)408-0961 \ 1 \ / / 241 11'POPLAR 330 5"OAK _ 1 \N LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 288 13'POPLAR 331 5'OAK �031 • 'N6UIG Ulf*makMING T� • ..,__•,,___...,.._. i -••---"-"------.------ 291 16'POPLAR 332 8'OAK 474\54" *•-........... a L1\ 292 23•POPLAR 89 333 22"POPLAR W ..—uf r.'` LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/SILT FENCE 48' E1051NG___ �' _ :� `�\y �) \�.\ 29311'POPLAR 339 1s POPLAR '•-,. `r:r:�,�. �::.: c _ _ M 294 18'POPLAR 339 16'POPLAR - -••�:- • \ 295 11'BEECH 343 13'PINE \ tiD ,�' -.s+-�.�*` �Oki% --1RE.E PROTECTION FENCE..--------- 344 6"GUM 1 297 17'POPLAR BUBMI7T/U.$ ^ 298 14'OAK 345 6'GUN / ��' \ 319 16"0AK 347 12"PINE DATE OESCRPIION REV. / - ` \=`` \ TREE OR VEGETATION UNE 320 12'POPLAR 349 12"PINE 06-30-17 ZONING REVIEW 321 21"POPLAR 381 8'GUM / .\ :-` 4. y�\ • 07-17-17 ZONING REVE9 •/ ---:;: A6 -•4[T,`` ` 06-16-17 ZONING REVEW /'/ MOF 0e.MA'����'- \ 09-19-17 COUTY C91I011S / OL1AL 2/Z-2 TT '�%ij . - Dom) \ �'.. - PROP06En LMTs CF \ TREES TO REMAIN - Nair DSTUReARLE(IYP.) •LRE / ` PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT AL N. / It \ 206 8"BEECH 265 16"POPLAR 335 10'PINE 207 9'PINE 266 28"POPLAR 93 337 18'OAK • 208 9'PINE 287 16-POPLAR 86 340 Y OAK \ \ — . fOlik . I \ 209 9"BEECN 2.69 2Y POPLAR 92 341 1Y PINE 1 / �.. 9 2 10'GUM 211 26'POPLAR 0 19"POPLAR 90 3482 6'•GUM OAK SEAL. / '.!\� /' 212 23"POPLAR 271 12"POPLAR 87 350 11'PINE \ / `�/tdii `��I , r NE 214 9'MAPLE 272 8-MAPLE 273 19"POPLAR M 352 6'POPLAR .isRLTH p 411 215 10'PINE 274 11'MAPLE 354 24"HICKORY pa FL/ • // 216 24'OAK 275 17"POPLAR 355 6"BIRCH ' �� Aribe / 217 19"OAK 276 19"POPLAR 356 14"POPLAR i -A S • \ / g218 24'POPLAR 277 19'POPLAR 357 10"PINE s{?,.••'219 24'POPLAR 278 8'BEECH 36 358 6'GUMe 1 /g \ E70S1p6�� 220 14"PINE 280 12'POPLAR 359 1Y POPLAR / 221 25'OAK 281 24'POPLAR 360 12"POPLAR a \ / / / AREA(TYPICAL) \ 222 29"POPLAR 282 18'POPLAR 361 8"HICKORY % 4'" \ ei0 �g223 18'OAK283 9' MAPLE362 6'PINES O�\[\I / 224 9'PINE284 15'POPLAR363 6'BIRCH �ONAL>=�• / 225 10'BEECH285 13'POPLAR364 12"PINE 9226 22'OAK286 24"POPLAR 92365 10"PINE 227 7•BEECH 287 24'POPLAR 91 366 5•GUMDW16M, / / 228 10'OAK \ / i 289 17'POPLAR 367 6"GUM / 235 13'POPLAR 290 9"PINE 73 368 8'PINE VP. / 242 13' POPLAR 296 22'POPLAR 92 369 6"GUM 1 \\./ 0 AP /i 243 12" POPLAR 301 21"POPLAR 370 16"POPLAR 244 10' POPLAR 302 8.OAK 371 20'POPLAR 245 8"POPLAR 303 8'POPLAR 372 8'GUM / CfP 246 9"MAPLE 304 26"POPLAR 88 373 6'HICKORY ,6A/ op, 247 9'POPLAR 305 21"POPLAR 87 374 10"PINE / �\ 252 19"MAPLE 83 306 14"POPLAR 79 375 15"OAK ' /p".q• 253 12" MAPLE 307 27"POPLAR 91 376 8'BIRCH 254 24'POPLAR 75 308 27"POPLAR 90 377 6'HICKORY %/� �, ,��> //\` 255 19"POPLAR 309 21"POPLAR 86 378 6'POPLAR /*� 4/ 256 20"MAPLE 310 12 GUM 379 5'POPLAR 257 35'OAK 80 311 12' POPLAR 79 360 6"GUM �.• N ('.',I� 258 26'POPLAR382 8'GUM / '.� ���t PR�OSfDIl11 OF 313616'PINE Milestone . . 4 � 4 O151UImesiE Or) 259 14" POPLAR 383 28'OAK r l/ 314 24"POPLAR firOwkL-4.- •�, J.` ! 260 11' POPLAR 384 Y GUM ,� (/may-/, 316 16'PINE 1�. / ,•� ' �� 261 14 POPLAR 318 9'BIRCH 385 iB•OAKCOMMUNICATIONS 262 24" _ 317 12'PINE ` . ,� 4S�! (- 0 //- 263 20"POPLAR 89 327 7'BEECH 387 I386 6'GUM/!�\ \�... /, �1 A, • i 264 20•POPLAR 91 / ` �pimal ..w // ',IMPOSED GRAVEL ACCESS oalE 334 8"PINE /• UNE TIP. •11,113"4t1.18T) / i PROJECT N0 1050.213 1 / we /i W.f* DESIGNER: C.S. / ` , /.� ��� ENGINEER: M.M. / '` 01 SCALE /. Oily - �� - 0 1/2_1 04 / i O GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES / ���'�_ � ' \ E>anR,G STONY POINT •• VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. J� ."►�/�!.• �� `� AREA(TYPICAL) / i jet ♦'ram 1t ,�� ,•. / " i1 d i .R 3827 STONY POINT RD / —` �, ► CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA Nies10 / 411itrAopt22911 / • 7171E: _ TREETOREM SURVEYAIN —`75422, 5�2sp~ r\ r V TREE SURVEY PLAN TREES TO REMAIN 1 LH SHEET NUMBERSCALE 1•-20' Z-I2 Z-12 T•STY • .� 6. ,Atti., 1 84 • ,�C1 ,A, 48 47-SO $�` 4t1.1SA1 k11A 48-11D s Areas Viewed During Balloon Test yap. 48.148 Slightly Visible - 01 47-53 4447, Not Visible - __ 01 a 600 0 Stonyp....Iht ` a %r 48-15 4`I4752 } Z a.s 47-68 , .41St-ny'PointES- ai -' _". VS Corresponding Pictures of Visibility _U tY Fk�Station �� A-View from Stony Point Fire Station Parking Lot 48•rea ;. 4>t-17 600 B-View from 3821 Stony Point Rd 5: 48-1e C-View from 3797 Stony Point Rd 48-180 D-View from driveway of 3755 Stony Point Rd 47�728 48-1:9 48.'18,y 1 I' 47-S1A it -2x ,21 48,.11►Eli Wn Si'`' 4 O < II wk p$•° Y m t 4 PO'' A48.2441. 7 47 71 N 8B Ir • iw. . (' r} 48-20 it �' two 44-27A ' . ' gRa�stCN "T n .s c FL4NNfGAN = n A) View from Stony Point Fire Station Parking Lot Zoomed in view ,�- y ' � ,; 3 a' S FF , 3 — Overview , �x8: Coln ^ 1 Y I 1 i r4 P 48.16 Fin Station 48.p6 �... 41447 'A48.16G tee •' G 48484 ° 48-168 -16A .a. S eD r=. B) View from 3821 Stony Point Rd Zoomed in view • y a I Overview Jj6 �VqM ' 1!1 Fr*Mahon 111.17 K��. AGA 4*.71 g C) View from 3797 Stony Point Rd Zoomed in view • • Overview is yir• „lot. 41-14 Fr.slabon . ,�;.�� a-re , � al/ 43.1681 ASA 111.21 • D) View from driveway of 3755 Stony Point Rd Zoomed in view - x Ati • w• - ♦. j V • Overview its, yp119 FYI st T N-1 .)4416C . R•1U0 48.111s .11u "} 1 y� ti� �aa„ F `.I A, Attachment D 4 '. U A County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Christopher Perez From: Bill Fritz,AICP Date: March 21,2016 Subject: SP 2016-04 Albemarle High School Communication Facility If this application is approved it will be impacted by the FCC's action published January 8,2015 which includes provisions addressing State and Local Review of Applications for Wireless Service Facility Modification. The FCC rule,in part, limits the ability of the County to review additional uses and modifications to wireless facilities. The County's ability to deny additional antenna,modification of antenna and increases in the tower height is limited. The County may only deny changes to the facility if - The tower is increased in height by more than 20 feet;or - Antenna or other equipment would protrude more than twenty feet from the tower;or - More than four ground based cabinets are added;or - Excavation occurs outside the lease area; or - The change would defeat concealment elements. The Zoning Ordinance defines"concealment elements of the eligible support structure"(this tower if approved would be an eligible support structure): "Concealment elements of the eligible support structure:Any condition of approval,including any applicable requirement of section 5.1.40 in effect at the time of approval, established and imposed on the personal wireless service facility as a concealment technique and which includes conditions or regulations pertaining to antenna size,color of the structure and all equipment,antenna mounting techniques, including the requirement that antennas be flush mounted,maximum tower diameters at the base and top, limitations on tower height relative to a reference tree, screening by trees including the restrictions on removing trees that are screening the tower,siting towers so that they are not skylighted, requirements as to how cables should be located on a tower,and the size,location,design,and screening for ground based equipment." • It is recommended that staff identify for the Board what if any features of the facility may be considered "concealment elements of the eligible support structure". If the Board of Supervisors approves this request it is recommended that they identify what,if any,conditions of approval should be considered"concealment elements of the eligible support structure". Without citing any"concealment elements of the eligible support structure"the County will be required to approve any requested changes that do not violate limitations cited above. If you would like something to be prepared as an attachment for the staff report please let me know and I will prepare something. Attachment E Citizen Correspondence Received 1) Staff received written feedback from 3 citizens in support of the facility. The feedback received revolved around the need for improved cellular service in this • area of the County. 2) Staff received correspondence from 1 citizen in opposition to the facility. The correspondence comprised of numerous emails,voicemails,phone calls, and in person conversations.The feedback received focused on concerns of the health effect caused by the facility(to children,pregnant women, and anyone else who lives nearby),requests to notify the parents of students at the elementary school of the proposal, concerns about the negative impacts to property values caused by the facility, concerns about the potential for the facility to catch fire and start a forest fire, concerns about the view of the monopole&ground equipment from the nature trail behind the elementary school, and concerns about the view from Route 20 and surrounding properties. 3) Staff received verbal feedback from a couple walking their property during the Tuesday,August 22nd balloon test.They requested another balloon test be performed during the winter months to better gauge the visibility after the leaves have fallen off the trees. 4) Staff received feedback from 2 citizens interested in receiving more information about the proposal.No follow-up correspondence was received by staff from these citizens after they were provided with the requested information about the proposal. 5) A community meeting was held on Monday,Aug 21 at 6:30pm.The meeting was attended by 4 citizens (3 of the same citizens referred to above,and 1 additional citizen), a handful of Fire Fighters with the Stony Point station,PC and BOS members,the applicants representatives,two county staff members, and a uniformed police officer. Attachment E • Citizen Support of the Proposal (correspondence provided after this sheet) Attachment E Christopher Perez From: Charlie Armstrong <CharlesA@southern-development.com> Sent: Tuesday,August 15,2017 4:41 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: 'Lori.Schweller@leclairryan.com' Subject FW:Introduction to Milestone Communications Project Chris, I write to express my SUPPORT for this SP application. My kids attend Stony Point Elementary and we would love to have better wireless coverage in that area. We need this infrastructure. Thanks, Charlie Armstrong From: STONY POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL[mailto:emall@blackboard.com] Sent:Tuesday,August 15, 2017 12:42 PM To: uvaalum@gmail.com Subject: Introduction to Milestone Communications Project A message from STONY POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Dear Members of our School Community: We recently learned that Milestone Communications,which is a developer of wireless communications infrastructure projects,will be holding a community meeting on August 21 from 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. at the Stony Point Fire Station. This meeting will provide information and answer questions about a proposal by the company to install a monopole near the fire station that will house up to four antennas for wireless carriers. This pole will not be located on school property and our school division is not involved with this project. Nonetheless,we want to ensure that you are aware of the August 21 meeting ahead of time in the event you would like to attend. Attached you will find a copy of a letter from Milestone Communications with more details about their proposed project and with instructions on whom you may contact for more information. Sincerely, Andy Johnson Principal Stony Point Elementary School File attachments: Balloon Test and Community Meeting Notice Stony Point Communications- 8....pdf This e-mail has been sent to you by STONY POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.To maximize their communication with you,you may be receiving this e-mail in addition to a phone cull with the same message.If you no longer wish to receive email notifications from STONY POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,please click here to unsubseribe. 1 • Attachment E (.. • Christopher Perez From: Mary Tise(gmail) <mary.tise@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,August 21,2017 10:21 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc shackelfordl@aol.com;Corkey Shackleford Subject: Milestone/Shentel cell tower application Chris, Thank you for the opportunity to follow up my comments at this evening's public hearing for the cell tower installation at Stony Point VFD. • I want to reiterate the need for reliable cell service in this area of the county. It's my view Stony Point is underserved in terms of cell service from ANY provider,even though the population appears to be increasing along with the traffic out here. My provider is AT&T; in order to get a signal to send you this email, I am sitting in a window on the second floor of my parents'house. A call to my husband in Delaware from my cell phone earlier today cut off when I stepped from the front yard onto the porch. The many commuters,tourists,and delivery trucks that travel Rt.20 are undoubtedly frustrated by the poor cell reception in this area. I appreciate Albemarle County's diligence in conducting public hearings,and I recognize the importance of protecting the health our children and residents as one factor in deciding where to approve cell tower construction. However, I want to emphasize the need for reliable cell service in the Stony Point area. Cell service has become a basic utility,and I urge Albemarle County to find a way to encourage its development here. Many thanks! Mary Shackelford Tise 1 Attachment E Christopher Perez From: Shackelfordl@aol.com Sent: Monday,August 21,2017 11:47 PM To: mary.tise@gmail.com;Christopher Perez Cc: Corkey Shackleford Subject Re: Milestone/Shentel cell tower application Chris, I agree completely with Mary Tise's comments. I live at 3733 Stony Point Pass,which is about a quarter mile from the Stony Point Fire Station. My cell carrier is Verizon,and the signal around my house is weak and unreliable.We definitely need better cell service in this area! Thanks, Fred Shackelford In a message dated 8/21/2017 10:22:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mary.tise@gmail.com writes: Chris, Thank you for the opportunity to follow up my comments at this evening's public hearing for the cell tower installation at Stony Point VFD. I want to reiterate the need for reliable cell service in this area of the county. It's my view Stony Point is underserved in terms of cell service from ANY provider, even though the population appears to be increasing along with the traffic out here. My provider is AT&T; in order to get a signal to send you this email, I am sitting in a window on the second floor of my parents'house. A call to my husband in Delaware from my cell phone earlier today cut off when I stepped from the front yard onto the porch. The many commuters,tourists,and delivery trucks that travel Rt. 20 are undoubtedly frustrated by the poor cell reception in this area. • I appreciate Albemarle County's diligence in conducting public hearings, and I recognize the importance of protecting the health our children and residents as one factor in deciding where to approve cell tower construction. However, I want to emphasize the need for reliable cell service in the Stony Point area. Cell service has become a basic utility, and I urge Albemarle County to find a way to encourage its development here. Many thanks! Mary Shackelford Tise 1 Attachment E • Citizen Opposition to the Proposal (printable correspondence provided after this sheet) Attachment E C Schweller, Lori H. From: ryan@rellinc.com Sent Tuesday,August 08,2017 7:11 AM To: Schweller,Lori H. Subject: Proposed cell tower stony point I received your letter about the proposed cell tower at the spvfc. I assume I received this letter because I live close to the proposed site. However I would like to know if you have contacted the parents of all the children that attend Stony Point Elementary school? As the children are the ones most endangered by the RF radiation emitted by the proposed tower. I have contacted a law firm that specializes in anti cell tower litigation to level the playing field here. If you think that parents will approve of their children being exposed to RF radiation the entire time they are at school which makes them more • likely to get cancer you are wrong. Have you done any research on the negative affects of humans? Do you think it is wise to install this tower right next to an elementary school? Sincerely Ryan Estes 3914 Stony Point Keswick VA 1 Attachment E Voicemail Message from Ryan Estes (8.10.17 at 7:37 AM) Hey Lori this is Ryan Estes 3914 Stony Point, Keswick, Virginia we spoke on the phone the other day regarding the proposed 138 foot monopole cell tower that could carry antennas from up to 4 providers, going in right next to the elementary school here. My concern is really for the parents of the children who will be involuntarily receiving all this extra radiation while they are at school everyday, throughout the school year. I've talked to you and you've told me that letters were mailed to all neighbors within a half mile, however that doesn't include our neighbors right across the street at the school, those kids who are most susceptible to the radiation and by the way as you suggested I've been doing my own research and I am very concerned with what I have found. So again back to the parents, I have talked to the principal across the street and he has no knowledge of this, I've been to the county's website, the school website and there is no mention of this. And it seems like this balloon test is going to be held either on the first day of school or the day before, now a law firm has been hired I guess to convince all of us locals that this is okay. I'm not sure why a law firm has been hired since their job is lawyers convince people, they make arguments. You know I think it makes more sense to have, like a radiologist or you know somebody like that, I'm sure you will probably have one at the meeting whose on the payroll there for the tower folks. It's a little slick that there is a law firm here that we've heard nothing from the people at the firehouse, you know we haven't heard anything from them and how they stand to gain from this, how much they want this to happen. We have gotten a letter from LeClairRyan and you know they are attorneys, so that's pretty slick, especially since you don't intend on notifying these children, or im sorry the parents of the children. Now again, first day of school coming up I would think that you would rather the parents hear about this from you, from the county, or from the firehouse, rather than me or the entire street that I live on which in front of the school being clustered with signs asking how much radiation is enough for your kid, a sign stating keep cell phone towers away from our elementary school, I mean I think that is going to cause a lot of concern especially on the first day of school especially if the county hasn't notified them and they are only finding out by these roadside signs littering the streets up and down Stony Point Road right across the street right across the street from the Elementary School. So I've talked to my neighbors and this sign thing is looking pretty promising, you know we are going to have the whole street covered and you know Mr. Christopher Perez the guy in charge of this for the county he's not returning my call, I've left two messages, with two simple questions. 1) Do you think this is an appropriate installation right next to an Elementary School? 2) Do you think it is wise? Don't you think the parents deserve to know well, he's not returning my call I guess he doesn't want to answer my questions, but I can understand why given the position that he is in. So, I'm just imploring with you Lori to let these parent know what their kids are going to be receiving in school and I don't mean an education I meal all that extra radiation. I mean we've all got smart meters in for our power meters outside delivering radiation. I have high voltage wires behind my house as well as in trash cans on a stick. The last thing I need is more radiation from a 138 foot tower, so again I implore you to contact the parents or implore you to urge the county contact these parents its simply not right for the parents not to be aware of this. It makes no sense to me for you to mail a letter to everyone within a half mile or well what about the kids, the kids are going to be closer to this than anyone else and you are Attachment E • • not going to inform the parents in any way shape or form? I mean as parent, don't you think that is wrong? I mean I know you are here to convince us that this is right and this is all good and that we should just relax because it's federally regulated and under the current administration that really scares me, that really really scares me. So again, you know the parents think they should be notified, I think you know I'm giving you some time to save face here, the county as well. So you guys can do the right thing and notify the parents or they are going to be seeing some shocking signs in front of the school, across the street from the school where we all live here and I just think you'd get a better response if you did the right thing and have the county or the firehouse or even a slick law firm letter from an attorney or something like that to contact the parents or let them know if you contacted all the neighbors within a half mile why haven't you contacted the parents of the kids who are going to be right underneath this thing, it makes no sense whatsoever, so again I'm going to implore you to do the right thing and contacts to the parents, whether the county does or the firehouse does or whether another law firm does, I don't know. Certainly they have the right to know and I really hope you follow up on that and save a lot of face if you just came right out and say hey this is what we are thinking about doing and can we get your input on it, but it seems kinda slick, pretty slick that you are going to skirt this parents on this one, I just cant understand it makes no sense to me. And again what kind of backlash is there going to be on the first day of school and they start seeing these signs about keeping these cell phone towers away from our elementary schools and how much radiation is enough for your kid? And you now concerns about leukemia, brain development issues, sterility you know all these things about radiation, and have know to cause. Again, you know I am asking you to do the right thing contact parents, I think the parents are going to be really upset if they have to learn about this from you know signs across the street from the school from neighbors who have been notified about this, while they haven't. I think that you are going to get backlash from upset parents who want to know why they weren't informed that their kids are going to be receiving all this extra radiation 8 hours a day, every day of the school year. So again that is really it, I don't even need a call back just • need you to do the right thing and make sure the parents are going to be notified of this in some way because they are the closest neighbors to that cell phone tower aside from the firehouse fellas but again the kids are again the most susceptible and I think that would be great if you did the right thing and notified the parents, you know if there is backlash because they are upset because they weren't notified and nobody sent them a letter, the county did nothing to notify them, but hey when I took my kid to school on the first day I'm seeing all these signs protesting cell phone towers what's that about? Are you guys gonna put? I just don't see that going well for you so just a head up. Have a good day! 2 Attachment E From:ryan(arcllinc.coui [mailtoryan@rellinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 22,2017 3;49 PM To: Schweller, Lori H. Subject:Todays meeting Lori I did want to write you to comment on the fact that when I arrived at the firehouse this morning at 9 am after leaving work I was told by spvfc personnel that their was no meeting today and that the meeting was yesterday. I produced your letter which for some reason gives the later date first and showed him that he was in fact uninformed. He conceded he knew nothing about it. No personnel from yesterdays meeting were present out front.Their was no sign or letter taped to the door. Nothing. I wandered around back'and found you meanwhile other people were arriving while NOBODY was out front to tell them we were all in back. It just seemed very unprofessional. After a while another fire man came around back and asked who we all were and what we were doing there. The lack of communication and forthrightness surrounding this tower really concerns me. Especially the lack of concern for the elementary school. I would like to know if you have checked in with the folks at Park Hill Farm who are 1.7 miles from the proposed site to see if they will accept your devices on their tower? Thank you Ryan Estes 3914 Stony Point Keswick VA 22947 * This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail with a copy to emailadministrator@leclairryan.com and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. 2 Attachment E ) • Voicemail Message from Ryan Estes (8.24.17) Hey Lori, Ryan Estes, 3914 Stony Point got your letter here full of untruths, the packet full of untruths that clearly states the untruth of cell towers do not affect property values, well why don't you sign this thing and lets go ahead and make a contract between me and either the law firm that you work for or the tower people that you work for,let's go ahead and create a contract and get signatures on it that makes the same promises that these cell phone towers that do not affect property values. Because I have worked for several realtors and they tell me differently, people don't want to live next to these things,just like I don't want to live next to these things just like the parents at the school threw a fit when they approved one on top of the school and I think that is where I am going to get my fraction here and get this thing stopped is with the parents of these kindergartners and stuff over here. You didn't acknowledge the parents over here at the school in your letter full of untruths; a big untruth in your letter is that Jamie Dennis, the paid Shentel Engineer that spoke at the meeting. When are we going to get some unbiased, unpaid people to talk about this thing—oh, that's right, we are not. He explained to us that the Stony Point area is high priority for Shentel because of lack of coverage. Well, I hope you can make this call out because I am speaking to you on my cell phone from inside my home which currently displays that I have three bars of 4G service so the lack of coverage here that Mr. Dennis is explaining to us I don't need it explained because I have a cell phone and it works great, right here in my home. So that's not true, that's not true at all, my coverage is great here, and-- what am I-- 1500 feet from the proposed tower wants to go in? Wow, so I'm just going to go ahead and throw this stuff away. The obvious propaganda that it's only here to forward your agenda, there is no unbiased material. There is nothing from anyone that is not being unpaid to you know just put this forward this agenda; it is all about getting this tower built. I guess the tower people that hired your law firm knew that, and that is why they went ahead and got all lawyered up from the get go so you can make all these promises but not back any of them up. You know what really, Lori, that's all you have to do is put it in writing and make a promise to me or the whole community would be better and to all the parents at the school and just go ahead and put in a contract everything that you are telling us,that this will have no negative impacts on the community, no negative impacts on health, no negative impacts on property values. This is going to be nothing but great, great, great go ahead and put it in writing for us and sign it so that we can have your word that that is the case, because I think that we all know that 5-10 years Attachment E from now we are going to find out this thing is bad for us, and you are going to be down the road still getting towers put up, and you are going to say oh I had nothing to do with that, that's not my fault. So you know there is no accountability here, everybody is telling us all these towers are great,they aren't going to hurt you one bit.We need it,we need the coverage because the lack of coverage, put it down on paper and sign it, you are a lawyer make a contract, make a contract with all homeowners here at Stony Point and all the parents over at the school that this isn't going to negatively affect our health, that this isn't going to negatively affect our property values. You can do that, can't you? But you won't, but you won't because you know that you cannot guarantee anything on this. Except that you'll get paid, the boys at the firehouse will get paid, and the county will be happy. You know, forget the kindergartners that are going to glow by the time they are in 5th grade. So, there's no mention of the parents here in your letter of lies that I got from you here, no mention of the parents whatsoever, which I find odd because when we initially spoke you told me you were doing this for the parents for the poor little Jimmy's and Janie's over at the school that didn't have internet and then we had our meeting, and it's like the last thing anyone wanted to talk about, was the school. It's weird, so which is it? So it rained today and I've got 10 pieces of poster board here with some letters and I am going to do the best I can to try to get these parents up in arms, because I think once they know about this and once they know that you are trying to put a tower 700 feet from where their 5 year old plays everyday I don't think they are going to be into it, because they like me are going to know that you can't guarantee us anything, that you are telling us everything, Lori, you're telling us everything but you are not showing me anything.You are sending me these packages that say oh the coverage is in desperate need in your area, well let me know if you haven't been able to make out this message because I am on my cell phone walking around my house, and I've got plenty of service, my coverage is fine-right here. So I don't know maybe send me a contract Lori, send me a contract that guarantees that we are not going to have any adverse affects from this with these health, with property values, any of that and give me an avenue to where I can get, you know compensated when years down the road when I can't sell this house because there is a tower right across the street and when I've got brain cancer because there is a tower across the street, give me that contract so in 10 years when bad things starts happening I've got some recourse and I can go to you and say hey, Lori, I need some money because I can't sell my house because of the tower that you guys put up and I am sick because the tower you guys put up and the whole 2 ATTACHMENT E. time you were telling me oh this is a great thing and there are no adverse impacts and its going to be great, great, great and it does not affect your property values and it's not going to affect your health. Put it in writing, Lori, put it in writing to tell me everything and showing me nothing. Send us a contract that puts this in writing so that we'll have some recourse later down the road. But right now you are just blowing smoke,just blowing smoke, Lori, and you sending me this letter where you tell me that the Shentel engineer who spoke at the meeting explained that Stony Point area is high priority because of lack of coverage. What about my coverage I got right now? Three bars,AT&T, 4G crystal, crystal clear, crystal clear. So what do you have to say about that? The lack of coverage, my coverage is great. That is just untruth to me as well as the packet entitled cell phone towers do not affect property values,what a blanket statement,what an untruth. So anyway this is good, I am going to show this to some of the parents that are going to be coming across the street to talk to me tomorrow when'I get these signs up, and I will be marching come 8:00, I will be marching. So.anyway I hope you are having a good day selling you soul to these cell phone folks and if you would put everything you are saying in writing, it contract form I would love, love it if you would mail that to me signed with you know recourse for us for when this thing turns out to be not the, not the positive, positive, positive impact all around that you say it is going to be. So, yeah,thanks! 3 ATTACHMENT Voicemail Message from Ryan Estes (8.24.17) Hey Lori, Ryan Estes 3914 Stony Point, Keswick, Virginia. I sent you an email yesterday evening. I took your advice and was doing some of my own research on this thing and cell towers have a proven negative impact on property values. It's not a mixed opinion like the health issues. It's a definite; you know that space needle looking antenna thing popping through the woods, popping through the treeline right behind all these homes is certainly going to affect these values. I wouldn't buy a house near a cell tower especially with the visibility that this tower offers. So I just want to give you a fair warning I am going to go door to door this weekend and we are going to go full signage Monday morning and rally the troops. I know the parents are the only way to get this thing stopped, so we are going to go ahead and appeal to the kindergartners whose parents will be sending their five year old to a school to receive radiation for the next six years every day, every moment while they are at school. I just can't believe that you think that that's right, but I guess they're paying you guys really well, so maybe that just okay with you, but yeah its come to that. Nobody is paying any attention to this thing. Nobody is talking about it, the firehouse folks don't want to talk about it and they are the applicants and that's because they know that if the parents find out about this thing they are going to raise holy heck and come Monday morning the parents are going to know all about this thing, but if you give me a call back and advise me on the property values situation since you guys seem to know everything about this and tell us that we have nothing to worry about whatsoever, so if you could comment on the property value situation I'd love to hear what you have to say.Thank you. ATTACHMENT • Christopher Perez From: ryan@rellinc.com Sent: Friday,August 25,2017 7:18 AM To: Schweller, Lori H. Cc: Christopher Perez;cris@milestonecorp.com;CHarold@milestonecorp.com Subject: RF exposure to Pregnant women and children Lori I am still waiting for you to tell me how the proposed tower will affect our property values? My latest research indicates that pregnant women and children are most at risk to your towers radiation. A Harvard study shows that children have increased hyperactivity and lower brain function when exposed to RF. Your emails do not show any text just your legal notice. Feel free to call and leave a message 434-977-7134 to explain how the proposed 135'cell tower will affect our property values. I would appreciate it if you answered my question. Thanks Ryan Estes 3914 Stony Point Keswick VA 1 Attachment F • ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE b. The applicant shall demonstrate that he has made a determined effort to reduce reliance on single occupancy vehicle use by putting in place incentives and/or employee programs to encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles. Where public transit reasonably could be made available,the applicant should demonstrate that efforts have been made to coordinate rotates and times with the public transportation service and the workforce hours. c. The parking lot shall be located, designed and constructed to reduce or eliminate significant visual impacts from all public streets, private roads and adjacent properties, and to reduce or eliminate other significant impacts to adjacent properties resulting from vehicular noise, dust, artificial lighting, glare, runoff, degradation of water quality and other similar disturbances. d. The applicant shall submit a conceptual plan or a site plan with his application for a special use permit. The plan shall show the approximate location of the parking lot on the property, its dimensions, its access to a public street, its distance from the off-site parking to the industrial site, and shall identify how persons will be transported or will transport themselves from the off-site parking to the building or use. The plan shall also show all features of the parking lot, which will insure that the parking lot will not adversely change the character of, or significantly impact, the area surrounding the property on which the parking lot is proposed, and will impact to the least extent practicable the property on which the parking lot is proposed. The features which shall be shown on the conceptual plan or site plan, and which may be required as a condition of approval of a special use permit,include but are not limited to: 1. Visual or noise barriers such as earthen berms, the existing or planned terrain and/or vegetative screening; 2. Proposed construction elements, which shall include elements which will minimize noise, light pollution, dust, glare, and runoff and which will protect water quality and protect trees designated to be preserved and will result in no significant degradation to the environment; 3. A lighting plan which identifies the location and design of all outdoor light structures and fixtures,demonstrates that all outdoor lights comply with section 4.12.6.4 and demonstrates that all outdoor lights will be shielded in such a manner that all light emitted from the fixture, either directly from the lamp or indirectly from the fixture, is projected below the horizontal plane of the fixture;and 4. Changes proposed to the entrance and public road, including any necessary road-widening,or grading and removal of trees to accommodate sight distance. e. The off-site parking and loading requirements set forth in section 4.12 shall apply to the off-site parking subject to this section,except as expressly provided otherwise therein. 5.1.40 PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES; COLLOCATION, REPLACEMENT, AND REMOVAL OF TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT The purpose of section 5.1.40 is to implement the personal wireless service facilities policy,adopted as part of the comprehensive plan, in a manner that complies with Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)) for new personal wireless service facilities and collocations and replacements that result in a substantial change in the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure; and to implement Section 6409(a)of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012(47 U.S.C. § 1455) and 47 CFR § 1.40001 for collocations and replacements that do not result in a substantial change in the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure. Each personal wireless service facility and the transmission equipment of any other wireless service shall be subject to the following, as applicable: 18-5-20 Zoning Supplement#89,4-8-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE a. Application for approval: An application providing the following information shall be required for each personal wireless service facility (hereinafter, "facility") and transmission equipment that will be collocated or replace existing equipment on an eligible support structure: ' yaril tryp'O.OINV)n atiMI': Application Requirementsi trs qjg[GIR 1. Application form and signatures. A completed application form, signed by the parcel X X X X owner, the parcel owner's agent or the contract purchaser, and the proposed facility's owner.If the owner's agent signs the application,he shall also submit written evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.If the contract purchaser signs the application, he shall also submit the owner's written consent to the application. 2. Plat or survey of the parcel. A recorded plat or recorded boundary survey of the parcel X X X X on which the facility will be located; provided, if neither a recorded plat nor boundary survey exists, a copy of the legal description of the parcel and the Albemarle County Circuit Court deed book and page number. 3. Ownership. The identity of the owner of the parcel and, if the owner is other than a real X X X X person, the complete legal name of the entity, a description of the type of entity, and written documentation that the person signing on behalf of the entity is authorized to do so. 4. Plans and supporting drawings, calculations, and documentation. Except where the X X X X facility will be located entirely within an eligible support structure or an existing building, a scaled plan and a scaled elevation view and other supporting drawings, calculations, and other documentation required by the agent, signed and sealed by an appropriate licensed professional.The plans and supporting drawings,calculations, and documentation shall show: (a) Existing and proposed improvements. The location and dimensions of all existing x x x x and proposed improvements on the parcel including access roads and structures, the location and dimensions of significant natural features, and the maximum height above ground of the facility(also identified in height above sea level). (b) Elevation and coordinates. The benchmarks and datum used for elevations shall X X X X coincide with the State Plane VA South US Survey Feet based on the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83), and the benchmarks shall be acceptable to the county engineer. (c) Design. The design of the facility, including the specific type of support structure X X X X and the design, type, location, size, height, and configuration of all existing and proposed antennas and other equipment. (d) Color. Identification of each paint color on the facility, by manufacturer color X X X X name and color number. A paint chip or sample shall be provided for each color. (e) Topography. Except where the facility would be attached to an eligible support X X structure or an existing building,the topography within two thousand(2,000) feet of the proposed facility, in contour intervals not to exceed ten (10) feet for all lands within Albemarle County and, in contour intervals shown on United States Geological Survey topographic survey maps or the best topographic data available,for lands not within Albemarle County. (t) Trees.The caliper and species of all trees where the dripline is located within fifty X X X (50) feet of the facility.The height, caliper, and species of any tree that the applicant is relying on to provide screening of the monopole or tower.The height, caliper and species of the reference tree.The caliper and species of all trees that will be adversely impacted or removed during installation or maintenance of the 18-5-21 Zoning Supplement#92,7-5-15 Attachment F • ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ,„ � A hoationRequirements s1 YP�e3f�A}ipheahoSih ' x t`:ww"'A: mi,�,R. reltv facility shall be noted,regardless of their distances to the facility. (g) Setbacks,parking,fencing, and landscaping. All existing and proposed setbacks, X X X X parking,fencing,and landscaping. (h) Location of accessways. The location of all existing vehicular accessways and the X X X X location and design of all proposed vehicular accessways. (i) Location of certain structures and district boundaries. Except where the facility X X X would be attached to an eligible support structure or an existing building, residential and commercial structures; and residential and rural areas district boundaries. (j) Proximity to airports. If the proposed monopole or tower will be taller than one X X hundred fifty (150) feet, the proximity of the facility to commercial and private airports. 5. Photographs. Photographs of the location of the proposed monopole or tower shall be X X provided that include, for applications for Tier II facilities, the reference tree, and for applications for Tier III facilities, the area within fifty (50) feet of the proposed monopole or tower.These photographs shall include reference points to enable the lease area,the vehicular access,the trees that will remain,and the trees that will be removed, to be identified. In addition, photographs, where possible, or perspective drawings of the facility site and all existing facilities within two hundred (200) feet of the site, if any,and the area surrounding the site. 6. Balloon tests. For any proposed monopole or tower,photographs taken of a balloon test, which shall be conducted,if requested by the agent,as follows: (a) Scheduling. The applicant shall contact the agent within ten (10) days after the X X date the application was submitted to schedule a date and time when the balloon test will be conducted. The test shall be conducted within forty(40)days after the • date the application was submitted,and the applicant shall provide the agent with at least seven (7) days prior notice; provided that this deadline may be extended due to inclement weather or by the agreement of the applicant and the agent. (b) Marking key boundaries and locations. Prior to the balloon test,the locations of X X the access road,the lease area,the tower site,the reference tree,and the tallest tree within twenty five (25) feet of the proposed monopole shall be surveyed and staked or flagged in the field. (c) Balloon height. The test shall consist of raising one or more balloons from the X X facility site to a height equal to the proposed facility. (d) Balloon color or material. The balloons shall be of a color or material that X X provides maximum visibility. (e) Photographing balloon test. The photographs of the balloon test shall be taken X X from the nearest residence and from appropriate locations on abutting properties, along each publicly used road from which the balloon is visible, and other properties and locations as deemed appropriate by the agent. The applicant shall identify the camera type, film size, and focal length of the lens for each photograph. • 18-5-22 Zoning Supplement#92,7-8-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE LBEMARLE COUNTY CODE - x• s Fl,„,.a " % LTY ffA ppheaio« „7 Application Requirements r� ply .III 7. Additions of antennas. If antennas are proposed to be added to an eligible support X X X X structure or an existing building, all existing antennas and other equipment on the structure, building, or facility, as well as all ground equipment, shall be identified by owner, type, and size. The method(s) by which the antennas will be attached to the mounting structure shall be depicted. 8. Site under conservation or open space easement. If the proposed facility would be X X located on lands subject to a conservation easement or an open space easement,a copy of the recorded deed of easement and the express written consent of all easement holders to the proposed facility. 9. Photographic simulations.At the request of the agent, photographic simulations of the X X proposed facility. 10. Statement of justification for exempt collocation. If the application is for an exempt X collocation, a statement of the justification for the application qualifying as an exempt collocation. 11. Evidence of prior approval. Approval letters or actions from the County authorizing X the initial construction of the facility and any approval letters or actions for modifications of the facility after initial construction. If no approvals were granted by the County for the facility the applicant shall provide evidence that the facility was constructed lawfully. 12. Special exception. If the proposed facility does not comply with any provision of X X X section 5.1.40, the applicant shall request a special exception in writing as part of the application.The request shall identify which regulation in section 5.1.40 for the special exception is requested and a justification for the special exception. The following abbreviations are used in this table: I,II,and III:Refer to Tier I,Tier II,and Tier III facilities,respectively. C/R:Refers to exempt collocations and exempt replacements of transmission equipment. X:Refers to a requirement that applies to the corresponding facility or transmission equipment. b. Development requirements.Each facility or transmission equipment may be established upon approval as provided in subsection (c) provided that the application satisfies the applicable requirements of subsection (a) and demonstrates that the facility or transmission equipment will be installed and operated in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter,and the following: 4-= t.y s,- • 4 . . , ° $. _ FIS Apphcat rn Development Requirements")3 �,42 :es , ta „ )-x h.Z*7.'.Km^C 9PIIL C/li 1. General design. The facility shall be designed,installed,and maintained as follows: (a) Guy wires.Guy wires are prohibited. X X X (b) Outdoor lighting. Outdoor lighting for the facility shall be permitted only during X X X maintenance periods; regardless of the lumens emitted, each outdoor luminaire shall be fully shielded as required by section.4.17;provided that these restrictions shall not apply to any outdoor lighting required by federal law. (c) Ground equipment. Any ground equipment shelter not located within an eligible X X X support structure or an existing building shall be screened from all lot lines either by terrain, existing structures, existing vegetation, or by added vegetation approved by the agent. (d) Whip antenna.A whip antenna less than six(6)inches in diameter may exceed the X X X height of the facility,the eligible support structure,or the existing building. 18-5-22.1 Zoning Supplement#92,7-8-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE r -. n.;1 � _ ^' � m , v 9,` "e ot7Apphcati l r c Development Requirements ^' , ,�15 ' 4 , 41.11 (e) Grounding rod.A grounding rod, whose height shall not exceed two (2) feet and X X X whose width shall not exceed one(1)inch in diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the facility, the eligible support structure,or - the existing building. 2. Antennas and associated equipment Antennas and associated equipment that are not X X X entirely within a proposed facility, an eligible support structure,or an existing building . shall be subject to the following: (a) Number of arrays.The total number of arrays of antennas shall not exceed three X X X (3). All types of antennas and dishes, regardless of their use, shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays. (b) Size.Each antenna proposed under the pending application shall not exceed the size X X X • shown on the application,which size shall not exceed one thousand four hundred (1400)square inches. (c) Projection.No antenna shall project from the facility,structure or building beyond X X X the minimum required by the mounting equipment,and in no case shall the closest point of the back of the antenna be more than twelve(12)inches from the facility, structure, or building, and in no case shall the farthest point of the back of the antenna be more than eighteen(18)inches from the facility,structure,or building; X X X and (d) Color. Each antenna and associated equipment shall be a color that matches the facility,structure or building. 3. Tree conservation plan;content. Before the building official issues a building permit for X X X the facility, the applicant shall submit a tree conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist.The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review and approval to ensure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall specify tree protection methods and procedures, identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the installation, operation and maintenance of the facility, and identify all dead and dying trees that are recommended to be removed. In approving the plan, the agent may identify additional trees or lands up to two hundred(200)feet from the lease area to be included in the plan. 4. Creation of slopes steeper than 2:1. No slopes associated with the installation of the X X X facility and its accessory uses shall be created that are steeper than 2:1 unless retaining walls,revetments,or other stabilization measures acceptable to the county engineer are employed. 5. Ground equipment shelter;fencing; Any ground equipment shelter not located within an X X X existing building shall be fenced only with the approval of the agent upon finding that the fence: (i) would protect the facility from trespass in areas of high volumes of vehicular or pedestrian traffic or,in the rural areas,to protect the facility from livestock or wildlife;(ii)would not be detrimental to the character of the area;and(iii)would not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare. 6. Screening and siting to minimize visibility. The site shall provide adequate opportunities X X for screening and the facility shall be sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets, regardless of their distance from the facility. The facility also shall be sited to minimize its visibility from any entrance corridor overlay district, state scenic river,national park or national forest,regardless of whether the site is adjacent to the district, river, park or forest. If the facility would be located on lands subject to a conservation easement or an open space easement, or adjacent to a conservation easement or open space easement,the facility shall be sited so that it is not visible from any resources specifically identified for protection in the deed of easement. 18-5-22.2 Zoning Supplement#92,7-8-15 • Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE Developmen Requirements P191 toe 7. Open space plan resources. The facility shall not adversely impact resources identified i X X the natural resources chapter of the county's comprehensive plan and the parks and gree systems chapters in any county master plan. 8. Horizontal separation of multiple facilities. The facility shall not be located so that it X and three(3)or more existing or approved personal wireless service facilities would be within an area comprised of a circle centered anywhere on the ground having a radius of two hundred(200)feet. 9. Diameter of monopole. The maximum base diameter of the monopole shall be thirty X (30)inches and the maximum diameter at the top of the monopole shall be eighteen(18) inches. . 10. Height of monopole. The top of the monopole,measured in elevation above mean sea X level, shall not be more than ten(10)feet taller than the tallest tree within twenty-five (25)feet of the monopole,and shall include any base,foundation or grading that raises the monopole above the pre-existing natural ground elevation. 11. Color of monopole, antennas, and equipment. Each monopole shall be a dark brown X X natural or painted wood color that blends into the surrounding trees. The antennas, supporting brackets,and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not closely match the color of the monopole if they are enclosed within a ground equipment shelter or within or behind an approved structure,facade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole;(ii)is consistent with the character of the area; and(iii) makes the ground equipment, ground equipment shelter, and the concrete pad invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street. 12. Placement of cables, wiring, and similar attachments. Each wood or concrete X monopole shall be constructed so that all cables,wiring, and similar attachments that run vertically from the ground equipment to the antennas are placed on the monopole to face the interior of the site and away from public view,as determined by the agent. Metal monopoles shall be constructed so that vertical cables, wiring and similar attachments are contained within the monopole's structure. 13. Special use permit conditions.All conditions of approval of a special use permit. X 14. No substantial change.The collocation or replacement shall not result in a substantial X change to the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure. 15. Replacement of wooden monopole with metal monopole.The replacement of a wooden monopole with a metal monopole: (a) The monopole is setback farther in distance than its height to any lot line,or is X located closer in distance than its height to any lot line and the document authorized by section 5.1.40(c)(3)exists. (b) The monopole is located closer in distance than its height to any lot line andtthe S document authorized by section 5.1.40(c)(3)does not exist and,for the purposes • of this subsection,the monopole shall be classified as a Tier II facility. The following abbreviations are used in this table: I,II,and III:Refer to Tier I,Tier II,and Tier III facilities,respectively. C/R:Refers to exempt collocations and exempt replacements of transmission equipment. X:Refers to a requitement that applies to the corresponding facility or transmission equipment. S:Refers to a special exception c. Applicability of other regulations in this chapter. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, each facility or transmission equipment shall be subject to all applicable regulations in this chapter: 18-5-22.3 Zoning Supplement#92,74-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ai r p, -'" x t-_ 4�"9,* �, vrfr #y 4. : r� t a , ,• 44 i "OfOfr Yintc3ttfop` 1 is ^3"'t zpp c ty of other Developmen0Requirements in this Chapter . I. Building site. Notwithstanding section 4.2.3(a), a facility is not required to be located X X X X within a building site. 2. Vehicular access.Vehicular access to the facility site or tower site shall be subject to the X X X X requirements of section 4.2 and shall not be exempt under section 4.2.6(c). 3. Setbacks. Notwithstanding section 4.10.3.1(6), the agent may authorize a facility to be X X X X located closer in distance than the height of the tower or other mounting structure to any lot line if the applicant obtains an easement or other recordable document showing agreement between the lot owners, acceptable to the county attorney as to addressing development on the part of the abutting parcel sharing the common lot line that is within the monopole or tower's fall zone. If the right-of-way for a public street is within the fall zone, the Virginia Department of Transportation shall be included in the staff review,in lieu of recording an easement or other document. 4. Area, bulb and minimum yards. Notwithstanding the requirements of the district in X X X X which the facility will be located,the area and bulk regulations,and the minimum yard requirements of the district shall not apply. 5. Required yards.Notwithstanding section 4.11,a facility may be located in a required yard X X X X 6. Site plan. Notwithstanding section 32.2, a site plan shall not be required for a facility, X X X X but the facility shall be subject to the requirements of section 32,and the applicant shall submit all schematics,plans, calculations, drawings and other information required by the agent to determine whether the facility complies with section 32. In making this determination,the agent may impose reasonable conditions authorized by section 32 in order to ensure compliance. The following abbreviations are used in this table: I,II,and III:Refer to Tier I,Tier II,and Tier III facilities,respectively. C/R:Refers to exempt collocations and exempt replacements of transmission equipment. X:Refers to a requirement that applies to the corresponding facility or transmission equipment. d. Performance standards and requirements for approved applications. In addition to the applicable development requirements in subsections (b) and (c), the following performance standards and requirements shall apply to facilities,as applicable: a 'i ' yir) r n a u4pts I-TypeoffAAiplication Performance Standards and Requirements , I i`III CIR'x,'�' 1. Building permit application; submitting certification of monopole height and revised X plans. The following shall be submitted with the building permit application: (i) certification by a registered surveyor stating the height of the reference tree that is used to determine the permissible height of the monopole;and(ii)a final revised set of plans for the construction of the facility.The agent shall review the surveyor's certificate and the plans to ensure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2. Tree conservation plan; compliance; amendment. The installation, operation, and X X X maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in accordance with the tree conservation plan. The applicant shall not remove existing trees within the lease area or within one hundred(100)feet in all directions surrounding the lease area of any part of the facility except for those trees identified on the plan to be removed for the installation,operation, and maintenance of the facility and dead and dying trees.Before the applicant removes any tree not designated for removal on the approved plan,the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of an amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the - proposed tree removal will not adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable conditions to ensure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved. • 18-5-22.4 Zoning Supplement#92,7-8-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ta spr ' Anlr eai0° " a � ,4t a # eo a erformance Standard;t�and +lIcai frI II /R ehr ,° cst. •4r5 f 3. Completion of installation; submitting certifications of compliance. Within thirty (30) X X X days after completion of the installation of the facility,the applicant shall provide to the agent prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: (i) certification by a registered surveyor stating the height of the tower or monopole, measured both in feet above ground level and in elevation above mean sea level,using the benchmarks or reference datum identified in the application; and(ii) certification stating that the lightning rod's height does not exceed two (2) feet above the top of the tower or monopole and its width does not exceed a diameter of one(1)inch. 4. Discontinuance of use; notice thereof removal; surety. Within thirty (30) days after a X X X tower or monopole's use for personal wireless service or any service facilitated by transmission equipment is discontinued,the owner of the facility shall notify the zoning administrator in writing that the facility's use has discontinued. The facility and any transmission equipment shall be disassembled and removed from the facility site within ninety (90) days after the date its use for personal wireless service or any service facilitated by transmission equipment is discontinued. If the agent determines at any time that surety is required to guarantee that the facility will be removed as required,the agent may require that the parcel owner or the owner of the facility submit a certified check, a bond with surety, or a letter of credit, in an amount sufficient for, and conditioned upon,the removal of the facility.The type and form of the surety guarantee shall be to the satisfaction of the agent and the county attorney.In determining whether surety should be required, the agent shall consider the following: (i)whether there is a change in technology that makes it likely that the monopole or tower will be unnecessary in the near future; (ii) the permittee fails to comply with applicable regulations or conditions;(iii)the permittee fails to timely remove another monopole or tower within the county;and(iv)whenever otherwise deemed necessary by the agent. The following abbreviations are used in this table: I,II,and III:Refer to Tier I,Tier II,and Tier III facilities,respectively. C/R:Refers to exempt collocations and exempt replacements of transmission equipment. X:Refers to a requirement that applies to the corresponding facility or transmission equipment. e. Application review and action.Each application shall be reviewed and acted on as follows: 'gyp. 'Cf s ,... 4 v,,,• § :�:v` � ; ;�. j z �VTvpe Ofapphcatron4 trontRevrew'and Action A8 -+'w rya '�` � k,,Applica ,` i3'III wit C/w. 1. Nature of review and action. The nature of the review and action on submitted applications are as follows: (a) Ministerial review and approval by the department of community development to X X X' determine compliance with applicable requirements of this section. (b) Legislative review and approval of a special use permit by the board of supervisors, X subject to the applicable requirements of this section and of sections 33.4 and 33.8; to the extent there is any conflict between the time for action in this subsection and in section 33.4,this section shall prevail. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an application for an exempt collocation shall not be subject to review by the architectural review board and a certificate of appropriateness shall not be required therefor. 2. Time for action.The application shall be acted upon within: (a) 60 days. X X X (b)• 90 days. S2 18-5-22.5 Zoning Supplement#92,7-8-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ... - feof;Application Application Review and Action P' II III C/R (c) 150 days. 52 X 2If the application requires a special exception, the time for acting on the special exception applies to the entire application 3. Calculating the time for action.The time for action on an application shall be calculated as follows: (a) Commencement.The time for action on an application shall begin on: (i) The date the application is received in the department of community X X development. (ii) The submittal date established for this type of application by the director of X X planning. (b) Determination of completeness. Within thirty (30) days after the application is X X X X received,the department of community development shall determine whether the application includes all of the applicable information required by this section. If any required information is not provided, 'the department shall inform the applicant within the thirty(30)day period of the information must be submitted in order for the application to be determined to be complete. (c) Resubmittal.Within ten(10)days after a resubmittal is received,the department of X X X X community development shall determine whether the application includes all of the applicable information required by the initial notice of incompleteness. If any required information was not provided,the department shall inform the applicant within the ten (10) day period of the information must be submitted in order for the application to be determined to be complete.Second or subsequent notices that information is missing may not include information that was not identified in the original notice of incompleteness. (d) Tolling. The running of the time for action shall be tolled between the date the X X X X department informs the applicant that its application is incomplete and the date on which the department receives all of the required information from the applicant. (e) Extending time for action. The time by which action must be taken may be X X X X • extended upon request by,or with the consent of,the applicant. 4. Notice. Notice to third parties shall be provided as follows: (a) Notice of the agent's consideration of an application for a Tier I facility with a S X special exception or a Tier II facility shall be sent by the agent to the owner of each parcel abutting the parcel on which the proposed facility will be located.The notice shall describe the nature of the facility, its proposed location on the lot,its proposed height,and the appropriate county office where the complete application may be viewed.The notice shall be mailed by first class mail or hand delivered at least ten(10) days before the agent acts on the application.Mailed notice shall be mailed to the last known address of the owner, and mailing the notice to the address shown on the current real estate tax assessment records of the county shall be deemed compliance with this requirement. The failure of an owner to receive the notice as provided herein shall not affect the validity of an approved facility • and shall not be the basis for an appeal. (b) Notice of public hearings shall be provided as required by section 33.4(m). X 18-5-22.6 Zoning Supplement k92,7-8-15 Attachment F • ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE tt n �' y t " &Type ot1il,ppltcitian riff, r Application •e leW and"Action I ks r i • r ' . q e• . s , 2 �r , 4: �,, ca a I� II Li E/R # 5. Action.An application shall be acted on as follows: (a) The application shall be approved if it satisfies all of the applicable requirements X X X of this section. (b) The application shall be acted on as provided in sections 33.4 and 33.8. X 6. Disapproval of application;appeal. If an application is disapproved: (a) If the agent disapproves an application,he shall identify which requirements were X X X not satisfied and inform the applicant what needs to be done to satisfy each requirement. The applicant may appeal the disapproval of an application to the board of supervisors.An appeal shall be in writing and be received in the office of the clerk of the board of supervisors within ten(10)calendar days after the date of the disapproval by the agent. In considering an appeal, the board may affirm, reverse, or modify in whole or in part,the decision of the agent, and its decision shall be based upon the applicable requirements of this section. (b) In lieu of the appeal provided in subsection(a),the applicant at its sole option may X X X appeal the disapproval of the application related to an alleged violation of 47 USC § 332(c)(7) or 47 CFR § 1.40001, as applicable, in any court of competent jurisdiction. (c) The applicant may appeal the decision of the board of supervisors as provided in X Virginia Code§ 15.2-2285 and section 33.4. 7. Effect offailure to act within time for action.The failure to act on an application within the time for action shall: (a) Be deemed to be approval of the application;provided that the deemed grant does X not become effective until the applicant notifies the department of community development in writing after the review period has expired that the application has been deemed approved. (b) Create a rebuttable presumption that the failure to timely act was not reasonable X X X under 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(ii). The following abbreviations are used in this table: I,II,and III:Refer to Tier I,Tier II,and Tier III facilities,respectively. C/R:Refers to exempt collocations and exempt replacements of transmission equipment. X:Refers to a requirement that applies to the corresponding facility or transmission equipment. S:Refers to an alternative review period that applies when an application for a special exception accompanies the application. f. Collocation or replacement that would result in a substantial change to an eligible support structure. Any collocation or replacement of transmission equipment that would result in a substantial change in the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure shall be subject to the procedures and standards for a Tier I facility. A special exception shall be required for any substantial change that does not satisfy the standards for a Tier I facility. Any collocation or replacement approved for an eligible support structure by special use permit prior to October 13, 2004 shall not reclassify the eligible support structure as a Tier I,II,or III facility. g. Removal of transmission equipment on any eligible support structure. Any transmission equipment on any eligible support structure may be removed as a matter of right and regardless of any special use permit condition providing otherwise. 18-5-22.7 Zoning Supplement#92,7-8-15 Attachment F ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE h. Agent approval of increase in height of monopole based on increase in height of reference tree. Upon the written request of the applicant,the agent may authorize the height of an existing Tier II facility's monopole to be increased above its originally approved height upon finding that the reference tree has grown to a height that is relative to the requested increase in height of the monopole.The application shall include a certified survey of the reference tree's new height,as well as the heights of other trees to be considered by the agent.The agent shall not grant such a request if the increase in height would cause the facility to be skylighted or would increase the extent to which it is skylighted. Administration of special use permits for facilities approved prior to October 13, 2004; conditions. If any condition of a special use permit for an eligible support structure approved prior to October 13,2004 is more restrictive than a corresponding standard in this section,the corresponding standard in this section shall apply. If any condition of the special use permit is less restrictive than a corresponding standard in this section and the applicant establishes that vested rights have attached to the approved facility,the special use permit conditions shall apply. j. Mobile personal wireless service facilities. Mobile personal wireless service facilities ("MPWSF") shall not be subject to any requirements of section 5.1.40, and are otherwise permitted by right in any zoning district,subject to the following: 1. Zoning clearance required; temporary non-emergency event. The owner shall obtain a zoning clearance under section 31.5 prior to placing a MPWSF on any site for a temporary non-emergency event.-The MPWSF may be placed on the site for a maximum of seven(7) consecutive days, and shall not be placed on any site for any temporary non-emergency event more than twice in a calendar year. 2. Zoning clearance required;declared state of emergency.If a state of emergency is declared by the President of the United States, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, or the board of supervisors, the owner shall obtain a zoning clearance under section 31.5 within forty-five(45)days after placing a MPWSF on any site.The MPWSF may be placed on the site for the duration of the state of emergency. The County of Albemarle,Virginia and the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors reserve any and all rights that it has under the United States Constitution including, but not limited to, the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment. • (§ 5.1.40, Ord.01-18(9), 10-17-01; Ord. 04-18(2), 10-13-04; Ord. 13-18(3),5-8-13; Ord. 15-18(1),2-11-15; Ord. 15-18(2),4-8-15;Ord. 15-18(6),7-8-15;Ord. 15-18(7),7-8-15) 5.1.41 PARKING LOTS AND PARKING STRUCTURES A site plan shall be required for each parking lot and parking structure,unless the requirement is waived as provided in section 32.2.2. (Ord.03-18(1),2-5-03) 5.1.42 HISTORICAL CENTERS Each historical center shall be subject to the following: a. New historical center structures.Newly constructed structures for historical centers shall be limited to one thousand five hundred(1,500) square feet in size, aggregate, including interpretative space and accessory uses within such structures. b. Rehabilitation or construction on historic structures or sites to be used for historical center structure. The rehabilitation of historic structures and sites to be used for historical centers shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources(DHR)as demonstrated by a letter to the county. The design and siting of any proposed accessory uses and visitor amenities at a historic structure or site shall also be approved by DHR. 18-5-22.8 Zoning Supplement#92,7-5-15 Albemarle County Planning Commission October 10, 2017 The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a public hearing on Tuesday, October 10, 2017, at 6:00 p.m., at the County Office Building, Room #241, Second Floor, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. Members attending were Tim Keller, Chair; Daphne Spain; Pam Riley; Jennie More; Karen Firehock; Bruce Dotson; and Bill Palmer, UVA representative. Absent was Mac Lafferty. Other officials present were Chris Perez, Senior Planner; Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner; David Hannah, Water Resource Manager; David Benish, Chief of Community Development; Andrew Gast-Bray, Assistant Director of Community Development/Director of Planning; Sharon Taylor, Clerk to Planning Commission; and John Blair, Deputy County Attorney. Call to Order and Establish Quorum Mr. Keller, Chair, called the regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and established a quorum. Mr. Keller welcomed the University of Virginia Law students, Officer Snodgrass, and the Boy Scout troop for being at the Planning Commission this evening. Public Hearing Items. a. SP-2017-00015 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co — Tier Ill Personal Wireless Service Facility MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna TAX MAP/PARCEL: 048000000018D0 LOCATION: 3827 Stony Point Road PROPOSED: Installation of a one hundred and thirty five (135) foot tall steel monopole with 4 antenna arrays. Two special exceptions are requested: the 1st to allow more than three arrays on the monopole, and the 2nd to allow mounting equipment a standoff distance greater than 12" from the monopole. Associated with the proposal is ground equipment located within a 2,500 square feet fenced compound area located on 8.02 acres. PETITION: Section 12.2.2 (16), which allows for Tier III personal wireless facilities in the Village Residential zoning district (reference Section 5.1.40). ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: VR - Village Residential: agriculture, compact residential (0.7 unit/acre); EC - Entrance Corridor: Overlay to protect properties of historic, architectural or cultural significance from visual impacts of development along routes of tourist access. Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District — Yes. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 1 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes PROFFERS: No COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Rural Areas - preserve and protect agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/ density (0.5 unit/ acre) (Chris Perez) Christopher Perez, Senior Planner, reviewed the request for 2017-00015 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co — Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility. This is a proposal for a Tier III Personal Wireless Facility, which is a personal wireless facility that is neither a Tier I nor a Tier II. A Tier II is a treetop tower where the tower is situated 10' above the tallest reference tree within 25' radius. This is not that kind of facility. Mr. Perez said the proposal is on tax map 48, parcel 18D owned by Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company, which is an 8-acre parcel, zoned Village Residential, located in the Southwestern Mountains Rural Historic District as well as in an Entrance Corridor on Route 20, a Scenic Byway. The facility is located in a heavily wooded section of the property, which is shown by a star on the GIS tax map on the slide, and on the right side the Google maps shows the aerials. The facility is around 706 feet south of the elementary school, which is an adjacent property owner. The site is 657' east of Route 20, which is the Entrance Corridor and Scenic By-Way and 300' from the nearest residence. The property this is sited on fronts Route 20 and abuts the Stony Point Elementary School that is surrounded by residential lots of varying sizes. Mr. Perez said the proposal is a 135' tower steel monopole to be painted brown proposed to have four (4) arrays with ground equipment that will be housed in a 2,500 square foot leased area that will be fenced. The fencing will have privacy slats. The proposed site is to be accessed by a 10-foot wide gravel access road utilizing the entrance to the fire station. The upper most array is the only array we actually have schematics or designs for and the other three (3) arrays that follow going down to be dictated by the parameters set by the top array. Mr. Perez pointed out the access road and the entrance on the slide noting the entrance on the far left goes through the property of the fire station next to the actual fire station. He noted the edge of pavement ends where they propose to begin their access road, which goes down the hill through the woods and back towards the back of the property. Mr. Perez explained that as part of the request, there are two special exceptions, one for the number or arrays to permit four (4) instead of the three (3) that the ordinance allows; and, the other special exception is for antenna projection. This special exception is interesting in that they are still meeting the maximum standoff distance of 18"; .however, this portion of the ordinance has two segments. First, the back of the antenna shall be not more than 12" from the monopole and secondly, the back of the antenna shall be no further than 18" from the monopole that is designed to allow tilt of the antenna. The applicant is not proposing to use any tilt physically rather they are just using electronic tilt; thus, they have only requested one-half of this requirement be waived or modified since they are still meeting the intent of the standoff distance. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 2 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes • Mr. Perez pointed out during the balloon test on August 22 they traveled numerous roads throughout the site, which are highlighted in green and the segments a, b, and c shown in red was where it was slightly visible just above the tree tops and for a very short duration along Route 20 to the west. The view was more in line with what staff would classify as a Tier II tower, which is a treetop tower; however, again that is not this application. Mr. Perez reviewed the various views starting with view a. from the entrance and the parking of the fire station that just barely peaks above the tree line. In view b. it is the residence right next to the fire station property, which barely peaks above the tree line. In view c., it shows the exact same thing. In view d. going further down Route 20 from 3755 Stony Point Road driveway it just barely peaks above again. Mr. Perez pointed out something new from the applicant within the last four (4) days was a proposal to slightly relocate a portion of the access road. He explained the entrance is the same, all of the fire station's parking stays the same, all of the actual access way through the woods to the site stay the same and the only part that deviates is going down the hill right after you get behind the fire station property. The point of that is the fire station currently uses this area as a training facility and they would like to relocate it slightly south, which is still on their property. He noted it is not taking down any trees, and it does not affect staffs review or recommendations. Mr. Perez said in summary staff notes the following factors: Factors favorable to this request include: - The proposed facility has minimum visibility due to the proposed height, location, and method of antenna attachment, which are "concealment elements". - The ARB has no objections to the special exceptions and finds that the proposed location sufficiently minimizes the visibility of the monopole from the Entrance Corridor. Factors unfavorable to this request include: - The proposal is located within the avoidance areas described as the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District, and the Scenic Byway (Rt. 20). Staff recommends approval of the request and two special exceptions with the following conditions of approval that lock down those three aspects just talked about which are categorized as concealing elements. He noted the second condition would be with regards to the VSMP permit to allow the grading and tree clearing to put the access road in because the area is over 10,000 square foot that is required. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The development of the site, and any modifications to the arrays, shall be in general accord with the plan titled "Milestone Communications — Shentel at Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co." prepared by John Caborgoudy, and dated 9/19/17 (hereafter "Conceptual Plan"), as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10.2017 - 3 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes Administrator. To be in general accord with the Conceptual Plan, development and use shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the development, including but not limited to all concealment elements and technique, as shown and described on the Conceptual Plan and mentioned below: a. Height (135 feet tall) b. Monopole location c. The farthest point of the back of the antennas shall be no more than 18 inches from the monopole Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit a VSMP permit will be required. Mr. Perez said that was the conclusion of his presentation and asked if there were any questions. Mr. Keller invited questions for staff. Ms. Spain asked if the relocation of the entry would affect the school's nature trail, which was an issue that came up at the community meeting. Mr. Perez replied no, this relocation does not get that far in. He explained in looking at the diagram it breaks off into two portions: one, it comes down more towards the actual site and then one that goes up and when you start to get to the nature trail area this access road does not affect the nature trail at all. Mr. Dotson asked for a recap and explanation since he found it confusing that the standoff requirement is 12", but it is not really, it is 18"; but that assumes it is a tilting antenna. He asked Mr. Perez to run through that again because there may be people in the audience confused by that. Mr. Perez explained there is a section in the ordinance that talks about standoff distance with regard to projection so you have the monopole and it factors in the idea that there is going to be a tilt associated with it. He pointed out the actual antenna that attaches to it is not supposed to be further than 12" from the actual monopole and the back portion is not supposed to be further than 18", which allows you to do this while still maintaining both of those parameters. What the applicant is trying to do is not tilt at all but to go straight flush, which is why they still need the 18" as their maximum, which - is the intent of the ordinance and essentially a special exception as a formality. Mr. Dotson asked if essentially 18" becomes the norm rather than 12". Mr. Perez replied that 18" is the maximum in the ordinance and the 12" is the closest point of the back that is the furthest. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 4 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes • 1 � I Mr. Benish pointed out that both of those distances are 18" rather than 12" and 18". Mr. Dotson noted the other question, which is something staff did not mention in your excellent brief summary, was the FCC regulations that if this is approved tonight, then certain modest changes could be made without having to seek county approval and the notion of concealment elements. Mr. Dotson asked Mr. Perez to explain that. Mr. Perez replied the last time he had taken a Tier Ill tower before the Planning Commission was for the Albemarle High School facility. As part of that request a • portion of the new FCC regulations talks about approved facilities that don't take advantage of certain concealment elements can administratively be approved for a one time increase of 20' in height as well as 20' in standoff distance from the monopole. Therefore, those are being avoided in this situation because the concealment elements that are used —the height, location as well as the standoff distance — allow this facility to get a recommendation of approval. Mr. Perez explained the last time we talked about one that was similar staff recommended denial and there was no concealment elements. He pointed out essentially it was this huge tower with no screening around it at all and there was no way the county could classify any of our requirements in the ordinance of height, location and all of that stuff as a concealment element. He noted this request is completely different in the fact that the tower actually if hidden in the tree lines; it is more in line with the treetop tower; and for all of those elements that is why those are concealment elements. If the applicant had requested the automatic 20' then he most likely would not be recommending approval of this request because it would change everything essentially as well as the standoff distance. Mr. Dotson asked if it was approved tonight if the depiction we see is what we will get; and, Mr. Perez replied yes. Mr. Benish suggested the Commission make sure their action clearly recognizes that those elements in the plan are the concealment elements. Mr. Blair pointed out that is captured as a condition, and Mr. Benish agreed. . Mr. Keller asked staff if Mr. Blair could speak to the constraints that are placed on local government in terms of evaluating health effects. Mr. Blair explained that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits Planning Commission or Board of Supervisor's consideration of what is called environmental emissions. Frankly, he could just read the text that says no local government or instrumentality therefore may regulate the placement, construction and modification on personal wireless service facilities based on the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions. Mr. Blair said the federal law is the principle as we all learned most likely in eighth grade civics about the constitution allowing for federal law to trump, for the lack of a better word, state law or local law. Therefore, this is part of that preemption doctrine that this federal law preempts state or local regulation for ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 5 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes • environmental effects of the emissions from cell towers. Mr. Keller thanked Mr. Blair. He opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to come forward; but noted first Vice-Chair Firehock is going to give us some ground rules. Ms. Firehock read the ground rules for the hearing from the agenda. Ms. Lori Schweller, representative for the applicant Milestone Communications, presented a PowerPoint presentation to explain the proposal. Ms. Schweller pointed out Christin Seltzer, with Milestone Communications and Mark Manzullo the civil engineer with Entrex are present to answer questions if necessary. As a brief summary, Ms. Schweller said that Milestone Communications is Virginia based as you know from our Albemarle High School application last year and partner with public entities. Ms. Schweller said in this case that Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company would provide wireless facilities on which commercial carriers and public entities can collocate with financial benefit to the landlord; it is the same in this case as the one for Albemarle High School which the Commission has seen before. The reason this site is needed it because there is a large coverage gap for Shentel, which provides the wireless network for Sprint. Ms. Schweller pointed out the large area of white, an area poorly served by this carrier, that makes it a very high priority for Shentel whose objective is to extend coverage from Pantops all the way to Barboursville and with this facility in place a good portion of that white turns to blue that is good coverage. Ms. Schweller said she wanted to talk about visibility mitigation, which Mr. Perez covered. She pointed out on the GIS map you can see how the Stony Point Fire Company's parcel does extend far back from Stoney Point Road, Route 20; and the yellow dot on the slide represents the location of the site. She pointed out you can see how heavily wooded it is and Stony Point Road, Route 20 takes a turn to the east and the site is located roughly 700' from the back of the school property and about 656' to the west to Route 20. In photos of the site, looking up at the fire company, it gives a sense of how the woods are dense in the area. In addition, to the required 100' no cut radius around the monopole area the applicant is proposing to preserve all of the trees in this area as noted with a marked shading that will provide a buffer between the site and Route 20. The topography is such that the above mean sea level at the back of the Stony Point Fire Department is 25' higher than the monopole, which is a large part of the reason why the monopole is not particularly visible from surrounding roadways. Ms. Schweller pointed out Mr. Perez already explained the proposed access modifications that is one change to the site plan in the packet That will be finalized before it goes to the Board if you recommend approval. Regarding the elevation and the special exceptions, Ms. Schweller said the first special exception is to ask for an exception to the maximum of three arrays. She said the reason we are asking for that is when you have flush mounted antennas, such as these, often times the larger carriers will need two positions on the pole to cover all of their technologies. Again, we are going to be flush-mounted only 18" to the back of the antennas. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 6 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes Ms. Schweller said she wanted to mention the community notice that was given for this site since it is a Tier III we notified all of the owners of properties within one-half mile of the site and we did have a community meeting. Though this is not on school property, it does have a school as a' neighbor and Milestone does not directly contact parents of schoolchildren and works with the administration of the schools just as was done with the Albemarle High School site. Ms. Schweller pointed out the principal of the elementary school sent an email to all student's parents notifying them of this application and Mr. Perez sent the public hearing notice directly to the schools as well so that they could make the decision how they wanted to contact the parents. Ms. Schweller said as Mr. Perez mentioned the visual impact of the site is quite similar to a Tier II treetop. In a slide an example of one of our Tier II treetop facilities in the county shows that my photos are very similar to what the county produced so you will be seeing similar sets including the balloon test. She said we also noticed that the site was visible only from points where we have a yellow tab and the photographs had been converted into photo simulations. Therefore, you can see what the flush-mounted round monopole facility would look like at those same locations that the county planners have noticed. Ms. Schweller said she thought the county's presentation was actually better in that they showed all the areas where we drove and all the streets that are highlighted in green and in those areas the balloon was not visible. She noted that was her presentation and was happy to take any questions. Mr. Keller invited questions for the applicant. Hearing none, Mr. Keller invited public comment. Ms. Firehock invited the first person signed up, A.C. Shackelford, Jr., to come forward to speak. Corky Shackelford said that his home is adjacent to the fire company property and he wanted to speak in favor of this request because there is such an extreme need for it since he had a cell phone and had no use at all for it in my home. However, if he walks out in the yard a good many feet from the house he gets maybe a bar or two. He has noticed in both receiving and sending efforts all along the road in that area the services definitely are limited and at best undependable so he certainly wants to emphasize the need. As far as appearance, he thought a single pole in the woods with an antenna on top is a lot less obtrusive and disagreeable than other structures we have along the same road and other roads in the county. He said it is located well off the road not in the immediate front of oncoming traffic from either direction so he did not think it is going to be a problem as far as appearance goes either. In summary, Mr. Shackelford said he hoped they would approve this effort and let it go ahead. Fred Shackelford said he lived about a quarter of a mile from the proposed site and he did not have a lot to add from what was already said because he agreed with everything his dad said. He said he was in favor of.the proposal since he lived closer than his dad did but still had very sporadic cell service where he lived and could only get a signal in a few places in.my house. As you drive from his house towards Charlottesville, there are ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 7 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes spots where the signal goes out so this would be a big help to the people in the Stony Point area. Mr. Shackelford urged the Commission to approve the request. He said there were a few folks who favor this but are not planning to speak so they are welcomed to raise their hands if they want to show support for it. Thank you. Mary Tice said she had been a property owner in Albemarle County for about 25 years and in the process of building a house on property on Stony Point Pass. She pointed out the property was on one of the maps down in the lower right corner of the screen. Because she is in the process of building a house and she has to work with her cell phone to conduct business Ms. Tice said the lack of cell service has been a problem. , Having signed up to speak before realizing her comments are already captured by . email, Ms. Tice said she just wanted to reiterate that cell service is a basic utility and it is hard to function in this day and age without it and Stony Point desperately needs coverage, and asked the Commission to take that into consideration. Mr. Jeff Werner, with Piedmont Environmental Council, said since 1999 he had been involved in local tower issues and took part in the development of the county' policy and had bragged that it was a national model and has done his best to defend it. While the policy has not changed through relentless efforts of the industry, help from Washington, periodic revisions to the regulations and even through some Tier III approvals that the policy's intent has been compromised and tweaked. The policy at its core encourages concealed treetop towers; it did not seek to limit them, in fact, it encourages them through an expedited review process. In exchange for timely approvals, the county would get less visible treetop monopoles rather than fewer but taller more visible towers with a simple monopole concealed within trees near certain approval and anything else would require scrutiny that is more intensive. Mr. Werner said early on we got tree top monopoles; many of them were flush mounted arrays that were on simple wooden poles; then contrary to other technology the arrays got bigger, had to be further from the pole, poles got wider and taller, and instead of wood they became metal which brings us to this proposal. He said the monopole is 135' tall, 40' taller than nearby trees; this is not a treetop tower. In lieu of four (4) shorter treetop poles, which the policy would allow, this single tower is intended for four (4) arrays. No doubt, the height and girth are needed for multiple arrays and it could be argued that one tower will increase revenue to the landowner, but Mr. Werner said that is not what the policy was intended to achieve. Relative to height the nearby trees are predominantly yellow Poplar, the 16 tallest range from 86' to 93' which is typical for mature Poplars. For a visual comparison, he was 5'9" and if he were the tower at that same scale this goalie stick is equivalent to a 90' tree. Mr. Werner said this is not a treetop tower noting he understands geometry and topography does not need any lessons in those. Mr. Werner pointed out there is a previously approved 109' tall tower on this very site so the argument that 135' is necessary for cell coverage does not fly and yes the policy allows for Tier III towers; but, these seem to be the norm lately. Since 2009, he found in his count there were at least 24 Tier II applications with 37 Tier III applications with 25 related to'new monopoles. Ever since developing the policy the main concern for applicants was time in the reviews being too long and too costly and in ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 8 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes response, the county adopted expedited review for true treetop towers that is why we have all the Tier III proposals. He said contrary to what the industry has said as long as they keep getting approvals maybe it is worth their time and expense to propose taller towers that are more visible. Thank you. Ryan Estes, resident of 3914 Stony Point Road across the street from Stony Point Elementary School, said he had lived there since about 2003. He said he, conducts a business from his home and being self-employed, he used a cell phone every day and in doing so he has not problems. He understands that people)just down the road do not have the same luxury but when he bought his I-phone it was explained when he gave the sales person his address that service inside my house was iffy. Mr. Estes said the service has improved since we have a tower 1.7 miles from this proposed location at Park Hill Farm. He said that he was still waiting to see if the applicant in this case has checked with them to see if their tower will take these arrays, but he has not heard anything. Mr. Estes said literally walking through his yard today; he had 4G service with 3 to 4 out of 5 bars. Mr. Estes pointed out the service is there so the need for improved service he guessed the argument could be made for that. However, he would just like to state that for a fact, he used his cell phone every day and it is not an issue. He said depending on your carrier, if you have service outside you might consider a signal booster to get better service inside your house or consider a different carrier other than AT&T. He would just like to say that a 135' cell tower 700' from a playground visible from his front yard is something he cannot believe we are having a discussion. He opposed putting this cell tower right next to an elementary school when you could put it at a farm where only cows would see it; the entire community would benefit from it; it would be further away from the school and the houses; and it would not affect health and my property value. Charles Humphries said he was a resident of 3894 Stoney Point that was even more across the street than Mr. Estes who just spoke. He said he was amazed first that our council has no questions; that this tower was rejected by the parents of Stony Point Elementary School about 5, 6, or 7 years ago for the very fact of the damage that has proven by these radiations on developing children. He had two children that went to Stony Point Elementary and a brand new baby who he was planning on sending there. With a newborn living within 700', he questioned whether it was a good idea so we can have service on Stony Point Road so more people can text and drive and did not understand what it is with technology and why we need to be so forward with this. He said it is just not necessary since he had no problem with his cell service. There are blank spots on Stoney Point Road and he knows exactly where they are but he did not use his phone while driving so he did not think cell tower needs it there. Nobody has concerns for the children and it is unbelievable why the principal is not here and the few letters that were given. Understanding that a letter was sent to people within a one-half mile radius of the school Mr. Humphries asked if the other parents of children at Stony Point Elementary know that it is going up; the same parents that rejected this tower that was going to be built on top of Stony Point Elementary School six or seven years ago. Mr. Humphries said we need to slow down; we need to do the right thing, and show compassion and understanding. He said we are on a constitution route and the county ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 9 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes as you all know is incredible and we want to fog it with technology and let us keep on moving forward because it is going to make everything better. Mr. Humphries said he did not believe that for one second. Mr. Humphries asked the Commission to ask yourself to consider the children. He said he has no problem with the site since he did not believe it was going to bother him, his property value or any of that; however, since he has a degree in elementary education even though he is not a teacher he cares about children. He said he loves his children and he wants people to understand the risks that are involved with young child brain development and these radiations that come from these towers. He asked why the tower is going 700' from where it was denied just a couple years ago he did not know. Ms. Firehock invited further public comment. Hearing none, Mr. Keller invited the applicant for rebuttal. Ms. Lori Schweller said there are a few comments made by some of the public she can respond to if you would like. The RF engineer for Shentel did evaluate the Park Hill site, which is a little over a mile from the site, and it would not serve the area that we are trying to serve with this site; it is actually too short and could not support another carrier; and it is just not in the right place. Ms. Schweller said that site was fully evaluated by the RF engineer; she gave him coordinates and he evaluated it and we did get a response that was provided to Mr. Perez in the county. As to the AT&T site that was approved for the parcel she did not know AT&T's plans, she assumed they were not building that site; it is not in the same location in a higher elevation; and my understanding is the lease has expired. So that is not this site and this is in a different location and like all special use permit applications we are presenting this to you based on its own merits. It is the same with the Stony Point Elementary School site, which she. believed was also in an AT&T application. That is not this site and we are not in that location, and again all of the parents were notified about this site. Ms. Schweller said she received several emails in favor of this site and she had not receive any emails or concerns from any parents. Those were the main points she wanted to make. However, she could talk about RF emissions and the FCC's pre- exemption of that issue. She could talk about the various national and world bodies that have evaluated that issue. It is not something that you are considering tonight so you probably do not want me to take the time to do that. However, Ms. Schweller said we truly do not believe this will have any negative health effects on any children, and keep in mind that the radio waves that are emitting from cell towers are the same ones that are coming to your cell phone. Those waves are all around us. Although there are • some OSHA guidelines for people who are standing immediately in front of a high- powered wireless facility those RF emissions degrade significantly in strength as they move through space and lower in elevation. There is simply no evidence that they cause any negative health effects to anyone. Ms. Schweller said again that is not something that you are taking the time to consider tonight and she just wanted to put that out there that we are not doing this in spite of health effects since we are certainly concerned as anyone else if there were health effects. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 10 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes Ms. Schweller asked if there were any other questions. Mr. Keller invited questions for the applicant. Mr. Riley said it would be helpful if Ms. Schweller could describe why you are asking for the height and why a treetop Tier II would not suffice. In our staff report, Ms. Riley said it looks like you are seeking four arrays as opposed to the standard three because you are looking to lease some of those arrays to another company and asked Ms. Schweller if she could answer those questions. Ms. Schweller replied that Mr. Werner talked about how the county's wireless policy in the ordinance was intended to provide a particular set of design and siting standards so that when a wireless applicant wants to bring in a new application and follows those specific standards the applicant knows that there will be a faster track. She said that is absolutely true. She said it is also true that we have submitted applications for Tier III's which do not fall within all of those guidelines or Tier III's with special exceptions for some variations. She thinks that is evidence enough that the carriers and those who were trying to provide wireless service need the service because they are sacrificing the fast track process in order to get the facilities that they need. Therefore, even if it is a Tier II but they need bigger antennas we will go through the process so that we can get that special exception. Ms. Schweller said in this case that the height is necessary because of the drop in elevation from the back yard of the fire company down to where the site is at a 25-foot drop in elevation. Therefore, it is true that 135' is certainly not 10' above the tree line there but from the road and surrounding roads and properties it appears to be and that is what really counts. We in the county do not want to look around and see monopoles towering above the trees on our Entrance Corridors and our Scenic Byways but that is not what you are seeing with this site. It happens to be 135' because that is what is necessary to clear the trees and provide the services. In terms of the number of arrays three is permitted under the terms of the ordinance and we are asking for 4 because we believe that if we have any of the larger carriers, not Shentel since they are fine with just the one at the top, but some of the other carriers when we have flush-mounted antennas do need two spaces. Therefore, if one of those larger carriers wanted to co- locate on the monopole they would be able to do so if they could have two spaces. Therefore, it makes it work better if you are going to put a site there, let's follow the county's promotion of co-location if you have site that only allows for three wireless arrays and somebody comes along and there is not enough room then you would need another monopole. Therefore, it is maximizing the efficiency of this one site by adding additional and because they are flush mounted, the visual impacts should be minimal. Ms. More said she had a question about the balloon test and since the trees seem to be a pretty big part of the screening she wondered about having it done in August as opposed to like November or December where we might see something different. Ms. More pointed out we have had this happen in another location and she thinks that the ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 11 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes people in that situation felt like they were not really being shown some of the visibility they might see if it was done. This is the best time for you to do it if you want the trees to conceal it, but she wonders what that would look like and why. She asked if there is a reason not to have it done when trees are such a huge part of the screening when the appearance of the trees would be quite different. Ms. Schweller replied that they do get that question a lot, but keep in mind that applications are a long process — the due diligence for these is sometimes years — so we submit when they are ready. She pointed out they submit year round and you can see me here all the time. Ms. Schweller said we submit applications at all times of the year and we do balloon tests at all times of the year and don't strategize to hold our balloon tests when the leaves are on the trees. For the most part Ms. Schweller said based on my experience looking at these that when you are looking at the facilities from a distance what we are trying to see is obviously not the ground equipment — that is going to be completely screened. What we are going to see is where the top of the monopole peaks above the trees. She said she is envisioning some of the ones we had done in the winter like Simon up near Monticello where the visibility of the monopole above the trees is the same whether there are leaves on the trees or not because you have the series of round trunks and then you have the balloon sticking above it. There is not that much difference since the balloon tests tend to provide the same results because we are only looking at what is sticking above the trees. Ms. More noted that other people have a view of what might be more visible without the trees with all the leaves so she would not suggest that you would strategize to do it when there is the most leaves on the trees. Ms. More suggested if the trees were a big part of why this is less visible it would be worth doing the balloon test during a time when the trees are offering as little amount of coverage and then show what neighbors could really expect to see. Ms. Spain said if other companies come in and use the additional arrays does that generate any more income or revenue for the fire company. Ms. Schweller replied yes, it does since every time a co-locator attaches or enters into an agreement to go onto the monopole it is a one-time fee to the fire company and the fire company receives a 40 percent revenue share for all of the income from rent that would be from all the carriers who are on the facility. There being no further questions, Mr. Keller closed the public hearing to bring the matter before the Commission for discussion and action. Mr. Dotson said he had a question for staff - the staff report indicates this is in the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District and the Entrance Corridor and does that make this an avoidance area and necessary that the applicant apply for a Tier III as opposed to a Tier II. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 12 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes Mr. Perez replied that the Southwest Mountains Historical District is the avoidance areas that you are talking about; the Entrance Corridor is not and nor is the Route 20 Scenic Byway because it is past 200' from the Scenic Byway it does not get into that portion of the avoidance area. However, the Southwest Mountains Historical District is an avoidance area and as part of that in the Wireless Policy, it talks about siting these facilities so that they minimize visibility and that is what this one has done. Mr. Dotson said the core of staffs position is that despite the height of the tower, part of which is due to the topography and being mounted down below the road and the fire station that the visibility above the trees is within sort of the county's custom of just visibility above the trees that are visible to the eye. He asked Mr. Perez if that is clear. Mr. Perez replied yes, the visual impacts are in line with what staff looks for a Tier II tower. This is not a Tier II tower because of the avoidance area conversation; it automatically kicks it up to a Tier III but the visual impacts are similar to a Tier II. Ms. More said she had a question about the height of the tower and it sounds like in staffs report the topography allows for some of the concealment but it also seems like that due to the topography the tower has to be taller. So that seems odd to me, but she understands the logistics behind it but if they are benefiting from the topography from where the fire station is located and where the proposed site is, it being 25' lower, but making the tower taller Ms. More asked is it still considered a concealment element because it seemingly provides concealment. Mr. Perez replied yes, the reason why is because the location of the facility is back in the topography where it more slopes. In the staff report he talks about the two different areas, which are the high zones, Route 20 is a higher zone as is the actual elementary school — and when you come down to this site it kind of converges down into this lower elevation. If they try to raise the tower taller than 135', he believes the visual impacts would be more and that is why he locked it down as a concealment element so they could not come back for that automatic 20' one time increase. Ms. More said she thinks that answers my other question, which Commissioner Dotson asked for clarification on about the FCC regulations - what can be done without additional approval it sounds like if you listed the increase by height of more than 20' the antenna or other equipment will protrude more than 20'. Ms. More said those do not seem like minimal changes, but what she sees here is the language if the change would defeat the concealment elements then it undergoes review. She asked if that is correct. Mr. Perez replied yes — those three items cannot be changed based on the general conformity conversation — those aspects are concealment elements and so that is why they are in there like that. Ms. More thanked Mr. Perez. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 13 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes • Mr. Keller said he had sort of a question in a comment that in some ways is a response to Ms. More's question but in visual analysis theory there is a part about visual absorption and if you have enough distance through deciduous trees all of those trunks in effect are going to create a wall. Therefore, even if you have a time of the year when there are not leaves on a tree there is still something that can be blocking the view in a situation like this. Mr. Keller said he thinks in the future if Mr. Fritz is leading us through the discussions on the wireless towers you might just explore that one and that comment he thinks would further support if we have new people in transitions in the Planning Commission membership. He asked if someone is ready to make a motion. Mr. Blair pointed out two motions would be needed with one for the special exceptions and one for the special use permit. Motion: Ms. Spain moved to recommend approval of special exceptions in Section 5.1.40(b)(2)(a) and Section 4.1.40(b)(2)(c)for the reasons outlined in the staff report. Mr. Dotson seconded the motion. Mr. Keller invited discussion. Ms. More said she is not going to vote to support the request because she believes they have a county policy and as pointed out earlier it is a national model and she worries about making these exceptions and has voted consistently in this way on other projects the Commission has reviewed. Ms. More said she feels the same way about this one since the county has a good policy and sees at least the part about the 18" standoff might be minimal, but adding the other array she just thinks that if we have a policy we should follow our policy and making changes to it is unwise. Ms. More said that is why she will not vote to recommend the proposal. Ms. Firehock said along those same lines as we enter the discussion portion she agreed completely with Ms. More. She said if a much taller tower has to be built to fit to actually work in that area to get high enough above the tree line because it is in a recessed location then perhaps that is not a good location for the tower to be built in. Ms. Firehock said she believed the county has a very clear policy; we have many topography challenges; and she is sympathetic to the people that do not have cell service but she has no cell service where she lives in the county within 5 miles. She - appreciates the difficulties that ensue with that, but she does not know that we need to solve this problem by this particular tower since she thinks it could be solved perhaps by finding a better location. Mr. Keller said he was really torn and pointed out the reason he asked Mr. Blair about the health issue is there is a significant portion of our community concerned with health issue from the cell towers. He said there have been a number of discussions about this very topic with the Supervisors with the last major one being the discussions involving the Albemarle High School site where there are really three schools in a zone. Mr. ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 14 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes Keller said there was a lot of data presented and he thinks it was good of the School Board staff to allow that kind of a discussion to occur even though the Commission or Supervisors were not to be using those points in making our decision. He noted it was quite inconclusive since there are strong antidotal evidence he would guess in both directions; but it was sort of a draw. Therefore, Mr. Keller encouraged anyone in the audience who is interested in that factor to go back and listen since those meetings can be found on the Albemarle County website and you can dig in and see references to studies that have been done internationally and nationally on that topic. Mr. Keller asked for a roll call vote. The motion passed by 4:2. (Firehock, More no) (Lafferty absent) Mr. Keller noted this request would go forward to the Board of Supervisors. He asked for the second motion on the special use permit request. Motion: Ms. Spain moved to recommend approval of SP-2017-00015 with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Mr. Dotson seconded the motion. Mr. Keller invited discussion. Mr. Dotson said he thinks the analysis has been very thorough and Mr. Werner made some very good points, but he feels that the topography here as the staff indicated yields a Tier II performance even though technically this is a Tier Ill. Mr. Keller agreed that would be the argument he would use as well. He asked for a roll call vote. The motion passed by 4:2. (Firehock, More no) (Lafferty absent) The meeting moved to the next item on the agenda. • ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION—OCTOBER 10,2017 15 17-566 SP-17-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Draft Minutes • ii" I ). C�euntrex communlcatlon services,Inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 BETHESDA.MD 20817 _ PHONE:(202)408-0960 ..,_ „,.......L FAX: (202)40B•0961 • MILESTONE COMMUNICATIONS - SHENTEL 1 SUBMITTALS DATE OESCRPTION REV. AT STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 08_;6->; 21CCNKW 09-19-17 COUNTY COMMENTS Milestone 3827 STONY POINT ROAD COMMUNICATIONS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 ,EA- 1 c„,.....7,0,., , • ,,,. i"../__411,Z SHENTEL S• 5�� ,ILId9 SHENANDOAH PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS,LLC 6y, OYAL frVi:X" 1 DIRECTIONS: VICINITY MAP T-1 TITLE SHEET FROM 12110 SUNSET HILLS ROAD,RESTON.VA: TURN RIGHT ONTO SUNSET HILLS RD.MERGE ONTO VA-286 S/FNRFAX COUNTY PKWY.MERGE ONTO I-6E A 7 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OW ALL NOTICES MD COMPLY WTH ALL LAWS,ORDINANCES,RULES,REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS MERGE ONTO US-29 S.TAKE THE OS-15 EXIT TOWARD CULPEPER/ORANGE.TURN LEFT ONTO US-15 S/JAM Z-1 SITE PLAN ES MADISON HWY.CONTINUE ON US-15 S. Cr ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY,MUNOPAL ANO U0U9Y COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS,AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICRONK CODES BEARING TURN RIGHT ONTO W MAIN ST/US-15 S.CONTINUE TO FOLLOW W MAIN ST.W MEN ST.BECOMES CONSTITUTION HWY/VA-20.TURN LEFT ON SPOTSWOOD TRL/ 7-1 A TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PLAN ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND THE MATERIALS INSTALLED US-33 E/VA-20.TAKE FIRST RIGHT ONTO CONSTITUTION HWY/VA-20.TURN LEFT ONTO STONY POINT RD/VA-20.3827 STONY POINT RD IS ON THE LEFT. L M ' SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COOKS,REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. 2. THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER HAS MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE Z-1 B ADJOINERS SCOPE WORK. THED CONTRAIFIC BIDDINGO THE JOB EXCUSE ORERRORSINDRAWINGSORSHALLNOT SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT w�I7y,pq� MD IMPROVEMENTS N ACCORDANCE MTH lit INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. Q' Z-3 COMPOUND PLAN Milestone 3. THE CONTRACTOR OR WOOER SHALL BEAR THE RESPON9&UTY OF NOTFYING(IN WRITING)THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY CONFLICTS,ERRORS.OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION CC CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL OR PERFORMANCE OF WORE. Z-4 MONOPOLE ELEVATION IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR EXTENSIVE WORK, Q S7gyY COMMUNICATIONS UNLESS DIRECTED IN WF6TING OTERWISE Z-5 SHENTEL ANTENNA LAYOUT,SECTION,DETAILS AND SCHEDULE _ 4. THE DEEMEDOEE OF CESSARYRK TO�COPLETE ME WORK/PROECT ASALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS. DES BED HEREIN. T,LABOR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND LABOR Pam'n Z-6 SHENTEL RADIO HEAD DETAILS 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AST RC JOB SITE PRIOR TO 1HE 988HNS51ON OF BIOS OR PERFORMING WORK TO FAMIUARIZE HIMSELF • Z-7 SHENTEL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN PROJECT NO: 1050.213 1 WITH THE FIELD CONDITIONS AND TO WRIT THAT RE PROJECT CAN BE OONSIRIICTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT 000.11ENTS. SITE Z-8 SHENTEL FIBER DISTRIBUTION AND PTC CABINET DETAILS DESIGNER: C.S. 6. THECONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED MTH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING ROR(ON ANY ITEM 4QO a ENGINEER: M.M. NOT CLEARLY DEFIED BY lE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Qa Z-9 SHENTEL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS 7. THE ES�IRACCT R SHALL INNOTED OTHERMISE NSSTAL ALL EERE �QUIPMCEENT ODES AND OUMAAT MATERIALS ACCORDINGC G TO MANUFACTUER'S/VENDOR'S SPECIFICATION ,,,\ Z-1 0 SITE DETAILS SCALE: UN4, Z-11 TREE SURVEY PLAN reed& THECONTRACTOR SHALL PROVDE A FULL SET OFCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AT THE STE UPDATED MTH THE LAMEST REASONS AND d� ADDENDA OR CLARIFICATIONS AVAILABLE FOR ME USE BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED MTH ME PROEM'. Z•12 TREE SURVEY-TREES TO REMAIN GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY - - RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS,METHODS.TEC-Ae0UES SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING All PORTIONS OF lit MURK UNDER THE CONTRACT. STONY POINT 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS MACH MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS I PROJECT DESCRIPTION VOLUNTEER FIRE CO, BY THE ARCIITECT/ENONEER,TEE STATE,COUNTY OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY. II. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS,EASEMENTS,PAVING,CURBING. ADJ ADJUSTABLE MECH MECHANICAL $ SPOT ELEVATION SCOPE OF MORK: 1,INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.CLEAR TREES. 8 ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMREIKXR OF HIK,RE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED APPROX APPROXIMATE MFR MANUFACTURER 2.INSTALL GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD TO COMPOUND. STONY POINT RD 3.INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT NE PROPERTY. CAB CABINET MGB MAIN GROUND BAR i CENTERLINE 4.CLEAR AND GRADE DIE TO FINAL SU8GRADE ELEVATION. CLO CEUNG MIN MINIMUM 5.INSTALL MONOPOLE FOUNDATION AND 135'MGH MONOPOLE. CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ME GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE CONC CONCRETE NIL METAL 6.INSTALL EQUIPMENT FRAME AND EOUIPMEHT C ALL DIRT,DEBRIS,RUBBISH MD REMOVE EOUIPLENT NOT SPECIFIED AS WANING ON TE PROPERTY.PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT COAT CONTINUOUS LAIC NOT IN CONTRACT It FLAME 7.INSTALL GROLINDNG,MESA CABINET BASE,BLUFF WNEWAY. 22911 N CLEAN ClXDITXN AND FEE FROM PAINT SPOTS.DUST.OR SMUDGES OF MY NATURE. CJ CONSTRUCTION JOINT TUTS NOT TO SCALE 8.INSTALL ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE LXXNOAT AND HAND HOLES 13. THE CCRTRACTCR SHALL COOLY NTH ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THIS PROECT. DIA DIAMETER DC ON CENTER Xlik DETAIL NUMBER 9.INSTALL FENCE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. DWG DRAWING OPP OPPOSITE IllarSHEET NUMBER TITLE: 14. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER MERE A CONFUCT OCCURS ON ANY OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS EGB EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR SF SQUARE FOOT THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO ORDER MATERIAL OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK THAT IS IN CONFUCT UNTL EA EACH SHT SHEET DIE CONFLICT IS RESOLVED BY DIE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. —G—GROUND WIRE PROJECT INFORMATION ELEC ELECTRICAL SIN SIMILAR 15. RE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALLDIMENSONS,ELEVATIONS,PROPERTY MINES ETC ON THEPROECT. a ELEVATION SS STAINLESS STEEL ED EQUAL SW STEEL pal ANTENNA EQUP EQUIPMENT TOC TOP OF CONCRETE PROPERTY OWNER STONY PONT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO,INC LATITUDE_ N 06'35.2292 TITLE SHEET 3827 STONY PONT RD. LONGITUDE: W-7-78'22'14.842- EXT EXTERIOR TOM TOP OF MASONRY CALL CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 GROUND ELEVATION: t480.0' FF FINISHED FLOOR 10S TOP OF STEEL APPLICANT: MILLSTONE COMMUNICATIONS JURISDICTON: ALBEMARLE COUNTY GA GAGE TIP TYPICAL MISS UTILITY 12110 SUNSET HILLS ROAD,SUITE 100 PROPERTY INFO: ACCT.NO.04800-D0-00-01800 GALV GALVANIZED HF WRAY IN FIELD 8-1-1 RESTON,VA 20190 CURRENT ZONING: VILLAGE RESDENTIAL(RR) G8 GROUND BAR LION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING MR.LEN FORKAS ENTRANCE CORRIDOR(EC) CC GENERAL CONTRACTOR WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC SAFETY PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY (703)620-2555 EX.104 SW MOUNTAINS RURAL HISTORIC DISTRICT CRND GROUND w/ WM CONTRACTOR(S)AT ALL TRENCHING IN ACCORDANCE WITH USE: FIRE/RESCUE STATION/ SHEET NUMBER' LG LONG & AND CURRENT OSHA STANDARD TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE N WI LONG LEG HORIZONTAL 0 AT MAX MAXIMUM T-1 41, • /% \ entrex WADS PASSAGE \ F� eommunleation eeMeOe,Inc. \ �k�v • l 04 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite SSO STN, \ / BETHESDA,MD 20817 POST Ab A PRONE:(202)408-0960 \ / »'44'39• FAX: (202)d08-0961 E w I zsol./LslrE O I / / I• \ qt Q N ) /� O / \\ ( SUBMITTALS• \ DATE pEswenm Im. 5`` Ryl h/ • \ 06-30-17 ZONING PENDY 07-17-17 HMG MEN �� • t' •\ \ \ \ • (�: !n�ry \ 08-16-17 ZOOG RENEW \ \ \ f/ � �� 09-19-17 COUNTY tta9ENR C7 sit ' \ Y S \ _ 10-10-n RLOGTm ACCESS ROAD 559. VICINITY MAP n Y / / I 1 'Gs SCALE 1.= 1000' J �r' . % /��/\ / 1 \\ \ 11111E DRIX \ .�{\i / / /\\\ I 1 '\ .•• v We'Vec 705.9' SITE PLAN NOTES \ / / •\�\F\ / \ ` \ • `' \ / ' l \\ \\ .' \• 1 \r J \ I.) SITE NAME: STONY POINT FIRE DEPARTMENT / ^J/ i ' .\ n. �4 \� \\\ i / �� 1 2.) THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND IS NOT TO BE \ y /-� �` 1 I\ PROPO4D It E0E \ 1v USED FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY. ^ \ \ -73 '� --v / a I 21, / l/O DUNL ACQSS ROVE 1. THE SUBJECT PARCEL INFORMATION: \ / --,1 1 A\ / / / / I�` EBESS AERSS ELYYDTT/ \ OWNER: STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. INCORPORATED I yS' \ v. '� 1 > I \PPEMISfS ADDRESS 3B2]STONY POINT RO l / X-/ I0 /71,i / ;III / /� 1 .\MAILING ADDRESS 382]CHASTONYEPOIM RD.22901 -OJZ\ � / I CHARLOTTESVILLE VA. 229DI / B5 W \\ i % / % l�(\I I I I ' N L// / 1 I I m dCOUNTY: ALBEMARLE COUNTY \ �V X/ i- „ \\ii I I i I 1 1 11 F N\\ W!_ACCOUNT NUMBER: 04800-CD-00-01800 // IZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL(VR).ENTRANCE CORRIDOR(EC), ) (SW MOUNTAINS RURAL HISTORIC DISTRICT \ / �,1 �' ( \'`\\\�1111A1�1 \� Oh" 4.) THE DATUM'S ARE HAD 83 AND NAVD 88, MD / A,7`i •// /T \'c. �. ��lf�V"�_ \ /OVALL>��6'.1 THE BEARING BASE IS STATE GRID. .y \.� 0. // PROPERTY / \ 440111 1 I 1 =.\ Or, � 5.) NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN / :.., `: O UNE.ffi. I ;\`I,\\\1\1/y \\ LOCATED.THE PRESENCE OF ANY SUCH CONTRACTOMUTES R BTEFORE CONSTRUCTION.E CONFIRMED BY E •EL 'Us %LA4= N •\ \\ �\\ \ • 1ST A _ \ \ \ \ \ \ ♦ C. \ 6.) NO WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DEFINED AND ANY _�y �_ \ 1 \. 1\ \ �, Z AREAS SHOWN AS MARSH, PONDS OR 1' '1 \ \� \ _ DITCHES ARE DONE SO FROM VISIBLE \ ¢�I \ t \ \ '\j \\\\\\ \ -;\ \ SURFACE FEATURES AND IN NO WAY CONSTITUTE A DEFINED WETLAND. § � \ / `- \ / \\ 1 1 I I \\% ' 7.) THE ROW ZONE OF THE PROPOSED MONOPOLE IS I T\/\ \ 1 1 I i I \ AS FOLLOWS; FLOOD ZONE X. AREA DETERMINED TO \ )I \ ( 1 I -� I • BE OUTSIDESOURCE,FEMA 5 FLOOD MAP FLOO FOR B. 2]5.6' \f/\ \ COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER ALBEMARLE511003C0325D COUNTY. VA. \ ' \ /T ) X/"\ 1 I I I\ E�/i�i�-�\ \ EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 4,2005. �.T \G § � •J 1 }t I I (\ \V/^ /-^ \ 7 B.) A TITLE REPORT FOR THIS PROPERTY WAS \.• 11,/' \ Milestone FURNISHED BY CAMDEN TITLE COMPANY DATED , ® \ '1('1 I II 1`��� ���\\ \ COMMUNICATIONS JUNE 2, 201]. 1 •A' \ I 1 ` //i^����\ 9.) THE DATA COLLECTED AND SHOWN ON THIS ,A, /p"1/ti • \� t I I \ v ^//./ N.." � \ DRAWING ARE FOR THE PURPOSES OF % A ` \ \ \� //^/ _ CONSTRUCTION OF A CELLULAR MONOPOLE. ANY 4 '�P \ \ \ \\ \ // �/ \ \\ \ NECESSARY ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND ALL / 656.6 \� \ 1' 1\ \'\ \\\_-"///j_^/\I\\\ \T \ PROJECT NO: 1050.213 APPROPRIATE EASEMENTS. \'\ 10.)NO UNRECORDED EASEMENTS ME SHOWN ON , la R135.0' \ \1 I\\\\ \ - /%/^^ 114�11\\ DESIGNER: CS. ` / ENGINEER: M.M. THIS SURVEY AND IT IS POSSIBLE 111AT SUCH / 299.6' I \ 1 \ \��-// �� \ \ \ EASEMENTS IMPACT THE SITE. `YDmm IJV.1 I I \�\\ \ 11J THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL MATTERS •/ \: M RDall 411117 I 1 1 \ \ \ ^// - \ \.....‘ \ / \ / OF PUBLIC RECORD. , ` ` 'I / / / J \` __^i/```\\\\S ,\ SCALE 12.) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED MONOPOLE IS / \ I` ' / ^ / / _\ S 0 1 f2 I O 1+`/1 / /i //j I/ i/ \\ N L AS FOLLOWS; THE VALUES USTED BELOW «�A�����` / // ) ) / /1 ^ // ���\\ GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES ARE WITHIN 350'HORIZONTAL MD 320'VERTICAL • I ?!' -_1 i// 1 1)/ /I i^/ /��,_ \ \ -- LATITUDE ± N 38'OW 35.229' -- � 1' tik " / // / / c LONGIlUOE 2 W J8'22'14.842 / 1 / / I(/ / / STONY POIT ELEVATBASE: 48D.O' AMSL / ! / 1/13.) FlELD SURVEY BY ENTRE%COMMUNICATION SERVILE$, INC. II I I ///-_ - VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. BY CPS ON JUNE 15, 201). II I/ / / '^14.) NO OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. \\III �j 3627 STONY POINT RD PVTLINE TYPES \ Iluyjljl CNARLOTTESVILLEIVA � l J)II I IIII 1, i,i'/ 22911 BOUNDARY LINE- PARENT PARCEL LEGEND MONOPOLE SETBACKS \ I II II !1//,//// • /PROPOSEDI I .K IIII III I II /O FOUND PROPERTY CORNER TO PROPERTY REQUIRED -1 / 111111�RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY LINE 'Z \M.J�/(IW11ITIRE: // \ / FRONT YARD(WEST) 1742 135.0 EDGE OF ASPHALT $ UTILITY POLE >54221•w I \'�y��, REAR YARD(EAST) 3OLP MP PROPOSEDID1N5393�680 622.60'� Ol EDGE OF CONCRETE 4 SIGN SIDE YARD(SOUTH) 156.9 135.e GRID E:11520095.964 LATITUDE: 38 Q UCHT POLE _ O635.229 FENCE UNE-CHAIN SIDEYARO(NORTH) )05.5 '36.V GROUNDELEVATION:GITUDE ]480.0'4ANSL O SITE PLAN TELEPHONE PEDESTAL I CLOSEST OFF BRE RESIDENCE 299.0 WA q 1' CONTOUR UNE 0 INDIVIDUAL TREE- DECIDUOUS CLOSEST OFF SITE ROAD 656.6' N/A lo� 1+ 5' CONTOUR UNE GRAPHIC SCALE TREE OR VEGETATION UNE _ u no SHEET NUMBER: SITE PLAN ® n j. SCllE 1'=50' n c z-1 (w FEET) 1 Inch= 50 EL , Nit- :' :;�i:. j • : • ;fit:: .. :• .•, :••:� :`''.o';::.•. ;j.. •: ..y € • to:. .(<i a . communication services,Inc. �'ybVjf,• ..i;. a'S5._. •:`a l: •' ,•` "• '•:i. ••N:. SSA. ti,• ,Sys •- -:„ . _L....: .':.4:'..'. ' E: rs: •:;-- ••}•�• •? '�,�: ' .:fS-• • E 6600 RockledgeDrive.Suite 550 • N . ' Y-.•.. - •.3?:,• •: '''.�'. �g . .K •.z�` BEfHESDA,MD 20817 iy Y• - . •µ'<. • PHONE:(202)408496° • rea:'�°ti":',.. n .,A,. . :� :•. . . .:. ::• `,F•. '• • •3i•.:.£'^m;.. : • FAX: (202)408-0961 ,'.. y - 4••f\%.4. • -•‘ .X'• i2' '' '��n•' n :: ..'�g • 4E,..;:$j• .:3' • i '; .•.J: }4 1• .., • f6:•• •'T ' y1`• tia �'A�:xi»::�riy1 . , i',; � . v::: £3. ?ci- ,.E..i,Ffi:. i4x(c£b- - " . . y_ • 1. ':� :' - r+ ;i£.. . Sr.. ..".x.::...,_.r.- .•.+.;:�.• '>:•. , .JR . .•:'>> ... ...q:K . ....1 • 6yp.; aia.. . _ ::.3. :?:3'•. .• SUBMITTALS ..Y• y2 ..:�:L. • .......... �m�'���IIIy@�������ya •_ :, _ : :-.x\��1{ •�••>,•"•.s'Y:'•• . . Dorf omAPnm IR`/. • 3. •' ,4:•;: . " •,wr-...zx3 .�: .. $.. :',e. • .•'.•. . ;'i�. .:'id'.. .'t. _ t' eT`. ' R' .:;fl.:.�. �g ac-so-n zaac RENEW •`." �•L :. uE!!'P7°Y"''. < Y, i�' y''.- .1 . y '' " : rFa •-ifis''¢e!'£f..'. •l'I•= � Jl�,tia- m-n-n ZONING RENEW ' �.. �$ l'':4�• :yk..: 08-IF(1 ZONING RENEW ��pp kq, �.' • y '•;•�^•.' •�� .. :• 'Ira, fR''Mt ?03;r:!� as-Is-n COUNTY camwrs .:iTa +..[jff c^:'• "R - .']' ',.7fA:.^ .'fit:' �',: •'R<56 .:j?::. '4' r�'. E •: •�kc:' ::£.•: :V"• ti ; "i :-4,..i' i*tia^''°DY' t ';.• ;.` :;'�. ..,4' -qi" V t0-10-17 Rl CAlED ACCESS ROAD • =S'• • >1)::/1 R ..,, .I' �C .' .. ' :r.• • : . . • .•-,,x.. +:.:�•dY.: •:0•r' '::�%°cSW ''r�.' •:R` :J':. . . ... : .N'� 'Y,{.s... l�:: i[ ' k :,Y itlAUR .�' �, ;Sf ,�(� ..�. CiYly• e-' •A�iL ..%.,_�J.' hlr.. :'?x!ZY,- rf9". • :3'.':S�l.�h.��$: :sat. .::� 9 �� - •_i ::S'... ;r .•goy'.:< ;''' 'ef•' •• x::. r': 'rv':�' tr' j9' • :•ts2t,`'' .. . :,�: `x�>:..;a•. :% i• •.,,,,�:• ,.�,.%I,{(.. ,:rd, - •..5. �' - - .. .,{.::,' - .:(4'-., .. .• .••A._:�:i. b /i:. 'i. • ... - jai'�1� '.' b:Wd#.. .Y i�.• .. •YA,eP✓I: . �l'Vi. ) i •�ti• ..'m...:V. •. - ;: 1T. .'�' . .:::-.•:. SEAL •'S••''{ •.fr• -•. Y$ .. ::, _'rA a!#.' -ry•. tii D. it • :i :.: ;i ,::irN''.•' _ . . yy _•:.vs: ri.. 7 :%J: i. :-9!� .4.• r °•: . r.�` . ::'.a -• °& .•_:a. -:v:.� 5r; Y\., ..e.• ..: :€;klNx' tq. :�t'�; •�`•: :.a✓" .: 7�, y�`�y7� • y r-p.}< :. .• £ y�a �.��3`�• '•. . . '`. � cN+H p•. .5 •i. �$. • Q •'d ./..... t.><t;. • zt.4 f.' 1. i4-0,,::.ii., :P:3..y;• :9 ?:. .:�::u:' .r • . i�• _..i : 15,. c 'S' •:'VRm'il'iV • {' •�s:.•:Y �.&.., i:!. WI?4.- • _:�%'ii • : leiat.' iidY�'• .,:" -t' _:.N'.•.N. YY ...4 .,.:. _ i (,:'. -�:� 4w.:--. •.: r:•-:r r _ •:•tl. :•f,.;.. w•••c iti .:5 is S • �yS•�•'�•Fp• • .:;... \3 , SlY S .>�� ••F • • • >T:i v+.! s. ..�-'. . iiiyi. : �fry•1 yy'`�� �1:r:::i':.H': :.'b i ^ice' '.v ^a, .. J :+.:..: 'L $`'� Gals •,,:. .'>c.*"�.� • .I' .:�. •_: <4. , ':.::�.. :, i?:,;;„ll., P . :•• ',.;! i,;•; �s, •b.: ' ': :r?•. 0 0.o_,s `•;::,d:::....:I: .y.. . ..•airi:Y%--.<�iss."- • - . . . .: :n1 :::. ,::vf :w,iPX tY?..'�ilxY-! rL '\45.4i .w:R'.,. • .. '.,..•se. y�fJ �:,.@pe •:I.�%..°�l::ln:;. .:I..•irr.• A' 1'ii. :t.:;e,\: .::lie.?'fh•i •r-:: .. .1:CV- y•. •••:c :I,' • ••Y ' • .: •• �Y x>:... .. ••-;I. "• ipaN .:.r _.r•.... ..k?. L'::' • �y:.' •.• \i.•. .,.3.r.. . •. �;ri4e.,:'rT•.. .., f, .•=. .»J•Y'<s•• • _ :.4c� 43.1 :,!k �y :'y1' ..:54'.,,.�p.'.Y : •.:.�:d� -�aeepp��.. +� .aA • • •:Ttd, �..,.:%:: :}::r' .•'gi. s4l§. a• 'rf:. Tovmse° • ,tli !'SH 'Y]..A _. • .' '➢A'S:'C'• .:'1.�k.,. :Grra4r�.Ai....•y : ,:[eCt ^ININ:!{Yi,.. 3 ..:: •:•' ....'��'•• :., :�.' <XII]'.. 1 : • ..>R. ".;: : •PFr-..' f::".^.E�'.• E• ;..zrs�{. •:.�::.;n•:'.: .�p;x;A:r':�.rlrif"s9>�s+,:::3R_:,•tiar':" • 'Z '�•t..' 7+ "^vt• 3� 4 . .f:. , .-�.: .�•. .. ,>' ,v`. ,3 .�:If • ,} . :3wij•�}T,'�y'.^.�j :-i.j;.� aem>;3n...... .arr , ,y yy • .., 1,‘. {}: �,�I�-x 'fea.-('e lU{,'.1:.• ./•y .l2 2:• • ';'I,.,..' ..•:,'�" a,Y ,'�>•:(IY4'•'Se,V'iff• i'y: -• '1 ' : i: •F. ..,':::ir''3lll / .. hot : • x,� i....' F : • :4A . :: '. ..r!il i.•wr :•••; 'I..: d1Y.'•• 4•.; •• lril - ag'hiv:.r?..:�,S,:i3':.• . ;`�ssiat!>�:eo'v�. '' ir ••' -r! : � �:'',.:•i• - _ ..F. ,:;�""`, ,'.:'�'" '?fin&. �i rid'-�•. ••.r:r. .o yxe.'' 5��-:<r.: ..w4;•;:_ y '3' . ••I:•'•• '•:_•.' iAC. }i'1:.••V^--yal X-�'>ke0)....,cam::. _'.L•.: .A. ,�yyv1 .3�.� £ :�'. .. :LYE. • •.��'.: .� • t.,,1 •.'F._7' { Sir'.'£:' . ..'Iitien : .r,:•• -1 i ..?2 �1 •'t ¢{' 'S' p ;M:.f' tx; :C'• • ••Y:.. .:V',� _`. y�� �,Y::'.� '. ••>y�: _,� ! ,lF :;Y Y : .:,•, .: : ) • • `r: ::'.,: i • • H : :; `:. . Milestone y�:� ''y . •! •' �.:' ,.!.s,;r,;.;' �4? :{. �.y COMMUNICATIONS • • vt _.. ..:8: §''•-� t .Irks. :�/�,y-tw>j • .yt'y�-k.,y'•�:'{�J $ i':.w?tt >t. � ,T". �:i`� • ��§]?< S V :• 1 ... ' r .;t. .5 .' x '[t • .R S•'. ,• - ,ii:,U:••. .-... wtq� J ,n:%f:5,:. .,:•13 *:o""- . . v . _ • r.: , .. ::::R.• i[� • ; ::•• 'may. .:r :� .. • . . s•aa. e;ice,- . ::,;K:,.s as ':.::�;# S - ;•.¢. : : - .N'- ' • ': i 'F. "i f ..•':.a'i .•'�+`iJi,„.:• "r • r •Ae , . '3�yd„ -� ..y: ,. ., .-.. ..-i...^�. r'.' Si•:: ' ...�;::;'S'.. .i::�..•. €.?'r�.:.:yr��y . �� : t�5 '.nfe^ • _! . yt's.:' PROJECT NO: 10502 ' ... .--`f:, ,.'. •I:. . : : �.:•: . .I,.?:':;.•.I::r,'L�'ti .. . . ': .. Y li _ail. . ::.. '_� . . y �_ ".$' :.:7:- .i.'2'::S':_':': ' ''�• • . DESIGNER: C.S. qN�� ,{�q p � e :'f:. `41 ' :'i.: f. , F:Vf. .9. •: r jT° fi.".:•_....?- : ..- .'.i'R . I� - . . ,.> , . ">u..l:. • .•': `r. 1. .:l.,at-'4: & €i E�i . _ .v p>;;u:-•. } • t/ lls firt0 • i EGINEER: MMr • • I: :s,: : .;r.: ' • ::.?.':'1 : s'•'rr . ' • �? i ?tpi , EI ��.�� SCAL:( , s., ::.S? . ;•4 r . .. '`.'!i u••• .,fi . • • . .:� Xl:3 ' •: 0 i 2:$ .b � rY��rr. GRAPHICSCALE IN INCHES j' : - f.: � wr:_>, ' v 5 ,�' • xA..L�s,.; n�'a. •J:. ' :�xf IY �I �.-£ �.! :t. •£'vix°tr .9. • .�.qel j. :,� e,�I�j'. .•r;.:.: - li /' 4 "°'si°r' - t`'•' re•-:'f,:- : ;e. • : ...ell „ • . �;.•.* > . •.•.•; :" •`` • �:,: • .- .z ,a;u, :£a.• STONY POINT • • • .yi?. .. . .:;2E:-' T f'•' •' - "'`m• '•.• ;j• '!>. • f, � • vr.N.. - ixi:x::rW', wixw.K.w.wlprp.'•'• 5, ...,.. :.• •� , •• VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. '.': .•.:. �.. . . : ; -.. : .'•--, ,- . . € : : i. : •. a'. . 7 1: . '. ::_ 'L � : sS:"�'n.. , s: . ' Pt :. _ 3827 STONY POINT RD . .;. . $f ` ��r . • f�:i4,x. •:��• • ,•. ' �F:'..�`.''..: wx,;;a.:.. •- '. , �'.. , zAirt �i:;; �'� . CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA " '•= •:I: ' .• ier:--':,1': !c . . m.•-�'.: '31` . ,uarafre'�L`i : • a;r•: . . :::e+.�;., . . ` •(: �' ? 21.J. 22911 �•' ', ' . :': ti:nv :' • r.>rsh: %' .i: ¢ .' • :.:#� i:. .$;i: i txL,:ai . •. .'i :;c.r;`; ; ' ' i 'siti:.:,s�< •: �i .ji::"s...fr:.,.iri.. liTE:- 3' -�.E:cY!; :.il• 3''• :. • �Y :� �.iit,= ., • -,f�i'{{ •• Ptisn..' '��ati4p; �.r$Iayiil �.. . �a. ' ;��:� .'v:✓:.iw..a. -.W'.••' 3'. • • • +.'§•r':I. •YB:S4"b ..4,;•h1 : k. -r :.:F .,:\14. .L• . l�:''R:•• ••• •-•/- •,i$•• .'x�,�rh'..'..:; .i •. '' : >:+. • •:r,. . • .s . .:r, .. .,..:: '•=3;• • ; . .a.<.;, wsw.,.:"... . :.� � TOPOGRAPHIC '>b • �q MAP GRAPHICSCALE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP '� SLEET NUMBER: ii ii SC0.L r=zsa z-lA J � L. (w Fal) , Z-1A 1 inch. 60 Il • entrex communication aeMcee,Inc. MAIN PARCEL 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 BETHESDA,MD 20817 GPIN 04800-00-00-018D0 PHONE: 202)406-0960 FAX: N/F FAX: (202)408-0961 STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC. PARCEL ADDRESS: 3827 STONY POINT ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22901 MAILING ADDRESS: SAME DEED BOOK 575 PAGE 493 ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL SUBMITTALS AREA: 8.0200 AC DAIS DWI1m REA 06-N1-11 MIND RENEW _ _ 07-17-17 LOINS RENEW 68-li-17 10Ix5 RENEW 09-19-17 COWIE COAISIR 1. 10-10-17 RELOCATE)ACCESS ROAD GPIN 04800-00-00-019E0 6 N/F GPIN 04800-00-00-018B1 DOVEDALE LLC N/F PARCEL ADDRESS: 3800 STONY POINT PASS MCDANIEL, KELVIN D OR DEBORAH J CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 PARCEL ADDRESS: 3821 STONY POINT ROAD MAILING ADDRESS: 3977 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 KESWCK VA, 22947 MAIUNG ADDRESS: 2966 WATTS PASSAGE ROAD DEED BOOK DATA NOT AVAILABLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 SEAL ZONING: RURAL AREA, VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL DEED BOOK 1640 PAGE 387 AREA: 247.73 AC ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 0.9980 AC 416AEDtoo 2 ° y_ GPIN 04800-00-00-01700 7 A 4. N/F GPIN 04800-00-00-01882 '1 r' .,5 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE SCHOOL BOARD N/F ATTN: SUPRTINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS TRIMBLE, MARY A PARCEL ADDRESS: 3893 STONY POINT RD. PARCEL ADDRESS: 3803 STONY POINT ROAD ° CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 51°NA4L1 e• MAILING ADDRESS: 401 MCINITRE ROAD MAILING ADDRESS: SAME CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 DEED BOOK 3839 PAGE 346 DEED BOOK 1582 PAGE 454 ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL a. ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 0.9980 AC AREA: 11.0350 AC 1 3. 8. GPIN 048000-00-01863 GPIN 04800-00-00-01800 N� \ N/F FLINT, THOMAS WAYNE OR AIMEE S 00,..--' MATZER, HEINZ E OR MARY C PARCEL ADDRESS: 3801 STONY POINT ROAD PARCEL ADDRESS: 3869 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 KESWICK, VA 22947 MAIUNG ADDRESS: 2904 WATTS PASSAGE MAILING ADDRESS: SAME CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DEED BOOK 4406 PAGE 175 IDEED BOOK 1613 PAGE 383 ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL Milestone AREA: 3.6400 AC AREA: 1.1710 AC COMMUNICATIONS ' 4. 9. GPIN 04800-00-00-016E0 GPIN 04800-00-00-02100 N/F RICKARD, DAVID JOHN OR SUSAN BAKER ATHAYDE, JOHN MF OR WHITNEY G PROJECT NO: 1050.213 PARCEL ADDRESS: 3830 STONY POINT RD PARCEL ADDRESS: 3775 STONY POINT ROAD DESIGNER: M.A. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 ENGINEER M.M. MAILING ADDRESS: 3796 STONY POINT RD MAILING ADDRESS: SAME CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 IDEED BOOK 4372 PAGE 599 DEED BOOK 4078 PAGE 457 ZONING: RURAL AREAS SCALE: ZONING: VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL AREA: 13.96 AC 0 1 2 AREA: 1.956 AC GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES GPIN 04800-00-00-0160110. 5. GPIN 04800-00-00-02000 NF STONY POINT N/F NOVEMBERINC. VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. RICKARD, DAVID JOHN OR SUSAN BAKER PARCEL ADDRESS: 2561 HILL, ER HILL FARM PARCEL ADDRESS: N/A KESWICK, VA 22947 MAILING ADDRESS: 3796 STONY POINT RD MAILING ADDRESS: SAME 3827 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 DEED BOOK 1983 PAGE 363 DEED BOOK 4078 PAGE 457 ZONING: RURAL AREAS CHARLOTTESVILLEI VA ZONING: VILLAGE 370ESIIDENTIAL AREA: 199.9020 ACAREA: AC ,I,I 111Le ADJOINERS SHEET NUMBER: Z-1 B AREA TABULATION ''LINE TYPES 1 1 STRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE `I/ FENCE LINE-CHAIN LIMITS OF . ANC. _ 1 WITHOUT WIRE SUPPORT) ((� SIZE AREA: B02 AC -.-.-.-.-._._.-.-.-._._. ._ TREE OR VEGETATION UNE JJ- •'�_ - -' �v entrex 1•CONTOUR UNE UNITS OF DISTURBANCE/SILT FENCE I.SET THE STAKES. 2.EXCAVATE A 4••(TRENCH DISTURBED AREA 16.672 SF UPS UNE ALONG THE LINE OF communication 60Meos.Inc. 42530 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE p STAp9. 5•CONTOUR UNE TREE PROTECTION FENCE li1 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 650 rT /� f III PHONE6DA,MD-0960 \ / 1 / / / ! / /I -.-.._.-..-.._.._,.� /% 1 V j /I i%- / / I / I11 - jjII pnmox 1.or � / / / / / l iI \ tfY • —� I' IC/ / / / ' i / I r Ensmc\wmm� \l fK°f/ '"�' / \ / 1I1 1 AIiFA(MIn1IIIIII-4. `' -- //' //i/ i -_ \ III II1 l I\ I1 1, 1 Y \ SOBMII'TALS •{. j :44i _ `9` / (✓ / // / / / / _ I I 1 1 I \ \ \ I .� M DATE DFSRPION REV. A•t�.•� y____ i / // /// o' '�' \ / I \ \ 1 1 1 I \ S.srAPIL FILTER TuiERW. :;: EL mANY REAAEO 0>-1]-1]mP1FIY. 06-I6-1]PROPOSED • 2 O" 10 THE%PAR 08-19-17 RONJNNG IROI END 10.10-1] PROPOSED MATS CP \ / I '-1 \''...--.....-...).") I• . ` I 1 1 I �� Uhl vy .y till; 1 95RD THE FAERC d A EDT TICE O6NIALINRE NO •\ I 1 I / - / ,.__ I I \ I 1 _ f / \ t1_i fre. / ., -' DEmIPt6E d BELCVE A SO.T TW PPod 1O SIT FBE$sx / / • -_____�_.__ ( 1 1 \ , ` .. M/ � IIr f � IB7 DOM 2/2-2 '��`-2"� 1 1 1 1 11 >11 !r • \ rAl 1ilYl BE 1EPUfFD BE NECEj.. TIE END OF THE SSARY, USABLE UM AND NE ___ _ 1 1 1 1 1" \ 1 ` ` •e - BASREP STILL BE M(f55AHY,1M MIMIC SHALL PROPERTY /X \ 1 1 1 m I f 1 1 \ L\"{r- WE '/ \ 1\ \ \ '" 1 •1 \� \ - RIOSBNG MIT SHEET FLOW INSTALLATION l SEMITDIT IMPOSTS OVED AFTER EAd STORM EVENT.ONTHEY YViOULD BE I BE REMOVED ' \ \ 1 1 1 ` I 1 \1 0.1+D(1TPIGLL) (PERSPECIIVX VIET) WEN DEPOSITS REACH ANPO%NA1FLr \ 1 1 1 1 I \\\ \ \ /r��� fflCPmm UYR A ONE-HALF THE KECHT CF THE EARNER / / r\ 1 \\ \ l \\ \. .I b dsNi✓BANCE(TIP.) SEAL \ \ PROPOSED Wits I SAND THE SILT Cora to LmCINMLE iip / / N. \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \`\ `\ \\ I 6OWOIG(Ire.) ' �• SWHTEESOr FENS6NOLdAR PEE / \ \ \ \ \ ` \ -- COS O RAESSm 10 REMAND NM D. \ FESING BODE PREPARED Am SEEDED ca411AlneCNI, TREE UNE DOSING rumor ‘\ 'o. \\ \ \ \ \ PHDPOSD 10•rnDE /// \ " r'.. at.,"*t.. AREA(DAG11) \ \ \ \ \ 9 \'` CRAW.ACCESS ORMIII/ \ �\\ \\ \ 1 \ \ \ \1 .. / ♦ \ 1 \ \\I \ �\(1 ` �,\ \ PODrrs•A•SRO=BE HIGHER THAN Poen•E•. O t /�• I ' ` 1 I \ 1 \ ,\ \\\ DRAINAGE WAY INSTALLATION 7ONAT CTTO /' / /! `� \ 1\ `\ \\ 4 `I� \ \ (FRONT ELEVATION) CVO ._ /•/ ,, L; 1 \ / \� j \ SILT FENCE \ \ 93 / ;' \ \y 1 �\ \ / -/ // I/ -`\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \ \\1 •/ \\\/ /\\ \`, \ 111 i ]v NUN. �' / /i / \ A \ /\% R� mlDcu) \\ a f A •r I e:, rRV I.M • Y}/ \ • Il ` J/.� \\ \\ \\\ \ 1'T • \\/ /\\ 11 \I , I \\ In_IlllfnxnNnHJ hx rOi01SF'At.i:•1 AraO lanxe ti'raa MOUNTABLE-- BERM \ / / \ 11 \I \ \\ 9 •\ 9 \ I 1 I / `\ / // EXISTING FILTER TIE A- ®rmav' Milestone / / \ 1 1 1 \ \ /s\I 1 i II 1 I �\ /'' SIDE ELEVATION COMMUNICATIONS •_ \ A / / I I I . T /IV 1 ]P MN. / `\ \ \,}/ \\ /\` \ 1 1 l\\ \\ \ / �D, rMm�TiNmo¢io IV PROJECT NO: 1050.213 \ \ !/y N \ / / DESIGNER: C.S. \ \A / 1 I LOE$m 1 \ \ -490•- / 1 rTT / flmmnitl.2A \ \ -\_% /\ X\,B \ D ¢(TIP) 1\ \1 / // l°Nsnp ITT A' III lewx Mv'KHT ENGINEER: M.M. CRAWL PARIONG "'1_ / • AHD MN AROUND \ \/ \1�/A'\ \I \PRIPOSED NOR \\ ��______/ / Will / •�• o. \I / 1 I 0 OGRND OW.) ` SCALE: J 0 1 2 7 / PROPERTY `�I gT 11 "�1 I6 i 1 L\ \ \{�. ______' i/ vmrnmmsc ~a. Pomrvc DRAINAGE T IY /• UNE,ire. a / , 1 �.r I j \\ \\ T--'^ _ / AGGREGATE.na. TO SEDIMENT Id 1 / / GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES I I / // \ m __ V .Musr mEUD FULL NIDTN / PROPOSED 1s•D• ® 1\ I/ 4 tD'WD > T / - / °a`vvu°06�'"D EArEa PLAN VIEW INgDE A m'•SD'FENCED f,,/L ', / / I ) 1 �^ ^EE,, \ / /----' STONY POINT 9 N£ / WTN m' 1 / / R VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. \ DOSING MARSH ' '� I x •rY / / / . , / / •x• %)a,JVyIVI} V�}IVIy >'T���Ifr�yA����•Y•�'• '•M�N. 3827 STONY POINT RD / AREA 11mcAL) \ l V , / 1 1 / ,, / 7'`,.' / / / 'Das1Nc / / ' ,/ �:IL=II I ‘Y\V.tY•SkIliatibagi it%P.V\AMSA•%:>- rum. s Is / \ lfM=�y FILTER CNARLDTTESVILLE,VA / ,/ I / / ,a. ., / /d / / ,"'L'' SECTION A—A 22911 \ I 1 I I 1 •/, %•- / / ,./ / / / r / / /- ' ?' rk iii •i:•— WILE: e / fr' '/ I 1 / / / / / / d `1 i4441 gitii h' Aits:0:41$ EROSION AND / i i 1 i / / `ram % / • • I i I i / / / / / p, REINFORCED MOM DRAIN SPACE SEDIMENT CONTROL / / ( / '''((((f,,'' , , �( , // // '!J. // ,' --4�'_-. I I I ; ; �' , SECTION B—e PLAN AND DETAILS 1 I I iDS µI£Y T TS OF / / / /\` • " /' 1 / / / / / / / • / /) I i / / / / A WATER TRUCK SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING I I I 1 I DETALL 0 0 / / f / / /�/ / ' /' _ 1 I / / / / / / / / i CONSTRUCTION IF NO HYDRANT IS LOCATED NEARBY. A r', / I Al r ti STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 410 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ® © SCALE HT.s SHEET NUMBER: Z-2 `PRDPOSEDID'ADE55RDAD� C� entrex j DIA ICD20'TURN AROUND wmmunlmtlon wrvlwr.,Inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 \\\\ PHONE:(202)408-0960 FAX: (202)608-0961 SUBMITTALS DAIS DEwaPnm REV. O6-.ill-11 ZUdNC REMW OJ-IJ-IJ MUG REVIEW OB-Ifi-1] ZdLNC REM 09-19-D WIM1Y WIINFNfS 10.f0-IJ ISLOGiED ACCESS ROAD PROPOSED TRANS/CO ER 19'-0' t. /+ kV/ /A 1 N.0//7 rx-x.-x—x,_x—x—x—x—x—x—x V x—z—x— — — — — — — —x� T ] SEAL: Elm _ I adP.+1TH OP . PROPOSED NETER CENTER •I I 1 , fA, e DETAIL1/Z-,., ON UTILITYE SEE PROPOSED MESA CABINETI `x BASE,SEE DETAIL 2/2-10 IJ .. I ir I r MI I 5_0 10120'LEASE AREA I I II000,..--4 ---\.,......„.4 I I2',2O asz AREA L J , I PROPOSED 8'-0'RCN b OWN IINN FENCE.WON ..I GREEN MACY SLATS SEE DETAL 5/2-10 x Milestone o _ _�uaxagaE _ >_ 1. , ^I'. r+ , COMMUNICATIONS J -��r. Io'.1D'LEASE AREA 5-0 I x L .'IT PROPOSED 135' x PROJECT NO: 1050.213 I CAR LE BADGEPROPOSED uwogdE I DESIGNER: C.S. ENGINEER: M.M. I _ PROPOSED%INTEL EQUIPMENT ON 2'-5'.12-0'P A 0AY` J SCALE I SEE DETAIL 1/2-7rec AREA. \\\l 5 0 //2 IW1L: GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES I C'� is 1 / s x STONY POINT I ��-^� IlIL I1 �'� *■■ I...„ / ( iLIn J L. 3' J 12.-0. xL: ;- - -x—x— fx—x— / n�: T , I COMPOUND PLAN / COMPOUND PLAN ®n SHEET NUMBER: SCAIE:1/4'=I' Y Z-3 -- - A -t ., NOTE �� PROPOSED i'DaTNND ROD DaWNG ROD TAPERS A10 DIAYE1ER W entrC Z ANTE SHOULD XOf EXCEED C.PIPES communication services,Inc. BIB TO BE PAR DNO ABRIO MO S ABE PANTED 9IENWN MUMS JAVA BROWN. (1)im M(3)SWIDL PANEL AN RASO, CS1 (1)MW MUMS MO(6)RWIS ON 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 FNIEN MONNIS BETHESDA,MD 20817 le POE DIA jr y PHONE:(202)408-0960 TOP P�.5i1 PROPOSED SNEiR ANTENNA RAD CENTER AND TOP OF MONOPOLE FAX: (202)408-0961 IMAEL Iss'-O Aq(6150 ANA) 4;1 MIRE ANTENNAS 1t 1 ON FORM MI MIS III ,III ADORE ANTENNA RAD CENTER FL 126'-0'A0.(6050 AMA) SUBMITTALS DATE DESCHPOa REV. I 06-30-11 MENG RESEW W-11-t1 20060 AEVE11 FORME ANTENNAS OB-IB-1> ZONING OQVRW ON RUSH MOUNTS '. ,�II MERE ANTENNA RAD CENTER D.115-OA0. (5960 AMA) 09-10-11 I1Y GaNa1$ 10-10.1T RELOCATED ACCESS ROAD RINK ARMORS I - ON MASH MOUNTS II. „III FUTURE ANTENNA RAD CENTER D.106'-0'AQ(SB10 NIA) 1 PROPOSED SNDDEL CABLES SEAL. / DEME MONOPOLE MPH 696-0' PUKED MNIITME 115'' .�VNTH co TREES BEYOND MONOPOLE t ,tto , '11oNa.00 I ) . to tie IT g2 -A, Milestone COMMUNICATIONS / / PROJECT N0: 1050.213 1 DESIGNER: C.S. ENGINEER: M.M. PROPOSED AONEL ICE BRIM SCALE D 1f2 1 PROP®smNm 0GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES on NENA t iji 0 ,,,m,_ STONY POINT PROPOSED MESTERE 6-0'Ha PROPOSED SttNgL EOJWUFN VOLUNTEER FIRE CO, MAIN LINK FACE W/1'-O' a SLED PLATFORM BARBED PARE ( 3827 STONY POINT RD itatrip� CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA TTE 11 m . .: :. C< V 1.. :. f '�. GROUND EL S1eEE MEL TOLE: 30"DIA AT BASE N1aOSED TRANSFERRER MONOPOLE LDOONG SDum ELEVATION MONOPOLE ELEVATION SCALE 1/8'=T-0" SHEET NUMBER: Z-4 — X- - 2.5 GHz ANTENNA API 'BLE SCHEDULE • READ YECWU0I;IR ELECTRICAL COIBA(ER CABLE JUMPER `'/ LOCATION AIDIUTH DER STATUS TECHNOLOGY ANTENNA DOWN-TILT DDWTHILT fOFRAH MIN/ COAXIAL CABLE SIZE LENGTH LENGTH entrex RW65B-C3-3XR NEW 1 1/C0 HYBRID 15-0 communication sonic..,Ina ' PROPOSED 9ENTE.BOG/I9G0 MH7 ALPHA A-1 0' 135'-0' PROPOSED - - - 2 N/A 3150 LCF12-50J / D)EADI SECTOR(3 MTAL) (72B'H x 11.9'W x 7.1'0) _HB114-13U3M12 ( ) NOTE RADIO NEARS 6600 BETHESDA,MO Drive,0017 550 Sulte NOT SHOW FOR CLARITY PRONE:(202)408-0960 A_I . _ RW65B-C3-3XR - - 15_D• BETA B-1 120' 135-0' PROPOSED (728'H x 11.9'W x 7.1'D) 2 N/A SHARED (L(F12-50J) FAX: (202)408-0961 - [� '� PROPOSED MOMS NOR PANEL ANTENNA Ala•A=25341 S0.0l GAMMA C I 240' 135'-0' PROPOSED - (728RVV65BH 1.9'W x 7.1'0) - - 2 N/A SHARED - (LCFI2-50J) SUBMITTALS ' �- TOTiAWAIE A ARAA A55A•3W 9L N�� TOT ANIENIA AREA=SS147 W' `\x\\\\ OARIIQION-30-17 ZCBNC REVIEW 1 CW CONE 07-17-17 ZONING REVEWCABLE MINIMUM BEND RADIUS MICROWAVE ANTENNA AND COAXULL CABLE SCHEDULE NnR i O8-It-17 ZONING RENEW *lc HH1/2'W INFER HYBRF7IX •. , AVIBWA BROWN Anna ASIM I E am TIE E MEI �E�F r O EN 09-ID-17 WN1Y(080415 B-IZED 10-10-P RELOCATED A�.4 ROAD } BLUE �• //if ./:� s' 2O (XYRE`N RADON to'D) NOTE 10 PURPLE MM MD 13s'-0' 150. RALIOWIL (2)CAT5 ■ ■ �, ANTENNA AND RF CABLE NOTES 00'910 C-1 `• [�� 1.ANTENNAS SHALL BE NNNIDHED NTH MOUNTING BRACKETS - — 13. Yzo. 2 PRUDE 1/2'OANEER mWER CA1YE 10•-0'LIMN LENGTH ERdI ANTENNA TO REIN DR FILM. S ALUMNA CENTERLINE HEIGHT IS IN REFERENCE TO ETEVA1101 O SEAL:SEA R 1.CONIRALIG0 SHALL INSTALL COLOR CODE RIGS W EACH Elm OF HYDRO r",PS AT BOTH NOES OF ANY ENTRY POT W WALL PENETRATION AND WMFM CABLES NM W RESISTANT TAPE All.CARIES SHALL BE LIMED AT THE TOR AND BMW NM Y BRANDS OF.CW W TAPE W STEEL TAG COLOR TAPE MAY BE OBTANED FROM GRAYBAR +IMALYN OP ELECTRONIC.LIE FIRST RIC N ME CLOSEST TO TE Elm GENE CABLE YRAP 3'COLORED TAPE A MNNUM OF 3 DES AROUND ME GRCAAREN ECE OF NE WAIL KEEPING PROPOSED 91CN1a 140 OWEDE ME TAPE N ME SALE AREA AS MUCH AS POSSBLE MILS MINION THE REMOVAL OF PAPE THAT WU.FADE W DISCOLOR WE TO WEATHER. •5. PROVIDE PHOTOGRAPHS 910WNG COMPLETE N MOUNTS, STA ATON OF ME ANTENNA MO ,WEATHERPROOFING WN ROOFING AND CABLE CO `A '� �S °2 &THE NORTH ARROW OR THE PUNS REFERS TO TRITE NORM TIE ONIRACTOt SHALLW M RETUR NEE PRIOR 10 CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ME �P.. •• A ARCITECT/DIDII R OF ANY DISCREPANCY. R/Cr 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY All.CONNECTOR HARDWARE TO SECS ENE RE CABLES ALL CONECTOR HARDWARE 9ULL BE STMRESS SUER A B ME OWNER MALL DIRNE H TIE ANEMIAS.DIE RE RADIO EMINENT AND OTTER MATERIALS RW DE PROJECT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MP(WITH ME OVER THE CNAR.ENCP MAMAS 10 BE FURNISHED PRIOR TO 901111NG A BD. ME Ad6 ARE N NE COW SEEDIER ANTENNA MOUNTING LAYOUT ® 9.REFER TO 1300/1900 MHR CABLE COLOR CODING DETAILS sCA1E 1'-t'-0' 10.CABLE LENGTH FROM THE a OF THE ANIMA TO THE SHELTER CAGE PONT FORS Is R. 1 11.9' %� 300' PROPOSE D CGIRLNG ROD TOP VIEW PNDNNA"ARNFAGRIF£R-GYINSWFE Milestone MOREL RYRO-C3-3E1 (729'H.119'W.71'D) b COMMUNICATIONS PROPOSED SHENTEL •J 11.9' '/,I' - ANTEm0.SEE SCHEDULE _= I-7 i bFr = PROJECT NO: 1050.213TOPVIEWDESIGNER: CS.= PROPOSED MONOPOLEWWAVE ANIMA MWn ENGINEER: M.M. ANTENNA READ CENTER Di (301W z 30'H LBS IO D) SCALE: II",'H tlSWi=Bt ID -i GRAPHIC cumF IN INCHES PROPOSED SHEKEL b b 11. IEI�e aG STONY POINT ililil 1lr 1Eli .c, 01 _ "" O RIG"�"i3 27 STO10 ENY POITCRD II 1 R ,, CHARL01291�LLE,VA ice•00 'I. 1El� 1 ERE: E EL '-0' _ 4)-T il1 I 1GI -. PROPOSED RING MOUNT SHENTEL 7W/850 MHZ ANTENNA FROM VIEW SIDE VIEW ANTENNA LAYOUT, SECTION DETAILS FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW AND SCHEDULE ANTENNA MOUNTING SECTION ® ANTENNA DETAILS ® MICROWAVE ANTENNA DETAILS ® SHEET NUMBER: . SCALE:3/4'=I'-0' SCALE:3/4-1'-D' 'rim F.3/4.1.-0' Z-5 1.-41/Y - 11/4' I 1'-31/4' 8.9. c5- 3 I-4•yY� � 5. Ii f'1k er4 M w � a 4 �p E 1 me _ z o Ng R r. z aE o 9g W n 'E i to 3' 1`4• $ sr .1 r s �� � .� J U m oiu iI" my �� enIIy `fie 4.33' m ` I— ,�,' W ILkiri J R O E I'-I 3/4' 2._Z. 10 1/4' i. -- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 g IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII g 4 rn IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII a 1 a 1 ° IWID11111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I o 4 LL , 41— _3 .3, l of m °llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 11 !ea m mllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll1111� iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII4 • r°IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 r 1 O [ LOLLLLIO 4 7 X' 4 � 0 P $ � 4e o S�� �'^. me c � g � 0 PPTi ,'� vma 3 N F� m y �11 +1x1lo im E El in W M C m ± M 2 m i i o z iIL,7— tl g gg giQ R.: 5 NcPo G r r a y 1,+ H O na 0 Pik Al 1' m o Q T O T p� b o a EnCD nX 7Th � 0 entrex LEASE AREA communication sorvlcea,Inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 BETHESDA,MD 20817 PHONE:(202)408-0960 FAX: (202)408-0961 PROPOSED%MMEL CABLE ERODE \ v/ _ \\ ___ i___-. SUBMITTALS PROPC6ED Sella : \ / / / DSIPoglllm CADET , \ / -./ . DATE CESLSIPOOl REV. \�•,�` i a-.10-n ZONNC PYEW / y�' :OY 0]-17-1] MD1NC REYEW LI, i , 0-16-17 ZOt0NC MEW PROPoSO 91DI1a L M-}_J / 09-19-17 COMFY MINFNIS FFC CABINET L_is i I Jj I0-10-17 RF10GiFD ACCESS FORD r _ _ 0 II c of T • n kolPROPOSED PROPOSED =a PtOPOSm 9928 BR 48VDC BAUM •F 16VDC BATTERY _ __ CABINET CABINET s' __ Ir J e .a SEAL: 1 PROPOSED SUM S1Ea RAISON n L- - — 1 kb 1 ks PROPOSED MENU Mani ON 2'-6-A I2'-r S ED.P ATON • , �/ de A 10Y20'LEA.. MU %ONALoO 1 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN AI SCALE:I/Y=T-O- WR 1 Milestone COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT Na 1050.213 ' DESIGNER: C.S. ENGINEER: M.M. SCALE 0_ 1/2 1 _ GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 3827 STONY POINT RD • CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 1111E: SHENTEL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-7 T - �SIIeWnM 0 entrex 2'-11 I/8' CAISIRUT P1000 cum.M. I, communication services,Inc. 2-11 3/B• 2'-11 3/8' i'-1 I/1• I Y-9 1/4' I 1-I 1/4• �,) I :600 RocMedge DHve,Suite 550 BETHESDA,MD 20817 n 3/1' 3/N' I PXDNE:(202)�8'0960 3'r CMV. I FAX: (20218a8-0961 I qq PPE TIP. —_ J 7 I I SUBMmas IL 1/2'9 UREIC MACE OAIE oESaPna REV. • 1 : ^ I I ^ b-Jo-n zaaxc l¢v¢w \\ n , 7 y n r _. _oT-n-n zoNMc REVRM' 06-16-n ZONING ROAM • 0919-11 OLugY CCM1ENi5 \\ I 10.10.D MLOCAIEO AKf59 ROAD \ _ _ NYDaIfX CABLES \ _ _ • • milli _ RR in ���__ (3)I-IHY HYB9xEl! nl 1119 (3)I-I/1•R NAVEL? - -- CABLES 10 MIENNAS Ll Ll ll 1 1 1� CABLES Ta ANIDVxA6 (1 PER SECTOR) I I (1 PEP SECTOR) (2)1-1/2'0 Coe)UIS - (2)1-1/2'0 MUM SEAL i0 CMMET,(I)F� R. R. p f TO CABINET.(I)FUR FINISH DUDE AND(I)Perm MO(I)POSER c v v v v .. ...,•-v- 7.•Y • •-c s_ •I I •"♦,•T s • 67-•T-,. �gP.AL Nap PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW LEFT SIDE VIEW iwi?� �i� I`' �y ��`v ```� 1 :i+• S 12'0 CONC.PIER 11V. dj RD1e DSRBJmN CABINET SHALL BE MLA R RATED -•0E1ALIID CABINET MGM-150 LBS FIBER DISTRIBUTION CABINET DETAILS ® FIBER CABINET MOUNTING DETAILS SCALE 3/4--ILO' - tl&IF 3/f-1-0' NN MONT SPOT DOLT EN PPE /'\ . NM u0TN91 SENSOR. SEE ELEGMC L DBLT 1.-8. PPE C.N.TYR Milestone _ COMMUNICATIONS I 2'-6- 1 -6- 10" •• 0- 7 I 21-13/8' 1 -- - - --- PROJECT NO: 1050.213 U1H1Y PDAER DURANCE - CDmATOR PWC II DESIGNER: C.S. '-'1-6 WC — �I�.� — _ .I uwRRur PiMO aay. E11gNEER: M.M. 6 ha I SEaBa ro PIPE rem I/YA U-80.15 SCALE r 3'0 ELLV.PPE O 12 11I R�HIC SCALE IN INa ...., \_ Ra ATTACH CABPRI To MIB,RUT STONY POIN" ' ' ' ro "T VOLUNTEER FIR 3827 STONY POI (65 H.30 a.10 CD _ ilLGllD5 M6M1:LBOro I ci CHARLOTTE/SVILLE,VA CEtmAIOR RECEPTADF — •• 22911 A M DUD CENTER MCI LOCATIONS t i uffq.. PRE .. s SHENTEL PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW REAR VIEW LEFT SIDE VIEW FIBER DISTRIBUTION OHRLTO FIFA AND PTC 'Y" CABINET DETAILS PTC CABINET DETAILS ® PTC CABINET MOUNTING DETAILS ® SHEET NUMBER: RPM F.3/4'-I.-a• • Z-8 r - 1 1 I 35.4 31.8 ..i ,, 0 entrex communlcaHon eaMeee,Inc. 35.3 35.4 25.7 6600 Rockledge Delve,Suite 550 31.5 BETHESDA,MD 20817 PHONE:(202)408-0960 FAX: (202)408-0961 0 0 SUBMITTALS a? n DATE AESCRPOON REV. o d OB-A-I] mac REVIEW pn 07-17-17 Z6Nx0 REVSW o> m 00-I6-17 ZONN°RENEW O O n n — 09-19-17 COUNT(QRA2N19 �I e O 1D-10.1] fQLOGiEO pCCfSi ROAD . ,, co SEAL ( ll _ _ — O .NbTN• 1 $uoy. 6 PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW • ,,,.; S ce '470NALe1t0 NOTES: NOTES: THE CABINET WEIGHT= 945 LBS THE CABINET WEIGHT= 2,640 LBS 1 9928 BTS CABINET DETAILS ® 45VCD BATTERY CABINET DETAILS ® 1 =1 SCALE:1/2" -0' SCALE:1/2'=P-0" Milestone COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT NO: 1050.213 DESIGNER: C.S. ENGINEER: M.M. SCALE: 0IY L'L 1 1l2 I. '.. GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. 3827 STONY POINT RD CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 TITLE: SHENTEL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: • Z-9 7 - _,A � ' 0 entrex communication ooMcoe,Inc. ll OIALIE DELOMORE Y'DEPTH 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 BETHESDA,MD20817 1 PHONE:(202)0084960 FAX: (202)408.0961 IIII (1-15 LNHD HFW SUBMITTALS I — — — g 901 N FEED O BOLTS W/NAMES OAT: DSRPTON REV. a I N ■ YESA Wx -4• 06-30-17 ZONING FUEY 07-17-17 ZONING TERM to ` 08-I6-17 ZONING TERM 5' 1 ® 09-19-17 COUNTY COWERS 'N NEW PI000 STEEL UMSMUT. 1-0'LONG WI 1/211 GLV. ' 10-10-17 RELOCATED ACCESS ROAD SEELWASH R-BO15 AM)LOCK „drO O SURFACE �� WASHERS(TIP) 06WRLPI/Cfl19DR O r PWi1IFR IONWE10'-0'ACCESS ROADW GROOVE WIT OF NEW Ctt(OSiE FaMDMax \� P57 STONE 9RFAONc -ABC GOALIE BOX EDSWNG GRACE FM911RADE (PART 2 PG5630 29VY) .�yj�y`/+ztzt I �/�`j �y���v�� SQ)�� SEAL :1/4rovd.:19.7ei,��// III /�/ / // j 4 i, . //% `� — YwA9 SOON \ rtoIFJFIIIE FOBPoc WRML1 V SURFACT SIIBWARE LD5Wx W E FABRIID Eau\ t L .. \ \ \ \ \ µ Q SUFFADNC T095L YAX,1 1C.•. / \ ••. i. I.(,• / , ANY DENSITYG WAGE SEECPAPACTEDS SUBCAIDFAN WTiE1DNG 9AVFAQ: SEE NOTES ' S \\� .. . r. `. \/�\\/�\\/�\\��\\�� . . i is I &\ \ \ \ \ DUANEB7a) \� I , ACms ROW.aAD1E W%(PARE , a \/ T MD STARE N PUCE \/// \/\//\/ N/ \ //\/ N/ NOTE UNDERCUT AND COMPACT TLPoRAGY ACCESS ROAD UP V� LOPWNO AIEA MALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. KO RR/GRADE FILL NOW UNSUITABLE L009E OR SOFT 3C4 TO 6'BFABRC ELOw FROM GRADE PLATE YBAT,SODS STABUlATON /\\ \ // /�\// /�\//\\//' O Oip �I a BELOW NOSH MADE.ORGANC MATERIAL W RUBBLE EA NARMI 5aaE WI STABILIZATION FABRICERCUT AND ACC9IBCJLWE UP TO O PLATE AND COMPPACCTT 6'DEPTH OFCRUSHER RUN/ABC TO FMISN WIDE 1'-Ce FRONT ELEVATW � , fLL WTI 6'W MSIITO 57 STOIC TO FINISH GRADE COMPACTION NOTES TOP. YW9HORS LUNG NOESI.SURFACE WESHALLSE LD BASE COISE 9L BE COMPACTED TO SIBS MAX DRY DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOL 2.=RADE 9W.SMALL BE WLPACEED 10 95x MAX WY UEN91Y STANDARD PROCTOR. UTILITY FRAME DETAIL 1 MESA QUAIITE BASE DETAIL 2 COMPOUND SURFACING DETAIL GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL 4 /'\ SCALE:3/4'-E-0' I-10 SCALE:I/T=1'-0' Z-10 CAo F.111'-0' Z-10 SCALE N.T.S. Z-10 Milestone COMMUNICATIONS W-0' ® ® 15-0' ® 6'-11"YAX _ ��...... . 1_ __ 1 I - - PROJECT NO: 1050.213 -{-S•v-••••:,•wrW'e-•vl 1a:4-W•••• W.v��-::.:.•Z•.•.:a_::_-- - - •sYh':� i44.40.4. •xext: "O.4.4•MM•4)*�•4 h �i•Pa;.00i4i�040i4i Wi4 L'�44ii4.4.4i iiA!':'4, DESIGNER: M.A. O II(:' :::{I� 1eS 3eei POiOdii! ••iii0*SSS•�i�3::::i - - ii4i4i�;ii ii4iiii -�i4i4i44i4i4ii4'':i4i4i4i •♦•O ©�: ENGINEER: M.M. ••..•.••• ♦••4; t•••e•••..•• •• ••`%} '•••w•w••0 r•OtW wevAvesst.444�444__•$4 SCALE: �'' �J1♦♦ Oi JPi4.4ii0•.Oi44i ii4.4.O,.• i•! '♦+• -i••••ii••O•O••••••W •' OD*• •Oi•••••_ 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES COMPOUND(RACE Icy ♦•••••e•••••e4. ;'V•••• •••••• ! :::s It:t1h t :J �4.4.4.4.4.4i••4i♦•4.4i � •4i•••ii••i•4e4.4.4❖i ©O \'%V :1.74•oo'oo:..44:i1:%;%�;4.-".:;.k.;%;`Q.14.. 11'Qk sikg1 4k-%2% ai•'�\:%g%41c.R'%"o'W4is'\a STONY POINT :\;\ \�,�y\ \\\�` iF\\„ �:I ,,,��.,\\��o��\ , o�\\\,,\,,,,.,..,,,\ „��1.if STONY FlRECO. • ` `°�" 'It § I,..I 382T STONY POINT RD FENCE AND GATE DETAIL f� W nuns."° a RL ND Y CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA SCALE N.T.S. 1 CatI DID E PL41 PWR 3'NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PPE GATE POST:f NOMINAL SMEDUIE 40 PPE O 5/8'DAEMON.RW WM GALVANIZED STEEL 22911 TURNBUCKLE tel POST:2'MEDIAE 40 PIPE PER AS1Y-E061 LINE ON MOM.MOM.THREADED ROD. I. INSTALL FENONG PER AS11 F-567 POSTS SHALL BE EWLLY SPACW AT VA15AW C-IE 0.G 2. INSTALL SWIG RITES PER AMR F-9W 0 FENCE CORNERPOST BRACE1 5/0'BA. 1 ONCE RIPE AND COMMENTS SNAIL BE GALVANIZED. TITLE: 3 TOP RALL&BRACEREM 1 1/2'PIPE,PER ASIV-FIOS3 EACH CORNER EACH WAY. 4. CATE FRAMES 91A1L BE RUED. 4 FABRIC 9 GA CORE OWE BE 2.BEM)WFEIDIG TO Il GATE FRAME 1 I/T PPE PER ASTN-F1081 MELDING GA1V(OR AL).SHAG BE COATED (3)COMB ASIR-A192 12 SUM W E-ID)EC TOME BY MILESTONE S POSTS 9 W L NAVE END-CAPS OTE MIRE MAIM II GAHARDWARE GLVW M STEEL AT POSTS AND 13 GATE DIAGONALCLVAMZfD STEEL 1 l/2'PIPE ]. PROVIDE WiUL1E STRSHAVE10°T(1 TO GAITSIN OPENSITE DETAILS RAMS A SINCE SNAP OF FABRIC DE AND M TENSION WRE BY HOG ENOS SPACED MAY-2C ROVES. M. 0 GATE FRAME BLAO:1 5/0'DONETS OTENSION ORE 9 GA GLVAMffD STEEL 0 CENTER GATE STOP . O GREEN PNVACY MATS(WFAE) 0 BARBED ORE OW9E STRANDDOTED12-I/2'OD.DOTED IMRE SHEET NUMBER: D TO EMI WTI FABRIC 14 GA.4 Pt.BARBS SPACED ON OSIHEOIER BAR APPRO%NATELY 5'CENTERS J ti I �\�� / /---Y LINE TYPES TREES TO BE RFMOVED 'I `, 0 entrex 1 1 f • FENCE UNE- CHAINcommunication toMcee,Inc. O %di \, PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE 9ZE/TYPE HOGHT \�� I 1 .. _._._._-_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 233 18'POPLAR 97 323 1T POPLAR \\ / N\ / \ 1•CONTOUR UNE 236 18" POPLAR 324 1T POPLAR • rL / \ 23)11'POPLAR 325 10'POPLAR 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 1 / 239 12'PINE238 10" H 328 14' POPLAR 326 16"POPLAR PHONESDA•MD20960 `� 1877 1 / . O 5'CONTOUR LINE \ / >---;0 240 15'PINE 329 12' PINE PHONE: 02)408B419FA 1 \ A / / \ 241 IT POPLAR 330 5"OAK FAX: (202)d08-0961 �\. H>.\ 1 `OOSIPIcSi \JI — OMITS OF DISTURBANCE 288 13'POPLAR 331 5"OAK <>q e .W AJIXNC LOT 512 PN�\ LIMITS OG pI51URBANCE SILT FENCE• 291 16'POPLAR 292 23' POPLAR B9 332 6" AK 333 22'OPOPLAR \ \ \ \ \ / 293 11'POPLAR 338 15'POPLAR \ \ ) � �w 0 DOSING WOODED .+ \ \+ \ AREA(11PICAl) V. 294 18'POPLAR 339 15-POPLAR \ • '- \b �` \e\• TREE PROTECTION FENCE 295 1P BEECH 313 13'PINE \ 1 • 1 29J 1J'POPLAR 345 6' GUM SUBMITTALS ~b • �:: \`- /P 4y\'1•► N • JCNIxcEW\ 09-I�n COUNTY IX101wR -/ DSTAIDANC gD 50>6:10 .r 1 • CODING CRT Io-10-r1 RDOGTED ACCESS ROOD SLT FENCE DETAIL 2/Z-2 PROPERTY --` 508 �`�� '�® ROAD(WEAL) \ �in < : PROPOSED VIER Of \ TREES TO REMAIN — TREE UNE al 509 1 �i' \ PT// WEE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT# TREE SIZE/TYPE HDGHT \\ 510 1� \`w� 206 8'BEECH 270 19'POPLAR 90 354 2C ?�,I \ 207 9'PINE 271 12"POPLAR 87 / �,",10/1".m 208 9'PINE 272 8'MAPLE 356 6"BIRCH �.,fN 209 9'BEECH 273 I19'& POPLAR 354 24' HICKORYINEOR 1 / y��.>I/ it 211 26'POPLAR DS 1J'POPLAR 358 6'GUM SEAL: /91•CE�� \ T10 10 GUM 2]4 11 MAPLE '��. •e � 359 17'POPLAR .�� _ 212 23'POPLAR 276 19'POPLAR 360 12'POPLAR S�i ®�l� 213 10'PINE 2J] 19' POPLAR 361 8'HICKORY •\ / � _� �� �� 214 9'MAPLE 278 215 4 10'PINE 288 8'•BEECCHH 36 362 6"PINE Oa<IP�'FNOa,2� • ��u516 363 6'BIRCH \/� ��3D ' 21217 19' OAK 9'OAK 281 24"POPLAR 364 12'PINE e \ CODING%MED tea / . 1u 218 24'POPLAR 2133 9282 B MAPLE 36fi 5'"POPLAR 365 •WIME s,‘i,A . S \ / AREA(MAC) \ ' A, / / 219 24'POPLAR 284 15'POPLAR 367 6'GUM \i .. 220 14"PINE 285 13'POPLAR . : DIMING YOLOFD369 6'CUM \ 333. AFEA O 221 25"OAK 286 24'POPLAR 92 370 16"POPLAR / � /• \ 222 29'POPLAR 287 24'POPLAR 91O,gr ft le 223 18'OAK 289 POPLAR 371 20"POPLAR muATs+.r \ / "-As_ 224 9'PINE 290 2'PINE 36972 8"GUM \ eas ron '. �6 225 10'BEECH 296 22" POPLAR 9273 373 6'HICKORY / , ^T, 226 22'OAK 301 T POPLAR 3J4 10'PINE DRIING 227 J'BEECH 302 B'OAK 3J5 15'OAK TIP' \ / 228 10'OAK 303 21 POPLAR LA 376 6'BIRCH 2}5 13'POPLAR 304 26'POPLAR BB 377 6'HICKORY . / rof al 242 13'POPLAR 305 21'POPLAR 87 378 6'POPLAR 243 12"POPLAR 3p6 I4'POPLAR 79 379 5'POPLAR 244 10'POPLAR 307 2J'POPLAR 91 380 6' GUM 245 8'POPLAR 306 27 'POPLAR 90 362 6'GUM 1 T46 9'MAPLE 310 Er POPLAR 86 383 26'OAK /' \ / 24]9"POPLAR 310 8'WM 384 T GUM Cii; 252 19'MAPLE 83 311 12'POPLAR 79 385 18-OAK \ /p?ry/ V" 253 12'MAPLE 313 13"PINE 386 16"OAK='O/�^. �A eV" 254 24'POPLAR 75 314 24" POPLAR 387 11'GUM ��. \ ea," SSSf( 255 19'POPLAR 316 16'PINE 504 18" BEECH / �f/ `_�1 e / 2565 19'MAPLE 317 16"PINE 505 15 CEDAR ©'.`� � it .✓ \ 25 35-OAK 80 318 9'BIRCH PINE 505 12"PINE el f 258 26'POPLAR 327 T BEECH 5259 14'POPLARtEtitt(isb$h �. LYSICR&NCPROPOSED E(IYP.) 334 8"PINE 5260 11'POPLAR 335 10'PINE 5vtg • /��i`110 et 261 14'POPLAR262 24'POPLAR }}]1B-GAK 5LE� . �.�9 26 14'POPLAR B9 340)"OAK 53, ( / /\ 26 'POP AR 91 341 12'PINE 5143CARE I1� 6342 10'OAK.�- PROP03D 10'WDE 26POPLAR '/ OU4FL ACCESS DPo1E 266 28'PROPwiY �1�;- / � �. 351 11" PINE 51]24'BEECH 4 / LP✓E ffi. ,'� �A/f� At- // \ 268 22"POPLAR efi PROJECT N0: 1050.213 �_ 3s T cuM '�tgai s 6/ erog. 268 2Y POPLAR 92 352 6'POPLAR DESGNER: C.S./ / �/ § I 0 T69 19'POPLAR 90 - atil, /� ` � � ��,�I / � ENGINEER: M.M. F /' �- civil 0 1 z 1 / 1.11,- � � A '•� / GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES i�•R�,.?� / d STONY POINT / ��`r�"�`�Mktg ` DNG VOLUNTEER FlRE CO, / it, Alb—11iI- �Y%���a 3827 STONY POINT RI) � FYGrvitN / ����.�`�c, CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA , m n e OTREE SURVEY PLAN e 52260.- y • TREE S SHEET NUMBER: R Z-11 SCR 1'-N z-n null lb 1 •--�_) O \\ IMF TYPES TREES TO BE REMOVED 0 entrex 1 1 ) .1 FENCE LINE - CHAIN communication services,Inc. ) o )\ : '\ —————— PT/ TREE 512E/1YPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE SIZE/IYPE HEIGHT 233 1B'POPLAR 97 323 It POPLAR \\ / \\ / I'CONTOUR UNE 236 18' POPLAR 324 If POPLAR \ L \ ,.' \ 237 11"POPLAR 325 10'POPLAR 6600 Rockledge Drive,Suite 550 \ T / 238 10"BEECH 326 16'POPLAR BETHESDA,MD 20817 \ 11 0 5'CONTOUR LINE 239 12"PINE 328 14"POPLAR _ 1 / --�•i 15'PINE PHONE: 202408-09610 \ / \ 241 if POPLAR 330 5?OAKE ( ) `�\ \ 1 `'ARCING`ASCUS.Li \ \J. — LIMITB OF ..—,-.ANCE ..---._.--_ 288 13"POPLAR }}1 5'OAK 7O3y . 'ARCING LOT � ' \ i 291 16'POPLAR 332 6'OAK 5]4 •� b� 5l2 ej' ''\ UMI19 OF DISTURBANCE SILT FENCE 292 23"POPLAR 89 333 22'POPLAR \ Aitei.� O ETSING WOODED y / 293 11'POPLAR 338 15'POPLAR \ _\ e'��e \� AREA(WPM) �''\N 294 295118'BEECH 34313'PI 339 IC NE ._ [jy�� '0��\ API ,� _-TREE PROMOTION FENCE-_-_ ^_^— 297 t>'POPLAR 344 6'GUM SUBMITTALS 1 e,e 0 �/d'i S rl�' \ 298 14'OAK 345 6'GUM � 4Y \ \ ' +\' S1] TREE OR VEGEIATON LINE 319 16'OAK 347 12'PINE DALE OL`a1PPON IRV. / 505 / _ \ 32012' POPLAR 349 12"PINE 06-30-17 MING ANDY / \� \\�'�3\� 321 21"POPLAR 381 6' GUM • 1� ���� m-n-n WNW uNEx • / PROPOSED OATS Of ✓✓ \ ♦ / DSTURHANCE mu t1 ) ,`� ROIa- COSMIC RRiJM -4D , �NE.TIP. I'./ � ® ROAD(1TPICLN,1 , PROPOSED ImIS DFTREES TO REMA-Y.. DRNRfiANCE(DP.)1RLE 509 ® \ PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT/ WEE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT PT/ TREE SIZE/TYPE HEIGHT 5109 206 8'BEECH 270 19'POPLAR 9D }54 24'HICKORY 207 9'PINE 271 12'POPLAR 87 355 6'BIRCH / ill 208 9'PINE 272 8' MAPLE356 14'POPLAR . 209 9'BEECH2J3 19'PCPLAR357 10'PINE �� ^ \ 21D 10' WM2>6 11'MAPLE358 6'GUM SEAL I\ ` I211 26"POPLAR 275 17'POPLAR515 212 23'POPIAR 359 If POPLAR 276 19'POPLAR 360 12'POPIAR 213 10'PINE 277 19- POPLAR 361 0 HICKORY\ , ��)' 2149' MAPLE/ 70 215 10"PINE 2]8 B' BEECH 36 362 6'PINE do EAU FI Opy / '.' /5,516 , 216 24' OAK 2810 24' POPLAR 364 12' POPLAR 363 12'BIRCH PINE /�� / 217 19'OAK 282 18'POPLAR 365 10 PINE • ,•, 2.1 5 • 218 24'POPLAR 283 9' MAPLE 366 5'GUMT / DOSING WOOED . 219 24-POPLAR 284 15'POPLAR \ /] / / \ 220 14' PINE 285 13'POPLAR 36J 8'GUM I••. ,IIiEA( �) \ / /9 AREA(T Y90DED221 25'OAK 286 24' POPLAR 92 368 6'PINE • �/ / / AAFA(TOPICAL) \ 370 I WM SS 222 29'POPLAR28J 24'POPLAR 91 }JO 20'POPLAR/ 289 1J'POPLAR371 20'POPLAR O290 9'PINEJ3372 8"373 HGUM IC/ INE 225 224 1D"PBEECH MAL6N\- • / 226 22'OPX 301 21' POPLAR92374 10 HPINERY 22J J'BEECHFARING / a� / 228 10 OAK 302 8'OAK 3J5 15'OAK RE9DDICE'. E 303 8'POPLAR 376 8'BIRCH 304 Y \ (1)1E-C)/IW f ./ POPLAR 2 13'POPLAR 'POPLAR 88 305 21'POPLAR 0] 377 6'HICKORY }JB 6'POPLAR1 35 \ / \ . r,>A /643 12'POPLAR306 14'POPLAR ]93J9 5'POPLAR �/ V' 44 10'POPLAR 3DJ 2]"POPLAR 91 380 6'WM46 8' MOPLER308 27'POPLAR 90 382 8'WM / / ' 46 9" MAPLE 309 21'POPLAR 86 383 26"OAK 4, 4J 9"POPLAR 310 8'WMIp?ha1552 19"MAPLE 3 12'MAPLE BJ 311 12' POP AR ]9385 18"OAK313 13'PINE 386 16'OAK =y0' +k /§ 54 24'POPLAR ]5 316 24'POPLAR 387 IY WM 56 10'POPLAR316 16' PINE504 18'BEELH / ©�,� �,�� 56 35'20'MAPLE 318 12' PINE 506 15'PCEDAR INE1�,1� 5 5]19'OPX 80 318 9' BIRCH 506 15'PINE/ /., 1hts`1. / PROPORU UMIS M 58 26'POPLAR 327 7"BEECH 507 24'MAPLE -� r/ 1 �'/ ) OLAMBMKE(TP.) 59 14'POPLAR335 8'PINE508 24"MAPLE :111::::?' stone/ .1_ ����/ /+` 9 �V 60 r 'POPLAR 335 10'PINE SO9 2]'MAPLE ,'T.\ ►.u, �/ 61 POPLAR33J 18'OAK 510 31'MAPLEICATIONS ,ram -� 62 'POPLAR 89 512 31'MAPLE �V �,Wel 1 PROPOSED I2 WIDE 63 'POPLAR 65 16"POPLAR 340 J' OAK 513 8'OAK 514 514 13'//////��1 1�" 'T 1���►�, � I //� 341 7" PINE \I ' P T A. B 64 ' POPLAR 91 342 10'OAK 515 17"MAPLEORE / PROEM �'��` -� / ACCESS 091E 66 POPLAR 9J348 6"WM 350 11'PINE/ "POPLAR 86 PROJECT N0 1050.213 ��� / "� 351 J'GUM 68 22'POPLAR 92 351 6'POPLAR DESIGNER: C.S. • / /$ 69 19'POPLAR 90 ENGIN EER: M.M. / / // -f . ...qt. I, aria._ 2 I / t*`.$ 0 / GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES / IL 101Q-,ill ,' St STONY POINT / ;•If�'`` 41- EN LNG WOODED VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. �_e �1+ War 3827 STONY POINT RD // '� �'�ily'�� CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA �� ``� 22911 TITLE: • TREE SURVEY `]stir W b PLAN TREES 522.60•�.,_ TO REMAIN _ f .. TREE SURVEY PLAN • TREES TO REMAIN I SHEET NUMBER: SLUE:1'6 20' 2-12 © Z-12 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SP 2017-15 STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY-TIER HI PWSF(RIVANNA) WHEREAS,the Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company is the owner of Tax Map Parcel Number 04800-00-00-018D0(the"Property"); WHEREAS,Milestone Communications filed an application for a special use permit to install a personal wireless service facility consisting of a monopole with four flush-mounted antenna arrays,and associated ground equipment and access,on the Property,and the application is identified as Special Use Permit 2017-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Tier III PWSF(Rivanna)("SP 2017-15"); and WHEREAS,on October 10,2017,after a duly noticed public hearing,the Albemarle County Planning Commission recommended approval of SP 2017-15 with the condition recommended by County staff;and WHEREAS,on November 8,2017,the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a duly noticed public hearing on SP 2017-15. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that,upon consideration of the foregoing,the staff report prepared for SP 2017-15 and all of its attachments,the information presented at the public hearing, and the factors relevant to a special use permit in Albemarle County Code §§ 18-5.1.40, 18-12.2.2(16),and 18-33.8,the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby approves SP 2017-15,subject to the applicable performance standards for personal wireless service facilities in Albemarle County Code § 18-5.1.40,and the conditions attached hereto. I,Claudette K.Borgersen,do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,Virginia,by a vote of to ,as recorded below,at a regular meeting held on Clerk,Board of County Supervisors AAy& Nay Mr.Dill Ms. Mallek Ms. McKeel Ms. Palmer Mr. Randolph Mr. Sheffield SP-2017-00015 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Tier III PWSF(Rivanna) Special Use Permit Conditions 1. The development of the site,and any modifications to the arrays, shall be in general accord with the plan titled "Milestone Communications—Shentel at Stony Point Volunteer Fire Co."prepared by John Caborgoudy, and dated October 10,2017(hereafter"Conceptual Plan"),as determined by the Director of Planning and the Zoning Administrator.To be in general accord with the Conceptual Plan,development and use shall reflect the following major elements within the development essential to the design of the development,including but not limited to all concealment elements and technique,as shown and described on the Conceptual Plan and mentioned below: a. Height(135 feet tall) b.Monopole location c.The farthest point of the back of the antennas shall be no more than 18 inches from the monopole d.No more than four antenna arrays shall be mounted to the facility Minor modifications to the plan which do not conflict with the elements above may be made to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall obtain a Virginia Stormwater Management Program permit. /47 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR SP 2017-15 STONY POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE _ COMPANY-TIER III PWSF(RIVANNA) WHEREAS,the Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company is the owner of Tax Map Parcel Number 04800-00-00-018D0(the"Property"); WHEREAS,Milestone Communications filed an application for a special use permit to install a personal wireless service facility consisting of a monopole with four flush-mounted antenna arrays, and associated ground equipment and access,on the Property,and the application is identified as Special Use Permit 2017-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company—Tier III PWSF(Rivanna)("SP 2017-15"); and WHEREAS,Albemarle County Code § 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(a)allows up to three arrays of antenna, which may be modified by special exception;and WHEREAS,Albemarle County Code§ 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(c)requires that antennas be mounted so that in no case shall the closest point of the back of the antenna be more than 12 inches from the monopole, which may be modified by special exception;and WHEREAS,the Applicant filed a request for special exceptions in conjunction with SP 2017-15 to modify the requirements of County Code§ 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(a)and County Code§ 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(c). NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that,upon consideration of the foregoing,the executive summary and staff report prepared in conjunction with the application,all of the factors relevant to the special exceptions in County Code §§ 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(a), 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(c),and 18-33.9,and the information provided at the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors' meetings,the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby approves the special exceptions to authorize the modification of County Code§ 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(a)and County Code § 18-5.1.40(b)(2)(c)as set forth above,subject to the conditions attached hereto. * * * I,Claudette K.Borgersen,do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,correct copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,Virginia,by a vote of to ,as recorded below,at a regular meeting held on Clerk,Board of County Supervisors Aye Nay Mr.Dill Ms. Mallek Ms. McKeel Ms.Palmer Mr. Randolph Mr. Sheffield . . , SP 2017-15 Stony Point Volunteer Fire Company-Tier III PWSF(Rivanna) Special Exception Condition 1. No more than four antenna arrays shall be mounted to the facility. 2. The farthest point of the back of the antennas shall be no more than 18 inches from the monopole.