HomeMy WebLinkAboutAP201900002 Presentation 2019-06-04AP 2019-02 Hilliard Estate &t Land
Management (HELM)
Appellants: Rick and Susan Goings
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals
June 4, 2019
Overview
Hilliard Estate and Land Management (HELM) owned by Carter Hilliard obtained a written
zoning decision to locate his business. The Zoning Administrator determined that HELM is an
agricultural service occupation, a by -right use in the Rural Areas zoning district. This zoning
decision was not appealed and is "a thing decided";
In reliance on the written zoning decision, HELM incurred substantial expenses. They entered
into a lease, built a new 4,500 sq ft building and located business equipment at 3214 Free
Union Road;
Rick Goings, a neighbor across Free Union Road, filed a zoning complaint about the new
business;
Zoning staff conducted a routine investigation and found no violation. We found that the
activity conducted by the business is the same as described for the letter of determination;
Rick and Susan Goings have appealed the decision that there is no zoning violation.
The Zoning Administrator's opinion is presumed correct and is given great weight. The
appellant has the burden of proof to rebut the presumption of correctness. (VA Code
15.202309 [1]).
Regulatory Framework
Consistent with the purposes stated in the Albemarle County
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance Section 10.2.1 permits "by right
in the Rural Areas (RA) district" 12. Agricultural service occupation.
Agricultural service occupation: An occupation in which skill and
expertise in some agriculturally related field are applied to the service
of others engaged in agriculture; provided that sales of goods shall be
limited to those incidental to the performing of a service.
Defined in Zoning Ordinance Section 3.1 "Definitions"
Regulatory Framework
Directly related to and used in this term is the use known as
"agriculture."
Agriculture: An agricultural operation, the keeping of livestock or
poultry, or both, regardless of whether the keeping of livestock or
poultry qualifies as an agricultural operation. The term includes
accessory processing facilities for agricultural products grown or raised
solely on the farm on which the agriculture is located, such as fruit
packing plants and dairies...
Defined in Zoning ordinance Section 3.1 "Definitions"
Regulatory Framework
Another term listed as a by -right use in the RA and related to this appeal is "accessory
use."
Accessory use, building or structure: A subordinate use, building or structure
customarily incidental to and located upon the same lot occupied by the primary use,
building, or structure, a located upon land zoned to allow the primary use, building
or structure; provided that a subordinate use, building or structure customarily
incidental to a primary farm use, building or structure need not be located upon the
same lot occupied by the primary farm use, building or structure.
Defined in Zoning ordinance Section 3.1 "Definitions"
Accessory Use
The finalized letter of zoning determination recognized and
allowed landscape services as accessory to the primary
agricultural services occupation.
Incidental Non -Agricultural Services
"However, due to its limited scope in the larger business operations
of Hilliard Estate Et Land Management, landscape maintenance may
be considered an incidental use accessory to the business. "
Page 2, Paragraph 2 July 26, 2018 Letter of Determination
Accessory Use
OSHA Major Group 07: Agricultural Services
This major group includes establishments
primarily engaged in performing soil preparation
services, crop services, veterinary services, other
animal services, farm labor and management
services, and landscape and horticultural
services, for others on a contract or fee basis.
HELM, an Agricultural Service
Occupation
HELM services include the following:
Fencing
► Vineyard installation
► Mowing, bushhogging fields
► Pasture clearing and reclamation
Seeding, reseeding
Clearing invasive trees and thinning early successional growth
Prescribed burn
Building farm roads
► Installing automatic waterers for livestock
► Rental of equipment for work on farms
HELM, an Agricultural Service
Occupation
HELM equipment includes the following:
Large tractors, up to 135 horsepower
► Bush hogs, including bat wings with up to a 15 foot wide cut
► Tractor implements
► Seed drills
No -till planters
Excavator
Skidsteer
Mowers
► Chain saws
► Post drivers
-
-
`r
Fag
sg
-i\ •. �,,:: - Rua 1 r. .51; i ,a1- Mr �$�- A
Mom
�1ru,;
•
All
Or
i
_J ~
LAW-
Asp-
'�— �,r ;��• ��.;c ,t�r� Syr, �►,^ � �.
Am
'fib. .•�r � � �.�r4 Nl �.•t�. � - �
_ ��1 rtl�flj,���td"R`���F'�A � � �,•� � .. �- ", f ,� rarer
i A 4
• f
`r I,•.�i by _
zr -
:IA
JPF._;TA
-
=T -P7
X
-LP
■
.49, 19.
`� �,,.a 4— •- � � _hL,
Ow
�T ��. •PTO•• -:.• �• F _ � , �
s-
,.ems r
•.'�`f ±�•'rr•'•+ J •�• r ram/;• � E'�
Y • -Tla I -ten c 1 h it
�f}� i � � i� ��•�� � � ram..
do
Js- _��'�� 'r r�� .fir •�,��
1
y
r � •,•may ' y' • + _
-� � � � � � -. -r! - _ 'i�•3 � �a� tea_
-
1 • -
I
' r -
Response to Appellant's Arguments
The letter of determination (LOD) is erroneous
The appellant confuses the issue by comingling concerns about the
initial determination process with this appeal of the ZA finding no
violation. The LOD was not timely appealed and is final and not
before the BZA.
Hilliard incurred significant expenses in reliance upon this final
determination.
► The activities associated with HELM are consistent with those
described for that determination letter.
Response to Appettant's Arguments
HELM is NOT an agricultural service occupation.
The overwhelming majority of evidence from all sources points towards
HELM being an agricultural services business. This includes
Hilliard's application and statements
Testimonials from Albemarle farmers
Observance of the operation, including the use of large agricultural
farm equipment
Criticizing the investigation does not change the conclusion that this
is a by -right use and is therefore, not a zoning violation.
Response to Appettant's Arguments
The actual use is landscaping service
This is the primary basis of the appeal and yet nothing substantiates
this claim. The website, the equipment, the facility and the use
description are not consistent with a landscaping service. It is
consistent with an agricultural service occupation.
Claims that the investigation was inappropriate is not evidence showing
the primary or majority activity associated with HELM is a landscaping
service.
Conclusion
The appellant has failed to provide a relevant and substantial basis for their
contention that HELM is primarily a landscape contracting business and that
HELM is in violation of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance.
The appellant has attempted to reopen the finalized letter of determination.
They have confused the controlling issue with contentions that the zoning
investigation was improper and biased. Neither of these is relevant to the
appeal.
The zoning determination was correct and should be upheld.