Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SP201700016 Resubmittal Special Use Permit 2017-12-20
2Q==860x1,100 pixels 12/20/17,8;13 AM . ! V r . .. —_.. FOR OFFICE tUSE.ONIN SP B ----._._— Fee Amount$ I).uo!',yid Ity rrhii? t{rrcii;t 0 CO By. i. Resubmittal of information fob. t +; Sp ecial Use Perm it ,'. ' [rRoJEcr NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: SV'Z II 0_001 Owner/Applicant Must Read anti Sign • I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff 4,..41.1 20Dec r Signature f wner,Contract Purchaser i)ate igvsry 4,-- aA, 870. ws, Zs 05--- • Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory • '/ 055 t v& ),it6wr • 5Y• ,c7 n' /4, coxes /T S ,, D VV7DPfrf62W ,tif,4A/AC.0 &,( . • • FEES to be paid after application For original Special Use Permit fee of$1,075 U First resubmission t'10 BE PAW WREN TIIE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) ti 'y Free U Each additional resubmission t co BE PAID WIIItN THE RESUBMISSION IS NtABETOINTAKE STAFF) S538 Far original Special Use Pernik fee o1S2,000 -❑ ..-first resubmission(10 BE:I'AII)WIIKN THE ltFSUBMIS.SION IS MADE To INTAKE ST,tFV) Free III' Each additionni resubmission rr0 BE:min wiIEN*11m ItESUIIMISSION IS MAJWTO INTAKE STAFF) $1,075 • • • County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice: (434)296-5832 Fax: (434)972-4126 ke..h.,,1 i itwal s Prim.t...r I data:Imagellpeg;base64,/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAZABkAAO/2wEIDAAgG...04+A5x8kf/AKJr6KPSvmrxf1037QM+48CSNQPb70tAHpVFJmirMz//2Q== Page 1 of 2 .FREELANI) and KAUFFMAN, INC. ENGINEERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHrTECTS December 21, 2017 To: Cameron Langille Albemarle County 401 McIntire Rd Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832, ext.3432 Re: SP201700016 Caliber Collision Avon Street Extended(U.S Route 742 near Interstate 64),Albemarle County, VA Albemarle County Special Use Permit Resubmittal in Response to 2"d Review Comments Please find attached the following documents for the above-referenced project pertaining to the Body Shop Special Use Permit resubmittal provided for Albemarle County. Please note,this resubmittal is for the submittal deadline of 1/02/2018. We are submitting it early due to our office being closed the week after Christmas. • (1)copy of the completed Resubmittal of information Application for a special use permit • (17)copies of the 2"d round SUP submittal comments annotated with our comment responses • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the revised Site Conceptual Plan • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the revised Grading Conceptual Plan • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the Landscape Conceptual Plan Arriving under a separate cover: • As previously discussed on 12/19/2017,we will be providing an electronic copy of the additional Septic feasibility report via email by 1/02/2018. • Resubmittal fee of$1,075 will be provided directly from our client Cross Development under a separate cover. Should you have any questions,or should you require additional information,please contact me directly at 864.282.3039 or tburnett@fk-inc.corn. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Todd Burnett, PE 209 West Stone Avenue • Greenville, South Carolina 29609 •Telephone 864-233-5497 • Fax 864-233-8915 • ��of MI•At r ill lye /IFIN10 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 December 1,2017 Rusty Coan 4336 Marsh Ridge Carrollton,TX 75010 Rusty@crossdevelopment.net RE: SP201700016 Caliber Collision—Revised October 23,2017 Dear Mr.Coan: County and State staff have reviewed your submittal with a revision date of October 23, 2017 for the above referenced special use permit application.We would be glad to meet with you to discuss any of the comments helnw NOTED, AN ADDITIONAL nts from all reviewers are provided below. The major questions/issues that need to be addressed before REPORT WILL forward to the Planning Commission are: BE SUBMITTED Additional information is needed on the feasibility of using a septic system on TMP 77-11F.If changes to the VIA EMAIL ON conceptual location of the septic system and drainfield are needed,the design of the site may be impacted 1/02 TO such that it does not meet the Neighborhood Model or intrudes into environmental features that should be CAMERON. preserved. If a septic system cannot be installed,the applicant will need to provide information on how the development will connect to public sewer. • The proposed driveway location conflicts with VDOT's access management standards due to the offset location of an existing driveway on the opposite side of Avon Street. Please see the attached VDOT comments and letters included below.VDOT recommends mirroring(reversing)the locations of all proposed improvements shown on the concept plan. However,there appear to be alternatives that may not require redesigning the site. Please contact Planning Staff to discuss this further. PER MEETING W/ VDOT AND ALBEMARLE CO. ON 12/18, WE ARE PROPOSING A 3/4 LIMITED ACCESS DRIVE. RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, LEFT IN, NO LEFT OUT. THIS WAS OFFERED AS AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO THE CONFLICTING LEFT MOVEMENTS. part of the staff report. Comprehensive Plan This parcel measures 4.382 acres and is split zoned between the HC Highway Commercial (approximately 1.61 acres)and RA Rural Areas (approximately 2.77 acres)Zoning Districts.The primary land use designation of the property is Industrial in the Southern and Western Urban Neighborhoods Master Plan,which calls for uses such as manufacturing, storage, distribution, office and commercial activities related to industrial use and research and development. The secondary land use is as designated Parks and Green Systems, which calls for parks, playgrounds, play fields, greenways, trails, paths, recreational facilities and equipment, plazas, outdoor sitting areas,natural areas,preservation of stream buffers,floodplains and steep slopes adjacent to rivers and streams. The Parks and Green Systems Plan shows a greenway/trail and a pedestrian or multi-use path along Moore's Creek.A pedestrian or multi-use path is also shown the parcel frontage along Avon Street Extended. 1 i Neighborhood Model Projects located within the Development Areas are typically reviewed for consistency with each of the Neighborhood Model Principles found in the Comprehensive Plan (see Objective 2 in the Development Areas chapter). 'Pedestrian Orientation This principle is met by providing new sidewalks along Avon Street Extended and by providing a supplemental sidewalk connection into the body shop main entrance and parking area, as shown in the Parks and Green Systems Plan. Mixture of Uses The body shop use will provide a mixture of uses along Avon Street Extended due to the proximity of the 5th Street Development retail center. Neighborhood Centers Not applicable to the request.The Master Plan calls for a regional retail center south and west of the subject property,which is already under construction(5th Street Development). The proposed use satisfies the land use goals called for on surrounding properties because the body shop is a supporting use surrounded by existing industrial uses. It will also provide employment opportunities to area residents. Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability Not applicable to the request due to the Industrial designation called for by the Master Plan. Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks The concept plan shows a proposed shared access easement between TMP 07700-00-00-011F0 and the adjacent Avon Motors property.The easement crosses into both properties.This principle is met;however,see additional comments later in this letter. Multimodal Transportation Opportunities This principle is met by providing additional sidewalks along the property frontage that will connect to the existing sidewalk south of the parcel along the west side of Avon Street Extended. This satisfies the Comprehensive Plan goals of providing pedestrian connections along Avon Street Extended. Parks, Recreational Amenities,and Open Space The concept plans demonstrate that the wooded portion of the property between Moore's Creek and the proposed development will be protected.This satisfies the Comprehensive Plan's goals of preserving sensitive resources such as water quality and biodiversity. As discussed by residents and CAC members during the Community Meeting, the Master Plan calls for a greenway/trail and a pedestrian or multi-use path along Moore's Creek.Please consider reserving for dedication to public use land near Moore's Creek for a potential future greenway or greenway trail.This will strengthen the application by also satisfying the Comprehensive Plan goals of providing recreational opportunities along Moore's Creek. Rev.1:Comment addressed with the Note on Sheet 1 of the Concept Plan. Dan Mahon with Parks&Recreation has verified that the note will suffice should the County wish to acquire an easement or land dedication in the future. Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale It appears that three sides of the building will face Avon Street Extended.As noted in the ARB comments below, the proposal will be reviewed by the ARB at their October 20, 2017 meeting.A major element of the SP review is conformance with Entrance Corridor guidelines. The ARB staff will provide comments to help you meet Entrance Corridor guidelines. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Please see ARB comments below for additional details that will be required to be addressed on the future site plan. Relegated Parking This principle is met with parking to the side of and behind the proposed building. Furthermore,the plans show a fence will be provided around the parking lot as an additional screening measure. 2 Redevelopment This principle is not applicable.The property is currently undeveloped. Respecting Terrain and Careful Grading and Re-Grading of Terrain The concept plans demonstrate that the parking lot, stormwater management devices, and building will be located outside of the RA zoned area. The conceptual grading plan appears to demonstrate compliance with Section 18-21.7(c)which requires a minimum 20'buffer for grading and construction between commercial and rural area zoning districts. However if the final design involves grading and construction within the 20' buffer you will need to request a special exception from the Board of Supervisors.This request may be made now or during the site plan process. The Health Department has expressed concern that soils on the property may not be suitable for a septic system and drainfield, particularly if both features will be located under the parking lot within the HC portion of the property. If a redesign is required,it may affect grading and the buffer.Please see comments later in this letter. Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. VDH cannot confirm that a septic system is viable in the HC Zoning District area shown on the Concept Plan based on the soils report provided by the applicant. Further study of the site is necessary in order for VDH to determine whether a septic system can be located in this area. Planning Staff cannot recommend approval of the SP until additional information is provided to VDH that demonstrates the soils can support a septic system within the HC zoned portion of the property. NOTED, AN ADDITIONAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED Clear Boundaries with the Rural AreVIA EMAIL ON 1/02 TO CAMERON. This principle is not applicable.The property is located with the designated Development Areas. Community Meeting The meeting held on September 21,2017 at Monticello High School during the 5th&Avon Community Advisory Committee satisfied the requirements for a community meeting as described in Section 33.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. Concerns were raised about lighting and screening. Site lighting will need to meet the County's lighting standards. Please see comments about screening and fencing later in this letter. The Planning Division also comments on the conceptual plan and other requirements of County Code. These comments are provided below. Conceptual Plan • Please add the word"Provided"to the Parking table on the conceptual plans.Rev.1:Comment addressed. • Please state the full Tax Map Parcel number of the property,and provide the owner name and address on the concept drawings. Please include the most recent instrument with a recorded plat(deed book and page number). Rev.1:Comment addressed. • Please state all applicable zoning overlay districts affecting the property on the concept plans. These include the EC-Entrance Corridor,the State Dam Break Inundation Zone,AIA—Airport Impact Overlay, FH —Flood Hazard Overlay,and the Steep Slopes—Preserved Overlay Districts. Rev.1:Comment addressed. • On both concept plans, please show the limits of the Steep Slopes—Preserved Overlay Districts and state the source.Rev. 1:Comment addressed. • Please clarify the building height data on the conceptual plans. Does the"Maximum Building Height:40" mean the maximum building height permitted by Code?If so,this figure is incorrect because the maximum building height in the HC district is 65'according to Section 18-21.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.The minimum step back requirements for any story that begins above forty(40)feet in height or for each story above the third story,whichever is less,in height shall be as provided in section 18-4.20.Rev.1: See Zoning comments below. Please amend the "Maximum Building Height" line in the Site Data table on Sheet 1 to state "Maximum Building Height Permitted:65'." NOTED, SITE DATA TABLE HAS BEEN REVISED. 3 • As required by Section 18-32.7.9.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, commercial and industrial uses shall be screened from adjacent rural areas zoning districts. Please provide more details regarding the materials of the 6'opaque fence that will surround the HC portion of the property.Also,Section 18-32.7.9.7(d)calls for fences used for screening purposes to be a minimum 6' in height,please consider a taller fence in order to address the concerns expressed by adjacent property owners regarding the views of the property during the winter months and at night. This will also help demonstrate compliance with Section 5.1.31 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding vehicles awaiting repair not being visible from residential properties and public streets. Rev. 1:Comment addressed. • The concept drawings do not identify the location and sizes of any loading spaces. Please be advised that the site plan will need to show loading spaces per Section 18-4.12.13 of the Zoning Ordinance. Rev. 1: Comment addressed,two loading spaces are now shown. • Please label the proposed shared access easement on the concept plans. Rev. 1: Comment addressed, shared access easement already exists,original comment made in error. • Please refer to VDOT comments regarding approval of an Access Management Exception for the proposed entrance onto Avon Street Extended.The proposed location may not meet VDOT standards for approval, which may alter the overall site layout. Please provide a note on the concept plans stating that "the entrance onto Avon Street Extended is subject to approval of an Access Management Exception by VDOT." Rev.1:Comment not addressed,please see VDOT comments below. The Access Management Exception request has been denied by VDOT. VDOT recommends mirroring (reversing) the locations of all improvements shown on the concept plan so that the proposed entrance is on the southern property border as opposed to the north. However,there appear to be other alternatives to redesigning the site, which Planning Staff can discuss with you further. PER MEETING W/ VDOT AND ALBEMARLE CO. ON 12/18, WE ARE PROPOSING A 3/4 LIMITED ACCESS DRIVE. RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, LEFT IN, NO LEFT OUT. THIS WAS OFFERED AS AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO THE CONFLICTING LEFT MOVEMENTS . LVI DLl ULLIUII UII LI IC p1 uper Ly IVIIVWIIIb' Lilt 3p CL.Idl VJC rtU IInL. MeV. 1:LUnhIIIefit dUUfesseU. • Regarding use of a septic system in the designated Development Areas, the applicant must provide additional information to County staff regarding the cost of constructing public sewer to the property in order to evaluate the Public Water and Sewer Evaluation request to allow an on-site septic system. Please provide an estimated cost to install a sewer line for public connection (not including ACSA connection fees) with the next submittal, which will be forwarded to the Director of Community Development for review. Rev.1:Comment partially addressed.The Director of Community Development has approved the Public Water and Sewer Evaluation request, see attached. However, please see comments related to VDH approval of the proposed septic system and drainfields. If a septic system cannot be installed, the applicant will need to demonstrate how the development will connect to public sewer. NOTED, AN ADDITIONAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED • VIA EMAIL ON 1/02 TO CAMERON. •r. The Zoning Division "...ed as accessory uses incidental to the body shop.Section 18-3.1 requires accessory uses to be located upon land zoned to allow the primary use, building or structure. Staff cannot recommend approval of the SP without additional confirmation from VDH and the Engineering Division that an onsite sewage system and drainfield can be NOTED, ANlocated within the HC zoned portion of the property. Please refer to VDH and Engineering comments below for additional information.Rev.1:Comment not fully addressed.VDH cannot confirm that a septic system ADDITIONAL is viable in the HC Zoning District area shown on the Concept Plan based on the soils report provided by REPORT the applicant. Further study of the site is necessary in order for VDH to determine whether a septic WILL BE system and drainfield can be located in the area identified on the concept plan.If the project is dependent SUBMITTED on installation of a private septic system instead of connecting to public sewer, Planning Staff cannot VIA EMAIL recommend approval of the SP until VDH verifies that the applicant has demonstrated that the soils are ON 1/02 TO capable of supporting a septic system within the HC zoned portion of the property. CAMERON. Per Engineering comments below, if connecting to public sewer is a viable option for the applicant to proceed with this project, please demonstrate on the Concept Plan how public sewer lines will be 4 extended to the property. ACSA will need to review the proposed extension before Planning Staff can recommend approval of the SP. NO VIABLE OFFSITE SANITARY AVAILABLE • New Comment 1st Revision: The concept plan shows that 23 customer/public parking spaces are required, but only 22 are provided. Please amend the concept plan so that the minimum number of spaces are provided based on Section 4.12.6. COMMENT IN ERROR PER EMAIL FROM CAMERON ON 12/13 • New Comment lst Revision: Please amend the rear and side building setbacks listed in the Site Data table on Sheet 1, as requested in the Zoning comments below. Please do not change the front building setbacks as stated in the Site Data table,they are currently correct. SETBACK TABLE HAS BEEN UPDATED AS NOTED. Planning-Architectectural Review—Margaret Maliszewski,434-296-5832,ext.3276, mmaliszewski@albemarle.org 1. At its meeting on November 6, 2017, the ARB expressed no objection to the rePLANTINGS HAVE BEEN permit based on the revised drawings reviewed on November 6,2017. ADDED AND SIDEWALK HAS 2. The ARB also noted the following expectations for the future site plan submittal: BEEN CONNECTED ON a. Secondary planting will be required to screen equipment. PROVIDED REVISED PLAN b. The sidewalk along the entrance elevation should connect to the sidewalk along Avon Street. Planning—Transportation—Kevin McDermott,434-296-5832,ext.3414,kmcdermott@albemarle.org 1. No comments or objections. Fire/Rescue—Shawn Maddox,smaddox@albemarle.org 1. Fire Rescue has no objections to this Special Use Permit. Zoning—Ron Higgins,434-296-5832,ext.3225,rhiggins@albemarle.org 1. Please correct the Site Data on the cover sheet of the conceptual site plan dated 10/23/2017 as follows: Setbacks: SETBACK TABLE HAS BEEN 50'Rear(adjacent to RA) 35' Rear(in RA) UPDATED AS NOTED. 0'Sides(in HC adjacent to HC) 25'Sides(in RA) Maximum Building Height(in HC): 65' NO VIABLE OFFSITE SANITARY AVAILABLE, ADDITIONAL Engineering—Frank Pohl,434-296-5832,ext.7914,fpohl@albemarle.org SEPTIC REPORT PROVIDED 1. No objection pending approval from VDH.Applicant may choose to include the offsite sanitary sewer as an option on this plan. If shown,offsite easements may be required. Virginia Department of Health—Joshua Kirtley,ioshua.kirtley@vdh.virginia.gov 1. As indicated in a letter from Brent Johnson dated 10/25/2017,the site contains"fill material". The letter goes on to indicate that it is not possible to confirm that an onsite sewage disposal system is viable for the subject property without further study.Based upon my understanding of the work that has been completed to date for the property,I cannot recommend approval at this time. Please inform the applicant that further testing/evaluation will be required in order to confirm whether or not an onsite sewage disposal system can be permitted. NOTED, AN ADDITIONAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL ON 1/02 TO CAMERON. VDOT—Adam Moore,434-422-9782,adam.moore@vdot.virginia.gov 1. The required Access Management exception request for entrance spacing has been denied; please see our 17 November 2017 letter. 2. The Department recommends mirroring the site so that the entrance can be moved to the south which will likely achieve the required entrance spacing, no longer needing an approved exception. If you have questions please feel free to contact me at(434)422-9782. PER MEETING W/ VDOT AND ALBEMARLE CO. ON 12/18, WE ARE PROPOSING A 3/4 LIMITED ACCESS DRIVE. RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, LEFT IN, NO LEFT OUT. THIS WAS OFFERED AS AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO THE CONFLICTING LEFT MOVEMENTS . 5 • COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Oiango Road CuIp0per Vaginla 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner November 28,2017 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Cameron Langille Re: Caliber Collision—Special Use Permit SP-2017-00016 Review#2 Dear Mr. Langille: The Department of Transportation,Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Freeland & Kauffman, Inc., dated 23 October 2017,and offers the following comments: I. The required Access Management exception request for entrance spacing has been denied; please see our 17 November 2017 letter. 2. The Department recommends mirroring the site so that the entrance can be moved to the south which will likely achieve the required entrance spacing,no longer needing an approved exception. Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at(434)422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, 0644, /4 Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency PER MEETING W/ VDOT AND ALBEMARLE CO. ON 12/18, WE ARE PROPOSING A 3/4 LIMITED ACCESS DRIVE. RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, LEFT IN, NO LEFT OUT. THIS WAS OFFERED AS AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO THE CONFLICTING LEFT MOVEMENTS. VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC. ENGINEEK5 • LANDSCAPE APCHITECTS October 25, 2017 To: Cameron Langille Albemarle County 401 McIntire Rd Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832,ext. 3432 Re: SP201700016 Caliber Collision Avon Street Extended(U.S. Route 742 near Interstate 64),Albemarle County, VA Albemarle County Special Use Permit& Public Sewer Exemption Resubmittal in Response to Review Comments Please find attached the following documents for the above-referenced project pertaining to the Body Shop Special Use Permit resubmittal and Public Sewer Exemption resubmittal provided for Albemarle County. Please note that the concept plan has been shifted slightly north to accommodate required roadwork within Avon Street Extended(an added left turn lane). Enclosed is the following: • (I)copy of the completed Resubmittal of information Application for a special use permit • (17)copies of the initial SUP submittal comments received by County and State staff including comment responses • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the revised Site Conceptual Plan • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the revised Grading Conceptual Plan • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the Landscape Conceptual Plan • (17)copies of the preliminary septic design report • (17)folded 24"x 36"copies of the Intersection Site Distance plan and profiles • (1)copy of the revised sanitary sewer system connection cost estimate • (1)copy of the Access Management Exception Request and traffic impact analysis report Should you have any questions,or should you require additional information,please contact Todd Burnett directly at 864.282.3039 or tburnett@fk-inc.com. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Brent Hutchinson 209 West Stone Avenue • Greenville, South Carolina 29609 • Telephone 864-233-5497• Fax 864-233-8915 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP# Fee Amount$ Date Paid By who? Receipt# Ckp By: o Resubmittal of information for or, F Special Use Permit '' PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: S P2 017 0 0 016 Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff Zo,av 24 1x i 17 Signature ofBrr'ner3 Contract Purchaser Date RUSTY A. Co/ix.' 870. RlB. Zso 5 Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory FOR'• CROSS DtvtZot i xi i 8Y ; R U ' Y A , co4*J 1 Ts DEYtL-OPMti11T .t9.4AJ4 41‹ FEES to be paid after application For original Special Use Permit fee of$1,075 ❑ First resubmission(TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) Free ❑ Each additional resubmission(TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $538 For original Special Use Permit fee of$2,000 ® First resubmission(TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) Free ❑ Each additional resubmission(TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,075 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434)296-5832 Fax: (434)972-4126 Revised 11/22015 Page I of l Public Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost Estimate Caliber collision, Albemarle County, VA Sanitary Sewer I quantity; Unit I Unit Cost I Totals r r 6"PVC-SDR35 I 460 ILF' i $37.00 I $17,020 r r Clean outs 1 10 Each i $750.00 F $7,500 Manhole P.C.with cover 1 8 :Each y $3,500.00 : $28,000 Sewer force main(4"min diameter) i 70 ILF I $40.00 I $2,800 • k T f Connect to existing manhole I 1 IEach I $4,500.00 I $4,500 • r r r Creek Crossing i 1 iLump Sum i $15,000.00 I $15,000 Pump station 1 1 iLump Sum f$50,000.00 i $50,000 Stone Bedding ; 850 !Tons y $35.00 1 $29,750 Total Onsite Sanitary Sewer I $154,570 *Premium due to steep slope installation condition I . , KOON7Z ORYANT JOHNSON WILLIAMS October 25, 2017 Freeland & Kauffman Inc. • Attn: Mr.Todd Burnett P.E. 209 West Stone Avenue Greenville, SC 29609 RE: Site and Soil Evaluation For Proposed Septic System Proposed Caliber Collision,Avon Street Albemarle County, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett, At your request, I have evaluated the site and soil conditions at the above referenced property for the ability to install an onsite sewage disposal system. The site has been evaluated based upon current Virginia Department of Health Regulations. Based upon information provided, development at the site will consist of a body shop facility with restroom facilities for employees and patrons. Any byproduct such as waste oils, cleaners, etc. will not be placed within any proposed onsite sewage disposal system. Preliminary information indicates that daily usage will range from 300-500 gallons per day. Prior to final design of any system, a wastewater usage and characterization should be completed to better define design values. The parking lot area to the rear of the proposed building was evaluated for the potential of septic system installation. Hand auger borings were dispersed throughout this area of the site to gather general soil condition information at this time. Fill materials were encountered in all borings and led to refusal in most locations at depths shallower than 36" below grade. The fill material consisted of soils with deleterious materials such as newspaper, plastics, and other waste • materials. I cross referenced the boring information I was able to gather with the PSI geotechnical report. The fill materials extend to depths of 5 to 10 feet below existing grade within the parking lot. The soils below the fill materials consisted of sandy Lean Clays (sandy Clay Loam) noted as firm to highly weathered rock. Groundwater depths were observed in several PSI test borings but do not appear indicative of seasonal high water table elevations and will require further evaluation. 11901 Old Stage Road,Chester,VA 23836 ■ (0)804-541-1436 ■ (F)804-541-1437 ■ kbjwgroup.com 11911 KOONTZ BRYANT JOHNSON VALtlAM6 Virginia Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulation 12 VAC 5-610-950 will not • allow for the installation of the septic dispersal area within fill materials. Additionally dispersal systems placed below paved parking lots or driveways must provide a minimum of 30 inches of cover for protection of the system. Therefore,the only potential option I see for the installation of an onsite system at this location would be the designation of a dispersal area within the parking Lot, removal of the fill materials to undisturbed soils, and the replacement of the fill with an ASTM C33 gradation sand and geotextile sand filter system such as the Eljen or Presby manufactured products. I have attached a tentative layout and basic design considerations for the Eljen GSF. This design will require a minimum of 12" separation to seasonal water table and 18" of separation to bedrock. As noted above, a minimum of 30" of cover is also required above the top of the system. It is unclear at this time if these standoffs will be achievable. This option will require further soil investigation via backhoe test pits due to the fill materials in place to fully examine the depth to seasonal groundwater, undisturbed soil conditions, and depth of fill. The further investigation will aid in selection of a specific location on the property for installation that also coordinates with the site design layout. This option is an engineered dispersal system outside of the general guidelines of the Virginia Sewage and Handling and Disposal Regulations. Without further investigation and a preliminary engineering conference with Health Department personnel, I cannot guarantee that this proposed system will be viable or able to be granted a permit. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss these observations and proposals further. -Sincerely, y `�- Brent E.Jo nson P.E., P.G., AOSE Principal Engineer/Geologist 11901 Old Stage Road,Chester,VA 23836 a (0)804-541-1436 ■ (F)804-541-1437 ■ kbjwgroup.com a SLOPE TO CREEK i 1171 k i---4 0441tiri Oil 4.4*-11). 40 - - ..4410............ .s...41 1'41 I'Pi titi Pi 0+.441.40.4.44414 40.44•* z I i r.cr41 0 4 4,..*skit kat 1/4.44 4 tikaattk fra..4.441,,4 I 141 Pi . it #11 40,4404ibHatkill44, ta--- ...$--4,-,-,e5;v4--,-;„, s_ „,,, . a 0 1 I it A 7416 4611 rattiti fri 6414,-.474 F40 Ft-to rat*.-....,--:..te. ces:44/ libellii- 7iiikalrsilltrAnli ... Nr- 7 _ a A i a " ad I kit,"b‘..,,•.t\Stea,,„4,,a„,4 4.4r- • *It It 1 I� `'�ill � sue-- �r!��, `:�\ `���� \`� I\IIIil tf4 1 I ills n - STORMWATER . \,�\� `�\ � ingW , , Retain- I ® 1 • ;\ •\� 1 Vl t 1 ingW@Ihs I1,1S�` l`• , _ it i . \ I '$ � `,� • 1 jl�I yi 4 �— 'gill VII yj I f , 16s `\ \.Z 1,1,Ein I r��� r --; \ .1/4\ ` LS . \ ) / itIo tconcreteSwale 1 ..y \�� l"wi l i - n S / \i for Run-0n ` ,leVALI ; I (Th\ �� f.. C , p 'Ito Ir. 1 _i - , p na\% I ' Rizeserv€i\ i Reing li �• . al \---.0-Rox ° ----\ I jv 40 i ,S2 Lon}s F.F.E 475.0 �N s c • `° `t I � 111111111111111111 ) tFSBub rade ',4 L ! *' ' 7 •I Buildl ^— � rr ; 1 Building Wall 1 ♦r ',my, Be .4� iNh.\ I ., �—y(,r > �J 1•I r n:-al jj t ®\ 1 _ __ ' _ . _ _ _ -_ ems'-----'�s�Bdi rastr irz f6"larar ztn RPEtza' _.�-1. �I T. 4� .'" • ' AVO $"tR ' o tEO+ Si• 7E ROVIEZ7 2 "� F. �C -- ieo na naa sPo•m �..- - — �:.,., G - - " i 1 • r • PAD System Example Drawings FIGURE 14: SUBSURFACE PAD SYSTEM CROSS SECTION :vd. p01`k.1'. • .1 PER DESIGN - - - - - - i 30 " CLEAN F0 4 _� PER DESIGN f�'l n In ill . 19" � it SPECIFIED SAND leRecital('^ la" 4-0 wake- Table 1/2 CENTER� CENTER SPACING agir FIGURE 15: RAISED OR FILL PAD SYSTEM CROSS SECTION GRADE,LOAM AND SEED . . STABILIZE SLOPE 12-18' ;�\= STATE OR LOCAL FILL REQIREME).e - ' MINIMUMS"LOAM * C. SEED Z77TTTTE1t : .Y GRADE t REMOVE TOPSOIL /1 SET SYSTEM BASE BELO i ' 36" 2 CENTER O ORGINIAL GRADE 12"MINIMUM 1/ CENTER SPACING 2013 Virginia Design&Installation Manual 23 www.elien.com 4 , , , • _" PAD System Example Drawings • • FIGURE 16: GRAVITY PAD SYSTEM PLAN VIEW • • PER DESIGN . 36" - - I—_ (- J I I DISTRIBUTION BOX -_ NON-PERFORATED PIPE (SEPTICTANK i PER DESIGN - -- -- O, SPACING I DESIGN I PER SPECIFIED SAND(TYP) l 1 r SPACING VARIES PERFORATED PIPE WITH HOLES AT 5&7 O'CLOCK(TYP). ... J Li sa FIGURE 17: PUMP DOSED PAD SYSTEM PLAN VIEW (WITH VENTING IF REQUIRED) > : : PERDESIGNVENT - - PER __ .__ DESIGN it l .I I 1 - DISTRIBUTION BOX J PUMP LINE NON-PERFORATED PIpE I SEPTIC TANK — U MP PER DESIGN - I- ' 1 - - - T TANK NK /' SPACING l_-_-- VARIES SPECIFI e D(TYP) MINIMUM 2"r _ DIA _Ai ---E BY-PASS AIR LINE MI IS PERFORATED PIPE ;• :H HOLES AT5&7 O'CLOCK(TVP) - I , SPACI c . -IES . � 6LL 2013 Virginia Design 8 installation Manual 24 www.elfen.com OWAI.111 f y OP) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 October 6,2017 (Revised October 9,2017) Rusty Coan 4336 Marsh Ridge Carrollton,TX 75010 Rusty@crossdevelopment.net RE: SP201700016 Caliber Collision Dear Mr.Coan: County and State staff have reviewed your initial submittal for the request to construct a body shop on Tax Map Parcel (TMP) 07700-00-00-011F0. The subject parcel is located on the west side of State Route 742 (Avon Street Extended)abutting the property located at 1570 Avon Street Extended to the north. Comments from all reviewers are provided below. The major questions/issues that need to be addressed before moving forward to the Planning Commission are: • Feasibility of using a septic system due to the soils located in this area of the County. If changes to the conceptual location of a septic system are needed,the design of the site may be impacted such that it does not meet the Neighborhood Model or intrudes into environmental features that should be preserved. • Creating a new driveway as shown may pose an issue from an access management standpoint due to the offset location of an existing driveway on the opposite side of Avon Street. Planning Initial comments on how your proposal generally relates to the Comprehensive Plan are provided below.Comments on conformity with the Comprehensive Plan are provided to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report. Comprehensive Plan This parcel measures 4.382 acres and is split zoned between the HC Highway Commercial (approximately 1.61 acres)and RA Rural Areas(approximately 2.77 acres)Zoning Districts.The primary land use designation of the property is Industrial in the Southern and Western Urban Neighborhoods Master Plan,which calls for uses such as manufacturing, storage,distribution,office and commercial activities related to industrial use and research and development. The secondary land use is as designated Parks and Green Systems, which calls for parks, playgrounds, play fields,greenways,trails, paths, recreational facilities and equipment, plazas,outdoor sitting areas,natural areas,preservation of stream buffers,floodplains and steep slopes adjacent to rivers and streams. The Parks and Green Systems Plan shows a greenway/trail and a pedestrian or multi-use path along Moore's Creek.A pedestrian or multi-use path is also shown the parcel frontage along Avon Street Extended. Neighborhood Model Projects located within the Development Areas are typically reviewed for consistency with each of the Neighborhood Model Principles found in the Comprehensive Plan (see Objective 2 in the Development Areas chapter). 1 Pedestrian Orientation This principle is met by providing new sidewalks along Avon Street Extended and by providing a supplemental sidewalk connection into the body shop main entrance and parking area, as shown in the Parks and Green Systems Plan. Mixture of Uses The body shop use will provide a mixture of uses along Avon Street Extended due to the proximity of the 5`h Street Development retail center. Neighborhood Centers Not applicable to the request.The Master Plan calls for a regional retail center south and west of the subject property,which is already under construction(5`h Street Development). The proposed use satisfies the land use goals called for on surrounding properties because the body shop is a supporting use surrounded by existing industrial uses. It will also provide employment opportunities to area residents. Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability Not applicable to the request due to the Industrial designation called for by the Master Plan. Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks The concept plan shows a proposed shared access easement between TMP 07700-00-00-011F0 and the adjacent Avon Motors property.The easement crosses into both properties.This principle is met;however,see additional comments later in this letter. Multimodal Transportation Opportunities This principle is met by providing additional sidewalks along the property frontage that will connect to the existing sidewalk south of the parcel along the west side of Avon Street Extended. This satisfies the Comprehensive Plan goals of providing pedestrian connections along Avon Street Extended. Parks, Recreational Amenities,and Open Space The concept plans demonstrate that the wooded portion of the property between Moore's Creek and the proposed development will be protected.This satisfies the Comprehensive Plan's goals of preserving sensitive resources such as water quality and biodiversity. As discussed by residents and CAC members during the Community Meeting, the Master Plan calls for a greenway/trail and a pedestrian or multi-use path along Moore's Creek,Please consider reserving for dedication to public use land near Moore's Creek for a potential future greenway or greenway trail.This will strengthen the application by also satisfying the Comprehensive Plan goals of providing recreational opportunities along Moore's Creek. APPLICANT HAS NO OPPOSITION TO DEDICATING LAND NEAR MOORE'S CREEK FOR A POTENTIAL FUTURE GREENWAY OR GREENWAY TRAIL PROJECT (BY OTHERS) . A NOTE TO Buildings and SpiTHAT EFFECT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE CONCEPT SITE PLAN. It appears that three sides of the building will face Avon Street Extended.As noted in the ARB comments below, the proposal will be reviewed by the ARB at their October 20,2017 meeting.A major element of the SP review is conformance with Entrance Corridor guidelines. The ARB staff will provide comments to help you meet Entrance Corridor guidelines. Relegated Parking This principle is met with parking to the side of and behind the proposed building. Furthermore,the plans show a fence will be provided around the parking lot as an additional screening measure. Redevelopment This principle is not applicable.The property is currently undeveloped. Respecting Terrain and Careful Grading and Re-Grading of Terrain The concept plans demonstrate that the parking lot, stormwater management devices, and building will be located outside of the RA zoned area. The conceptual grading plan appears to demonstrate compliance with 2 Section 18-21.7(c)which requires a minimum 20'buffer for grading and construction between commercial and rural area zoning districts. However if the final design involves grading and construction within the 20' buffer you will need to request a special exception from the Board of Supervisors.This request may be made now or during the site plan process. NOTED The Health Department has expressed concern that soils on the property may not be suitable for a septic system and drainfield, particularly if both features will be located under the parking lot within the HC portion of the property. If a redesign is required,it may affect grading and the buffer.Please see comments later in this letter. Clear Boundaries with the Rural Area This principle is not applicable.The property is located with the designated Development Areas. Community Meeting The meeting held on September 21,2017 at Monticello High School during the 5th&Avon Community Advisory Committee satisfied the requirements for a community meeting as described in Section 33.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. Concerns were raised about lighting and screening. Site lighting will need to meet the County's lighting standards. Please see comments about screening and fencing later in this letter. The Planning Division also comments on the conceptual plan and other requirements of County Code. These comments are provided below. Conceptual Plan • Please add the word"Provided"to the Parking table on the conceptual plans. PARKING TABLE REVISED • Please state the full Tax Map Parcel number of the property,and provide the owner name and address on the concept drawings. Please include the most recent instrument with a recorded plat(deed book and page number). REQUESTED INFORMATION ADDED TO THE 'SITE DATA TABLE' . • Please state all applicable zoning overlay districts affecting the property on the concept plans. These include the EC-Entrance Corridor,the State Dam Break Inundation Zone,AIA—Airport Impact Overlay, FH —Flood Hazard Overlay,and the Steep Slopes—Preserved Overlay Districts. INFORMATION ADDED TO THE CONCEPT SITE PLAN • On both concept plans, please show the limits of the Steep Slopes—Managed Overlay Districts and state the source. STEEP SLOPES - PRESERVED OVERLAY ADDED TO BOTH PLANS. SOURCE IS FROM ALBEMARLE COUNTY GIS SYSTEM • Please clarify the building height data on the conceptual plans. Does the "Maximum Building Height:40" mean the maximum building height permitted by Code?If so,this figure is incorrect because the maximum building height in the HC district is 65'according to Section 18-21.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.The minimum step back requirements for any story that begins above forty(40)feet in height or for each story above the third story.whichever is less.in height shall be as provided in section 18-4.20. THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IS 23' . THIS INFORMATION IS LISTED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE • As required by Section 18-32.7.9.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, commercial and industrial uses shall be screened from adjacent rural areas zoning districts. Please provide more details regarding the materials of the 6'opaque fence that will surround the HC portion of the property.Also,Section 18-32.7.9.7(d)calls for fences used for screening purposes to be a minimum 6' in height,please consider a taller fence in order to address the concerns expressed by adjacent property owners regarding the views of the property during the winter months and at night. This will also help demonstrate compliance with Section 5.1.31 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding vehicles awaiting repair not being visible from residential properties and public streets.ADDITIONAL NOTES ADDED TO THE PLAN STATING THE FENCE MATERIAL SHALL BE A WOODEN SCREEN FENCE (6-FT TALL) . • The concept drawings do not identify the location and sizes of any loading spaces. Please be advised that the site plan will need to show loading spaces per Section 18-4.12.13 of the Zoning Ordinance. (2) TWO LOADING SPACES HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE PLAN. THEY ARE LOCATED SUCH TO NOT BLOCK ANY ACCESS DRIVE AISLES AND 'REQUIRED' PARKING SPACES. THE 3 SPACES THEY DO BLOCK ARE NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED PARKING AND ARE PROPOSED STORAGE SPACES. 3 RED ACCESS EASEMENT IS EXISTING AND IT HAS BEEN LABELED WITH THE • Please label the proposed shared access easement on the concept plans.DEED BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER ON THE CONCEPT PLAN. • Please refer to VDOT comments regarding approval of an Access Management Exception for the proposed entrance onto Avon Street Extended.The proposed location may not meet VDOT standards for approval, which may alter the overall site layout. Please provide a note on the concept plans stating that "the entrance onto Avon Street Extended is subject to approval of an Access Management Exception by VDOT." NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE PLAN • Please be advised that, following approval by the Board of Supervisors, an initial and final site plan application will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County in order to commence construction on the property following the Special Use Permit. NOTED • Regarding use of a septic system in the designated Development Areas, the applicant must provide additional information to County staff regarding the cost of constructing public sewer to the property in order to evaluate the Public Water and Sewer Evaluation request to allow an on-site septic system. Please provide an estimated cost to install a sewer line for public connection(not including ACSA connection fees) with the next submittal,which will be forwarded to the Director of Community Development for review. ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL • As indicated by VDH, a soils evaluation should be conducted sooner rather than later.The Zoning Division has confirmed that onsite sewage systems and subsurface drainfields are defined as accessory uses incidental to the body shop.Section 18-3.1 requires accessory uses to be located upon land zoned to allow the primary use, building or structure. Staff cannot recommend approval of the SP without additional confirmation from VDH and the Engineering Division that an onsite sewage system and drainfield can be located within the HC zoned portion of the property. Please refer to VDH and Engineering comments below for additional information. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PRELIMINARY SEPTIC DESIGN REPORT Planning-Architectectural Review—Margaret Maliszewski,434-296-5832,ext.3276, mmaliszewski@albemarle.org 1. This proposal will be reviewed by the ARB at their October 16 meeting.Comments will be provided after the meeting. NOTED Planning—Transportation—Kevin McDermott,434-296-5832,ext.3414,kmcdermott@albemarle.org 1. As discussed in VDOT comments below,creating a new driveway as shown may pose an issue from an access management standpoint due to the offset location of an existing driveway on the opposite side of Avon Street. Please provide further evaluation of proposed vehicular movements at the new entrance in order to demonstrate that the driveway location can be aooroved by VDOT durine the site plan phase. CONCEPT SITE PLAN HAS SHIFTED THE DRIVE AS FAR TO THE EAST AS POSSIBLE. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDITIONAL EVALUATION. THIS HAS ALSO BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO VDOT 2. The Turn Lane Warrant Analysis and Access Management Exception (AME) request prepared by Ramey Kemp&Associates recommends a northbound left turn lane into the property.Please show this on the next submittal. Staff recommends consulting further with VDOT to ensure that installation of the turn lane is acceptable and possible based on the width of Avon Street Extended. THE CONCEPT SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED To SHOW THE PROPOSED THBOUND LEFT TURN LANE. THIS PLAN IS STILL CONCEPTUAL AND THE Fire/Rescue—Robbie Gilmer,434-296-5833,rgilmer@albemarle.org ROADWORK SHOWN IS A PRELIMINARY SKETCH 1. Based on SP dated 8/21/17. Fire Rescue has no objections or comments for the SP. Zoning—Ron Higgins,434-296-5832,ext.3225,rhiggins@albemarle.org 1. No comments or objections. Inspections—Michael Dellinger,434-972-4179,ext.3228,mdellinger@albemarle.org 1. Please be advised that full stamped plans will be required for building permit submission. Engineering—Frank Pohl,434-296-5832,ext.7914,fpohl@albemarle.org 1. Show critical slopes on application plan.PRESERVED SLOPES ADDED 2. Show where drainfield is proposed on application plan.PRELIMINARY DRAINFIELD LOCATION ADDED Virginia Department of Health—Joshua Kirtley,joshua.kirtley@vdh.virginia.gov 4 • 1. I recommend that the applicant consult with a licensed PE and soil evaluator to determine what options the property as in terms of an onsite sewage disposal system. Once completed,the consultant will submit a preliminary report to your office outlining the available soils and indicating the proposed water use. Once received, please forward to my office for review and comment. The location of the proposed sewage disposal system will be critical moving forward,hence the reason for determining its location now. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED PRELIMINARY SEPTIC DESIGN REPORT VDOT—Adam Moore,434-422-9782,adam.moore@vdot.virginia.gov 1. Please see attached letter dated October 3,2017 for VDOT comments related to the SP plan. 2. Please see attached letter dated September 25, 2017 for VDOT comments related to the Access Management Exception request. PLEASE SEE REPONSES TO EACH OF THESE LETTERS BELOW Albemarle County Service Authority(ACSA)—Alex Morrison,amorrison@serviceauthority.org 1. I am recommending approval of the SP. My only comment is that the installation of a fire hydrant may be required during site development to meet the current fire code spacing requirements. NOTED Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority(RWSA)—Victoria Fort,vfort@rivanna.org 1. No comments received from RWSA as of October 6,2017.Any comments will be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt. Action after Receipt of Comments After you have read this letter,please take one of the actions identified on"Action After Receipt of Comment Letter" which is attached. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form (or just call me to schedule a time to sit down together). There is no fee for the first resubmittal.The resubmittal date schedule is provided for your convenience. Notification and Advertisement Fees Prior to scheduling a public hearing with the Planning Commission, payment of the following fees for newspaper advertisements and notification of adjoining owners are required: $406.00 Cost for newspaper advertisement $215.00 Cost for notification of adjoining owners(minimum$200+actual postage/$1 per owner after 50 adjoining owners) $621.00 Total amount due prior to Planning Commission public hearing Prior to the Board of Supervisor's public hearing,payment of the newspaper advertisement for the Board hearing is needed: $406.00 Additional amount due prior to Board of Supervisors public hearing $1,027.00 Total amount for all notifications Fees may be paid in advance. Payment for both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors public hearings may be paid at the same time. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. I can be reached at blangille@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832, ext. 3432. Sincerely, CC: Ludwig Kuttner ALL { Destiny of Lynchburg LLC P.O.Box 359 Keene,VA 22946 Cameron Langille Ikuttner@hampshireinvest.com Senior Planner Planning Division Enclosed: Action After Receipt of Comment Letter Resubmittal Form 5 opiN "E� c COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1501 Orange Road Culpeper,Virg ma 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner September 25, 2017 Rusty Coan, P.E. Cross Development 4336 Marsh Ridge Carrollton, TX 75010 Re: Caliber Collision Access Management Exception Request Dear Mr. Coan: We have reviewed the above referenced AM-E dated August 18, 2017 and have the following comments: 1. There appears to be an entrance on the opposite side of Avon Street that is offset from the proposed entrance to Caliber Collision. The conflicting lefts that this entrance would create could create a safety concern. Please add to your analysis an evaluation of these movements. Please provide a revised AM-E or if the exception is no longer desired,a site layout that meets current access management standards. CONCEPT SITE PLAN HAS SHIFTED THE DRIVE AS FAR TO THE EAST AS POSSIBLE. ANY FURTHER WOULD BE OUTSIDE OF THE RECORDED SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT, OFF OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND OUT OF OUR CONTROL. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDITIONAL EVALUATION. Oiltut_ f l vui./ Adam J. Moo"re, P.E. Assistant Resident Engineer—Land Use VDOT Charlottesville Residency «1;.. yM. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper V.rgugo 22 An• Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner October 3, 2017 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Cameron Langille Re: Caliber Collision—Special Use Permit SP-20I7-00016 Review#1 Dear Mr. Langille: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Freeland & Kauffman, Inc., dated 17 August 2017, and offers the following comments: 1. There is an existing entrance on the adjacent parcel that does not meet the minimum entrance spacing(335')for a 45 mph Collector road. An Access Management Exception is required. Please see our letter, dated 25 September 2017,regarding this matter. This and all other entrances in proximity to the proposed entrance must be shown on the Site Plan. PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW ENTRANCE DRIVES 2. Turn lane warrants must be included on the Site Plan, and if required turn lanes must be provided. See Appendix F of the Road Design Manual for turn lane warrants and required geometry.CONCEPTUAL TURN LANES HAVE BEEN ADDED TO PLAN. PROFILES PROVIDED 3. Intersection sight distances must be shown on the Site Plan and profiles provided. w/ RESUB. 4. Entrance geometry must be provided on the Site Plan. Note that the minimum radius for a commercial entrance without a separate truck access is 42 feet. PLAN REVISED TO SHOW 42' RADII 5. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B(1)and F,as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other requirements. NOTED Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894. VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING October 3, 2017 Cameron Langille Page 2 A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way.The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at(434)422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, altax_11. t AL, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING NVDCIT Virginia Department of Transportation February 2015 ACCESS MANAGEMENT EXCEPTION REQUEST: AM-E ACCESS MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS 24 VAC 30-73 SECTION 120 Submitted by: Rusty Coan, P.E.-Cross Development Date: 10-17-2017 Email Address: rusty@crossdevelopment.net Phone: (214) 614-8252 Address: 4336 Marsh Ridge,Carrollton,TX 75010 Project Name: Caliber Collision Rte# 742(Avon St) Locality: Albemarle County Description of Project: Proposed 19,000 s.f.automobile care center on the northwest side of Route 742(Avon Street) north of Fifth Street Station Parkway. The proposed access plan includes one full-movement driveway on Avon Street approximately 205 feet southwest of the existing Avon Motors driveway. VDOT District: Culpeper Area Land Use Engineer: Adam Moore,P.E. NOTES: j1).Submit this form and any attachments to one of the District's Area Land Use Engineers. (2).See Section 120 of the Regulations for details on the requirements,exceptions,and exception request review process. (3).Attach additional information as necessary to justify the exception request(s). (4).If a traffic engineering study is required,the decision on the request will be based on VDOT engineering judgment. (5).Use the LD-440 Design Exception or the LD-448.Design Waiver forms for design and engineering standards,e.g.radius,grade,sight distance. See IRVI-LD-227 on VDOT web site for additional instructions. Select the Exception(s)Being Requested 0 Exception to the shared commercial entrance requirement. (Access M.Regulations section 120 C.2) Reason for exception: A.An agreement to share the entrance could not be reached with adjoining property owner. Attached:Written evidence that adjoining property owner will not share the entrance. El B. Physical constraints:topography,adjacent hazardous land use,stream,wetland,other. 0 Specify constraint: Q Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial photo or topographic map. Exception to the vehicular connection to adjoining undeveloped property requirement.(section no c.4) Reason for exception: El A. Physical constraints:topography,adjacent hazardous land use,stream,wetland,other. 0 Specify constraint: Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial photo or topographic map. p B. Other reason: 1 , • ; • February 2015 0 Exception to the commercial entrance shall not be located within the functional area of an intersection requirement. (See Regulation Section 120 C.1;Appendix F,Rd Design Manual) QAttached: A traffic engineering study documenting that the operation of the intersection and public safety will not be adversely impacted. ❑✓ EXCEPTION TO THE SPACING STANDARDS FOR: • Commercial entrances;intersections/median crossovers(Table 2-2); • Commercial entrances/intersections near interchange ramps(Tables 2-3,2-4);or • Corner clearance(Figure 4-4). Appendix F,Road Design Manual Information on the Exception Request ON A STATE HIGHWAY Functional classification: Principal Arterial: Minor Arterial: Collector: © Local: Posted speed limit: 45 mph ❑NEAR AN INTERCHANGE RAMP(Submittal of a traffic engineering study required) ❑CORNER CLEARANCE(Submittal of a traffic engineering study required) Type of intersection/entrance: Signalized ❑ Unsignalized® Full Access® Partial Access❑ Required spacing distance 335 ft Proposed spacing distance 205 ft Requested exception: Reduction in required spacing 130 ft REASON FOR EXCEPTION: LI A. To be located on an older,established business corridor along a highway where existing spacing did not meet the standards prior to 7/1/08 or 10/14/09.(Regulation Section 120 C.3.c) IDAttached: Dated aerial photo of corridor identifying proposed entrance/intersection location. �! B. Not enough property frontage to meet spacing standard,but the applicant does not want a partial access right-in/right-out entrance. (Section 120 C.3.f) Q✓ Attached: A traffic engineering study documenting that left turn movements at the entrance will not have a negative impact on highway operation or safety. C. To be located within a new urbanism mixed use type development. (Section 120 C.3.d) Attached: The design of the development and compliance with intersection sight distance. 0 D. The proposed entrance meets the signal warrants but does not meet the signalized intersection spacing standard. The applicant requests an exception to the spacing standard. IDAttached: A traffic engineering study that(i)evaluates the location's suitability for a roundabout and(ii) provides documentation that the proposed signal will not impact safety and traffic flow. (Section 120 CS) 2 February 2015 E. The development's 2nd (or additional)entrance does not meet the spacing standards but is necessary for the streets to be accepted into the secondary system. (Section 120 C.3.e) Attached: Information on the development that identifies the location of entrances. 0 F. To be located within the limits of a VDOT and locality approved access management corridor plan. Ej Attached:Aerial photo of corridor identifying proposed entrance/intersection location.(Sect 120 C.3.b) FOR VDOT USE ONLYI Recommendation on Exception Request: Approve❑ Deny {Date: Area Land Use Engineer or: Name Remarks: Exception Request Action: Approvedn Denied n I Date: District Administrator or Designee: Name(and position if Designee) Remarks: District Staff: Please email copy to Bradley.Sheltonc VDOT.Virginia.gov 3 RAMEY KEMP RAMEY KEMP&ASSOCIATES,INC. 4343 Cox Road a_ _ - _ _ Glen Allen,VA 23060 4 ASSOCIATES Phone: 804-217-8560 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS wWw.femeykemp.mm October 17,2017 Megan Yaniglos,ASLA Albemarle County Planning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 Phone: (434)296-5832 Reference: Caliber Collision—Access Management Exception(AME)Request Albemarle County,Virginia Dear Ms. Yaniglos, Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. (RKA) has performed a turn lane warrant analysis for the proposed 19,000 s.f. automobile repair facility on the northwest side of Route 742 (Avon Street) north of Fifth Street Station Parkway. The proposed access plan includes one full-movement driveway on Avon Street, which will serve this parcel and provide cross-access to the adjacent parcel to the north. If approved,the automobile repair facility is expected to be constructed by 2018. Figure 1 shows the site location and study intersection. The original AME request was dated August 18, 2017. This revised AME request is based on review comments provided by the Virginia Department of Transportation(VDOT) in letters dated September 25 and October 3. Based on discussion with VDOT,the purpose of this letter report is to provide the following: • Access Management Exception(AME)request • Trip generation calculations • Evaluation of turn lane warrants for the proposed driveway on Avon Street • Evaluation of side street left-turn conflicts at build-out Existing Conditions Avon Street is a two-lane Major Collector with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 11,000 vehicles per day, and a posted speed limit of 45 mph within the vicinity of the site. The AM peak hour (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM peak hour (4:00 to 6:00 PM) turning movement counts were conducted by Quality Counts,LLC at the following intersection during the week of October 2: • Avon Street at The Baseball Company North Entrance Figure 2 shows the existing traffic volumes, and the traffic count data are enclosed for reference. Charleston,SC-Charlotte, NC-Raleigh,NC-Richmond,VA-Winston-Salem, NC Ms.Megan Yaniglos,ASLA Page 2 of 3 Background Traffic Growth Based on the historical ADT's and discussion with VDOT, the existing volumes were grown by an annual rate of 3.0%for one year to 2018. Figure 2 shows the no-build 2018 traffic volumes. Trip Generation The trip generation potential of the site during a typical weekday, AM peak hour and PM peak hour was estimated using the methodologies published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual—9h Edition, and are shown in Table 1. Table 1 ITE Trip Generation—9th Edition—Weekday Weekday AM Peak PM Peak Hour Land Use, Daily Traffic Size Hour(vph) ' (vph) (ITE Land Use Code) (vpd). Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Automobile Care Center 19,000 s.f. 255* 255* 28 15 28 31 (942) *ITE does not publish daily trip rates for this land use,therefore,it was assumed that 20%of the daily traffic volume occurs during the AM and PM peak hours combined. Site Traffic Distribution The following site traffic distribution was applied based on a review of the existing traffic volumes, the adjacent roadway network,and engineering judgement: • 60%to/from the north on Avon Street • 40%to/from the south on Avon Street Figure 3 shows the site trip distribution and site trip assignment. Figure 4 shows the projected build(2018)AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. VDOT Turn Lane Warrant Analysis The projected build-out AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the proposed automobile repair facility were compared to the turn lane warrants in the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections: • A northbound left-turn lane on Avon Street is warranted during the AM and PM peak hours • A southbound right-turn lane on Avon Street is not warranted during the AM and PM peak hours The turn lane warrant diagrams are enclosed for reference. Figure 4 shows the recommended lane configuration. e RAMEY KEMP �i ASSOCIATES • Ms.Megan Yaniglos,ASLA Page 3 of 3 Intersection Spacing Standards VDOT requires at least 335 feet of separation between full-movement entrances on Major Collector roadways posted 45 mph. The proposed site driveway on Avon Street is approximately 205 feet southwest of the existing Avon Motors driveway. An AME request form is enclosed. Evaluation of Side Street Left-Turn Conflicts The proposed site driveway is offset from the existing commercial driveway on the southeast side of Avon Street by approximately 35 feet. In their review, VDOT requested an evaluation of how often the side street left-turn movements would occur simultaneously. As shown in Figure 4, we are projecting a total of 14 side street left-turn movements during the AM peak hour (9 eastbound and 5 westbound), and 27 side street left-turn movements during the PM peak hour (19 eastbound and 8 westbound) at build-out of the site. Therefore, at the most, there will be 5 simultaneous side street left-turn movements in the AM peak hour (once every 12 minutes), and 8 in the PM peak hour (once every 7.5 minutes). The frequency of simultaneous side street left-turn movements will be low, and opposing drivers will be able to see each other,so we recommend approval of the AME request. Recommendations We recommend the following improvements to accommodate the projected site trips: • Construct a northbound left-turn lane on Avon Street with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper o Note that there are only 11 northbound lefts in each peak hour (1 vehicle every 5.4 minutes), so the storage needs in this turn lane are minimal • Construct the site driveway with one ingress lane and one egress lane We appreciate your attention to this matter. Please contact - . 3 I 217-8560 if you have any questions about this report. ONIT H •F Sincerely yours, s' � o ' • 1L� Ramey Kemp&Associates,Inc a . ,A P nY � - • 'L A. HULTGR-PD Lic. No. 04962t '9 I6-17- 17 Carl Hultgren,P.E.,PTOE 'c�c O\� Regional Manager sSfONAL Enclosures: AME Request form,Figures,Traffic count data,VDOT turn lane warrant diagrams Copy to: Mr.Adam Moore,P.E.,VDOT Mr.Rusty Coan,P.E., Cross Development Mr.Todd Burnett,P.E.,Freeland and Kauffman,Inc. 4) RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES >/ / / 17 ' J-' ! teoir' f ci T T?: flY / a f .r f : i �'7r ii oCr • '! r, it ^aLw ti fir r .w __ ` ��},: / \' r , r _"....?----,--/-i4I• mr Z 'iW fir, 4 P bf44"�"� ✓,✓' ""1 py +.✓J -,,,-,.c, q y_a ^'vb•Y' t lid l ini'erSlty." ,,`.Si t, 7h�At Z. °'4rfo ...."a q t4 ti-"Akiglrlklay--- '� 4 :. Charlott'esvilIe? �4� ���Av- `a Witan LEGEND 4 j �;,i ,( yf O?,. 4.1 O Study Intersection 'i'S7„,4\.... �i` .01 '7e ztvci r _ 1 Site Boundary �,y5 it- ut El),P ,� a• , n N y°� r ` a ifi , , ,-- • r t mow '. _;r' ..-AP.,,-I/ e�'', N r Ly 4, t'c 5 sir''' �, A �.J r, . g, a !.> YEa".s..,h,`a F� Jd` � ,.:__IL, �'..��1tv�� t Site Location and 4RAMEY KEMP Caliber Collision Study Intersection Albemarle County,Virginia 4 ASSOCIATES TRANSPORTATION 6NO,NSSRS Scale:Not to Scale I Figure 1 Existing(2017)Traffic Volumes Avon Street a a L4(3) en VD f 5(8) Existing Commercial Driveway N_ -+ N O Cr' N N No-Build(2018)Traffic Volumes Avon Street • N 4— 4(3) en VD r 5(8) • Existing Commercial Driveway en -. en �v rn v LEGEND X(Y) AM(PM)Peak Hour 1 R A M E Y K E M P Caliber Collision Existing and No-Build(2018) ASSOCIATES Albemarle County,Virginia Peak Hour Traffic Volumes TRANSPORTATION ENOINEENE Scale:Not to Scale Figure 2 Site Trip Distribution Avon Street 60% e Proposed Site Existing Commercial 1 Driveway Driveway (60%) • Site (40%)—y I I 40% LEGEND XX% Regional Trip Distribution X%(Y%) Entering(Exiting)Trip Distribution Site Trip Assignment Avon Street N Proposed Site Existing Commercial 1 Driveway Driveway (19)9-4 Site (12)61 I I LEGEND X(Y) AM(PM)Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution &RAMEY KEMP Caliber Collision and ASSOCIATES Albemarle County,Virginia Site Trip Assignment TRANSPORTATION FNOINSSRS Scale:Not to Scale Figure 3 • Build(2018)Traffic Volumes Avon Street IC 4(3) -4—g(0) N r 5(8) Proposed Site Existing Commercial Driveway Driveway (19)9J Site I (o)o—► f (12)6—i ,-.N_c 7N LEGEND X(Y) AM(PM)Peak Hour Recommended Lanes Avon Street Proposed Site + Existing Commercial I Driveway ! Driveway I I ! Site I 1 0 LEGEND - Existing Lane —► Recommended Lane X' Storage(In Feet) 4RAMEY KEMP Caliber Collision Build comm) dedLa Volumes and Recommended Lanes A S S D C I A T E S Albemarle County,Virginia TRANSPORTATION 6NOINEER6 Scale:Not to Scale I Figure 4 r - Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Avon Street—The Baseball Company(North Entrance) QC JOB#: 14530101 CITY/STATE: Charlottesville,VA DATE:Thu,Oct 05 2017 377 716 Peak-Hour:7:45 AM--8:45 AM 42 2.2 + * Peak 15-Min:8:00 AM--8:15 AM I a it 0 371 6 J 7 * 0.0 4.3 0.0 o •o J t 4♦ 9 J i V o.o o.o t 0.0 o.o 0 ~ 0.90 ~ 0 0 0 1 f ' 5 7 O.a •�oo 19 * r,r�'o�o� oo 0 712 1 I a * Quality Counts �0.0 2.2 OAI 376 713 TRANSPORTATION DATA 4. f COLLECTION SERVICES 4.3 2.2 J a L J 1 J0 0 b 6 t o 1 tot o iit L o o 0 '9 f 1�` I� 0 I -1 0 3 0 J4VI T. I•J4bI ♦ ! ®t • I"r ) '©'t NA • ~ NA NA ' ~ NA ♦ 1 P ♦ 1 C ♦ * to n f w f A NA NA 15-Min Count Avon Street Avon Street The Baseball Company(NortIfEe$tae4tll Company(North Entrattattpl Hourly Period (Northbound) _ (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 121 0 0 1 53 0', 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 7:15 AM 0 117 0 0 3 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 179 7:30 AM 0 169 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 250 7:45AM 0 150- - 0 0 0'. - 87 0.. 0 0 0 _0 0 1 0 0 0 238 842 1.. 8-00AM . .,,Oa' 190 > .rr0.,^4' -0 . 'i 3:tW„110..yam+0 :,.=+0 `0's..rP9 <fr, 0-.n ,0 .t0'.:nT., .0 ..3.3..F..X0. aa30.6-Ao.01973:.I 8i15AM 0 198 1 0 1 98 0 '0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 301 1095 8:30 AM- 0 174 0 0 - 2 76 0 0 0 '0 0 0 2 0 0 0 254. 1099 8:45 AM 0 147 1 0 2 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 215 1076 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thm Right U Left Thru Right. U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 0 760 0 0 12 440 '0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 12 0 1224 Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Pedestrians 0 0 - 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad . Stopped Buses .4 . Comments: Report generated on 10/10/2017 12:04 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http:/Avww.quaiitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Avon Street—The Baseball Company(North Entrance) QC JOB#: 14530102 CITY/STATE: Charlottesville,VA DATE:Thu,Oct 05 2017 699 427 Peak-Hour:5:00 PM—6:00 PM a a Peak 15-Min:5:15 PM—5:30 PM I a a O 898 1 0.0 2.0 0.0 J a �. J a t. ♦ J t ♦ 0 0 3 11 0.0 ♦0.0 J t 0.0♦ 9.1 O ♦ 0.93' ' 0 oo • • oo • 1 4' • 0 0 * r. 6 I 0.0 . ..0.0 a 'r 12 5♦ 0.0 0 424 0 a Quality Counts 00 2.4 0.0 706 424 TRANSPORTATION DATA 4 a COLLECTION SERVICES 2.1 2.4 J I J a V 0 � t 0 0 O , ii. L0 ♦ •� 6�!"1 , f P� 0 NA I I J a t. NA ♦ « NA NA ♦ 7iI.r t- NA ♦ i P • 1 -rIfr��a r n —1 1 a r' 1 NA NA• a 16-Min Count Avon Street Avon Stm t he Baseball Company(NortITEoM -1 pll C mpany(North EnfraModhl Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbou d) (Eastbound) (W stbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru RI•ht Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 146 2 3 146 0 5 1 303 4:15 PM 0 104 0 1 164 0 5 2 276 4:30 PM 0 97 0 0 138 0 1 1 237 4:45 PM 0 102 0 1 149 0 1 1 254 1070 5:00 PM 0 87 0 '0 197. 0 .4 2 290 ..: 1057 I .LS15 PM ' .0 1' 118 ,,',.0,z, :,p1_v^185,.''-:'4,. ,. p ,,,I .3. u.6 a -4 w .I . 0 a v ,, 'I304 ,aa ,+si1085"-I 5:30 PM 0 111 0 h 0 158 0 2 0 271 1119 5:45 PM 0 -108 0 0 158 0 2 1 269 1134 Peak 16-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thm Right U_ Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 0. "472 0 0 , 4 740 0 ,0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 1216 Heavy Trucks. 0 0 0 0 12 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses - Comments: Report generated on 10/10/2017 12:04 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 F-64 WARRANT FOR LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAY 800 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i ` At-Grade,Unsignalized Intersections— L=%Left Turns in VA 5=Storage Length Required — = 700 V=50 mph(Design Speed) a L=5% -- 600 i LU 5=200' • 500 d. L d ■ ISM I O > 400 Z - y 300 O a . a 200 0 No Left-Turn Lane Required > 100 0 - 0 200 400 . 600 800 1000 VA ADVANCING VOLUME (VPH) FIGURE 3-11 800 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - At-Grade,Unsignalized Intersections— L=%Left Turns in VA - S=Storage Length Required f. — = 700 V=50 mph(Design Speed) _ • - L=10% > 600 Lu D 500 w 0 .- • S=200' > 400 > , Z in 300 O a a 200 - - O 0 —No Left-Turn - > 100 _Lane Required 0 II I11IIII •. • 0 200 400 600 800 1000 VA ADVANCING VOLUME (VPH) FIGURE 3-12 F-96 Y. 100 ¢=::::::::::::: : v w FULL-WIDTH TURN LANE AND TAPER REQUIRED i cr - D 0 w 0426 UJ Y, `, F JK Y" cri 60 TAPER REQUIREDLU " :-; i> cc t a NO TURN LANES 20 _ OR TAPERS REQUIRED I I I I I I 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 PHV APPROACH TOTAL, VEHICLES PER HOUR Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. When right turn facilities are warranted, see Figure 3-1 for design criteria. FIGURE 3-26 WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) Rev. 1/15 RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT