HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900015 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2019-06-21Yes, all of the revised Arch, Elec and Civil, with comment responses will be submitted and we will make sure we cover all
comments from the previous submissions.
Have a good weekend,
Kevin Thorstad, P.E.
Consulting Specialties I Land Development Services
Little
571.257.2865 (t) 703.908.4502 (f)
Littleonline.com I Littlesyeakeasy.com I Facebook I Twitter
Please consider the environment before printing this page or its attachments.
From: Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.or8>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 9:57 AM
To: Kevin Thorstad <kevin,thorstad@littleonline.com>
Subject: Re: Message from GEORGIA CALL (96783131414)
Hi Kevin,
This looks very good. On a quick look, it appears to capture all of the site and landscape alterations since 1996. Your
resubmission should include this as an Existing Conditions sheet; a follow up question is does the applicant expect to
remove any additional landscaping as part of this project? If so that should be shown on this plan or a separate
Demolition sheet.
Also ensure that the resubmission includes revised (if it was necessary, which I recall it was) architectural elevations, the
lighting plan and details sheets, and the proposed landscape plan if you are adding or replacing landscaping in addition
to the lighting alterations.
I believe that covers it, but we sure to respond to all comments in the previous two comment letters I have sent. If all
comments are addressed, then your approval will follow.
Thanks,
Heather
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Kevin Thorstad <kevin.thorstad@littleonline.com>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 9:46:59 AM
To: Heather McMahon
Subject: RE: Message from GEORGIA CALL (96783131414)
Heather,
I changed course slightly to make the plan more legibie with various different bases in the background of the dwg
file. The information that exists onsite which is different from the approved 1996 Site Plan is now shown in Red. These
site features range from the differences in parking, missing trees and shrubs, the ADA parking work which was
completed in 2015 and other site features.
In the hopes of getting this correct with this submission, could you provide any quick feedback before we get this out
the door. I am not looking for a comprehensive review, I just wanted to get your input since the new base is noticeably
different from the plan we had been using.