HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800030 Review Comments Letter of Revision 1 2019-06-26COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
June 4, 2019
Rev. 1: June 26, 2019
Craig Kotarski
608 Preston Avenue
Charlottesville, VA 22903
craig.kotarski(d-)timmons.com
RE: LOR #1 SDP2018-30 The Center at Belvedere — Letter of Revision
Dear Craig Kotarski:
Your Letter of Revision application has been reviewed. In order for the amended site plan to be
approved the following revisions are required:
4. [Comment] The LOR submission has been reviewed by Engineering and ACSA.
Attached please their comments.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. Please see the engineering comments
attached.
In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails
to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after
the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the
developer.
If you have any questions about the comments please feel free to contact me at
Psaternye(cDalbemarle.org or at 434-296-5832 ext. 3250.
Sincerely,
Paty 8atemye
Senior Plan
Planning Division
CC: Michael Matthews, Matthews Development Company
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Patricia Saternye
From: Emily Cox
Date: 03 May 2019
Rev. 1: 21 June 2019
Subject: The Center at Belvedere — Final Site Development Plan (SDP201800030 LOR 1)
The final site development LOR 1 plan for The Center at Belvedere has been reviewed by Engineering.
1. VSMP Plan amendment (WP0201800029 amendment 1) must be approved before this LOR can
be approved. Rev. 1: Comment still valid. WPO is close to approval.
2. Please provide a typical detail for the new wall. Will there be tiebacks, etc. It is very close to some
underground utilities. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
3. Drainage divides must be provided to go along with the storm calculations. Rev. 1: It appears the
calculations for pipe 155 and 153 are missing. This is the same remaining comment for the
WPO.