The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201900072 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2019-06-27Heather McMahon From: Heather McMahon Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 10:21 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski; Katherine Pabody Subject: RE: Your recent ARB submittal Hello Katherine, I just completed a review of your application for completeness. While this is a very well assembled application, there are items missing that must be provided. Firstly, the site plan that you submitted for SRC review includes sheets that are not included in the ARB review, namely: 1. Title sheet (T1.0) 2. Existing Conditions (C-1.0) 3. Demolition Plan (C-1.1) 4. Details (C-2.0) The ARB submission must mirror the SRC submission (except the SRC does not need the architectural elevations), and there is information on those four sheets that are pertinent to my review. Please resubmit 2 hardcopies of a complete site plan as soon as possible. Since the digital file you sent includes everything but these missing four sheets, please email a digital version of only those four missing sheets in addition to 2 hardcopies of a complete site plan. Secondly, we will need a physical sample of the CMU for review. Please submit that as soon as possible. And lastly, color renderings/perspective sketches are on the submittal requirements list and are really expected at this final stage of review. Please provide. Depending on how quickly you can provide me these missing items, we will determine what ARB meeting this project is slated for. Please let me know by when you think you could provide all of these missing elements. Thanks, Heather McMahon, Senior Planner Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3278 hmcmahon@albemarle.org From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 9:49 AM To: Katherine Pabody <katherine@goodhousellc.com> Cc: Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: Your recent ARB submittal Yes, Katherine. Heather McMahon will be reviewing this application. If items are missing from the submittal, she will be in touch soon. If the application is complete, it will be scheduled for the August 5 ARB meeting and you will receive a notification letter in the mail. Margaret From: Katherine Pabody <katherine@goodhousellc.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 9:41 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: Your recent ARB submittal Good morning, Margaret! Of course. It is attached to this email. Will you be advising us of whether or not our application is complete and next steps? Katherine On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:08 PM Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> wrote: Katherine, Thank you for your recent ARB submittal. Would it be possible for you to provide me an electronic copy of your submittal? Thank you. Margaret Margaret Maliszewski, Chief of Planning/Resource Management Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 mmaliszewski@albemarle.org Katherine Pabody Goodhouse Design katherinengoodhousellc. com office: 434.295.5959 ARB2019-72: Crozet Ave., Final ® 8 collated copies HNM 6/27/19 Architectural Review Board Final Review of a Site Development Plan Checklist for Completeness ® 1 set of color/material A. Written description of the proposal ® Written description of the proposal. ® Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20', clearly legible and folded): ® Location(s) of proposed building(s) on the site. ® Location of proposed parking, travelways, walkways and other improvements. ® Mechanical equipment, trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and improvements, and associated screening. ® Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient off -site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent of easement. ❑ Stormwater management plan. ® Location of retaining walls indicating top and bottom elevations, maximum wall height, and proposed materials, with material and color samples. Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and Commented [HMi]: ARs submission missing sue sheet, contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised existing conditions sheet, demolition sheet, and details sheet drawings, clearly identify revisions made. C. Landscape plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20' or larger, clearly legible and folded): ® Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines. ❑ Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species. Commented [1111142]: N/A ® Landscape key including all landscape symbols and a description of what they represent. ❑ Location of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas. _ Commented [1111143]: N/A ❑j Location of existing natural features. _ — Commented [HMa]: N/A ® Location of individual trees of 6-inch caliper or greater and all significant groups of trees indicated by botanical name and caliper. ❑ Location and height of above -ground utilities and associated easements, and location of below - ground utilities and associated easements. ❑ Stormwater facilities. ® Provide a signed, tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the landscape plans. ❑ Include tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans. t OVER ARB2019-72: Crozet Ave., Final HNM 6/27/19 D. Lighting plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1'=20' or larger, clearly legible and folded): ® Location of all proposed building and site lighting. ® Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets. ® Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures and information on illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height. ® Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting does meet the requirements of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. ® Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements. E. Appearance of the build!ng(s) (architectural elevations, color perspective sketches, site sections): ® Dimensioned architectural elevations of the proposed building(s). Elevations must be drawn to the scale of 1/8"=1'-0". Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings. Submittal of elevations that are not visible from the Entrance Corridor may be required to clarify the overall building design. ❑l Color perspective sketches that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor. commented [HMS]: Not provided and would bcncSt ® Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed application development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor elevation(s) and roof height(s) relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor. ® One set of all building materials � colors. Commented [HM6]: An actual sample of the proposed crvN ® A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors. will be required F. Additional material ® Provide labeled, color, 8-'/2" x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the Entrance Corridor. ® Signatures 2 OVER