The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201900067 Application 2019-05-30Albemarle '` ., Commtrnit} De�re!opmentDe a .rn& Coin 4 ,1 t ire id. 22-"Q 45H (434 2 E-5632 Fax : (434'. 172-4125 Planning Application TMPI 079A1-00-OC-00300 Osmer(s): ALICE S EASTON Application # ARB201.90006 LPROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description i ROYAL ACRES C 3 & 4 t4 5 t4 @ t1agisterial Gist. Scottsville Land Use Primary Open ,. Current.=.FG Not in A/F District Current Zoning Primary Rural Areas � APPLICATION INFORMATION Street %ddress Entered 6; Jennifer Pritcl- application Type Architectural Review Board Project Yerizon - Shadurell (Easton Property) Tier II PWSF Received Gate O5/30j 19 1 Received Gate Final F � Submittal Gate F106/03/ 19 �� Total Fees Closing File Gate Submittal Gate Final Total Paid Revision Number Comments Legal ad SUB APPLICATION(s) TyRe _ _ _._ Sub=spplicati Cornmert-____ _ Personal Wireless Facility 06/03/ 19 i APPLICANT / CONTACT INFORMATION Mart ---1..,——Ngrress_Cit"State 'i PF:ore FhaneCsll i ALICE 5 E.-.STpN 513 RER.:'^ICK COURTCH.=.kLGTTES;ILL9Ci . . i_ .............................................................................................................................................._.............-....:...............................,............................ i Signature of Contractor or Ruthorized.Agent Date Architectural ..eview Board ApplicatY,sn Part A: Applicant, Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: Verizon - Shadwell (Easton Property) Tier II PWSF Tax map and parcel(s): 079A1-00-OC-00300 Physical Street Address: 3646 Richmond Road Contact Person: Stephen Waller, AICP Business Name: Verizon Address 8159 Cancun Court city Gainesville State Virginia Zip 20155 Daytime Phone ( ) 434-825-0617 Fax # ( ) E-mail stephen.waIfer@gdnsites.com Owner of Record: Alice S. Easton Address 513 Berwick Court city Charlottesville State Virginia Zip 22901 Daytime Phone ( ) 434-295-6302 Fax # E-mail Part B: Review Type and Fee Select review type Review by the Architectural Review Board Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review (for a Special Use Permit or a No Fee Rezoning) Preliminary/Initial Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1075.00 Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $ 242.00 Building Permit Review $ 634.00 County -wide Certificate of Appropriateness Structures 750' or more from the EC, no taller than 5 stories No Fee Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee Personal wireless service facilities No Fee X Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee Building permits where the change is 50% or less of the altered elevation No Fee NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ARB# Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Check # By County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development, 401 McIntire Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 10/2015 Page 1 of 2 OVER — IPart C: Description of Proposal I Describe your proposal. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. Installation of a Tier II Personal Wireless Service Facility with a 100.5' monopole (please see attached) I Part D: Applicant Agreement Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain (8) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without the appropriate checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true, and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by the appropriate checklist. May 30, 2019 Signature of owner, owner's representative Date or contract purchaser Stephen Waller, AICP (consultant) 434-825-0617 Printed name, Title *Ownership Information: Daytime phone number of Signatory If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has the authority to do so. If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. Attach the owner's written consent. 11 /2010 Page 2 of 2 OVER — Architectural Review Board Checklist of Submittal Requirements i .b COUNTY -WIDE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Additions to ARB-approved structures or improvements Part / V Applicant Contact and Parcel Information --� Project name: Verizon - Shadwell (Easton Property) Tier II PWSF Contact person: Stephen Waller, AICP I Part B: Submittal 'Requirements Note: Submittal packages must contain 2 collated & folded copies of all information unless otherwise stated. A. Written description of the proposal 1 GZ Provide a description of the proposed work. 2 GZ Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. B. Site plan showing the approved site conditions and the proposed changes, as follows (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20' and clearly legible): 1 ® Location(s) of existing and proposed building(s) on the site. 2 Location of proposed parking, travelways, walkways and other improvements. 3 Mechanical equipment, .trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and improvements, and associated screening. 4 Existing and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient off -site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. 5 Location, size, identification of type and extent of existing and proposed utilities and easements. 6 Stormwater management plan. 7 ❑ Location of retaining walls indicating top and bottom elevations, maximum wall height, and proposed materials, with material and color samples. C. Landscape plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1 "=20' or larger and clearly legible): 1 W Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species. 2 Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the EC guidelines. 3 Landscape schedule including plant species with common and botanical names, quantity, size at planting, and symbol used. 4 Location of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas. 5 Location of existing natural features. 6 Location of individual trees of 6-inch caliper or greater and all significant groups of trees indicated by botanical name and caliper. 7 kZ Location and height of above -ground and below -ground utilities and associated easements. 8 ❑ Stormwater facilities. 9 ❑ A signed, tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the plan. 10 ❑ Tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans. 1 OVER D. Lighting plan showing the follows. -,(drawn to the scale of 1 "=20' or larger and cle_ .yr legible): 1 Location of all proposed building and site lighting. 2 ❑ Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets, and illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height. 3 ❑ Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures, poles and brackets, included as a sheet of the site plan set. 4 ❑ Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting does meet the requirements of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. LLF must equal 1.0. 5 ❑ Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements. E. Appearance of the building(s): 1 Dimensioned architectural elevations of the existing building and proposed addition. Elevations must be drawn to the scale of 1/8"=1'-0". Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings. 2 ❑ One set of all building materials / colors. 3 ❑ A floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors. F. Additional material 1 ❑ Provide labeled, color 8-1/" x 11" photos of the site as seen from both directions on the EC. 2 ❑ Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor elevation(s) and roof height(s) relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor. 3 ❑ Color perspective images (for example: sketches, renderings, photosimulations, etc.) that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor are often useful for gaining a clear understanding of the proposal. The ARB may require such images in certain cases when other submitted documents do not answer all questions of building form, building details, materials, context, topography, and/or visibility. 4 ❑ Sheet number, total number of sheets, drawing date, date and description of the latest revision, and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised drawings, clearly identify revisions made. 5 ❑ Any additional material that will make the review more productive. Clarification of topography, visibility, utilities, landscaping, or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome.. j Part G: Applicant Agreement Appl4can1 ttst read and sign I Each application package must contain 2 collated & folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only 1 set of material samples is required. All submittal items, including samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants should maintain duplicate copies for their own use. All information in this checklist is required before review begins. Additional submittal materials may be required, depending on the proposal. In representing the above referenced firm submitting this application for review, I hereby state that the information provided in this application, and all accompanying information, is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by this checklist. `- May 30, 2019 Signature of person completing checklist Date Stephen Waller, AICP (consultant) 434-825-0617 Printed Name / Title Daytime phone number of Signatory County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596; (434) 296-5832 Tel www.albemarle.org revised 10/24/2014 2 OVER —► GDNSItes Consultants to Verizon Wireless 8159 Cancun Court Gainesville, Virginia 20155 May 30, 2019 TO: Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 RE: Verizon - Shadwell (Easton Property) - Tier II PWSF Application To whom it may concern: The application and information enclosed with this cover letter are being submitted in support of Verizon's request for approval of a Tier II Personal Wireless Service Facility. Please note that a similar application was submitted for review at the same location in 2017, and that application (SDP201700055) has been deemed "withdrawn" due to inactivity. Based on visibility of the balloon during the balloon test and the Architectural Review Board's finding at its September 18, 2017 meeting that the location would not sufficiently minimize the visibility of the monopole from the Entrance Corridor, Verizon had the surveyors remeasure the heights of the trees using an alternate method an determined that the March 27, 2017 zoning drawings submitted with the previous application contained an error with respect to the height of the reference tree upon which the monopole's proposed height was based. This application is being submitted with revised drawings noting the correct reference tree height and a lower monopole height: In accordance with requirements set forth in the County of Albemarle's Zoning Ordinance, sixteen (16) separate packages are being submitted for review and each collated set contains the following information in support of the above -mentioned project: 1. Memorandum addressing the Site `Review Committee's memo for SDP201700055, dated November 10, 2017 2. Revised project narrative. 3. Photos taken from the man -basket during the remeasuring of tree heights. 4. Specification sheets for the proposed antennae, remote radio head and fiber optic junction boxes. 5. Site Plan and Construction Design Drawings reflecting corrected tree heights, revisions made in response to the Site Review Committee's memo for SDP201700055, and updated Verizon equipment. Please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience if you should have any questions or will require any additional information or support from myself and/or my clients at Verizon Wireless. Sincerely, Stephen Waller, AICP Zoning and Permitting Manager Phone: 434-825-0617 tephcn.w&llcr(&gdnsitcs.corn