HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA198800084 Action Letter 1989-01-12 STAFF REPORT - VA-88-84
APPLICANT - Bobby D. & Barbara Graves
TAX MAP/PARCEL - 69/51
ZONING - RA (Rural Areas)
ACREAGE - 27 . 660 (pt of)
LOCATION - North side of Rt 250, +/- . 1 miles east of its
intersection of Rt 6
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 30. 5. 6.2 . 1 of
the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. This section states:
"30.5. 6. 2 SA-HIGHWAYS
30. 5. 6.2 . 1 No buildings or structures other than permitted
under Section 4 . 11, except as hereafter provided
in the case of certain signs, shall be constructed
within any SA-highways overlay district. "
"30. 5. 2 . 2 SA-HIGHWAY
SA-highway overlay districts are hereby established
along the following highway corridors in Albemarle
County for a distance of one hundred fifty (150)
feet on each side of the right-of-way.
a. U.S. Route 250 from the western corporate limits
of the City of Charlottesville to the western
Albemarle County border. "
The applicant requests a variance from the one hundred fifty foot
setback requirement to locate a structure to house a country store
and public garage at a fifty-five (55) foot setback, a variance of
ninety-five (95) feet.
The applicant has agreed to purchase a portion of parcel #51, or
enough to establish the proposed county store and garage.
Gasoline will be available at the site also.
A couple of options were available to the applicant in the
development of the property within the SA-Highway district:
30. 5. 6. 3 . 1 For a use where off-street parking facilities are
required to accommodate more than two (2) motor
vehicles, the commission may reduce building setback
to not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the
right-of-way of a designated scenic highway, provided
that:
a. All parking facilities shall be located on the
rear side of the structures or buildings for
which such exception is sought and that such
parking facilities will be screened from view
of such scenic highway;
STAFF REPORT - VA-88-84
Bobby D. & Barbara Graves
Page 2
The applicant has choosen to pursue the variance option because
providing parking to the rear of the building is not acceptable or
customary to a country store operation. If gas is offered at the
site, then it is feasible that a canopy covering the gas pump area
will be installed. Setback distance should be considered for both
the canopy and building.
RECOMMENDATION
The application snoula ne aeniea tor cause:
1) The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show
that a strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would
produce a clearly demonstrable hardship approaching con-
fiscation as distinguished from a special privilege or
convenience.
2) The applicant has not demonstrated that the perceived
hardship is unique to his property in contradistinction
to other properties in the same zoning district and general
vicinity. The requirement the applicant seeks relief from
is shared by all properties zoned Rural Areas.
3) The applicant has not provided evidence to demonstrate that
the authorization of the variance will not be of substantial
detriment to the adjacent properties or that the character
of the district will be altered.
�>RGI1��P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
January 12, 1989
Mr. J. B. Coffey
Rt. 1, Box 39
Afton, VA 22920
Re: Board of Zoning Appeals Action
VA-88-84, Tax Map 69, Parcel 51
Dear Mr. Coffey:
This letter is to inform you that on January 10, 1989, during
the regular meeting of the Albemarle County Board of Zoning
Appeals, your application for VA-88-84 was denied.
Pursuant to Section 35. 0 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance,
the actual cost of any notice required under the code shall be
taxed to the applicant, to the extent that the same shall exceed
the applicable fee set forth in this section. Please see the
attached bill for the amount due of $15. 60.
Anyone aggrieved by a decision made by the Board can appeal
the decision to the Circuit Court of Albemarle County within
thirty days of the decision.
If you have any questions, please contact our office.
Sincerely,
Charles W. Burgess, Jr.
Zoning Administrator
CWBJr/st
cc: VA-88-84
Enc.
,
STAFF REPORT - VA-88-84 Revised 1/9/89
APPLICANT - Bobby D. & Barbara Graves
TAX MAP/PARCEL - 69/51
ZONING - RA (Rural Areas)
ACREAGE - 27. 660 (pt of)
LOCATION - North side of Rt 250, +/- . 1 miles east of its
intersection of Rt 6
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 30. 5. 6. 2 . 1 of
the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. This section states:
"30.5. 6. 2 SA-HIGHWAYS
30.5. 6.2 . 1 No buildings or structures other than permitted
under Section 4. 11, except as hereafter provided
in the case of certain signs, shall be constructed
within any SA-highways overlay district. "
"30. 5.2 .2 SA-HIGHWAY
SA-highway overlay districts are hereby established
along the following highway corridors in Albemarle
County for a distance of one hundred fifty (150)
feet on each side of the right-of-way.
a. U.S. Route 250 from the western corporate limits
of the City of Charlottesville to the western
Albemarle County border. "
The applicant requests a variance from the one hundred fifty foot
setback requirement to locate a structure to house a country store
and public garage at a fifty-five (55) foot setback, a variance of
ninety-five (95) feet.
The applicant has agreed to purchase a portion of parcel #51, or
enough to establish the proposed county store and garage.
Gasoline will be available at the site also.
A couple of options were available to the applicant in the
development of the property within the SA-Highway district:
30. 5. 6. 3 . 1 For a use where off-street parking facilities are
required to accommodate more than two (2) motor
vehicles, the commission may reduce building setback
to not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the
right-of-way of a designated scenic highway, provided
that:
a. All parking facilities shall be located on the
rear side of the structures or buildings for
which such exception is sought and that such
parking facilities will be screened from view
of such scenic highway;
STAFF REPORT - VA-88-84
Bobby D. & Barbara Graves
Page 2
The applicant has choosen to pursue the variance option because
providing parking to the rear of the building is not acceptable or
customary to a country store operation. If gas is offered at the
site, then it is feasible that a canopy covering the gas pump area
will be installed. Setback distance should be considered for both
the canopy and building.
A proposed development drawing has been submitted, showing the gas
pump island at 70+ feet, and the store building located 95+ feet
beyond the front property line. The applicant cites the enbankment
to the rear as reasons for locating the proposed structure at 95
feet, thus having the need to acquire a variance. Maintenance of
the existing topography is the applicant's wish to develop at the
proposed location. The staff certainly commends the applicant in
the effort to develop with the land, and in preserving the natural
environment.
RECOMMENDATION
The application should be denied for cause:
1) The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show
that a strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would
produce a clearly demonstrable hardship approaching con-
fiscation as distinguished from a special privilege or
convenience.
2) The applicant has not demonstrated that the perceived
hardship is unique to his property in contradistinction
to other properties in the same zoning district and general
vicinity. The requirement the applicant seeks relief from
is shared by all properties zoned Rural Areas.
3) The applicant has not provided evidence to demonstrate that
the authorization of the variance will not be of substantial
detriment to the adjacent properties or that the character
of the district will be altered.