HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900040 Staff Report 2019-07-12ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2019-40: Cascadia Office Building
Review Type
Final Site Plan (second review)
Parcel Identification
078000000005EO
Location
On the north side of Cascadia Drive, approximately 200' east of Rt. 20
Zoned
Neighborhood Model District (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Virendra & Nita Patel/Design Develop (Kevin Schafer)
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To construct a 3-story office building with associated site improvements.
Context
The proposed office building is to be located just off the Rt. 20 entrance into the Cascadia development. Residences are located to the east, stormwater facilities are
located to the north and south, and Darden Towe Park is located across Rt. 20 to the west.
Visibility
The proposed building will be readily visible from the EC street.
ARB Meeting Date
July 15, 2019
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
The ARB reviewed this proposal on May 20, 2019. The action letter from that meeting is included as Attachment A to this report and the recommendations made are included in the Analysis section of
this report.
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
5/20/2019
CURRENT
CURRENT
RECOMMENDATION
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated
Revise the architectural
Several changes have been made to increase
Provide material/color
Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the corridors reflects
design to achieve greater
unity in the design: the butterfly roof has been
samples for review.
the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review
unity of parts and greater
lowered and the wings now have equal heights;
and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated
connection to historic
red brick has been replaced with a brown brick
Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant
architecture of the area.
that relates more directly to the colors of
historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and
Consider modifications to
Cascadia residences; spandrel glass has been
Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive development within these
curtain wall framing
replaced with metal panels that are also used at
corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither
material and window
the third story. These changes bring the
required nor desired.
opening sizes, alternate
roof form, reduced
building together as more of a single unit, and
help the building blend more fully into the
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area
experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to
expanse of curtain wall.
surrounding context.
accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of
Provide material and color
these sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility
samples for review.
The materials and colors appear appropriate in
with significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor;
the illustrations, but physical samples have not
site development and layout; and landscaping.
been provided.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the
traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area,
as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples
of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building
design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not
intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of
the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor
desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building
scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is
contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design
to accommodate varying tastes as well asspecial functional requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors
and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant
historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings
described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility
can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in
architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of
important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these
guidelines.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
Consider methods for
The switch to a brown brick places the building
None.
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order
establishing continuity
in the same color palette as the entrance sign.
to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity
between the Cascadia
Continuity has been established.
to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated
entrance signs and
corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful
localized context of the
-
balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the
proposed office building
corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
development.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes,
scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral
See landscape
The window openings, brick material,
None.
to the building and site design.
recommendations.
distribution of metal panels, stepped walls, and
landscaping help establish human scale in this
development.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved
None.
Blankness is not a characteristic of the design.
None.
using design detail or vegetation, or both.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to
None.
This building is the only office building in the
None.
unify groups of buildings within a development.
development. Physically connecting with the
residences isn't necessary or desired.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
None.
A trademark design is not proposed.
None.
requirements of the Guidelines.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
Add the standard window
The window glass note has been added to the
Provide a physical sample
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following
glass note to the
architectural plans.
of the metal panel.
criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 4001o. Visible light
architectural drawings.
reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30% Specifications on the proposed window
Spandrel glass is no longer proposed. Metal
glass should be submitted with the application for final review.
Revise the plans to clarify
infill panels are proposed instead. The metal
the use of spandrel glass.
panels would also be used at the upper story.
Provide a glass sample for
A physical sample of the metal panel has not
review.
been submitted.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan of
To screen the mechanical
The Arborvitae that were originally proposed
Choose a plant that will
development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the building
equipment, consider an
to screen the equipment on the north side of the
fully screen the
designs used on the site.
alternate species of
evergreen shrub whose
building have been changed to rhododendron
catawbiense, which typically grow 6' tall x 6'
mechanical equipment at
planting without an
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor
street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual
height is more consistent
wide. At their mature height, the equipment
overwhelming mature
impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate
with that of the equipment.
will likely be screened. However, the
height.
visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e.
rhododendron are proposed to be planted at
Mechanical equipment,
1'/2'- 21/2' tall. Even at the upper end of this
f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and
range, the equipment will not be fully screened
similar security fencing devices.
immediately upon planting.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c.
Fencing.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
Add the standard
The mechanical equipment note has been
None.
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
mechanical equipment
added to the architectural plans.
eliminated."
note to the architectural
Tans.
Lighting
Revise the lighting plan in
No changes have been made.
None.
the site plan to make the
proposed light fixtures
clearly legible.
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent properties or
None.
The lighting plan shows no spillover onto
None.
streets;
adjacent properties or streets.
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All
None.
The parking lot fixture is a full cutoff fixture.
None.
fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures.
The fixtures at the entrances on the east and
west sides are downli hts.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in the
None.
The maximum light level is 19.1 fc in the
None.
Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in the
parking lot.
Entrance Corridors.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow; however,
Coordinate lighting (lamp
There appear to be no changes to the lighting
Coordinate lighting (lamp
a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is required.
type, finish color, color
proposal. A luminaire schedule has not been
type, finish color, color
Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to remain, new
temperature) with that in
provided in the plan. Available options (lamp
temperature) with that in
lamps may be required to match them.
the residential
development. Include a
type, wattage, lumens, finish color, color
temperature, etc.) for the fixtures have not been
the residential
development. Include a
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing pole
mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
luminaire schedule on the
specified. Without this information, the level of
luminaire schedule on the
lighting plan with all
coordination with the residential development
lighting plan with all
standard information.
cannot be determined.
standard information.
Indicate the color
Indicate the color
temperature of the
temperature of the
proposed lamps. Indicate
proposed lamps. Indicate
fixture finish.
fixture finish.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors,
See recommendations
The Cascadia residential development will
the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case
above.
provide a backdrop for the office building.
basis.
Coordinating the character of the lighting here
with that approved in the residential
development would be appropriate.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be
Include a note on the
The light pole height note has been included on
None.
compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are
lighting plan indicating the
the lighting plan.
illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding
overall height of the
pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet,
parking lot pole fixture,
including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require
including the base (if
additional screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance
used). Maximum height
Corridor.
shall not exceed 20'.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
Include the complete
The complete note is included on the lighting
None.
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a
language of the standard
plan.
full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from
lighting note on the site
adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of
plan.
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural
areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle."
30-31
Guidelines or the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
None.
Decorative lighting is not proposed.
None.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to reflect
None.
Frontage landscaping was approved with a
None.
the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic sites
previous plan. Landscaping in this portion of
which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should
the development can help integrate the building
promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings
with the pond site and help mitigate the scale
into the existing environment of the corridor.
of the building.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different
types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements
allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape
features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the
street upon which the Corridor is centered.
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the
following:
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street.
Such trees should be at least 3'/2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the
ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should
be located at least every 35 feet on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental
trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted
among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall,
typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive
of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
None.
Landscaping along Cascadia Drive, and in and
Revise the landscape plan
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be
around the parking lot and retaining walls was
to clearly show the new
at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be
approved with the previous site plan. The
locations for relocated
of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every
current amendment proposes to replace a row
trees 13-19 and correct
40 feet on center.
of leather leaf viburnum along the east
perimeter of the parking lot with a row of Ilex
the remaining RL-13
through RL-19 notations
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. Such
crenata Japanese holly. Some reconfiguration
near the 4 new AG.
trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
of the site has led to the shifting of the
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at
locations of some previously approved trees.
Coordinate the 4 London
least every 25 feet on center.
The new locations for trees 13-19 aren't clear;
the "relocated" notations remain below the 4
Planetrees drawn on the
plan with the 5 noted in
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
new AG.
the landscape key.
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one
tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed
There are 4 new London Planetrees shown
Correct/clarify the
throughout the interior of the parking area.
along Cascadia Drive, but 5 are noted in the
grayed -out trees located
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2'/2 inches caliper
landscape key.
west of the building and
(measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be
the western property line
of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or
The "grayed -out" trees west of the building
for conformity with the
medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected
and the western property line don't all match
approved and proposed
by curbing.
those shown on the approved plan (and there
plans.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact
are no relocation notes).
on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height.
Label the tree located east
A tree east of the entrance into the site has no
of the entrance into the
label.
site and coordinate it with
the landscape key.
Three trees located north of the dumpster on
the "approved" landscape plan are not shown
Clarify why three trees
on the current plan.
located north of the
dumpster on the
3 Crypotmeria are drawn on the plan and 7 are
"approved" landscape
noted in the schedule.
plan are not shown on the
current plan.
Clarify why 3
Crypotmeria are drawn
on the plan and 7 are
noted in the schedule.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
Consider replacing the
The cryptomeria have been replaced with Red
None.
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long buildings as
cryptomeria on the west
Maples.
necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type
side of the building with
of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and
an alternate tree that
blankness of such walls.
provides softening without
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
complete screening.
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
See architectural
recommendations.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based
Include a complete
A schedule is included.
None.
upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List
landscape schedule on the
and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D .
plan.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site
Add the standard
The standard landscape note has been added to
None.
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at,
landscape note to the plan.
the plan.
mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant."
Site Development and layout
The site plan does not include updated revision
Include updated revision
dates and both the landscape and lighting plans
dates on the site plan.
are labeled SP5.
Correct the sheet numbers
of the landscape and
lighting lans.
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should
See architectural and
The location of the proposed office building
None.
contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be
landscaping
was established with previous site plan
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain
recommendations.
approvals. The site has already been graded.
typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and
The plan is organized, with access from
choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will
Cascadia Drive, parking and travelways
blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape;
relegated behind the building as viewed from
preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys
the EC, and retaining walls at the northwest
which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of
corner of the site conforming to the shape of
surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale
the stormwater pond. Proposed landscaping
that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
can help integrate the building into the
development.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street
and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks
The building is oriented parallel to the EC. The
should guide the layout of the site.
main entrance is on the east side of the
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to
building and not visible from the EC street. A
the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance
secondary entrance is proposed on the west
Corridor street.
elevation. A low retaining wall to the south
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular
provides a border for a small patio area.
circulation systems.
Although the main entrance is on the other side
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within
of the building, the EC elevation does not look
the Entrance Corridor.
like an undesigned, rear elevation.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep
slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such
A sidewalk leads to the site from Rt. 20. The
natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section
building is 3 stories tall, with the south and east
32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements
sides built into the grade. The taller northwest
required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing
corner of the building presents a more open
features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets.
appearance with greater use of glass to address
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas
the pond view. Scale is partly mitigated with
on and around the site.
the change in design at the third story, and with
landscaping.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
Revise the landscape plan
Shrubs have been added on the terrace above
None.
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through
to add shrubs on the
the lower retaining wall. They are Kalmia
the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut
terrace above the lower
latifolia mountain laurel.
or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan
retaining wall and to
shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
revise the Emerald Green
The arborvitae have been changed to
condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered,
Arborvitae to a lower
Burkwood Viburnum, which generally grow to
appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be
growing evergreen.
8-10' tall.
terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or
None.
No grading is proposed within the drip lines of
None.
other existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
existing trees.
Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control
plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity
on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the
development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the
None.
An existing stormwater facility is adjacent.
None.
natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance
Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They
should not have the appearance of engineered features.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should
be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
SIGNS
Multiple tenants could occupy the proposed building. Consequently, a
Staff recommends
Comprehensive Sign Plan is required to ensure compatibility of building
approval of the
signage. Current elevation drawings show only building identification wall
Comprehensive Sign Plan
signs. These are composed of individual aluminum letters in a dark bronze
included as Attachment
finish and "Cabin" font. The building ID signs are placed above the entrance
B.
on the parking lot side of the building and in the EIFS window band on the
Rt. 20 elevation. No other sign locations are identified, though appropriate
Note that separate sign
locations exist. Letters following the design of the building ID and centered
applications are required
above windows in the brick wall areas on the various elevations would be
for new wall and
appropriate.
freestanding signs. Sign
location and design
A monument sign design has also been submitted. The sign is composed of a
cannot be approved with
brick -faced CMU base supporting a stucco panel in an aluminum frame. The
the site plan; they are
panel is divided into sections for three tenants. Proposed letters would match
provided at this time for
the material, color and style of the wall -mounted signs. The brick, metal and
information only.
stucco colors would match the building colors. The proposed signs have an
appropriate appearance. However, the site plans show the monument sign
Confirm the orientation
oriented parallel to the retaining wall at the western entrance. The
of the monument sign.
perspective illustrations show the sign oriented perpendicular to the retaining
Landscaping is required
wall. Landscaping at the sign includes a tree to the east and two cryptomeria
to fully integrate and
to the north.
coordinate the sign into
the development.
1.100T Iu M W&O a 9 Occeld IU 1040 MTI IT[IRM
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The revised building materials/colors/forms
2. The proposed landscaping, particularly the equipment screening
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide physical material/color samples for review.
2. Choose a plant that will fully screen the mechanical equipment at planting without an overwhelming mature height.
3. Coordinate lighting (lamp type, finish color, color temperature) with that in the residential development. Include a luminaire schedule on the lighting plan with all standard information. Indicate the
color temperature of the proposed lamps. Indicate fixture finish.
4. Revise the landscape plan to clearly show the new locations for relocated trees 13-19 and correct the remaining RL-13 through RL-19 notations near the 4 new AG.
5. Coordinate the 4 London Planetrees drawn on the plan with the 5 noted in the landscape key.
6. Correct/clarify the grayed -out trees located west of the building and the western property line for conformity with the approved and proposed plans.
7. Label the tree located east of the entrance into the site and coordinate it with the landscape key.
8. Clarify why three trees located north of the dumpster on the "approved" landscape plan are not shown on the current plan.
9. Clarify why 3 Crypotmeria are drawn on the plan and 7 are noted in the schedule.
10. Include updated revision dates on the site plan.
11. Correct the sheet numbers of the landscape and lighting plans.
12. Note that separate sign applications are required for new wall and freestanding signs. Sign location and design cannot be approved with the site plan; they are provided at this time for information
only. Confirm the orientation of the monument sign. Note that landscaping is required to fully integrate and coordinate the sign into the development.
10
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
24" x 36" submittal
11" x 17" submittal
SP1
Cover Sheet
11/27/2018
1
Cover
June 3 2019
SP2
General Notes, Legend, Abbrev's
11/27/2018
2
Comment Response Letter
June 3 2019
SP3
Existing Conditions & Layout/Grading Plan
11/27/2018
3
Description of Revisions
June 3 2019
SP4
Stormwater Calcs & Details
11/27/2018
4
Vicinity map
June 3 2019
SP5
Lighting Plan
11/27/2018
5
Context Photos
June 3 2019
SP6
Landscape Plan
11/27/2018
6
Existing Approach: Southbound Rt. 20
June 3 2019
7
Proposed Approach: Southbound Rt. 20
June 3 2019
ALL
Basement Plans
May 31, 2019
8
Existing Approach: Northbound Rt. 20
June 3 2019
A1.2
Main Level Plans
May 31, 2019
9
Existing Approach: Northbound Rt. 20
June 3 2019
A1.3
Upper Level Plans
May 31, 2019
10
West Route 20 Perspective
June 3 2019
A1.4
Roof Plans
May 31, 2019
11
Neighborhood Entrance Perspective
June 3 2019
A2.1
Elevations
May 31, 2019
12
West Elevation
June 3 2019
13
East Elevation
June 3 2019
14
Proposed Elevations
June 3 2019
15
Landscape Plan
June 3 2019
16
Exterior Finishes
June 3 2019
17
Exterior Finishes
June 3 2019
11
ATTACHMENT A
t
w
1:4tNIY Off' AL.BENIAKLE
JIgpunlubmt afVmrllmruulr} ISevrlapplepl
401 3ldnrlm Rrrtd. tiurih W'ikmR
[�hhHldlet5111v,1InCle]a 32'19#�p'96
Phcmc t4i 296- 2 F,a [ )97x-412A
Mn 21, 20, 9
Kevin Schap
Dmgn Develcv LLC
416 Eaal gain 51reM
Charh mw9hp. VA 22902
Ftg A.110-201": Caeeodio Final Situ Plan, ITMiPomel 071 H10DON056GI
Dear Mr. Schafer,
The Aerie Caunp AxmiteuturaI Havlevr Board. at Its mmui-H eel Wy 20. 2019. campla" a
pdtlunndryrtM**d#Ih6Abdwe-181td trgt+d!1p Od55arxii9-lorry affiot huldYrq why atb6.ieted
silo mprPvvPw4 Thu Board v%rod Ihu r kwMrg can mortis ror tti4 tmrwht of aIe apphcamPs r"
eut miUl. F9ease nale lhet he 1WOW9 PorrinremD5 ara>hove that re-v been idemhbed at mIs We
gddildnal u mhYnl5 maybe *JdedOr e.imi*lmthi4.:donllvihd rEtirwdnd rh2ngesto yrt ply"
1- Fte�nm the erchltect.lral design to achleve greater unite} of par4e aad greater omviechon
t4 hprlpro arri-ew ,ra qg the arw fi.{xixidtr N cmdun walr framing malmnal
and Y&4i rw opening won, altemale r4o l f4fm, reduced expanse of wrAn wall 11r4Ytde
meierlat aryl O1 Aol swvl&& Ttm xe4iew
2. Canardermelhads far aslatiiahn9 cwlttru &VtcIyj"n the Cavladia enhamg sgns are
brallxed cordwd of the propaeedAlcetwddlrg develolpmenL
3. Add me standard window glass r * IG tm smhitechlral drawlrge. V7sm Nghf
&r3wrereance rVL71 sw nor droop below 0%C Vra W MAW nffsr wxv (VLPJ sr;8 npp
exceed 30%
,11 Rowlho Plans to dardy I*use orwwWml glass Prm'rd4 agesasarnPio for rw+ rw.
5. To wean he macharnral &]blamer[ omalder an altarnele epeaee of SYWgN erg SWUb
whose room is mm cov-&5 Enl. with Mal of lyre equipment
6. Xdd McVarorlatd i1a&mafucal aquipmeng into to the mchneclldal pdams: VAI iTPlydraa
macJmWmf ege,pmenf ft m Ore tnfrarec'e CumWr sAm4 be arllrwta!W
7- ReVisethe IlghUng plan In IhL erne plait 18 make the proposed Gghillxhlreaclearly laglhie.
A CeorilmA& rgl,eing (xrmp Type. frnieh color, mlerienlperakae) weli 1hati5 Me rvNdenllal
development Imhto7e a Iumnare e#tedble an the hghtng plan vrErt all uUndard
Ind miallon. indime the moor demperalure of Me proposed Iaepe- Irdltale nxhlre 11niah.
9 Irltkom p mole Pn the lighling plan inditoling errt dw.i7r merghl or the Puking lol Rae
fndura.lncludlINVehase{d ueedy Mawmum height shal nol exceed ZT.
10. Include lhe::AIplete lampmgedl lhesiandwel NMinq r im on lhrsdedlsn- Each
oMow Ni m eve KLYpDed Nt M 9 Am6 rrmf ih IhTS 3.ON or mm vffhW 1LYAws VW he a
R9erfioAf fcurk mVe and afre0' be snsn09 a' sA eddad Eo re.%?a Ltgbt awaay ftnnt a4brm'ug
m;Sdeydmi &3yerds and aw my Aram adq'ar"r rdaaa. Tale 7pWavrr arly" Pum
du T*m*aa onto p Lh5k! reads and pvoFe rty kr ream flat or rwar erase aonuig drshwls
VW rat M6M sore fierrfeafcandre
11. Codafdef replaritg Iheq;nyplommiaon Ihewesl swc arlha huldngwrihan ailemare nee
mat pfoulmae soUning Umtldrut mmplate eareenmg.
412. in51Nde a s4rrmleie rardscapa achvdule an IN plan.
113. Add the etardard Iandecape role 1011-P3 plan: AG arts phsPbrfW of traas and aWE&S a1W
b4 e,kbmvd fo rvarh. And be nmfWvkxL0 al. m#rwe hpipru- Or wmirg of omm is
Rra,hob,fea SJr,'ohsantlh�eaaha4beAr�dmvli�r�adYar�darh'Y�asclpDu'f2heoverau
rfeaMh of the p,'ar%!.
14 Rvyratt fhb OrLdsaPa Plan w artd shr*r, on IN larrace above the krwrfr "phoning irate
aml I*revlsethe EmarM Greem AMonitae to a bwerWumnge'mli-ean.
15. Nola thm asperate sign appNeallme are oaq.11red far raw ueai and treeslsrLding %gm.
SW IrraUon and d'eaigl carmat be apP*oMad swith Me site p;an: grey are puvdad at It *
hme Tor InfonTu9 . n only.
Yaumay submrlyourappznmfarcuritrwredAFMrevlewaAyour a3ftfftcopmrienw-Applk7iir l
Igtrrq, eMe�tkll3l$ 2r,4fthefols$ are awWahle*rlaneAl*wkl6enlede orgeARl3
Revert] erawnga addressing Lhe wwmertle fisted above are requued. Irrkide upuatad Nib
Fp1iY.iph dorms Pn U*M rlrareanq. Plpppe pr c rido jA rrrhrrn inr.L.id ri j amlMW4 Mspor4os ifibratli-ly Puw
mch comnlenl ha* bean addressed. If charms other then Iho*a regpaged have been made.
Identlry MDA d�emges In the memo also. HlghllgMing the changes In She drerrdng wiGr'Muding' or
by olhor nwnf wig fwAbalm mvr m and avpmyw
gym ham aryquasuons €anummg my orlhe atone, please reel nee to conU6 me.
5mreralp,
Margaret malmemkl
Chief of PlamlagiRamwfve Managamnl
'L3;-29,W 2 a3275
mrnaeamaewskl@ataemarla.ar$
M. Virerdf&&Nits Pa%l
12005#i611y LdxrCL
Cereal Fein, VA 22%5
File
12
ATTCHMENT B: ARB COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN APPROVED CRITERIA
PROJECT #NAME: ARB-2019-40: Cascadia Office Building
TAX MAP/PARCEL#: 078H0000126700
WALL SIGN FEATURE
DESIGN CRITERIA
Sign Type
Individual letters
Letter Face Color
Aluminum letters with dark bronze finish
Location(S)
As illustrated in approved elevations and centered above windows in brick areas
Mounting Details
Direct to wall
Graphics Details
Standard EC guidelines apply
Illumination Details
None or external (If external, fixture details must be submitted for review and must be consistent for all signs.)
Letter Type/Font
Cabin font
FREESTANDING SIGN FEATURE
DESIGN CRITERIA
Monument
Materials/Colors
Base: Meridian Old Lexington brick veneer on CMU base
Sign cabinet: Aluminum framepower-coated to match Benjamin Moore "Nightfall"
Location
North side of Cascadia Drive, just off southwest corner of building
Landscaping
See approved site plan
Tenant Panels
Materials/Colors
Aluminum letters in dark bronze; stucco background in Benjamin Moore "Tapestry Beige"
Illumination
External or none
Graphics
Standard EC Guidelines apply
13