HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA198900068 Public Notification 1989-07-27COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 290 5875
July 27; 1989
Alan Roecks
118 Blithe Court
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Re: Variance Application, VA-89-68
Tax Map 61W2, Parcel 01-P5
Dear Mr. Roecks:
This letter is to inform you that your variance application,
VA-89-68, will be heard during the public hearing by the
Board of Zoning Appeals on August 15, 1989, at 3:15 p.m.,
Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, Virginia.
Enclosed please find a placard which must be posted on the subject
property so that it will be visible from a public road as soon as
possible.
It will be necessary for someone to be present to speak for
the variance application. If you have any questions, please
contact our office.
Sincerely,
fy� l' '0 kJD 6 nb -r-
Amelia M. Patterson
Zoning Administrator
AMP/st
cc: VA-89-68
Enc.
'Al
July 29, 1989
Steigman, Kay P.
Four L Partnership
Gercke Land Company,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
Inc.
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is to notify you as
Alan Roecks, property described
zoned R10, has made application
from Sections 4.11.2.1 and 17.3
Ordinance, as follows:
adjoining property owners, that
as Tax Map 61W2, Parcel 01-P5,
for VA-89-68, requesting relief
of the Albemrle County Zoning
The applicant seeks a variance from Sections 4.11.2.1 and
17.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to allow a
deck (existing) to be located three (3) feet from the rear
property line, a variance of three (3) feet from the required
six (6) foot setback.
A public hearing will be held by the Board of Zoning Appeals on
August 15, 1989, at 3:15 p.m., in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor,
County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA.
This application is made available
Albemarle County Zoning Office, 401
Charlottesville, VA.
Sincerely,
dmu� im. Pci oog6.T
Amelia M. Patterson
Zoning Administrator
AMP/mlm
for your review in the
McIntire Road,
Query on file CISPLAN by STAYLOR
ADJACENT OWNERS LIST
Query selection conditions:
1.
TAXPAR =
'?061W2010P006001,
2.
TAXPAR =
1061W2010PO04001,
3.
TAXPAR =
1061W20100001001,
4.
TAXPAR =
1000000000000001,
1 OR2OR3OR4
TAXMAP/PARCEL:
ADDRESS1:
ADDRESS2:
ADDRESS3:
ADDRESS4:
ADDRESS5:
ADDRESS ZIP CODE9:
TAXMAP/PARCEL:
ADDRESS1:
ADDRESS2:
ADDRESS3:
ADDRESS4:
ADDRESS5:
ADDRESS ZIP CODE9:
TAXMAP/PARCEL:
ADDRESS1:
ADDRESS2:
ADDRESS3:
ADDRESS4:
ADDRESS5:
ADDRESS ZIP CODE9
061W2010P00400
STEIGMAN, KAY P
120 BLITHE COURT
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
229010000
061W2010P00600
FOUR-L PARTNERSHIP
1234 RIVER ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
229010000
061W2010000100
GERCKE LAND COMPANY INC
3056 BERKMAR DRIVE
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
229010000
End of Query on file CISPLAN by STAYLOR
07/27/89 Page 1 V
5.
ij�J
P E T I T I O N
TO THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
RE: Variance Application VA-89-68
Tax Map 61W(2)-01, Parcel P-5
118 Blithe Court, Birnam Wood
Alan L. and Jane E. Roecks
We, the undersigned owners of adjoining units in Block
P, Section Two, Birnam Wood, do hereby support the
above -referenced variance application of Alan L. and Jan E.
Roecks, and we request that the Roecks be permitted to
maintain the deck behind their unit Lot 5, Block P, Section
Two) in its present state, without the forced removal or
alteration which would be caused by a denial of their said
application.
We strongly believe that to require the Roecks to alter
or remove their existing deck will cause senseless and
unnecessary disruption and potential damage to all of our
adjoining units, for the following reasons:
1. The deck serves an important function in
stabilizing the steep bank at the rear of all our units.
There is aprior history of flooding, ban lAee osion and water
damage along this block, but no such pro e m have occurred
since this deck structure was built. To alter the structure
now would invite a recurrence of storm -water runoff flooding
and erosion problems.
2. This area is well -settled and attractively
landscaped. To force a removal or alteration of the deck
structure at this time would be terribly disruptive to our
neighborhood, and would create noice, dirt, soil,
disturbance, const►oction traffic and landscape destruction,
with absolutely no benefit to anyone.
3. The deck in its present condition is very
attractive, and enhances the enjoyment and value of all the
properties in the neighborhood.
For the above reasons, we strongly urge the Board of
Zoning Appeals to grant variance application VA-89-68.
NAME Unit #
NAME Unit #
y