HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA198900069 Action Letter 1989-08-16 •
•
47141°'
�1fKaN�P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
August 16, 1989
Freeman & Morgan Architects P.C.
7110 Forest Avenue
Suite 200
Richmond, VA 23226
Re: Board of Zoning Appeals Action for VA-89-69
Tax Map 61Z, Parcel 03-11
Gentlemen:
This letter is to inform you that on August 15, 1989 , during
the regular meeting of the Albemarle County Board of Zoning
Appeals, that the Board ruled to defer action on the freestanding
sign, but approved the variance as requested for the wall signage
with the following conditions:
1. That each tenant be allowed one (1) business wall sign.
2 . That the wall sign area for each tenant be determined on
the basis of one and five tenths (1. 5) square feet of
sign area per linear foot of business footage.
3 . That the maximum sign area for any one tenant shall not
exceed two hundred (200) square feet, and
4 . That the criteria for the sign as submitted should be
followed and be controlled by the Zoning Administrator
along with the approved colors of red, yellow, green,
blue, and white.
This variance approval allows relief from Section 4 . 15. 3 . 5 of the
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to increase the total square
footage for wall signs on parcel 11 from twenty (20) square feet
to 1, 150 square feet, a variance of 1, 130 square feet for wall
signs.
Freeman & Morgan Architects P.C.
August 16, 1989
Page 2
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our
office.
Sincerely,
(1) ,Ult_ Mi4)4,ye-r\
Amelia M. Patterson
Zoning Administrator
AMP/st
cc: VA-89-69
Inspections Department
Reading File
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals
April 9, 1991 Actions
All Members Present
1. VA-91-11 Simeon Vineyards (Tax Map 92 , Parcel 2D)
Unanimously approved subject to the following conditions:
1. Sign area shall not exceed 24 square feet.
2 . Sign shall not be located closer than 25 feet to
the existing right-of-way of Route 795 .
3 . Sign design and colors shall conform to application
and example submitted with variance request.
4 . Sign style, composition and colors for future
replacement to be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
5. Sign shall not be lighted.
2 . VA-91-12 William S. Coleman, Jr.
Unanimously deferred request to April 16th special meeting.
3 . VA-89-9 Reynovia Land Trust
Unanimously voted to extend the variance for one more year
and after the new ordinance established have a guideline to go
by.
4 . VA-89-69 B. P. T. California, Inc. (Toys R' Us)
Staff asked the Board if the intent of the variance approval
condition #4 which reads, "That the criteria for the sign as
submitted should be followed and be controlled by the
Zoning Administrator along with the approved colors of red,
yellow, green, blue, and white, " was that a sign could have
all of those colors. The Board unanimously agreed that
the decision was left up to the Zoning Administrator, and
if any problems then come back before the Board.
5. Unanimously approved the minutes for 8/14/90, 10/16/90, and
3/12/91
STAFF REPORT - VA-89-69
OWNER: B.P.T. California, Inc.
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 61Z/03/11, Lot 6
ZONING: PUD, Planned Unit Development
ACREAGE: 9. 074
LOCATION: East side of Rt 29N, +/- 4/10 mile south of
Rio Road & Rt 29 intersection, adjacent to
Marriott Court Yard and in front of
Branchlands Retirement Community.
Request:
The applicant requests a variance from Section 4 . 15. 3 . 5 of the
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. This section states:
"4 . 15. 3 Permitted Signs
4 . 15. 3 . 5 Residential (R-10 and R-15) ; Planned Residential
Development (PRD) ; and Planned Unit Development
(PUD)
Business Signs: Limited to wall signs with an
aggregate area not to exceed twenty (20) square
feet. If illuminated, no flashing, blinking or
color-changing or exposed, bare or uncovered neon
illumination or lighting.
Identification Signs: Provided: (a) not more than
(2) square feet in area; (b) not more than one (1)
on any lot or premises. . . "
The applicant seeks a variance to increase the aggregate area
of wall signage in a Planned Unit Development from 20 sq. ft.
to 1, 150 sq. ft. and to increase the aggregate area of
identification signage from 2 sq. ft. to 400 sq. ft.
History:
In July 1988, the applicant applied for rezoning (ZMA-88-4)
which in part requested that C.O. and C-1 uses be allowed in
this Planned Unit Development. The amendment application along
with a site plan (for a shopping center) known as the Centre at
Branchlands consisting of 28 shops and stores, has since been
approved for construction. The problem the applicant faces at
this time is that there was previously no consideration given
to the question of signs that would be allowed in a Shopping
Center in a Planned Unit Development.
It is Staff's opinion that consideration should be given to the
applicant's request in this situation, but the decision should
not be applied to PUD districts in general so as to warrant a
Zoning Text Amendment. This opinion is formulated on the fact
that the character each Planned Unit Development is very unique
and each may differ in the individual needs for signage.
STAFF REPORT - VA-89-69
B.P.T. California, Inc.
Page 2
The applicant does possess a hardship in that the Zoning
Ordinance does not provide for adequate signage for the
Shopping Center. The applicant at present is ready to commence
work on the Centre at Branchlands and does have prospective
tenants, however the allowable signage is severely limited for
this size shopping with this number of tenants (twenty-eight) .
Recommendation:
The application should be approved for cause:
1) As the ordinance only allows for 20 square feet of wall
signage in a PUD, the applicant clearly faces the hardship of
not having adequate signage for the approved shopping center.
2) The applicant has demonstrated that his property is unique
and differs from other properties in this area. This property
lies substantially below the grade of Rt 29, thus making it
less visible. This exceptional topographic condition creates
a hardship for signage to serve its purpose.
3) The applicant has provided evidence that the character of
the district will not be changed by the granting of the
variance. The property is bordered on the north and
south by commercial property of like uses.
In the event the Board of Zoning Appeals should find cause to
approve the applicant's request, the following conditions should
be considered:
1) That each tenant be allowed one (1) business wall sign.
2) That the wall sign area for each tenant be determined
on the basis of one and five tenths (1. 5) square feet of
sign area per linear foot of business footage.
3) That the maximum sign area for any one tenant shall not
exceed two hundred (200) square feet.
4) That the maximum sign area for identification signs shall
not exceed one hundred (100) square feet, exclusive of
decorative wall design on which the lettering will be placed.