HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA199100041 Application 1991-09-09APPLICATION FOR:
(check one)
® VARIANCE
❑ SPECIAL USE PERMIT
❑ REZONING
❑ ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT
❑ MOBILE HOME
❑ HOME OCCUPATION
❑ ACCESSORY TOURIST LODGING
FILE NUMBER
DATE SUBMITTED
C"S.00
PEE PAID see reverse
DATE OF PRELIM CONF.
STAFF AT PRELIM. CONF.
OWNER (as currently listed in Real Estate) Day
Name IzyEtZ- N>`1&�AT5 A55-CtA-Tr--.5 L�rvmy l i�a, Lr4n� _ Phone (91` 33 /
Address P-o . I3pX S 5yg, CNAF--L-o-rTCSVtt,LC- , \/A 2220�
APPLICANT (if different from owner) Day
Name L.Y-Ul -Cr ri I_ A ^Ly C-orR-T'� AT 1 � Phone (`,&4 q1 f - 33 3 `/
Address F---O -F�,-a;K S 5 4 0 GHAV-L01-TS-S \1tL L G, V A 2210S'
CONTACT PERSON (if different from above) Day
Name 1 o KA tVt LiN c. c, 5 -T r. R.- Phone (504) 9-7 9 - 7L 9
Address 3 38 tz-1 v 9-a C 14A9-L-0TT22 9 o I
LOCATION: Neer 1-TE E41 i 4O TH OF- 1zIv4NNA ¢IUEr: ; AL-ON4 t,2- (OsCj
TAX MAP/PARCEL NUMBERS (use reverse if needed)
1. 4 S - � 8 - TD I - 3 . - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2. - - - 4. - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EXISTING ZONING cl/ Nc, PROFFERED? Yes _ No _ Acreage if different R
DESIRED ZONING PROFFERED? Yes _ No _ Acreage if different
EXISTING USE VAcA N--(
PROPOSED USE rL E To, t l_ / o r- r- I c
ORDINANCE SECTION (S) : 4.1 2 , 6 - (,. 1. a
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To t-IA\jE ?i-& 2T--TAIL- sPgcE c.o�vsi4EI- v As .A
�iHpPPIN4 GEN'rI=R- (4. IZ,..�o .2 FOK.. Tr-�6 P�+�ye5E5 CIF' QAP-IeJN4
JUSTIFICATION
FOR REQUEST: 7 NI7--
IZE-TAI � GEN7P-Pis
ML)t.Tt PL-e
usss
LAJouLD l3C
SIMILAYLL_y To A.
S1�aPPt�.rcr
GEnIZ�tZ
AHD `Ti-ALs
INTGw-r-'z-t-rATIoN
WovLD F3E Mo2iF,
Cow>tS1E�l-T
V-11T44
Prz=Vi0US t7E?Etzt
tlrtATroNS
dtr pArz�tnCc, �VIR
A/l�NTS
�Ei
F->0lr-t7tt4Ce5
ot% 17z::,lM1LAfz- [�ESIC%tvi
• The foregoing information is complete and correct to the best of my
knowledge. I have read and understand the provisions of the Albemarle County
prd4rnnce to ibis application.
• Signed
I'-ate-9 , 19 L
(Owner, Contract j'urchaser(Agent
Fee $ Date Paid Received Received By
AY..tec • 1
VA-91-41. River Heights Associates (owners), United Land Corporation
(applicants). Property located on Rt 659 SE of intersection of proposed
Berkmar Dr Ext and Hilton Heights Rd. TM45/P68D1, zoned Highway Commercial.
Applicant seeks variance to reduce required parking for commercial and
office uses from 174 to 138 spaces.
I'lBoard. of Supervisors Date: Action:
PM \,
Board of `Loring Appeals Date: LQ_ �/ Action:
-`T•^,-M.,...,-?'�gSr;j-•�„TEM�.",I�eigs"m�, t ;jM1l .i• ��.- +, T -t ., .•'i.1 .
0
1 4
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
31
49G3- 49G2 — SOGl31 y
�Ji1 JO
O
>� 49G4 49G3 E TIO 45E � JO 1A�.
46
4,ox 4,p b C3 �, •r
490 49C
47B 49J 90dU
is P�
4301 47 ♦ 4 t,8`. J08 508
450 47 48F ,g sgC121 19B 50E 5otx,`., ti.�\• t
41
� 48G E2 S!A
50E1 >oex •'
AyG GZ 4BC 4BE �.• t,1 49CI \ 50
I A5 46D t94�� SOE3 /l
C yDCI 59 A(4) 30 33
.
456 5C4 48 48B \ �. SOE4 34q
45t .rIsA(2)� SSC 34 _
`\ 330 SSA SS
/ 454 48A 4w4 59M\•.599A (5)) 56 C 8 56A
ss1 59L
59E ✓✓ 59 A(E;
\56
59 s9Mn 37q
P I
59 N
J: I1s 38 h
•.. G I N \ y in 59F '\ O
Ix, Izo 590
59 S9'.
It L• t1l 1>D 12 411160 �7
123
x
.L 448 131 Ixt Ix3 121
133 63`�• Q
C
2 �OT� 61 H3141 I31130 / / = i
u
'C17Y Sy)143 43A ut �
142
• •'
i 39 4t
p � A SFI y, A 41 I4a
M AA 5F2 41A I47 141 - 140 4qM, 70 SEE
4e \ 40F65 39 I6•IBD
�,IS 5F4 5F3 � aoE
67`C A -
400 40c 408 40 40 $
,
39C -- i 66
4 1t4 38 34N - ll �• 6A
rtt SBA Isx Itt 31G 3601 36E 67A �-
17t Ito 37 34 31• 31i cwAAlo7r'awM� gA'g4• 668�
$1 174 /'�/\,�� � 3SA 36C 36F l 688 N\ tfq E 643
17s It7 1 32 348 34E 368 366 '//' �•r• Iu q SEE
4 46.1 B,C
• 5 SA IT71" 1el 63 u6 35 34C 340 36M e
0
SO ,9• 36J W 680 6803 �\ `� 5~ 31AI a' 31U V
a
t� SAI f 361
SOS 31V 31T 31R� 69
502 313' 310
♦ 5C4 h
31 B bey
So � 68 ' 6D 31w � eo
6C 602 �31M lIN• 31P
31L �
� v 604
2C• 72 6�03
/ xp MI 7 se[ /S CT D 1 8
R[90T� 76C 74 74A
Is3 Is1 Ise l9♦ IM�=�� 76
80 68
31N xN) 81
6Bti
7 311,62
7A' 70 31N d '\5! ❑z[0. 6'
31E r 84A �� O��J
\O 31J VV
JIO
' �h 67A _ A-91-41 United Land Trust
7� �• i3'' „o Tax Map 45, Parcel 68D1
/ A ..... Illt
8 J10 S0
95• N`�10
18J nc u / 25 (/
IBR 11 'M Ile IIN \
IBL ua IIJ 27 nx . 94 94A
19A xa ISM ur uvnR \l ?• yra "O
20IB[ 18N G ti In • SECTION 43
16 20
a
A O� 2M •4 i
940 • EC710M 46A
ISO 188 � 28 � 4r
186 ISE 16C 18• 21► / Nw t10r
~� AGRICULTURAL d FORF CTAI f1lCTr?ICT 61
,6ALi ,„ ►[ET CHARLOTTESVILLE , RIVANNA 81
JACK JOIJETT DISTRICTS
'SECTION 45
_ -' - _ _-_ - ---_'--'-_--__-- ---
_-- -----_ ~_'--_- _
� Char/ot�esvilIe� �� ��901 --
_... __.... _____ 8�_�-97����-�79__
Wovemoer 11, 1991
Mr. Max C. Kennedy, Chaarman
Board of Zoning Appeals
Department of Zoning
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Cha/lotte�viIle, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Kennedw
relief from Section
4.12-6.�7.11(a), "Oetermznatzon o|
We request
Unsoeczfieo
of -i�he Albemarle County
Parking
Soaces for
Zon-jng Ordznancer
which states;
For
each commerclal use of
a relazI character: One (z)
soace
oer
each one nunure� (10'}.
.ouare feet of retail sales
for
She
first five thousano (5,000)
souare feet ano one (1)
Space
each two hundred
square feet of retail saies
area
pe,
s(:juare feet. (Amended 7-20-88)
above
five thousand
In other wo�ds twice �, much parking is required for the the
~ f t/and the parkinq reouOred xs one-haIf that
first 5,000 square ee�� feet. �t�ff's position is that
rate for more than �~0m» square �e ' d Ii ated and
tai� areas within the nuzl�zng have mot oeem e ne ,
re ki f r th� en±ire retail area should be calculated
therefore oar ng o e� each orp hundreg souar`� feet
based on the �igher o�e spa�e p
used for the f�rst 5,D0(> square feE-t.
We are reque�ting this variance under Section 34.2 because:
a) The strict application of this interoretation of the
ordinance would produce undue haroshzp.
this
is
identical to the original
The projected use of
project
Heights Retail
Center whi�h �s
b�i
not yet I�' b"t wa�
Rzver
for
site 'if-flya
d
couple of hundr�� yar �
ap�r oved th�s summer
a
Road.
intersection
Y R �e 29
o ou
and Hilton hts
away at the
ti
made the logical assumption
When we Prepared our
e
�ite
Pl�n we
deter -
that the two sites snou
ld
ha" their
oarxin� reocirements
mineed the same �ay,
�,ihich
we di-J.
Max c. Kennedy
November 11, 1991
Page 2
After expendinq considerable time and effort baF;ed on this
a.ssurnption, we are being required to provide inuch more
parkinci. When we are required to provide considerable 1-nore
parking than another consultant, it decreases the size of
buildings permitted and increases site development Costs Gf our
plans, putting us under an extreme econornic disadivantiage and
threatening oi.1- 1. certainly n e
� if -Ins to make a living, which is cert. - inly u, du
hardship.
From the developer's perspective, it was the County's decision to
extend Berkmar Drive which determined the configuration cind,
developabilty of the parcel. Therefoce, the County has at least
sortie responsibility to ensure that this is a developable parcel.
According to 1--he, (1ev(-,,1Loper, the rule of thunill-) for the profit'-_a
IDility of development (-if thiS type- is 10,000 sf per acre. The
pr()p(),,3ed site 1)]aj-) 1.3 for 29,00'C'j sf oll -3.089 ac whic'n works c-alt.
to 9,383 sf per acre-, alre�Ady well under 1.0,000 sf/ac.:. To
require more parking than has been requi-red or, Similar PTOJ(-c's
in the vicinity further reduces the buildable sc11a Ire footage and
IV. That :I_ _3Jso unditue
the projert c-
hardship.
b 11 'ctich hardship is not shired general -IN by other properties
in the same Toning di -strict and the same vicinity.
The oricilrial River Heicthts P,t,-ji) j'c Lhe prInie (_xainple.
The original River Heights Re�tail Center did not suffer the hard
tjj(__� only r.(�� -1 for
qujyed 17' spaue
,:Ji ip L) e c a t_is e
I 74 ,31.)aces wFt are bel')Y
,37,000 sf of retail (--011ipaie(l to Llie� i
required for 14,500 sf retail and 14,500 sf office. W(_ wOU'd not
have the hardship if parking was calculat(�d in the Mariner.
approved in the vicinity .ire
two prope.rt!(°cBf_,c�ajjsp (_)f the each
Wal--Mart and Sam'.,ClUb.
tore', parking requirements were based on a lower rate
after the first 5,000 :-_sf of floor space. Th(_- of these two
stores inearit they (lid nil-)t have Lo siiffer the hardship of -:111
excessive Late of parking required.
It '�"hoifld he rintp(I that during the. approval process of both of
these site plans that staff, the planninga r -1
corrimissiOl-I , id t1-1 e
board of supervisors a:11 cont.1i)ually complained a1-_14,-)1.it the
perceived (gross excess of parking. Yet if Wal-Mart and Sant's
-
s
were required to provide parking at the same rate a property, another 193 spaces and 97 spaces respectively, for a
3,00 total
total_ oi, aln'-iost. additional spa -s, would be required
aID- ti -ie e
"gross xct�ssll already provide(l'
Ove
(7, V t� ri tit� Ma/ " V 0
19'91
I YLIII --mAx—t
Total Retail Area (sf) 114,51
20% 22, 903 21,880
8-7, 518
over 5000 82, 518
pa c e �� 1 � "'� 1- 5 0 0 0 �� f
I: 1
5()
50
spaces over 5000 sf
86r>825
Total R (-- ta i I S P,-I C
916
875
Calculated at FRI-Vef
i-Ieiqhts II Rate
Actual Space. ReCII-IlreC1
48
4 C) 3
Act0al Space; P-rc)V'I(le,(]
723
778
vaTia,ric*e will not btuof �;tibstantjal
detriment to adjacent property and that t--hE- character of Lhp
district will nol-. he. ch'ilicled by tilt-, granting ()f tIjt7- variance.
Wal-m'-irt and Sam's art, Lije two adjacent prof rties
i construction and both have bpt:,n Jmlclf-d 1-)� )rOv
under -I)y E;taff, the commissiOrl --i"d tli(-
grossly exces,-,3ivt� Pal.-kil-19 tlitl pr,")ve to, 11E,
1.
Therefore, if the parking for this S parked on adjacent
no proble-m if Pe( jle Pa r�'-
-)p- -t , t eXc(-�ssive park-
c - 1 J have gr().,
pruperties hf-'cat)Se o the fact tha-t the
ing. Such an oururrt-ncc- is, unlikely dt 1.1 , e t
neayc,st parkInq spaceS 011 ovf'y
proposed I-IL111diny.
we -,-Ive prov-I. (I e (l -A very compromise in requestin(j trial
the I_Ipper le-ve]. of the building be commercial Office- and the
fox the ioweL lc-,.ve.1- be calculated asFID-SC.
parki.n(4 lower level W(-)II'Ld surely be used
The multiple uses in the
similarly to a shopping '-"enter which make-s cal-c"ll-a-LiOr'.1 based on
PD-SC very ill -St as the Pj-jy:5icaj separation of the Lipper
ie-'/el ajE-;o makes separate calculations for commerCi,:jI-L office
o n �� i d . t f t Lc�,I. We el -a L
:pace very log you fete your
request.
SJ 1-) (: e Y e I Y'
W. Thomac; Mtmcaster, Jjl.., P.F.
Max {'. Kennedy
November 11, i'i 91
Page 4
Retail T
Retail II
Retail
I ioninq
PD-SC
Method
Dept
Total Retail Area (sf)
37,Ci00
14,500
14,500
14,500
Lest; 20%
7,400
2,900
2,900
29, r,Ui)
1.1, 600
11., 600
14, 500
5, 000
- `,, 000
- 5, 000
--5, 000
-ever 5000 sf
24, 600
6, 00
6, 6(10
9, 500
�.p;aces first 5000 L,j
-i0
5C1
5(
') �,
spaces over 50Ci;o f
1.21 3
tih,
,
Total. Reta.i l ^,ztaC'e�;
1 7
i1.6
- 00
Total Office Area
o, 000
1.4, 500
14, 0(1
14, 500
less (30 a Reta S 1 T)
1 , ,00
- I ", `,-
- 2, 9nn
- 2 900
4, 200,
1 C, 1 C.
11, hn
11, 600
OFFICE SPACES REQUIRED
21.
5'1- 58
53
TOTAL SPACE:) REQUIRED
194
134
174
1 -118
M. Mf
7, T,
471 S D P=
e f rl
t:
C hundre-d
'r e t e e t
sa
iR2 IJ 'S o L" -r E feet c, f E-
zt-,
ee4-
1-%R
-Tj ;T, 0
P7
I n e
i n
-are e!zl
:Dice% af,
W ff e r
-ri
D e,--
7.
!e
jl�
u U- v P I cl oa b J I t
4- k
S CS IME F- E
t ensf
-ir
t
71
M
r
14---
E -Ek f-P. e Z D F! 1 0 G 1 S I C: 'Tt
r c. ir-i
GaY HeJohi
73 im
7
1 7-VO
Fj T E. v e
Y&-vy,=�
'1
C. eC- I V
Li t:f
i7
4-
L: ii
L f,.
Li e r
D ID
im r
Ti E
E7
DL T
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE CERTIFICATION
PLANNINQ COMMISSION BOARD OF SUPERVISOR$
THIS IS A CORRECT AND ACCURATE
,Q Y PLAT
CHA RMAN ne-
DESIGN ED &SENT
4.2 '"10 - 09L� . -
DATE DATE ARTHUR F. EDWARDS , LS
OWNERS APPROVAL
THE DIVISION OF THE LAND DESCHIBED HEREIN IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE UNDERSIGNED
OWNERS, PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES, ANY REFERENCE TO FUTURE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS TO BE DEEMED AS THEORETICAL ONLY.
ALL STATEMENTS AFFIXED TO THIS PLAT ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST of MY KNOWLEDGE.
GENERAL P A R T N E R R I VER HEIGH TS ASS OC I ATE S
V -� Yam•• • y ~ '"�
ok
RN 659 r
• Vq iy <'119�OMPCPM/( �Q vL ARTNUk4208WAF�p�
v S� MON►CaN A � r � r
211
,*
No.
DEL rA
RAO/uS
rAN6ENr
ARC
CH REARING
CHORa
C U R V E D A
T A
/
1
d
4 4
6
7
Joe it' a*"
I/o54'I?0
/6057'
16057' .93007
/0/1'?9"
?0058'43"
567. I d
64 8. BB
8/ 8. B/
868.01 45.00
475.58
?49. 96
I01.50
$7.65
136.66
145.00 47.5?
4. 94
46. 15
?00. BI
/d4. 8/
270.8?
?87. d5 73./3
S. 89
21. ?7
N35°4?'O7"E N/9036'670E SZ7°4Z'30"W
S2704Z:10"W S64047'30"W
S1/006'37'E S2?0/d' E
/99 . ed
/34.55
269.58
?86. 04 65.15
9.89
90.76
NOTE -
A00/rIONAL
RIGHT -OF-WAY MAY BE NECESSAR Y
FROM
THE PARCELS
SHOWN TO ACCOMODArE
THE --
T.AI.45 Parcel 6dc
Henry Price
0.9. 647-337
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
STATE OF VIRGI N I A TO- W I T'`.
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS
ACKNOWLEDGED of ME THIS
OF J1590 BY
�a�fa� ; Rives l�e�sh�-t- /�ssac.
AS OWNER
MY COMMISSI ON E%PIR S �C
`�-W/ �
NOTARY Pus L.IC
I
9
/0
I/
5/045'05
I?611/4'55"
51•le'Y7"
460.58
45.00
60.00
44.00
19.25
?/.61
/?d. 70
1i.19
59.81
40.65
/34.50
45.9d
S36°?3'3i"E
566001,160E
S?d°58'40"W
s/Oo5444"E
59.77
39.?8
107.97
45.96
PLANS TAX MAP 45 PARCEL 6601 PRESENTLY
TO BE APPROVEO BY v00r FOR THE WALMAR r SIrE PLAN.
STANOING IN THE NAME OF RIVER
i
HEIGHTS ASSOC. DEED BOOK loll PAGE
253, DEED BOOK 711 PAOE 738
PARCEL A'
IRON PINS TO BE SET AT ALL CORNERS
So3�03 E ' �� 0. /99 Acre
BY JANUARY I, 1992.
N1-- �'
PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY SERVED BY
iay,37 0
PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER.
o \� l
SZ?°/5'05"WQ �• lad.46'
TRACT A IS PRESENTLY ZONED HC
~ R e S l N u Q f 7758'\ v m ��
REFERENCE ZMA-40-21 . ZMA-81- S AND
Parce /
B°'q
S//4W
68D / d014
ZMA-03-35 FOR APPLICABLE PROFFERS.
b
New Acreage
'
= 29. 418
w J. 089
Acres !�5
_ p f((���\; ,; o
T. M. 45 P a r c e l 6 B 0
i so.Os's37 W
..1 N37°//' E
C f r7 ( T5V `;) o
'TrQ N ��.
h
River Heights Assoc.
n 160. 00 ' 4 N18°l4 E o
PARCEL Y
Acre
,n p O q b ��� �•
M t '
„
: QQ n
N � O � � q O
h a 7
T.N. 45 ParCe/ 66
. .14,
z T.N. 45 Par Cf/ 6B0?
rrust (roiled Trust Agreement
p
�''�536/o??/"E River Heights Assoc.
Robert Rosenthal Trustee %r a c t A
o�
O D. B. T 6/ - 29 7
-s jre'45 "E
O. B. IV2 6 - 2 0 2 / 3. 28 4 Acres
50 Access Ease. 0; 6. 7 61- ? 9 I Z--0-
b
Original Acreage of QD
ti
T. M. 45 Parc e / 680 2
Parcl/ 6aOl =Ia.ZOI ' b����4�
r) ��b
River Heights Assoc.
0.
0. 9. 761 - 29 7
•� �1k
T.N. 45 Parcel 6804
`\m
z
�
Ri vI r Hligb! s A s s 0 C
�= sds°od'al' w
" ?o. 94 ,
o Q
{�
D.B. 76 / - ?9 7
s W
2 736'S1
\
/ 3 5. 0 0 ' 14 6 r 2 2 5.00
I "W ss�
j 0
S37°I/�5"WS22�Zj 300i N,S37°11'4.5 W
/I
THE LAND USE REGULATIONS LISTED HEREIN ARE
IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY
U S. R 0 U T E
2.9
ZONING ORPINANCE IN EFFECT THIS DATE AND ARE
SHOWN FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE
TRACT e e PARCEL X HEREIY OEO/CATER r0
NOT RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RUNNING WITH THE LAMA
PuIL/C use rOR srREEr PNRPOses.
AND THEIR APPEARANCE ON THIS PLAT IS NOT
PARCEL v rO IE Aa0E0 TO B BECOME A
INTENDED TO IMPOSE THEM AS SUCH-
POR r/ 0 N Of PAR CeL f o p
PLAT SHOWING DIVISION OF
PARCELS 68D & 6801 ON SHEET 45 COUNTY TAX MAPS
ALBEMARLE COUNTY VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OCTOBER 23, 1000
0 200 400 a00 1100 1000 1200
Graphic goals In Foot
B. AUBREY HUFFMAN & ASSOCIATES , LTD.
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - LAND PLANNING
CHARLOTTESVILLE , VIRGINIA