The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP198300048 Review Comments 1990-02-08 Oh AL/j� , S OLD RGIN� 3 -off COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 1 � 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 FEB£CE��ED February 8 , 1990 • ®�f V M. 0. Whyte 6 Route 2, Box 26A Earlysville, VA 22936 RE: Earlysville Greene Phase II Site Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Whyte: I am forwarding copies of the comments from the following departments: • Engineering Department - contact Peter Parsons 296-5861 o Inspections Department - contact Jay Schlothauer 296-5832 • Zoning Department - contact Kathy Dodson 296-5868 • Health Department - contact Gary Rice 972-6259 Please work with each department individually in addressing the comments and obtaining their tentative approval. If you are agreeable to revising the plan to address these comments we can approve it administratively. However, if you disagree with any of these comments we can schedule a public hearing at the Planning Commission to resolve such issues . This will require proper adjacent property owner notification of the proposed site plan amendment. Please note that, in my opinion, the most crucial approval at this point is from the Health Department. If they can not approve the site and its drainfield locations for the additional demand occasioned by Phase II, we can not approve this site plan amendment at all. The comments of the Planning Department are as follows: • Provide signature panels for the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Zoning Department, Inspections Department, and Health Department. M. O. Whyte Page 2 February 8, 1990 • Note Tax Map and Parcel numbers (Tax Map 31A, Parcel A and Tax Map 31, Parcel 32) -.r • Condition 1. h of the 1983 approval of Phase I stated: "When future additions and parking are submitted for approval an entrance may be required on Earlysville Forest Drive. " Staff opinion is that an entrance onto Earlysville Forest Drive is desirable considering the large development of Earlysville Forest subdivision and the issue of public safety in regard to providing access to the site without having to go onto Route 743 . The road should be at least twenty feet wide to accommodate two-way traffic and the pavement specifications will be determined by the Engineering Department. Virginia Department of Transportation must approve the location of the entrance. • Any revisions to the site plan which are occasioned by the review and comments of any of the departments should be submitted through me. Please submit seven (7) copies of the revised site plan. If it is necessary to take this site plan to the Planning Commission, the revisions should be submitted on or before the following dates with the corresponding date for the meeting: Revisions Submitted Planning Commission Meeting February 20 March 13 March 5 March 27 March 19 April 10 April 2 April 24 If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Richard E. Tarbell Planner RET/blb cc: Steve Phillips teeter Parsons CO u NTY OF ALBEMARLi ��RGIN�P MEMORANDUM TO: Richard E. Tarbell, Planner FROM: Peter J. Parsons, Civil Engineer 0? DATE: January 31, 1990 RE: Earlysville Green Phase II (SDP-83-048) We have reviewed the siteplan amendment for the above project. We recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1) Department of Engineering approval of grading and drainage plans and calculations, to include verification that the stormwater detention basin was sized to accomodate Phase II. 2) VDOT verification that an adequate 350' sight easement has been recorded for the entrance. 3) Department of Engineering issuance of an erosion control permit. Please call me if you have any questions. PJP/ksb 44r r------ . & OSBOR INC. -.r[r[ OF rAQmatiDU'UQE, Engineers, Surveyors & Lan inners 700 & 710 East High Street CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901 DATE JOB NO. [. 27. 70 o(6'0 9 1.CD 1 Phone 971-1591 ATTENTION -.,. ( RE: I—e t TO A f arl� C,0 VKil C4''N 1 c7tiT5 �T 4`7 C o't iw, > WE ARE SENDING YOU %Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ,,I ❑ Samples 0 Specifications an ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order X ►gale, (AA-c Y( 11 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Yoyu '0 ,4Y ( E�' tr:fi ��, chi JAN 29loso LNUMEEPJNG 1,711V THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution > ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Ike, cc otn Co✓cel( tni vw `f)'� tizino�-Fln awl( 2 c4 lA al- �+ be un GP�� 1, L at +(v_s i)otitke..._—�o (jot r coo�nitetlt . 1-kacktueAe, -L-l- fttam a( i•C +k - 2 i" C' 1? (•w(*in -i'k set,tt®M i A di Ca{cd) Yer ref lb E l e o f ?r,re- 1 vex. have- rest'i on�o� �once� _ ra c - o f do vz , p- Eh 1„k. 4, con . ,�4,. COPY TO V ' it SIGNED: )2it-`` PRODUCT 24E2 /nreesJ Inc,Croton,Mass.01471. JN---e-- If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1 / - V r k'f To: THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION A Petition - WHEREAS, Mr. M. 0. Whyte desires to build a grocery store on Route 743 in Earlysville and has applied to Albemarle County for the necessary permits; and WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Planning Commission approved a site plan which maintained a sight and sound buffer between the proposed development and the adjoining residential properties; and WHEREAS, subsequent-to fhe^Planning Commission' s action the County .Engineers require_. the construction of a stormwater detention pond in lieu of the drainage items shown on the site plan, thereby substantially altering the site plan without notification or review of the adjoining property owners; and WHEREAS, construction of the said stormwater detention pond has destroyed the sight .and sound buffer between the development and the adjoining residential properties, and represents a potential health and safety hazard to children and other residents of the immediate area; and WHEREAS, it is our understanding that the stormwater runoff could be handled as effectively by other means such as increasing downstream pipe capacity; specifically, by constructing an additional culvert crossing under Viewmont Road; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, we, the undersigned residents of Earlysville, hereby petition the Albemarle County Planning Commission to require the prevention of further construction of the said stormwater detention pond, and require instead that the disturbed area be regraded to its approximate original contours, landscaped, seeded and planted with a suitable sight and sound buffer; and further require the drainage aspects of the site plan to be restudied and redesigned such that the negative impacts on the community' s health, safety and aesthetic well-being are minimized. NAME . ADDRESS 0) 1?4\dAb.t) titt - / I Q0 J; Rd 0-) o. Tu fslh •r itImpo ,....cQwinoit. "ied• (3) *VA.- 0,10, - , ni/ . 4.1gb V i�Afm A-- Al. (.1., "7/77d /-/r-f-t-i,I.---1--/il < 7 vs. k . �-of OF AL.�em.41 00 4,<4. Tg. R N OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING 401 MCINTIRE ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 2 2001-48 0 6 October 22 , 1984 Mr. Stephen A. Phillips • Post Office Box 5265 Charlottesville, VA 22903 Re: Phase I, Earlysville Green Site Plan - Revised 10/10/84 Dear Mr. Phillips: We have reviewed your computations for the stormwater detention basin and the outfall channel across the existing -vvel lot and have ' the following comments. 1) Your assumption of a maximum allowable velocity of 5 FPS in the channel is not acceptable. The soils in this area are classified as loams by the S.C.S. soil study. The maximum allowable velocities for loams are 2. 25 to 3. 5 FPS. We suggest using 2. 5 FPS. If the soils are "stiff clays" as you stated, you will have to furnish evidence of that fact. 2) In your computations for the basin outlet structures you assumed a ponded depth of 4 feet to calculate the flow through the 12" pipe but then used 3 . 58 feet for the vertical riser. This may not seem like a great difference but by our figures it results in a 30% increase in the outflow to the downstream channel over the amount you calculated. Please rework your computations using correct assumptions and design methods. The rest of the grading and drainage shown appears adequate. We note that the parking spaces adjacent to the new entrance will probably not meet with VDH&T acceptance and .sequest that you submit this plan to them for their approval. Y Mr. Stephen A. Phillips Page Two October 22, 1984 We also suggest that you check with the Health Department to see if they have any objection to your routing the existing stream as close to ,the existing well as you have it shown. Please resubmit two copies of your revised plan and computa- tions to this office. Respectfully, p� Maynard L. Elrod County Engineer MLE/ps cc: Mr. M. O. Whyte Mr. Roger Ray Ms. Mary Joy Scala • • • • 0.4 % I/R ir,% OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia,. 22901-4596 MEMO TO: Mary Joy Scala, Planner FROM: Maynard L. Elrod, County Engineer `'0c)j. i 0Q_1 RE: Site Review Comments for Planning Commission Meeting of October 18, 1983 DATE: October 6, 1983 . • 1) Pargo' s Restaurant Site Plan Recommend final approval subject to: a) County Engineer approval of drainage., grading, and stormwater detention plans. b) Issuance of an erosion control permit. 2) Joanne L. G. Moyer Final Plat - Recommend final approval subject to : a) Dedication of a temporary easement for a turn-around at the end of the existing state road. b) Dedication of a 25 ' wide strip across the entire frontage of Lot B. 3) Jim Zauner Preliminary Plat - Recommend approval. 4) Solomon Court Final Plat - Recommend approval. Discussion: There are traffic movement problems in the south parking area and there are off-site drainage problems however, we cannot require the changes that would be necessary to correct the problems. • Mary Joy Scala Page 2 • October 6, 1983 \e//'5) Earlysville Green Phase I Site Plan - Recommend final approval - subject to: a) County Engineer approval of grading and storm sewer plans and computations (showing the hydraulic grade line) . b) County Engineer approval of drainage plans and computa- tions for off-site easement to culvert at Viewmount Road. c) Issuance of a new erosion control permit. 6) Donald & Agnes Clark Preliminary Plat - Recommend approval subject to: a) County Engineer approval of road and drainage plans from Route 684 to proposed parcel 4 . The portion of of the road from 684 to the Young property will require pavement. b) Issuance of an erosion control permit. 7) Brook Hollow Preliminary Plat - Recommend approval subject to: a) County Engineer approval of final road and drainage plans. b) Issuance of an erosion control permit. 8) Fitzwood Final Plat - Recommend deferral until topographic maps and drainage computations are submitted. MLE/ps •