The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201900033 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2019-08-09 (3)County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434-296-5832 Fax 434-972-4126 Memorandum To: Justin Shimp (Justin@shimp-engineering.com) From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: June 21, 2019 Rev. 1: August 9, 2019 Subject: SDP201900033 Northside Material Recovery Facility - final site plan The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Most of the remaining items to be addressed are minor, technical "clean up" items, such as corrections to notes on addingmissing information required on the plan. Staff is willing to meet to discuss these changes if that would be helpful. The specifics of these items are outlined in the comments section below. We wanted to call also your attention to the items most of note. They are: • WPONMMP approval. • VDOT approval. See attached VDOT comments. • ACSA approval. ACSA comments are still pending. • Instrument that will assure continuation of the off -site parking. Instrument not yet submitted for review. • The vacation of the drainage easement across the property. Easement plat not yet submitted for review. • The creation of an off -site easement for the security fence construction and perpetual maintenance on TMP 32-67. Easement plat not yet submitted for review. • The creation of a stormwater facility maintenance easement (see WPONSMP comments this and other required items). COMMENTS: Comments from Initial Site Plan review that were to be addressed with the Final Site Plan submission: [4.18.04, 5.1.51, 5.1.52, & 26.5(C)] The Special Exceptions (SEs) that were requested were approved with conditions by the BOS on May 1, 2019. Address the following in reference to the conditions of approval for the SEs. a) [SE Condition #3(f) & 4(b)] Add a note to the site plan that specifies how conditions 3(f) & 4(b) will be met and the method of measurement that will be utilized. If any permanent physical object(s) will be utilized for these measurements, then show them on the site plan and label them accordingly. Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. A note has been added. However, it does not specify the full requirements of conditions 3(f) and 4(b) and it also integrates a timing from 3(d) that does not apply to 3(f) or 4(b). Therefore, must be revised. Address the following: i. The timing of 3(f) is "... prior to commencement of use and upon request by the Zoning Administrator." not 120 days after final site plan approval. ii. Include in the note WHAT visible markers are proposed that will "... be utilized to measure and limit the height of the stockpiles." iii. Specify in the note that the "visible marker shall be utilized to measure and limit the height of the stockpiles." iv. If the form of visible markers is permanent in nature, then shown them on the site plan and label them accordingly. f) [SE Condition #81 An off -site easement for the proposed opaque security fence on the adjoining parcel, that is not part of this site plan, is required. Submit the easement for review and approval. Approval and recordation of this easement will be required prior to site plan approval. Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the following: a) Submit the easement plat and deed for review and approval. Approval and recordation of this easement will be required prior to site plan approval. b) Revise the label, that is on sheets C4 & C5, for the connection of the new fence to the existing fence within TMP 32-67 to include the wording "Future Maintenance Easement to..." The full label would be "Future Maintenance Easement to Connect New 7' Opaque Chain Link Fence to Existing Fence on TMP 32-67." c) Remove the text for the size of the easement (1185'x10"') from within the easement area. The size of the easement will be determined during the review of the plat for the fence maintenance easement, when the location of the existing fence is clearly and accurately shown. d) Please note that the location of the existing fence, on TMP32-67, should be shown on the proposed easement plat to ensure that the length and width of the proposed easement will be sufficient for the existing and proposed fences to be connected. 8. [32.5.2(i), 32.5.2(n), 32.5.2(m)] Streets, easements, and travel ways. & Ingress and Egress. Address the following: e) A note on the coversheet of the site plan states "Parking shall be provided on the adjacent TMP 32-67." Address the following: i. Provide revised parking calculations for the existing use(s) on TMP 32-67 and demonstrate that there is sufficient parking available to meet the parking requirements for the proposed use on this site plan. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Revise the portion of the parking calculation for SDP2004-26 on the cover sheet to show: 1) That 28 parking spaces are designated as "Inventory spaces" on SDP2004-26 (Hall's Autobody Site Plan) and therefore should not be included in the "Available Spaces". 2) That the 4 required parking spaces for this site plan will be provided within TMP32-67 and will further reduce the "Available Spaces" for SDP2004-26. 3) That the "Available Spaces" will be only 3, because of the two items above, after this site plan is approved. 4) Please note that once this site plan is approved it will be included in the project folder for SDP2004-26 to document the revision to SDP2004-26's parking calculations. ii. Provide the instrument that will assure continuation of the off -site parking for this use (4.12.8(e)). Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. The comment response stated, "The owner, who is also the owner of the off -site parking, will provide, prior to final approval of this site plan, an instrument that will assure continuation." Please note that the instrument must be approved by the County and recorded prior to the final site plan being approved since the parking is required for this site plan. 12. [32.5.2 j & 32.5.2(k)] Existing sewer and drainage facilities; Proposed sewer and drainage facilities. Address the following: a) Address the following: i. Submit for review a plat that vacates the existing drainage easement that runs parallel to northside drive for most of its length. This plat must be approved and recorded prior to the final site plan being approved since the existing easement conflicts with trees that are to be preserved for screening. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. The comment response stated, "The vacation plat is being prepared for submittal." This plat must be submitted, reviewed, approved and recorded prior to the final site plan being approved since the existing easement conflicts with trees that are to be preserved for screening. ii. It appears that the Hall's Autobody site has its SWM pond outfall right on the edge of this property (SDP2004-26). This may be associated with the existing drainage easement. Address how the off -site stormwater will be handled or provide information on the alternative outfall direction for the pond and any required easements to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. The comment response stated, "A new outfall is proposed for the pond and a revised easement plat is being prepared." These items have not yet been added to the Final Site Plan. Show any improvement and proposed easements on the final site plan. Required easements must be submitted, reviewed, approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. c) [From previous comment 181 See the attached ACSA comments. If the ACSA comment(s) require changes or addition add them, and any easements required, to the site plan. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. ACSA comments are still pending. If the ACSA comment(s) require changes or addition add them, and any easements required, to the site plan. d) Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENTI As was specified in the WPONSMP comment #3 (on 6/12 & 8/9/19), a stormwater maintenance easement is required for the proposed stormwater pond. This easement plat, and associated deed, must be submitted, reviewed, approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. 25. [32.5.2(e), 32.5.2(p), 32.6.2(j) & 32.7.91 Provide a full landscape plan that provides all required landscaping, calculations and meets the landscaping requirements for 32.7.9. Ensure all calculations and graphics correctly represent the existing and proposed plantings and planting areas. Address the following: f) Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENTI On Sheet C4 the screening trees on top of the proposed have been removed or their layer turned off. However, the label for the trees remains. Revise the site plan to either turn the trees back on or remove the label on sheet C4. The trees and their label should remain visible on sheet C5. 2 g) Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENTI On Sheet C4 & C5 there appears to be new impacts to preserved trees where the stormwater outfall has extended to the property line. However, the area of trees is still shown as preserved. Revise the site plan so that trees that cannot be preserved are not shown as preserved and are also not included in the canopy calculation. 27. [32.5.2 (e), (n) 32.6.20) & 32.7.9.4 (b)&(c)] Address the following: a) Preserve all existing trees that are to remain. Address the following: ii. Conservation checklist. A conservation checklist has been provided. However, the following must still be addressed: 1) The checklist must be signed and dated by the owner(s) of the parcels. Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment. b) Provide the labels for the existing trees to be preserved in the northeast portion of TMP 32-73, which is adjacent to TMP32-22C4 Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. Hatching for the existing trees on the boundary line between TMP 32- 22C3 and TMP 32-67 has been removed. Clarify if that area of existing trees will remain and be preserved. If it is to be preserved hatch it and provide tree protection during construction. If it is not to be preserved add a label specifying that and ensure it is not included in the area of preserved trees in the canopy calculation. 31. [Comment] See the attached comments from most reviewers. VDOT and ARB comments will be provided once they are available. Rev. 1: Comment not vet fullv addressed. See the attached comments from most reviewers. ACSA comments will be provided once they are available. 32. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENT] The County Engineer has no objection to the requested waiver for 18-4.12.15(a) Surface Materials Considering. This waiver request is approved. Revise the notes on the cover sheet in reference to the waiver request since it is no longer pending. 33. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENT] The response to VDOT comment states, "A sight distance plan and profile exhibit will be provided for review under a separate cover." Address the following: a) See engineering's comment on the exhibit for the proposed sight distance easement. b) Ensure sight distance easement is shown on the site plan as approved by VDOT. 34. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENT] Revise the elevation labels on the proposed topography to be correct. The elevation labels appear to have typographical errors, sometimes even having two different elevations on the same topo line. The area around the proposed berm appears to have the most errors. 35. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENT] Revise the site plan to turn back on hatch layers on sheets C3 & C4 that appear to have been turned off accidentally. These hatches were representing the following: a) Existing trees b) Existing stock piles c) Existing asphalt and gravel d) Stormwater management pond e) An area of preserved trees along the boundary with TMP32-67. 36. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENT] Revise the section labels for the "Entrance Paving Detail" on sheets C4 & C6 to be correct. Address the following: a) On C4 it should be shown, in the circle, 7/C6 and not as 6/C6. b) On C6 it should be shown, in the circle, 7/C6 and not as 7/C7. 37. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENT] The response to the ACSA comment #2 states, "The site needs permanent water service for dust control." However, the Utilities coversheet note still specifies that water is not proposed with the site plan. Please clarify this discrepancy and update the site plan as appropriate. Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for further information. 3 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 Stephen C. Brich, P.E. Commissioner August 08, 20I9 Ms. Paty Saternye County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP-2019-00033- Northside Drive Material Recovery Facility -Final Site Plan Dear Ms. Saternye: We have reviewed the Northside Drive Material Recovery Facility Final Site Plan, submitted by Shimp Engineering, dated May 13, 2019, revised August 01, 2019, and offer the following comment. Land use 1. Please extend mill and overlay to the adjacent travel lane on plans in accordance with WP-2, and show limits of mill and overlay. 2. Previous comment remains applicable, please provide sight distance plan and profile. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. If further information is desired, please contact Willis Bedsaul at 434-422-9866. Sincerely, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patricia Saternye From: Emily Cox Date: 12 June 2019 Rev. 1 Date: 07 Aug 2019 Subject: Northside Material Recovery Facility — Final Site Plan (SDP201900033) The final site plan for Northside Material Recovery Facility has been reviewed by Engineering. The following comments will need to be addressed before approval: 1. VSMP Plan (WPO201500001) must be amended and approved before final site plan can be approved. Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. 2. Plans should be signed, sealed and dated by professional. [18-32.6.1 ] Rev. 1: Comment acknowledged. 3. Specify the type of stone for the stone access aisle cross-section. [Sheet C6] Rev. 1: Comment Addressed. 4. Provide a cross-section of the proposed berm. Rev. 1: Comment Addressed. 5. Rev. 1: Please provide a copy of the exhibit that shows adequate sight distance at the entrance. Review Comments for SDP201900033 Project Name: Narlhside Material Recovery Facility - Final Date Completed: Friday, August DO, 2019 DepartmentGivisiorMgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Rebecca Ragsdale CIJIJ Zonina - Requested Changes El Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 08109/2019 Review Comments for SDP201900033 Project Name: Narihside Material Recovery Facility - Final Date Completed: Friday, August DO, 2019 DepartmentQvisiorMgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Coo ARB Approves El Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 08109/2019