HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA199300027 Action Letter 1993-07-14 �RGIN�P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060
TDD (804) 972-4012
July 14, 1993
Robert J. and Joan E. Cornelius
Route 2, Box 327
Crozet, VA 22932
RE: Board of Zoning Appeals Action
Tax Map 25, Parcel 17
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Cornelius:
This letter is to inform you that on July 13, 1993, during the meeting of the Albemarle County
Board of Zoning Appeals, the Board (4:0) unanimously approved your request for VA-93-27,
subject to the following conditions:
1) No bedrooms may be added to the house on proposed parcel A without amendment
to this variance;
2) County Engineering approval of either a) some suitable portion of reserved area
either on the proposed lot or residue; or b) that there is not reserve. This
shall be accomplished by the submittal to the County Engineering Department of
all the necessary information to ascertain this determination.
3) The septic field shall be maintained in accordance with practices as approved by
the Health Department.
This variance approval allows relief from Section 4.1.6 of the Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance to reduce the reserve septic area from full 100% to 0%, for subdivision of an existing
house into a 3 ac lot.
July 14, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Cornelius/VA-93-27
Page 2
If you have any questions, please contact our office.
Sincerely,
Q1&J44, c
Amelia G. McCulley, I. . .
Zoning Administrator
AGM/sp
cc: Inspections Department
Jack Kelsey, Engineering Department
Jan Sprinkle, Planning
Health Department
STAFF PERSON: i-,_ alia McCulley
PUBLIC HEARING:July 13 , 1993
STAFF REPORT - VA 93-27
OWNER: Gerald L. Blencowe (owner)
APPLICANT: Robert J. and Joan E. Cornelius (applicants)
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 25/17 with parcel 17A
ZONING: RA, Rural Areas
ACREAGE: 45.72 acres parcel 17 and 3 . 0 acres parcel 17A
LOCATION: On the north side of Route 614 and the Moorman's
River in Sugar Hollow, at the bridge about 1/2 mile
from Route 674 .
REQUEST:
The applicants request a variance from Section 4 . 1. 6 of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance, to eliminate the requirement of a reserve
septic field, for subdivision of an existing house into a 3 acre lot.
They have been residing in and renting this house for thirteen years,
and are in the process of purchasing it. The house is one of the
oldest in Sugar Hollow, and they believe it was built in the late
nineteenth century.
The actual land transaction from a land use perspective will result in
no additional lots being created. Parcel 17A consisting of 3 . 0 acres
and improved with one dwelling. Parcel 17 consisting of almost 46
acres is improved with two dwellings, including that which is subject
to this application. The subdivision plan is to merge or combine
parcel 17A into parcel 17; and then to create parcel A of the same
acreage as parcel 17A, for this house.
In order to understand the constraints on this situation, a property
description is in order. The southern portion of the property is
floodplain and beyond that is poor draining alluvial soils. A natural
gas pipeline easement bisects the property. Towards the north and
west the property rises sharply to critical slopes with areas of
exposed rocks. Two different streams traverse the property, and carry
additional septic setback requirements. The driveway follows the
southern and western border, and most of the northern border.
Soil scientist, Mr. Hutcherson reviewed the site. Based on the many
constraints, he saw no need for soil samples, because there was no
apparent area in which to obtain them. The current drainfield is
located ---nt Aa-€-the house, on the hill above the floodplain. A
newly dug well is located to the side- of the house.
read
The applicant's justification includes:
UNDUE HARDSHIP
The strict application would disallow owning this house we've lived in
for thirteen years, something we've planned for five years. Up to
this time, we have spent more than $6, 000 for the survey and other
funding, the majority of which was withdrawn with penalty from a
retirement plan.
STAFF REPORT - VA-.d�-27
PAGE 2
UNIQUENESS
The geographical conditions of this property, such as the streams and
steep grade are specific to this house and not shared by the
neighborhood generally.
CHARACTER OF THE AREA
The authorization of the variance would not change existing conditions
in terms of traffic or appearance or the like. It would allow us to
assume ownership of the house and property we have improved and used
as our yard.
RELEVANT HISTORY:
None in our files.
STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION:
This application has been reviewed by both the Chief of Engineering,
the Water Resources Engineer and the Chief of Planning. The Engineers
saw no environmental concerns with this request. It is not a matter
where the proposed property lines are drawn out of convenience and
some other design could result in septic reserve.
The Planners also voiced no concerns. They and we are clear to
distinguish this request from one in which new development, such as
house construction is being requested. This is to recognize an
existing situation. There are no known reserve areas on the residue
to which to percolate by a septic easement. However, a full-scale
report has not been done.
It is significant that this is a house with some sense of history to
the area. Despite the absence of a landmark status, it is one of the
stated goals of both the Comprehensive Plan and the Rural Areas zoning
district to protect and preserve historic resources.
Staff concurs with the topographic and other constraints on this
property. And we recognize that there will likely be no change in the
use of the property and its impact. This property is downstream from
the water impoundment area. In consideration of its location in the
watershed, and for general planning purposes we would like to see some
study done to determine if there is any way that some or all of a
septic reserve could be placed on the residue property.
With a condition to that effect, staff recommends approval for cause:
1. The applicant has provided evidence that the strict application of
the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
Development of the property predates these zoning and health
department regulations. The property suffers from exceptional
topographical conditions - floodplain, soils, steepness, etc. , which
prevent septic reserve. The applicants desire to create a lot around
their house is reasonable.
STAFF REPORT - VA-,,s-27
PAGE 3
2. The applicant has provided evidence that such hardship is not
shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district
and the same vicinity.
Staff is unaware of any properties which have all of these
combinations of limiting conditions operating at one time. There are
several which have substantial amounts of critical slopes or flood
plain, but I am not aware of any which also have two bisecting streams
and a gas easement.
3. The applicant has provided evidence that the authorization of such
variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property
and that the character of the district will not be changed by the
granting of the variance.
Provided the existing field never fails, or can be easily repaired,
there is no apparent negative impact. The approval of the variance
and resulting subdivision will not change the land use or visual
impacts.
Should the Board find cause for approval, staff recommends the
following conditions:
1. No bedrooms may be added to the house on proposed parcel A without
amendment to this variance;
2. County Engineering approval of either a) some suitable portion of
reserve area either on the proposed lot or residue; or b)that there
is no reserve. This shall be accomplished by the submittal to the
County Engineering Department of all the necessary information to
ascertain this determination.
3. The septic field shall be maintained in accordance with practices
as approved by the Health Department.