HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA199300036 Application 1993-10-07 it County of Albemarle
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
(804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060
VA- q3-3 DATE: juI'7Cq3
FEE: $95. 00 10 STAFF: R.f
VARIANCE APPLICATION
OWNER (as currently listed in Real Estate)
(‘C,N) - 3q00. (w1
Name aci, A. +- LiA j.. S Phone ( $cy- ) 973 - 4s6S (h
Address -.;211 pin ,dtt Lan,; GRe& Iit- , VA 61
-
APPLICANT (if different from above)
Name Phone ( ) -
Address
CONTACT PERSON (if different from above)
Name Phone ( ) -
Day Phone ( ) -
Address (� �,2
LOCATION: -1 T&(t J(?G(}j( ,.
PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION OF YOUR REQUEST ON
THE BACK OF THIS SHEET.
OFFICE USE ONLY
OI'
TAX MAP fr, PARCEL ,Q ; TM , P ; TM , P
ZONED: RA ORDINANCE SECTION: ( o *) A reA R&L4
Board of Zoning Appeals Date: L/9 /93
( >=j Special Permit IQ (A ( ) Variance N O
( ) Proffers
B ZA ACTION: 6,90ce (.57-ei) W�fikcZh
�/-4- 3
3) VA-93-36. James and Linda Schmidt (owners). Property located in Terrbrook Subd on the N side
of Pineridge Ln near the cul-de-sac, off Terrybrook Dr on the N side of Rt 649, TM32F/P01-B25,
zoned Rural Areas. Variance to reduce the side setback from 25 to 10 ft, for the construction of a
carport addition to the house.\qlr\
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: la A Aq.aL w wends,, ca.r sri.—
C4 S f fur R e 4 kov s t Ak•(ac6.I A5 tb k c se_ LA U �v"G6Z►tom c.
sr+o,re_ 6,44-6n5 if`cs'CL 1%c.a arid. 14 Lt .. 101
c.- nno c4 tat LI StGv +l.a.n et Acts +Q..kd;e1_,
Cak.ar p4 r-+ , A lfL(,1. t l Jfa-r c.Ctrs bt e recte.l ws44ku,,,r- -. Vcsr sn,Le._
t� iuuold. be c4A scr 1-c z nlec�ti�a,'s Io+ („r,e i w+., to r Sil cn
et.tS inS CoAcre4( 'Fad �.y.al t+ LI J(d no+ b-e_ as v�s. _[ Ptc.csin5 .
JUSTIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON THESE THREE (3) CRITERIA:
1) That the strict application of this ordinance would produce
undue hardship.
SIACZ -1'�t (,+ is A trtaA le (o+ inn� to k•:St-(Lb(c. ��cnd cA -I'�.e-
aS-t- Sidc sh e 110Oj 2_ (Lt:...d 5.1b Vs- +. a 04(5
LocAAion 5J:F�bto_ r .� c.ovr.we.d c•krrro,^t- . `A-t1ti.r�.�k /i'kc_ -E�o.L�+ o-F- /+�1.`
No Pv.S & _L1�'0.'r p4'r C I$ Y--21/ "T1br-n to#1 I;eat_ YLc.t) L tr S^Apt GT
ID+, 17- �t k 1.1. .t cl /hso'+ Mck.'f'- CO Z ,J t.f tc t'&$ . Tr1-2 s a c�edv ti+t S C-r4-
or ho.'sz C„rtur! {ram 0.diS4iri",N) 11,A-A5 [tiara • ( i-14,4 r ,'M,s velciraiaca..tra I Frees+,w.IJ. Gat Vt.h
2) That such hardship is not shared generally y other properties - b`--'fit
in the same zoning district and the same vicinity.
Stne.t. a I;fets-Fund Ce.r e,,t (s*- AWVz ` t -tt . l d 3 Clc Sz: a z+ �►'�c
ur21/4i Iat Cuero, +- G+.1e_ woJle be 4 3 't$'t +0 tit-2." c�
f4kg_J. b d r_a.rf tmk.', lk wc..jr 1oa_ mate_ vIs.Q.l(y ercd;,1.
Strop I� biz-+.use- t# t`s clacd + is 11z:'S2 - Tl�_ 0 us+..- S&{ 0+ -rt , l0 r
G1..v1/4.d '%L lay 0-c 'l'1n.t_ l<nd make- ii- iwposs.bI, to Cat s1 (} cc CAP tlsew,ktre_
+v "ANL ko"�• 04-4.sr lofs hays- two r.t GoASt-vG{'r.oA SP0.C�
3) That the authorization of such variance will not be of
substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the
character of the district will not be changed by the granting
of the variance.
+-r.,r Art T we is t►+,t, i -t- ,t }ra c 1 c v; `}-v a.11 doe -(-0 '
crroc}u(-n4 Sc.vnAAcsS and if 1 cal T+ (esvCs +all a -eke. Cur ra.,-
6 'e r o-E }Ir.is to t he eta.). h.) I°t', ,i- V S-LS -tLc kC.V:it_ as.•K d EIC ristis
t ,r,Crc}t P -k {}r fPci + 4,44 i+ w`,1I t sk 4 1n 11\I-
S0,1.,t de--Ji r'_s '1't.t Cur CA^oo-F live , e-+ -.)
The application may be deferred by the staff or the Board of
Zoning Appeals, if sufficient information necessary to this review
has not be submitted by the deadline.
I hereby certify that the information provided on this application
and accompanying information is accurate, true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
loss-iR3 (pub
Si►:tune Date Receipt# a e
•
c ,
\ :
O H 1 Ti Q'1NT
I 7
7r
c.
v
11
+ r
. \\
7
to if .
Is
tt
.. I II
'� *to
• I Ik1 r
tri
. P T.K 0,
q N _ L
rhitN I •-•'•'• k -f-...1 ...,4
-fir r T \ in '' £
D r f _
c a- '�
Fi
Pn ;• y V.t1 it
s
L J
cm
N
Z
.b
• 1
K
O
F r
From the Desk of O
JAMES A. SCHMIDT
October 11, 1993
Albemarle County Zoning Commission
Variance Hearing Panel
To Whom It May Concern:
We have recently completed a request for a variance at Lot 25, Block B, Section I Terrybrook
to construct an attached carport to our existing house. Although we could build (with a
variance) a free-standing structure within the space selected (3 feet from the house and 6 feet
from the east lot line), it is our plan to attach it to the house for the following reasons:
(1) It would be more structurally sound;
(2) It would be built using roof trusses so that it would be consistent with the
house roof line (etc.) and be more esthetically pleasing;
(3) It would sit upon an existing concrete pad (additional support); and
(4) It would allow us to retain all of the existing tree buffer between our lot and
Lot 24.
To this end, we have talked with all of our adjoining neighbors and have asked them to sign a
statement of support for our project. You will find a copy attached to this letter.
Although the hearing is scheduled for November 9, 1993, it will be impossible for me to
attend as I have a commitment to provide two program presentations at a Conference in
Greenville, South Carolina that week. Therefore, given the nature of the request and the
support of the adjoining neighbors, I would like to ask that the Board consider the variance
request even though I am unable to attend the scheduled meeting. I would like to complete
the project before cold weather comes in (Thanksgiving) and since the roof trusses must be
made to order, it will take some time to order them. If it is not possible to consider the
request without us being in attendance, we will ensure that a representative or other
arrangements are made. Please let me know one way or the other.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
1 ames A. Schmidt, Ph.D.
217 Pineridge Lane Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (804) 973-4205
a
°` A Note From the Desk of
JAMES A. SCHMIDT
November 4, 1993
Dear Zoning Committee Members:
This letter is being written because I have several concerns regarding the Staff Report (VA
93-36) submitted in regard to my request for a variance to attach a carport to my house.
The report provides the appropriate details and the staff person appears to agree with our
request for a variance in regard to Items #2 (unique location hardship) and #3 (no
detriment to adjoining property). It is with Item #1 that I disagree with the staff members'
t assessment. Recognizing that her overall recommendation must be based on agreeing with
all 3 Items (agreeing with 2 out of 3 items will not merit a positive recommendation), I feel
4 x that I must respond to her assessment regarding Item #1 (that strict application of the
f ordinance would not produce undue hardship).
Essentially, the staff members' view is that "because there is the alternative of
l
reconstructing the existing carport" this Item criterion is not met (undue hardship) and the
;- "staff must recommend denial". Although I was willing to meet with the staff person at
`, the location in order to help explain items such as this, at no time was the option of
reconstructing the existing carport discussed with me. It is not a viable option for the
following reasons:
The current carport is 16' x 16' x 7' (tall). The van is 17'3" long and 17'6+"
tall. Therefore, the van will not fit in the current side carport.
Restructuring the structure would not be a simple process as the existing
carport can't just be heightened or dug out (made taller). The existing
carport would need to be totally dismantled and cut out of the hill (deeper
and wider) in order to accommodate the van. The approximate cost of this
option would be $15,000+. Further, even if it were possible to alter the
existing carport, it is not located in an area of the driveway that provides
enough maneuverability to get the van into the carport space. At present,
we back the car onto the concrete pad -- this works because it is a "straight
slot" in and out of the driveway. With the narrowness of the driveway (hill
on the right, slight drop off on the left) and the number of trees lining both
sides of the driveway, there is not enough room for the van to be turned
into the existing carport. And even if you were able to accomplish this,
the van would take up more than half of the carport space requiring us to
park the 2 cars currently housed there on the street and next to the house.
Therefore, I do not believe that the staff report presents an option reasonably
available to us.
217 Pineridge Lane Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (804) 973-4205
Secondly, although it is possible for me to build a detached carport (without variance
approval) by locating it 3' from the house, such an option would also incur additional
tremendous expense. Such an effort would require cutting out a hillside, building a
retaining wall, extending the concrete pad, cutting down some existing trees and moving
the project closer to my neighbors. All of these items would add an additional expense
(again, approximately $15,000) to this building permit. It represents an undue hardship to
me (financially as well as in regard to land usage) and it doesn't satisfy my neighbor's need
to keep the structure as far away from his property as is possible. Further, although the
staff member may feel differently, I believe (and my neighbors unanimously agreed) that an
attached carport will be more aesthetically pleasing than a detached carport. Further, since
I will feel more confident in my building abilities if I attach the carport to the house, I also
believe it will be a more structurally sound option. Certainly a free-standing detached
carport could be constructed structurally sound, but I think it would require a professional
contractor which would also incur additional expense. Therefore, even the option available
to me (without a variance approval) is not a reasonable option based on cost factors,
aesthetics, neighbor support and structural soundness.
Lastly, I am trying to keep a $22,000 van in as good condition as possible. Therefore, it
needs to be covered. It is an investment and as the report clearly states, there is no other
area in which to build the carport. Strict application of the ordinance would make it
impossible for me to protect this investment even when all of my adjoining neighbors have
supported this petition. They recognize that the lay of the land, the triangular shape of
the lot and the desire of all to keep the existing trees make this a unique request with no
other real option available. Although, some may feel that a carport is not a necessary
component to one's reasonable use of the land, I disagree in that the land is being used as
a residence and, as such, requires a methodology for getting to and from the house. A
carport clearly maintains a vehicle in better condition. With such overwhelming support
from my neighbors, it is in my best interest to house my vehicles in a carport. This
request allows us to do it such that the vehicle is accessible, protected and well maintained.
For the above cited reasons, I am hopeful that you will agree with me that denying my
variance request would produce undue hardship.
Respectfully Submitted,
r------tfamesSchmidt, Ph.D.
cmg
•
kl • •
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
Mk
VA-93-36 James & Linda SCHMIDT
Tax Map 32F, Parcel O1-B25
12
O 13
2y,�
111111.421
20
11110*
37 4
*.„,4;‘
05)
035
3� *36
401,1011P 4110
.p F�
. ROUTE 649
TER RYBROOK
•
®I D.B. 544 Pp 210-212
®2 ACREAGE
•
LE
0 "A_o�"'400 SOO OW RtVANNA DISTRICT SECTION 32F
{IN;1., __ 4- 1,, r/.-•-ate,t4 p I�+-
THIS CERTIFIES THAT ON 7/2.4/ G I SURVEYED THE PROPERTY s Et oy N HEREON, AND THE TITLE LINES
AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. r-,// 42 VA. CERT. NO. 1443
We acknowledge that the fence around the pool is located
on the corner or near the property line and that the gravel
drive encroaches onto Pineridge Lane.
IRON
FOUND
1
'1
U1
W O
t / / N N
I, rj
\�/ N Orik/rR
j �''. ALOT 24
/ / °
/ PUMP
FILTER 0 FENCE CORNER ON
a OR NEAR LINE.
LOT 26 1
K" .11
LOT 25
/� o T.M.32F PAR.258
I I!: 56,363.I SQ.FT. "'1" •
r� I ° I i u 2 '
A�o m So.z a ,.,
•
4` �A I I N �1
• 1 r Two STORY N 24,
�a a\� 1 m FRAME -p6.2• +WWI .. •
In #217
m
1
y
1 '
1
� 1
1 III 1
Sp B LDG. LINE m
1 0
N --11-------Dr
_
�\\ ° I o r
1 N I
,
A : 253.64 1 1
R - 632.25 \ 135.55' ; 1
N74 o IRON
/5 iv r r FOUND
IRON
FOUND, pINERIDGE (50')
STATE ROUTE /306
•
1 i 014 6Ba0ol( DRIVE
1ERRY
SUBDIVISION PLAT: D.B. 583 P.366
SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN HUD FLOOD ZONE C.
- (NOT A FLOOD HAZARD AREA)
•
cpiLTif OIL •
PLAT SHOWING PHYSICAL SURVEY OF 1
frd ;
,',--..-1
G � i\i, mI .LAN4PC)/ LOT 25, BLOCK B, SECTION I
No. 1443 '
. � o�, , TERRY BROOK i
1 ,:.qNO SUR - ,
ALBEMARLE COUNTY , VIRGINIA
Gary M. Whelan I
up Land Surveyor SCALE : I : 60' SEPTEMBER 26, IVOS
ChorIotteaviIle, Virginia
-ssaa`ne..r..w...+++..e�.aT+.s...,aa:.rtn.a".—rru:=.:er.• ..,,:r mac.- ir:•:s... -' ...r,.._e...:r..,m,.rr.e»r•ew..-....r...... .+..+.w.:u.uw..maue^.r,,;::_;. r[ r•i .. _�
4
(21; Irzcu�'titry �c(c.^,eie.4 p(ai-j -1Si-,,ncc 1-0 10fiIn� 6/ fr,(4".,t ck,"f„1-`f"
THIS CERTIFIES THAT ON 7/26/616 I SURVEYED THE PROPERTY SHO N HEREON, AND THE TITLE LINES
AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. � � 41 _ VA. CERT. NO. 1443
• T _
We acknowledge that the fence around the pool is located
on the corner or near the property line and that the gravel
drive encroaches onto Pineridge Lane.
�`-- A. �,_,.,L-.___�
C�/ r _
•
T 23
IRON
FOUND
•
14
i N
I A o
l \ / / N N
I,
R N O
Crt
i �� o" LOT 24
/ /TE
P. / PUMP
y FILTER 0 FENCf CORNER ON
'ti LOT 26 OR NEAR LINE.
• fi
LOT 25 2
-// al T,M,32FPAR,25B
In lu'
i 56,363.1 SQ.FT, .11 2 PCr°r o�r�
`\
0 I ml 50.2 �1�,'1`I f Af'f"Y 3�s�
kph h� ,„ ��It.- ft..n (0 (InZ
�. I iu,l TWO STORY ,� 24' N, 2+ front-
�tx Q\ m 1 FRAME 26.2' ►S"� `� p�
1`z, #2►7 ' ' a '� r
U1
-1
1 1
1
1
I 1 1
50'BLDG. LINE m '
- \ --_ I r
1 --ate
' 1
\\ I o t
\ I '3 I
I m
A : 253.64� \. v 1 '
R - 632.25 \ /35.55' ; f
N740/5 W ' IRON
IRON , FOUND
FOUND, pINERI D G E (50) � .T _,
_
CANE
STATE ROUTE 1506
---------------------
t0 RI,/E
1,014.60RDOK D
tERR
•
SUBDIVISION PLAT.' D.B. 583 P.366
SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN HUD FLOOD ZONE C.
- (NOT A FLOOD HAZARD AREA)
1
Jeff-;-- .t'NI.
� NLT}IO�L PLAT SHOW ING PHYSICAL SURVEY OF
l Q , '
0 41111.
v G 11, wi l LAN• . 25,LOT BLOCK B , SECTION I
No. 1443
I •
4 •yp4,: ' 1T E R R Y BROOK
.No SUR\ I
ALBEMARLE COUNTY , VIRGINIA 11
Gary M. Whelan
tiLand Surveyor SCALE : I " : 60' SEPTEMBER 26, IV06
t
Charlottesville, Virginia
22Ria'sYv�M...�rOYi1iiiWJY1TM"e�.t1+: .:1.Y.t r. : 1.. ...r. -b'.::1'r.ml'. .t'.YfT1'1v1. .r......3^vr.w.xd•�N�aaY><t'-T_':r`^'.�.. ... - H - .
. i
4
. D 5 83 G' , 3C,h I
Bishop � �..
Gerl° 8 I I
1796.02 589°0441"W /
SO
\1 553.2/ w. e1 alone
tI 1 q��ryb 244 63 • s =o 1
'ram\1! .•0v ho mo h 1 i
cal ca I LOT 24 k ;
4` '•° a LOT /3 • - IC! I 72,1525.1 • l'J,tJO' l�
• O t`zi�° 40,30/s.f ° o m
O 6 Q
1 N 12°DO•W NI } \
1 I 342.49 �0 3 0 y`'a'o •
1 2 h. h % ,ice, 0 1 \'_
\\.\CPo \a o y 26> Q2., / L ti I
\ \ a 22 — 0 4_, -
T \a• .LOT 25. o I /,
. \ \F
56, 397 s.f. I LOT /2 ,// a W .
��� /' I' 4/,o54:f /,/ to a 1- o C C{
N. sr /// °. Ep5e!.ent // m d �>
/ N. w • .7/ 11 12 �r--�St�eom-- t
\ ^1 / `s- o W
bryh h / 3
LL o ti N /• 2'99 = w
ae/, • LOT I\ NeiN : " c - J\ \ ry'o- 54,0/3s.f N o `
\�
v¢� o, :a' •
o d
N Z ''' o Ilk•
5/IgddE N /°OO�W 288.95 t - � `i.
1 9 55 "i • " I- r
I' vnm O d:jo26'19- m
I I b ''41 •A R.JB 2511
~ o'C' 1
bry �''11 T• /7 J/ N '.1
•
• 11 ",ery • O IL
a h- o ��
• 0 I h m m
i.0/ 27 4/ C' 11 cxti 3. W o LOT I M
0 0 00 0 40,955 s 1
m ry LOT 1, 137 o o ,, z:
•
H
h I 1 ,.J2 so°3o'W
LI! -i a
1 1 /5 O 257 56 " �, a -
T;_" rl
..------ [// h.,,h.`-. r7- - - Q '2� I
m
1 203. 62 o
/ OT 9h h.
{-(Ty. c1 • ° ryh 4/,/54sf
O O t1 • �n'n
!' lt - ^w
o
° - a2' H i
e I` Q " °
y OLOT Wvkn136 ?.°° N6000E
i U
n
h uSV4/,4485..f 'i! I V2r 9.38
CO lal `ZbCV u-t
Mea 3 "1
'S/so �� oh V q 0 5 •a o
O •• — '5 `-'
?6 �. NI I . :• LOT 8 nn�..1 a r^ A
9,89 I 7 4/,436 s.f `t
- o I I O ti \
o ^ LOTS✓ l s6°°p,w '� o
0
m 40,749 s.f. I I •, h
2 1 •
1 n� o C� 2 5p•56 a
O ° m
O /Bo 1 iI ,\A O P o Z m Q
o 2/s•�O•e 1 1 * kt[a LOT 7 ti x
° \� ��h 44 2oss.f o Z Q
I
�'' °
/ 4
u try
i t 0 , 1 `V • ° N/QO3° • ti
e° ,, LOT 34 I •R , c $ � � O
.h++n,w �',3z tL
yco \ti 4/,aae s.f I dvo, 4/' B4°J.f o o"
1 1 ti Lp ,b a Q_m O
`„ T6 g . o m
�'p 13 II p / b1y'h �� /�/\ \� -_/4lo'/-.D�3'/(eo Esm_/.� 4`4i O O J
, ..• r o PI .
ti?sow oe"n/ m 2 • C( CC Ct
I: 0. S. RCUl iPUiH, JR. '" /// h e'''• ' I I s'�,J)v m °n -- ▪L
rtrt No. Y 1 a \y I OLI
u [Z._l7 .3 o I K.
v
c,n.1,a 1;,!655 4/,y 1 I e�00, 1 0,
�.' ,c 7 p�Ar. y �/I ' u�Ts -o 'ti ° y
•a " srs▪ 0 1 ,.i w' o N li
E` 1 0) 0 0
6A 5 it ? 0
•
.Min,
NOTE Ml mum building se/bock line is MIL fr N.,•) k,• ,)\all street lines,unless otherwise shown. V. aa'c, �A5
�° WILLIAM S. ROUDABUSH, JR.
r<l CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR
SCALE: /"' WO' DATE: AUG_10,1973 /' `w:' Charlottesville Virginia
{o,Ih•,n Photo Print{Supply Co.,]00 KDf3 05)59 1/73 PL A T "E l/ FILE NO. 3 785
omit
THIS CERTIFIES THAT ON 'fZL(8G I SURVEYED THE PROPERTY SHO N HEREON, AND THE TITLE LINES
AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ,'7"/. 4)
VA. CERT. NO. 1443
We acknowledge that the fence around the pool is located
on the corner or near the property line and that the gravel
drive encroaches onto Pineridge Lane .
fir k
-,/f', / .0/ i
IRON
FOUND
,
i
i ._ W 0
F A
/ T N N
/ N O
rtk
TRoA LOT 24
I FUP
ILTER a FENCE CORNER ON
LOT 26 OR NEAR LINE.
is x
LOT 25
• \ .00L
T.M. 32F PAR.258 •
•
,� 56,363. 1 SQ.FT. ';;- 2
\o i
50.2 N •
0h0h\ N v ' '.
DNA A\co• Two STORY , 24'
'. FRAME
#217 p6.2' tr ' '
•
t_
' C
50DG. LINE n
i
' BL
m
----- I r
„il
----- _,.. .... N
t Ol
• N i r
A = 253.64
R = 632.25 T ma. /35.55' , 1
IRON N74 IRON
FOUND, 0/5 w - '' FOUND
piNERIDGE l50') '.' •.__
LANE •Tv_
/ STATE ROUTE
1506
--- 1OK Da1vEVA els ..
1.0� YBR00
,.... .oR
•
SUBDIVISION PLAT: D.B. 583 P. 366
SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN HUD FLOOD ZONE C.
• (NOT A FLOOD HAZARD AREA)
Setilm ibr
.. .. .
”-A zyz's
NLTf1O�. PLAT SHOWING PHYSICAL SURVEY OF
O� •
Li
#/&JJ .
0 --rot
- 11:,,NE,..
O G � tl�� I� N�II L�1N �'� t
v No• 1443 : " LOT 25, B LO C It B , S ECT I O(VI
TERRY El ROOK i
,..,4A. . .
N0 S U R' . ;
ALBEMARLE COUNTY , VIRGINIA
Gary M. Whelan I
I
Land Surveyor SCALE : I " = 60. SEPTEMBER 26, 100S
Char loffesviIle , Virginia
•'+��a`•I•Mr/ �ai.l,p"^+n.Jn":--f t 4:'. 1.'.•., en � ate:•:s... :'�=.s:.._o•..:z '-..rr:•.-.,-.'en.e, a+rw..s.n.rw.+maurar_:+—. :<:. ..._.. N" .. .a,•.
. I
k•.„ f �1 ;
.4 M t I + i I +
'►/ 'r �✓ „ni _ i
, .. .14,,,••• 1 , 1 _ :4.i, .,,\"
1 i I
•
'-". t - ' 441 ...]Zi LI k . 9. ,.,
•7:4 �. �� r; 1.
.r , ' Ord> 4 i
f
111111 -Allir1\ \ ' .[-,.;.,
'
I.
•A.. 1 A
;h *t
,a'( a 1
��...... 1 ft 1. - ..t� , ♦ '�� t pn
ram.�. ? ..�..+i riIt� ��9•� y+ 7 •
1.
t. t
944
smut �/ t• fit;t `,f �- �,f► +
{ "ter . f.3 •
• 1 ` 4 ,i' y �
- . 1, • .5',..„ 4,,,,,,..; .z.l. ,• r, : , , _ , , ,2 ,
A _____,-;..,-- ..) 1 4.41f,. ' , -C..:*-IY , . \ Yfh:
,.,-14 4...*1...........0004 41;4. • . , ,„
-..00,,,- tv ‘..., 1-. i i,,,41 , i , .
IV
tt
y }i cap ., mow a�� p 1 s • i, �� +' 't. '
4