HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201900042 Action Letter 2019-08-21*(A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
August 21, 2019
John Thier
Turner Enterprises
250 West Main Street, Suite 201
Charlottesville VA 22902
SDP2019-42 Chattanooga Colonnade Drive - Initial Site Plan
Mr. Collins,
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative conditional approval to the above referenced
site plan. This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the
developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as
provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and thereafter diligently pursues
approval of the final site plan.
Early or Mass Grading, in accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8, is not permitted following this initial site
plan approval. Grading will only be permitted after final site plan approval.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A final site plan fee of $1,613 & a Fire Rescue fee of $100.
Please submit 11 copies of the final plans to the Community Development Department. The assigned Lead
Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. Once you receive the first set of comments on the
final site plan, please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until
tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained:
SRC Members:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) - 2 copies [Paty Saternye ext. 3250]
Albemarle County Planning Services (ARB) - 1 copies [Margaret Maliszewski ext. 3276]
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) - 1 copy [John Anderson ext. 3069]
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) - 1 copy [Andy Slack ext. 3384]
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue - 1 copy [Shawn Maddox 434-326-2623]
Virginia Department of Transportation - 1 copy [Adam Moore 434-422-9894]
Albemarle County Building inspections — 1 copy [Michael Dellinger ext. 3228]
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) - 3 copy [Richard Nelson 434-977-4511]
If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at
Extension 3250, psatemye@albemarle.org.
Sincerely,
Senior P anner L� ,,
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832
Memorandum
To:
John Thier
From:
Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
August 7, 2019
UPDATE: August 21, 2019
Subject: SDP201900042 Chattanooga — Colonnade Drive — Initial Site Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following
comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by
the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Comments to be addressed Drior to the Initial Site Plan
Pay an additional $220 for the required notices fees. The fee for notice fees was revised in early June. It is now $435.
Since only $215 was paid there is an outstanding balance for the fees due.
UPDATE: Comment a0A --ssed.
Comments to be addressed with the Final Site Plan submission:
2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
14.201 Setbacks. Address the following:
a) Revise the setback descriptions to fully specify the setback requirements. There are special circumstances both for
parking setbacks and when a sidewalk is outside of the street right of way that apply to these parcels and therefore
should be included in the setback descriptions.
a. Revise the front setback to include the wording about when the sidewalk is outside of the ROW.
b. Revise the front setback to specify the setback for parking and loading.
c. Clarify the location of the private street right of way. There appears to be one which does not include the
sidewalks and then another property line further into the property which makes it appear that the
sidewalks are in the private street right of way. It cannot be determined if the sidewalk is inside or
outside of the street right of way.
b) Remove the dompster- efielosufe from the side and rear sethaek to r-esiden4ially zoaed pr-epei4y. "No poi4ioa of a*y
stFueture, exeluding signs, shall be leea4ed eloser- tha-a 50 feet from the distriet boundai-7y."
UPDATE: Comment withdrawn. Dumpsters and retaining walls are not considered "structures".
c) Provide both of the setbacks to "residentially zoned" property for the City parcel at the back of the two subject
parcels.
d) Revise the site plan so that the setback requirements to the "residentially zoned" parcel in the City are met. The
50' and 20' setbacks are required to that parcel as well.
UPDATE: Address the comment as specified. Please note that since dumpsters and retaining walls are not
considered "structures" they can be within the 50' side and rear setback to residentially zoned property.
However, please also note that they cannot be in the "undisturbed buffer" (see buffer comment) since no
disturbance of any type is allowed.
[21.7(c)] Use buffer adjacent to residential and rural area districts. Revise site plan to meet the undisturbed buffer
requirements and the screening requirements for both sides of the properties that are adjacent to a residentially zoned
property. This includes the City parcel behind the subject parcels. "No construction activity including grading or
clearing of vegetation shall occur closer than twenty (20) feet to any residential or rural areas districts. Screening shall
be provided as required in section 32.7.9." Because the 20' buffer must be left undisturbed the screening requirement
must be met outside of the 20' buffer area unless a special exception is granted by the Board of Supervisors. No
clearing, grading or improvements can be done in the 20' buffer without a special exception being granted. See 21.7(c)
for a list of the specific circumstances when the BOS may waive these requirements.
5. [Comment] Stand along parking is not allowed on a parcel without a special use permit (SP). Either a boundary line
adjustment must be done prior to the final site plan approval or submit an applicant, fee, and all required
documentation and request letter for a SP. A shared parking agreement would also be required in order to utilize
parking on an adjoining parcel.
6. [Comment] If a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) will be done in order to address this offsite parking show this in the
site plan. If this is to be done a BLA Plat will be required under a separate submission and with appropriate fees.
[32.5.1(c) & 32.5.2(a)] General information. Address the following:
a) Include in the Zoning area of the cover sheet the ZMA# (ZMA1998-16) for TMP60-40C3, the Airport Impact
overlay, and the Steep Slopes — Managed overlay information.
b) There are proffers for ZMA1998-16. They should be included in the site plan sheets.
c) Revise the departing lot lines, and the parcel information, to be up to date. TMP60-40B2 no longer exists and was
merged to be part of TMP60-40B 1.
d) Show all required setbacks. Please note, there is an adjoining city parcel that is residentially zoned and setbacks
have not been shown from that parcel.
e) Provide all of the required information for the abutting parcel that is in the city. That parcel is a residential parcel.
See other comments in reference to requirements for commercial uses adjoining residentially zoned parcels.
[32.5.2(d)] Topography and proposed grading. Address the following:
a) The Managed Steep Slopes, although shown on the sheets with the proposed layout, are hard to distinguish except
on the existing conditions sheet. Use hatching, or some other method, on at least one of the proposed sheets so
that it is clear the improvements that will impact the managed slopes.
b) Ensure that the design standards in the steep slope overlay district, for managed slopes, is followed.
9. [32.5.2(f)] Watercourses and other bodies of water. The site plan does not show the existing stream in the same
location as the County's, or City's, GIS. Address the following:
a) Ensure that it is accurately located on the site plan.
b) Address engineering comments in reference to any disturbance of the stream or buffer.
c) Provide the watershed note on the cover sheet of the site plan.
10. [32.5.2(i)] Streets, easements and travelways. Address the following:
a) Accurately represent the right of way lines for the existing private street. As stated above, there appears to be two
different lines for the right of way and property line. It cannot be determined if the sidewalk is inside or outside of
the street right of way.
b) Provide the centerline, and dimension the pavement widths, for the existing private street.
11. [32.5.2(j)] Existing sewer and drainage facilities. If the proposed retaining walls remain where they are shown on the
initial site plan, provide documentation that allows the building of retaining walls within the existing drainage
easement.
12. [32.5.2(k)] Private & public easements. Address the following:
a) It appears that a public stormwater management easement will be required.
b) Provide the location and dimension of all proposed private offsite easements. See engineering comments in
reference to the possible need for offsite construction and/or grading easements.
c) Any easements required by the County must have the easement plat submitted (separate application, fee and
submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan.
2
13. [32.5.2(1)] Existing and proposed utilities. Address the following:
a) Show all existing utilities and easements. There are utilities near the corner of TMP60-40D0. If any of this
equipment is within the TMP60-40C2 parcel it must be shown on the site plan and any easement associated with
them also shown.
b) If there are any existing telephone, cable, electric or gas easement within the site, internally or along the edge of
the private street, show them on the site plan and include the deed book and page numbers for the easements.
c) Show any proposed utility easement. The submission, review, approval and recordation of a plat and deeds of
easement for all proposed easements will be prior to final site plan approval.
14. [32.5.2(m)] Ingress and egress. Provide the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection in both
directions.
15. [32.5.2(n)] Existing and proposed improvements. Address the following:
a) Clearly label and/or delineate areas of sidewalk and walkways. The sidewalks along Colonnade Drive are not
clearly shown, are not hatched and are not labeled.
b) The line that may represent the sidewalk appears to be within the parcel and not within the private street right of
way. If this is the case, show all information available on any existing access easements along the existing
sidewalk.
c) Provide all dimensions and components of the dumpster pad and ensure they meet or exceed the minimum
requirements.
d) Add a dimension for the width of the entrance from the private street.
e) Add a typical dimension for the depth of the parking spaces.
f) There are not enough parking spaces provided to meet the minimum parking requirements for the proposed use. If
the applicant wishes to request a reduction in the required parking, follow the steps specified in section 4.12.12 in
reference to Transportation Demand Management (TDM). An applicant seeking to reduce the number of required
parking spaces through TDM shall submit to the zoning administrator a parking study demonstrating how the
number of required parking spaces may be reduced through TDM. TDM is a set of tools that provide an alternative
to parking spaces upon a demonstration that the number of vehicle trips upon which the minimum number of
parking spaces required herein will be reduced. TDM tools include, but are not limited to, mass transit, car
pooling, and park and ride lots. The zoning administrator may reduce the number of on -site parking spaces using
TDM alternatives if the parking study submitted by the applicant demonstrates that the use of TDM tools can
effectively eliminate the need for some of the required parking spaces. If this option interests you please make the
request, provide the study with appropriate justifications for the Zoning Administrator's consideration.
g) Provide the required loading space on the site plan.
h) Please note that business signage is not approved with the site plan. Although it is appropriate to show the
monument sign location on the site plan please not that a full review of the location, dimensions, and details of any
business signage is reviewed separately from the site plan.
UPDATE: Although as specified above signs are not reviewed and approved with the site plan one
modification should be made in the site plan. Revise the monument (Freestanding) sign location to meet the
minimum setback for freestanding signs in the HC zoning district (4.15.11). The sign shown is closer than
5' to what appears to be the property line and therefore must be relocated.
i) Provide the required handicapped parking space signage.
16. [32.5.2.(e), 32.5.2.(p) & 32.6.20)] Landscape plan. A landscape plan is required in the final site plan that complies
with section 32.7.9. A landscape plan was submitted but requires additional information for the final site plan. Such
information should include, but is not limited to, the following:
a) Full schedules and information on the plantings proposed.
b) Updated information on calculations, such as canopy, once species are specified.
c) Revise calculation so that required number of trees is rounded up and not down, such as in the street tree
calculation.
d) Existing trees and landscape features
e) Conservation checklist (signed, dated & filled out). Please note that there are areas required to be maintained as
"undisturbed buffers" (see other comments on required buffers). All existing vegetation in those areas must be
undisturbed and conserved.
f) Tree preservation details.
g) Show shrubs that will be provided in the planting areas of the parking lot.
h) Screening of the parking lot from the two adjoining residentially zoned parcels (TMP60-40C4 & Parcel 7-1.101 in
the City).
i) Screening of the required loading space and dumpster location.
3
17. [32.5.2(n) & 32.6.2(k)] Outdoor lighting. A photometric plan is required on the final site plan that meets all
requirements of section 4.17. Ensure the photometric plan includes all free standing and wall mounted lighting that is
proposed.
18. [Comment] Please note that business signs are reviewed by separate submission.
19. [Comment] See the other SRC reviewer comments attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently
address prior to final site plan approval.
20. UPDATE NEW COMMENT]: Prior to final site plan approval pay an additional $215 in Initial Site Plan
notice fees. Comment #1 above was incorrect in that no notice fee had actually been paid prior to 8/21/19.
Review staff apologizes for having misinterpreted what notice fee had already been paid and having requested
in that comment that only $220 needed to be paid.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye(aDalbemarle.orq or 434-296-5832 ext.
3250 for further information.
4
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Site Plan Review
Project title: Chattanooga Medical Office Building — Initial Site Plan
Project file number: SDP201900042
Plan preparer: John Thiere (Turner Enterprises), 250 W. Main Street, Suite 201,
Charlottesville, VA 22902 [ john6btumer-enter2rises.com ]
Plan preparer: Timmons Group, Craig Kotarski, P.E. craig.kotarski@timmons.com
Owner or rep.: WP Colonnade LLC, 224 141 Street NW, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Plan received date: 3 Jul 2019
Date of comments: 7 Aug 2019; rev. 8 Aug 2019 (to incl Attachments /slight edit (typo))
Plan Coordinator: Paty Saternye
Reviewer: John Anderson
SDP201900012
General
1. Provide field run surveyed topographic data as basis of Final Site Plan (FSP) design.
2. Source of topographic data is listed as county GIS, but topographic information is inconsistent with GIS.
Note especially the centerline of drainage feature, shown off -site on ISP, but on -site in GIS. ISP should be
re -submitted with either field run survey, or topographic information consistent with GIS, if GIS is used as
basis of Initial Site Plan design.
3. GIS topographic features indicate a drainage feature and show blue stream line that may be a perennial
stream. Provide confirmation that drainage is either intermittent or ephemeral, and not a perennial stream.
If feature is perennial, establish and show stream buffer on FSP, and revise proposed development design
consistent with Ch. 17, Article VI, Stream Buffers.
4. An approved VSMP Plan is pre -requisite to FSP approval. From Engineering perspective, conceptual
design shown on C6.0 is sufficient for ISP approval. With VSMP, please include plan note and analysis
that consider Colonnade Drive runoff which appears to bypass the site in pre -development condition, but
appears partially routed to detention (via relocated DI) in the post -developed condition. Engineering does
not object to relocating DI, but requests FSP confirm effect: non -capture (pre- ) vs. capture (post-).
Note: with VSMP plan, provide complete calculations, including RV calculations, Energy Balance Eq.
5. SWM Facility /Access easement with deed must be recorded prior to FSP approval.
6. Recommend title sheet note that parcel lies within ACSA service area for water and sewer.
7. Ensure project has all relevant state /federal permits, including Army Corps of Engineers permit for any
stream or wetland impacts.
8. Identify existing wetlands, if any (FSP).
9. With FSP, identify area or length of any wetland or stream impacts.
10. Provide detailed retaining wall design prior to FSP approval /ref. attached Retaining Wall Plan checklist.
11. With FSP, provide comprehensive drainage design. Revise to include plan /profile drainage data, tables,
elevations, inlet /storm pipe design, etc. and provide inlet capture for hardscape areas to prevent ponding.
Please see Drainage Plan review checklist (attached /also, county website).
12. C1.2: Include VDOT ST-1, IS-1 details (MH steps /inlet shaping).
C4.0:
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 5
13. Recommend label typical length of parking space/s (TYP.=18.0').
14. Provide off -site temporary construction /grading easement for retaining wall construction. Lowest tier wall
is approximately 6.0' away from the nearest property line.
15. C5.0: It is Engineering understanding that no grading is allowed within the 20' landscape buffer located
parallel to south property line. Revise grading per landscape buffer requirements.
16. L1.0: Recommend review and revise if needed planting design to limit potential conflict between tree
canopy and dumpster lift operations, which may require 14' vertical clearance above dumpster pad.
Please feel free to call if any questions. Thank you
J. Anderson 434.296-5832 -x3069
SDP201900042 Chattanooga Med Office ISP 080719 080819rev.docx
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 5
Albemarle County Engineering
Retaining Wall Plan checklist for plan reviewers
18 Feb 2014 (Use the latest checklist from the Team Services engineering forms site)
Any walls supporting roads or necessary infrastructure require engineered plans (not generic
manufacturer's details) and computations. {Design Manual, section 81 This will also be required
where walls are close to propert lines and there is the danger of affecting neighboring property,
either during construction, with later failures, or with pedestrian or vehicle safety.
Reference key;
[Square Brackets] are County Code references, {Curved Brackets} are policy references, and (regular
parenthesis) are explanatory. Links to reference documents are provided where possible.
Title information: (applicable to any type of plan)
Project title.
Professional seal, with original signature and date. [ 18-32.6.1 ]
Plans :
safety railing shown for retaining walls over 4' high
guardrail with VDOT designations or equivalent shown for retaining walls next to
parking or travelways
VDOT approval for any walls in right-of-way
Accurate depiction of horizontal depth (batter) on site plans.
All structural reinforcement, steal, or geogrids specified.
All dimensions specified
Constructability; there should be no vertical cuts on property lines during construction,
such that abutting property does not become unstable. Adequate room for consruction
needs to be available.
Details and sections :
typical sections with dimensions shown for all configurations
reinforcement layout shown and dimensioned (steel, geogrids, etc.)
details for any pipes through, or bridged utilities, or manholes through geogrid
Computations
Structural computations with original seal and signature for walls over 5' high
Accurate surcharges and loadings assumed
Materials and dimensions match plans
appropriate safety factors used
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 5
Albemarle County Engineering
Drainage Plan checklist for plan reviewers
18 Feb 2014 (Use the latest checklist from the Team Services engineering forms site)
A drainage plans is typically a component of a road plan, site plan, or stormwater management plan. It
consists of the channel, ditch, culvert, or stormsewer design drawings, drainage maps, and computations
for hydrology and hydraulics.
Reference key;
[Square Brackets] are County Code references, {Curved Brackets} are policy references, and (regular
parenthesis) are explanatory. Links to reference documents are provided where possible.
A professional seal should be provided for any computation packages where are separate
from sealed plans.
Drainage: [18-32.6.2d, 14-305, 311 ]
drainage area maps (This is a basic element, and without this there is no review)
drainage computations (usually in the form of tables from the VDOT Drainage Manual
App. 9B-1 LD-2014, App.713-1 LD-268, App., App.8B-1 LD-269, etc. -computations are
a basic element, and without them there is no review)
all proposed and existing storm sewer must be shown in plan view
for residential development, principle access free of flooding during the 25yr storm [14-
410]
site runoff and entrances do not drain into streets (from VDOT Drainage Manual 9.4.5.2,
9.4.6.2)
concentrated runoff (Icfs or greater) does not run across travelways/streets (as above'
following VDOT design)
drainage does not run across, through, or backwater in dumpster areas [ 18-4.12.19]
overland relief is provided for any drainage structure or inlet in case of clogging. The
failure of any system will not cause structures, streets or yards to flood. {Policy}
direction of flow change (or deflection angle) in each drainage structure is 90 degrees or
greater (flow should not have to reverse direction) (from guide of VDOT Drainage
Manual 9.4.9.3.2.3)
labels on all drainage structures provided (and should match the drainage computations
and profiles)
provisions and easements for drainage across 3 or more lots. Dense development where
fencing, decking, etc is expected should provide yard inlets and pipes in easements,
rather than ditches {Policy}
Drainage profiles: (applicable to site plans, road and drainage plans) [14-311, 18-32]
drainage profiles for each pipe, structure or channel must contain:
existing ground
proposed ground
any channel linings
all utility crossings
a VDOT designation (MH-1, DI-3B, etc.) for each structure
throat length for each drop inlet
Engineering Review Comments
Page 5 of 5
grate type for each grate inlet
a label on each structure to correspond with the computations
material and strength class or gage of each pipe
manhole access every 300' for 15"42" or 800' for 48" or greater
pipe slopes at 0.5% min. to 16% max. (per VDOT stnds for anchors over 16%)
concrete inlet shaping (IS-1) specified on any structure with a 4' or greater drop
safety slabs (SL-1) in any structure taller than 12'.
top or rim elevation for each structure
all invert elevations for each structure (with positive flow drop between inverts).
end sections (ES-1) or endwalls (EW-1) on all pipe outlets. Endwalls for culverts 48" or
taller
scour outlet protection at all outlets, corresponding to computations (Green Brook, OP)
Drainage computations: (applicable to any plan proposing pipes, channels, etc.)
Pipe computations for all pipes
All proposed systems are designed within open channel flow capacities. (HGL
computations are not necessary, and should not be relied upon unless the entire
system is to be watertight.)
For systems within drainage easements, all proposed pipes are a minimum 15" in
diameter
There are no excessive outlet velocities (> 15fps)
Curb inlet computations for any curb inlets on grade
All spreads are less than 10'
carryover is accounted for
100% capture at entrances so no flow runs out entrances into travel lanes
100% capture, or overland flow of capacity storm, to stormwater management
facilities. Typically stormwater management is designed to the 1 Oyear storm, and
inlets on grade cannot capture this.
Curb inlet computations for any curb inlets in sump conditions
All flow depths are below 6" in the capacity table
All spreads are less than 10'
100% capture to stormwater management facilities
Ditch computations for any ditches
ditch linings specified per plans meet velocity requirements
Culvert computations for any culverts
headwaters < 1.5 x culvert height, and 18" below shoulder elevation of streets.
Outlet protection computations for all outlets
dimensions and stone sizes for all outfalls
Proposed pipe and inlet drainage area map
limits of all areas and sub -areas draining to proposed structures, and existing
structures or channels which will be impacted
acreage of each drainage area as used in computations
hydrologic coefficient for each drainage area as used in the computations
time of concentration for each drainage area as used in the computations
destination structure labeled for each drainage area (if not obvious)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
August 7, 2019
Mr. John Thier
Turner Enterprises
250 West Main Street, Suite 201
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ARB-2019-82: Chattanooga — Colonnade Drive (TMP 066000-00-00-040C3)
Dear Mr. Thier,
At its meeting on Monday, August 5, 2019, the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
unanimously voted to forward the following recommendations on the above -noted Initial Site
Development Plan to the agent for the Site Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and
(5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the
satisfaction of the ARB: None.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
1. Show existing tree lines on the existing conditions plan. Maintain grading outside
the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated
throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The following
items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan Checklist must be addressed:
1. Show how mechanical equipment will be screened from views from the EC.
2. Provide a complete plant schedule with the next submittal.
3. Add 2 trees on the east side of the parking lot.
4. Provide a minimum separation of 5-7' between pipes and trees, without reducing
tree quantities.
5. Revise the plan to show all contours on the grading plan rounded with a ten -foot
minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition.
6. Indicate retaining wall material and color on the plan. A physical sample may be
necessary for review.
7. Revise the plan to show plants at the base of the far northeastern retaining wall.
8. Show existing tree lines on the existing conditions plan.
9. Note that a "back of building" appearance will not be appropriate for the EC -
facing elevation.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application
forms, checklists and schedules are available on-line at www.albemarle.o[g/ARB. Please be certain
that your ARB submittal addresses the above -noted issues.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely, 5
Margaret Maliszewski
Chief of Planning/Resource Management
434-296-5832 x3276
mmaliszewski@albemarle.org
cc: WP Colonnade LLC
224 14th Street NW
Charlottesville, VA 22903
File
Review Comments for SDP201900042 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: CHAITANOOGA- COLONNADE DRIVE
Date Completed: Wednesday, July 31, 2U19 DepartmentQvisiorMgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger
CDD Inspections Requested Changes El
Add the fallowing note to the general notes page:
Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require a
stamped engineered design also. Walls require inspections as outlined in the USBC.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
Accessible parking spaces and access isles shall not have a surface slope greater than 1:48. Access isles shall be at the
same level as the parking space they serve.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
ALL water lines, sewer lines, and fire lines from the main to the structure MUST have a visual inspection per -formed by the
buildng department.
Add the following to the general notes page:
All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks.
.A
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: I 08l0712019
Review Comments for SDP201900042 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: CHATTANOOGA- COLONNADE DRIVE
Date Completed: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 DepartmentQvisiordAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer:
Richard Nelson ACSA Requested Changes
2010-08-06: 1 recommend approval for SDP2019-42 Chattanooga - Colonnade Drive with the following conditions-
x Submit 3 copies and water/sewer data sheets to ACSA for review.
z Provide fixture counts.
"ACSA GIS indicates sewer connection is a 4-inch sewer lateral_ Confirm pipe diameter_
z Relocate hydrant closer to entrance.
" Relocate meter closer to pavement and grass area.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: I 08l0712019
Review Comments for SDP201900042 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: CHATTANOOGA- COLONNADE DRIVE
Date Completed: Friday, July 12, 2019 DepartmentQvisiorMgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Shawn Maddox 7-1 FFire Rescue Requested Changes
1. A knox box is required. Please add a note indicating such and that the location can be coordinated with the fire marshars r
office.
2. Will the building be sprinklered? If so the FDG must be shown and have a hydrant within 100' of the FDC_
3. Gonfirm the building height to ensure the travel width is adequate.
4. Afire flow test will be required prior to final acceptance.
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: I 08l0712019
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper Virginia 22701
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
July 25, 20I9
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Paty Saternye
Re: Chattanooga Medical Office Building — Initial Site Plan
SDP-2019-00042
Review #1
Dear Ms. Saternye:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Timmons Group, dated 2 May
2019, and finds it to be generally acceptable. Note that the proposed improvements are on a
private street. If further information is desired, please contact Justin Deel at 434-422-9894.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Review Comments for SDP201900042 Initial Site Plan
Project Name: CHATTANOOGA- COLONNADE DRIVE
Date Completed: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 DepartrnentQvisiordAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Health Deaartment No Otiection
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: I OB/2012019
Review Comments for SDP2O19OOO42 Initial Site Plan LJ
Project Name: CHATTANOOGA- COLONNADE DRIVE
Date Completed: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 DepartmentQvisiorMgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Andrew Slack CDD E911 No Objection
No objection_ r
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: I 08l0712019