Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CPA201900003 Plan - Other (not approved) 2019-08-23
- _ - AICJ.� ar .r 5 Z - RURAL LONG RANGE �� �__ _ fi c TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2018 Acknowledgements Chip Boyles, Executive Director, TJPDC Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commissioners Albemarle County Ms. Liz Palmer Mr. Rick F. Randolph- Vice Chair Fluvanna County Mr. Tony O'Brien Mr. Keith B. Smith- Treasurer Greene County Mr. Dale Herring Ms. Andrea Wilkinson Louisa County Mr. Bob Babyok Mr. Tommy Barlow Nelson County Mr. Ernie Reed Mr. Jesse Rutherford City of Charlottesville Ms. Genevieve Keller- Chair Mr. Mike Signer Project Leadership- TJPDC Wood Hudson, Planning Manager Kristian Zimmerman, TDM Planner I Planner II Faruk Hesenjan, Regional Planner I Planner I Rural Technical Advisory Committee Albemarle County Kevin McDermott Fluvanna County Jason Stewart Greene County Bart Svoboda Stephanie Golon JAUNT Chris Rowland Karen Davis Louisa County Robert Gardner Nelson County Sandy Shackelford TJPDC Sara Pennington VDOT Charles Proctor David Cook Rick Youngblood Guide to Chapters 1. Gives an introduction to the plan and a discussion of plan -related goals and objectives. The chapter also provides an overview of the transportation system. 2. Provides an overview of the region's demographic and land use trends. These conditions set the stage for transportation planning and meeting future needs of the region. 3. Explores the state of the region's transportation system. This chapter looks at roadway conditions including roadway functional class, average annual daily traffic, level of service, pavement conditions, bridges and safety. Further, the chapter provides an overview of the freight system, goods movement, and transit systems. CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Purpose .. ............................... 1-8 Description and Function of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission Summary of the Transportation Network Goals and Objectives CHAPTER 2 Demographic and Land Use Trends .... ... ........ ... ... ...... 9-18 Demographic Trends Population Trends Community Profiles Housing and Transportation Affordability Employment Locations Commute Patterns Growth Areas and Land Cover Transportation Implications CHAPTER 3 Regional Transportation System .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. 19-42 Road Functional Classifications Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Level of Service Volume to Capacity Ratio Heavy Vehicles Traffic Pavement Conditions Bridge Sufficiency Concentration of Crashes Potential for Safety Improvement Locations Freight and Inter -Regional Transportation Goods Movement Public Transportation Traffic Demand Management Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Guide to Chapters 4. Provides a list of project recommendations that address various deficiencies in the regional transportation network. Recommendations are prioritized on the county level. S. Lists the counties and the date of adoption of the 2040 Rural Long Range Transportation Plan. 6. Provides a collection of supplemental materials to the information provided in previous chapters. CHAPTER 4 Transportation System ......... ...... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... 43-82 Deficiency Evaluation Performance and Recommendations CHAPTER 5 Plan Adoption .. .................................... 83-84 CHAPTER 6 Appendices and References ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ... ..... .... 85-96 fx-.+ a>� - _ +air - - w�w rr A,r - Y ' _ . 4 r c-r L f fw •c1N •_ �r _ tif L n��A� -► _- i°4 "\ f _ter �.1 .�{}'� i +•y. _ _ - _ f Y -._ w� _ -rw. l.+.eya'av 1r•._. - -,. -... -:�_. -- - _- ti_sa..u.i�_sy� - �- rr:.- ..r-�ii: �.�. _u ra., -•..�: --.- +u_«. _.�.__. ..-. ..r e.. _..�_�, _� _n. _.�. _ ._-_...w -:.�.v �..,_:: ._.s: �s .r =--- •.,r.s..-,y,.,+.r• �: r.:a:� _ti - M-_ • _'ra,...�.s „rs-a:-_--.-;—,--•- \•-c->� .+-�.:,-, 'a_'....,.5 ,..-�r' - ..-� :_�..._,a�...-.1 � � sr �r ..va , �..�,�...>: .w .t.,r.+n �f.::r-�-.. �r�..:f.�.,: sw•......r,-�.. - arli �;✓.r..�-.....< - :w�`irw..��....:.....r �wn.e.� .. .. -:�. ...y. +"a...v.t..wK.-rrr��;nu�Y+• .r►' - .-ac-� �aw:Y:�:ys.- �.ys.�-.� .f'- i _ � � �-.w...: �r=.^..f+,,.=.+.---.d- - . �- . , .,� _ <p�" ,,s:.� ,r.•:� �� ._ - -. `'eY."'`'�e_ :"-�+++-ter'— •T=-� -.,-.• .r•-.,-�:Y _�.�..�.,: .-+� _ ,..,.�.�+,ti� d-�-.�.;- /,-.. rty. ,�'Y'!�^cff�'*' -.rr�! �"..r'.�.�Y` .r.•a.� � y . .�� ,y."�in-_"`tw:r..� 'F` �+�- - �> �R»•A�.w' �,.�s'1-!-.:-�..s-�, , - i � _',�.rr•, .-l..siw� - --- - rr�� �rp�r.'w7'.��---_�•-. �..r.r T __ 'r ti �v- � -._ '? ae-�..•.-:..+w � ..s- �._ :�.: �� ��kY�+►✓ .•.-. .r'-� ./+w.•+� • ,fin.-,C. � - _ .atY�`..c �,r•r .. N,:, --�tt�,,+.. s - _..�/a.w, rmhF ..,�%da v,, -.s . _ - _,f�. �, sr„<,.v�' .•-n.-"t.;- r�:`�,"'. --""'l � ....ti:-:� =•-_S. >•n<s-�:....., u.- •::` �: "�`�=`"rs ._+•.-- .^�r��''�e`�,,s+d!r��ex� `��►v✓�'"" .' -'...— .+-�+'—n-..•� ..��-��-.-�.h.�. .�_,a«r+�.• ::,,,F.rr� `T_"'f' _� _�„ f. -.s. � _>rc�, °`�� •,f=.- . �z--Kas+,F++"6r'irr rrr-:iw- ^+'- Yr .�"`..' -.:.+� S,,.a-1:,i4 - - is �_r._ � L-�•-.� :: �L.��...�rw," i-a:�.�.�i -.; -,.•-- ��•- �.v- �IRt- _ �.�Is� � x'-1..*.. _ s..a..it-w.'.Ja.rrr -+:--sJ '�>..r+9-.- R•. as.. ' - y,• ''N{.:s.•ywi?+"`—wva.;a-waX.•.:.-r...:>rr-rr .`.•>:>- � - w+,.r.e+s _ "- .w_.nc.+..sr. •rrr•_...arsK,v.+.,.[::r- �s#�a.. .,..• - _,- "-._-�i-.. .....�.�..�.4,.,a'ir.. �..� �../ a � �� 1..'.' �-c. _' PMaa'•�iiKsi _ q�f r�� -- �al.,,a „•c/ v - - -_.ems,: - _ r. •-.ws:-..i�,�.�: ....wa<.az.s.•,�,ri•-�. - �:.. -:-s � •,4 lr _} a rh .. .. _ r -`i•a - --.:. - „ ._ - _ - '_ . SC _�.. - :.-_ . ,,.4 - ;a•p:,I.>-.:`s. r_ -..- _... �. - � �w.'Ak:; - '•e+ti.,-t<-.•'-- --ter- _ ����* 4h.-•_--'. _ nisi _ w•,�T-S:-•.;. Y-'.-"•�✓ C. wTJ •� J w- a,r�' - .ter- , ,. _ _w•tkn�i' ,�r�..,-re.-,._ .. .,-..� ... __ _ _-�'i5ltr_ - ..:l,i-t T yY, z��f �y-r- Y. r cif 4. t • i --•4--' -r3 1 � .r 4Y V1 � .r• � �.*-�✓ �x yr. 4 �I - Y b. f _ $ �v.T �..• ,Y.M ~�.'y�_ - gayyR.... _ lFV'�1�'�+K 'i _ •Y r � �Y r` r. r �µ. r jYh -ah i 1 �n h' f- r � r i L ' •r l I -1 L YM 4 .��y.�• �}sy�. a +.y 1 t ,j - � 114 5A n r +i Y r Yr - i t-i t tia_ �.. 1'.i y� -J_ i•-..:-.w_p•r P "'-l�4_�w _ F: .ti C'¢jj a a • _r - L _ >__d���--1�. . -�Y?. „ .. - �:� e � 1F'�`. _ _u•-Y ..ei :.r•.:;}�SKf:� . _ .. - . .. .. ..... - :.-..Mc•�'. � .. ,,, lY. - �! �K+'•F•.h�:i-�."!� ..rs�sa,: ,'-.- .�te4=i-awrr•'"""- - :"C-:_w• -ter& hnZ�RX?GS� v Ali";.. r�-iM`_=.% � '�f•J'.r 4.a,/✓K11rr� �• S 4.'-T as .'•+t-'� - -- �--- - u r- ;E+. - Yq , _ r Rdl j 1^ 4'W .r a hsM �tyg AC." . `+r 4 v 'e ..y ry L A Y" a _ 1 ""TRODUCTION AND PURPOSE In 2010 the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission adopted its first Rural Specific Long Range Transportation Plan. The 2010 Plan was developed in conjunction with the States' development of the VTRANS 2035 statewide multimodal long- range plan. Prior to the 2010 plan, the TJPDC had developed a set of comprehensive transportation plans known as the United Jefferson Area Mobility Plans (UnJAM). The first of these plans was adopted by the PDC and MPO in 2004 (UnJAM 2025) and subsequently updated in 2009 (UnJAM 2035). The 2040 Rural Long Range Transportation Plan serves as an update to the 2035 Rural Long Range Transportation Plan and incorporates new data and relies on the most recent trends in transportation, including adopting a performance -based approach that mirrors the approach used by the State for prioritizing funding of transportation projects known as Smart Scale. The Plan is designed to serve as a tool to help rural localities prioritize transportation projects and prepare for Smart Scale. The transportation system within each rural county was evaluated, and a range of transportation improvements - roadway, rail, transit, air, bicycle, and pedestrian - were then developed into recommendations that would help address expected existing and future needs. Some of the PDCs contain urbanized areas whose transportation needs are coordinated by a metropolitan planning organization. In the case of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's region, only the rural portion of the region was analyzed and is addressed in this report. The Charlottesville -Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) conducts the transportation planning for the urban portion of Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville. DESCRIPTION AND FUNCTION OF THE THOMAS JEFFERSON PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION The Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission serves the counties of Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, Nelson, and the City of Charlottesville. The TJPDC staffs both the Metropolit Transporta Transporta of the TJPDC which include Greene, Fluvanna, Louisa, ta Nelson, portions of Albemarle County, as well as R GR the Towns of Louisa, Mineral, Standardsville, CO and Scottsville. The Rural Technical Advisory Commit-teeEM T (RTAC) is the regional planning A COU RLE body responsible for coordinating rural transportation planning. The planning area is served by two corridors of statewide significance; Interstate 64, which travels ,";,; 250 east/west; and US Route 29, which Af _ travels north/south. In 29 addition, the rural areas AVA.,wintergreen 20 are served by other US Mnntebellp 151 $s Esmont Routes, including 250, chuyler 15, 522, and 33. The Loving s n region is also served by both Spman north/south and east/west rail , ey lines and four railroads which NELSON M O COUNTY � include Amtrak, Buckingham Branch, Tc CSX, and Norfolk Southern. The region 60 AI is also home to a major US Bicycling + R Route, Bike Route 76. SUMMARY OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Interstate 64 is the primary east -west corridor of the region along with US 250 and US 33. The primary north -south corridors are US 29 and US 15. Public transportation services are provided by Charlottesville Area Transit, University of nsit. US i t h 136 o west. Norfolk Southern and CSX operate two class I railroads I° that pass through the region. Additionally, the 33 Buckingham Branch Railroad serves local industries uc r ille in the region. Access to three Amtrak passenger rail routes are in the City of Charlottesville. A range of travel demand management W, services are available 231 22 TreviJians through RideShare, _jLouisa in I housed within the TJPDC. There ossroads Lake ZI 208 LOUISA COUNT cu°k°° are presently 4`Montic to r 15 33 31 official and Antioch almyra. 522 unofficial Park . F UVANNA and Ride lots sville COUNTY s throughout the Spring Colu h a RideShare service area. Commercial air service is available - Interstates or Limited Access Hm at the Charlottesville -Albemarle Airport - US Highways - Highway Ramps (CHO) and private services are available - State Routes at Louisa County Airport and Lake Anna -W Bike Route76 Aiport. 2040 RLRPI 2 1 12040 RLRP NTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The TJPDC has developed a set of uniform goals and objectives across its family of plans. The Goals and Objectives will be used across the RLRP, the LRTP, and the Jefferson Area Bike and Pedestrian Plan. These Goals and Objectives were developed with input from the Rural Technical Advisory Committee, MPO Policy Board and committees, and guidance from FHWA. These goals and objectives are in line with MAP21 performance measure guidance. '1 ACCESSIBILITY Objectives: • Improve access to transit for all users. Ensure the diverse needs of a changing population are met (elderly, disabled, and Improve inter- and intra-regional access and mobility for all LEP, persons lacking access to private vehicles) users (people, goods, and service) by integrating various modes . Ensure the appropriate types, connections, and levels of of transportation in an effort to improve connectivity and in the freight service are provided to the entire region region. • Continue to support efforts to enhance access to intra-regional transit services, to include bus, rail, and air services • Increase awareness and continue to support RideShare and Travel Demand Management (TDM) services 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Objectives: AND LAND USE • Improve the effectiveness of the existing transportation network, recognizing internal and external future travel Support the region's economic competitiveness by ensuring demands from tourism, freight, and commuters the integration of transportation and land use decisions in the . Assure designated growth areas are designed to accommodate planning process to enhance efficiency across all modes of a range of transportation modes transportation. • Target transportation improvements to support local land use and development priorities TA Y ` 1- • Enhance connectivity among and between various modes of transportation through identifying and filling gaps in networks • Provide a forum for policy discussion among transportation stakeholders Planning Factors Addressed: • Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight; • Enhance travel and tourism r r Planning Factors Addressed: • Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned growth and economic development patterns • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned growth and economic development patterns INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 3 OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT Encourage and promote cost-effective operations and maintenance of the regional transportation network that delivers optimum performance for all users. SAFETY Improve the geometric conditions and physical characteristics of the transportation network to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. Objectives: • Identify and prioritize addressing of physical deficiencies, to include pavement, bridges and other multi -modal deficiencies, on the existing transportation network • Improving communication among stakeholders regarding transportation data, maintenance coordination, best practices, and emerging technologies • Develop efficiencies for prioritizing rural roadway pave in place, rural rustic, and rural additions • Improve secondary roadway network by prioritizing improvements that enhance access for the most users. Such as shoulder maintenance widening for all users Objectives: • Reduce the number and severity of crashes • Identify key safety deficiencies in roadway networks at intersections and along roadway segments (spot improvements, intersections, shoulders, railroad crossings) • Identify, evaluate, recommend, and prioritize other safety deficiencies • Incorporate the safety needs of all users Planning Factors Addressed: • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight • Promote efficient system management and operation • Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system • Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate storm water impacts of surface transportation Planning Factors Addressed: • Increase the safety of the transportation motorized and non -motorized users • Increase the security of the transportation motorized and non -motorized users system for system for s Photo Credit: The R Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE GOALSOBJECTIVES 5 CONGESTION L Objectives: • Improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system and services whenever possible Where appropriate, improve roadway design to reduce congestion for vehicles, freight and transit. 6 ENVIRONMENTAND COMMUNITY Promote sustainable transportation improvements that mitigate impacts on the environment and ensure nondiscriminatory planning within the region. Objectives: • Incorporate environmentally- and/or contextually -sensitive design into roadway, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, and transit improvements to improve or maintain the aesthetic values of the surrounding environment and to minimize environmental impacts and avoid encroachment on historic and culturally - significant assets • Promote the inclusion of minority and disadvantaged populations in the planning process Planning Factors Addressed: • Increase the safety of the transportation motorized and non -motorized users • Increase the security of the transportation motorized and non -motorized users • Enhance travel and tourism INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE System for system for�— Planning Factors Addressed: • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned growth and economic development patterns • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes for people and freight a � E 4' Photo Credit: The Daily Progress �j _ r Photo Credit: State College Penr r -R !-.+'4•=°s' c - , i3 --- -. "^ MGr;.^+.eY,Y/.'s_-. �-n.r+'r_"�+:v�+-is!�.-_' --atr•-'.-...s-.., •'1E ;�'+�r-.'-��-.rr3�a .-<s�':. --. 46 t Wbl t" - S -» ^c - .J v �a - - -._ - _ - e.. - _ - ' i• a�,,.�' ,�,' - -- < c_4 y"" �"�c�J.^"`.� is Nit •r _ -.. '- ' - i W_ ". ., - - '. •. - " Yam . .+.' - , a. N. y e -- _ _ _ 1 vt -aL - ` DEMOGRAPHIC AND .AND "cc, TRENPe- DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS Rural counties throughout the Commonwealth and the Thomas Jefferson region are working either to seek new economic growth and diversification or to balance growth while striving to preserve the rural character of the landscape. Most of the land in these counties is in agricultural or forested use, with more intensive land use in the towns and village centers. There is a broad spectrum of the amount of growth and land use changes occurring through the Commonwealth and the Thomas Jefferson region, based particularly on proximity to urban areas. Many of the rural counties are trying to direct any new growth towards existing towns, village centers, or service districts in order to provide services and to continue to address the needs of residents as well as maintain a general agricultural setting. As the population fluctuates, either through in- or out -migration or shifting within the region, the needs of the communities- including education, health care, social services, employment, and transportation- shift and fluctuate as well. Land use and development changes that particularly affect transportation in rural areas include, but are not limited to, school consolidation, loss or gain of a major employer, movement of younger sectors of the population to more urban areas, retirement community development, and growth of bedroom -community developments. 9 12040 RLRP Disadvantaged population groups were studied in order to determine if there are any gaps or deficiencies in the transportation network that could affect these groups. Disadvantaged groups studied include low-income, minority, elderly, and people with disabilities, as defined by the US Census. In 2016, only the City of Charlottesville had a minority population nearing that of the state (31%). In 2016, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson Counties and the City of Charlottesville had low-income populations equal to or above the state percentage of 11%. The portion of the population with disabilities in Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson Counties are above the state average of 11%. All of the jurisdictions, except for Charlottesville and Greene County, have elderly populations higher than the state percentage of 14%. POPULATION TRENDS Regional population increased by 6.5% between 2010 and 2016. The rate of growth was not distributed evenly throughout the region. Nelson County was the only jurisdiction to have a declining population at a rate of -1.2%. Fluvanna and Louisa Counties had the lowest positive growth rates of 1.7% and 3.5% respectively. The Counties of Albemarle, 6.8%; and Greene, 7.5%; and the City of Charlottesville, 13.0%; had the highest growth rates. The TJPDC had a growth rate of 6.5%. However, by absolute numbers, Albemarle and Greene Counties increased the most, 6,705 and 1,382 persons each. Population projections through 2040 for the region exhibit these trends as well, including a rebounding population in Nelson County. The populations in Nelson County and the City of Charlottesville are projected to grow the least; populations in Albemarle, Greene, and Louisa Counties are expected to increase by more than 30%, and Fluvanna County will grow at nearly the same rate. Improvements to the transportation network are needed because mobility and safety are affected by increases in population. In the case of the Thomas Jefferson region, increasing pressure on the network has already resulted in changes to the transportation network, such as additional capacity demands on the roadways and additional demand for public transportation and travel demand management services. The region has experienced growth in through -traffic along US 29 and 1-64. Development pressures from urban growth have also reduced mobility. Finally, access from more rural areas of the region into Charlottesville for commercial and economic purposes has become affected by increased population and development. 350,000 300,000 250,000 0 200,000 Z c 150,000 a 100,000 50,000 0 T1PDC Population Growth 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 2040 RLRPI 10 cl I IVANNA COUNTY Sources: Weldon Cooper Center 2016 Population Estimates; 2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Estimates. Sources: Weldon Cooper Center 2016 Population Estimates; 2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Estimates. Note: Elderly populations are 65 years of age and over. Low-income and disability populations Note: Elderly populations are 65 years of age and over. Low-income and disability populations 11 12040 RLRP are those for whom the poverty level and disability status is determined. are those for whom the poverty level and disability status is determined. 2040 RLRP I 12 gELSOwN.�- M ue s,.d - WIYJ.i Y■ MUS1n0 OnC1Tr9nVar ati n c o 9 1 a am P9 "iase or Typical Regional Mor rehold Moms M CITY OF r14AQ1 nTT1;C3111 1 F r f� Sources: Weldon Cooper Center 2016 Population Estimates; 2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Estimates. Note: Elderly populations are 65 years of age and over. Low-income and disability populations 13 12040 RLRP are those for whom the poverty level and disability status is determined. HOUSING AND TRANSPORTATION AFFORDABILITY Housing and transportation -related costs are the major expenditures for a household. However, transportation -related costs are usually not considered in affordability analyses. The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index (The H+T Index) developed by the Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT) offers an expanded view of affordability, one that combines housing and lot transportation costs and sets the benchmark at no more than 45% of household income. H+T Index provides a more comprehensive way of thinking about the true affordability of place. The data is provided on various geographic scales from the 't regional down to the neighborhood level. Considering the extent of the TJPDC area, Census Tract data is selected as the most appropriate scale for analysis. According to the data, as of 2015, the housing and transportation expenditures combined accounts for 45-65% of the households' typical monthly income in the TJPDC region (without MPO area), which is higher than the affordability benchmark of 45%. As shown in the adjacent map, the census tracts with the highest H+T index are found in Albemarle County and Louisa County, followed by Greene and Fluvanna County. Nelson County's census tracts have the lowest H+T index in the region. 2040RLRP1 14 EMPLOYMENT LOCATIONS icentrated along the region's lude the US 15 corridor in 29 corridors in Greene County, 29 corridor in Nelson, and the E!marle (located in the MPO). Ilowing industries: I assistance, and retail trade in ade, educational services, ation and food services in aunty; Manufacturing, retail trade, and warehousing in Louisa educational services, and )od services in Nelson County; ces, public administration, and canna County. • The University of Virginia / Blue Ridge Hospital, County of Albemarle, and Sentara Healthcare in Albemarle County; • Greene County School Board, County of Greene, and Wal Mart in Greene County; • Walmart, Louisa County School Board, and Dominion Virginia Power in Louisa County; • Nelson County School Board, County of Nelson, and Wintergreen Resort in Nelson County; • Fluvanna County School Board, County of Fluvanna, and Fluvanna Correctional Center in Fluvanna County. COMMUTE PATTERNS Like many regional jobs centers, the urbanized area of Charlottesville and Albemarle draws a workforce from a large area. This includes people commuting from rural portions of the planning district and people commuting from places outside the region. Data on where people are working versus living was sourced from the 2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates and is highlighted in the table below. The City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County combined offer a total of approximately 81,000 jobs. Almost half of these job positions are occupied by workers residing outside of these jurisdictions. A total of over 40,000 workers commute to the Charlottesville -Albemarle area for work. Other jurisdictions in the TJPDC area (Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson County) combine to account for 32% of those workers employed who commute to the Charlottesville Albemarle area. The matrix shows the specific number of commuters between various jurisdictions in the TJPDC area. The data shows that for all the jurisdictions in the TJPDC area, the Charlottesville -Albemarle area is the top commute destination for work purposes. For the Charlottesville -Albemarle area, these jurisdictions are not ranked among the top out -commute destinations. Commute to Albemarle Charlottesville Commute from Albemarle Fluvanna Greene Louisa Nelson Other Charlottesville Fluvanna Greene Louisa Nelson Other® 15 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 16 TJPDC Area - MPO Area Future Land Use Growth Areas Land Cover a� 11 - Hydro - 21 - Impervious (extracted) 22 - Impervious (Local datasets) 31 - Barren 41 - Forest r= 42 - Tree 51 -Scrub/Shrub 61 - Harvested/Disturbed 71-TurfGrass 81 - Pasture 82 - Cropland 91 -Woody Wetlands 92 - Emergent Wetlands G{adstone 33 22 - ktanardsville Dyke Quin-}` .�. 4;kersvllle GROWTH AREAS AND LAND COVER While growth and development continue to spread along the major corridors and in rural areas, localities in the region have taken steps via their comprehensive plans and by the delineation of growth area boundaries to create more compact development patterns. Each county has adopted their own approaches to limiting growth. All counties except for Louisa and Nelson have adopted Urban Development Areas that are in line with state code. Albemarle has successfully used growth management tools to direct the vast majority of new development to its growth areas, which are within the MPO. Over the past decade Albemarle County has absorbed much of the region's growth, which has altered the county's land use patterns. Albemarle's land use patterns !_. have become more urban along the 29 t 221 Jrevilians Louisa Corridor and around the Village of '—'�,Miner3i Zion _.1 Crozet (MPO area). In the rural areas, IV Crossroads �� Bumpass 208' Cuckoo the land use pattern continues to Lake Monticello 33 be large lot single family homes, 53 Palmyra KentsSlore agriculture, silviculture, and rural n � szz 15 development. Fluvanna County is also 'Dixie, �,m Snring mostly rural or forested, but the county Bre tiff �C°I�'n'''la has designated Community Planning areas Brem°in order to concentrate growth in specific locations. Greene County is more rural and highly forested due to the location of Shenandoah National Park. However, additional growth has moved the County to designate growth areas around existing towns. Louisa County land use has been primarily rural and rural residential in the past but is rapidly changing due to its location between Richmond and Charlottesville. Finally, Nelson County is primarily rural with large tracts of forested land within the George Washington National Forest and Wintergreen Resort. TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS US Census data from 2010 decennial census and 2015 American Community Survey were reviewed at the block group level in order to provide enough detail to assess possible areas of service expansion for fixed -route and demand -responsive transit. Any segment of the population without a vehicle available, which can include elderly, people with disabilities, and low-income groups, are more dependent on responsive transit in a rural area than in urban areas. This is due to the smaller network of transit routes in rural areas when compared to urban areas. Through various regional planning documents such as the RLRP 2035 plan and the UnJAM 2035 plan, regional planners have sought to create a regionally cohesive transportation system that provides residents and businesses transportation choices and a safe efficient and well - maintained transportation system. These guiding principles are reflected in the recommendations included in this plan. Specific projects identified in the plan will have broad positive impacts on all segments of the region's population. Connecting neighborhoods will also improve access to services. Bicycle and pedestrian projects will also expand mobility options and provide opportunities for healthy lifestyles. 17 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 18 }i _ y -, '. r' -—.�— ->_�a ,�ii> ia°—:3..a+ �-a'..�_ '� _'3 a�� a'�.-:. •. ._� �. _ ate_. s_ -- _ z .:� s `. m a� _ < - ..-i..;.= - - a _ - _ - -- * t • �h ff %--��Y _ : + �,� f iy� g �''�® •1-�" i� - ' +_ ,�+ +.� '+his ,.� ar '� — a ,� ` ' m _ �i� �.�r� .. Tim - �" �v '� �a� �1.T''i,� Tir-+�*`��1°.�'i�-'�.. � "�i�`-'. . �-�a �'•r .ti -`�� �.i ..,� - _ -.1 as "�i.- ,¢ a � - �' - •��i'+'��t'--. _ T •3' rrt3 liF mI MJC1''I,y* Rr �91 .er i.., ..!' Zr96;-. lid !, ri , s.� _ . }fines.. r*fir 7 'ram`! �lz r ,�._ _°�i r._ e _ 1�'- �r . -S r- � ,�__.' ,r- �tJ� '� °tea r d 1 r ,i.r :� �i1i•r 'r7 _ � _ .. - • -iA. ��-t �E•rij -r r-P .- lF.��ti'�s� '�`i-'aL`- F �i�' �"n�• �, r -.,. .r.• �_1' '•r" ' f j� + t, - �'i'A �r # �a 's! 5 irs�i _ - _.-'�.•a�'"� a�.� r y'..'�' _. .!T '�' �� r" �t� Ps�r' �1, aa,r.a� r a '� �• er`>G.� aar �� • _. d f >< - .. .. _ . �a+''�• . - - -+ s jam. y_ -. a!—,,�:.. ate_ — .1�. +'� •r •i����-� Pia�E4i, i'i�r - 3' ii i" i :,, - 1'�e#�>i.: lar��'a9r.1S-I� ��1- �S!` '1 ;''' - 98'" $� •!� z'I� .esr .�, •� i'SF'i6i_i%+ •l•s 4�1•~' *�•�ai'i� . + _• ';� 1 i._:..' '<d l a,E_'Ai Zj�.Fi�-i•P 4'.i¢ - �_S�'�';d's.��'��'�� liR�14'Le• .L •. PqLO �¢.r. !�. a_ �,, . 4'e �P'r •1:. ;. si '�� �,,�Iy,.. �s a��.i 'P?,yra�!'-"�� �^' aF - a.: aiL �. -. r. ®r i- _ ...1,� .. �� $ a� ,i ,�' -'i'P _ _ x 1 ._ .= s 4 - -'��, 4' �, v. a _ _,F, a -: _ _ a �• - - _ �"�L aria a. r •?mac a -.s ° - ..'n3ral., ._ - arse is - �.T14. ,.- -P ,i - _ _ _ '� �F-a� �,.ar� ... _ f$_+�; r - raaa-aay� a� ,�..'•,i,. �i .�_i__i� a _ a �' .. r'�"T ��lrE r •tia!,a. • '� m.�F-FIB, ;idF rilAeT''.,� .}fir r a>�g'. �-i A s+i--rrijii . yj' z ' Via•'- r -- :� r a�;aFy. is+.A�•:i�->r' aim r ara, P rn:l;�.r r fl-- '�- -r a' Fr :.yEd�e` r'7"' -s' -�:� �'+�.�r`'5� ��de `�aL s.i'.'' • _. r:=•yam+--_fID.� -_°. r. �-r¢ yr 'I,s�..- s #T>''' s- -a. :r • e =r r s� �; �' 'a - is' �� .:ice rt.. .sue, f' rr...1�. 'iaf ' ��• !�i �, e� _ # ,,r,•-r• - 'is•� r.:r�i� .at' r.� rfi a• r, .r - r ^irLy'. 11Pi - :*vrm.=.�a'i'=��.� aria .�• .-. r .r`r�.s...a .r'rr•'e+'�^�115. .. f�. a<a � f� �v ��`iy��:y�_y�I �':,�apv�a�'�,��d'F�. ,��.. �s sa�..�s.,�a,F-iic" ease �� •�-i. �'r a-� ,:rc.� .y��-r���� rr-- ,r -_� _ � - �•w-�'�•_•�t.� -°-era �� - �.� -. - _3•�ar�' -�_ �i.s a.�• r • 'IIF� :c _ - ��-'._�¢ �. _ -- s = ®r�� -•^ u:-,.F:i-+ -. �.. --i � .�I. i-e+i:�s: �a�a}a'�� ,�..aau ate` Tom. � --. - _ _ {.. _� -�-Y f -��'' `.s ��.y�.yy�{ - .�,� �':- Til- lre il'i'� -�''°�i :.tY.2• S. a1--11•' j" °2'id�^,•�• -2 °�: s .. R>- 4_ TE' i ri'iiS_ j -i'. �� '' it- r� - •' $ - a .i s"-.+d-^ss• .*r - <s •=.as, sr• �: 1.�..'!� ..� ��,�� s � a ss�• �:•t `S �' i. _ try• >- �. ��i�t i. _ �lr' �F' � '�.�.' � srTy.' �r .r' r S - �1. -•+d *f• + _,a i ' s r.. it-' - '�'•. � 7�, 1F�- i�'� •' - '4'• �• ., - a.. �, _. 'e . _ s•�a •gip.: a`: �: ":.ve��pw �.�^ ,�� ar• _ - eri� - .i r r „'- ��'eiF• _ 3_ aT+ -,• . • __ �F�F >_ '_ " • 3 i ' r y{�4 :ai.'- i m. -, d`;.p -- Q- _ ,� fir'' .c �•, - �R'' v ° - .. �F _ �• ,e C . - .. a �•L.E i _-:•'fi A �Ji -1�'i� - IE,.i�a Ir•V.'a� ia' ., Y'� �• - n °-.` _ L r =; 'a®"J�' -::43' i_ ���3. -' • - 1 � _ -•t _ a. 3 J -.�-� J i F L 3l:f �� �_.� 3 i � i _j v"T�� . f 3. ��-R f �+:#` �� � ��y -• 1 .�} 4� i. SI_.����� C v. 3 � _ •= i :i - � T� i "� . 1 � - .� r!-=� d"T'�_- i _ i"i� :-� i� Y����� �� �,.i .. , M1 � -��i r.• i .� y� r Y°' - r'r�1Wi _ - ' r �• . •_ .. : S '� �'}'.��.,�� _�r + P . _ �'i �. _F-i _ i. + _ ®. ...�, >�. .r a= = 3 `. _�,' �._'a '!_ -. s: �,�i+�'�•'.��'l,S y �� .i1d,��• E F•i' 1'iaY�.s: .o ••�� - e� = pg '�" ••...�r,�'aia ti' '.�} T #-. •Y_i �= �., _:•y. ,_ : a� 3 ae-. -, 3t+ Z a•i' a �� __�: ,: - �` _-a: s �'�. P��• _ mod. �:...• .�� _- ->e_ m- .� �- ,i�-3.fi�,1 .+•'" ,_. . ..� au ail. ®. "!' JE7 W � �tii�. �s._�� 'r. �� r a1 r' � r -: ,� :�Li iP•�• � ! . � _ _ _ f.- i' ,k� !!'Rim •.�1. !T!i r�.3 �' �L „�- 1 F '�iyC� R - � � _. r' '��lyy- F F� _ .�-- � ! '.� e' '! 1� .P'�. r a .a_ d� __ _r. � �. ::`•11. _. - �_a _ s �' •- � rL16 - r�-i• r l!° 1. � •aiE_ � 1' _ .�3 �.>i�� '�a�..�a r i-�_�.._� ' �� „ • d '� :i_,i i'• i'� :!� � _`il.. ��. :�Y .� -_ ��-: .�.-.. f,�-`s �• - � x _ - � � fir. s1i1�•�ir� ! il�.'�••_3'�... - <, �� '�, �'. �'rE.��.'�� 'P �f�K"'Z 'i! _ -�' .iv .i. •!a. +a i!'��5 of 'r G _ - aaaaa! >_9#. �: s.:F _ - A• f .N •� T �a1 ...-. �� �r . i -_ F��-i1�>•k�= �• "ate'' -ice ,! '� i,S. _. r' L .-.. ^_! �r �..� �' _.'t� iR - _ ._ _ .� '�d!ti� �a �• �' g - . :��. .'- ae ,. r ' -._ c F - .� •y • -' ° _ �r .`-- i, aaa€ =. •.�• i - a s "1 - aL f I • �' : _ r s ,d 'L.. , - 'v_ u � �r,�r '•- _ _ -..., 5. sue, � � - -� .•� ._ � 'f}'�^ R!aTv IC. w^:ate �5.�'-a� . , �"�a:'P a` ° _ � �jius- - r •�'R. _ �. _ - -.. � �. � a. _ ° _ a .��''' '+� T a is .r. i r �. �'^vx .� p t '•'� IC _ ar �... �. a ._ P ..- -e- a+�.4 .. - - _ 'arl' .'•rF '�.s. `�-^fy _- rite t• - -. � a•-- F�� - aar� •�' - , .+'r �`- i a Ei� _ + F.,�n, .�. � - - �. r- _. q, - � ._ ,• es'rY %P-I 9 ir'•i: J":al` .,r'�4 _�!! aP s ilr y� - ram. _ �1 •L... -. _. � 3•, .. - �- i R air 'A.� _ - _. a••. � a 3.r. '' -- - - iF �' _ a:`� . i-�: �i at-!`TiAi� � �i - - _ 'l •lV: _J .F �i 4 E` :. : . L� � �. �_ _�•I �`gB - � � _P•�� �' ,•_�� _ .� �"�aT�a aL•aI ^ -T'� ryj.l F... ,. - _i'.:�..• •� P irk ,- - - �. yy � rir• f ...- � , _ r'*1e,�r �. _ -. T_ rp .. �r �.r.��. 1� 3 � .. - i��.�.i - .aver f 'Z yY �E y >_. - '. ®- '�'�i_ !.�' Tt� -- _ , -,� a�._ ��-�*, �`•�1 J• of S J�.1=. e' � _, i d - y, - �_� � ��y �,< I .i -- - 1' -' Sri i3r1,�--' d � - _ .�. .. a• J �J• r � F-•1� ySr'. _ 4 ' ��E_ r-.•'y = -. r.� �.-_. � i- '� -�.•• �'a r�•••a 3_ � �' �•_ � �yv 1 - - Yr1�= �a _fir' �. -`�F �:, d� tel: r-v:.._•, 3ft _ -i'r, .. _ -� ,-rr � �- �q -d a� - v v�� _.,e,i�=i. �.�. :l � i� � -�f- r "7il .r T�'.I e i i�a�.� '� ��y� aa�•3-�'d� w_ �'..2 yra�'._ � _-�. - � ��a�„ - fir' - <- �- 3• it ,� - _ -.! - _ - _ .i �* f �851 �. �#�Iff.-mil- ,2 �.,1 _ f '• - 'L - -.� .lr �'1 � _ • '`!.. � e3.1 +_ � '�. '•. '� 3 �L ir_ � _ 4 A . � ra _ 'e a° 'i - �' - _ • d� i+� .ate • - a e� T-� _' W �.TL . ..�' �� - Vf a;f- f , ® 4a•.�r r � 7 ��. �- - i �- ' •,. • ' " .- - +® '� - Q. .. _i I�t f 1,�. ari T!x•.'- �9 '•t-.�- ". �. i ,t.� _,yam P - _..��fl 'ice.. • -.: _� ,�:�li •! 4{' d 'a�v _ _ r - yS y °. d'� p F i. 'y J ' S ®I' .ate - z - "!� _ Fr e T Y-_ �. P lit _ r a: � � llp- da -- 1� v L. -"L yr 'ei ,'�- --,�ar�.i� '�ill�9 i� _. s r �-�_'r� .a•_ r_a... _ - Z r L �',`.� `'r �V -._•,r-� m - .r '.F man•, •�• _ -xarF� ,_ _ r r sfa�� a7�- • L� °r �r _. :a a� af.�l= ��. _ .. _�°!^..i�:_,Ca .•;_ - ��+�r r� �31. .ems .r�-� r ,� ..--� � :� � _ - , _ ..-� i � r' � - - - � �'i��`ia�v '_` fi r+,��...s.�e` !• _ - v � T � '�'.�s� -�-E' - _ 's --.•. -� -ter �^ _ �. ^� _ : 1,�. - Y.. � aa_It. �_- '�•-. . - .a �'. � •i - r #: _ ram* R - ' N'' -_• u' a a . �— , � ;arm '� -•�i'§!b _ ,�d . _ - __:-i a '. % -'9Y _:. . E �z -� 4 • %. . •_ _ s - �- '�aL - �`��_'!!ii�'�i- .. �la�l� E. .... • � e� �. - .. 3- - � ,� � i�• � -' ���T w4•�� �!i ar���' _ �I�•'-' r �.� r �5r6E - t� '. 9 � iu'I � - r. .� - � � �, r �- _ - _ .; - p ,. .. _ _. - . _.� '. �.-i� it ti. _ �P L. _ ram' }.mar -9:r .9r - '� d m ,• ANI_ . �.' i�- ,rE •�° 'y�+e ar=l „- -wr6,�: _.,t.• ,'�- .. _ r. >_.�� • ip- _ s - - - _ � - _ �� _ - asi+t.. _r - _ '� ���>�'�aF �r r _' - . + L _ r _ - .. m jr , rE z r i - -.. j ... �4 r r r . s..r`, as - :.. ,_ �,' r, �. 3 Wig.. _. -f[. - s _ •rE- - �: _ ��. ,�L vd _.. i �r �� sa+'r •s •i--r•.� - ra_F a _ <. _, •. �3 �P A _ ,r`. :> n _ r r r c� _ 9.� �'s ��. �+., r• .dam. L %: rrT�a, �. ,r.� � r r r.., m. a, m _ -P,,-m.4.� . �_ •'� _ .. .. j ri'a �1 _ ��� ri• i' �yl "r_li� . ._ .� - r -.. °d is r -. @..1� - ''.�' • r ]I _ - '�,s •� }W '�� �-�' _ ,: i''�-pr - �, � _ - _. - :_ v - -' ;�' . 'r. �, --� �.r�.F� m-s_r sr..r . '�r��� _ •� J - _.. _�+' y cam,. . ,�' .ems a aa�®a s�' `a+1r ,� 'r" �' +F !. >3�Ay. a� -� :a^"g•-1'.=' arE . � - _ •: _ .. - _ •s �._� 'i'° - _ ._.-m..F iu: - _ _ r REGIONAL ROAD FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTM 19 12040 RLRP Functional Classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification defines the role that I serving the flow of traffic through assigned to one of several possible archy according to the character of does not include private roadways. segments in the region are grouped or categories: Principal Arterial, al, Collector, and Local. Principal include interstate, other freeways �ssways, and other principal arterial . Collectors include major and (lector roads. The Local roadways rally composed of two-lane, low - roadway segments are not part ional Classification analysis of the )f roadways in the region are either State 64, there are other principal arterials such as US 29 and US 33, minor arterials Route 20 and Route •... Interstate 59.91 Roadways 1.7% Other Principal Arterials 99.37 2.8% Minor Arterials 243.71 6.8% Major Collector 371.97 10.5% Minor Collector 171.67 4.8% Local 1,497.96 42.1% Not Classified 1,114.76 31.3% 151, major collector US 250, and minor collectors form the main skeleton of the roadway system in the region (see table on page 19 for "Total Length and Percentages of All Roadways" statistics). TJ PDC Area MPO Area Average Annual Daily Traffic (2014) < 400 400-1,000 1,000-2,500 2,500-6,000 6,000-8,500 8,500-18,500 28, 500-34, 000 > 34,000 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is an estimate of the average daily traffic along a defined segment of a roadway. As shown on the adjacent map, there are several areas with high volumes of traffic concentration in the non-MPO portion of the TJPDC region. These areas include (in decreasing order of traffic volume carried): • Segments of Interstate 64 and US 250 from Crozet to Afton Mountain, and 1-64 segments from the MPO limits to Zion Crossroads in Louisa County; • Segments along the US 29 corridor in Ruckersville in Greene County; Nelson County. Segments of US 29 from the MPO limits to Covesville and Lovingston in Nelson ass County; • Segments of Route 208 from Louisa to Mineral in Louisa County; • Segments of Route 151 from Afton Mountain to Nellysford in 2040 RLRPI 20 traffic volume on 135. Some of the (increase by over m Lovingston to ;ton in Nelson ;ments from Zion Dixie in Fluvanna d Route 53 from area boundary ,ra in Fluvanna ease by 5,000 to the MPO area the south to Nelson County o 5,000); and the town of p to Nellysford in Nelson County (increase by 1,000 to 2,000). VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO compares traffic m a low of 0 to e (LOS). The LOS /ere congestion). ) indicates traffic i is characterized and stop -and -go great majority in the area challenge their tarrying capacity. segments in s, however, are r capacity. These cents include US in Ruckersville inty; Route 208 ouisa in Louisa 64 segments in in Albemarle sty. 21 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 22 ill be an overall vays in the area's where roadway . Such roadway ake Monticello in )8 from Louisa to runty (increase by of the MPO area i County, Route Cunningham to Fluvanna County, 33 from Quinque Ile in Greene ')e by 0.15 to 0.2) on Crossroads in Dixie in Fluvanna )m the western MPO to Afton �marle County (increase by 0.1 to 0.15) As shown on the ad vehicles are 1-64, a Statewide Significar traffic volume of tf' corridors, such as I increases the total roadway segments in Fluvanna County Nellysford in Nelsoi Gum Spring in Loui! traffic in their dai can be used as a corridors are pro\, regions industries. I movement is disci 29. HEAVY VEHICLES TRAFFIC 23 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 24 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Jurisdiction Pavement Distance in Miles Condition Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Bridge Number of Bridges and Culverts of 20'+ Jurisdiction Sufficiency Fair Good Poor Bridge Sufficiency Ratings consider structural adequacy, whether the bridge is 1 M1.functionally obsolete, and level of service provided to the public. TJPDC Area MPO Area Concentration of crashes W Low Relatively Low Moderate High Relatively High Extremely High 110 w 56 29 yk Es 151 chuyler vingston e e Shipma# i �I Arrington all Dyke Crash Type Fatal (K) Value $5,400,000 Weight 540 Number] 812 Serious (A) $300,000 30 2,052 Moderate Injury (B) $100,000 10 477 Minor Injury (C) $50,000 5 122 Property Damage Only (0) $10,000 1 6,730 CONCENTRATION OF CRASHES r that results in ites with similar Acant backups, and can have an economic impact on people and communities. le VDOT's crash location data from 2011 to 2016 enables k sville us to pinpoint several crash hotspots. The data classifies crashes into five categories according to their -, severity that range from least severe 31 (property damage only) to the 22 vilians most severe (fatal injury). The inerI crash locations are mapped "r-s,,. - 08 koo npas=. by attributing each crash l0 33 type a different weight o Kentsr tore according to its severity, 0ioch 522 53 Imyra referring to the 'KABCO' scale ttsv 15 established by VDOT. We Spring Columbia dA remo Bluff The heat map, created using VDOT crash data from 2011 to 2016, illustrates areas with higher levels of concentration of severe crashes — crash hot spots. These areas include Zion Crossroads in Louisa County, Ruckersville in Greene County, US 29 between the MPO southern limits and Covesville in Albemarle County, Lovingston in Nelson County, and 1-64 and US 250 in Rockfish Gap. Greene County • US 29 segments south of Ruckersville (PSI 100 and 115) • Intersection on US 29 south of Ruckersville (PSI 82) POTENTIAL FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS tential for Safety uses the most s a result, VDOT iy segments and igs have higher prioritized for inty is a part of District, and the es are apart of Ipeper District. s with high PSI as follows: t near s on Route 6 60 and 72) SI 139) 25) Farms (PSI 136) Louisa County • US 33 segments between Louisa and Cuckoo (PSI 152) • US 33 segments in the east of Louisa (PSI 141) • Route 623 segments in the north of Mineral (PSI 138) 27 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 28 FREIGHTAND INTER -REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Situated at a major transportation crossroads, the region is well served by freight and inter -regional transportation connections. These connections include interstate 64 and, within close proximity, Interstate 81, US 250 (a corridor of statewide significance) and rail linkages on severa class I railroads (CS) and Norfork Southern providing access to maio ports and west into thf heartland of America These freight connection: are critical to the region's and are the region's most L transporting goods from region. Maintaining and in transportation links are cr region's economic develo long-term economic stabi region should continue collaboratively to identify key rural freight corridors 1-64, and US 15. Designati as such could bring revenL and construction of roadwa There is one commerciz general aviation facilities Ic Jefferson region. The Charlottesville -Albemarle 29 12040 RLRP Airport is located in northern Albemarle County and provides both commercial and general aviation services. Louisa County Industrial Airpark is located between the towns of Louisa and Mineral. Lake Anna Airport is also located in Louisa County just west of Bumpass. I One Amtrak station, in the City of Charlottesville, serves three routes: The Crescent, which runs from New York to New Orleans daily, and the Cardinal/Hoosier State, which operates between New York and Chicago three days per week. The existing Northeast Regional was extended to Lynchburg in October 2009 with potential final destinations as far 25 north as Boston. There is a stop in Charlottesville. Additional inter -city transportation is also available via Greyhound Bus Monte Ilo Lines, which works in conjunction 56 with Amtrak in the Charlottesville - Albemarle MPO area. Greyhound also provides transportation to major cities within and outside the region, but this transportation is utilized more for recreational travel than standard commuting patterns. GOODS MOVEMENT Freight generators with the Thomas Jefferson region were identified and their proximity to nearby major roadway and rail corridors noted. Approximately 16 interstate carriers serve the Charlottesville urbanized area and broader Planning District via truck freight, four of which have Albemarle County terminals: UPS, Fed Ex, Swift, and Roadway Express. Four roadways tanardsville Dyke Quin e uck svill White Hall 3 m 53 Lake Monti esville 20 AnAh Esmont r 6 ottsville C uyler ® Amtrak Station Freight Related Industries T Buckingham Branch �— CSx —� Norfolk Southern Amtrak Service Q TJPDC Area MPO Area ians Spring, provide primary access to the major commercial areas and business centers at the center of the Planning District - Interstate 64, US 29, US 250 and US 15. Major employers were also identified and mapped by the TJPDC in order to assess additional trip generator locations as part of the traffic analysis. 2040 RLRPI 30 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Public transportation includes public transit, both fixed -route and demand -responsive, volunteer transportation, and private providers. Charlottesville Area Transit Service operates a public fixed -route transit system in the TJPDC, but all routes are within the MPO. The University of Virginia Transit Service (UTS) operates fixed -route and charter services for UVA students, employees, and campus visitors. All routes are also within the MPO. 3 JAUNT operates demand -responsive and fixed -route service throughout the PDC, except in Greene County. Fixed - route service primarily connects outlying communities to the urban/ metropolitan area. Demand - responsive service is available seven days a week; days and hours ergreen II sford vesville Montebello 20 of service vary by 56 151 28 Esmont locality. From July 0 chuyler 2016 to June 2017, ovingstq JAUNT provided more stun e een than 355,000 trips. ington Demand -responsive services in Greene County are provided by Greene 80 dstone County Transit. Greene County Transit operates Monday through Friday with shorter hours on Saturday. 31 12040 RLRP JAUNT completed a Transit Development Plan (TDP) in June 2011. JAUNT, CAT, and Greene County Transit are currently updating their TDP's, any recommendations from those plans can be incorporated at a later date. Transit needs identified in the plan include expanded commuter routes; expanded service hours and weekend service; additional services TJPDC Area that cross jurisdictional _ MPO Area Greene County Transit boundaries; reduced ride GCT times; expanded service to uck svitle GCT JAUNT medical facilities; expanded JAUNT same day transportation options; non -Medicaid funded medical trips; 231 options for recreational T 22 revilians Louisa metrips; and improved Zi coordination with rossroads 208 Cuckoo Bumpass Greene County Lake to 33 MonticLmyra Transit. Greene 53 KentsStore;County Transit, for County, US 29 and US 33 corridors. their future needs, has made a commitment to maintain service levels that match population growth in Greene especially along the TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT RideShare is an active participant of the Commuter Information Team Travel Demand Management (TDM) holds the potential for TJPDCArea (CIT) which includes RideShare, enhancing many elements of the transportation network MPO Area Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT), and, with other improvements, has been shown to p Park and Ride Lots (Yearly Average) JAUNT, University Transit Service (UTS), greatly aid in reducing single -occupant vehicle 0 0-9 O 10-19 and Greene County Transit. In 2009 trips. TDM measures include carpooling and 33 230; tanardsville O 20-29 the RideShare program expanded vanpooling programs, expanded peak hour Dyke Quin e to include the Central Shenandoah ® public transit, commuter buses, park and uckersville 30-39 Planning District (CSPDC) and the ride lots, as well as better coordination • 40+ Harrisonburg metro area. between modes to facilitate intermodal White Hall transfers. While low population densities 231 There are presently in rural areas are not conducive to �• 22 Trevilians 31 official and � Louisa major shifts towards mass transit, 250 ineral unofficial park and some gains can be realized. There sroads 208 uckoo Bumpass ride lots throughout are concentrated Lake Montic Ilo •I the RideShare service areas to which 4 Wintergreen II sford ovesville 20 � 33 Kents Store area with 10 of those Montebello 151 29 commuters Es t n 53 almyra � 522 lots in Albemarle ottsvilAntioch in the TJPDC 56 6 le Schuyler 15 County. Within are Currently ovingston Dixie � m Spring „Columbia Albemarle County, nine traveling for Shipman e tver C een Bremo Bluff are in the urban area employment, primarily Arrington and three are spread out Charlottesville and, to in the rest of the County. One is in the City of Charlottesville. a lesser extent, Lynchburg, Both Fluvanna and Greene County have one lot each. There are Richmond, and Waynesboro. 60 three lots in Louisa County and four in Nelson County. The park iadstone and ride lots offer varying degrees of formality and amenities. TJPDC coordinates the RideShare program, whose services Several of the lots are owned and operated by VDOT and include car and vanpool matching, referrals to transit providers, include lighting and trash cans. Other parking lots are informal inventory, marketing and developing park and ride lots, and are gravel strips along VDOT right-of-way at major operating the Guaranteed Ride Home Program, and promoting intersections. Most of the park and ride lots exist at private bicycle and pedestrian transportation. Total active RideShare facilities through agreements with the property owners. The registrants as of December 2017 was 552. 2040 RLRPI 32 Waynesboro official VDOT park and ride lot, located in the CSPDC, is the busiest lot, with the majority of users commuting to work in the City of Charlottesville. The other two busiest lots are also official VDOT lots at Zion Crossroads and Gum Springs in Louisa County. The average number of all park and ride lot users was 317 in 2017. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are well used in the urban areas. Roads without facilities are also used by necessity. The region is traversed by US Bike Route 76, an east to west cross- country bike route, and the Appalachian Trail. The Jefferson Area Bike and Pedestrian Plan outlines potential corridors that can be developed by each locality over time (TJPDC, 2004). Currently TJPDC staff are developing an update to the Jefferson Area Bike and Pedestrian Plan. The update will be integrated into the region's 2040 Rural Long Range Plan and the MPO's 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The Planning District completed a region -wide study of the Bike Route 76. Adopted in 2012, the study provides detailed recommendations for improving safety and bikeability of this on -road transAmerican bike route. The majority of bicycle route development and planning has been concentrated within the MPO, City of Charlottesville, and Albemarle County. The City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County adopted bicycle plans in 1991 and updated these in 2004 known as the Jefferson Area Bike and Pedestrian Plan. The city has further adopted a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan in 2015. Other than US Bike Route 76, Fluvanna County maintains minimal bicycle facilities. Biking in Fluvanna County is generally for recreational purposes or short trips. Palmyra and Columbia each have a few narrow walkways, while Fork Union has sidewalks along US 15 and VA 6. Fluvanna County has, however, expanded its trail system at Pleasant Grove near Palmyra. The Fluvanna Heritage Trail and Village Park are designed to provide pedestrian access for tourists and local citizens to the Rivanna River, by linking the village of Palmyra to Pleasant Grove, a county -owned tract of land. Greene County roads offer potential routes for bicyclists. On some roads there is very little automobile and/or truck traffic; however, most roads do not currently have paved shoulders or bike lanes. Pedestrian activity in Greene County is generally limited to Standardsville and Ruckersville. The Appalachian Trail passes through the western mountains of the County. The secondary and back roads of Louisa County host numerous bicycle routes, including 25 miles of US Bike Route 76. Louisa County has a painted, on -road bicycle lane on a section of VA 618 near the Town of Mineral. The majority of pedestrian activity and facilities are in the Towns of Louisa and Mineral. The Blue Ridge Parkway is a key bike route along the western edge of Nelson County and is part of US Bike Route 76. Other major tourist bikeways in Nelson County include the Delfosse Trail, the Rockfish Valley Loop Trails, and the Blue Ridge Railway Trail, which is an ongoing rails to trails project. There are a number of hiking opportunities in the area including trails at Fortunes Cove Preserve, Wintergreen Resort, Crabtree Falls, Nelson County Wilderness Area, and the Appalachian Trail. 33 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 34 ALBEMARLE COUNTY I TOWN OF SCOTTSVILLE y ,,Seo Y � ille � LJ1 f E oa � aEl 0 El � ��o� a � a Scottsville Boundary Sidewalks O Buildings Interstates or Limited Access HWY US Highways Highway Ramps State Routes �— Rail Line — Parks \ / Rivers/Streams FLUVANNA COUNTY I LAKE MONTICELLO Lake Monticello Boundary Sidewalks Buildings Interstates or Limited Access HWY US Highways Highway Ramps State Routes Lake Monticello Rivers/Streams 35 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 36 FLUVANNA COUNTY I PALMYRA ❑o HWY GREENE COUNTY I TOWN OF STANARDSVILLE u ❑ v 230 o f r a b ° $ 00 ❑ o ❑a � 0 D 00 UD 0 0 L� 0/ 4 Standardsville Boundary �• Sidewalks Buildings Interstates or Limited Access HWY US Highways Highway Ramps State Routes Streams/Rivers 37 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 38 LOUISA COUNTY I TOWN OF MINERAL •� Q p Off" o 4 •� °� 22Vb A a k Q 22 ,ny O p o p •' b 4 $ •a n ��. � • O e e� SS 0 . 4 0 22 n D tit] d �o {] � � � o. o ° a• 9 y � n VJ o 9 0 © 0 rf r9 o 0 • g 0 _ L P CJ AR a s e Mineral Boundary Sidewalks o ° = ❑ b ➢. ° ❑ Buildings ° a a Interstates or Limited Access HWY Q o ; a ❑ II -° n° ' In US Highways e 0 o an P� d ❑e ° ❑ a Highway Ramps d 0 ❑° �$ © P ° oo q Mo State Routes `a ° ❑ ° �❑ 0 _ e ® a o o ° .a O ❑ -b Rail Line 39 12040 RLRP w n� LOUISA COUNTY I TOWN OF LOUISA 4 a a► d � a ® Louisa Boundary a q aR Sidewalks Interstates or Limited Access HWY US Highways Highway Ramps State Routes ° Rail Line 2040 RLRPI 40 LOUISA COUNTY I ZION CROSSROADS Sidewalks Buildings Interstates or Limited Access HWY US Highways Highway Ramps State Routes NELSON COUNTY I LOVINGSTON � g � 0o 0 0. 4 ❑ Ll 11.0 n o n a `3 Q V 29 ,,RQ p � o L� � El ED e p �oo a R �D � fl b Lovingston Boundary Ej Sidewalks >� a © Buildings p ©Q 00 Interstates or Limited Access HWY US Highways El QJ Highway Ramps QState Routes 41 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 42 Man -if '� ° e� - rse ,ir _'� g' - *.: 4 . �°'r• --■irz. a�-,rir _ +qL-.,,r A r e - , - - - - u�"e ■uuu .:ram +s ,� +' -�' • a f r a i. _ - it .. _ ...•Y '°'•rt ^d•.e>f , a �y' �,: =.s- _-;- - �P'rfy. �' �u `�r , i !r.- e •r s _ .- AW a 196-, ...° • • - .i.,� .ice a _ �• ,- . _: .�-'i i . _ !}_ ' �' ! 5 . ,tu t .,A.� ' �, v. ,tea. -= . a. •' ,, urn . :'� _i __ ' -_ • 'T is. a r _ . r .- - .1 P-"WPML- 0 r 1 r_. _ � . �® � w & ui _° • _ IEL- _ - s-1 s , f. Mwimw _ ",-jffi r-��.�e��.- � - �.• _�"ems t.u. r u!°a a _ B" ' .0 r, F - T • �' �""� h��y°® i'` `-°t■, 7 I� 'tea 40E-M ` -N. 9 ta u Ppw e .: ■ fir, e T er u-.�, �•.� „�' .- - ur - - - , i° - - - -. _ - s ie, �,' ,E '�� - �- - ,::�-•■,. _ _ NOW. A IL 7 -W law - " euuuu�u�..,�„ ,� � 3 � i, , . . ,_ i.� ram a �' - _ . • � � �, a# � - , v ." _, ...,. ¢ _ - t... 'vim' - T• o ..m r6 a' � � �'� u• � .. IFS. `";NE am y -. is st•! - -,_ ■i �-$ ar J -MEL-@ -_ = r■ e!-°� ..-i.�" � � a.= a � � u— s. -' _•e.�1e- r � � _ �' ,'�i�da#. � #•i��•.e�3 ■,'6�, s: `i■ � _ " JM AR A 4 ' �- �1 r ru�-� F - �° a ri"° �- - ,_ .� _;�• - - ° rr - .ae� 1�+,�a. 11 r eei -ar-.' - •'s���- si ,r_� �n'r s, = e• �iu■-.r"r o: - i ` ! .. •- - - .lc - • . .uuu'. f °: •a uk • },' ,u, u� •sue ' �' iw9 - -'4 ° �■ •'�°u �1 ;">a. - - fir' �. !- ,- - - _ - _ _ m P, - - - .� ,�■, ear :. - �-rir.;a•,-,�..�� ., ..�"� _ , .. i.., .a�i� �:.�_ pia' r - ■ _ IIIU -` ' . i,_F 7 I� .. ° ,. �■!-■°sr" ice': - .�� - - - r , +emu Jry ur$� :��_ 3 r-,.c m - a a* P go-. = �' ` -. _ _ � E r - _ - " „3 .a- .moo . -. ■ 4w up fur f am ■. s - , ti `KMk _r IF -fi -tea a r - r ,` . • • s" Ad �. 4_ z a AM r e ' °- , z - i• ` ,' IIII - _ c "b■ - i�'� i- ■ a". - u!� �'� ..,�- •,y y � r. � a � .� .-:: � � � - � . �". �� '�i�;air �.lN io 7 E e••� I -. R �r i - 'i - -■t, -1- ' , , !' fir. = 'II _. d6 IF «� - = - PERFORMANCE ANC Rcorn%r.4MENPA-r1^m4;`- DEFICIENCY EVALUATION The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Transportation Reauthorization bill (P.L.112-141), which took effect in 2012 places greater emphasis on performance -based planning and measures as well as performance -based funding approaches. The bill established national performance goals in seven categories; safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays. To measure progress towards meeting these goals the bill sets out a set of transportation performance measures. MPO's, DOT's and other stakeholders have been working to implement the measures into their planning systems. For the rural areas in Virginia, implementation is on the statewide level with rural plans supporting the statewide goals. Projects included in the RLRP have been reviewed with this in mind. On the state level, the Smart Scale process has transformed how funding is allocated to transportation projects. Projects must compete for funding based on expected quantifiable outcomes tied to a common set of performance measures. This is further reflected in VTRANS 2040, which is the State's transportation plan. As a result of these policy changes the 2040 RLRP integrated performance -based planning at its core. This included ensuring that the plan's goals and objectives were aligned with Map-21 and that projects were evaluated to determine their potential performance under the Smart Scale scoring systems. Projects identified in this chapter were screened using a performance measure -based project ranking and prioritization tool. By utilizing this approach all projects have been shown to provide transportation benefits falling into the following categories: • Safety • Geometry structure • Bridge sufficiency • Capacity The 2040 Rural Long -Range Transportation Plan is designed to identify projects that have the potential to do well and get funded by Smart Scale. To that end, all projects presented in the plan recommendations were evaluated against Smart Scale scoring proxies. A detailed discussion of the Smart Scale process is included in this section. For additional information about Smart Scale please visit www.smartscale.org To assist in scoring projects TJPDC staff used a spreadsheet scoring template developed by the VDOT Lynchburg office. The spreadsheet tool allowed projects to be evaluated and ranked based on similar categories and weights to Smart Scale and VTRANS. Goals and weights used in evaluating projects included in the plan are highlighted in the table at the top of page 44. • Goal 1: Provide a transportation system that facilitates the efficient movement of people and goods ..� .� ..CATEGORY 15% Goal 2: Provide a safe and secure transportation system 25% Goal 3: Retain and increase business and employment opportunities 25% Goal 4: Improve quality of life and protect the environment 10% Goal 5: Preserve the existing transportation system and promote efficient system management 25% Additional points for multimodal transportation 0% The planning process involved TJPDC staff working with local jurisdictions and the MPO-Technical committee to review project lists in the 2035 Rural Long -Range Transportation plan. These reviews took into account new studies and statewide priorities including STARS, the Route 76 Bike Route study, VTRANS 2040 and local comprehensive plans. To further inform this exercise, Planning District staff conducted a region- wide deficiency analyses using all available data on roadway performance, safety, access to employment, state of good repair and impacts on the natural and human environment. Once the analyses were completed and project areas were identified, the project areas were then fed into the spreadsheet -based scoring tool. This allowed projects to be evaluated and prioritized on a county basis. The projects presented on the following pages are the result of this process. M-.Ahk.- = 43 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 44 Recommendations in the plan are categorized as follows: 1. Safety Recommendations were developed for both intersections and segments throught the region. The recommendations are identified by jurisdiction in blue. 2. Geometry and Structure a. Geometric Conditions Roadways and intersections with geometric deficiencies such as substandard lane width, shoulder width, or horizontal and vertical curvature, were identified from the VDOT Statewide Planning System (SPS) database. Higher priorities were given to those roadways with potential geometric concerns that also carried higher levels of traffic. Recommendations to address these needs are identified by juridiction in green. b. Bridge Condition Current bridge sufficiency ratings were reviewed and those structures with a rating of less than 50 were considered deficient and in need of structual upgrades or replacement. These appear in a separate table by juridiction. A functionally obsolete structure has an appraisal rating of three or worse for the deck geometry, under clearance, approach roadway alignment, structural condition or waterway adequacy. This designation means that the structure was built to standards for these criteria that are less conservative than those used today. Please refer to page 26 for Bridge Sufficiencies. 3. Operation Operational deficiencies focus on problem areas not related to safety, geometry, or capacity. Operational needs address intersection and roadway characteristics that cause localized issues or present challenges for multimodal users. Many of the operational recommendations fall into the long-term recommendations or focus on continued monitoring of potential problem areas. 4. Capacity Analyses were conducted for intersections identified by the TJPDC and local governments as priority study locations. Forecasted deficiencies are applicable only to anticipated mobility performance measures, since it is not possible to forecast safety issues or geometric and structural deficiencies. VTRANS VTRANS is the long-range, statewide multi -modal policy plan that lays out overarching Vision and Goals for transportation in the Commonwealth. It identifies transportation Investment Priorities and provides direction to transportation agencies on strategies and programs to be incorporated into their plans and programs. The VTRANS 2040 Multi -modal Transportation Plan has identified transportation needs throughout the Commonwealth. Many of the needs identified in VTRANS are reflected in this plan. These include projects on the regions Corridors of Statewide Significance, Regional Networks, Urban Development areas, and Statewide Safety Needs. VTRANS needs within the planning District are shown on the adjacent VTRANS Needs map. In addition to screening projects for VTRANS Needs, the VTRANS 2025 Needs assessment and Recommendations were referenced during project identification. Detailed recommendations for the Culpepper and Lynchburg Districts are included in the plan appendix. A list of relevant recommendations for the Culpepper District are below. Note: There were no Lynchburg District recommendations within the the TJPDC. -. TotaiScore Final ID Need Description -. Icons (out of 20) Tiering Within the Culpepper District, US 29 between Charlottesville and Culpepper has _ mode choice (mode choice needs now represented by expanded CA) and safety C.8 needs 16 II Within the Culpepper District, 1-64 and US 250 for east -west intercity travel from C.9 Charlottesville have redundancy and mode choice issues 23 II Within the Culpepper District, Fluvanna County UDA's have safety, network C.10 connectivity, and pedestrian/bicycle access issues 7 111 45 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 46 VTRANS NEEDS TJPC MPO Regi( - Urba Cord PSI (Safe - Segn Inter: 3SS 47 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 48 ROADWAY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES ea Deficiency and Safety ficiency 49 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 50 1 0 v i 110 01 :3 LA 11 u ROADWAY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES TJPDC Area - MPO Area Intersection Deficiency • Operation 0 Safety • Operation and Safety Segment Deficiency Operation Safety Geometric 51 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 52 ALBEMARLE COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS 1 ProjectRank VA 20/VA 726 ProjectRoute 307 Intersection VA 20/VA 726 VA 20 (Valley Street) VA 726 (James River Road) 2 Gordonsville Road -South 308 Segment VA 231 VA 22 (Louisa Road) Charlottesville -Albemarle MPO 3 Scottsville Road -North 303 Segment VA 20 VA 712 (Plank Road) Charlottesville -Albemarle MPO 4 VA 20/VA 712 304 Intersection VA 20/VA 712 VA 20 (Scottsville Road) VA 712 (Plank Road) 5 US 29/VA 692 310 Intersection US 29/VA 692 US 29 (Monacan Trail Road) VA 692 (Plank Road) 6 VA 6/VA 627 306 Intersection VA 6/VA 627 VA 6 (Irish Road) VA 627 (Porters Road) 7 VA 20/VA 6 309 Intersection VA 20/VA 6 VA 20 (Valley Street) VA 6 (Irish Road) 8 US 250/VA 691 311 Intersection US 250/VA 691 US 250 (Rockfish Gap Turnpike) VA 691 (Ortman Road) 9 VA 20/VA 720 302 Intersection VA 20/VA 720 VA 20 (Scottsville Road) VA 720 (Harris Creek Road) Plank Road 312 Segment VA 712 VA 813 (Starlight Road) VA 1012 (Garden Gate Road) 11 VA 810/VA 663 313 Intersection VA 810/VA 663 VA 810 (Dyke Road) VA 663 (Simmons Gap Road) Garth Road 314 Segment VA 614 VA 810 (White Hall Road) Charlottesville -Albemarle MPO VA 635/VA 637 315 Intersection VA 635/VA 637 VA 635 (Miller School Road) VA 637 (Dick Woods Road) Lanes 2 VTRANS NeedsRank 2, 3, 4 Description Monitor for safety improvements 2 2 2 Long -Term: Spot safety and geometric improvements, full -width lanes and pave shoulders for bikes 3 2 2 Long -Term: Spot safety and geometric improvements and pave shoulders for bikes 4 2 3,4 Mid -Term: Reconstruct westbound lanes; Long -Term: Realign or relocate intersection to improve geometry and sight distance 5 2 1, 2, 3, 4 Mid -Term: Lengthen left turn lanes 6 2 3,4 Long -Term: Realign or relocate intersection to improve geometry and sight distance 7 2 3,4 Long -Term: Improve alignment of intersection (Town of Scottsville) 8 2 1, 2, 3, 4 Long -Term: Reconstruct intersection to improve safety 9 2 2, 3, 4 Monitor for safety improvements 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 11 2 3,4 Monitor for safety improvements 2 Long -Term: Realign to improve geometry and sight distance 13 2 3,4 Long -Term: Reconstruct with alternative intersection treatments 53 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 54 ROADWAY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES TJPDC Area - MPO Area Intersection Deficiency • Operation O Safety • Operation and Safety Segment Deficiency � Operation Safety ® Geometric 55 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 56 FLUVANNA COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS ProjectRank ProjectRoute VA 53/ VA 1015 VA 53 (Thomas Jefferson 1 Intersection 6501 Intersection VA 53/VA 1015 Parkway) VA 1015 (Turkeysag Trail) US 15/VA 601 2 Intersection 6503 Intersection US 15/VA 601 VA 601 (Courthouse Road) US 15 (James Madison Highway) US 15/VA 631 US 15 (James Madison 3 Intersection 6504 Intersection US 15/VA 631 Highway) VA 631 (Troy Road) US 15/VA 673 US 15 (James Madison 4 In 6505 Intersection US 15/VA 673 Highway) VA 673 (Bethel Church Road) US 15 (James Madison US 15/US 6 Intersection 6506 Intersection US 15/VA 6 Highway) VA 6 (West River Road) James Madison Highway - North 6507 Segment US 15 VA 616 (Union Mills Road) VA 632 (Ridge Road) US 250/VA 1030 Intersection 6508 Intersection US 250/VA 1030 US 250 (Richmond Road) VA 1030 (Fieldstone Drive) James Madison Highway- 8 Zion 6509 Segment US 15 Louisa County Line VA 616 (Union Mills Road) James Madison Highway- 9 South 6510 Segment US 15 VA 673 (Bethel Church Road) VA 6 (East River Road) 10 Richmond Road -West 6511 Segment US 250 Albemarle County Line VA 600 (Paynes Mill Road) Thomas Jefferson 11 Parkway -West 6512 Segment VA 53 Albemarle County Line VA 636 (Nahor Manor Road) VA 53/Martin Kings VA 53 (Thomas Jefferson 12 Intersection 6513 Intersection VA 53/VA 618 Parkway) VA 618 (Martin Kings Road) VA 53/Lake Monticello VA 53 (Thomas Jefferson 13 Road Intersection 6514 Intersection VA 53/VA 618 Parkway) VA 618 (Lake Monticello Road) James Madison Highway 6515 Segment VA 6/US 15 VA 6 (West River Road) US 15 (James Madison Highway) James Madison Highway 15 Central Segment US 15 VA 632 (Ridge Road) VA 673 (Bethel Church Road) Lanes 2 VTRANS NeedsRank 2 Description Long -Term: Reconstruct a roundabout 2 2 2,3 Monitor for safety improvements 3 2 2 Monitor for safety improvements 4 2 Monitor for safety improvements 2 2,3 Long -Term: Reconstruct intersection as one -lane roundabout 6 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 2 1 Monitor for operational and safety improvements 8 2 3 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 9 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 10 2 1 Long -Term: Widen to four lanes within median 11 2 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 12 2 Short -Term: Maintenance and replace signage 13 2 2 Mid -Term: Add turn lanes and consider a roundabout; Long -Term: Reconstruct roadway to lower vertical curve 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 15 2 Monitor for safety improvements 57 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 58 FLUVANNA COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS 16 ProjectRank Thomas Jefferson Parkway -Central ProjectRoute 6517 Segment VA 53 VA 636 (Nahor Manor Road) VA 600 (South Boston Road) 17 Richmond Road -East 6518 Segment US 250 VA 600 (Paynes Mill Road) Louisa County Line Union Mills Road 6519 Segment VA 616 Albemarle County Line VA 600 (South Boston Road) 19 VA 600/VA 618 6520 Intersection VA 600/VA 618 VA 600 (South Boston Road) VA 618 (Lake Monticello Road) 20 VA 600/VA 616 6521 Intersection VA 600/VA 616 VA 600 (South Boston Road) VA 616 (Union Mills Road) 21 South Boston Road -North 6522 Segment VA 600 VA 618 (Lake Monticello Road) VA 616 (Union Mills Road) 22 South Boston Road- Central 6523 Segment VA 600 VA 53 (Thomas Jefferson Parkway) VA 618 (Lake Monticello Road) Thomas Jefferson Parkway -East 6524 Segment VA 53 VA 600 (South Boston Road) US 15 (James Madison Highway) Lake Monticello Road 6525 Segment VA 618 VA 53 (Thomas Jefferson Parkway) VA 600 (South Boston Road) West River Road 6526 Segment VA 6 Scottsville Town Line VA 675 (Old Drivers Hill Road) Rolling Road -South 6527 Segment VA 620 VA 6 (West River Road) VA 639 (Long Acre Road) 16 Lanes 2 VTRANS Needs 2 DescriptionRank Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 17 2 1 Long -Term: Widen to four lanes with median 2 Long -Term: Consider roundabout or signalization and addition of turn lanes 19 2 2,3 Mid -Term: Add turn lanes and consider a roundabout; Long -Term: Reconstruct roadway to lower vertical curve 20 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct with alternative intersection treatments 21 2 Long -Term: Widen to four lanes 2 Long -Term: Widen to four lanes 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) I22 4 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 25 2 3 Long -Term: Realign to improve geometry and sight distance 2I Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 59 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 60 0 ROADWAY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES TJPDC Area - MPO Area Intersection Deficiency Operation Safety • Operation and Safety Segment Deficiency � Operation - Safety � Geometric 61 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 62 GREENE COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS j. US 33/VA 680 �. 7901 Intersection •.Ill US 33/VA 680 US 33 (Spotswood Trail) VA 680 (Pinewood Court) 2 US 29/US 33 7902 Intersection US 29/33 US 29 (Seminole Trail) US 33 (Spotswood Trail) New Road, Northeast US 29/US 33 7903 Segment New US 29 (Seminole Trail) US 33 (Spotswood Trail) New Road West US 29/ VA 607 7904 Segment New US 29 (Seminole Trail) VA 607 (Cedar Grove Road) New Road, East US 29/ VA 607 7905 Segment New US 29 (Seminole Trail) VA 607 (Matthew Mill Road) New Parallel, West US 29/US 33 7906 Segment New US 29 (Seminole Trail) US 29 (Seminole Trail) US 29/VA 609 7907 Intersection US 29/VA 609 US 29 (Seminole Trail) VA 609 (Fredericksburg Road) 8 Seminole Trail -North 7908 Segment US 29 US 33 (Spotswood Trail) Madison County Line 10 US 29/VA 616 7910 Intersection US 29/VA 616 US 29 (Seminole Trail) VA 616 (Carpenter Mill Road) 11 New Parallel, East US 29/ VA 607 7911 Segment New US 29 (Seminole Trail) US 29 (Seminole Trail) 12 New Parallel, West US 29/VA 607 7912 Segment New US 29 (Seminole Trail) US 29 (Seminole Trail) 13 Spotswood Trail -Central 7913 Segment US 33 VA 636 (Goose Pond Road) US 33 Business -West 14 Spotswood Trail -East 7914 Segment US 33 US 29 (Seminole Trail) Orange County Line 15 Spotswood Trail -West 7915 Segment US 33 Rockingham County Line VA 636 (Goose Pond Road) 16 Amicus Road 7916 Segment VA 633 VA 623 (Swift Run Road) US 33 (Spotswood Trail) 17 Seminole Trail -South 7917 Segment US 29 Albemarle County Line US 33 (Spotswood Trail) 1 Bacon Hollow Road 7918 Segment VA 627 VA 632 (Wyatt Mountain Road) VA 810 (Dyke Road) 19 Main Street -Central 7919 Segment US 33 Business VA 230 (Madison Road) VA 622 (Celt Road) Main Street -East 7920 Segment US 33 VA 230 (Madison Road) US 33 (Spotswood Trail -West) 2 1, 2, 3 .- Long -Term: Realign or relocate intersection to improve geometry and sight distance 6 1,3 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 2 1, 2, 3 Long -Term: Construct new roadway 2 1, 2, 3 Long -Term: Construct new roadway 5 2 1,3 Long -Term: Construct new roadway 6 2 1 Long -Term: Construct new roadway 4 1,2 Long -Term: Reconstruct intersection to improve safety 8 4 1 Long -Term: Elimate crossovers 10 4 1, 2, 3 Short -Term: Maintenance and improve signage; Long -Term: Add curb and gutter to eastbound roadway 11 2 1, 2, 3 Long -Term: Construct new roadway 12 2 Long -Term: Construct new roadway 13 4 Monitor for geometric improvements 14 2 2,3 Long -Term: Widen road to increase capacity and/or accommodate travel demand on alternative corridors 15 2 Monitor for geometric improvements 16 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 17 4 1, 2, 3 Long -Term: Widen to six lanes with median, remove traffic signals and upgrade to provide alternative forms of access, including interchanges 8 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (11-foot lanes) 19 2 3 Mid -Term: Consider conducting a truck circulation study; Long -Term: Consider prohibiting truck through traffic (Town of Standardsville) 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 63 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 64 GREENE COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS ProjectRank 21 Main Street -West ProjectRoute 7921 Segment US 33 Business US 33 (Spotswood Trail) VA 622 (Celt Road) Madison Road 7922 Segment VA 230 US 33 Business Madison County Line 23 Matthew Mill Road 7923 Segment VA 607 US 29 (Seminole Trail) Orange County Line 24 Cedar Grove Road 7924 Segment VA 607 US 29 (Seminole Trail) VA 743 (Advance Mills Road) Rank Lanes 2 VTRANS Needs Description21 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 22 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 23 2 2 Long -Term: Widen road to increase capacity and/or accommodate travel demand on alternative corridors 24 2 2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potenetial improvements 65 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 66 ROADWAY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES is 67 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 68 LOUISA COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS ProjectRank Cross County Road -South ProjectRoute 10901 Segment US 522 US 250 (Three Notch Road) Interstate 64 2 Sandy Hook Road 10902 Segment US 522 Goochland County Line US 522 (Cross County Road) 3 US 522/US 250 10903 Intersection US 522/250 US 522 (Cross County Road) US 250 (Three Notch Road) 4 Interstate 64-West 10904 Segment 1-64 Fluvanna County Line US 15 (James Madison Highway) 5 US 15/US 33 10905 Intersection US 15/33 US 15 (James Madison Highway) US 33 (South Spotswood Trail) 6 James Madison Highway- North 10906 Segment US 15 VA 617 (East Green Springs Road) Orange County Line 7 US 15/VA 22 10907 Intersection US 15/VA 22 US 15 (James Madison Highway) VA 22 (Louisa Road) 8 James Madison Highway- Zion 10908 Segment US 15 Fluvanna County Line Interstate 64 9 US 522/VA 663 10909 Intersection US 522/VA 663 US 522 (Cross County Road) VA 663 (Owens Creek Road) 10 Pendleton Road 10910 Segment US 522 Town of Mineral, Southern Limits US 33 (Jefferson Highway) 11 Courthouse Road -North 10911 Segment VA 208 VA 640 (East Jack Jouett Road) US 33/VA 22 (East Main Street) 12 US 522/East First Street 10912 Intersection US 522 US 522 (Mineral Avenue/ Piedmont Avenue) US 522 (East First Street) 13 VA 208/22/VA 767 10913 Intersection VA 208/22/767 VA 208/22 (Davis Highway) VA 767 (School Bus Road) 14 Cuckoo 10914 Segment US 522/33 US 522 (Pendleton Road) US 33 (Jefferson Highway) 15 Jefferson Highway 10915 Segment US 33 Town of Louisa, Southern Limits US 522 (Cross County Road/ Pendleton Road) 16 James Madison Highway- South 10916 Segment US 15 Interstate 64 Sommerfield Drive 17 Courthouse Road -South 10917 Segment VA 208 Interstate 64 VA 640 (East Jack Jouett Road) 18 US 522/VA 700 10918 Intersection US 522/VA 700 US 522 (Pendleton Road) VA 700 (Mica Road) 2 •. 1,2 .- Long -Term: Widen to four lanes with median 2 2 1, 2 3 2 1,2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 4 4 1 5 2 2 6 2 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 7 2 2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 8 4 1,3 9 2 10 2 2 11 2 12 2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 13 2 14 2 2 15 1 2 2 16 2 Monitor capacity demands in this corridor and develop strategies for accommodating/managing these demands through a mix of travel demand and growth management, as well as enhanced multi -modal travel capacity and consideration of accommodating demands on both existing and potential new parallel corridors. Seek to reserve rights -of -way (through setbacks) from 1-64 to Sommerfield Drive in order to allow for potential widening of this section of the corridor to four lanes with a median 17 1 2 1 1 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 18 1 2 69 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 70 LOUISA COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS 19 ProjectRank US 522/VA 208 ProjectRoute 10919 Intersection US 522/VA 208 US 522 (Zachary Taylor Highway) VA 208 (New Bridge Road) 20 East Main Street 10920 Segment VA 22/208 US 33 (Jefferson Highway) Town of Louisa, Eastern Limits 21 Davis Highway 10921 Segment VA 22/208 Town of Louisa Town of Mineral 22 Kentucky Springs Road 10922 Segment VA 652 VA 790 (Mitchell Point Road) Boones Point Road 23 Exit 143 Interchange 10923 Segment 1-64/VA 208 Interstate 64 VA 208 (Courthouse Road) 24 US 33/VA 605 10924 Intersection US 33/VA 605 US 33 (Jefferson Highway) VA 605 (Willis Proffitt Road) 25 James Madison Highway- Central 10925 Segment US 15 Sommerfield Drive VA 617 (East Green Springs Road) 26 Mineral Avenue 10926 Segment US 522 VA 22/208 (Piedmont Avenue) Town of Mineral, Southern Limits 27 Cross County Road- Central 10927 Segment US 522 Interstate 64 VA 629 (Cartersville Road) 28 New Bridge Road 10928 Segment VA 208 US 522 (Zachary Taylor Highway) Spotsylvania County Line 29 VA 652/VA 208 10929 Intersection VA 208/652 VA 652 (Kentucky Springs Road) VA 208 (New Bridge Road) 30 Jefferson Highway 10930 Segment US 33 VA 22/208 (East Main Street) Town of Louisa, Eastern Limits Louisa Road 10931 Segment US 33 US 33 (Jefferson Highway) Town of Louisa, Western Limits 32 VA 22/US 33 10932 Intersection VA 22/US 33 VA 22 (Davis Highway) US 33 (Jefferson Highway) 63431 33 Jefferson Highway- Central 10933 Segment US 33 US 522 (Cross County Road) VA 609 (Buckner Road) US 522/VA 619 10934 Intersection US 522/VA 619 US 522 (Cross County Road) VA 619 (New Line Road) 35 US 522/VA 601 10935 Intersection US 522/VA 601 US 522 (Cross County Road) VA 601 (Paynes Mill Road) 36 1 Louisa Avenue 10936 Segment US 522 US 522/VA 618 (East First Street) Town of Mineral, Northern Limits 722 2 Mid -Term: Consider installation of traffic signal and add turn lanes 20 2 Long -Term: Remove street parking and reconfigure eastbound and westbound lanes to provide additional capacity 21 2 2 Short -Term: Improve warning signs for railroad crossing; Mid -Term: Lengthen turn lanes; Long -Term: Widen to four lanes 22 2 23 4 1 24 2 25 2 Monitor capacity demands in this corridor and develop strategies for accommodating/managing these demands through a mix of travel demand and growth management, as well as enhanced multi -modal travel capacity and consideration for accommodating demands on both existing and potential new parallel corridors 26 2 Long -Term: Widen road to increase capacity and/or accommodatetravel demand on alternative corridors or modes 27 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 28 2 2 Long -Term: Widen to four lanes with median 29 2 Long -Term: Add turn lanes and consider realignment and signalization of VA 652/VA 670 intersection 30 2 2 31 2 32 2 2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 2 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 34 2 35 2 36 2 Long -Term: Construct new bypass route 71 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 72 LOUISA COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS ProjectRank ProjectRoute US 33 (Jefferson Hwy)/VA Intersection US 33/VA 648 US 33 (Jefferson Highway) VA 648 (Gardners Road/Jouett 37 648 Gardners Road 10937 School Road) 38 Jefferson Highway -East 10938 Segment US 33 VA 609 (Buckner Road) Hanover County Line 39 Cross County Road -North 10939 Segment US 522 VA 629 (Cartersville Road) VA 648 (Gardners Road) US 33 US 15 (James Madison 40 South Spotswood Trail 10940 Segment Highway) VA 691 (Old Louisa Road) 41 East First Street 10941 Segment US 522 VA 22/208 (Piedmont Avenue) US 522 (Louisa Avenue) Kents Store Road 10942 Segment VA 659 Fluvanna County Line US 250 (Three Notch Road) VA 626 (Evergreen Road/ 43 US 250/VA 626 10943 Intersection US 250/VA 626 US 250 (Three Notch Road) Mallory Road) Rank 37 Lanes 2 VTRANS Needs 38 2 2 39 2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 40 2 2 41 2 2 1,2 Long -Term: Reconstruct road to address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 43 2 1 73 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 74 I* ROADWAY SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES TJPDC Area - MPO Area Intersection Deficiency • Operation Q Safety Operation and Safety Segment Deficiency � Operation Safety Geometric 75 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 76 NELSON COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS ProjectRank ProjectRoute US 29 Acess Management 1 at Colleen 12501 Segment US 29 VA 655 (Colleen Road) 3999 Thomas Nelson Highway 2 Interstate 64 12502 Segment 1-64 Albemarle County Line Augusta County Line Thomas Nelson/Front US 29 (Thomas Nelson Business 29 (Front Street/ 3 Street 12503 Intersection US 29/Business 29 Highway) Callohill Drive) River Road/Thomas 4 Nelson 12504 Intersection VA 6/US 29 VA 6 (River Road) US 29 (Thomas Nelson Hwy) Nelson County Middle & US 29 (Thomas Nelson VA 741 (Drumheller Orchard 5 High School 12505 Intersection US 29/VA 741 Highway) Lane) Thomas Nelson Highway- 6 North 12506 Segment US 29/VA 6 VA 617 (Rockfish River Road) VA 779 (Mosby Lane) Thomas Nelson Highway- 7 Central 12507 Segment US 29 VA 718 (Mountain Cove Road) 9749 Thomas Nelson Highway 8 Rockfish Gap Turnpike 12508 Segment US 250 Albemarle County Line Augusta County Line 9 US 250/VA 6 12509 Intersection US 250/VA 6 US 250 (Rockfish Gap Turnpike) VA 6 (Afton Mountain Road) US 151/VA 6/VA 10 638-North 12510 Intersection US 151/VA 6/ 638 US 151 (Critzers Shop Road) VA 638 (Avon Road), North US 151 (Rockfish Valley 11 US 151/VA 6 (River Road) 12511 Intersection US 151/VA 6 Highway) VA 6 (River Road) 12 Critzers Shop Road 12512 Segment US 151 Albemarle County Line VA 6 (Afton Mountain Road) US 29 (Thomas Nelson VA 775 (Anderson Lane/Lewis 13 US 29/VA 775 12513 Intersection US 29/VA 775 Highway) Lane) VA 622 (Allens Creek Road/ 14 US 60/VA 622 12514 Intersection US 60/VA 622 US 60 (Richmond Highway) Spring Lane) 15 Richmond Highway 12515 Segment US 60 Robertson Lane (Private) VA 809 (Payne Place) Rank 1 Lanes 4 VTRANS Needs 1,2 Description Improve signage; Mid -Term: Lengthen turn lanes 2 4 1,2 Long -Term: Widen road to include truck climbing lanes 3 2 1,2 Short-term: Modify signal timing and improve signage and pavement markings 4 4 1,2 Long -Term: Address safety deficiencies 5 4 1 Monitor for safety improvements 6 4 1,2 Long -Term: Address safety deficiencies 7 4 1 Monitor for operational improvements 8 4 1 Long -Term: Widen road to increase capacity and address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 9 4 1 Monitor for safety improvements 10 2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 11 2 2 Deficiency with low priority, continue to monitor for potential improvements 12 2 Long -Term: Widen road to increase capacity and address geometric deficiencies (including full -width lanes and shoulders) 13 4 1 Short -Term: Improve signage Long -Term: Consider closing median opening and installing rumble strips 147 2 Mid -Term: Improve intersection to address site distance deficiency 15 1 2 Monitor for operational improvements 77 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 78 NELSON COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS ProjectRank ProjectRoute a From TO Rockfish Valley Highway/ VA 6/US 151 (Rockfish Valley 16 VA 640 12516 Intersection VA 6/US 151/VA 640 Highway) VA 840 (Tanbark Drive) US 151/VA 6/VA VA 6/US 151 (Rockfish Valley 17 638-South 12517 Intersection US 151/VA 6/638 Highway) VA 638 (Avon Road), South 18 Beech Grove Road 12518 Segment VA 664 US 151 (Patrick Henry Highway) US 48 (Blue Ridge Parkway) VA 6/US 151 (Rockfish Valley 19 River Road 12519 Segment VA 6 Highway) US 29 (Thomas Nelson Highway) Rockfish Valley Highway- 20 North 12520 Segment US 151/VA 6 VA 6 (Afton Mountain Road) VA 6 (River Road) VA 6-US 151 (Rockfish Valley 21 US 151/VA 6/VA 609 12521 Intersection US 151/VA 6/609 Highway) VA 609 (Mill Lane) Rockfish Valley Highway/ VA 6-US 151 (Rockfish Valley 22 VA 784 12522 Intersection VA 6-US 151/VA 784 Highway) VA 784 (Bland Wade Lane) VA 6/US 151 (Rockfish Valley 23 US 151/VA 6/VA 760 12523 Intersection US 151/VA 6/760 Highway) VA 760 (Sunrise Drive) US 151 (Rockfish Valley 24 US 151/VA 729 12524 Intersection US 151/VA 729 Highway) VA 729 (Creek Road) US 151 (Rockfish Valley 25 US 151/VA 635 12525 Intersection US 151/VA 635 Highway) VA 635 (Greenfield Road) US 151 (Rockfish Valley 26 US 151/VA 634 12526 Intersection US 151/VA 634 Highway) VA 634 (Adial Road) US 151 (Rockfish Valley 27 US 151/Rodes Farm Drive 12527 1 Intersection US 151/VA 613 Highway) VA 613 (Rodes Farm Drive) Rank Lanes VTRANS Needs Description Refresh the yellow lines and stop bars and move the stop sign; Mid -Term: Consider rumble strips on Route 840 (Tanbark Drive) approaches; Long -Term: Regrade Route 840 (Tanbark Drive) to improve visibility to Route 151; 16 2 Long -Term: Regrade the embankment in the southwest and southeast quadrants Short -Term: Move the stop bar on Route 638 (Avon Road) closer to the roadway to improve sight distance; 17 2 Short -Term: Add deer crossing signs south of the intersection and gas station 18 2 Monitor for operational improvements 19 2 2 Long -Term: Address safety deficiencies 20 2 2 Long -Term: Address safety deficiencies Mid -Term: Improve access management; 21 2 Long -Term: Widen the bridge structure Mid -Term: Consider changing flashers to be demand responsive, so that they flash only when a vehicle is present or approaching (35 mph advisory speed sign with flashers already present); Long -Term: Regrade the roadway to improve sight distance and eliminate the dip in the road, or; 22 2 Long -Term: Consider relocating VA 784 (Bland Wade Lane) south of the fitness center Short -Term: Add deer crossing signs in vicinity of intersection; 23 2 Long -Term: Regrade the roadway to reduce crest and reduce embankment Mid -Term: Restripe the roadway to provide a northbound left turn into the Ashley's Market southern access Long -Term: Add a southbound right turn lane on Route 151 for turning traffic onto VA 729 (Creek Road), and 24 2 move the stop bar on VA 729 (Creek Road) closer to the southband through lane Short -Term: Extend the northbound right turn lane by utilizing (restriping) the existing northbound shoulder 25 2 prior to the start of the turn lane Mid -Term: Add sidewalks for pedestrians; Long -Term: As new development or re -development occurs, improve access management and inter -parcel 26 2 connectivity Short -Term: Review commercial signage to ensure signage is not within the VDOT right-of-way; 27 1 2 1 1 Long -Term: Reduce the crest of hill and regrade the embankments to improve sight distance 79 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 80 NELSON COUNTY I PRIORITIZATIONS • . '. US 151 (Rockfish Valley 28 US 151/1-odebar Estate 12528 Intersection US 151/VA 613 Highway) VA 613 (Lodebar Estate) US 151 (Rockfish Valley VA 627 (Spruce Creek Lane and 29 US 151/VA 627 12529 Intersection US 151/VA 627 Highway) Glenthorne Loop) 81 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 82 .".r-mil.' �y -•- -.r,� 1�.._ -.__, _ a ��-�-�_ �- _-f-.Y•.,�., �•�.��- E - .1�..-:--- <.,-��'-- ...�..'.e-' - r�;:.� -tea.-e-.>s1.�-,�....-�--.-���.5.. - .�••�-:--^�----'•.'=--,, �`'--"-'-�"-•�'": -,.>"rr`�.•-_-.... --- - - - - = - .'-•-•,r5s;;-- - � - - - -•-S, .�-�.,..,_ . - .,A..r-...ram ...�...rr•Y,-=-a'-.:.--.�.r_...r,r-� -,-N.: `'--"--r-"•�_�'--�--„yn" .-_,:-, .'.•�-,..._..,._ - .�, _.- �-- .sue•:.,.•--+� ,•� �. .�s-�•�•-.� _ .- :•t. .-E-,:t.--4 _ .�•.�--.'4 ,-• vim•.:..-,—.-- vim...--� - - - ,.-.••:�"".�'"`� ,�`."�`�.""�-,.-: ��"�-��.-�.�">ar--��-- _ _- - - - - v-� :-+_`--�-�•�.--...,-_ �_ -� _-'�'�s...-max"{.'.-. '.'�•": �.-.� L=�"�.•r -�—�.G'^'..-,��'.'-.�, _ �--•-'•'rr-.4v-:--�^"=-� - --'•-..- may. -.�.._.-.:�.��!".�� .`s'r` - - - -'_" -- - " -^'�-_,-.__-_. __ -_ -- �'.-. »� --_ - . - . - ,.3--..-- . `�'�'� _-,a�„�e- - . _ - �5r~-.•i�%•�"i�-"�• ,- xrr--,�-_.:_-'r•r, �., - -_ _ - - .-:i•�' ��-��Y'•''��.-�--�'F' ..,.t�..�-f1.: - - f..., : _ � - - - - _- -' `-'°�,v �-•-'� � .''tom � ., - • �• - - _ _ -_ - °-ss,�;� - "%-r T Av 7-7 r�. - - -_.: „tom•'BE _ a +7P= �JIe±C _ . � 44 �, _ _�•-.mac."- "" .K$.}-� nt lw - _,s,� - -_dye} ,� �u ,• - ,�` - _ a a. K.+n _� _ 4.� 4 ntil�=,A��v �'' �`C.v � �-� �...�..a1na-rI•�fm � � «,.: wr.-_ .+�. '�•«, '.ic. ,"'fir. - 6 k-+.... • Yi. _--_�._ _�. - sue. � �.•,. .�_, . �- _ � - 'ti •Fv '� ✓r ,'fix . _ - �", „•�,: < e. w r .. 4 - f-.' . r---' �.4,?.y,,,'}�.'i? 7�. `-�="au`"`_ ,.,;v ' `;i.� t .?adt -.•wr� n - ��� ' �-T 1 •�-�` .-�' zl:..�. to - i .. 0 kr, _� ..J.r I.V. s•I-''- ..N a {r T 3 _ - t• J } a<m - w . , f. 5 f a1a. .�- ar. 1 � f z�} �j _ As dr+ y _ - ,s5• a !. r T 4 t - ram•+•.-�- - r. PV - - mow.'•=A... -� O ten_ f - , T e 1 - - t - 1 f� y rad n 41 NeIv ,'YA is SPY-" - _ r}r f+•+tiP" 1 �>i _ X - `.:i.R . . K z y . .r .+ try - - r..+.t F .•F• • ¢c_♦.. '••+M' .-,^c -_Y. S' A� a•, 4 �-.i' _ _�i-,-•", .'�� _ \AFT. J: i ,n-.y.,,'-•'u1il • - h } " t ra, 1 K t `t Mr 3'� Pti 1 "! i -f. 4 ra,, - j w s' r' 'A w, - , t - - _ S_ t` PLAN ADOPTION PLAN ADOPTION On July 17, 2018 the Rural Technical Advisory Committee (RTAC) formally recommended the 2040 Rural Long Range Transportation Plan to the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. On August 2, 2018 the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission (TJPDC) formally adopted the 2040 Rural Long Range Transportation Plan. i[ i�.e '• ,��,. •. law_r'�v=LiPt, - �Yi.F- �•:. er "5i++- d, _- ■A -- '+'r '- !f Fig. -i•4�' . ., ,A'tiy ��a _ _ y •+IF r. . .. +.� d." rr _.#r - - IbI� _ - ~ '., '' fit-, -raj-".,, _ .. _ - ,.._ ,�+: .�,.iF .. .. . .e -Ae •' . _�'. .. .. �„ � r. 5 ' � .- �..rw f r-._�. - - _ _�.,-m + a,e -:' . ;'.-. ." ... - - _ -• •� ,r r. \, c•1_ #ya•;r - ",r p'"s,a:-. _ , _ _ a ,+p _ 4 _ _ .fir'.. Y - _ !r� 'r+J 'n�' _ A461" -*R T"P #7 • r la : 4 - r s �' .� ' �.: -. � `. - .> � g♦ ,� � s_ _ � + � a �a�f-:t.-'��#-yi-- . . - x, r� F -ti __ I F v .a �.•Ra +rF�e �.F+r.� .. �� p, a, s , L WM� r .'S� - _ _ r _ � •_ _ _..r _". .� .: _ .. ..,. '.. _ a,•. F. �� ,+._. - �"`�.- ,_ - . .�=�4,- _ _ -' - �'� _ --- - -''" �fi'+"vz��-_ - _ - .-. t'r, _ �- ems' - �•� _VC 4P".4,�. - - _ rF-�,*'. r... r�.�.. � _ .. - ram_ .. - __ 'a - .. = r- - w �.• : r _ .. _ . -_ - - .„ . ♦ .r. - a .. - - - .. _. _ ,.. -,.r- � ;- - P- - _ _ � �. _ �-� !��`-.. -,� - r. _- .. r. p.,__ „_-,.-,,<.-_.r �__-..-.-_._.-. rrh- :w f -.��- +..r r r .+- - rr .. r_ __ - a`w< .��.-�"u•'�.r - -..r .r . - . - - . r - r'`- �r'.r :<.�>� gar r-r .. .. _ _ :�#.-.^�,_ .. -.. _. _. -. _-f... - -,...._ _ ..,- i, _-_�-`_i_�". - � _ p, - _ - _. _ , s.. -Te.�. +'4�1' 1. �!'��-a'•�3� fib. a�{n�'i4. - ., � �ry, _'y=,?ir-+ .: . _ ., +�i='�IiFT-..-� .. _ -u► �. j y -,.+- - ram._- r; -,,,. `_ _ . _ ' " ' _ - _ _,� -- .i+t'"`. - -- _ _ _ _ _ - ''r yr,�' i'r .' j- s��''+�.r'=A ,� _ r... _. �•. ., ad+. - _ _ , _ _- _ _ t ,3Y�lv � , , '-�_.._ - -�s � r}=yF= }' :� 'i' I.PF'► � j i. - - ems,' 1i'fiir - _�!`� - rf _ •'.y.`.v._.. _ - _ .. -a , _57 ,. - t � ' n`h _a _+- _, +- - �.Y - ._, �° - '. .. 'a.. - . e.. .:. ,_ ,.� _ «-- • : . � t " - a a -- - _ - _T _' 6.. _ _ _ J5 ` a--� _T r�++ _ ' s�.. - ... T-a"r+r_ 'r•,�3sT,y� . , � � -'- ' ,tit. !'-�'^5ilr-s rf '1�? � ' .,�1. � _ ,r •f , - _ -i '"J'.oe . ,7F in�1�,�4:'.�_ s._y .-_. _ -,i a - -..F .: _^ v.,, :.. -: _ _ --�. r si ��lii•.Pi. -Gaifii�# - .-: � _....y. r!'t+' �"-'�k r-`r�ji�P�+i�r' 4 r - _ ` ^ ' -W - - _ - 5 •, - 'i�5[.�Yr t- �,W`S.s±� ,- � �,. rt�. - _ _ - .. _ �� _ - �� i .. , A: i�t._- �, _ ' y °4. - r ` .,-.�5n@ili mod+ - r�'•� ,_,, ,�,;. asr.,aig�-`��®''�.1�+:.- .-. . r�l• __: '�.ay� � -'p - 4F . � r • t;'y =.e � - - -aM ,. i -��-- �"wi .--: yF �s4-_ii'..�,,,�".y'�r'"i •, - - �',+/'!.�,�� �����+'� � _ _ r'i +Yw.'h_ _ _ "'.,- - -- - - _ t.ip�' a �`k, - '-r ►'�. - I• r .�:. �, _ _ - } _ _ _ . - _ - - ,{ r.:F;:.ri+4 .. - _ _ �" y �: -,.: :rQdr° +��"+',�,'�r✓+�+.ir� ,.. a=• -- +'t��,..-_: t r _ . ' it �-,� _ •�� - ��� ' „�� .. ..� . , � � .�#� - _ ^'� - a ram. a�i # -r � - .. � . - _ � _ s` i r , ���-� a -, -�� _ rr4r•�" ..y;� ..F�_r=- ' ,, air �,� = �_ r a� � _ � a . _ ����� _-," - _ �. .: r - � -� �-r t•" fir.#'" •-�" - ` .�_. _� _• .� - p- -may,. �� ,, _ , -- _a _ �'r.-.._ .. _ _ -, _ ' .•. ,`r z'-t - - -._ - i -_ .r'. j.�= �. r� ..... . + . r� �. ..s..."� ..s- 1`..r `,Fe'��- _q;y' _ e V - _ _ . _ .... - - - r'� . -_ f- . ,1u ' r,. _ _ . _ _ ..•+'r -� ;,� a •� +# y!k �-. -. �. " .MR 3r'= .�`R - - - - - dr.. ,�-� - _ r• _ - � - - - - - � . - � -.: - - _ .` .. _ - i • _err - _ - r - - - . t=t - . - _ �--. a, �••. :. .�F. _ _` - '' __,. � x,. ._ .r+. ..' SYiL .� -1+ 4 a ti } :,� - .._#'-_�.�'1'T �'•11•,1°++'•it+"� r��e �'. _- ,Y.r. - - - .'-A. 3r Fii:�-_y '„r +s. .P,±- f♦` _ _ , _ - 477��`lE 36 � -.� s �°I'r r r� v :-ate - e a — _ _ _ _ - ��.�.. - - '� iR _ �' �. .. .. u. - � _ � -z-s• � situ � , _ J r i' _ a••.a�+y.. _ • - - .r ..r p+' .= �-..-®.x �._�-�_ r �--� +: _ � _ ♦ ,. _ a -, - � Y.�.,r'���_-. _ ... r +�r:��- j 'L: � -. - _ _ r _. _ _ _ r _ - _ g:-.� "T^'_�or 't - . . _ f -� .. F :�I•r' ems ---.ram .=,�,{': r y 'b0 _ _ - -.`�. _ - _ ., - - ' - �• -• _... AIR _ _ - a u 1 : C a _ 6 . . �. �s �# �_ . , ._ . _„ ,rr r• ��_ ,P f ,. . _-S:•...r - :'r _ _ -.+i . -••+r _ -..� :' -, ti - ��, r:IR '�,.. .-�r�•.. .'-..-ass-.' _-`r��. _ � �a'.._ '- -,,, ,R -i' r-'�_ s+ �'��y-"4a, - - - _ _ _"..v-' �. �a.,i .: ws - _ __�� af''a--.wty,', . •� 'zei'. _ }_ ,"a. j_�• y. ,. - f = - r _ : - _ ry. �s r...� a �,:Y '�a: F� -, - # - - . _ - _ - ',F _,.�'.�•a ,r a i"'.- ,,1_. a _ _�, �. ,� _ - - 7Y`7 V�'._E a ��- -'r . -"F . _ -. -+� a. - . n • a - . �`..��_ •- -' f� ..- �+. - e vT'� i Cam°- -s _g. t. _ sf. . - , _ F.. z - .+� _ - .�- . -� . mod.,.-. - - =?r•. _ s +•- - - - - - - . �. .-se _ - - *. f ..�. - _ ,�•. x' rtyln�- . • .. _ .. T ,� �...�; ..yam_ _ 9': _ ''!�' :r• 1.:._-°�'r� + 'K. _+rT -�- .. _ .. : - :' - - •� s .+, +n'�+ ✓• . _ - _ - _ . _ - r _ _ JDA. - _ -_ y- �' .: -"�`.F . - : - _. _k� . �i.J,'.r-+"'.,.r'. _' s _ .>.a .r ®rye �: - fyr - _ r .,+- _ ..' _ - _ "'.�r•r't _ - . .. ,i�-�'e.. h .-: '.�'4� •.. - - - - .'1 _ ., _ _' . - _ _ _ _ -�w _"-r -: '� ,!-.--:-� �-� - ..: --._ y ><-s-�-s���-^-� �. w �-- y- - '" - .� � ` s t � _ .� - �. _ - �+:+.�5l.ais�'.F�rrr--.�:� ��T �';ir+.�r- - _- _ _ - - -..0 T - _ - - _ '� s.. - .. -. - . � � 1�'.�• �.•�e+'� -- � - � ,., _ j.,f _ _ _ _ . s # r r - r- .�.#. - - � �w � , Win. � :�- * r* -.+: _ _ ... _ p._ •�� '�. � � � . - _ ��iy+}ya. s�i�i.�' . . - - • - � ., - - - - ��,+�,f. -'hI` ' � � r•+. - r.� '•.�.P-•-- - - .a•,+.�, ' = r� �>�: ��- `- - a.-. .. +f • .x�.-�•�r� �f-' - -_. `-��-s�� _ _.-.atria' _ .� - -. � r.r`�1Y� �r,.� � . �'.._ --�..� .- .. _ : �r-� �.. �•-.ARY'�li --�'kr-' _ - "..=,J'.� r '_ s . : s _ t.,.♦,+.�=ter..-�`� - _' t _ _�• , _ -JL '�r7,� 3. .� _�. � ... r : - � ��� ..� . s �.� � _'-� ��_. ; f ... � r _ - . , �t•••'t� � r.J's .. .��, ,�• �.r��-r._ ,ra .._ t. r _ ," � f _ _ - � _ _ _ . __ __ _ . s . r - _- _ : � .+.w��.. ,�� _ _ - a �-.J` ' ... - _ -- ..� _ .--s; . � +� -+t - - - - _ � ... _ „� z . s � •�+tr �->r'a ran - - ` - r a - �4- -�. rt» re �.: * �: 4�"i.i=" -- < a�.�',r-a^`+�i.z-._.�-�-,� . �- _ _ d r � M• T -� - - - �.a-,Ri��-r.!-�=.-i. � ��'"'_.�� + _ _ _ - -� -�.. _ . ° _� _rs,9�-,:i•�•.+w.r. - A�yi.,�y.�, s _ .' . _ - = - - - _ _ _ ' �•.- .. - _ �_-T - �� * _ .. - - - �: raw •-r-•+. ram-. �,,�'�..a•�4:�+-.,rr�= 'm•�r: •..�:--�� ..�. ax'�r'r�`�•� �y �. - a •. �A,d�4��•�-�rJ t ..F� _ ._� f.a � � �-,k_ • _ - . .. _ >._ . ; _ s . _ 3 �a�f�-'r. �'1!'�w'�� �� a�.' _ J r _ ram. �f.t„w.lys-.�.� - ' '� �.`f �-r4r:-.�4� - y _ � �, .- _ ,r _ � _ . � � -... _ � � � - ^�..�Ia�rI�M p, Y••r�lRa� . a.. - _ �,.�._ -. .. � ... +lrr - � - _ ��+• _ ,. - _ - _ t .. - � -! ' - `�+_�,. _ _ .. j .. - •. .fit � a, � - - _ � . -*" .. .y sF - �r t••'�pR->+,.!' s +:. _ :#.-,.nsx��= . , z _ r1,y"+' AI �., as "�'_�.•.:"�`�� ". ^- ' _ _. - = _ _ �. . .. _ � •. -. ' • - yr.. _•:. ore _ '.'�:.. +��y�„r:+��'+'t.�., -�.f _ 'ri - _ _ , - r _ ems.. .r �'.. .r •a�.+�:�-. - �-- _',�° '' . � _ _ .. ,� . ��'¢T-T.,..- tom" •i��-�'�. - _ �'_--_.�P,r",�� _:-- � �.s .�;• x• __-.._��i��.�ar....�.f''�g•.e�.��..�'=r`m �S�r'�r.+i�.s,r!`:i'�:.•'„_,�s .�r����iars r=.+x•��._ - _ - - .. - =^�v _...�i.,J�Fy� _. -. -- �°r*-'. - - _-. _ _ , --�..�=^�..F ;._'.•�*4n3!!!al+..,d/ar A-t. -_ ' - - - - E"� � '� : 1� J ,ib .. r = r c '+ + 1 ♦�-rF' _ram ' +.,.._ - _ - _ _ �.' nl�rN� ^ _. _ a .r-.3 . - _ -� _ _ _ .. _ v, a ,. � - - _ �, z _ 4 --. - #. . -a.-•......��r ,ram 3r}..`- r - . F—:w �' .P.-. £-- �-- -�' _�_d �+ - - - — ,� ; �•'a;. rar;.-�r�'- - - - - . - _ - . - - --a�-r��.,a ��� �♦ �_ ��r ,ram,_ - ,._ _ _ �.. � - __ _ - � - ' � .� . �I ' a' _ „Isrt, rt'4y _ _ ili"'r �.�i�"�"4f'�•r 4� .s J - .r ��r��',�.'',} -._ �:i.unY+.eiy�-a�r,�. � e - •I.. a_-r v -` v_ . x - �.: -- � _ .. l:'� � �. r y �.�# ���i•rJ _ �' ' � - � •'fit. �� •✓r �Y '. .. - - ''--'° - _' ..� r-.,.�•.-�'���=��,a�c+r�ra��rA 7�.,- - - �. 3; � � _ _ - - " �."r�r - '+'7i�i4-i•'.ii Asa. _ •`..r.��lrl�' - - J�� _ �.�� �'>r — +.:��r.� .,� s - - - - - - - _ _ _ � "'^r"r:NDICES TOP INDUSTRIES ALBEMARLE COUNTY Educational Services EmploymentIndustry 11,440 Health Care and Social Assistance 7,181 Retail Trade 5,687 Accommodation and Food Services 41216 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 3,981 FLUVANNA COUNTY Educational Services EmploymentIndustry 988 Public Administration 559 Construction 464 Retail Trade 362 Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 341 GREENE COUNTY Retail Trade EmploymentIndustry 554 Educational Services 551 Accommodation and Food Services 372 Health Care and Social Assistance 352 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 294 LOUISA COUNTY Manufacturing EmploymentIndustry 1,236 Retail Trade 1,064 Transportation and Warehousing 1,013 Educational Services 960 Construction 920 NELSON COUNTY Accommodation and Food Services EmploymentIndustry 561 Educational Services 525 Manufacturing 499 Health Care and Social Assistance 323 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 291 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE Health Care and Social Assistance EmploymentIndustry 10,397 Accommodation and Food Services 5,198 Educational Services 3,941 Retail Trade 3,211 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 2,356 TOP EMPLOYERS ALBEMARLE COUNTY Employer.. University of Virginia/ Blue Ridge Hospital 1,000 and over County of Albemarle 1,000 and over Sentara Healthcare 1,000 and over State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 500 - 999 U.S. Department of Defense 500 - 999 FLUVANNA COUNTY Employer.. Fluvanna County School Board 500 - 999 Fluvanna Correctional Center 250 - 499 County of Fluvanna 100 - 249 Fork Union Military Academy 100 - 249 Lake Monticello Owners 100 - 249 GREENE COUNTY Employer.. Greene County School Board 250 - 499 Walmart 100 - 249 County of Greene 100 - 249 Sunland Employee Leasing LLC 100 - 249 Lowes' Home Center, Inc. 100 - 249 LOUISA COUNTY Employer.. Walmart 1,000 and over Louisa County Public School Board 500 - 999 Dominion Virginia Power 500 - 999 Fluor Daniel Services Corporation 500 - 999 Klockner Pentaplast America 500 - 999 NELSON COUNTY Employer.. Wintergreen Resort 250 - 499 Nelson County School Board 250 - 499 County of Nelson 100 - 249 Devils Backbone Brewing Company 100 - 249 Veritas Vineyard and Winery 50 - 99 CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE Employer.. University of Virginia Medical Center 1,000 and over City of Charlottesville 1,000 and over UVA Health Services Foundation 1,000 and over Charlottesville City School Board 500 - 999 Servicelink Management Company Inc. 500 - 999 85 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 86 PARKAND RIDE LOT LOCATIONS Albemarle, Maple Grove Christian Church Azalea Park Peace Lutheran Church Route 29 & 1-64 Walmart Mountainside Senior Living Darden Towe Park Keene Avon Street Extended Scottsville CountyFluvanna Beaver Dam Baptist Church Lake Monticello CountyGreene Walmart Greene County School System Louisa • Gum Springs Zion Crossroads City of Charlottesville Azalea Park =1 2040 5) nsL The Commonwealth Transportation Board is directed by the General Assembly, with assistance from the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (OIPI), to conduct a comprehensive review of statewide transportation needs in a Statewide Transportation Plan — VTrans. Vision — Virginia's multimodal transportation plan will be Good for Business, Good for Communities, and Good to Go. Virginians will benefit from a sustainable, reliable, transportation system that advances Virginia businesses, attracts a 21st century workforce, and promotes healthy communities where Virginians of all ages and abilities can thrive. Includes guiding principles goals. objectives and a trends assessment Adopted by the CTB, December 2015 office Of INTF,RMODAI.. Planning and Invutmen• ?V)MTP 20 ANS MIILTiMOOAL TPnn.ti�uv�ATiOn 4•�.nN CULPEPER District Approach CoSS = Corridor of Statewide Significance RN = Regional Network UDA = Urban Development Area • UOA Need • RN Need • RN Nr�A In 61 of 800+ Market Needs Coss Need • Co55 Need • RN Need Adopted by the CTB, December 2015 — These 800+ Needs, summarized by each market, are the basis for screening projects into SMART SCALE. The Board directed OIPI to prioritize the needs and develop recommendations to address the 2025 prioritized needs. Coss Needs Reports ;• (# 2025 Needs Assessment The VTrans204O Vision guides development of the VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan (VMTP), including the 2025 Needs Assessment and 2025 Recommendations. The VMTP incorporates stakeholder input and transportation system data to guide transportation planning, policy, and programming for the first 10 years of VTrans204O. 10 of 169 Consolidated Needs [1Wy ]t]•Dl bell � /IIII �I`�,v !III Ahgn wvTlan; uoJ i, 091! & P# f Local Pnonty ISUI,eMMer Inputs 2025 Recommendations The 2025 Recommendations is a new concept for VTrans. This component of the VMTP focuses on critical needs across the Commonwealth over the next 10 years with solutions based on VTrans guiding principles. It also creates a framework consistent with new Federal planning regulations which place more attention on performance based planning and programming. Tier 1 Recommendations Funded Projects Funded projects(SYIP,TIP)thataddressthe Need I New Ideas Project or study recommendation to meet a potential 2 gap in addressing the Need z --� a A 4 Pipeline Projects 3 r Unfunded or partly funded projects from local and The Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (OIPI) worked with agency staff, regional agencies, transit providers, localities, and stakeholders to consolidate the 2025 needs and then prioritize them into three tiers. This process, starting in February 2016, included multiple rounds of questionnaires and webinars, held 6 regional forums for regional and local input, conducted a needs criticality analysis, and collaborated with CTB members for confirmation of the tiering. The results of this effort are presented in an Executive Summary document available on VTrans204O.com. UDA Needs RN Needs Profiles Reports ♦(covering 215 UDAs/DGAs) Statewide 2025 Needs Safety M' Assessment Needs M Executive Assessment Summary http://www.vtrans204O.com/Pages/Needs.aspx New ideas focus on VTrans204O Guiding Principles — especially: Optimize Return on Investment and Consider Operational Strategies and Demand Management First The plan includes project -level recommendations that represent the Commonwealth's perspective for a pipeline of future projects for consideration under SMART SCALE and other funding. It also helps strengthen the connection between planning, project development, and programming and reflects a commitment to Common Sense Engineering principles. District Level Summary & Recommendations Profiles www.vtrans204O.com/Pages/Recommendations.aspx 87 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 88 NEED TYPE Bottienecks - Acute areas of congestion within she niukirnodal network, typicaily at a bridge,, ttennel, of interchange or tether rnnstraint_ Ccln&estloft - 9totaning InconswonT travail times within a corr.dor bar passengers and hetght- corridor of Caeeidor ReMbillFty - corrido" whsire non-r*curting ovsmit that occur at slatewide teas? ID% of the time ret,ult In slgrocirant delay to passengers and frelght. Significance Ill Network Connet+thrlty - Gaps in mulurrlodal network connecisioru amonE REglonal Nrtworli co ... durs dnd actirny centun. Netrd' Latagories Ila Redundancy & Modal Choice-Multlrnadal system constraints to address diverted trips in cnticaJ corridors and limited flexibility and access for a Itetnative trauel cipt.ioni . Transportatlats Demand Mana,gernent- P+niltra+n Amitatouns regarding incentives and other mechanisms to provide Intormatlon and ooportunity to thcoxte dlUrnative roodre or reduce trip maklne urban I, 5jferyr-Lorailonsmtheson 100PSI (potentlafInasafetyImprouerr"nt) LLLJ�] rrmntr and Intersettiont statprWdc pr within the Djorlct Development Area Need � Walkable & Rikeadic Places- Seed rot a sage and acres>able wvalklnb and Gatawwm hLkms ir"irpnrne-t wiThin activity tRntors and,LOGAs. Ckratlatlan and Access W thin the VITA - Bastion to effective a ss and iniwmnl circtttatlon In tinA, ti Ac'cttss to Transportation Networks Outside the VDA- Constraints L fri iiir to linking UDAs wrth regional tnd nterstate nouhimrrdal corridors. 20,25 Needs Assessment- Synthesis & Tiering The Needs Synthesis and Tiering approach does not replace the 2025 Needs Assessment; projects that address these needs are still eligible for funding through SMART SCALE. Simply stated, the Needs Synthesis and Tiering approach creates a higher -level consolidation of needs through a carefully delivered process of identifying which needs are most critical when looking at UTrans goals and objectives. The 2025 Recommendations then highlight the feasible capacity and operational approaches for addressing each Tier 1 consolidated need through 2025. Uflecr,A IN-1 ERN10I)AI: f lamtingand htveArnem NEED TIER 0 Tier Tier 2 10 Tier 3 RAPPAFtWltlD7 C0047y C U P'EPER C:OIRJTY I IADISG? 4 COUNn Amtrak :station ALBE"ARLE ■ ® Airport jjA y Coss — - U DA MPO _t LesulsA cr-ruNrr :a awe sat ,* FLUVANNA. C:CAJNTV 'a IV mMD. NFLD LOCATIONS ARE CZNFAA= BY REGION, THEY ARE N17r JNTENDEDTO BE EXACF GEOGRAPHOC REPREENTATIONS. 2025 Needs Assessment - Synthesis & Tiering The process of trerirlg needs included a data -driven criticality analysis and multiple steps of stakeholder coordination and direct outreach, iriduding briefings with ACT$ members in summer 2016. The below graphic summarizes the overall approach to consolidating and tiering needs. Coss flN Needs A1111111 ConLolidated cross -Geography bleeds Needs Erit>kolity IITotal Score P'rFQritized "Tiered" Needs t Ilri.�ri , \F�} .��f I n�„i� i l ln+csirrie-ni Need 10 Need 13,escription Need lcom TOW Scare (out of t F&W Tiering C a Within the CA-MP0,regtonw Urban DevegmentAreas (UDAsj and other high -activity iocaWns have moae choice,salety, �� 17 ] connectivity, and bicycle and pedestrian needs. C.3 Within the CA-MP0, the US 250 (Bypass and Business) and US 29 have safety, reliability, connectivity and congestion needs. 17 ] C.5 Within the Culpeper District US 171VA 281 US 29 (Vlfarrenton} have safety: congestion.reliabilityand mode choice needs. Elsea 19 ] CA Within Within the Culpeper District, the Amtrak fides through Charlottesville and the Charlottesville Station have service reliability, including intercity bus �0 to i2 ] access, and mode choice needs, regional anal service. C.4 Within the Culpeper District 1.64 and US 25D for east -west intercity travel from ChariottesvAle have redundancy and mode choice 13 tSSxaei. C 8 Within the Culpeper District US 29 between Charlottesville and Culpeper has mode choice (mode choice needs now 1i 16 y represented by expanded C_4} and safety needs. C.I Within the CA-MPO,1-64 interchanges have safety and reliability needs. C•7 Within the Culpeper District US 17 north of Warrenton has redundancy, reliability, and mode choice xreeds. k1 9�I � 6 , C.6 Within the Culpeper District 1-66 west of Gainesville has safety and redundancy issues. I 7 3 C.10 Within the Culpeper District Fluvanna County UDAs have safety, network connectivity. and pedestrian/bicycle access issues. CC jai@ 7 3 To expand view of table and see more details, view online at www.vtransZ040.coni 89 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 90 MT P 225 www.VTraiis2O4O.com 4 Tier 1 Needs Pipeline Projects High Tights: Bicycle, pedestrian, transit, transportation denia,nd management, and safety improvements throughout the Charlottesville -Albemarle MPO region, focusing on access within and to designated Urban Development Areas, are supported by.safety, access management, and operations improvements in the US 250 and US 29 corridors. The 2ndand 31i daily roundtrip Northeast Regional Train will improve intercity connections to Washington D.C., Lynchburg, and Roanoke. Safety and access management improvements along US 17 and Route 28 in Fauquier County help manage increasing travel demand in these corridors. M arket/ Need Diversity LI yJA � t7fFeed} ShTtFthltll)rl PlawLingarld Invesitretc ill 9 Needs Gz� Focus on VTrans2040 Guiding Principles: Optimize Return on Investment and Consider Operational Strategies and Demand Management First Multimodal Diversity Coss M, ED I a Note: Many recommendations address more than one market, need type, or mode —therefore, numbers in charts do not add to the total number of gap recommendations (20), New Idea Highlights: Implementation of the actions identified within CAT and JAUNT transit develo pin ent plans, improved access and capacity at the Charlottesville AMTRAK station, plus corridor studies and arterial management along the 5thStreet corridor, US 250, and U5 29, including implementation of the Route 29/Hydraulic Road interchange project address key corridor of statewide significance and regional network needs in the Charlottesville region. A US 29 safety and access management program will address spot safety and reliability needs, while enhanced commuter bus service to Northern Virginia along the U5 29 corridor improves mode choice. The purpose of the VMTP 2025 Recommendations: To provide the CTB with statewide priorities for project development to create a pipeline for projects to be developed and proposed for funding within the SYIP through SMART SCALE or other sources. SMART SCALE eligible recommendations (based on anticipated project scale and eligibility, pending concept development/study completion) Other Federal and State funding sources these 2 recommendations are considered ineligible for SMART SCALE, implementation funding will come through other Federal and State programs) 2040 rans LOCAL a GLOBAL+ MOBILE The Commonwealth Transportation Board is directed by the General Assembly, with assistance from the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (OIPI), to conduct a comprehensive review of statewide transportation needs in a Statewide Transportation Plan — VTrans. Vision - Virginia's multimodal transportation plan will be Good for Business, Good for Communities, and Good to Go. Virginians will benefit from a sustainable, reliable, transportation system that advances Virginia businesses, attracts a 21st century workforce, and promotes healthy communities where Virginians of all ages and abilities can thrive. Includes guiding principles goals. objectives and a trends assessment Adopted by the CTB, December 2015 0 cc of INTF,RMODAI.. Planning and Invurmena Trl20Pnn.ti�::vinir�:.ry •i nn LYNCHBURG District Approach COSS = Corridor of Statewide Significance RN = Regional Network uuA = uman ueveiopmeni Area • UOA Need • RN Need • RN Need UnA Net _ 52 of 800+ Market Needs Coss Need • Co55 Need • RN Need 1[,,-J,-, Adopted by the CTB, December 2015 — These 800+ Needs, summarized by each market, are the basis for screening projects into SMART SCALE. The Board directed OIPI to prioritize the needs and develop recommendations to address the 2025 prioritized needs. (# 2025 Needs Assessment The VTrans204O Vision guides development of the VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan (VMTP), including the 2025 Needs Assessment and 2025 Recommendations. The VMTP incorporates stakeholder input and transportation system data to guide transportation planning, policy, and programming for the first 10 years of VTrans204O. #,0- Al�_ 17 of 169 Consolidated Needs Urta-Urrveo Crltl(aldv Align to VTrans Goal% a,trnader Inpun locaI Pmrnty ISOAen-. ice. i A*) 2025 Recommendations The 2025 Recommendations is a new concept for VTrans. This component of the VMTP focuses on critical needs across the Commonwealth over the next 10 years with solutions based on VTrans guiding principles. It also creates a framework consistent with new Federal planning regulations which place more attention on performance based planning and programming. Tier 1 Recommendations 0' 0 8 of 66 O Tier 1 Needs d 6 of 59 0 Tier 2 Needs © 3 of 44 © Tier 3 Needs The Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (01PI) worked with agency staff, regional agencies, transit providers, localities, and stakeholders to consolidate the 2025 needs and then prioritize them into three tiers. This process, starting in February 2016, included multiple rounds of questionnaires and webinars, held 6 regional forums for regional and local input, conducted a needs criticality analysis, and collaborated with CTB members for confirmation of the tiering. The results of this effort are presented in an Executive Summary document available on VTrans204O.com. 126 UDA Statewide 2025 Needs 12 COSS 15 RN Needs Safety p Assessment Needs Needs + Profiles + Needs l� Executive Reports Reports (covering 215 UDAs/DGAs) Assessment Summary http://www.vtrans204O.com/Pages/Needs.aspx New ideas focus on VTrans204O Guiding Principles — especially: Optimize Return on Investment and Consider Operational Strategies and Demand Management First The plan includes project -level recommendations that represent the Commonwealth's perspective for a pipeline of future projects for consideration under SMART SCALE and other funding. It also helps strengthen the connection between planning, project development, and programming and reflects a commitment to Common Sense Engineering principles. District Level Summary & Recommendations Profiles www.vtrans204O.com/Pages/Recommendations.aspx 91 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 92 N EED TYPE cerridix or stetawida signi"icance & ReglNud NErwarir Nerd C4telarles Ur4en Oev �rtPrnr:nx Area Need Ce elaries Bottlenecks -aeu areas of r:ongt wive witbrn the rautumodal nerwork, typically at a bridge, tunrel, or-rtterchange orathercaristmint- Cong estlnn - flerurring inmortslstent trawl tJmes with] n a cv rrdw for passengers and Irelchl. torridar;W13abiiityr - U-reidare who,-* non-rveurrin4wvs+ ha th*t oetw *i; Ieesi 11oK of the rlrne tesatt Ito algniDadnr delay to ptu stoops mild frelsha. NewoorkCon neeahrity-tiap9ln mulhlnlndrl network opnnettlon# among corneors andacsrviry ceahtipm Redundancy & Modal Cho" - multirnodaI s}rstem constraints tit address dverted trips in crilical i:umdo^ and limited flexibility ane access for afternadve travel motions Transportation Datnand fVJa mgamant - t ragrem ll rnl tattoos -ego rti l n g I ncentivcs end ether mechanisms to prevrde infarntetlan a nd mpperxuttirr to Laos® •I breativa made o. raduee trip rnak.YnQ, Safety- Lomtions in the tcp 100PSI Ipottntal for safttylmprcvementl segmelits3Itd Irdeivecticnsstmewldlt at within McDishitr_ ' Walkable & Bilcrabie Places -Nreedfor a cafe aorJ .retssible walknganci bk,r%erw'rOM1M4nt within atrlvits eemors end UDAs ACirrtulatlan and Access Within the UDA-6arrien toeflerflw access and Internal circulation In UDA€. 1# Q Access to Transportaflon 'Networks Outside the VDA- ranstra.inta f. * to ilnkirya liDA- with misinnal w,4IritP x:e.e m+.Iltirnr±r♦ar —A- 2025 Needs Assessment- Synthesis fat Tiering The Needs .Synthesis and Tiering approach does not replace the 2025 Needs Assessment; projects that address these needs are stfll eligible for funding through SMART SCALE, Simply stated, the Needs Synthesis and Tiering approach creates a higher -level consolidation of needs through a carefully delivered process of identifying which needs are most critical when looking at VTrans goals and objectives. The 2025 Recommendations then highlightthe feasible capacity and operational approaches for addressing each Tier 1 consolidated need through 2025. NEED TIER Tier Tier 2 Tier 3 or t� - 1 -LALFAX caw+nr DISTRICT -WIDE NEEDS Wa.lkability and placemaking needs in activity centers Paratransit connecting rural workforce to activity centers a xo 23 limes , I I NEED Li)CY9TGNS ARE GENFFA=D BY REGt4N, Ltfirr ri . a N 1 l a if IN I t l I ) A I . TJ-dEY AHE NOTh'dTEP�JeFD TO HEEXACTGFAGRAi°f -liC AiPRfSEFJ7ATiDNS. IrlataiirtLT,anti IrYves[m�iti A A 2025 Needs Assessment - Synthesis &Tiering The process of tiredng needs included a data -driven criticality analysis and multiple steps of stakeholder coordination and direct outreach, including briefings with CTB members in summer 2016. The below graphic summarizes the overall approach to consolidating and tiering needs, Coss ftN Needs i{v dS 111� tiN1A/ Consaildated Crois�Gcography Needs f Wet4%Ctl4t<ahty urmnn�av itTotal Score Prioritized "Tiered" Needs t_hftrtr ivl 7 ltkrnsiiny�,vu,llrrvc�anu-ni � 1 Need ID Need Description Heed i1coins �aut * of Within the Lynchburg District and regional networks, the activity centers have walkability and placernaking needs to support L,7 the ewer workforce. 16 Within the CentralWirginia MPCI, the Lakeside Drive I Lynchburg Expressway area has safety, congestion and mode choke needs l 6 to support the knowledge sector.! i I5 L.9 Within the CentralWirginia MPO the Wards Road area has reliability needs to help connect local a€tiaity centers. 14 I L.4 Within the Darhviile MPO and thrro,ughout Pittsytvania County, US 5® has reliability and safety needs for commute, through and men 1 freight trafific- miMiall L.17 WWithin the Lynchburg Districm the US 460 corridor between Bedford and Farmvvilie has redundancy, mode choice, safety and 14 reliability needs. L 2 Within the Danville MPG and throughout Pittsyfvania County, US 29 has congestion and safety needs to address freight and I I commuter traffic, especiallyespecrally during peak periods. !� L.5 Within the CentralWirgirtia MPG and dhroughAmherst and Campbell Counties.the US 29 corridor has reliability and mode 02011 choice needs for passenger-, .and freight M Within the CentralWirgin.ia MPG and in Campbell County, the US 501 corrkior has. travel time reliability needs in order to / L. I I sumort the o knowlecia and lcal economic sectors for workforce travel_ 1 . L 10 Within the CentralWirginia MPG and in Bedford County, the US 221irUS 460 corridor has travel time reliability and mode �J 13 choice needs to better serve inter and inL-a-regional centers. L.3 Within the Danville MPG, there are safety needs due to minimal active transport on infrastructure. 1'_ L. I S Within the Lynchburg District, the LDS 29 corridor between Danville and Lynchburg has mode choice and travel demand - I management DM needs associated with imn arcity travel. LL.16 Within Central Virginia MPG, there are additional air service needs from the Lynchburg Regional Airport „„ 10 L,S Within the Lynchburg District and through Bedford County, the rural areas have paratransit needs to connect the rural '1 9 workforce to activity centers. _ LA Within the Danville MPG and throughout Pittsyivania County,. the'US 29 corridor has mode choice and travel demand management - 9 needs. L.13 W+itthin the Lynchburg D,istrict. the Town of South Boston has safety needs. 8 Within the Lynchburg District and crass -District, US 50 has mode choice needs in support intercity travel from Danville and Ham tm Roads- L. 14 Within the Lynchburg DistriM LDS 58 East in Halifax County has reliability issues - To expand mew of table and see more details, view online at wwwmtrans2040.aom 93 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 94 eMTP225 www.VTra ns2040.co Tier T Needs 112T 1 8 Pipeline Projects Highlights: Pipeline recommendations within the Lynchburg District focus on accessibility, safety and reliability on primary routes such as U5 460, US 501, US 221 and US 29. This is especially important for the region as there is not an interstate within the District and primary routes play a greater role in interregional freight and passenger travel. M arket f Need Diversity U IAA C}[lELP 4� Plaanaigarid tlnw�ar u Multimodal Diversity r 1 Needs Gap Focus on VTrans2040 Guiding principles: Optimize Return on Investment find Consider Operational Strategies and Demand Management First Ante: Many recommendations address more than one market, need type, or mode —therefore, numbers in charts do not add to the total number of gap recommendations (3D). New Idea Highlights: Nine of Lynchburg's recommendations focus on safety improvements and capacity enhancements along US 460, US 29, US 58 and VA 86. Other new ideas focus on bicycle and pedestrian connections and .safety, transit and interregional travei. These neW ideas include a new Park &. Ride lot along US 2.9, a bus service enhancement study to connect the region's colleges and universities, and an expansion ofthe RiverwalkTrail in Danville. The purpose of the iAMTP 2025 Recommendations: To provide the CTB with statewide priorities for project development to create a pipeline for projects to be developed :and proposed for funding within the SYIP through SMART SCALE or other sources. SMART SCALE eligible recommendations (based on anticipated project scale and eligibility, pending concept development/study completion) Other Federal and State funding sources (these 2 recommendations are considered ineligible for SMART -SCALE, implementation funding will come through other Federal and State programs) REFERENCES 95 12040 RLRP 2040 RLRPI 96 �P-rk -'-