The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB201900104 Review Comments Easement Plat 2019-08-27COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Subdivision Plat Review Project title: Oakleigh — Easement Plat Project file number: SUB201900104 Plan preparer: Steve Edwards [steve(&edwarddesienstudio.com] 4936 Old Boonesboro Road, Lynchburg VA 24503 Owner or rep.: Oakleigh Albemarle LLC — 690 Berkmar Circle / Charlottesville, VA 22901 Plan received date: 18 Jun 2019 (Rev. 1) 12 Aug 2019 Date of comments: 1 Jul 2019; rev. 5 Jul 2019 (item 12.) (Rev. 1) 26 Aug 2019 Plan Coordinator: Paty Saternye Reviewer: John Anderson SUB201900104 Majority of comments addressed with Revision 1. If gray-sca,c, Addressed. If black print or follow-up, revision requested, or recommended Sheet 1 1. Plat date is May or June, 2019. This is a new unrecorded plat. It is initial review of file SUB201900104. Delete all dates displayed with plat title. Provide a single initial plat date. 2. Recently recorded plat signature panels for Oakleigh Albemarle, LLC, do not provide print information for authorized signatory. Signature of owner on recorded plats is unreadable. Print name beneath signature line in signature panel for this owner. 3. Owner signature panels: Identify which parcels /lots are owned by Oakleigh Albemarle, LLC, and which by The Blake at Charlottesville, LLC. 4. Note 12: On graphic portion of plat indicate corners where irons will be set. Abbreviate, and indicate irons to be set at all new property corners upon completion of construction. (Rev. 1) Comment persists, but revised to recommendation. If recommendation is not accepted, comment will be withdrawn. 5. Note 13 appears twice. Please delete one or the other. 6. Title re£ list includes an unrecorded plat d. 5/30/2003. It is unclear why since legal effect of an unrecorded plat, though informative, is uncertain. Defer to Planning whether to retain reference to an unrecorded plat. (Rev. 1) Comment persists. Engineering defers to Planning. Comment will be withdrawn if Planning does not object. Legal review may likewise comment on this item (ask same /related question). 7. Recommend list plat at deed bk.-pg. 4928-61, which is relevant. 8. Recommend list plat at deed bk.-pg. 5051-627, which is relevant. 9. Include Ownership information (name, TMP #) on graphic plat for Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 6A. (Rev. 1) Addressed; listed on sheet 1. Sheet 2 Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 10. Lot 4A: Show Ex. SWM Easement lines. If SWM Easement exactly coincides with Lot 4A lot lines, provide note to this effect on sheets 2, 3, 4. If SWM easement and 4A lot lines are not identical, provide easement metes and bounds. (Rev. 2) Addressed on plat sheet 4. 11. Provide bk.-pg. ref. for Rio Road. 12. Revise bk.-pg. reference (Lot 4) to read: "All existing easements platted by D.B. 4928 P. 61 within Lot 4 boundaries established by plat recorded at D.B. 5051 P. 627 are hereby vacated. All existing easements in Lot 4A are to remain." (since plat at bk.-pg. 5051-627 creates Lot 4A, and plat under review does not vacate SWM facility (or other) easements on Lot 4A.) Sheet 3 13. Engineering recommends an open space table correlate revised open space areas across lots and plats recorded at bk.-pg. 4928-61, 5051-627 and current plat, but defers to Planning. 14. Identify and label two existing monuments on property boundary. (14-303.L) 15. Provide leader line for segment bearing S64°53'22"E (34.44') along Rio Road to distinguish this boundary segment from easement line segment, L32. (Rev. 1) Withdrawn; no longer applicable. 16. Revise L13 to read L31 (transposition). 17. This plat does not adjust boundaries of Lot 5, or create Lot 6 or 6A, which are shown by plat recorded at bk.-pg. 5051-627. Remove hatching /combined area symbols on Lot 5, 6, 6A, since these changes were recorded with plat at 5051-627 (p. 635, ifnage belo ; Images removed with Rev. 2), yet appear to be proposed with this plat. Sheet 3 does not revise Lots 5, 6, or 6A. 18. Detail A: Provide tie distance for C1 to boundary. 19. Provide and extend 40' private street easement from Lot 6 lot line to approximate point interior to Lot 4 where 1-way travel and 2-lane travel ways diverge. (Rev. 1) Withdrawn; email sent: 8/2/2019 10:18 AM. Sheet 4 20. Rotate 1.00' label (at S1) 90' counterclockwise. This segment is continuous with L94, L43. 21. Revise easement areas to correlate revised SWM easements across lots and plats recorded at bk.-pg. 4928- 61, 5051-627 and current plat. At a minimum, include Lots 4, 4A, 6, 6A. Recommend: a. Show revised easements in column format, with headings plat A, plat B, revised easements (ft'). Provide abbreviation index ref: i. Plat `A' is plat recorded at bk.-pg. 4928-61. ii. Plat `B' is plat recorded at bk.-pg. 5051-627. b. Include Lots 1, 2, 3, 5 in revised table. If no change one plat to the next, then listing area in table will clarify, and make explicitly clear. c. Alternative to b., if area of SWM Easement on a lot (Lot 2, for example) is unchanged across all 3 plats, then include plat note to that effect, re£ prior recorded plats, and do not list SWM easement area information unchanged with any plat, and with all three plats. Note: It is confusing, for example, to read total new revised SWM Easement—12,650.36 sq. ft. when plat at bk.-pg. 4928-61 lists total SWM Easement (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)=114,597.91 sq. ft. d. Also, SWM easement, Lot 5, on plat recorded at bk.-pg. 4928-61=55,700.97 sq. ft., while sheet 4 lists new revised SWM easement Lot 5—1,061.13 sq. ft. 54,639.84 sq. ft. SWM easement on Lot 5 is not vacated with this plat, and was not vacated by prior plat. e. Present in row -column table format; include all three plats in table. 22. Provide legend re£ to dot -dot pattern (ACSA easement). (Rev. 1) Withdrawn. 23. Label line segment, L48. 24. Label arc between C61 and C62, and include data in curve table. (Rev. 1) May persist. As follow-up: Please confirm that only Arc C62 and no other arc or segment lies between Arc C61 and Arc C63. 25. Provide inset details (1" =20') for areas centered on C54 and C64. 26. Label L92. Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 27. At east end L92, include `(tie)' after 12.60' distance. 28. Provide ties to two permanent monuments on exterior boundary. Provide northing /easting for these monuments. (14-303.I) (Rev. 1) Partially addressed. As follow-up: Tie to one monument visible; if second tie provided, please alert reviewer. 29. Provide tie to permanent monuments on the exterior boundary for new revised Emergency Access. Provide northing /easting. (Rev. 1) Comment may persist. As follow-up: If 8.02' tie is to an Ex. iron, pin, or nail, please label monument (NF, IPF, etc.). 30. S9 and S 10 appear to be transposed. Revise. 31. At text label reading `ties to Existing SWM Easement' include a bk.-pg. re£ to recorded Ex. easement. 32. Sheet 5: Provide SWM Easement curve table data for arcs C50 - C67 (+). Please feel free to call if any questions. Thank you J. Anderson 434.296-5832 -x3069 SUB201900104 Oakleigh plat 082719revl.docx