HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201900011 Review Comments Zoning Map Amendment 2019-08-30COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4176
August 30, 2019
Clark Gathright
100 10t1i Street NE, Suite 200
Charlottesville, VA 22902
cgathright&dgarchs.com / (434) 971-8848
RE: Review Comment Letter #1: ZMA-2019-00011 2231 Seminole Lane
Mr. Gathright:
Staff has reviewed your initial submittal for the zoning map amendment, ZMA201900011 2231 Seminole Lane. We have
questions and comments which we believe should be addressed before we can recommend favorably on your ZMA
request. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues. Our comments are provided below:
General Application Comments:
1. Project narrative:
i. Page 2 states that no proffers are proposed at this time. This means that if the rezoning were approved to
change from CO to HC, none of the ZMA application materials would tie down certain parameters of
future development on the site. For example, Sheet 3 lists "Intended Uses" and "Excluded Uses;" unless
certain uses are "proffered out," basically all uses from by -right uses specified in the HC Zoning District
under Section 18-24.2.1 (by -right uses) would be possible on site in the future should the rezoning be
approved. Please verify whether this is the applicant's intent. Staff highly suggests proffering the
application so that certain by -right uses are excluded. Please see the comments under the
"Comprehensive Plan" section below explaining why some by -right uses allowed in HC should be
excluded with this rezoning to comply with the Places29 master Plan future land use recommendations.
ii. If the applicant intends to commit to providing certain design features, eliminate certain uses, etc. then the
application needs to be proffered with a written proffer statement outlining the specific items. See
comments below for additional items unrelated to uses that staff highly recommends proffering.
Concept Plan Comments:
Based on the statement on Sheet 2 of the application, the conceptual drawings provided are for reference only as
an example of how the site could be developed in the future. This layout is not being proffered. However,
Planning and ARB staff have identified conflicts between the landscaping requirements specified in the Zoning
Ordinance and the Entrance Corridor (EC) Design Guidelines, and existing utilities on site. Due to the parcel
acreage, there is not too much flexibility with building and parking location possibilities. Has any formal
evaluation been done to verify that all minimum landscaping requirements can be installed on site without
conflicting with existing utilities? Please provide a written response on this matter.
2. There are other elements of the concept site design that demonstrate consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
and Neighborhood Model principles. Providing a written proffer statement that commits to providing these
elements at the future site plan stage will greatly strengthen the application. To be clear, the actual ZMA
drawings do not need to be proffered, just a written description of certain design features. See comments under
the "Proffers" and "Neighborhood Model" sections below.
Proffers:
1. Making a commitment to providing certain site design elements will make this proposal more consistent with the
Neighborhood Model principles. Providing a written proffer statement that states that future development will
adhere to these elements will greatly strengthen the application. These elements are as follows:
a. Parking will only be provided to the side and rear of buildings.
b. Pedestrian sidewalk interconnections will be provided to the adjacent parcels to the north (TMP 045B1-
05-OA-01000) and south (TMP 045B1-05-OA-01300).
c. Although an existing 18' wide easement "dedicated for future passageway through lots" is recorded in
DB 1678, pages 364-375 and DB 689, pages 444-448, staff cannot verify that this is in fact a public
access easement. The Neighborhood Model principles call for interconnectivity between parcels.
Providing a written proffer that clearly permits interconnections to parcels north and south of TMP
045B1-05-OA-01100 will help the application be consistent with this Neighborhood Model principle.
2. Restricting certain by -right uses to comply with the Places29 Master Plan future land use recommendations would
strengthen the proposal. Staff has identified the following by -right uses allowed in the HC Zoning District that
could be eliminated in order to be consistent with the Master Plan. Uses are listed by name and the applicable
Zoning Ordinance section number:
a. 24.2.1 (5) Churches,cemeteries;
b. 24.2.1 (6) Clubs, lodges;
c. 24.2.1 (13) Fire and rescue squad stations;
d. 24.2.1 (14) Funeral homes;
e. 24.2.1 (23) Manufactured home and trailer sales and service;
f. 24.2.1 (24) Modular building sales;
g. 24.2.1 (41) and 22.2.1 (b)(3) Religious assembly use, cemeteries;
h. 24.2.1 (41) and 22.2.1 (b)(4) Clubs, lodges;
i. 24.2.1 (41) and 22.2.1 (b)(6) Fire and rescue squad stations;
j. 24.2.1 (41) and 22.2.1 (b)(7) Funeral homes.
3. Please see ARB comment #1 regarding the building walls that will face Seminole Lane. A written proffer could
be made that addresses this ARB comment. Please follow-up with ARB staff for specific architectural elements
that will make future buildings most consistent with Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines. Providing a written
proffer commiting to these elements will strengthen the applications consistency with the "Buildings and Spaces
of Human Scale" Neighborhood Model principle.
4. Please see Engineering comment #3 regarding on -site treatment of stormwater. Currently, the stormwater drains
from the subject property to the parcel located due south. Has any evaluation of stormwater treatment been carried
out? Providing a proffer stating that stormwater will be treated on site as opposed to purchasing of off -site
nutrient credits will strengthen the application's consistency with Strtagey #la of Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive
Plan. A proffer committing to use of low -impact development techniques could also address this issue.
Planning
Planning staffs comments are organized as follows:
• How the proposal relates to the Comprehensive Plan
• The Neighborhood Model analysis
• Additional comments from reviewers (See attached)
Comprehensive Plan
Comments on how your project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan will be provided to the Planning Commission and
Board of Supervisors as part of the staff report that will be prepared for the work session or public hearing. The comments
below are in preparation for the Planning Commission review and may change based on direction from the Commission
and/or with subsequent submittals.
The subject parcel is identified as Tax Map Parcel (TMP) 045131-05-OA-01100 and is located within the Neighborhood 2
Comprehensive Plan Area, which is part of the Places29 Development Area. The property measures 0.702 acres and is
currently zoned CO Commercial Office. The property is also located within the Airport Impact Area (AIA) Overlay
Zoning District, the Entrance Corridor (EC) Overlay Zoning District, and contains areas designated as Managed Steep
Slopes Overlay District. A 2 '/z structure that was built in 1973 currently occupies the property and measures 5,772
finished sq. ft. including a half -story basement level measuring 992 sq. ft. The building has been previously used as an
administrative/professional office for a real estate business.
The Future Land Use Plan -South contained in the Places29 Master Plan designates two future land use classifications on
portions of TMP 045B1-05-OA-01100:
1. Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial;
2. Commercial Mixed Use.
The Places29 Master Plan does not designate any Center types on properties within the vicinity of TMP 045B1-05-OA-
01100. The nearest Center in the Places29 Future Land Use Plan -South is located approximately 1 mile north of the site,
across the South Fork Rivanna River, at the site of the Brookhill development.
The Places29 Master Plan explains that the Office/R&D/Flex/Light Industrial classification is meant to allow "a range
of employment -generating uses and is applied to the majority of the nonretail employment areas within the Places29 area
to create Employment Neighborhoods."
• "Office" uses include typical commercial office buildings that may house a variety of users such as professional
offices, medical, or real estate offices.
• "Research & Development (R&D)" is applied to an administrative, engineering, and/or scientific research, design,
or experimentation facility that engages in research, or research and development, of innovative ideas in
technology -intensive fields. Many research & development uses can locate in traditional office buildings or
buildings that resemble office buildings, rather than traditional industrial facilities.
• "Flex" includes uses engaged in research & development, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, office, retail,
customer service, and showrooms, among others. Different businesses can have different combinations of these
uses and in varying percentages.
• "Light Industrial" includes primary uses such as office, research & development (R&D), and flex, light
manufacturing/storage/distribution uses. Secondary can include retail, commercial, and light manufacturing uses
that are associated with the primary use.
The Commercial Mixed Use classification applies to areas that are already developed or have been approved for
development as commercial shopping areas. Primary uses include community and regional retail, commercial service,
auto commercial service, and office uses. Secondary uses include office, research & development (R&D), flex, residential,
open space, and institutional uses.
In addition to consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, please also be advised that all zoning map amendment
applications are evaluated relative to the "factors to be considered" specified in County Code § 18-33.27(B). This
evaluation will be written in the staff report to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors once the application
moved forward to public hearings.
Neighborhood Model
Projects located within the Development Areas are typically reviewed for consistency with each of the Neighborhood
Model Principles found in the Comprehensive Plan. Comments are provided below on relevant aspects of the
Neighborhood Model. More detailed comments may be provided after more detailed plans are provided.
Pedestrian Orientation
This principle is partially met but could be strengthened. The conceptual site plan is not
being proffered. Providing sidewalk or other pedestrian walkway connections to parcels
north and south of the subject property could address this comment. Additionally, the
proffer statement could commit to providing a crosswalk and sidewalk/ramp on the
opposite side of the existing 18' access easement at the front of the property to enable a
pedestrian connection to the existing sidewalk along Route 29, consistent with Strategy
#2c of Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mixture of Uses
This principle is partially met but could be strengthened by eliminating potential uses at
the site that are already in abundance on other properties in this section of the Places29
development area. See the earlier comments in the "Proffers" section for specific by -
right uses available under the HC zoning district that could be removed through a
written proffer statement.
Neighborhood Centers
This principle is not applicable to the request. The Places29 Master Plan does not call
for any land use centers near the subject parcel.
Mixture of Housing Types
This principle is not applicable to the request. In accordance with Strategy #2g of
and Affordability
Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Plan, no residential future land use classifications
apply to the property. Providing housing at this site is not a recommendation of the
Places29 Master Plan.
Relegated Parking
This principle is not met. Under the Zoning Ordinance, the site could be redeveloped
with parking inf ront of a future building. Making a proffer stating that parking will
only be provided to the side or rear of future buildings will address this.
Interconnected Streets and
This principle is partially met.
Transportation Networks
No new streets are called for within the subject parcels by Figure 4.8 — Future
Transportation Network in the Places29 Master Plan.
As explained under Strategy #2j, "at times it may not be possible to make a connection
in the short term. In these cases, right-of-way should be reserved for dedication in a
manner consistent with planned transportation improvements, and non -roadway
connections made, such as walking and bicycle paths."
The application could be strengthened with a proffer allowing for interconnectivity
between parcels to the north and south.
Multimodal Transportation
This principle is met.
Opportunities
The Long Term Transit Network map (Figure 4.9 of the Places29 Master Plan) shows
future transit service being provided along Route 29. The plan also calls for a future
bus rapid transit (BRT) route along Route 29 to the west of the subject parcel.
Parks, Recreational
This principle is not applicable to the request. The Places29 Master Plan does not
Amenities, and Open Space
designate any greenspace future land uses or parks on the subject property.
Buildings and Spaces of
This principle is not met. Please see ARB comment #1 regarding design of the building
Human Scale
facades and other architectural elements that should be incorporated into any future
redevelopment. The application could be strengthened through a proffer that commits
to certain design elements along the building fagade facing Route 29, and the side walls
visible from Route 29. Blanks walls and lack of appropriate detailing, such as windows
and other architectural elements, are not consistent with this Neighborhood Model
principle or the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines. Please contact ARB staff directly
for further information on specific elements of the building design that could be
proffered in order to be consistent with this principle.
Redevelopment
This principle is met. The requested rezoning will permit redevelopment of the subject
property.
Respecting Terrain and
This principle is partially met.
Careful Grading and Re-
grading of Terrain
The property contains areas within the Managed Steep Slopes Overlay Zoning District.
Pursuant to Section 18-30.7.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, Managed Steep Slopes can be
disturbed if the design standards of Section 18-30.7.5 are adhered to. This includes
future buildings and parking areas.
Staff recognizes that retaining wall installation within the Managed Steep Slopes will
likely provide a more stable slope area that support properties to the east of the subject
parcel. However, there is no way for staff to definitively say that the Managed Steep
Slopes will remain undisturbed in the future since the Zoning ordinance allows
disturbances. Providing a written proffer stating that the only uses allowed within the
Managed Steep Slopes will be necessary retaining walls or utility lines, for example,
would allow staff to say that this principle is met.
Clear Boundaries Between
This principle is not applicable to the request. The subject property is located within the
the Development Areas and
Places29 Development Area. No improvements or changes in use near any boundaries
the Rural Area
with the Rural Area are proposed.
Department of Community Development — Zoning Division
Please see the attached zoning comments from Francis MacCall, fmaccallkalbemarle.org.
Department of Community Development - Planning Division- Transportation Planning
The County's transportation planner, Kevin McDermott, kmcdermott@albemarle.org, has no objection to the proposal.
Department of Community Development - Planning Division — Architectural Review Board (ARB)
Please see the attached comments from Margaret Maliszewski, mmaliszewski@albemarle.org.
Department of Community Development — Engineering Division
Please see the attached comments from Frank Pohl, fpohl@albemarle.org.
Department of Community Development — Inspections Division
Please see the attached comments from Michael Dellinger, mdellinger@albemarle.org.
Albemarle County Department of Fire & Rescue
Comments related to Fire & Rescue have been provided by Shawn Maddox, smaddoxkalbemarle.org, and are attached.
VDOT
Please see the attached letter from Adam Moore, adam.moore@vdot.vir ig niLWy.
ASCA
See attached comments from ACSA staff.
RWSA
See attached comments from RWSA staff.
Action after Receipt of Comments
Your project has been scheduled for a public hearing by the Planning Commission for (October 22, 2019) which
represents 84 days from acceptance of your application for review. From this comment letter you will see that staff
recommends changes to your project to help you achieve approval. Without changes, staff cannot recommend approval
and your application will be taken to the Commission as originally submitted.
After you have read this letter, please take one of the actions identified on "Action After Receipt of Comment Letter"
which is attached.
Resubmittal
If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal date
schedule is provided for your convenience. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place
and adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date.
Feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is blan ig lle(c-r�,albemarle.org.
Sincerely,
Cameron Langille
Senior Planner
Planning Division, Department of Community Development
enc: ZMA201900011 Action After Receipt of Comments
2019 Zoning Map Amendment Resubmittal Schedule
Zoning Map Amendment Resubmittal Form
Review Comments for ZMA201900011 -
Project Name: 2231 SEMINOLE LANE
Date Completed: Sunday, August 25, 2019 DepartmentlaivisionlAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski -El CDDARB Requested Changes
1 _ For an appropriate appearance on the Entrance Corridor, the building elevation facing Seminole Lane must be a fully designed
Tontp_ Side elevations must not appear blank_ Elevations with an overly utilitarian character will likely require revisions to meet
the Entrance Corridor Design
Guidelines-
_ Landscaping meeting the minimum requirements of the Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines and possibly more, will be
required for an appropriate appearance on the corridor_ Illustrated landscaping does not meet minimLim requirements of the
Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines_ Frontage and perimeter landscaping is insLifficient Additional planting will likely be
needed at the base of the retaining walls-
3- There appear to be conflicts between required landscaping and utilities (storm pipe, sanitary, water)_ Utilities should be
arranged such that all required landscaping can be provided without exception_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 881261 00'19
Cameron Langille
From: Frank Pohl
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 1:34 PM
To: Cameron Langille
Subject: Planning Application Review for ZMA201900011 2231 SEMINOLE LANE.
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number = ZMA201900011
Reviewer = Frank Pohl
Review Status = See Recommendations
Completed Date = 08/26/2019
This email was sent from County View Production.
COMMENTS:
VSMP permit will be required prior to site plan approval. An [9VAC25-870-63.2b].
Even though there is a reduction in impervous area, channel and flood protection will need to be confirmed to the limits
of analysis [9VAC25-870-66.B and 9VAC25-870-66.C]. Also, the total phosphorus load shall be reduced at least 10%
below the predevelopment total phosphorus load [9VAC25-870-63.2.b]. These issues can be addressed during the VSMP
permitting process.
It is recommended that quality requirements are met through on site measures instead of through the use of offsite
nutrient credits.
Review Comments for ZMA201900011 -
Project Name: 2231 SEMINOLE LANE
Date Completed: Fnday, August 09, 2019 DepartmentlaivisionlAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Michael Dellinger ODD Inspections See Recommendations
For site plan information the following would need to be added to the documents:
Add the follo}r5,ing note to the general notes page
Retaining }, alls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate briilding permit_ Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require a
stamped engineered design also 'YValls require Inspections as outlined in the U BO_
Add the follo}r5,ing note to the general notes page:
Accessible parking spaces and access isles shall not have a surface slope greater than 1:48_ Access isles shall be at the
same level as the parking space they serve_
Add the following note to the general notes page:
ALL water lines, sewer lines, and fire lines from the main to the strricture MUST have a 5risrial inspection performed by the
buildng department_
Add the following to the general notes page:
All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to carise a priblic nriisance and not over side,,valks
Add the following note to the general notes page:
Building or structures built before January 1, 1986 must have an asbestos survey performed in order to apply for a permit_
Asbestos removal permits are required if positive for such_ Contact VDOLI for additional requirements and permits for
demolition projects_
Other than this, no objection_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 10812712019
Review Comments for ZMA201900011 -
Project Name: 2231 SEMINOLE LANE
Date Completed: Wednesday, August 07, 201 DepartmentlaivisionlAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Ishawn Maddox F Fire Rescue No Obje-Ction
Fire Rescue has no objections_ SNIVI
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 881291 00'19
Stephen C. Brich, P.E.
Commissioner
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper. Virginia 22701
August 27, 2019
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Cameron Langille
Re: 2231 Seminole Lane Re -zoning
ZMA2019-00011
Review #1
Dear Mr. Langille:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced re -zoning as submitted by B. Clark Gathright, dated
1 July 2019 and offer the following comments:
Seminole Lane is a private road that connects to Route 29 at two signalized intersections.
At this time the impacts of the proposed re -zoning on the transportation network, namely
at the two referenced signals, cannot be determined as no study or analysis has been
provided.
If further information is desired, please contact me at 434-422-9782. A VDOT Land Use Permit
will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the
Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for
information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
04l�yt.
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
ALBEMARLE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — Information from Service Providers
To be filled out by ACSA for ZMA's and SP's
1) Is this site in the jurisdictional area for water and/or sewer? Yes
2) What is the distance to the closest water and sewer line, if in the jurisdictional area? Parcel is
currently served by water and sewer.
3) Are there water pressure issues which may affect the proposed use as shown on plan? Water
pressures in the area are high. PRV will be required.
4) Are there major upgrades needed to the water distribution or sewer collection system of which the
applicant and staff should be aware?
5) Are there other service provision issues such as the need for grinder pumps?
6) Which issues should be resolved at the SP/ZMA stage and which issues can be resolved at the site
plan/plat stage? Fixture counts will need to be provided to confirm meter size. Appropriate
connection fees will be charged prior to release of meter, if meter upgrade is needed. If meter size
upgrade is needed, ACSA may request the meter be moved closer to Seminole Trail. These can be
addressed at the Site Plan stage.
7) If the project is a large water user, what long term impacts or implications do you forsee?
8) Additional comments?
Cameron Langille
From:
Dyon Vega <DVega@rivanna.org>
Sent:
Monday, July 29, 2019 3:28 PM
To:
Cameron Langille
Cc:
vfort@rivanna.org; Richard Nelson
Subject:
ZMA201900011 2231 Seminole Lane
Cameron,
RWSA has reviewed application ZMA201900011 2231 Seminole Lane. Below is a completed copy of the form that was
provided to us by Elaine Echols for SP & ZMA Applications.
General Notes:
RWSA will request Site plans to review.
To be filled out by RWSA for ZMA's and SP's
1. Capacity issues for sewer that may affect this proposal None Known
2. Requires Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Capacity Certification Yes X-No
3. Water flow or pressure issues that may affect this proposal None Known
4. "Red Flags" regarding service provision (Use attachments if necessary) None Known
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Dyon Vega
Civil Engineer
RIVANIIIqA
WATER �TH
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority
(434) 977-2970, Ext. 170
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
www.rivanna.or
1
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
trRrtNl°'
ACTION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMMENT LETTER
FIRST SET OF COMMENTS
Your project has been scheduled for a public hearing by the Planning Commission for October 22,
2019, which is 84 days from the date your application was accepted for review. State Code requires a
90-day review by the Planning Commission unless the applicant requests deferral. As you will read in
this comment letter, staff recommends changes to your project to help you achieve approval. Without
these changes, staff cannot recommend approval to the Planning Commission.
If you would like to address the comments you must request deferral by September 20, 2019. If you
choose not to request deferral, staff will take your project to the Commission as originally submitted,
but without a recommendation of approval. Instructions for requesting a deferral are outlined below.
Please note that you can submit revisions even if you defer your application.
Please do one of the following on or before September 20, 2019:
(1) Request deferral to resubmit to address comments, pursuant to Section 33.52(A)(1).
Please understand that if a deferral request is made, the Planning Commission public
hearing date will be later than October 22, 2019.
(2) Request to proceed to a Planning Commission public hearing on October 22, 2019. All
advertising fees must be paid by September 20, 2019.
(3) Withdraw your application.
(1) Deferral Request and Resubmittal
To request deferral, you must submit a request in writing to defer action by the Planning Commission
and Board of Supervisors. The request may be made by email. You may request a deferral for up to 36
months from the date your application was accepted for review, which is July 31, 2022. However, all
outstanding information necessary for Commission action must be submitted by April 1, 2022,
according to the published schedule. (See Section 18-33.52 (A)(2) of the Albemarle County Code).
Revised 10-9-18 MCN
(2) Proceed to Planning Commission Public Hearing on October 22, 2019
At this time, you may request that your application proceed to public hearing with the Planning
Commission on October 22, 2019. With this option, staff will take your project to the Commission as
originally submitted, but without a recommendation of approval.
(3) Withdraw Your Application
If at any time you wish to withdraw your application, please provide your request in writing.
Resubmittals
As stated above, a deferral does not preclude you from resubmitting the application to address
changes based upon the comments. If you would like to resubmit after you defer, you may do so
following the resubmittal schedule. Be sure to include the resubmittal form on the last page of your
comment letter with vour submittal.
The application fee which you paid covers staff review of the initial submittal and one resubmittal.
Each subsequent resubmittal requires an additional fee. (See attached Fee Schedule.)
Failure to Respond
An application shall be deemed to be voluntarily withdrawn if the applicant requests deferral pursuant
to subsection 33.52(A), and fails to provide within 120 days before the end of the deferral period all of
the information required to allow the Board to act on the application. (See Section 18-33.53 (C) of the
Albemarle County Code).
Fee Payment
Fees paid in cash or by check must be paid at the Community Development Intake Counter. Make
checks payable to the County of Albemarle. Do not send checks directly to the Review Coordinator.
Fees may also be paid by credit card using the secure online payment system, accessed at
http://www.albemarle.org/department.asp?department=cdd&relpage=21685.
Revised 10-9-18 MCN
2019 Submittal and Review Schedule
Special Use Permits and Zoning Map Amendments
Resubmittal Schedule
Resubmittal Dates
Comments given to the
Applicant
Applicant requests PC
Public Hearing AND
Payment Due for Legal
Ad (no additional
resubmittals)
Planning
Commission Public
Hearing No sooner
than* COB Auditorium
Monday
Wednesday
Friday
Tuesday
Dec 17 2018
Jan 16
Jan 25
Feb 19
Jan 07
Feb 06
Feb 08
Mar 05
Tue Jan 22
Feb 20
Feb 22
Mar 19
Feb 04
Mar 06
Mar 15
Apr 09
Tue Feb 19
Mar 20
Mar 29
Apr 23
Mar 04
Apr 03
Apr 12
May 07
Mar 18
Apr 17
Apr 26
May 21
Apr 01
May 01
May 10
Jun 04
Apr 15
May 15
May 31
Jun 25
Apr 29
May 29
May 31
Jun 25
May 06
Jun 05
Jun 14
Jul 09
May 20
Jun 19
Jun 28
Jul 23
Jun 03
Jul 03
Jul 12
Aug 06
Jun 17
Jul 17
Jul 26
Aug 20
Jul 01
Jul 31
Aug 09
Sep 03
Jul 15
Aug 14
Aug 30
Sep 24
Jul 29
Aug 28
Sep 13
Oct 08
Aug 05
Sep 04
Sep 13
Oct 08
Aug 19
Sep 18
Sep 27
Oct 22
Tue Sep 03
Oct 02
Oct 18
Nov 12
Sep 16
Oct 16
Oct 18
Nov 12
Sep 30
Oct 30
Nov 08
Dec 03
Oct 07
Nov 06
Nov 08
Dec 03
Oct 21
Nov 20
Nov 19
Dec 17
Nov 04
Dec 04
Dec 20
Jan 14 2020
Nov 18
Dec 18
Dec 20
Jan 14 2020
Dec 16
Jan 15 2020
Jan 24 2020
Feb 18 2020
Dec 30
Jan 29 2020
Feb 07 2020
Mar 03 2020
Jan 06 2020
Feb 05 2020
Feb 07 2020
Mar 03 2020
Bold italics = submittal/meeting day is different due to a holiday.
Dates with shaded background are not 2019.
2020 dates are tentative.
*Public hearing dates have been set by the Planning Commission; however, if due to unforeseen
circumstances the Planning Commission is unable to meet on this date, your project will be moved to
the closest available agenda date.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP #
Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# Bv:
Resubmittal of information for
k»
Zoning Map Amendment .N
PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED:
Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff
Signature of Owner, Contract Purchaser
Print Name
FEES that may apply:
Date
Daytime phone number of Signatory
❑
Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request
$194
Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,688
❑
First resubmission
FREE
❑
Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF)
$1,344
Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $3,763
❑
First resubmission
FREE
❑
Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF)
$1,881
To be Daid after staff review for Dublic notice:
Most applications for a Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public
hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal
advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice
are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be
provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body.
➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices
$215 + actual cost of first-class postage
➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50)
$1.08 for each additional notice + actual
cost of first-class postage
➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing)
Actual cost
(averages between $150 and $250)
County of Albemarle Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
Revised 11/02/2015 Page 1 of 1